Manzano Del Sol by Purehealth
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Manzano Del Sol by Purehealth has received a Trust Grade of C+, indicating that it is slightly above average but still has room for improvement. It ranks #10 out of 67 nursing homes in New Mexico, placing it in the top half of facilities, and #4 out of 18 in Bernalillo County, meaning only three local options are better. The facility is showing an improving trend in its performance, with issues decreasing from four in 2024 to two in 2025. Staffing is rated as average with a 3/5 star rating and a turnover rate of 60%, which is close to the state average. However, the facility has incurred $31,962 in fines, which is concerning, and they have reported serious incidents, including a delay in hospitalizing a resident who suffered from dehydration and severe infection, as well as concerns about food safety practices that could expose residents to foodborne illnesses. On a positive note, the facility has more RN coverage than 92% of New Mexico nursing homes, which is a strong point in ensuring quality care.
- Trust Score
- C+
- In New Mexico
- #10/67
- Safety Record
- Moderate
- Inspections
- Getting Better
- Staff Stability ⚠ Watch
- 60% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- $31,962 in fines. Lower than most New Mexico facilities. Relatively clean record.
- Skilled Nurses ✓ Good
- Each resident gets 64 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than 97% of New Mexico nursing homes. RNs are the most trained staff who catch health problems before they become serious.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 38 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
5-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
Facility shows strength in quality measures, fire safety.
The Bad
14pts above New Mexico avg (46%)
Frequent staff changes - ask about care continuity
Below median ($33,413)
Moderate penalties - review what triggered them
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
12 points above New Mexico average of 48%
The Ugly 38 deficiencies on record
Aug 2025
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Investigate Abuse
(Tag F0610)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record reviews and interview, the facility failed to complete and submit a Five Day Report (a report sent to the State ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jan 2025
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Assessment Accuracy
(Tag F0641)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS; a federall...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jun 2024
1 deficiency
1 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide quality of care for 1 (R #1) of 1 (R #1) resident reviewed ...
Read full inspector narrative →
May 2024
3 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0688
(Tag F0688)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review, and interview, and observation the facility failed to ensure residents received appropriate treatment and services to prevent decrease in range of motion and mobility to the ex...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to prevent an accident and to provide a safe transfer when the facilit...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to:
1. Ensure expired supplies were not kept with unexpired supplies.
2...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jan 2023
12 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0602
(Tag F0602)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent misappropriation of resident money, when money wasn't deposited onto R #14's debit card and money was taken by staff for one reside...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0657
(Tag F0657)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to complete a revised care plan to include interventions for 1 (R #48) of 1 (R #48) resident who was receiving renal dialysis (process of remov...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the facility was free from accident hazards for 1 (R #19) of 1 ( R# 19) resident by having a bed side table placed...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that oxygen tubing was changed and dated for 2...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0760
(Tag F0760)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that medications were administered as ordered for 1 (R # 28) of 10 (R #'s 3, 6, 13, 18, 28, 33, 36, 42, 44, and 51) res...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0825
(Tag F0825)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify the Therapy Department of a referral for 1 (R #40) of 3 (R #...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medical Records
(Tag F0842)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to consistently document tube feedings (is a medical device used to feed a person who is unable to eat or drink) on the Medication Administrati...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0578
(Tag F0578)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that residents had accurate and complete advanced directives...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0655
(Tag F0655)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to create an accurate Baseline Care Plan within 48 hours of admission for 1 (R #11) of 4 (R #'s 8, 11, 17 and 42) residents reviewed for Basel...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Resident #49
D. Record review of the EHR (Electronic Health Record) revealed that R #49 was admitted on [DATE] with the pertinen...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to:
1. Ensure that expired medications were not being stored with unexpired medications on the second floor inside of the medication storage roo...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to store food under sanitary conditions by not ensuring food stored in r...
Read full inspector narrative →
Mar 2022
20 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0561
(Tag F0561)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 (R #11) of 1 (R #11) resident interviewed had a right to make a choice about keeping her Keurig (brand name) coffee maker in her r...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Transfer Notice
(Tag F0623)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide advance notice in writing of resident discharge to resident/resident representative and the State Ombudsman for 1 (R #6) of 1 (R #6...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Assessment Accuracy
(Tag F0641)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment [par...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0687
(Tag F0687)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide appropriate foot care for 1(R #13) of 1(R #13) who during ran...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Unnecessary Medications
(Tag F0759)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate did not exceed 5% by failing to administer medication separately with water flushes in betwee...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0790
(Tag F0790)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 (R#20) of 1 (R#20) residents reviewed had ob...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0558
(Tag F0558)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure 3 (R#20, 28 and 30) of 3 (R#20, 28, and 30) residents reviewed in their rooms, had environmental safety accommodations by keeping the ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0577
(Tag F0577)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all 53 residents identified on the census provided by administrator on 02/22/22 were able to examine the results of the...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0578
(Tag F0578)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that 3 (R#22, 28, 30) of 3 (R#22, 28, 30) residents were notified of their right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment as...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Notification of Changes
(Tag F0580)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify the medical provider of low blood sugar for 1 (R #211) of 1 (R #211) resident reviewed for repeated early morning blood sugars, resu...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0657
(Tag F0657)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that the care plan had been revised for 2 (R #59 and 211] of...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide professional care and services to 1 (R #211) of 1 (R #211) resident noted to have repeated incidents of blood glucose [sugar] readi...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0757
(Tag F0757)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that the pharmacist recommendations were reviewed and acted on in a timely manner for 1 (R #53) of 1 (R #53) resident noted to have ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medication Errors
(Tag F0758)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that consultant pharmacist recommendations regarding gradual dose reductions of psychotropic medication (a medication that is prescr...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure that drugs (medications) and biological's ( a vaccine not chemically made) were secure (cannot be moved or lost) and inaccessible (una...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation and interview the facility failed to:
1. Implement a process to ensure any person entering the facility was screened for COVID-19 virus [an infectious disease caused by the SARS-...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0886
(Tag F0886)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure staff unvaccinated for COVID-19 [an infectious disease caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, that can cause symptoms that vary from unnotic...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0888
(Tag F0888)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure a contingency plan/policy [a plan designed to take a possible future event or circumstance into account] was developed and implemented ...
Read full inspector narrative →
MINOR
(C)
Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact
Resident Rights
(Tag F0550)
Minor procedural issue · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to support residents and dignity while eating for almost all 53 residents identified on the resident census list provided by the Administrator o...
Read full inspector narrative →
MINOR
(C)
Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact
Deficiency F0565
(Tag F0565)
Minor procedural issue · This affected most or all residents
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that the Resident Council had an opportunity to discuss and offer suggestions about facility policies and proceed related to residen...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Why is there high staff turnover? How do you retain staff?"
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
- • 38 deficiencies on record, including 1 serious (caused harm) violation. Ask about corrective actions taken.
- • $31,962 in fines. Higher than 94% of New Mexico facilities, suggesting repeated compliance issues.
- • 60% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
About This Facility
What is Manzano Del Sol By Purehealth's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns Manzano Del Sol by Purehealth an overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars, which is considered much above average nationally. Within New Mexico, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.
How is Manzano Del Sol By Purehealth Staffed?
CMS rates Manzano Del Sol by Purehealth's staffing level at 3 out of 5 stars, which is average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 60%, which is 14 percentage points above the New Mexico average of 46%. High turnover can affect care consistency as new staff learn residents' individual needs. RN turnover specifically is 64%, which is notably high. RNs provide skilled clinical oversight, so turnover in this role can affect medical care quality.
What Have Inspectors Found at Manzano Del Sol By Purehealth?
State health inspectors documented 38 deficiencies at Manzano Del Sol by Purehealth during 2022 to 2025. These included: 1 that caused actual resident harm, 35 with potential for harm, and 2 minor or isolated issues. Deficiencies causing actual harm indicate documented cases where residents experienced negative health consequences.
Who Owns and Operates Manzano Del Sol By Purehealth?
Manzano Del Sol by Purehealth is owned by a non-profit organization. Non-profit facilities reinvest revenue into operations rather than distributing to shareholders. The facility is operated by PUREHEALTH, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 117 certified beds and approximately 78 residents (about 67% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in ALBUQUERQUE, New Mexico.
How Does Manzano Del Sol By Purehealth Compare to Other New Mexico Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in New Mexico, Manzano Del Sol by Purehealth's overall rating (5 stars) is above the state average of 2.9, staff turnover (60%) is significantly higher than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (5 stars) is much above the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Manzano Del Sol By Purehealth?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "How do you ensure continuity of care given staff turnover, and what is your staff retention strategy?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's high staff turnover rate.
Is Manzano Del Sol By Purehealth Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, Manzano Del Sol by Purehealth has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 5-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in New Mexico. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Manzano Del Sol By Purehealth Stick Around?
Staff turnover at Manzano Del Sol by Purehealth is high. At 60%, the facility is 14 percentage points above the New Mexico average of 46%. Registered Nurse turnover is particularly concerning at 64%. RNs handle complex medical decisions and coordinate care — frequent RN changes can directly impact care quality. High turnover means new staff may not know residents' individual needs, medications, or preferences. It can also be disorienting for residents, especially those with dementia who rely on familiar faces. Families should ask: What is causing the turnover? What retention programs are in place? How do you ensure care continuity during staff transitions?
Was Manzano Del Sol By Purehealth Ever Fined?
Manzano Del Sol by Purehealth has been fined $31,962 across 2 penalty actions. This is below the New Mexico average of $33,398. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.
Is Manzano Del Sol By Purehealth on Any Federal Watch List?
Manzano Del Sol by Purehealth is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.