SPRINGVIEW MANOR
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Springview Manor in Lima, Ohio has a Trust Grade of C+, which means it is considered decent and slightly above average among nursing homes. It ranks #341 out of 913 facilities in Ohio, placing it in the top half, and #6 out of 11 in Allen County, indicating that only five other local options are better. However, the facility's performance is worsening, as the number of identified issues rose from 1 in 2024 to 7 in 2025. Staffing is relatively stable, with a 3 out of 5 rating and a turnover rate of 31%, which is below the state average of 49%. Concerns arise from $16,113 in fines, which is higher than 76% of Ohio facilities, suggesting potential compliance issues. The facility has average RN coverage, which is important for catching problems that CNAs might miss. Specific incidents include a critical failure to respond to door alarms, allowing a cognitively impaired resident to leave the facility unnoticed, and issues with serving food at the correct temperature, which has been reported as sometimes cold and unappetizing. Additionally, a leaking kitchen steamer posed safety concerns for residents. While the facility has some strengths, such as decent staffing levels, these concerning incidents highlight areas that families should carefully consider.
- Trust Score
- C+
- In Ohio
- #341/913
- Safety Record
- High Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Worse
- Staff Stability ○ Average
- 31% turnover. Near Ohio's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
- Penalties ○ Average
- $16,113 in fines. Higher than 74% of Ohio facilities. Some compliance issues.
- Skilled Nurses ○ Average
- Each resident gets 33 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — about average for Ohio. RNs are the most trained staff who monitor for health changes.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 13 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
5-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
-
Staff turnover below average (31%)
17 points below Ohio average of 48%
Facility shows strength in quality measures, fire safety.
The Bad
15pts below Ohio avg (46%)
Typical for the industry
Below median ($33,413)
Minor penalties assessed
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
The Ugly 13 deficiencies on record
Apr 2025
7 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0558
(Tag F0558)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 3. Review of the medical record for Resident #17 revealed an admission date of 12/21/22 with diagnoses including but not limited...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0698
(Tag F0698)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure assessments were documented and/or complete...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were not left at the bedside. This...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and facility policy the facility failed to ensure staff practices hand hygiene when delivering meal trays. This affected two (#258 and #260) out of seven room trays ob...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0804
(Tag F0804)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure food was served at a palliative and warm food ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Room Equipment
(Tag F0908)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to maintain the kitchen steamer in a safe operating condition. This had the potential to affect all residents in the facility at...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Safe Environment
(Tag F0921)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure no pervasive odors were present in hallways or common areas. This had the potential to affect all residents. The census was 56.
...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jan 2024
1 deficiency
1 IJ
CRITICAL
(J)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident
THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY.
Based on record review, staff interview, review of hospital records, review...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jul 2022
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
MDS Data Transmission
(Tag F0640)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on resident record review and staff interview; the facility failed to timely finalize and transmit Minimum Data Set (MDS) ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Aug 2019
4 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, medical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident received treatment for edema to bilateral lower extremities. This affected one (#47) of two r...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0688
(Tag F0688)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, medical record review, and family and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a splint was in place...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Pharmacy Services
(Tag F0755)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident received medication as ordered. Thi...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and review of a facility policy, the facility failed to follow their isolation policy for a resident with a drug resistant infection. This...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • 31% turnover. Below Ohio's 48% average. Good staff retention means consistent care.
- • Multiple safety concerns identified: 1 life-threatening violation(s). Review inspection reports carefully.
- • 13 deficiencies on record, including 1 critical (life-threatening) violation. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
- • $16,113 in fines. Above average for Ohio. Some compliance problems on record.
About This Facility
What is Springview Manor's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns SPRINGVIEW MANOR an overall rating of 4 out of 5 stars, which is considered above average nationally. Within Ohio, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.
How is Springview Manor Staffed?
CMS rates SPRINGVIEW MANOR's staffing level at 3 out of 5 stars, which is average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 31%, compared to the Ohio average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.
What Have Inspectors Found at Springview Manor?
State health inspectors documented 13 deficiencies at SPRINGVIEW MANOR during 2019 to 2025. These included: 1 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death) and 12 with potential for harm. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.
Who Owns and Operates Springview Manor?
SPRINGVIEW MANOR is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by TRILOGY HEALTH SERVICES, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 62 certified beds and approximately 57 residents (about 92% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in LIMA, Ohio.
How Does Springview Manor Compare to Other Ohio Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Ohio, SPRINGVIEW MANOR's overall rating (4 stars) is above the state average of 3.2, staff turnover (31%) is significantly lower than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (3 stars) is at the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Springview Manor?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations.
Is Springview Manor Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, SPRINGVIEW MANOR has documented safety concerns. Inspectors have issued 1 Immediate Jeopardy citation (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 4-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Ohio. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.
Do Nurses at Springview Manor Stick Around?
SPRINGVIEW MANOR has a staff turnover rate of 31%, which is about average for Ohio nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was Springview Manor Ever Fined?
SPRINGVIEW MANOR has been fined $16,113 across 1 penalty action. This is below the Ohio average of $33,240. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.
Is Springview Manor on Any Federal Watch List?
SPRINGVIEW MANOR is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.