Peak Resources - Alamance, Inc
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Peak Resources - Alamance, Inc. has a Trust Grade of B+, indicating it is above average and recommended for families considering care options. It ranks #48 out of 417 nursing homes in North Carolina, placing it in the top half, and #2 out of 7 in Alamance County, meaning only one local facility performs better. The facility is improving, with the number of issues decreasing from three in 2023 to two in 2024. While staffing is a concern with a rating of 2/5 stars and a high turnover of 51%, there is less RN coverage than 81% of state facilities, which could impact the quality of care. Recent inspections noted several cleanliness issues in food storage areas, which could pose health risks, as well as concerns regarding a resident who fell during a transfer, highlighting areas needing improvement despite the overall positive ratings.
- Trust Score
- B+
- In North Carolina
- #48/417
- Safety Record
- Low Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Better
- Staff Stability ⚠ Watch
- 51% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
- Penalties ○ Average
- $3,728 in fines. Higher than 54% of North Carolina facilities. Some compliance issues.
- Skilled Nurses ⚠ Watch
- Each resident gets only 20 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for North Carolina. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
- Violations ✓ Good
- Only 5 deficiencies on record. Cleaner than most facilities. Minor issues only.
The Good
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
Facility shows strength in fire safety.
The Bad
Near North Carolina avg (46%)
Higher turnover may affect care consistency
Below median ($33,413)
Minor penalties assessed
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
The Ugly 5 deficiencies on record
Apr 2024
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to prevent a fall from a mechanical lift for one (Resident #1) of...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
QAPI Program
(Tag F0867)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and staff interview the facility's Quality Assessment Performance Improvement committee failed to maintain implemented procedures and monitor the interventions that the committe...
Read full inspector narrative →
Sept 2023
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and staff and Nurse Practitioner interviews, the facility failed to provide incontinent care safely for 1...
Read full inspector narrative →
Aug 2023
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0727
(Tag F0727)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide Registered Nurse (RN) coverage for 8 consecutive hours a day for 1 out of 121 days reviewed for staffing (2/4/2023).
Finding...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observations, staff interviews, and record review the facility failed to: 1) keep the floors of the walk-in refrigerator and walk-in freezer clean; 2) label foods in the walk-in refrigerator,...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • Grade B+ (88/100). Above average facility, better than most options in North Carolina.
- • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
- • $3,728 in fines. Lower than most North Carolina facilities. Relatively clean record.
- • Only 5 deficiencies on record. Cleaner than most facilities. Minor issues only.
- • No significant concerns identified. This facility shows no red flags across CMS ratings, staff turnover, or federal penalties.
About This Facility
What is Peak Resources - Alamance, Inc's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns Peak Resources - Alamance, Inc an overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars, which is considered much above average nationally. Within North Carolina, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.
How is Peak Resources - Alamance, Inc Staffed?
CMS rates Peak Resources - Alamance, Inc's staffing level at 2 out of 5 stars, which is below average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 51%, compared to the North Carolina average of 46%.
What Have Inspectors Found at Peak Resources - Alamance, Inc?
State health inspectors documented 5 deficiencies at Peak Resources - Alamance, Inc during 2023 to 2024. These included: 5 with potential for harm.
Who Owns and Operates Peak Resources - Alamance, Inc?
Peak Resources - Alamance, Inc is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by PEAK RESOURCES, INC., a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 142 certified beds and approximately 119 residents (about 84% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in Graham, North Carolina.
How Does Peak Resources - Alamance, Inc Compare to Other North Carolina Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in North Carolina, Peak Resources - Alamance, Inc's overall rating (5 stars) is above the state average of 2.8, staff turnover (51%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (5 stars) is much above the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Peak Resources - Alamance, Inc?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?" These questions are particularly relevant given the below-average staffing rating.
Is Peak Resources - Alamance, Inc Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, Peak Resources - Alamance, Inc has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 5-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in North Carolina. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Peak Resources - Alamance, Inc Stick Around?
Peak Resources - Alamance, Inc has a staff turnover rate of 51%, which is about average for North Carolina nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was Peak Resources - Alamance, Inc Ever Fined?
Peak Resources - Alamance, Inc has been fined $3,728 across 1 penalty action. This is below the North Carolina average of $33,116. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.
Is Peak Resources - Alamance, Inc on Any Federal Watch List?
Peak Resources - Alamance, Inc is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.