WAYNE CENTER

30 WEST AVENUE, WAYNE, PA 19087 (610) 688-3635
For profit - Corporation 112 Beds GENESIS HEALTHCARE Data: November 2025
Trust Grade
63/100
#247 of 653 in PA
Last Inspection: May 2025

Inspected within the last 6 months. Data reflects current conditions.

Overview

Wayne Center has a Trust Grade of C+, indicating it is slightly above average in quality. It ranks #247 out of 653 facilities in Pennsylvania, placing it in the top half overall, but #13 out of 20 in Chester County suggests there are better local options available. The facility is improving, with the number of reported issues decreasing from four in 2024 to three in 2025. Staffing is rated average with a turnover rate of 40%, which is better than the state average of 46%. However, the facility has faced significant concerns, including serious incidents where a resident was hospitalized due to improper monitoring of diabetes and another was not properly assessed for blood in their urine, both indicating potential gaps in care. Overall, while Wayne Center shows some strengths, families should weigh these serious issues when considering this facility.

Trust Score
C+
63/100
In Pennsylvania
#247/653
Top 37%
Safety Record
Moderate
Needs review
Inspections
Getting Better
4 → 3 violations
Staff Stability
○ Average
40% turnover. Near Pennsylvania's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
Penalties
✓ Good
$7,443 in fines. Lower than most Pennsylvania facilities. Relatively clean record.
Skilled Nurses
✓ Good
Each resident gets 42 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than average for Pennsylvania. RNs are trained to catch health problems early.
Violations
⚠ Watch
13 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
★★★★☆
4.0
Overall Rating
★★★☆☆
3.0
Staff Levels
★★★☆☆
3.0
Care Quality
★★★★☆
4.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2024: 4 issues
2025: 3 issues

The Good

  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record
  • Staff turnover below average (40%)

    8 points below Pennsylvania average of 48%

Facility shows strength in fire safety.

The Bad

Staff Turnover: 40%

Near Pennsylvania avg (46%)

Typical for the industry

Federal Fines: $7,443

Below median ($33,413)

Minor penalties assessed

Chain: GENESIS HEALTHCARE

Part of a multi-facility chain

Ask about local staffing decisions and management

The Ugly 13 deficiencies on record

2 actual harm
May 2025 3 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0605 (Tag F0605)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on a review of the facility's policy, clinical records review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that as-needed anti-anxiety medication were administered ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on a review of the facility's policy, clinical records review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that as-needed anti-anxiety medication were administered with appropriate indications and that non-pharmacological interventions were provided before administering the medication for one of five residents reviewed (Resident 58). Findings include: A review of the facility's policy titled Medication Management, undated revealed non-pharmacological interventions such as behavior modification or social services and their effects are documented as part of the care planning process and are utilized by the prescriber in assessing the continued need for medication. The same policy revealed that the clinical record must reflect an adequate indication for the use of psychotropic medications. A review of Resident 58's physician's order dated May 9, 2025, revealed an order for Clonazepam (An anti-anxiety medication) 0.5 mg giving one tablet every 12 hours as needed for anxiety. A review of Resident 58's May 2025, Medication Administration Record revealed that from May 9, 2025, until May 22, 2025, the resident was administered with needed Clonazepam ten times without indications and was administered seven times without attempting non-pharmacological interventions. An interview with the Director of Nursing conducted on May 23, 2025, at 10:00 a.m., confirmed Resident 58 was administered with as-needed Clonazepam without an indication and nonpharmacological interventions were not attempted before administering as-needed Clonazepam. 28 Pa. Code: 211.12 (d)(1)(3)(5) Nursing Services Previously cited 10/7/24, 7/1/24
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on clinical records review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to follow physician's order regarding insulin/blood sugar parameters and fluid restrictions for three o...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on clinical records review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to follow physician's order regarding insulin/blood sugar parameters and fluid restrictions for three of 22 residents reviewed (Residents 15, 58, and 87) Findings include: Review of Resident 15's clinical record revealed diagnoses including but not limited to chronic kidney disease stage 3 (failure of kidney function to remove toxins from blood), diabetes type 2, heart disease and dementia (general loss of cognitive abilities, including memory). Review of Resident 15's physician order dated October 3, 2024 ,revealed an order for daily fluid restriction of 2000 ml daily as follows: Breakfast tray 540 ml; Free fluids day shift 400ml; Lunch tray 180 ml; Free fluids evening shift 600ml; Dinner tray 180ml; Free fluids Night shift 100ml. Review of Resident 15's Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed no evidence of fluid monitoring. Interview with Director of Nursing on May 23, 2025, at approximately 10:30 am confirmed the above findings. A review of Resident 58's physician's order dated April 30, 2025, revealed an order for Insulin Lispro (A fast acting insulin)100 unit/ml Inject as per sliding scale: If 180-200 = 1 unit; 210-250 = 2 units; 251-300 = 3 units; 301-350 = 4 units; 351-400 = 5 units, subcutaneously before meals and at bedtime. Notify physician is blood sugar is below 70 or above 400. A review of the May 2025, Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed a blood sugar of 64 on May 18, 2025, at 7:30 a.m. Clinical records review failed to reveal that the physician was notified of the above blood sugar result on May 18, 2025. A review of Resident 87's physician's order dated April 22, 2025, revealed an order for Insulin Glargine (A long-acting insulin) U 100 pen Inject 14 units subcutaneously one time a day hold for blood sugar less than 100. A review of Resident 87's May 2025, MAR revealed Insulin Glargine was administered out of parameters on the following dates: May 3, 2025, (99mg/dl); May 10, 2025, (83mg/dl); May 11, 2025, (86mg/dl); May 12, 2025, (93mg/dl). An interview with the Director of Nursing conducted on May 23, 2025, at 10:00 a.m., confirmed physician was not notified of Resident 58's blood sugar. The DON also confirmed Resident 87's insulin was administered outside of the ordered parameters on the dates mentioned above. The facility failed to ensure Residents 58 and 87's orders regarding insulin and blood sugar parameters were followed. 28 Pa. Code: 211.12 (d)(1)(3)(5) Nursing Services
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on review of facility policy, observations, and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety i...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on review of facility policy, observations, and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in the main kitchen area. Findings included: Review of facility policy, Food Storage: Cold Foods, revised February 2023, revealed that all foods will be stored wrapped or in covered containers, labeled and dated, and arranged in a manner to prevent cross contamination. Observations in the main kitchen on May 20, 2025, at 9:20 a.m. in the presence of Employee E4 revealed uncovered scoops on top of the flour and sugar bins. Observations in the freezer during the same time frame revealed a bag of frozen green beans on the shelf with no label or date. Additionally, there were four frozen turkey burgers without a date. Observations in the walk-in refrigerator revealed ten 32 ounce containers of yogurt with a use by date of May 11, 2025. Observations in the dry storage room revealed a five pound open box of pancake mix with a use by date of March 25, 2025. Interview on May 20, 2025, during the kitchen tour with Employee E4, confirmed that the scoops should not have been stored uncovered on top of the bins, all items should be labeled and dated, and expired items should have been disposed. 28 Pa. Code 201.14(a) Responsibility of licensee 28 Pa. Code 201.18(b)(1) Management 28 Pa. Code 201.18(b)(3) Management 28 Pa. Code 211.10(a) Resident care policies
Oct 2024 1 deficiency 1 Harm
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on a review of hospital, and clinical records, and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to pr...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on a review of hospital, and clinical records, and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to properly assess, monitor, and provide treatment for a resident with known condition of diabetes resulting in the harm of hospitalization after experiencing hypoglycemia (low sugar in blood) for one of three residents reviewed (Resident CL1). Findings include: Review of Resident CL1's clinical record revealed Resident CL1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident CL1's diagnosis list includes Diabetes Mellitus (group of metabolic disorders characterized by a high blood sugar level over a prolonged period) long-term (current use of insulin), and Chronic Kidney Disease. Review of Resident CL1's hospital records including document labeled Clinical Summary created on September 22, 2024, revealed the resident was on blood sugar monitoring three times daily. The same document indicated, regarding Resident CL1's DM (Diabetes Mellitus), with the use of insulin, the plan was to continue to monitor POTC (point-of-care test) Accuchecks (machine used to check blood glucose); Hypoglycemia and Hyperglycemia (high blood sugar) protocol in place; and encourage p.o. (by mouth) intake. Review of Resident CL1's hospital record Emergency Department Provider Notes dated September 21-22, 2024, revealed the resident's POTC glucose was checked. A laboratory report dated September 21, 2024, showed a Glucose level of 166 mg/dl (Normal range 80-130 mg/dl). Review of Resident CL1's physician orders dated September 22, 2024, revealed the following orders: Insulin Aspart Protamine & Aspart Suspension (Aspart 70/30- premixed insulin that starts to work within 10 to 20 minutes after injection, peaks in 2 hours, and keeps working for up to 24 hours) Inject 25 units two times daily.; Insulin Aspart Solution (fast-acting insulin) Inject 16 units one time a day (Scheduled at noon); Insta-Glucose Gel 77.4% Give one dose by mouth as needed for blood glucose less than 70, for a patient who is arousable conscious, and able to swallow if repeat blood glucose is below 70 mg/dl. Continue to hold all diabetic medications until the provider authorizes resumption; Glucagon Emergency Kit 1 mg Inject 1 mg intramuscularly as needed for blood glucose less than 70, not arousable conscious or able to swallow if repeat blood glucose is below 70 mg/dl and the patient is not arousable, conscious, or able to swallow. Continue to hold all diabetic medications until the provider authorizes resumption, and the Hypoglycemia protocol observes signs/symptoms of Hypoglycemia as needed if blood glucose is less than 70 mg/dl or ordered low parameters follow the Hypoglycemia protocol. Review of Resident CL1's clinical record failed to reveal a blood glucose monitoring order despite the notation within hospital record of insulin administration and Hypoglycemia protocol orders. Interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) was conducted on October 7, 2024. The DON agreed no blood glucose order was done since it was not indicated on the resident's hospital discharge summary/instructions. Review of Resident CL1's clinical record failed to reveal facility staff clarified the admission orders to the physician, regarding how to monitor for hypoglycemia and how to implement hypoglycemia protocol without monitoring Resident CL1's blood glucose level. Review of Resident CL1's September 2024, Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed the resident was administered Insulin Aspart 70/30, 20 units on September 23, 2024, at 8:00 a.m., and Insulin Aspart 16 units at noon. Review of Resident CL1's vitals revealed Resident CL1's blood glucose was checked on September 23, 2024, at 7:30 a.m., with a result of 187 mg/dl, and September 23, 2024, at 11:30 a.m., with a result of 100 mg/dl. Interview with the Director of Nursing on September 23, 2024, revealed the nurse checked Resident CL1's blood glucose before the above insulin administration as a nursing judgment. Review of Resident CL1's physician's progress notes dated September 23, 2024, at 1:11 p.m., revealed under assessment a Plan for DM, continue insulin, and monitor blood sugar. Review of Resident CL1's clinical record failed to reveal an order for blood sugar monitoring. Review of Resident CL1's nursing progress notes dated September 23, 2024, at 10:46 p.m., revealed around 4:00 p.m., the resident complained of a headache, the charge nurse assessed the resident and was administered two tablets of Tylenol (medication to treat mild pain). Review of Resident CL1's clinical record failed to reveal the resident was thoroughly assessed after complaining of a headache. The resident's blood pressure and blood sugar were not assessed. A pulse rate (81 BPM) and respirations (18) were assessed on September 23, 2024, at 3:40 p.m. Review of Resident CL1's MAR revealed Resident CL1 was administered with Insulin Aspart 70/30 25 units on September 23, 2024, at 5:00 p.m. Review of Resident CL1's meal consumption revealed the following: September 23, 2024, at 8:00 a.m., (25% eaten); noon (50% eaten), and 8:23 p.m., (25% eaten). Review of Resident CL1's nursing progress notes dated September 23, 2024, at 10:46 p.m., revealed around 8:00 p.m., the resident's family came and observed the resident with eyes closed and not responding. The nursing supervisor was notified, 911 was called and the resident was sent to the emergency room. Review of Resident CL1's hospital transfer form dated September 23, 2024, revealed the reason for the transfer was altered mental status, vitals as follows: Blood pressure 146/57 mmHg; pulse 75 BPM; respirations 18/min.; temperature 97.7 F; and Spo2 was 91%. Records did not reveal blood sugar was checked. Review of Resident CL1's hospital records and emergency provider notes dated September 23, 2024, revealed patient presents to the ED (Emergency Department) for evaluation of altered mental status. On arrival, the patient is lethargic and unable to answer any questions. Per medics, blood sugar was 59. Additional hospital records review and ED clinical impression revealed initial fingerstick glucose performed on arrival showing blood sugar to be 30, Dextrose (medication used to treat low blood sugar) was given. The patient was also found to be with hypokalemia (low potassium level). The patient was admitted with Altered Mantal Status, Hypoglycemia, and Hypokalemia. Hospital blood work done on September 23, 2024, revealed a blood glucose level of 25 mg/dl. The above information was conveyed to the Director of Nursing on October 7, 2024, at 1:00 p.m. The facility failed to assess, monitor, and provide necessary treatment to Resident CL1's for Diabetes resulting in hospitalization for low blood sugar levels. 28 Pa. Code: 211.12(d)(5) Nursing Services Previously cited 7/1/24 28 Pa. Code: 211.12 (d)(1)(3) Nursing Services Previously cited 7/1/24
Jul 2024 3 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0694 (Tag F0694)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, staff interviews, clinical records, and the facility's policy and procedure review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure proper care and maintenance of a peripher...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, staff interviews, clinical records, and the facility's policy and procedure review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure proper care and maintenance of a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC- medical device that is placed into a vein to allow access to the bloodstream) dressing to one out of one resident reviewed (Resident 243). Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Central Vascular Access Device (CVAD) Dressing Change, last revised on June 21, 2021, revealed that sterile dressing changes using standard -ANTT is performed: Upon admission, if the transparent dressing is dated, clean, dry and intact, the admission dressing change may be omitted and scheduled for seven days from the date on the dressing label; At least weekly; and if the integrity of the dressing has been compromised. Review of Resident 243's physician order revealed an order made on June 17, 2024, for Cefazolin Sodium (Antibiotic) two grams intravenously (medication/fluids administered through a needle or tube inserted into a vein) every eight hours for Bacteremia (infection in the blood). Observation conducted on June 26, 2024, at 11:00 a.m., revealed Resident 243 was lying in bed, with a PICC line to the upper arm. The transparent dressing to the PICC line was dated June 18, 2024. Observation conducted July 1, 2024, at 11:10 a.m., in the presence of licensed nurse Employee E3, revealed Resident 243's PICC line transparent dressing was dated June 18, 2024. Interview conducted with Employee E3 on July 1, 2024, confirmed that Resident 243's PICC line transparent dressing had a date of June 18, 2024. Employee E3 reported that the transparent dressing of the PICC line should have been changed weekly. Interview conducted with the Director of Nursing on July 1, 2024, revealed PICC line transparent dressing is changed weekly. The Director of Nursing confirmed the dressing was not done weekly and was last done on June 18, 2024. The facility failed to ensure Resident 243's PICC line transparent dressing was changed weekly to prevent parenteral infusion complications. 28 Pa. Code 211.12 (c)(d)(1)(5) Nursing services 28 Pa. Code 211.10(c) Resident care policies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Medication Errors (Tag F0758)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on clinical records review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure PRN (as needed) anti-anxiety psychotropic (any drug that affects brain activities associated ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on clinical records review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure PRN (as needed) anti-anxiety psychotropic (any drug that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior) medication was administered with appropriate indication for one of five residents reviewed (Resident 2). Findings include: Review of Resident 2's diagnosis list includes Depression (mental health disorder characterized by low mood or loss of interest in activities that last for a long time and can interfere with normal functioning) and anxiety disorder (mental health disorder characterized by feelings of worry, anxiety, or fear that are strong enough to interfere with one's daily activities) Review of Resident 2's Physician order (POS) dated June 12, 2024, revealed Alprazolam (anti-anxiety medication) 0.5 mg one tab at bedtime. Review of Resident 2's POS dated June 8, 2024, revealed Alprazolam 0.5 mg two tablets every six hours as needed for anxiety. Review of Resident 2's June 2024, Medication Administration Record revealed that from June 9, 2024, until June 16, 2024, Resident 2 was administered PRN Alprazolam 12 times with no appropriate indication for use. Interview with the Director of Nursing was conducted on July 1, 2024. The facility failed to provide documentation of appropriate indication for administering PRN Alprazolam to Resident 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident 2 was administered with PRN anti-anxiety psychotropic medication with appropriate indications. 28 Pa. Code: 211.12(d)(5) Nursing Services 28 Pa. Code: 211.12 (d)(1)(3) Nursing Services
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Pressure Ulcer Prevention (Tag F0686)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on clinical records review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure wound treatment and a...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on clinical records review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure wound treatment and assessment were completed and recommendation of a wound physician was followed for three of eight residents reviewed (Residents 83, 87, and 242). Findings include: Review of Resident 83's clinical records revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis of Bladder Cancer and duodenal ulcer with surgical treatment. Revie of Resident 83's clinical record revealed resident was admitted with a Stage 2 Pressure Ulcer (Partial-thickness skin loss with exposed dermis) to the lower back with a measurement of 3.7 x 1.2 cms. The wound was treated with normal saline and then covered with an Optifoam (silicone-bordered dressing) dressing every three days. Review of Resident 83's clinical record revealed a wound consult dated June 11, 2024, indicating the lower back/lumbar spine wound was an Unstageable Pressure Ulcer (Obscured full-thickness skin and tissue loss), with a measurement of 1.3 x 0.6 x 0.1 cms. With 100 % slough. The physician recommended cleansing the wound with cleanser, applying Medihoney, and cover with Silicone dressing daily. Review of Resident 83's clinical record revealed the Medihoney treatment recommended by the wound physician was not implemented until June 27, 2024, 16 days after the recommended treatment was made on June 11, 2024. During that time the unstageable wound to the lower back/lumbar spine was treated with Optifoam dressing every three days. Interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) conducted on July 1, 2024, revealed, after a resident is seen by the wound physician, the unit manager was responsible for reviewing the recommendations and notifying the primary physician of the order. The DON reported that the unit manager was not able to relay the wound care treatment recommendation to the primary physician therefore wound treatment was not changed to Medihoney until June 27, 2024. The facility failed to ensure wound physician's recommendation for wound treatment of Resident 83's unstageable wound to the lower back was followed. Review of Resident 87's Progress Notes revealed a nursing entry dated June 6, 2024 at 7:54 p.m. stating Resident noted with B/L (bilateral-both) heel DTI (Deep Tissue Injury- deep red, purple or maroon areas of intact skin, non-intact skin or blood-filled blisters caused by damage to the underlying soft tissues). Review of Resident 87's clinical record revealed there was no full documentation of the wound discovered on June 6, 2024 other than the above progress note. Review of Resident 87's physician orders and Medication Administration Record for June 2024 revealed there was no treatment to the DTI discovered on June 6, 2024 until June 10, 2024. Review of Resident 87's wound evaluations revealed there was no thorough documentation, including measurements and full description of the wound until June 18, 2024. Interview with the Director of Nursing on July 1, 2024 at 10:30 a.m. confirmed the deep tissue injury found on Resident 87 on June 6, 2024 were not thoroughly assessed until June 18, 2024 or any documented evidence a treatment had been completed until June 10, 2024. Review of Resident 242's wound consult dated June 18, 2024, revealed a Stage 3 Pressure Ulcer (Full thickness skin loss) on the left buttock measuring 1.1. x 1.2 x 0.1 cm., with heavy serous drainage, 100% granulation with no slough. The physician recommended cleansing the wound with a cleanser, applying medical honey, and cover with Silicone bordered foam dressing daily. Review of Resident 242's clinical record review revealed the Medihoney wound treatment recommended by the wound physician was not implemented. Interview with the DON on July 1, 2024, confirmed that the Medihoney treatment recommended by the wound physician was not relayed to the primary physician thus, the order was not implemented. The facility failed to ensure wound physician's recommendation for a Medihoney treatment for Resident 242's left buttock wound was followed. 28 Pa. Code 211.12 (c)(d)(1)(5) Nursing services 28 Pa Code 211.5(f) Clinical Records
Aug 2023 4 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on clinical records review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to follow a physician's order for medication and blood work and failed to timely inform the physician o...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on clinical records review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to follow a physician's order for medication and blood work and failed to timely inform the physician of a missed medication for two of 21 resents reviewed (Resident 249, and 252). Findings include: Review of Resident 249's diagnosis list includes Cerebrovascular Disease (CVA-Stroke), and Intracranial hemorrhage. Review of Resident 249's nursing progress notes dated August 4, 2023, at 10:50 p.m., revealed resident was admitted to the facility for wound care, nutrition management, intravenous therapy, and post-operative care of left craniotomy (A surgical opening into the skull) with wound infection. Review of the Physician Order dated August 4, 2023, revealed an order for Cefazolin (antibiotic) Sodium Injection Solution Reconstituted 2 grams. Use 2 grams intravenously every eight hours for infected wounds infuse 2 grams at 200ml/hr. over 30 minutes into a venous catheter. The order medication was scheduled for August 5, 2023, at 12 midnight, 8:00 a.m., and 4:00 p.m. Review of the August 2023 Medication Administration Record revealed Resident 249's Cefazolin was not administered on August 5, 2023, at midnight and 8:00 a.m. REview of Resident 249's clinical record review failed to reveal that the physician was notified of the missed medication. An interview with the Director of Nursing was conducted on August 10, 2023, at 10:00 a.m. The DON reported that on August 4, 2023, a midnight dose of Cefazolin was not administered because the facility was waiting for clearance from the hospital physician to use Resident 249's PICC line (Peripherally inserted central catheter). The DON reported that the physician did not respond until around 1:00 a.m. The DON reported that the 8:00 a.m., medication was not administered despite medication being available. The DON reported that as per the facility's investigation, and staff interview, the nurse did not check if the medication was available and reported that there was no available IV pump to use to administer the ordered medication. The DON confirmed that the physician was not notified of the missed medication until August 9, 2023, when the surveyor brought up the concern to the facility. Review of the nursing progress notes dated August 9, 2023, at 2:15 p.m., revealed Nurse Practitioner (NP) was notified of the resident's missed 12 a.m., and 8 a.m., doses of Cefazolin on August 5, 2023. A new order to add two additional doses of IV Cefazolin was made, to notify the infectious disease (ID) physician of the missed dosage and schedule a follow-up with the ID doctor. The facility failed to ensure Resident 249's ordered IV medication was followed and the physician was notified of the missed medication. Review of Resident 252's diagnosis list revealed Chronic heart failure, Diabetes (group of metabolic disorders characterized by a high blood sugar level over a prolonged period), and Sepsis (body's extreme reaction to an infection, without prompt treatment can lead to organ failure, tissue damage, and death). Rview of Resident 252's July 28, 2023, Physician's order revealed an order for blood work (Complete Blood Count -CBC, and Basic Metabolic Panel-BMP) for July 31, 2023. Review of Resident 252's clinical records failed to reveal that Resident 252's blood work was done on July 31, 2023. Review of the nursing progress notes dated August 9, 2023, at 8:55 a.m., revealed NP was notified on August 8, 202, that lab was unable to obtain the resident's blood and will reschedule on August 9, 2023. Interview with the Director of Nursing conducted on August 10, 2023, at 11:00 a.m. confirmed Resident 252's blood work order for July 31, 2023, was not done. The DON reported that the order was received but was not transcribed and was therefore not drawn on July 31, 2023. The error was later found and scheduled the missed blood work on August 8, 2023. The facility failed to ensure Resident 252's blood work order was followed. 28 Pa. Code 211.11(d) Resident care plan 28 Pa. Code 211.12 (c)(d)(1)(5) Nursing services
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on facility policy and procedure review, clinical record review, and staff interview it was determined the facility failed...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on facility policy and procedure review, clinical record review, and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to develop interventions to prevent falls for one of 3 residents reviewed. (Resident 199) Findings Include: Revie of facility policy and procedure titled Falls Management, last revised on September 22, 2022 revealed Patients will be assessed for risk of falling as part of the nursing assessment process. Interventions to reduce risk and minimize injury will be implemented as appropriate. Review of Resident 199's demographic sheet revealed they were admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including but not limited to muscle weakness, unspecified lack of coordination, unsteadiness on feet, and age-related cognitive decline. Review of Resident 199's admission nursing assessment, dated June 2, 2023 revealed the resident was not at risk for falls. Review of Resident 199's care plan revealed there was no care plan for the risk of falls developed with interventions to prevent falls developed on admission. Review of Resident 199's Progress notes revealed a nursing entry dated July 4, 2023 at 6:46 a.m. stating, Charge nurse reported that resident was found on floor in his bathroom, and that his Foley [a flexible tube that is passed into the bladder to drain urine] was dislodged (came out) resident stated, I fell while trying to use the bathroom. Interview with the Nursing Home Administrator on August 10, 2023 at 9:45 a.m. confirmed the resident was not correctly identified as a fall risk on admission and no care plan with interventions to prevent falls was developed prior to the fall on July 4, 2023. 28 Pa. Code 211.11(d) Resident care plan 28 Pa. Code 211.12 (c)(d)(1)(5) Nursing services
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0761 (Tag F0761)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, a review of medication manufacturer's guidelines, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facili...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, a review of medication manufacturer's guidelines, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that medications were properly labeled and stored in two of three medication carts observed (First Floor A wing, and Second Floor 2CD Hall medication cart). Findings include: Review of manufacturer's storage guidelines for Insulin Gargline (long-acting insulin) revealed that the medication may be stored at room temperature and must be discarded within 28 days after opening. Review of the manufacturer's storage guidelines for Novolog Insulin (fast-acting insulin), revealed that the medication must be stored at room temperature and must be discarded within 28 days after opening. Review of manufacturers' storage guidelines for Lantus Insulin Pen (long-acting insulin) revealed that the medication may be stored at room temperature and must be discarded within 28 days after opening. [DATE] 09:32 AM Observation was conducted on the First Floor A wing medication cart on [DATE], at 9:32 a.m., in the presence of licensed nurse Employee E4. Observation revealed the following: One Insulin Gargline pen, opened and undated; One Novolog pen, opened and undated, and A glucagon kit with an expiration date of February 2023. Interview with Employee E4 confirmed that the above insulins should have been dated once opened and expired medication should have been discarded. Observation was conducted on the Second Floor 2 CD Hall medication cart on [DATE], at 10:02 a.m., in the presence of licensed nurse Employee E5. Observation revealed the following: One Novolog vial with an open date of [DATE], and One Lantus pen with an open date of [DATE]. The above findings were relayed to the Director of Nursing on [DATE], at 10:00 a.m. The facility failed to ensure medications were properly labeled and stored on the First Floor A wing, and Second Floor 2CD Hall medication cart 28 Pa. Code 201.18(b)(1)(3)(e)(1) Management 28 Pa. Code 211.12 (c)(d)(1)(5) Nursing services
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0919 (Tag F0919)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observations and interviews with residents and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a call bell was available for two of 21 residents reviewed (Resident 3 and Resi...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations and interviews with residents and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a call bell was available for two of 21 residents reviewed (Resident 3 and Resident 44). Findings include: Observation conducted on August 7, 2023, at 11:56 a.m. revealed that there was no call bell or communication system available that would allow for a resident, family member or staff member to call for assistance for Resident 3. Interview conducted with Resident 3 on August 7, 2023, at 11:56 a.m., Resident 3 stated that they took her call bell away about a year ago. Resident 3 also stated that she must ask her roommate to use her call bell to call for assistance for Resident 3. Further observation on August 9, 2023, at 1:21 p.m., revealed that there still was no call bell or communication system available for a resident, family member or staff member to call for assistance for Resident 3. Interview with Resident 15, roommate, on August 9, 2023, at 1:21 p.m., confirmed that Resident 3 would request Resident 15 use her call bell to alert facility staff for assistance with ADL needs. Observation on August 7, 2023, at 9:25 a.m. revealed that there was no call bell or communication system available that would allow for a resident, family member or staff member to call for assistance for Resident 44. Interview with Resident 44 on August 7, 2023, at 9:25 a.m., Resident 44 stated that he did not know where his call bell was. Resident 44 could not remember the last time he saw the call bell. Resident 44 stated he usually just yells out the door for assistance. Further observation on August 9, 2023, at 1:26 p.m., revealed that there still was no call bell or communication system available for a resident, family member or staff member to call for assistance for Resident 44. Interview on August 10, 2023, at 10:03 a.m., Employee 3 confirmed that the call bell in Resident 3's room was located on the floor, behind the privacy curtain, on her roommate's side of the curtain. The call bell was not within Resident 3's reach or sight. Interview on August 10, 2023, at 10:03 a.m., Employee 3 confirmed that there was no call bell available for Resident 44 and confirmed that there should be. Review of facility policy NSG101 Call Lights, on August 10, 2023, at 11:07 a.m., revealed that all Genesis HealthCare patients will have a call light or alternative communication device within their reach at all times when unattended. The facility failed to ensure that two residents had a call bell available within their reach when unattended. 28 Pa Code 201.29(j) Resident Rights 28 Pa Code 207.2(a) Administrator's Responsibility
May 2023 1 deficiency 1 Harm
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on a review of the facility's policy, hospital records and clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on a review of the facility's policy, hospital records and clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to follow a physician's order and appropriately monitor the resident's hematuria (blood in urine) and failed to timely notify the physician of resident's abnormal vitals resulting to the harm of being hospitalized for one of six residents reviewed (Resident CL1). Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Change in condition: Notification of, with a revision date of June 1, 2021, revealed A Center must immediately consult with the patient's physician where there is: A significant change in the patient's physical mental, or psychosocial status (that is, a deterioration in health, mental or psychosocial status in either life-threatening conditions or clinical complications). Review of Resident CL1's Minimum Data Set (MDS- A standardized assessment tool that measures health status in long-term care residents) dated April 9, 2023, revealed resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. MDS revealed resident had moderate cognitive impairment and had an indwelling Foley catheter (A catheter that drains urine from your bladder into a bag outside your body). Review of Resident CL1's diagnosis list revealed, Orthostatic Hypotension (low blood pressure that happens when standing up from sitting or lying down), Congestive Heart Failure (chronic condition in which the heart doesn't pump blood as well as it should), Coronary Artery Disease, Urinary Retention, and Hematuria. Review of the admission physician's order dated April 4, 2023, revealed an order of Midodrine HCl Oral tablet given three tablets by mouth before meals for low blood pressure. Medication was scheduled to be given at 7:30 a.m., 11:30 a.m., and 4:30 p.m. Review of weights and vitals dated April 4, 2023, until April 8, 2023, revealed Resident CL1's blood pressure ranges from 142/81-111/71 mmHg (normal blood pressure = 90/60 to 120/80 mm Hg). Pulse rates range from 90-78 BPM (normal pulse = 60 to 100 BPM). Review of the Nurse Practitioner (NP) notes dated April 5, 2023, revealed Resident CL1's orthostatic hypotension was in clinically stable condition. Review of the nursing progress notes dated April 7, 2023, at 9:13 a.m., revealed resident had blood present on linens and hematuria noted in the foley bag, resident was assessed, resident reported going to the bathroom but was not aware of the catheter being tugged. NP (Nurse Practitioner) visited, ordered to flush the foley, unit manager to follow through with orders. Review of the physician notes dated April 7, 2023, revealed resident with urine retention with acute hematuria on April 7, 2023, maintain foley, flush and follow. Clinical records review failed to reveal the NP's verbal order to flush Resident CL1's Foley catheter was completed. Interview with the NP was conducted on May 1, 2023, at 1:00 p.m., and reported that nursing is responsible for placing verbal orders into the resident's EMR (Electronic Medical Record). Interview with the Director of Nursing (DON), on May 1, 2023, at 1:00 p.m., revealed both nursing and NP are responsible for placing the order into the resident's EMR. The DON confirmed that there was no documented evidence that Resident CL1's Foley was flushed. The clinical records review failed to reveal documentation/follow-up of Resident CL1's hematuria on April 8, 2023. A review of the nursing progress notes dated April 9, 2023, at 10:54 a.m., revealed blood pressure taken lying at 7:45 a.m., was 83/54 mmHg. The same note stated, Hematuria continues. Interview conducted with licensed nurse Employee E4 on May 1, 2023, at 12:30 p.m., confirmed resident had hematuria on April 9, 2023, and blood pressure taken at 7:54 a.m., was 83/54 mm Hg. Employee E4 reported the physician was not informed of the continued hematuria because it was not a new condition. Employee E4 reported that the blood pressure was not relayed to the physician because the resident had a diagnosis of orthostatic hypotension and Midodrine medication was administered with therapy session occurring after administration. Review of physical therapy notes dated April 9, 2023, revealed resident rolled to the right and left with minimal assistance, supine to sit on the edge of the bed, a resident reported lightheadedness and dizziness., blood pressure was 91/60 mm Hg, heart rate (HR) was 123 BPM. After five minutes of sitting resident with no symptoms reported, attempted to transfer from the bed to a wheelchair but the resident lost balance requiring moderate assistance to recover and sit on the edge of the bed, the blood pressure was 88/58 mm Hg, and HR was 120 . Sit supine with moderate assistance, blood pressure was 106/63 mm Hg, HR 127 BPM. Interview with Physical Therapy Assistant (PTA) Employee E5 was conducted on May 1, 2023, at 1:00 p.m. Employee E5 reported that the resident was seen before lunch on April 9, 2023, for a therapy session. Employee E5 reported that she/he was not notified of the Resident's earlier vitals (low blood pressure) but she/he always check the resident's vitals during therapy sessions. Employee E5 reported that the resident was unable to transfer from the bed to the wheelchair due to weakness and loss of balance, vitals were monitored during the session. Employee E5 reported that she/he discussed the resident's low blood pressure and resting elevated heart rate with the Physiatrist (doctor who has special training in physical medicine). Employee E5 also reported that the nurse on duty was notified of the abnormal vitals of the resident. Interview with Licensed nurse Employee E4 on May 1, 2023, at 1:00 p.m., revealed Employee E5 notified her/him of the resident's low blood pressure but was not made aware of an elevated heart rate. Employee E4 reported the physician was not notified of the low blood pressure during therapy because the therapist indicated the blood pressure returned to resident's baseline blood pressure. Employee E4 stated that for any significant change in a resident's condition, the primary physician, NP, or the on-call physicians need to be notified and not the rehab doctor. Employee E4 reported that the resident was last observed at 2:30 p.m. and reported the resident was ok. Review of the Physiatrist's notes on April 9, 2023, revealed HR of 90 BPM, respiration was 19, continue occupational therapy, physical therapy, medications, and medical management with [primary physician]. Review of the progress notes dated April 9, 2023, at 4:30 p.m., revealed resident was unresponsive, and would not follow simple commands, pulse oximeter noted 91% on room air, oxygen was administered, 911 was called, MD and family were notified, resident was sent to the hospital. Review of the vitals documented on April 9, 2023, at 5:00 p.m., revealed Resident CL1's blood pressure was 79/44 mm Hg, and HR was 131 BPM. Review of the progress notes dated April 10, 2023, at 10:26 a.m., revealed resident was admitted with a diagnosis of septic shock (A widespread infection causing organ failure and dangerously low blood pressure). Review of the hospital records Discharge summary dated [DATE], revealed resident's principal problem was septic shock. Presenting problem was Acute Kidney Injury, Urinary Tract Infection with hematuria, and Sepsis due to unspecified organism. The hospital course revealed the patient presented to the hospital on April 9, 2023, and was found to be lethargic, and hypotensive and required intubation after failing a BIPAP. The patient was admitted to the Intensive Care Unit for management of septic shock. The patient arrested and passed on April 11, 2023. Review of Resident 1's hospital record revealed under section titled HPI (History of Present Illness) that the resident had a recent hospital admission March 31 to April 4, 2023 for Orthostatic Hypotension. Further review of hospital record revealed, When EMS arrived patient hypotensive 70s over 40s with fever 102.5F (farentheit). Medics unable to oxygen saturation in the field and subsequently started [resident] on nonrebreather. In ED (emergency department) [resident] tachypneic and markedly hypotensive. Additional review of hospital record revealed vitals recorded as follows; April 9, 2023 at 1659 (4:59 p.m.) pulse 144 with respiration 40 but blood pressure no reading. April 9, 2023 at 1714 (5:14 p.m.) blood pressure reading of 76/45. Vitals taken at 1730 (5:30 p.m.) recorded as pulse 124, respirations 48, and blood pressure 95/54 and oxygen saturation (oxygen level in blood) was 94%. Further review of hospital record revealed section Physical Exam subsections Procedures and Critical care the following; treatment was necessary to treat or prevent imminent or life threatening deteroriation of the following conditions: Cardiac failure, CNS(Central Nervous System) failure or compromise, respiratory failure, renal failure, sepsis, shock and dehydration. Additional review of hospital record revealed ED Provider noted indicating, [resident] was in hospital within past 10 days for issues with orthostatic hypotension. Apparently this morning the [resident] appeared to be more lethargic. On EMS arrive, [resident] found to be febrile, hypotensive. [Resident] has an indwelling Foley (catheter) in place on arrival with a very small amount of bloody urine in teh bag. On Arrival [resident] temperature is 100.2. He is tachycardi. He is markedly hypotensive with an initial pressure being obtained 53 systolic manually. Upon removal of the old Foley, purulent urine was draining from the penis. A new Foley was placed and with this, a large return of purulent urine. The facility failed to ensure physician order and follow-up for hematuria was followed, and low blood pressure and elevated pulse rate were timely reported to the Resident's attending physician resulting in the harm of hospitalization, intubation, and admission to the Intensive Care Unit. 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(3)(5) Nursing services Previously cited 3/22/23, 8/5/22 28 Pa Code 211.5(f) Clinical Records Previously cited 8/5/22 28 PA Code 211.10(a) Resident care policies Previously cited 8/5/22
Mar 2023 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Notification of Changes (Tag F0580)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on a review of the facility's policy, clinical records, interviews with staff and medical provider, it was determined that the facility failed to timely notify the physician of an abnormal x-ray...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on a review of the facility's policy, clinical records, interviews with staff and medical provider, it was determined that the facility failed to timely notify the physician of an abnormal x-ray for one of two residents reviewed (Resident CL1). Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Physician/Advanced Practice Provider (APP) Notification, with a revision date of December 1, 2021, revealed that upon identification of a patient who has a change in condition, abnormal laboratory values, or abnormal diagnostics, a licensed nurse will report to physician/APP. Review of Resident CL1's diagnosis list revealed Hypoxemia (low level of oxygen in the blood), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD-chronic inflammatory lung disease that causes obstructed airflow from the lungs), and Chronic Congestive Heart Disease (CHF- chronic condition in which the heart doesn't pump blood as well as it should). Review of the nursing progress notes dated February 27, 2023, at 11:58 a.m., revealed resident was assessed, lung sound was decreased and respirations were slightly labored, and unable to follow directions in taking deep breaths. On Oxygen at 2 LPM via nasal cannula, the temperature is 98.2 Fahrenheit (F), the pulse is 122, blood pressure is 102/77. Oral intake was poor, Advanced Practice Provider was notified. Review of the physician's notes dated February 27, 2023, at 1:48 p.m., revealed resident was seen and examined for an acute change in condition per the nursing's request. The resident was sitting in bed, lethargic, opens eyes to verbal stimuli, and denies any shortness of breath or pain on the exam. On continues oxygen at 2 liters via nasal cannula with 96-97% oxygen saturation. Medications reviewed and adjustments made. Vitals as follows: B/P(Blood Pressure)-117/54, PR-86/min., RR-28, Temp- 98 F. New orders for STAT (immediately) blood work, and chest X-ray was made. An order for a Prednisone (medication used to treat diseases and conditions, associated with inflammation) 40 mg (milligram) one tab now and 40 mg daily for three days was also made. Review of the nursing progress notes dated February 27, 2023, at 12:56 p.m., revealed blood work, and a chest X-ray order was placed. An order for Prednisone 40 mg tablet and DuoNeb two times a day and PRN (as needed) was made. Records revealed all orders were followed. Review of the Radiology Result Report revealed that resident CL1's chest x-ray was done on February 27, 2023, at 2:52 p.m., and the result was reported on February 27, 2023, at 3:49 p.m. The findings revealed bronchopneumonia (infection that inflames sacs in one or both lungs) in the lower right lung. The clinical records reviewed failed to reveal the attending physician was notified of the abnormal chest X-ray until February 28, 2023, at 11:27 a.m. Interview with the Advanced Practice Provider (APP) was conducted on March 22, 2023, at 1:00 p.m. The Advanced Practice Provider confirmed that she/was not notified of the resident's chest x-ray result until the morning of February 28, 2023. The APP confirmed that the resident was stable during the visit on February 27, 2023, but she/he should have been notified of the abnormal chest X-ray for possible additional treatment. Interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) was conducted on March 24, 2023, at 1:30 p.m. The DON reported that laboratory and radiology results were sent to the facility via electronic medical records which can be viewed both by the nursing staff and medical provider. The DON reported that the desk nurse is responsible for checking the resident's blood and radiology results and then relaying the results to the physician/APP for any abnormalities. The DON also reported that the APP also has the responsibility to check the resident's laboratory and radiology results especially if the result was reported before 5:00 p.m. since they also have access. The DON confirmed that Resident CL1's abnormal chest x-ray reported on February 27, 2023, was not reported to the medical provider until the morning of February 28, 2023. The facility failed to timely notify the attending physician/Advanced Practice Provider, regarding Resident CL1's abnormal chest X-ray. 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(3)(5) Nursing services Previously cited 8/5/22
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • 40% turnover. Below Pennsylvania's 48% average. Good staff retention means consistent care.
Concerns
  • • 13 deficiencies on record, including 2 serious (caused harm) violations. Ask about corrective actions taken.
Bottom line: Mixed indicators with Trust Score of 63/100. Visit in person and ask pointed questions.

About This Facility

What is Wayne Center's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns WAYNE CENTER an overall rating of 4 out of 5 stars, which is considered above average nationally. Within Pennsylvania, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.

How is Wayne Center Staffed?

CMS rates WAYNE CENTER's staffing level at 3 out of 5 stars, which is average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 40%, compared to the Pennsylvania average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.

What Have Inspectors Found at Wayne Center?

State health inspectors documented 13 deficiencies at WAYNE CENTER during 2023 to 2025. These included: 2 that caused actual resident harm and 11 with potential for harm. Deficiencies causing actual harm indicate documented cases where residents experienced negative health consequences.

Who Owns and Operates Wayne Center?

WAYNE CENTER is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by GENESIS HEALTHCARE, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 112 certified beds and approximately 101 residents (about 90% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in WAYNE, Pennsylvania.

How Does Wayne Center Compare to Other Pennsylvania Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Pennsylvania, WAYNE CENTER's overall rating (4 stars) is above the state average of 3.0, staff turnover (40%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (4 stars) is above the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Wayne Center?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"

Is Wayne Center Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, WAYNE CENTER has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 4-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Pennsylvania. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.

Do Nurses at Wayne Center Stick Around?

WAYNE CENTER has a staff turnover rate of 40%, which is about average for Pennsylvania nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.

Was Wayne Center Ever Fined?

WAYNE CENTER has been fined $7,443 across 1 penalty action. This is below the Pennsylvania average of $33,153. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.

Is Wayne Center on Any Federal Watch List?

WAYNE CENTER is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.