REHAB AT SHANNONDELL
Inspected within the last 6 months. Data reflects current conditions.
Rehab at Shannondell has a Trust Grade of B+, which means it is recommended and above average in quality. It ranks #108 out of 653 nursing homes in Pennsylvania, placing it in the top half of facilities in the state, and #13 out of 58 in Montgomery County, indicating only a few local options are better. The facility is improving, having reduced its issues from four in 2024 to two in 2025. Staffing is a strong point with a perfect 5/5 star rating, a turnover rate of 34% that is lower than the state average, and better RN coverage than 84% of state facilities, ensuring that residents receive attentive care. However, there have been some concerning incidents, such as failing to inform a physician promptly after a resident's fall and not properly supervising a resident during transfers, which could pose risks for safety. Overall, while there are notable strengths, families should be aware of these weaknesses when considering this facility.
- Trust Score
- B+
- In Pennsylvania
- #108/653
- Safety Record
- Low Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Better
- Staff Stability ○ Average
- 34% turnover. Near Pennsylvania's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Pennsylvania facilities.
- Skilled Nurses ✓ Good
- Each resident gets 64 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than 97% of Pennsylvania nursing homes. RNs are the most trained staff who catch health problems before they become serious.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 13 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
5-Star Staffing Rating · Excellent nurse staffing levels
-
4-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
-
Staff turnover below average (34%)
14 points below Pennsylvania average of 48%
Facility shows strength in staffing levels, quality measures, fire safety.
The Bad
12pts below Pennsylvania avg (46%)
Typical for the industry
The Ugly 13 deficiencies on record
Jun 2025
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Notification of Changes
(Tag F0580)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on clinical record, hospital record and policy and procedure review and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to immediately inform the physician of an accident that ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on review of clinical record, review of policy and procedures, interviews with staff, and review of hospital records, it w...
Read full inspector narrative →
Dec 2024
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0578
(Tag F0578)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on staff interviews, review of faciltiy policy and review of clinical records, it was determined that the facility failed ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jul 2024
3 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Pharmacy Services
(Tag F0755)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, review of clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement a system of records of receipt and disposition of all controlled drugs bet...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Unnecessary Medications
(Tag F0759)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interviews with staff, review of clinical records and facility policy, it was determined that the facility failed to have a medication error rate less than five percent (Resident...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on review of clinical records, reviewof facility policy, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the faci...
Read full inspector narrative →
Sept 2023
6 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Safe Environment
(Tag F0584)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observations and interviews with residents and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a homelike atmosphere during mealtime for two of two floors (Second and Third floor)...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Grievances
(Tag F0585)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, review of facility policy, and interview with residents and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that grievance/concern forms were available for residents,...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0655
(Tag F0655)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on clinical record review, review of faciltiy policy and interviews with the staff, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan for one of 25 residen...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0657
(Tag F0657)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on review of clinical records and review of facility policy, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident's ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Pharmacy Services
(Tag F0755)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on a review of facility policy, observation, review of incident report, review of manufacture guidelines, and interview staff , it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a medica...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based of a review of facility policies and procedures, observation, review of manufactures' guidelines, interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to store and label medication i...
Read full inspector narrative →
Mar 2023
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0572
(Tag F0572)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interviews with staff, review of clinical records, review of admission records and review of facility policies and procedures, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that reside...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • Grade B+ (85/100). Above average facility, better than most options in Pennsylvania.
- • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
- • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Pennsylvania facilities.
- • 34% turnover. Below Pennsylvania's 48% average. Good staff retention means consistent care.
- • 13 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
About This Facility
What is Rehab At Shannondell's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns REHAB AT SHANNONDELL an overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars, which is considered much above average nationally. Within Pennsylvania, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.
How is Rehab At Shannondell Staffed?
CMS rates REHAB AT SHANNONDELL's staffing level at 5 out of 5 stars, which is much above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 34%, compared to the Pennsylvania average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.
What Have Inspectors Found at Rehab At Shannondell?
State health inspectors documented 13 deficiencies at REHAB AT SHANNONDELL during 2023 to 2025. These included: 13 with potential for harm.
Who Owns and Operates Rehab At Shannondell?
REHAB AT SHANNONDELL is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 120 certified beds and approximately 114 residents (about 95% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in AUDUBON, Pennsylvania.
How Does Rehab At Shannondell Compare to Other Pennsylvania Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Pennsylvania, REHAB AT SHANNONDELL's overall rating (5 stars) is above the state average of 3.0, staff turnover (34%) is significantly lower than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (4 stars) is above the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Rehab At Shannondell?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"
Is Rehab At Shannondell Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, REHAB AT SHANNONDELL has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 5-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Pennsylvania. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Rehab At Shannondell Stick Around?
REHAB AT SHANNONDELL has a staff turnover rate of 34%, which is about average for Pennsylvania nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was Rehab At Shannondell Ever Fined?
REHAB AT SHANNONDELL has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.
Is Rehab At Shannondell on Any Federal Watch List?
REHAB AT SHANNONDELL is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.