HELEN HAYES HOSPITAL T C U

51 N ROUTE 9W, WEST HAVERSTRAW, NY 10993 (845) 786-4000
Government - State 24 Beds STATE OF NEW YORK COMPTROLLER'S OFFICE Data: November 2025
Trust Grade
93/100
#47 of 594 in NY
Last Inspection: March 2025

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

Helen Hayes Hospital TCU in West Haverstraw, New York, has an excellent Trust Grade of A, indicating it is highly recommended for care. It ranks #47 out of 594 nursing facilities in New York, placing it in the top half, and #2 out of 10 in Rockland County, meaning only one other local facility is rated higher. The facility is improving, with issues decreasing from 2 in 2018 to none reported in 2025. Staffing is a strong point, with a perfect 5/5 rating and a turnover rate of only 27%, significantly lower than the state average. Notably, there have been no fines, and the facility has more RN coverage than 98% of nursing homes in the state, which is crucial for catching potential issues. However, there were concerns noted during inspections, including failures to provide timely written notifications about transfers and the bed hold policy for a resident facing hospitalization. These incidents could potentially impact the resident's understanding and continuity of care, highlighting areas for improvement despite the overall strong performance of the facility.

Trust Score
A
93/100
In New York
#47/594
Top 7%
Safety Record
Low Risk
No red flags
Inspections
Getting Better
2 → 0 violations
Staff Stability
✓ Good
27% annual turnover. Excellent stability, 21 points below New York's 48% average. Staff who stay learn residents' needs.
Penalties
✓ Good
No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most New York facilities.
Skilled Nurses
✓ Good
Each resident gets 222 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than 97% of New York nursing homes. RNs are the most trained staff who catch health problems before they become serious.
Violations
✓ Good
Only 2 deficiencies on record. Cleaner than most facilities. Minor issues only.
★★★★★
5.0
Overall Rating
★★★★★
5.0
Staff Levels
★★★★★
5.0
Care Quality
★★★★★
5.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2018: 2 issues
2025: 0 issues

The Good

  • 5-Star Staffing Rating · Excellent nurse staffing levels
  • 5-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
  • Low Staff Turnover (27%) · Staff stability means consistent care
  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record
  • Staff turnover is low (27%)

    21 points below New York average of 48%

Facility shows strength in staffing levels, quality measures, staff retention, fire safety.

The Bad

Chain: STATE OF NEW YORK COMPTROLLER'S OFF

Part of a multi-facility chain

Ask about local staffing decisions and management

The Ugly 2 deficiencies on record

May 2018 2 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Transfer Notice (Tag F0623)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview conducted during a recertification survey, the facility did not ensure for 1 of 1 resident ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview conducted during a recertification survey, the facility did not ensure for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for hospitalization that the resident or her representatives were given timely written notification of a transfer and the reasons for the move in a language and manner they could understand. This was evident for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for closed record. The finding is: Resident #9 was an [AGE] year old female admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including, but not limited to, pneumonia and congestive heart failure. The 5-day Scheduled Minimum Data Set (a resident assessment and screening tool) of 2/2/18 indicated the resident was cognitively alert. The progress notes of 2/4/18 at 7:45 AM documented that the resident complained of shortness of breath. The oxygen saturation (a measure of the blood oxygen level) was checked and the results were 60 to 65% (normal range is 90-100%). The resident received respiratory treatment and was placed on a venturi mask (medical device to deliver a set concentration of oxygen). The oxygen saturation level then increased to 90%. The resident stated she felt better but the shortness of breath persisted. The resident received a medication to improve her breathing status. Arterial blood gases were performed and the oxygen level was 70%. The resident was sent to the hospital for further evaluation and left the facility in guarded condition. Review of the medical record revealed no documented evidence that the resident or her representative received written notification of the transfer on 2/4/18. The Registered Nurse/Administrator was interviewed on 2/7/18 at 2:00 PM and she stated she had not provided the resident or her representative with a transfer notice. 415.3(h)(1)(iii)(a-e)
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0625 (Tag F0625)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview conducted during a recertification survey, the facility did not ensure for 1 of 1 resident ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview conducted during a recertification survey, the facility did not ensure for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for hospitalization that the resident or her representatives were given timely written notification of the bed hold policy before transfer in a language and manner they could understand. This was evident for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for hospitalization. ( Resident #9). The finding is: Resident #9 was an [AGE] year old female admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including, but not limited to; pneumonia and congestive heart failure. The 5-day Scheduled Minimum Data Set (MDS; a resident assessment and screening tool) of 2/2/18 indicated the resident is cognitively alert. The progress notes of 2/4/18 at 7:45 AM documented that the resident complained of shortness of breath. The oxygen saturation (a measure of the blood oxygen level) was checked and the results were 60 to 65% (normal range is 90-100%). The resident received a respiratory treatment and was placed on a venturi mask (medical device to deliver a set concentration of oxygen). The oxygen saturation level then increased to 90%. The resident stated she felt better but the shortness of breath persisted. The resident received medication to improve her breathing status. Arterial blood gases were performed and the oxygen level was 70%. The resident was sent to the hospital for further evaluation and left the facility in guarded condition. Review of the medical record revealed no documented evidence that the resident or her representative received written notification about the facility's bed hold policy prior to the transfer on 2/4/18. In an interview with the Registered Nurse/Administrator on 2/7/18 at 2:00 PM she stated she had not provided the resident or her representative with a notice of the bed hold policy. 415.3(h)(1)(iii)(a-e)
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • Grade A (93/100). Above average facility, better than most options in New York.
  • • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
  • • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most New York facilities.
  • • Only 2 deficiencies on record. Cleaner than most facilities. Minor issues only.
Concerns
  • • No significant concerns identified. This facility shows no red flags across CMS ratings, staff turnover, or federal penalties.
Bottom line: Generally positive indicators. Standard due diligence and a personal visit recommended.

About This Facility

What is Helen Hayes Hospital T C U's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns HELEN HAYES HOSPITAL T C U an overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars, which is considered much above average nationally. Within New York, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.

How is Helen Hayes Hospital T C U Staffed?

CMS rates HELEN HAYES HOSPITAL T C U's staffing level at 5 out of 5 stars, which is much above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 27%, compared to the New York average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.

What Have Inspectors Found at Helen Hayes Hospital T C U?

State health inspectors documented 2 deficiencies at HELEN HAYES HOSPITAL T C U during 2018. These included: 2 with potential for harm.

Who Owns and Operates Helen Hayes Hospital T C U?

HELEN HAYES HOSPITAL T C U is owned by a government entity. Government-operated facilities are typically run by state, county, or municipal agencies. The facility is operated by STATE OF NEW YORK COMPTROLLER'S OFFICE, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 24 certified beds and approximately 16 residents (about 67% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in WEST HAVERSTRAW, New York.

How Does Helen Hayes Hospital T C U Compare to Other New York Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in New York, HELEN HAYES HOSPITAL T C U's overall rating (5 stars) is above the state average of 3.1, staff turnover (27%) is significantly lower than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (5 stars) is much above the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Helen Hayes Hospital T C U?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"

Is Helen Hayes Hospital T C U Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, HELEN HAYES HOSPITAL T C U has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 5-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in New York. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.

Do Nurses at Helen Hayes Hospital T C U Stick Around?

Staff at HELEN HAYES HOSPITAL T C U tend to stick around. With a turnover rate of 27%, the facility is 19 percentage points below the New York average of 46%. Low turnover is a positive sign. It means caregivers have time to learn each resident's needs, medications, and personal preferences. Consistent staff also notice subtle changes in a resident's condition more quickly.

Was Helen Hayes Hospital T C U Ever Fined?

HELEN HAYES HOSPITAL T C U has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.

Is Helen Hayes Hospital T C U on Any Federal Watch List?

HELEN HAYES HOSPITAL T C U is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.