CYPRESS POINT-SKILLED NURSING BY AMERICARE
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Cypress Point-Skilled Nursing by Americare has a Trust Grade of D, indicating below-average quality and raising some concerns for families considering this facility. In terms of rankings, it is #143 out of 479 facilities in Missouri, placing it in the top half, and #4 out of 7 in Stoddard County, meaning there are only three local options that are better. The facility is showing signs of improvement, with issues decreasing from 5 in 2024 to 2 in 2025, which is encouraging. Staffing is a strength, with a rating of 4 out of 5 stars and a turnover rate of 48%, which is below the state average of 57%, indicating staff stability. However, the facility has incurred $73,743 in fines, which is concerning and suggests ongoing compliance issues. There were critical incidents reported, including one where a resident was left unattended for nine hours and found seriously injured on the bathroom floor. Additionally, there were concerns about cleanliness and safety, with observations of cobwebs and debris in common areas, and failures to develop individualized care plans for some residents. Overall, while there are strengths in staffing and some improvement in issues, the serious incidents and high fines should be carefully considered by families.
- Trust Score
- D
- In Missouri
- #143/479
- Safety Record
- High Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Better
- Staff Stability ⚠ Watch
- 48% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- $73,743 in fines. Lower than most Missouri facilities. Relatively clean record.
- Skilled Nurses ○ Average
- Each resident gets 39 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — about average for Missouri. RNs are the most trained staff who monitor for health changes.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 13 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
4-Star Staffing Rating · Above-average nurse staffing levels
-
4-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
Facility shows strength in staffing levels, quality measures, fire safety.
The Bad
Above Missouri average (2.5)
Meets federal standards, typical of most facilities
Near Missouri avg (46%)
Higher turnover may affect care consistency
Well above median ($33,413)
Moderate penalties - review what triggered them
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
The Ugly 13 deficiencies on record
Sept 2025
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Safe Environment
(Tag F0584)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean and comfortable homelike enviro...
Read full inspector narrative →
Mar 2025
1 deficiency
1 IJ
CRITICAL
(J)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to ensure the safety of one resident (...
Read full inspector narrative →
Sept 2024
5 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop, implement and follow an individualized comprehensive care plan with specific interventions for two residents (Reside...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0658
(Tag F0658)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately assess and document a wound for one resident (Resident #12) out of two sampled residents. The facility's census wa...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to store and distribute food under sanitary conditions, increasing the risk of cross-contamination and food-borne illness. These deficient pra...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement and follow enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) for four residents (Residents #12, #13, #35 and #56) out of four samp...
Read full inspector narrative →
MINOR
(C)
Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact
Safe Environment
(Tag F0584)
Minor procedural issue · This affected most or all residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean and comfortable homelike enviro...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jun 2023
4 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Resident Rights
(Tag F0550)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the dignity of two residents (Resident #36 and #55) out of two sampled residents with a properly covered urinary cathe...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0655
(Tag F0655)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement a baseline care plan upon admission with specific interventions for one sampled resident (Resident #167) out of 5 sampled residen...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement an infection control program and a risk management process specific to Legionella disease (a serious type of pneumon...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Safe Environment
(Tag F0921)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe environment for the residents and staf...
Read full inspector narrative →
Sept 2021
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0578
(Tag F0578)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the accuracy of the Advance Directive regarding the resuscitation status for one resident (Resident #53) out of 16 sampled residents...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper transfer technique for one resident (Resident #9) out of 7 sampled residents. The facility census was 65.
Recor...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
- • Multiple safety concerns identified: 1 life-threatening violation(s), $73,743 in fines. Review inspection reports carefully.
- • 13 deficiencies on record, including 1 critical (life-threatening) violation. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
- • $73,743 in fines. Extremely high, among the most fined facilities in Missouri. Major compliance failures.
- • Grade D (43/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
About This Facility
What is Cypress Point-Skilled Nursing By Americare's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns CYPRESS POINT-SKILLED NURSING BY AMERICARE an overall rating of 3 out of 5 stars, which is considered average nationally. Within Missouri, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This mid-range rating indicates the facility meets federal standards but may have areas for improvement.
How is Cypress Point-Skilled Nursing By Americare Staffed?
CMS rates CYPRESS POINT-SKILLED NURSING BY AMERICARE's staffing level at 4 out of 5 stars, which is above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 48%, compared to the Missouri average of 46%.
What Have Inspectors Found at Cypress Point-Skilled Nursing By Americare?
State health inspectors documented 13 deficiencies at CYPRESS POINT-SKILLED NURSING BY AMERICARE during 2021 to 2025. These included: 1 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death), 11 with potential for harm, and 1 minor or isolated issues. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.
Who Owns and Operates Cypress Point-Skilled Nursing By Americare?
CYPRESS POINT-SKILLED NURSING BY AMERICARE is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by AMERICARE SENIOR LIVING, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 79 certified beds and approximately 65 residents (about 82% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in DEXTER, Missouri.
How Does Cypress Point-Skilled Nursing By Americare Compare to Other Missouri Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Missouri, CYPRESS POINT-SKILLED NURSING BY AMERICARE's overall rating (3 stars) is above the state average of 2.5, staff turnover (48%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (3 stars) is at the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Cypress Point-Skilled Nursing By Americare?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations.
Is Cypress Point-Skilled Nursing By Americare Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, CYPRESS POINT-SKILLED NURSING BY AMERICARE has documented safety concerns. Inspectors have issued 1 Immediate Jeopardy citation (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 3-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Missouri. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.
Do Nurses at Cypress Point-Skilled Nursing By Americare Stick Around?
CYPRESS POINT-SKILLED NURSING BY AMERICARE has a staff turnover rate of 48%, which is about average for Missouri nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was Cypress Point-Skilled Nursing By Americare Ever Fined?
CYPRESS POINT-SKILLED NURSING BY AMERICARE has been fined $73,743 across 1 penalty action. This is above the Missouri average of $33,816. Fines in this range indicate compliance issues significant enough for CMS to impose meaningful financial consequences. Common causes include delayed correction of deficiencies, repeat violations, or care failures affecting resident safety. Families should ask facility leadership what changes have been made since these penalties.
Is Cypress Point-Skilled Nursing By Americare on Any Federal Watch List?
CYPRESS POINT-SKILLED NURSING BY AMERICARE is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.