TRANSITIONS HEALTHCARE AUTUMN GROVE CARE CENTER
Inspected within the last 6 months. Data reflects current conditions.
Transitions Healthcare Autumn Grove Care Center has received a Trust Grade of F, indicating significant concerns about the quality of care provided. It ranks #502 out of 653 facilities in Pennsylvania, placing it in the bottom half, and #7 out of 11 in Butler County, meaning only three local options are better. While the facility has shown some improvement in its issues, decreasing from 5 in 2024 to 3 in 2025, the overall situation remains troubling. Staffing is a relative strength with a 4 out of 5 rating, but the turnover rate is concerning at 59%, which is higher than the state average of 46%. However, the facility has faced serious issues, including failing to provide emergency life-saving interventions for a choking resident, which put all residents at risk. Additionally, there were significant delays in meal service, causing residents to receive meals hours late. On a more positive note, the RN coverage is average, which means there is some oversight to catch potential problems. Despite the strengths, the high fines of $179,218 and numerous deficiencies raise valid concerns for families considering this facility.
- Trust Score
- F
- In Pennsylvania
- #502/653
- Safety Record
- High Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Better
- Staff Stability ⚠ Watch
- 59% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- $179,218 in fines. Lower than most Pennsylvania facilities. Relatively clean record.
- Skilled Nurses ✓ Good
- Each resident gets 42 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than average for Pennsylvania. RNs are trained to catch health problems early.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 25 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
4-Star Staffing Rating · Above-average nurse staffing levels
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
Facility shows strength in staffing levels, fire safety.
The Bad
Below Pennsylvania average (3.0)
Below average - review inspection findings carefully
13pts above Pennsylvania avg (46%)
Frequent staff changes - ask about care continuity
Well above median ($33,413)
Significant penalties indicating serious issues
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
11 points above Pennsylvania average of 48%
The Ugly 25 deficiencies on record
Jul 2025
3 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0605
(Tag F0605)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on review of clinical records and facility policy, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a clinical rationale for the continued use of a PRN (as needed) psyc...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on review of facility policies, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to serve food in a safe and sanitary manner during tray line and ensure that food w...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0925
(Tag F0925)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on review of facility policy, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program to ensure a pest free environment in one ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Aug 2024
5 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Resident Rights
(Tag F0550)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on review of clinical records, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed provide an environment that enhances resident's quality of life for three of 21 resi...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Assessment Accuracy
(Tag F0641)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on review of clinical records and Minimum Data Set (MDS - federally mandated standardized assessment conducted at specific intervals to plan resident care), and staff interview, it was determine...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, observations, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain proper care of respiratory equipment for one of two r...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0698
(Tag F0698)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on review of facility dialysis (a blood purifying treatment given when your kidneys are not functioning) center contract, facility policy, and clinical record, and staff interview, it was determ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on review of facility policies, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to store fo...
Read full inspector narrative →
Nov 2023
5 deficiencies
2 IJ (1 facility-wide)
CRITICAL
(K)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Deficiency F0805
(Tag F0805)
Someone could have died · This affected multiple residents
Based on review of clinical records, facility documents and coroner's report, and staff interviews it was determined the facility failed to provide food in a form designed to meet individual needs for...
Read full inspector narrative →
CRITICAL
(L)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Deficiency F0836
(Tag F0836)
Someone could have died · This affected most or all residents
⚠️ Facility-wide issue
Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, facility documents, staff documentation, and coroner's report and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to provide emergency lif...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0678
(Tag F0678)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on review of facility policies, facility documentation and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0726
(Tag F0726)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on review of job descriptions, facility cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR-emergency life-saving procedure that is done wh...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Administration
(Tag F0835)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on review of facility records and job descriptions, it was determined that the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) and the Director of Nursing (DON) failed to effectively manage the facility to mak...
Read full inspector narrative →
Sept 2023
12 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Safe Environment
(Tag F0584)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on review of facility documents, observations, and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to provide ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Assessment Accuracy
(Tag F0641)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on review of the Long Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual 2019 (RAI-assessment guide used to plan the provision of care for residents), clinical records and staff...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0660
(Tag F0660)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on review of clinical records, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to implement an effective discharge plan for one of 22 residents reviewed (Resident R...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Incontinence Care
(Tag F0690)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure urinary catheter care was completed per physician orders fo...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Tube Feeding
(Tag F0693)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on review of facility policy, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide care and services to help prevent complications related to a gastrostomy tub...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0849
(Tag F0849)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on review of Hospice contract, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that Hospice documentation was maintained in the clinical record...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on review of facility policy, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure COVID-19 infection control protocols were followed to help prevent the deve...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on review of facility policy, observations and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to prevent the opportunity for the potential unauthorized access of medications on one ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medical Records
(Tag F0842)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on review of facility policies, facility documents, and clinical records, observations, and staff interview, it was determ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0802
(Tag F0802)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on review of facility grievances and resident council minutes, observations and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide sufficient staff to carry out...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on review of facility policies, observations, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to properly store foods/maintain proper sanitation in the main kitchen.
Findings include...
Read full inspector narrative →
MINOR
(C)
Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact
Deficiency F0575
(Tag F0575)
Minor procedural issue · This affected most or all residents
Based on observations and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to display the Department of Health (DOH) Hotline (toll-free telephone number) number in a prominent/accessible lo...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
- "Why is there high staff turnover? How do you retain staff?"
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
- • Multiple safety concerns identified: 2 life-threatening violation(s), $179,218 in fines. Review inspection reports carefully.
- • 25 deficiencies on record, including 2 critical (life-threatening) violations. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
- • $179,218 in fines. Extremely high, among the most fined facilities in Pennsylvania. Major compliance failures.
- • Grade F (6/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
About This Facility
What is Transitions Healthcare Autumn Grove's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns TRANSITIONS HEALTHCARE AUTUMN GROVE CARE CENTER an overall rating of 2 out of 5 stars, which is considered below average nationally. Within Pennsylvania, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.
How is Transitions Healthcare Autumn Grove Staffed?
CMS rates TRANSITIONS HEALTHCARE AUTUMN GROVE CARE CENTER's staffing level at 4 out of 5 stars, which is above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 59%, which is 13 percentage points above the Pennsylvania average of 46%. High turnover can affect care consistency as new staff learn residents' individual needs.
What Have Inspectors Found at Transitions Healthcare Autumn Grove?
State health inspectors documented 25 deficiencies at TRANSITIONS HEALTHCARE AUTUMN GROVE CARE CENTER during 2023 to 2025. These included: 2 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death), 22 with potential for harm, and 1 minor or isolated issues. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.
Who Owns and Operates Transitions Healthcare Autumn Grove?
TRANSITIONS HEALTHCARE AUTUMN GROVE CARE CENTER is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by TRANSITIONS HEALTHCARE, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 103 certified beds and approximately 97 residents (about 94% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in HARRISVILLE, Pennsylvania.
How Does Transitions Healthcare Autumn Grove Compare to Other Pennsylvania Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Pennsylvania, TRANSITIONS HEALTHCARE AUTUMN GROVE CARE CENTER's overall rating (2 stars) is below the state average of 3.0, staff turnover (59%) is significantly higher than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (2 stars) is below the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Transitions Healthcare Autumn Grove?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "How do you ensure continuity of care given staff turnover, and what is your staff retention strategy?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations and the facility's high staff turnover rate.
Is Transitions Healthcare Autumn Grove Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, TRANSITIONS HEALTHCARE AUTUMN GROVE CARE CENTER has documented safety concerns. Inspectors have issued 2 Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 2-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Pennsylvania. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.
Do Nurses at Transitions Healthcare Autumn Grove Stick Around?
Staff turnover at TRANSITIONS HEALTHCARE AUTUMN GROVE CARE CENTER is high. At 59%, the facility is 13 percentage points above the Pennsylvania average of 46%. High turnover means new staff may not know residents' individual needs, medications, or preferences. It can also be disorienting for residents, especially those with dementia who rely on familiar faces. Families should ask: What is causing the turnover? What retention programs are in place? How do you ensure care continuity during staff transitions?
Was Transitions Healthcare Autumn Grove Ever Fined?
TRANSITIONS HEALTHCARE AUTUMN GROVE CARE CENTER has been fined $179,218 across 1 penalty action. This is 5.1x the Pennsylvania average of $34,871. Fines at this level are uncommon and typically indicate a pattern of serious deficiencies, repeated violations, or failure to correct problems promptly. CMS reserves penalties of this magnitude for facilities that pose significant, documented risk to resident health or safety. Families should request specific documentation of what issues led to these fines and what systemic changes have been implemented.
Is Transitions Healthcare Autumn Grove on Any Federal Watch List?
TRANSITIONS HEALTHCARE AUTUMN GROVE CARE CENTER is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.