ST MARTHA CENTER FOR REHABILITATION & HEALTHCARE
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
St. Martha Center for Rehabilitation and Healthcare has a Trust Grade of C+, indicating it is decent and slightly above average, but not outstanding. It ranks #361 out of 653 facilities in Pennsylvania, placing it in the bottom half, and #16 out of 20 in Chester County, meaning only a few options are worse locally. The facility is improving, with issues decreasing from 6 in 2024 to 2 in 2025. However, staffing is a concern, receiving a low rating of 1 out of 5 stars, and staff turnover is high at 61%, which is above the state average. Despite having no fines on record, which is positive, the facility has less RN coverage than 97% of others in Pennsylvania, meaning residents may not receive enough oversight. Specific incidents include delays in breakfast tray delivery due to insufficient dietary staff, leading to some residents receiving meals late, and failures to obtain necessary weight measurements for several residents, which can impact nutritional status. Overall, while St. Martha has strengths in health inspections and no fines, families should be aware of staffing challenges and recent issues that need addressing.
- Trust Score
- C+
- In Pennsylvania
- #361/653
- Safety Record
- Low Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Better
- Staff Stability ⚠ Watch
- 61% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Pennsylvania facilities.
- Skilled Nurses ⚠ Watch
- Each resident gets only 19 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Pennsylvania. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 15 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
Facility shows strength in fire safety.
The Bad
Near Pennsylvania average (3.0)
Meets federal standards, typical of most facilities
15pts above Pennsylvania avg (46%)
Frequent staff changes - ask about care continuity
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
13 points above Pennsylvania average of 48%
The Ugly 15 deficiencies on record
Feb 2025
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on a review of facility policy, observations, clinical records and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to follow physician orders for two of 22 residents reviewed (Resid...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medication Errors
(Tag F0758)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on clinical records review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure appropriate indications and non-pharmacological interventions were provided before administer...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jan 2024
6 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on clinical records review, resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement a comprehensive care plan intervention to prevent alteration in nutrition and hy...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0661
(Tag F0661)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on clinical record review and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to complete a discharge summary for a planned discharge for one of one residents reviewed. (Resident 112)
Find...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on clinical records review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure physician orders regarding medications were followed for two of the 24 residents reviewed (Re...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Pharmacy Services
(Tag F0755)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the pharmacy services ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Laboratory Services
(Tag F0770)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on clinical records review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that laboratory test was obtained as ordered by the physician for one of the 24 residents rev...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0692
(Tag F0692)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on clinical record review, facility policy and procedure review, and staff interview it was determined the facility failed...
Read full inspector narrative →
Aug 2023
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(F)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0802
(Tag F0802)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on resident and staff interviews, observations, and facility documentation review it was determined the facility failed to have adequate number of dietary staff to meet the needs of the resident...
Read full inspector narrative →
Apr 2023
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Report Alleged Abuse
(Tag F0609)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on a review of facility policy, review of clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to report an allegation of misappropriation of resident property to th...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medical Records
(Tag F0842)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on a review of clinical records and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate medical records for three of nine residents reviewed (Resi...
Read full inspector narrative →
Mar 2023
4 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0657
(Tag F0657)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on clinical record review and staff interviews it was determined that the facility did not update or revise the care plan in a timely manner for one of 32 residents reviewed (Resident 363).
Fin...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observations, clinical record review, and interviews with staff it was determined that the facility failed to follow physician, and/or clarify physician orders regarding daily weights for ede...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Drug Regimen Review
(Tag F0756)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a rationale from attending physician was provided for disagreed recommendations provided ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0804
(Tag F0804)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on a review of facility documentation, observation, and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to provide foods that were served at the proper temperature to ensure resident ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Why is there high staff turnover? How do you retain staff?"
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
- • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Pennsylvania facilities.
- • 15 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
- • 61% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
About This Facility
What is St Martha Center For Rehabilitation & Healthcare's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns ST MARTHA CENTER FOR REHABILITATION & HEALTHCARE an overall rating of 3 out of 5 stars, which is considered average nationally. Within Pennsylvania, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This mid-range rating indicates the facility meets federal standards but may have areas for improvement.
How is St Martha Center For Rehabilitation & Healthcare Staffed?
CMS rates ST MARTHA CENTER FOR REHABILITATION & HEALTHCARE's staffing level at 1 out of 5 stars, which is much below average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 61%, which is 15 percentage points above the Pennsylvania average of 46%. High turnover can affect care consistency as new staff learn residents' individual needs. RN turnover specifically is 56%, which is notably high. RNs provide skilled clinical oversight, so turnover in this role can affect medical care quality.
What Have Inspectors Found at St Martha Center For Rehabilitation & Healthcare?
State health inspectors documented 15 deficiencies at ST MARTHA CENTER FOR REHABILITATION & HEALTHCARE during 2023 to 2025. These included: 15 with potential for harm.
Who Owns and Operates St Martha Center For Rehabilitation & Healthcare?
ST MARTHA CENTER FOR REHABILITATION & HEALTHCARE is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by CENTER MANAGEMENT GROUP, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 120 certified beds and approximately 111 residents (about 92% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in DOWNINGTOWN, Pennsylvania.
How Does St Martha Center For Rehabilitation & Healthcare Compare to Other Pennsylvania Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Pennsylvania, ST MARTHA CENTER FOR REHABILITATION & HEALTHCARE's overall rating (3 stars) matches the state average, staff turnover (61%) is significantly higher than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (4 stars) is above the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting St Martha Center For Rehabilitation & Healthcare?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "How do you ensure continuity of care given staff turnover, and what is your staff retention strategy?" "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's high staff turnover rate and the below-average staffing rating.
Is St Martha Center For Rehabilitation & Healthcare Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, ST MARTHA CENTER FOR REHABILITATION & HEALTHCARE has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 3-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Pennsylvania. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at St Martha Center For Rehabilitation & Healthcare Stick Around?
Staff turnover at ST MARTHA CENTER FOR REHABILITATION & HEALTHCARE is high. At 61%, the facility is 15 percentage points above the Pennsylvania average of 46%. Registered Nurse turnover is particularly concerning at 56%. RNs handle complex medical decisions and coordinate care — frequent RN changes can directly impact care quality. High turnover means new staff may not know residents' individual needs, medications, or preferences. It can also be disorienting for residents, especially those with dementia who rely on familiar faces. Families should ask: What is causing the turnover? What retention programs are in place? How do you ensure care continuity during staff transitions?
Was St Martha Center For Rehabilitation & Healthcare Ever Fined?
ST MARTHA CENTER FOR REHABILITATION & HEALTHCARE has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.
Is St Martha Center For Rehabilitation & Healthcare on Any Federal Watch List?
ST MARTHA CENTER FOR REHABILITATION & HEALTHCARE is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.