Mid-Nebraska Lutheran Home

109 North 2nd Street, Newman Grove, NE 68758 (402) 447-6203
Non profit - Church related 45 Beds Independent Data: November 2025
Trust Grade
43/100
#123 of 177 in NE
Last Inspection: September 2024

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

Mid-Nebraska Lutheran Home has a Trust Grade of D, indicating it is below average and has some concerns that families should consider. It ranks #123 out of 177 nursing homes in Nebraska, placing it in the bottom half of facilities in the state, and #4 out of 5 in Madison County, meaning there is only one local option rated higher. The facility is improving, with issues decreasing from 4 in 2024 to 2 in 2025, but there are still serious concerns, including $6,015 in fines, which is higher than 75% of Nebraska facilities. Staffing is a strength, with a turnover rate of 0%, but there is less RN coverage than 90% of other facilities, which could impact care quality. Specific incidents include failures to identify causes of falls for residents and a lack of qualified personnel in infection control, raising potential safety risks. Overall, while there are some positive aspects, families should weigh these concerns carefully.

Trust Score
D
43/100
In Nebraska
#123/177
Bottom 31%
Safety Record
Moderate
Needs review
Inspections
Getting Better
4 → 2 violations
Staff Stability
○ Average
Turnover data not reported for this facility.
Penalties
○ Average
$6,015 in fines. Higher than 55% of Nebraska facilities. Some compliance issues.
Skilled Nurses
⚠ Watch
Each resident gets only 27 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Nebraska. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
Violations
⚠ Watch
19 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
★★☆☆☆
2.0
Overall Rating
★★☆☆☆
2.0
Staff Levels
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Care Quality
★★★☆☆
3.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2024: 4 issues
2025: 2 issues

The Good

  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record

Facility shows strength in fire safety.

The Bad

2-Star Overall Rating

Below Nebraska average (2.9)

Below average - review inspection findings carefully

Federal Fines: $6,015

Below median ($33,413)

Minor penalties assessed

The Ugly 19 deficiencies on record

2 actual harm
Apr 2025 2 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Notification of Changes (Tag F0580)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.04(F)(i)(5) Based on record review and interviews; the facility failed to notify Resident 1's Primary Care Practitioner of changes in the resident's conditio...

Read full inspector narrative →
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.04(F)(i)(5) Based on record review and interviews; the facility failed to notify Resident 1's Primary Care Practitioner of changes in the resident's condition related to behaviors, increased confusion, and back pain. The sample size was 5 and the facility census was 30. Findings are: A record review of the undated facility policy Change in a Resident's Condition or Status revealed the following; -the facility promptly notified the resident, the attending physician, and the resident representative of changes in the resident's medical/mental condition and/or status, -the nurse would notify the resident's attending physician or on-call physician when there had been, accident/incidents involving the resident, injuries or unknown source, adverse reactions to medications, a significant change in the resident's condition, a need to significantly alter the resident's medical treatment, refusal of medication or treatments 2 or more consecutive times, or a need to transfer or discharge the resident, -prior to notifying the physician the facility nurse would make detailed observations and gather relevant and pertinent information for the provider, -except in emergencies notifications would be made within 24 hours of a condition change, and -a nurse would record in the resident's medical record information relative to the change in the resident's condition. A record review of Resident 1's MDS (Minimum Data Set, a federally mandated comprehensive assessment tool used for care planning) dated 3/21/25, revealed the resident was admitted with diagnoses of cancer, anemia, dementia, seizure disorder, anxiety, depression, and psychotic disorder. The following was assessed for Resident 1: -moderate cognitive impairment. -behaviors which included rejection of cares and verbal behaviors directed toward others. -required staff assistance with transfers, bed mobility, dressing, toileting, and personal hygiene. -frequently incontinent of urine. -one fall without injury since previous assessment. A record review of Resident 1's Nursing Progress Notes revealed the following: -4/7/25 at 5:17 AM the resident had a fall at 4:30 AM outside of the resident's bathroom. The resident had been incontinent of urine and had a 2 centimeter (cm) superficial cut to the back of the resident's head. The resident was complaining of back pain which the resident had rated at an 8 out of 10. -4/7/25 at 7:06 PM the resident continued to complain of back pain with little relief from the as needed Tramadol (medication used to treat pain). -4/7/25 at 5:10 PM the resident was having lower back pain and had a headache. The resident received Ultram (medication used to treat pain) 50 milligrams (mg). -4/7/25 at 6:53 PM the resident's pain was a 7 out of 10 and the Ultram given at 5:10 PM was ineffective. The resident was also complaining of neck pain. -4/10/25 at 11:42 AM the resident was complaining of back pain and was unable to turn in bed without yelling in pain. -4/11/25 at 9:05 AM (4 days after the resident's fall) the resident was found slumped in the recliner. The resident was lethargic and unable to follow simple commands. The resident's pupils were fixed and did not respond to light. -4/11/25 at 9:07 AM the resident had a dark purple bruise on the back of the resident's head. -4/11/25 at 9:34 AM the resident was transferred by ambulance to the Emergency Room. -4/11/25 at 1:01 PM the resident was transferred to a hospital in Omaha due to a brain bleed. During an interview on 4/24/25 at 2:00 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed the resident had a history of falls with the resident's last fall happening on 4/7/25 at 4:30 AM. The resident also had a history of moderate back pain.After the resident's fall on 4/7/25, the resident had increasing pain to the resident's back. A record review of Resident 1's medical records revealed no evidence that the facility staff had notified the resident's PCP of the resident's complaints of increased back pain until 4/11/25 (4 days after the resident's fall) when the resident was hospitalized .
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09D Based on record review and interviews; the facility failed to monitor and to assess Resident 1 for a change of condition after a fall with injury. The sam...

Read full inspector narrative →
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09D Based on record review and interviews; the facility failed to monitor and to assess Resident 1 for a change of condition after a fall with injury. The sample size was 4 and the facility census was 30. Findings are: A record review of the undated facility policy Change in a Resident's Condition or Status revealed the following; -the facility promptly notified the resident, the attending physician, and the resident representative of changes in the resident's medical/mental condition and/or status, -the nurse would notify the resident's attending physician or on-call physician when there had been, accident/incidents involving the resident, injuries or unknown source, adverse reactions to medications, a significant change in the resident's condition, a need to significantly alter the resident's medical treatment, refusal of medication or treatments 2 or more consecutive times, or a need to transfer or discharge the resident, -prior to notifying the physician the facility nurse would make detailed observations and gather relevant and pertinent information for the provider, -except in emergencies notifications would be made within 24 hours of a condition change, and -a nurse would record in the resident's medical record information relative to the change in the resident's condition. A record review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated comprehensive assessment tool used for care planning) dated 3/21/25, revealed the resident was admitted with diagnoses of cancer, anemia, dementia, seizure disorder, anxiety, depression and psychotic disorder. The following was assessed for Resident 1: -moderate cognitive impairment. -behaviors which included rejection of cares and verbal behaviors directed toward others. -required staff assistance with transfers, bed mobility, dressing, toileting and personal hygiene. -frequently incontinent of urine. -one fall without injury since previous assessment. A record review of Resident 1's Nursing Progress Notes revealed the following: -3/18/25 at 10:52 AM the resident was alert and oriented to self with periods of confusion. Resident 1 had increased weakness and required 2 staff to assist with transfers. -3/19/25 at 1:51 PM the resident was alert and oriented with periods of confusion. -3/27/25 at 2:15 PM the resident was found lying on their right side on the floor of the resident's room. The note indicated the resident had ongoing issues with back pain. -4/7/25 at 5:17 AM the resident had a fall at 4:30 AM outside of the resident's bathroom. The resident had been incontinent of urine, had a 2 centimeter (cm) superficial cut to the back of the resident's head. The resident was complaining of back pain which the resident had rated at an 8 out of 10. -4/7/25 at 7:06 PM the resident continued to complain of back pain with little relief from their as needed Tramadol (medication used to treat pain). -4/7/25 at 5:10 PM the resident was having lower back pain and had a headache. The resident received Ultram (medication used to treat pain) 50 milligrams (mg). -4/7/25 at 6:53 PM the resident's pain was a 7 out of 10 and the Ultram given at 5:10 PM was ineffective. The resident was also complaining of neck pain. -4/10/25 at 12:03 AM the resident had increased behaviors, tried to walk in the corridor with a walker, and struck out at staff and tried to ram staff with the wheelchair when attempted to redirect. -4/10/25 at 5:51 PM the resident was showing signs of confusion with behavioral issues. In addition, the resident refused to allow staff to assist with care. -4/10/25 at 11:42 AM the resident was complaining of back pain and was unable to turn in bed without yelling in pain. -4/11/25 at 9:05 AM (4 days after the resident's fall) the resident was found slumped in their recliner. The resident was lethargic and unable to follow simple commands. The resident's pupils were fixed and did not respond to light. -4/11/25 at 9:07 AM the resident had a dark purple bruise on the back of the resident's head. -4/11/25 at 9:34 AM the resident was transferred by ambulance to the Emergency Room. -4/11/25 at 1:01 PM the resident was transferred to a hospital in Omaha due to a brain bleed. During an interview on 4/24/25 at 2:00 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed the resident had falls on 3/16/25 at 5:08 AM, 3/27/25 at 2:15 PM and on 4/7/25 at 4:30 AM. The resident had been complaining of increased back pain, had increased confusion, and behaviors. In addition, the resident required 2 assists for transfers. Further interview revealed no assessments were completed and/or documented regarding the resident's back pain, increased confusion, or behaviors.
Sept 2024 4 deficiencies 1 Harm
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** LICENSURE REFERENCE NUMBER 175 NAC 12-006.09(I)(i). Based on record review and interview; the facility failed to identify causal...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** LICENSURE REFERENCE NUMBER 175 NAC 12-006.09(I)(i). Based on record review and interview; the facility failed to identify causal factors and to revise and/or develop additional interventions for the prevention of ongoing falls for Resident 29 and falls with injury for Resident 135. The sample size was 5 and the facility census was 34. Findings are: A. Review of the facility Falls-Clinical Protocol with a revision date of 3/2018 revealed the facility was to review each resident's risk factors for falling and document in the resident's medical record. If the resident had a fall, staff were to identify possible causes within 24 hours of the fall. The facility would then identify pertinent interventions to try to prevent subsequent falls and then monitor and document the resident's response to the interventions. If the interventions were successful in fall prevention the approaches would be continued. Staff were to assess the need for changes on the approaches of the plan of care and develop additional approaches to prevent ongoing falls as needed. B. Review of Resident 135's Minimum Data Set (MDS-a federally mandated comprehensive assessment tool used for care planning) dated 7/19/24 revealed diagnoses of fractures, arthritis, osteoporosis, previous stroke, non-Alzheimer's dementia, anxiety, and depression. The MDS further indicated Resident 135 had: -moderately impaired cognition, -was dependent on staff for assist with eating/drinking, personal hygiene, dressing, bed mobility and transfers, -incontinence of bowel and bladder, and -experienced 2 or more falls with no injury, 2 or more falls with injury (except major) and 1 fall with major injury. Review of Resident 135's Progress Notes revealed the following: -1/29/24 at 8:10 AM the resident had a witnessed fall in the resident's room. Resident 135 had fallen backwards when transferred by a staff member and was then lowered to the floor. Staff placed the resident in the lobby area for increased supervision and therapy was to assess the resident. -1/31/24 at 1:38 PM received orders for Occupation Therapy (OT) and Physical Therapy (PT) services. -1/31/24 at 9:10 PM the resident was found on the floor in front of the recliner in the lobby area. A new intervention was developed for a drug review due to increased confusion in the evenings. The Primary Care Provider (PCP) changed the resident's antidepressant medication to be given in the morning instead of the evening to minimize side effects. -2/27/24 at 1:00 PM the resident was found on the floor next to a chair in the resident's room. An immediate intervention to check the resident every 30 minutes for 8 hours was identified. Further review revealed no ongoing interventions and/or causal factors were identified related to the resident's fall. -2/27/24 at 2:55 PM revealed the resident was to be discharged from PT and OT due to goals met and resident had reached a plateau. -2/29/24 at 7:45 AM the resident was found on the floor in the resident's room. No causal factors were identified regarding the fall. The resident's medications were reviewed but no changes were made. -3/12/24 at 10:45 AM the resident was found on the floor of the resident's room. The resident had been lying in bed and stated a desire to get into the chair. A new intervention was developed to place non-skid strips next to the resident's bed. -4/11/24 at 4:00 PM the resident was found on knees on the floor. No causal factors were identified, and staff failed to revise current interventions or to develop new interventions to prevent further falls. -4/18/24 at 12:44 PM the facility visited with the family about the resident's behaviors and requested to move the resident to the Memory Unit. The family felt this would increase the resident's confusion and declined having the resident moved. -4/19/24 at 11:07 AM the resident was heard calling for help and was found on the floor in the resident's room. The resident had attempted to remove slacks and urinary incontinence brief. The resident, despite ongoing confusing was educated to use the call light to seek staff assistance. No further interventions were identified. -5/20/24 at 7:45 PM the staff heard a noise in the resident's room and found the resident sitting on the floor. The resident had been talking on the phone to family prior to the fall and fell when trying to hang up the phone. The resident was encouraged to call for assist as needed. The resident was screened by PT and orders were received for therapy to treat on 5/23/24. -6/18/24 at 3:23 PM the resident was discharged from PT as on 6/14/24 the resident was admitted to Hospice. -6/24/24 at 8:15 PM the resident was found on the floor of the resident's room and was lying on right hip. Hospice was to bring a scoop mattress for the resident's bed. -7/14/24 at 9:00 PM the staff heard the resident screaming in their room and calling for help. The resident was found on the floor next to the bed and was assisted to the bathroom. No causal factors were identified, and the facility failed to revise current interventions or to develop new interventions to prevent further falls. The staff sent a note to the PCP regarding assessment for a possible fracture but did not receive a response. -7/15/24 at 9:20 AM the resident had been positioned in a wheelchair at a table in the lobby area. The wheelchair brakes had been locked. The resident attempted to move the wheelchair back away from the table and tipped over backwards in the chair. The resident was unable to bear weight with continued complaints of hip pain. At 10:30 AM the resident was transferred to the emergency room (ER) for assessment. -7/15/24 at 2:49 PM anti-tip bars were placed on the resident's wheelchair after returned from the ER with diagnosis of 2 pelvic fractures. -7/17/24 at 4:22 PM the resident was found on the floor beside the resident's bed. The resident's incontinence brief was partially removed and there was urine on the floor. Staff identified interventions to toilet the resident every 2 hours and to position the resident to the middle of the mattress. -7/18/24 at 2: 25 PM the resident was found on the floor next to the resident's bed. The resident had a scoop mattress and body pillow in the bed when staff had checked the resident 2 minutes prior to the fall. An intervention was identified for a fall mat to the floor next to the resident's bed. -7/19/24 at 10:00 PM the resident had passed away. An interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)-B on 9/12/24 at 9:57 AM confirmed the following: -2/27/24 at 1:00 PM after the resident's fall, the staff were to do 30-minute checks for 8 hours. No further interventions were developed to prevent further falls and no casual factors were identified. -2/29/24 at 7:45 AM the resident was found on the floor in the resident's room. No causal factors were indicated. Medications were reviewed but no changes were made to prevent further falls. -4/11/24 at 4:00 PM when the resident was found on their knees, no casual factors were identified, and no additional interventions were developed. -4/19/24 at 11:07 AM the resident was found on the floor of the resident's room with brief and slacks lowered. Education was provided to the resident regarding calling for assistance despite the resident's confusion and safety impairment. -6/14/24 the resident was admitted to Hospice. -7/14/24 at 9:00 PM the resident was found on the floor of the resident's room. The resident had been restless earlier in the shift and had been positioned at the Nurse's Station for constant monitoring. The resident had complained of right hip pain and a facsimile was sent to the PCP regarding assessment for fracture of the resident's right hip. The facility again asked the family about moving the resident to the Memory Unit, but the family refused. -7/15/24 at 9:20 AM the resident had another fall when the resident tipped the wheelchair over backwards. The resident continued to complain of hip pain and was unable to bear weight. At 10:30 AM the resident was sent to the ER for evaluation. The resident was found to have 2 fractures of the resident's right pelvis. Anti-tip bars were placed on the resident's wheelchair upon return from the hospital and staff were instructed not to lock the wheelchair brakes when the resident was at the table. -7/17/24 at 3:25 PM the resident had another fall out of bed. The staff were educated to position the resident in the middle of the bed and to toilet the resident every 2 hours. -7/18/24 at 2:25 PM staff had checked on the resident who had been lying in bed with the scoop mattress and a body pillow. Two minutes later the resident was found on the floor. A fall mat was placed on the floor next to the resident's bed. -7/19/24 at 10:00 PM the resident passed away. C. Review of Resident 29's MDS dated [DATE] revealed diagnoses of non-traumatic brain dysfunction, Alzheimer's disease, depression, anxiety, and dementia. The MDS further indicated Resident 29 had: -severely impaired cognition, -behaviors which included resistance with cares, wandering and verbal behaviors directed toward others, -was dependent on staff for assist with personal hygiene, dressing, bed mobility and transfers, -incontinence of bowel and bladder, and -experienced 2 or more falls with no injury. Review of Resident 29's Nursing Progress Notes revealed the following: -1/13/24 at 4:10 AM the resident was on the bathroom floor and was incontinent of urine. Staff felt the resident had been awakened on safety rounds. New interventions were identified to have staff do rounds more quietly and to toilet the resident at least 2 times throughout the night. -1/14/24 at 10:11 PM the resident was found on the floor in the corridor. No causal factors were identified, and staff indicated an intervention for therapy to re-screen the resident even though the resident was currently on therapy caseload. -1/15/24 at 8:00 PM the resident was found sitting on the floor of the resident's room. Family was concerned about a possible urinary tract infection (UTI) and new orders for a urinalysis. 1/18/24 a new antibiotic was ordered to treat the infection. -3/13/24 at 1:07 PM the resident was found on the floor next to the resident's bed. No causal factors were identified. The facility completed urinalysis which was negative, and therapy re-screened the resident but did not pick up for therapy. -5/14/24 at 11:28 PM the resident was observed seated on the floor in front of the recliner. Staff assisted the resident out to the commons area for closer supervision. Staff were to do frequent checks and encourage the resident to remain in the recliner in the commons area for supervision. In addition, a new order was received to increase the resident's Tylenol Arthritis to three times a day for pain control. -6/25/24 at 3:30 PM the resident was found sitting on the floor of the resident's room. The resident was assisted into the wheelchair and out to the common's area for closer supervision. Further review revealed no causal factors were determined and no additional interventions were identified. -6/26/24 at 2:22 AM the resident was found on the floor next to the resident's bed and in front of the wheelchair. The resident was incontinent of urine. A new intervention was developed for use of a pancake call light which was to be positioned on the right side of the bed. -6/30/24 at 3:10 PM the resident was lowered to the floor when became unsteady during assisted toileting transfer. Further review revealed no evidence current fall interventions were revised or new interventions developed. -8/6/24 at 2:29 PM the resident was found on the floor of the commons area next to the resident's wheelchair. The resident had attempted to stand and sat down on the floor. An intervention was put into place for one staff on the Memory Unit to always supervise the resident. -8/28/24 at 11:00 PM the staff entered the resident's room and witnessed the resident stand and then slide down to the floor. The resident was barefoot and had been incontinent of urine. An intervention was added to the resident's treatment sheet for the Charge Nurse to verify the resident was wearing gripper slippers when not wearing shoes. 9/8/24 at 5:47 AM the was found seated on the floor in the doorway of the resident's room. The resident was not wearing shoes or the gripper socks. Staff received written education regarding use of the gripper socks and the resident's bed was no longer to be placed in the lowered position but was to be placed at the height of the resident's wheelchair. During an interview pm 9/11/24 at 11:22 AM, LPN-B confirmed the following regarding fall prevention assessment and interventions for Resident 29: -1/14/24 fall at 10:11 PM there were no causal factors identified regarding the resident's fall. A screen went out to have therapy re-screen the resident despite already being on their case load. No further interventions were identified. -3/13/24 fall at 1:07 PM there were no causal factors identified. A urinalysis was completed and was negative. In addition, a therapy screen was completed but therapy did not pick the resident up for treatment. No new interventions were indicated to prevent further falls. -6/25/24 at 3:30 PM the resident was found on the floor of the resident' room. The resident was assisted into the wheelchair and then out to the common's area for increased supervision at the time of the fall. No causal factors and no further interventions were identified. -6/30/24 at 3:10 PM the resident fell when the staff were transferring the resident onto the toilet. There was no evidence current interventions were revised or additional interventions developed.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0757 (Tag F0757)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09 Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident 4's antibiotic ointment use had an ordered duration to prevent potential adver...

Read full inspector narrative →
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09 Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident 4's antibiotic ointment use had an ordered duration to prevent potential adverse outcomes. The sample size was 5 and the facility census was 34. Findings are: A. Review of the facility undated policy Antibiotic Stewardship; revealed the following: -The facility's antibiotic stewardship program promoted the appropriate use of antibiotics and a system of monitoring to improve resident outcomes and reduce antibiotic resistance. -Antibiotic were prescribed for the correct indication, dose, and duration to appropriately treat the resident while attempting to reduce the development of resistant organisms or other adverse consequences or outcomes. Review of Resident 4's Minimum Data Set (MDS-federally mandated comprehensive assessment used to develop resident Care Plans) dated 6/21/24 revealed the resident took antibiotic medication. Further review revealed the resident received enteral (nutrition provided using the gut or tube feeding) nutrition. Review of Resident 4's Care Plan with a revision date of 7/17/23 revealed the resident had a feeding tube (tube inserted through the abdominal wall and into the stomach to provide nourishment) and staff were to change the dressing to the tube site daily, observe for signs and symptoms of infection and apply Bacitracin (antibiotic) ointment to the site twice daily every 3rd day. Review of Resident 4's Medication Administration Record (MAR) date August 2024 revealed the resident received Bacitracin Ointment starting 2/27/19 (5 and ½ years). During an interview on 9/11/24 at 10:41 AM the Director of Nursing confirmed the facility did not have an ordered stop date or duration of use orders for Resident 4's Bacitracin ointment. In addition, the ongoing use of an antibiotic without a defined duration or clinical rationale for continued use was not in accordance with the facility antibiotic stewardship policy.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0761 (Tag F0761)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

LICENSURE REFERENCE NUMBER 175 NAC 12-006.12E1 Based on observation, record review and interview; the facility failed to provide safe storage of drugs and biological's as a medication cart was left un...

Read full inspector narrative →
LICENSURE REFERENCE NUMBER 175 NAC 12-006.12E1 Based on observation, record review and interview; the facility failed to provide safe storage of drugs and biological's as a medication cart was left unlocked and unattended, and medications were left unsecured in Resident 21's room. The sample size was 6 and the facility census was 34. Findings are: A. Review of the facility policy titled Medication Labeling and Storage with a revision date of 2/23 revealed the following: -the facility was to store all drugs and biological's in a safe, secure, and orderly manner; -the Charge Nurse was responsible for maintaining medication storage and preparation areas in a clean, safe, and sanitary manner, and -compartments (including, but not limited to, drawers, cabinets, rooms, refrigerators, carts, and boxes) containing drugs and biological's were to be locked when not in use, and trays or carts used to transport such items were not to be left unattended if open or otherwise potentially available to others. B. Observations in Resident 21's room revealed the following: -9/9/24 at 8:30 AM a clear medication cup was observed lying on its side atop a blanket on the floor next to the resident's recliner. One pill (Plavix 75 milligram (mg) 1 tablet) remained in the cup. Further observation revealed the presence of 7 additional medications in the folds of the blanket (Amlodipine (used to treat high blood pressure) 5 mg 1 tablet, Isorbide (medication used to treat chest pain) 30 mg 1 tablet, Loratadine (used to treat allergies) 10 mg 1 tablet, Pantoprazole (used to treat heart burn) 40 mg 1 tablet, Eliquis (blood thinner) 2.5 mg 1 tablet, Guaifenesin (used to treat cough) 600 mg 1 capsule and Metoprolol (used to treat high blood pressure) 25 mg 1 tablet). Resident 21 confirmed the staff would leave the resident's morning medications in the resident's room as the resident preferred to take the medication with the breakfast meal. -9/10/24 at 8:38 AM the resident was seated in a recliner in the resident's room. Next to the chair on a table was a clear medication cup which contained the same 8 medications as the previous day. C. During an observation on 9/11/24 at 8:31 AM, the Medication Cart which was positioned outside of the dining room in the 300 corridor was left unlocked and no staff were observed in the immediate area. At 8:34 AM, Medication Aide (MA)-H returned to the cart. MA-H confirmed the cart had been left unlocked and unattended while the MA was in the dining room. D. During interview on 9/11/24 at 3:09 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) verified medications were to be stored inside the medication cart and the medication cart was to be always locked when unattended. In addition, Resident 21 had not been assessed and did not have an order for self-administration of medications.
MINOR (C)

Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact

Staffing Data (Tag F0851)

Minor procedural issue · This affected most or all residents

Based on record review and interview: the facility failed to submit their Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) data for quarter 3 of 2024 as required. This had the potential to affect all residents residing wi...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review and interview: the facility failed to submit their Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) data for quarter 3 of 2024 as required. This had the potential to affect all residents residing within the facility. The facility identified a census of 34. Findings are: A record review of the PBJ report from Centers for Medicare and Medicaid services (CMS) revealed the facility had failed to submit data for the third quarter (April 1 to July 30) in 2024. The PBJ report is a collection of staffing information and is a requirement of all long-term facilities to promote accountability and consistency. During an interview on 9/10/24 at 3:09 PM, the Provisional Administrator, revealed the facility did not know how to submit the required information and confirmed no information had been submitted.
Aug 2023 8 deficiencies 1 Harm
SERIOUS (G)

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Notification of Changes (Tag F0580)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** C. Review of Resident 29's MDS dated [DATE] revealed the following: -the resident was cognitively intact, - the resident was in...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** C. Review of Resident 29's MDS dated [DATE] revealed the following: -the resident was cognitively intact, - the resident was independent with transfers and dressing, needed supervision with eating, and limited assistance with toileting, - had diagnosis of cancer, heart failure, renal (kidney) disease, and pulmonary (lung) disease, -had shortness of breath with exertion and when lying flat, and -was on supplemental oxygen. Review of Resident 29's Care Plan with a last revision date of 8/19/23 revealed the following: -the resident was sent to the hospital on 8/12/23 and readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of pneumonia, -the resident could be tested for Covid-19 as needed, and -the resident was to wear oxygen during the night and staff were to offer oxygen during the day. Review of Resident 29's Progress Notes dated 8/11/23 at 7:30 PM revealed the resident complained of not feeling good and stated that when the resident coughed, the residents whole body hurt. The resident's lung sounds were diminished (decreased air movement which makes lung sounds hard to hear) and had wheezes. The resident reported coughing up green phlegm. The resident's oxygen saturation was at 85% (normal is above 90) and oxygen was placed on the resident and a fax was sent to the provider. Review of the Resident 29's Progress Notes dated 8/12/23 at 10:44 AM revealed the resident stated the resident was not feeling good and didn't want to get out of bed. The resident reported every time the resident coughed, it hurt the residents back and abdomen. The resident asked the Registered Nurse to call (gender) son and that the resident wanted to be seen in the clinic that day. The RN assessed the resident and the resident continued to have diminished lung sounds and wheezing. Further review revealed at 11:40 AM the son updated the facility that the resident was admitted to the hospital with pneumonia. Interview with Resident 29 on 8/21/23 at 10:32 AM revealed the resident was recently in the hospital with pneumonia and was taking an antibiotic. Interview on 8/22/23 at 12:15 PM with RN-R revealed that if the nurse faxes the physician after clinic hours or on a weekend, they will follow up the next day or on Monday. Further interview at 2:30 PM revealed if the nurse faxes on the weekend, they were to follow up or refax on Monday, but they would monitor the resident's symptoms. If the condition persisted or worsened, they were to call the Provider. Interview on 8/22/23 at 2:44 PM interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN-Q) revealed that if the resident's condition persisted the nurses were to send the resident to the ER if the provider or family wanted. Interview on 8/22/23 at 2:49 PM Interview with RN-R revealed the facility had no evidence the facility notified the provider regarding Resident 29's condition. Further interview confirmed no documentation that the fax was followed up on and that the resident requested to be seen by the provider the next day and was admitted to the hospital. Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.04C3a(6) Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify the physician of a significant change for Resident's 8 and 29. The sample size was 18 and the facility census was 33. Findings are: A. Review of the facility policy Change in a Resident's Condition or Status with a revision date of 2/2021 revealed the following; -the facility promptly notified the resident, the attending physician, and the resident representative of changes in resident's condition/status. -the nurse notified the resident's attending physician or physician on call when there had been a change in the resident's physical/emotional/mental condition, or a need to alter the resident's medical treatment significantly, -the facility defined a significant change of condition as a major decline or improvement in the resident's status that would not normally resolve itself without intervention, impacted more than one area of the resident's health status, and required interdisciplinary review and/or revision to the care plan, and -except for in emergencies, notifications of change would be made within 24 hours of a change occurring, B. Review of Resident 8's Minimum Data Set (MDS-federally mandated comprehensive assessment used in the development of resident care plans) dated 7/21/23 revealed the following; -The resident received limited assistance with bed mobility, transfers, and toileting, -had a diagnosis of heart disease, high blood pressure, anxiety, depression, and -used oxygen. Review of Resident 8's Care Plan with a revision date of 8/15/23 revealed the following; -the resident returned to the facility following a hospitalization for sepsis from a broken tooth and pneumonia, -used oxygen as needed, and -needed limited assistance of 1 staff member for bed mobility, transfers, and hygiene. Review of Resident 8's Progress Notes revealed the following; -On 8/3/23 at 2:46 PM the resident complained of feeling tired and used a wheelchair to get to and from meals. -On 8/4/23 at 2:35 AM the resident had activity intolerance, tired quickly after minimum efforts, used a wheelchair to get to and from meals and used a Stand-up Lift -(mechanical lift on wheels used to aid the resident to a standing position and move the resident from a sitting to a standing position and then back to a sitting position) was activity intolerant, and tired easily. -On 8/4/23 at 7:03 PM the resident reported terrible when asked how they were, complained of a headache, right arm and shoulder pain, and used a wheelchair to and from meals. -On 8/5/23 at 3:28 AM the resident continued to be activity intolerant, used a wheelchair for meals, and required 2 staff to transfer. -On 8/5/23 at 4:04 PM the resident had been coughing up mucus, had rattling lung sounds, continued to feel weak, and staff had used the stand lift for transfers. The facility faxed the physician requesting nebulizer (inhaled breathing treatments often used to treat shortness of breath, chronic lung conditions, or acute lung/breathing conditions) and no evidence the physician responded to the request. -On 8/6/23 at 1:27 AM the resident had a body temperature of 99 degrees and had coarse lung sounds, and a productive cough with thick phlegm. -On 8/6/23 at 9:49 AM the resident had a body temperature of 100.3 degrees, oxygen saturations between 85-88% (90 -100 is normal), and unstable vital signs, a pain rating of 10 out of 10, and was sent to the emergency room (ER) by ambulance. (At the time of the transfer the physician had still not responded to the fax sent on the previous day). Review of a Fax Communication to Physician for Resident 8 dated 8/5/23 revealed no response other than a signature to a request for nebulizer treatment and an x-ray that was not noted (signed by a nurse acknowledging the physician directions) until 8/7/23 (1 day after the resident had been taken to the emergency room (ER) and admitted to the hospital). During an interview on 8/23/23 at 11:15 AM Registered Nurse (RN)-G confirmed the facility did not receive a signed physician response for Resident 8, in regard to the facilities request for a nebulizer treatment and/or an x-ray for Resident 8 on 8/5/23 until 2 days later on 8/7/23 at which time the resident had already been taken to the ER for evaluation. During an interview on 8/23/23 at 11:30 AM the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed the facility had no evidence the facility attempted to contact the physician for Resident 8 after not receiving a fax response to a request for nebulizer treatments and an x-ray on 8/5/23. Further interview confirmed the resident was taken to the ER on [DATE] for unstable vital signs and continued condition decline. In addition, the DON confirmed the facility should have contacted the physician again on 8/5/23 when a response was not received regarding the request for treatment of the resident's change in condition.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0645 (Tag F0645)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09A Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident 14's ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09A Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident 14's Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR-screening used to determine if a person had or was suspected of having Mental Illness (MI), Intellectual Disability (ID) or a Related Condition (RC)) was completed accurately. The sample size was 6 and the facility census was 16. Findings are: Review of the facility policy Behavioral Assessment, Intervention and Monitoring with a revision date of 3/2019 revealed the following; -the facility provided residents with behavioral health services as needed to attain and/or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being in accordance with the comprehensive assessment and plan of care. -behavioral symptoms were identified using facility approved behavioral screening tools and the comprehensive assessment, -residents who did not display symptoms of, or had not been diagnosed with, mental, psychiatric, psychosocial adjustment, substance abuse or post-traumatic stress disorder(s) would not develop behavioral disturbances that could not be attributed to specific clinical conditions that made them unavoidable, -behavioral health services were provided by qualified staff who had the competencies and skills necessary to provide appropriate services, -residents would have minimal complications associated with the management of altered or impaired behavior, and -the facility would comply with regulatory requirement related to the use of medications to manage behavioral changes, -as part of the initial assessment, the nursing staff and attending physician would identify individuals with a history of impaired cognition, altered behavior, substance use disorder, or mental disorder, -all residents would receive a Level 1 PASRR-screen prior to admission, -if the level 1 screen indicated that the individual met the criteria for MI, ID or RC the resident would be referred to the state PASRR representative for a Level 2 (comprehensive evaluation required as a result of a positive level 1 screen used to determine whether placement or continued stay in a Nursing Facility was appropriate) evaluation and determination process, and -the level 2 evaluation report would be used when conducting the resident assessment and developing the care plan. Review of Resident 14's Minimum Data Set (MDS-federally mandated comprehensive assessment used in the development of resident care plans) dated 8/1/22 revealed the following; -The resident was admitted on [DATE], -was not considered by the state PASRR to have MI, ID or RD, and -had diagnoses of depression, bipolar disorder (mood disorder characterized by depressive lows and manic highs), and schizophrenia (a range of problems affecting thinking, behavior, and emotions). Review of Resident 14's PASRR completed by the facility on 7/26/22 revealed the resident had no suspected Mental Illness or Related Disorder. Review of Resident 14's Diagnosis Report dated 7/26/22 revealed the following diagnoses; Adjustment Disorder with mixed anxiety and depression (the development of emotion and or behavior symptoms related to a stressor but out of proportion to the stressor) and Schizoaffective Disorder, bipolar type (a chronic mental health condition characterized by symptoms of schizophrenia, such as delusions and hallucinations and symptoms of mood disorders such as mania or depression). Review of Resident 14's Care Plan with a revision date of 8/5/23 revealed the resident had an Adjustment Disorder with mixed anxiety and depressed mood, Schizophrenia, Schizoaffective Disorder, and the resident took psychotropic (drugs that affect a person's mental state) medications. During an interview on 8/22/23 at 1:42 PM the Social Services Director confirmed Resident 14's PASRR was completed incorrectly and did not accurately reflect the resident's MI diagnoses. In addition, due to the incorrect level 1 PASRR screen a level 2 PASRR was not completed.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** LICENSURE REFERENCE NUMBER 175 NAC 12-006.09D7(a) (b) Based on record review and interview; the facility failed to identify caus...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** LICENSURE REFERENCE NUMBER 175 NAC 12-006.09D7(a) (b) Based on record review and interview; the facility failed to identify causal factors, to develop new interventions and/or revise current interventions to prevent ongoing falls for 2 (Residents 10 and 19) of 4 sampled residents. The facility census was 33. Findings are: A. Review of Resident 19's Minimum Data Set (MDS-a federally mandated comprehensive assessment tool used for care planning) dated 6/2/23 revealed the resident was admitted [DATE] with diagnoses of dementia, anxiety, depression, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) and hip fracture. The following was assessed regarding the resident: -cognition was severely impaired; -behaviors which included delusions, verbal and physical behaviors directed at others, rejection of cares and wandering; -extensive staff assistance with transfers, bed mobility, dressing, toilet use and personal hygiene; -frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder; -not steady and only able to stabilize with staff assistance during transfers, when walking and when moving from a seated to standing position; and -functional limitation of range of motion to one side of lower extremities. Review of an Incident Report dated 12/21/22 at 1:41 PM revealed the resident was found on the floor of the resident's room. The resident's foot was caught between the recliner and a magazine rack. The resident reported standing at the window and looking out. When the resident turned around, the resident's foot got caught between the recliner and a magazine rack. A new intervention was developed to move the magazine rack to the other side of the recliner. Review of a Progress Note dated 1/9/23 at 5:41 AM revealed the resident fell outside and landed on bottom when out walking with family. No injury was noted. Further review of the resident's medical record revealed no evidence causal factors were assessed, a new intervention developed, or current fall interventions revised to prevent further falls. Review of an Incident Report dated 2/27/23 at 4:15 AM revealed the staff heard a noise and found the resident lying on the floor in the center of the resident's room. The resident indicated going to the bathroom, slipping and falling. The resident complained of left hip pain. The resident was sent to the emergency room for evaluation and then admitted to the hospital with a fractured hip. Review of a facility investigation dated 3/2/23 revealed causal factors for the resident's fall on 2/27/23 included drowsiness, a current urinary tract infection and incontinence. The resident was not wearing proper footwear and had self-transferred and ambulated to the bathroom without assistance. New interventions included reminding the resident to use the call light for assistance with toileting, treatment of infection, staff to apply gripper socks at night and the resident was started on Physical Therapy. B. Review of Resident 10's MDS dated [DATE] revealed the resident was admitted [DATE] with diagnoses of dementia, multiple sclerosis, seizure disorder, anxiety and depression. The following was assessed regarding resident 10: -cognition was severely impaired; -behaviors which included delusions, verbal and physical behaviors directed at others and other behavioral symptoms (hitting or scratching self, pacing, rummaging, public sexual acts, disrobing in public, throwing or smearing food or bodily wastes or verbal/vocal symptoms like screaming or making disruptive noises) and rejection of cares; -requires extensive staff assistance with transfers, bed mobility, dressing, toilet use and personal hygiene; -always incontinent of bowel and bladder; and -2 or more falls without injury and 1 fall with injury (except major) since the previous assessment. Review of an Incident Report dated 3/17/23 at 8:25 PM revealed the resident was found on the floor between the wheelchair and the resident's bed. The resident reported trying to get into the bed. An intervention was identified to position the resident in the commons area after meals while waiting for staff to assist into bed. Review of an Incident Report dated 4/19/23 at 7:15 PM revealed the resident was lowered to the floor by staff while using the sit-to-stand mechanical lift (device that allows transfer from a seated to a standing position. Designed to support only the upper body and requires the resident have some weight-bearing capability). Staff failed to secure the resident's lower extremities in the lift and resident could not maintain foot placement on the lift. An intervention was identified to educate the staff on proper use of the lift. Review of an Incident Note dated 5/2/23 at 5:30 PM revealed the resident had a witnessed fall. The staff had assisted the resident to a seated position on the side of the bed. The resident leaned over and then fell onto the floor. An intervention was identified for staff to use 2 assist to transfer the resident out of bed. Review of an Incident Report dated 6/30/23 at 11:15 AM revealed the resident was found on the floor between the resident's bed and the sit-to-stand lift. Further review of the report indicated a causal factor for the resident's fall related to incorrect use of the lift. An Agency staff had attempted to transfer the resident by themselves with the lift instead of using 2 staff. C. Interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 8/22/23 at 2:37 PM revealed the Charge Nurses were to complete an Incident Report for each resident fall. Staff were to determine causal factors for falls and then revise current interventions or develop new fall interventions. The DON confirmed the following: -staff failed to complete an Incident Report after Resident 19's fall on 1/9/23 at 5:41 AM. No causal factors were identified, and interventions were not revised or new interventions for fall prevention developed; and -Resident 10 had falls on 4/19/23 at 7:15 PM, 5/2/23 at 5:30 PM and on 6/30/23 at 11:15 AM due to staff failure to transfer the resident and/or to use the mechanical lift in accordance with facility policy. Interventions were identified for education to be provided to the staff however, there was no evidence the facility provided education to all staff regarding transfers and use of the lift for the resident.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Medication Errors (Tag F0758)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12.006019D Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that PRN (as n...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12.006019D Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that PRN (as needed) orders for psychotropic (any drug capable of affecting the mind, emotions, and behavior) drugs are limited to 14 days or have a duration documented by the prescriber for 1 sampled resident (Resident 85). Facility census was 33 and the sample size was 5. Findings are: A. Review of the facility policy Behavioral Assessment, Intervention and Monitoring with revision date of 3/2019 revealed when a medication was prescribed for behavioral symptoms, documentation will include: -rationale for use; -potential underlying causes of behavior; -other approaches and interventions tried prior to use of antipsychotic medications; -potential risks and benefits of medications; -specific target behaviors and expected outcomes; -duration; -dosage; -monitoring of adverse consequences and efficacy; and -plans for gradual dose reduction. B. Review of the MDS (Minimum Data Set (a federally mandated comprehensive assessment tool used for care planning) dated 08/07/23 revealed the resident was admitted [DATE] with diagnosis of anxiety, psychotic disorder, nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage, delusional disorder and insomnia. The following was assessed regarding the resident: -moderate cognitive impairment; and -behaviors which included delusions, other behavioral symptoms (physical symptoms such as hitting or scratching self, pacing, rummaging, public sexual acts, disrobing in public, throwing or smearing food or bodily wastes, or verbal/vocal symptoms like screaming or disruptive sounds) not directed at others, rejection of cares and wandering. A record review of the 8/23/23 MAR (Medication Administration Record) revealed Resident 85 had an order dated 8/3/23 for Xanax (medication used to treat anxiety and panic disorder) 0.25 mg (milligrams) every 24 hours as needed for anxiety, agitation and paranoia. There was no stop date, duration or reevaluation date identified. Interview with the Director of Nursing on 8/22/23 at 1:46 PM confirmed the resident's as needed order for Xanax did not have a duration identified on the current order dated 8/3/23 and use had exceeded 14 days. Interview with the Director of Nursing on 8/22/23 at 1:46 PM confirmed the resident's as needed order for Xanax did not have a duration identified on the current order dated 8/3/23 and use had exceeded 14 days.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** C. Review of Resident 29's MDS dated [DATE] revealed the following: -the resident was cognitively intact, - the resident was in...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** C. Review of Resident 29's MDS dated [DATE] revealed the following: -the resident was cognitively intact, - the resident was independent with transfers and dressing, needed supervision with eating, and limited assistance with toileting, - had diagnosis of cancer, heart failure, renal (kidney) disease, and pulmonary (lung) disease, -had shortness of breath with exertion and when lying flat, and -was on supplemental oxygen. Review of Resident 29's Care Plan with a last revision date of 8/19/23 revealed the following: -the resident was sent to the hospital on 8/12/23 and readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of pneumonia, -the resident could be tested for Covid-19 as needed, and -the resident was to wear oxygen during the night and staff were to offer oxygen during the day. Review of Resident 29's Progress Notes dated 8/11/23 at 7:30 PM revealed the resident complained of not feeling good and stated that when the resident coughed, the resident's whole body hurt. The resident's lung sounds were diminished (decreased air movement which makes lung sounds hard to hear) and had wheezes. The resident reported coughing up green phlegm. The resident's oxygen saturation was at 85% (normal is above 90), oxygen was placed on the resident and a fax was sent to the provider. Review of the Resident 29's Progress Notes dated 8/12/23 at 10:44 AM revealed the resident stated the resident was not feeling good and didn't want to get out of bed. The resident reported every time the resident coughed, it hurt the resident's back and abdomen. The resident asked the Registered Nurse (RN) on duty to call her son and that the resident wanted to be seen in the clinic that day. The RN assessed the resident and the resident continued to have diminished lung sounds and wheezing. Interview with Resident 29 on 8/21/23 at 10:32 AM revealed the resident was recently in the hospital with pneumonia and was taking an antibiotic. 8/22/23 at 12:10 PM Interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN-Q) revealed that if the resident was tested for Covid-19, it would be noted in the Progress Notes along with the results. LPN-Q confirmed there were no Progress Notes with testing or results documented for 8/11/23 or 8/12/23. LPN-Q also confirmed that residents who have symptoms of Covid-19 such as coughing, shortness of breath or fever were to be tested for Covid-19. Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.17 Based on record review and interview the facility failed to prevent the potential spread of COVID-19 by not testing Residents 8 and 29 when potential symptoms of COVID -19 were present. The sample size was 16 and the facility census was 33. Findings are: A. Review of the facility policy Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) -Testing Residents with a revision date on 9/2022 revealed the following; -Residents were tested for the SARS-CoV2 virus to detect the presence of current infections (viral testing) and to help prevent the transmission of COVID-19 in the facility. -All resident's regardless of their vaccination status were actively monitored for fever and symptoms consistent with COVID-19. -Residents were asked to report if they felt feverish or had symptoms consistent with COVID-19 or an acute respiratory infection. -Any resident with even mild symptoms of COVID-19 received a viral test as soon as possible due to the difficulty in distinguishing between COVID-19, influenza, and or acute respiratory infections based on symptoms alone. and -The facility would record all testing offered, completed, the results of the testing, and specific actions taken with the resident tested. B. Review of Resident 8's Minimum Data Set (MDS-federally mandated comprehensive assessment used in the development of resident care plans) dated 7/21/23 revealed the following; -The resident received limited assistance with bed mobility, transfers, and toileting, -had a diagnosis of heart disease, high blood pressure, anxiety, and depression, and -used oxygen. Review of Resident 8's Care Plan with a revision date of 8/15/23 revealed the following; -The resident returned to the facility following a hospitalization for sepsis from a broken tooth and pneumonia -used oxygen as needed, and -needed limited assistance of 1 staff member for bed mobility, transfers, and hygiene. Review of Resident 8's Progress Notes revealed the following; -On 8/3/23 at 2:46 PM the resident complained of feeling tired and used a wheelchair to get to and from meals. -On 8/4/23 at 2:35 AM the resident had activity intolerance, tired quickly after minimum efforts, used a wheelchair to get to and from meals and used a Stand-up Lift -mechanical lift on wheels used to aid the resident to a standing position and move the resident from a sitting to a standing position and then back to a sitting position) and was activity intolerant, tired easily, and the stand-up lift was being used for transfers. -On 8/4/23 at 7:03 PM the resident reported terrible when asked how they were, complained of a headache, right arm and shoulder pain, and used a wheelchair to and from meals. -On 8/5/23 at 3:28 AM the resident continued to be activity intolerant, used a wheelchair for meals, and required 2 staff to transfer. -On 8/5/23 at 4:04 PM the resident had been coughing up mucus, had rattling lung sounds, continued to feel weak, and staff had used the stand lift for transfers. The facility faxed the physician requesting nebulizer (inhaled breathing treatments often used to treat shortness of breath, chronic lung conditions, or acute lung/breathing conditions) and no evidence the physician responded to the request. -On 8/6/23 at 1:27 AM the resident had a body temperature of 99 degrees and had coarse lung sounds, and a productive cough with thick phlegm. -On 8/6/23 at 9:49 AM the resident had a body temperature of 100.3 degrees, oxygen saturations between 85-88% (90 -100 is normal), and unstable vital signs, a pain rating of 10 out of 10, and was sent to the emergency room (ER) by ambulance. During an Interview on 8/23/23 at 10:20 AM the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed the facility did not COVID-19 test Resident 8 who had symptoms of potential COVID 19.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0726 (Tag F0726)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

LICENSURE REFERENCE NUMBER 175 NAC 12-006.10A3 Based on record review and interview; the facility failed to ensure staff had the required certification when administering medications for 1 Medication ...

Read full inspector narrative →
LICENSURE REFERENCE NUMBER 175 NAC 12-006.10A3 Based on record review and interview; the facility failed to ensure staff had the required certification when administering medications for 1 Medication Aide (MA-S). The total sample size was 18 and the facility census was 33. Findings are: Review of MA-S's Certification of Nebraska Licensure form indicated MA-S was not currently registered on the MA registry with a 40-hour MA license. Review of the facility Nursing Schedule from 3/1/23 through 5/31/23 revealed MA-S was scheduled as an MA and administered medication to residents on: -3/20, 3/21, 3/22, 3/25, 3/26, 3/28, 3/29 and 3/30; -4/4, 4/5, 4/6, 4/10, 4/11 and 4/12; and -5/10, 5/15, 5/16, 5/24 and 5/25. Interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 8/22/23 at 1:30 PM revealed MA-S was employed from a staffing agency with a contract from 3/1/23 to 6/5/23. The facility failed to check MA-S' license and was not aware MA-S did not have a 40-hour MA license. The DON confirmed MA-S administered medications throughout 3/23, 4/23 and 5/23 without the required license.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0882 (Tag F0882)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.17 Based on interview and record review; the facility failed to ensure the designated Infection Preventionist (IP-staff who looks for patterns, observes and e...

Read full inspector narrative →
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.17 Based on interview and record review; the facility failed to ensure the designated Infection Preventionist (IP-staff who looks for patterns, observes and educates staff on infection control and compiles infection data) met the required qualifications for the position and was not the Director of Nursing (DON) . This had the potential to affect all residents. The total sample size was 18 and the census was 33. A. Review of the facility policy Infection Preventionist with a revision date of 9/22 revealed the following responsibilities were identified for the role: -coordinates the development and monitoring of infection prevention and control program; -reports information related to compliance with the infection prevention and control program to the Administrator and the Quality Assurance team; -collects, analyzes and provides infection antibiotic usage data and trends to nursing staff and health care practitioners; and -provides education and training on evidenced based infection prevention and control practices. The IP is employed on site and at least part time. Additional hours are scheduled as indicated by the needs identified in the facility assessment. The IP is scheduled with enough time to properly assess, develop, implement, monitor and manage the Infection Prevention Control Program, address training requirements and participate in required committees such as Quality Assurance. B. During the entrance conference on 8/21/23 at 7:42 AM, the DON confirmed working a minimum of 40 hours each week as the DON and was also the only designated facility IP. During an interview on 8/21/23 at 03:04 PM, the Administrator confirmed the facility did not have an IP who was employed at least part time and the DON was functioning as both the IP and the DON.
MINOR (C)

Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact

Employment Screening (Tag F0606)

Minor procedural issue · This affected most or all residents

Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.04A3b Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure background checks through the state nurse aide registry were completed on 3 of 5 emp...

Read full inspector narrative →
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.04A3b Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure background checks through the state nurse aide registry were completed on 3 of 5 employees. The facility census was 33. Findings are: A. Review of the Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation Prevention policy with a revised date of April 2021 revealed, the facility would conduct background checks and not knowingly employ or otherwise engage any individual who: -has been found guilty of abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of property, or mistreatment by a court of law; -had a negative finding in the state nurse aide registry concerning abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment of residents or misappropriation of their property; and/or -a disciplinary action in effect against his or her professional license by a state licensure body as a result of a finding of abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment of residents or misappropriation of resident property. B. A Review of 5 employee files on 8/23/23 revealed no evidence Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)-P, Environmental Services staff (EVS)-O, and Dietary Aide (DA)-N had background checks completed through the state nurse aide registry at the time they were hired. LPN-P was hired 8/17/23, EVS-O was hired 7/6/23 and DA-N was hired 7/20/23. C. An interview with the Director of Nurses (DON) on 8/23/23 at 10:15 AM, confirmed there was no evidence LPN-P, EVS-O and DA-N had background checks completed through the state nurse aide registry prior to their hired dates.
Apr 2023 3 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.05(9) Based on interview and record review; the facility failed to ensure agency staff (staff hired on a per diem basis from a staffing company) had the requi...

Read full inspector narrative →
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.05(9) Based on interview and record review; the facility failed to ensure agency staff (staff hired on a per diem basis from a staffing company) had the required background checks, and required abuse training to protect Residents 6, 7, and 8 from potential abuse and or misappropriation, failed to identify Resident 8's behavior as potential abuse, and failed to report staff treatment of Resident's 7 and 8 as potential abuse. The sample size was 8 and the facility census was 33. Findings are: A. Review of the facility policy Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation Prevention Program date 4/2021 revealed the following; -the resident abuse, neglect, and exploitation prevention program consisted of a facility-wide commitment and resource allocation to support the following objectives; - resident protection, - development of policies to prevent and identify abuse, neglect, and or exploitation or misappropriation, - ensure adequate staffing and support, - conduct employee background checks and not knowingly employ or otherwise engage individuals who had been found guilty of abuse, neglect, exploitation or misappropriation, had findings entered into the state nurse aide registry concerning abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment of residents, or misappropriation of resident property, -establish and maintain a culture of compassion and caring, -provide staff orientation and training that included topics such as abuse prevention, identification, and reporting of abuse, stress management, and handling verbally or physically aggressive resident behavior, -implement measures to address factors that may lead to abusive situations, -identify and investigate all possible incidents of abuse, neglect, mistreatment, or misappropriation of resident property, -investigate and report any allegations within the timeframes required by federal requirements, and -protect residents from any further harm during investigations. B. Review of the facility Standard Facility Contract with the staffing agency AACO dated 10/23/20 revealed the facility had no evidence that AACO was providing abuse training or assuring all employees had undergone required background checks for their employees, prior to providing services for the facility. C. Review of Resident 6's Care Plan dated 8/18/22 revealed the resident was admitted following a hospitalization, and was awaiting an opening at the Veteran's home. The resident had mild cognitive impairment. Review of Resident 6's Progress Notes revealed the following; -on 8/12/22 at 1:15 PM the resident was admitted from the hospital following surgery to remove a kidney, and -on 8/17/22 at 7:22 PM the facility SSD (Social Services Director) received a call from the resident's POA (Power of Attorney) at 5:00 PM reporting the resident was missing $2000 from a billfold. The facility staff conducted a search of the resident's room, and the missing money was not located. Law enforcement was contact. Review of the Facility Reported Incident dated 8/18/22 revealed the facility initiated an immediate investigation of Resident 6's missing money on 8/17/22, including interviews of staff working during the time frame in which the money was determined to be missing. A determination was made that an agency staff NA (Nurse Aid)-P had worked during the prior evening, when the resident's money allegedly came up missing. Additional interviewed staff reported missing money during the same time frame. NA-P was interviewed, and a determination was made to place the NA on suspension pending further investigation. On 8/19/22 The local Police Department informed the facility that NA-P had been charged with theft from a nursing home within the past year. A determination was made that NA-P would not be allowed to return to work in the facility and the staffing agency AACO, that employed NA-P was notified. D. Review of the facility Resident Grievance/Complaint Investigation Report Form dated 3/1/23 revealed the responsible party for Resident 7 reported to the facility SSD (Social Services Director) that on 2/28/23 following an incident of falling, a staff member who was an agency employee was mean and rude including yelling at the resident to get up, and the resident was heard saying ouch. In additional when Resident 8 inquired as to what was going on when yelling was heard, the same agency staff responded by saying it's none of your fucking business. Further reviewed revealed the agency staff was not allowed to return to the facility and the agency was contacted. E. During an interview on 4/5/23 at 11:00 AM the SSD confirmed that agency staff involved in the verbal altercations with Resident's 7 and 8 was no longer allowed to work in the facility following Resident 7's responsible parties report of potential abuse. Further interview revealed the facility had not reported the allegation to the State Agency. F. During an Interview on 4/5/23 at 11:10 AM the Facility Administrator confirmed the facility failed to ensure that agency staff had the required abuse training and background checks conducted prior to working in the facility, and failed to report an allegation of abuse for Resident 7 and Resident 8, following a family report on 3/1/23.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09 Based on interview and record review the facility failed to assess Resident 3 for a change in condition and report the potential change in condition to the...

Read full inspector narrative →
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09 Based on interview and record review the facility failed to assess Resident 3 for a change in condition and report the potential change in condition to the Physician in a timely manner. The sample size was 6 and the facility census was 33. Findings are: Review of the facility policy Change in a Resident's Condition or Status revealed the following; -the facility promptly notified the resident, the attending physician, and the resident representative of changes in the resident's medical/mental condition and/or status, -the nurse would notify the resident's attending physician or on-call physician when there had been, accident/incidents involving the resident, injuries or unknown source, adverse reactions to medications, a significant change in the resident's condition, a need to significantly alter the resident's medical treatment, refusal of medication or treatments 2 or more consecutive times, or a need to transfer or discharge the resident, -prior to notifying the physician the facility nurse would make detailed observations and gather relevant and pertinent information for the provider, -except in emergencies notifications would be made within 24 hours of a condition change, and -a nurse would record in the resident's medical record information relative to the change in the resident's condition. Review of Resident 3's Care Plan dated 3/18/19 with a revision date of 3/30/23 revealed the following; -had impaired cognitive function related to dementia, -required assistance with all activities of daily living, -received all nutrition and hydration through a feeding tube, -required the assistance of 2 staff members for bed mobility, transfers, bathing, toileting (check and change), and dressing, and -was transferred using a full body mechanical lift, Review of Resident 3's Progress Notes revealed the following; -on 3/28/23 the resident was given Acetaminophen (pain medication) for right knee pain. -on 3/30/23 a late entry reflecting Resident 3's status on 3/28/23 revealed the resident's knee was swollen, but not red, not warm, and not bruised and the skin was intact. -on 3/30/23 at 9:53 AM indicated LPN-N was called to the resident's room at approximately 9:15 AM while the resident was lying in bed and the right leg was observed to be deformed above the knee. The medical clinic was contacted and advised the facility to transport the resident to the emergency room (ER) by ambulance. -on 3/30/23 at 10:27 AM LPN-N documented the resident was transferred to the ER by ambulance at 10:15 AM. -on 3/30/23 at 12:32 PM the facility was notified that Resident 3's right leg was fractured, orders were pending, and the resident would be returning to the facility later in the afternoon. -on 3/30/23 at 2:10 PM the resident returned to the facility with an immobilizer in place on the right leg. During an interview on 4/4/23 at 11:00 AM Nurse Aide (NA)-I revealed that NA-I first noticed Resident 3's right knee was slightly swollen on 3/21/23, and reported this to RN (Registered Nurse)-Q. NA-I then returned to work on the following Tuesday (3/28/23), and noticed Resident 3's right knee was more swollen and deformed, and at this time reported the findings to LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse)-N. NA-I was not aware of any fall or potential mechanism for injury. NA-I did report having received training several times yearly on abuse and neglect and had no concerns about treatment of residents in the facility. During an interview on 4/4/23 at 11:30 AM with NA-G revealed that NA-G noticed on Tuesday (3/28/23) that Residents 3's right knee was swollen, painful and looked weird. NA-G reported the concern to LPN-N in the morning and to the hospice nurse RN-J in the afternoon. NA-G had no knowledge of the resident having an accident or injury. During an interview on 4/4/23 at 12:10 PM RN-J (contract hospice RN) revealed that RN-J provided care for Resident 3 on Tuesday 3/28/23 and noted slight swelling in the resident's right knee; and the swelling was minimal, the resident was not displaying pain, and there was no redness or bruising present. RN-J discussed the findings with the facility RN-Q, and a decision was made to monitor the resident. RN-J reported returning to the facility on 3/30/23 at which time Resident 3's right knee was very swollen, purple in color, bruised, and the resident appeared through non-verbal indication to be in pain. RN-J reported that the resident's doctor was then notified, the resident was given pain medication, and then sent to the ER for further evaluation. RN-J was aware that it was determined that Resident 3 had sustained a fractured right femur (large bone of the upper leg). During an interview on 4/5/23 at 8:55 AM the DON (Director of Nursing) confirmed being notified on 3/30/23 that Resident 3 was sent to the ER for a concern with the right knee, and a femur fracture was identified. Further interview revealed the DON had interviewed multiple staff members following the identified injury, and determined staff were aware of and reported a concern with the resident's knee up to a week prior to the identified fracture, however professional facility staff had not documented an assessment of the Resident 3's knee prior to 3/30/23 when a late entry made by RN-Q identified that a concern was identified by the hospice RN-J initially on 3/28/23. Additional interview confirmed facility staff had no documented assessments of the knee until 3/30/23, despite interviews of facility NA's that revealed knowledge of a concern up to a week prior. In additional the DON confirmed Resident 3's Physician had not been notified in accordance with facility policy.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Investigate Abuse (Tag F0610)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.02(8) Based on interview and record review the facility failed to submit investigation...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.02(8) Based on interview and record review the facility failed to submit investigations to the State Agency for falls on Residents 1 and 2, conduct and report an investigation of threats made toward others by Resident 8, and report and investigate an allegation of potential abuse for Resident's 7 and 8. The sample size was 8 and the facility census was 33. Findings are: A. Review of the facility policy Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation- Reporting and Investigating dated 04/2021 revealed the following; -all reports of resident abuse (including injuries of unknown origin), neglect, exploitation, or theft/misappropriation or resident property are reported to local, state, and federal agencies (as required by current regulations) and thoroughly investigated by facility management, -findings of all investigations are documented and reported, -if abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation or resident property or injury of unknown source was suspected, the suspicion would be reported immediately (immediately defines as within 2 hours for alleged abuse involving serious bodily injury and within 24 hours for an allegation that does not involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury) to the administrator and to other officials, -the Administrator would immediately report to state licensing/certification agency responsible for licensing the facility, the ombudsman, the resident representative, Adult Protective Services, law-enforcement officials, the resident's attending physician, and the facility medical director, and -the administrator would determine what actions were needed for the protection of residents, and -all allegations were thoroughly investigated. B. Review of the facility Resident Grievance/Complaint Investigation Report Form dated 3/1/23 revealed the responsible party for Resident 7 reported to the facility SSD (Social Services Director) that on 2/28/23 following an incident of falling, a staff member who was an agency employee was mean and rude including yelling at the resident to get up, to Resident 7 and the resident was heard saying ouch. In addition when Resident 8 inquired as to what was going on when yelling was heard, the same agency staff responded by saying it's none of your fucking business, to Resident 8. Further review revealed the agency staff was not allowed to return to the facility and the agency was contacted. C. Review of the facility Standard Facility Contract with the staffing agency AACO dated 10/23/20 revealed the facility had no evidence that AACO was providing Abuse training or assuring all employees had undergone required background checks for their employees prior to providing services for the facility. D. Review of Resident 7's Care Plan dated 9/20/22 with a revision date of 11/20/22 revealed the resident needed assistance with bed mobility, transfers, dressing, ambulation, toileting, and bathing. The resident had highly impaired hearing with no hearing device and sometimes understood. Review of Resident 7's Incident Record dated 2/28/23 the resident was found lying on the floor next to the bed, with no obvious injury. E. Review of Resident 8's Care Plan dated 9/28/22 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] following a hospitalization, and was discharged from the facility on 3/17/23 at 12:15 into the custody of the [NAME] County Sheriff's Office on a warrant for making terroristic threats. Review of Resident 8's Progress Notes revealed the following; -on 3/15/23 at 9:15 AM the evening cook informed the SSD the resident was threatening to hurt another resident along with harming the cook. The SSD reached out to the Ombudsman (long term care resident advocate whom investigates, reports on and helps settle complaints) who was not able to be reached, and then to the Sheriff's Department. A Sheriff's deputy visited the resident and made a determination the resident would be arrested for making terroristic threats, when the resident was discharged . The facility Administrator, DON (Director of Nursing), and SSD were involved. The facility obtained discharge orders from the attending physician, and -on 3/17/23 at 12:15 the [NAME] County Sheriff's Department took the resident from the facility into custody on warrant of terroristic threats. F. Review of Resident 1's Care Plan dated 9/22/22 with a revision date of 1/31/23 revealed the resident had self-care deficits and received supervision to limited assistance with walking, transfers, bed mobility, personal hygiene, and toileting. In addition, the resident was at risk for falls due to an unsteady gait, and poor safety awareness. Review of Resident 1's Incident Record dated 12/13/22 revealed the resident was found lying on the floor in the resident room and the resident reported I was trying to get a spoon off the floor and fell. The resident was noted to have an abrasion (superficial skin injury) and hematoma (a pool of mostly clotted blood that forms under the skin) to the back of the head. G. Review of Resident 2's Care Plan dated 3/23/22 with a revision of 3/22/23 revealed the resident needed assistance with bed mobility, transfers, dressing, hygiene, ambulation toileting and bathing. Further review revealed the resident had dementia with cognitive loss and was at risk for falling and fell on 2/27/22 resulting in a left hip fracture. Review of Resident 2's Incident Record dated 2/27/23 at 4:15 AM a nurse heard a thump and went to find the source and found Resident 2 laying in the center of the resident room. The resident reported I got up to use the bathroom and the floor was slippery and I fell The resident reported pain rated at 10 on a 10--point scale. The facility called 911 and the resident was taken to the hospital for evaluation. H. During an Interview on 4/5/23 at 11:10 AM the Facility Administrator confirmed the facility did not report an allegation of abuse for Resident 7 and Resident 8, following a family report on 3/1/23, the facility did not report Resident 8's terroristic threats and discharge into police custody, and the investigation reports sent to the state agency for Resident 1's fall on 12/13/22, and Resident 2's fall on 2/27/23 were faxed to an incorrect number.
May 2022 2 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Investigate Abuse (Tag F0610)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.02(8) Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to report an allegation of potential abuse and submit an investigation to the State Agency in...

Read full inspector narrative →
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.02(8) Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to report an allegation of potential abuse and submit an investigation to the State Agency in the required time frame for Resident 228. The sample size was 18 and the facility census was 27. Findings are: Review of the facility policy Reporting Abuse to State Agencies and Other Entities/Individuals with a revision date of 12/2017 revealed the following; -all suspected violations and all substantiated incidents of abuse would be immediately reported to appropriate State Agencies and or other individuals as required by law, and -suspected violations of abuse would be promptly reported to the required agencies as soon as possible with a maximum notification limit of with 24 hours, and a written report of the findings of the investigation would be submitted within 5 working days of the occurrence. Review of Resident 228's Progress Notes revealed the following; -on 5/4/22 at 8:07 AM Resident 228 reported staff being too rough and a desire to call a son to take the resident somewhere else. Review of Resident 228's Care Plan dated 5/9/22 revealed the following; -the resident required extensive assistance of 1-2 staff for personal hygiene, bed mobility, dressing, bathing, toileting, transferring with a full body mechanical lift, and incontinence care. An interview on 5/23/22 at 11:28 AM with Resident 228 revealed that staff had been rough during cares. An interview on 5/24/22 at 11:17 AM with the Director of Nursing confirmed that Resident 228 had reported staff being rough on 5/4/22 and the facility failed to report the allegation, conduct an investigation, or submit an investigation to the State Agency in the required time frames.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

C. Review of Resident 5's Nursing Progress Notes between 4/27/22 and 5/2/22 revealed the following related to the resident's decline in condition: -4/27/22 at 5:00 PM, the resident was lethargic and d...

Read full inspector narrative →
C. Review of Resident 5's Nursing Progress Notes between 4/27/22 and 5/2/22 revealed the following related to the resident's decline in condition: -4/27/22 at 5:00 PM, the resident was lethargic and difficult to arouse. The resident's head was lying[sic] to the right side and had a moderate amount of clear drainage from the mouth and [gender] skin color was pale. The resident also had swelling, increased warmth and pain to [gender] left wrist. The physician was notified and ordered lab work. -4/27/22 at 6:32 PM, facility staff notified the resident's representative of the decline and a discussion was held about sending the resident to the emergency room (ER). The representative had no response. -4/28/22 at 2:10 PM, the physician instructed nursing staff to monitor the resident's arm, provide pain medication, and if there was no improvement the physician was to be updated. -4/30/22 at 4:22 PM, documentation indicated the physician's nurse was notified on 4/29/22 about the condition of the resident's left arm. There was no evidence the physician had been notified and updated about the resident's continued decline (lethargic, increased weakness, and pale skin color) on 4/29/22 and 4/30/22. -5/1/22 at 09:20 AM, the resident was very lethargic this morning, difficult to arouse, weak, transferred poorly .did not eat much for breakfast .and had a new cough. There was no evidence the physician was notified. -5/1/22 at 12:12 PM, the resident continued to be lethargic and had a wet cough. There was no evidence the physician was notified or interventions implemented. -5/2/22 at 07:45 AM, the resident's condition declined further lethargic, confused, leaning forward in the wheelchair and was unable to keep head held upright. -5/2/22 at 08:30 AM, the resident was transferred to the hospital and at 10:35 AM [gender] was admitted for treatment of pneumonia (4 days later). During an interview with Registered Nurse (RN)-G on 5/24/22 at 11:15 AM, RN-G confirmed there was no evidence of documentation the physician had been notified of the Resident 5's continued decline between 4/29/22 and 5/2/22, that resulted in the resident being transported by ambulance and admitted to the hospital for pneumonia. RN-G also confirmed the physician should have been notified of the resident's continued decline prior to 5/2/22. During an interview with the Director of Nurses (DON) on 5/25/22 at 2:35 PM, the DON confirmed staff should have documented ongoing assessments of Resident 5's declining condition and the physician should have been updated. Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09D Based on record reviews and interviews; the facility failed to assure changes of condition were addressed in a timely manner for 2 (Residents 5 and 18) of 2 sampled residents. The facility census was 27. Findings are: A. Review of the facility policy Change in a Resident's Condition or Status with revision date of 2/2021 revealed the facility was to notify the physician promptly of significant changes in the resident's medical/mental condition and/or status. Further review of the policy revealed a significant change was classified as a decline in the resident's status that would not normally resolve itself without intervention or by implementing standard clinical interventions. Except in medical emergencies, notifications were to be made within 24 hours of a change. B. Review of Resident 18's MDS (Minimum Data Set, a federally mandated comprehensive assessment tool used for care planning) dated 4/28/22 revealed diagnoses of dementia without behavioral disturbances, chronic kidney disease and high blood pressure. The following was assessed regarding the resident: -severely impaired cognition; -behaviors included delusions and wandering which occurred on a daily basis; -required extensive staff assistance with bed mobility, dressing and toilet use; and -frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder. Review of Resident 18's Nursing Progress Notes revealed the following: -2/14/22 at 10:04 AM the resident was more confused and was unsure how to dress self. The note further indicated the resident's urine was very odorous. -2/15/22 at 10:06 AM the resident remained more confused than normal baseline. The resident had been drinking fluids well but the resident had not voided and was incontinent of only a small amount. Review of a Clinical Assessment and Communication Tool Template for Suspected Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) dated 2/15/22 revealed at 2:30 PM the resident's physician was notified regarding the resident's change of condition. Further review of the form revealed the resident's physician signed the notification on 2/16/22, however, there was no response from the physician regarding recommendations or new orders related to the resident's change of condition. Review of Resident 18's medical record revealed no evidence the facility attempted to again contact the physician regarding the resident's increased confusion, odorous urine and failure to void. Review of a Nursing Progress Note dated 3/23/22 at 2:29 PM revealed the resident was complaining of increased discomfort to the right leg and to the left middle back. The note indicated the resident had received Tylenol without any relief and was having difficulty with ambulation. Review of a Facsimile (Fax) Communication to Physician dated 3/23/22 (no time identified) revealed the resident's physician was notified of the resident's increased pain and difficulty with ambulation. Further review of the fax revealed a new order for Aleve (medication used to treat pain) 250 milligrams (mg) twice a day for 2 weeks dated 3/29/22 (6 days after the physician was notified of the resident's change of condition). Review of Resident 18's Nursing Progress Notes revealed the following: -4/9/22 at 7:17 AM the resident's oxygen saturation level (amount of oxygen carried in the blood) had dropped with ambulation. The resident was short of breath with increased fatigue. The resident's oxygen level was in the 80's and as the resident continued to walk, dropped down to the 70's (normal oxygen saturation levels are 95-100 percent (%). -4/11/22 at 3:25 PM the resident was seen by the physician with no new orders and the resident was to be rechecked in 2 months. -4/26/22 at 5:06 AM the resident's oxygen has been desaturating again with ambulation. The resident was very pale and weak and was having difficulty walking. -4/26/22 at 10:24 AM the resident's oxygenation level was 80% with crackles (fluid in the lungs making it difficult to inflate correctly) in the right upper lungs. The resident was weak and required total assistance with cares. -4/26/22 at 3:28 PM (16 days after the resident first displayed symptoms) the resident was diagnosed with pneumonitis and sinusitis and started on antibiotics. During an interview on 5/25/22 at 8:58 AM, the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) confirmed Resident 18's physician did not always respond to faxes and/or communications from the facility in a timely manner. The ADON further confirmed there was no system in place to assure physician notifications were addressed and returned in a timely manner regarding changes in condition.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
Concerns
  • • Multiple safety concerns identified: 2 harm violation(s), Payment denial on record. Review inspection reports carefully.
  • • 19 deficiencies on record, including 2 serious (caused harm) violations. Ask about corrective actions taken.
  • • Grade D (43/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
Bottom line: Trust Score of 43/100 indicates significant concerns. Thoroughly evaluate alternatives.

About This Facility

What is Mid-Nebraska Lutheran Home's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns Mid-Nebraska Lutheran Home an overall rating of 2 out of 5 stars, which is considered below average nationally. Within Nebraska, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.

How is Mid-Nebraska Lutheran Home Staffed?

CMS rates Mid-Nebraska Lutheran Home's staffing level at 2 out of 5 stars, which is below average compared to other nursing homes.

What Have Inspectors Found at Mid-Nebraska Lutheran Home?

State health inspectors documented 19 deficiencies at Mid-Nebraska Lutheran Home during 2022 to 2025. These included: 2 that caused actual resident harm, 15 with potential for harm, and 2 minor or isolated issues. Deficiencies causing actual harm indicate documented cases where residents experienced negative health consequences.

Who Owns and Operates Mid-Nebraska Lutheran Home?

Mid-Nebraska Lutheran Home is owned by a non-profit organization. Non-profit facilities reinvest revenue into operations rather than distributing to shareholders. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 45 certified beds and approximately 31 residents (about 69% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in Newman Grove, Nebraska.

How Does Mid-Nebraska Lutheran Home Compare to Other Nebraska Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Nebraska, Mid-Nebraska Lutheran Home's overall rating (2 stars) is below the state average of 2.9 and health inspection rating (3 stars) is at the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Mid-Nebraska Lutheran Home?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?" These questions are particularly relevant given the below-average staffing rating.

Is Mid-Nebraska Lutheran Home Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, Mid-Nebraska Lutheran Home has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 2-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Nebraska. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.

Do Nurses at Mid-Nebraska Lutheran Home Stick Around?

Mid-Nebraska Lutheran Home has not reported staff turnover data to CMS. Staff turnover matters because consistent caregivers learn residents' individual needs, medications, and preferences. When staff frequently change, this institutional knowledge is lost. Families should ask the facility directly about their staff retention rates and average employee tenure.

Was Mid-Nebraska Lutheran Home Ever Fined?

Mid-Nebraska Lutheran Home has been fined $6,015 across 1 penalty action. This is below the Nebraska average of $33,139. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.

Is Mid-Nebraska Lutheran Home on Any Federal Watch List?

Mid-Nebraska Lutheran Home is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.