LUTHERAN REHABILITATION AND SKILLED CARE CENTER
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Lutheran Rehabilitation and Skilled Care Center has a Trust Grade of B+, indicating it is recommended and above average in quality. It ranks #38 out of 338 facilities in Massachusetts, placing it in the top half, and #6 out of 50 in Worcester County, which means there are only five local options that are better. The facility is improving, having reduced its issues from three in 2023 to none in 2024. Staffing is an area of concern, with a 3/5 star rating and a turnover rate of 39%, which is average for the state. However, there are some serious weaknesses, including a notable incident where a resident developed a pressure injury and needed surgery due to inadequate care in following their treatment plan. Additionally, there were concerns about kitchen sanitation practices that could have increased the risk of foodborne illness. On a positive note, the facility has excellent health inspection and quality measure ratings, indicating strong overall care.
- Trust Score
- B+
- In Massachusetts
- #38/338
- Safety Record
- Moderate
- Inspections
- Getting Better
- Staff Stability ○ Average
- 39% turnover. Near Massachusetts's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- $7,901 in fines. Lower than most Massachusetts facilities. Relatively clean record.
- Skilled Nurses ⚠ Watch
- Each resident gets only 26 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Massachusetts. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 11 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
5-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
-
Staff turnover below average (39%)
9 points below Massachusetts average of 48%
Facility shows strength in quality measures, fire safety.
The Bad
Near Massachusetts avg (46%)
Typical for the industry
Below median ($33,413)
Minor penalties assessed
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
The Ugly 11 deficiencies on record
Feb 2023
3 deficiencies
1 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who required the use of a splint to ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on records reviewed and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who was admitted with a supracondylar fracture (near the elbow) of the right humerus (long bone in the upper ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medical Records
(Tag F0842)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on records reviewed and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), the Facility failed to ensure they maintained a complete and accurate medical record, when recommendations fo...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jul 2021
8 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Transfer Notice
(Tag F0623)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a transfer notice was sent to the Office of the State Long-Term Ombudsman for two residents (#55 and #38), out a total sample of 19 ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the plan of care was followed for one resident (#68), out a total sample of 19 residents.
Findings include:
Resident # 68 was admitt...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0658
(Tag F0658)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on document review, record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain Professional Standards of Care related to checking placement of a Gastrostomy Tube (G-Tube) (a tube ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0698
(Tag F0698)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the plan of care was followed for one resident (#74) receiving dialysis services, out a total sample of 19 residents.
Findings inclu...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0700
(Tag F0700)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on policy review, record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure that ongoing assessments were co...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on policy review, observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure that an opened vial of insulin was labeled in accordance with Professional Standards, including expiration date, in one...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medical Records
(Tag F0842)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 4. For Resident #91, the facility failed to accurately document the correct discharge status on a Discharge Minimum Data Set (MD...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on policy review, observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure that kitchen sanitation and food/beverage storage was in accordance with Professional Standards for Food Service Safety...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • Grade B+ (83/100). Above average facility, better than most options in Massachusetts.
- • 39% turnover. Below Massachusetts's 48% average. Good staff retention means consistent care.
- • 11 deficiencies on record, including 1 serious (caused harm) violation. Ask about corrective actions taken.
About This Facility
What is Lutheran Rehabilitation And Skilled's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns LUTHERAN REHABILITATION AND SKILLED CARE CENTER an overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars, which is considered much above average nationally. Within Massachusetts, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.
How is Lutheran Rehabilitation And Skilled Staffed?
CMS rates LUTHERAN REHABILITATION AND SKILLED CARE CENTER's staffing level at 3 out of 5 stars, which is average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 39%, compared to the Massachusetts average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.
What Have Inspectors Found at Lutheran Rehabilitation And Skilled?
State health inspectors documented 11 deficiencies at LUTHERAN REHABILITATION AND SKILLED CARE CENTER during 2021 to 2023. These included: 1 that caused actual resident harm and 10 with potential for harm. Deficiencies causing actual harm indicate documented cases where residents experienced negative health consequences.
Who Owns and Operates Lutheran Rehabilitation And Skilled?
LUTHERAN REHABILITATION AND SKILLED CARE CENTER is owned by a non-profit organization. Non-profit facilities reinvest revenue into operations rather than distributing to shareholders. The facility is operated by ASCENTRIA CARE ALLIANCE, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 150 certified beds and approximately 103 residents (about 69% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in WORCESTER, Massachusetts.
How Does Lutheran Rehabilitation And Skilled Compare to Other Massachusetts Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Massachusetts, LUTHERAN REHABILITATION AND SKILLED CARE CENTER's overall rating (5 stars) is above the state average of 2.9, staff turnover (39%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (5 stars) is much above the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Lutheran Rehabilitation And Skilled?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"
Is Lutheran Rehabilitation And Skilled Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, LUTHERAN REHABILITATION AND SKILLED CARE CENTER has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 5-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Massachusetts. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Lutheran Rehabilitation And Skilled Stick Around?
LUTHERAN REHABILITATION AND SKILLED CARE CENTER has a staff turnover rate of 39%, which is about average for Massachusetts nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was Lutheran Rehabilitation And Skilled Ever Fined?
LUTHERAN REHABILITATION AND SKILLED CARE CENTER has been fined $7,901 across 1 penalty action. This is below the Massachusetts average of $33,158. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.
Is Lutheran Rehabilitation And Skilled on Any Federal Watch List?
LUTHERAN REHABILITATION AND SKILLED CARE CENTER is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.