Peter Becker Community

800 MAPLE AVENUE, HARLEYSVILLE, PA 19438 (215) 256-9501
Non profit - Corporation 72 Beds Independent Data: November 2025
Trust Grade
88/100
#103 of 653 in PA
Last Inspection: April 2025

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

Peter Becker Community in Harleysville, Pennsylvania, has a Trust Grade of B+, indicating it is above average and generally recommended for families seeking care. It ranks #103 out of 653 facilities in Pennsylvania, placing it in the top half of the state, and #12 out of 58 in Montgomery County, meaning only 11 local options are better. The facility's trend is new as this is its first inspection on record, so there is no indication of improvement or decline yet. Staffing is a strong point with a perfect 5/5 rating and a turnover rate of 36%, which is well below the state average of 46%, suggesting that staff are experienced and familiar with residents. However, there are some concerns, including $3,174 in fines, which is considered average, and two reported issues during the inspection. One incident involved improper food storage in the kitchen, with expired items found, raising potential health risks. Another concern was the failure to develop a comprehensive care plan for a resident with depression, meaning their specific needs were not adequately addressed. While there are notable strengths, families should be aware of these weaknesses when considering this facility for their loved ones.

Trust Score
B+
88/100
In Pennsylvania
#103/653
Top 15%
Safety Record
Low Risk
No red flags
Inspections
Too New
0 → 2 violations
Staff Stability
○ Average
36% turnover. Near Pennsylvania's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
Penalties
○ Average
$3,174 in fines. Higher than 56% of Pennsylvania facilities. Some compliance issues.
Skilled Nurses
✓ Good
Each resident gets 62 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than 97% of Pennsylvania nursing homes. RNs are the most trained staff who catch health problems before they become serious.
Violations
✓ Good
Only 2 deficiencies on record. Cleaner than most facilities. Minor issues only.
★★★★★
5.0
Overall Rating
★★★★★
5.0
Staff Levels
★★★★★
5.0
Care Quality
★★★★☆
4.0
Inspection Score
Stable
: 0 issues
2025: 2 issues

The Good

  • 5-Star Staffing Rating · Excellent nurse staffing levels
  • 5-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record
  • Staff turnover below average (36%)

    12 points below Pennsylvania average of 48%

Facility shows strength in staffing levels, quality measures, fire safety.

The Bad

Staff Turnover: 36%

10pts below Pennsylvania avg (46%)

Typical for the industry

Federal Fines: $3,174

Below median ($33,413)

Minor penalties assessed

The Ugly 2 deficiencies on record

Apr 2025 2 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Comprehensive Care Plan (Tag F0656)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan to meet each resident's needs identified in the comprehensive assessment for one of 16 sampled residents. (Resident 15) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and had diagnoses that included depression. The Minimum Data Set Care Area Assessment summary dated March 23, 2025, noted that the resident's psychotropic drug use was to be addressed in the care plan. Review of the medication administration record in March and April 2025, revealed the resident was receiving an antidepressant. There was no documented evidence that interventions to address Resident 15's psychotropic drug use were included in the current care plan. In an interview on April 9, 2025, at 2:40 p.m., the Director of Nursing confirmed there was no documented evidence that the care area was addressed in the Resident 15's current care plan. 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(5) Nursing services.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on policy review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to properly store food and maintain sanitary conditions in two of two kitchenettes (Great Oak and E...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on policy review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to properly store food and maintain sanitary conditions in two of two kitchenettes (Great Oak and Elm) and in the main kitchen of the dietary department. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy entitled, Date Marking for Food Safety, dated March 20, 2025, revealed that staff were to label food items with the date the item was opened and the items were to be discarded by the use-by date. Observations during the tour of the two kitchenettes and the main kitchen on April 8, 2025, at 10:30 a.m., revealed the following: In the Great Oak kitchenette reach-in cooler, there was an opened container of cottage cheese with a use-by date of March 21, 2025, and had an opening date of April 8, 2025, written on the lid. In the deli cooler, there was a pan of egg salad with a use-by date of April 4, and a bagel with a use-by date of December 24, 2024. There was a pan of lettuce and a cut wrapped sweet potato that were both not dated. In the Elm kitchenette reach-in cooler, there was a dished pan of pears labeled use-by April 4, and a dished pan of pureed fruit cup labeled use-by April 3. In the deli cooler, there was a container of chicken salad with a use-by date of April 6, a container of tuna salad labeled use-by April 6, a package of six hot dogs labeled use-by April 6, a container of lemon slices labeled use-by March 15, a package of cream cheese labeled use-by March 28, and a package of sliced provolone cheese labeled use-by March 14, and all items were opened. There was a container of 10 eggs, a cut wrapped onion, and an opened package of sliced cheese that were not dated. In the Main Kitchen reach in cooler, there was a package of cheese slices that was open to air and an opened package of whipped topping that was not dated. In the walk-in cooler, there was a container of cottage cheese with a use-by date of March 21, 2025. There was a container of 17 eggs and a large container of 30 peeled potatoes in water that were not dated. In dry storage, there was an opened package of walnuts that was not dated. In an interview on April 8, 2025, at 11:30 a.m., the Assistant Director of Dining confirmed these items should have been dated, expired items should have been removed, and the food items were for use in the skilled areas. 28 Pa. Code 201.14(a) Responsibility of licensee.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • Grade B+ (88/100). Above average facility, better than most options in Pennsylvania.
  • • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
  • • $3,174 in fines. Lower than most Pennsylvania facilities. Relatively clean record.
  • • Only 2 deficiencies on record. Cleaner than most facilities. Minor issues only.
Concerns
  • • No significant concerns identified. This facility shows no red flags across CMS ratings, staff turnover, or federal penalties.
Bottom line: Generally positive indicators. Standard due diligence and a personal visit recommended.

About This Facility

What is Peter Becker Community's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns Peter Becker Community an overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars, which is considered much above average nationally. Within Pennsylvania, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.

How is Peter Becker Community Staffed?

CMS rates Peter Becker Community's staffing level at 5 out of 5 stars, which is much above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 36%, compared to the Pennsylvania average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.

What Have Inspectors Found at Peter Becker Community?

State health inspectors documented 2 deficiencies at Peter Becker Community during 2025. These included: 2 with potential for harm.

Who Owns and Operates Peter Becker Community?

Peter Becker Community is owned by a non-profit organization. Non-profit facilities reinvest revenue into operations rather than distributing to shareholders. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 72 certified beds and approximately 56 residents (about 78% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in HARLEYSVILLE, Pennsylvania.

How Does Peter Becker Community Compare to Other Pennsylvania Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Pennsylvania, Peter Becker Community's overall rating (5 stars) is above the state average of 3.0, staff turnover (36%) is significantly lower than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (4 stars) is above the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Peter Becker Community?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"

Is Peter Becker Community Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, Peter Becker Community has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 5-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Pennsylvania. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.

Do Nurses at Peter Becker Community Stick Around?

Peter Becker Community has a staff turnover rate of 36%, which is about average for Pennsylvania nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.

Was Peter Becker Community Ever Fined?

Peter Becker Community has been fined $3,174 across 1 penalty action. This is below the Pennsylvania average of $33,111. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.

Is Peter Becker Community on Any Federal Watch List?

Peter Becker Community is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.