SARTELL THERAPY SUITES

990 19TH STREET SOUTH, SARTELL, MN 56377 (320) 534-3000
Non profit - Corporation 24 Beds ECUMEN Data: November 2025
Trust Grade
90/100
#72 of 337 in MN
Last Inspection: November 2024

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

Sartell Therapy Suites has received a Trust Grade of A, indicating it is excellent and highly recommended for families considering care options. It ranks #72 out of 337 nursing homes in Minnesota, placing it in the top half of facilities statewide, and #4 out of 10 in Stearns County, meaning only three local options are better. The facility is improving, having reduced its issues from 2 in 2023 to none in 2024. While the staffing rating is poor at 1 out of 5 stars, an impressive 0% turnover rate suggests that staff remain long-term, which is a positive sign. Notably, the home has not incurred any fines, which is reassuring for families; however, there were concerns found during inspections, including failing to ensure that some residents received their recommended vaccines and not posting required nurse staffing information in a visible location.

Trust Score
A
90/100
In Minnesota
#72/337
Top 21%
Safety Record
Low Risk
No red flags
Inspections
Getting Better
2 → 0 violations
Staff Stability
○ Average
Turnover data not reported for this facility.
Penalties
✓ Good
No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Minnesota facilities.
Skilled Nurses
○ Average
RN staffing data not reported for this facility.
Violations
✓ Good
Only 2 deficiencies on record. Cleaner than most facilities. Minor issues only.
★★★★★
5.0
Overall Rating
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Staff Levels
★★★★★
5.0
Care Quality
★★★★★
5.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2023: 2 issues
2024: 0 issues

The Good

  • 5-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record

Facility shows strength in quality measures, fire safety.

The Bad

Chain: ECUMEN

Part of a multi-facility chain

Ask about local staffing decisions and management

The Ugly 2 deficiencies on record

Dec 2023 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0883 (Tag F0883)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure 3 of 5 residents (R67, R118 and R124) were offered or rece...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure 3 of 5 residents (R67, R118 and R124) were offered or received the pneumococcal vaccine (PCV20) and/or the influenza vaccine in accordance with the Center for Disease Control (CDC) recommendations. Findings include: The CDC's PneumoRecs VaxAdvisor identified: -based on shared clinical decision-making, decide whether to administer one dose of PCV20 at least 5 years after the last pneumococcal vaccine dose. Regardless of whether PCV20 is administered, their pneumococcal vaccinations are complete. The CDC's Pneumococcal vaccine timing for adults identified: -together, with the patient, vaccine providers may choose to administer PCV20 to adults 65 years and older who have already received PCV13 (but not PCV15 or PCV20) at any age and PPSC23 at or after the age of [AGE] years old. R67's face sheet, identified she was [AGE] years old and admitted ion 11/24/23. R67 had no allergies to vaccines or contraindications to vaccine listed. R67's immunization report, identified R67 had previously received the PCV23 on 11/27/2007 and the PCV13 on 1/28/2015. R67's medical record lacked evidence the recommended pneumococcal (PCV20) vaccination was offered or received. R118's face sheet, identified she was [AGE] years old and admitted in 11/30/23. R118 had no allergies to vaccines or contraindications to vaccine listed. R118's immunization report, identified R118 had not previously received the influenza vaccine. R118's medical record lacked evidence the recommended influenza vaccination was offered or received. R124's face sheet, identified she was [AGE] years old and admitted on [DATE]. R124 had no allergies to vaccines or contraindications to vaccine listed. R124's immunization report, identified R124 had previously received the PCV23 on 7/16/2014 and the influenza vaccine on 2/11/21. R124's medical record lacked evidence the recommended pneumococcal (PCV20) vaccination and the influenza vaccination was offered or received. During interview on 12/13/23 at 8:35 a.m., infection preventionist (IP) stated when a resident was admitted to the facility, they go through an admission event, where the immunization record was reviewed. IP stated R67, R118 and R124 were not offered the PCV20 or influenza vaccinations. The facility Pneumococcal vaccine policy dated 9/2023, identified that all resident's will be offered the pneumococcal vaccinations and administered, according to the MDH and CBC recommended interval for the vaccines, unless contraindicated, already immunized, or the resident and/or the resident representative declines the vaccine. The facility Influenza vaccination policy dated 6/2023, identified that during the influenza season, resident will be offered, and when indicated, provided the influenza vaccination, according to the MDH and CDC recommendation, unless medically contraindicated, already immunized, or the resident and/or the resident representative declines the vaccine.
Apr 2023 1 deficiency
MINOR (C)

Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact

Staffing Information (Tag F0732)

Minor procedural issue · This affected most or all residents

Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure required and complete nurse staffing information was posted in a readily available, visible location within the nurs...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure required and complete nurse staffing information was posted in a readily available, visible location within the nursing home. This had potential to affect all 22 residents and visitors who wanted to review this information. Findings include: On 4/24/23 at 4:02 p.m., a tour was completed of the nursing home including the main desk, nursing station, and public hallways of the building. However, there was no posted nurse staffing information located. On 4/25/23 at 8:36 a.m., there was no posted nurse staffing information located. When interviewed on 4/25/23 at 8:38 a.m., the director of nursing (DON) stated the nurse staffing information was supposed to be presented on the desk at the nursing station. DON went and looked on the desk, where she stated it was posted and could not locate posting. DON stated she will get a hold of the staffing person, who is responsible for it, and will get a new one posted on the desk. DON stated she knows that it needs to be posted daily. At 8:45 a.m. DON brought in plastic stand up holder that had a list of resident's names and room numbers posted and showed that the daily staff posting was on the backside. Daily staff posting was not visible to anyone. At 9:51 a.m. new plastic holder was placed on the counter by the front door reception area with daily staff posting in holder that is visible to residents and visitors. When interviewed on 4/25/23 at 11:31 a.m., DON stated that the daily staff positing was normally kept on the counter by office and then was moved to the counter by the front door after construction. DON stated the daily staff posting is completed by night shift, right after midnight so they can get an accurate heads in the bed count, and then posts the completed form. At 3:05 p.m. DON stated the daily staff posting is important to be visual to resident and families so that they know who is in the building for nurses, nurse aides, and management. A provided Posting of Nursing Hours - Long Term Care policy, dated 3/2023, identified the facility would make staffing information readily available for resident and visitors at any given time. To display daily staffing information in a prominent area. Staffing personnel and/or their designee will post the following daily information in a prominent area of the facility: facility name, current date, the total number, and the actual hours worked by the following categories of licensed and unlicensed nursing staff directly responsible for resident care per shift, registered nurses, licensed practical nurses, certified nurse aides and resident census. Posting requirements: the staffing information will be posted as follows: Clear and readable format, and in a prominent place readily accessible to residents and visitors. Further, the policy directed the records of these postings would be kept for a minimum of 18 months or as required by State law.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • Grade A (90/100). Above average facility, better than most options in Minnesota.
  • • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
  • • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Minnesota facilities.
  • • Only 2 deficiencies on record. Cleaner than most facilities. Minor issues only.
Concerns
  • • No significant concerns identified. This facility shows no red flags across CMS ratings, staff turnover, or federal penalties.
Bottom line: Generally positive indicators. Standard due diligence and a personal visit recommended.

About This Facility

What is Sartell Therapy Suites's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns SARTELL THERAPY SUITES an overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars, which is considered much above average nationally. Within Minnesota, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.

How is Sartell Therapy Suites Staffed?

CMS rates SARTELL THERAPY SUITES's staffing level at 1 out of 5 stars, which is much below average compared to other nursing homes.

What Have Inspectors Found at Sartell Therapy Suites?

State health inspectors documented 2 deficiencies at SARTELL THERAPY SUITES during 2023. These included: 1 with potential for harm and 1 minor or isolated issues.

Who Owns and Operates Sartell Therapy Suites?

SARTELL THERAPY SUITES is owned by a non-profit organization. Non-profit facilities reinvest revenue into operations rather than distributing to shareholders. The facility is operated by ECUMEN, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 24 certified beds and approximately 0 residents (about 0% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in SARTELL, Minnesota.

How Does Sartell Therapy Suites Compare to Other Minnesota Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Minnesota, SARTELL THERAPY SUITES's overall rating (5 stars) is above the state average of 3.2 and health inspection rating (5 stars) is much above the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Sartell Therapy Suites?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?" These questions are particularly relevant given the below-average staffing rating.

Is Sartell Therapy Suites Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, SARTELL THERAPY SUITES has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 5-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Minnesota. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.

Do Nurses at Sartell Therapy Suites Stick Around?

SARTELL THERAPY SUITES has not reported staff turnover data to CMS. Staff turnover matters because consistent caregivers learn residents' individual needs, medications, and preferences. When staff frequently change, this institutional knowledge is lost. Families should ask the facility directly about their staff retention rates and average employee tenure.

Was Sartell Therapy Suites Ever Fined?

SARTELL THERAPY SUITES has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.

Is Sartell Therapy Suites on Any Federal Watch List?

SARTELL THERAPY SUITES is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.