PARK REST HARDIN COUNTY HEALTH CENTER
Inspected within the last 6 months. Data reflects current conditions.
Park Rest Hardin County Health Center in Savannah, Tennessee has a Trust Grade of B, indicating it is a good choice for families looking for care; this grade suggests it is solid, but not exceptional. The facility ranks #147 out of 298 in Tennessee, placing it in the top half, and #3 out of 5 in Hardin County, meaning only two local options are rated higher. While the facility is improving, with issues decreasing from four to three in recent years, there are significant concerns about staffing; it has a low staffing rating of 1 out of 5 stars, with RN coverage lower than 99% of state facilities, which means there may not be enough registered nurses available to monitor residents effectively. Additionally, there have been troubling incidents, such as failing to ensure RN coverage for eight consecutive hours on multiple days and not reporting allegations of suspected abuse involving multiple residents within the required timeframe. On the positive side, Park Rest has no fines on record, and staff turnover is an impressive 0%, suggesting that employees remain long-term and can build strong relationships with residents.
- Trust Score
- B
- In Tennessee
- #147/298
- Safety Record
- Low Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Better
- Staff Stability ○ Average
- Turnover data not reported for this facility.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Tennessee facilities.
- Skilled Nurses ⚠ Watch
- Each resident gets only 13 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Tennessee. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
- Violations ○ Average
- 10 deficiencies on record. Average for a facility this size. Mostly minor or procedural issues.
The Good
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
Facility shows strength in fire safety.
The Bad
Near Tennessee average (2.8)
Meets federal standards, typical of most facilities
The Ugly 10 deficiencies on record
Jun 2025
3 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Report Alleged Abuse
(Tag F0609)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on policy review, facility investigation review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to report an al...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on facility policy review, medical record review, and interviews, the facility failed to follow a physician's order relate...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0727
(Tag F0727)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on policy review, facility working schedule review, calculated time by calendar day list review, Employee Timesheet review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure there was Registered Nurs...
Read full inspector narrative →
Oct 2023
4 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Resident Rights
(Tag F0550)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to maintain or enhance resident dignity and respect when 4 of 10 staff members (Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #1, CNA #2, Li...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Tube Feeding
(Tag F0693)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to date and label Percutaneous En...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were properly and securely stored when 1 of 3 Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) left unsecured and unattended...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0727
(Tag F0727)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on policy review, facility working schedule, calculated time by calendar day list, and the facility detailed hours report, the facility failed to ensure there was Registered Nurse (RN) coverage ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Dec 2021
3 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0604
(Tag F0604)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to follow Physician's Orders for ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0760
(Tag F0760)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were free fro...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medical Records
(Tag F0842)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure documentation of medications when 2 of...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
- • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Tennessee facilities.
- • No major red flags. Standard due diligence and a personal visit recommended.
About This Facility
What is Park Rest Hardin County's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns PARK REST HARDIN COUNTY HEALTH CENTER an overall rating of 3 out of 5 stars, which is considered average nationally. Within Tennessee, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This mid-range rating indicates the facility meets federal standards but may have areas for improvement.
How is Park Rest Hardin County Staffed?
CMS rates PARK REST HARDIN COUNTY HEALTH CENTER's staffing level at 1 out of 5 stars, which is much below average compared to other nursing homes.
What Have Inspectors Found at Park Rest Hardin County?
State health inspectors documented 10 deficiencies at PARK REST HARDIN COUNTY HEALTH CENTER during 2021 to 2025. These included: 10 with potential for harm.
Who Owns and Operates Park Rest Hardin County?
PARK REST HARDIN COUNTY HEALTH CENTER is owned by a government entity. Government-operated facilities are typically run by state, county, or municipal agencies. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 62 certified beds and approximately 33 residents (about 53% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in SAVANNAH, Tennessee.
How Does Park Rest Hardin County Compare to Other Tennessee Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Tennessee, PARK REST HARDIN COUNTY HEALTH CENTER's overall rating (3 stars) is above the state average of 2.8 and health inspection rating (4 stars) is above the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Park Rest Hardin County?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?" These questions are particularly relevant given the below-average staffing rating.
Is Park Rest Hardin County Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, PARK REST HARDIN COUNTY HEALTH CENTER has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 3-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Tennessee. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Park Rest Hardin County Stick Around?
PARK REST HARDIN COUNTY HEALTH CENTER has not reported staff turnover data to CMS. Staff turnover matters because consistent caregivers learn residents' individual needs, medications, and preferences. When staff frequently change, this institutional knowledge is lost. Families should ask the facility directly about their staff retention rates and average employee tenure.
Was Park Rest Hardin County Ever Fined?
PARK REST HARDIN COUNTY HEALTH CENTER has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.
Is Park Rest Hardin County on Any Federal Watch List?
PARK REST HARDIN COUNTY HEALTH CENTER is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.