DOCK TERRACE

275 DOCK DRIVE, LANSDALE, PA 19446 (215) 368-4438
Non profit - Corporation 72 Beds Independent Data: November 2025
Trust Grade
95/100
#29 of 653 in PA
Last Inspection: September 2023

Over 2 years since last inspection. Current conditions may differ from available data.

Overview

Dock Terrace in Lansdale, Pennsylvania, has an impressive Trust Grade of A+, indicating it is an elite facility and among the best in terms of care and services. It ranks #29 out of 653 nursing homes in Pennsylvania, placing it in the top half, and #2 out of 58 in Montgomery County, meaning only one nearby option is better. The facility is improving, having reduced its issues from three in 2021 to zero in 2023, which is a positive trend. Staffing is a strong point, with a 5-star rating and a turnover rate of only 24%, significantly lower than the state average. However, there have been some concerns in the past; for example, there was a failure to provide necessary restorative nursing services for a resident with limited mobility, and food was not adequately prepared for residents with dietary restrictions, which could affect their wellbeing. Despite these past issues, the facility has shown a commitment to improvement and overall maintains high standards of care.

Trust Score
A+
95/100
In Pennsylvania
#29/653
Top 4%
Safety Record
Low Risk
No red flags
Inspections
Getting Better
3 → 0 violations
Staff Stability
✓ Good
24% annual turnover. Excellent stability, 24 points below Pennsylvania's 48% average. Staff who stay learn residents' needs.
Penalties
✓ Good
No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Pennsylvania facilities.
Skilled Nurses
✓ Good
Each resident gets 61 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than 97% of Pennsylvania nursing homes. RNs are the most trained staff who catch health problems before they become serious.
Violations
✓ Good
Only 3 deficiencies on record. Cleaner than most facilities. Minor issues only.
★★★★★
5.0
Overall Rating
★★★★★
5.0
Staff Levels
★★★★★
5.0
Care Quality
★★★★★
5.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2021: 3 issues
2023: 0 issues

The Good

  • 5-Star Staffing Rating · Excellent nurse staffing levels
  • 5-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
  • Low Staff Turnover (24%) · Staff stability means consistent care
  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record
  • Staff turnover is low (24%)

    24 points below Pennsylvania average of 48%

Facility shows strength in staffing levels, quality measures, staff retention, fire safety.

The Bad

No Significant Concerns Identified

This facility shows no red flags. Among Pennsylvania's 100 nursing homes, only 1% achieve this.

The Ugly 3 deficiencies on record

Nov 2021 3 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0688 (Tag F0688)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide restorative nursing s...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide restorative nursing services to increase or prevent a reduction in range of motion (ROM) for one of two sampled residents with limitations in ROM. (Resident 25) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 25 had diagnoses that included left femur fracture, protein calorie malnutrition, muscle weakness, and dementia. Review of the Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE], revealed that Resident 25 had a limitation in range of motion to both sides of her lower extremities (hip, knee, ankle, foot). Record review of a physical therapy Discharge summary dated [DATE], revealed recommendations for a restorative nursing program (RNP) that included passive ROM and transfers to maintain current level of performance and prevent decline. There was no documented evidence that a RNP was implemented per the therapy discharge recommendations. In an interview on November 4, 2021, at 11:58 a.m., the Director of Nursing confirmed a RNP was not implemented for Resident 25 per the therapy discharge recommendations. 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(5) Nursing services.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0805 (Tag F0805)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on review of the dietary manual, clinical record review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the faci...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on review of the dietary manual, clinical record review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs for three of ten sampled residents who were on a mechanically altered diet. (Residents 5, 31, 60) Findings include: Review of the facility diet manual for modified menus, dated September 3, 2021, revealed that hot dogs should be in chopped form when served to residents ordered a mechanically altered diet that included chopped meats and that beef roast should be in chopped form when served to residents ordered a mechanically altered diet that included chopped meats. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 31 had diagnoses that included dysphagia (difficulty eating or swallowing). On June 1, 2020, the physician ordered for the resident to have a mechanically altered diet that included ground meats. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated that the resident had some memory impairment, required supervision for eating, and that he received a mechanically altered diet. On November 2, 2021, during a lunch meal observation at 12:05 p.m., Resident 31 was sitting at a table in the dining room and he was observed being served and eating a hamburger. The hamburger was served as a patty, not chopped into small pieces or ground. In an interview on November 3, 2021, at 12:19 p.m., Dietary Aide 1 (DA 1) confirmed that Resident 31 was served a hamburger as a patty during the lunch meal on November 2, 2021. In a subsequent interview on November 4, 2021, at 9:39 a.m., the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed that hamburger meat served to residents on a ground meat diet should be served in ground texture. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 60 had diagnoses that included hemiplegia, history of a stroke, slurred speech and aphasia (difficulty speaking). On August 6, 2020, a physician ordered for the resident to have a mechanically altered diet that included chopped meats. The MDS assessment dated [DATE], indicated that the resident had some memory impairment, required supervision for eating and that she received a mechanically altered diet. Review of a nutritional assessment dated [DATE], revealed that the resident chose to eat in her room and that she received a mechanically altered diet that included chopped meats. Observation on November 2, 2021, at 12:15 p.m., revealed that the resident was seated in her wheelchair in her room in front of her bedside table. Staff had served her lunch which included a whole hot dog on a bun. The hot dog was not chopped. The resident then ate the hot dog. In an interview on November 4, 2021, at 9:44 a.m., the DON stated that the resident was to receive chopped meats as ordered by the physician. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 5 had diagnoses that included dysphagia. On November 2, 2020, the physician ordered for the resident to have a mechanically altered diet that included chopped meats. The MDS assessment dated [DATE], indicated that the resident had some memory impairment, required supervision for eating, and that she received a mechanically altered diet. On November 3, 2021, during a lunch meal observation at 12:03 p.m., Resident 5 was observed sitting at a table in the dining room, she was observed being served and eating beef roast. The beef roast was not chopped. In an interview during this observation period, DA 1 confirmed Resident 5 should have received chopped beef roast, she was not served beef roast in the correct form.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on review of facility policy and observation, it was determined that the facility failed to store food under sanitary conditions on one of three nursing units. (Ivy Lane) Findings include: Revi...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on review of facility policy and observation, it was determined that the facility failed to store food under sanitary conditions on one of three nursing units. (Ivy Lane) Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Use and Storage of Resident Obtained Foods-HC, dated June 25, 2021, revealed that when a resident chose to consume food at the facility that was not obtained by the facility, safe and sanitary use, storage, and handling shall be maintained as follows: foods requiring refrigeration would be labeled with the residents name, dated, and placed in a designated refrigerator or freezer. Unconsumed foods would be disposed of as follows or upon evidence of spoilage: leftover food discarded after three days. Frozen items would be discarded after 30 days. The dietary department would monitor this. Observation of the nourishment refrigerator on the Ivy Lane nursing unit on November 4, 2021, at 9:58 a.m., revealed a container of lemon flavored yogurt product with a facility label that was dated September 12, 2021, and a manufacturer expiration date of October 5, 2021, a container of blueberry yogurt product with a manufacturer expiration date of September 22, 2021. There was a container of a food product with a date of October 28, 2021, a container of a food product that was dated October 24, 2021, a Whole Foods grocery store bag with a date of October 30, 2021, a bottle of a red Powerade drink that was not labeled with a resident name or dated. Observation of the freezer revealed a container of salted caramel lactaid ice cream product with a date of September 22, 2021, and a Rita's container of an orange frozen product that was not labeled or dated. CFR 483.60 Food Procurement Store/Prepare/Serve-Sanitary Previously cited 11/25/2020 28 Pa. Code 201.18(b)(3) Management.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • Grade A+ (95/100). Above average facility, better than most options in Pennsylvania.
  • • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
  • • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Pennsylvania facilities.
  • • Only 3 deficiencies on record. Cleaner than most facilities. Minor issues only.
Concerns
  • • No significant concerns identified. This facility shows no red flags across CMS ratings, staff turnover, or federal penalties.
Bottom line: Generally positive indicators. Standard due diligence and a personal visit recommended.

About This Facility

What is Dock Terrace's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns DOCK TERRACE an overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars, which is considered much above average nationally. Within Pennsylvania, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.

How is Dock Terrace Staffed?

CMS rates DOCK TERRACE's staffing level at 5 out of 5 stars, which is much above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 24%, compared to the Pennsylvania average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.

What Have Inspectors Found at Dock Terrace?

State health inspectors documented 3 deficiencies at DOCK TERRACE during 2021. These included: 3 with potential for harm.

Who Owns and Operates Dock Terrace?

DOCK TERRACE is owned by a non-profit organization. Non-profit facilities reinvest revenue into operations rather than distributing to shareholders. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 72 certified beds and approximately 71 residents (about 99% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in LANSDALE, Pennsylvania.

How Does Dock Terrace Compare to Other Pennsylvania Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Pennsylvania, DOCK TERRACE's overall rating (5 stars) is above the state average of 3.0, staff turnover (24%) is significantly lower than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (5 stars) is much above the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Dock Terrace?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"

Is Dock Terrace Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, DOCK TERRACE has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 5-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Pennsylvania. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.

Do Nurses at Dock Terrace Stick Around?

Staff at DOCK TERRACE tend to stick around. With a turnover rate of 24%, the facility is 21 percentage points below the Pennsylvania average of 46%. Low turnover is a positive sign. It means caregivers have time to learn each resident's needs, medications, and personal preferences. Consistent staff also notice subtle changes in a resident's condition more quickly. Registered Nurse turnover is also low at 15%, meaning experienced RNs are available to handle complex medical needs.

Was Dock Terrace Ever Fined?

DOCK TERRACE has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.

Is Dock Terrace on Any Federal Watch List?

DOCK TERRACE is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.