Mid-Nebraska Lutheran Home
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Mid-Nebraska Lutheran Home has a Trust Grade of D, indicating it is below average and has some concerns that families should consider. It ranks #123 out of 177 nursing homes in Nebraska, placing it in the bottom half of facilities in the state, and #4 out of 5 in Madison County, meaning there is only one local option rated higher. The facility is improving, with issues decreasing from 4 in 2024 to 2 in 2025, but there are still serious concerns, including $6,015 in fines, which is higher than 75% of Nebraska facilities. Staffing is a strength, with a turnover rate of 0%, but there is less RN coverage than 90% of other facilities, which could impact care quality. Specific incidents include failures to identify causes of falls for residents and a lack of qualified personnel in infection control, raising potential safety risks. Overall, while there are some positive aspects, families should weigh these concerns carefully.
- Trust Score
- D
- In Nebraska
- #123/177
- Safety Record
- Moderate
- Inspections
- Getting Better
- Staff Stability ○ Average
- Turnover data not reported for this facility.
- Penalties ○ Average
- $6,015 in fines. Higher than 55% of Nebraska facilities. Some compliance issues.
- Skilled Nurses ⚠ Watch
- Each resident gets only 27 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Nebraska. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 19 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
Facility shows strength in fire safety.
The Bad
Below Nebraska average (2.9)
Below average - review inspection findings carefully
Below median ($33,413)
Minor penalties assessed
The Ugly 19 deficiencies on record
Apr 2025
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Notification of Changes
(Tag F0580)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.04(F)(i)(5)
Based on record review and interviews; the facility failed to notify Resident 1's Primary Care Practitioner of changes in the resident's conditio...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09D
Based on record review and interviews; the facility failed to monitor and to assess Resident 1 for a change of condition after a fall with injury. The sam...
Read full inspector narrative →
Sept 2024
4 deficiencies
1 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** LICENSURE REFERENCE NUMBER 175 NAC 12-006.09(I)(i).
Based on record review and interview; the facility failed to identify causal...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0757
(Tag F0757)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident 4's antibiotic ointment use had an ordered duration to prevent potential adver...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
LICENSURE REFERENCE NUMBER 175 NAC 12-006.12E1
Based on observation, record review and interview; the facility failed to provide safe storage of drugs and biological's as a medication cart was left un...
Read full inspector narrative →
MINOR
(C)
Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact
Staffing Data
(Tag F0851)
Minor procedural issue · This affected most or all residents
Based on record review and interview: the facility failed to submit their Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) data for quarter 3 of 2024 as required. This had the potential to affect all residents residing wi...
Read full inspector narrative →
Aug 2023
8 deficiencies
1 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Notification of Changes
(Tag F0580)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** C. Review of Resident 29's MDS dated [DATE] revealed the following:
-the resident was cognitively intact,
- the resident was in...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0645
(Tag F0645)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09A
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident 14's ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** LICENSURE REFERENCE NUMBER 175 NAC 12-006.09D7(a) (b)
Based on record review and interview; the facility failed to identify caus...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medication Errors
(Tag F0758)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12.006019D
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that PRN (as n...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** C. Review of Resident 29's MDS dated [DATE] revealed the following:
-the resident was cognitively intact,
- the resident was in...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0726
(Tag F0726)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
LICENSURE REFERENCE NUMBER 175 NAC 12-006.10A3
Based on record review and interview; the facility failed to ensure staff had the required certification when administering medications for 1 Medication ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0882
(Tag F0882)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.17
Based on interview and record review; the facility failed to ensure the designated Infection Preventionist (IP-staff who looks for patterns, observes and e...
Read full inspector narrative →
MINOR
(C)
Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact
Employment Screening
(Tag F0606)
Minor procedural issue · This affected most or all residents
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.04A3b
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure background checks through the state nurse aide registry were completed on 3 of 5 emp...
Read full inspector narrative →
Apr 2023
3 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Free from Abuse/Neglect
(Tag F0600)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.05(9)
Based on interview and record review; the facility failed to ensure agency staff (staff hired on a per diem basis from a staffing company) had the requi...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to assess Resident 3 for a change in condition and report the potential change in condition to the...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Investigate Abuse
(Tag F0610)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.02(8)
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to submit investigation...
Read full inspector narrative →
May 2022
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Investigate Abuse
(Tag F0610)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.02(8)
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to report an allegation of potential abuse and submit an investigation to the State Agency in...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
C. Review of Resident 5's Nursing Progress Notes between 4/27/22 and 5/2/22 revealed the following related to the resident's decline in condition:
-4/27/22 at 5:00 PM, the resident was lethargic and d...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
- • Multiple safety concerns identified: 2 harm violation(s), Payment denial on record. Review inspection reports carefully.
- • 19 deficiencies on record, including 2 serious (caused harm) violations. Ask about corrective actions taken.
- • Grade D (43/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
About This Facility
What is Mid-Nebraska Lutheran Home's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns Mid-Nebraska Lutheran Home an overall rating of 2 out of 5 stars, which is considered below average nationally. Within Nebraska, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.
How is Mid-Nebraska Lutheran Home Staffed?
CMS rates Mid-Nebraska Lutheran Home's staffing level at 2 out of 5 stars, which is below average compared to other nursing homes.
What Have Inspectors Found at Mid-Nebraska Lutheran Home?
State health inspectors documented 19 deficiencies at Mid-Nebraska Lutheran Home during 2022 to 2025. These included: 2 that caused actual resident harm, 15 with potential for harm, and 2 minor or isolated issues. Deficiencies causing actual harm indicate documented cases where residents experienced negative health consequences.
Who Owns and Operates Mid-Nebraska Lutheran Home?
Mid-Nebraska Lutheran Home is owned by a non-profit organization. Non-profit facilities reinvest revenue into operations rather than distributing to shareholders. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 45 certified beds and approximately 31 residents (about 69% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in Newman Grove, Nebraska.
How Does Mid-Nebraska Lutheran Home Compare to Other Nebraska Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Nebraska, Mid-Nebraska Lutheran Home's overall rating (2 stars) is below the state average of 2.9 and health inspection rating (3 stars) is at the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Mid-Nebraska Lutheran Home?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?" These questions are particularly relevant given the below-average staffing rating.
Is Mid-Nebraska Lutheran Home Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, Mid-Nebraska Lutheran Home has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 2-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Nebraska. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Mid-Nebraska Lutheran Home Stick Around?
Mid-Nebraska Lutheran Home has not reported staff turnover data to CMS. Staff turnover matters because consistent caregivers learn residents' individual needs, medications, and preferences. When staff frequently change, this institutional knowledge is lost. Families should ask the facility directly about their staff retention rates and average employee tenure.
Was Mid-Nebraska Lutheran Home Ever Fined?
Mid-Nebraska Lutheran Home has been fined $6,015 across 1 penalty action. This is below the Nebraska average of $33,139. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.
Is Mid-Nebraska Lutheran Home on Any Federal Watch List?
Mid-Nebraska Lutheran Home is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.