NHC HEALTHCARE, MURFREESBORO

420 N UNIVERSITY ST, MURFREESBORO, TN 37130 (615) 893-2602
For profit - Corporation 181 Beds NATIONAL HEALTHCARE CORPORATION Data: November 2025
Trust Grade
60/100
#81 of 298 in TN
Last Inspection: February 2020

Over 2 years since last inspection. Current conditions may differ from available data.

Overview

NHC Healthcare in Murfreesboro has a Trust Grade of C+, indicating it is slightly above average, but not outstanding. It ranks #81 out of 298 facilities in Tennessee, placing it in the top half, and #3 out of 8 in Rutherford County, meaning only two local options are better. However, the facility's trend is worsening, with reports of issues increasing from 3 in 2020 to 4 in 2024. Staffing is a mixed bag, earning a 3 out of 5 rating but with a concerning turnover rate of 59%, which is higher than the state average of 48%. On a positive note, there have been no fines recorded, and the facility has more RN coverage than 80% of other facilities in Tennessee, which is beneficial for resident care. On the downside, inspector findings noted serious incidents, including a failure to provide necessary two-person assistance for transfers, which resulted in harm to a resident. Additionally, there were reports of falls that led to injuries for two residents, indicating potential lapses in safety protocols. Lastly, the facility has had issues addressing grievances properly, which raises concerns about how they handle resident and family complaints. Overall, while there are strengths in RN coverage and no fines, the increasing number of issues and serious incidents should be carefully considered by families.

Trust Score
C+
60/100
In Tennessee
#81/298
Top 27%
Safety Record
Moderate
Needs review
Inspections
Getting Worse
3 → 4 violations
Staff Stability
⚠ Watch
59% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
Penalties
✓ Good
No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Tennessee facilities.
Skilled Nurses
✓ Good
Each resident gets 46 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than average for Tennessee. RNs are trained to catch health problems early.
Violations
⚠ Watch
16 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
★★★★☆
4.0
Overall Rating
★★★☆☆
3.0
Staff Levels
★★★★☆
4.0
Care Quality
★★★★☆
4.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2020: 3 issues
2024: 4 issues

The Good

  • 4-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record

Facility shows strength in quality measures, fire safety.

The Bad

Staff Turnover: 59%

13pts above Tennessee avg (46%)

Frequent staff changes - ask about care continuity

Chain: NATIONAL HEALTHCARE CORPORATION

Part of a multi-facility chain

Ask about local staffing decisions and management

Staff turnover is elevated (59%)

11 points above Tennessee average of 48%

The Ugly 16 deficiencies on record

2 actual harm
Aug 2024 4 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0604 (Tag F0604)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on facility policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to provide an environmen...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on facility policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to provide an environment free from physical restraints for 1 (Resident #3) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for restraints. The findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Patient Protection and Response Policy for Allegations/Incidents of Abuse, Neglect, Misappropriation of Property and Exploitation, dated [DATE], revealed, .Abuse, Neglect .will not be tolerated by anyone, including staff .family members or legal guardians .The patient has the right to be free from abuse .This includes but is not limit to freedom from .any physical restraint .not required to treat the patients medical symptoms .All allegations of possible abuse .will be immediately assessed to determine the appropriate direction of the investigation . Review of the medical record revealed Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses which included Local infection of the skin and subcutaneous tissue, Acute Respiratory Failure with Hypoxia, Metabolic Encephalopathy, Muscle Wasting and Atrophy, Unspecified Dementia, Contusion of right lower leg, and History of falling. Resident #3 expired at the facility on [DATE]. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed Resident #3 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 6, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. Continued review revealed Resident #3 required extensive assistance of two plus person physical assistance for bed mobility, transfer, toileting, personal hygiene, and limited assistance of one person for dressing. Continued review revealed Resident #3 had limitation in range of motion with both lower extremities. Further review revealed Resident #3 had a fall in the last 2-6 months. Review of the facility Safety Events (Incident Reports), with dates ranging from 11/2022 through 10/2023, revealed Resident #3 had a total of 39 documented falls with various injuries, which included 2 major injuries that required hospital transfer for evaluation. (Refer to Tag F689) During an interview on [DATE] at 5:20 PM, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) K stated, .[Named Resident #3] had a lot of falls .when she came back from hospital, she was mainly in the bed .we mainly used a lift with her, and you always need 2 people when you use the lift .her bed was kept against the wall and she had a clip alarm to alert us if she was trying to get up . During a telephone interview on [DATE] at 1:54 PM, Family Member (FM) O stated, .the facility called me when she [Resident #3] had the fall [DATE] .he [Licensed Practical Nurse LPN I] just said I need you to go to the hospital .she had so many falls since she had been there .the Administrator called me the next day .she couldn't tell me how long she laid in the floor or what time for sure it happened .you know the staff would put chairs against the end of the bed to keep her restrained to the bed .I have pictures of it .we have walked in and the bed be against the wall and two chairs at the end of her bed . Review of the undated picture provided by FM O revealed Resident #3 in the bed with one side of the bed against the wall and two burgundy chairs sitting at the end of the bed below the half side rail. During a telephone interview on [DATE] at 2:00 PM, CNA P stated, .the staff was very aware of her [Resident #3] fall risk .I have found chairs next to her bed to keep her in the bed .I told the staff it's a restraint she could get hurt you can't do that .it was more than one time I found it that way . During a telephone interview on [DATE] at 2:27 PM, an Anonymous Registered Nurse (RN) stated, .I knew about the chairs sitting next to [Named Resident #3]'s bed .the staff said the family was doing it and staging it but the family said the staff was doing it .I have walked into the room when family had not been there and found two burgundy straight back chairs next to the bed and the other side of the bed against the wall .the daughter reported that the second shift was doing it .the Administrator was aware of it .I told the staff you can't do that . The RN was asked was an in-service given to the staff or any education given to the family about restraints. The Anonymous RN stated, No. During an interview on [DATE] at 4:30 PM, the Administrator was asked if she had been made aware of staff or family placing chairs against the side of Resident #3's bed to restrain her in the bed. The Administrator stated, .Not that I know of .you can't leave chairs next to a bed, that is a restraint . The Administrator reviewed the picture provided by FM O and identified the person in the photo was Resident #3 and confirmed the photo had been taken in Resident #3's room. The photo revealed Resident #3 lying in bed with one side of the bed pushed up against the wall and the other side had 2 chairs placed against the opposite side of the bed.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Transfer Requirements (Tag F0622)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on facility policy, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a discharge summary was completed that con...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on facility policy, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a discharge summary was completed that contained needed information of the residents stay to ensure a safe discharge for 1 of 3 (Resident #4) residents reviewed for discharge. The findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, TRANSFER/DISCHARGE, dated 2/2023 revealed, .A patient may be transferred or discharged to another health care institution or discharged home upon the written order of the attending physician .Sufficient information will be provided to the patient to assure continuity of care, regardless of the destination of the patient or the reason for the transfer .The center will assist in effecting a smooth transition . Review of the medical record revealed Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], readmitted on [DATE] and discharged on 7/27/2023 with diagnoses which included Dementia, moderate, with anxiety, Obsessive-compulsive disorder, Unspecified Psychosis, Depression, Alcohol Dependence with alcohol-induced persisting Dementia, Anxiety Disorder, and Pseudobulbar affect. Review of the Behavior Analysis Report revealed on 12/17/2022 Resident #4 was wandering hallway and attempting to enter other resident ' s room. Continued review revealed on 12/30/2022 Patient searching nurses' station for drinks/snacks and grabbing multiple supplements, attempted to redirect and pt stated, You can't tell me what to do. On 1/6/2022 resident repeatedly in and out of nurses' station stealing supplements/snacks, hiding items under shirt or in her purse. On 2/17/2023 Resident #4 smeared feces on curtain. Continued review revealed on 3/10/2023 Resident #4 with usual wandering behavior. On 3/13/2023, Resident #4 taking food (pudding) and supplement off med cart and med cart cooler and 3/14/2023 Resident #4 rummaging on top of med cart, cabinets, and cooler. Review of the comprehensive care plan for Resident #4 revealed a problem start date of 4/5/2022 at risk for alteration in behaviors related to diagnoses of Dementia, psychosis, anxiety, as evidenced by restlessness pacing and wandering. Continued review of the comprehensive care plan for Resident #4 revealed she likes to travel around the environment and may occasionally follow others into other rooms/areas and assist her back to common area as needed. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #4 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 5 which indicated severe cognitive impairment. Continued review revealed Resident #4 had delusional behaviors and wandered daily over the last 7 days. Further review revealed the wandering impact placed the resident at significant risk of getting to a potentially dangerous place and wandering intrudes on the privacy of others. Review of the Behavior Analysis Report revealed on 4/8/2023 resident had been going to other residents' rooms, to nurses' station, trying to steal food and drinks, did not sleep much. Review of the Elopement Risk dated 5/27/2023 for Resident #4 revealed resident exhibited wandering or exit seeking behavior in the last 90 days. Continued review revealed Resident #4 was independently ambulatory. Review of the Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident #4 had a BIMS score of 4 which indicated severe cognitive impairment. Review of the Psychiatric Nurse Practitioner (NP) Progress Notes revealed, .6/9/2023 .PSYCHOTIC SYMPTOMS .Preoccupation with the bathroom/toilet and at times will smear feces due to confusion .Preoccupation with food and continues to take food items from nursing carts/others .Patient denies AH/VH [Auditory Hallucination/Visual Hallucination] but had been observed responding to internal stimuli and talking to self and has been talking to her daughter, when daughter is not present and has made some delusional thinking about someone 'being hit by a train' and that someone 'being molested'. Patient denies these things to writer today .Chronic pacing .Due to severity of cognitive deficits, her behaviors will most likely progress/worsen as her overall condition declines. Redirection or patient education is not effective due to her cognition and inability to recall information .Prognosis is guarded and she may eventually need placement in a memory care unit or a geriatric behavioral nursing facility . Review of the Behavior Analysis Report revealed on 6/16/2023, Resident #4 rummaging through roommate's clothes and trying to take food from tray rack (clean and dirty). Review of the Psychiatric Nurse Practitioner Progress Notes revealed, .7/10/2023 .Chronic pacing and asking for multiple things repetitively due to significant short-term memory impairment .Patient with progressing behaviors and has begun taking peer's clothes and putting soiled linens in peer's bed. She continues to respond to internal stimuli and has been having extended conversations with unseen people. Her hallucinations do not appear to be bothersome or distressing to her, however her behaviors towards her peers have been distressing to them. Will increase Seroquel [antipsychotic medication used to treat psychosis] .Will D/C [discontinue] Depakote [anticonvulsant medication used as a mood stabilizer] since she is taking a low dose .increasing Seroquel for psychosis/disorganization . Further review of the Psychiatric Nurse Practitioner Progress Notes revealed, .7/17/2023 .Chronic pacing in the afternoon/evening and asking for multiple things repetitively due to significant short term memory impairment .No history of inpatient psychiatric hospitalization . Review of the Care Conference Report for Resident #4 dated 7/20/2023 revealed, .Care Plan meeting held today. Present were Social Work, Nurse Manager, Dietician, and participating by telephone was patient's daughter .Care Plan, medications, and diet reviewed. Patient's behavior was discussed and nurse shared that there are memory care units that are designed for patients that wander and might be more helpful to her. Daughter agreed with referral being made . Review of the Progress Notes dated 7/26/2023 revealed, .SW (Social Worker) made referral to several long term care facilities that have Dementia and Memory Care units per daughter .agreement during recent care plan meeting .[Named Facility #2] has accepted .[Named Resident #4] as a patient and daughter is in agreement with her mother being transferred and admitted there. [Named Facility #2] to contact daughter and set up a date and time for admission and will inform SW . Review of the Progress Notes dated 7/27/2023 revealed, .[Named Facility #2] social worker called and stated they are able to admit [Named Resident #4] today .Van Service has been arranged to transport patient around 3:30 PM today . Review of the Department Notes from (Named Facility #2) dated 7/28/2023 8:26 AM, .Late Entry 7/27/23 [2023] .Resident up in the common area asking staff that walked by how to get out of here. Resident is also asking other residents how to get out of here. Unable to redirect. Snack offered and provided. Resident stated in a raised angry tone, 'I did not ask for a snack, if I want a snack I will get one myself' . Continued review of the Department Notes dated 7/28/2023 11:59 AM, .spoke with daughter, with daughter stating she thought her mom was going to a nursing home with a memory care unit .daughter did not realize facility does not have a memory care unit .daughter plans to come in on this date, will have further discussion of resident plan of care at that time . Continued review of the Department Notes dated 7/28/2023 3:33 PM revealed, .spoke with .daughter at bedside to review residents behaviors, resident has behaviors prior to admission to this facility .adjusted psychotropic medication in facility multiply [multiple] times stated by daughter .reviewed in patient psych stay at behavioral unit may benefit resident, daughter agreeable .4:07 PM New order received to initiate transfer .for eval and treat for possible inpatient psych stay, EMS [Emergency Management Service] notified of need for transport . Further review of the Department Notes from (Named Facility #2) dated 8/16/2023 revealed, .Late entry on 8/15/23 [2023] [Named Facility #3] called to inform this writer that they would accept resident as long term for memory care. Daughter contacted via phone to make aware that facility .has accepted resident for long term care. Daughter agreeable with facility to set up transportation . Review of the Transitions of Care/Discharge summary dated [DATE] (completed by Facility #1- 2 days after Resident #4's discharge) revealed, .Mood and Behavior Patterns .other behavioral symptoms directed toward others .Behavior of this type occurred 1 to 3 days .Care Plan Goals .Goal Date .9/15/2023 Will have elopement risk minimized through next 120 days or next review. Will remain in safe confines of center unless supervised by staff/representative . The completion date of the discharge summary revealed it was completed after her discharge and could not have been sent or faxed to [Named Facility #2] on the day of discharge 7/27/2024. During an interview on 7/29/2024 at 4:10 PM, Social Service Director (SSD) stated, .We were wanting to find safer placement for [Named Resident #4] .she was needing more of a secured unit .dementia unit .she was on the 2nd floor but she was exit seeking .flushing clothing and food down the toilet .daughter was aware of her transfer to [Named Facility #2] .a discharge summary would have been sent . During a telephone interview on 7/29/2024 at 7:38 PM, The Complainant stated, .I was told it would be more beneficial for [Named Resident #4] to transfer to another facility with memory care .they didn't give me a definite date at that point .On 7/27/2023 I was told I needed to go to the new facility [Facility #2] and sign papers .I explained to them I couldn't go until 7/28/2023 because I was out of town. The new facility [Named Facility #2] called me and said mom was already there .[Named Facility #1] had mom to wear an ankle monitor and had a secured door but the facility they sent her to does not have ankle monitors and no secured doors .[Named Facility #1] transferred mom to where she was a flight risk . During an interview on 8/1/2024 at 10:15 AM, Social Worker H stated, .[Named Resident #4] needed a specialized dementia unit .the daughter was aware of the discharge and I faxed out the referral to [Named Facility #2] .the admission Coordinator at the facility is the one that accepted her transfer . During a telephone interview on 8/1/2024 at 10:25 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON for Named Facility #2) stated, .[Named Resident #4] is no longer at our facility .she is now at a memory care unit at [Named Facility #3] .our doors can be pushed on and after a few seconds they will open we are not a locked unit .when she got here she was confused, wandering, pushing on exit doors, cursing, threatening behaviors .we had to place her on 1 on 1 supervision .We sent her out for a psychiatric stay and she came back but she was still exit seeking .I sent out further referrals and found a locked facility for her .the daughter understood from the previous facility [Named Resident #4] wound be transferring to a secured unit .it was not a safe transfer .it was not in her referral that she was exit seeking and that is not what we understood when she was being transferred to our facility .we do not have a wanderguard system . The DON was asked to email this surveyor a copy of the referral the facility received from (Named Facility #1) on (Named Resident #4). Review of the referral received by Facility #2 revealed Resident #4's wandering and intrusive behavior and risk for elopement was not documented on the Nursing Summary referral. No discharge summary was provided to Facility #2. During an interview on 8/1/2024 at 12:08 PM, the NP stated, .[Named Resident #4] wandered and was exit seeking, very ambulatory .a secured unit would have been better for her . During an interview on 8/1/2024 at 1:00 PM the Administrator was asked if the facility kept a copy of the referral that was sent out on (Named Resident #4). The Administrator stated, .We don't keep a copy of the referrals we send out . During an interview on 8/1/2024 at 3:25 PM, SW H stated, .I saw [Named Resident #4] get on elevator behind some visitors .I was not aware the facility [Named Facility #2] did not have locked doors .I was not aware the facility did not have a wanderguard [ankle monitoring] system . SW H was asked if he had any email correspondence with the admission Coordinator at [Named Facility #2] he stated, we only talked by phone about [Named Resident #4]. During an interview on 8/1/2024 at 4:07 PM, the Administrator stated, .She [Named Resident #4] was always on the 2nd floor .she never got on the elevator .It was my understanding that [Named Facility #2] had a secured unit . The Administrator was asked does she feel Resident #4 had a safe transfer considering the facility did not have a secured unit. The Administrator stated, .I still feel it would be better for her . During an interview on 8/2/2023 at 8:40 AM, the Medical Director (MD) stated, .[Named Resident #4] was transferred to another facility where I make visits also [Named Facility #3] . The MD was asked why Resident #4 had to be transferred to (Named Facility #3). MD stated, .she needed to be in a locked memory unit the previous settings were not appropriate for her needs .
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Comprehensive Care Plan (Tag F0656)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on facility policy review, medical record review, facility documentation, and interview, the facility failed to develop an...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on facility policy review, medical record review, facility documentation, and interview, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive, person-centered care plan that addressed discharge plans for 1 (Resident #4) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for discharge. The findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses which included Dementia, Obsessive-compulsive disorder, Unspecified Psychosis, Depression, Alcohol Dependence with alcohol-induced persisting Dementia, Anxiety Disorder, and Pseudobulbar affect. Resident #4 was discharged on 7/27/2023. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #4 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 4, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #4's Comprehensive Care Plan, with revision date 5/31/2023, revealed no discharge plan. Review of the Psychiatric Nurse Practitioner (NP) Progress Notes for Resident #4, revealed, .6/9/2023 .Chronic pacing .Due to severity of cognitive deficits, her behaviors will most likely progress/worsen as her overall condition declines. Redirection or patient education is not effective due to her cognition and inability to recall information .Prognosis is guarded and she may eventually need placement in a memory care unit or a geriatric behavioral nursing facility . Review of the Care Conference Report for Resident #4, dated 7/20/2023, revealed, .Care Plan meeting held today. Present were Social Work, Nurse Manager, Dietician, and participating by telephone was patient's daughter .Patient's behavior was discussed and nurse shared that there are memory care units that are designed for patients that wander and might be more helpful to her. Daughter agreed with referral being made . Review of the Progress Notes for Resident #4, dated 7/26/2023, revealed, .SW (Social Worker) made referral to several long term care facilities that have Dementia and Memory Care units per daughter .agreement during recent care plan meeting .[Named Facility #2] has accepted .[Named Resident #4] as a patient and daughter is in agreement with her mother being transferred and admitted there. [Named Facility #2] to contact daughter and set up a date and time for admission and will inform SW . Review of the Progress Notes for Resident #4, dated 7/27/2023, revealed, .[Named Facility #2] social worker called and stated they are able to admit [Named Resident #4] today .Care Ride Van Service has been arranged to transport patient around 3:30 PM today . During an interview on 8/1/2024 at 3:25 PM, Social Worker H was asked to review [Named Resident #4]'s care plan to see if a discharge plan was noted in her care plan. SW H stated, .I don't see one . During an interview on 8/1/2024 at 4:07 PM, the Administrator was asked to review [Named Resident #4]'s care plan for a discharge plan. The Administrator stated, .I don't see a discharge care plan on her .
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on the facility policy review, medical record review, hospital record review, facility documentation, review of photograph...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on the facility policy review, medical record review, hospital record review, facility documentation, review of photographs, and interview, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #3) reviewed for accidents. The findings include: Review of the facility policy titled .Incident and Accident Process . dated 1/2024 revealed, .An incident or accident is defined as 'any occurrence that is outside the norms or any happening that is not consistent with the routine operation of the center or care of a particular patient' .Some examples .are Falls .Found on floor .Unexplained bruising .All patient incidents should be documented in the EHR [electronic health record] .Injury is defined, for reporting purposes, as Significant injury including: Fracture or dislocation of bones or joints .Any condition requiring medical treatment outside the center that is inconsistent with the routine management of the patient's preexisting condition .The DON [Director of Nursing] should review all incidents for accuracy and complete documentation .is data complete and thorough and paints a picture of what happened .Was hospitalization necessary to treat the patient .Was the care plan updated to reflect the incident .Is additional investigation needed to determine the exact events of the incident .What can be done to avoid similar incidents recurring on this or any patient in the center .The data may be used for occurrence trending and improvement/prevention by the Safety Committee and QAPI [Quality Assurance Performance Improvement] Committee . Review of the medical record revealed Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Local infection of the skin and subcutaneous tissue, Acute Respiratory Failure with Hypoxia, Metabolic Encephalopathy, Muscle Wasting and Atrophy, Unspecified Dementia, Contusion of right lower leg, and History of falling. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #3 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 6, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. Continued review revealed Resident #3 required extensive assistance of two plus person physical assistance for bed mobility, transfer, toileting, personal hygiene, and limited assistance of one person for dressing. Continued review revealed Resident #3 had limitation in range of motion with both lower extremities. Further review revealed Resident #3 had a fall in the last 2-6 months. Review of the Safety Events (Incident Report) revealed Resident #3 had an unwitnessed fall in her room and sustained a bruise on right abdomen on 11/3/2022.?Resident #3 had two additional unwitnessed falls in her room on 11/7/2022, and 11/23/2022. Resident #3 had 3 falls during 11/2022. 1 of 3 falls resulted in injury. Review of the Safety Events revealed Resident #3 had unwitnessed fall in her room on 12/29/2022. Review of the Safety Events revealed Resident #3 had an unwitnessed fall in her room on 2/17/2023, after staff had placed her back in center of bed 3 times prior to the fall. Resident #3 had an unwitnessed fall on 2/21/2023 at 2:30 AM and sustained bruising on her right elbow and both knees. Resident #3 had a second unwitnessed fall in her room on 2/21/2023 at 6:15 AM which resulted in discoloration and tenderness to bilateral patella and bruising to her hand. Resident #3 had a third fall on 2/21/2023 at 8:10 PM and sustained small half dollar shaped red/bruised area to both kneecaps. Resident #3 had an unwitnessed fall in her room on 2/27/2023. Resident #3 had 5 falls during 2/2023. 3 of 5 falls resulted in injury. Review of the Safety Events revealed Resident #3 had an unwitnessed fall in her room on 3/6/2023 at 3:14 AM and sustained bruising on both knees. Resident #3 had an unwitnessed fall in her room on 3/11/2023, and sustained bruising to her left wrist. Resident #3 had 2 falls during 3/2023. 2 of 2 falls resulted in injury. Review of the Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident #3 had a BIMS score of 4, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. Continued review revealed Resident #3 required extensive assistance of two plus person physical assist for bed mobility, transfers, dressing, toileting, personal hygiene, and was totally dependent for locomotion on and off unit and bathing. Further review revealed Resident #3 had 2 falls with no injury and 2 falls with injury since prior assessment. Review of the Safety Events revealed Resident #3 rolled out of bed while Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) was in the process of changing the resident on 4/3/2023 and sustained a skin tear to her right hand. Resident #3 had an unwitnessed fall off low bed to fall mat on 4/13/2023. Resident #3 had been restless, agitated, talking loudly, delusional, and seeing men in her room prior to the fall. Resident #3 had an unwitnessed fall on 4/29/2023, and sustained skin tear on left forearm. Resident #3 had 3 falls during 4/2023. 2 of 3 falls resulted in injury. Review of the Safety Events revealed Resident #3 was found lying on the ground in front of her geriatric chair (a large, padded chair that can be reclined for comfort) while sitting at nurses' station on 5/6/2023 at 11:25 PM and sustained a large hematoma to her right forehead, eye orbit, and temple. Resident #3 had an unwitnessed fall in her room on 5/9/2023. Resident #3 was found in the floor after an unwitnessed fall in her room on 5/16/2023. Resident #3 was found sitting with her back by the bed after an unwitnessed fall in her room on 5/25/2023. Resident #3 had 4 unwitnessed falls during 5/2023. 1 of 4 falls resulted in injury. Review of the Safety Events revealed Resident #3 was found on the floor next to her bed after an unwitnessed fall on 6/4/2023. Resident #3 was found sitting beside her bed after an unwitnessed fall on 6/11/2023. Resident #3 was found sitting in floor after an unwitnessed fall in her room on 6/16/2023. Resident #3 was found on the floor in her room after an unwitnessed fall on 6/18/2023. Resident #3 had bruising under her left eye the following day on 6/19/2023. Resident #3 had an unwitnessed fall in her room on 6/21/2023. Resident #3 had 5 unwitnessed falls in her room during 6/2023. Review of the Psychiatric Progress Notes dated 6/19/2023 revealed, .[Resident #3] tells writer that there are 'two men' in her room .they have been there all morning and is unsure why they are in her room or how they got there .Discussed VH [visual hallucinations] with her and she admits that sometimes her mind plays tricks on her .she [Resident #3-with severe cognitive impairment] agrees to believe staff if they tell her there is no one in her room . Review of the Safety Events revealed Resident #3 had an unwitnessed fall in her room and sustained 2 small bruises on each patella with bilateral knee pain, bruising to left hand on 2nd, 3rd, and 4th fingers at knuckle on 7/2/2023. An X-ray was obtained on 7/3/2023, results were positive for a fracture to right hip. Resident #3 had an unwitnessed fall in her room on 7/5/2023. A CNA heard Resident #3's clip on alarm and was unable to answer the alarm in time to prevent the fall. Resident was placed back in bed without further intervention. Resident #3 had unwitnessed fall in her room on 7/21/2023. Resident #3 had 3 falls during 7/2023. 1 of 3 falls resulted in major injury. Review of the Progress Notes for Resident #3 dated 8/6/2023 revealed, .Patient confused and climbing out of bed. Delusional, crying . Review of the Safety Events revealed Resident #3 had an unwitnessed fall in her room on 8/12/2023. Resident #3 had an unwitnessed fall in her room on 8/14/2023 and sustained bruising on her left knee with bilateral knee pain. Resident #3 had 2 falls during 8/2023. 2 of 2 falls resulted in injury. Review of the comprehensive care plan for Resident #3 dated 9/15/2023, revealed, .Transfer via [by way of] [named mechanical lift] and 2 person assist . Review of the Progress Notes for Resident #3 dated 9/21/2023 revealed, .pt having inc [increase] behaviors, crying and trying to get out of chair, explaining pt that there is no man, reassuring pt she is safe but unable to reorient her .PRN [as needed] diazepam [antianxiety medication given for anxiety] . Review of the Psychiatric Progress Note for Resident #3 dated 9/21/2023 revealed, .She tells writer that she did not sleep well last night but she cannot tell me why she had difficulty sleeping .She has periods of increased confusion, agitation, aggression and crying spells .Nursing report that she had increased behaviors last night with crying, trying to get out of her chair and talking about a 'man' . Review of the Safety Events revealed Resident #3 had an unwitnessed fall in her room on 9/1/2023, and was confused, agitated, and unable to be redirected. Resident #3 had a witnessed fall from her chair while sitting in front of the nursing station on 9/2/2023. Resident #3's clip alarm sounded upon nurse entering the room, resident was up unassisted. The nurse was unable to get to resident in time and resident sat upright on fall mat on 9/25/2023. Review of the Progress Notes for Resident #3 dated 9/28/2023 revealed, .4:49 PM Pt seen by NP [Nurse Practitioner], has shingles. Contact precautions initiated . Review of the Progress Notes for Resident #3 dated 9/29/2023 revealed, .1:50 PM .Pt requires private room isolation for shingles-pt has cognitive deficit and does not understand precautions. She is not able to understand to avoid picking at skin and then touching other surfaces, roommate, or other people. Staff attempt to keep areas covered but pt is able to self-remove and adjust coverings. All care and services provided in pt's private room . Resident #3, a severely cognitively impaired resident with a history of multiple unwitnessed falls with injury, was relocated for isolation purposes to a room that was approximately 38 feet from the nurse station which was located on a separate hall. Review of the Safety Events revealed Resident #3 was up unassisted in her room and a CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) walked in and had to lower her to the floor on 9/30/2023 at 8:00 AM. Resident #3 was placed back in the bed. Resident #3 had an unwitnessed fall in her room [ROOM NUMBER] hours later and sustained a large hematoma noted on her right lower extremity (RLE) with pain rated 8 out of 10 (pain scale of 1-10 with 10 being the highest pain level) in her leg. Resident #3's injuries required transfer to the local emergency room for evaluation. Review of Hospital #1's History and Physical dated 9/30/2023 for Resident #3 revealed, .medical history of dementia .paroxysmal A-Fib [Atrial Fibrillation] on Eliquis [blood thinner], history of DVT/PE [Deep Vein Thrombosis/Pulmonary Embolism] present from nursing home to hospital after a fall .patient was in shingle isolation at nursing home, had unwitnessed fall this morning. Nursing facility states they are unsure what happened exactly .Patient is requiring high amount of pain medication for leg pain .Reviewed CT [Computed Tomography] scan including CTA [Computed Tomography Angiography] lower extremity right showed large hematoma .ongoing small arterial bleeding [most severe and urgent type of bleeding which can result from a penetrating injury or blunt trauma] .Hematoma of right lower leg .Primary diagnosis is an acute or chronic illness with a high risk disease process that poses a threat to life or bodily function in the near term without treatment .Dementia .Severe, oriented to person. Also has sundowning . Review of Hospital #1's Consult Notes dated 10/1/2023 for Resident #3 revealed, .She came in from a nursing home status post a fall .history, she sustained an unwitnessed fall because she was in insolation [isolation] secondary to a shingles diagnosis. She is on Eliquis for Afib .physical examination today .right lower extremity has a 15cm [centimeter] x [by] 10 cm hematoma along the medial calf with serous blisters .fall was unwitnessed .facility states they are unsure of when it exactly happened .CTA was ordered and showed a hematoma measuring 22cm x 11.4cm x 6.5cm with multiple areas of contrast with ongoing bleeding . Review of a pictures provided by Family Member (FM) G dated 10/3/2023 at 11:24 AM, (3 days after Resident #3's fall at facility) revealed a large hematoma with swelling noted covering the top of her right lower leg. A picture dated 10/8/2023 at 2:09 PM revealed, the hematoma was black in color with the appearance of necrotic tissue. Review of medical records revealed Resident #3 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Safety Events revealed Resident #3 had an unwitnessed fall in her room on 10/9/2023. Review of the comprehensive care plan for Resident #3 dated 10/9/2023, revealed .Pt recently returned from hospital and is in new room closer to nurses station; reorient to new environment . (Resident #3 had severe cognitive impairment) Review of a picture provided by FM G dated 10/10/2023 at 1:08 PM, revealed a circular bruise to Resident #3's lower left leg. Review of the Safety Events revealed a nurse heard Resident #3's clip alarm going off and Resident #3 was found sitting on her buttocks after an unwitnessed fall in her room on 10/11/2023. Review of the comprehensive care plan for Resident #3 dated 10/11/2023, revealed, .Encourage pt to sit in common areas such as nurses station, tv [television] room while up in chair to increase staff supervision . Resident #3 with dementia and was totally dependent on a mechanical lift and 2-person assist could not be encouraged but rather needed staff assistance to stay in common areas for closer staff supervision. Resident #3 had 28 unwitnessed falls in her room before 10/11/2023. Review of the Progress Notes dated 10/15/2023 at 12:27 AM revealed, Resident #3 had moments of confusion and hallucinations. Resident #3 stated that a fire was nearby and able to each the building. Review of the Safety Events revealed on 10/15/2024 at 12:45 AM, Resident #3's bed alarm sounded. Resident #3 had increased anxiety and confusion and staff noted she wanted to get out of bed because a fire was approaching. Review of the Safety Events revealed on 10/17/2023, .CNA was getting ready to transfer pt to her chair and when she turned her back to but [put] the pad in the chair pt slide out of low bed onto the mat with her buttocks . Resident #3 was care planned for use of a mechanical lift with 2 persons for all transfers. The event note above does not indicate a second person available for transfers present in the room. Review of the comprehensive care plan for Resident #3 revealed, .10/17/2023 .When pt anxious and agitated use x2 staff assistance with ADL [Activities of Daily Living] care . Resident #3 had an unwitnessed fall in her room on 10/18/2023. Resident #3 was found lying face down and tilted to right side at foot of geri chair. Resident #3 had skin tear to left elbow and bruising to inner right forearm. On 10/20/2023, CNA walked into Resident #3's room and resident was found lying on mat beside bed. Review of a picture provided by FM G dated 10/23/2023 at 10:12 AM, revealed Resident #3's clip alarm was unattached from the resident, lying next to the TV. Review of the Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident #3 had a BIMS score of 4, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. Resident #3 had functional limitation in range of motion in upper and lower extremities on both sides. Resident #3 was dependent for toileting, upper and lower body dressing, personal hygiene, roll left and right, and chair/bed-to-chair transfer. Resident #3 had an acute diagnosis of Contusion of right lower leg. Resident #3 had 1 fall with no injury and 1 fall with injury since the prior assessment.?Resident #3 had a bed alarm used less than daily. Review of a picture provided by FM G dated 10/26/2023 at 1:53 PM, Resident #3's clip alarm was laying on top of sheets not clipped to anything. During an interview on 7/29/2023 at 4:00 PM, the Social Service Director (SSD) stated, .I do remember the daughter having concerns about the fall with injury, but I really don't remember the details . Observation on the 100 hall on 7/31/2024 at 3:00 PM, revealed room [ROOM NUMBER]B (the room Resident #3 was relocated to for isolation and had a fall with a major injury on 9/30/2023), was the last room on the hall approximately 38 feet from the nurse station which was located on a separate hall. During a telephone interview on 7/29/2024 at 7:30 PM, FM G stated, .[Resident #3] fell out of bed .it caused a big hematoma .she had to have several surgeries to debride it .the facility couldn't tell me how long she had been in the floor .it never healed up .she was in severe pain every time they changed the bandage .I never could get an explanation out of them [facility staff] .when I would come to visit her the alarm was either on the table or not hooked up to her gown .I never saw [Resident #3] remove it .I would go in and they wouldn't have it hooked up .after all this happened [fall with Arterial Bleed] the staff wouldn't get [Resident #3] up and she just got worse .I talked to the Director of Nursing and the Administrator .I never seen anything improve and then they put her in that back corner in the rehab part to isolate her because they thought she had shingles .[Resident #3] was supposed to have a low bed but it wasn't always in the low position .she just kept declining and then she passed away . Review of pictures provided by FM G revealed undated pictures of Resident #3 with bruising noted to her right temple area close to her hair line, above her right eye, down the right side of her face, and bruising to back of ear and down her neck. FM G stated, I lost some of my phone information, but that picture was taken around 9/2023. During an interview on 7/31/2023 at 4:25 PM, MDS Coordinator/Quality Assurance (QA) Nurse stated, . [Named Resident #3] had severe dementia, very restless .was dependent with transfers .the care plan on admission has assist with ADLs per patient needs and preferences .[Resident #3] was impulsive on her own and her range of motion was impaired . The MDS Coordinator/QA Nurse reviewed the therapy notes and confirmed Resident #3 was dependent for transfers with a mechanical lift using 2 persons. The MDS Coordinator/QA Nurse stated nursing staff could review care plans in the computer and she expected staff to follow interventions related to resident care. During an interview on 7/31/2024 at 5:15 PM, the Physical Therapist (PT) stated, .her [Resident #3] transfer during the evaluation was a [Named mechanical lift] with 2 assist .she had limitation in her range of motion in her lower extremities and could not hold a movement .when we saw her in 7/2023, we recommended use of a [Named mechanical lift] . During an interview on 7/31/2024 at 5:20 PM, CNA K confirmed Resident #3 was a fall risk and required use of a mechanical lift using 2 persons assist for transfer. During an interview on 7/31/2024 at 5:30 PM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) L stated, .the CNAs and nurses can look in the computer at the care plan to see how much assistance a resident need with care .you always need 2 people if you are getting someone up with a lift . During an interview on 7/31/2024 at 5:35 PM, CNA M stated, .I cared for [Named Resident #3] .She would try to get up without help .very restless . During an interview on 7/31/2024 at 8:50 PM, CNA N stated, .I was charting when I heard [Named Resident #3]'s bed alarm sound, when I opened the door, she was in the floor .a bruise was on her right leg where she hit the table .I know she had to hit the overbed table because it was beside the bed .the table was scooted across the floor in front of her . During an interview on 8/1/2023 at 11:00 AM, LPN I stated, .I was here the day she [Resident #3] fell [9/30/2023] .the 8:00 AM fall, [Resident #3] said she was getting up to get something out of the dresser .the CNA found her up and had to lower her to the ground .the second fall happened in her room .she was found on the floor .when I assessed her, the right leg had started getting red and swelling . During a telephone interview on 8/1/2024 at 1:54 PM, FM O stated, .the facility called me when [Resident #3] had the fall 9/30/2023 .[Resident #3] got at the ER about the same time I did .she was shaking and hurting so bad .[Resident #3] said she laid in the floor and hollered for help .[Resident #3] was crying and said I didn't think they would come get me .she was begging for someone to come kill her she was hurting so bad .they had to sedate her in the ER .She was in that room all the way at the end of the hall away from the nurse's desk with the door closed .she had so many falls since she had been there .the Administrator called me the next day .she couldn't tell me how long she laid in the floor or what time for sure it happened . During a telephone interview on 8/1/2023 at 2:00 PM, CNA P stated, .I was told when I came in after [Named Resident #3] fell [9/30/2023], she had been trying to get up and they found her in the floor and the staff didn't know how long she had been in the floor .I found her clip alarm not clipped several times .I would tell them her alarm wasn't on .the staff was very aware of her fall risk . During a telephone interview on 8/1/2024 at 2:28 PM, the Activity Staff stated, .I done some in room stuff with [Named Resident #3] she didn't come to group activities much .I don't remember any meetings we had where they discussed a specific activity plan for her .I just encouraged her to come to group activities . During an interview on 8/2/2024 at 8:40 AM, Medical Director stated, .[Named Resident #3] had Afib that is why she was on Eliquis [blood thinner] .constantly trying to get up, [Resident #3] just couldn't remember she couldn't walk anymore and needed help .the hematoma was a complication from the Eliquis .I vaguely remember her being put on isolation .dementia was a contributing factor .she was placed in a room at the end of the hall to limit the people going by the room . The Medical Director was asked why he felt limiting people going by the room would be necessary to stop the spread of Shingles. The Medical Director stated, .it was a reasonable decision to make .it's more commonly spread by touch .less traffic better idea . The Medical Director was asked if a special focus, trending, or tracking was performed for Resident #3 since she had numerous falls with injuries. The Medical Director stated, .I can't recall .falls happen no way to prevent falls . During an interview on 8/2/2024 at 4:30 PM, the Administrator was asked if the facility considered placing the resident in isolation so far from the nurse's station could have contributed to her falls. The Administrator stated, .the family met with us after the fall, and they voiced concerns about her being moved at the end of the hall, we moved her back closer to the nurse's desk . The Administrator was asked if the Interdisciplinary Team had performed any tracking, trending, root cause analysis, or developed a specific activity plan related to Resident #3's multiple (over 30) unwitnessed falls in her room, with various injuries (including two major injuries). The Administrator stated, .just what we have given you and what is in the chart .I don't know of anything else .she was on a low bed, fall mat, everything was in place already .she was never transferred out to the psych unit . During an interview on 8/2/2024 at 4:45 PM, the Interim DON was asked to review Resident #3's care plan and her fall event for 10/17/2023. The Interim DON confirmed Resident #3 required use of a mechanical lift with 2 persons assist. The Interim DON stated the CNA was trying to prepare to transfer Resident #3 on 10/17/2023 when the resident slid off the bed and stated, .I think any fall could be prevented with another person but maybe she was just getting her ready .
Feb 2020 3 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Resident Rights (Tag F0550)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on medical record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to treat 1 of 20 residents (Resident #25) reviewe...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on medical record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to treat 1 of 20 residents (Resident #25) reviewed for indwelling urinary catheters with dignity related to not covering the resident's indwelling urinary catheter drainage bag with a privacy cover. The findings include: Review of the medical record, showed Resident #25 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Pressure Ulcer of Left Buttock Stage 3, Paraplegia, and Neuromuscular Dysfunction of Bladder. Review of the Physician Order Report for Resident #25, showed .Suprapubic Catheter change Q [every] month on the 8th and PRN [as needed] . Observation in the resident's room on 2/18/2020 at 3:49 PM and on 2/19/2020 at 8:32 AM, showed Resident #25's indwelling urinary catheter bag was placed on the right side of bed facing the door, without a privacy cover. During an interview conducted on 2/18/2020 at 4:28 PM, Licensed Practical Nurse #1 confirmed Resident #25's indwelling urinary catheter bag was not placed in a privacy cover. During an interview conducted on 2/18/2020 at 4:39 PM, the Director of Nursing stated that her expectations were for the indwelling urinary catheter bags to be placed in a privacy cover while residents were up and about and when the catheter bags were facing the door when the residents were in their rooms.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on facility policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to prevent abuse for 2 of 2 residents...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on facility policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to prevent abuse for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #47 and Resident #60) involved in a resident to resident altercation. The findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Patient Protection and Response Policy for Allegations/Incidents of Abuse, Neglect, Misappropriation of Property and Exploitation, revised 12/11/2017, showed physical abuse included slapping, pinching, and kicking. Review of the medical record, showed Resident #47 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Vascular Dementia with Behavioral Disturbances, Mood Disorder, and Cognitive Communication deficit. Review of the medical record, Quarterly Mininmum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] showed Resident #47 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 99 indicating severe cognitive impairment. Review of the medical record, showed Resident #60 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Dementia without Behavioral Distrubances, and Adjustment Disorder with Depressed Mood. Review of the Quarterly MDS dated [DATE], showed Resident #60 had a BIMS score of 3 indicating severe cognitive impairment. Review of the facility investigation dated 11/4/2019, showed Resident #47 was found in Resident #60's room rearranging the sheets on Resident #60's bed. Continued review showed the actions of Resident #47 scared Resident #60 and she grabbed Resident #47's hands which caused a skin tear to her right hand. Resident #60 had an X-ray of the right 5th digit because of pain due to physical contact with Resident #47. During an interview conducted on 2/19/2020 at 8:35 AM, Family Member #2 stated, [named Resident #47] was aggressive and wandered into other resident's rooms and fought with other residents. During an interview conducted on 2/19/2020 at 3:48 PM, Certified Nurse Aid (CNA) #3 stated she was walking to the dining room around 8:00 PM or 9:00 PM and she heard [named Resident #60] yell help. When she entered [named Resident #60's] room [named Resident #60] was lying in bed and [Named Resident #47] was standing over [named Resident #60] and her wheel chair was right behind her. [named Resident #47] had [named Resident #60's] blankets in her hands. Resident #60 was grabbing the blankets and also grabbed [named Resident #47's] hands. During an interview conducted on 2/20/2020 at 4:40 PM, Social Worker #2 stated [named Resident #47] got easily annoyed. During an interview conducted on 2/20/2020 at 5:22 PM, the Director Of Nursing confirmed there was a physical altercation between Resident #47 and Resident #60 which resulted in a skin tear for Resident #47 and pain to the right hand resulting in a need for an Xray for Resident #60.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0657 (Tag F0657)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on facility policy review, medical record review, and interview the facility failed to revise a care plan for 1 of 52 resi...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on facility policy review, medical record review, and interview the facility failed to revise a care plan for 1 of 52 residents (Resident #47) reviewed for behaviors. The findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Care Plan Development, revised 7/3/2008, showed care plans were updated as needed, and on quarterly basis within 7 days of completion of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment. Review of the medical record, showed Resident #47 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Vascular Dementia with Behavioral Disturbances, Mood Disorder, and Cognitive Communication deficit. Review of the medical record, Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] showed Resident #47 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score 99 indicating severe cognitive impairment. Continued review showed Resident #47 had behaviors of wandering, hitting, kicking, pushing, scratching, and grabbing others. Review of the care plan dated 7/1/2019, 11/4/2019, and 11/7/2019 showed no new behavior interventions for Resident #47. Review of the facility investigation dated 11/4/2019 showed Resident #47 was found in Resident #60's room rearranging the sheets on Resident #60's bed. Continued review showed the actions of Resident #47 scared Resident #60 and she grabbed Resident #47's hands which caused a skin tear the right hand. Resident #60 had an X-ray of the right 5th digit because of pain due to physical contact with Resident #47. During an interview conducted on 2/20/2020 at 4:40 PM, Social Worker #2 confirmed the behavioral care plan for Resident #47 was not updated to reflect behaviors prior to the resident to resident incident on 11/3/2019.
Feb 2018 9 deficiencies 2 Harm
SERIOUS (G)

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Comprehensive Care Plan (Tag F0656)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on medical record review and interview, the facility failed to follow the interventions on the Comprehensive Care Plan for...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on medical record review and interview, the facility failed to follow the interventions on the Comprehensive Care Plan for 1 (Resident #81) of 39 residents reviewed. This failure resulted in actual Harm to the resident. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #81 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Parkinson's Disease, Dementia, Muscle Weakness and Difficulty in Walking. Medical record review of a Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #81 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status of 9 indicating she was moderately cognitively impaired. Continued review revealed the resident required assistance of 2 or more people for transfers and toileting. Medical record review of a Comprehensive Care Plan updated 8/23/17 and 11/13/17 revealed a problem of required assistance with activities of daily living. Continued review revealed an intervention to Assist patient with transfers using two person assist. Medical record review and interview with Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #6 on 2/28/18 at 3:50 PM by the East shower room door confirmed she was transferring Resident #81 alone when she fell into the bathtub on 12/15/17. Continued interview revealed the CNA was asked if the resident was ever a 2 person assist with transfers stated, She used to be, but she's gotten stronger and I try to let her do as much as she wants to. She gets anxious when you touch her and likes to do things herself. Interview with the Director of Nursing on 2/28/18 at 11:41 AM in the Administrator's office confirmed the resident was to be transferred with assistance of 2 or more people at the time of the fall on 12/15/17. Continued interview confirmed the facility failed to transfer Resident #81 with assistance of 2 people resulting in a sacral fracture (HARM)
SERIOUS (G)

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Medical record review of ER records dated 12/17/17 of the computerized tomography (CT) of the cervical spine revealed, No clear ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Medical record review of ER records dated 12/17/17 of the computerized tomography (CT) of the cervical spine revealed, No clear evidence of acute trauma to the cervical spine. CT of head revealed, No acute intracranial abnormality is evident .right posterior parietal/occipital scalp hematoma with overlying skin staples present. Interview with CNA #7 on 2/28/18 at 5:10 PM confirmed the resident was found sitting up on her buttocks in front of the sink with a laceration to the back of her head and small amount of bleeding. Telephone interview with Family Member #1 on 2/17/17 at 8:30 AM confirmed a family friend notified her Resident #285 had staples to the back of her head after a fall. (HARM). Based on medical record review, hospital records, facility post fall investigation and interview, the facility failed to prevent falls for 2 residents (#81 and #285) of 23 residents reviewed for falls. This failure resulted in actual Harm for Resident #81 and Resident #285. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #81 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Parkinson's Disease, Muscle Weakness and Difficulty in Walking. Medical record review of a Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #81 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 9 indicating she was moderately cognitively impaired. Continued review revealed the resident required assistance of 2 or more people for transfers and toileting. Medical record review of a Comprehensive Care Plan dated 8/23/17 and 11/13/17 revealed the resident required assistance with activities of daily living (ADL). Continued review revealed an intervention to Assist patient with transfers using two person assist. Medical record review of Post Falls Nursing assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #81 had a fall on 12/15/17 at 9:40 PM. Further review revealed, .PT [patient] was being transferred from toilet to wheelchair by CNA [Certified Nurse Assistant] CNA .CNA said while transferring the PT she pulled the wheelchair closer and PT got startled and let go of CNA and fell backwards into the bathtub on the left side and hit her shoulder . Continued review revealed the resident's position after the fall was .Sitting in bathtub, leaning to left, head against wall. Pain following the fall? Y [yes] .Pain Intensity: 07 .Immediate intervention was sending PT to hospital. Care plan intervention is transfer with gait belt . Medical record review of Nurse's Notes dated 12/16/17 at 1:55 AM revealed, .[At 9:40 PM] Pt. was being transferred by CNA .from toilet to wheelchair. During transfer Pt. fell into bathtub hit head and [left] shoulder .Family requested Pt. be sent to [hospital] .Pt left [at 11:00 PM]. Pt had bump on back of head [and] bruise on [left] shoulder, arm [and] hand . Medical record review of the Emergency Department (ED) record dated 12/16/17 revealed, .The pt family reports that she was in using the restroom when she told her caregiver that she was about to fall and they did not catch her as she fell backwards into the bathtub. She hit the back of her head, her L [left] shoulder and buttock on the bathtub. She complains of lower back pain .shoulder/hand pain and tailbone pain .Physical Examination .Head: On exam: Moderate, occipital, swelling, occipital hematoma no bleeding .Back: lower back tenderness .Musculoskeletal: No swelling, L shoulder tenderness .Radiology results .probable sacral fx [fracture] .Reexamination/Reevaluation .remaining sacral pain .Impression and Plan head injury, shoulder strain, sacral fx . Medical record review of the hospital report of the sacrum (a triangular bone in the lower back formed from fused vertebrae and situated between the two hipbones of the pelvis) and the coccyx (a small triangular bone at the base of the spinal column) dated 12/16/17 revealed, .Focal lucency [absorbing less radioactive energy] in the inferior third of the sacrum which is nonspecific, but does raise possibility of underlying nondisplaced sacral fracture .Osteopenia and degenerative spinal changes . Interview with CNA #6 on 2/28/18 at 3:50 PM by the East Shower Room door confirmed she was transferring Resident #81 without assistance when the resident fell into the bathtub on 12/15/17. Continued interview revealed the CNA#6 was asked if the resident was ever a 2 person assist with transfers and CNA #6 stated, She used to be, but she's gotten stronger and I try to let her do as much as she wants to. She gets anxious when you touch her and likes to do things herself. Further interview revealed the CNA #6 was asked if she used the gait belt to transfer the resident after the fall and CNA #6 stated, No. I guess I should because we have enough of them. Interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 2/28/18 at 11:41 AM in the Administrator's office confirmed the resident was to be transferred with assistance from 2 or more people at the time of the fall on 12/15/17. Continued interview confirmed the facility failed to transfer Resident #81 with assistance of 2 people resulting in and a sacral fracture (HARM). Medical record review revealed Resident #285 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including Muscle Weakness/Generalized, Depression, Osteoarthritis of Left Hip, Muscle Wasting and Atrophy, History of Falling, Osteoporosis, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Dementia, Anxiety Disorder, Morbid Obesity, Anemia, Chronic Pain, Recurrent Encephalopathy and Bursitis of Left and Right Hip. Medical Record review of the 14 day MDS dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 9 (indicating the resident was moderately impaired). Further review revealed the resident was extensive assist with 2 person for bed mobility, transfer, toilet use and personal hygiene. Continued review revealed Resident #285 was not steady, only able to stabilize with staff assistance for moving from seated to standing position, walking, turning around and facing opposite direction while walking, moving on and off toilet and surface to surface transfer (transfer between bed and chair or wheelchair). Medical record review of the Care Plan dated 12/4/17 revealed: Resident 285 at risk for falls with interventions including: call light in reach and bed in lowest position while in bed, educate on call light use; resident able to return demonstration due to Dementia may need additional reminders; and non-skid footwear on while up, keep area free of clutter. Intervention dated 12/6/17; low bed. Intervention dated 12/7/17: fall mat to both side of bed. Medical record review of the Post Falls Nursing assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #285 had a fall on 12/17/17 at 12:20 AM . Further review revealed PT [Patient] was found sitting in front of bathroom sink. Continued review revealed .Pt has a small laceration on the back of the head with small amount of bleeding .A bandage was put on it and then the head was wrapped .upon assessment Pt has a sluggish pupil response and her SBP [Systolic Blood Pressure] was 99 which was lower than normal. The doctor was called and gave the order to send to the ER (Emergency Room) for eval (evaluation). Pt was sent to ER for eval. Further review revealed: Describe task: patient attempting at time of fall: Ambulating in room unattended. Location of incident: Patients room. Safety device in use: Patient was wearing footwear. Pain following the fall? Y [YES]. Pain intensity: 06. Immediate intervention: Send to ER. Medical record review of Emergency Department (ER) records dated 12/17/17 revealed, The patient presents following a fall. Staff states the patient fell backwards and struck her head on the ground at the nursing home. There was no report of loss of consciousness. Location: Left scalp lower extremity. The character of symptoms is bleeding. The degree at present is minimal. The exacerbating factor is movement. Risk factor consist of age and frequent falls. Additional history: She was just released from the hospital recently, with a history of frequent falls and dementia. Continued review revealed. Impression and Plan: Diagnosis: Head Injury, Scalp laceration, Fall mechanical .Plan: Condition: Stable. Disposition: discharged to nursing home. Medical record review of ER records dated 12/17/17 of the computerized tomography (CT) of the cervical spine revealed, No clear evidence of acute trauma to the cervical spine. CT of the head revealed, No acute intracranial abnormality is evident . right posterior parietal/occipital scalp hematoma with overlying skin staples present. Interview with CNA #7 on 2/28/18 at 5:10 PM confirmed the resident was found sitting up on her buttocks in front of the sink with a laceration to the back of her head and a small amount of bleeding. Review of the Facility Post Fall Investigation for revealed a telephone interview with Family Member #1 on 2/17/17 at 8:30 AM confirmed a family friend notified her. The facility failed to supervise Resident #285 which had a hisory of being a high risk for falls resulting in a fall with injury with staples to the back of her head. (HARM).
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Safe Environment (Tag F0584)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on review of facility policy, observation, and interview, the facility failed to maintain a safe and orderly environment i...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on review of facility policy, observation, and interview, the facility failed to maintain a safe and orderly environment in 1 resident room of 50 resident rooms on the first floor. Findings include: Review of facility policy,Housekeeping Cleaning Schedule, Daily undated revealed .Patient Rooms .Damp dust all horizontal and vertical surfaces of patient furniture .Remove clutter and arrange furniture neatly .Damp dust all light fixtures, window sills, blinds, etc. with disinfectant solution .Spot clean walls . Observation of room [ROOM NUMBER] on 2/27/18 at 12:09 PM revealed an unsampled resident in bed near the door with a BIMS( Brief Interview of Mental Status) of 99 and none interviewable. Continued observation revealed the resident's family member was sitting in a chair. Further observation revealed there was narrow access around the resident's bed. Continued observation revealed multiple items were present in the room in cardboard boxes and plastic totes lining all of the walls around the perimeter of the room extending into the normal walkway and the entire area was extremely cluttered. Observation revealed a bed was in the corner of the room with cardboard and plastic containers, creating only a narrow access around the bed to bathroom, sink and commode. Boxes were lining all the walls around the perimeter extending into the walkway; the shower also had boxes stacked from the floor to the ceiling. Observations of room [ROOM NUMBER] on 2/27/18 at 3:00 PM and 2/28/18 11:00 AM revealed the same continued cluttered and unsafe environment. Interview with Registered Nurse (RN) #3 at the [NAME] Nurse station on 2/28 12:00 PM revealed several staff members had asked the resident's family to remove the clutter, boxes, etc. and she would not comply with the request. Continued interview with RN #3 states it was s safety issue for the resident with all the clutter in the room and having to walk around the multiple objects presents a unsafe environment. Interview with Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) #5 on 2/27/18 at 1:00 PM at the [NAME] Nurse's Station revealed it was difficult to care for the resident with all the clutter and get around the narrow pathways in the room. Interview with RN #4/Unit Manager on 2/27/18 at 1:07 PM at the [NAME] Nurse's station revealed the staff was unable to keep a safe physical environment due to the refusal by the resident's family member. Interview with Environmental Services Technician #1 on 2/27/18 at 1:21 PM in the hall near room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed the resident's family member refused to allow staff to organize or clean the resident's room with cleaning supplies. Interview with the Administrator on 2/28/18 at 2:38 PM in her office confirmed the resident's room was not kept in a sanitary, orderly, and safe manner.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0657 (Tag F0657)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on medical record review and interview, the facility failed to revise the Care Plan for 1 Resident # 285 of 39 Resident Ca...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on medical record review and interview, the facility failed to revise the Care Plan for 1 Resident # 285 of 39 Resident Care Plans reviewed. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #285 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Muscle Weakness/Generalized, Depression, Osteoarthritis of Left Hip, Muscle Wasting and Atrophy, History of Falling, Osteoporosis, Dementia, Morbid Obesity, Anemia, Chronic Pain, Recurrent Encephalopathy and Bursitis of Left and Right Hip. Medical record review of the care plan dated 12/4/17 revealed: Resident #285 was at risk for falls with interventions including: call light in reach and bed in lowest position while in bed, educate on call light use; resident able to return demonstration due to Dementia may need additional reminders, non-skid footwear on while up, and keep area free of clutter. Continued review of the careplan revealed an intervention dated 12/6/17: and on 12/7/17 fall mats to both sides of the bed. Medical record review of the Care Plan dated 12/4/17 revealed the resident to be at risk fo fall. Continued review revealed interventions were not revised after 12/17/17 fall. Interview with the Director of Nursing on 2/27/18 at 2:40 PM in the Director of Nursing office, confirmed the facility failed to update the care plan for Resident #285 after fall on 12/17/17.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on review of facility policy, observation, and interview, the facility dietary department failed to dispose of expired food and failed to maintain dietary equipment in a sanitary manner in 2 of ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on review of facility policy, observation, and interview, the facility dietary department failed to dispose of expired food and failed to maintain dietary equipment in a sanitary manner in 2 of 6 observations. Findings include: Review of the facility policy Refrigerator and Freezer Storage, dated 11/2017 revealed .Commercially prepared .Salad ( .pimento .) .Storage Time Manufacturer's expiration date or 7 days after opening (whichever comes first) .Special Instructions .date when opened and with use by date. Cheese .Storage Time Manufacturer's expiration date or best if used by date .Special Instructions .if removed from the original packaging, date with expiration date or best if used by date . Observation on 2/26/18 beginning at 8:59 AM in the dietary department with the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) present revealed the walk-in refrigerator had a container of pimento cheese dated 2/17. Interview with the CDM on 2/26/18 beginning at 8:59 AM in the dietary department walk-in refrigerator confirmed the pimento cheese was dated 2/17. Further interview revealed when asked what the facility policy was regarding how long they keep opened food or leftovers, the CDM stated .throw out after 7 days . Observation on 2/27/18 beginning at 12:45 PM with Registered Dietitian (RD) #1 and the CDM present revealed 5 of 8 hood filters with greasy debris present, 5 of 6 protective glass hood light covers with an accumulation of debris on the interior and exterior of the cover. Further observation revealed the side splash guard of the grill had an accumulation of blackened debris. Interview with RD #1 and CDM on 2/27/18 beginning at 12:45 PM in the dietary department confirmed the dietary department failed to maintain the hood filters, hood light covers, and the side splash guard of the grill in a sanitary manner.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Room Equipment (Tag F0908)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation and interview, the facility dietary department failed to maintain the hood lights in an operating condition in 2 of 6 observations. Findings include: Observation on 2/27/18 beginn...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation and interview, the facility dietary department failed to maintain the hood lights in an operating condition in 2 of 6 observations. Findings include: Observation on 2/27/18 beginning at 12:45 PM and on 2/28/18 at 2:15 PM in the dietary department with Registered Dietitian (RD) #1 and the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) present revealed 5 of 6 lights in the hood over the production equipment were not operating. Interview with RD #1 and the CDM on 2/27/18 beginning at 12:45 PM in the dietary department confirmed the facility failed to have the hood lights maintained in an operating condition.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Grievances (Tag F0585)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on review of facility policy, review of the Grievance Log and interview, the facility failed to address reported greivances and failed to confirm or take corrective action regarding the facility...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on review of facility policy, review of the Grievance Log and interview, the facility failed to address reported greivances and failed to confirm or take corrective action regarding the facility findings and conclusions. Findings include: Review of facility policy, Grievance Procedure, dated 11/2016 revealed . the person with the grievance could contact various entities to report an allegation. Further review revealed no information addressing what the facility process was to address and document the grievance, including a summary statement of the resident's grievance, the steps taken to investigate the grievance, a summary of the pertinent findings or conclusions regarding the resident's concerns, a statement as to whether the grievance was confirmed or not confirmed, any corrective action taken or to be taken by the facility as a result of the grievance, and the date the written decision was issued. Review of the facility grievance log dated12/2017 through 1/2018 revealed the facility failed to include the specific concern/grievance, the investigation steps taken, a summary of the conclusion, a statement if the concern was confirmed or not or a dated written decision. Interview with the Social Services Director on 2/27/18 at 2:25 PM in the conference room confirmed the facility had no documentation to show the summary of the pertinent findings or conclusions regarding the resident's concerns; whether the grievance was confirmed or not confirmed, any corrective action taken or to be taken by the facility or a date written decision was issued. Further interview revealed .After I'm done with the investigation and put information on the log, I dispose of all the paperwork . Interview with the Administrator and the Administrator-in-Training on 2/27/18 at 4:30 PM in the conference room, confirmed the facility failed to provide a summary of the pertinent findings or conclusions regarding the resident's concerns, a statement as to whether the grievance was confirmed or not confirmed, any corrective action taken or to be taken by the facility as a result of the grievance, or a written decision. Interview with the Regional Social Worker on 2/27/18 at 5:20 PM in the and conference room, when asked about the Resident's concerns on 12/8/17 and 12/17/17 from the grievance log, the Regional Social Worker stated .I don't know . Further interview when asked how the facility would track Resident concerns yielded no response from the Administrator or the Regional Social Worker.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Assessment Accuracy (Tag F0641)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on medical record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the (Mininmum Data Set) accurately reflected the res...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on medical record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the (Mininmum Data Set) accurately reflected the residents state of the assessment reference date for 5 hospice resident (#24, #52, #60, #81, #106) of 11 hospice residents reviewed. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #24 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Dementia, Hypertension and Abnormal Weight Loss. Medical record review of the Hospice Certification of Terminal Illness form revealed Resident #24 was admitted to hospice services on 9/13/17. Medical record review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident #24 revealed hospice services was not captured on the assessment. Medical record review revealed Resident #52 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Congestive Heart Failure, Cardiomyopathy, Muscle Wasting, Muscular Dystrophy, Hypertension and Adult Failure To Thrive. Medical record review of the Hospice Certification of Terminal Illness form revealed Resident #52 was admitted to hospice services on 10/1/17. Medical record review of the Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] for Resident #52 revealed hospice services was not captured on the assessment. Medical record review revealed Resident #106 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's Disease, Chronic Kidney Disease, Protein-Calorie Malnutrition and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Medical record review of the Hospice Certification of Terminal Illness form revealed Resident #106 was admitted to hospice services on 5/24/17. Medical record review of the Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] for Resident #106 revealed hospice was not captured on the assessment. Interview with Registered Nurse (RN) #5/MDS Coordinator on 2/28/18 at 3:42 PM in her office confirmed Residents #24, #52, and #106 were receiving hospice services. Continued interview confirmed the facility failed to accurately assess each resident as having hospice services on their individual MDS. Medical record review revealed Resident #81 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Palliative Care, Parkinson's Disease, Dementia, Psychotic Disorder with Delusions and Resistance to Multiple Antibiotics. Medical record review of the Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident #81 was assessed as receiving hospice services. Medical record review of a Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident #81 was not receiving hospice services. Medical record review of a Hospice Contact Information form revealed Resident #81 .has elected his or her Hospice benefit starting 4/7/17 . Interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #3 on 2/27/18 at 8:30 AM in the East Nurse Station confirmed Resident #81 had been receiving hospice services for several months. Interview with RN #5/MDS Coordinator on 2/27/18 at 9:40 AM in the East Nurse's station confirmed the facility failed to capture hospice services for Resident #81 on the Quarterly MDS dated [DATE]. Medical record review revealed Resident #60 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including, Sequelae of Cerebral Infarction, (an aftereffect of a disease, condition, or injury), Vascular Dementia with Behavioral Disturbances, Anxiety, Psychotic Disorder with Delusions, Anorexia, Diabetes Mellitus Type 2, Congestive Heart Failure, and Spondylosis. Medical record review revealed hospice services were ordered for Resident #60 on 10/10/17. Further review revealed no order for the discontinuation of the hospice service. Medical record review of the Hospice Certification of Terminal Illness revealed Resident #60's was admitted to hospice services on 10/9/17. Medical record review of the Significant Change MDS dated [DATE] revealed hospice services were provided while the resident was in the facility. Medical record review of the Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed hospice services was not captured on the assessment for Resident # 60. Interview with RN #5/MDS Coordinator on 2/28/18 at 11:58 AM in the conference room confirmed the facility failed to accurately assess the hospice status on the Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] for Resident #60.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0800 (Tag F0800)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on review of the therapeutic diet spread sheet, observation and interview, the facility dietary department staff failed to serve food at the portion specified on the therapeutic diet spreadsheet...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on review of the therapeutic diet spread sheet, observation and interview, the facility dietary department staff failed to serve food at the portion specified on the therapeutic diet spreadsheet for 16 residents of 141 residents receiving a meal tray. Findings include: Review of the therapeutic diet spreadsheet for Week 1 Day Monday dated 2/26/18 revealed Regular and Mechanical Soft textured diets were to receive 1 cup (8 ounces) pasta and 4 ounces (oz) of meat sauce. Further review revealed the pureed textured diets were to receive 6 oz of pureed pasta and 4 oz of pureed meat sauce. Observation on 2/26/18 beginning at 11:23 AM of the dietary department resident mid-day meal trayline service with Registered Dietitian (RD) #1 present revealed the dietary staff member serving 4 ounces (oz) of pasta and 4 oz of meat sauce. Further observation revealed the dietary staff member serving 6 oz of the combined pureed pasta and pureed meat sauce for the first meal cart served and 3 pureed textured diets served in the main dining room. Interview with RD #1 on 2/26/18 beginning at 11:23 AM at the dietary department resident mid-day meal trayline confirmed the facility failed to serve the food portion per the therapeutic spreadsheet for 16 residents of 141 residents reviewed.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "Why is there high staff turnover? How do you retain staff?"
  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Tennessee facilities.
Concerns
  • • 16 deficiencies on record, including 2 serious (caused harm) violations. Ask about corrective actions taken.
  • • 59% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
Bottom line: Mixed indicators with Trust Score of 60/100. Visit in person and ask pointed questions.

About This Facility

What is Nhc Healthcare, Murfreesboro's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns NHC HEALTHCARE, MURFREESBORO an overall rating of 4 out of 5 stars, which is considered above average nationally. Within Tennessee, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.

How is Nhc Healthcare, Murfreesboro Staffed?

CMS rates NHC HEALTHCARE, MURFREESBORO's staffing level at 3 out of 5 stars, which is average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 59%, which is 13 percentage points above the Tennessee average of 46%. High turnover can affect care consistency as new staff learn residents' individual needs.

What Have Inspectors Found at Nhc Healthcare, Murfreesboro?

State health inspectors documented 16 deficiencies at NHC HEALTHCARE, MURFREESBORO during 2018 to 2024. These included: 2 that caused actual resident harm and 14 with potential for harm. Deficiencies causing actual harm indicate documented cases where residents experienced negative health consequences.

Who Owns and Operates Nhc Healthcare, Murfreesboro?

NHC HEALTHCARE, MURFREESBORO is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by NATIONAL HEALTHCARE CORPORATION, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 181 certified beds and approximately 116 residents (about 64% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in MURFREESBORO, Tennessee.

How Does Nhc Healthcare, Murfreesboro Compare to Other Tennessee Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Tennessee, NHC HEALTHCARE, MURFREESBORO's overall rating (4 stars) is above the state average of 2.8, staff turnover (59%) is significantly higher than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (4 stars) is above the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Nhc Healthcare, Murfreesboro?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "How do you ensure continuity of care given staff turnover, and what is your staff retention strategy?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's high staff turnover rate.

Is Nhc Healthcare, Murfreesboro Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, NHC HEALTHCARE, MURFREESBORO has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 4-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Tennessee. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.

Do Nurses at Nhc Healthcare, Murfreesboro Stick Around?

Staff turnover at NHC HEALTHCARE, MURFREESBORO is high. At 59%, the facility is 13 percentage points above the Tennessee average of 46%. High turnover means new staff may not know residents' individual needs, medications, or preferences. It can also be disorienting for residents, especially those with dementia who rely on familiar faces. Families should ask: What is causing the turnover? What retention programs are in place? How do you ensure care continuity during staff transitions?

Was Nhc Healthcare, Murfreesboro Ever Fined?

NHC HEALTHCARE, MURFREESBORO has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.

Is Nhc Healthcare, Murfreesboro on Any Federal Watch List?

NHC HEALTHCARE, MURFREESBORO is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.