Beatrice Health and Rehabilitaion
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Beatrice Health and Rehabilitation has a Trust Grade of C+, indicating it is slightly above average but not exceptional. It ranks #75 out of 177 facilities in Nebraska, placing it in the top half, and #2 out of 3 in Gage County, meaning only one local facility is rated higher. The facility is improving, with a decrease in issues from 7 in 2024 to 3 in 2025. However, staffing is a concern, with a rating of 2 out of 5 stars and less RN coverage than 87% of state facilities, which could impact resident care. Notably, there have been issues such as failure to ensure proper hand hygiene in the kitchen and a lack of a qualified dietitian, which could pose risks to food safety and nutrition for residents. On a positive note, the facility has not incurred any fines, and its staff turnover rate of 35% is better than the state average.
- Trust Score
- C+
- In Nebraska
- #75/177
- Safety Record
- Low Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Better
- Staff Stability ○ Average
- 35% turnover. Near Nebraska's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Nebraska facilities.
- Skilled Nurses ⚠ Watch
- Each resident gets only 23 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Nebraska. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 16 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
4-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
-
Staff turnover below average (35%)
13 points below Nebraska average of 48%
Facility shows strength in quality measures, fire safety.
The Bad
Near Nebraska average (2.9)
Meets federal standards, typical of most facilities
11pts below Nebraska avg (46%)
Typical for the industry
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
The Ugly 16 deficiencies on record
Apr 2025
3 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medication Errors
(Tag F0758)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure an as needed antipsychotic medication had a 14-day stop date...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Licensure reference number 175 NAC 12-006.18(B)
The facility failed to ensure hand hygiene was performed during catheter and per...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.11C
The facility failed to ensure hand hygiene was performed in the kitchen in order to prevent the spread of food borne illness. This had the potential to af...
Read full inspector narrative →
Apr 2024
7 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09D6
Based on observations, record review and interviews; the facility failed to obtai...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medication Errors
(Tag F0758)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12.006019D
Based on record reviews, observation, and interviews; the facility failed to ensure that Resident 25 was free from unnecessary medications by attempting a...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.17D
Based on observation, record review, and interview; the facility failed to perform hand hygiene during wound cares for 1 (Resident 16) of 1 sampled reside...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Safe Environment
(Tag F0584)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12.006. 18B
Based on observation, and interview; the facility failed to maintain the cleanliness and condition of vents located in rooms 7, 16, 17, 29, 33, 38, 39, ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Incontinence Care
(Tag F0690)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09 D3
Based on observation, interview and record review; the facility failed to maintain indwelling catheter (a tube inserted into the bladder) drainage bag b...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Unnecessary Medications
(Tag F0759)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.10D
Based on observations, record reviews and interviews; the facility failed to administer the correct medication and give within the time frame prescribed b...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0923
(Tag F0923)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12.007. 04D
Based on observation, and interviews; the facility failed to maintain mechanical ventilation in residents' bathrooms located in rooms 38, 39, 40, 47, 48....
Read full inspector narrative →
Jun 2023
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a provider's or...
Read full inspector narrative →
May 2023
5 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
PASARR Coordination
(Tag F0644)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a Level II PASARR (A Level II is necessary to confirm the indicated Mental Illness (MI)/Intellectual Disability (ID) diagnosis and t...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09C
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Comprehensive Care Plan (CCP- written instructions needed to provide effective and...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** C) Observation on 5/01/23 at 06:25 PM revealed HK - B (Housekeeper) gathered room [ROOM NUMBER] bedding and held it against HK-B...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0801
(Tag F0801)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.04D2
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to employ a qualified dietician on a full time basis or other clinically qualified nutrition pr...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
LICENSURE REFERENCE NUMBER 175 NAC 12-006.11E
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure food temperatures were maintained to prevent the potentail of foodborne illness which ha...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
- • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Nebraska facilities.
- • 35% turnover. Below Nebraska's 48% average. Good staff retention means consistent care.
- • 16 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
About This Facility
What is Beatrice Health And Rehabilitaion's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns Beatrice Health and Rehabilitaion an overall rating of 3 out of 5 stars, which is considered average nationally. Within Nebraska, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This mid-range rating indicates the facility meets federal standards but may have areas for improvement.
How is Beatrice Health And Rehabilitaion Staffed?
CMS rates Beatrice Health and Rehabilitaion's staffing level at 2 out of 5 stars, which is below average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 35%, compared to the Nebraska average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.
What Have Inspectors Found at Beatrice Health And Rehabilitaion?
State health inspectors documented 16 deficiencies at Beatrice Health and Rehabilitaion during 2023 to 2025. These included: 16 with potential for harm.
Who Owns and Operates Beatrice Health And Rehabilitaion?
Beatrice Health and Rehabilitaion is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by THE ENSIGN GROUP, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 87 certified beds and approximately 54 residents (about 62% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in Beatrice, Nebraska.
How Does Beatrice Health And Rehabilitaion Compare to Other Nebraska Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Nebraska, Beatrice Health and Rehabilitaion's overall rating (3 stars) is above the state average of 2.9, staff turnover (35%) is significantly lower than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (3 stars) is at the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Beatrice Health And Rehabilitaion?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?" These questions are particularly relevant given the below-average staffing rating.
Is Beatrice Health And Rehabilitaion Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, Beatrice Health and Rehabilitaion has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 3-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Nebraska. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Beatrice Health And Rehabilitaion Stick Around?
Beatrice Health and Rehabilitaion has a staff turnover rate of 35%, which is about average for Nebraska nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was Beatrice Health And Rehabilitaion Ever Fined?
Beatrice Health and Rehabilitaion has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.
Is Beatrice Health And Rehabilitaion on Any Federal Watch List?
Beatrice Health and Rehabilitaion is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.