MEADOWOOD

3205 SKIPPACK PIKE, LANSDALE, PA 19446 (610) 584-1000
Non profit - Corporation 59 Beds Independent Data: November 2025
Trust Grade
93/100
#82 of 653 in PA
Last Inspection: May 2024

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

Meadowood in Lansdale, Pennsylvania, has received an excellent Trust Grade of A, indicating it is highly recommended and provides quality care. It ranks #82 out of 653 nursing homes in Pennsylvania, placing it in the top half of facilities statewide, and #11 out of 58 in Montgomery County, meaning there are only ten local options considered better. The facility is improving, having reduced its issues from two in 2023 to none in 2024. Staffing is a strong point, with a perfect 5/5 rating and a turnover rate of only 25%, well below the state average of 46%, indicating a stable workforce that likely fosters better care. While there are no fines on record, which is a positive sign, there were two concerns noted by inspectors: one regarding a failure to update a resident's care plan after a fall and another about not monitoring a resident's nutritional intake, which could lead to health risks. Overall, while Meadowood has strong staffing and is improving, families should be aware of the identified concerns.

Trust Score
A
93/100
In Pennsylvania
#82/653
Top 12%
Safety Record
Low Risk
No red flags
Inspections
Getting Better
2 → 0 violations
Staff Stability
✓ Good
25% annual turnover. Excellent stability, 23 points below Pennsylvania's 48% average. Staff who stay learn residents' needs.
Penalties
✓ Good
No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Pennsylvania facilities.
Skilled Nurses
✓ Good
Each resident gets 74 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than 97% of Pennsylvania nursing homes. RNs are the most trained staff who catch health problems before they become serious.
Violations
✓ Good
Only 2 deficiencies on record. Cleaner than most facilities. Minor issues only.
★★★★★
5.0
Overall Rating
★★★★★
5.0
Staff Levels
★★★★★
5.0
Care Quality
★★★★★
5.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2023: 2 issues
2024: 0 issues

The Good

  • 5-Star Staffing Rating · Excellent nurse staffing levels
  • 5-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
  • Low Staff Turnover (25%) · Staff stability means consistent care
  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record
  • Staff turnover is low (25%)

    23 points below Pennsylvania average of 48%

Facility shows strength in staffing levels, quality measures, staff retention, fire safety.

The Bad

No Significant Concerns Identified

This facility shows no red flags. Among Pennsylvania's 100 nursing homes, only 1% achieve this.

The Ugly 2 deficiencies on record

Jul 2023 2 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0657 (Tag F0657)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on review of facility policy, review of clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on review of facility policy, review of clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to revise one resident's care plan with updated interventions status post fall for one of two residents reviewed for falls (Resident R25). Findings Include: Review of facility policy Care Plan Process, revised October 2017, revealed the plan of care is continually reviewed and updated by members of the interdisciplinary team to reflect the current needs of the resident. Review of facility policy Fall management Guideline, revised December 2022, revealed to reduce the risk of falls or fall related injuries the facility will implement appropriate person-centered interventions and the resident's plan of care will be updated accordingly. Resident specific interventions are put in place initially and ongoing, and the interdisciplinary team will review current falls and fall interventions. Review of Resident R25's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS - federally mandated resident assessment and care screening) dated June 9, 2023, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and had diagnoses of muscle weakness, lack of coordination, unsteadiness on feet, and difficulty in walking. Continued review of the MDS revealed the resident required one-person physical assistance for transfers, ambulation, and toilet use. Review of Resident R25's fall risk assessment dated [DATE], revealed the resident was at high risk for falling. Review of Resident R25's care plan dated May 24, 2023, revealed the resident had a decline in his ability to perform independent bed mobility, transfers, and walking with rolling walker safely without falls. Continued review of Resident R25's care plan revised July 18, 2023, revealed the resident was at risk for falls related to his decline in mobility and balance impairment and had unwitnessed falls on June 30, 2023, July 8, 2023, and July 18, 2023. Review of facility incident report dated June 30, 2023, revealed Resident R25 rang call bell to report that he had fallen after coming from the bathroom. Resident R25 did not ring call bell for assistance to and from bathroom. Continued review of the incident report and review of Resident R25's comprehensive care plan revealed no documented evidence new interventions were implemented status post fall. Review of facility incident report dated July 8, 2023, revealed the nurse heard a loud noise coming from Resident R25's room and the resident yelling out. Resident R25 was subsequently found laying on the bathroom floor. Continued review of the incident report and review of Resident R25's comprehensive care plan revealed no documented evidence new interventions were implemented status post fall. Review of Resident R25's clinical record revealed a nursing note dated July 18, 2023, that the resident again had an unwitnessed fall and was observed kneeling on the floor in his bathroom holding onto his walker. Per Resident R25's comprehensive care plan revised July 18, 2023, revealed the resident was attempting to initiate morning care. Resident R25's care plan was subsequently updated on July 18, 2023, with new interventions to offer and encourage early morning get-up per the resident preference and that the resident would be assisted by the 11:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. nursing shift. Interview on July 19, 2023, at 12:15 p.m. with Director of Nursing, E1, confirmed Resident R25's care plan was not updated with new interventions status post falls on June 30, 2023, and July 8, 2023. Continued interview on July 19, 2023, at 1:00 p.m. with the Director of Nursing, Employee E1, revealed all three falls happened during the morning hours. 28 Pa. Code 211.10 (c) Resident Care Policies. 28 Pa. Code 211.10 (d) Resident Care Policies. 28 Pa. Code 211.12 (d)(5) Nursing Services.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0692 (Tag F0692)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on review of facility policy, review of clinical records, resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facili...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on review of facility policy, review of clinical records, resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to monitor meal and nutritional supplement consumption for one of one resident reviewed for nutritional status. (Resident R20) Findings include: Review of facility policy Nutrition Risk Guidelines revealed that an undesired significant weight loss qualifies a resident for nutrition risk monitoring. Review of Resident R20's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - federally mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) dated April 11, 2023, revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and had the diagnoses of Alzheimer's Dementia (a disease that destroys memory and other important mental functions), anxiety disorder, and depression. A review of Resident R20's BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) revealed a score of nine, which indicated that the resident had moderately impaired cognition. Review of R20's clinical records revealed Resident R20 had a documented weight of 153 pounds on April 11, 2023, and a weight of 144.2 on July 18, 2023; indicating a significant weight loss of 5.8% weight loss in three months. Further review revealed a documented weight of 174.8 pounds on January 15, 2023, and a documented weight of 144.2 on July 11, 2023; indicating a significant weight loss of 17.5% in six months. Review of physician orders revealed an order dated February 16, 2023, for a dietary supplement, Ensure Clear, two times a day for significant weight loss. This supplement order would provide 480 calories and 16 grams of protein total per day for resident to prevent further weight loss. Review of Resident R20's Medication Administration Records for February, March, April, May, June, and July of 2023 revealed documented evidence that the nutritional supplement had been provided to resident and that it was occasionally refused, but no documented evidence of supplement daily percent intakes by resident. Further review of progress notes revealed no documented evidence regarding an alternative supplement option choice offered to resident when resident had refused the Ensure Clear nutritional supplement. Interview with the Registered Dietitian, Employee E3, on July 18, 2023, at 1:08 p.m. revealed Resident R20 had a history of refusing meals and prefers to eat in her room. Further interview confirmed there was no documented evidence of supplement daily percent intakes by resident to be able to evaluate the effectiveness of this nutrition intervention. Observation of the resident room on July 19, 2023, at 11:03 a.m. revealed an ensure clear with a straw placed on Resident R20's stand. During an interview with Resident R20 this surveyor asked, do you drink all of the ensure? Resident stated, no. Follow-up interview with Resident R20's nurse, Employee E6, on July 19, 2023, revealed Resident R20 can make her needs known by using the call bell, passing it on to the nurse aids, and answering yes and no questions. During interview on July 19, 2023, at 3:05 p.m. with the Director of Nursing, Employee E1, and Administrator, Employee E2, it was confirmed that there was no daily monitoring evidence for Resident R20's nutrition supplement daily percent intakes. 28 Pa. Code 211.5 (f) Clinical records 28 Pa. Code 211.6 (d) Dietary services 28 Pa. Code 211.12 (c)(5) Nursing Services
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • Grade A (93/100). Above average facility, better than most options in Pennsylvania.
  • • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
  • • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Pennsylvania facilities.
  • • Only 2 deficiencies on record. Cleaner than most facilities. Minor issues only.
Concerns
  • • No significant concerns identified. This facility shows no red flags across CMS ratings, staff turnover, or federal penalties.
Bottom line: Generally positive indicators. Standard due diligence and a personal visit recommended.

About This Facility

What is Meadowood's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns MEADOWOOD an overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars, which is considered much above average nationally. Within Pennsylvania, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.

How is Meadowood Staffed?

CMS rates MEADOWOOD's staffing level at 5 out of 5 stars, which is much above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 25%, compared to the Pennsylvania average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.

What Have Inspectors Found at Meadowood?

State health inspectors documented 2 deficiencies at MEADOWOOD during 2023. These included: 2 with potential for harm.

Who Owns and Operates Meadowood?

MEADOWOOD is owned by a non-profit organization. Non-profit facilities reinvest revenue into operations rather than distributing to shareholders. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 59 certified beds and approximately 53 residents (about 90% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in LANSDALE, Pennsylvania.

How Does Meadowood Compare to Other Pennsylvania Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Pennsylvania, MEADOWOOD's overall rating (5 stars) is above the state average of 3.0, staff turnover (25%) is significantly lower than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (5 stars) is much above the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Meadowood?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"

Is Meadowood Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, MEADOWOOD has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 5-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Pennsylvania. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.

Do Nurses at Meadowood Stick Around?

Staff at MEADOWOOD tend to stick around. With a turnover rate of 25%, the facility is 20 percentage points below the Pennsylvania average of 46%. Low turnover is a positive sign. It means caregivers have time to learn each resident's needs, medications, and personal preferences. Consistent staff also notice subtle changes in a resident's condition more quickly. Registered Nurse turnover is also low at 16%, meaning experienced RNs are available to handle complex medical needs.

Was Meadowood Ever Fined?

MEADOWOOD has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.

Is Meadowood on Any Federal Watch List?

MEADOWOOD is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.