A Holly Patterson Extended Care Facility

875 JERUSALEM AVENUE, UNIONDALE, NY 11553 (516) 572-1400
Government - State 589 Beds Independent Data: November 2025 2 Immediate Jeopardy citations
Trust Grade
19/100
#370 of 594 in NY
Last Inspection: April 2024

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

A Holly Patterson Extended Care Facility has received a Trust Grade of F, indicating significant concerns about its overall quality and care. It ranks #370 out of 594 facilities in New York, placing it in the bottom half of all nursing homes, and #28 out of 36 in Nassau County, meaning only a few local options are worse. The facility's condition is worsening, with the number of issues identified increasing from 3 in 2022 to 7 in 2024. Staffing is somewhat stable with a 3-star rating, and a 25% turnover rate is better than the state average. However, the facility has incurred $184,138 in fines, which is higher than 87% of New York facilities, indicating ongoing compliance issues. There are serious concerns highlighted by inspector findings, including a resident with a history of substance abuse who was not adequately supervised, leading to multiple overdoses, and another resident who was not monitored properly for medication administration, potentially jeopardizing their health. While the facility also has good RN coverage, more than 78% of state facilities, the critical incidents and high fines suggest that families should carefully consider these factors when evaluating care options.

Trust Score
F
19/100
In New York
#370/594
Bottom 38%
Safety Record
High Risk
Review needed
Inspections
Getting Worse
3 → 7 violations
Staff Stability
✓ Good
25% annual turnover. Excellent stability, 23 points below New York's 48% average. Staff who stay learn residents' needs.
Penalties
✓ Good
$184,138 in fines. Lower than most New York facilities. Relatively clean record.
Skilled Nurses
○ Average
Each resident gets 37 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — about average for New York. RNs are the most trained staff who monitor for health changes.
Violations
⚠ Watch
11 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
★★☆☆☆
2.0
Overall Rating
★★★☆☆
3.0
Staff Levels
★★★★★
5.0
Care Quality
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2022: 3 issues
2024: 7 issues

The Good

  • 5-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
  • Low Staff Turnover (25%) · Staff stability means consistent care
  • No fines on record
  • Staff turnover is low (25%)

    23 points below New York average of 48%

Facility shows strength in quality measures, staff retention.

The Bad

2-Star Overall Rating

Below New York average (3.1)

Below average - review inspection findings carefully

Federal Fines: $184,138

Well above median ($33,413)

Significant penalties indicating serious issues

The Ugly 11 deficiencies on record

2 life-threatening 1 actual harm
Apr 2024 7 deficiencies 1 Harm
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 2) Resident #159 was admitted with diagnoses that included Peripheral Autonomic Neuropathy (when there is damage to the nerves t...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 2) Resident #159 was admitted with diagnoses that included Peripheral Autonomic Neuropathy (when there is damage to the nerves that control automatic body functions this can affect the blood pressure or temperature control), End Stage Renal Disease, and Seizures. The Annual Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 3 which indicated severely impaired cognition. The Minimum Data Set assessment documented the resident was usually able to understand others. The facility's policy titled, Medication Administration last reviewed 3/2024 documented that medications are never left at the bedside. The unit nurse must watch the resident take the medications. Directly Observed Therapy is required by the nurse when administering medication. Visualization of the oral cavity by a resident's tongue sweep after the resident has taken a dose of medication is required to verify that it (the medication) has been swallowed. A physician's order dated 10/8/2023 documented to administer Neurontin 100 milligram (mg), 1 capsule by mouth three times a day for Peripheral Autonomic Neuropathy. A Seizure Activity Comprehensive Care Plan dated 2/21/2024 documented the resident has potential for seizure activity related to Seizure disorder. Interventions included but were not limited to administer anticonvulsant(s) as per the physician's order. Resident #159 was interviewed on 3/26/2024 at 2:30 PM. Resident #159 was observed in bed and alert. A medication cup containing one white dry capsule was observed on the resident's overbed table within the resident's reach. Resident #159 was unable to name the medication and did not know how long the medicine had been there on the overbed table. There was no staff member present in the resident's room. The medication was observed in Resident #159's room accompanied by Registered Nurse #7 at 2:35 PM. Registered Nurse #7 stated that the medication in the cup was a Neurontin 100 milligram capsule that they (Registered Nurse #7) had administered to Resident #159 approximately ten minutes ago. Registered Nurse #7 stated they observed Resident #159 put the medicine in their (Resident #159) mouth. Registered Nurse #7 stated they were then called away to see another resident on the unit and left the resident with the empty medication cup and their nutrition supplement. Registered Nurse #7 stated they assumed the resident had swallowed the medicine but did not ask the resident to open their mouth to check. Licensed Practical Nurse #6 was interviewed on 3/28/2024 at 1:39 PM. Licensed Practical Nurse #6 stated that they were the regularly assigned day (7:00 AM-3:00 PM) shift nurse on the unit where Resident #159 resided; however, they did not work on that unit on 3/26/2024. Licensed Practical Nurse #6 stated they regularly administered medications and Resident #159 required a lot of encouragement to take their (Resident #159) medication. Licensed Practical Nurse #6 stated they have never observed Resident #159 with any noncompliant behaviors. Licensed Practical Nurse #6 stated Resident #159 cannot take medications on their own and there was no reason for the medication to be left unattended with the resident. Registered Nurse #8 was interviewed on 3/29/2024 at 1:44 PM and stated that they were the regularly assigned evening (3:00 PM-11:00 PM) shift nurse on the unit where Resident #159 resided. Registered Nurse #8 stated they regularly administered medications to Resident #159 who required verbal prompts to take their medications. Registered Nurse #8 stated they have never observed Resident #159 with any noncompliant behaviors. Registered Nurse #8 stated Resident #159 cannot take medications on their own and the nurses should not leave any medicine with the resident unless the resident was assessed for self-administration. The Director of Nursing Services was interviewed on 3/29/2024 at 3:12 PM and stated that the nurse who administered medications to Resident #159 should have ensured the medications were swallowed by the resident. The Director of Nursing Services stated that Resident #159 was not allowed to self-administer their medication and therefore the medication should not have been left unattended by Resident #159's bedside. 10 NYCRR 415.12(h)(1)(2) Based on record review and staff interviews during the Recertification and Abbreviated Survey (Complaint #NY00314085) initiated on 3/26/2024 and completed on 4/2/2024, the facility did not ensure that each resident's environment remains free of accident hazards as is possible. This was identified for two (Resident #42 and #159) of eight residents reviewed for accidents. Specifically, 1) on 4/4/2023 Resident #42 fell out of the mechanical lift when the mechanical lift sling pad loops got detached from the mechanical lift's sling bar hook. The mechanical lift used for the resident's transfer was missing the safety latches (clips), which were supposed to hold the mechanical lift sling pad loops in place, on the mechanical lift's sling bar hook. Certified Nursing Assistant #14, who was assisting with the resident's transfer, was aware of the missing safety latches and continued with transferring the resident from the bed to the wheelchair. Subsequently, the resident was transferred to the hospital and was diagnosed with a Right Humerus (upper arm bone) Fracture. 2) Additionally, Resident #159 was observed on 3/26/2024 with one medication capsule (Neurontin 100 milligrams) in a medication cup on their overbed table with no staff member in the vicinity. The resident was not assessed to self-administer their medication and did not have a physician's order to self-administer medications. This resulted in actual harm to Resident #42 that is not Immediate Jeopardy. The findings are: 1) Resident #42 was admitted with diagnoses that included Cerebral Vascular Accident with Right Hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body), and Osteoarthritis (degenerative joint disease). The annual Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] documented the resident's Brief Interview for Mental Status score was 11 which indicated the resident had moderately impaired cognition. The resident had no behavior problems and required extensive assistance of two staff members for bed mobility and total assistance of two staff members for transfers. The facility policy and procedure dated 10/11/2023 for Management of Essential Equipment Malfunction documented to replace and sequester the malfunctioning equipment without interruption to patient care. In the event of malfunctioning of a medical device and or injuries sustained to a patient caused by equipment, the device must be sequestered, labeled with an appropriate tag describing the malfunction, and sent to the Medical Electronics Department. The facility policy and procedure for Application and Use of Transfer Sling revised 10/2022 documented that at least two staff members are needed to transfer a resident using a mechanical lift, the nursing staff will ensure resident safety during transfer procedures and inspect the (mechanical lift) for functionality prior to use for safety. The undated instruction manual for the mechanical lift, under the safety instruction section, documented that before lifting always make sure that accessories are not damaged, the lifting accessory is correctly attached to the lift; the latches are intact; missing or damaged latches must always be replaced; and that the sling's strap (pad) loops are correctly connected to the sling bar hooks when the sling straps are stretched up but before the patient is lifted from the underlying surface. A Comprehensive Care Plan for activities of daily living dated 2/23/2023 documented interventions that included but were not limited to provide total assistance of two staff members for transfers via a mechanical lift. A Comprehensive Care Plan for falls dated 2/23/2023 documented interventions included but were not limited to transfer the resident out of bed to a wheelchair via a mechanical lift. A review of the Certified Nursing Accountability Record dated 3/2023 documented the resident required the use of a mechanical lift and two staff members for transfers. A nursing progress note dated 4/4/2023 documented the resident was alert, verbally responsive, and able to make needs known. The resident sustained a fall during the transfer and complained of right shoulder pain. The resident's physician was notified and visited the resident. Tylenol (pain medication) 1000 milligrams was administered as per the physician's order. The resident was transferred to the hospital for further evaluation. A medical progress note dated 4/4/2023 documented the resident fell during transfer and complained of right arm and right shoulder pain. There was a decreased passive range of motion causing severe pain. Tylenol Extra Strength was ordered for pain and the resident was sent to the emergency room for further evaluation. A physician's order dated 4/4/2023 documented to administer Tylenol 500 milligram, give 2 tablets by mouth one time only for right shoulder pain. A physician's order dated 4/4/2023 at 12:52 PM documented to transfer the resident to the Emergency Room, Status Post fall. The Hospital Radiology Report dated 4/4/2023 documented a fracture of the right humerus. The Hospital Orthopedic Consult and Recommendation dated 4/4/2023 documented the Computerized Tomography (CT) scan of the right shoulder showed there was a right humerus fracture. The plan included no weight bearing to the right upper extremity; to place a sling to the right upper extremity; and pain control. The Accident and Incident Report dated 4/4/2023 documented that at 11:15 AM the resident sustained a fall during transfer and the resident was transferred to the emergency room for complaint of pain to the right shoulder and right elbow. The resident was unable to describe the occurrence and stated, I fell. A nursing admission note dated 4/6/2023 at 2:00 PM documented the resident was re-admitted to the facility status post fall with diagnoses of humerus fracture and Urinary Tract Infection (UTI). The resident had a right arm sling status post fracture and required extensive assistance for all activities of daily living and three staff members' assistance with the mechanical lift transfers. The Accident and Incident Summary dated 4/10/2023 documented a demonstration of the procedure which was performed with the two involved Certified Nursing Assistants shortly after the occurrence revealed a missing metal closure clip (latch) on the right hook of the mechanical lift. The mechanical lift was removed from the unit for further inspection and repair. The team analyzed the root causes of the event; any equipment with missing parts or malfunctioning should have been removed from the unit and reported immediately for maintenance; there was a need to reinforce with staff to ensure the attachment of mechanical lift pad loops onto the hooks and that the staff is using the right size sling. A Work Order Sheet dated 4/13/2023 documented that a full service was completed for the Unit 24 Electrical Patient Lift (mechanical lift) and both missing safety clips were replaced for the sling bar. Registered Nurse #11, who was on duty on 4/4/2023 and responded to the accident, was interviewed on 3/28/2024 at 9:14 AM. Registered Nurse #11 stated they were outside a resident's room when they heard Certified Nursing Assistant #15 calling for assistance. Registered Nurse #11 stated they ran to the room and observed Resident #42 on the floor between the legs of the mechanical lift. Registered Nurse #11 stated they assessed the resident who complained of right arm pain and was transferred to the hospital. Registered Nurse #11 stated they spoke with Certified Nursing Assistant #14 and Certified Nursing Assistant #15, who reported the right side of the safety latch was missing from the mechanical lift sling bar where the mechanical lift sling pad loops came off. Registered Nurse #11 stated maintenance was called, and the mechanical lift sling bar hook was fixed. Registered Nurse #11 was re-interviewed on 4/1/2024 at 9:17 AM and stated they were not aware the safety latches were missing from the sling bar until after Resident #42 fell from the mechanical lift. Registered Nurse #11 stated Certified Nursing Assistants were responsible for checking the mechanical lift before they used the machine and if a problem was identified they were to report the issue to the unit nurses immediately. Registered Nurse #11 stated a sticker should be placed on the machine indicating the machine is out of order and the mechanical lift is then removed from the unit. Registered Nurse #11 stated when they were examining the mechanical lift, they observed that one of the safety latches were missing. Registered Nurse #11 stated they could not recall if the safety latch was missing on both sides. An attempt to call Certified Nursing Assistant #15 on 3/27/2024 at 3:07 PM was made; however, the staff member was out of the country on vacation and would not be available until 4/3/2024 as reported by the Director of Nursing Services. A re-enactment observed by the surveyor was completed on 3/28/2024 at 8:15 AM with Certified Nursing Assistant #14 who had assisted with Resident #42's transfer on 4/4/2023. Certified Nursing Assistant #14 demonstrated that they were on one side of Resident #42 and the assigned Certified Nursing Assistant #15 was on the other side of Resident #42. Certified Nursing Assistant #14 stated they attached the mechanical lift sling pad loops to the hook of the mechanical lift sling bar on their side and the assigned Certified Nursing Assistant #15 attached the mechanical lift sling pad loops on their side. Certified Nursing Assistant #14 stated that assigned Certified Nursing Assistant #15 was controlling the mechanical lift and lifted the resident off the bed without a problem. Certified Nursing Assistant #14 stated just before Certified Nursing Assistant #15 began to lower the resident onto the wheelchair, they (Certified Nursing Assistant #14) observed that one of the mechanical lift sling pad loops came off the mechanical lift sling bar hook, and the resident slid out of the mechanical lift sling pad onto the floor between the legs of the mechanical lift. Certified Nursing Assistant #14 stated the safety latch was missing from the right side of the mechanical lift sling bar and that the safety latch keeps the mechanical lift sling pad loops in place and prevents the mechanical lift sling pad loops from coming off the hook. Certified Nursing Assistant #14 was interviewed on 3/28/2024 at 8:34 AM and stated during Resident #42's mechanical lift transfer on 4/4/2023, when Certified Nursing Assistant #14 was hooking up the mechanical lift sling pad loops, they noticed the safety latch was missing; however, continued using the mechanical lift. Certified Nursing Assistant #14 stated they did not switch the mechanical lift because the second mechanical lift available on the unit was in use. A subsequent interview was conducted with Certified Nursing Assistant #14 on 4/1/2024 at 9:10 AM. Certified Nursing Assistant #14 stated both safety latches on the mechanical sling bar were missing for a long time and they have been using the mechanical lift without the safety latches. Certified Nursing Assistant #14 could not recall how long the safety latches on the mechanical lift had been missing. Certified Nursing Assistant #15's written statement, dated 4/4/2023, documented that while transferring Resident #42 with the mechanical lift, they noticed one of the loops (right top one) fell off. Certified Nursing Assistant #14 and Certified Nursing Assistant #15 tried their best to lower the patient. An interview was conducted on 3/28/2024 at 10:19 AM with the Medical Electronic Technician (maintenance employee) who was responsible for servicing the mechanical lift and other medical equipment. The Medical Electronic Technician stated the mechanical lift that was used for Resident #42 was last serviced on 7/1/2022. All the mechanical lifts are checked annually and as needed. The Medical Electronic Technician stated after the resident's fall, they were informed by the Director of Environmental Services that the safety clips were missing. The Medical Electronic Technician stated when they checked the mechanical lift sling bar, both safety clips were missing and on 4/13/2023 both safety clips were replaced. The Medical Electronic Technician stated they were not notified of the missing safety latches prior to the resident's fall. The Medical Electronic Technician stated if the nursing staff observed missing parts or that the machine was not functioning properly, nursing staff were supposed to email their department (Medical Electronic) The Medical Electronic Technician stated that the safety latch on the mechanical lift functions to keep the mechanical lift sling pad loops from slipping off of the mechanical lift sling bar hooks. An interview with Resident #42's physician, who was on duty on 4/4/2023, was conducted on 4/1/2024 at 9:52 AM. The physician stated they assessed Resident #42 after the resident fell from the mechanical lift on 4/4/2023. The physician stated that the resident complained of severe pain to the right arm and was sent to the emergency room. The physician stated the pain in the resident's right arm was related to a fracture which was directly related to the fall from the mechanical lift. The Registered Nurse Risk Manager was interviewed on 4/1/2024 at 10:16 AM and stated on 4/4/2023 they were on the resident's unit and when they got to the resident's room the resident was already back in bed; however, the mechanical lift was still in the resident's room. The Registered Nurse Risk Manager stated the safety latch on the right side of the sling bar hook was missing. The Registered Nurse Risk Manager stated that Certified Nursing Assistant #14 and Certified Nursing Assistant #15 informed them the mechanical lift safety latch was missing prior to the use of the mechanical lift for Resident #42. The Registered Nurse Risk Manager stated the staff should not have used the mechanical lift as the safety latch was missing. The Registered Nurse Risk Manager stated the staff should have immediately reported the faulty mechanical lift issue to the charge nurse. The Inservice Coordinator was interviewed on 4/1/2024 at 10:45 AM and stated all Certified Nursing Assistants receive training on the use of the mechanical lift transfer and then a competency is completed at least yearly, and as needed. The Inservice Coordinator stated if the Certified Nursing Assistants observe any malfunction that prevents the machine from functioning as designed, then the Certified Nursing Assistants should report the malfunction to the unit Registered Nurse in charge or the Supervisor. The Inservice Coordinator stated the staff should not have used the mechanical lift to transfer Resident #42 if the safety latch was missing. The Director of Nursing Services was interviewed on 4/1/2024 at 11:36 AM and stated they expected the staff to inspect the equipment before use and if there was something wrong with the equipment, or if the equipment was broken, the staff should have reported the issue to the unit nurses, and the equipment should have been immediately removed from the unit. The Director of Nursing Services stated the staff should not have used the mechanical lift knowing the safety latch was missing. The Director of Nursing Services stated Resident #42 sustained a fracture due to a fall from the mechanical lift. The Director of Nursing Services stated after the Registered Nurse Risk Manager completed the investigation, the mechanical lift was taken out of service on 4/4/2023.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Resident Rights (Tag F0550)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 3/26/2024 and completed on 4...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 3/26/2024 and completed on 4/2/2024 the facility did not ensure that each resident was treated with respect and dignity and cared for in a manner that promoted maintenance or enhancement of their quality of life. This was identified for two (Resident #134 and Resident#192) of three residents reviewed for dignity. Specifically, during a lunch meal observation on 3/26/2024 two staff members were observed standing over Resident #134 and Resident #192 while they assisted the residents with eating. The findings are: The facility's policy titled, Meal Pass documented to provide dignified care to residents during the meal pass. 1) Resident #134 was admitted with diagnoses that included Cerebral Vascular Accident (stroke), Dementia, and Depression. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] documented the Brief Interview for Mental Status score was 11, which indicated the resident had moderately impaired cognition. The resident required setup or clean-up assistance for meals. The Comprehensive Care Plan for Activities of Daily Living initiated on 8/18/2023 and updated on 11/9/2023 documented Resident #134 needed setup or clean-up assistance with eating and was able to feed themself. During the Dining Task observation conducted on Unit 14 during the lunch meal on 3/26/2024 from 12:24 PM to 12:56 PM Resident #134 was observed being fed their yogurt by Certified Nursing Assistant #2, who was standing over the resident. Certified Nursing Assistant #2 was interviewed on 3/26/2024 at 2:16 PM and stated Resident #134 needed encouragement to eat and before they (Certified Nursing Assistant #2) removed the tray they wanted to encourage Resident #134 to eat a little more yogurt. Certified Nursing Assistant #2 stated Resident #134 normally eats independently once the tray is set up. Certified Nursing Assistant #2 stated they should have sat down next to Resident #134 while they assisted the resident with completing their meal. Registered Nurse #4 was interviewed on 3/26/2024 at 2:29 PM. Registered Nurse #4 stated a staff person assisting a resident with their meal should be seated next to the resident. Registered Nurse #4 stated a staff person is expected to sit and interact with the resident in order to maintain the resident's dignity and quality of life. The Director of Nursing Services was interviewed on 3/26/2024 at 3:48 PM. The Director of Nursing Services stated a staff person is expected to sit next to and interact with the resident while assisting with a meal in order to maintain the resident's dignity and quality of life. The Director of Nursing Services stated they reviewed the Meal Pass policy, and the policy did not explicitly indicate that staff should sit next to the resident while assisting with meals. Resident #134 was interviewed on 3/28/2024 at 11:31 AM. Resident #134 stated they were able to eat independently; however, they sometimes felt weak and the staff assisted them with eating. Resident #134 could not recall if the staff normally sat next to them during that time. 2) Resident #192 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included Cerebral Vascular Accident (stroke), Dementia, and Left Hemiparesis (weakness). The resident required setup or clean-up assistance for meals. The Comprehensive Care Plan for Activities of Daily Living initiated on 8/30/2023 and updated on 11/23/2023 documented Resident #192 needed setup or clean-up assistance with eating and was able to feed themself. During the Dining Task observation conducted on Unit 14 during the lunch meal on 3/26/2024 from 12:24 PM to 12:56 PM Resident #192 was observed being fed their sherbet by Certified Nursing Assistant #3, who was standing over the resident. Certified Nursing Assistant #3 was interviewed on 3/26/2024 at 2:23 PM. Certified Nursing Assistant #3 stated Resident #192 normally did not require assistance with eating once their meal tray was set up. Certified Nursing Assistant #3 stated Resident #192 does not have use of their left hand but was able to use a utensil in their right hand. Certified Nursing Assistant #3 stated they normally sit next to a resident who requires total assistance with eating but during the lunch meal, they (Certified Nursing Assistant #3) wanted to encourage Resident #192 to eat a little bit more before they (Certified Nursing Assistant #3) removed Resident #192's tray. Certified Nursing Assistant #3 stated they should have been seated next to Resident #192 when they assisted the resident with their sherbet. Certified Nursing Assistant #3 understood it was a dignity concern and they would normally sit next to a resident they were assisting with a full meal. Registered Nurse #4 was interviewed on 3/26/2024 at 2:29 PM. Registered Nurse #4 stated a staff person assisting a resident with their meal should be seated next to the resident. Registered Nurse #4 stated a staff person is expected to sit and interact with the resident in order to maintain the resident's dignity and quality of life. The Director of Nursing Services was interviewed on 3/26/2024 at 3:48 PM. The Director of Nursing Services stated a staff person is expected to sit next to and interact with the resident while assisting with a meal in order to maintain the resident's dignity and quality of life. The Director of Nursing Service stated they reviewed the Meal Pass policy, and the policy does not explicitly indicate that staff should sit next to the resident while assisting with meals. Resident #192 was interviewed on 3/28/2024 at 11:38 AM. Resident #192 stated they did not like to be fed because it made them feel worse than they really were. Resident #192 stated their left hand is in a brace due to a stroke and their right hand sometimes shakes. Resident #192 stated on days when their right hand shakes more than normal they required assistance with eating and could not recall if staff sat next to them or stood over them. 10 NYCRR 415.3(d)(1)(i)
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0558 (Tag F0558)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 3/26/2024 and completed on 4...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 3/26/2024 and completed on 4/02/2024, the facility did not ensure that each resident received services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs including ensuring that the resident has a call system within reach and is able to use it if desired. This was identified for one (Resident #233) of one resident reviewed for the Environmental Task. Specifically, Resident #233 was observed lying in a Geri chair in their room on 3/26/2024 at 10:15 AM, 3/26/2024 at 2:39 PM, and on 3/28/2024 at 9:46 AM. The call bell was observed on the floor on each occasion and was not within the resident's reach. The finding is: The facility's policy titled, Call Bells/Call Bell Audit revised in April 2023, documented the call bell must always be accessible to the resident. Resident #233 was admitted with diagnoses that included Cerebral Infarction, Pulmonary Embolism, and Tachycardia. The Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] documented the resident's Brief Interview for Mental Status score was 00 which indicated the resident had severe cognitive impairment. The Minimum Data Set assessment documented the resident had a range of motion impairment to both upper extremities. The Comprehensive Care Plan for Falls dated 2/28/2024 documented to keep the call bell within the resident's reach. The Comprehensive Care Plan for Potential for Injuries dated 3/07/2024 documented to place the call bell within reach of the resident. During an observation on Unit 21 on 3/26/2024 at 10:15 AM and again on 03/26/2024 at 2:39 PM, Resident #233 was lying in a [NAME] chair in their bedroom with no call bell within their reach. The call bell was observed on the floor on both occasions. Resident #233 was not able to be interviewed. On 03/27/2023 at 11:03 Certified Nursing Assistant #5 was observed finishing their care with Resident #233 and placing the call bell on her blanket within reach. During an observation on 3/28/2024 at 9:46 AM the surveyor walked with Registered Nurse #1, the Charge Nurse, into Resident#233's room. The resident was resting in their bed. The curtain was drawn halfway around the bed and the resident was not visible from the room door. The call bell was on the floor. Registered Nurse #1, the Charge Nurse, cleaned and placed the call bell in the resident's hand. Registered Nurse #1 asked the resident if they could press the call bell. The resident stated Yes but did not press the call bell. On 3/27/2024 at 11:04 AM, Certified Nursing Assistant#5 was interviewed and stated that every resident must always have access to a call bell. Registered Nurse #1 was interviewed on 3/28/2024 at 9:46 AM and stated Resident #233 sometimes uses the call bell. Registered Nurse #1 stated the call bell should be accessible to the resident when the resident is in their room. The Director of Rehabilitation Services was interviewed on 3/29/2024 at 8:47 AM and stated that Resident #233 receives occupational and speech-language pathology services. Resident #233 will be evaluated today for the ability to use the call bell. Licensed Practical Nurse #4 was interviewed on 3/29/2024 at 10:00 AM and stated Resident #233 was evaluated today by an Occupational Therapist and the resident was unable to use a call bell and therefore now will be monitored frequently. Once the physician's order to monitor the resident is obtained the Certified Nursing Aide Accountability record will be updated to reflect the enhanced monitoring schedule. The Director of Nursing Services was interviewed on 4/01/2024 at 8:29 AM and stated if the residents cannot use the call bell, they should be evaluated for an alternate means to alert staff if they need assistance. The use of a tap bell is an alternative to the regular call bell. For those residents who cannot use any call bell, the call bell will still be kept within reach for the resident and any of the resident's visitors. The Director of Nursing Services further stated that staff should monitor those residents who cannot use the call bell system and Resident #233 should have been assessed upon admission for their ability to use the call bell system. 10 NYCRR 415.5 Euro(1)
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0657 (Tag F0657)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 3/26/2024 and completed on 4/2/2024, the fa...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 3/26/2024 and completed on 4/2/2024, the facility did not ensure a person-centered comprehensive care plan was reviewed and revised to address each resident's needs. This was identified for one (Resident #252) of one resident reviewed for care planning care area out of 40 total sampled residents. Specifically, there was no documented evidence that the comprehensive care plans for Resident #252 were reviewed and revised upon the quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE]. The finding is: The facility's policy and procedure titled, Care Planning last reviewed 2/2024, documented to ensure the accurate and timely completion of the Minimum Data Set, Care Area Assessment, and Comprehensive Care Plan for all residents. Procedure 1.0.3 documented the care plan will be reviewed and revised to reflect the resident's current condition per policy and regulation. Procedure 1.0.11 documented it is the responsibility of the clinical team to ensure that care plans are updated according to specified time frames and the resident response to goals, interventions, and changes in condition must be updated as well. Resident #252 was admitted diagnosis of Cerebral Infarction. The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15 indicating the resident was cognitively intact. The resident required setup assistance for eating and bed mobility, and supervision for toileting and transfer. The resident participated in the assessment. The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15 indicating the resident was cognitively intact. The resident required setup assistance for eating and bed mobility, and supervision for toileting and transfer. The resident participated in the assessment. A record review revealed multiple Comprehensive Care Plans (such as, but not limited to dementia, dental, vision, communication, and pain) with an onset date of 8/4/2023, last revised 10/27/2023, were not reviewed and/or revised in accordance with the Minimum Data Set assessment schedule. There was no documented evidence that the comprehensive care plans were reviewed and/or revised when the quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment was completed on 1/19/2024. Registered Nurse #11 was interviewed on 4/1/2024 at 9:55 AM and stated that all Registered Nurses and Nursing Supervisors, on any shift can initiate, update, and review care plans. Registered Nurse Supervisor #6 was interviewed on 4/1/2024 at 10:04 AM and stated that any Registered Nurse on the unit can update a care plan. The Director of Nursing Services will also assign some nurses familiar with the process to review and revise the care plans. Registered Nurse Supervisor #6 stated that care plans are updated every time there is a change in the resident's condition, such as a medical order; and reviewed and revised quarterly, with the Minimum Data Set schedule. Registered Nurse Supervisor #6 stated nursing supervisors are responsible for ensuring that residents' care plans are initiated and updated timely. Registered Nurse Supervisor #6 stated they were not aware that the care plans for Resident #252 were not updated when the quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment was completed on 1/19/2024. The Registered Nurse Minimum Data Set Coordinator was interviewed on 4/1/2024 at 2:41 PM and stated that they complete the Minimum Data Set assessments but have nothing to do with the care plans. The Registered Nurse Minimum Data Set Coordinator further stated that the Director of Nursing Services assigns the Nursing Supervisors to initiate and update the care plans in accordance with the Minimum Data Set schedule. The Director of Nursing Services was interviewed on 4/1/2024 at 2:46 PM and stated that the Nurse Manager and Nursing Supervisors are responsible to review and update residents' care plans. The care plans are supposed to be updated whenever there is a change in the resident's condition or when a change in the resident's treatment plan occurs such as new physician orders, etc. The Director of Nursing Services stated that if there are no changes in the resident's plan of care then the staff are supposed to review the care plans in accordance with the Minimum Data Set schedule. The Director of Nursing Services stated that the care plans for Resident #252 should have been updated with the 1/19/2024 Minimum Data Set assessment schedule. 10 NYCCR 415.11(c)(2)(i-iii)
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Tube Feeding (Tag F0693)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 3/26/2024 and completed on 4...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 3/26/2024 and completed on 4/2/2024, the facility did not ensure that a resident who is fed by enteral means receives the appropriate treatment, care, and services to prevent complications of enteral feeding. This was identified for one (Resident #184) of three residents reviewed for Tube Feeding. Specifically, on 3/26/2024 at 10:30 AM and 3/27/2024 at 8:00 AM Resident #184's tube feeding bottle was observed hanging on a feeding tube stand without a label including the resident's name, and the time the tube feeding was initiated. The finding is: The facility's Policy and Procedure titled; Enteral Tube Feeding last revised 10/2023 documented that the tube feeding preparation will be administered as per the physician's order to meet the nutritional needs of the resident. The feeding bottle must be labeled with the resident's name and the administrating nurse's initial, date, and time of administration. Resident #184 was admitted with diagnoses that included Respiratory Failure, Osteomyelitis (bone infection), and Type II Diabetes. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented that the resident's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was 99 which indicated the resident had severely impaired cognition. Resident #184 required one-person assistance with all Activities of Daily Living (ADL). The Minimum Data Set documented the resident required a feeding tube to meet the total calories per day. The Comprehensive Care Plan (CCP) for tube feeding dated 1/9/2024 documented interventions to assess for patency and proper placement of the tube, and ensure the head of the bed is elevated at 45 degrees during feeding and one-hour post feeding. The Physician's order dated 2/20/2024 documented to administer Jevity 1.5 Cal (a fiber-fortified, high-nitrogen liquid tube feeding formula, suitable for supplemental or sole source of nutrition) at 95 milliliters per hour continuously. Water flush of 120 milliliters before and after each feeding. During an observation on 3/26/2024 at 10:30 AM, Resident #184 had an enteral feeding bottle hanging from the feeding tube stand. The enteral bottle did not have a label that indicated the resident's name, the time feeding was started, and the feeding directions as prescribed by the physician. In a subsequent observation on 3/27/2024 at 8:00 AM, Resident #184 had an enteral feeding bottle hanging from the feeding tube stand. The enteral bottle did not have a label that indicated the resident's name, the time feeding was started, and the feeding directions as prescribed by the physician. Licensed Practical Nurse #1 was interviewed on 3/27/2024 at 8:00 AM and stated they did not notice that Resident #184 did not have a label on their enteral feeding bottle. Licensed Practical Nurse #1 stated they should have checked the bottle to ensure a label was in place. Resident #184 receives continuous feeding and they (Licensed Practical Nurse #1) were concentrating on the medication administration and forgot to check the enteral feeding label. Licensed Practical Nurse #5 was interviewed on 3/28/2024 at 2:03 PM and stated that they always check the label on the enteral bottle before administering the enteral feeding. All enteral feeding bottles are received from the kitchen. The nurses are responsible for ensuring that labels on the enteral feeding bottles are in place with the correct name of the resident and the amount to be administered as per the Physician's order. The Director of Nutrition and Food Services was interviewed on 4/1/2024 at 8:00 AM and stated that the process of labeling for all enteral bottles starts from the kitchen. Once they receive the order for enteral feeding, one of the nutritionists will provide a label with the resident's name, room number, direction for enteral feeding, date, and the name of the Physician who ordered the enteral feeding. All enteral feeding bottles are supplied to each resident unit with the correct label. The kitchen staff delivers the enteral bottles early in the morning. The Director of Nutrition and Food Services stated they did not know why Resident #184's enteral feeding bottle was not labeled. The Director of Nursing Services was interviewed on 4/1/2024 at 8:19 AM and stated that all nurses must follow the protocol for Tube Feeding which includes labeling the tube feeding bottle with the resident's name, and the direction for enteral feeding administration as per the physician's orders. The Director of Nursing services stated they expected the nurses to ensure that the enteral bottle had a proper label before starting the enteral feeding. 10 NYCRR 415.12(g)(2)
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 3/26/2024 and completed on 4...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 3/26/2024 and completed on 4/2/2024, the facility did not establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. This was identified for four (Residents #151, #64, #374, and #282) of seven residents reviewed for Infection Control. Specifically, during observation of the four-bedded room shared by Resident #151, Resident #64, Resident #374, and Resident #282, a Special Droplet/Contact Precaution sign was observed outside the door. The precaution sign included instructions for the use of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) including gloves, mask, gown, and a face shield or goggles. Certified Nursing Assistant #6 was observed taking vital signs (blood pressure, pulse rate, and oxygen saturation level) for Resident #151 inside the room wearing gloves and a surgical mask. Certified Nursing Assistant #6 was not wearing a gown and a face shield or goggles as indicated on the precaution sign. The finding is: The facility's policy titled Infection Prevention and Control: Transmission-Based Precautions revised on 2/9/2024 documented that transmission-based precautions are the second tier of basic infection control and are to be used in addition to standard precautions for residents who may be infected or colonized with certain infectious agents for which additional precautions are needed to prevent infection transmission. Special Precautions are combined Droplet and Contact precautions used for residents with confirmed or suspected COVID-19 and with high-risk exposures; may also be used on the unit when an outbreak occurs when both COVID-19, influenza, or Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) infections are co-circulating on the unit or in the facility. A fit-tested National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) approved N95 (Non-Oil 95 percent efficiency mask) or higher-level Respiratory Respirator for healthcare personnel who must enter the room is required upon entry into the resident room. Doff (take off)/discard) when exiting the room to contain pathogens and perform hand hygiene. The policy documented that Multidrug-Resistant Organisms contaminate the skin and immediate environment of residents who are dependent upon assistance for activities of daily living, ventilator dependent, have indwelling medical devices, wounds, and frequent soiling. The use of gowns and gloves for specific care activities for such residents reduces contamination and subsequent transmission to other residents. -Resident #151 was admitted with diagnoses including Acute Respiratory Failure with Hypoxia, Traumatic Brain Injury, and Sepsis. A Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of four which indicated the resident had severely impaired cognition. A Comprehensive Care Plan dated 1/20/2023 for Actual and Potential Infection as evidenced by Extended Spectrum Beta Lactamase (ESBL - a type of bacteria that is resistant to some antibiotics) in the urine and Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci (VRE-bacteria that is resistant to some powerful antibiotics) in the rectum included intervention to monitor vital signs as needed, laboratory monitoring, and physician evaluation as needed. A Comprehensive Care Plan (CCP) dated 1/26/2024 for Actual/Potential for Infection of COVID-19 virus/Influenza/Respiratory Syncytial Virus/ Pneumococcal documented interventions that included monitoring signs and symptoms of infection such as congestion, fever, chills, body aches, and shortness of breath. Practice social distancing. Encourage fluids via a Gastrostomy Tube (GT). Proper handwashing and maintaining precautions as ordered. A physician's order dated 4/27/2023 documented to place the resident on Contact Isolation (Precautions) secondary to Multidrug-Resistant organism (MDRO). There were no current physician's orders for Contact precautions. A Nursing Progress Note dated 3/24/2024 during the 11:00 PM-7:00 AM shift documented that Resident # 151 developed a temperature of 102.5 degrees Fahrenheit, and Tylenol (fever-reducing medication) was administered. A rapid COVID-19 test was completed with a negative result. -Resident #64 was admitted with diagnoses including Nontraumatic Intracerebral Hemorrhage, Type II Diabetes and Hypertension. A Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating the resident was cognitively intact. A Physician's Order dated 7/22/2023 documented to place the resident on Contact Isolation secondary to Multi-Drug Resistant Organism (MDRO). There were no current physician's orders for Contact precautions. A Comprehensive Care Plan dated 11/28/2023 for Multi-Drug Resistant Organism (MDRO) Colonization in the rectum, sputum, and nares (nose), documented interventions that included vital signs and laboratory orders as per the physician. -Resident # 374 was admitted with diagnoses including Malignant Neoplasm of the tongue, Gastrostomy (G Tube) Status, and Dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). A Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, indicating the resident was cognitively intact. A Comprehensive Care Plan (CCP) dated 1/4/2024 for Multi-Drug Resistant Organism (MDRO) documented interventions that included vital signs monitoring, laboratory orders, and a physician's evaluation as needed. A physician's Order dated 1/4/2024 documented to place the resident on Contact isolation secondary to Multi-Drug Resistant Organism (MDRO). There were no current physician's orders for Contact precautions. A Comprehensive Care Plan dated 1/26/2024 for Actual potential for infection, COVID-19, Influenza, and Respiratory Syncytial Virus documented interventions that included social distancing, medications as per order, proper handwashing, and monitoring for signs and symptoms of infection such as fever, chills, body aches, shortness of breath. -Resident #282 was admitted with diagnoses including Respiratory Failure, Quadriplegia, and Sepsis. A Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview for a Mental Status score of 15, indicating the resident was cognitively intact. A Comprehensive Care Plan (CCP) dated 9/6/2023 for Multi-Drug Resistant Organism (MDRO) in urine and rectum, documented interventions that included monitoring for signs and symptoms of infection. Ensure good hygiene and observe frequent hand washing. A physician order dated 12/19/2023 documented to place the resident on Contact Isolation secondary to Multi-Drug Resistant Organisms (MDRO). There were no current physician's orders for Contact precautions. During an observation on 3/27/2024 at 8:00 AM on Unit 22, Certified Nursing Assistant #6 was observed inside the residents' room that was occupied by Resident #151, Resident #64, Resident # 374, and Resident #282. Certified Nursing Assistant #6 obtained Resident #151's blood pressure, pulse, and oxygen saturation level then exited the room. Certified Nursing Assistant #6 was observed wearing gloves and a surgical mask; Certified Nursing Assistant #6 was not wearing a gown and was not wearing a face shield or goggles. A sign posted outside the room read Special Droplet/Contact Precautions. The sign included instructions for the use of specific Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) for all visitors, doctors, and staff which included, wearing a face mask, eye protection (face shield or goggles), a gown, and gloves. When doing aerosolizing procedures, N95 mask with eye protection or higher is required. Use patient-dedicated or disposable equipment. Clean and disinfect shared equipment. Certified Nursing Assistant #6 was interviewed on 3/27/2024 at 8:40 AM and stated that they were in the residents' room to check Resident #151's vital signs. Certified Nursing Assistant #6 stated they were wearing gloves and a surgical mask in the room. Certified Nursing Assistant #6 stated while they were in the room they cleaned the blood pressure machine after using the machine for each resident. Certified Nursing Assistant #6 stated they did not check the sign posted outside the door, they did not pay attention because they were focused on completing their task. Certified Nursing Assistant #6 stated they were aware that the unit had different isolation precautions and they should have checked the sign and the instructions for the use of proper Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) before entering the resident rooms. The Infection Preventionist was interviewed on 3/27/2024 at 9:00 AM and stated that the signage posted outside the resident's room is to alert the staff about proper Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) use before entering the room. Resident #151, Resident #64, Resident #374, and Resident #282 were on contact precautions because of a history of Multi-Drug Resident Organism infection. The Residents were placed on enhanced droplet-contact precautions secondary to possible COVID-19 infection exposure; however, the test results came back negative and the residents were put back on contact precautions again. The expectation is for all staff and visitors to follow the correct Personal Protective Equipment use as indicated on the precaution sign that is posted outside the resident's room. A subsequent observation of the Residents (#151, #64, #374, and #282) room was conducted on 3/28/2024 at 9:00 AM. The sign posted outside the room read, Contact Isolation which included instructions for the use of a gown, gloves, an eye shield, and a surgical mask. The Director of Nursing Services was interviewed on 4/1/2024 at 9:37 AM and stated that all staff must follow infection control protocols. These protocols are in place to keep the residents and staff safe. All changes are communicated to each unit to ensure that all infection control standards are followed. The Director of Nursing Services stated that Certified Nursing Assistant #6 should have followed the correct Personal Protective Equipment indicated on the signage that is posted outside the resident's room. 10 NYCRR 415.19(a)(1-3)
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Pharmacy Services (Tag F0755)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 3/26/2024 and completed on 4/2/2024, the facility did not ensure that drug records were in order and...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 3/26/2024 and completed on 4/2/2024, the facility did not ensure that drug records were in order and accounted for all controlled drugs. This was identified on three (Unit 21, Unit 22, and Unit 31) of 13 nursing units. Specifically, during the medication storage task observations on Unit 21, Unit 22, and Unit 31, the Controlled Substance Administration Record form was not reconciled to reflect the available controlled medications in the medication blister pack for Resident #35 (Unit 21), Resident #221 (Unit 22) and for Resident #7 (Unit 31). The finding is: The facility's policy titled, Medication: Controlled Substances, revised 3/2024, documented that immediately after a medication dose is administered the licensed nurse administering the drug enters all of the following information on the controlled substance administration record: date/time of administration, dose/amount administered, and the signature of the nurse administering the drug. 1) Resident #35 was admitted with diagnoses including Diabetes Mellitus, Anxiety Disorder, and Depression. The 1/8/2024 Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15, indicating the resident was cognitively intact. A physician's order effective 3/8/2024 documented to administer Klonopin (Clonazepam-a controlled substance used to treat anxiety) 1-milligram tablet, one tablet by mouth two times a day, for diagnosis of Anxiety Disorder. During an observation of Unit 21's medication cart on 3/26/2024 at 1:16 PM, Resident #35's Controlled Substance Administration Record form for Clonazepam documented that 55 tablets of Clonazepam were remaining; however, the blister pack for Clonazepam only had 24 tablets. Registered Nurse #1 was present during the observation. Registered Nurse #1 was interviewed on 3/26/2024 immediately after the observation and stated that there were 30 additional tablets available, in storage, in the medication room. Registered Nurse #1 stated they gave one tablet of Clonazepam to Resident #35 at 10:00 AM but did not document in the Controlled Substance Administration Record form that the dose was administered because the unit was busy. Registered Nurse #1 stated they should have documented and reconciled the Controlled Substance Administration Record as soon as they removed the controlled substance from the blister pack. 2) Resident #221 was admitted with diagnoses including Diabetes Mellitus, Cerebral Palsy, and Seizure Disorder. The 1/18/2024 Minimum Data Set assessment documented no Brief Interview for Mental Status due to the resident's severely impaired cognitive skills for daily decision-making. A physician's order dated 3/11/2024 documented to administer Vimpat (Lacosamide- controlled substance used to treat seizures) 100 milligrams tablet; give one tablet via gastrostomy tube two times a day, for diagnosis of Seizures. During an observation of Unit 22's medication cart on 3/26/2024 at 1:25 PM Resident #221's Controlled Substance Administration Record form for Lacosamide (Vimpat) documented that 34 tablets were remaining; however, the blister pack for Lacosamide only had three tablets. Licensed Practical Nurse #2 was present during the observation. Licensed Practical Nurse #2 was interviewed on 3/26/2024 immediately after the observation and stated there were 30 additional tablets in storage in the medication room. Licensed Practical Nurse #2 stated they gave one Lacosamide tablet to Resident #221 at 10:00 AM. Licensed Practical Nurse #2 stated normally they document on the Controlled Substance Administration Record form immediately after the medication is administered; however, today the unit was busy and they were not feeling well. 3) Resident #7 was admitted with diagnoses including Diabetes Mellitus, Seizure Disorder, and Schizophrenia. The 2/15/2024 Minimum Data Set assessment documented no Brief Interview for Mental Status score due to the resident's moderately impaired cognitive skills for daily decision-making. A physician's order dated 3/19/2024 documented to administer Xcopri (a controlled substance used to treat seizures) 100 milligrams tablet; give one tablet by mouth per day, for diagnosis of Seizures. During an observation of Unit 31's medication cart on 3/26/2024 at 2:07 PM, Resident #7's Controlled Substance Administration Record form for Xcopri documented that eight tablets were remaining; however, the blister pack for Xcopri only had seven tablets. Registered Nurse #2 was present during the observation. Registered Nurse #2 stated they administered one Xcopri tablet to Resident #7 at 10:00 AM. Registered Nurse #2 stated they have been getting calls from residents and have been busy and that is why they (Registered Nurse #2) did not document on the Controlled Substance Administration Record form when they removed the controlled medication from the blister pack for administration. The Registered Nurse Inservice Coordinator was interviewed on 3/27/2024 at 10:26 AM and stated all medications have to be signed for when they are administered, not just narcotics or controlled substances. The Registered Nurse Inservice Coordinator stated whenever a narcotic or controlled substance is removed from a blister pack, the Controlled Substance Administration Record form has to be updated and the controlled substance count of the blister pack has to be confirmed. The Director of Nursing Services was interviewed on 3/27/2024 at 1:52 PM and stated signing the Controlled Substance Administration Record form has to be done immediately after a medication is administered because reconciliation of the Controlled Substance Administration Record is necessary to keep track of controlled substances. 10 NYCRR 415.18(b)(1)(2)(3)
Mar 2022 3 deficiencies 2 IJ (2 affecting multiple)
CRITICAL (K)

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Someone could have died · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record reviews and staff interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 3/1/2022 and completed on 3/9/2022 t...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record reviews and staff interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 3/1/2022 and completed on 3/9/2022 the facility failed to ensure that the resident's environment was free of accident hazards for one (Resident #220) of 4 residents reviewed for accidents. Specifically, Resident #220 with a known history of Polysubstance abuse, was not supervised to prevent the availability of non-prescribed illicit drug usage within the facility. Resident #220 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. A Psychosocial assessment dated [DATE] documented the resident was utilizing and selling illicit drugs in the previous nursing facility. The current facility did not develop care plan interventions to monitor and supervise the resident for substance abuse. On 12/13/2021 Resident #220 was found unresponsive and transferred to hospital for opioid drug overdose. The facility did not initiate an investigation after the 12/13/2021 incident. The hospital discharge recommendations were to provide supervised visits. The facility did not address and re-assess the interventions to monitor and prevent the resident from obtaining illicit drugs. Subsequently, on 3/2/2022 the resident was found unresponsive and sent to hospital with diagnosis of drug overdose. The resident reported to the emergency room Physician that they (Resident #220) snorted heroin and passed out. Additionally, the facility did not have a system in place to identify and monitor residents with history of drug abuse. This resulted in actual harm to Resident #220 with potential for serious harm for 64 residents with history of drug abuse that is Immediate Jeopardy and Substandard Quality of Care. The finding is: The facility Contraband policy and procedure dated 11/2021 documented in order to ensure a safe environment, all residents presenting to the facility will be subject to a search directed towards identifying contraband and preventing its entrance into the facility. The policy defined contraband as items of danger including illegal substances. The procedure documented that all residents who enter the facility will be subjected to search if any suspected, or any evidence of having contraband. If a resident is found to have controlled substances during their stay, the staff member who finds the controlled substances will bring this to the attention of the attending in charge and the nurse in charge. Visitors who bring contraband into the facility may be asked to leave and may be denied visiting privileges in the future. The resident involved may become subject to a repeat search with confiscation or checking of objects as described above. The facility did not have a documented Policy and Procedure for management of residents with diagnosis of Substance Abuse. Resident #220 was admitted with diagnoses of Polysubstance Abuse, Anxiety Disorder, Depression and status post Laminectomy. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition. The MDS documented Resident #220 required limited assistance of one-person with locomotion in the resident's room. The locomotion off the unit did not occur in seven days of the MDS look back period. The MDS documented the resident was feeling depressed, or hopeless, and had disturbed sleep. The Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] documented Resident #220 had a BIMS score of 15, indicating intact cognition. The MDS further documented Resident #220 required supervision without physical help from staff for locomotion on and off the unit. The resident was feeling depressed, or hopeless, and had disturbed sleep. The resident exhibited behavioral symptoms that were not directed towards others in four to six days in the last 7 day look back period of the MDS. The psychosocial assessment dated [DATE] documented Resident #220 was at another skilled nursing facility for 2 years for their back issues and was kicked out of previous facility for using and selling heroin, fentanyl and cocaine. The psychosocial assessment documented that Resident #220's judgement was poor. Resident #220 was noted to be anxious, impulsive, easily agitated, and disregarded rules. The history of polysubstance abuse care plan dated 9/28/2021 documented that Resident #220 was kicked out of a previous skilled nursing facility for using and selling heroin, fentanyl and cocaine. Resident #220 knew what was done was wrong and will not do that in the current facility. The goal included that Resident #220 will not use or sell illegal substances. The interventions included to encourage participation in activities of interest, social work one to one visits for emotional support and counselling as needed, psychiatric consultation, and psychological services follow up as needed. The Nursing Progress Note from 9/23/2021 through 12/12/2021 were reviewed and indicated no documented behaviors related to consuming or selling illicit drugs. The Situation Background Assessment Recommendation (SBAR) Communication Form dated 12/13/2021 documented Resident #220 had a change in condition with symptoms of altered mental status. The SBAR documented Resident #220 presented with altered level of consciousness, weakness, and shortness of breath. Around 9:00 PM, Resident #220 was observed sitting in the chair very lethargic with alteration in consciousness and was transferred to the hospital. The hospital record dated 12/13/2021 documented that Resident #220 was admitted to the hospital for altered mental status with Acute Hypoxic Respiratory Failure secondary to drug overdose (cocaine, opiate and benzodiazepine) with moderate improvement after Narcan 2 milligram (mg) injection. As per Emergency Medical Service (EMS) the oxygen saturation rate for Resident #220 was 82% (normal 95% or above) on room air at the Skilled Nursing Facility and was Hypotensive (low blood pressure). The hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE] documented a note to the Skilled Nursing Facility: supervised visiting only. Resident #220 has been receiving drugs from outside visitors and subsequently overdosed. There was no documented evidence of an investigation to determine the root cause of Resident #220's opiate overdose nor where and how the resident received the drugs. The Nursing Admission/readmission note dated 12/16/2021 documented that Resident #220 was admitted from the hospital at 7:40 PM. The resident was to only have supervised visitation. The Social Work note dated 12/16/2021 documented Resident #220 stated that a visitor brought the drugs to the building. Resident #220 stated that they took the visitor's phone number out of their phone and will not do it again. The Social Worker re-educated Resident #220 about not to smoke or vape in the facility. The history of polysubstance abuse care plan dated 9/28/2021 was not updated after the resident had returned from the hospital on [DATE] with a diagnosis of drug overdose. A document titled Resident Delivery Searches dated 12/2021 documented that when a delivery comes to the facility for any of the following residents, the deliveries are to be searched for contraband. The list of names included Resident #220. The Physician readmission note dated 12/17/2021 documented Resident #220 had a past medical history of Polysubstance Abuse. Resident #220 was admitted on [DATE] [to the hospital] for altered mental status with Acute Hypoxic Respiratory Failure secondary to drug overdose (cocaine, opiate and benzodiazepine) with moderate improvement after Narcan 2mg injection. The assessment and plan included to continue current medications, provide safe environment, adequate nutrition, and supportive care. Monitor fingerstick, GI follow up for hepatic mass and psychiatry follow up. The Physician did not acknowledge the recommendation from the hospital related to supervised visitation for Resident #220. The Social Work note dated 1/4/2022 documented Resident #220 was moving from Unit 22 to Unit 46. Resident #220 was educated about not smoking or vaping in the facility. The Physician's note dated 1/12/2022 documented that Resident #220 has not had any acute events. The assessment and plan included to provide current medications, provide safe environment, adequate nutrition, and supportive care. The Physician did not acknowledge the recommendation from the hospital related to supervised visitation for Resident #220. The physician's note dated 2/9/22 documented that Resident #220 has not had any acute events and Resident #220 was able to transfer out of bed to ambulate by pushing the wheelchair independently. The physician documented that Resident #220 has a history of Anxiety that is controlled with Xanax. Psychiatry recommended to decrease Xanax and Resident #220 gets very agitated and violent when you try to discuss tapering of the Xanax. Resident #220 is on Cymbalta, Oxycodone and Baclofen for chronic back pain. Will decrease Cymbalta and discontinue Baclofen and follow up with Psychiatry regularly. The assessment and plan included to provide current medications, provide safe environment, adequate nutrition, and supportive care. Continue 2 liters of oxygen via nasal cannula. Nursing progress notes from 2/1/2022 to 3/2/2022 were reviewed. There was no documented evidence that the resident was being monitored or supervised for drug seeking behavior, attempts to sell illicit drugs, or consumption of illicit drugs prior to 3/2/2022. The December 2021 to March 2022 Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) Accountability Records documented Resident #220 had a diagnosis of Polysubstance abuse. The CNA Accountability Records documented that Resident #220 could push the wheelchair independently. There was no documented evidence that the resident was to have supervision or monitoring related to Polysubstance abuse. The SBAR Communication Form dated 3/2/2022 documented Resident #220 had a change in condition. At 6:00 PM, Resident #220 was unresponsive to verbal and tactile stimuli. The SBAR documented oxygen saturation level of 66% when on oxygen at 3 liters per minute. Resident #220 was transferred to the hospital. The hospital record dated 3/2/2022 documented Resident #220 was transferred from the Skilled Nursing Facility for altered mental status. Resident #220 was brought in by EMS from the Skilled Nursing Facility for possible overdose. Narcan 2mg was administered intramuscularly by EMS. Resident #220 stated that they (Resident #220) snorted some Heroin and passed out. Resident #220 had an admission three months ago in December [2021] for a similar overdose. Resident #220 was admitted to the hospital for altered mental status secondary to opioid intoxication. The urine toxicology report was positive for opiates and benzodiazepines. The attending physician at the hospital diagnosed Resident #220 with toxic encephalopathy secondary to opioid intoxication and Substance abuse. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #8 was interviewed on 3/03/2022 at 2:17 PM and stated they (CNA #8) were the regularly assigned CNA for the 7AM to 3PM shift for Resident #220 for the past two months. CNA #8 stated Resident #220 propelled their wheelchair throughout the facility and sometimes went downstairs to the vending machine. Resident #220 did not have any specific instructions to be monitored. CNA #8 stated that Resident #220 was independent in self-care and mobility and did not require any oversight. CNA #8 stated that they have not received any instructions to look through Resident #220's belongings to check for substance abuse related materials. CNA #8 was not aware if Resident #220 had any visitors on 3/2/2022 or even in the past month. CNA #8 further stated that there were no special instructions to monitor Resident #220 for substance abuse behaviors and there was no direction provided to supervise the resident throughout the facility. Registered Nurse (RN #7) was interviewed on 3/3/2022 at 2:20 PM. RN #7 stated that they (RN #7) were the regular 7AM to 3PM shift Unit Nurse for Resident #220's unit and has known Resident #220 since the resident was transferred to the unit two months ago. RN #7 stated that the staff did not have any specific instructions for monitoring Resident #220's whereabouts in the facility or for supervised visits. RN #7 was not aware if Resident #220 had any visits on 3/2/2022. RN #7 stated that they were aware of Resident #220's history of Substance abuse but thought it was a long time ago. RN #7 was not aware of Resident #220's overdose in the facility in December 2021. RN #7 further stated they (RN #7) did not receive any instructions to look through Resident #220's belongings to check for substance abuse related materials. CNA #9 was interviewed on 3/3/2022 at 3:15 PM and stated that they (CNA #9) were the assigned CNA for Resident #220 on the 3 PM -11 PM nursing shift on 3/2/2022. CNA #9 stated that the regularly assigned CNA was on vacation as of 3/2/2022. Resident #220 was able to independently propel their wheelchair throughout the facility without supervision. CNA #9 stated that they last saw Resident #220 at 4:30 PM in their room on 3/2/2022. Resident #220 was in the room and was talking. CNA #9 was called over by RN #8 who discovered Resident #220 unresponsive in their room at 5:00 PM. CNA #9 stated that they did not have any instructions for monitoring the resident for substance abuse behaviors and was not aware of Resident #220's history of drug overdose at the facility. CNA #10 was interviewed on 3/3/2022 at 3:20 PM and stated that they (CNA #10) were the regularly assigned CNA on the 11:00 PM to 7:00 AM nursing shift for the past two months for Resident #220. CNA #10 stated that Resident #220 was usually in bed sleeping or watching television when they (CNA #10) started the 11:00 PM to 7:00 AM shift. CNA #10 stated they rarely went into Resident #220's room because Resident #220 was able to care for themself. CNA #10 stated that there was nothing on the CNA accountability record that instructed the CNAs to monitor the resident for drug abuse behavior. CNA #10 further stated they (CNA #10) were not aware of Resident #220's overdose and illicit drug use in the facility. RN #10 was interviewed on 3/3/2022 at 3:26 PM and stated that they (RN #10) were the RN Supervisor on 3/2/2022 on the 11 PM-7AM nursing shift and was covering the 3 PM-11 PM nursing shift on Resident #220's unit. RN #10 stated that they were called by RN #8 to Resident #220's room because Resident #220 presented with an altered mental status and was not waking up. Resident #220's oxygen saturation level was 66% and oxygen was being administered. The oxygen saturation level went up to 90-92%. RN #10 was aware of Resident #220's overdose in December 2021 but did not suspect that the resident had a drug overdose in this case. RN #10 did not tell the EMS anything about Resident #220's drug abuse behavior. RN #8 was interviewed on 3/3/2022 at 3:52 PM and stated that they (RN #8) were covering the 3PM-11PM nursing shift on 3/2/2022. RN #8 stated they were not the regularly assigned nurse for the resident's unit. RN #8 stated they (RN #8) were not aware that Resident #220 had substance abuse behaviors and had overdosed in December 2021 in the facility. RN #8 stated that there were no Physician's orders or instructions related to substance abuse monitoring for Resident #220. At the beginning of the shift Resident #220 was talking and seemed to be their usual self. RN #8 stated that they (RN #8) were not sure if Resident #220 left their bedroom at all during the shift. RN #8 stated that they (RN #8) did not see any visitors for Resident #220 during that shift nor did the Resident Care Associate (RCA) come to escort Resident #220 for a visit. At 5:00 PM, RN #8 went to Resident #220's room and Resident #220 seemed out of it. RN #8 stated they knew Resident #220 had a diagnosis of Diabetes and thought Resident #220 was in Diabetic shock. RN #8 did a fingerstick to check the blood sugar level which was 258 which did not indicate Diabetic shock. RN #8 stated they called RN #10 and continued to try to get Resident #220 to respond. When RN #10 arrived on the unit, RN #8 reported the resident's condition to RN #10. Resident #220 was transferred to hospital due to the unresponsiveness. Social Worker (SW) #2 was interviewed on 3/3/2022 at 5:11 PM and stated that they (SW #2) were the assigned SW for Resident #220 when the resident was admitted in September 2021. SW #2 stated they were aware that Resident #220 had a history of Substance abuse. SW #2 stated that residents with a known history of Substance abuse problems are referred to psychology and their incoming packages are to be checked for illicit drugs. SW #2 stated that searching packages is a standard protocol in the facility and did not have to be in a care plan. The nursing staff are expected to look through food items brought in from outside as per facility wide protocol. SW #2 stated that they (SW #2) believed that Resident #220 was not actively having Substance abuse disorder so a care plan to prevent and monitor substance abuse behavior was not developed. SW #2 stated that the facility cannot always search Resident #220's belongings and there's only so much they can do. SW #2 stated that Resident #220 was placed on SW #1's caseload when the resident was readmitted from the hospital on [DATE] and that it was SW #1's responsibility to develop a care plan to address Resident #220's substance abuse behavior. SW #1 was interviewed on 3/3/2022 at 5:51 PM. SW #1 stated that they were assigned to Resident #220 upon their readmission in December 2021 after the resident returned from the hospital from the opiate overdose. SW #1 stated that they did not complete a psychosocial assessment and did not develop a revised plan of care to address Resident #220's Substance abuse behavior. SW #1 could not recall reviewing the hospital discharge paperwork with the instruction for supervised visitation to reduce Substance abuse behavior. SW #1 stated that an interdisciplinary team approach was not used to address Resident #220's Substance abuse behavior. Resident #220 was reassigned to SW #2 on 1/4/2022. The Medical Director and Director of Nursing were interviewed concurrently on 3/3/2022 at 6:30 PM. The Medical Director stated that Resident #220's diagnosis of Poly Substance Abuse is noted on the medical record and the staff are aware of Resident #220's history. The Director of Nursing stated that there is a system in place to monitor Resident #220 and it is the facility wide protocol to check packages and to supervise visits for all residents in the auditorium. The Director of Nursing stated that everyone on the interdisciplinary team is aware of Resident #220's smoking behavior and the substance abuse history is noted in the medical record. The Medical Director stated that Resident #220's name is on the list at the entrance way for security to search any packages that came from the outside. The facility wide protocol is that the Social Worker, Recreation Aide, and Security are to look through incoming food and packages for any hazardous materials. The Director of Nursing stated that room searches are only done if a staff member suspected that a resident was smoking and that the facility cannot do more than that. The Medical Director and the Director of Nursing stated that Resident #220 has not had any visitors. The Director of Nursing stated that the facility did not initiate an Incident Report to investigate how Resident #220 obtained drugs in the facility on 12/13/2021 because SW #2 had written a note that Resident #220 received the drugs from a visitor. The Director of Nursing stated that Resident #220 did not require increased supervision. The Director of Nursing further stated that the protocols were facility wide and did not need to be documented in a care plan. Attending Physician #2 was interviewed on 3/4/2022 at 3:42 PM and stated that they (Attending Physician #2) provided care for Resident #220 since Resident #220 was moved to Unit 46 on 1/4/2022. Attending Physician #2 stated that Resident #220 required monitoring and supervision and they (Attending Physician #2) had verbally informed CNA #10 and RN #7 to monitor Resident #220 for Substance abuse behavior. Attending Physician #2 stated that they did not recall documenting the need for increased monitoring for Substance abuse behaviors or placing an order instructing nurses to do so. SW #2 was re-interviewed on 3/4/2022 at 5:15 PM. SW #2 stated that the facility staff located Resident #220's care plan entitled history of substance abuse which was dated 9/28/2021. The interventions did not include to monitor and supervise Resident #220's whereabouts in the facility for substance abuse behavior. SW #2 stated that they had developed the care plan but did not revise the care plan after the resident returned from the hospital on [DATE] since that was the responsibility of SW #1. Resident #220 should have had a revised care plan after the 12/13/2021 hospitalization. The care plan did not include any updates in December 2021. Resident #220 was not on the radar for active use of drugs at the time of the 9/28/2021 care plan. The search of packages is a standard practice for any resident in the facility so that intervention would not be in the care plan. 415.12(h)(1) The facility was notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on 3/3/2022. The Immediate Jeopardy was removed on 3/7/2022 prior to the completion of the survey. -The facility created policies and procedures to address needs of the residents with Alcohol and Drug abuse problems and Management of Residents with a History of Substance abuse. -The facility Educated 95% of the facility staff on the newly developed policies and procedures and on identification of care for residents' with a history of using Polysubstance/Polydrug abuse and identifying signs and symptoms of drug abuse. The facility also educated staff on narcotic overdose and use of Narcan. The staff that did not receive in-service education were either on vacation, on medical leave, or not were been scheduled for duty and will be in-serviced as they report to work. - The facility assessed and formulated care plans for all residents identified as having a history of Polysubstance abuse. -The facility created Resident contracts/agreements to educate residents on the facility's zero tolerance drug policy along with consequences. -The facility developed audit tools to monitor residents with a history of Substance abuse for signs and symptoms of drug abuse and updated the room search audit tool to include legal and illegal substances.
CRITICAL (K)

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Deficiency F0740 (Tag F0740)

Someone could have died · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interviews and record review during the Recertification Survey initiated on 3/1/2022 and completed on 3/9/...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interviews and record review during the Recertification Survey initiated on 3/1/2022 and completed on 3/9/2022, the facility failed to ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide the necessary behavioral health care and services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being, in accordance with the comprehensive assessment and plan of care. Behavioral health encompasses a resident's whole emotional and mental well-being, which includes, but is not limited to, the prevention and treatment of mental and substance use disorders. This was identified for one (Resident #220) of three residents reviewed for Behavioral health. Specifically, Resident #220 was admitted to the facility with a known history of illicit drug abuse. The admission psychosocial assessment dated [DATE] documented the resident was utilizing and selling illicit drugs in the previous nursing facility. The facility failed to develop and implement an effective comprehensive person-centered plan of care to address the substance abuse disorder. On 12/13/2021, Resident #220 was found unresponsive, was transferred to the hospital, and was diagnosed with an overdose from opiate use. No assessments or changes to the resident's plan of care were made upon their return from the hospital on [DATE]. Subsequently, Resident #220 was again found unresponsive on 3/2/2022, was transferred to the hospital for an overdose of Heroin and was diagnosed with Acute Hypercapnic Respiratory failure secondary to unintentional overdose. This resulted in actual harm to Resident #220 with potential for serious harm for 64 residents with a history of drug abuse that is Immediate Jeopardy. The finding is: The facility policy on assessment process dated 12/2021 documented that all residents receive timely, accurate, and appropriate interdisciplinary assessment and care planning. The assessment and review should be completed upon return from the hospital, when there is a significant change that appears to be permanent, based on a comparison of the resident's pre and post hospital status. The facility Behavior Documentation Policy and Procedure dated 4/4/2008 and last revised in 3/2022 documented to monitor residents' behavior and document on a daily basis. Behavior documentation is done on a daily basis on the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) Accountability Record by the CNA. It is the responsibility of the caregiver to document the resident's behavior, the intervention utilized for that behavior, and the efficacy of the intervention used every shift. The facility Contraband policy and procedure dated 11/2021 documented in order to ensure a safe environment, all residents presenting to the facility will be subject to a search directed towards identifying contraband and preventing its entrance into the facility. The policy defined contraband as items of danger including illegal substances. The procedure documented that all residents who enter the facility will be subjected to search if any suspected, or any evidence of having contraband. If a resident is found to have controlled substances during their stay, the staff member who finds the controlled substances will bring this to the attention of the attending in charge and the nurse in charge. Visitors who bring contraband into the facility may be asked to leave and may be denied visiting privileges in the future. The resident involved may become subject to a repeat search with confiscation or checking of objects as described above. The facility did not have a documented Policy and Procedure for management of residents with diagnosis of Substance Abuse. Resident #220 was admitted with diagnoses of Polysubstance Abuse, Anxiety Disorder, Depression and status post Laminectomy. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition. The MDS documented Resident #220 required limited assistance of one-person with locomotion in the resident's room. The locomotion off the unit did not occur in seven days of the MDS look back period. The MDS documented the resident was feeling depressed, or hopeless, and had disturbed sleep. The Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] documented Resident #220 had a BIMS score of 15, indicating intact cognition. The MDS further documented Resident #220 required supervision without physical help from staff for locomotion on and off the unit. The resident was feeling depressed, or hopeless, and had disturbed sleep. The resident exhibited behavioral symptoms that were not directed towards others in four to six days in the last 7 day look back period of the MDS. Resident #220 was observed on 3/1/2022 at 10:29 AM seated in their wheelchair in the hallway and conversing with another resident. Resident #220 stated that there are no activities that meet their interests. Resident #220 stated that it was very boring at the facility, and they (Resident #220) had complained to the recreation staff. Resident #220 stated that nothing was done and they did not find the current activities appropriate for them (Resident #220). The psychosocial assessment dated [DATE] documented Resident #220 was at another skilled nursing facility for 2 years for back issues. Resident was discharged in August 2021 from the other facility. Resident #220 was admitted to the current facility on 8/24/2021 for subacute rehabilitation and was discharged on 9/3/2021. Resident #220 decided they (Resident #220) could not stay where they were discharged to and had several hospitalizations until admitted as a second admission to the facility on 9/21/2021. The psychosocial assessment documented Resident #220 was kicked out of previous facility for using and selling heroin, fentanyl, and cocaine. The psychosocial assessment documented that Resident #220's judgement was poor. Resident #220 was noted to be anxious, impulsive, easily agitated, and disregarded rules. The history of polysubstance abuse care plan dated 9/28/2021 documented that Resident #220 was kicked out of a previous skilled nursing facility for using and selling heroin, fentanyl and cocaine. Resident #220 knew what was done was wrong and will not do that in the current facility. The goal included that Resident #220 will not use or sell illegal substances. The interventions included to encourage participation in activities of interest, social work one to one visits for emotional support and counselling as needed, psychiatric consultation, and psychological services follow up as needed. There were no care plan updates from 9/21/2021 to 3/2/2022. The psychology consultation dated 10/14/2021 documented that Resident #220 had diagnoses of Anxiety, Depression, and Substance Abuse. Resident #220 reported briefly receiving psychotherapy at a previous Skilled Nursing Facility. Resident #220 reported that they (Resident #220) were living with a friend but were unhappy with the arrangement because their friend was using drugs. The Psychologist documented the Resident #220 presents with a history of drug abuse and was homeless with limited social supports and significant health issues. Resident #220 agreed to speak with the Psychologist today but declined psychotherapy and was coping adequately. No psychotherapy was recommended at this time. The Physician's Order dated 12/2/2021 documented to obtain a psychological evaluation for Anger Management due to Resident #220 having a peer-to-peer altercation. There was no documented evidence that a psychological evaluation was completed after the 12/2/2021 referral. The Situation Background Assessment Recommendation (SBAR) Communication Form dated 12/13/2021 documented Resident #220 had a change in condition with symptoms of altered mental status. The SBAR documented Resident #220 presented with altered level of consciousness, weakness, and shortness of breath. Around 9:00 PM, Resident #220 was observed sitting in the chair very lethargic with alteration in consciousness and was transferred to the hospital. The hospital record dated 12/13/2021 documented that Resident #220 was admitted to the hospital for altered mental status with Acute Hypoxic Respiratory Failure secondary to drug overdose (cocaine, opiate and benzodiazepine) with moderate improvement after Narcan 2 milligram (mg) injection. As per Emergency Medical Service (EMS) the oxygen saturation rate for Resident #220 was 82% (normal 95% or above) on room air at the Skilled Nursing Facility and was Hypotensive (low blood pressure). The hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE] documented a note to the Skilled Nursing Facility: supervised visiting only. Resident #220 has been receiving drugs from outside visitors and subsequently overdosed. There was no documented evidence of an investigation to determine the root cause of Resident #220's opiate overdose nor where and how the resident received the drugs. The Nursing Admission/readmission note dated 12/16/21 documented that Resident #220 was admitted from the hospital at 7:40PM. Resident to only have supervised visitation. The Social Work note dated 12/16/2021 documented Resident #220 stated that a visitor brought the drugs to the building. Resident #220 stated that they took the visitor's phone number out of their phone and will not do it again. The Social Worker re-educated Resident #220 about not to smoke or vape in the facility. A document titled Resident Delivery Searches dated 12/2021 documented that when a delivery comes to the facility for any of the following residents, the deliveries are to be searched for contraband. The list of names included Resident #220. The Physician readmission note dated 12/17/2021 documented Resident #220 had a past medical history of Polysubstance Abuse. Resident #220 was admitted on [DATE] [to the hospital] for altered mental status with Acute Hypoxic Respiratory Failure secondary to drug overdose (cocaine, opiate and benzodiazepine) with moderate improvement after Narcan 2mg injection. The assessment and plan included to continue current medications, provide safe environment, adequate nutrition, and supportive care. Monitor fingerstick, GI follow up for hepatic mass and psychiatry follow up. The Physician did not acknowledge the recommendation from the hospital related to supervised visitation for Resident #220. The Physician's Order dated 12/28/2021, 11 days after the Physician's readmission note, documented to obtain a Psychiatric consultation for adjustment disorder. The Social Work note dated 1/4/2022 documented Resident #220 was moving from Unit 22 to Unit 46. Resident #220 was educated about not smoking or vaping in the facility. The Physician's note dated 1/12/2022 documented that Resident #220 has not had any acute events. The assessment and plan included to provide current medications, provide safe environment, adequate nutrition, and supportive care. The Physician did not acknowledge the recommendation from the hospital related to supervised visitation for Resident #220. The Psychiatric Evaluation dated 1/28/2022, one month after requested by the Physician, documented Resident #220 had the diagnoses of Insomnia, Anxiety Disorder and Depression. The social history included a history of polysubstance abuse. The recommendation included to decrease Xanax to 0.5 mg from 1mg and individual therapy 2-5 times monthly. There was no documented evidence that the individual therapy 2-5 times monthly was offered or provided to Resident #220. The physician's note dated 2/9/2022 documented that Resident #220 has not had any acute events and Resident #220 was able to transfer out of bed to ambulate by pushing the wheelchair independently. The physician documented that Resident #220 has a history of anxiety that is controlled with Xanax. Psychiatry recommended to decrease Xanax and Resident #220 gets very agitated and violent when you try to discuss tapering the Xanax. Resident #220 is on Cymbalta, Oxycodone and Baclofen for chronic back pain. Will decrease Cymbalta and discontinue Baclofen and follow up Psychiatry regularly. The assessment and plan included to provide current medications, provide safe environment, adequate nutrition, and supportive care. The facility did not provide evidence of a Psychiatric follow up after 1/28/2022. Nursing progress notes from 2/1/2022 to 3/2/2022 were reviewed. There was no documented evidence that the resident was being monitored or supervised for drug seeking behavior, attempts to sell illicit drugs, or consumption of illicit drugs prior to 3/2/2022. The December 2021 to March 2022 Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) Accountability Records documented Resident #220 had a diagnosis of Polysubstance abuse. The CNA Accountability Records documented that Resident #220 could push the wheelchair independently. There was no documented evidence that the resident was to have supervision or monitoring related to Polysubstance abuse. The SBAR Communication Form dated 3/2/2022 documented Resident #220 had a change in condition. At 6:00 PM, Resident #220 was unresponsive to verbal and tactile stimuli. The SBAR documented oxygen saturation level of 66% when on oxygen at 3 liters per minute. Resident #220 was transferred to the hospital. The hospital record dated 3/2/2022 documented Resident #220 was transferred from the Skilled Nursing Facility for altered mental status. Resident #220 was brought in by EMS from the Skilled Nursing Facility for possible overdose. Narcan 2mg was administered intramuscularly by EMS. Resident #220 stated that they (Resident #220) snorted some Heroin and passed out. Resident #220 had an admission three months ago in December [2021] for a similar overdose. Resident #220 was admitted to the hospital for altered mental status secondary to opioid intoxication. The urine toxicology report was positive for opiates and benzodiazepines. The attending physician at the hospital diagnosed Resident #220 with toxic encephalopathy secondary to opioid intoxication and Substance abuse. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #8 was interviewed on 3/03/2022 at 2:17 PM and stated they (CNA #8) were the regularly assigned CNA for the 7AM to 3PM shift for Resident #220 for the past 2 months. Resident #220 did not have any specific instructions to be monitored. CNA #8 stated that Resident #220 was independent in mobility and did not require any oversight. CNA #8 stated that they have not received any instructions to look through Resident #220's belongings to check for substance abuse related materials. CNA #8 was not aware if Resident #220 had any visitors on 3/2/2022 or even in the past month. CNA #8 further stated that there were no special instructions to monitor Resident #220 for substance abuse behaviors and there was no direction provided to supervise the resident throughout the facility. Registered Nurse (RN #7) was interviewed on 3/3/2022 at 2:20 PM. RN #7 stated that they (RN #7) were the regular 7AM to 3PM shift Unit Nurse for Resident #220's unit and has known Resident #220 since the resident was transferred to the unit two months ago. RN #7 stated that the staff did not have any specific instructions for monitoring Resident #220's whereabouts in the facility or for supervised visits. RN #7 was not aware if Resident #220 had any visits on 3/2/2022. RN #7 stated that they were aware of Resident #220's history of substance abuse but thought it was a long time ago. RN #7 was not aware of Resident #220's overdose in the facility in December 2021. RN #7 did not receive any instructions to look through Resident #220's belongings to check for substance abuse related materials. CNA #9 was interviewed on 3/3/2022 at 3:15 PM and stated that they (CNA #9) were the assigned CNA for Resident #220 on the 3PM -11PM nursing shift on 3/2/2022. CNA #9 stated that they did not have any instructions for monitoring the resident for substance abuse behaviors and were not aware of Resident #220's history of drug overdose at the facility. CNA #10 was interviewed on 3/3/22 at 3:20 PM and stated that they (CNA #10) were the regularly assigned CNA on the 11:00 PM to 7:00 AM nursing shift for the past 2 months for Resident #220. CNA #10 stated they rarely went into Resident #220's room because Resident #220 was able to care for themself. CNA #10 stated that there was nothing on the CNA accountability record that instructed the CNAs to monitor the resident for drug abuse behavior. CNA #10 further stated they (CNA #10) were not aware of Resident #220's overdose and illicit drug use in the facility. RN #10 was interviewed on 3/3/2022 at 3:26 PM and stated that they (RN #10) were the RN Supervisor on 3/2/2022 on the 11 PM-7AM nursing shift and was covering the 3 PM-11 PM nursing shift on Resident #220's unit. RN #10 stated that they were called by RN #8 to Resident #220's room because Resident #220 presented with an altered mental status and was not waking up. Resident #220's oxygen saturation level was 66%. RN #10 was aware of Resident #220's overdose in December 2021 but did not suspect that the resident had a drug overdose in this case. RN #10 did not tell the EMS anything about Resident #220's drug abuse behavior. RN #8 was interviewed on 3/3/2022 at 3:52 PM and stated that they (RN #8) were covering the 3PM-11PM nursing shift on 3/2/2022. RN #8 stated they were not the regularly assigned nurse for the resident's unit. At 5:00PM, RN #8 went to Resident #220's room and Resident #220 seemed out of it. Resident #220 was transferred to the hospital due to the unresponsiveness. RN #8 stated they (RN #8) were not aware that Resident #220 had substance abuse behaviors and had overdosed in December 2021 in the facility. RN #8 further stated that there were no Physician's orders or instructions related to substance abuse monitoring for Resident #220. Social Worker (SW) #2 was interviewed on 3/3/2022 at 5:11 PM and stated Resident #220 had a short stay at the facility from 8/24/2021 to 9/3/2021 and was readmitted on [DATE] which was considered a new stay. SW#2 stated that Resident #220 informed them (SW #2) that Resident #220 was kicked out of another skilled nursing facility two years ago because of selling and using illicit drugs. Resident #220 informed SW #2 that they (Resident #220) were clean and were not using illicit drugs when they were admitted on [DATE]. Resident #220 was referred to psychology for therapy and only had one psychotherapy session in October 2021. SW #2 stated that the plan of care for history of substance abuse was to refer Resident #220 to psychology and to check any incoming packages for illicit drugs. SW #2 stated that searching packages is a standard protocol in the facility and did not have to be in a care plan. The nursing staff are expected to look through food items brought in from outside as per the facility-wide protocol. SW #2 stated that Resident #220 was not actively having substance abuse disorder so a care plan to prevent and monitor substance abuse behavior was not developed. SW #2 stated that Resident #220 had a history of smoking in their room and it is the facility's protocol to search the room only when they suspect smoking. SW #2 stated that the facility cannot always search Resident #220's belongings and there is only so much we can do. On 12/13/21, Resident #220 was found in their room unresponsive and was hospitalized . SW #2 stated that they (SW #2) followed up with Resident #220 on 12/16/21 and educated Resident #220 on the facility rules. SW #2 stated that Resident #220 was placed on SW #1's caseload when readmitted on [DATE]. SW #2 stated that it was SW #1's responsibility to develop and update the care plan to address Resident #220's substance abuse behavior when Resident #220 was readmitted on [DATE]. SW #1 was interviewed on 3/3/22 at 5:51 PM. SW #1 stated that they were assigned to Resident #220 upon their readmission in December 2021 after the resident returned from the hospital from the opiate overdose. SW #1 stated that they did not complete a psychosocial assessment and did not develop a revised plan of care to address Resident #220's substance abuse behavior. SW #1 stated that they could not recall reviewing the hospital discharge paperwork with the instruction for supervised visitation to reduce substance abuse behavior. SW #1 stated that an interdisciplinary team approach was not used to address Resident #220's substance abuse behavior. SW #1 stated that they did not initiate any additional interventions for Resident #220 after the resident's return from the hospital on [DATE]. Resident #220 was reassigned to SW #2 on 1/4/2022. The Medical Director and Director of Nursing was interviewed concurrently on 3/3/22 at 6:30 PM. The Medical Director stated that Resident #220's diagnosis of Policy Substance Abuse is noted on the medical record and the staff are aware of Resident #220's history. The Director of Nursing stated that everyone on the team is aware of Resident #220's substance abuse history is noted in the medical record. The Director of Nursing stated that the facility did not initiate an Incident Report to investigate how Resident #220 obtained drugs in the facility on 12/13/2021 because SW #2 had written a note that Resident #220 received the drugs from a visitor. The Director of Nursing stated that the facility was in COVID-19 quarantine and Resident #220 did not require increased supervision. The Director of Nursing stated that the visitation protocols were facility wide and did not need to be documented in a care plan. The Director of Nursing stated that Resident #220 refused psychotherapy in the past. The Medical Director stated that they were not aware if the psychotherapist had seen Resident #220 after 12/16/2021. The Medical Director was not aware if the substance abuse behaviors were addressed in psychotherapy or psychiatry and if substance abuse treatment was offered. The Director of Nursing stated that it was the hospital's responsibility to refer Resident #220 to a drug rehabilitation programs and that the facility can only offer psychiatric and psychological care. The Director of Recreation was interviewed on 3/4/22 at 2:40 PM. The Director of Recreation stated that Resident #220 preferred extra newspapers and enjoyed watching television. The Director of Recreation stated that during the outbreak in December 2021 and January 2022, activities were provided one to one or in the room. When Resident #220's unit was cleared in February 2022, Resident #220 would go out to the courtyard when weather permitted and self-propelled throughout the facility, to other units to talk to other residents and to go to the vending machines. Attending Physician #2 was interviewed on 3/4/22 at 3:42 PM and stated that they (Attending Physician #2) provided care for Resident #220 since Resident #220 was moved to Unit 46 on 1/4/2022. Resident #220 has a history of high blood pressure, chronic lower back pain, and anxiety disorder. Attending Physician #2 stated that Resident #220 was known to have agitated and aggressive behaviors and was followed by a psychiatrist. Resident #220 refused psychotherapy on several occasions. Attending Physician #2 stated that they (Attending Physician #2) believed that Resident #220 was very agitated when the suggestion to decrease the Xanax was recommended by the psychiatrist and Attending Physician #2 reduced Cymbalta instead. Attending Physician #2 stated that Resident #220 required monitoring and supervision and they (Attending Physician #2) had verbally informed CNA #10 and RN #7 to monitor Resident #220 for Substance abuse behavior. Attending Physician #2 stated that they did not recall documenting the need for increased monitoring for substance abuse behaviors or placing an order instructing nurses to do so. SW #2 was re-interviewed on 3/4/2022 at 5:15 PM. SW #2 stated that the facility staff located Resident #220's care plan entitled history of substance abuse which was dated 9/28/2021. The interventions did not include to monitor and supervise Resident #220's whereabouts in the facility for substance abuse behavior. SW #2 stated that they had developed the care plan but did not revise the care plan after the resident returned from the hospital on [DATE] since that was the responsibility of SW #1. Resident #220 should have had a revised care plan after the 12/13/2021 hospitalization. The care plan did not include any updates in December 2021. Resident #220 was not on the radar for active use of drugs at the time of the 9/28/2021 care plan. The search of packages is a standard practice for any resident in the facility so that intervention would not be in the care plan. The facility was notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on 3/3/2022. The Immediate Jeopardy was removed on 3/7/2022 prior to the completion of the survey. -The facility created policies and procedures to address needs of the residents with Alcohol and Drug problems and Management of Residents with History of Substance abuse. -The facility Educated 95% of the facility staff on the newly developed policies and procedures and on identification of care for resident history of using Polysubstance/Polydrug abuse and identifying signs and symptoms of drug abuse. The facility also educated staff on narcotic overdose and use of Narcan. Those not in-serviced are either on vacation, on medical leave, or have not been scheduled for duty and will be in-serviced as they report to work. - The facility assessed and formulated care plans for all residents identified as having history of Polysubstance abuse. -The facility created Resident contracts/agreements to educate residents on facility's zero tolerance drug policy along with consequences. -The facility developed audit tools to monitor residents with history of Substance abuse history for signs and symptoms of drug abuse and updated the room search audit tool to include legal and illegal substances.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Pharmacy Services (Tag F0755)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review and staff interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 3/1/2022 and completed o...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review and staff interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 3/1/2022 and completed on 3/9/2022, the facility did not ensure that drug records are in order and that an account of all controlled drugs is maintained and periodically reconciled. This was identified on one of thirteen units reviewed for the Medication Storage task. Specifically, Resident #364 was administered Alprazolam (psychotropic) 0.5 milligrams (mg) without accurate reconciliation on the Control Substance Administration Record (Narcotic Sheet). The finding is: The facility's undated Medication Administration Policy and Procedure documented upon removal of the controlled substance from the container the nurse must record the date, hour, amount used, signiture and the amount of the controlled substance remaining on the Controlled Substances Administration Record form. The nurse. The Policy further documented the nurse administer the medication per the policy then documents the date and time on the Medication Administration Record. Resident #364 was admitted with diagnoses that include Anxiety disorder and Depression. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 which indicated the resident had intact cognition. The MDS documented the resident received Antianxiety medication for the seven days during the assessment look back period. During a Medication Storage observation on 3/7/2022 at 12:05 PM on nursing unit 31, the unit medication cart was observed, including the Narcotic medications in the cart. Resident #364's Controlled Substance Administration Record for Alprazolam was reviewed. The Controlled Substance Administration Record documented that the last Alprazolam tablet was administered on 3/6/2022 at 8:00 PM. The amount of the Alprazolam medication remaining on the Controlled Substance Administration Record was documented to be 22 tablets. However, the Alprazolam medication tablets remaining in the blister pack were 21 tablets. The Medication Administration Record (MAR) beginning dated 2/16/2022 was reviewed and revealed the Alprazolam was not signed as administered on 3/7/22 at 8:00 AM. The Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #3 was interviewed on 3/7/22 at 12:15 PM and stated they (LPN #3) had administered the medication to Resident #364 at 8:00 AM on 3/7/22 but did not sign the Controlled Substance Administration Record. LPN #3 stated when they (LPN #3) removed the tablet from the blister pack, they (LPN #3) should have signed the Control Substance Administration Record and after administering the medication they should have signed the MAR. The Registered Nurse (RN) #6, who was the Nurse Manager, was interviewed on 3/7/22 at 12:20 PM and stated that all the nurses are instructed to sign the Narcotic Sheet after removing the narcotic medication from the blister pack. RN #6 stated that LPN #3 should have signed the Controlled Substance Administration Record at the time the tablet was removed from the blister pack and should have signed the MAR after administering the medication. The Director of Nursing Services (DNS) was interviewed on 3/9/2022 at 1:23 PM and stated when LPN#3 removed the medication from the blister pack LPN #3 should have signed the Control Substance Administration Record right away. After administering the medication to the resident, LPN #3 should have signed the MAR. 415.18(b)(1)(2)(3)
Oct 2019 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Medication Errors (Tag F0758)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review, and staff interviews during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that ea...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review, and staff interviews during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that each resident's medication regimen was free from unnecessary medication. This was identified for one (Resident #178) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Specifically, Resident #178 had an order for Risperdal (an antipsychotic medication) 0.25 milligram (mg) by mouth (po) which was discontinued on 2/4/19. On 3/25/19 the resident was restarted on Risperdal 0.25 mg and there was no documented evidence of a proper indication for the use of the medication. Additionally, there was no documented evidence of non-pharmacological interventions attempted prior to the start of the antipsychotic medication Risperdal. The finding is: Resident #178 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include Alzheimer's Disease and Major Depressive Disorder. A Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented the resident's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) Score was 3, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. The resident had a problem concentrating on things, was short tempered and was easily annoyed. The resident had no behavioral symptoms and no indicators for Psychosis. The resident required supervision to extensive assist of one staff member for all areas of Activities of Daily Living (ADL)'s and received Antipsychotic and Antidepressant medications seven of seven days during the assessment period. The Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] documented a BIMS Score of 3, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. The staff assessed the resident as being short tempered, easily annoyed and had trouble concentrating on things. The resident received Antipsychotic and Antidepressant medications seven of seven days during the assessment period. A Comprehensive Care Plan (CCP) dated 8/5/19 for Psychotropic medication documented the resident had a history of Psychotropic medication use. Interventions included to monitor for changes in mood, behavior, affect, appetite, activity level, and attempt psychotropic medication dosage reduction/elimination per protocol. On 2/4/19 the CCP was updated and documented the resident had decreased restlessness and agitation and that the Physician discontinued Risperdal. On 2/26/19 the CCP documented that there were no adverse reaction from discontinuation of Risperdal. Additionally, the CCP was updated on 3/25/19 and documented increased restlessness, agitation, the resident was not easily redirected, and that the Physician ordered Risperdal 0.25 mg. A CCP dated 8/7/19 for Behavior documented the resident was resistive to ADL care and showers. The resident preferred to return to her room between meals and after group programs. Interventions included to monitor for side effects of medication and evaluate for gradual dose reductions. A Nurse's Progress note dated 2/4/19 documented the resident was alert and responsive, withdrawn towards peers, and interacts with staff members. Decreased restlessness and agitation was noted and the Unit Physician ordered to discontinue Risperdal. Staff were to encourage the resident to join group programs and to talk to the resident in an affectionate tone of voice. A Physician's order dated 2/4/19 documented to discontinue Risperdal 0.25 mg po daily. A Nursing Progress note dated 3/8/19 documented the resident was observed with a sudden outburst of restlessness, was agitated, and was difficult to redirect. The resident was exit seeking, pacing the hallway, and agitated. Emotional support was offered by the staff. A Medication Administration Record dated 3/9/19 documented Bactrim DS tablet, 1 tablet by mouth twice daily for 5 days for diagnosis of Urinary Tract Infection. A Mental Health Meeting Minutes dated 3/14/19 documented the resident had diagnoses of Dementia and Depression. The resident had a decrease in resistance during ADL care and personal hygiene. She was withdrawn towards peers at times, however, interacts with the staff and participates in group programs. The resident was less restless and decreased agitation was observed, however, the resident was easily annoyed on redirection. Interventions included that the staff talk to the resident in an affectionate tone of voice. The date of last Gradual Dose Reduction (GDR) was 2/4/19 when Risperdal was discontinued. A Behavior/Intervention Monthly Flow Record dated 2/2019 documented the targeted behavior was verbal, physical and aggressive behaviors and that the resident had no behaviors for the month of February. The Flow Record for 3/2019 documented the same target behaviors: verbal, physical and aggressive behaviors. The Flow Record documented 3/1/19 to 3/25/19 the resident had one episode of behavior and was redirected or one to one support was provided. There was no documented evidence in the Flow record of the actual behavior exhibited by the resident. A Physician's order dated 3/25/19 documented Risperdal 0.25 mg po daily at 1700 (5PM) for Mood Disorder. A Nursing Progress note dated 3/26/19 documented the resident was evaluated by the unit Physician and Risperdal was reordered on 3/25/19. A Psychiatry consult was ordered, staff continues to monitor behavior, and to increase one to one interaction with the resident who enjoys being greeted in an affectionate tone of voice. A Physician Progress note dated 4/5/19 documented the Assessment and Plan was to continue the current medication and provide a safe environment. The resident had no side effects from the medications of Risperdal and Remeron. In the past, the resident had been discontinued of these medication. However, the resident becomes severely anxious, pacing the floor, refusing to eat, refusing care, and refusing to communicate with family and friends. There was no documented evidence of behavioral interventions that were tried prior to the restart of Risperdal. A Psychiatry consult dated 4/11/19 documented the resident was seen and evaluated for increase agitation. The resident denied any new emotional problems. The resident was alert with disorganized thoughts and behavior. Her speech was non-spontaneous, reduced in rate and volume. Insight, judgement and cognition was impaired. Diagnoses was Mood Disorder and Unspecified Dementia. Recommendation was to continue the present management with supportive nursing care. A Mental Health Meeting Minutes dated 8/12/19 documented the resident was occasionally non-compliant with showers, changing clothes and personal hygiene. The resident was combative at times, not easily redirected when agitated. The resident was exit-seeking at times, and had hoarding tendencies of perishable items taken from food trays. The resident becomes physically inappropriate towards staff when redirected. Resident # 178 was observed in the day room in an activity program on 10/15/19 at 11:30 AM. The resident was calm with no behavior problems noted. During an interview conducted on 10/16/19 at 2:15 PM with CNA #1 she stated that the resident was very confused and that the resident understands very little English. The CNA stated that the resident likes to be dressed before breakfast and once awake the resident will cooperate with morning care. The CNA stated the resident likes to sit quietly by herself, and that she does not hit out at other residents, but when another resident gets too close the resident gets excitable. The CNA stated the resident likes to hoard juice and milk and that sometimes she works on the evening shift and would find juice, milk, cookies or a stuffed animal in the resident's drawer, under her pillow or behind her bed. The CNA stated that the resident was not difficult to handle. During an interview conducted on 10/16/19 at 3:30 PM with the 3:00 PM -11:00 PM Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA #2 ), she stated she has cared for the resident for more than two years. The CNA stated at the start of her shift the resident is usually in the day room and that the resident eats her dinner in the front dining room. The CNA stated that at times the resident would resist receiving PM care then transfers herself into bed without care. She stated sometimes after re-approaching the resident she will allow care. The CNA stated that the resident would sometimes take containers from the garbage bin, fill them with water and leave them on the night table. The CNA also stated that the resident would get upset when her personal space is not respected. The CNA further stated that the resident sometimes refuses showers, but allows her to perform PM care. Additionally, the CNA stated most of the time resident keeps to herself. During an interview conducted on 10/17/19 at 10:38 AM with the Attending Physician, she stated that the resident was not eating and was not communicating with her family and was not able to recognize her family. The Physician stated that the resident was refusing care and was pacing on the unit. The Physician stated that the resident had a previous laboratory result that was positive for UTI but she was asymptomatic. The Physician further stated that she was treating the resident with antibiotic therapy as a precautionary measure. During an interview conducted on 10/17/19 at 12:47 PM with the unit Charge Registered Nurse (RN), she stated that the Risperdal was restarted because the resident was restless and that she was pacing on the unit and speaking loudly. The RN stated that she was not able to tell what intervention was attempted for the resident on 3/25/19 when the Risperdal was initiated, however, the staff generally gives the resident one to one attention. The RN stated that the resident does attend recreation and that when she gets restless the staff walks with the resident, takes her to a different location or takes the resident to the bathroom. The RN stated times when the resident is restless the staff reminds her about the daughter, gives snacks, redirects the resident, and talks to her in an affectionate tone of voice. The RN further stated the resident's behavior was documented on the Behavior Log and was completed by the medication nurses or herself. During an interview conducted on 10/17/19 at 1:35 PM with the Director of Nursing Services (DNS), she stated that the Risperdal was discontinued in February 2019 and restarted in March 2019 due to the resident being a danger to herself. The DNS stated that the resident was a danger to herself because she was refusing care, she was refusing to eat, refusing to take her medication, and was hoarding dirty diapers from the garbage and had an episode of physical aggression. When the DNS was asked for the documentation for the behaviors, she stated that they were documented on the Behavior Log. Review of the Behavior Log lacked documented evidence of the specific behavior stated by the DNS. 415.12(l)(2)(i)
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • 25% annual turnover. Excellent stability, 23 points below New York's 48% average. Staff who stay learn residents' needs.
Concerns
  • • Multiple safety concerns identified: 2 life-threatening violation(s), 1 harm violation(s), $184,138 in fines, Payment denial on record. Review inspection reports carefully.
  • • 11 deficiencies on record, including 2 critical (life-threatening) violations. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
  • • $184,138 in fines. Extremely high, among the most fined facilities in New York. Major compliance failures.
  • • Grade F (19/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
Bottom line: Trust Score of 19/100 indicates significant concerns. Thoroughly evaluate alternatives.

About This Facility

What is A Holly Patterson Extended Care Facility's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns A Holly Patterson Extended Care Facility an overall rating of 2 out of 5 stars, which is considered below average nationally. Within New York, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.

How is A Holly Patterson Extended Care Facility Staffed?

CMS rates A Holly Patterson Extended Care Facility's staffing level at 3 out of 5 stars, which is average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 25%, compared to the New York average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.

What Have Inspectors Found at A Holly Patterson Extended Care Facility?

State health inspectors documented 11 deficiencies at A Holly Patterson Extended Care Facility during 2019 to 2024. These included: 2 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death), 1 that caused actual resident harm, and 8 with potential for harm. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.

Who Owns and Operates A Holly Patterson Extended Care Facility?

A Holly Patterson Extended Care Facility is owned by a government entity. Government-operated facilities are typically run by state, county, or municipal agencies. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 589 certified beds and approximately 441 residents (about 75% occupancy), it is a large facility located in UNIONDALE, New York.

How Does A Holly Patterson Extended Care Facility Compare to Other New York Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in New York, A Holly Patterson Extended Care Facility's overall rating (2 stars) is below the state average of 3.1, staff turnover (25%) is significantly lower than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (1 stars) is much below the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting A Holly Patterson Extended Care Facility?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations.

Is A Holly Patterson Extended Care Facility Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, A Holly Patterson Extended Care Facility has documented safety concerns. Inspectors have issued 2 Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 2-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in New York. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.

Do Nurses at A Holly Patterson Extended Care Facility Stick Around?

Staff at A Holly Patterson Extended Care Facility tend to stick around. With a turnover rate of 25%, the facility is 20 percentage points below the New York average of 46%. Low turnover is a positive sign. It means caregivers have time to learn each resident's needs, medications, and personal preferences. Consistent staff also notice subtle changes in a resident's condition more quickly. Registered Nurse turnover is also low at 28%, meaning experienced RNs are available to handle complex medical needs.

Was A Holly Patterson Extended Care Facility Ever Fined?

A Holly Patterson Extended Care Facility has been fined $184,138 across 2 penalty actions. This is 5.3x the New York average of $34,920. Fines at this level are uncommon and typically indicate a pattern of serious deficiencies, repeated violations, or failure to correct problems promptly. CMS reserves penalties of this magnitude for facilities that pose significant, documented risk to resident health or safety. Families should request specific documentation of what issues led to these fines and what systemic changes have been implemented.

Is A Holly Patterson Extended Care Facility on Any Federal Watch List?

A Holly Patterson Extended Care Facility is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.