Gold Crest Retirement Center
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Gold Crest Retirement Center in Adams, Nebraska, has earned a Trust Grade of B, indicating it is a good choice for families looking for care. It ranks #45 out of 177 facilities in the state, placing it in the top half, and is the best option among the three facilities in Gage County. The facility is improving, having reduced its issues from five in 2024 to three in 2025. Staffing is a concern, with a turnover rate of 64%, which is higher than the state's average of 49%, although they maintain a solid RN coverage. Notable incidents include failures to provide daily oral care for several residents, unsecured medications, and inconsistent hand hygiene practices, highlighting areas that need attention despite their overall good ratings.
- Trust Score
- B
- In Nebraska
- #45/177
- Safety Record
- Low Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Better
- Staff Stability ⚠ Watch
- 64% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Nebraska facilities.
- Skilled Nurses ✓ Good
- Each resident gets 42 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than average for Nebraska. RNs are trained to catch health problems early.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 12 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
4-Star Staffing Rating · Above-average nurse staffing levels
-
4-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
Facility shows strength in staffing levels, quality measures, fire safety.
The Bad
18pts above Nebraska avg (46%)
Frequent staff changes - ask about care continuity
16 points above Nebraska average of 48%
The Ugly 12 deficiencies on record
Mar 2025
3 deficiencies
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
ADL Care
(Tag F0677)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Licensure Reference 175 NAC 12-006.09(H)(i)(3)
Based on record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to prov...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
LICENSURE REFERENCE NUMBER 175 NAC 12-006.12(D)(i)
Based on interview, observation, and record review the facility failed to secure all medications in a locked storage area and to limit access only to...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** D.
Record review of the undated facility policy titled Perineal Care revealed perineal care refers to the care of the external ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Apr 2024
5 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Notification of Changes
(Tag F0580)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.04C3a(6)
Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to notify Residen...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Assessment Accuracy
(Tag F0641)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the accuracy of the Minimum Data Set (MDS- a comprehensive ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0642
(Tag F0642)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that a Discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS- a comprehensive asse...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09D6
Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure oxygen tubing was changed as required and stored in a manner to preven...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0657
(Tag F0657)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09C1c
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to revise the Care Plan ( written instructions needed to provide effective an...
Read full inspector narrative →
Oct 2023
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Report Alleged Abuse
(Tag F0609)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.02
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to report an elopement of...
Read full inspector narrative →
May 2023
3 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Notification of Changes
(Tag F0580)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
LICENSURE REFERENCE NUMBER 175 NAC 12-006.04C3a(6)
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to notify the resident representative and physician of a change in condition for 1 of 1 samp...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Transfer Notice
(Tag F0623)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.05(5)
Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to provide written notice of transfer to the resident and/or resident representative upon tr...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Licensure Reference 175 NAC 12-006.17D
Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to prevent the potential for cross-contamination (the physical movement or transfer of h...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Why is there high staff turnover? How do you retain staff?"
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
- • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Nebraska facilities.
- • 12 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
- • 64% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
About This Facility
What is Gold Crest Retirement Center's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns Gold Crest Retirement Center an overall rating of 4 out of 5 stars, which is considered above average nationally. Within Nebraska, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.
How is Gold Crest Retirement Center Staffed?
CMS rates Gold Crest Retirement Center's staffing level at 4 out of 5 stars, which is above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 64%, which is 18 percentage points above the Nebraska average of 46%. High turnover can affect care consistency as new staff learn residents' individual needs.
What Have Inspectors Found at Gold Crest Retirement Center?
State health inspectors documented 12 deficiencies at Gold Crest Retirement Center during 2023 to 2025. These included: 12 with potential for harm.
Who Owns and Operates Gold Crest Retirement Center?
Gold Crest Retirement Center is owned by a non-profit organization. Non-profit facilities reinvest revenue into operations rather than distributing to shareholders. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 52 certified beds and approximately 36 residents (about 69% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in Adams, Nebraska.
How Does Gold Crest Retirement Center Compare to Other Nebraska Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Nebraska, Gold Crest Retirement Center's overall rating (4 stars) is above the state average of 2.9, staff turnover (64%) is significantly higher than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (4 stars) is above the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Gold Crest Retirement Center?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "How do you ensure continuity of care given staff turnover, and what is your staff retention strategy?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's high staff turnover rate.
Is Gold Crest Retirement Center Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, Gold Crest Retirement Center has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 4-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Nebraska. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Gold Crest Retirement Center Stick Around?
Staff turnover at Gold Crest Retirement Center is high. At 64%, the facility is 18 percentage points above the Nebraska average of 46%. High turnover means new staff may not know residents' individual needs, medications, or preferences. It can also be disorienting for residents, especially those with dementia who rely on familiar faces. Families should ask: What is causing the turnover? What retention programs are in place? How do you ensure care continuity during staff transitions?
Was Gold Crest Retirement Center Ever Fined?
Gold Crest Retirement Center has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.
Is Gold Crest Retirement Center on Any Federal Watch List?
Gold Crest Retirement Center is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.