STROUD NURSING & REHAB
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Stroud Nursing & Rehab has a Trust Grade of F, which means it is considered poor and raises significant concerns about the quality of care provided. It ranks #133 out of 282 facilities in Oklahoma, placing it in the top half, but it’s still not a strong recommendation. The facility is improving, as the number of reported issues has decreased from 5 in 2024 to 1 in 2025. Staffing is a notable strength, with a turnover rate of 0%, well below the state average, indicating that staff members are likely experienced and familiar with the residents. However, the facility has incurred $32,858 in fines, which is concerning and suggests ongoing compliance issues. While RN coverage is average, there have been critical incidents, such as a resident suffering serious burns without timely medical evaluation and a failure to protect residents from potential harm, indicating serious lapses in care. Families should weigh these strengths and weaknesses carefully when considering this facility for their loved ones.
- Trust Score
- F
- In Oklahoma
- #133/282
- Safety Record
- High Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Better
- Staff Stability ○ Average
- Turnover data not reported for this facility.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- $32,858 in fines. Lower than most Oklahoma facilities. Relatively clean record.
- Skilled Nurses ⚠ Watch
- Each resident gets only 14 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Oklahoma. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 19 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
5-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
Facility shows strength in quality measures, fire safety.
The Bad
Near Oklahoma average (2.6)
Meets federal standards, typical of most facilities
Below median ($33,413)
Moderate penalties - review what triggered them
The Ugly 19 deficiencies on record
May 2025
1 deficiency
1 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Free from Abuse/Neglect
(Tag F0600)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was not touched sexually by another resident for 1 (#1) of 5 sampled resident reviewed for abuse.
The DON s...
Read full inspector narrative →
Feb 2024
5 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
PASARR Coordination
(Tag F0644)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview, the facility to ensure OHCA was contacted for a resident that had a serious mental illness for one (#19) of four sampled residents reviewed for recommendations fo...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0645
(Tag F0645)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the PASARR for a resident with a serious mental health diagnosis was filled out correctly and referred to the OHCA for two (#12 and ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive care plan was developed for Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) for one (#12) of one sampled resident who was revi...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0697
(Tag F0697)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure pain medication was administered upon request for one (#51) of two sampled residents who were reviewed for pain manage...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Pharmacy Services
(Tag F0755)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to administer medication as ordered by the physician for one (#39) of seven residents reviewed for medication administration.
The administrat...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jan 2023
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medical Records
(Tag F0842)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure records accurately documented medication administered for one (#1) of three sampled residents reviewed for medications.
The Residen...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jan 2023
7 deficiencies
2 IJ
CRITICAL
(J)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** On 01/11/23 at 10:20 a.m., the Oklahoma State Department of Health (OSDH) confirmed the existence of an immediate jeopardy relat...
Read full inspector narrative →
CRITICAL
(J)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident
A past noncompliance Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was determined to exist effective 12/26/22 related to the facility's failure to ensure a resident who smoked was free from accident hazards. The ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Pharmacy Services
(Tag F0755)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered as ordered for one (#55) of th...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to properly label and store food in accordance with professional standards for food safety.
The DON identified 50 residents that...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0883
(Tag F0883)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the pneumococcal vaccine was administered for one (#31) of five sampled residents reviewed for pneumococcal immunizations.
The Resid...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Laboratory Services
(Tag F0770)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure laboratory tests were obtained as ordered by the physician for one (#31) of five sampled residents reviewed for laboratory tests.
Th...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0919
(Tag F0919)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure emergency call systems were functioning and/or ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Dec 2022
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure hand hygiene was performed during the provision of care for four (#4, 5, 7, and #8) of four sampled residents observed...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jun 2021
4 deficiencies
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Abuse Prevention Policies
(Tag F0607)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to update and implement their abuse policy for two (#5 and #7) of two sampled residents who were reviewed for abuse.
This h...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Report Alleged Abuse
(Tag F0609)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to report to the appropriate authorities allegations of abuse in a timely manner for two (#5 and #7) of two sampled resident...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to complete a comprehensive care plan reflecting the status of the resident during the completion of the assessment and list...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure oxygen tubing was changed in a timely manner to prevent cross contamination for one (#29) of two sam...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
- "What safeguards are in place to prevent abuse and neglect?"
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
- • Multiple safety concerns identified: Federal abuse finding, 2 life-threatening violation(s), 1 harm violation(s), $32,858 in fines, Payment denial on record. Review inspection reports carefully.
- • 19 deficiencies on record, including 2 critical (life-threatening) violations. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
- • $32,858 in fines. Higher than 94% of Oklahoma facilities, suggesting repeated compliance issues.
- • Grade F (16/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
About This Facility
What is Stroud Nursing & Rehab's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns STROUD NURSING & REHAB an overall rating of 3 out of 5 stars, which is considered average nationally. Within Oklahoma, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This mid-range rating indicates the facility meets federal standards but may have areas for improvement.
How is Stroud Nursing & Rehab Staffed?
CMS rates STROUD NURSING & REHAB's staffing level at 2 out of 5 stars, which is below average compared to other nursing homes.
What Have Inspectors Found at Stroud Nursing & Rehab?
State health inspectors documented 19 deficiencies at STROUD NURSING & REHAB during 2021 to 2025. These included: 2 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death), 1 that caused actual resident harm, and 16 with potential for harm. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.
Who Owns and Operates Stroud Nursing & Rehab?
STROUD NURSING & REHAB is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 58 certified beds and approximately 53 residents (about 91% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in STROUD, Oklahoma.
How Does Stroud Nursing & Rehab Compare to Other Oklahoma Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Oklahoma, STROUD NURSING & REHAB's overall rating (3 stars) is above the state average of 2.6 and health inspection rating (2 stars) is below the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Stroud Nursing & Rehab?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "What safeguards and monitoring systems are in place to protect residents from abuse or neglect?" "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations, the substantiated abuse finding on record, and the below-average staffing rating.
Is Stroud Nursing & Rehab Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, STROUD NURSING & REHAB has documented safety concerns. The facility has 1 substantiated abuse finding (meaning confirmed case of resident harm by staff or other residents). Inspectors have issued 2 Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 3-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Oklahoma. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.
Do Nurses at Stroud Nursing & Rehab Stick Around?
STROUD NURSING & REHAB has not reported staff turnover data to CMS. Staff turnover matters because consistent caregivers learn residents' individual needs, medications, and preferences. When staff frequently change, this institutional knowledge is lost. Families should ask the facility directly about their staff retention rates and average employee tenure.
Was Stroud Nursing & Rehab Ever Fined?
STROUD NURSING & REHAB has been fined $32,858 across 3 penalty actions. This is below the Oklahoma average of $33,407. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.
Is Stroud Nursing & Rehab on Any Federal Watch List?
STROUD NURSING & REHAB is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.