HOMEWOOD LIVING PLUM CREEK, INC
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Homewood Living Plum Creek, Inc. in Hanover, Pennsylvania has received a Trust Grade of A, indicating it is highly recommended and performs excellently compared to other facilities. It ranks #58 out of 653 facilities statewide, placing it in the top half, and is the top facility among 14 in York County. However, the trend is worsening, with the number of issues increasing from 3 in 2024 to 5 in 2025. Staffing is a strength with a perfect 5/5 rating and a turnover rate of 29%, which is significantly lower than the state average, meaning staff are likely to be familiar with residents' needs. The facility has $7,443 in fines, which is average, but there have been concerning incidents, such as failing to implement proper infection control practices for residents on droplet precautions and not updating care plans to reflect current medical needs. Overall, while the home excels in several areas, families should be aware of the recent increase in concerns that need addressing.
- Trust Score
- A
- In Pennsylvania
- #58/653
- Safety Record
- Low Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Worse
- Staff Stability ✓ Good
- 29% annual turnover. Excellent stability, 19 points below Pennsylvania's 48% average. Staff who stay learn residents' needs.
- Penalties ⚠ Watch
- $7,443 in fines. Higher than 81% of Pennsylvania facilities, suggesting repeated compliance issues.
- Skilled Nurses ✓ Good
- Each resident gets 45 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than average for Pennsylvania. RNs are trained to catch health problems early.
- Violations ○ Average
- 10 deficiencies on record. Average for a facility this size. Mostly minor or procedural issues.
The Good
-
5-Star Staffing Rating · Excellent nurse staffing levels
-
5-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
-
Low Staff Turnover (29%) · Staff stability means consistent care
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
-
Staff turnover is low (29%)
19 points below Pennsylvania average of 48%
Facility shows strength in staffing levels, quality measures, staff retention, fire safety.
The Bad
Below median ($33,413)
Minor penalties assessed
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
The Ugly 10 deficiencies on record
Jan 2025
5 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0558
(Tag F0558)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on facility policy review, observations, clinical record review, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the right to receive services with reason...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Assessment Accuracy
(Tag F0641)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for one of 25 resident...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observations, clinical record review, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to implement resident-directed care and treatment consistent with the resid...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medication Errors
(Tag F0758)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure PRN (as needed) orders for anti-psychotic drugs are limited to 14 da...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on facility policy review, observations, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement infection control practices to help prevent the deve...
Read full inspector narrative →
Feb 2024
3 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
MDS Data Transmission
(Tag F0640)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on review of the Resident Assessment Instrument User Manual, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to complete required Minimum Data Set (MDS) ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Assessment Accuracy
(Tag F0641)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on clinical record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for two of 23 residen...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observations, policy review, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a comprehensive, person-centered care plan was developed f...
Read full inspector narrative →
Mar 2023
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Assessment Accuracy
(Tag F0641)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for two of 21 resident...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0657
(Tag F0657)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident care plan was reviewed and revised to reflect the resident's current status ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • Grade A (91/100). Above average facility, better than most options in Pennsylvania.
- • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
- • 29% annual turnover. Excellent stability, 19 points below Pennsylvania's 48% average. Staff who stay learn residents' needs.
- • No significant concerns identified. This facility shows no red flags across CMS ratings, staff turnover, or federal penalties.
About This Facility
What is Homewood Living Plum Creek, Inc's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns HOMEWOOD LIVING PLUM CREEK, INC an overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars, which is considered much above average nationally. Within Pennsylvania, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.
How is Homewood Living Plum Creek, Inc Staffed?
CMS rates HOMEWOOD LIVING PLUM CREEK, INC's staffing level at 5 out of 5 stars, which is much above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 29%, compared to the Pennsylvania average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.
What Have Inspectors Found at Homewood Living Plum Creek, Inc?
State health inspectors documented 10 deficiencies at HOMEWOOD LIVING PLUM CREEK, INC during 2023 to 2025. These included: 10 with potential for harm.
Who Owns and Operates Homewood Living Plum Creek, Inc?
HOMEWOOD LIVING PLUM CREEK, INC is owned by a non-profit organization. Non-profit facilities reinvest revenue into operations rather than distributing to shareholders. The facility is operated by HOMEWOOD RETIREMENT CENTERS, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 120 certified beds and approximately 93 residents (about 78% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in HANOVER, Pennsylvania.
How Does Homewood Living Plum Creek, Inc Compare to Other Pennsylvania Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Pennsylvania, HOMEWOOD LIVING PLUM CREEK, INC's overall rating (5 stars) is above the state average of 3.0, staff turnover (29%) is significantly lower than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (4 stars) is above the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Homewood Living Plum Creek, Inc?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"
Is Homewood Living Plum Creek, Inc Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, HOMEWOOD LIVING PLUM CREEK, INC has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 5-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Pennsylvania. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Homewood Living Plum Creek, Inc Stick Around?
Staff at HOMEWOOD LIVING PLUM CREEK, INC tend to stick around. With a turnover rate of 29%, the facility is 17 percentage points below the Pennsylvania average of 46%. Low turnover is a positive sign. It means caregivers have time to learn each resident's needs, medications, and personal preferences. Consistent staff also notice subtle changes in a resident's condition more quickly.
Was Homewood Living Plum Creek, Inc Ever Fined?
HOMEWOOD LIVING PLUM CREEK, INC has been fined $7,443 across 1 penalty action. This is below the Pennsylvania average of $33,153. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.
Is Homewood Living Plum Creek, Inc on Any Federal Watch List?
HOMEWOOD LIVING PLUM CREEK, INC is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.