NELSON COUNTY HEALTH SYSTEM CARE CENTER
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Nelson County Health System Care Center has a Trust Grade of D, indicating below-average performance with some concerning issues. It ranks #43 out of 72 nursing homes in North Dakota, placing it in the bottom half of the state's facilities, but it is #2 out of 3 in Nelson County, meaning there is only one local option better. The facility is improving, as it went from 9 issues in 2024 to 2 in 2025, but it still faces challenges, including $36,855 in fines, which is higher than 87% of North Dakota facilities, suggesting ongoing compliance problems. Staffing is a strong point with a perfect 5/5 rating and a turnover rate of 48%, matching the state average, indicating staff stability. However, there have been serious concerns about resident safety, including incidents where one resident displayed abusive behaviors towards others, highlighting a need for better protective measures. Overall, while there are strengths in staffing, the facility has significant concerns regarding resident safety and compliance that families should weigh carefully.
- Trust Score
- D
- In North Dakota
- #43/72
- Safety Record
- High Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Better
- Staff Stability ⚠ Watch
- 48% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- $36,855 in fines. Lower than most North Dakota facilities. Relatively clean record.
- Skilled Nurses ✓ Good
- Each resident gets 56 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than average for North Dakota. RNs are trained to catch health problems early.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 13 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
5-Star Staffing Rating · Excellent nurse staffing levels
-
4-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
Facility shows strength in staffing levels, quality measures, fire safety.
The Bad
Near North Dakota average (3.1)
Meets federal standards, typical of most facilities
Near North Dakota avg (46%)
Higher turnover may affect care consistency
Above median ($33,413)
Moderate penalties - review what triggered them
The Ugly 13 deficiencies on record
Jun 2025
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Free from Abuse/Neglect
(Tag F0600)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, review of the facility reported incident (FRI) and investigation, review of facility policy, and staff i...
Read full inspector narrative →
Apr 2025
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to follow standards of infection control and prevention for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Nov 2024
2 deficiencies
1 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Free from Abuse/Neglect
(Tag F0600)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review, review of the facility reported incident, review of facility policy, and staff interviews t...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0605
(Tag F0605)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 1 closed record (Resident #1) remained free from ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Mar 2024
7 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0657
(Tag F0657)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review, and resident and staff interview, the facility failed to review and revise the comprehensive care plan to reflect the resident's current status for 3 of 14 sampled...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review, and resident and staff interview, the facility failed to provide care and services for 1 of 1 sampled residents (Resident #25) reviewed for edema (fluid retention)...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review, review of professional reference, facility policy, and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide supervision and assistive devices necessary to prevent acci...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Incontinence Care
(Tag F0690)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review, review of a professional reference, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide appropriate toileting for 2 of 12 sampled residents (Resident #8 and #13) w...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure safe and secure storage of medications in 1 of 1 medication carts. Failure to store all medications ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, facility policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure staff followed standard infection control practices for 2 of 10 sampled residents (Resident #6 and #16)...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Staffing Data
(Tag F0851)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on review of the Electronic Staffing Data Submission Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ) Long-Term Care Facility Policy Manual and staff interview the facility failed to submit direct care staffing info...
Read full inspector narrative →
Mar 2023
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Report Alleged Abuse
(Tag F0609)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to investigate and report to the State Survey Agency (SSA) potential incidents of abuse/neglect...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0888
(Tag F0888)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to implement policies and procedures that included additional precautions, intended to mitigate...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "What safeguards are in place to prevent abuse and neglect?"
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
- • Multiple safety concerns identified: Federal abuse finding, 1 harm violation(s), $36,855 in fines. Review inspection reports carefully.
- • 13 deficiencies on record, including 1 serious (caused harm) violation. Ask about corrective actions taken.
- • $36,855 in fines. Higher than 94% of North Dakota facilities, suggesting repeated compliance issues.
- • Grade D (40/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
About This Facility
What is Nelson County Health System's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns NELSON COUNTY HEALTH SYSTEM CARE CENTER an overall rating of 3 out of 5 stars, which is considered average nationally. Within North Dakota, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This mid-range rating indicates the facility meets federal standards but may have areas for improvement.
How is Nelson County Health System Staffed?
CMS rates NELSON COUNTY HEALTH SYSTEM CARE CENTER's staffing level at 5 out of 5 stars, which is much above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 48%, compared to the North Dakota average of 46%.
What Have Inspectors Found at Nelson County Health System?
State health inspectors documented 13 deficiencies at NELSON COUNTY HEALTH SYSTEM CARE CENTER during 2023 to 2025. These included: 1 that caused actual resident harm and 12 with potential for harm. Deficiencies causing actual harm indicate documented cases where residents experienced negative health consequences.
Who Owns and Operates Nelson County Health System?
NELSON COUNTY HEALTH SYSTEM CARE CENTER is owned by a government entity. Government-operated facilities are typically run by state, county, or municipal agencies. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 35 certified beds and approximately 30 residents (about 86% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in MCVILLE, North Dakota.
How Does Nelson County Health System Compare to Other North Dakota Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in North Dakota, NELSON COUNTY HEALTH SYSTEM CARE CENTER's overall rating (3 stars) is below the state average of 3.1, staff turnover (48%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (2 stars) is below the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Nelson County Health System?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What safeguards and monitoring systems are in place to protect residents from abuse or neglect?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?" These questions are particularly relevant given the substantiated abuse finding on record.
Is Nelson County Health System Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, NELSON COUNTY HEALTH SYSTEM CARE CENTER has documented safety concerns. The facility has 1 substantiated abuse finding (meaning confirmed case of resident harm by staff or other residents). The facility has a 3-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in North Dakota. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.
Do Nurses at Nelson County Health System Stick Around?
NELSON COUNTY HEALTH SYSTEM CARE CENTER has a staff turnover rate of 48%, which is about average for North Dakota nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was Nelson County Health System Ever Fined?
NELSON COUNTY HEALTH SYSTEM CARE CENTER has been fined $36,855 across 1 penalty action. The North Dakota average is $33,447. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.
Is Nelson County Health System on Any Federal Watch List?
NELSON COUNTY HEALTH SYSTEM CARE CENTER is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.