COASTAL HEALTH AND REHABILITATION CENTER
Inspected within the last 6 months. Data reflects current conditions.
Coastal Health and Rehabilitation Center in Gulfport, Mississippi, has received a Trust Grade of F, indicating significant concerns about the care provided, which is far below acceptable standards. The facility ranks #151 out of 200 in the state, placing it in the bottom half for nursing homes in Mississippi, and #3 out of 6 in Harrison County, meaning only two local options are worse. Unfortunately, the situation appears to be worsening, with the number of issues increasing from 7 in 2024 to 17 in 2025. Staffing is a major concern, with a low rating of 1 out of 5 stars and a turnover rate of 71%, significantly higher than the state average of 47%, indicating instability among staff. Additionally, the facility has incurred $91,850 in fines, which is higher than 88% of Mississippi facilities, suggesting ongoing compliance problems. Importantly, there have been critical incidents, such as failing to properly assist residents during transfers and not delivering consistent care for pressure ulcers, which put residents at serious risk for harm. Families should weigh these serious issues against any potential strengths when considering this facility for their loved ones.
- Trust Score
- F
- In Mississippi
- #151/200
- Safety Record
- High Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Worse
- Staff Stability ⚠ Watch
- 71% turnover. Very high, 23 points above average. Constant new faces learning your loved one's needs.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- $91,850 in fines. Lower than most Mississippi facilities. Relatively clean record.
- Skilled Nurses ⚠ Watch
- Each resident gets only 7 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Mississippi. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 44 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
Facility shows strength in fire safety.
The Bad
Below Mississippi average (2.6)
Significant quality concerns identified by CMS
25pts above Mississippi avg (46%)
Frequent staff changes - ask about care continuity
Well above median ($33,413)
Moderate penalties - review what triggered them
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
23 points above Mississippi average of 48%
The Ugly 44 deficiencies on record
Aug 2025
17 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0561
(Tag F0561)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record reviews, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to honor a resident's documented meal preferences for one (1) of 27 sampled residents (Resident #84). Specifically, the facil...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Safe Environment
(Tag F0584)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a safe, clean, and homelike environment for residents on four (4) of (4) days of the survey, as...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0604
(Tag F0604)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, record reviews, interviews, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure a resident was free ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0657
(Tag F0657)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to revise the care plan to address the resident's visual impairment needs after his glasses were broken for one (1) of (27) care...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0658
(Tag F0658)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record reviews, interviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure services were provided in accordance with professional standards of practice as evidenced by a nurse who d...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0679
(Tag F0679)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents had access to independent leisure activities during all hours, including evenings and weekends, wh...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0685
(Tag F0685)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the resident received proper treatment and assistive devices to maintain vision for one (1) of ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0760
(Tag F0760)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure that new physician orders were entered into the electronic medical record and administered upon a resident...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0804
(Tag F0804)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure meals were prepared and...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0925
(Tag F0925)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0565
(Tag F0565)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure Resident Council grievances were ad...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0628
(Tag F0628)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on interviews, record reviews, and the facility policy review the facility failed to notify a resident's representative in writing of the reason for the transfer/discharge to the hospital in a l...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0645
(Tag F0645)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observations, interviews, record reviews, and the facility policy review, the facility failed to refer and follow through with the appropriate state-designated authority for Level II Preadmis...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to implement care plan interventions related to keeping skin clean and dry and providing prompt care afte...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
ADL Care
(Tag F0677)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate incontinence care for a resident dependent upon staff for activities of daily living (ADL) to maintain th...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
QAPI Program
(Tag F0867)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
The facility's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Committee failed to ensure the program was sustained during transitions in leadership and failed to maintain implemented procedures ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to store, label, and maintain food in a sanitary...
Read full inspector narrative →
Nov 2024
3 deficiencies
3 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Free from Abuse/Neglect
(Tag F0600)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews, record reviews, and facility policy reviews, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free...
Read full inspector narrative →
SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
Based on interviews, record reviews, and facility policy reviews, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plan was implemented for one (1) of four (4) residents reviewed. Resident #1
Find...
Read full inspector narrative →
SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews, record reviews, and facility policy reviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident received care and ser...
Read full inspector narrative →
Oct 2024
4 deficiencies
2 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to implement care plan approaches or interve...
Read full inspector narrative →
SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Pressure Ulcer Prevention
(Tag F0686)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents received consistent pres...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Assessment Accuracy
(Tag F0641)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to accurately code a Minimum Data Set (MDS) for a resident with an unhealed pressure ulcer for one (1) of three...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide care and treatment in accordance with professional standards of practice, by failing to follow a Physicia...
Read full inspector narrative →
Nov 2023
11 deficiencies
2 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to develop and/or implement comprehensive care plans regarding incontinent care, Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), ...
Read full inspector narrative →
SERIOUS
(G)
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Deficiency F0697
(Tag F0697)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
Based on observations, staff and resident interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to administer pain medication as ordered for one (1) of 27 sampled residents. (Resi...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0561
(Tag F0561)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, staff and resident interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to honor residents' rights or choices by not completing wound care in time for the re...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0565
(Tag F0565)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on staff and resident interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to promptly resolve grievan...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Transfer Notice
(Tag F0623)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed notify the Resident and/or Resident Representative in writing, in a language they could understand, of hospital tran...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0625
(Tag F0625)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide the Resident or the Resident Representative (RR), written notification of the bed hold policy at the time ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0645
(Tag F0645)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to accurately complete a Pre-admission Screening (PAS) by not identifying a mental disorder resulting in no Level II ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
ADL Care
(Tag F0677)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, staff and resident interviews, facility policy review, and record review, the facility failed to provide a...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Incontinence Care
(Tag F0690)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide incontinent care in a manner to prevent infection for one (1) of four (4) incontinence care ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0727
(Tag F0727)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide Registered Nurse (RN) coverage on 4/16/23 for at least 8 hours in a 24-hour period for one (1) of 25 staffing days reviewed. ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation, staff interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide a safe and clean dietary department as evidenced by a dirty ice machine, out of date/expired food and u...
Read full inspector narrative →
Mar 2023
4 deficiencies
4 IJ (3 affecting multiple)
CRITICAL
(J)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to promptly assess a resident f...
Read full inspector narrative →
CRITICAL
(K)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Someone could have died · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to implement comprehensive care plan interventions related to the use of a mechanical lift and for Press...
Read full inspector narrative →
CRITICAL
(K)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Pressure Ulcer Prevention
(Tag F0686)
Someone could have died · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were assesse...
Read full inspector narrative →
CRITICAL
(K)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Someone could have died · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure that the residents' environment remained free from actual harm for Resident #1 and the likeli...
Read full inspector narrative →
Apr 2021
5 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Free from Abuse/Neglect
(Tag F0600)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Resident #55
Findings Include:
A record review of the MDS with ARD dated 2/25/21 section G revealed resident requires extensive ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0687
(Tag F0687)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Resident #35
Findings Include:
At 08:30 AM on 04/22/2021, observed CNA #3 providing activities of daily living care SA observed ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to distribute meals in a safe manner for one (1) of 23 residents. (Resident #26)
The facility's, Principl...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Social Worker
(Tag F0850)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to employ a Licensed/Qualified Social Worker for four (4) days of four (4) days of survey.
Findings include:
R...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Resident #20
Findings Includ:
In a record review of the facility's, Respiratory Therapy Equipment, section of the Infection Cont...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
- "What safeguards are in place to prevent abuse and neglect?"
- "Why is there high staff turnover? How do you retain staff?"
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
- • Multiple safety concerns identified: Federal abuse finding, 4 life-threatening violation(s), 7 harm violation(s), $91,850 in fines. Review inspection reports carefully.
- • 44 deficiencies on record, including 4 critical (life-threatening) violations. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
- • $91,850 in fines. Extremely high, among the most fined facilities in Mississippi. Major compliance failures.
- • Grade F (0/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
About This Facility
What is Coastal Center's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns COASTAL HEALTH AND REHABILITATION CENTER an overall rating of 1 out of 5 stars, which is considered much below average nationally. Within Mississippi, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.
How is Coastal Center Staffed?
CMS rates COASTAL HEALTH AND REHABILITATION CENTER's staffing level at 1 out of 5 stars, which is much below average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 71%, which is 25 percentage points above the Mississippi average of 46%. High turnover can affect care consistency as new staff learn residents' individual needs. RN turnover specifically is 73%, which is notably high. RNs provide skilled clinical oversight, so turnover in this role can affect medical care quality.
What Have Inspectors Found at Coastal Center?
State health inspectors documented 44 deficiencies at COASTAL HEALTH AND REHABILITATION CENTER during 2021 to 2025. These included: 4 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death), 7 that caused actual resident harm, and 33 with potential for harm. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.
Who Owns and Operates Coastal Center?
COASTAL HEALTH AND REHABILITATION CENTER is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by CONSULATE HEALTH CARE/INDEPENDENCE LIVING CENTERS/NSPIRE HEALTHCARE/RAYDIANT HEALTH CARE, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 180 certified beds and approximately 121 residents (about 67% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in GULFPORT, Mississippi.
How Does Coastal Center Compare to Other Mississippi Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Mississippi, COASTAL HEALTH AND REHABILITATION CENTER's overall rating (1 stars) is below the state average of 2.6, staff turnover (71%) is significantly higher than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (1 stars) is much below the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Coastal Center?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "What safeguards and monitoring systems are in place to protect residents from abuse or neglect?" "How do you ensure continuity of care given staff turnover, and what is your staff retention strategy?" "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations, the substantiated abuse finding on record, the facility's high staff turnover rate, and the below-average staffing rating.
Is Coastal Center Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, COASTAL HEALTH AND REHABILITATION CENTER has documented safety concerns. The facility has 1 substantiated abuse finding (meaning confirmed case of resident harm by staff or other residents). Inspectors have issued 4 Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 1-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Mississippi. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.
Do Nurses at Coastal Center Stick Around?
Staff turnover at COASTAL HEALTH AND REHABILITATION CENTER is high. At 71%, the facility is 25 percentage points above the Mississippi average of 46%. Registered Nurse turnover is particularly concerning at 73%. RNs handle complex medical decisions and coordinate care — frequent RN changes can directly impact care quality. High turnover means new staff may not know residents' individual needs, medications, or preferences. It can also be disorienting for residents, especially those with dementia who rely on familiar faces. Families should ask: What is causing the turnover? What retention programs are in place? How do you ensure care continuity during staff transitions?
Was Coastal Center Ever Fined?
COASTAL HEALTH AND REHABILITATION CENTER has been fined $91,850 across 8 penalty actions. This is above the Mississippi average of $33,997. Fines in this range indicate compliance issues significant enough for CMS to impose meaningful financial consequences. Common causes include delayed correction of deficiencies, repeat violations, or care failures affecting resident safety. Families should ask facility leadership what changes have been made since these penalties.
Is Coastal Center on Any Federal Watch List?
COASTAL HEALTH AND REHABILITATION CENTER is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.