GARDENS AT YORK TERRACE, THE

2401 WEST MARKET STREET, POTTSVILLE, PA 17901 (570) 622-3982
For profit - Corporation 80 Beds PRIORITY HEALTHCARE GROUP Data: November 2025
Trust Grade
80/100
#176 of 653 in PA
Last Inspection: December 2024

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

The Gardens at York Terrace in Pottsville, Pennsylvania has a Trust Grade of B+, indicating it is above average and recommended for families looking for care. It ranks #176 out of 653 facilities in Pennsylvania, placing it in the top half, and #2 out of 12 in Schuylkill County, meaning there is only one local option considered better. However, the facility is experiencing a worsening trend, with the number of issues increasing from 1 in 2023 to 3 in 2024. Staffing is a strength with a 4/5 rating and a turnover rate of 43%, which is below the state average, and they have good RN coverage, being better staffed than 78% of Pennsylvania facilities. On the downside, recent inspections revealed that food items were not properly labeled, and there were concerns about monitoring weight loss for residents, which could lead to potential health risks. Additionally, there was a failure to follow physician orders for weight management in one resident, highlighting areas that need improvement.

Trust Score
B+
80/100
In Pennsylvania
#176/653
Top 26%
Safety Record
Low Risk
No red flags
Inspections
Getting Worse
1 → 3 violations
Staff Stability
○ Average
43% turnover. Near Pennsylvania's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
Penalties
✓ Good
No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Pennsylvania facilities.
Skilled Nurses
✓ Good
Each resident gets 48 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than average for Pennsylvania. RNs are trained to catch health problems early.
Violations
✓ Good
Only 4 deficiencies on record. Cleaner than most facilities. Minor issues only.
★★★★☆
4.0
Overall Rating
★★★★☆
4.0
Staff Levels
★★★★☆
4.0
Care Quality
★★★★☆
4.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2023: 1 issues
2024: 3 issues

The Good

  • 4-Star Staffing Rating · Above-average nurse staffing levels
  • 4-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record
  • Staff turnover below average (43%)

    5 points below Pennsylvania average of 48%

Facility shows strength in staffing levels, quality measures, fire safety.

The Bad

Staff Turnover: 43%

Near Pennsylvania avg (46%)

Typical for the industry

Chain: PRIORITY HEALTHCARE GROUP

Part of a multi-facility chain

Ask about local staffing decisions and management

The Ugly 4 deficiencies on record

Dec 2024 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0692 (Tag F0692)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on clinical record review, facility policy review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to adequately monitor and assess weight loss for one of three sampled residents...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on clinical record review, facility policy review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to adequately monitor and assess weight loss for one of three sampled residents at risk for weight loss. (Resident 5) Findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled, Weight Assessment and Intervention, last reviewed January 18, 2024, revealed that any weight change of five pounds (lbs.) or more from the last weight assessment would be retaken for confirmation. If the weight was verified, nursing staff would notify the dietitian. The dietitian or Certified Dietary Manager would review the individual weight records and make recommendations as appropriate. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 5 had diagnoses that included osteoporosis and dementia. Review of the care plan revealed that the resident had a history of weight loss. On March 1, 2024, the resident weighed 127 lbs. On April 5, 2024, the resident weighed 117 lbs. The resident was reweighed on April 7, 2024, and weighed 120 lbs., which verified a weight loss of 7 lbs., (5.5 percent). There was a lack of evidence to support that staff notified the dietitian, or that the dietitian assessed the weight loss or resident's nutritional status until April 30, 2024, during a regularly scheduled quarterly assessment. In an interview on December 5, 2024, the Administrator confirmed that there was no evidence that the dietitian was notified of the verified weight loss and that the dietitian should have assessed the resident prior to April 30, 2024. 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(3)(5) Nursing services.
Jan 2024 2 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that physician's orders were implemented for one of 16 sampled residents. (Resident 10) Findin...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that physician's orders were implemented for one of 16 sampled residents. (Resident 10) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 10 had diagnoses that included congestive heart failure, diabetes mellitus, dementia, and peripheral vascular disease. On November 20, 2023, the physician ordered that staff administer a medication (Lasix) if the resident gained more than three pounds in one day to treat the resident's swelling in her legs. Review of Resident 10's weights revealed that on December 7, 2023, Resident 10 weighed 134 pounds (lbs). On December 8, 2023, the resident weighed 145 lbs, indicating a nine pound weight gain. On December 15, 2023, the physician ordered for staff to weigh the resident three times a week and administer Lasix if the resident gained more than three pounds when weighed on Monday, Wednesday, or Friday. On December 25, 2023, the resident weighed 140 lbs and on December 27, 2023, she weighed 145 lbs, indicating a five pound weight gain. A review of the December 2023, Medication Administration Record revealed that there was no evidence that staff administer the Lasix as ordered on December 8, 2023, or December 27, 2023. In an interview on January 5, 2024, at 10:15 a.m., the Director of Nursing confirmed that Resident 10 did not receive the Lasix as ordered by the physician. 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(5) Nursing services.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observation and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to store food under sanitary conditions in the kitchen. Findings include: Observation of the kitchen during a tour...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to store food under sanitary conditions in the kitchen. Findings include: Observation of the kitchen during a tour on January 3, 2024, at 10:00 a.m. revealed an opened container of thickener that was not labeled or dated, an opened bag of spaghetti that was undated, and a grilled cheese sandwich on the bottom shelf in the dry storage area. There was trash and food debris on the floor in the freezer. In an interview on January 3, 2024, at 10:20 a.m., Employee 1 confirmed that the opened items should have been dated and that the grilled cheese sandwich should have been discarded. 28 Pa. Code 201.18(b)(3) Management.
Jan 2023 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Incontinence Care (Tag F0690)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on clinical record review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that proper catheter care was provided for one of two sampled residents who used...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on clinical record review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that proper catheter care was provided for one of two sampled residents who used an indwelling urinary catheter (a flexible tube that a clinician passes through the urethra and into the bladder to drain urine). (Resident 8) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 8 had a physician's order dated January 7, 2023, for the use of an indwelling catheter for the diagnosis of urinary retention. Observations on January 19, 2023, from 12:15 p.m. through 1:33 p.m., revealed the resident was seated in a wheelchair with the Foley bag and tubing directly on the floor. In addition, Resident 8's care plan directed that staff place the catheter bag in a privacy bag. There was no privacy bag in use during the observation. During an interview on January 20, 2023, at 12:50 p.m., the Director of Nursing confirmed that the bag and tubing should not have been in contact with the floor and that a privacy bag was to be used. 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(5) Nursing services.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • Grade B+ (80/100). Above average facility, better than most options in Pennsylvania.
  • • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
  • • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Pennsylvania facilities.
  • • Only 4 deficiencies on record. Cleaner than most facilities. Minor issues only.
Concerns
  • • No significant concerns identified. This facility shows no red flags across CMS ratings, staff turnover, or federal penalties.
Bottom line: Generally positive indicators. Standard due diligence and a personal visit recommended.

About This Facility

What is Gardens At York Terrace, The's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns GARDENS AT YORK TERRACE, THE an overall rating of 4 out of 5 stars, which is considered above average nationally. Within Pennsylvania, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.

How is Gardens At York Terrace, The Staffed?

CMS rates GARDENS AT YORK TERRACE, THE's staffing level at 4 out of 5 stars, which is above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 43%, compared to the Pennsylvania average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.

What Have Inspectors Found at Gardens At York Terrace, The?

State health inspectors documented 4 deficiencies at GARDENS AT YORK TERRACE, THE during 2023 to 2024. These included: 4 with potential for harm.

Who Owns and Operates Gardens At York Terrace, The?

GARDENS AT YORK TERRACE, THE is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by PRIORITY HEALTHCARE GROUP, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 80 certified beds and approximately 63 residents (about 79% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in POTTSVILLE, Pennsylvania.

How Does Gardens At York Terrace, The Compare to Other Pennsylvania Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Pennsylvania, GARDENS AT YORK TERRACE, THE's overall rating (4 stars) is above the state average of 3.0, staff turnover (43%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (4 stars) is above the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Gardens At York Terrace, The?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"

Is Gardens At York Terrace, The Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, GARDENS AT YORK TERRACE, THE has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 4-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Pennsylvania. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.

Do Nurses at Gardens At York Terrace, The Stick Around?

GARDENS AT YORK TERRACE, THE has a staff turnover rate of 43%, which is about average for Pennsylvania nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.

Was Gardens At York Terrace, The Ever Fined?

GARDENS AT YORK TERRACE, THE has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.

Is Gardens At York Terrace, The on Any Federal Watch List?

GARDENS AT YORK TERRACE, THE is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.