CONEMAUGH MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER TCU

320 MAIN STREET, JOHNSTOWN, PA 15901 (814) 534-6111
For profit - Partnership 30 Beds LIFEPOINT HEALTH Data: November 2025
Trust Grade
95/100
#23 of 653 in PA
Last Inspection: February 2025

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

Conemaugh Memorial Medical Center TCU has a Trust Grade of A+, indicating it is an elite facility with exceptional care standards. It ranks #23 out of 653 nursing homes in Pennsylvania, placing it in the top half of statewide options, and #2 out of 9 in Cambria County, meaning only one local facility ranks higher. However, the facility's trend is worsening, with issues increasing from 1 in 2024 to 2 in 2025. Staffing is a strong point, receiving a 5/5 rating and a low turnover of 22%, much better than the state average of 46%, and they provide more RN coverage than 99% of facilities in Pennsylvania. While there have been no fines, which is a positive sign, recent inspections revealed concerns such as failing to obtain required weights for several residents and not following proper infection control practices during medication administration, which could pose risks to resident safety.

Trust Score
A+
95/100
In Pennsylvania
#23/653
Top 3%
Safety Record
Low Risk
No red flags
Inspections
Getting Worse
1 → 2 violations
Staff Stability
✓ Good
22% annual turnover. Excellent stability, 26 points below Pennsylvania's 48% average. Staff who stay learn residents' needs.
Penalties
✓ Good
No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Pennsylvania facilities.
Skilled Nurses
✓ Good
Each resident gets 190 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than 97% of Pennsylvania nursing homes. RNs are the most trained staff who catch health problems before they become serious.
Violations
✓ Good
Only 5 deficiencies on record. Cleaner than most facilities. Minor issues only.
★★★★★
5.0
Overall Rating
★★★★★
5.0
Staff Levels
★★★★★
5.0
Care Quality
★★★★☆
4.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2024: 1 issues
2025: 2 issues

The Good

  • 5-Star Staffing Rating · Excellent nurse staffing levels
  • 5-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
  • Low Staff Turnover (22%) · Staff stability means consistent care
  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record
  • Staff turnover is low (22%)

    26 points below Pennsylvania average of 48%

Facility shows strength in staffing levels, quality measures, staff retention, fire safety.

The Bad

Chain: LIFEPOINT HEALTH

Part of a multi-facility chain

Ask about local staffing decisions and management

The Ugly 5 deficiencies on record

Feb 2025 2 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on a review of facility policies, clinical records, and facility investigation reports, as well as observations and staff ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on a review of facility policies, clinical records, and facility investigation reports, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure resident safety during transportation in a wheelchair for one of 40 residents reviewed (Resident 216). Findings include: A facility policy regarding safe mobility, dated March 15, 2024, indicated that the facility would promote safe mobility for all residents in their care. Yellow code was caution, the resident needs assistance with mobility. A review of the clinical record for Resident 216 indicated that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis of a closed non-displaced intertrochanteric fracture of the right femur. Resident 216 was coded yellow. A mobility care plan for Resident 216, dated February 12, 2025, indicated that the resident was to have therapeutic exercise, bed mobility gait training, and transfer and ambulation devices as ordered. The resident was weight bearing as tolerated to the right lower extremity. A certified physician's assistant note for Resident 216, dated February 12, 2025, revealed that the resident had active problems that included a distal radius fracture of the right upper extremity with splint and a right femur fracture. The resident had an open reduction and internal fixation (surgical procedure used to treat broken bones) on February 8, 2025. Observations on February 20, 2025, at 1:15 p.m. in the therapy room revealed that Occupational Therapist 2 pushed Resident 216 into the therapy room. Resident 216's wheelchair did not have foot rests in place and her feet were approximately one inch off the ground. Resident 216 was pushed to the table to work on a hand coordination activity with a board and plastic pins. Interview with the Occupational Therapist 2 at the time of the observation revealed that Resident 216 had foot rests and they should be in use. Interview with Director of Nursing on February 20, 2025, at 12:44 p.m. confirmed that the staff should always use leg/footrests on wheelchairs when residents are being transported in their wheelchairs but indicated that therapy staff have their own procedure. 28 Pa. Code 201.14(a) Responsibility of Licensee. 28 Pa. Code 201.18(b)(1)(e)(1) Management. 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(5) Nursing Services.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that proper infection control practices were follow...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that proper infection control practices were followed during the administration of medications for one of 15 residents reviewed (Resident 116). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding medication administration, dated March 15, 2024, indicated that medications are administered in accordance with professional standards of practice, in a manner to prevent contamination or infection. Staff will follow all infection control practices for hand hygiene and application of personal protective equipment as indicated. Physician's orders for Resident 116 included an order for the resident to receive 8.6 milligrams of Sennosides glycoside two tablets daily for constipation. Observations on February 19, 2025, at 8:45 a.m. revealed that Registered Nurse 1 dropped a tablet of Sennosides glycoside onto the medication cart. She picked the medication up off the cart with her bare hands and placed it into the medication cup and administered the medications to the resident. Interview with Registered Nurse 1 at that time confirmed that she should have wasted the medication. Interview with the Nursing Home Administrator on February 19, 2025, at 3:15 p.m. confirmed that medications that were dropped should have been wasted and were not to be touched with bare hands. 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(5) Nursing Services.
Mar 2024 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0700 (Tag F0700)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a safety assessment was completed for side rai...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a safety assessment was completed for side rail use for one of 12 residents reviewed (Resident 163). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding side rails, dated March 15, 2024, indicated that the facility would promote a person-centered approach when determining the need and/or use of grab bars and side rails, which would include an assessment of the resident, medical condition, decision-making ability, and a review for possible entrapment and/or injury from use of a bed rail. Observations of Resident 163 on March 25, 2024, at 9:58 a.m. and March 26, 2024, at 8:20 a.m. revealed that the resident's bed was equipped with bilateral side rails. There was no documented evidence that Resident 163 was assessed for potential safety hazards prior to the side rails being applied to the resident's bed. Interview with the Director of Nursing on March 26, 2024, at 11:25 a.m. confirmed that there was no safety assessment completed for the use of side rails for Resident 163. 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(5) Nursing Services.
Apr 2023 2 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0761 (Tag F0761)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on review of facility policies, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that medications were properly stored in the medication cart. ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on review of facility policies, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that medications were properly stored in the medication cart. Findings include: A policy for Pharmacy Services, dated March 16, 2023, indicated that medications should be secured in the proper medication cart for administration. Observations during medication administration on April 5, 2023, at 7:50 a.m. revealed that Registered Nurse 1 prepared Atenolol 50 milligrams (mg), Bupropion 300 mg, Lexapro 10 mg, Metformin 1000 mg, and Potassium Chloride 10 milliequivalents (mEq) for Resident 9 and left the blister packs of medications unsecured and unattended on top of the medication cart while he entered the resident's room to administer the medications to the resident. When Registered Nurse 1 entered the resident's room, the medication cart was out of his line of sight and was left unlocked with the keys to the medication cart hanging in the lock. An interview with Registered Nurse 1 at that time revealed that he should have put all medication in the cart, locked the cart, and removed the keys prior to entering the resident's room. Interview with the Director of Nursing on April 5, 2023, at 12:10 p.m. confirmed that medications should not have been left unattended and unsecured on the medication cart and the medication cart should have been locked and the keys removed. 28 Pa. Code 211.9(a)(1) Pharmacy services. 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1) Nursing services.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on a review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility fa...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on a review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to obtain weights as ordered by the physician for eight of 11 residents reviewed (Residents 2, 6, 7, 9, 10, 12, 13, 14). Findings include: The facility's policy for weights, dated March 16, 2023, indicated that upon admission, residents would have an admission weight done to record baseline weight. Residents will then be set up on a biweekly weight schedule unless otherwise ordered by physician or deemed necessary by registered nurse. All weights would be documented in the electronic record and on the report sheet. Physician's orders for Resident 2, dated March 22, 2023, included and order for the resident to be weighed every Wednesday and Saturday. A review of Resident 2's weight records from admission on [DATE], to April 5, 2023, revealed that the resident was not weighed three out of three days. Physician's orders for Resident 6, dated March 29, 2023, included an order for the resident to be weighed daily. A review of Resident 6's weight records from admission on [DATE], until April 5, 2023, revealed that the resident was not weighed seven out of seven days. Physician's orders for Resident 7, dated March 28, 2023, included an order for the resident to be weighed on Tuesdays and Fridays. A review of Resident 7's weight records from admission on [DATE], to April 5, 2023, revealed that the resident was not weighed two out of two days. Physician's orders for Resident 9, dated March 25, 2023, included an order for the resident to be weighed on Wednesday and Saturdays. A review of Resident 9's weight records from admission on [DATE], to April 5, 2023, revealed that the resident was not weighed three out of three days. Physician's orders for Resident 10, dated March 18, 2023, included an order for the resident to be weighed on Wednesday and Saturdays. A review of Resident 10's weight records from admission on [DATE], to April 5, 2023, revealed that the resident was not weighed five out of five days. Physician's orders for Resident 12, dated March 30, 2023, included an order for the resident to be weighed every Monday and Thursday. A review of Resident 12's weight records from admission on [DATE], to April 5, 2023, revealed that the resident was not weighed two out of two days. Physician's orders for Resident 13, dated March 21, 2023, included an order for the resident to be weighed every Tuesday and Friday. A review of Resident 13's weight records from admission on [DATE], to April 5, 2023, revealed that the resident was not weighed four out of four days. Physician's orders for Resident 14, dated March 24, 2023, included an order for the resident to be weighed on Tuesdays and Fridays. A review of Resident 14's weight records from March 24, 2023, to April 5, 2023, revealed that the resident was not weighed four out of four days. Interview with the Director of Nursing on April 5, 2023, at 9:20 a.m. confirmed that Residents 2, 6, 7, 9, 10, 12, 13 and 14 should have been weighed per their physician's orders and they were not. 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(3)(5) Nursing services.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • Grade A+ (95/100). Above average facility, better than most options in Pennsylvania.
  • • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
  • • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Pennsylvania facilities.
  • • Only 5 deficiencies on record. Cleaner than most facilities. Minor issues only.
Concerns
  • • No significant concerns identified. This facility shows no red flags across CMS ratings, staff turnover, or federal penalties.
Bottom line: Generally positive indicators. Standard due diligence and a personal visit recommended.

About This Facility

What is Conemaugh Memorial Medical Center Tcu's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns CONEMAUGH MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER TCU an overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars, which is considered much above average nationally. Within Pennsylvania, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.

How is Conemaugh Memorial Medical Center Tcu Staffed?

CMS rates CONEMAUGH MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER TCU's staffing level at 5 out of 5 stars, which is much above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 22%, compared to the Pennsylvania average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.

What Have Inspectors Found at Conemaugh Memorial Medical Center Tcu?

State health inspectors documented 5 deficiencies at CONEMAUGH MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER TCU during 2023 to 2025. These included: 5 with potential for harm.

Who Owns and Operates Conemaugh Memorial Medical Center Tcu?

CONEMAUGH MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER TCU is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by LIFEPOINT HEALTH, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 30 certified beds and approximately 19 residents (about 63% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in JOHNSTOWN, Pennsylvania.

How Does Conemaugh Memorial Medical Center Tcu Compare to Other Pennsylvania Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Pennsylvania, CONEMAUGH MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER TCU's overall rating (5 stars) is above the state average of 3.0, staff turnover (22%) is significantly lower than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (4 stars) is above the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Conemaugh Memorial Medical Center Tcu?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"

Is Conemaugh Memorial Medical Center Tcu Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, CONEMAUGH MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER TCU has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 5-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Pennsylvania. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.

Do Nurses at Conemaugh Memorial Medical Center Tcu Stick Around?

Staff at CONEMAUGH MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER TCU tend to stick around. With a turnover rate of 22%, the facility is 24 percentage points below the Pennsylvania average of 46%. Low turnover is a positive sign. It means caregivers have time to learn each resident's needs, medications, and personal preferences. Consistent staff also notice subtle changes in a resident's condition more quickly. Registered Nurse turnover is also low at 21%, meaning experienced RNs are available to handle complex medical needs.

Was Conemaugh Memorial Medical Center Tcu Ever Fined?

CONEMAUGH MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER TCU has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.

Is Conemaugh Memorial Medical Center Tcu on Any Federal Watch List?

CONEMAUGH MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER TCU is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.