WESTPARK REHABILITATION AND LIVING

900 WESTPARK WAY, EULESS, TX 76040 (817) 545-4071
Government - Hospital district 140 Beds THE ENSIGN GROUP Data: November 2025 11 Immediate Jeopardy citations
Trust Grade
0/100
#889 of 1168 in TX
Last Inspection: November 2024

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

Westpark Rehabilitation and Living has a Trust Grade of F, indicating significant concerns and a poor overall quality of care. It ranks #889 out of 1168 facilities in Texas, placing it in the bottom half of all nursing homes in the state, and #54 of 69 in Tarrant County, meaning there are only a few local options that perform better. The facility is showing signs of improvement, having reduced its issues from 15 in 2024 to 8 in 2025, but it still faces serious challenges. Staffing is a relative strength with a 3/5 star rating and a turnover rate of 49%, which is slightly below the state average, but the facility has been fined $316,433, a concerning figure higher than 95% of Texas facilities, suggesting ongoing compliance issues. Specific incidents include a failure to provide timely care for a resident's hip dislocation, resulting in a 28-hour delay in treatment, and a lack of protection for several residents from potential abuse by another resident, raising serious safety concerns. While there are some positive aspects, such as good RN coverage, families should be cautious due to the facility's significant weaknesses.

Trust Score
F
0/100
In Texas
#889/1168
Bottom 24%
Safety Record
High Risk
Review needed
Inspections
Getting Better
15 → 8 violations
Staff Stability
⚠ Watch
49% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
Penalties
○ Average
$316,433 in fines. Higher than 65% of Texas facilities. Some compliance issues.
Skilled Nurses
○ Average
Each resident gets 32 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — about average for Texas. RNs are the most trained staff who monitor for health changes.
Violations
⚠ Watch
53 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
★★☆☆☆
2.0
Overall Rating
★★★☆☆
3.0
Staff Levels
★★★★★
5.0
Care Quality
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2024: 15 issues
2025: 8 issues

The Good

  • 5-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record

Facility shows strength in quality measures, fire safety.

The Bad

2-Star Overall Rating

Below Texas average (2.8)

Below average - review inspection findings carefully

Staff Turnover: 49%

Near Texas avg (46%)

Higher turnover may affect care consistency

Federal Fines: $316,433

Well above median ($33,413)

Significant penalties indicating serious issues

Chain: THE ENSIGN GROUP

Part of a multi-facility chain

Ask about local staffing decisions and management

The Ugly 53 deficiencies on record

11 life-threatening 2 actual harm
Aug 2025 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0558 (Tag F0558)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to reside and receive s...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences except when to do so would endanger the health or safety of the resident or other residents for two of ten residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2) reviewed for reasonable accommodation of needs. 1. The facility failed to ensure the call light system in Resident #1's room was in a position that was accessible to the resident on 08/21/2025.2. The facility failed to ensure the call light system in Resident #2's room was in a position that was accessible to the resident on 08/21/2025.These failures could place residents at risk of being unable to obtain assistance when needed and help in the event of an emergency.Findings include: 1. Record review of Resident #1's Face Sheet, dated 08/21/2025, reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1 had diagnoses which included dementia (decline in cognitive function that interferes with daily life), cognitive communication deficit (impacts how a person processes and conveys information), and difficulty in walking.Record review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS (tool used to measure health status) Assessment, dated 08/11/2025, reflected severe cognitive impairment with a BIMS (tool used to measure cognitive status) score of 02. Resident #1 required staff assistance for transfers and acts of daily living. Record review of Resident #1's Comprehensive Care Plan, dated 06/21/2024, reflected Resident #1 was at risk for falls. One of the interventions was to ensure the call light was within reach and encourage the resident to use it to call for assistance as needed. During an observation and interview on 08/21/2025 at 11:33 AM, Resident #1 was lying in bed awake. Resident #1's call light cord was on the floor near the head of the bed. When asked if she could reach her call light, Resident #1 did not reply. The DON was in the hall and came into the resident's room. She attempted to pick up the call light from the floor but was unable to because it was under the wheel of the bed. The DON rolled the bed to the side and picked up the call light. The DON placed the call light on the bed within Resident #1's reach. She stated she would get a clip and secure the call light to ensure it did not fall off of the bed. 2. Record review of Resident #2's Face Sheet, dated 08/21/2025, reflected a [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #2 had diagnoses which included parkinsonism (condition that causes movement-related symptoms), schizophrenia (mental condition that affects how people think, feel, and behave), unsteadiness on feet, and other lack of coordination. Record review of Resident #2's Quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 06/11/2025, reflected moderately impaired cognition with a BIMS score of 08. Section GG (functional abilities) reflected Resident #2 needed assistance with toileting. Record review of Resident #2's Comprehensive Care Plan, dated 08/05/2025, reflected Resident #2 was at risk for falls related to an unsteady gait and weakness. One of the interventions was to ensure the call light was within reach and encouraged the resident to use it to call for assistance as needed. An observation on 08/21/2025 at 11:43 AM revealed Resident #2 lying in bed asleep. Resident #2's chair was approximately two feet to the right of the bed. Resident #2's call light was on the floor behind the chair. During an observation and interview on 08/21/2025 at 11:50 AM, CNA B stated she had moved Resident #1's bed a few minutes earlier to provide care and had not noticed the call light was on the floor. She stated Resident #2 might have moved his call light. She stated she rounded on all her residents at the beginning of the shift and made sure their call lights were within reach. She stated she also checked call light placement during her shift when rounding on the residents. She stated it was important for the residents to have their call lights within reach because that was their main source of communication to call for help. CNA B immediately went to Resident #2's room, picked up his call light, and placed it on the bed within the resident's reach. During an interview on 08/21/2025 at 2:53 PM, LVN C stated Resident #1 and Resident #2's call lights should have been in reach. He stated the call lights should be clipped to the side of the bed or bed sheet so the residents could reach them. He stated it was important for residents to have their call lights in case they needed water to drink, their television turned on or off, or needed to go to the restroom. He stated if residents attempted to get up without assistance, it could lead to an accident. He stated residents should have 24-hour access to their call light. He stated it was important to educate and remind residents what the call light was for and to use it when they needed help. During an interview on 08/21/2025 at 4:45 PM, the DON stated her expectation was for all residents to have their call lights in reach because that was how the residents communicated their needs to staff. She stated the facility started in-service training on call light placement. During an interview on 08/21/2025 at 4:50 PM, the Administrator stated the facility began in-service training about call light placement. He stated the nursing staff on the halls checked the call light placement when they completed their rounds. He stated when the department heads rounded daily on their assigned residents, one of the things they looked at was call light placement. He stated the facility also had customer service related audits of call lights for response time. Record review of the facility's policy Policy/Procedure - Nursing Clinical: Call Light/Bell, revised 08/03/2021, reflected It is the policy of this facility to provide the resident a means of communication with nursing staff . 3. Leave the resident comfortable. Place the call light within the resident's reach before leaving room.
Apr 2025 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0761 (Tag F0761)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were stored securely for one (treatment cart #1) of 1 treatment carts reviewed for storage o...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were stored securely for one (treatment cart #1) of 1 treatment carts reviewed for storage of medications. The facility failed to ensure treatment cart #1 was locked while unattended. This failure could place residents at risk of having access to unauthorized medications and/or lead to possible harm or drug diversions. Findings included: An observation on 04/01/25 at 2:36 PM revealed, treatment cart #1 was unlocked and unattended. All drawers could be opened and supplies (bandages, gauze, scissors, etc) could be easily accessed. 1 resident in a wheelchair was observed within approximately 5 feet from the treatment cart. In an interview and observation on 04/01/25 at 2:40 PM, with DON revealed that treatment cart #1 was unlocked and all drawers were able to be opened with supplies easily accessible. The DON stated that staff member had just stepped away. The DON stated her expectation was when the treatment cart was not in use that the treatment cart was locked. The DON stated it was important to ensure that the treatment cart was locked when not in use, so people do not get inside the cart and access medication. Review of facility policy titled Medication Access and Storage / Drug Destruction last revised on 07/2023 reflected: It is the policy of this facility to store all drugs and biological in locked compartments under proper temperature controls. The medication supply is accessible only to licensed nursing personnel, pharmacy personnel, or staff members lawfully authorized to administer medications Only licensed nurses, the consultant pharmacist and those lawfully authorized to administer medications (e.g., medication aides) are allowed access to medications. Medication rooms, carts, and medication supplies are locked or attended by persons with authorized access.
Mar 2025 1 deficiency
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Pharmacy Services (Tag F0755)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for two (Residents #1 and #2) of eight residents reviewed for medications and pharmacy services. 1. The facility failed to obtain hospital discharge orders and administer Resident #1's seizure medication after his admission to the facility on Friday-03/21/25, resulting in him missing the medication on the evening of 03/21/25 and the morning of 03/22/25. 2. The facility failed to administer Resident #2's long and short acting inhalers related to her COPD after her admission to the facility on Friday-03/21/25 and on Saturday 03/22/25, in accordance with the admission orders. The failure could place residents at risk for not receiving therapeutic dosages of their medications as ordered by the physician and a potential for decreased health status, including seizure activity, respiratory distress, disorientation, physical and emotional discomfort. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #1's Face Sheet dated 03/24/25 reflected he was a [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1's active diagnoses included other seizures (a sudden burst of electrical activity in the brain that can cause changes in behavior, movements, feelings and levels of consciousness), congestive heart failure (a condition where the heart muscle is weakened and cannot pump blood effectively), type 2 diabetes (a chronic disease characterized by high blood sugar levels), morbid obesity (a severe form of obesity characterized by a significantly excessive body weight that poses serious health risks), hypertension (when the pressure of blood flowing through your blood vessels is consistently too high) and hemiplegia (a condition characterized by paralysis or weakness on one side of the body). Record review of Resident #1's clinical chart reflected no admission MDS assessment was completed as the resident had just admitted to the facility and it was not required to be completed yet. Record review of Resident #1's clinical chart reflected no initial 48-hour baseline care plan was completed as the resident had just admitted to the facility and it was not required to be completed yet. Record review of Resident #1's hospital clinicals reflected they were faxed to the facility on [DATE] from the hospital social worker. The hospital clinicals reflected Resident #1 had been admitted to the hospital due to ongoing chest pain for six days resulting in a hypertensive urgency (severely high blood pressure) and a blood pressure of 212/97. Resident #1 admitted to the hospital from his previous facility with the medication Levetiracetam (Keppra) 750 mg two tablets in the morning and before bedtime for treatment of seizure disorder. Record review of Resident #1's clinical chart reflected no evidence of the hospital discharge medication orders on 03/21/25, which was his date of admission. Record review of Resident #1's admission nursing assessment dated [DATE] reflected it was completed at 03/21/25 at 8:40 PM. The assessment reflected Resident #1 had admitted from the hospital and the facility physician was notified of his admission. Resident #1 was assessed to be alert and oriented to time, place and person and all other body systems were evaluated as well with no significant issues documented with the exception of mobility. Resident #1 had paralysis present on his left side and range of motion limitations in his arms, hands, legs and feet. Record review of Resident #1's nursing progress notes post-admission on [DATE] on the 2-10pm shift and 10pm-6am shift into Saturday morning (03/22/25) reflected no entry related to his Keppra being given or why it was not given. An observation of Resident #1 on 03/22/25 at 9:35 AM revealed he was calling out from his room and stated he needed to go to the hospital. Upon entering, Resident #1 was observed to be in his bed, not in any obvious physical distress, but upset that he had not been given his Keppra since he admitted from the hospital the day before around 4:00 PM. Resident #1 stated he was worried he would have a seizure and felt he needed to go back to the hospital to ensure the medication level had not dropped in his system. Resident #1 stated one of the nurses (name unknown) told him the hospital had not sent his medications with him and the facility had not received them yet from the pharmacy. Resident #1 voiced concern that he could only miss one dose before he would start to have symptoms and start feeling poorly. He said he had already missed two doses since his admission and he did not remember the hospital administering it to him prior to his discharge time. Resident #1 stated he was not having any seizure like symptoms yet, and he was mostly frustrated that the nurses had not figured out what to do. Review of Resident #1's clinical chart reflected no hospital admission orders from 03/21/25, the date of his admission. Record review of Resident #1's current facility physician's orders dated 03/22/25 reflected, Levetiracetam Oral Tablet 750 MG give 2 tablets by mouth two times a day for Seizure (start 03/22/25). An interview with the charge nurse LVN A on 03/22/25 at 9:45 AM revealed she arrived for the start of her shift (6:00 AM) and began working on the floor when Resident #1 had informed her he had not received his seizure medication. LVN A stated she was currently in the middle of looking into it and did not know anything about it since he was a new admission. An interview with RN B on 03/22/25 at 9:50 AM revealed there was an e-kit at the facility the nurses could use if a resident admitted with no medications from the hospital, or the facility could call the pharmacy and stat the new meds to the facility which took about two hours and was more expensive. RN B stated there were four new admissions the day prior (03/21/25) and it was busy because they were not all supposed to admit in one day, as some had been postponed from an earlier anticipated admission. RN B stated everyone was having to step in and assist because it was a lot for just one charge nurse to handle. Record review of Resident #1's March 2025 MAR reflected, Levetiracetam Oral Tablet [Keppra] 750 MG-Give 2 tablets by mouth two times a day for Seizure (order date 03/22/2025; order start 03/22/2025). (Note: Keppra is an anti-epileptic drug, also called an anticonvulsant). The Keppra was not initialed as given on his date of admission or the next morning. After investigator intervention, the MAR reflected the first dose was timestamped as administered on 03/22/25 at 11:10 AM. An interview with the ADM on 03/22/25 at 11:50 AM revealed he had just talked with the DON and Resident #1's Keppra medication was still within the time frame to be given without it being considered missed. The ADM stated he did not know why Resident #1 was not given Keppra from the facility's e-kit and would have to look into it. An interview with LVN A on 03/22/25 at 12:03 PM revealed she had just administered Resident #1 his two 750 mg tablets of Keppra from the e-kit based off the hospital orders he came with the day before. LVN A stated when the facility got a new admission, the resident's information got entered into the system and the MD was notified of who the attending physician was. Then the attending physician and the admitting charge nurse would go through the medications for any clarifications, then the charge nurse entered the medication information into the online e-chart. LVN A stated the pharmacy used by the facility had two runs a day for deliveries. The first run came around 3:00 PM and the cutoff to get an order called in was around 11:00 AM- noon. For the second overnight pharmacy delivery run, the order would need to be called in by midnight. LVN A stated stat pharmacy deliveries could happen for emergency medications if needed and the turnaround time would be two hours. LVN A stated with Resident #1, she had to pull the Keppra from the e-kit on 03/22/25 to make sure he was able to get it. LVN A stated the potential harm of not getting a seizure medication was critical because the resident was supposed to have it and could have a seizure if they abstain from it. LVN A stated she did not work the day prior for Resident #1's admission, but all admissions were done as a team and had to be done within 24 hours. She stated if the admitting nurse did not get finished with their admission tasks, the oncoming nurse could complete them. LVN A stated she found out there was an issue because the medication aide passing meds earlier in the morning of 03/22/25 reported to her that Resident #1's Keppra was not in the medication cart. LVN A said she went to talk to Resident #1 and told him she would look into it. After that, LVN A stated Resident #1 called 911 because he got anxious and wanted to go back to the hospital, but the EMTs cancelled the call they arrived because LVN A was able to give him the Keppra from the e-kit and he calmed down. Record review of the facility's e-kit inventory log reflected there were 16 tablets of Keppra available as of 03/22/25. An interview with ADON C on 03/24/25 at 11:43 AM revealed he did the admission for Resident #1 the day prior (03/21/25). ADON C stated when Resident #1 arrived from the hospital from the medical transport service, he did not come with all his hospital documentation, which included no discharge medication list. He said when that happened, he called the hospital and talked to someone who said it would get faxed to the facility but it never did and then his shift ended around 11:30 PM and he told the oncoming nurse to look out for them. ADON C stated he found out the next morning (03/22/25) prior to investigator intervention that the orders from the hospital never got faxed over. ADON C stated Resident #1 did not have any seizures since his admission. An interview with the DON on 03/24/25 at 11:45 AM revealed the hospitals usually sent the facility referrals which included medications a resident was being given, but the facility could not use those in lieu of hospital discharge orders for an admission. The DON stated Resident #1 admitted late the night before (03/21/25) so she thought the staff assumed he had taken all his medications at the hospital and they would just start them the next morning. The DON stated normally a hospital faxed discharge orders when asked, but going forward she was going to have the facility marketer get an additional copy of the discharge orders from the case manager once the doctor signs them at the hospital as a backup. The DON stated the hospital always sent a copy in the envelope that comes with a resident, but it would be a backup in case something happened. The DON stated not administering Keppra as ordered could result in the potential for a seizure if they miss a couple of doses. 2. Record review of Resident #2's Face Sheet dated 03/24/25 reflected she was a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #2's active diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a chronic disease that causes airflow obstruction, making it difficult to breathe), acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (occurs when the lungs cannot adequately provide oxygen to the blood, leading to low oxygen levels), morbid obesity, asthma (a chronic respiratory disease characterized by inflammation and narrowing of the airways, leading to difficulty breathing, coughing, and wheezing), obstructive sleep apnea (a sleep disorder characterized by repeated episodes of complete or partial blockage of the upper airway during sleep) and dependence on supplemental oxygen. Record review of Resident #2's clinical chart reflected no admission MDS assessment was completed as the resident had just admitted to the facility and it was not required to be completed yet. Record review of Resident #2's clinical chart reflected no initial 48-hour baseline care plan was completed as the resident had just admitted to the facility and it was not required to be completed yet. Record review of Resident #2's admission physician orders initiated 03/21/25 reflected the following inhalers: -Advair Diskus Inhalation Aerosol Powder Breath Activated 100-50 MCG/ACT 1 inhalation inhale orally two times a day for Asthma (ordered: 03/21/2025, start date: 03/22/2025); -Atrovent 2.5mg/3ml 1 inhalation inhale orally three times a day for COPD (ordered 03/22/25, start date 03/22/25); -Budesonide-Formoterol Fumarate Inhalation Aerosol 160-4.5 MCG/ACT 2 puff inhale orally two times a day for COPD (ordered 03/21/2025, start date: 03/22/2025; discontinued 03/22/2025) -Incruse Ellipta 62.5 MCG/ACT Aerosol Powder, breath activated 1 inhalation once time a day for COPD (Pharmacy Pending confirmation ordered: 03/22/2025, start date: 03/22/2025). Record review of Resident #2's admission nursing assessment [e-signed by RN D] dated 03/21/25 reflected it was completed on 03/21/25 at 9:48 PM. The assessment reflected Resident #2 had admitted from the hospital and the facility physician was notified of her admission. Resident #2 was assessed to be alert and oriented to time, place and person and all other body systems were evaluated as well with no significant issues documented. Resident #2 was noted to have COPD and asthma and was on 4 liters of continuous oxygen. Her lung sounds were clear and she did not have any shortness of breath. Record review of Resident #2's nursing progress notes post-admission on [DATE] on the 2-10pm shift and 10pm-6am shift into Saturday morning (03/22/25) reflected no entry related to her physician ordered inhalers being given or why they were not given. An interview with Resident #2 on 03/22/25 at 12:37 PM revealed she was on continuous oxygen via a nasal cannula and concentrator at four liters per minute. Resident #2 admitted to the facility the night prior around 7:30 PM (03/21/25). Resident #2 stated that she had been in the hospital recently for double pneumonia and had previously been in another facility. She said every time a nursing facility had accepted her in the past, they knew ahead of time what medications she needed, But that didn't happen here. Resident #2 stated the facility nurses had been taking her oxygen saturation levels since her admission the night prior and her levels were normal and she had received her nebulizer treatments. Resident #2 stated her inhalers were not at the facility and she had one that was taken routinely every four hours and was short acting. The other was a long-acting inhaler every 12 hours and was a steroid. Resident #2 denied having any difficulty breathing but expressed frustration and concern that the inhalers were not available if she needed them and that her bipap machine was also not available for her on her first night. Record review of Resident #2's March 2025 MAR reflected she was not administered the following inhalants: 1) Incruse Ellipta was not administered on 03/21/25 on the evening shift and twice on 03/22/25 in the AM and PM, 2) Budesonide-Formoterol Fumarate was not administered on the 03/22/25 on the morning and evening shift and discontinued on 03/22/25 ; 3) Advair Diskus was not administered on 03/21/25 on the evening shift; and 4) Atrovent was not administered on the 03/21/25 evening shift, 03/22/25 on the PM shift/midday. An interview with the DON on 03/24/25 at 11:45 AM revealed after investigation intervention, Resident #2 now had all of her inhalers on the medication cart. The DON stated not having the inhalers available for a resident with known respiratory issues could result in an adverse reaction in the lungs, such as the resident having an asthma attack. An interview with ADON C on 03/24/25 at 11:43 AM revealed he was present at the facility during Resident #2's admission on [DATE] when Resident #2 admitted to the facility and was the nurse who completed her admission. He stated he had spoken to her on 03/24/25 as she was a new admission and she did not have any concerns about her inhalers anymore as they had all been delivered to the facility and were on the medication cart. ADON C stated a potential problem of not getting medication such as routine inhalants as ordered was it could cause an adverse reaction and the resident could have an asthma attack. A follow up interview with Resident #2 on 03/24/25 at 12:37 PM revealed she was getting three of the four inhalers ordered by the doctor. She did not know why she did not get the fourth one (note: It had been dc'ed by the MD), but stated she had no breathing issues going without them for the past one to two days and said everything was okay. 3. Review of the facility's policy titled, Administration of Medications dated July 2017, reflected, Procedure .3. Medications must be administered in accordance with the written orders of the attending physician .10. Should a drug be refused, withheld or given other than at the scheduled time, the staff administering must indicate the reason on the MAR. For those utilizing e-MAR, the appropriate code must be entered with any follow up documentation as appropriate for the situation. Review of the facility's policy titled, Nursing admission Guidelines (not dated), reflected the following tasks to be completed, Review meds for accuracy, .Admit progress note (include from where, with whom and why. Comment of general status of resident, physician notification with verification of medications .
Feb 2025 5 deficiencies 1 IJ
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from abuse for...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from abuse for 1 (Residents #7) of 6 residents reviewed for resident abuse. The facility failed to ensure Resident #7 was free from physical abuse from LVN B during an incident on 01/04/2025 that subsequently required surgery on 01/09/2025. A Past Non Compliance Immediate Jeopardy (PNC IJ) was identified and presented to the Administrator on 02/19/2025 at 11:37 AM. The noncompliance began on 01/04/2025 and ended on 01/06/2025. The facility corrected the noncompliance before the investigation began. These failures placed residents at risk for serious injuries, abuse, and serious harm. Findings Included: Review of Resident #7's Face Sheet, dated 02/18/2025 at 1:30 PM, revealed she was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Relevant diagnoses included schizophrenia, generalized anxiety disorder, osteoporosis, opioid dependence, and anorexia. Review of Resident #7's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed she was cognitively intact with a BIMS score of 15. She received both scheduled and PRN pain medication. She was prescribed antipsychotics for her mental health. Review of Resident #7's Care Plan, revised 01/22/2025, revealed she had . falls . resulted in ulnar styloid avulsion fracture (bony projection of the wrist) . right wrist fracture . fracture of the olecranon (part of the elbow) . and interventions included to anticipate resident needs, encourage resident to leave splints in place on wrists for proper healing, monitor pain level, educate/encourage resident to wear appropriate footwear, educate/encourage resident to ask for assistance when needed, pharmacy consult to evaluate medications, ensure personal belongings were with resident's reach, enhanced monitoring for pain, bruising, and change in mental status, ensure environment was safe, and therapy evaluation and treatment per orders. Review of Resident #7's Radiology Results Report on 01/06/2025 at 12:41 PM revealed acute fracture of the right elbow and right wrist. Review of Resident #7's Clinical Record from her orthopedic surgery on 01/09/2025, dated 01/10/2025 at 10:00 am revealed Resident #7 presented for outpatient surgery for ORIF left and right wrist and ORIF right elbow . Patient sustained injuries with a previous fall . In interview with Resident #7 on 02/18/2025 at 11:25 AM, she stated that last month, LVN B threw her across the room and slammed her down to the ground. She stated LVN B caused injury to both of her arms and wrists. Resident #7 stated she had to have surgery because of her injuries. She declined further interview at this time and could not provide further detail. In an attempt for a follow up interview with Resident #7 on 02/19/2025 at 12:22 PM, she declined interview at this time. Interview attempted with LVN B on 02/18/2025 at 12:18 PM and 02/19/2025 at 2:00 and 02/19/2025 at 2:30 PM was unsuccessful. Record review of Progress Note by LVN B, dated 01/04/2025 at 8:41 PM revealed, [Resident #7] punched nurse. [LVN B] pushed resident away from her. Resident dramatically fell against the wall and slid to the floor. [LVN B] attempted to assist resident. [Resident #7] refused. [Resident #7] then lied down in the supine position. [CNA A] attempted to assist resident. Resident again refused . In interview with CNA A on 02/18/2025 at 2:28 PM, she stated she worked the time of the incident, but she did not recall the exact time the incident occurred. She stated she was not present for the specific incident but arrived afterward the alleged incident to assist Resident #7 from the floor to her bed. She stated she did not suspect any abuse at this time, and stated Resident #7 did not report any allegations during any time after the interaction. Record review of Progress Note by LVN T, dated 01/05/2025 at 11:15 AM revealed: [Resident #7] called nurse to give her pain pill and noticed bruising in her elbow and wrist asked when that happened, she replied 'it happen last night after the dinner in the hallway' doctor, DON, ADON, family notified, as per doctor's order R elbow, hand, skull X-RAY stat ordered. vitals are stable, call button is in place, nurse is monitoring resident closely. Interview attempted with LVN T at 02/18/2025 at 3:25 was unsuccessful. In interview with DON at 2/18/2025 at 3:00 PM, she stated LVN B was a good nurse and denied any complaints or suspicions of abusive conduct prior to the incident. She stated that LVN B reported to her that she specifically witnessed the resident sit on the floor and that was why LVN B did not report the incident as a fall, accident, or abuse. DON stated that once LVN T noticed bruising on Resident #7's wrists and reported to her the incident, she immediately began interventions. She stated she immediately suspended LVN B, contacted law enforcement, and conducted a thorough investigation with facility's Administrator. DON stated while she did not feel LVN B's action was willful or malicious, she stated LVN B was terminated out of an abundance of caution and her license was referred for further review. In interview with Administrator at 02/18/2025 at 12:43 AM, he stated he immediately suspended LVN B pending investigation, contacted law enforcement, and conducted a thorough investigation after LVN T reported the allegation regarding Resident #7. He stated after he completed his investigation, he stated LVN B reported to him that her actions were defensive, and not willful or malicious. Administrator stated that as a result of his investigation, he concluded her actions were out of line and terminated her employment at the facility. Additionally, he stated he referred her license out of an abundance of caution. Following the incident his leadership team conducted safe-surveys with the residents and multiple in-services related to abuse, neglect, exploitation and employee burnout. Review of Facility in-services on 02/18/2025 revealed multiple staff were in-serviced on what Abuse and Neglect consist of, policy, protocol and procedures following any suspected abuse, neglect, and/or exploitation, and specifically whom to report to and the timeframe required. Further review revealed complementary Abuse & Neglect Knowledge Check quiz completed by all staff to ensure comprehension of the in-service information provided. In interview with Administrator, DON, ADON, RN D, CAN E, CNA F, CNA A, LVN Z, LMSW, and Activity Director between 02/18/2024 9:00 AM - 3:00 PM revealed staff were knowledgeable on what abuse and neglect consisted of, facility policy, protocol, and procedures, whom to specifically report suspected abuse, neglect, and/or exploitation to and the timeframe required. Review of Facility safe surveys on 02/18/2025 conducted by Administrator on 01/05/2025 revealed no additional allegations of Abuse, Neglect, and/or Exploitation from the residents at the facility. Review of LVN B's In-services, dated 01/06/2025 at 10:57 AM revealed she was in-serviced on Preventing and De-escalating Crisis Situations, on 12/27/2024 and received a 100% on the post-test. Additional in-services included Knowing the Rights of the Residents, Working with Residents with Substance Use Disorder, Tips on Managing Challenging Behaviors, Effective Communication, Pian Management, Fall Prevention, and Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation all completed on 12/27/2024. Review of LVN B's Termination Form dated 01/06/2025 revealed she was involuntarily terminated due to gross misconduct and additional explanation of termination: conclusion of the investigation, employee did not express regret, no remorse. Termination effective immediately and is not rehire-able. A Past Non Compliance Immediate Jeopardy (PNC IJ) was identified and presented to the Administrator on 02/19/2025 at 11:37 AM. The noncompliance began on 01/04/2025 and ended on 01/06/2025. The facility corrected the noncompliance before the investigation began. Record review of Facility Policy, Resident Rights and Protections, dated 12/2014, signed by LVN B on 10/23/2024 revealed Our residents are entitled to . be treated with respect and dignity . be free from verbal, sexual, physical, and mental abuse . have a physician and/or representative notified any time a resident is injured in an accident or needs to see a doctor . Review of Facility Policy, Reporting and Preventing Abuse, Neglect and Mistreatment, dated 12/2014, revealed Any person who observes or becomes aware of an incident of resident/patient abuse, neglect or mistreatment . whether alleged, suspected, or observed, must report the incident to the Administrator . immediately. Record review of Facility Policy, Abuse: Prevention and Prohibition Against, dated 11/2017 revealed each resident has the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation . Physical abuse includes but is not limited to hitting, slapping, pinching, and kicking.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0558 (Tag F0558)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure the right to reside and receive services in t...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure the right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences for two (Resident #3 and Resident #4) of ten residents reviewed for Reasonable Accommodation of Needs. The facility failed to ensure the call light system in Resident #3 and Resident #4's rooms were in a position that was accessible to the residents on 02/18/2025. This failure could place the residents at risk of being unable to obtain assistance when needed and help in the event of an emergency. Findings included: Resident #3 Record review of Resident #3's Face Sheet, dated 02/18/2025, reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident was diagnosed with muscle weakness and unsteadiness on feet. Record review of Resident #3's Comprehensive MDS Assessment, dated 01/25/2025, reflected the resident had a severe impairment in cognition with a BIMS score of 00. The resident required maximal assistance for hygiene, shower, and dressing. Record review of Resident #3's Comprehensive Care Plan, dated 02/05/2025, reflected the resident was at risk for falls related to unstable gait and one of the interventions was to be sure the resident's call light was within reach. Observation and interview on 02/18/2025 at 10:19 AM revealed Resident #3 was in his bed, awake. It was observed that his call light was clipped to the privacy curtain and was not within reach of the resident. The resident only shrugged his shoulders when asked where his call light was. Resident #4 Record review of Resident #4's Face Sheet, dated 02/18/2025, reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident was diagnosed with generalized muscle weakness and difficulty in walking. Record review of Resident #4's Comprehensive MDS Assessment, dated 01/27/2025, reflected the resident was unable to complete the interview to determine the BIMS score. The resident required assistance in toileting, shower, and dressing. Record review of Resident #4's Comprehensive Care Plan, dated 02/12/2025, reflected the resident was at risk for falls related to weakness and one of the interventions was to be sure the call light was within reach. Observation and interview on 02/18/2025 at 10:27 AM, revealed Resident #4 was sitting at the side of his bed. it was observed that his call light was behind his roommate's oxygen concentrator. When asked if he had his call light, the resident searched his bed and said he cannot even find the cord of his call light. The resident stood up and continue to search and he could not find his call light. He said he seldom used the call light but it should be with him just in case he needed it. Observation and interview with RN D on 02/18/2025 at 10:38 AM, RN D stated call lights should be with the residents all the times because they use the call lights to call for help or assistance if needed. She said anything could happen if the call lights were not with the residents like the resident might fall trying to do things by themselves or get frustrated because they could not call the staff. She said all the staff were responsible in making sure the call lights were within reach of the residents. She also said the call lights were not just for the dependent residents but for the independent residents as well. RN D said Resident #3 was dependent for his activities of daily living such as transfer and bed mobility. RN D went inside Resident #3's room and saw the call light was clipped to the privacy curtain. She took the call light from the privacy curtain and placed it where the Resident #3 could reach it. She went to Resident #4's room but the door was closed. She said she would check Resident #4's call light after She said she did her morning round but did not notice if the call lights were with the residents. In an interview on 02/18/2025 at 12:31 PM, the ADON stated the call lights should always be accessible to the residents to call the staff for assistance or help. The ADON said the residents used their call lights if they needed to be changed, for a refill of water, or if they needed their tv remote. She said if the call lights were not within reach, the residents would not be able to call the staff and their needs would not be met. The ADON said the expectation was for all the staff to make sure the call lights were within the reach of the residents every time they do their rounds and before leaving the room. The ADON said they would do an in-service about call lights being accessible to the residents. In an interview on 02/18/2025 at 12:56 PM, the DON stated call lights should be placed where the residents could easily access them. The DON said the call lights were the residents' mode of communication so they could tell the staff they needed something. She said all the staff were responsible in ensuring that the call lights were within reach. The DON said the expectation was for the staff would be mindful that every time they leave the residents' room, the call lights were within reach. The DON said she would conduct an in-service about the call lights. She said she would personally monitor that all the residents' call lights were within reach. In an interview on 02/18/2025 at 1:21 PM, the Administrator stated the call lights should be within reach of the residents. The Administrator said the residents might be having an emergency and staff would not know. The Administrator said the staff should be make sure the call lights were within reach. The Administrator said he would coordinate with the DON regarding call lights. In an interview on 02/18/2025 at 1:39 PM, CNA F stated she did not notice the call lights were not with resident #3 and #4. She said she should have made sure the call lights were accessible to all the resident entrusted to her in case they needed something. She said without the call light, the needs of the resident will not be known and met. Record review of facility's policy Call Light/Bell Policy/ Procedure - Nursing Clinical revised 08/03/2021 revealed POLICY: It is the policy of this facility to provide the resident a means of communication with nursing staff . PROCEDURES . 4. Leave the resident comfortable. Place the call device within resident's reach before leaving room.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Incontinence Care (Tag F0690)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident was incontinent of bladder received ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident was incontinent of bladder received services and assistance to prevent urinary tract infections for one (Resident #2) of one resident reviewed for Urinary Incontinence. The facility failed to prevent Resident #2's indwelling urinary Foley catheter (device that drains urine from the urinary bladder) device from contact with the floor on 02/18/2025. This failure could place the resident with indwelling urinary catheter devices at risk for the development of urinary tract infections. Findings included: Review of Resident #2's Face Sheet, dated 02/18/2025, reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident was diagnosed with neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder (the muscles and nerves that control the bladder do not work properly due to illness). Review of Resident #2's Quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 12/18/2024, reflected the was unable to complete the interview to determine the BIMS score. The Quarterly MDS Assessment indicated the resident had an indwelling suprapubic catheter (device inserted into the stomach to the bladder to drain urine). Review of Resident #2's Comprehensive Care Plan, dated 01/20/2025, reflected the resident had a suprapubic catheter related to neurogenic bladder and one of the interventions was to secure catheter to facilitate flow of urine, prevent kinking of tubing, and accidental removal. Review of Resident #2's Physician Order, dated 11/14/2024, reflected SUPRAPUBIC CATHETER 16 FR (French scale: measurement system for the size of the catheter)/10 ML TO CLOSED DRAINAGE SYSTEM. DX TO SUPPORT USE: RETENTION. Observation and interview on 02/18/2025 at 10:07 AM, revealed Resident #2 was in his bed, awake. It was observed that his catheter bag was on the floor. The drain valve (used to drain the urine in the catheter bag) of the catheter bag was not secured and was also touching the floor. When asked about his catheter, the resident did not reply. Observation and interview on 02/18/2025 at 10:38 AM, RN D stated the catheter bag should not be on the floor because the floor was definitely dirty. She said the proper care of the catheter was changing it as ordered and making sure the catheter bag was off the floor to prevent infection. She went inside Resident #2's room and saw the catheter bag was on the floor with its drain valve also touching the floor. She said the catheter bag should be secured properly on the railings under the resident's bed so it would not fall on the floor. She said the drainage valve of the catheter should not be left dangling and touching the floor because there was a place in the catheter bag to insert it. She said if the catheter bag was on the floor, germs could enter the bag and multiply upward. She said she would get another catheter bag and replace the one on the floor. In an interview on 02/18/2025 at 12:31 PM, the ADON stated the catheter bag should be off the floor. She said the catheter bag should be below the bladder but not on the floor. ADON said it could cause infection especially for individuals who were immuno-compromised. ADON said the expectation was for the staff to make sure the catheter bag was off the floor when the resident was in the bed or in the wheelchair. In an interview on 02/18/2025 at 12:56 PM, the DON the catheter bag should not be on the floor to prevent infection such as urinary tract infection. The DON said the nurses were responsible in ensuring the catheter was off the floor. The DON added the nurse should start monitoring the catheter bag and should start reminding the staff that every time they would empty the catheter bag, they should make sure that the catheter bag was off the floor. The DON said the expectation was the catheter bags would be off the floor to prevent infection and the staff would ensure they were following the best practice for catheter care. The DON concluded she would do an in-service regarding catheter bags not being on the floor. In an interview on 02/18/2025 at 1:21 PM, the Administrator stated the catheter bag should be off the floor to prevent a potential contamination. The Administrator added the expectation was for the staff to ensure the catheter bag was not on the floor. He said he was not clinical and would let the DON handle the issue about the catheter bag. In an interview on 02/18/2025 at 1:45 PM, CNA E stated she might had missed to check Resident #2's catheter bag during her round. She said she was not aware the resident's catheter bag was on the floor. She said she would check if the resident's catheter bag was hanged on the resident bed's railings. Review of facility policy, Catheter Care, Urinary, 2001 MED-Pass revised January 3, 2023, revealed Purpose: The purpose of this procedure is to prevent catheter-associated urinary tract infections . Infection Control . 1. Use standard precautions when handling or manipulating the drainage system.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Respiratory Care (Tag F0695)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview,' and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents, who needed respiratory care, w...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview,' and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents, who needed respiratory care, were provided such care consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for one (Resident #1) of five residents reviewed for Respiratory Care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's face mask for his nebulizer was properly stored when not in use on 02/18/2025. This failure could place residents at risk for respiratory infection and not having their respiratory needs met. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's Face Sheet, dated 02/18/2025, reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident was diagnosed with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a chronic inflammatory lung disease that causes obstructed airflow from the lungs). Record review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 02/07/2025, reflected the resident was unable to complete the interview to determine the BIMS score. The Quarterly MDS Assessment indicated the resident had chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Record review of Resident #1's Comprehensive Care Plan, dated 02/12/2025, reflected the resident had oxygen therapy related to COPD and one of the interventions was give medications as ordered. Record review of Resident #1's Physician Orders, dated 05/26/2024, reflected Albuterol Sulfate Inhalation Nebulization Solution (2.5 MG/3ML) 0.083% (Albuterol Sulfate) 1 vial inhale orally via nebulizer every four hours for SOB/Wheezing. Observation and interview with Resident #1 on 02/18/2025 at 10:14 AM, revealed the resident was in her bed, awake. It was observed that a breathing mask was on top of a semi open drawer of the resident's right-side table. The breathing mask was not bagged. The resident said the nurse did not come back when she was done with the breathing treatment that was why she took it off. The resident said nobody told her the breathing mask should be bagged or do the staff come to bag the breathing mask. Observation and interview on 02/18/2025 at 10:38 AM, RN D stated the breathing mask used for nebulization should be bagged when not in use. She said she administered the resident's morning breathing treatment and went back to check if the resident was done with her breathing treatment and saw the resident was not yet done. She said she went back to check if the resident was done with her breathing treatment. She said when she saw the resident was done and checked the resident's O2 saturation. RN D went inside the resident's room and saw the breathing mask was on the drawer and was not bagged. She went out of the room and said she would get a new breathing mask and a plastic bag. she said she did not notice the breathing mask was not bagged when she checked the resident's O2 saturation. She said she should be mindful that the breathing mask was inside a plastic bag and there should always be a plastic bag at bedside for the breathing mask. In an interview on 02/18/2025 at 12:31 PM, the ADON stated the breathing mask should be cleaned after usage and then bagged to prevent cross contamination and infection. She said whoever was caring for the resident should check if the breathing mask was bagged when not in use or needed to be changed because it was exposed or touched something dirty. She said the expectation was for the breathing mask to be bagged when the resident was not using it and the staff would check during their rounds that the breathing was bagged. She said she would do an in-service about bagging the breathing when not in use. In an interview on 02/18/2025 at 12:56 PM, the DON stated the breathing mask was supposed to be in a bag when the resident was not using it to prevent cross contamination and respiratory infections. She said the expectation was for the staff to be mindful and make sure the breathing mask was bagged when the resident was not using it. She said she would conduct an in-service about respiratory care. In an interview on 02/18/2025 at 1:21 PM, the Administrator stated everything the residents were using should be kept clean to prevent infection. He said he was not a clinician but would coordinate with the DON on how to go forward about the issue of respiratory care. Record review of the facility's policy, Departmental (Respiratory Therapy) - Prevention of Infection 2001 MED-PASS, Inc. revised October 2012, reflected Purpose: The purpose of this procedure is to guide prevention of infection associated with respiratory therapy tasks and equipment . 7. Store the circuit in plastic bag, marked with date and resident's name.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based observation, interview and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based observation, interview and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for one (Resident #5) of ten residents reviewed for Infection Control. The facility failed to ensure CNA G and COTA G changed their gloves and performed hand hygiene while providing incontinent care to Resident #5 on 02/18/2025. These failures could place residents at risk of cross-contamination and development of infections. Findings included: Record review of Resident #5's Face sheet, dated 02/18/2025, reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident was diagnosed with cerebral palsy (a disorder that affects movement and muscle tone due to brain injury). Record review of Resident #5's Comprehensive MDS Assessment, dated 01/25/2025, reflected the resident was unable to complete the interview to determine the BIMS score. The Comprehensive MDS Assessment indicated the resident was always incontinent for both bowel and bladder. Record review of Resident #5's Comprehensive Care Plan, dated 12/12/2024, reflected the resident had bowel/bladder incontinence related to impaired mobility and one of the interventions was to wash, rinse and dry perineum. Observation on 02/18/2025 at 11:02 AM, revealed COTA G and PTA H went inside the room to transfer Resident #5 to her bed. PTA H sanitized her hands from the wall mounted hand sanitizer outside the resident's room and then put on a pair of gloves. COTA G went inside the room while pushing a Hoyer lift. She then put on a pair of gloves without doing hand hygiene. PTA H and COTA G hooked the resident's Hoyer sling and transferred the resident to her bed. COTA G said they would clean the resident up and transfer her again to her electric wheelchair because the resident needed to go somewhere. When the resident was in her bed, COTA G pulled down the resident's pants, unfastened the soiled brief, and pushed it between the resident's thighs. After pushing the soiled brief in between the resident's thighs, COTA G opened a new brief and placed it beside the resident. She did not change her gloves after touching the soiled brief and before touching the new brief. COTA G cleaned the resident's perineal area (area between the legs). After cleaning the perineal area, PTA H and COTA G rolled the resident to her right. COTA G started cleaning the resident's bottom. While COTA G was cleaning the resident's bottom, CNA F entered the room and assisted in cleaning the resident. PTA H stepped back and let CNA F helped COTA G. COTA G continued to clean the resident's bottom. It was observed that the resident had a large bowel movement. While COTA G was cleaning the resident's bottom, her gloves got some feces on it. COTA G took some wipes and just wiped the feces off her gloves. She did not change her gloves when her gloves got soiled. COTA G continued to clean the resident's bottom. When she was done, she pulled the soiled brief and she asked CNA F to get a plastic bag near her so she could throw the soiled brief. CNA F handed over the plastic bag, COTA G threw the soiled brief, and CNA F threw the plastic bag to the trash can. COTA G then took the new brief from the resident's side and put it under the resident. She did not change her gloves before touching the new brief. While COTA G was fixing the brief, CNA F took off her gloves, took the box of gloves from the wall beside the resident's door, and then put on a pair of gloves. CNA F did not sanitize her hands before putting on the new pair of gloves. They rolled back the resident and fixed the brief further. They pulled up the resident's pants and transferred her to her electric wheelchair. In an interview with COTA G on 02/18/2025 at 11:19 AM, COTA G stated she should have changed her gloves after she tucked the soiled brief between the legs of the resident and after she cleaned the bottom of the resident because her gloves were considered dirty. She said touching the new brief with soiled gloves rendered the new brief dirty. She said she should have changed her gloves when feces came in contact with her gloves. She said wiping off the feces from her gloves did not make the gloves clean. She said she should have removed her gloves, washed her hands, and put on a new pair of gloves. She said her actions could cause cross contamination and infection. She said she would be mindful the next she would do incontinent care. She added that she should do hand hygiene before doing any care and before putting on a new pair of gloves, also, to prevent cross contamination. In an interview with CNA F on 02/18/2025 at 11:24 AM, CNA F stated she handed over the plastic bag to COTA G so she could throw the soiled brief and then threw the plastic bag in the trash can. She said should have changed her gloves and sanitized her hands to be sure her gloves were clean. She said she took off her gloves to get the box of gloves but did not sanitize before putting on a new pair of gloves. She said changing of gloves and sanitizing in between changing of gloves would prevent transfer of germs. In an interview with the ADON on 02/18/2025 at 12:31 PM, the ADON stated hand hygiene should be done before doing any care, like transfer and incontinent care. She said gloves should be changed after tucking the soiled brief and after cleaning the residents' bottom. She also said that if the gloves were soiled during incontinent care, the gloves should be changed and the staff should do hand hygiene. She said not washing the hands before doing care, not changing the gloves after touching soiled items and after being soiled, and not sanitizing the hands in between changing of gloves could result to cross contamination and probable infections. She said the expectation was for the staff to do hand hygiene before and after every care, in between changing of gloves, and after contact with anything soiled. She said another expectation was for the staff to change their gloves after touching anything soiled. ADON said she would do in-services about infection control and hand hygiene. In an interview with the DON on 02/18/2025 at 12:56 PM, the DON stated hand hygiene was the most effective way to prevent cross contamination and infection. She said hands should be washed before and after any care and hand hygiene should be done in between changing of gloves. She said the gloves should have been changed after tucking the soiled brief, after cleaning the resident's bottom, and when the gloves got feces on them. She said the expectation was for the staff to practice proper procedures to prevent cross contamination and hand hygiene. She said she would do an in-service about infection control and hand hygiene. In an interview with the Administrator on 02/18/2025 at 1:21 PM, the Administrator stated not doing hand hygiene before any care, not changing the gloves from soiled to clean could contribute to cross contamination and infection. He said the expectation was for the staff to follow the policy and procedures pertaining to infection control. He said he was not a clinician and would let the DON handle the issue about infection control and hand hygiene. Record review of the facility policy, Hand Hygiene Policy & Procedure, revised 12/2023, reflected Policy: It is the policy of this facility to provide . education . healthcare workers perform hand hygiene, which is one of the most effective measures to prevent the spread of infection . wash hands . b. Before and after direct contact with residents . h. Before moving from a contaminated body site to a clean body site . j. After contact with blood or bodily fluids . m. After removing gloves. Record review of the policy Perineal Care Policy/ Procedure -Nursing Clinical revised 07/2013 revealed POLICY . It is the policy of this facility to . 3. Prevent irritation or infection . PROCEDURES . 5. Wash hands properly.
Dec 2024 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Resident Rights (Tag F0550)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and care ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life for one (Resident #1) of 5 residents reviewed for Dignity. The facility failed to treat Resident #1 with dignity and promote enhancement of her quality of life when the resident was not provided a privacy bag for her catheter bag. This failure placed residents at risk of not having their right to a dignified existence maintained and a decline in their quality of life. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's Face Sheet, dated 12/28/2024, reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE]. The resident was diagnosed with obstructive and reflux uropathy (a blockage in the urinary flow causing the urine to flow back to the kidneys). Review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 11/08/2024, reflected the resident was unable to complete the interview to determine the BIMS score. The Quarterly MDS Assessment indicated the resident had an indwelling catheter (a thin tube inserted to the urinary bladder to collect urine and drain to a drainage bag). Review of Resident #1's Comprehensive Care Plan, dated 10/18/2024, reflected the resident had an indwelling catheter and interventions were provide catheter care every shift and position catheter bag away from entrance room door. Review of Resident #1's Physician Order, dated 8/22/2024, reflected CATHETER CARE EVERY SHIFT. Observation and interview on 12/28/2024 at 8:43 AM revealed Resident #1 was in her bed, awake. Resident #1 had a catheter bag hanging at the railings below her bed. The catheter bag and its content were observed visible upon entrance to the room. The catheter bag contained straw-colored fluid at approximately 150 milliliter. The catheter bag did not have a privacy bag. It was also observed that there was no privacy bag in sight. When asked how long she had the catheter bag, the resident did not reply. When asked if she was aware her catheter bag was exposed, the resident did not reply. Observation on 12/28/2024 at 10:49 AM revealed Resident #1's catheter bag still did not have a privacy bag. The content of the catheter bag was still visible upon entrance to the room. Observation and interview with RN A on 12/28/2024 at 10:53 AM, RN A stated if a resident had a catheter, there should be a privacy bag for the catheter bag so the content would not be visible to other residents or visitors. She said without the privacy bag, the resident might be embarrassed, humiliated, or might feel uncomfortable. She said the catheter bag should be inside a privacy bag whether the resident was inside or outside the room. RN A went inside Resident #1's room and saw the resident's catheter bag was exposed. She said she did not notice the catheter bag was exposed when she did her round. She said she was responsible in making sure the catheter bag had a privacy bag. She said she would get a privacy bag for Resident #1's catheter In an interview with the DON on 12/28/2024 at 11:26 AM, the DON stated the catheter bag should have been placed inside a privacy bag to avoid embarrassment and humiliation. The DON said all the residents had the right for a dignified existence and not having a privacy bag was not one of them. The DON said all the staff, including her, were responsible in ensuring the catheter bag was inside a privacy bag. The DON said the expectation was for the staff to make sure the catheter bag had a privacy bag when the resident was in her bed or in the wheelchair. She concluded that she would continually remind the staff the importance of providing dignity and placing the catheter bag inside a privacy bag through an in-service. In an interview with ADON C on 12/28/2024 at 11:44 AM, ADON C stated all the residents should be treated with dignity. She said providing dignity could be done by knocking at the door before going inside the room, talking to the residents in a courteous way, or pulling the privacy curtain while providing care. She said, for a resident with catheter, there should be privacy bag to maintain the resident's dignity. She said without the privacy bag, the resident might prefer to stay inside the room so that other residents would not see she had a catheter. She said the issue was not if the resident was embarrassed or not, but if the staff were providing them dignity. She said the expectation was for the staff to treat the residents with catheter with dignity by placing the catheter bag inside a privacy bag. She said she would collaborate with the DON to do an in-service about maintaining the residents' dignity and placing the catheter bag inside a privacy bag. In an interview with the Administrator on 12/28/2024 at 12:25 PM, the Administrator said the catheter bag should be inside a privacy bag to provide dignity and prevent any embarrassment. He said the expectation was the staff to provide dignity to all the residents. In an interview with CNA B on 12/28/2024 at 12:44 PM, CNA B stated she emptied Resident #1's catheter bag earlier and she saw the catheter bag was exposed. She said she knew there should be a privacy bag so that the resident would not be embarrassed. She said she should have gotten a privacy bag when she saw the resident's catheter bag was exposed or told the nurse that there was no privacy bag. She said there should be a privacy bag whether the resident was inside the room or outside the room to prevent embarrassment. Record review of the facility's policy, Dignity and Respect Policy/Procedure - Nursing Administration revised 05/2007 revealed POLICY: It is the policy of this facility that all residents be treated with kindness, dignity, and respect. Review of facility policy, Indwelling Urinary Catheter Care, Policy and Procedure revised 01.2022 revealed Policy: It is the policy of this facility that each resident with an indwelling catheter will receive catheter care daily and as needed (PRN) for soiling . Purpose: To promote hygiene, comfort, and decrease the risk of infection for a resident with an indwelling urinary catheter . Procedure . 14. Cover the drainage bag with a privacy bag to maintain dignity.
Nov 2024 10 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0558 (Tag F0558)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure the right to reside and receive services in t...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure the right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences for one (Resident #35) of sixteen residents reviewed for Reasonable Accommodation of Needs. The facility failed to ensure Resident #35 call light was answered within a reasonable time on 11/20/2024. This failure could place the residents at risk of being unable to obtain assistance when needed and help in the event of an emergency. Findings included: During a confidential group interview 6 of 6 residents stated it took the weekday staff 30 minutes-1 hour to respond to the call lights, and the weekend staff 1 hour or more to respond to the call lights. Record review of Resident #35 face sheet dated 11/21/2024 reflected an [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included: Dementia (condition characterized by loss of brain functions such as memory loss), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Record review of Resident #35's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] reflected, she had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 99 which indicated the interview was unable to be completed. Interview on 11/20/2024 at 11:20am Resident #35 stated staff do not come quickly when she used her call light. She stated it took staff 30 minutes or so to respond but it has been longer, about 1 hour or so before staff responded to the call light. Observation on 11/20/2024 at 11:23am revealed Resident #35's call light in use. Observation on 11/20/2024 at 11:44am revealed Resident #35's call light in use. Observation on 11/20/2024 at 12:00pm revealed Resident #35's call light in use. Observation on 11/20/2024 at 12:20pm revealed Resident #35's call light in use. Observation on 11/20/2024 at 12:30pm revealed Resident #35's call light no longer in use. Interview on 11/19/2024 at 11:17am with LVN-A, he stated staff was expected to respond to the call lights in a timely manner. He stated all staff can respond to the call lights and assist a resident within their scope of practice. He stated if staff was unable to respond to the call light immediately, the resident should be acknowledged and informed assistance will take place as soon as possible. He stated the risks of the call lights not being answered in a timely manner was considered neglect and the resident could have an emergency such as a fall. Interview on 11/19/2024 at 11:32am with CNA-I, she stated she answered the call lights immediately unless she was assisting another resident. She stated once she was done assisting one resident, she responded to another resident immediately. She stated not answering the call lights immediately is neglect to the resident, and a resident could have fallen, or something happened to the resident. Interview on 11/20/2024 at 8:57am with ADON G, she stated staff was expected to answer the call lights immediately or in a timely manner. She stated if the call lights were not answered in a timely manner is a risk of safety not only to the residents but the facility. Interview on 11/20/2024 at 12:23pm with the DON, she stated all staff can answer the call lights and respond to the resident within their scope of work. She stated the call lights should be answered in a timely manner and as soon as staff sees the call light. She stated answering the call light 30 minutes- 1 hour was not ideal, but staff should respond as soon they can. She stated the risks of the call lights not answered in a timely manner could be potential harm to the resident. Interview on 11/21/2024 at 9:21am with ADM, he stated any staff can respond to the call lights and assist a resident within their job title. He stated staff should respond to the call lights as soon as possible per the facility's the call light policy. She stated the risks of the call lights not answered timely can impact the resident's health. Interview on 11/21/2024 at 12:04pm with ADON H, he stated staff should answer call lights immediately. He stated any staff can answer call lights and assist the resident within the scope of their job title or get help from another staff member that can help. He stated call lights not answered immediately puts residents at risks of an emergency or their needs not met. Record review of the facility's grievances log dated 8/12/2024 and 9/9/2024, reflected concerns from resident council regarding call light not answered in a timely manner. Record review of the facility's Nursing Clinical Routine Procedures: Call Light/Bell dated: revised 8/3/2021, Policy Statement: It is the policy of this facility to provide the resident a means of communication with nursing staff. 1. Answer the light/bell within reasonable time. 2. Listen to the resident's request/need. 3. Respond to the request. If the item is not available or you are unable to assist, explain to the resident and notify the charge nurse for further instructions.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0583 (Tag F0583)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide the right to personal privacy which include...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide the right to personal privacy which includes accommodations during personal care for one (Resident #1) of fourteen residents reviewed for Privacy. The facility failed to ensure LVN A closed Resident #1's door while checking the resident's blood sugar and while administering insulin on 11/20/2024. This failure could place the residents at risk of not having their personal privacy maintained during medical treatment. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's Face Sheet, dated 11/21/2024, reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE]. Resident #1 was diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus (high blood sugar) and unspecified dementia (a condition characterized by loss of memory and ability to reason) with agitation. Review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 11/10/2024, reflected the resident scored 99 on her BIMS Summary Score denoting the resident was unable to complete the interview to determine the BIMS score. The Quarterly MDS Assessment indicated diabetes mellitus and unspecified dementia with agitation as primary medical conditions. Review of Resident #1's Care Plan, dated 10/15/2024, reflected the resident was type 2 diabetic and the interventions were to obtain blood sugars as ordered and administer diabetes medications as ordered. The resident was at risk for impaired cognitive function related to dementia and one of the interventions was reduce any distractions like closing the door. Review of Resident #1's Physician Order, dated 11/13/2024, reflected Insulin Glargine (man-made form of insulin) Solution 100 UNIT/ML. Inject 15 units subcutaneously (under the skin) one time a day for diabetes. Observation and interview with LVN A on 11/20/2024 at 7:49 AM revealed LVN A was preparing to administer Resident's #1 medication. He said he would check the resident's blood sugar first to determine if he needed to hold the resident's insulin. He inserted a test strip to the glucometer, took a push button safety lancet and alcohol wipe from the first drawer of his cart, and went inside the resident's room. Resident #1 was in her wheelchair at the foot of her bed and was visible from the hallway. He told the resident that he was going to check her blood sugar and asked which finger she preferred. The resident shrugged her shoulders. LVN A wiped the resident's right index finger, pricked it with the push button lance, scooped some blood from the finger, and wiped the remaining blood off the finger. While LVN A was checking the resident's blood sugar, a staff passed by the hall. After he was done checking the resident's blood sugar, he went out of the resident's room and said he would prepare for the resident's insulin. LVN A prepared the insulin, went inside the resident's room, wiped the resident's left upper arm, and injected the insulin on the resident's left upper arm. He did not close the door when he checked the blood sugar and administered insulin. He said the door should be closed every time a staff was providing care or administering any treatment. He said checking the blood sugar and administering insulin were forms of treatments, therefore the door should be closed. LVN A stated he forgot to close the door before he did the resident's blood sugar and gave her insulin. He said the door should be closed every time treatment was done to provide privacy and give dignity to the resident. He said he would make sure she closed the door or pulled the privacy curtain every time he would do any treatment. In an interview with Resident #1 on 11/20/2024 at 12:26 PM, Resident #1 stated LVN A always leave the door open every time he came inside the room to give her insulin. The resident's roommate seconded that LVN A did not close the door every time he would administer treatment. In an interview with ADON G on 11/21/2024 at 7:32 AM, ADON G stated the door should be closed or the privacy curtain should be drawn when checking the blood sugar and administering insulin. She said not closing the door or pulling the curtain was a privacy issue. She said other residents, staff, or visitors could see what treatments were being done to a particular resident. She said the resident could be embarrassed that others could see the treatment being done to her. ADON G said the expectation was for the staff to make sure the door was closed, or the curtain was drawn when they were providing any care. She said she would do an in-service about privacy and dignity. In an interview with the DON on 11/21/2024 at 7:49 AM, the DON stated the door should be closed when the blood sugar was checked and when the insulin was administered. She said the purpose of closing the door or pulling the curtain was to provide privacy and dignity for the resident who might be embarrassed if others could see that she was diabetic. The DON said the expectation was for the staff to close the door when providing care or treatment, especially if the resident was visible from the hallway. She said they could also pull the curtain to provide privacy. She said she would do an in-service about the importance of providing privacy and dignity. In an interview with the Administrator on 11/21/2024 at 8:14 AM, the Administrator stated the staff must provide privacy when providing care to prevent embarrassment. He said the expectation was for the staff to close the door during all care provided. He said he would collaborate with the DON to do an in-service about privacy during treatment. Record review of the facility's policy, Dignity and Respect Policy / Procedure - Nursing Administration revised 05/2007 revealed POLICY: It is the policy of this facility that all residents be treated with kindness, dignity, and respect. PROCEDURES . 4. Residents shall be examined and treated in a manner that maintains the privacy of their bodies. A closed door or drawn curtain shields the Resident from passers-by.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Assessment Accuracy (Tag F0641)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received an accurate assessmen...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received an accurate assessment, reflective of the resident's status for one (Resident #45) of eight residents reviewed for Accuracy of Assessments. The facility failed to ensure Resident #45's Quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 11/10/2024, accurately reflected that Resident #45 was on oxygen therapy. This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving care and services to meet their needs, diminished function of health, and regressions in their overall health. Findings included: Review of Resident #45's Face Sheet, dated 11/21/2024, revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE]. The resident was diagnosed with respiratory failure with hypoxia (insufficient amount of oxygen in the body). Review of Resident #45's Quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 11/10/2024, reflected the resident scored 99 on her BIMS Summary Score denoting the resident was unable to complete the interview to determine the BIMS score. Resident #45's Minimum Data Set, Section O - Special Treatments, Procedures, and Programs specified the resident was not on oxygen therapy. Review of Resident #45's Comprehensive Care Plan, dated 11/17/2024, reflected the resident had oxygen therapy related to respiratory illness and one of the interventions was oxygen via nasal cannula continuously. Review of Resident #45's Physician Order, dated 11/27/2023, reflected Apply oxygen via NC up to (4) LPM, to keep saturation at or above 90%. Titrate as indicated. every shift related to ACUTE AND CHRONIC RESPIRATORY FAILURE WITH HYPOXIA. Observation and interview with Resident #45 on 11/19/2024 at 10:55 AM revealed Resident #45 was in her bed, awake. It was noted that the resident was on oxygen therapy at 3 liters per minute via nasal cannula. The nasal cannula was connected to an oxygen concentrator at bedside. She stated she had been using oxygen since last year because she had issues with breathing. She said she would use oxygen at all times, inside the room or outside the room. She said he used portable oxygen when she went out of the room and used the oxygen machine when inside the room. In an interview with LVN A on 11/19/2024 at 11:43 AM, LVN A said Resident #45 had an order for oxygen because of her respiratory issue. He said the resident had an order for continuous oxygen because of her respiratory issue. He said the resident use the oxygen all the time. In an interview with ADON G on 11/21/2024 at 7:32 AM, ADON G stated she was not familiar with the policy for MDS. She said if the MDS assessment represented the minimum data of the resident, then the use of the oxygen should be reflected on the MDS. She said if the resident was using oxygen continuously, it should be reflected in the system to make sure all the needed care was given to the residents. She said accuracy in assessments would help the staff make a correct care plan for the resident. ADON G said if there was no accurate assessment, there could be a confusion with the care needed by the resident, and the resident might not be able to get the treatment needed. She said the expectation was for all the residents would be properly assessed, not only during admission, but every day. She said the best person to explain the process was the MDS Nurse. In an interview with the DON on 11/21/2024 at 7:49 AM, the DON stated if a resident was using oxygen, it should be on the resident's profile. She said the resident should be accurately assessed to provide the needed interventions. If the residents were not properly assessed, the proper care and needs would not be met. The DON said the expectation was the residents were properly assessed not only during admission but every day to see if there was a change in condition, any refusal of care, or resident acting different than usual. She said she would collaborate with the MDS Coordinator to audit MDS assessments and make appropriate changes. In an interview with the Administrator on 11/21/2024 at 8:14 AM, the Administrator stated the MDS should reflect current condition of the resident and not miss the care needed by the resident. He said he was not clinical and would let the DON evaluate the situation and do in-services about assessments. In an interview and observation with the MDS Nurse on 11/21/2024 at 10:37 AM, the MDS Nurse stated the MDS was to have the overall snapshot of the residents' overall conditions. Said if the resident had an order for oxygen and had an active diagnosis, it should be coded on the MDS. He said he would usually visit the resident to do an assessment. He said he might had overlooked it. He said the medical diagnosis, physician order, MDS, and the care plan should be all in-line and should match to provide a clear overview of the resident's current condition. He said, by doing so, accurate goals and interventions would be provided. The MDS Nurse logged on to his computer, searched for Resident #45's profile and saw that the resident had respiratory failure, an order for continuous oxygen since last year and a care plan for oxygen therapy. He said Resident #45's MDS assessment should reflect that she was on oxygen therapy. The MDS Nurse said again that it was an oversight on his part. He said an accurate MDS assessment was important because it would be the basis of the care needed by the resident. If the assessment was not accurate, the current status of the resident would not be correct resulting in possible confusion on the residents' care. He said he would audit the residents' MDS to reflect their current condition. Record review of the facility policy, Resident Assessment and Associated Processes Policy & Procedure revised 12.2023 revealed Policy: It is the policy of this facility that resident's will be assessed, and the findings documented in their clinical health record . These will be comprehensive, accurate, standardized reproducible assessment of each resident.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained as free of ac...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as was possible for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #66) reviewed for accident hazards. The facility failed to obtain physician orders or a physician assessment, as of 11/19/24, for Resident #66 for the usage of a scoop mattress prior to installing the mattress to assist in fall prevention. This failure could place residents at risk of accidents and hazards. Findings included: Record review of Resident #66's face sheet, dated 11/21/2024, reflected a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #66 had diagnoses which included seizures, syncope and collapse, and muscle weakness. Record review of Resident #66's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], reflected, he had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 99. ADL care reflected transfers, toileting, and bathing and the resident was totally dependent for assistance. Record review of Resident #66's physician orders, dated 11/19/24, reflected no physician orders for a scoop mattress. An observation on 11/19/24 at 11:49 AM revealed Resident #66 laying on a scoop mattress. In an interview on 11/20/24 at 1:45 PM, the DON was advised Resident #66 was observed laying on a scoop mattress; however, no physician assessment or physician orders were observed on file. The DON stated sometimes family members requested them for the resident so they would attempt to please the family member. She stated no assessment was completed to ensure the scoop mattress was not a risk to the resident. She stated the risk for the resident having the scoop mattress without a physician order or physician assessment could result in the resident injuring himself if he attempted to get out of bed. The facility's policy Fall Management System (12/2023) reflected It is the policy of this facility to provide an environment that remains as free of accident hazards as possible. It is also the policy of this facility to provide each resident with appropriate assessment and interventions to prevent falls and to minimize complications if a fall occurs.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Incontinence Care (Tag F0690)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents who were incontinent of bladder received ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents who were incontinent of bladder received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infection and to restore continence to the extent possible for one of two residents (Resident #6) reviewed for Incontinent Care. The facility failed to ensure CNA C did not use the same wipes used to clean Resident #6's groin (junction between the central part of the body and the thighs) to clean the resident's front part on 11/19/2024. This failure could place residents at risk of cross-contamination and development of urinary tract infections. Findings include: Record review of Resident #6's face sheet, dated 11/21/2024, reflected the resident was an [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #6 was diagnosed with dementia (a condition characterized by loss of memory and ability to reason) and muscle weakness. Record review of Resident #6's Comprehensive MDS Assessment, dated 08/19/2024, reflected the resident was not able to complete a BIMS. The Comprehensive MDS Assessment reflected Resident #6 was always incontinent for both bowel and bladder. Record review of Resident #6's Comprehensive Care Plan, dated 10/28/2024, reflected the resident had occasional to frequent bowel/bladder incontinence related to impaired mobility/cognition and muscle weakness. Observation on 11/19/2024 at 1:14 PM revealed CNA C was about to do incontinent care for Resident #6. The resident was ushered to her room from the activity area and was transferred to her bed. CNA C sanitized her hands, put on a pair of gloves, and prepared the things needed for incontinent care. She pulled the resident's dress up and unfastened the brief. She started to clean the resident's front part using the front to back technique. After cleaning the resident's front part, she rolled the resident and cleaned the resident's bottom. After cleaning the resident's bottom, CNA C took the brief, placed it under the resident, and rolled back the resident. CNA C said she would clean the resident's front part again. She pulled a wipe and started cleaning the left and right sides of the front part. After cleaning the sides, she used the same wipe to clean the middle part of the front side. After cleaning the front part again, she fastened the new brief and transferred the resident back to her wheelchair. In an interview with CNA C on 11/19/2024 at 1:29 PM, CNA C stated she used the front to back technique when she cleaned Resident #6's front part. CNA C said she did clean again the resident's front part after she was done with the resident's bottom. She said she should have thrown the wipe after each use. She said the staff should not use the same wipe to prevent the microorganisms from the sides of the front part to go to the middle of the front part. She said the practice could cause a urinary tract infection. She said she should be mindful of how she did incontinent care because the resident would be at risk for infection. She said they had in-services for incontinent care but was not able to apply it. In an interview with ADON G on 11/21/2024 at 7:32 AM, ADON G stated the wipes should be discarded after every stroke and not be reused because it could cause cross contamination and probable infection. She said the expectation was for the staff to do incontinent care the right way which was using one wipe per stroke and then discard it. She said she would initiate an in-service as soon as the interview was over. In an interview with the DON on 11/21/2024 at 7:49 AM, the DON stated the wipes should be changed with every stroke specially after cleaning the sides of the front part of the resident. She said, sometimes if the wipes were not that soiled, the wipes could be folded, and could be used again. She said but to be on the safe side, the wipes should not be re-used. She said the expectation was for the staff to remember and practice the proper way of incontinent care. She said she would be on top of this issue, would do an in-service, and would personally monitor the staff during incontinent care. In an interview with the Administrator on 11/21/2024 at 8:14 AM, the Administrator stated improper cleaning of the resident could cause infection. He said the expectation was for the staff to do the right procedure. He said he was not a clinician and would let the DON handle the issue. Record review of the facility's policy, Perineal Care Policy/Procedure - Nursing Clinical, revised 07/2013 reflected POLICY: It is the policy of this facility to 1. Cleanse perineum (area between the thighs) . 3. Prevent irritation or infection . The basic infection control-concept for peri care is to wash from the cleanest area to the dirtiest area.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Tube Feeding (Tag F0693)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was fed by enteral means receive...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was fed by enteral means received appropriate treatment and services to restore, if possible, oral eating skills and to prevent complications of enteral feeding which included but not limited to aspiration pneumonia, diarrhea, vomiting, dehydration, metabolic abnormalities, and nasal-pharyngeal ulcers for one of two resident (Resident #39) reviewed for feeding tube. 1. The facility failed to ensure LVN A used a new syringe during Resident #39's medication administration via g-tube (a tube inserted through the abdomen that delivers nutrition directly to the stomach) on 11/20/2024. 2. The facility failed to ensure LVN A put on Resident #39's abdominal binder on 11/20/2024 as per order. These failures could place residents at risk of infection and accidental pulling of the gastronomy tube. Findings include: Record review of Resident #39's face sheet, dated 11/21/2024, reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #39 was diagnosed with gastrostomy (medical procedure where a tube is inserted into the stomach) status and dysphagia (difficulty in swallowing). Record review of Resident #39's Quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 09/03/2023, reflected the resident had severe impairment in cognition with a BIMS score of 03. The resident was on tube feeding while a resident of the facility. Record review of Resident #39's Quarterly Care Plan, dated 11/13/2024, reflected the resident required tube feeding (delivery of nutrition through a tube inserted in the stomach) related to dysphagia and the interventions were to change enteral (tube feeding) administration set every night and monitor if the tube was dislodged. The care plan did not mention the resident refused to put on the abdominal binder. Record review of Resident #39's Physician Order, dated 06/08/2021, reflected every night shift Change Syringe. Record review of Resident #39's Physician Order, dated 05/06/2024, reflected Apply abdominal binder to secure Gastrostomy tube every shift. Observation and interview on 11/20/2024 at 7:46 AM revealed LVN A was about to administer Resident #39's medication via g-tube. LVN A performed hand hygiene and put on a pair of gloves. He started to prepare the medications by putting each medication in a small plastic cup. After preparing the medications, he crushed the medications one by one and mixed it with 10 ml of water. After mixing the medications, he went inside the resident's room with all the medications and supplies needed. LVN A checked for Resident #39's G-tube placement by connecting a 60 ml piston syringe with plunger (inside the syringe) to the feeding port and introduced air into the abdomen by pushing the plunger of the syringe. After checking for the placement, LVN A pulled the plunger to check for the residual. The residual was noted less than 10 ml. LVN A pushed the gastric content back, detached the syringe, pulled the plunger of the syringe, and attached it again to the feeding port of the g-tube. LVN A poured 30 ml of water into the syringe to flush it and then started to administer the medications one at a time. After administering the medications, he flushed the g-tube with 30 ml of water. LVN A detached the syringe along with the plunger from Resident #39's G-tube, washed it, and placed into a plastic bag. LVN A then put the syringe in the resident's side table. It was noted that the date on the syringe's plastic bag was 11/18/2024. It was also noted another syringe was on the side table dated 11/17/2024. LVN A said he did not notice the date on the syringe was 11/18/2024. He said the syringe was supposed to be changed every 24 hours to prevent infection. He said the night nurse was responsible in changing the syringe, but he was supposed to check before he used it to make sure he was using a new syringe. He said the syringes were replaced every day to prevent infection. He said the residual was checked to ensure the stomach was emptying effectively. It was observed during medication administration that the resident did not have an abdominal binder and there was no abdominal binder inside the resident's room. LVN A said the resident refused to put the binder and the resident was still in her right mind to decide if she wanted the binder or not. In an interview with Resident #39 on 12:22 PM, the resident said nobody had given her a binder or put a binder on her. She said if she needed the binder, she would put it on. She said she was never asked if she wanted the binder or not. She said if the binder was ordered for her, maybe she needed it. In an interview with ADON G on 11/21/2024 at 7:32 AM, ADON G stated the syringe should be changed every day as per order and it was the right thing to do. She said one would never know what was already growing inside the syringe or the plastic bag of the syringe specially if the syringe was placed inside the bag wet. She said if the resident had an order for abdominal binder, the resident should be wearing one to prevent accidental dislodgement of the g-tube. She said there should be one inside the room or if it was in the laundry, there should be another one to replace it if the other abdominal binder was not available. She said sometimes the resident would take it off, but it should be documented, or care planned. She said she already talked to the night nurse from last night and the night nurse admitted she was not able to put a new syringe. Said the staff used the old syringe could not solely blame the other nurse because he failed to check if the syringe was new. She said it was his shift and should own the mistake. She said the expectation was for the syringes to be changed every day and if the resident had an order for an abdominal binder, the resident should be wearing one to prevent accidental pulling og the g-tube She said she would do an in-service about g-tube. In an interview with the DON on 11/21/2024 at 7:49 AM, the DON stated the syringes should be replaced every 24 hours to prevent infection. She said if the resident had an order for an abdominal binder, there should be an abdominal binder, basically to prevent the g-tube to be pulled. She said if the resident was refusing it, there should be a documentation that the resident was refusing it. She said the expectation was for the staff to do the right procedure in providing g-tube care. she said she would do an in-service about g-tube care. In an interview with the Administrator on 11/21/2024 at 8:14 AM, the Administrator stated he was not aware about the procedure for tube feeding. He said whatever the policy and procedure for tube feeding was, should be followed to address the medical necessities of the residents. He said he would let the clinicians address the issue. Record review of the facility's policy Gastrostomy Tube Care and Management Policy & Procedure, revised 12/2023 reflected Policy: It is the policy of this facility to provide proper care and maintenance of gastrostomy tubes . Procedure . 6. Avoid excessive pulling or manipulating of the tube . 12. Syringe Storage and Replacement . b. The syringe will be discarded and replaced on a daily basis.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Safe Environment (Tag F0584)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike env...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely for 7 (room [ROOM NUMBER], #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, and #7) of 10 resident rooms and the hallway floors reviewed for cleanliness and sanitization. The facility failed to ensure that Resident room [ROOM NUMBER], #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, and #7 were thoroughly cleaned and sanitized. The facility failed to ensure that the facility hallway floors were cleaned. These deficient practices could place residents at risk of living in an unclean and unsanitary environment which could lead to a decreased quality of life. Findings included: An observation on 11/19/24 at 11:14 AM of the facility hallways revealed thick dirt and some reddish stains along the borders of the floor. An observation on 11/19/24 at 11:16 AM of Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] reflected the air condition unit had vents filled with black dirt debris and thick dusts. The air filters were thick with dust. A wall near a mini fridge had a long brownish stain [NAME] vertically up and down the wall. The bathroom floor had light brownish stains around the toilet. The corners of the bathroom floor had thick dirt debris building up. The mini fridge in the resident's bathroom, had reddish stains on the inside, and the small freezer section had a very thick ice buildup, and nothing could be placed in it. An observation on 11/19/24 at 11:21 AM of Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] reflected the bathroom floor had light brownish circle shape stain under the bathroom sink. The bathroom floor had light brownish stains around the toilet. The corners of the bathroom floor had thick dirt debris building up. The doorway floor entering the room had a thick dirt and wax build up. An observation on 11/19/24 at 11:23 AM of Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] reflected the air condition unit had vents filled with black dirt debris and thick dusts. The air filters had thick layers of dust. The doorway floor entering the room had a thick dirt and wax build up. The bathroom floor had thick black dirt along the corners of the floor and behind the toilet. An observation on 11/19/24 at 11:28 AM of Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] reflected the bathroom floor had thick black dirt along the corners of the floor. The corners of the room floor had thick black dirt buildup. An observation on 11/19/24 at 11:33 AM of Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] reflected the air condition unit had a thick dark stain along the top of the unit. The air filters had thick layers of dust. The bathroom floor had thick black dirt along the corners of the floor and around the toilet. The doorway floor entering the room had a thick dirt and wax build up. The corners of the room floor had thick black dirt buildup. An observation on 11/19/24 at 11:39 AM of Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] reflected the air condition unit had vents filled with black dirt debris and thick dusts. The air filters had thick layers of dust. The bathroom floor had thick black dirt along the corners of the floor, under the sink, and around the toilet. The hinges on the toilet seat had thick black dirt on the seat bracket. The doorway floor entering the room had a thick dirt and wax build up. An observation on 11/19/24 at 11:55 AM of Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] reflected the air condition unit had vents filled with black dirt debris and thick dusts. The air filters had thin layers of dust. The bathroom floor had thick brownish stain under the toilet. In an interview on 11/21/24 at 11:50 PM, the Operations Manager was shown photos of the concerns observed in the Resident room [ROOM NUMBER], #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, and #7 and the hallways. He stated he was not made aware of any concerns observed in the rooms. He stated he would meet with the housekeeping supervisor to address the concerns observed. He stated the risk of the resident's room not being thoroughly cleaned is a dignity issue. In an interview on 11/21/24 at 11:53 AM, Housekeeping Supervisor, stated she had been at the facility for 4 years. She stated housekeeping was supposed to clean everything in the room, including the air conditions. She stated they had a floor tech to clean the hall floors. She was shown pictures of the concerns observed in Resident room [ROOM NUMBER], #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, and #7 and the hallways, and she advised that housekeeping was responsible for ensuring those areas were cleaned. She stated the risk of not cleaning the rooms could result in health problems. She stated the housekeeping assigned to the 400-hall was only at the facility less than a week. In an interview on 11/21/24 at 12:05 PM, Housekeeping A stated she had only been at the facility for 4 days and she cleaned the 400-hall. She stated she was supposed to clean everything from the window to the door. She was shown pictures of the concerns observed in Resident room [ROOM NUMBER], #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, and #7 and the hallways. She stated that her housekeeping supervisor had just made her aware of the air filters needed to be cleaned. She stated the impact to the resident of the rooms not being thoroughly cleaned was not good for the resident because it was their room, and she would not want to be in a dirty room. Review of the facility's Cleaning (05/2023) revealed Housekeeping is responsible for maintaining equipment and keeping it as bacteria-free as possible. Thoroughly clean resident treatment areas, bathroom fixtures, handwashing facilities and service sink with a detergent.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Respiratory Care (Tag F0695)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents, who needed respiratory care, wer...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents, who needed respiratory care, were provided such care consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for 3 of twelve residents (Resident #35, Resident #55 and Resident #45) reviewed for Respiratory Care. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #35's nasal cannula for her oxygen concentrator was properly stored. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #55's face mask for his nebulizer was properly stored when not in use. 3. The facility failed to ensure Resident #45's nasal cannula (flexible tube used to deliver oxygen to the nose through two prongs) at the back of the wheelchair was properly stored. These failures could place residents at risk for respiratory infection and not having their respiratory needs met. Findings include: 1. Record review of Resident #35's face sheet, dated 11/21/2024, reflected an [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #35 had diagnoses which included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease with Acute Exacerbation. Record review of Resident #35's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], reflected, she had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 99. The resident was on oxygen therapy while a resident of the facility. Record review of Resident #35's physician orders, dated 11/19/24, reflected O2 at 4 liters/minute continuous per n/c to keep sats above 95%. Record review of Resident #35's Comprehensive Care Plan, dated 10/14/2024, reflected nasal canula keep inside plastic bag when not in use. An observation on 11/19/24 at 11:53 AM revealed Resident # 35's nasal canula sitting on top of a large pink stuffed rabbit and was unbagged. The resident was not in the room. In an interview and observation on 11/19/24 at 11:58 PM, the DON was shown Resident #35's nasal canula sitting on top of a large pink stuffed rabbit and unbagged. She stated the resident's nasal canula should be bagged when not in use and the risk was infection control. 2. Record review of Resident #55's face sheet, dated 11/21/2024, reflected a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #55 had a diagnosis which included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Record review of Resident #55's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 9/19/24, reflected, he had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13. The resident was diagnosed with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Record review of Resident #55's physician orders, dated 11/19/24, reflected O2 via NC to keep O2 saturation > 92%. In an interview and observation on 11/19/24, Resident #55 had his oxygen mask sitting on top of his nightstand unbagged. The resident stated he used the oxygen concentrator whenever he had difficulties breathing but had not used it for the past few days. In an interview and observation on 11/19/24 at 12:18 PM, ADON P was shown Resident #55's face mask not in use and unbagged. She stated the resident's breathing mask should be bagged when not in use to avoid the resident from getting an infection. 3. Record review of Resident #45's face sheet, dated 11/21/2024, reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident had a diagnosis which included respiratory failure with hypoxia (insufficient amount of oxygen in the body). Record review of Resident #45's Quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 11/10/2024, reflected the resident scored 99 on her BIMS Summary Score denoting the resident was unable to complete the interview to determine the BIMS score. Resident #45's Minimum Data Set, Section O - Special Treatments, Procedures, and Programs specified the resident was not on oxygen therapy. Record review of Resident #45's Comprehensive Care Plan, dated 11/17/2024, reflected the resident had oxygen therapy related to respiratory illness and one of the interventions was oxygen via nasal cannula continuously. Record review of Resident #45's Physician Order, dated 11/27/2023, reflected Apply oxygen via NC up to (4) LPM, to keep saturation at or above 90%. Titrate as indicated. every shift related to Acute and Chronic Respiratory Failure with Hypoxia. Observation and interview with Resident #45 on 11/19/2024 at 10:55 AM revealed Resident #45 was in her bed, awake. It was noted the resident had a portable oxygen tank at the back of the resident's wheelchair. A nasal cannula was connected to the portable oxygen tank. The nasal cannula was tangled to the right wheel of the wheelchair with the prongs of the nasal cannula touching the floor. There was no plastic bag at the back of the wheelchair. The resident said she never saw a plastic bag behind her wheelchair. Observation on 11/19/2024 at 11:03 AM revealed CNA E provided incontinent care to Resident #45. During the process of incontinent care, CNA E folded the wheelchair to provide more space at the foot of the bed. She did not notice the nasal cannula was tangled to the wheelchair and the prongs of the nasal cannula touched the floor. Observation and interview with LVN A on 11/19/2024 at 11:43 AM, LVN A entered the Resident #45's room to attend on the resident. LVN A passed by the resident's wheelchair going to the resident's bedside to administer the powder for the redness to. He did not notice the nasal cannula at the back of the wheelchair was on the floor. After administering the powder, LVN A washed his hands and was about to go out of the room when asked to check the nasal cannula at the back of the wheelchair. He said the nasal cannula was tangled up on the wheel of the wheelchair and the prongs of the nasal cannula was on the floor. He said he did not notice the nasal cannula was on the floor when he did his morning rounds. He said the nasal cannula should be in a bag when the resident was not using it to prevent cross contamination and respiratory infection. He said there was bag at the back of the wheelchair. LVN A disconnected the nasal cannula and said he would get a new one. He said he would also get a bag to put the nasal cannula if the resident was not using it. LVN A said he was responsible to in making sure the nasal cannula was bagged In an interview with CNA E on 11/19/2024 at 11:56 AM, CNA E stated she did not notice Resident #45's nasal cannula was on the floor when she folded the resident's wheelchair. She said if the nasal cannula was on the floor and the staff still put it on the resident's nose, it could cause infection because the dirt from the floor could enter the lungs. She said she would be mindful next time to check if the nasal cannula was in a bag and not on the floor. She said she would notify the nurse to replace the nasal cannula immediately and would also let the nurse know there was no bag for the nasal cannula that was not in use. In an interview with CNA D on 11/19/2024 at 2:27 PM, CNA D said she was the CNA on Resident #45's hall. She said she did not notice the nasal cannula was on the floor. She said if the nasal cannula was on the floor, there could be chance for cross contamination. She said she would check those residents with nasal cannula if they were bagged when not in use. In an interview with ADON G on 11/21/2024 at 7:32 AM, ADON G stated the nasal cannula should be bagged whenever the resident was not using it for infection control and prevention of cross contamination. She said whoever was caring for the resident should check if the nasal cannula was bagged when not in use or needed to be changed because it touched something dirty. She said the expectation was for the nasal cannula to be bagged when the resident was not using it and the staff would check during their rounds that the nasal cannula was bagged. she said she would do an in-service about bagging the nasal cannula when not in use. In an interview with the DON on 11/21/2024 at 7:49 AM, the DON stated the nasal cannula was supposed to be in a bag when the resident was not using it to prevent cross contamination and respiratory infections. She said the expectation was for the staff to be mindful and make sure the nasal cannula was bagged when the resident was not using it. She said she would conduct an in-service about respiratory care. In an interview with the Administrator on 11/21/2024 at 8:14 AM, the Administrator stated everything the residents were using should be kept clean to prevent infection. He said he was not a clinician but would coordinate with the DON on how to go forward about the issue of respiratory care. Record review of the facility's policy, Departmental (Respiratory Therapy) - Prevention of Infection 2001 MED-PASS, Inc. revised October 2012, reflected Purpose: The purpose of this procedure is to guide prevention of infection associated with respiratory therapy tasks and equipment . 7. Store the circuit in plastic bag, marked with date and resident's name.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, distributed, and s...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, distributed, and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for the facility's only kitchen, reviewed for food storage, labeling, dating, and kitchen sanitation. 1. The facility failed to ensure the ice chest, located on the 400-hall, was cleaned. 2. The facility failed to ensure the food stored in the refrigerator and freezer were labeled with the stored date. 3. The facility failed to ensure that the sugar and flour bins were cleaned. 4. The facility failed to ensure the ice scoop in the facility kitchen was cleaned. 5. The facility failed to ensure the kitchen cooking equipment was cleaned. 6. The facility failed to ensure the tea dispenser had the top placed back once the tea had brewed. These failures could place residents at risk for cross contamination and other air-borne illnesses. Findings included: Observations on 11/19/24 from 9:01 AM to 9:13 AM in the facility's only kitchen reflected: The ice scoop, hanging in a blue plastic holder, had brownish dirt debris along the bottom of the holder. One 9-ounce box of fish filet, located in the refrigerator, did not have a stored date. One plate with a sandwich and potato chips, located in the refrigerator, did not have a stored date. Four 2-pound bags of sliced ham, located in the refrigerator, only displayed the month and day, but there was no year documented. One large bag of sliced turkey, located in the refrigerator, only displayed the month and day, but there was no year documented. One zipped lock bag of croissants, located in the refrigerator, only displayed the month and day, but there was no year documented. Three containers containing a vegetable soup, mixed vegetables, and gravy, located in the refrigerator, was not labeled, and dated. One large container containing diced vegetables, located in the refrigerator, was not labeled, and dated. One zipped lock bag of croissants, located in the refrigerator, only displayed the month and day, but there was no year documented. One zipped locked bag of beef enchilada, located in the freezer, only displayed the month and day, but there was no year documented. Two 4-pound bags of stir fry vegetables, located in the freezer, did not have a stored date. Two 4-pound bags of slice carrots, located in the freezer, did not have a stored date. One large tea dispenser, located in the kitchen area, near the entry, was uncovered and exposed to air-borne contaminants. Two large sheets of chocolate cake, sitting on the serving line table was uncovered. The warming table in the kitchen, had brownish muddy water in it. The fryer in the kitchen was dark and smelled burnt. The inside and outside was heavily stained with grease and dirt [NAME]. The ice chest on the 400-hall was sitting on a cart. Both the ice chest and cart had black, brownish, and reddish stains all over them. The inside of the ice chest had a dark grayish stain circling the ice chest, which also contained ice. The inside lid had black dirt stains. In an interview on 11/20/24 at 1:55 PM, the consultant dietitian, was shown the pictures of the concerns observed in the kitchen area and the ice chest. She stated the dietary manager was on leave and she was the assisting with managing the kitchen in his absence. She stated they did not have anyone else designated as a temporary manager of the kitchen area. She stated that everyone was responsible for the areas identified in the kitchen and she could not point me towards any kitchen staff that was solely responsible for the care of the kitchen area. She stated she think they cleaned the kitchen equipment weekly. She stated that she would advise the dietary manager of the concerns observed once he returned. She stated these concerns not being addressed could result in food contamination and residents getting sick. In an interview on 11/21/24 at 11:50 PM, the Operations Manager was shown photos of the concerns observed in the kitchen, and he stated that the consultant dietitian had advised him of the concerns observed in the kitchen. He stated the Dietary Manager was out on leave and was expected to return next week Monday. He stated the risk of the concerns not being addressed could result in residents becoming ill. Record Review of the Facility's policy on Dietary Services and Infection Control dated 2/05/24, revealed It is the policy of this facility to prevent contamination of food products and therefore prevent foodborne illness. Provide safe food services for residents and employees All non-food items must be properly labeled and stored away from food products. Dirty equipment should never touch food. All work surfaces, utensils and equipment should be cleaned and sanitized after each use. Review of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Code (2022) revealed, PACKAGED FOOD shall be labeled as specified in LAW, including 21 CFR 101 FOOD Labeling, 9 CFR 317 Labeling, Marking Devices, and Containers, and 9 CFR 381 Subpart N Labeling and Containers, and as specified under § 3-202.18. FOOD shall be protected from contamination that may result from a factor or source not specified under Subparts 3-301 - 3-306. Review of TITLE 21--FOOD AND DRUGS CHAPTER I--FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES SUBCHAPTER B - FOOD FOR HUMAN CONSUMPTION PART 110 -- CURRENT GOOD MANUFACTURING PRACTICE IN MANUFACTURING, PACKING, OR HOLDING HUMAN FOOD
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based observation, interview and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based observation, interview and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for two of eight residents (Resident #6 and Resident #41) reviewed for Infection Control. 1. The facility failed to ensure CNA C changed her gloves and performed hand hygiene while providing incontinent care to Resident #6 on 11/19/2024. 2. The facility failed to ensure CNA B changed her gloves and performed hand hygiene while providing incontinent care to Resident #41 on 11/20/2024. 3. The facility failed to ensure CNA C would not place the pericare cleanser that would be used for incontinent care inside her pocket before using it on 11/19/2024. These failures could place residents at risk of cross-contamination and development of infections. Findings include: 1. Record review of Resident #6's face sheet, dated 11/21/2024, reflected an [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #6 had diagnoses which included with dementia (a condition characterized by loss of memory and ability to reason) and muscle weakness. Record review of Resident #6's Comprehensive MDS Assessment, dated 08/19/2024, reflected the resident was not able to complete a BIMS. The Comprehensive MDS Assessment indicated Resident #6 was always incontinent for both bowel and bladder. Record review of Resident #6's Comprehensive Care Plan, dated 10/28/2024, reflected the resident had occasional to frequent bowel/bladder incontinence related to impaired mobility/cognition and muscle weakness. Observation on 11/19/2024 at 1:14 PM revealed CNA C was about to do incontinent care for Resident #6. The resident was ushered to her room from the activity area and was transferred to her bed. CNA C sanitized her hands, put on a pair of gloves, and prepared the things needed for incontinent care. CNA C opened a new brief and placed it beside the resident's right leg. After preparing the new brief, she took a bottle of peri care and skin cleanser from her scrub pants' right-side pocket and put it on top of the new, open brief. She pulled the resident's dress up, unfastened the brief, and pushed it between the resident's thighs. She removed her gloves, sanitized her hands, and put on a new pair of gloves. She started to clean the resident's front part using the front to back technique. During the process of cleaning, the resident's right leg fell on top of the new, open brief. After cleaning the resident's front part, she took off her gloves, sanitized her hands, and put on a new pair of gloves. She rolled the resident and cleaned the resident's bottom. After cleaning the resident's bottom, CNA C took the brief from the resident's side, placed it under the resident, and rolled back the resident. She did not change her gloves after cleaning the resident's bottom and before touching the new brief. She rolled the resident back and cleaned the resident's front part some more. After cleaning the front part of the resident some more, CNA C fixed the brief and then taped it on both sides. She washed her hands. In an interview with CNA C on 11/19/2024 at 1:39 PM, CNA C stated she washed her hands before and after incontinent care. She said she put the bottle of the skin cleanser in her pocket and then placed it on top of the new brief. She said she should not put anything from her pocket on the new brief because her pocket could be dirty. She said she should not put the brief beside the resident's leg until needed because if the resident's leg touched the new brief and any germs from the legs could transfer to the brief. She said she should have changed her gloves after cleaning the resident's bottom and before touching the new brief because her gloves were already soiled from cleaning the bottom. She said her actions could cause cross contamination and infection. She said she had in-services about incontinent care and hand hygiene but failed to practice it. 2. Record review of Resident #41's face sheet, dated 11/21/2024, reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #35 had diagnoses which included urinary tract infection (infection in any part of the urinary system) and paraplegia (paralysis of the legs and lower part of the body). Record review of Resident #41's Comprehensive MDS Assessment, dated 08/20/2024, reflected the resident scored 99 on her BIMS Summary Score denoting the resident was unable to complete the interview to determine the BIMS score. The Comprehensive MDS Assessment reflected the resident was always incontinent for bladder and bowel. Record review of Resident #41's Comprehensive Care Plan, dated 08/29/2024, reflected the resident had incontinence and one of the interventions was to provide peri care after each incontinent episode. Observation and interview on 11/20/2024 at 9:48 AM revealed CNA B was about to do incontinent care for Resident #41 before her wound care. CNA B entered the resident's room and put on a gown and a pair of gloves, she did not wash her hands before putting on the gown and the gloves. She pulled the resident's overbed table and put everything she needed for incontinent care. she did not sanitize the table before putting the things needed for incontinent care on the overbed table. She unfastened the brief, pushed it between the resident's legs, and cleaned the resident's front part from front to back. She assisted the resident to roll to the left side and started to clean the resident's bottom. After cleaning the resident's bottom, she pulled the soiled brief, and threw it in the trash can. She did not pull the old padding and only rolled it towards the middle. She said she was still waiting for the nurse who would do the wound care and then she would transfer the resident to her wheelchair via Hoyer lift. While the resident was still on her side-lying position, CNA B inserted the Hoyer sling beneath the resident, put a new padding on top of the Hoyer sling, and put a new brief on top of the new padding. After putting the new brief on top of the new padding, she unrolled the old padding and put it on top of the new brief. She did not change her gloves before touching the new padding and the new brief. After wound care, CNA B rolled the resident back and fixed the brief. She said hands should be washed before incontinent care but she forgot to do so. She said she should have placed the Hoyer sling, the new padding, and the new brief after wound care so the old padding would not touch the new brief. She said the dirt from the old padding would transfer to the new brief rendering it soiled. She said the gloves should have been changed after cleaning the resident's bottom and before touching the new brief for the same reason. She said her actions could cause infection. She said she had in-services for incontinent care and hand hygiene but failed to apply them. In an interview with ADON G on 11/21/2024 at 7:32 AM, ADON G stated hand hygiene was included in all the procedures of any care. She said the staff should do hand hygiene before care was done, after any care, and in between changing of gloves. She said gloves should be changed after cleaning the residents' bottom, before getting a new brief. She said not changing the gloves after touching soiled items, or after touching soiled body parts could result in cross contamination and probable infections. She said the staff should not place any item from their pocket on the new brief for the reason that the pockets could be dirty. She said the legs should not touch the new brief as well because the legs could also be dirty. She said it would be ideal to just open the brief when incontinent care was done. She said the expectation was for the staff to do hand hygiene before and after every care, after changing their gloves, and when transitioning from a dirty site to a clean site. She said another expectation was not to put anything presumed dirty on the new brief. She said the expectation was for the staff would be mindful when they performed incontinent care to prevent infection. ADON G said she would do in-services about infection control and hand hygiene. In an interview with the DON on 11/21/2024 at 7:49 AM, the DON stated hand hygiene was the most effective way to prevent cross contamination and infection. She said hands should be washed before and after any care. She said gloves should be changed after touching the soiled brief to prevent transfer of microorganisms to any clean items. She also said nothing soiled or presumed soiled should be placed on top of the new brief to prevent transfer of anything dirty. She said the expectation was for the staff to wash their hands before and after any care, change their gloves when going from dirty to clean, and ensure the brief was clean before putting it on the resident. She said she would do an in-service and skills check-off for infection control and hand hygiene. In an interview with the Administrator on 11/21/2024 at 8:14 AM, the Administrator stated not washing the hands before any care, not changing the gloves from soiled to clean, and putting anything soiled to the new brief could contribute to cross contamination and infection. He said the expectation was for the staff to follow the policy and procedures pertaining to infection control. He said he was not a clinician and would let the DON handle the issue about infection control and hand hygiene. Record review of the facility policy, Hand Hygiene Policy & Procedure, revised 12/2023, reflected Policy: It is the policy of this facility to provide . education . healthcare workers perform hand hygiene, which is one of the most effective measures to prevent the spread of infection . wash hands . b. Before and after direct contact with residents . h. Before moving from a contaminated body site to a clean body site . j. After contact with blood or bodily fluids . m. After removing gloves.
Aug 2024 2 deficiencies 2 IJ
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to be free from abuse, ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation for 1 of 11 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for abuse and/or neglect. The facility failed to protect Resident #1, who was not verbal, from sexual abuse when a confidential interviewee provided video footage of the resident trying to cover her breasts and vaginal area with her hands while CNA A was undressing her and when CNA A had her hands between Resident #1's legs and moved her hand in a fast motion inside the vaginal area for eight (8) minutes and two seconds (.02) after changing her. An IJ was identified on 08/07/24. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 1:30 p.m. While the IJ was removed on 08/09/24, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated and a severity level of potential for more than minimal harm because all staff had not been trained on abuse and neglect. This failure could place residents at risk of abuse, neglect, humiliation, and psychosocial harm. Findings include: Record review of Resident #1's admission record, dated 07/25/24, reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1 had diagnoses which included, Dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), Cognitive Communication Deficit (trouble reasoning and making decisions while communicating), Dementia (a group of thinking and social symptoms that interferes with daily functioning), Psychotic Disorder with Delusions (an unshakeable belief in something untrue), Paranoid Schizophrenia (a person feels distrustful and suspicious of other people and acts accordingly), Major Depressive Disorder (persistently depressed mood or loss of interest in activities, causing significant impairment in daily life) and Muscle Weakness (decreased strength in the muscles). Record review of Resident #1's Modified admission MDS assessment, dated 02/12/24 , this was the most recent comprehensive assessment on file, reflected Resident #1 had no speech. She usually understood and comprehended most conversations. Resident #1 had severe cognitive impairment, the BIMS score was not indicated, Resident #1 was unable to participate. Resident #1 was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living and was incontinent of bowel and bladder. Record review of Resident #1's care plan, dated 01/31/24, reflected Resident #1 was incontinent of bowel and bladder. Staff were to provide incontinent care after each episode. The care plan reflected Resident #1 was totally dependent on staff for all her activities of daily living. Observation on 07/25/24 at 10:38 a.m. the State Surveyor received and reviewed the video provided by a confidential interviewee of the alleged incident involving CNA-A and Resident #1. The video revealed the following: Video dated 7/21/24 at (19:30:00) 7:30 PM, CNA-A entered the room with Resident #1, within camera view CNA-A began to remove the clothes off Resident #1, at (19:30:50) 7:30:50 PM the resident's blouse was completely removed, and CNA-A took the resident to her bed by grabbing her by the right arm. CNA-A used her right hand to turn back the cover on the bed. The resident was observed in the video using her left arm to cover her breast while CNA-A was walking her toward the bed. CNA-A stood the resident by the bed and pulled down the resident's pants before laying the resident on the bed, then reached to grab her feet from the floor and placed her feet in the bed. At (19:31:58) 7:30:58 PM CNA-A put the resident in bed and removed her pants leaving on the adult brief, during this time the resident was watching CNA-A while covering her breast with both of her arms. At (19:32:04) 7:32:04 PM CNA-A unfastened the adult brief of Resident #1 and walked away from the bed out of camera view, while the resident was lying on the bed covering her breast with both of her arms and the open adult brief was open exposing her vaginal area. CNA-A returned to the bedside of the resident at (19:32:38) 7:32:38 PM. When CNA-A returned to the bedside of the resident she returned with adult briefs and wipes. CNA-A was observed using the wipes to clean the resident. While CNA-A was cleaning the resident, Resident#1 was observed holding both of her arms in a bent position covering her breast while shaking her hands in a clasped position in front of her. CNA-A then turned the resident toward the wall and removed the soiled adult brief and bed pad. CNA-A stepped away from the bed again to dispose of the soiled items, as she left the resident lying on the bed completely naked. CNA-A returned to the bedside of the resident, and she placed two clean adult briefs under the resident by turning the resident from side to side. Once the open briefs were under Resident #1, CNA-A moved to the head of the bed and repositioned the pillow under the head of the resident before returning to the middle of the bed and grabbed the gown and shook the gown before she placed the gown over the head of the resident and put her arms inside the gown. At (19:35:19) 7:35:19 PM, while the resident's vaginal area was still uncovered CNA-A used her hands to open the bent legs of the resident and placed her hands in the vaginal area. The resident was observed raising up her right forearm and tapping the left arm of CNA-A while grimacing her face. The resident was observed stretching out her right leg and reaching her right hand toward CNA-A while looking at her. CNA-A was observed looking toward the resident while she had her hands in the open vaginal area of the resident. At (19:35:54) 7:35:54 PM Resident #1 was observed placing her shaking left hand in front of her face, while CNA-A was looking toward her. Resident #1 was observed raising her head slightly off the pillow and patting her left foot on the bed. At (19:36:17) 7:36:17 PM CNA-A continued to have her hands in the vaginal area of the resident when the resident raised her right arm and was moving it toward CNA-A, as CNA-A looked toward the resident. At (19:36:22) 7:36:22 PM CNA-A continued to have her hands in the vaginal area of Resident #1 as CNA-A's right arm was observed to be moving in a fast motion until the resident looked toward something behind CNA-A at (19:36:29) 7:36:29 PM. CNA-A then looked behind her, then she continued to keep her hands in the open vaginal area of the resident until the resident looked behind CNA-A again at (19:36:35) 7:36:35 PM. At (19:36:35) 7:36:35 PM CNA-A stood up as if she was talking to Resident #1. At (19:36:46) 7:36:46 PM CNA-A opened the legs of Resident #1 with her vaginal area still uncovered and then she walked away from the bed off camera. During this time Resident #1 used her hands to cover her open vaginal area. CNA-A returned to the bedside of Resident #1 at (19:36:52) 7:36:52 PM and she moved the hands of the resident, CNA-A leaned over and placed her right hand between the still bent legs of the resident at (19:37:02) 7:37:02 PM and the resident looked behind CNA-A and CNA-A looked at the resident. At (19:37:13) 7:37:13 PM the resident was observed moving her hand and looking behind CNA-A while CNA-A continued to have her hand moving it in a fast motion. At (19:37:24) 7:37:24 PM Resident#1's legs were stretched on the bed while CNA-A's hands were still moving fast in her vaginal area. This action continued in the open vaginal area of the resident until (19:37:32) 7:37:32 PM when CNA-A bent Resident #1's right leg back up before returning her hands to the open vaginal area. At (19:37:55) 7:37:55 PM, CNA-A moved her body closer to the head of the bed of the resident exposing her vaginal area more, CNA-A's right hand was observed on the vagina of Resident #1 moving in a fast motion until (19:38:02) 7:38:02 PM when CNA-A reached down and pulled up both adult briefs and fastened them at (19:38:21) 7:38:21 PM. At (19:38:30) 7:38:30 PM, CNA-A pulled down the gown of Resident #1 then repositioned her in bed. At (19:38:43) 7:38:43 PM, CNA-A covered Resident #1 with the bed covers, lowered the resident's bed, and repositioned her pillow at (19:39:26) 7:39:26 PM. A confidential interview revealed it was observed on 07/21/24 in the evening time, the confidential interviewee stated they were not sure of the specific time of the original viewing of the video. The confidential interviewee stated it was observed via video CNA-A was in the bedroom of Resident #1 putting Resident #1 in bed when they touched her inappropriately. The confidential interviewee stated Resident #1 was not verbal. The confidential interviewee stated there was audio on the camera, the interviewee stated when CNA-A entered the room with the resident CNA-A said, Let me lay you down. The confidential interviewee stated there was not much communication after that statement. The confidential interviewee stated after Resident #1's clothes were taken off, and the resident was put on the bed and the incident happened. The confidential interviewee stated the abuse was reported to the Administrator in Training, and law enforcement. The confidential interviewee stated Resident #1 was taken to the hospital for an exam on 07/22/24. The confidential interviewee stated the hospital stated it would take several weeks to receive the results of the exam. The confidential interviewee stated Resident #1 was anxious when her adult brief was changed, and she would grab the hand of the person who was changing her. The confidential interviewee stated it was hard to determine if the incident had caused the resident harm at this time. The confidential interviewee stated the family requested Resident #1 not be visited because she was non-verbal and could not contribute to the investigation. The confidential interviewee they had contacted the police and Resident #1 was removed from the facility on 07/22/24 at 3:50 p.m. The confidential interviewee stated Resident #1 would not be returning to that facility. The confidential interviewee stated the video would be sent via text. In an interview with the Administrator in Training, acting abuse coordinator on 07/25/24 at 9:40 a.m. revealed he was notified of the abuse allegation on 07/22/24 late in the afternoon by the POA of Resident #1 . He stated the POA notified LE prior to coming to the facility. He stated he was told Resident #1 had been abused, he was not given specifics and was told there was a video, but he had not seen the video. He stated while LE and the POA was at the facility they removed Resident #1 from the facility when they left. He stated CNA A last worked 07/21/24 and was suspended on 07/22/24. He stated the facility's investigation was still ongoing at that time. He stated the facility was conducting safe surveys of all the residents and angel rounds (department heads are making rounds on assigned residents) and skin assessments on the two non-verbal residents. He stated the facility conducted an in-service with all staff on 07/22/24. He stated there was not any previous warnings or incidents regarding CNA-A at the facility. He stated CNA-A received the employee of the month for the month of June. He stated several families complimented her work. He stated at that time the facility was not able to verify if the incident had happened because the investigation was still ongoing. He stated the nursing staff was responsible to ensure the CNA's took proper care of the residents, the DON, and then the Administrator. In an interview on 07/24/24 at 12:08 p.m. with Detective from the local PD revealed he went to the facility on [DATE] and he was not provided the information for CNA-A until he returned on 07/23/24. He stated after the facility provided him with the location information of CNA-A an arrest warrant was issued. He stated due to the nature of his investigation he did not want CNA-A to be interviewed by the State Surveyor prior to her arrest. During an interview on 07/25/24 at 12:20 p.m., LVN B said the abuse coordinator should be notified immediately after an allegation of abuse was made. She said she could tell the abuse coordinator, the administrator or administrator in training in person or call them. She said she could also tell the DON of an allegation of abuse. She said she was trained on abuse and neglect several times. She said the abuse policy was a topic that was trained frequently. She said when abuse allegedly occurred she would also need to ensure the resident and other residents were kept safe from the person who allegedly did the abuse. During an interview on 07/25/24 at 1:17 p.m., CNA C said if a resident alleged that they were abused then she would need to ensure the resident was safe, report to the abuse coordinator, the administrator and the DON, keep the resident safe, and prevent the person who allegedly did the abuse away from other residents. She said she was in-serviced on all these principals' multiple times. During an interview on 07/25/24 at 2:47 p.m., CNA-D said she had been in-serviced on the facility abuse policy several times. She said if an allegation of abuse was made, they were to immediately report the allegation to the abuse coordinator, the administrator. She said she could also report to the charge nurse and the DON as well as call the abuse coordinator. She said she would also need to ensure the person who did the abuse did not have access to any resident and have them leave the building. In a follow-up interview with the Administrator in training on 07/25/24 at 3:43 p.m., he stated he interviewed CNA-A prior to the State Surveyor's entrance. He stated, CAN-A described and demonstrated the service she provided to Resident #1 as cleaning her and changing her bed and her brief. She stated she did not have any issues with Resident #1. He stated CAN-A did not provide a written statement of the services she provided to Resident #1. The Administrator in training stated the facility had psych services at the facility and they came and talked to the residents whom CNA-A had provided care . He stated psych services noted no concerns for other residents on Hall 500, where Resident #1 resided. He stated CNA-A would be terminated on 07/25/24, now that he knew the allegation was substantiated. He stated the facility became aware of the incident when the POA and police came to the facility on [DATE]. He stated the facility started in-services on abuse with the facility staff on 07/22/24. He stated their abuse and neglect policy required that all residents be protected after an allegation of abuse. He stated they ensured the protection of residents by conducting the safe surveys and angel rounds. He stated the residents were at risk of having their rights violated, risk of no longer being free from abuse, and risk of trauma. Record review of the facility's in-service, dated 03/26/24, reflected CNA A was in-serviced on the facility abuse policy. Abuse policy educated staff on identifying abuse and neglect as well as timeframes associated with reporting abuse and neglect to the State Agency. Record review of the facility in-service, dated 07/22/24, reflected all staff signed they were in-serviced on facility abuse policy. Record review of residents residing on Hall 500 evaluated by Psych services dated 07/23/24 reflected no change made to medication, the psych evaluation was secondary to an incident that occurred with another resident, the incident included inappropriate touching, the residents were emotionally stable and the recent incident did not affect the resident. Record review of CNA A's Date of Hire-01/10/2023 Background check completed reflected: 01/04/2023-Federal Criminal National-clear, Healthcare Sanctions-clear, Sex Offender-clear 01/04/23-Criminal History Conviction Name Search with Department of Public Safety-No search results found 01/03/23-Texas Health and Human Services Not listed on the EMR, NAR: Active 07/15/23-Employability Status Check Search Results-Not listed on EMR-NAR status: Active; Certification expiration date: 07/03/2025 07/22/2024-Criminal History Conviction Name Search Results-No search results found 07/23/2024-Employability Status Check Search Results-Nurse Record review of CNA A's Counseling/Disciplinary Notice dated 07/22/24 reflected suspension, pending investigation, subject to discharge, reason why counseling/disciplinary action necessary was due to abuse allegation, notified via phone on 07/22/24. Record review of facility Termination Form dated 7/25/24 to CNA A reflected her last day of work was 07/21/24 and she was involuntary terminated for gross misconduct on 7/25/24. Record review of facility Abuse: Prevention of and Prohibition Against dated 11.2017 revised 12.2023 reflected, The facility will provide oversight and monitoring to ensure that its staff, who are agents of the Facility, deliver care and services in a way that promotes and respects the rights of the residents to be from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, exploitation, or use technology that would infringe on the resident's right to personal privacy. Sexual abuse is non-consensual sexual contact of any type with a resident. An IJ was identified on 08/07/24. The IJ template was provided to the Administrator on 08/07/24 at 1:30 p.m. and a Plan of Removal was requested. The POR was accepted on 08/08/24 at 4:23 p.m. The POR revealed the following: Abuse: Per the information provided in the IJ Template given on 8/7/2024, the facility has started but has not completed in-services with all staff as of 07/25/24. The facility received verbal information alleging that a staff member had touched a resident inappropriately. This allegation was given to the facility by the police and by an HHSC surveyor. 1. The Medical Director was notified of the IJ on 08/07/2024 at 2:10 pm. 2. Train the trainer in-servicing was given to the ED, DON, ADON, MDS Nurse and RN/ED Partners by the Clinical Resource. The training included regarding abuse to include resident rights to be free of sexual abuse. Started in-service training on 7/22/2024 on Abuse: Prevention of and Prohibition Against Sexual Assault and Prevention. Train the trainer in-servicing on training and implementation of abuse and neglect policy and procedures. This was completed on 8/7 /24. 3. Training and knowledge checks were completed with all staff regarding abuse to include resident rights to be free of sexual abuse. Skills check offs and skin assessments started on pericare [sic] 7/22/2024. Train the trainer in-servicing on training and implementation of abuse and neglect policy and procedures. This was completed on 8/7/24. This training was given by the ED, DON, ADON, MDS Nurse Clinical Resource and RN/ED Partners, was initiated on 8/7/24 will be completed on 8/8/24 with all staff prior to the start of their next shift. Staff will not be allowed to work unless they have completed the training and knowledge checks. This training will also be included in the new hire orientation and will be included for PRN staff prior to starting work on the floor. These staff will not be allowed to work unless they have received this training and knowledge checks. ED, DON and/or Designee will be responsible that all staff are trained before working. 4. An ad hoc (a non-scheduled QA meeting) meeting regarding items in the IJ templates will be completed on 8/7/24. Attendees will include the DON, Medical Director, ADON, Clinical Resource, Executive Director and will include the plan of removal items and interventions. 5. The ED or designee will verify staff knowledge on abuse prevention with 10 staff weekly using the abuse and neglect knowledge checks. This will be completed weekly after the initial training and knowledge checks completed on 8/8/24. 6. Summary of IJ and corrective action to be reviewed by QAPI Committee weekly x 4 weeks beginning 8/8/24 or until substantial compliance established and continue monthly for 90 days to ensure ongoing compliance. Monitoring of the facility plan of removal was as follows: In an interview on 08/09/24 at 9:30 a.m. with the Administrator in Training revealed he had been trained on 08/07/24 on how to in-service the staff on Abuse: Prevention of and Prohibition Against a resident by staff and they should report abuse/neglect to the administrator or person in charge of the facility at the time the abuse was observed or suspected. In an interview on 08/09/24 at 9:35 a.m. with the Resource Nurse, revealed she had been trained on 08/07/24 on how to in-service the staff on Abuse: Prevention of and Prohibition Against a resident by staff and they should report abuse/neglect to the administrator or person in charge of the facility at the time the abuse was observed or suspected. In an interview on 08/09/24 at 10:50 a.m. Resident #2 revealed she did feel safe in the facility, she stated a few weeks ago a facility staff came by to ask if there had been any issues with any CNA's and she told her there had not been any issues. She stated she knew she could notify the social worker or the administrator if she did not feel safe or was abused. In an interview on 08/09/24 at 11:23 a.m. with RN E revealed she had been in-serviced that abuse was a willful act, it was never appropriate for an employee to have sexual contact with a resident, the administrator was the abuse coordinator and should be notified if abuse was suspected. In an interview on 08/09/24 at 11:36 a.m. with Resident #3 revealed stated she did feel safe in the facility, she stated she had been asked by facility staff if she felt safe and if she had any issues with a CNA. She stated she had not had any issues. She stated if she did not feel safe or if she was abused she would tell her son or the administrator. In an interview on 08/09/24 at 11:41 a.m. with CNA F revealed he had been in-serviced that abuse was a willful act, it was never appropriate for an employee to have sexual contact with a resident, and the administrator was the abuse coordinator and should be notified if abuse was suspected. In an interview on 08/09/24 at 11:45 a.m. with MA G revealed she had been in-serviced that abuse was a willful act, it was never appropriate to have sexual contact with a resident, if she suspected abuse she would notify the abuse coordinator, the administrator, or the DON. In an interview on 08/09/24 at 12:07 p.m. with the Housekeeping Supervisor revealed she had been in-serviced on how to in-service the staff on Abuse: Prevention of and Prohibition Against a resident by staff and they should report abuse/neglect to the administrator or person in charge of the facility at the time the abuse was observed or suspected. She stated she would in-service the staff that abuse was a willful act, it was not appropriate for a staff to have sexual contact with a resident. She stated abuse and neglect should be reported to the administrator, as the abuse and neglect coordinator. In an interview on 08/09/24 at 12:16 p.m. with CNA H revealed she was in-serviced that abuse was a willful act, it was not appropriate for an employee to have sexual contact with a resident. She stated if she suspected or saw abuse she should report to the administrator the abuse coordinator. In an interview on 08/09/24 at 12:22 p.m. with CNA I revealed she was in-serviced that abuse was a willful act, it was never appropriate for an employee to have sexual contact with a resident. Abuse and neglect should be reported to the abuse coordinator, the administrator. In an interview on 08/09/24 at 12:28 p.m. with RN J revealed she was in-serviced that abuse was a willful act, it was never appropriate for an employee to have sexual contact with a resident. Abuse and neglect should be reported to the abuse coordinator, the administrator. In an interview on 08/09/24 at 12:34 p.m. with visiting DON revealed she had been in-serviced on how to in-service the staff on Abuse: Prevention of and Prohibition Against a resident by staff and they should report abuse/neglect to the administrator or person in charge of the facility at the time the abuse was observed or suspected. She stated she would in-service the staff that abuse was a willful act, it was not appropriate for a staff to have sexual contact with a resident. She stated abuse and neglect should be reported to the administrator, as the abuse and neglect coordinator. In an interview on 08/09/24 at 12:51 p.m. with CNA K revealed she was in-serviced that abuse was a willful act, it was never appropriate for an employee to have sexual contact with a resident. Abuse and neglect should be reported to the abuse coordinator, the administrator. In an interview on 08/09/24 at 12:57 p.m. with CNA L revealed she was in-serviced that abuse was a willful act, it was never appropriate for an employee to have sexual contact with a resident. Abuse and neglect should be reported to the abuse coordinator, the administrator. In an interview on 08/09/24 at 1:02 p.m. with RN M revealed she was in-serviced that abuse was a willful act, it was never appropriate for an employee to have sexual contact with a resident. Abuse and neglect should be reported to the abuse coordinator, the administrator. In an interview on 08/09/24 at 1:05 p.m. with the Director of Rehabilitation revealed he had been in-serviced on how to in-service the staff on Abuse: Prevention of and Prohibition Against a resident by staff and they should report abuse/neglect to the administrator or person in charge of the facility at the time the abuse was observed or suspected. He stated he would in-service the staff that abuse was a willful act, it was not appropriate for a staff to have sexual contact with a resident. He stated abuse and neglect should be reported to the administrator, as the abuse and neglect coordinator. In an interview on 08/09/24 at 1:02 p.m. with RN M revealed she was in-serviced that abuse was a willful act, it was never appropriate for an employee to have sexual contact with a resident. Abuse and neglect should be reported to the abuse coordinator, the administrator. In an interview on 08/09/24 at 1:15 p.m. with Therapist N revealed she was in-serviced that abuse was a willful act, it was never appropriate for an employee to have sexual contact with a resident. Abuse and neglect should be reported to the abuse coordinator, the administrator. In an interview on 08/09/24 at 1:23 p.m. with CNA O revealed she was in-serviced that abuse was a willful act, it was never appropriate for an employee to have sexual contact with a resident. Abuse and neglect should be reported to the abuse coordinator, the administrator. In an interview on 08/09/24 at 1:27 p.m. with CNA P revealed she was in-serviced that abuse was a willful act, it was never appropriate for an employee to have sexual contact with a resident. Abuse and neglect should be reported to the abuse coordinator, the administrator. In an interview on 08/09/24 at 1:31 p.m. with CNA Q revealed she was in-serviced that abuse was a willful act, it was never appropriate for an employee to have sexual contact with a resident. Abuse and neglect should be reported to the abuse coordinator, the administrator. In an interview on 08/09/24 at 1:35 p.m. with Resident #4 revealed she stated she had not been touched inappropriately by anyone, she stated she received her medication on time. She stated facility staff asked her a few weeks ago if she was safe. She stated she felt safe living at the facility, she stated if she was abused she could tell her family or the administrator. In an interview on 08/09/24 at 1:42 p.m. with Resident #5 revealed she stated she did feel safe at the facility, she stated if she did not feel safe she could tell her family or the social worker. In an interview on 08/09/24 at 1:50 p.m. with Resident #6 revealed she felt safe in the facility, she stated she had not been touched inappropriately. She stated if she was abused she could notify the nurse or the administrator. In an interview on 08/09/24 at 2:30 p.m. with the Administrator revealed she had been trained on 08/07/24 on Prevention of and Prohibition Against Sexual Assault and Prevention. Train the trainer in-servicing on training and implementation of abuse and neglect policy and procedures. This training will also be included in the new hire orientation and will be included for PRN staff prior to starting work on the floor. These staff will not be allowed to work unless they have received this training and knowledge checks. She stated the QA team met and discussed they would ensure new staff were in-serviced and current staff would conduct random knowledge test of staff and it would be documented on form. She stated safety assessments had been completed on the residents. She stated Resident #1 had not returned to the facility since she was removed by the POA on 07/22/24. She stated CNA A was suspended 07/22/24 by phone and she was terminated on 07/25/24. Review of Facility train the trainer in-service dated 8/7/24 revealed the management staff had been in serviced on how to train the staff on Abuse: Prevention of and Prohibition Against by staff policy dated 10.2022 Review of Facility abuse and neglect in-service dated 8/7/24 revealed all facility staff had been in serviced on Abuse: Prevention of and Prohibition Against by staff policy dated 10.2022 Record review of Psych services evaluation for Resident's #7, #8, #9, #10, #11, #12, #13, and #14 dated 07/23/14 reflected no change made to medication, the psych evaluation was secondary to an incident that occurred with another resident, the incident included inappropriate touching, the residents were emotionally stable, and the recent incident did not affect the resident. Record review of resident roster provided 08/07/24 reflected Resident #1 was no longer residing at the facility. Record review of Skills checklist-Perineal Care dated 07/22/24 and 07/23/24 reflected CNAs were re-evaluated to ensure they performed proper Perineal Care. Record review of Safe Interviews of facility residents dated 07/22/24 and 07/23/24 reflected residents were assessed for safety. Record review of CNA A's Counseling/Disciplinary Notice dated 07/22/24 reflected suspension, pending investigation, subject to discharge, reason why counseling/disciplinary action necessary was due to abuse allegation, notified via phone on 07/22/24. Record review of facility Termination Form dated 7/25/24 to CNA A reflected her last day of work was 07/21/24 and she was involuntary terminated for gross misconduct on 7/25/24. The administrator was informed the Immediate Jeopardy was removed on 08/09/2024 at 4:23 p.m. the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated and a severity level of potential for more than minimal harm because all staff had not been trained on abuse and neglect.
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Abuse Prevention Policies (Tag F0607)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement written policies and procedures that prohibi...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement written policies and procedures that prohibit mistreatment, neglect, and abuse of residents, for 1 of 11 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to implement policy that prohibited abuse of Resident #1 was sexually abused when a confidential interviewee provided video footage of CNA A undressing Resident #1 as Resident #1used her crossed arms to cover her breast and CNA A inserted her hands between the legs of Resident #1, moved her hands in a fast motion inside the vaginal area for eight (8) minutes and 2 (.02) seconds after the resident's clothes were taken off. An IJ was identified on 08/07/24. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 1:30 p.m. While the IJ was removed on 08/09/24, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated and a severity level of potential for more than minimal harm because all staff had not been trained on abuse and neglect. This failure could place residents at risk for physical harm, psychosocial harm, unsafe environment, and further abuse. Findings included: Record review of facility Abuse: Prevention of and Prohibition Against dated 11.2017 revised 12.2023 reflected, The facility will provide oversight and monitoring to ensure that its staff, who are agents of the Facility, deliver care and services in a way that promotes and respects the rights of the residents to be from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, exploitation, or use technology that would infringe on the resident's right to personal privacy. Sexual abuse is non-consensual sexual contact of any type with a resident. Record review of Resident #1's admission record, dated 07/25/24, reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] Resident #1 had diagnoses which included, Dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), Cognitive Communication Deficit (trouble reasoning and making decisions while communicating), Dementia (a group of thinking and social symptoms that interferes with daily functioning), Psychotic Disorder with Delusions (an unshakeable belief in something untrue), Paranoid Schizophrenia (a person feels distrustful and suspicious of other people and acts accordingly), Major Depressive Disorder (persistently depressed mood or loss of interest in activities, causing significant impairment in daily life) and Muscle Weakness (decreased strength in the muscles). Record review of Resident #1's Modified admission MDS assessment, dated 02/12/24, reflected Resident #1 had no speech. She usually understood and comprehended most conversations. Resident #1 had severe cognitive impairment, the BIMS was not indicated, Resident #1 was unable to participate. Resident #1 was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living and was incontinent of bowel and bladder. Record review of Resident #1's care plan, dated 01/31/24, reflected Resident #1 was incontinent of bowel and bladder. Staff were to provide incontinent care after each episode. The care plan reflected Resident #1 was totally dependent on staff for all her activities of daily living. Observation on 07/25/24 at 10:38 a.m. the State Surveyor received and reviewed the video provided by a confidential interviewee of the alleged incident involving CNA-A and Resident #1. The video revealed the following: Video dated 7/21/24 at (19:30:00) 7:30 PM, CNA-A entered the room with Resident #1, within camera view CNA-A began to remove the clothes off Resident #1, at (19:30:50) 7:30:50 PM the resident's blouse was completely removed, and CNA-A took the resident to her bed by grabbing her by the right arm. CNA-A used her right hand to turn back the cover on the bed. The resident was observed in the video using her left arm to cover her breast while CNA-A was walking her toward the bed. CNA-A stood the resident by the bed and pulled down the resident's pants before laying the resident on the bed, then reached to grab her feet from the floor and placed her feet in the bed. At (19:31:58) 7:30:58 PM CNA-A put the resident in bed and removed her pants leaving on the adult brief, during this time the resident was watching CNA-A while covering her breast with both of her arms. At (19:32:04) 7:32:04 PM CNA-A unfastened the adult brief of Resident #1 and walked away from the bed out of camera view, while the resident was lying on the bed covering her breast with both of her arms and the open adult brief was open exposing her vaginal area. CNA-A returned to the bedside of the resident at (19:32:38) 7:32:38 PM. When CNA-A returned to the bedside of the resident she returned with adult briefs and wipes. CNA-A was observed using the wipes to clean the resident. While CNA-A was cleaning the resident, Resident#1 was observed holding both of her arms in a bent position covering her breast while shaking her hands in a clasped position in front of her. CNA-A then turned the resident toward the wall and removed the soiled adult brief and bed pad. CNA-A stepped away from the bed again to dispose of the soiled items, as she left the resident lying on the bed completely naked. CNA-A returned to the bedside of the resident, and she placed two clean adult briefs under the resident by turning the resident from side to side. Once the open briefs were under Resident #1, CNA-A moved to the head of the bed and repositioned the pillow under the head of the resident before returning to the middle of the bed and grabbed the gown and shook the gown before she placed the gown over the head of the resident and put her arms inside the gown. At (19:35:19) 7:35:19 PM, while the resident's vaginal area was still uncovered CNA-A used her hands to open the bent legs of the resident and placed her hands in the vaginal area. The resident was observed raising up her right forearm and tapping the left arm of CNA-A while grimacing her face. The resident was observed stretching out her right leg and reaching her right hand toward CNA-A while looking at her. CNA-A was observed looking toward the resident while she had her hands in the open vaginal area of the resident. At (19:35:54) 7:35:54 PM Resident #1 was observed placing her shaking left hand in front of her face, while CNA-A was looking toward her. Resident #1 was observed raising her head slightly off the pillow and patting her left foot on the bed. At (19:36:17) 7:36:17 PM CNA-A continued to have her hands in the vaginal area of the resident when the resident raised her right arm and was moving it toward CNA-A, as CNA-A looked toward the resident. At (19:36:22) 7:36:22 PM CNA-A continued to have her hands in the vaginal area of Resident #1 as CNA-A's right arm was observed to be moving in a fast motion until the resident looked toward something behind CNA-A at (19:36:29) 7:36:29 PM. CNA-A then looked behind her, then she continued to keep her hands in the open vaginal area of the resident until the resident looked behind CNA-A again at (19:36:35) 7:36:35 PM. At (19:36:35) 7:36:35 PM CNA-A stood up as if she was talking to Resident #1. At (19:36:46) 7:36:46 PM CNA-A opened the legs of Resident #1 with her vaginal area still uncovered and then she walked away from the bed off camera. During this time Resident #1 used her hands to cover her open vaginal area. CNA-A returned to the bedside of Resident #1 at (19:36:52) 7:36:52 PM and she moved the hands of the resident, CNA-A leaned over and placed her right hand between the still bent legs of the resident at (19:37:02) 7:37:02 PM and the resident looked behind CNA-A and CNA-A looked at the resident. At (19:37:13) 7:37:13 PM the resident was observed moving her hand and looking behind CNA-A while CNA-A continued to have her hand moving it in a fast motion. At (19:37:24) 7:37:24 PM Resident#1's legs were stretched on the bed while CNA-A's hands were still moving fast in her vaginal area. This action continued in the open vaginal area of the resident until (19:37:32) 7:37:32 PM when CNA-A bent Resident #1's right leg back up before returning her hands to the open vaginal area. At (19:37:55) 7:37:55 PM, CNA-A moved her body closer to the head of the bed of the resident exposing her vaginal area more, CNA-A's right hand was observed on the vagina of Resident #1 moving in a fast motion until (19:38:02) 7:38:02 PM when CNA-A reached down and pulled up both adult briefs and fastened them at (19:38:21) 7:38:21 PM. At (19:38:30) 7:38:30 PM, CNA-A pulled down the gown of Resident #1 then repositioned her in bed. At (19:38:43) 7:38:43 PM, CNA-A covered Resident #1 with the bed covers, lowered the resident's bed, and repositioned her pillow at (19:39:26) 7:39:26 PM. A confidential interview revealed it was observed on 07/21/24 in the evening time, the confidential interviewee stated they were not sure of the specific time of the original viewing of the video. The confidential interviewee stated it was observed via video CNA-A was in the bedroom of Resident #1 putting Resident #1 in bed when they touched her inappropriately. The confidential interviewee stated Resident #1 was not verbal. The confidential interviewee stated there was audio on the camera, the interviewee stated when CNA-A entered the room with the resident CNA-A said, Let me lay you down. The confidential interviewee stated interviewee stated there was not much communication after that statement. The confidential interviewee stated after Resident #1's clothes were taken off, and the resident was put on the bed and the incident happened. The confidential interviewee stated the abuse was reported to the Administrator in Training, and law enforcement. The confidential interviewee stated Resident #1 was taken to the hospital for an exam. The confidential interviewee stated the hospital stated it would take several weeks to receive the results of the exam. The confidential interviewee stated Resident #1 was anxious when her adult brief was changed, and she grabbed the hand of the person who was changing her. The confidential interviewee stated it was hard to determine if the incident had caused the resident harm at this time. The confidential interviewee stated the family requested Resident #1 not be visited because she was non-verbal and could not contribute to the investigation. The confidential interviewee stated the video would be sent via text. In an interview with the Administrator in Training, acting abuse coordinator on 07/25/24 at 9:40 a.m. revealed he was notified of the abuse allegation on 07/22/24 late in the afternoon by the POA of Resident #1 . He stated the POA notified LE prior to coming to the facility. He stated he was told Resident #1 had been abused, he was not given specifics and was told there was a video, but he had not seen the video. He stated while LE and the POA was at the facility they removed Resident #1 from the facility when they left. He stated CNA A last worked 07/21/24 and was suspended on 07/22/24. He stated the facility's investigation was still ongoing at that time. He stated the facility was conducting safe surveys of all the residents and angel rounds (department heads are making rounds on assigned residents) and skin assessments on the two non-verbal residents. He stated the facility conducted an in-service with all staff on 07/22/24. He stated there was not any previous warnings or incidents regarding CNA-A at the facility. He stated CNA-A received the employee of the month for the month of June. He stated several families complimented her work. He stated at that time the facility was not able to verify if the incident had happened because the investigation was still ongoing. He stated the nursing staff was responsible to ensure the CNA's took proper care of the residents, the DON, and then the Administrator. During an interview on 07/25/24 at 12:20 p.m., LVN B said the abuse coordinator should be notified immediately after an allegation of abuse was made. She said she could tell the abuse coordinator, the administrator or administrator in training in person or call them . She said she could also tell the DON of an allegation of abuse. She said she was trained on abuse and neglect several times. She said the abuse policy was a topic that was trained frequently. She said when abuse allegedly occurred she would also need to ensure the resident and other residents were kept safe from the person who allegedly did the abuse. During an interview on 07/25/24 at 1:17 p.m., CNA C said if a resident alleged that they were abused then she would need to ensure the resident was safe, report to the abuse coordinator who was the administrator, and/or the DON . She stated she would keep the resident safe and prevent the person who allegedly did the abuse away from other residents. She said she was in-serviced on all these principals' multiple times. During an interview on 07/25/24 at 2:47 p.m., CNA-D said she had been in-services on the facility abuse policy several times. She said if an allegation of abuse was made, they were to immediately report the allegation to the abuse coordinator , the administrator. She said she could also report to the charge nurse and the DON as well as call the abuse coordinator. She said she would also need to ensure the person who did the abuse did not have access to any resident and have them leave the building. In a follow-up interview with the Administrator in training on 07/25/24 at 3:43 p.m., he stated he interviewed CNA-A prior to the State Surveyor's entrance. He stated, CAN-A described and demonstrated the service she provided to Resident #1 as cleaning her and changing her bed and her brief. She stated she did not have any issues with Resident #1. He stated CAN-A did not provide a written statement of the services she provided to Resident #1. The Administrator in training stated the facility had psych services at the facility and they came and talked to the residents whom CNA-A had provided care . He stated psych services noted no concerns for other residents on Hall 500, where Resident #1 resided. He stated CNA-A would be terminated on 07/25/24, now that he knew the allegation was substantiated. He stated the facility became aware of the incident when the POA and police came to the facility on [DATE]. He stated the facility started in-services on abuse with the facility staff on 07/22/24. He stated their abuse and neglect policy required that all residents be protected after an allegation of abuse. He stated they ensured the protection of residents by conducting the safe surveys and angel rounds. He stated the residents were at risk of having their rights violated, risk of no longer being free from abuse, and risk of trauma. Record review of the facility's in-service, dated 03/26/24, revealed CNA A was in-serviced on the facility abuse policy. Abuse policy educated staff on identifying abuse and neglect as well as timeframes associated with reporting abuse and neglect to the State Agency. Record review of residents by Psych services dated 07/23/14 reflected no change made to medication, the psych evaluation was secondary to an incident that occurred with another resident, the incident included inappropriate touching, the residents were emotionally stable, and the recent incident did not affect the resident. Record review of the facility in-service, dated 07/22/24, reflected all staff signed they were in-serviced on facility abuse policy. Record review of Psych services evaluation for Resident's #7, #8, #9, #10, #11, #12, #13, and #14 dated 07/23/14 reflected no change made to medication, the psych evaluation was secondary to an incident that occurred with another resident, the incident included inappropriate touching, the residents were emotionally stable, and the recent incident did not affect the resident. Record review of CNA A's Background check completed reflected: 01/04/2023-Federal Criminal National-clear, Healthcare Sanctions-clear, Sex Offender-clear 01/04/23-Criminal History Conviction Name Search with Department of Public Safety-No search results found 01/03/23-Texas Health and Human Services Not listed on the EMR, NAR: Active 07/15/23-Employability Status Check Search Results-Not listed on EMR-NAR status: Active; Certification expiration date: 07/03/2025 07/22/2024-Criminal History Conviction Name Search Results-No search results found 07/23/2024-Employability Status Check Search Results-Nurse Record review of CNA A's Counseling/Disciplinary Notice dated 07/22/24 reflected suspension, pending investigation, subject to discharge, reason why counseling/disciplinary action necessary was due to abuse allegation, notified via phone on 07/22/24. An IJ was identified on 08/07/24. The IJ template was provided to the Administrator on 08/07/24 at 1:30 p.m. and a Plan of Removal was requested. The POR was accepted on 08/08/24 at 4:23 p.m. The POR revealed the following: Develop and Implement Policy: Per the information provided in the IJ Template given on 8/7/2024, the facility has started but has not completed in-services with all staff as of 07/25/24. The facility received verbal information alleging that a staff member had touched a resident inappropriately. This allegation was given to the facility by the police and by an HHSC surveyor. The facility has not been given or reviewed the video where the alleged abuse may have occurred. 1. The Medical Director was notified of the IJ on 08/07/2024 at 2:10 pm. 2. Train the trainer in-servicing was given to the ED, DON, ADON, MOS Nurse and RN/ED Partners by the Clinical Resource. The training included regarding abuse to include resident rights to be free of sexual abuse. Started in-service training on 7/22/2024 on Abuse: Prevention of and Prohibition Against Sexual Assault and Prevention. Train the trainer in-servicing on training and implementation of abuse and neglect policy and procedures. This was completed on 8/7/24. 3. Training and knowledge checks were completed with all staff regarding abuse to include resident rights to be free of sexual abuse. Skills check offs and skin assessments started on peri care 7/22/2024. Train the trainer in-servicing on training and implementation of abuse and neglect policy and procedures. This was completed on 8/7/24. This training was given by the ED, DON, ADON, MOS Nurse Clinical Resource and RN/ED Partners, was initiated on 8/7/24 will be completed on 8/8/24 with all staff prior to the start of their next shift. Staff will not be allowed to work unless they have completed the training and knowledge checks. This training will also be included in the new hire orientation and will be included for PRN staff prior to starting work on the floor. These staff will not be allowed to work unless they have received this training and knowledge checks. ED, DON and/or Designee will be responsible that all staff are trained before working. 4. An ad hoc (a non-scheduled QA meeting) meeting regarding items in the IJ templates will be completed on 8/7/24. Attendees will include the DON, Medical Director, ADON, Clinical Resource, Executive Director and will include the plan of removal items and interventions. 5. The ED or designee will verify staff knowledge on abuse prevention with 10 staff weekly using the abuse and neglect knowledge checks. This will be completed weekly after the initial training and knowledge checks completed on 8/8/24. 6. Summary of IJ and corrective action to be reviewed by QAPI Committee weekly x 4 weeks beginning 8/8/24 or until substantial compliance established and continue monthly for 90 days to ensure ongoing compliance. 7. Monitoring of the facility plan of removal was as follows: In an interview on 08/09/24 at 9:30 a.m. with the Administrator in Training revealed he had been trained on 08/07/24 on Prevention of and Prohibition Against Sexual Assault and Prevention. Train the trainer in-servicing on training and implementation of abuse and neglect policy and procedures. This training will also be included in the new hire orientation and will be included for PRN staff prior to starting work on the floor. These staff will not be allowed to work unless they have received this training and knowledge checks. He stated the QA team met and discussed they would ensure new staff were in-serviced and current staff would conduct random knowledge test of staff and it would be documented on form. He stated he was also trained on understanding behavioral symptoms of residents that may increase the risk of abuse was resistance to care, outburst, and difficulty in adjusting to new routines or staff. He stated he had been trained that if abuse or neglect involved an employee he should immediately remove the employee from care of any resident and suspend the employee during the investigation. In an interview on 08/09/24 at 9:35 a.m. with the Resource Nurse, revealed she had been trained on 08/07/24 on Prevention of and Prohibition Against Sexual Assault and Prevention. Train the trainer in-servicing on training and implementation of abuse and neglect policy and procedures. This training will also be included in the new hire orientation and will be included for PRN staff prior to starting work on the floor. These staff will not be allowed to work unless they have received this training and knowledge checks. She stated the QA team met and discussed they would ensure new staff were in-serviced and current staff would conduct random knowledge test of staff and it would be documented on form. She stated she was trained to recognize the signs of abuse of physical or psychosocial indicators, to inform staff they could report abuse they could do so without fear of reprisal. She stated she was trained to respond immediately to protect the alleged victim of abuse, and the victim should be examined for any injury, by physical examination or psychosocial assessment. In an interview on 08/09/24 at 11:23 a.m. with RN E revealed she was in-serviced on abuse policy that she should ensure all residents were free from neglect and abuse, to identify and assess behaviors that could indicate a resident had been abused was sexually aggressive behavior and saying sexual things. She sated some indicators of abuse would be sudden or unexplained changes in behaviors or activities, fear of a person providing care. She had been given a knowledge assessment regarding abuse and neglect included to report to the administrator. In an interview on 08/09/24 at 11:41 a.m. with CNA F revealed his training included identifying and preventing abuse of a resident, how to report abuse and that he could report abuse without fear of retaliation. He sated he was re-in-serviced that they should not take photos of residents. He had been given a knowledge assessment regarding abuse and neglect included to report to the administrator. In an interview on 08/09/24 at 11:45 a.m. with MA G revealed she stated abuse and neglect policy stated she should intervene in situations of abuse or neglect, she stated signs that a resident had been abused could be the resident acted different around a specific staff, the resident might be withdrawn or act ashamed when staff were providing care. She had been given a knowledge assessment regarding abuse and neglect included to report to the administrator. In an interview on 08/09/24 at 12:07 p.m. with the Housekeeping Supervisor revealed she had been trained on 08/07/24 on Prevention of and Prohibition Against Sexual Assault and Prevention. Train the trainer in-servicing on training and implementation of abuse and neglect policy and procedures. This training will also be included in the new hire orientation and will be included for PRN staff prior to starting work on the floor. These staff will not be allowed to work unless they have received this training and knowledge checks. She stated the QA team met and discussed they would ensure new staff were in-serviced and current staff would conduct random knowledge test of staff and it would be documented on form. She stated abuse prevention policy included verbal aggression, physical aggression, sexual abuse. She stated some signs a resident had been abused would include injuries in an unusual location on the resident, sudden unexplained changes in the resident's behavior such as fear of a person or feeling shame or guilt. In an interview on 08/09/24 at 12:16 p.m. with CNA H revealed she had been given a knowledge assessment regarding abuse and neglect included to report to the administrator. She stated when she received additional in-service on the abuse policy she learned the abused resident should be kept safe from the employee, the resident should receive emotional support and counseling. She stated some signs of abuse would be sudden change in behavior or a resident who would normally participate in activities suddenly did not want to participate. In an interview on 08/09/24 at 12:22 p.m. with CAN I revealed she learned all abuse was not directly observed and possible indicators would be bruises, skin tears, injuries in an unusual location, and unexplained changes in behaviors. She stated she must protect the resident from the perpetrator. she had been given a knowledge assessment regarding abuse and neglect included to report to the administrator. In an interview on 08/09/24 at 12:28 p.m. with RN J revealed she stated regarding the facility policy on abuse and neglect all personnel, residents, and visitors were encouraged to report incidents and grievances without the fear of retribution, she would supervise the staff to identify and correct any inappropriate or unprofessional behaviors, she stated as a member of the staff she was responsible for ensuring residents were free from abuse, policy indicated that a resident with communication disorders or spoke a different language should be monitored for signs of abuse. She stated she had been given a knowledge assessment regarding abuse and neglect included to report to the administrator. In an interview on 08/09/24 at 12:34 p.m. with visiting DON revealed she had been trained on 08/09/24 on Prevention of and Prohibition Against Sexual Assault and Prevention. Train the trainer in-servicing on training and implementation of abuse and neglect policy and procedures. This training will also be included in the new hire orientation and will be included for PRN staff prior to starting work on the floor. These staff will not be allowed to work unless they have received this training and knowledge checks. She stated the QA team met and discussed they would ensure new staff were in-serviced and current staff would conduct random knowledge test of staff and it would be documented on form. In an interview on 08/09/24 at 12:51 p.m. with CNA K revealed she stated the abuse neglect policy was reviewed with her regarding recognizing signs of abuse, neglect, exploitation such as physical or psychosocial indicators, facility staff were prohibited from taking or keeping photographs of facility residents in any manner that demeaned or humiliated the resident. She stated she should report any reasonable suspicion of a crime against a resident, she should protect the resident. She had been given a knowledge assessment regarding abuse and neglect included to report to the administrator. In an interview on 08/09/24 at 12:57 p.m. with CNA L revealed she stated she learned from abuse and neglect policy that she should ensure the residents were safe, she stated some types of abuse of a resident would be verbally aggressive behavior, screaming, cursing, insulting to their race, physically aggressive behavior. She stated a resident who has been abuse might also exhibit the same behaviors. she had been given a knowledge assessment regarding abuse and neglect included to report to the administrator. In an interview on 08/09/24 at 1:02 p.m. with RN M revealed she received additional training on the abuse policy regarding recognizing signs of abuse and neglect such as physical or psychosocial indicators, abuse and neglect should be reported to the administrator without fear of reprisal, she learned the facility staff was responsible for protecting the residents, they should not take or distribute photos of the residents, and that dementia residents are at a greater risk of abuse. She had been given a knowledge assessment regarding abuse and neglect included to report to the administrator. In an interview on 08/09/24 at 1:05 p.m. with the Director of Rehabilitation revealed he would be responsible to protect all the residents, he stated the abuse and neglect policy indicated all personnel, residents, and visitors should be encouraged to report incidents without the fear of retribution, the facility would act to protect the resident and prevent further abuse, the facility should have structures and processes to provide needed care and services for all residents. Residents who require extensive nursing care or totally dependent on staff for provision of care are most vulnerable. He had been trained on 08/07/24 on Prevention of and Prohibition Against Sexual Assault and Prevention. Train the trainer in-servicing on training and implementation of abuse and neglect policy and procedures. This training will also be included in the new hire orientation and will be included for PRN staff prior to starting work on the floor. These staff will not be allowed to work unless they have received this training and knowledge checks. She stated the QA team met and discussed they would ensure new staff were in-serviced and current staff would conduct random knowledge test of staff and it would be documented on form. In an interview on 08/09/24 at 1:15 p.m. with Therapist N revealed she was re-in-serviced on policy for identification of signs of abuse of a resident that included sudden or unexplained changes in behaviors or activities such as fear of a person or place, learning to identify different types of abuse such as mental/verbal, sexual, and physical, any act that would demean or humiliate a resident. She had been given a knowledge assessment regarding abuse and neglect included to report to the administrator. In an interview on 08/09/24 at 1:27 p.m. with CNA O revealed she received addition training on how to prevent abuse or neglect of a resident how to recognize signs that a resident had been abused or neglected either physically or mentally. She stated she could report abuse without reprisal, and she should not take photos of any resident or distribute any resident to cause the resident to be demeaned or humiliated. She had been given a knowledge assessment regarding abuse and neglect included to report to the administrator. In an interview on 08/09/24 at 1:15 p.m. with CNA P revealed she was re-in-serviced on the facility policy of how to recognize signs of abuse and neglect such as physical or psychosocial indicators, abuse and neglect should be reported without fear of retaliation, vulnerable residents usually had dementia or were cognitively impaired. She sated she learned that some residents with behavioral symptoms would be aggressive reactions outburst or yelling difficulty in adjusting to new routines or staff. She had been given a knowledge assessment regarding abuse and neglect included to report to the administrator. In an interview on 08/09/24 at 1:31 p.m. with CNA Q revealed she had been re-trained on the abuse policy that all staff were encouraged to report incidents and abuse without fear of retribution, how to recognize signs of abuse and neglect which were physical or psychosocial, she should not take photos and distribute them of the residents, she stated she learned that residents with dementia or cognitively impaired residents were at greater risk of abuse. She had been given a knowledge assessment regarding abuse and neglect included to report to the administrator. In an interview on 08/09/24 at 2:30 p.m. with the Administrator revealed she had been trained on 08/07/24 on Prevention of and Prohibition Against Sexual Assault and Prevention. Train the trainer in-servicing on training and implementation of ab[TRUNCATED]
Jan 2024 2 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Comprehensive Care Plan (Tag F0656)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs for one (Resident #1) of three residents reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to ensure two staff performed incontinence care per the care plan for Resident #1. This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving care consistent with their care plan. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's MDS quarterly assessment dated [DATE], reflected she was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. She was always incontinent of bladder and bowel. She required the extensive of two staff for incontinence care and bed mobility. Her cognitive status was unable to be determined. Her diagnoses included stroke. Review of Resident #1's Care Plan dated 07/17/20, reflected the resident had an ADL self-care performance deficit related to history of stroke. An intervention was for two staff to assist for bed mobility and toileting. An observation on 01/11/24 at 12:45 PM revealed CNA A was preparing to do incontinence care for Resident #1. Resident #1 was lying in bed and was awake and alert. She had some difficulty with communicating. CNA A provided incontinence care by herself for the resident. An interview on 01/11/24 at 3:15 PM with CNA A revealed Resident #1 was a 2 person assist for incontinence care. She said she had another staff at the door waiting, but then the staff member left. CNA A said she felt comfortable providing incontinence care by herself for Resident #1. An interview on 1/11/24 at 3:00 PM with the DON revealed two staff were not used to provide incontinence care for Resident #1 because the care plan was a guide. The care plan indicated two staff were needed, but the DON said that could change depending on the level of participation during the care of the resident. The DON said some residents might require two staff in the morning and only one staff in the evening. Review of the facility's policy Comprehensive Resident Centered Care Plan revised January 2022, reflected: Procedure: 1.the facility will develop and implement a baseline care plan that includes instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and con...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infection for one (Resident #1) of two residents observed for incontinence care. CNA A failed to perform hand hygiene and clean Resident #1's mattress during incontinence care. This failure could place residents at risk for infection during incontinence care. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's MDS quarterly assessment dated [DATE], reflected she was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. She was always incontinent of bladder and bowel. She required the extensive of two staff for incontinence care and bed mobility. Her cognitive status unable to be determined. Her diagnoses included stroke. Review of Resident #1's Care Plans reflected the following: -04/17/23 History of frequent urinary tract infections related to immobility and incontinence. -07/17/20 ADL self-care performance deficit related to history of stroke. An intervention was for two staff to assist for bed mobility and toileting. An observation on 01/11/24 at 12:45 PM revealed CNA A was preparing to do incontinence care for Resident #1. Resident #1 was lying in bed and was awake and alert. She had some difficulty with communicating. The resident was soiled with urine that had gone through the bed sheets and down to the mattress. CNA A folded down the brief while the resident was lying on her black and cleaned the urine in the peri-area. CNA A turned the resident to her right side and cleaned the urine from the resident's buttocks. CNA A changed her gloves but did not perform hand hygiene. CNA grabbed a clean sheet, mattress pad, and brief and placed them underneath the resident. The CNA did not clean the urine on the mattress. The CNA put the clean brief on the resident. An interview on 01/11/24 at 12:50 PM with CNA A revealed she did not perform hand hygiene because she did not have hand sanitizer with her. She said she did not clean the mattress because it would have been hard for her to do and she would have needed another staff member to help her. CNA A said she had been trained to perform hand hygiene and to clean the mattress. CNA A said hand hygiene and cleaning the mattress were important to prevent infection. An interview on 1/11/24 at 3:00 PM with the DON revealed staff were supposed to perform hand hygiene between glove changes and clean the mattress if it had urine on it. The DON said it was important to prevent infection. Review of the facility's policy Incontinence Care dated March 2017, reflected, POLICY: It is the policy of this facility to provide incontinence care for those residents requiring assistance with bladder and/or bowel incontinence . 6. Remove gloves and wash hands .
Oct 2023 5 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Pharmacy Services (Tag F0755)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services, which included proced...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services, which included procedures that assured accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing and administering of all drugs and biologicals to meet the needs of each resident, for 1 of 16 residents (Resident #15) reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed reorder the pain medication oxycodone in time causing Resident #15 to missed three doses on 10/17/23. This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving the therapeutic benefits of the prescribed medications. Findings included: Review of Resident #15's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] reflected the resident was an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included Parkinson's disease, muscle weakness, fibromyalgia. The MDS further reflected the resident had clear speech, was understood and understood others. Review of Resident #15's care plan revised on 09/28/23 reflected the resident had complaints of pain related to advanced osteoarthritis. Interventions included to administer oxycodone as per orders and monitor for effectiveness. Observation and interview on 10/17/23 at 1:23 PM with Resident #15 revealed she was ambulatory with a rolling walker and was wearing a back brace. Resident #15 stated she had been at the facility for about 5 months and she did not have any concerns with the facility or staff care. Interview on 10/18/23 at 10:20 AM with Resident #15 revealed she had run out of her pain medication the day prior, 10/17/23, because it appeared they were not ordered in time, and they would have to wait for the pharmacy to fill it. The resident said the medication had arrived from the pharmacy because she had already taken it today, 10/18/23. Resident #15 stated when she was at home, she only took the oxycodone as needed but when she was admitted to the facility, the doctor had prescribed the medication to be taken routinely. Resident #15 stated she wanted to be sure the facility re-ordered her medication on time so she would have it in case she was in extreme pain. Review of Resident #15's October 2023 Medication Administration Record for reflected the following: oxycodone-acetaminophen oral tablet 10-325 Give one tablet by mouth three times a day for pain may have 1 PRN dose between 2200-0200 Further review of the Medication Administration Record revealed the medication oxycodone had not been given on 10/17/23 at 6:00 AM, 12:00 PM, and 6:00 PM. Interview on 10/19/23 at 2:42 PM with MA D revealed Resident #15 had run out of the pain medication oxycodone and she was responsible for re-ordering the medication before it ran out, but it appeared she overlooked it. Resident #15 had her pain medication on 10/16/23 and had only gone 10/17/23 without it. On 10/17/23 when she noticed the resident was out, she gave the empty medication cards to RN E, so he could order them. Interview on 10/19/23 at 2:48 AM with RN E revealed MA D told him to re-order pain medication (oxycodone) for Resident #15 but did not recall which day. RN E said he was not aware Resident #15 did not have any to take on 10/17/23 and said if he would have been made aware he would have checked their E-kit to see if they had any to give the resident. Interview on 10/19/23 at 2:57 PM with the DON revealed she was not aware Resident #15 had run out of oxycodone and did not take it on 10/17/23. The DON said when MA D became aware Resident #15 did not have any medication, she should have let RN E know so he could have checked the facility E-kit to see if they had any in stock. The DON further stated risks of a resident not taking routine pain medications included extreme pain or risks of sending the resident through withdrawals. Review of the facility's Medication Administration policy, revised 08/31/23, reflected the following: Policy: It is the policy of this facility that medications shall be administered as prescribed by the attending physician. .Nurse notifies pharmacy for new supply
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Drug Regimen Review (Tag F0756)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure any drug regimen irregularities reported by the Pharmacist C...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure any drug regimen irregularities reported by the Pharmacist Consultant were acted upon, for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for unnecessary medications, psychotropic medications, and medication regimen review. The facility's Pharmacist Consultant recommended Resident #15's Lexapro 10 mg be discontinued. The physician agreed but the medication continued to be administered to the resident. This failure could place residents on psychoactive medications at risk for possible adverse side effects, adverse consequences, and decreased quality of life. Findings included: Review of Resident #11's MDS dated [DATE] reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included cerebrovascular accident, non-Alzheimer's dementia, depression, bipolar disorder, and psychotic disorder. Review of Resident #11's care plan revised on 03/28/23 reflected the resident had potential for mood problem related to depression, bipolar, and epileptic seizures. Interventions included to administer Lexapro as ordered. Review of the pharmacy recommendation printed on 09/20/23 for Resident #11 revealed the following: .duplicate serotonin agents present increased risk: Effexor and Lexapro Increase risk of serotonin action and [side effects] including anorexia, anxiety, agitation, bleeding, serotonin syndrome please Consider DC of one Further review of the pharmacy recommendation revealed the doctor agreed to discontinued Lexapro 10mg and signed the recommendation on 10/04/23 and it was noted by RN F. Review of Resident #11's October 2023 Medication Administration Record reflected she was taking Lexapro 10 mg by mouth one time a day for depression. The MAR further reflected Resident #11 was administered the medication from 10/04/23 through 10/19/23. Interview on 10/19/23 at 1:49 PM with RN F revealed she recalled getting Resident #11's pharmacy recommendation, but she must have forgot to discontinue the medication in the computer system. Interview on 10/19/23 at 1:52 PM with the DON revealed the Resident #11's Lexapro should have been discontinued when RN F got the recommendation signed by the doctor. The DON said it was important to follow pharmacy recommendations to gradually decrease some of the medications because some medications can be hard on the liver and kidneys and to try to keep residents on the least amountnumber of medications. Review of the facility's Pharmacist, Services of a Licensed policy, revised January 2022, reflected the following: Purpose The pharmacist is responsible for helping the facility obtain and maintain timely and appropriate pharmaceutical services that support resident's healthcare needs, that are consistent with current standards of practice, and that meet state and federal requirements. .Conducting the monthly medication regimen review (MRR) for each resident in the facility. Addressing the expected time frames for conducting the review and reporting the findings. Addressing the irregularities Documenting and reporting of the results of the review
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and con...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for one of three residents (Resident #27) reviewed for infection control, in that: 1. RN A failed to perform hand hygiene prior to entering room [ROOM NUMBER] to obtain blood pressure. 2. RN A failed to clean the blood pressure wrist cuff after checking vitals of Resident #27 and then placing the contaminated wrist cuff in the top drawer of the medication cart. 3. RN A prepared medications for Resident #27 by placing the medications in small dose cups and transported the dose cups by pinching the side of the dose cup using a forefinger inserted into dose cup and thumb on the outside of the dose cup. Failure to follow Infection Control policy placed residents at risk of infection/illness. Findings included: Record review of Resident #27's undated face sheet revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility 02/27/20. Review of Resident #27's MDS revealed Resident #27 had a history that included hypertension, Cerebral Palsy, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, diabetes, Hyponatremia, Peripheral Vascular Disease, aphasia, depression, bipolar disorder, and contractures. Observation on 10/18/23 at 8:51 AM revealed RN A entering various resident rooms on hall 200 in search of the facility movable/rolling blood pressure machine and then, without performing hand hygiene, RN A entered room [ROOM NUMBER] and used a wrist cuff to obtain the blood pressure of Resident #27. RN A returned to the medication cart and placed the contaminated wrist cuff in the left side of the top drawer of the medication cart. RN A was then observed to prepare medications for Resident #27 without performing hand hygiene prior to setting up medications. Observation on 10/18/23 at 8:53 AM revealed RN A transported the medications prepared for Resident #27 by pinching the side of the dose cup using a forefinger inserted into dose cup and thumb on the outside of the dose cup. Interview on 10/18/23 at 9:41 AM with RN A stated after she used the blood pressure wrist cuff on Resident #27 she had not disinfected the cuff prior to placing the cuff in the medication cart drawer. RN A stated she forgot to sanitize the wrist cuff before placing the cuff in the medication cart. RN A stated failure to disinfect the cuff prior to placing the cuff in the med cart was cross-contamination and placed residents at risk of infection. RN A stated she did not realize she was placing her index finger inside the dose cup and thumb on the outside in a pinching motion when picking up dose cups. RN A stated touching the inside of cups was cross contamination and placed residents at risk of infection/illness. RN A stated after leaving her medication cart in search of the rolling blood pressure machine, she forgot to disinfect her hands before entering resident room and prior to setting up medications. RN A stated she had disinfectant wipes and hand sanitizer on her cart. RN A stated she had received a recent infection control in-service but could not recall who had performed the in-service; stated in-services were usually provided by DON/ADON. Interview on 10/19/23 at 1:00 PM with RN B stated hand hygiene must be performed before and after all resident contact, immediately before preparing medications or dressings. RN B stated failure to perform hand hygiene put residents at risk of infection or exacerbation of current condition. RN B stated blood pressure cuffs should be disinfected after use and between residents to prevent risk of infection/cross-contamination. RN B stated disinfectant wipes were used to clean items used at bedside and stated dry time was 2 minutes. RN B stated equipment should be disinfected prior to storage. RN B stated all carts had disinfectant hand gel and wipes and that the facility had a generous supply of each. Interview on 10/19/23 at 9:55 AM with the DON stated her expectation was that all staff would perform hand hygiene before and after resident care and as needed. The DON stated she had been employed in facility since September 2023 and had not provided a hand hygiene in-service to staff since her arrival. The DON stated failure to perform hand hygiene and disinfect cuffs after use placed all residents/others at risk of illness/infection. Interview on 10/19/23 at 2:12 PM with the PT Director stated hand hygiene was performed before and after each resident contact to prevent spread of germs and minimize resident risk of infection. The PT Director stated each piece of therapy equipment was disinfected after each resident use with either a disinfectant wipe or a specialized spray used for various gym items. The PT Director stated a plentiful supply of disinfectant wipes/sprays and plenty of soap/water and paper towels. The director stated failure to perform hand hygiene and disinfect equipment after each use placed residents/staff at risk of illness/infection. The Director stated he monitored staff to ensure staff were following infection control policies. Interview on 10/19/23 at 2:30 PM with the Administrator stated his expectation was that all staff would follow Infection Control policies and all staff would perform hand hygiene after each resident contact. The Administrator stated the facility had plenty of hand gel, soap/water and disinfectant wipes. The Administrator stated his expectation was that blood pressure cuffs, other equipment used for resident care, be disinfected after each use. The Administrator stated facility policy prohibited cross-contamination, spread of organisms. Record review of the facility's Infection Prevention and Control Program Policy dated June 2021 and reviewed/revised October 2022 reflected: Policy .It is the policy of this facility to provide the necessary supplies, education and oversight to ensure healthcare workers perform hand hygiene based on accepted standards. Reporting Mechanisms for Infection Control .6. The facility will provide areas, equipment, and supplies to implement it Infection Control Program with the goal of: .c. Effective cleaning and disinfecting equipment as needed, to include bathing areas between each resident use
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Comprehensive Care Plan (Tag F0656)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights, that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment for 4 of 10 residents (Residents # 37, #30, #21, #47) reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to address Residents #37, #30, #21 and #47's elected code status on their comprehensive person-centered care plan. This failure could affect residents and could result in resident's needs not being met. Findings included: 1. Review of Resident #37's face sheet, undated, revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old female admitted [DATE] with a history that included pulmonary hypertension (a condition that affects the blood vessels in the lungs), hypertension (high blood pressure), pleural effusion (the accumulation of fluid in between the parietal and visceral pleura, called the pleural cavity), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a group of diseases that cause airflow blockage and breathing-related problems) and anemia. Review of Resident # 37's undated Physician Orders revealed an order dated 08/14/23 of Full Code status. Review of Resident #37's Plan of Care dated 08/09/23 and another Plan of Care dated 09/21/23 revealed Full Code status was not included in the Plan. 2. Review of Resident #30's face sheet, undated, revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old male admitted [DATE] with a history that included Frontotemporal Neurocognitive Disorder (sometimes called frontotemporal dementia, are the result of damage to neurons in the frontal and temporal lobes of the brain), aphasia (loss of ability to understand or express speech), congestive heart failure, non-Alzheimer's dementia, Encephalopathy (any disease that affects the whole brain and alters its structure or how it works, and causes changes in mental function), cognitive communication deficit, hemiplegia and hemiparesis. Review of Resident #30's undated Physician Orders revealed an order dated 06/28/23 of Full Code status. Review of Resident #30's Plan of Care dated 07/11/23 and another Plan of Care dated 09/26/23 revealed Full Code status was not included in Plan of Care. 3. Review of Resident #21's face sheet, undated, revealed the resident an [AGE] year-old male admitted [DATE] with a history that included non-traumatic brain dysfunction, Metabolic Encephalopathy (is a problem in the brain. It is caused by a chemical imbalance in the blood), anemia, hypertension (high blood pressure), diabetes, renal failure, aphasia (difficulty understanding speech or communicating), cerebrovascular accident (stroke), non-Alzheimer's dementia and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). Review of Resident #21's undated Physician Orders revealed an order dated 02/20/23 of Do Not Resuscitate. Review of Resident #21's Plan of Care dated 09/26/23 revealed Do Not Resuscitate was not on the Plan. 4. Review of Resident #47's face sheet, undated, revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old male admitted [DATE] with a history that included Wegener's Granulomatosis without renal involvement (Granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA) is a rare disorder in which blood vessels become inflamed. This leads to damage in major organs of the body. It was formerly known as Wegener's granulomatosis), anemia, hypertension (high blood pressure), non-Alzheimer's dementia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a group of diseases that cause airflow blockage and breathing-related problems), depression and hip fracture. Review of Resident #47's undated Physician Orders revealed an order dated 3/03/23 for Full Code status. Review of Resident #47's Plan of Care dated 10/10/23 revealed Full Code status was not included in the Plan. Interview on 10/19/23 at 2:05 pm with the MDS Coordinator stated a Resident Care Plan described exactly what to do for each individual resident for ADL's (Activities of Daily Living), transport, bathing, diet, wound care, psycho-social needs, code status and any impairments. The MDS Coordinator stated all staff utilized the Care Plan to determine resident needs. The MDS Coordinator stated a Care Plan should reflect physician orders. The MDS Coordinator stated she had removed code status from care plans to reflect [NAME] company policy. The MDS Coordinator stated policy was to document Code Status discussion with resident/RP. Interview on 10/19/23 at 1:00 PM with RN B stated a resident's Plan of Care was a reflection of the Physician Orders and described type of care resident was to receive; from diet to medications, any therapies, catheter care and code status. Interview on 10/19/23 at 12:45 PM with LVN C stated all medical staff used resident Plan of Care to determine needs of resident. LVN C stated Plan of Care should reflect physician orders. LVN C stated an incomplete Care Plan could cause resident not to receive necessary care. Interview on 10/19/23 at 2:30 PM with the administrator stated his expectation was that care plans would reflect physician orders and code status would be included in plan of care. The administrator stated failure to follow resident wishes regarding code status would be detrimental to resident/family. Review of the facility's Comprehensive Person-Centered Care Planning Policy dated November 2016 and reviewed/revised January 2022 reflected: Policy It is the policy of this facility that the interdisciplinary team (IDT) shall develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment. Procedure: .2. The baseline care plan will include the minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for a resident including, but not limited to: b. Physician Orders
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food safety in the facility's only ki...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food safety in the facility's only kitchen. 1. The facility failed to ensure Dietary Aide G's hair restraint was worn properly and the Dietary Manager wore a beard restraint. 2. The facility failed to ensure stove top (range/griddle) and ovens were cleaned in accordance with professional standards. These failures could place all residents, who receive food from the kitchen, at risk for food contamination and food-borne illness. Findings included: Observation on 10/17/23 at 9:20 AM revealed Dietary Manager was not wearing a beard covering (restraint). Observation on 10/17/23 at 9:25 AM revealed Dietary Aide G, who was responsible for dishwashing, was not wearing a hairnet properly in place. Observation and interview on 10/17/23 at 9:28 AM revealed the stove, range, and ovens were layered in grease, food spills, and food particles. The Dietary Manager stated he had received a cleaner in the previous day and planned on cleaning the equipment. The Dietary Manager was asked to provide a copy of the cleaning schedule; hoowever, a cleaning schedule was not provided during the survey. Observation on 10/18/23 at 11:06 AM revealed the Dietary Manager was again not wearing a beard covering. Further observation revealed Dietary Aide G was not wearing a hairnet properly in place. At this time, the Dietary Aide G was assisting [NAME] H with placing drinks on the residents' trays and preparing the trays for lunch. This included Dietary Aide G using the ice scoop to place ice in the glasses. Interview with the Dietary Manager on 10/18/23 at 11:10 AM revealed the Dietary Manager had beard coverings available in the kitchen and pointed them out. He stated he only wore his beard covering when he was working with food in the kitchen. The Dietary Manager also stated that the Dietary Aide G's hair covering had slipped upwards due to sweating. Interview with Dietary Aide G on 10/18/23 at 11:28 AM revealed she thought her hair covering was down on both days. She stated her hair coverings slipped upwards when she sweated. Observation on 10/18/23 at 1:14 PM revealed the stove, range, and ovens were still layered in grease, food spills, and food particles. Interview on 10/19/23 at 3:46 PM with the Administrator revealed he had gone into the kitchen on 10/18/23 and viewed the stove, range, and ovens. He also stated no cleaning schedule could be provided. The Administrator revealed equipment should be cleaned per facility's policy to prevent cross contamination and the risk of food borne illnesses for the residents. Interview on 10/19/23 at 3:54 PM with the Administrator revealed staff should wear beard coverings and hair coverings properly in place as per facility's policy to prevent cross contamination and the risk of food borne illnesses for the residents. Record review of the facility's Infection Control Policy/Procedure policy, dated October 2022, reflected: Policy: It is the policy of this facility to prevent contamination of food products and therefore prevent food born illness. Procedures: .-Personal Hygiene .Proper attire for food handlers should include a hair covering (hair nets or caps), freshly laundered uniform and work shoes and short, clean fingernails. Moustaches and sideburns must be kept trimmed. Beards must be covered .-Dietary Housekeeping .Ovens will be cleaned as needed and according to the cleaning schedule (at least once every two weeks). Spills and food particles will be removed after each use. .Stove tops (Range, griddle) will be cleaned after each use. Record review on of the Food and Drug Administration's Food Code, dated 2017, reflected: Section 3-305.11 Food Storage. (A) Except as specified in (B) of this section, FOOD shall be protected from contamination by storing the FOOD: (1) In a clean, dry location; (2) Where it is not exposed to splash, dust, or other contamination; and (3) At least 15 cm (6 inches) above the floor. (B) FOOD in packages and working containers may be stored less than 15 cm (6 inches) above the floor on case lot handling EQUIPMENT as specified under § 4-204.122. 3-305.14 Food Preparation. During preparation, UNPACKAGED FOOD shall be protected from environmental sources of contamination. 3-307.11 Miscellaneous Sources of Contamination. FOOD shall be protected from contamination that may result from a factor or source not specified under Subparts 3-301 - 3-306. 3-602.11 Food Labels. (A) FOOD PACKAGED in a FOOD ESTABLISHMENT, shall be labeled as specified in LAW, including 21 CFR 101 - Food labeling, and 9 CFR 317 Labeling, marking devices, and containers. 92 3-501.13 revealed Thawing: TIME/TEMPERATURE CONTROL FOR SAFETY FOOD shall be thawed: (A) Under refrigeration that maintains the FOOD temperature at .(41 [degrees] F) or less; or (B) Completely submerged under running water: (1) At a water temperature of . (70 [degrees] F) or below, (2) With sufficient water velocity to agitate and float off loose particles in an overflow.
Sept 2023 2 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Pharmacy Services (Tag F0755)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services, including procedures ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services, including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals, to meet the needs of each resident for 1 of 2 Medication Carts (400 Hall Medication Cart) reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to ensure 400 Hall Medication Cart did not include medication for a deceased resident, Resident #1. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving the correct medication, adverse reactions to medications, and worsening of symptoms of diseases. Findings Include: An observation on [DATE] at 7:52 AM, revealed there was medication on the 400 Hall Medication Cart for Resident #1. Record review of Resident #1's electronic record revealed the resident passed away on [DATE]. The status noted on her electronic record was, discharged . Record review of a progress note dated [DATE], on Resident #1's electronic record stated the following: At 1900 hours patient noted unresponsive, no verbal or tactile stimulation, no breathing or lung sound were auscultated or heartbeat An interview and observation on [DATE] at 1:10 PM revealed Resident #1's medications were still on the 400 Hall Medication Cart. The following punch packets of medications for Resident #1 were on the 400 Hall Medication Cart: Levothyroxine 75 MCG tablets usually used to treat an underactive thyroid gland Benzonatate 100 MG capsules usually used to treat coughs Methocarbamol 500 MG tablets usually used as a skeletal muscle relaxer Ondansetron 4 MG tablets usually used to prevent nausea and vomitting DON B stated the medications should not be on the cart since Resident #1 was deceased . She stated she recently audited all medications carts and is not sure why Resident #1's medications were still on the cart. In a follow up interview on [DATE] at 1:46 PM, DON B stated the risk of Resident #1's medication still on the cart was it could have been given to the incorrect resident. Record review of the facility's policy titled, Wellness Services, dated 07/2017, revealed the following: Subject: Storing and Controlling Medications It is the policy of this facility to: Store medications safely, securely, and properly following manufacturer's recommendations or those of the supplier, and in accordance with federal and state laws and regulations. The medication supply is accessible only to authorized personnel. 9. Medications that are discontinued, expired, contaminated, or deteriorated, and those that are in containers that are cracked, soiled, or without secure closures are immediately removed from the locked medication storage area and disposed of in accordance with the facility policies and procedures.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0761 (Tag F0761)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure, in accordance with State and Federal laws, all drugs and biologicals were stored in locked compartments under proper...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure, in accordance with State and Federal laws, all drugs and biologicals were stored in locked compartments under proper temperature controls and permitted only authorized personnel to have access to the keys for one of three (400 Hall Medication Cart) treatment carts reviewed for medication storage. The facility failed to ensure the 400 Hall Medication Cart was locked when unattended. This failure could place residents at risk of having access to unauthorized medications and/or lead to possible harm or drug diversion. Findings include: In an observation and interview on 09/26/23 at 7:48 AM, the 400 Hall Medication Cart was unlocked with the keys sitting on top of the cart. The medication cart was unattended and there were no staff in the immediate area. The medication cart was near the main entrance, so there were several staff and residents observed in close proximity to the medication cart. RN A entered the hallway from a resident's room across the hallway from where the medication cart stood. RN A stated he was aware he left the medication cart unlocked. He stated he did not leave it unlocked on purpose. RN A stated he assisted a resident to their room when he left the cart unlocked. He stated he was aware of the risks of the cart unlocked, and the risk was a patient gaining access to the cart and the medications. In an interview on 09/26/23 at 1:46 PM, DON B stated she just completed an in-service that covered locked medication. DON B stated the medication carts should be locked at all times. She stated the risk of an unlocked medication cart was others having access to the medication on the cart without permission. Record review of an in-service document titled, General In-service and dated 09/26/23, stated the following: Description of In-service: Medication carts must be locked when not in use/in direct line of sight of the nurse. Record review of the facility's policy titled, Wellness Services, dated 07/2017, revealed the following: Subject: Storing and Controlling Medications It is the policy of this facility to: Store medications safely, securely, and properly following manufacturer's recommendations or those of the supplier, and in accordance with federal and state laws and regulations. The medication supply is accessible only to authorized personnel. 4. Medications of those residents who do not self-administer, will be stored in a locked cabinet (such as a medication cart). Only authorized personnel will have a key/access to the locked cabinet.
Sept 2023 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

PASARR Coordination (Tag F0644)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to coordinate an assessment with the Preadmission Screeni...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to coordinate an assessment with the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review program (PASRR) under Medicaid to the maximum extent practicable to avoid duplicative testing and effort for one (Resident #1) of one resident reviewed for PASRR services. The facility failed to submit Resident #1's PASRR Comprehensive Service Plan (PCSP) form in the LTC Online Portal for Resident #1 by the specific deadline. This failure could place residents with a positive PASRR evaluation at risk of not receiving specialized PASRR services which could contribute to a decline in physical, mental, psychosocial well-being and quality of life. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 09/01/23, reflected she was a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included dementia, moderate intellectual disabilities, and cognitive communication deficit. Review of Resident #1's care plan, undated, reflected she was PASRR positive. Review of Resident #1's PASRR Level 1 Screening, dated 07/13/22, reflected she was positive as indicated by a Yes under mental illness. Review of Resident #1's PASRR Evaluation, dated 07/25/22, reflected she had an intellectual disability. Review on 09/01/23 of the Simple LTC's Texas Medicaid Form Activity page reflected Resident #1's PCSP form had a status of draft. The listed meeting date was 08/02/23 and that status date was 08/18/23. Review on 09/01/23 of an email provided by the MDS Coordinator reflected she received the PCSP form from the SW on 08/03/23. Review on 09/01/23 of Resident #1's PCSP form revealed the date of the meeting was 08/02/23 and was an annual IDT meeting . In an observation and interview on 09/01/23 at 10:40 AM with Resident #1 revealed she was in the dining room and was not responding to any questions asked by the surveyor. In an interview on 09/01/23 at 3:07 PM with the MDS Coordinator revealed there was an IDT meeting held on 08/02/23 for Resident #1 in which counseling services was requested. The MDS Coordinator said Resident #1 was still receiving counseling services and had been for a long time so there was no interruption in her receiving the requested services. The MDS Coordinator said the previous SW was supposed to put the PCSP form in the Simple LTC system after the IDT meeting but she did not. The MDS Coordinator said the previous SW left and on her last day at the facility was when she sent the PCSP form to the MDS Coordinator to complete. The MDS Coordinator said she had not had the chance to put the PCSP form into Simple LTC yet but had started it on 08/18/23 . The MDS Coordinator was unsure of the SW's last day at the facility. The MDS Coordinator said the purpose of this form was to have everything that was discussed in the meeting accessible to everyone who attended and notify them of the resident's wants/needs. The MDS Coordinator said she was not sure when the PCSP form was supposed to be entered into Simple LTC because she had never been told about any sort of deadline for that after the IDT meeting. In an interview on 09/01/23 at 4:45 PM with the Interim Administrator revealed he was not sure about PASRR requirements but the MDS Coordinator was responsible for ensuring anything PASRR related was submitted timely. In a phone interview on 09/05/23 at 4:18 PM with the Habitation Coordinator revealed the facility had not submitted Resident #1's PCSP into the database after the IDT meeting on 08/02/23. The Habitation Coordinator said the facility was supposed to have the PCSP entered into the database within three days of the IDT meeting, which would have been 08/04/23. The Habilitation Coordinator said if the facility failed to put the PCSP into the system on time, Resident #1 could be at risk of losing her therapy services. Review of the facility's current Instructions for PASRR Preadmission Process policy, revised December 2017, revealed it did not address the timeliness of submitting the PCPS form.
Jul 2023 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

ADL Care (Tag F0677)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide residents who were unable to carry out activi...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living the necessary services to maintain good personal hygiene to dependent residents for two (Resident #1 and Resident #2) of 15 reviewed for ADL care: 1. The facility failed to provide Resident #1 with a shower/bath on all scheduled days. 2. The facility failed to provide Resident #2 with a shower/bath on all scheduled days. This failure could place all residents who are dependent on staff for showers/baths at risk of a decreased quality of life, poor hygiene, and skin breakdown. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #1's face sheet revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old male, initially admitted on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: mild intellectual disability, dementia without behavioral disturbances (decrease in memory and thinking abilities), major depressive disorder (mood disorder), unspecified convulsions (involuntary movement and muscle contractions), and unsteadiness on feet. Record review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 04/05/23, revealed Resident #1: - was cognitively intact (BIMS score of 13); - required limited assistance and one-person assist with dressing; and - required extensive assistance and one-person assist with personal hygiene and bathing. Record review of Resident #1's care plan, revised 07/06/23, indicated Resident #1 had ADL self-care performance deficits and required one staff participation with bathing and an assist of one verbal cue with personal hygiene routine. Record review of Resident #1's paper shower sheets for June 2023 revealed his showers were scheduled for Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturday during the 6:00 AM-2:00 PM shift. The shower sheets further revealed that Resident #1 received a shower on the following dates: 06/02/23, 06/06/23, 06/08/23, 06/09/23, 06/13/23, 06/15/23, 06/20/23, 06/22/23, 06/26/23, and 06/27/23. There were no documented refusals. Record review of Resident #1's bathing task documented electronically in PCC (electronic charting system) for a 30-day period (06/07/23-07/04/23) revealed he received a shower on the following dates: 06/08/23, 06/13/23, 06/15/23, 06/19/23, 06/20/23, 06/22/23, 06/27/23, 06/29/23, and 07/04/23. There were no documented refusals. 2. Record review of Resident #2's face sheet revealed the resident was an [AGE] year-old female, admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: dementia without behavioral disturbances (decrease in memory and thinking abilities), muscle weakness, obesity (excessive body fat), difficulty in walking, Type II diabetes, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (lung disease). Record review of Resident #2's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 04/05/23, revealed Resident #2: - had severe cognitive impairment (BIMS score of 04); - required extensive assistance and one-person assist with ADLs including dressing and personal hygiene; and - required total assistance and one-person assist with bathing. Record review of Resident #2's care plan, revised 01/30/23, indicated Resident #2 had ADL self-care performance deficits and required two staff to provide bath as necessary. Record review of Resident #2's paper shower sheets for June 2023 revealed her showers were scheduled for Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturday during the 6:00 AM-2:00 PM shift. The shower sheets further revealed that Resident #2 received a shower on the following dates: 06/06/23, 06/08/23, 06/13/23, 06/22/23, and 06/27/23. There were no documented refusals. Record review of Resident #2's bathing task documented electronically in PCC for a 30-day period (06/07/23-07/04/23) revealed she received a shower or sponge bath on the following dates: 06/08/23, 06/27/23, and 07/04/23. There were no documented refusals. Interview on 07/06/23 at 10:00 AM, the Ombudsman stated during a resident council meeting held last month, there were significant concerns that showers were not being given consistently, especially during the weekends when there were no managers on duty and CNAs had no accountability. Interview and observation on 07/06/23 at 10:28 AM, Resident #1 stated he had received a shower on this date and the last one was about two days ago. He stated that he was scheduled to receive three showers each week and he only received two showers during the weekdays. He denied receiving showers during the weekend and stated he felt unclean because he would have to wait 4-5 days before receiving his next shower during the week. Resident #1 stated he would feel better if he could receive three showers each week as scheduled. He stated that he would ask for showers during the weekend but never received them. Observation of Resident #1 revealed he was well groomed with no odors. There was no visible skin breakdown, marks, or bruises on Resident #1. Interview and observation on 07/06/23 at 10:42 AM, Resident #2 stated she could not remember the last time she received a shower or bath. She did not know how often she was scheduled to receive a shower. Resident #2 repeatedly asked surveyor if she could smell an odor and stated that she could smell herself. Resident #2 stated that she felt unclean and could not recall if she told the CNA. Resident #2 denied having any sores on her body. Observation of Resident #2 revealed she had body odor, and her hair was oily. There was no visible skin breakdown, marks, or bruises on Resident #2. Interview on 07/06/23 at 11:15 AM, CNA A revealed she had worked at the facility for about two months. She stated she normally worked on the weekends but was helping during the week. CNA A stated all residents had scheduled shower days depending on their bed and room number. She stated there were usually two CNAs and a nurse scheduled on the halls, but she felt there needed to be more CNAs to ensure that residents received all showers as scheduled. CNA A denied that any residents complained to her about not getting their showers. She stated she worked with Resident #2 but did not know if she had received her showers because she did not normally work on her hall. CNA A stated she would complete all scheduled showers before her shift ended. Interview on 07/06/23 at 01:15 PM, CNA B revealed she had worked at the facility for about three months. She stated her regular schedule was double weekends on Saturday and Sunday, but she was helping during the week. CNA B stated there were always two CNAs and one nurse scheduled on the hall during the weekends. She stated all residents had scheduled shower days, and the residents on her scheduled hall and workdays received their showers, which were documented on a shower sheet in a binder. She denied that any residents complained to her about not receiving showers. CNA B stated she was responsible for showering Resident #1, and he had already received his shower. Interview on 07/06/23 at 4:32 PM, the Administrator stated it was her expectation for all residents to receive showers routinely based on their needs and preferences. She stated showers were documented in the electronic medical records, but she was unaware if there was a new system being implemented by the new DON. The Administrator stated not receiving a regular shower could place the residents at risk of poor hygiene and not feeling clean. She stated she was unable to state how it could affect a resident clinically. Interview on 07/06/23 at 5:25 PM, the DON stated she had been employed at the facility since 06/12/23. She stated it was her expectation for all residents to receive showers as scheduled unless they refused. The DON stated nursing was flexible and ADL care such as showers could not always be given exactly as it was schedule, but it should be offered as soon as possible. The DON stated all showers should be documented under the shower task in the electronic medical records, and there was also system implemented by the previous DON to document them on shower sheets as backup documentation. The DON stated she had not yet changed any processes that were already in place and could not state if the documentation between the shower sheets and electronic records were consistent. The DON stated not receiving showers as scheduled could place residents at risk of developing skin breakdowns, infections, and cause psychological distress. Review of the facility's Showers/Bed baths policy and procedure, revised May 2022, revealed the following: Policy: It is the policy of this facility that residents are given the appropriate treatment and services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychological well-being of each resident in accordance with a written plan of care. Procedures: 1. Showers and bed baths will be provided to residents in accordance with the residents' shower schedule provided. 2. If a resident is unable to be showered on their scheduled day related to room changes or appointments, will attempt to reschedule. 3. Shower and bed baths will be documented on shower sheet and/or medical record.
May 2023 3 deficiencies 2 IJ (2 affecting multiple)
CRITICAL (K) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

Someone could have died · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents received treatment and care in ac...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices for one (Resident #4) of five residents reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to retrieve results of an x-ray order of Resident #4's left hip in a timely manner, which resulted in delayed treatment of a dislocation for a period of approximately 28 hours. Resident #4 was found on the floor on 04/10/23 approximately 9:00 PM, STAT orders (referring to a diagnostic or therapeutic procedure that is to be performed immediately; prioritized in a lab, as the results have a potentially immediate impact on patient management) were submitted on 04/11/23 at approximately 4:56 AM, results retrieved on 04/12/23 at approximately 9:11 AM, by Physician I, and the resident was sent out to the hospital on [DATE] at approximately 11:21 AM. An Immediate Jeopardy was determined to have existed from 04/10/23 through 04/27/23. While the IJ was removed on 04/28/23, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of actual harm that is not Immediate Jeopardy and a severity level of pattern, due to the facility's need to implement corrective systems. The facility implemented actions that corrected the Immediate Jeopardy prior to re-entering the facility on 05/11/23. The facility Administrator was provided the Immediate Jeopardy Template on 05/11/23 at 3:39 PM. This failure placed residents at risk of a delay in medical evaluation, treatment and decrease in quality of care. Findings included: Review of Resident #4's face sheet dated 04/27/23 revealed the resident was an [AGE] year-old-female admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident #4's diagnosis included non-displaced intertrochanteric of fracture of left femur, unspecified fall, muscle weakness, difficulty in walking, abnormalities of gait and mobility, history of falling, lack of coordination, unsteadiness on feet. aphasia, major depressive disorder, vascular dementia with agitation. Review of Resident #4's quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 03/25/23, revealed Resident #4 was usually understood by others and was usually able to understand others; however, the resident's cognitive assessment/BIMS was not completed. Transferring between bed, chair, wheelchair, and standing position required extensive assistance with one person assist. Locomotion in the room required supervision with two person assist. Review of Resident #4's care plan, undated, revealed Resident #4 had ADL self-care performance deficit related to weakness, dementia, and transient ischemic accident. Goal: will maintain current level of function in transfers, toilet use and personal hygiene, Intervention: Toilet use: requires x1 staff to assist, Transfer requires x1 staff assist with transferring. Resident #4 at risk for falls related to weakness. Goal: will not sustain serious injury. Intervention: 1/1/23 Fall; due to drop in blood pressure, 1/19/23 Fall; educated resident to call for assistance when picking up things off the floor, 02/12/23 Fall; offer bathroom assistance when making rounds, 04/10/23 Fall; fall mat to beside at all times, be sure the call light is within reach and encourage to use it to call for assistance as needed, keep needed items, water, etc. in reach. Resident #4 had an actual fall with minor injury. Goal: Sutures x4 to be removed 02/19/23 will resolve without complication. Intervention: offer bathroom assistance when making rounds, Bed in lowest position, provide activities that promote exercise and strength building where possible. Review of Resident #4's progress notes dated 04/10/23 at 10:11 PM, documented by LVN A reflected: resident was noted sitting on the floor at the end of bed facing the door next to wheelchair. The roommate says she was trying to get out of bed, and she slid out and sat on the floor. Head to toe assessment done. Alert with no signs or symptoms of acute distress, no injuries noted at this time, vitals checked, staff helped back in bed, denies pain at this time. Bed placed in low position, MD, DON, and family notified, will continue to monitor. Review of medication notes dated 04/11/23 at 4:55 AM documented by LVN A reflected: Acetaminophen Tablet 650 mg. Give 1 tablet by mouth every 6 hours as needed for general discomfort. Review of nurse's notes dated 04/11/23 at 4:56 AM documented by LVN A reflected: During routine rounds, this nurse noted Resident #4 holding left hip massaging it. Asked resident if she was in pain and resident nodded her head. Acetaminophen Tablet 650 MG Give 1 tablet by mouth was administered, MD notified, new order left hip x-ray to rule out fracture. X-ray order placed and waiting for the technician. Will continue to monitor. Review of medication notes dated 04/11/23 at 8:00 AM documented by the DON reflected: Acetaminophen Tablet 650 MG. Give 1 tablet by mouth every 6 hours as needed for general discomfort. Follow up: PRN administration was: Effective, Pain scale was: 2. Review of nurse's notes dated 04/11/23 at 9:55 PM documented by LVN A reflected: Follow up follow day 1 of 2, no delayed injury noted, able to move all extremities without difficult. Denies pain to left hip. Bed placed in low position. Will continue to monitor. Review of nurse's notes dated 04/12/23 at 11:21 AM documented by the ADON reflected: Resident complained of pain to right hip. Pain management administered with acetaminophen. X-rays ordered. Results showed fracture to right hip (error in the facility note). Resident sent to hospital via city ambulance by stretcher. Review of Resident #4's lab results dated 04/11/23 at 11:21 AM revealed interpretation: significant findings: left hip x-ray unilateral 2-3 views show a fracture of the left proximal femur at the intertrochanteric region. Impression: Acute fracture of the left proximal femur at the intertrochanteric region. Reviewed by doctor on 04/12/23 9:11 AM. There was a delay (approximately 28 hours) in getting medical treatment for Resident #4 due to the facility not being aware x-ray results (which showed hip fracture) had been received and not promptly notifying the physician of the results. During an observation and interview on 04/27/23 at 11:48 AM with Resident #4 revealed communication was unclear. Resident #4 would nod head when asking her questions. Resident #4 stated she had some pain, she stated she fell, and she went to the hospital. Resident #4 was not able to say how the fall occurred. During an interview on 04/27/23 at 3:15 PM with CNA C revealed she was alerted to Resident #4's room by the roommate engaging the call light. CNA C stated she observed Resident #4 on the floor around 7:00 PM and called for the nurse to enter the room to assess. CNA C stated after the assessment Resident #4 was put in bed. CNA C stated she returned to check on Resident #4 and to complete incontinent care. CNA C stated Resident #4 was fighting with her and did not want me to change her. CNA C stated it was hard to tell if she was fighting or if she was displaying pain and alerted the nurse. CNA C stated Resident #4 usually did not talk too much but during her rounds the next day Resident #4 was crying. CNA C stated she informed the nurse Resident #4 was crying and appeared to be in pain, she stated the nurse then administered pain medication and ordered x-ray. CNA C stated Resident was not in the facility the following day when she arrived to work. During an interview on 04/27/23 at 3:48 PM with RN D revealed she was informed about Resident #4's fall. RN D stated she was not present when resident had fall or when the x-ray was completed. RN D stated it was protocol if a resident had a fall and complained of pain, nurses would contact the doctor, and the doctor would order an x-ray stat. RN D stated the x-ray techs would show up within the hour and would usually have the results returned the same day via fax. Upon the receipt of the result, nurses would send the results to the doctor, and wait on the doctor's new orders if any which could be pain management or send resident out to the hospital. If the doctor was busy the Nurse Practitioner would respond or would reach back out to the doctor if no response within 2-3 hours. It was the responsibility of all nurses to receive the x-ray results and alert the doctor of the results. RN D stated there was not one specific person who received the x-ray results; however, if you know your resident had an x-ray you should be looking for the results to come in so that you can alert the doctor. RN D stated not following up with x-ray results put the resident at risk of prolonged pain and not getting the services needed. On 04/27/23 at 4:10 PM an attempt to interview LVN A was unsuccessful. During an interview on 04/27/23 at 4:10 PM with the ADON revealed she was present on the day Resident #4 had a fall. ADON stated she and LVN A entered the room between 9:00 PM-9:30 PM after noting the call light was on and someone yelling. The ADON stated she found Resident #4 on the floor at the foot of the bed feet facing the door and head towards the wall. The ADON stated Resident #4's bed was observed to be at the lowest position. The ADON stated Resident #4 was assessed and back in the wheelchair. The ADON stated Resident #4 was crying and upset, you could tell she was in pain. According to the ADON, the next morning on 04/11/23 Resident #4 was hurting, in pain and grabbing her left side so she told the nurse to give pain medication and was told x-rays were already ordered. The ADON stated on 04/12/23 Resident #4 was showing signs of pain with crying and yelling. The ADON stated facility protocol would be to call out for mobile x-ray, when necessary, results were received pretty quick in the resident's chart and the nurse will contact the doctor immediately. The ADON stated she was not able to say who received Resident #4's x-ray results. The ADON stated any nurse on duty could review the x-ray results and contact the doctor. There was not one person responsible for following up with the doctor with the results. The ADON stated not getting the x-ray results in a timely manner could place residents at risk of getting proper medical care. On 04/27/23 at 4:48 PM an attempt to interview Physician I was unsuccessful. During an interview on 04/27/23 at 5:07 PM with the DON revealed she was notified by nursing staff on 04/10/23 at 8:00 PM that Resident #4 had a fall with no injuries. The DON stated LVN A stated during rounds he assessed Resident #4 and observed she was rubbing her hip, expressing that she was in pain. The DON stated LVN A contacted the doctor for an x-ray. The DON stated the x-ray was completed on 04/11/23 at 11:21 AM. The DON stated x-rays were returned the same day and were auto-posted into resident file. The DON stated there was no way to know when the results were uploaded to resident charts. The DON stated the charge nurse on duty for that resident would be the person to go into resident files to check for x-ray results, then contact the doctor. The DON stated in this case the doctor was the one that logged in, reviewed the results, and contacted us to send her out on 04/12/23. The DON stated Resident #4 was given Tylenol one time for pain and was sent to the hospital by stretcher. The DON stated without knowing what time the results came in it was hard to know the risk for Resident #4. During an interview on 04/28/23 at 12:26 PM with Physician I revealed he was reviewing all lab results and identified the results himself for Resident #4. Physician I stated he did not receive notification from the facility that the results were in. Physician I stated he notified the facility that Resident #4 needed to be sent out to the hospital right after revealing the results. Physician I stated he spoke to the DON to have the results sent directly to her so that she was aware when the results were in so she could notify the required authorities as soon as possible to prevent risk to the resident. During interview and record review it was revealed LVN A received a STAT order for an X-ray as of 04/11/23 at 4:56 AM. The x-ray was completed on 04/11/23 at 11:21 AM. Resident #4 was sent out to the hospital on [DATE] after the doctor reviewed the results on 04/12/23, he then notified the facility of the results. The ADON stated she did not follow up on the X-ray orders to see if they were received on 04/11/23 after the orders had been completed. ADON stated on 04/12/23 when she asked about orders for the X-ray on 04/12/23, she was notified the resident was being sent out to the hospital. Resident #4 had now been in pain during several shifts (10:00 PM-6:00 AM day 1 of 3, 6:00 AM-2:00 PM, 2:00 PM-10:00 PM, 10:00 PM-6:00 AM day 2 of 3, and 6:00 AM-until sent to the hospital day 3 of 3) according to both LVN A and ADON. Review of the EMAR revealed she was administered pain medication once on 04/11/23 at 4:55 AM throughout all shifts after the fall. Hospital records revealed Resident #4 admitting diagnosis was severe left hip pain, left hip fracture, leukocytosis, acute cystitis without hematuria, fall, dementia. An Immediate Jeopardy was determined to have existed from 04/10/23 through 04/27/23. The IJ was removed on 04/28/23 because the facility implemented actions that corrected the Immediate Jeopardy prior to re-entering the facility on 05/11/23. The facility Administrator was provided the Immediate Jeopardy Template on 05/11/23 at 3:39 PM. The facility submitted the following accepted Plan of Removal on 05/12/23: .Immediate Action: 1. ADON re-education was completed on 4/12/2023 was completed by DON. DON was educated by Clinical Resource .04/27/2023. 2. The Medical Director was notified of IJ on 5/11/2023 at 3:51 PM and read at 3:59 PM . 3. Education was initiated with nurses by DON/ADON/Clinical Resource on 4/28/23 related to: a. Lab results reporting and checking lab and radiology PCC modules every 4 hours during per shift; b. Every shift to complete assessments on residents that have had a fall. Report any complaints of pain to MD immediately; c. Notification to MD of Abnormal Results; Notification to Responsible Party in the clinical record; d. Fall prevention; e. Stop and watch program; f. Abuse, neglect, misappropriation 4. Notified Medical Director of survey results on 4/28/23 and physician wrote a written statement of no harm or significant delay in care that we received on 5/1/23. (Relevance is that there is no harm or significant delay in care per the Medical Director). 5. Immediately notified Xray provider that all Abnormal and Critical Findings are required to be called to the DON if facility staff do not answer facility phone on 4/12/2023. 6. An Ad hoc QA meeting regarding items in IJ template was completed on 5/11/23 at 5:15pm. Attendees included the Administrator, DON, Medical Director and Clinical Resource. The plan of removal items and interventions were developed, reviewed, and agreed upon. Identification of Others Affected: Residents who have ordered diagnostic and radiology services have the potential to be affected. Systemic Change to Prevent Re-occurrence: 1. Education was initiated with nurses by DON/ADON/Clinical Resource on 4/28/23 related to: a. Lab results reporting and checking lab and radiology PCC modules every 4 hours during per shift; b. Every shift to complete assessments on residents that have had a fall. Report any complaints of pain to MD immediately; c. Notification to MD of Abnormal Results; Notification to Responsible Party with a progress note identifying results and notification made; d. Fall prevention; e. Stop and watch program; f. Abuse, neglect, misappropriation 2. Review of all radiology and diagnostic services to ensure completion and follow up with appropriate documentation, daily, in clinical morning meeting, effective 5/1/2023. 3. Immediately notified Xray provider that all Abnormal and Critical Findings are required to be called to the DON if facility staff do not answer facility phone on 4/12/2023. 4. An Ad hoc QA meeting regarding items in IJ template was completed on 5/11/23 at 5:15pm. Attendees included the Administrator, DON, Medical Director and Clinical Resource. The plan of removal items and interventions were developed, reviewed, and agreed upon. Monitoring: 1. Review of all radiology and diagnostic services to ensure completion and follow up with appropriate documentation, daily, in clinical morning meeting, effective 5/1/2023, by Clinical IDT, daily, for 4 weeks, and then routinely monitored through the change of condition process. 2. Weekly clinical meetings will include review of laboratory orders and results. Meeting attendees will include the clinical IDT and the Administrator. Meeting minutes will be reported to monthly QA by DON/ADON/designee. During an interview on 05/11/23 at 4:11 PM with the ADON revealed when she entered the facility on 04/11/23 she received updated information from LVN A and the 24-hour report for Resident #4. The ADON stated she was told an x-ray had been ordered and waiting on x-ray techs arrival. The ADON stated you get busy doing other things and then she realized the next day on 04/12/23, they were sending Resident #4 out to the hospital. The ADON stated since she worked the floor on 04/11/23, she should have followed up with looking for the results by looking in the chart or contacting the x-ray company for results then contacting the physician and the family about Resident #4's results. The ADON stated she completed training and in-services pertaining to labs and radiology services on 04/28/23 the day after the initial HHSC visit on 04/27/23. The ADON stated the facility had implemented daily clinical meetings to review order listing reports and orders from the previous day to be checked by the interdisciplinary team. The ADON stated the team would then reach out to the nurse who created the order or charge nurse on the floor that day to see if they had reviewed orders, reached out to the doctor, and documented in the chart. The ADON stated lab results with significant findings would be sent directly to the DON, the DON would contact the charge nurse and the physician with the findings. The ADON stated the nurses would communicate verbally and through the 24-hour report, whether residents had labs, doctor appointments, anything noted on the 24-hour report, that shift nurse was now responsible to ensure the task was completed, followed-up on and documented in the resident chart. During interview on 05/11/23 at 6:11 PM with the DON revealed she received notification via text from LVN A on 04/10/23 the night of the fall after 9:00 PM. LVN A indicated Resident #4 had no apparent injury and no complaints of pain. The DON stated she returned to the facility on [DATE] about 5:45 AM and was verbally told by LVN A that Resident #4 started complaining of pain, and LVN A contacted the doctor and received an order for x-ray. The DON stated she would have expected x-ray to show up within 4-6 hours. The DON stated since LVN A's shift ended, the 24-hour report would alert the next shift nurse that Resident #4 was to complete x-ray. That shift nurse, which in this case was the ADON should have followed up to ensure the x-ray was completed and results given to the physician. The DON stated in-services were started on 04/28/23 with nurses to check lab results every 4 hours during 12-hour shift. The DON stated the facility had now implemented that after the morning stand-up meeting, the clinical team would review all orders from the previous day, check on the things that needed to be done, go over current orders, care plans, nurses' notes, documentation and calls to doctors and resident representatives. The DON stated she also contacted the imaging company to ensure they would send notification directly to her via text when there were significant findings with lab results. The DON stated the notifications came with a link so that she could access the results. The DON stated she would put in a progress note and notify the doctor, nurse, and resident representative. The DON stated for agency staff or as needed staff there would be a binder with in-services and test to complete to ensure all nursing staff were aware to check for laboratory, radiology, diagnostic result every 4 hours, and to call doctor and resident representatives with results, and to document in the resident chart. During interview on 05/11/23 at 6:46 PM with LVN A revealed the aide alerted him that Resident #4 had fallen on 04/10/23 between 8:00 PM-9:00 PM. LVN A stated when he entered the room Resident #4 was sitting down next to the bed legs straight out, the call light had been initiated by the roommate. LVN A stated the roommate stated Resident #4 was trying to get up off the bed and slid down to the floor. LVN A stated after his assessment her vitals were normal, no findings with range of motion and no indication of pain, Resident #4 was assisted to her bed. LVN A stated during his rounds at 12:00 AM Resident #4 was sleeping, during his rounds at 4:00 AM, Resident #4 was rubbing her left hip continuously. LVN A stated he asked her if she was in pain and the way she replied confirmed she was in pain. LVN A stated he provided her with pain medication which she has an order for use as needed. LVN A stated he contacted the physician and received order for X-ray, contacted the family and notified the DON. LVN A stated when the next shift nurse came, rounds were completed together, completed the 24-hour report so that she could follow up with X-ray. LVN A stated the next day when he entered the facility he completed rounds, Resident #4 was sleep, not showing signs of pain. LVN A stated he thought the results were received and the physician was notified. LVN A stated he did not think to look or ask about the x-ray results, LVN A stated he should have followed up on the results himself. LVN A stated he completed several in-service training about 2 weeks ago covering labs and x-ray results, checking for results every 4 hours during shift and if the results were critical to contact the physician and resident representative immediately, and document. During interview on 05/12/23 at 1:47 PM with Physician I revealed the reason he sent Resident #4 out to the hospital was due to her results of acute fracture of her left hip. Physician I stated Resident #4 did not have an emergency; however, it was urgent, and they needed to act with urgency. Physician I stated he was not sure when the results were sent or received and speaking with the x-ray company, they did not think the hip fracture was considered critical. Physician I stated communication was completed with them to have the understanding to contact the facility through phone call and fax with critical findings. It was discussed with the x-ray company that a hip fracture was a critical result and should have been called to the facility and not just faxed. Physician I stated some things were critical and needed action right away and this was one. Physiciani I stated even if the results came in the same day and she was sent to the hospital that night, the surgery would not have happened until 2-3 days later, and they were still in that window. During interview on 05/12/23 at 3:19 PM with a representative from the x-ray company revealed she had been communicating with the facility a number of ways to alert the facility when results came in. The x-ray company representative stated the results were automatically sent to the same number and emailed whether the findings were significant or not. The x-ray company representative stated after Resident #4's fall more functionality was provided to the alerts and as of 04/17/23 the facility would now be automatically emailed the findings and if there were significant results then the DON would also get a text notifying the DON of the critical result. The x-ray company representative confirmed monitoring and there had not been any further concerns. Review of in-services and interviews on 05/12/23 with nurses, ADON, DON, Clinical Resources revealed the facility implemented in-services on 04/28/23 on the following topics: 1. Notification to MD of abnormal results. Notification to responsible party (RP), progress notes, stating results and notification. 2. Reporting Lab results, check Lab & Radiology Q4 hours during a 12 hour shift. 3. Stop & Watch training with the Nurses, MAs, and CNAs. 4. Response on Resident call lights. Call light in reach of resident. 5. Fall Prevention Review of facility's Nursing Clinical policy and procedure, revised May 2007, reflected the following: Policy- It is the policy of this facility that the resident's attending physician will be notified of the results of diagnostic tests. Procedures: 1. Results of laboratory, radiological, and diagnostic tests shall be reported in writing to the resident's attending physician or to the facility. 2. Should the test results be provided to the facility, the attending physician shall be notified of the results. 3. The Director of Nursing Services, or Charge Nurse receiving the test results, shall be responsible for notifying the physician of such test results .
CRITICAL (K) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Deficiency F0777 (Tag F0777)

Someone could have died · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to promptly notify the ordering physician, physician assi...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to promptly notify the ordering physician, physician assistant, nurse practitioner, or clinical nurse specialist of results that fall outside of clinical reference ranges in accordance with facility policies and procedures for notification of a practitioner or per the ordering physician's orders for one (Resident #4) of five residents reviewed for radiology services. The facility failed to retrieve results of an x-ray order of Resident #4's left hip in a timely manner, which resulted in delayed treatment of a dislocation for a period of approximately 28 hours. Resident #4 was found on the floor on 04/10/23 approximately 9:00 PM, STAT orders (referring to a diagnostic or therapeutic procedure that is to be performed immediately; prioritized in a lab, as the results have a potentially immediate impact on patient management) were submitted on 04/11/23 at approximately 4:56 AM, results retrieved on 04/12/23 at approximately 9:11 AM, by Physician I, and the resident was sent out to the hospital on [DATE] at approximately 11:21 AM. An Immediate Jeopardy was determined to have existed from 04/10/23 through 04/27/23. While the IJ was removed on 04/28/23, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of potential of actual harm that is not Immediate Jeopardy and a severity level of pattern, due to the facility's need to implement corrective systems. The facility implemented actions that corrected the Immediate Jeopardy prior to re-entering the facility on 05/11/23. The facility Administrator was provided the Immediate Jeopardy Template on 05/11/23 at 3:39 PM. This failure placed residents at risk of a delay in medical evaluation, treatment and decrease in quality of care. Findings included: Review of Resident #4's face sheet dated 04/27/23 revealed the resident was an [AGE] year-old-female admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident #4's diagnosis included non-displaced intertrochanteric of fracture of left femur, unspecified fall, muscle weakness, difficulty in walking, abnormalities of gait and mobility, history of falling, lack of coordination, unsteadiness on feet. aphasia, major depressive disorder, vascular dementia with agitation. Review of Resident #4's quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 03/25/23, revealed Resident #4 was usually understood by others and was usually able to understand others; however, the resident's cognitive assessment/BIMS was not completed. Transferring between bed, chair, wheelchair, and standing position required extensive assistance with one person assist. Locomotion in the room required supervision with two person assist. Review of Resident #4's care plan, undated, revealed Resident #4 had ADL self-care performance deficit related to weakness, dementia, and transient ischemic accident. Goal: will maintain current level of function in transfers, toilet use and personal hygiene, Intervention: Toilet use: requires x1 staff to assist, Transfer requires x1 staff assist with transferring. Resident #4 at risk for falls related to weakness. Goal: will not sustain serious injury. Intervention: 1/1/23 Fall; due to drop in blood pressure, 1/19/23 Fall; educated resident to call for assistance when picking up things off the floor, 02/12/23 Fall; offer bathroom assistance when making rounds, 04/10/23 Fall; fall mat to beside at all times, be sure the call light is within reach and encourage to use it to call for assistance as needed, keep needed items, water, etc. in reach. Resident #4 had an actual fall with minor injury. Goal: Sutures x4 to be removed 02/19/23 will resolve without complication. Intervention: offer bathroom assistance when making rounds, Bed in lowest position, provide activities that promote exercise and strength building where possible. Review of Resident #4's progress notes dated 04/10/23 at 10:11 PM, documented by LVN A reflected: resident was noted sitting on the floor at the end of bed facing the door next to wheelchair. The roommate says she was trying to get out of bed, and she slid out and sat on the floor. Head to toe assessment done. Alert with no signs or symptoms of acute distress, no injuries noted at this time, vitals checked, staff helped back in bed, denies pain at this time. Bed placed in low position, MD, DON, and family notified, will continue to monitor. Review of medication notes dated 04/11/23 at 4:55 AM documented by LVN A reflected: Acetaminophen Tablet 650 mg. Give 1 tablet by mouth every 6 hours as needed for general discomfort. Review of nurse's notes dated 04/11/23 at 4:56 AM documented by LVN A reflected: During routine rounds, this nurse noted Resident #4 holding left hip massaging it. Asked resident if she was in pain and resident nodded her head. Acetaminophen Tablet 650 MG Give 1 tablet by mouth was administered, MD notified, new order left hip x-ray to rule out fracture. X-ray order placed and waiting for the technician. Will continue to monitor. Review of medication notes dated 04/11/23 at 8:00 AM documented by the DON reflected: Acetaminophen Tablet 650 MG. Give 1 tablet by mouth every 6 hours as needed for general discomfort. Follow up: PRN administration was: Effective, Pain scale was: 2. Review of nurse's notes dated 04/11/23 at 9:55 PM documented by LVN A reflected: Follow up follow day 1 of 2, no delayed injury noted, able to move all extremities without difficult. Denies pain to left hip. Bed placed in low position. Will continue to monitor. Review of nurse's notes dated 04/12/23 at 11:21 AM documented by the ADON reflected: Resident complained of pain to right hip. Pain management administered with acetaminophen. X-rays ordered. Results showed fracture to right hip (error in the facility note). Resident sent to hospital via city ambulance by stretcher. Review of Resident #4's lab results dated 04/11/23 at 11:21 AM revealed interpretation: significant findings: left hip x-ray unilateral 2-3 views show a fracture of the left proximal femur at the intertrochanteric region. Impression: Acute fracture of the left proximal femur at the intertrochanteric region. Reviewed by doctor on 04/12/23 9:11 AM. There was a delay (approximately 28 hours) in getting medical treatment for Resident #4 due to the facility not being aware x-ray results (which showed hip fracture) had been received and not promptly notifying the physician of the results. During an observation and interview on 04/27/23 at 11:48 AM with Resident #4 revealed communication was unclear. Resident #4 would nod head when asking her questions. Resident #4 stated she had some pain, she stated she fell, and she went to the hospital. Resident #4 was not able to say how the fall occurred. During an interview on 04/27/23 at 3:15 PM with CNA C revealed she was alerted to Resident #4's room by the roommate engaging the call light. CNA C stated she observed Resident #4 on the floor around 7:00 PM and called for the nurse to enter the room to assess. CNA C stated after the assessment Resident #4 was put in bed. CNA C stated she returned to check on Resident #4 and to complete incontinent care. CNA C stated Resident #4 was fighting with her and did not want me to change her. CNA C stated it was hard to tell if she was fighting or if she was displaying pain and alerted the nurse. CNA C stated Resident #4 usually did not talk too much but during her rounds the next day Resident #4 was crying. CNA C stated she informed the nurse Resident #4 was crying and appeared to be in pain, she stated the nurse then administered pain medication and ordered x-ray. CNA C stated Resident was not in the facility the following day when she arrived to work. During an interview on 04/27/23 at 3:48 PM with RN D revealed she was informed about Resident #4's fall. RN D stated she was not present when resident had fall or when the x-ray was completed. RN D stated it was protocol if a resident had a fall and complained of pain, nurses would contact the doctor, and the doctor would order an x-ray stat. RN D stated the x-ray techs would show up within the hour and would usually have the results returned the same day via fax. Upon the receipt of the result, nurses would send the results to the doctor, and wait on the doctor's new orders if any which could be pain management or send resident out to the hospital. If the doctor was busy the Nurse Practitioner would respond or would reach back out to the doctor if no response within 2-3 hours. It was the responsibility of all nurses to receive the x-ray results and alert the doctor of the results. RN D stated there was not one specific person who received the x-ray results; however, if you know your resident had an x-ray you should be looking for the results to come in so that you can alert the doctor. RN D stated not following up with x-ray results put the resident at risk of prolonged pain and not getting the services needed. On 04/27/23 at 4:10 PM an attempt to interview LVN A was unsuccessful. During an interview on 04/27/23 at 4:10 PM with the ADON revealed she was present on the day Resident #4 had a fall. ADON stated she and LVN A entered the room between 9:00 PM-9:30 PM after noting the call light was on and someone yelling. The ADON stated she found Resident #4 on the floor at the foot of the bed feet facing the door and head towards the wall. The ADON stated Resident #4's bed was observed to be at the lowest position. The ADON stated Resident #4 was assessed and back in the wheelchair. The ADON stated Resident #4 was crying and upset, you could tell she was in pain. According to the ADON, the next morning on 04/11/23 Resident #4 was hurting, in pain and grabbing her left side so she told the nurse to give pain medication and was told x-rays were already ordered. The ADON stated on 04/12/23 Resident #4 was showing signs of pain with crying and yelling. The ADON stated facility protocol would be to call out for mobile x-ray, when necessary, results were received pretty quick in the resident's chart and the nurse will contact the doctor immediately. The ADON stated she was not able to say who received Resident #4's x-ray results. The ADON stated any nurse on duty could review the x-ray results and contact the doctor. There was not one person responsible for following up with the doctor with the results. The ADON stated not getting the x-ray results in a timely manner could place residents at risk of getting proper medical care. On 04/27/23 at 4:48 PM an attempt to interview Physician I was unsuccessful. During an interview on 04/27/23 at 5:07 PM with the DON revealed she was notified by nursing staff on 04/10/23 at 8:00 PM that Resident #4 had a fall with no injuries. The DON stated LVN A stated during rounds he assessed Resident #4 and observed she was rubbing her hip, expressing that she was in pain. The DON stated LVN A contacted the doctor for an x-ray. The DON stated the x-ray was completed on 04/11/23 at 11:21 AM. The DON stated x-rays were returned the same day and were auto-posted into resident file. The DON stated there was no way to know when the results were uploaded to resident charts. The DON stated the charge nurse on duty for that resident would be the person to go into resident files to check for x-ray results, then contact the doctor. The DON stated in this case the doctor was the one that logged in, reviewed the results, and contacted us to send her out on 04/12/23. The DON stated Resident #4 was given Tylenol one time for pain and was sent to the hospital by stretcher. The DON stated without knowing what time the results came in it was hard to know the risk for Resident #4. During an interview on 04/28/23 at 12:26 PM with Physician I revealed he was reviewing all lab results and identified the results himself for Resident #4. Physician I stated he did not receive notification from the facility that the results were in. Physician I stated he notified the facility that Resident #4 needed to be sent out to the hospital right after revealing the results. Physician I stated he spoke to the DON to have the results sent directly to her so that she was aware when the results were in so she could notify the required authorities as soon as possible to prevent risk to the resident. During interview and record review it was revealed LVN A received a STAT order for an X-ray as of 04/11/23 at 4:56 AM. The X-ray was completed on 04/11/23 at 11:21 AM. Resident #4 was sent out to the hospital on [DATE] after the doctor reviewed the results on 04/12/23, he then notified the facility of the results. The ADON stated she did not follow up on the X-ray orders to see if they were received on 04/11/23 after the orders had been completed. ADON stated on 04/12/23 when she asked about orders for the X-ray on 04/12/23, she was notified the resident was being sent out to the hospital. Resident #4 had now been in pain during several shifts (10:00 PM-6:00 AM day 1 of 3, 6:00 AM-2:00 PM, 2:00 PM-10:00 PM, 10:00 PM-6:00 AM day 2 of 3, and 6:00 AM-until sent to the hospital day 3 of 3) according to both LVN A and ADON. Review of the EMAR revealed she was administered pain medication once on 04/11/23 at 4:55 AM throughout all shifts after the fall. Hospital records revealed Resident #4 admitting diagnosis was severe left hip pain, left hip fracture, leukocytosis, acute cystitis without hematuria, fall, dementia. An Immediate Jeopardy was determined to have existed from 04/10/23 through 04/27/23. The IJ was removed on 04/28/23 because the facility implemented actions that corrected the Immediate Jeopardy prior to re-entering the facility on 05/11/23. The facility Administrator was provided the Immediate Jeopardy Template on 05/11/23 at 3:39 PM. The facility submitted the following accepted Plan of Removal on 05/12/23: .Immediate Action: 1. ADON re-education was completed on 4/12/2023 was completed by DON. DON was educated by Clinical Resource .04/27/2023. 2. The Medical Director was notified of IJ on 5/11/2023 at 3:51 PM and read at 3:59 PM . 3. Education was initiated with nurses by DON/ADON/Clinical Resource on 4/28/23 related to: a. Lab results reporting and checking lab and radiology PCC modules every 4 hours during per shift; b. Every shift to complete assessments on residents that have had a fall. Report any complaints of pain to MD immediately; c. Notification to MD of Abnormal Results; Notification to Responsible Party in the clinical record; d. Fall prevention; e. Stop and watch program; f. Abuse, neglect, misappropriation 4. Notified Medical Director of survey results on 4/28/23 and physician wrote a written statement of no harm or significant delay in care that we received on 5/1/23. (Relevance is that there is no harm or significant delay in care per the Medical Director). 5. Immediately notified Xray provider that all Abnormal and Critical Findings are required to be called to the DON if facility staff do not answer facility phone on 4/12/2023. 6. An Ad hoc QA meeting regarding items in IJ template was completed on 5/11/23 at 5:15pm. Attendees included the Administrator, DON, Medical Director and Clinical Resource. The plan of removal items and interventions were developed, reviewed, and agreed upon. Identification of Others Affected: Residents who have ordered diagnostic and radiology services have the potential to be affected. Systemic Change to Prevent Re-occurrence: 1. Education was initiated with nurses by DON/ADON/Clinical Resource on 4/28/23 related to: a. Lab results reporting and checking lab and radiology PCC modules every 4 hours during per shift; b. Every shift to complete assessments on residents that have had a fall. Report any complaints of pain to MD immediately; c. Notification to MD of Abnormal Results; Notification to Responsible Party with a progress note identifying results and notification made; d. Fall prevention; e. Stop and watch program; f. Abuse, neglect, misappropriation 2. Review of all radiology and diagnostic services to ensure completion and follow up with appropriate documentation, daily, in clinical morning meeting, effective 5/1/2023. 3. Immediately notified Xray provider that all Abnormal and Critical Findings are required to be called to the DON if facility staff do not answer facility phone on 4/12/2023. 4. An Ad hoc QA meeting regarding items in IJ template was completed on 5/11/23 at 5:15pm. Attendees included the Administrator, DON, Medical Director and Clinical Resource. The plan of removal items and interventions were developed, reviewed, and agreed upon. Monitoring: 1. Review of all radiology and diagnostic services to ensure completion and follow up with appropriate documentation, daily, in clinical morning meeting, effective 5/1/2023, by Clinical IDT, daily, for 4 weeks, and then routinely monitored through the change of condition process. 2. Weekly clinical meetings will include review of laboratory orders and results. Meeting attendees will include the clinical IDT and the Administrator. Meeting minutes will be reported to monthly QA by DON/ADON/designee. During an interview on 05/11/23 at 4:11 PM with the ADON revealed when she entered the facility on 04/11/23 she received updated information from LVN A and the 24-hour report for Resident #4. The ADON stated she was told an x-ray had been ordered and waiting on x-ray techs arrival. The ADON stated you get busy doing other things and then she realized the next day on 04/12/23, they were sending Resident #4 out to the hospital. The ADON stated since she worked the floor on 04/11/23, she should have followed up with looking for the results by looking in the chart or contacting the x-ray company for results then contacting the physician and the family about Resident #4's results. The ADON stated she completed training and in-services pertaining to labs and radiology services on 04/28/23 the day after the initial HHSC visit on 04/27/23. The ADON stated the facility had implemented daily clinical meetings to review order listing reports and orders from the previous day to be checked by the interdisciplinary team. The ADON stated the team would then reach out to the nurse who created the order or charge nurse on the floor that day to see if they had reviewed orders, reached out to the doctor, and documented in the chart. The ADON stated lab results with significant findings would be sent directly to the DON, the DON would contact the charge nurse and the physician with the findings. The ADON stated the nurses would communicate verbally and through the 24-hour report, whether residents had labs, doctor appointments, anything noted on the 24-hour report, that shift nurse was now responsible to ensure the task was completed, followed-up on and documented in the resident chart. During interview on 05/11/23 at 6:11 PM with the DON revealed she received notification via text from LVN A on 04/10/23 the night of the fall after 9:00 PM. LVN A indicated Resident #4 had no apparent injury and no complaints of pain. The DON stated she returned to the facility on [DATE] about 5:45 AM and was verbally told by LVN A that Resident #4 started complaining of pain, and LVN A contacted the doctor and received an order for x-ray. The DON stated she would have expected x-ray to show up within 4-6 hours. The DON stated since LVN A's shift ended, the 24-hour report would alert the next shift nurse that Resident #4 was to complete x-ray. That shift nurse, which in this case was the ADON should have followed up to ensure the x-ray was completed and results given to the physician. The DON stated in-services were started on 04/28/23 with nurses to check lab results every 4 hours during 12-hour shift. The DON stated the facility had now implemented that after the morning stand-up meeting, the clinical team would review all orders from the previous day, check on the things that needed to be done, go over current orders, care plans, nurses' notes, documentation and calls to doctors and resident representatives. The DON stated she also contacted the imaging company to ensure they would send notification directly to her via text when there were significant findings with lab results. The DON stated the notifications came with a link so that she could access the results. The DON stated she would put in a progress note and notify the doctor, nurse, and resident representative. The DON stated for agency staff or as needed staff there would be a binder with in-services and test to complete to ensure all nursing staff were aware to check for laboratory, radiology, diagnostic result every 4 hours, and to call doctor and resident representatives with results, and to document in the resident chart. During interview on 05/11/23 at 6:46 PM with LVN A revealed the aide alerted him that Resident #4 had fallen on 04/10/23 between 8:00 PM-9:00 PM. LVN A stated when he entered the room Resident #4 was sitting down next to the bed legs straight out, the call light had been initiated by the roommate. LVN A stated the roommate stated Resident #4 was trying to get up off the bed and slid down to the floor. LVN A stated after his assessment her vitals were normal, no findings with range of motion and no indication of pain, Resident #4 was assisted to her bed. LVN A stated during his rounds at 12:00 AM Resident #4 was sleeping, during his rounds at 4:00 AM, Resident #4 was rubbing her left hip continuously. LVN A stated he asked her if she was in pain and the way she replied confirmed she was in pain. LVN A stated he provided her with pain medication which she has an order for use as needed. LVN A stated he contacted the physician and received order for X-ray, contacted the family and notified the DON. LVN A stated when the next shift nurse came, rounds were completed together, completed the 24-hour report so that she could follow up with X-ray. LVN A stated the next day when he entered the facility he completed rounds, Resident #4 was sleep, not showing signs of pain. LVN A stated he thought the results were received and the physician was notified. LVN A stated he did not think to look or ask about the x-ray results, LVN A stated he should have followed up on the results himself. LVN A stated he completed several in-service training about 2 weeks ago covering labs and x-ray results, checking for results every 4 hours during shift and if the results were critical to contact the physician and resident representative immediately, and document. During interview on 05/12/23 at 1:47 PM with Physician I revealed the reason he sent Resident #4 out to the hospital was due to her results of acute fracture of her left hip. Physician I stated Resident #4 did not have an emergency; however, it was urgent, and they needed to act with urgency. Physician I stated he was not sure when the results were sent or received and speaking with the x-ray company, they did not think the hip fracture was considered critical. Physician I stated communication was completed with them to have the understanding to contact the facility through phone call and fax with critical findings. It was discussed with the x-ray company that a hip fracture was a critical result and should have been called to the facility and not just faxed. Physician I stated some things were critical and needed action right away and this was one. Physician I stated even if the results came in the same day and she was sent to the hospital that night, the surgery would not have happened until 2-3 days later, and they were still in that window. During interview on 05/12/23 at 3:19 PM with a representative from the x-ray company revealed she had been communicating with the facility a number of ways to alert the facility when results came in. The x-ray company representative stated the results were automatically sent to the same number and emailed whether the findings were significant or not. The x-ray company representative stated after Resident #4's fall more functionality was provided to the alerts and as of 04/17/23 the facility would now be automatically emailed the findings and if there were significant results then the DON would also get a text notifying the DON of the critical result. The x-ray company representative confirmed monitoring and there had not been any further concerns. Review of in-services and interviews on 05/12/23 with nurses, ADON, DON, Clinical Resources revealed the facility implemented in-services on 04/28/23 on the following topics: 1. Notification to MD of abnormal results. Notification to responsible party (RP), progress notes, stating results and notification. 2. Reporting Lab results, check Lab & Radiology Q4 hours during a 12 hour shift. 3. Stop & Watch training with the Nurses, MAs, and CNAs. 4. Response on Resident call lights. Call light in reach of resident. 5. Fall Prevention Review of facility's Nursing Clinical policy and procedure, revised May 2007, reflected the following: Policy- It is the policy of this facility that the resident's attending physician will be notified of the results of diagnostic tests. Procedures: 1. Results of laboratory, radiological, and diagnostic tests shall be reported in writing to the resident's attending physician or to the facility. 2. Should the test results be provided to the facility, the attending physician shall be notified of the results. 3. The Director of Nursing Services, or Charge Nurse receiving the test results, shall be responsible for notifying the physician of such test results .
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0558 (Tag F0558)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to provide for the right to reside and receive service...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to provide for the right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences except when to do so would endanger the health or safety of the resident or other residents for one (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3) of five residents reviewed for call lights. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3's call light was accessible. This failure placed the resident at risk of falling, further injury, and unnecessary pain from not being able to call for help. Findings included: Review of Resident 1#'s face sheet revealed the resident was an [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included cystitis without hematuria (infection of your urinary bladder), muscle weakness, Type 2 diabetes mellitus (high blood sugar) with foot ulcer (slow healing wound), retention of urine (inability to empty the bladder), Stage 3 chronic kidney disease, dehydration, and repeated falls. Review of Resident #1's MDS, dated [DATE], revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairment with a BIMS score of 2, and he required extensive assistance of two staff for transfers and extensive assist with one staff for all other ADLs. The MDS further revealed the resident was not steady, only able to stabilize with staff assistance, and he used a walker/wheelchair for mobility. Review of Resident #1's care plan, revised 02/21/23, revealed he was at risk of falling related to weakness, poor safety awareness, history of many falls. The care plan reflected: Goal: will be free of falls. Intervention: ensure call light is in reach at all times, ensure assistive device is within reach at all times, educate on what to do if a fall occurs and safety reminders, keep water and needed items within reach, Therapy evaluations and treatment per physician orders. Observation and interview on 04/27/23 at 11:21 AM revealed Resident #1 was lying in bed, with a boot on the right foot. Resident #1 stated he encountered some type of fungus, and it had become an issue with ambulating. Resident #1 stated he did have a fall while trying to go to the restroom. The resident's call light was observed on the wall behind him, not within reach for use. Resident #1 stated his call light was usually not within reach, pretty much hanging on the wall. Resident #1 stated when he did attempt to use the call light for assistance staff usually did not respond in a timely manner at times more than an hour response time, which was why he attempted to go to the restroom on his own. Interview on 04/27/23 at 2:07 PM with CNA C revealed she had been working with Resident #1 for two days. This morning Resident #1 had a complete bed change and after that call light should have been put within reach. CNA C stated therapy may have come in after the bed change and relocated the call light and not put it back. CNA C stated it was the responsibility of the aides to ensure call lights were within reach. She stated every time she entered the room, she would try to check call light placement. CNA C stated it was very important that residents had access to the call light because it was their means of communication, and they could hurt themselves without it. Review of Resident #2's face sheet revealed the resident was an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included cystitis with hematuria (infection of your urinary bladder), history of falls, lack of coordination, paraplegia, foot drop, right foot; foot drop, left foot and muscle weakness (generalized). Review of Resident #2's MDS, dated [DATE], revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairment with a BIMS score of 5, she required extensive assistance of two staff for bed mobility and transfers, and extensive assist with one staff for all other ADLs except for eating and locomotion off the unit. Resident #2 was not steady, only able to stabilize with staff assistance, and she required a walker/wheelchair for mobility. Review of Resident #2's care plan, revised 04/27/21, revealed resident had alteration in musculoskeletal status related to spinal stenosis, left foot drop, right foot drop, muscle weakness, gout. The care plan reflected: Goal: will return to prior level of function. Intervention: Anticipate level of needs, be sure call light is within reach and respond promptly to all requests for assistance. Resident #2 is at risk for falls related to weakness, paraplegia. Goal: will be free of falls. Intervention: Be sure call light is within reach and encourage to use it to call for assistance as needed. Observation and interview on 04/27/23 at 11:42 AM revealed Resident #2 was sitting in wheelchair beside the bed with both feet propped on a pillow. Resident #2 asked the surveyor to close her window because she was getting cold. The surveyor asked Resident #2 to activate her call light. Resident #2's call light was located behind Resident #2 on the floor not within reach. According to Resident #2 most of the time the call light was within reach, however lately she had not had the call light within reach and would have to wait until staff came in to check on her. During interview on 04/27/23 at 1:36 PM with CNA F revealed she was usually making frequent rounds on the hall. CNA F stated she completed training on call light placement about 2 months ago. CNA F stated it was the responsibility of the nursing staff to ensure residents have their call lights within reach at all times. CNA F stated Resident #2 will usually have her call light pinned on her or within reach, at times the call light will fall on the floor so during the rounds she will replace it near resident. Resident #2 was in therapy and perhaps therapy will forget to place the call light within reach when they leave the room. CNA F stated it is important for residents to have call light within reach to communicate their needs. Review of Resident #3's face sheet revealed the resident was an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included unsteadiness on feet, abnormalities of gait and mobility, difficulty walking, displaced fracture of fourth metatarsal bone, left foot, subsequent encounter for fracture with routine healing, age-related osteoporosis, muscle weakness, kidney disease stage 3. Review of Resident #3's MDS, dated [DATE], revealed a BIMS score of 13 indicating cognitive intact. Her Functional Status indicated she required limited assistance with one person assist with all ADLs except toileting was extensive assist with one person, supervision with locomotion off the unit and eating with one person assist. Resident# 3 is not steady, but able to stabilize without staff assistance. Review of Resident #3's care plan, revised 04/27/21, revealed resident is at risk for falls related to gait/balance problems, weakness. Goal: will be free of falls. Intervention: 04/23/23 Fall, family to provide proper fitting shoes, be sure the call light is within reach and encourage to use it to call for assistance as needed keep needed items close and within reach. Observation and interview on 04/27/23 at 11:50 AM revealed Resident #3 sitting on the right side of her bed. Resident #3's call light is on the left, opposite side of the bed on the floor. Resident #3 stated she did not have a fall, she slid down on the side of the bed. When Surveyor asked how she was able to alert staff, Resident #3 stated her call light is usually always on the floor and not within reach. Resident #3 stated if she needed assistance from staff, she would wait on staff to enter the room or ambulate in her wheelchair to find someone for assistance. During interview on 04/27/23 at 2:23 PM with CNA G revealed she was constantly walking the halls to ensure call lights were within reach. CNA G stated the facility seemed to be short staffed, and she had increased duties which may have created longer times to complete one round and return back around to the residents. CNA G stated it was the responsibility of all nursing staff to ensure call lights were within reach for the resident to use for alerting staff for help. CNA G stated when the call light is not within reach it creates opportunities for injuries. CNA G stated the facility has provided trainings on call light placement but could not recall the training done. During interview on 04/27/23 at 3:32 PM with RN H revealed Resident #3 recently had a fall. RN H stated Resident #3 had not been known to use the call light for assistance. RN H stated while rounds are to be completed at least every two hours, all staff are responsible for ensuring the call light is within reach for all residents. RN H stated not having the call light within reach puts residents at risk of attempting to go to the restroom alone, fall, or injury. During interview on 04/27/23 at 5:07 PM with the DON revealed call lights should be within reach at all times, call lights should be answered as timely as possible. The DON stated it was her desire to have call lights answered within 5 minutes when not giving care to other residents on the halls. The DON stated all staff are responsible for ensuring call lights are within reach of each resident and all staff should answer the call lights if they see one lit on the hall. The DON stated there was no risk to the resident not having the call light within reach, but ideally, staff would want to have the call light within reach. Review of facility policy titled Call Light/Bell revised July 2015 reflected: .It is the policy of this facility to provide the resident a means of communication with nursing staff
Feb 2023 3 deficiencies 2 Harm
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Deficiency F0697 (Tag F0697)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that pain management is provided to residents ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that pain management is provided to residents who require such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for one (Resident #1) of five residents reviewed for pain management. 1. MA A failed to apply a pain patch on Resident #1 as ordered, which resulted in the resident having pain at a level 8 out of 10. 2. MA A failed to report Resident #1's request for a PRN muscle relaxant to the nurse, which resulted in the resident having pain at a level 8 out of 10. These failures resulted in the resident experiencing preventable pain symptoms. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's EHR revealed the resident was an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with emphysema, back pain, and difficulty swallowing. Resident #1 was hospitalized for her emphysema on 01/31/23 and incidental x-rays found fractures in her spine. The resident was diagnosed with compression fractures of the spine in her lower back. Review of Resident #1's admission MDS, dated [DATE], revealed her BIMS score had not been completed. Her Functional Status revealed she required limited assistance with most of her ADLs except her bed mobility and transfers for which she required extensive assistance. Review of Resident #1's care plan, dated 01/18/23, revealed she was at risk for self-care deficit related to back pain and for chronic pain related to back pain. Review of Resident #1's physician orders revealed the following orders written on 02/09/23: Cyclobenzaprine HCl Oral Tablet 5 MG (Cyclobenzaprine HCl) Give 1 tablet by mouth every 8 hours as needed for Muscle spasm. Lidoderm Patch 5 % (Lidocaine) Apply to per additional directions topically in the morning for Pain on right shoulder and remove per schedule. Interview and observation on 02/22/23 at 11:50 AM, Resident #1 stated she had back pain for quite some time. She did not recall having any falls that would have caused her to have fractures in her back. Resident #1 stated she suffered from back pain and muscle spasms in her back that made it hard for her to sit up, get out of bed, and participate in her therapy. Resident #1 stated she had pain medication prescribed routinely that helped with the pain, and her muscle relaxant was prescribed every eight hours as needed. Resident #1 stated she really needed her muscle relaxant first thing in the morning to make the rest of the day bearable. Resident #1 stated she woke around 6:30 AM and had asked her medication aide (MA A) for a muscle relaxant when she was given her pain pill around 9:00 AM today and was told by the medication aide that she could not have a pain pill and a muscle relaxant at the same time. Resident #1 stated the medication aide only gave her the pain pill and moved on. She also wanted her pain patch applied; it was scheduled, but the medication aide had not applied it. Resident #1 stated her pain was an 8 out of 10 before receiving hydrocodone. Resident #1 stated she had had her pain pill and muscle relaxant at the same time in the past, and those were good days for her. Resident #1 stated she was not able to go to therapy because she was not able to get out of bed. At the time of the interview, Resident #1 was lying on her side and complaining of back spasms and requested the surveyor to ask her nurse for a muscle relaxant. The surveyor notified RN B of the resident's request for a muscle relaxant. Interview and observation on 02/22/23 at 12:05 PM, RN B stated she had not been made aware Resident #1 wanted a muscle relaxant. RN B proceeded to Resident #1's room to ask if she wanted a muscle relaxant, Resident #1 stated she did. RN B assessed Resident #1 for the presence of her lidocaine patch, the lidocaine patch was not observed. Resident #1's pain was 8 out of 10. RN B stated she would ask the medication aide about the patch. Interview on 02/22/23 at 12:30 PM, MA A stated when Resident #1 had asked for a muscle relaxant she thought the resident could not have the muscle relaxant and a pain pill at the same time. MA A stated she had not informed RN B about the muscle relaxant request because of that. MA A stated she had documented the lidocaine patch as being given, but she had been called away before she could apply it and forgot to come back. MA A stated she had not followed up with Resident #1 about her pain level after the resident received hydrocodone. Review of Resident #1's February 2023 MAR revealed the Lidocaine patch had been documented as being given at 8:00 AM on 02/22/23. The last documented time the muscle relaxant was administered was on 02/20/23, although it was a PRN order and could be administered as needed for muscle spasms. Interview on 02/22/23 at 12:32 PM, RN B stated she had not rounded on Resident #1 that morning to see if she had received her medications and if she had any needs. RN B stated if she had made rounds she would have known Resident #1 had been having pain and needed additional medications. RN B would not state if she normally conducted rounds on her residents. RN B stated medications prescribed as needed were administered by the nursing staff, and medication aides only administered routine medications. RN B stated as needed medications required a nurse's assessment to determine if the medication requested was appropriate for the resident's complaint. Interview on 02/22/23 at 12:55 PM, the DON stated all medications given were required to be documented in the resident's MAR at the time they were administered. The DON stated having an inaccurate MAR could lead to a resident being over medicated, missing a medication, and not receiving the therapeutic effects of a medication. The DON stated medication aides were expected to report a request for an as needed medication to the nurse so that the nurse could assess the resident for the appropriateness of the medication or find alternatives to medication. The DON stated MA A should have reported the request for a muscle relaxant by Resident #1 to RN B. She also stated MA A should not have documented she applied the lidocaine patch until she had actually placed it. Review of the facility's policy Administration of Medications, dated July 2017, reflected: .1. Only licensed medical and nursing personnel or any lawfully authorized staff member may prepare, administer, and record medication administration. 2. Medication must be administered in accordance with the resident's service plan. 3. Medications must be administered in accordance with the written orders of the attending physician. 8. The nurse or medication technician administering the medication must record such information on the resident's MAR before administering the resident's next medication.
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Deficiency F0760 (Tag F0760)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents were free of any significant me...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents were free of any significant medication errors for one (Resident #1) of five residents reviewed for medications. 1. MA A failed to apply a pain patch on Resident #1 as ordered, which resulted in the resident having pain at a level 8 out of 10. 2. MA A failed to report Resident #1's request for a PRN muscle relaxant to the nurse, which resulted in the resident having pain at a level 8 out of 10. These failures resulted in the resident experiencing preventable pain symptoms. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's EHR revealed the resident was an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with emphysema, back pain, and difficulty swallowing. Resident #1 was hospitalized for her emphysema on 01/31/23 and incidental x-rays found fractures in her spine. The resident was diagnosed with compression fractures of the spine in her lower back. Review of Resident #1's admission MDS, dated [DATE], revealed her BIMS score had not been completed. Her Functional Status revealed she required limited assistance with most of her ADLs except her bed mobility and transfers for which she required extensive assistance. Review of Resident #1's care plan, dated 01/18/23, revealed she was at risk for self-care deficit related to back pain and for chronic pain related to back pain. Review of Resident #1's physician orders revealed the following orders written on 02/09/23: Cyclobenzaprine HCl Oral Tablet 5 MG (Cyclobenzaprine HCl) Give 1 tablet by mouth every 8 hours as needed for Muscle spasm. Lidoderm Patch 5 % (Lidocaine) Apply to per additional directions topically in the morning for Pain on right shoulder and remove per schedule. Interview and observation on 02/22/23 at 11:50 AM, Resident #1 stated she had back pain for quite some time. She did not recall having any falls that would have caused her to have fractures in her back. Resident #1 stated she suffered from back pain and muscle spasms in her back that made it hard for her to sit up, get out of bed, and participate in her therapy. Resident #1 stated she had pain medication prescribed routinely that helped with the pain, and her muscle relaxant was prescribed every eight hours as needed. Resident #1 stated she really needed her muscle relaxant first thing in the morning to make the rest of the day bearable. Resident #1 stated she woke around 6:30 AM and had asked her medication aide (MA A) for a muscle relaxant when she was given her pain pill around 9:00 AM today and was told by the medication aide that she could not have a pain pill and a muscle relaxant at the same time. Resident #1 stated the medication aide only gave her the pain pill and moved on. She also wanted her pain patch applied; it was scheduled, but the medication aide had not applied it. Resident #1 stated her pain was an 8 out of 10 before receiving hydrocodone. Resident #1 stated she had had her pain pill and muscle relaxant at the same time in the past, and those were good days for her. Resident #1 stated she was not able to go to therapy because she was not able to get out of bed. At the time of the interview, Resident #1 was lying on her side and complaining of back spasms and requested the surveyor to ask her nurse for a muscle relaxant. The surveyor notified RN B of the resident's request for a muscle relaxant. Interview and observation on 02/22/23 at 12:05 PM, RN B stated she had not been made aware Resident #1 wanted a muscle relaxant. RN B proceeded to Resident #1's room to ask if she wanted a muscle relaxant, Resident #1 stated she did. RN B assessed Resident #1 for the presence of her lidocaine patch, the lidocaine patch was not observed. Resident #1's pain was 8 out of 10. RN B stated she would ask the medication aide about the patch. Interview on 02/22/23 at 12:30 PM, MA A stated when Resident #1 had asked for a muscle relaxant she thought the resident could not have the muscle relaxant and a pain pill at the same time. MA A stated she had not informed RN B about the muscle relaxant request because of that. MA A stated she had documented the lidocaine patch as being given, but she had been called away before she could apply it and forgot to come back. MA A stated she had not followed up with Resident #1 about her pain level after the resident received hydrocodone. Review of Resident #1's February 2023 MAR revealed the Lidocaine patch had been documented as being given at 8:00 AM on 02/22/23. The last documented time the muscle relaxant was administered was on 02/20/23, although it was a PRN order and could be administered as needed for muscle spasms. Interview on 02/22/23 at 12:32 PM, RN B stated she had not rounded on Resident #1 that morning to see if she had received her medications and if she had any needs. RN B stated if she had made rounds she would have known Resident #1 had been having pain and needed additional medications. RN B would not state if she normally conducted rounds on her residents. RN B stated medications prescribed as needed were administered by the nursing staff, and medication aides only administered routine medications. RN B stated as needed medications required a nurse's assessment to determine if the medication requested was appropriate for the resident's complaint. Interview on 02/22/23 at 12:55 PM, the DON stated all medications given were required to be documented in the resident's MAR at the time they were administered. The DON stated having an inaccurate MAR could lead to a resident being over medicated, missing a medication, and not receiving the therapeutic effects of a medication. The DON stated medication aides were expected to report a request for an as needed medication to the nurse so that the nurse could assess the resident for the appropriateness of the medication or find alternatives to medication. The DON stated MA A should have reported the request for a muscle relaxant by Resident #1 to RN B. She also stated MA A should not have documented she applied the lidocaine patch until she had actually placed it. Review of the facility's policy Administration of Medications, dated July 2017, reflected: .1. Only licensed medical and nursing personnel or any lawfully authorized staff member may prepare, administer, and record medication administration. 2. Medication must be administered in accordance with the resident's service plan. 3. Medications must be administered in accordance with the written orders of the attending physician. 8. The nurse or medication technician administering the medication must record such information on the resident's MAR before administering the resident's next medication.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Medical Records (Tag F0842)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain medical records in accordance with accepted professional...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain medical records in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices on each resident that were complete and accurately documented for one (Resident #1) of five residents reviewed for medical records. The facility failed to maintain medication administration records that were complete and accurately documented for Resident #1. This failure placed residents at risk of not receiving therapeutic medications as needed. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's EHR revealed the resident was an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with emphysema, back pain, and difficulty swallowing. Resident #1 was hospitalized for her emphysema on 01/31/23 and incidental x-rays found fractures in her spine. The resident was diagnosed with compression fractures of the spine in her lower back. Review of Resident #1's admission MDS, dated [DATE], revealed her BIMS score had not been completed. Her Functional Status revealed she required limited assistance with most of ADLs except her bed mobility and transfers where she required extensive assistance. Review of Resident #1's care plan, dated 01/18/23, revealed she was at risk for self-care deficit related to back pain, and for chronic pain related to back pain. Review of Resident #1's physician orders revealed the following orders written on 02/09/23: Cyclobenzaprine HCl Oral Tablet 5 MG (Cyclobenzaprine HCl) Give 1 tablet by mouth every 8 hours as needed for Muscle spasm. Lidoderm Patch 5 % (Lidocaine) Apply to per additional directions topically in the morning for Pain on right shoulder and remove per schedule Review of Resident #1's pill packs on 02/22/23 at 12:48 PM revealed Cyclobenzaprine HCl had been delivered by the pharmacy, and the pharmacy had dispensed 30 pills on 02/10/23 in a pill pack format. Seven pills had been removed from the pill pack to date. Review of Resident #1's MAR for February 2023 revealed the resident had only three Cyclobenzaprine HCl pills documented as given: one pill on 02/19/23 and two pills on 02/20/23. On 02/22/23, the MAR reflected Resident #1's lidocaine patch had been administered. Interview on 02/22/23 at 11:50 AM, Resident #1 stated she had back pain and had not received her lidocaine patch as prescribed. Resident #1 stated she usually requested it daily as it made it easier to participate in therapy and activities. Interview on 02/22/23 at 12:30 PM, MA A stated she had signed off the lidocaine patch as administered for Resident #1, but she had been called away before she could apply the patch. She stated she had forgotten to go back and apply it. Interview on 02/22/23 at 12:55 PM, the DON stated she did not know why Resident #1's MAR did not reflect the total number of Cyclobenzaprine HCl pills removed from the pill pack. The DON stated it could be sloppy charting, or it could indicate medication diversion. The DON stated MA A should have placed the lidocaine patch on Resident #1 if she had documented it. She stated that was neglectful practice and allowed the resident to experience preventable pain. The DON stated it was imperative for the MAR to be accurate to prevent a resident from missing medications, being over medicated, and to ensure they received the therapeutic effects of the medications prescribed. Review of the facility's policy Administration of Medications, dated July 2017, reflected: .2. Medication must be administered in accordance with the resident's service plan. 3. Medications must be administered in accordance with the written orders of the attending physician. 8. The nurse or medication technician administering the medication must record such information on the resident's MAR before administering the resident's next medication.
Jan 2023 1 deficiency 1 IJ (1 affecting multiple)
CRITICAL (K) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

Someone could have died · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to be from abuse, neglec...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to be from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation for six of 16 residents (Residents #2, #3, #4, #5, #6 and #7) reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to protect Residents #2, #3, #4, #5, #6 and #7 from Resident #1, who had a known history of physical and verbal aggression towards residents. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was identified on 01/05/23. The IJ began on 11/04/22 and removed on 12/22/22. While the IJ was removed on 12/22/22, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of potential for more than minimal harm that is not Immediate Jeopardy and a severity level of pattern, due to the facility's need to implement corrective systems. This failure placed residents at risk of subsequent abuse, mental anguish, and emotional distress. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 12/22/22, revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old male initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included alcohol dependence with alcohol induced persisting dementia (brain disorder that causes memory loss), alcoholic polyneuropathy (alcohol induced nerve disorder), aphasia (speech disorder), schizoaffective disorder (psychotic/mood disorder), major depressive disorder (mood disorder), and cognitive communication deficit. Record review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 11/28/22, reflected Resident #1 had a diagnosis which included non-Alzheimer's dementia. The resident had a BIMS score of 0, due to the BIMs not being completed due to cognitive deficits. The MDS reflected Resident #1 rarely had the ability to make himself clear and understand others. Resident #1 was severely impaired when it came to making decisions regarding tasks of daily life. The MDS reflected Resident #1 was short-tempered and easily annoyed. Record review of Resident #1's care plan, revised 11/07/22, revealed: Resident #1 was at risk for impaired cognitive function or impaired thought processes r/t dementia. Resident #1 had poor attention span, fidgety, unable to sit for a very long time and was constantly on the move. Goal: resident will maintain current level of cognitive function through review date. Interventions: administer Memantine as ordered, administer Thiamine as ordered, identify self at each interaction, and give step-by-step instructions one at a time as needed to support cognitive function. Resident #1 had the potential for psychosocial well-being problem r/t resident wandering into other residents' spaces, grabs their wrists, their items, food on trays in dining room, then other residents retaliate against him. Goals: resident will have no indications of psychosocial well-being problems through review date. Interventions: 1:1 supervision, monitor for injuries every shift for 3 days, monitor/document resident's feelings relative to the other residents. Resident #1 had the potential to demonstrate physical behaviors r/t Dementia, hitting, kicking at staff, unable to redirect behavior. Resident combative, verbally aggressive, going in and out of resident rooms, upset with redirection, cursing staff, and refusing care. Goals: resident will not harm self or other residents. Interventions: 1:1 supervision, administer Benadryl as ordered, provide physical and verbal cues to alleviate anxiety, document observed behaviors and attempted interventions, and give as many choices as possible regarding care and activities. Record review of Resident #2's face sheet, dated 12/22/22, revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old female, who was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included age-related osteoporosis (weak bones), unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbances (brain disorder that causes memory loss), speech language deficits, and profound intellectual disabilities. Record review of Resident #2's Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 10/21/22, reflected a BIMS score of 06, which indicated severe impairment. Record review of Resident #2's care plan, dated 06/21/22, revealed the resident was to be monitored for re-traumatization r/t assault in 2013. The family complained of poor care at prior living situation. Resident noted to cry a lot, but not abnormal per guardian. Goals: resident will have no evidence of emotional, physical, and psychological problems by review date. Interventions: anticipate and meet needs, document behaviors and resident's response to interventions. Record review of Resident #3's face sheet, dated 12/22/22, revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old female, who was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (chronic inflammatory lung disease), unspecified dementia and essential hypertension (high blood pressure). Record review of Resident #3's Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 12/21/22, reflected a BIMS score of 0, due to the BIMs not being completed, due to cognitive deficits. Record review of Resident #3's care plan, dated 11/04/22, revealed the resident had potential for injury related to another resident hitting her in the chest, monitoring needed for injury. Interventions: Monitor res for pain, bruising chest area q shift. Resident #3 also had potential for pain and inability to communicate. Goal: If or when res shows signs of pain, pain med will be effective. Interventions: Anticipate need for pain relief and respond immediately to any complaint of pain. Evaluate the effectiveness of pain interventions. Review for compliance, alleviating of symptoms, dosing schedules and resident satisfaction with results, impact on functional ability and impact on cognition. Record review of Resident #4's face sheet, dated 12/22/22, revealed the resident was an [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (chronic inflammatory lung disease), respiratory failure, anxiety disorder. Record review of Resident 4's Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 10/02/22, reflected the resident had a BIMS of 08, which indicated moderately impaired cognition. Record review of Resident #4's care plan, dated 01/22/20, revealed: Resident #4 had a terminal prognosis related to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Goal: to be free of depression and anxiety. Interventions: assess resident coping strategies and respect resident wishes, monitor significant changes in patients physical, mental, social, or emotional status and/or concerns including pain and uncomfortable situations. Record review of Resident #5's face sheet, dated 12/22/22, revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (chronic inflammatory lung disease), asthma, abnormalities of gait and mobility and major depressive disorder. Record review of Resident #5's Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 11/15/22, reflected the resident had a BIMS of 12, which indicated moderately impaired cognition. Record review of Resident #5's care plan, dated 04/01/22, revealed: Resident #5 was at risk for Re-traumatization related to history of alleged verbal abuse and history of alleged physical abuse. Goal: have no evidence of emotional, physical, and psychological problems. Interventions: monitoring behavior episodes and attempt to determine underlying cause. Consider location, time of day, persons involved and situations. Anticipate and meet needs. Record review of Resident #6's electronic face sheet, dated 12/22/22, revealed Resident #6 was a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included moderate intellectual disabilities, manic episode without psychotic symptoms and cognitive communication deficit. Record review of Resident #6's Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 07/13/22, revealed Resident #6's BIMS score was 0, due to the BIMs not being completed due to cognitive deficits. Record review of Resident #6's care plan, dated 08/04/22, revealed Resident #6 had Anti-anxiety medication use related to anxiety disorder. Goal revealed resident will be free from discomfort or adverse reactions related to anti-anxiety therapy. Interventions included Lorazepam as ordered by physician. 8/3/2022 Increased Dosage. Record review of Resident #7's face sheet, dated 12/22/22, revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (chronic inflammatory lung disease), type II diabetes, aphasia (speech disorder), hemiplegia (severe or complete paralysis), hemiparesis (mild or partial weakness), osteoporosis (weak bones) and dementia (brain disorder that causes memory loss). Record review of Resident #7's Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 12/15/22, reflected the resident had a BIMS of 13, which indicated her cognition was intact. Record review of Resident #7's care plan, dated 06/08/22, revealed: Resident #7 had potential for aggressive behaviors and psychosocial well-being problem related to a resident-to-resident incident. Goal: resident will have no indications of psychosocial well-being problems and will identify coping mechanisms. Interventions: skin assessments, monitor for mood change, separate from other resident in incident, when conflict arises, remove Resident #7 to a calm safe environment and allow to vent/share feelings. Record review of Progress Notes, dated 12/11/2022, regarding Resident #1 revealed Resident was found in another resident's room scooting around. He took her picture frame and threw it and broke it. The other resident was pushing the seat of the wheelchair into his back over and over to scoot him out of her room. Resident removed from her room and avoiding glass on the floor, assisted back into wheelchair. Head to toe assessment shows no apparent injuries. Record review of Progress Notes, dated 12/12/2022, regarding Resident #1 revealed Resident remains on follow up related to resident-to-resident altercation with no other incidents observed or reported . Record review of Progress Notes, dated 12/13/2022, regarding Resident #1 revealed Resident wandering aimless into resident room with re-direction given . Record review of Progress Notes, dated 12/14/2022, regarding Resident #1 revealed Resident wandering aimless into resident room with re-direction given . Record review of Progress Notes, dated 12/21/2022, regarding Resident #1 revealed Resident agitated, moving from room to room waking up residents, resisting care Lorazepam Tablet 0.5 MG . Record review of Incident Report, dated 10/9/2022, regarding Resident #1 revealed Resident wheeled himself into room [ROOM NUMBER] and was found crawling around the floor there. Wheelchair was also knocked over. Left forearm skin tear noted. Range of motion per baseline. No signs of pain. Record review of Incident Report, dated 12/11/2022, regarding Resident #1 revealed Resident was in another residents' room and was bothering her things. He got out of his wheelchair and got onto the floor, found and broke a picture frame. An attempted interview and observation on 12/22/22 at 11:51 AM with Resident #1 revealed he was unable to participate in an interview due to cognitive deficits. When asked a question, the resident did not respond and was not aware of what was being said. Resident #1 was observed self-propelling around the facility in a wheelchair. He was seen entering a resident's room without any intervention. An interview and observation on 12/22/22 at 11:53 AM with RN C revealed she saw Resident #1 enter room [ROOM NUMBER]. RN C stated Resident #1 was always going into other rooms, and it was hard for staff to stop him because he would become angry. RN C stated she did not intervene because there were no residents in room [ROOM NUMBER], although Resident #1 was not supposed to be in that room. RN C proceeded to go into room [ROOM NUMBER] and redirected Resident #1 out. RN C stated Resident #1 went all over the facility and usually did not disturb anyone until he was redirected and unable to do what he wanted. RN C stated staff had been trained to do frequent checks on Resident #1 to prevent him from going into other resident rooms. An interview on 12/22/22 at 11:30 AM with Resident #2 revealed she was sitting in a wheelchair on the 200 Hall near her room. Resident #2 denied being abused or neglected by staff. When asked about other residents, Resident #2 stated she was afraid of Resident #1 and immediately became teary-eyed and hysterical. Resident #2 was so upset she could barely speak, but she was able to state Resident #1 was always coming into her room to take things and curse at her and her roommate. Resident #2 stated she was afraid Resident #1 was going to hurt her and her roommate. Resident #2 continued to cry and stated she had to protect her roommate from Resident #1. An attempted interview on 12/22/22 at 11:15 AM with Resident #3 revealed she was unable to participate in an interview due to cognitive deficits. Resident #3 was dressed and well-groomed with no visible marks or bruises. An interview on 12/22/22 at 11:55 AM with Resident #4 revealed she had recently relocated to another room because of having issues with another resident who she described as Resident #1. Resident #4 stated Resident #1 had just been in her room the previous night going through her personal items. Resident #4 stated Resident #1 liked to get close to her, in her personal space and this made her feel uncomfortable. Resident #4 stated Resident #1 needed to be in a different facility because staff were not able properly care for him because he liked to roam the facility, curse at residents, and cause problems with other residents. Resident #4 stated she always alerted staff to remove him from her room, but it sometimes took a long time to remove him. She stated she would use the saltshaker, telling him it was evil, to get Resident #1 away from her. Resident #4 denied ever being physically harmed by Resident #1 but stated she was afraid of him. An interview on 12/22/22 at 12:33 PM with Resident #5 revealed she had an encounter with Resident #1 while sitting in the dining room. She stated Resident #1 jumped on her. Resident #5 stated she was physically attacked but did not indicate having any pain or injuries from the incident. She stated she was nervous around Resident #1 since then. She stated Resident #1 would always come in her personal space as if he did not understand boundaries. Resident #5 stated when she saw Resident #1 getting too close, she would have to stop him to keep him from grabbing her. She stated he could have become very aggressive. Resident #5 stated Resident #1 needed to be at a different facility, because of the way he treated people and he could harm someone. Resident #5 stated she was scared he would cause harm to her again. An interview on 12/22/22 at 12:42 PM with Resident #6 revealed she was hit in the stomach by Resident #1 in the dining hall during lunch. Resident #6 stated she reported the altercation to the Speech Therapist. Resident #6 did not recall any pain or injuries after the altercation. Resident #6 stated she did not like Resident #1 and he was mean and made her feel uncomfortable. An interview on 12/22/22 at 2:45 PM with the Speech Therapist revealed on 11/07/22, he was walking in the dining area and Resident #6 reported to him she was hit in the stomach. When asked to identify the person who hit her, she pointed out Resident #1. The Speech Therapist stated he saw Resident #1 having aggressive behaviors towards staff and other residents on many occasions. The Speech Therapist stated he was told by several residents they were fearful of Resident #1. Residents stated they have woken to him being in their rooms throughout the night. The Speech Therapist stated he alerted the Administrator about all concerns that were brought to him by residents, and he would try to assist with redirecting Resident #1 as much as possible. An interview on 12/22/22 at 11:41 AM with Resident #7, revealed the only person she was afraid of at the facility was Resident #1. She stated, He's a pain in the butt! Resident #7 stated Resident #1 would always come in her room and take her personal belongings. She stated he was caught in her room about a week ago and when she broke a special picture frame of hers. Resident #7 stated staff would try to keep him out of her room, but he would find a way to get in. She stated she was recently moved to a different room to get away from Resident #1 and now felt safer. She denied ever being physically abused by Resident #1. An interview on 12/22/22 at 1:05 PM with CNA A, revealed she had worked at the facility since 2019. CNA A stated she worked on the 200 Hall with Resident #1. She stated Resident #1 would beat on the staff and other residents periodically since being admitted . CNA A stated he would sneak into other resident rooms and if staff were unable to catch him in a timely manner, he would grab or hit the residents. She stated if Resident #1 was seen going into another resident's room, staff would redirect and guide him out immediately. CNA A stated she last witnessed Resident #1 hit another resident about a month ago; however, he was constantly cursing and yelling at everyone. She stated Resident #1 was placed on 1:1 supervision after this incident, but she believed it was discontinued because he would attack the staff who were supervising him, and staff started refusing to work with him. This incident was reported and investigated on this date. CNA A stated Resident #1 was able to be redirected sometimes but most times he could not be due to his cognition. CNA A stated staff could not reason with Resident #1 or help him understand why he was unable to wander in other rooms or intrude on the space of other residents. She stated staff were told to check on Resident #1 more frequently, but it was hard to do so and care for all other residents. She stated most residents on the 200 Hall were afraid of Resident #1, and some had even been moved to different halls to get away from him. CNA A stated staff were trained on abuse, neglect and handling aggressive behaviors with the last training being about a month ago. An interview on 12/22/22 at 1:25 PM with RN B, revealed she had worked at the facility since 2017. RN B stated she worked on the 200 Hall with Resident #1. She stated Resident #1 was a difficult resident with aggressive behaviors. RN B stated most of the residents were afraid of him. She stated there were interventions in place to check on him every 15 mins and sometimes he was placed on 1:1 supervision. RN B stated she tried to keep Resident #1 close to her station, but it was hard because he liked to wander and go into other resident rooms. RN B stated Resident #1 had been on psychotropic medications to help control his behaviors; however, the family would have them adjusted or discontinued. RN B stated the medications Resident #1 was currently on, was not helping him. She stated the other residents were not safe with Resident #1 in the facility and she felt he belonged in a psychiatric hospital. An interview on 12/22/22 at 2:14 PM with the COTA revealed she worked at the facility for 5 months. She stated she witnessed a physical altercation between Resident #1 and Resident #3 on 11/4/22. The COTA stated she was standing in the dining room when she heard groans coming from the table where Resident #3 was sitting. The COTA stated she turned and saw Resident #1 trying to take food from one of the trays and when staff intervened, he became angry. The COTA stated Resident #1 was able to ball up his fist and reach across to punch Resident #3 in the chest twice before staff were able to pull him away. The COTA stated Resident #3 was assessed by the nurse and did not sustain any injuries to her knowledge. The COTA stated she saw Resident #1 become verbally aggressive and knock over things, but she denied ever seeing him physically harm any residents prior to that incident. The COTA stated the Administrator was immediately notified about the incident. An interview on 12/22/22 at 5:45 PM with the DON revealed she had been employed at the facility for about 5 months. The DON stated shortly after starting at the facility, she recommended Resident #1 be transferred to a memory care facility. However, he was Medicaid pending and the family would not provide the necessary documents for the application to be approved. The DON stated Resident #1 was not receiving proper care at their facility because he needed a more structured environment with staff who were trained to better handle his behaviors. The DON stated Resident #1 was in an advanced stage of dementia and his cognitive deficits was beyond what the facility was capable of managing. The DON stated Resident #1 would wander around the entire facility, going in other residents' rooms causing them to become upset. She stated there were incidents where Resident #1 would become physically aggressive towards other residents, break their personal items, and use profanity. She stated the physical aggression had not happened in about a month; however, the wandering and verbal aggression was continuous. The DON stated she was concerned with the safety of all residents but more so for Resident #1 because of his unawareness and the conflict he would cause. The DON stated she was concerned he would wander into another confused or aggressive resident's room. The DON stated Resident #1 was also physically and verbally aggressive towards staff, especially when care was being provided. The DON stated the MD placed Resident #1 on 1:1 supervision for about 2 weeks then discontinued after there were no new incidents. The DON stated he was then placed on 15-minute checks. The DON stated she could not say the interventions were effective, because Resident #1 was not suitable for the facility. She stated Resident #1 was previously on psychotropic medications that seemed to be working. However, the family decided to take him off and refused any other psychiatric services. The DON stated she was able to convince them to consent to low dose PRN psychotropic medications that were not as effective. The DON stated Resident #1's family would threaten to sue the facility if they transferred him or sent him out to be evaluated at a psychiatric hospital. The DON stated she was not sure what other options they had to protect everyone's safety and rights. Interview on 12/22/22 at 6:05 PM with the Administrator, revealed she had been employed at the facility since 12/01/22. The Administrator stated she was not yet familiar with all of Resident #1's history. However, he had presented many challenges since the start of her employment. She described Resident #1 as having extreme mood swings, presenting very friendly and happy at times and then frustrated and aggressive at other times. The Administrator stated Resident #1 was not easily redirected, and staff would have a hard time keeping him content. The Administrator stated Resident #1 required a higher level of care the facility could not provide due to not having a secured unit and because Resident #1's family would not consent to any psychiatric services, which included psychotropic medications and/or evaluations at a psychiatric hospital. The Administrator stated Resident #1's family also would not cooperate in providing documents to get him Medicare so he could be transferred to a more appropriate facility. She also stated Resident #1 had a balance of $60,000 owed to their facility, which made it even more difficult to find appropriate placement. The Administrator stated it was her responsibility to ensure the proper care and safety of all residents in the facility. However, she felt like there was not a simple solution and either way she would face a dilemma. The Administrator stated she knew it was best for Resident #1 to be discharged from the facility, but with his family not giving consent for him to be transferred or sent out to a psychiatric hospital, she would be at risk for an inappropriate discharge tag. The Administrator stated her hands were tied. She stated the facility had interventions in place for Resident #1's behaviors such as frequent redirection, checks every 15 minutes, and allowing him to self-redirect and have self-determination as much as possible; however, these interventions were not always effective. The Administrator stated the facility had decided to discharge Resident #1 to a psychiatric hospital and was in the process of doing so on this date. The Administrator stated keeping Resident #1 at the facility where he was not receiving the proper treatment was a risk to his safety as well as others; however, she did not know what else to do. Interview on 01/05/23 at 11:43 AM with CNA D revealed she had worked at the facility for 8 years and worked with Resident #1 until he was discharged on 12/22/22. CNA D stated Resident #1 was a wanderer and was verbally and physically aggressive towards staff and other residents. CNA D stated she had not witnessed any incidents where Resident #1 was physically aggressive towards other residents; however, she witnessed him go throughout the halls yelling and cursing. CNA D stated residents were annoyed by Resident #1 and did not like for him to be in their space. CNA D stated she witnessed Resident #2 become visibly shaken and tearful in the presence of Resident #1. CNA D stated Resident #2's family informed staff Resident #1 resembled Resident #2's father, who abused her as a child, and Resident #1 triggered her post traumatic stress disorder. Interview on 01/05/23 at 12:10 PM with the Administrator and the DON revealed there were currently no other residents in the facility who exhibited similar aggressive behaviors as Resident #1. The DON stated Resident #1 was discharged from the facility on 12/22/22 and the facility put measures in place to prevent further abuse from occurring. The Administrator stated the facility already had interventions in place that would have been effective for Resident #1 had the family been cooperative and would still be effective for other residents who might exhibit similar aggressive behaviors. The DON further stated they hit many brick walls with the family by not allowing Resident #1 to get the assistance he required. The DON stated the family had requested Resident #1 be taken off all psychotropic medications 09/12/22 because they thought the resident appeared to be more confused. Two other nursing facilities had agreed to accept Resident #1, but only if they had the Medicaid application pending, but the POA was not assisting with the Medicaid application process by failing to produce the required documentation. They had also contacted the local ombudsman for assistance and the family kept making promises they would get the necessary paperwork for the Medicaid application, but they never received them. The Administrator stated that management had been in-serviced on the processes of discharges and transfers. The DON stated clinicals for potential residents would be screened closer for keywords such as agitation, aggression, and confusion to prevent the facility from admitting residents who may not receive appropriate services. The DON stated for current residents, the facility would continue to monitor for changes in conditions and a new onset of aggressive behaviors so appropriate interventions could be put in place immediately. The Administrator stated if interventions proved to be ineffective, the facility would meet with the resident and family to begin the process of discharge. Review of Resident #1's IDT meeting notes dated 12/23/22 reflected the following: Note Text: Discussed initial patient behaviors upon admission compared to most recent behaviors. The patient's behaviors have progressed to an increasingly difficult to manage level. POA previously requested termination of all pharmacological psychotropic interventions, which were initially prescribed to address diagnosis of dementia with agitation, schizoaffective disorder, alcohol induced persisting amnestic disorder, Wernicke's Korsakoff's syndrome, and major depression disorder. Team discussed how termination of psych meds has contributed to progressively increased behaviors and a higher risk of harm to self or others. Prior discussions have been had with POA regarding cooperative efforts needed to find alternative placement considering increased behaviors. POA and family continue to appear to be in denial regarding resident's disease process, resulting in unproductive discussions. Current non-pharmacological interventions currently in place: - Distract resident from wandering of offering pleasant diversions, structured activities, food, conversation, television, book. - Identify pattern of wandering: Is wandering purposeful, aimless, or escapist? Is resident looking for something? Does it indicate the need for more exercise? Intervene as appropriate. - Monitor resident and redirect from entering other resident rooms. - Intervene as necessary to protect the rights and safety of others. - Approach/Speak in a calm manner. Divert attention. Remove from situation and take to alternate location as needed. - Give as many choices as possible about care and activities. - Q15 minute checks - D/t the increase progression of negative behaviors and barriers related to current POA allowed interventions becoming increasingly ineffective resident was transferred to an acute care hospital for higher level of care and assessment. Acute care hospital case manager advised that hospital has identified two facilities with memory care units that can provide increased level of care not available at this facility. Interview on 01/05/23 at 1:23 PM with the Physician revealed Resident #1 was under her care while he was at the facility. She stated when the resident was taken off of his psych medications, per family request, and it had a big impact on Resident #1's increased behaviors. The Physician said the facility kept in communication with her regarding his behaviors and the family later agreed for the resident to begin taking Zoloft and lorazepam because he was hitting staff and throwing things. She further stated she had given an order for Resident #1 to begin psych services but upon reading the psych notes, the resident remained agitated and combative. The Physician said there was nothing else the facility could do other than discharge him from the facility. Record review of the facility's policy titled Abuse: Prevention of and Prohibition Against, revised 10/2022, revealed the following: Policy: It is the policy of this Facility that each resident has the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property and exploitation . Definitions: Abuse is willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain, or mental anguish. This includes the deprivation by an individual, including a caretaker, of goods and services that are necessary to attain or maintain physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Instances on abuse of all residents, irrespective of any mental or physical condition, cause physical harm, pain, or mental anguish . Prevention: .2. The Facility will act to protect and prevent abuse and neglect from occurring within the Facility by: -Identifying, assessing, care planning for appropriate interventions, and[TRUNCATED]
Dec 2022 1 deficiency
CONCERN (F) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0583 (Tag F0583)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that each resident had a right to secure and confidential personal and medical records for the entire facility residen...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that each resident had a right to secure and confidential personal and medical records for the entire facility residents reviewed for medical record confidentiality. The facility failed to secure 67 residents admission agreements, containing identifying information. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of loss of privacy and dignity and decreased quality of life. Findings included: An interview with Resident #3's RP on 12/30/22 at 8:20 am revealed while she was at the facility on 12/23/22 retrieving the personal belongings for Resident #3. Resident #3 items were packed in boxes inside the admission office. While she was standing outside of the office, a male staff person from the facility handed her 3 boxes. Two of the boxes contained personal items for Resident #3. One of the boxes contained several current residents personal information, including names, social security numbers, and addresses. She had not contacted the facility to inform them she had the records. She stated the box had approximately 30 residents records. No one at the facility had contacted her regarding the box of files. She did not want to give the facility the files because they should not have allowed her to leave with those records. She stated Resident #3 records had gone missing before. An interview with the DON on 12/30/22 at 9:41 am revealed the facility were not missing any records. Resident #3's RP was upset with the facility for discharging Resident #3. All the records for resident had been secured and it was not possible for the RP to have any files. An interview with the ADM on 12/30/22 at 11:04 am revealed the facility was not missing any residents records. The ADM stated Resident #3's RP did not have access to other resident records. The ADM stated nothing had been identified as missing for the residents. An interview on 12/30/22at 12:15 pm with the ADM she stated the facility had identified some records were missing. Records that were in the admission office had not been delivered to the storage area as requested. The admission office staff had left the files in the office in a box for another staff member to move over to the storage area. While Resident #3's RP was in the office, she must have taken the files. Observation on 12/30/22 a 12:28 pm, while meeting with Resident #3's RP in the parking lot. She provided a box full of residents files. The box was brown, there were several blue and yellow files in the box. The files contained residents social security numbers, names and addresses. Interview and record review of an undated and untitled list provided by the ADM on 12/28/22 at 3:47 pm indicated a list of 67 residents whose records were contained in the box. The ADM stated the box belonged to the facility. The records contained residents admission agreements that were current and those who had discharged from the facility. The files contained residents social security numbers, names, addresses any payor sources. Record review of the facility's HIPPA compliance Policy and Procedure dated 07/17 revealed Covered entity will take reasonable precautions to safeguard and secure the resident information at all times.
Nov 2022 9 deficiencies 5 IJ (5 affecting multiple)
CRITICAL (K) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

Someone could have died · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe environment free from abuse for 4 (Resi...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe environment free from abuse for 4 (Resident #3, #12, #13, and #14) of 14 residents reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to protect and assure the safety of Residents #3, #12, #13, and #14 when verbal abuse was reported on 10/19/22 and 10/20/22. Resident #3 was verbally abused by staff (recorded on video footage) and Residents #12, #13, and #14 said they were verbally abused by CNA E. These failures placed residents, who resided in the facility, at risk of abuse, and mental anguish caused by fear. This failure resulted in an identification of an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation on 10/24/22. While the IJ was removed on 10/29/22, the facility remained out of compliance at a severity level of actual harm, and a scope identified as pattern due to the facility's need to complete in-service training and evaluate the effectiveness of the corrective actions. Findings included: In an interview, with the DON and Administrator on 10/20/22 at 9:15 AM, the DON said staff found a camera hidden in a Halloween decoration in Resident #3's room. The DON said she received the call from staff on 10/19/22 round 2:00 AM staff regarding the camera. She said the staff texted her a picture of the Halloween decoration and the camera in it. The DON had staff unplug the camera because it was plugged into an un-approved extension cord. The DON said she was not surprised to find the hidden camera in the room, because the resident's family disagreed with an abuse investigation, conducted on 09/15/22, that did not reveal any abuse. The Administrator said Resident #3's family did not contact the facility regarding the camera, and they had not reported any concerns. The Administrator said he was going to have the Social Worker contact Resident #3's family regarding the camera to get to sign an Electronic Monitoring Form, but he did not know if the Social Worker had contacted them yet. The Administrator and DON said they had not heard anything from the family regarding the camera and no abuse or care issues had been reported to them. On 10/20/22 at 10:43 AM, a video was received from Resident #3's responsible party. The video was recorded on 10/19/22 at 1:58 AM, it showed a female staff person (LVN C) taking Resident #3 to his room in his wheelchair. She pulled him backwards into the room in his wheelchair. LVN C, once in the resident's room, she faced the resident and said, there you go, she pointed her right finger at the resident and said, you stop it, then she pulled her right hand in a fist, the fist does not touch the resident, but her left hand came down on something that cannot be seen in frame and a pop was heard, at the same time LVN C was heard again saying, you stop it, the resident told LVN C, fuck you, LVN C turned towards the door and it appeared the resident attempted to continue the altercation, but the images are obscured by the Halloween decoration. LVN C asked the resident, are you fighting me?', then she said angrily, at the door, you stay there and then shuts the door. On 10/20/22 at 11:08 AM, a video was received from Resident #3's responsible party, it was recorded on 10/16/22 at 12:09 AM, it showed a male staff person (CNA D) enter the resident's room the resident was in bed. CNA D picked up the bed sheet but the resident tugs on the sheet, and CNA D lets go of the sheet. The resident says, get off me, you mother fucker, and throws the sheet at CNA D. CNA D walked to the foot of the resident's bed and told he resident, I'm going to kick your ass. The resident responds but his response could not be understood on the video. In a telephone interview on 10/20/22 at 11:25 AM, Resident #3's responsible party said she had a previous complaint regarding staff treatment of the resident, which she believed to be abuse, that was investigated and found to be unsubstantiated on 09/15/22. She said she disagreed with the findings of the facility's investigation and felt the facility was covering up abuse and/or mistreatment of Resident #3. She said a former employee, Housekeeper F, informed her she believed Resident #3 was being mistreated and told her she should place a camera in his room, because reports to the Administrator and DON of mistreatment were not being acted on. She said Housekeeper F was terminated for telling her about the mistreatment of Resident #3 for not reporting the abuse allegations to the Administrator. She said based on her experience with the facility; she decided to place a hidden camera in the resident's room. She said the resident did not have a roommate and it was not violating any other resident's privacy. She said when she saw the abuse recorded on the camera, she came to the facility to check on Resident #3 but did not alert the facility to the hidden camera. She said the videos showed Resident #3 was being abused by the staff. She said on 10/19/22 around 2:00 AM she could see on the camera that staff discovered the camera was in the room. She said she could see several staff members looking at the camera before it was unplugged. She said, staff from the facility just called her a few minutes ago, she did not know who, to tell her the camera was not approved and that she would need to sign a consent for its use. She said she asked the person that called if they were concerned about what the camera revealed and the person did not answer the question, and just told her she needed to sign the form in order for the camera to be approved. She said she informed the staff she had already removed the camera from the room and took it home. She said no one reached out to her about the camera prior to the phone call today, after the investigator entered the facility. She said there was one additional video that she had not sent yet, but she would send it. She said she wanted to move the resident to another facility but had to wait for his Medicaid to be approved before her facility of choice would accept him. She said she feels stuck because she cannot move him but cannot trust that he won't be harmed at the facility. On 10/20/22 at 12:04 PM, the Administrator and DON were shown the above videos for staff identification purposes. They said both videos showed abuse of Resident #3. They identified LVN C as the staff in the first video and CNA D in the second video. The DON said there had been no reports or concerns regarding the employees' care and treatment of the residents. She said the employees would be notified and suspended pending the outcome of the investigation. On 10/20/22 at 12:38 PM, the third and final video was received from Resident #3's responsible party, it was recorded on 10/13/22 at 7:36 PM, it showed two staff (LVN C and CNA E) providing care to the resident while he was in bed. LVN C was at the head of the resident's bed encouraging him to allow care but he was saying don't do that, CNA E was observed getting some wipes, she joined LVN C at the resident's bedside. The resident could be heard saying, God dammit, at that point, LVN C's left hand went up with her hand open, while she leaned forward and told the resident to stop it, she does not hit the resident, but it appeared to be a gesture like she was going to slap the resident. On 10/20/22 at 12:45 PM, the Administrator and DON said the third video was LVN C who appeared to raise her hand to Resident #3. They said the other staff was CNA E. Record Review of Resident #3's admission Record dated 10/20/22 indicated the [AGE] year-old male resident was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included dementia and major depressive disorder. Record Review of Resident #3's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] indicated the resident had short and long-term memory problems. He was severely cognitively impaired. He had no behaviors. Record Review of Resident #3's un-dated Care Plan indicated he had behaviors which included, combativeness, physical and verbal aggression with staff. The interventions included to provide physical and verbal cues to alleviate the resident's anxiety and give positive feedback. If the resident resists care, reassure the resident, leave, and return 5-10 minutes later and try again. In an observation on 10/20/22 at 1:34 PM, Resident #3 was propelling himself in his wheelchair. He was not able to answer any direct questions. In an interview on 10/20/22 at 2:44 PM, CNA E watched third video. She said she did not think LVN C was raising her hand to the resident, but she was not paying attention, at the time. She said she thought maybe LVN C was reaching to roll the resident over. She said she had never seen any staff being abusive or mistreating the resident. She said around 10:00 PM yesterday, 10/19/22, the resident's responsible party asked her if she was aware there had been a camera in the room. She said she told her she was not aware. She said the resident's responsible party told her she put the camera in the room because the resident was being abused by the staff. She said she told the resident's responsible party she did not believe that would happen at the facility. She said she did not tell anyone the resident's responsible party reported the resident had been abused. She said LVN C overheard her talking with the resident's responsible party and knew about the allegation. She said she was supposed to inform the Administrator of any abuse allegations; however, she did not report it. In an interview on 10/20/22 at 4:21 PM, with the DON present, LVN C said on 10/19/22 Resident #3 was awake around 2:00 AM and staff got him up in his wheelchair and assisted him to the nurses' station for monitoring. She said the resident became combative, threw things off the nurses' station, and tried to hit, kick and bite staff. She said the video showed her pulling him in his room backwards because he was being combative. She said her right hand was in a fist and pulled back because she thought he was going to grab or bite her. She said she did not make physical contact with the resident. She said the slap sound on the video was when she slapped her own leg. She said she did not feel she was being abusive to the resident. She said she was speaking loudly but it was because the resident was hard of hearing. She said she did tell the resident to stay in his room and closed the door, but it was only for approximately 5 minutes until she could get a CNA to assist her to put the resident back to bed. She denied ever threatening or hitting the resident. She said staff discovered the camera after 2:00 AM and let the DON know. She said she did hear CNA E speaking to Resident #3's responsible party but she did not hear the allegation of abuse. She later said that maybe CNA E told her something about the allegation, but she did not remember, and she was busy at the time. She said she would report abuse to the DON, she was not aware the Administrator was the Abuse Coordinator. She said she should not have raised her voice to the resident. She said Resident #3 tried to kick her as she was leaving the room and that was why she asked him if he was trying to fight her. She said she never raised her hand to hit the resident. The DON informed her she was suspended pending the outcome of the investigation and was not to return to the facility until further notice. In a telephone interview on 10/20/22 at 3:35 PM, with the DON present, CNA D said if the resident was too combative, he was supposed to get another CNA to assist him, but he did not feel the resident was being that aggressive on 10/16/22. He said the resident tugged on the sheet and he let go, he said he did not know, at the time, the camera was in the room. He said he did tell the resident he was going to kick his ass because he was under pressure, but he would not have physically hurt the resident because it was not in his heart to do so. He said what he said was abuse. He said he was frustrated and tired of the resident being so mean. He said he had not seen or heard any other staff be mean or aggressive with the resident. He said he apologized dearly for his actions and would never hurt the residents. The DON informed him he could not report to work and was under investigation. In an interview on 10/20/22 at 5:00 PM, the Administrator said staff knew he was the Abuse Coordinator because they had all been in-serviced and it was posted in the facility. He said it was his expectation that staff would notify him immediately of any allegations of abuse or mistreatment. He said the facility would investigate, and notify the police and State Agency. In a telephone interview on 10/20/22 at 5:42 PM, Resident #3's responsible party said on 10/19/22 she spoke to CNA E regarding her abuse concerns and why she installed the camera. She said she asked if she could show CNA E the videos of the abuse, but the CNA told her her eyesight was not good and she did not think she could see the videos. She said she believed CNA E did not wish to see the videos because she would have to report the abuse to the Administrator. She said it further showed how staff wanted to turn a blind eye to reports of abuse. In a telephone interview on 10/20/22 at 6:07 PM, Former Housekeeper F said she was the housekeeper on Resident #3's hall and she felt staff were not caring for the resident appropriately. She said she believed the staff were not assisting him with meals, were abrupt and discourteous to him. She said she spoke with the Administrator and DON about her concerns, but she believed they were not addressed. She said she spoke to the resident's responsible party regarding her concerns and told her she should put a camera in the resident's room because she believed he was being mistreated by staff. She said when the facility found out she told the resident's responsible party she suspected abuse, the DON called her on 09/10/22, to question her if she knew who the Abuse Coordinator was, and she told her it was the Administrator. She said the Administrator wanted to meet with her in the next day 09/11/22, in his office, but she did not meet with him for fear she would be terminated. She said her last day of employment was 09/11/22. She said the facility's inaction regarding allegations made employees not want to report anything. She said other facility employees knew about things but don't report it. She would not give the investigator the names of the other employees. She said there were employees, still working at the facility, who abused residents. She named CNA E, as an abuser. In an observation on 10/24/22 at 9:30 AM, Resident #3 was propelling himself in his wheelchair. He was smiling and appeared to be in a good mood. He was not able to answer questions appropriately. In an interview on 10/24/22 at 9:43 AM, the Administrator and DON said the videos showed, based on their investigation, verbal abuse, and included intimidation and seclusion. They said they were going to terminate LVN C and CNA D for abuse. They said CNA E would be terminated for not reporting the allegation of abuse to the Administrator. The Administrator and DON said Former Housekeeper F never reported any abuse, neglect, or mistreatment of Resident #3 to them. The Administrator and DON said in-service training was provided orally and written for all staff on all three shifts, after the abuse allegation regarding Resident #3 on 09/15/22. On 10/24/22 at 12:43 PM the Administrator and DON were informed of an Immediate Jeopardy. On 10/25/22 at 3:58 PM Safe Surveys (interviews with residents regarding abuse and/or mistreatment) were received from the Administrator. On 10/25/22 at 4:18 PM the Immediate Jeopardy Plan of Removal was accepted. In an interview on 10/26/22 at 10:04 AM, the Social Worker said Medical Records had completed Safe Surveys with residents on 10/20/22. Record Review of the Safe Surveys, provided by the Administrator, on 10/25/22 at 3:58 PM, did not include any completed by Medical Records. Record Review of the Resident Council Minutes dated 10/17/22 indicated resident said they needed more customer service and respect from the staff. No staff was named and the number of residents who voiced this was not identified. In an interview on 10/26/22 at 10:27 AM, the AD said the Resident Council did bring up, in the meeting on 10/17/22, that they would like staff to be more respectful, but no abuse was alleged. In an interview on 10/26/22 at 11:05 AM, Medical Records said she conducted safe surveys on 10/20/22. She said during the surveys on 10/20/22, Resident #13 said CNA E yelled at her and was pointing her finger at her so close to her she thought the aide was going to hit her, but she did not. She said Resident 13's roommate, Resident #14 said she put on the light again for a different reason, to ask a question, and CNA E yelled at them again and stated, why are you on the light again? What's your problem? I was just in here!. She said Resident #14 was the Resident Council President and told her that they just tried not to bother CNA E after that. She said Resident #14 told Resident #13 they needed to speak up to get it to stop. She said Residents #13 and #14 told her they were verbally abused by CNA E. She said the interviews were between 9:00 AM -11:00 AM on Thursday, 10/20/22. She said she told the Administrator and DON immediately on 10/20/22. She said the residents told her the verbal abuse occurred on Monday, 10/17/22 on the 2:00 PM - 10:00 PM shift. She said, after she reported the allegation of abuse to the Administrator and DON, she interviewed Resident #12 on 10/20/22 between 11:00 AM -12:00 PM and the resident told her CNA E had verbally abused her too by yelling at her. She said once again she immediately informed the Administrator and DON of the verbal abuse allegation on 10/20/22. On 10/26/22 at 12:10 PM the investigator sent the Administrator an email requesting any additional safe surveys and if the facility had any new allegations of abuse. Record Review of Resident #13's admission Record dated 10/29/22 indicated the [AGE] year-old female resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and bipolar disorder (a mental illness). Record Review of Resident #13's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] indicated the resident was cognitively intact with a BIMS score of 15 (a score of 13-15 indicated no cognitive impairment). In an observation and interview on 10/26/22 at 1:22 PM, Resident #13 was in her room in her wheelchair. She said on 10/17/22, her roommate, Resident #14, had the call light and CNA E came in the room and was screaming, upset, that the call light was on. She said CNA E came over to her while she was in her bed and was screaming and pointing her finger so close to her; she was afraid she was going to hit her. She said CNA E was mad that her roommate had turned on the call light. She said she was shocked, she felt threatened and scared by CNA E's outburst. She said she later, the same evening, wanted to just ask a question, she put the call light on, and CNA E came in yelling again and asked why they were on the light again after she had just been in there. She said CNA E verbally abused her on 10/17/22. She said the only person she told, about the abuse, was the Medical Records person on 10/20/22. Record Review of Resident #12's admission Record dated 10/29/22 indicated the [AGE] year-old female resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of mild cognitive impairment, mild intellectual disabilities, depression and, the need for assistance with personal care. Record Review of Resident #12's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] indicated the resident was moderately cognitively impaired with a BIMS score of 10 (a score of 8-12 indicated moderate cognitive impairment). In an observation and interview on 10/26/22 at 1:46 PM, Resident #12 was in her wheelchair. She said about two or three weeks ago, CNA E came in her room and was going to assist with her incontinent care. She said CNA E started yelling at her, saying the resident could help more with the care. She said she was unable to physically help more, and she started crying. She said she was verbally abused by CNA E and was a little scared of her. She said it was on a weekend, and she told a lady working the 500 Hall, she did not know the lady's name, and the DON was called. She said she told the DON what happened with CNA E. She said the DON told her they would do some additional training with staff. She said she felt like she received the silent treatment from CNA E after she reported her. She said she reported the incident again on 10/20/22 to the Medical Records person. At 10/26/22 at 2:41 PM, there was no response from the Administrator regarding the email sent at 12:10 PM. In an interview on 10/26/22 at 2:58 PM, the Administrator said Medical Records conducted some Safe Surveys on 10/20/22. He said she did not notify him of the verbal abuse allegations reported by Residents #12, #13, and #14. He said staff conducting the Safe Surveys were told to immediately report any allegations of abuse and/or mistreatment to him immediately. He said he would look for the Safe Surveys conducted by Medical Records on 10/20/22. In an interview on 10/26/22 at 3:12 PM, the DON said she was not aware of the new allegations regarding CNA E. She said she was not contacted on a weekend regarding an incident between Resident #12 and CNA E. She said she would immediately tell the Administrator of any allegations regarding abuse. She said CNA E was terminated on Monday, 10/24/22 for not reporting Resident #3's responsible party's allegation of abuse to the Administrator. Record Review of Resident #14's admission Record dated 10/29/22 indicated the [AGE] year-old female resident was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included mild cognitive impairment and anxiety. Record Review of Resident #14's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] indicated the resident was cognitively intact with a BIMS score of 15 (a score of 13-15 indicated no cognitive impairment). In an observation and interview on 10/26/22 at 4:04 PM, Resident #14 was in bed in her room. She said she had been the Resident Council President about a month. She said, in the Resident Council Meeting in October 2022 it was discussed how the staff were speaking to the residents, at times. She said the residents perceived some of the staff to be snotty and argumentative, at times, like when a resident needed something the staff acted like they were doing the resident a favor instead of the fact that the staff worked for the residents. She said this was discussed in the council because staffs' attitudes towards the residents were getting worse not better. She said Medical Records came in and asked her, last week on 10/20/22 about her treatment in the facility. She said she told her about an incident on Monday 10/17/22 around 5:00 PM, she requested to be transferred from her wheelchair to bed and provided incontinent care. She said CNA E told her go to room and get in position. She said she followed instructions and waited over an hour and then put the call light on. She said CNA E came into the room yelling and screaming that the resident should not have put the call light on and that she had to just wait her turn for assistance. She said she told CNA E she was going to report her, and CNA E told her to go ahead because she did not have to answer to the resident. She said CNA E was screaming over her and pointing her finger. She said CNA E then went to her roommate's (Resident #13) side of the bed, the roommate was in bed, CNA E was standing over Resident #13, still yelling, and pointing her finger but was directed at her (Resident #14) and not the roommate (Resident #13). She said Resident #13 became afraid CNA E was going to hit her and Resident #13 started crying. She said she told Resident #13 not to cry because CNA E was mad at her (Resident #14). She said CNA E left the room, and Resident #13, who does not cuss, said Holy Shit!. She said about an hour later, the same evening, Resident #13 just wanted to ask a question, so she put the call light on, and CNA E came in the room screaming again. She said CNA E asked them What is your problem why is the call light on again?. She said Resident #13 apologized and said she just wanted to ask the AD something. She said she had been a resident at the facility for 5 years and CNA E had always had a temper. She said CNA E had an attitude like she was invincible because nothing ever happened to her, and she felt like she would not get fired. She said CNA E had always had a bad temper, but it had never been like this before. She said she did not tell anyone about the incident until the Medical Records person asked her about abuse on 10/20/22. She said she was verbally abused and intimidated by CNA E on 10/17/22. In an interview on 10/26/22 at 4:47 PM, the DON and the Clinical Resource RN said Medical Records had the Safe Surveys dated 10/20/22, on her person, for Residents #12, #13, and #14. She said Medical Records reported them verbally to the Administrator on 10/20/22 but did not give him the forms. They said the Administrator and Medical Records were suspended pending the outcome of the investigation. Record Review of Safe Surveys dated 10/20/22, not timed, indicated the question, Do you feel that you have been intentionally injured by a team member? -Resident #12 - verbal abuse -Resident #13 - verbal abuse with violently yelling and afraid CNA E would hit her on Monday (10/17/22) -Resident #14 - verbally abused with attitude - CNA E Record Review revealed Medical Records completed the three above Safe Surveys again on 10/20/22, not timed, and all three residents' answers to Do you feel you have been intentionally injured by a team member? were changed to, No. In an interview on 10/27/22 at 10:02 AM, the Clinical Resource RN and DON said the facility began in-services with all staff on the types of abuse, with a written quiz. The DON was made the Abuse Prevention Coordinator. The facility began interview with staff to see if any abuse allegations had been reported to the Administrator that were not acted upon. The facility began a root cause analysis. She said the Safe Surveys conducted on 10/20/22 with Residents #12, #13, and #14 revealed verbal abuse by CNA E. The DON said CNA E worked on 10/21/22, after the allegations of verbal abuse were reported to the Administrator on 10/20/22. She said CNA E did not work after 10/21/22. She said CNA E was terminated on 10/24/22 for not reporting the allegation of abuse made by Resident #3's responsible party, but not related to the allegations of verbal abuse. Record Review of CNA E's time sheet dated 10/27/22 indicated she worked on 10/21/22 from 2:24 PM - 9:48 PM, 7.4 hours. Attempts were made to interview CNA E on 10/28/22 at 5:23 PM, 7:24 PM, and 10/29/22 at 12:19 PM, there was no answer to the phone call and messages, a text was also sent on 10/29/22 at 12:20 PM requesting an interview, no return call was received prior to the exit on 10/29/22 at 1:00 PM. In a telephone interview on 10/27/22 at 5:26 PM, Medical Records said she told the Administrator immediately about each of the allegations of verbal abuse on 10/20/22. She said she told him after each allegation was made. She said the DON was also present, during the discussion with the Administrator. She said the administrator told her to shred Resident #12, #13, #14's Safe Surveys that revealed verbal abuse. She said he told her State was not looking at verbal abuse as being intentionally injured. She said the Administrator, then gave her new forms to complete with the same residents again. She said on 10/26/22, after the investigator asked about the Safe Surveys, she got the three original Safe Surveys for Resident #12, #13, and #14 out of the shred bin to give to the Administrator. She said the Administrator understood on 10/20/22 Residents #12, #13, and #14 had alleged they were verbally abused by CNA E. In an interview on 10/27/22 at 5:41 PM, the DON said she was not involved in the conversation regarding the abuse, as stated above, on 10/20/22. She said she was not aware of abuse being reported on the three residents (Residents #12, #13, and #14) in question. In a telephone interview on 10/27/22 at 5:45 PM, the Administrator said DON was not in the room when Medical Records discussed the verbal abuse allegations. He said Medical Records did notify him on 10/20/22 of the verbal abuse allegations. He said with everything going on the verbal abuse allegations did not cross his mind again. He said yesterday (10/26/22) Medical Records did get the Safe Surveys out of the shred bin, but he did not tell her to shred them. He told her to set them aside in his office. He said he did ask her to conduct new Safe Surveys on Resident #12, #13, and #14 because he did not believe verbal abuse was applicable to the question, Do you feel that you have been intentionally injured by a team member?. He said he was aware of the facility abuse policy and reporting requirements. In an interview on 10/27/22 at 6:35 PM, Resident #14 said she was having increased anxiety related to the verbal abuse from CNA E and just a combination of things. She said she might need an increase in her anti-anxiety medication. Record Review of the facility's Abuse: Prevention of and Prohibition Against dated October 2022 indicated verbal abuse included the use of oral, written, or gestured language that willfully includes disparaging and derogatory terms to residents or their representative, or within their hearing distance, regardless of their [NAME], ability to comprehend, or disability. Prevention included - all staff, residents and visitors are encouraged to report incidents and grievances without the fear of retribution. Supervising staff to identify and correct any inappropriate or unprofessional behaviors. Identifying, correcting, and intervening in situations in which abuse is more likely to occur. Investigation included - all identified events are reported to the Administrator immediately. After receiving the allegation, during and after the investigation, the Administrator will ensure that all residents are protected from physical and psychosocial harm. Protection included - immediately removing the employee from the care of any resident when an allegation of abuse is reported. Reporting included - all allegations of abuse she be reported immediately to the Administrator. Allegations of abuse will be reported to the appropriate State Agency in the applicable timeframes, as per the policy and applicable regulations. The Administrator and DON were notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on 10/24/22 at 12:43 PM, a Plan of Removal was requested and the Immediate Jeopardy template was provided. The Plan of Removal was accepted on 10/25/22 at 4:18 PM. [TRUNCATED]
CRITICAL (K) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Abuse Prevention Policies (Tag F0607)

Someone could have died · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement their written policies and procedures that ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement their written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse of residents for 4 (Resident #3, #12, #13, and #14) of 14 residents reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to implement a policy and process for immediately investigating, protecting the residents, and reporting allegations of abuse when: 1. Resident #3's responsible party made allegations of abuse to CNA E on 10/19/22 and she did not report it to the Administrator and the facility did not investigate or implement measures to protect the resident from further abuse; and 2. Resident #12, #13, and #14 reported on 10/20/22 that CNA E verbally abused them, and the facility did not investigate or implement measures to protect the residents from further abuse. This failure resulted in an identification of an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation on 10/24/22. While the IJ was removed on 10/29/22, the facility remained out of compliance at a severity level of actual harm, and a scope identified as pattern due to the facility's need to complete in-service training and evaluate the effectiveness of the corrective actions. Findings included: Record Review of the facility's Abuse: Prevention of and Prohibition Against dated October 2022 indicated verbal abuse included the use of oral, written, or gestured language that willfully includes disparaging and derogatory terms to residents or their representative, or within their hearing distance, regardless of their [NAME], ability to comprehend, or disability. Prevention included - all staff, residents and visitors are encouraged to report incidents and grievances without the fear of retribution. Supervising staff to identify and correct any inappropriate or unprofessional behaviors. Identifying, correcting, and intervening in situations in which abuse is more likely to occur. Investigation included - all identified events are reported to the Administrator immediately. After receiving the allegation, during and after the investigation, the Administrator will ensure that all residents are protected from physical and psychosocial harm. Protection included - immediately removing the employee from the care of any resident when an allegation of abuse is reported. Reporting included - all allegations of abuse she be reported immediately to the Administrator. Allegations of abuse will be reported to the appropriate State Agency in the applicable timeframes, as per the policy and applicable regulations. In an interview, with the DON and Administrator on 10/20/22 at 9:15 AM, the DON said staff found a camera hidden in a Halloween decoration in Resident #3's room. The DON said she received the call from staff on 10/19/22 round 2:00 AM staff regarding the camera. She said the staff texted her a picture of the Halloween decoration and the camera in it. The DON had staff unplug the camera because it was plugged into an un-approved extension cord. The DON said she was not surprised to find the hidden camera in the room, because the resident's family disagreed with an abuse investigation, conducted on 09/15/22, that did not reveal any abuse. The Administrator said Resident #3's family did not contact the facility regarding the camera, and they had not reported any concerns. The Administrator said he was going to have the Social Worker contact Resident #3's family regarding the camera to get to sign an Electronic Monitoring Form, but he did not know if the Social Worker had contacted them yet. The Administrator and DON said they had not heard anything from the family regarding the camera and no abuse or care issues had been reported to them. On 10/20/22 at 10:43 AM, a video was received from Resident #3's responsible party. The video was recorded on 10/19/22 at 1:58 AM, it showed a female staff person (LVN C) taking Resident #3 to his room in his wheelchair. She pulled him backwards into the room in his wheelchair. LVN C, once in the resident's room, she faced the resident and said, there you go, she pointed her right finger at the resident and said, you stop it, then she pulled her right hand in a fist, the fist does not touch the resident, but her left hand came down on something that cannot be seen in frame and a pop was heard, at the same time LVN C was heard again saying, you stop it, the resident told LVN C, fuck you, LVN C turned towards the door and it appeared the resident attempted to continue the altercation, but the images are obscured by the Halloween decoration. LVN C asked the resident, are you fighting me?', then she said angrily, at the door, you stay there and then shuts the door. On 10/20/22 at 11:08 AM, a video was received from Resident #3's responsible party, it was recorded on 10/16/22 at 12:09 AM, it showed a male staff person (CNA D) enter the resident's room the resident was in bed. CNA D picked up the bed sheet but the resident tugs on the sheet, and CNA D lets go of the sheet. The resident says, get off me, you mother fucker, and throws the sheet at CNA D. CNA D walked to the foot of the resident's bed and told he resident, I'm going to kick your ass. The resident responds but his response could not be understood on the video. In a telephone interview on 10/20/22 at 11:25 AM, Resident #3's responsible party said she had a previous complaint regarding staff treatment of the resident, which she believed to be abuse, that was investigated and found to be unsubstantiated on 09/15/22. She said she disagreed with the findings of the facility's investigation and felt the facility was covering up abuse and/or mistreatment of Resident #3. She said a former employee, Housekeeper F, informed her she believed Resident #3 was being mistreated and told her she should place a camera in his room, because reports to the Administrator and DON of mistreatment were not being acted on. She said Housekeeper F was terminated for telling her about the mistreatment of Resident #3 for not reporting the abuse allegations to the Administrator. She said based on her experience with the facility; she decided to place a hidden camera in the resident's room. She said the resident did not have a roommate and it was not violating any other resident's privacy. She said when she saw the abuse recorded on the camera, she came to the facility to check on Resident #3 but did not alert the facility to the hidden camera. She said the videos showed Resident #3 was being abused by the staff. She said on 10/19/22 around 2:00 AM she could see on the camera that staff discovered the camera was in the room. She said she could see several staff members looking at the camera before it was unplugged. She said, staff from the facility just called her a few minutes ago, she did not know who, to tell her the camera was not approved and that she would need to sign a consent for its use. She said she asked the person that called if they were concerned about what the camera revealed and the person did not answer the question, and just told her she needed to sign the form in order for the camera to be approved. She said she informed the staff she had already removed the camera from the room and took it home. She said no one reached out to her about the camera prior to the phone call today, after the investigator entered the facility. She said there was one additional video that she had not sent yet, but she would send it. She said she wanted to move the resident to another facility but had to wait for his Medicaid to be approved before her facility of choice would accept him. She said she feels stuck because she cannot move him but cannot trust that he won't be harmed at the facility. On 10/20/22 at 12:04 PM, the Administrator and DON were shown the above videos for staff identification purposes. They said both videos showed abuse of Resident #3. They identified LVN C as the staff in the first video and CNA D in the second video. The DON said there had been no reports or concerns regarding the employees' care and treatment of the residents. She said the employees would be notified and suspended pending the outcome of the investigation. On 10/20/22 at 12:38 PM, the third and final video was received from Resident #3's responsible party, it was recorded on 10/13/22 at 7:36 PM, it showed two staff (LVN C and CNA E) providing care to the resident while he was in bed. LVN C was at the head of the resident's bed encouraging him to allow care but he was saying don't do that, CNA E was observed getting some wipes, she joined LVN C at the resident's bedside. The resident could be heard saying, God dammit, at that point, LVN C's left hand went up with her hand open, while she leaned forward and told the resident to stop it, she does not hit the resident, but it appeared to be a gesture like she was going to slap the resident. On 10/20/22 at 12:45 PM, the Administrator and DON said the third video was LVN C who appeared to raise her hand to Resident #3. They said the other staff was CNA E. Record Review of Resident #3's admission Record dated 10/20/22 indicated the [AGE] year-old male resident was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included dementia and major depressive disorder. Record Review of Resident #3's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] indicated the resident had short and long-term memory problems. He was severely cognitively impaired. He had no behaviors. Record Review of Resident #3's un-dated Care Plan indicated he had behaviors which included, combativeness, physical and verbal aggression with staff. The interventions included to provide physical and verbal cues to alleviate the resident's anxiety and give positive feedback. If the resident resists care, reassure the resident, leave, and return 5-10 minutes later and try again. In an observation on 10/20/22 at 1:34 PM, Resident #3 was propelling himself in his wheelchair. He was not able to answer any direct questions. In an interview on 10/20/22 at 2:44 PM, CNA E watched third video. She said she did not think LVN C was raising her hand to the resident, but she was not paying attention, at the time. She said she thought maybe LVN C was reaching to roll the resident over. She said she had never seen any staff being abusive or mistreating the resident. She said around 10:00 PM yesterday, 10/19/22, the resident's responsible party asked her if she was aware there had been a camera in the room. She said she told her she was not aware. She said the resident's responsible party told her she put the camera in the room because the resident was being abused by the staff. She said she told the resident's responsible party she did not believe that would happen at the facility. She said she did not tell anyone the resident's responsible party reported the resident had been abused. She said LVN C overheard her talking with the resident's responsible party and knew about the allegation. She said she was supposed to inform the Administrator of any abuse allegations; however, she did not report it. In an interview on 10/20/22 at 4:21 PM, with the DON present, LVN C said on 10/19/22 Resident #3 was awake around 2:00 AM and staff got him up in his wheelchair and assisted him to the nurses' station for monitoring. She said the resident became combative, threw things off the nurses' station, and tried to hit, kick and bite staff. She said the video showed her pulling him in his room backwards because he was being combative. She said her right hand was in a fist and pulled back because she thought he was going to grab or bite her. She said she did not make physical contact with the resident. She said the slap sound on the video was when she slapped her own leg. She said she did not feel she was being abusive to the resident. She said she was speaking loudly but it was because the resident was hard of hearing. She said she did tell the resident to stay in his room and closed the door, but it was only for approximately 5 minutes until she could get a CNA to assist her to put the resident back to bed. She denied ever threatening or hitting the resident. She said staff discovered the camera after 2:00 AM and let the DON know. She said she did hear CNA E speaking to Resident #3's responsible party but she did not hear the allegation of abuse. She later said that maybe CNA E told her something about the allegation, but she did not remember, and she was busy at the time. She said she would report abuse to the DON, she was not aware the Administrator was the Abuse Coordinator. She said she should not have raised her voice to the resident. She said Resident #3 tried to kick her as she was leaving the room and that was why she asked him if he was trying to fight her. She said she never raised her hand to hit the resident. The DON informed her she was suspended pending the outcome of the investigation and was not to return to the facility until further notice. In a telephone interview on 10/20/22 at 3:35 PM, with the DON present, CNA D said if the resident was too combative, he was supposed to get another CNA to assist him, but he did not feel the resident was being that aggressive on 10/16/22. He said the resident tugged on the sheet and he let go, he said he did not know, at the time, the camera was in the room. He said he did tell the resident he was going to kick his ass because he was under pressure, but he would not have physically hurt the resident because it was not in his heart to do so. He said what he said was abuse. He said he was frustrated and tired of the resident being so mean. He said he had not seen or heard any other staff be mean or aggressive with the resident. He said he apologized dearly for his actions and would never hurt the residents. The DON informed him he could not report to work and was under investigation. In an interview on 10/20/22 at 5:00 PM, the Administrator said staff knew he was the Abuse Coordinator because they had all been in-serviced and it was posted in the facility. He said it was his expectation that staff would notify him immediately of any allegations of abuse or mistreatment. He said the facility would investigate, and notify the police and State Agency. In a telephone interview on 10/20/22 at 5:42 PM, Resident #3's responsible party said on 10/19/22 she spoke to CNA E regarding her abuse concerns and why she installed the camera. She said she asked if she could show CNA E the videos of the abuse, but the CNA told her her eyesight was not good and she did not think she could see the videos. She said she believed CNA E did not wish to see the videos because she would have to report the abuse to the Administrator. She said it further showed how staff wanted to turn a blind eye to reports of abuse. In a telephone interview on 10/20/22 at 6:07 PM, Former Housekeeper F said she was the housekeeper on Resident #3's hall and she felt staff were not caring for the resident appropriately. She said she believed the staff were not assisting him with meals, were abrupt and discourteous to him. She said she spoke with the Administrator and DON about her concerns, but she believed they were not addressed. She said she spoke to the resident's responsible party regarding her concerns and told her she should put a camera in the resident's room because she believed he was being mistreated by staff. She said when the facility found out she told the resident's responsible party she suspected abuse, the DON called her on 09/10/22, to question her if she knew who the Abuse Coordinator was, and she told her it was the Administrator. She said the Administrator wanted to meet with her in the next day 09/11/22, in his office, but she did not meet with him for fear she would be terminated. She said her last day of employment was 09/11/22. She said the facility's inaction regarding allegations made employees not want to report anything. She said other facility employees knew about things but don't report it. She would not give the investigator the names of the other employees. She said there were employees, still working at the facility, who abused residents. She named CNA E, as an abuser. In an observation on 10/24/22 at 9:30 AM, Resident #3 was propelling himself in his wheelchair. He was smiling and appeared to be in a good mood. He was not able to answer questions appropriately. In an interview on 10/24/22 at 9:43 AM, the Administrator and DON said the videos showed, based on their investigation, verbal abuse, and included intimidation and seclusion. They said they were going to terminate LVN C and CNA D for abuse. They said CNA E would be terminated for not reporting the allegation of abuse to the Administrator. The Administrator and DON said Former Housekeeper F never reported any abuse, neglect, or mistreatment of Resident #3 to them. The Administrator and DON said in-service training was provided orally and written for all staff on all three shifts, after the abuse allegation regarding Resident #3 on 09/15/22. On 10/24/22 at 12:43 PM the Administrator and DON were informed of an Immediate Jeopardy. On 10/25/22 at 3:58 PM Safe Surveys (interviews with residents regarding abuse and/or mistreatment) were received from the Administrator. On 10/25/22 at 4:18 PM the Immediate Jeopardy Plan of Removal was accepted. In an interview on 10/26/22 at 10:04 AM, the Social Worker said Medical Records had completed Safe Surveys with residents on 10/20/22. Record Review of the Safe Surveys, provided by the Administrator, on 10/25/22 at 3:58 PM, did not include any completed by Medical Records. Record Review of the Resident Council Minutes dated 10/17/22 indicated resident said they needed more customer service and respect from the staff. No staff was named and the number of residents who voiced this was not identified. In an interview on 10/26/22 at 10:27 AM, the AD said the Resident Council did bring up, in the meeting on 10/17/22, that they would like staff to be more respectful, but no abuse was alleged. In an interview on 10/26/22 at 11:05 AM, Medical Records said she conducted safe surveys on 10/20/22. She said during the surveys on 10/20/22, Resident #13 said CNA E yelled at her and was pointing her finger at her so close to her she thought the aide was going to hit her, but she did not. She said Resident 13's roommate, Resident #14 said she put on the light again for a different reason, to ask a question, and CNA E yelled at them again and stated, why are you on the light again? What's your problem? I was just in here!. She said Resident #14 was the Resident Council President and told her that they just tried not to bother CNA E after that. She said Resident #14 told Resident #13 they needed to speak up to get it to stop. She said Residents #13 and #14 told her they were verbally abused by CNA E. She said the interviews were between 9:00 AM -11:00 AM on Thursday, 10/20/22. She said she told the Administrator and DON immediately on 10/20/22. She said the residents told her the verbal abuse occurred on Monday, 10/17/22 on the 2:00 PM - 10:00 PM shift. She said, after she reported the allegation of abuse to the Administrator and DON, she interviewed Resident #12 on 10/20/22 between 11:00 AM -12:00 PM and the resident told her CNA E had verbally abused her too by yelling at her. She said once again she immediately informed the Administrator and DON of the verbal abuse allegation on 10/20/22. On 10/26/22 at 12:10 PM the investigator sent the Administrator an email requesting any additional safe surveys and if the facility had any new allegations of abuse. Record Review of Resident #13's admission Record dated 10/29/22 indicated the [AGE] year-old female resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and bipolar disorder (a mental illness). Record Review of Resident #13's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] indicated the resident was cognitively intact with a BIMS score of 15 (a score of 13-15 indicated no cognitive impairment). In an observation and interview on 10/26/22 at 1:22 PM, Resident #13 was in her room in her wheelchair. She said on 10/17/22, her roommate, Resident #14, had the call light and CNA E came in the room and was screaming, upset, that the call light was on. She said CNA E came over to her while she was in her bed and was screaming and pointing her finger so close to her; she was afraid she was going to hit her. She said CNA E was mad that her roommate had turned on the call light. She said she was shocked, she felt threatened and scared by CNA E's outburst. She said she later, the same evening, wanted to just ask a question, she put the call light on, and CNA E came in yelling again and asked why they were on the light again after she had just been in there. She said CNA E verbally abused her on 10/17/22. She said the only person she told, about the abuse, was the Medical Records person on 10/20/22. Record Review of Resident #12's admission Record dated 10/29/22 indicated the [AGE] year-old female resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of mild cognitive impairment, mild intellectual disabilities, depression and, the need for assistance with personal care. Record Review of Resident #12's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] indicated the resident was moderately cognitively impaired with a BIMS score of 10 (a score of 8-12 indicated moderate cognitive impairment). In an observation and interview on 10/26/22 at 1:46 PM, Resident #12 was in her wheelchair. She said about two or three weeks ago, CNA E came in her room and was going to assist with her incontinent care. She said CNA E started yelling at her, saying the resident could help more with the care. She said she was unable to physically help more, and she started crying. She said she was verbally abused by CNA E and was a little scared of her. She said it was on a weekend, and she told a lady working the 500 Hall, she did not know the lady's name, and the DON was called. She said she told the DON what happened with CNA E. She said the DON told her they would do some additional training with staff. She said she felt like she received the silent treatment from CNA E after she reported her. She said she reported the incident again on 10/20/22 to the Medical Records person. At 10/26/22 at 2:41 PM, there was no response from the Administrator regarding the email sent at 12:10 PM. In an interview on 10/26/22 at 2:58 PM, the Administrator said Medical Records conducted some Safe Surveys on 10/20/22. He said she did not notify him of the verbal abuse allegations reported by Residents #12, #13, and #14. He said staff conducting the Safe Surveys were told to immediately report any allegations of abuse and/or mistreatment to him immediately. He said he would look for the Safe Surveys conducted by Medical Records on 10/20/22. In an interview on 10/26/22 at 3:12 PM, the DON said she was not aware of the new allegations regarding CNA E. She said she was not contacted on a weekend regarding an incident between Resident #12 and CNA E. She said she would immediately tell the Administrator of any allegations regarding abuse. She said CNA E was terminated on Monday, 10/24/22 for not reporting Resident #3's responsible party's allegation of abuse to the Administrator. Record Review of Resident #14's admission Record dated 10/29/22 indicated the [AGE] year-old female resident was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included mild cognitive impairment and anxiety. Record Review of Resident #14's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] indicated the resident was cognitively intact with a BIMS score of 15 (a score of 13-15 indicated no cognitive impairment). In an observation and interview on 10/26/22 at 4:04 PM, Resident #14 was in bed in her room. She said she had been the Resident Council President about a month. She said, in the Resident Council Meeting in October 2022 it was discussed how the staff were speaking to the residents, at times. She said the residents perceived some of the staff to be snotty and argumentative, at times, like when a resident needed something the staff acted like they were doing the resident a favor instead of the fact that the staff worked for the residents. She said this was discussed in the council because staffs' attitudes towards the residents were getting worse not better. She said Medical Records came in and asked her, last week on 10/20/22 about her treatment in the facility. She said she told her about an incident on Monday 10/17/22 around 5:00 PM, she requested to be transferred from her wheelchair to bed and provided incontinent care. She said CNA E told her go to room and get in position. She said she followed instructions and waited over an hour and then put the call light on. She said CNA E came into the room yelling and screaming that the resident should not have put the call light on and that she had to just wait her turn for assistance. She said she told CNA E she was going to report her, and CNA E told her to go ahead because she did not have to answer to the resident. She said CNA E was screaming over her and pointing her finger. She said CNA E then went to her roommate's (Resident #13) side of the bed, the roommate was in bed, CNA E was standing over Resident #13, still yelling, and pointing her finger but was directed at her (Resident #14) and not the roommate (Resident #13). She said Resident #13 became afraid CNA E was going to hit her and Resident #13 started crying. She said she told Resident #13 not to cry because CNA E was mad at her (Resident #14). She said CNA E left the room, and Resident #13, who does not cuss, said Holy Shit!. She said about an hour later, the same evening, Resident #13 just wanted to ask a question, so she put the call light on, and CNA E came in the room screaming again. She said CNA E asked them What is your problem why is the call light on again?. She said Resident #13 apologized and said she just wanted to ask the AD something. She said she had been a resident at the facility for 5 years and CNA E had always had a temper. She said CNA E had an attitude like she was invincible because nothing ever happened to her, and she felt like she would not get fired. She said CNA E had always had a bad temper, but it had never been like this before. She said she did not tell anyone about the incident until the Medical Records person asked her about abuse on 10/20/22. She said she was verbally abused and intimidated by CNA E on 10/17/22. In an interview on 10/26/22 at 4:47 PM, the DON and the Clinical Resource RN said Medical Records had the Safe Surveys dated 10/20/22, on her person, for Residents #12, #13, and #14. She said Medical Records reported them verbally to the Administrator on 10/20/22 but did not give him the forms. They said the Administrator and Medical Records were suspended pending the outcome of the investigation. Record Review of Safe Surveys dated 10/20/22, not timed, indicated the question, Do you feel that you have been intentionally injured by a team member? -Resident #12 - verbal abuse -Resident #13 - verbal abuse with violently yelling and afraid CNA E would hit her on Monday (10/17/22) -Resident #14 - verbally abused with attitude - CNA E Record Review revealed Medical Records completed the three above Safe Surveys again on 10/20/22, not timed, and all three residents' answers to Do you feel you have been intentionally injured by a team member? were changed to, No. In an interview on 10/27/22 at 10:02 AM, the Clinical Resource RN and DON said the facility began in-services with all staff on the types of abuse, with a written quiz. The DON was made the Abuse Prevention Coordinator. The facility began interview with staff to see if any abuse allegations had been reported to the Administrator that were not acted upon. The facility began a root cause analysis. She said the Safe Surveys conducted on 10/20/22 with Residents #12, #13, and #14 revealed verbal abuse by CNA E. The DON said CNA E worked on 10/21/22, after the allegations of verbal abuse were reported to the Administrator on 10/20/22. She said CNA E did not work after 10/21/22. She said CNA E was terminated on 10/24/22 for not reporting the allegation of abuse made by Resident #3's responsible party, but not related to the allegations of verbal abuse. Record Review of CNA E's time sheet dated 10/27/22 indicated she worked on 10/21/22 from 2:24 PM - 9:48 PM, 7.4 hours. Attempts were made to interview CNA E on 10/28/22 at 5:23 PM, 7:24 PM, and 10/29/22 at 12:19 PM, there was no answer to the phone call and messages, a text was also sent on 10/29/22 at 12:20 PM requesting an interview, no return call was received prior to the exit on 10/29/22 at 1:00 PM. In a telephone interview on 10/27/22 at 5:26 PM, Medical Records said she told the Administrator immediately about each of the allegations of verbal abuse on 10/20/22. She said she told him after each allegation was made. She said the DON was also present, during the discussion with the Administrator. She said the administrator told her to shred Resident #12, #13, #14's Safe Surveys that revealed verbal abuse. She said he told her State was not looking at verbal abuse as being intentionally injured. She said the Administrator, then gave her new forms to complete with the same residents again. She said on 10/26/22, after the investigator asked about the Safe Surveys, she got the three original Safe Surveys for Resident #12, #13, and #14 out of the shred bin to give to the Administrator. She said the Administrator understood on 10/20/22 Residents #12, #13, and #14 had alleged they were verbally abused by CNA E. In an interview on 10/27/22 at 5:41 PM, the DON said she was not involved in the conversation regarding the abuse, as stated above, on 10/20/22. She said she was not aware of abuse being reported on the three residents (Residents #12, #13, and #14) in question. In a telephone interview on 10/27/22 at 5:45 PM, the Administrator said DON was not in the room when Medical Records discussed the verbal abuse allegations. He said Medical Records did notify him on 10/20/22 of the verbal abuse allegations. He said with everything going on the verbal abuse allegations did not cross his mind again. He said yesterday (10/26/22) Medical Records did get the Safe Surveys out of the shred bin, but he did not tell her to shred them. He told her to set them aside in his office. He said he did ask her to conduct new Safe Surveys on Resident #12, #13, and #14 because he did not believe verbal abuse was applicable to the question, Do you feel that you have been intentionally injured by a team member?. He said he was aware of the facility abuse policy and reporting requirements. In an interview on 10/27/22 at 6:35 PM, Resident #14 said she was having increased anxiety related to the verbal abuse from CNA E and just a combination of things. She [TRUNCATED]
CRITICAL (K) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Report Alleged Abuse (Tag F0609)

Someone could have died · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse or mistreatment,...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse or mistreatment, were reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation was made, if the events that caused the allegation involved abuse or resulted in serious bodily injury, or not later than 24 hours if the events that caused the allegation did not involve abuse and did not result in serious bodily injury, to the administrator of the facility and to other officials, including the State Agency, in accordance with State law through established procedures for 4 (Residents #3, #12, #13, and #14) of 14 residents reviewed for abuse. 1) CNA E failed to report Resident #3's responsible party's allegation of abuse to the Administrator on 10/19/22. 2) The Administrator failed to report Resident #12, #13, and #14's allegations of verbal abuse on 10/20/22 to the State Agency; due to not reporting the residents continued to be exposed to the staff that had verbally abused them. These failures could place all the residents, who resided in the facility, at risk for abuse and mental anguish. This failure resulted in an identification of an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation on 11/14/22. While the IJ was removed on 11/14/22, the facility remained out of compliance at a severity level of actual harm, and a scope identified as pattern due to the facility's need to complete in-service training and evaluate the effectiveness of the corrective actions. Findings included: In an interview, with the DON and Administrator on 10/20/22 at 9:15 AM, the DON said staff found a camera hidden in a Halloween decoration in Resident #3's room. The DON said she received the call from staff on 10/19/22 round 2:00 AM staff regarding the camera. She said the staff texted her a picture of the Halloween decoration and the camera in it. The DON had staff unplug the camera because it was plugged into an un-approved extension cord. The DON said she was not surprised to find the hidden camera in the room, because the resident's family disagreed with an abuse investigation, conducted on 09/15/22, that did not reveal any abuse. The Administrator said Resident #3's family did not contact the facility regarding the camera, and they had not reported any concerns. The Administrator said he was going to have the Social Worker contact Resident #3's family regarding the camera to get to sign an Electronic Monitoring Form, but he did not know if the Social Worker had contacted them yet. The Administrator and DON said they had not heard anything from the family regarding the camera and no abuse or care issues had been reported to them. On 10/20/22 at 10:43 AM, a video was received from Resident #3's responsible party. The video was recorded on 10/19/22 at 1:58 AM, it showed a female staff person (LVN C) taking Resident #3 to his room in his wheelchair. She pulled him backwards into the room in his wheelchair. LVN C, once in the resident's room, she faced the resident and said, there you go, she pointed her right finger at the resident and said, you stop it, then she pulled her right hand in a fist, the fist does not touch the resident, but her left hand came down on something that cannot be seen in frame and a pop was heard, at the same time LVN C was heard again saying, you stop it, the resident told LVN C, fuck you, LVN C turned towards the door and it appeared the resident attempted to continue the altercation, but the images are obscured by the Halloween decoration. LVN C asked the resident, are you fighting me?', then she said angrily, at the door, you stay there and then shuts the door. On 10/20/22 at 11:08 AM, a video was received from Resident #3's responsible party, it was recorded on 10/16/22 at 12:09 AM, it showed a male staff person (CNA D) enter the resident's room the resident was in bed. CNA D picked up the bed sheet but the resident tugs on the sheet, and CNA D lets go of the sheet. The resident says, get off me, you mother fucker, and throws the sheet at CNA D. CNA D walked to the foot of the resident's bed and told he resident, I'm going to kick your ass. The resident responds but his response could not be understood on the video. In a telephone interview on 10/20/22 at 11:25 AM, Resident #3's responsible party said she had a previous complaint regarding staff treatment of the resident, which she believed to be abuse, that was investigated and found to be unsubstantiated on 09/15/22. She said she disagreed with the findings of the facility's investigation and felt the facility was covering up abuse and/or mistreatment of Resident #3. She said a former employee, Housekeeper F, informed her she believed Resident #3 was being mistreated and told her she should place a camera in his room, because reports to the Administrator and DON of mistreatment were not being acted on. She said Housekeeper F was terminated for telling her about the mistreatment of Resident #3 for not reporting the abuse allegations to the Administrator. She said based on her experience with the facility; she decided to place a hidden camera in the resident's room. She said the resident did not have a roommate and it was not violating any other resident's privacy. She said when she saw the abuse recorded on the camera, she came to the facility to check on Resident #3 but did not alert the facility to the hidden camera. She said the videos showed Resident #3 was being abused by the staff. She said on 10/19/22 around 2:00 AM she could see on the camera that staff discovered the camera was in the room. She said she could see several staff members looking at the camera before it was unplugged. She said, staff from the facility just called her a few minutes ago, she did not know who, to tell her the camera was not approved and that she would need to sign a consent for its use. She said she asked the person that called if they were concerned about what the camera revealed and the person did not answer the question, and just told her she needed to sign the form in order for the camera to be approved. She said she informed the staff she had already removed the camera from the room and took it home. She said no one reached out to her about the camera prior to the phone call today, after the investigator entered the facility. She said there was one additional video that she had not sent yet, but she would send it. She said she wanted to move the resident to another facility but had to wait for his Medicaid to be approved before her facility of choice would accept him. She said she feels stuck because she cannot move him but cannot trust that he won't be harmed at the facility. On 10/20/22 at 12:04 PM, the Administrator and DON were shown the above videos for staff identification purposes. They said both videos showed abuse of Resident #3. They identified LVN C as the staff in the first video and CNA D in the second video. The DON said there had been no reports or concerns regarding the employees' care and treatment of the residents. She said the employees would be notified and suspended pending the outcome of the investigation. On 10/20/22 at 12:38 PM, the third and final video was received from Resident #3's responsible party, it was recorded on 10/13/22 at 7:36 PM, it showed two staff (LVN C and CNA E) providing care to the resident while he was in bed. LVN C was at the head of the resident's bed encouraging him to allow care but he was saying don't do that, CNA E was observed getting some wipes, she joined LVN C at the resident's bedside. The resident could be heard saying, God dammit, at that point, LVN C's left hand went up with her hand open, while she leaned forward and told the resident to stop it, she does not hit the resident, but it appeared to be a gesture like she was going to slap the resident. On 10/20/22 at 12:45 PM, the Administrator and DON said the third video was LVN C who appeared to raise her hand to Resident #3. They said the other staff was CNA E. Record Review of Resident #3's admission Record dated 10/20/22 indicated the [AGE] year-old male resident was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included dementia and major depressive disorder. Record Review of Resident #3's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] indicated the resident had short and long-term memory problems. He was severely cognitively impaired. He had no behaviors. Record Review of Resident #3's un-dated Care Plan indicated he had behaviors which included, combativeness, physical and verbal aggression with staff. The interventions included to provide physical and verbal cues to alleviate the resident's anxiety and give positive feedback. If the resident resists care, reassure the resident, leave, and return 5-10 minutes later and try again. In an observation on 10/20/22 at 1:34 PM, Resident #3 was propelling himself in his wheelchair. He was not able to answer any direct questions. In an interview on 10/20/22 at 2:44 PM, CNA E watched third video. She said she did not think LVN C was raising her hand to the resident, but she was not paying attention, at the time. She said she thought maybe LVN C was reaching to roll the resident over. She said she had never seen any staff being abusive or mistreating the resident. She said around 10:00 PM yesterday, 10/19/22, the resident's responsible party asked her if she was aware there had been a camera in the room. She said she told her she was not aware. She said the resident's responsible party told her she put the camera in the room because the resident was being abused by the staff. She said she told the resident's responsible party she did not believe that would happen at the facility. She said she did not tell anyone the resident's responsible party reported the resident had been abused. She said LVN C overheard her talking with the resident's responsible party and knew about the allegation. She said she was supposed to inform the Administrator of any abuse allegations; however, she did not report it. In an interview on 10/20/22 at 4:21 PM, with the DON present, LVN C said on 10/19/22 Resident #3 was awake around 2:00 AM and staff got him up in his wheelchair and assisted him to the nurses' station for monitoring. She said the resident became combative, threw things off the nurses' station, and tried to hit, kick and bite staff. She said the video showed her pulling him in his room backwards because he was being combative. She said her right hand was in a fist and pulled back because she thought he was going to grab or bite her. She said she did not make physical contact with the resident. She said the slap sound on the video was when she slapped her own leg. She said she did not feel she was being abusive to the resident. She said she was speaking loudly but it was because the resident was hard of hearing. She said she did tell the resident to stay in his room and closed the door, but it was only for approximately 5 minutes until she could get a CNA to assist her to put the resident back to bed. She denied ever threatening or hitting the resident. She said staff discovered the camera after 2:00 AM and let the DON know. She said she did hear CNA E speaking to Resident #3's responsible party but she did not hear the allegation of abuse. She later said that maybe CNA E told her something about the allegation, but she did not remember, and she was busy at the time. She said she would report abuse to the DON, she was not aware the Administrator was the Abuse Coordinator. She said she should not have raised her voice to the resident. She said Resident #3 tried to kick her as she was leaving the room and that was why she asked him if he was trying to fight her. She said she never raised her hand to hit the resident. The DON informed her she was suspended pending the outcome of the investigation and was not to return to the facility until further notice. In a telephone interview on 10/20/22 at 3:35 PM, with the DON present, CNA D said if the resident was too combative, he was supposed to get another CNA to assist him, but he did not feel the resident was being that aggressive on 10/16/22. He said the resident tugged on the sheet and he let go, he said he did not know, at the time, the camera was in the room. He said he did tell the resident he was going to kick his ass because he was under pressure, but he would not have physically hurt the resident because it was not in his heart to do so. He said what he said was abuse. He said he was frustrated and tired of the resident being so mean. He said he had not seen or heard any other staff be mean or aggressive with the resident. He said he apologized dearly for his actions and would never hurt the residents. The DON informed him he could not report to work and was under investigation. In an interview on 10/20/22 at 5:00 PM, the Administrator said staff knew he was the Abuse Coordinator because they had all been in-serviced and it was posted in the facility. He said it was his expectation that staff would notify him immediately of any allegations of abuse or mistreatment. He said the facility would investigate, and notify the police and State Agency. In a telephone interview on 10/20/22 at 5:42 PM, Resident #3's responsible party said on 10/19/22 she spoke to CNA E regarding her abuse concerns and why she installed the camera. She said she asked if she could show CNA E the videos of the abuse, but the CNA told her her eyesight was not good and she did not think she could see the videos. She said she believed CNA E did not wish to see the videos because she would have to report the abuse to the Administrator. She said it further showed how staff wanted to turn a blind eye to reports of abuse. In a telephone interview on 10/20/22 at 6:07 PM, Former Housekeeper F said she was the housekeeper on Resident #3's hall and she felt staff were not caring for the resident appropriately. She said she believed the staff were not assisting him with meals, were abrupt and discourteous to him. She said she spoke with the Administrator and DON about her concerns, but she believed they were not addressed. She said she spoke to the resident's responsible party regarding her concerns and told her she should put a camera in the resident's room because she believed he was being mistreated by staff. She said when the facility found out she told the resident's responsible party she suspected abuse, the DON called her on 09/10/22, to question her if she knew who the Abuse Coordinator was, and she told her it was the Administrator. She said the Administrator wanted to meet with her in the next day 09/11/22, in his office, but she did not meet with him for fear she would be terminated. She said her last day of employment was 09/11/22. She said the facility's inaction regarding allegations made employees not want to report anything. She said other facility employees knew about things but don't report it. She would not give the investigator the names of the other employees. She said there were employees, still working at the facility, who abused residents. She named CNA E, as an abuser. In an observation on 10/24/22 at 9:30 AM, Resident #3 was propelling himself in his wheelchair. He was smiling and appeared to be in a good mood. He was not able to answer questions appropriately. In an interview on 10/24/22 at 9:43 AM, the Administrator and DON said the videos showed, based on their investigation, verbal abuse, and included intimidation and seclusion. They said they were going to terminate LVN C and CNA D for abuse. They said CNA E would be terminated for not reporting the allegation of abuse to the Administrator. The Administrator and DON said Former Housekeeper F never reported any abuse, neglect, or mistreatment of Resident #3 to them. The Administrator and DON said in-service training was provided orally and written for all staff on all three shifts, after the abuse allegation regarding Resident #3 on 09/15/22. On 10/24/22 at 12:43 PM the Administrator and DON were informed of an Immediate Jeopardy. On 10/25/22 at 3:58 PM Safe Surveys (interviews with residents regarding abuse and/or mistreatment) were received from the Administrator. On 10/25/22 at 4:18 PM the Immediate Jeopardy Plan of Removal was accepted. In an interview on 10/26/22 at 10:04 AM, the Social Worker said Medical Records had completed Safe Surveys with residents on 10/20/22. Record Review of the Safe Surveys, provided by the Administrator, on 10/25/22 at 3:58 PM, did not include any completed by Medical Records. Record Review of the Resident Council Minutes dated 10/17/22 indicated resident said they needed more customer service and respect from the staff. No staff was named and the number of residents who voiced this was not identified. In an interview on 10/26/22 at 10:27 AM, the AD said the Resident Council did bring up, in the meeting on 10/17/22, that they would like staff to be more respectful, but no abuse was alleged. In an interview on 10/26/22 at 11:05 AM, Medical Records said she conducted safe surveys on 10/20/22. She said during the surveys on 10/20/22, Resident #13 said CNA E yelled at her and was pointing her finger at her so close to her she thought the aide was going to hit her, but she did not. She said Resident 13's roommate, Resident #14 said she put on the light again for a different reason, to ask a question, and CNA E yelled at them again and stated, why are you on the light again? What's your problem? I was just in here!. She said Resident #14 was the Resident Council President and told her that they just tried not to bother CNA E after that. She said Resident #14 told Resident #13 they needed to speak up to get it to stop. She said Residents #13 and #14 told her they were verbally abused by CNA E. She said the interviews were between 9:00 AM -11:00 AM on Thursday, 10/20/22. She said she told the Administrator and DON immediately on 10/20/22. She said the residents told her the verbal abuse occurred on Monday, 10/17/22 on the 2:00 PM - 10:00 PM shift. She said, after she reported the allegation of abuse to the Administrator and DON, she interviewed Resident #12 on 10/20/22 between 11:00 AM -12:00 PM and the resident told her CNA E had verbally abused her too by yelling at her. She said once again she immediately informed the Administrator and DON of the verbal abuse allegation on 10/20/22. On 10/26/22 at 12:10 PM the investigator sent the Administrator an email requesting any additional safe surveys and if the facility had any new allegations of abuse. Record Review of Resident #13's admission Record dated 10/29/22 indicated the [AGE] year-old female resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and bipolar disorder (a mental illness). Record Review of Resident #13's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] indicated the resident was cognitively intact with a BIMS score of 15 (a score of 13-15 indicated no cognitive impairment). In an observation and interview on 10/26/22 at 1:22 PM, Resident #13 was in her room in her wheelchair. She said on 10/17/22, her roommate, Resident #14, had the call light and CNA E came in the room and was screaming, upset, that the call light was on. She said CNA E came over to her while she was in her bed and was screaming and pointing her finger so close to her; she was afraid she was going to hit her. She said CNA E was mad that her roommate had turned on the call light. She said she was shocked, she felt threatened and scared by CNA E's outburst. She said she later, the same evening, wanted to just ask a question, she put the call light on, and CNA E came in yelling again and asked why they were on the light again after she had just been in there. She said CNA E verbally abused her on 10/17/22. She said the only person she told, about the abuse, was the Medical Records person on 10/20/22. Record Review of Resident #12's admission Record dated 10/29/22 indicated the [AGE] year-old female resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of mild cognitive impairment, mild intellectual disabilities, depression and, the need for assistance with personal care. Record Review of Resident #12's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] indicated the resident was moderately cognitively impaired with a BIMS score of 10 (a score of 8-12 indicated moderate cognitive impairment). In an observation and interview on 10/26/22 at 1:46 PM, Resident #12 was in her wheelchair. She said about two or three weeks ago, CNA E came in her room and was going to assist with her incontinent care. She said CNA E started yelling at her, saying the resident could help more with the care. She said she was unable to physically help more, and she started crying. She said she was verbally abused by CNA E and was a little scared of her. She said it was on a weekend, and she told a lady working the 500 Hall, she did not know the lady's name, and the DON was called. She said she told the DON what happened with CNA E. She said the DON told her they would do some additional training with staff. She said she felt like she received the silent treatment from CNA E after she reported her. She said she reported the incident again on 10/20/22 to the Medical Records person. At 10/26/22 at 2:41 PM, there was no response from the Administrator regarding the email sent at 12:10 PM. In an interview on 10/26/22 at 2:58 PM, the Administrator said Medical Records conducted some Safe Surveys on 10/20/22. He said she did not notify him of the verbal abuse allegations reported by Residents #12, #13, and #14. He said staff conducting the Safe Surveys were told to immediately report any allegations of abuse and/or mistreatment to him immediately. He said he would look for the Safe Surveys conducted by Medical Records on 10/20/22. In an interview on 10/26/22 at 3:12 PM, the DON said she was not aware of the new allegations regarding CNA E. She said she was not contacted on a weekend regarding an incident between Resident #12 and CNA E. She said she would immediately tell the Administrator of any allegations regarding abuse. She said CNA E was terminated on Monday, 10/24/22 for not reporting Resident #3's responsible party's allegation of abuse to the Administrator. Record Review of Resident #14's admission Record dated 10/29/22 indicated the [AGE] year-old female resident was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included mild cognitive impairment and anxiety. Record Review of Resident #14's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] indicated the resident was cognitively intact with a BIMS score of 15 (a score of 13-15 indicated no cognitive impairment). In an observation and interview on 10/26/22 at 4:04 PM, Resident #14 was in bed in her room. She said she had been the Resident Council President about a month. She said, in the Resident Council Meeting in October 2022 it was discussed how the staff were speaking to the residents, at times. She said the residents perceived some of the staff to be snotty and argumentative, at times, like when a resident needed something the staff acted like they were doing the resident a favor instead of the fact that the staff worked for the residents. She said this was discussed in the council because staffs' attitudes towards the residents were getting worse not better. She said Medical Records came in and asked her, last week on 10/20/22 about her treatment in the facility. She said she told her about an incident on Monday 10/17/22 around 5:00 PM, she requested to be transferred from her wheelchair to bed and provided incontinent care. She said CNA E told her go to room and get in position. She said she followed instructions and waited over an hour and then put the call light on. She said CNA E came into the room yelling and screaming that the resident should not have put the call light on and that she had to just wait her turn for assistance. She said she told CNA E she was going to report her, and CNA E told her to go ahead because she did not have to answer to the resident. She said CNA E was screaming over her and pointing her finger. She said CNA E then went to her roommate's (Resident #13) side of the bed, the roommate was in bed, CNA E was standing over Resident #13, still yelling, and pointing her finger but was directed at her (Resident #14) and not the roommate (Resident #13). She said Resident #13 became afraid CNA E was going to hit her and Resident #13 started crying. She said she told Resident #13 not to cry because CNA E was mad at her (Resident #14). She said CNA E left the room, and Resident #13, who does not cuss, said Holy Shit!. She said about an hour later, the same evening, Resident #13 just wanted to ask a question, so she put the call light on, and CNA E came in the room screaming again. She said CNA E asked them What is your problem why is the call light on again?. She said Resident #13 apologized and said she just wanted to ask the AD something. She said she had been a resident at the facility for 5 years and CNA E had always had a temper. She said CNA E had an attitude like she was invincible because nothing ever happened to her, and she felt like she would not get fired. She said CNA E had always had a bad temper, but it had never been like this before. She said she did not tell anyone about the incident until the Medical Records person asked her about abuse on 10/20/22. She said she was verbally abused and intimidated by CNA E on 10/17/22. In an interview on 10/26/22 at 4:47 PM, the DON and the Clinical Resource RN said Medical Records had the Safe Surveys dated 10/20/22, on her person, for Residents #12, #13, and #14. She said Medical Records reported them verbally to the Administrator on 10/20/22 but did not give him the forms. They said the Administrator and Medical Records were suspended pending the outcome of the investigation. Record Review of Safe Surveys dated 10/20/22, not timed, indicated the question, Do you feel that you have been intentionally injured by a team member? -Resident #12 - verbal abuse -Resident #13 - verbal abuse with violently yelling and afraid CNA E would hit her on Monday (10/17/22) -Resident #14 - verbally abused with attitude - CNA E Record Review revealed Medical Records completed the three above Safe Surveys again on 10/20/22, not timed, and all three residents' answers to Do you feel you have been intentionally injured by a team member? were changed to, No. In an interview on 10/27/22 at 10:02 AM, the Clinical Resource RN and DON said the facility began in-services with all staff on the types of abuse, with a written quiz. The DON was made the Abuse Prevention Coordinator. The facility began interview with staff to see if any abuse allegations had been reported to the Administrator that were not acted upon. The facility began a root cause analysis. She said the Safe Surveys conducted on 10/20/22 with Residents #12, #13, and #14 revealed verbal abuse by CNA E. The DON said CNA E worked on 10/21/22, after the allegations of verbal abuse were reported to the Administrator on 10/20/22. She said CNA E did not work after 10/21/22. She said CNA E was terminated on 10/24/22 for not reporting the allegation of abuse made by Resident #3's responsible party, but not related to the allegations of verbal abuse. Record Review of CNA E's time sheet dated 10/27/22 indicated she worked on 10/21/22 from 2:24 PM - 9:48 PM, 7.4 hours. Attempts were made to interview CNA E on 10/28/22 at 5:23 PM, 7:24 PM, and 10/29/22 at 12:19 PM, there was no answer to the phone call and messages, a text was also sent on 10/29/22 at 12:20 PM requesting an interview, no return call was received prior to the exit on 10/29/22 at 1:00 PM. In a telephone interview on 10/27/22 at 5:26 PM, Medical Records said she told the Administrator immediately about each of the allegations of verbal abuse on 10/20/22. She said she told him after each allegation was made. She said the DON was also present, during the discussion with the Administrator. She said the administrator told her to shred Resident #12, #13, #14's Safe Surveys that revealed verbal abuse. She said he told her State was not looking at verbal abuse as being intentionally injured. She said the Administrator, then gave her new forms to complete with the same residents again. She said on 10/26/22, after the investigator asked about the Safe Surveys, she got the three original Safe Surveys for Resident #12, #13, and #14 out of the shred bin to give to the Administrator. She said the Administrator understood on 10/20/22 Residents #12, #13, and #14 had alleged they were verbally abused by CNA E. In an interview on 10/27/22 at 5:41 PM, the DON said she was not involved in the conversation regarding the abuse, as stated above, on 10/20/22. She said she was not aware of abuse being reported on the three residents (Residents #12, #13, and #14) in question. In a telephone interview on 10/27/22 at 5:45 PM, the Administrator said DON was not in the room when Medical Records discussed the verbal abuse allegations. He said Medical Records did notify him on 10/20/22 of the verbal abuse allegations. He said with everything going on the verbal abuse allegations did not cross his mind again. He said yesterday (10/26/22) Medical Records did get the Safe Surveys out of the shred bin, but he did not tell her to shred them. He told her to set them aside in his office. He said he did ask her to conduct new Safe Surveys on Resident #12, #13, and #14 because he did not believe verbal abuse was applicable to the question, Do you feel that you have been intentionally injured by a team member?. He said he was aware of the facility abuse policy and reporting requirements. In an interview on 10/27/22 at 6:35 PM, Resident #14 said she was having increased anxiety related to the verbal abuse from CNA E and just a combination of things. She said she might need an increase in her anti-anxiety medication. Record Review of the facility's Abuse: Prevention of and Prohibition Against dated October 2022 indicated verbal abuse included the use of oral, written, or gestured language that willfully includes disparaging and derogatory terms to residents or their representative, or within their hearing distance, regardless of their [NAME], ability to comprehend, or disability. Prevention included - all staff, residents and visitors are encouraged to report incidents and grievances without the fear of retribution. Supervising staff to identify and correct any inappropriate or unprofessional behaviors. Identifying, correcting, and intervening in situations in which abuse is more likely to occur. Investigation included - all identified events are reported to the Administrator immediately. After receiving the allegation, during and after the investigation, the Administrator will ensure that all residents are protected from physical and psychosocial harm. Protection included - immediately removing the employee from the care of
CRITICAL (K) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Investigate Abuse (Tag F0610)

Someone could have died · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interview and record reviews the facility failed to ensure allegations of abuse were thoroughly investiga...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interview and record reviews the facility failed to ensure allegations of abuse were thoroughly investigated, prevent further potential abuse, and mistreatment while the investigation was in process, and report the results of all investigations to the administrator or his or her designated representative and to other officials in accordance with State law, including to the State Survey Agency, within 5 working days of the incident, and if the alleged violation is verified appropriate corrective action must be taken for 4 (Residents #3, #12, #13, and #14) of 14 residents reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to immediately investigate, protect the residents, and report allegations of abuse when: 1. Resident #3's responsible party made allegations of abuse to CNA E on 10/19/22 and she did not report it to the Administrator and the facility did not investigate or implement measures to protect the resident from further abuse; and 2. Resident #12, #13, and #14 reported on 10/20/22 that CNA E verbally abused them, and the facility did not investigate or implement measures to protect the residents from further abuse. These failures place all the residents, residing in the facility, at risk of abuse and mental anguish. This failure resulted in an identification of an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation on 10/24/22. While the IJ was removed on 10/29/22, the facility remained out of compliance at a severity level of actual harm, and a scope identified as pattern due to the facility's need to complete in-service training and evaluate the effectiveness of the corrective actions. Findings included: In an interview, with the DON and Administrator on 10/20/22 at 9:15 AM, the DON said staff found a camera hidden in a Halloween decoration in Resident #3's room. The DON said she received the call from staff on 10/19/22 round 2:00 AM staff regarding the camera. She said the staff texted her a picture of the Halloween decoration and the camera in it. The DON had staff unplug the camera because it was plugged into an un-approved extension cord. The DON said she was not surprised to find the hidden camera in the room, because the resident's family disagreed with an abuse investigation, conducted on 09/15/22, that did not reveal any abuse. The Administrator said Resident #3's family did not contact the facility regarding the camera, and they had not reported any concerns. The Administrator said he was going to have the Social Worker contact Resident #3's family regarding the camera to get to sign an Electronic Monitoring Form, but he did not know if the Social Worker had contacted them yet. The Administrator and DON said they had not heard anything from the family regarding the camera and no abuse or care issues had been reported to them. On 10/20/22 at 10:43 AM, a video was received from Resident #3's responsible party. The video was recorded on 10/19/22 at 1:58 AM, it showed a female staff person (LVN C) taking Resident #3 to his room in his wheelchair. She pulled him backwards into the room in his wheelchair. LVN C, once in the resident's room, she faced the resident and said, there you go, she pointed her right finger at the resident and said, you stop it, then she pulled her right hand in a fist, the fist does not touch the resident, but her left hand came down on something that cannot be seen in frame and a pop was heard, at the same time LVN C was heard again saying, you stop it, the resident told LVN C, fuck you, LVN C turned towards the door and it appeared the resident attempted to continue the altercation, but the images are obscured by the Halloween decoration. LVN C asked the resident, are you fighting me?', then she said angrily, at the door, you stay there and then shuts the door. On 10/20/22 at 11:08 AM, a video was received from Resident #3's responsible party, it was recorded on 10/16/22 at 12:09 AM, it showed a male staff person (CNA D) enter the resident's room the resident was in bed. CNA D picked up the bed sheet but the resident tugs on the sheet, and CNA D lets go of the sheet. The resident says, get off me, you mother fucker, and throws the sheet at CNA D. CNA D walked to the foot of the resident's bed and told he resident, I'm going to kick your ass. The resident responds but his response could not be understood on the video. In a telephone interview on 10/20/22 at 11:25 AM, Resident #3's responsible party said she had a previous complaint regarding staff treatment of the resident, which she believed to be abuse, that was investigated and found to be unsubstantiated on 09/15/22. She said she disagreed with the findings of the facility's investigation and felt the facility was covering up abuse and/or mistreatment of Resident #3. She said a former employee, Housekeeper F, informed her she believed Resident #3 was being mistreated and told her she should place a camera in his room, because reports to the Administrator and DON of mistreatment were not being acted on. She said Housekeeper F was terminated for telling her about the mistreatment of Resident #3 for not reporting the abuse allegations to the Administrator. She said based on her experience with the facility; she decided to place a hidden camera in the resident's room. She said the resident did not have a roommate and it was not violating any other resident's privacy. She said when she saw the abuse recorded on the camera, she came to the facility to check on Resident #3 but did not alert the facility to the hidden camera. She said the videos showed Resident #3 was being abused by the staff. She said on 10/19/22 around 2:00 AM she could see on the camera that staff discovered the camera was in the room. She said she could see several staff members looking at the camera before it was unplugged. She said, staff from the facility just called her a few minutes ago, she did not know who, to tell her the camera was not approved and that she would need to sign a consent for its use. She said she asked the person that called if they were concerned about what the camera revealed and the person did not answer the question, and just told her she needed to sign the form in order for the camera to be approved. She said she informed the staff she had already removed the camera from the room and took it home. She said no one reached out to her about the camera prior to the phone call today, after the investigator entered the facility. She said there was one additional video that she had not sent yet, but she would send it. She said she wanted to move the resident to another facility but had to wait for his Medicaid to be approved before her facility of choice would accept him. She said she feels stuck because she cannot move him but cannot trust that he won't be harmed at the facility. On 10/20/22 at 12:04 PM, the Administrator and DON were shown the above videos for staff identification purposes. They said both videos showed abuse of Resident #3. They identified LVN C as the staff in the first video and CNA D in the second video. The DON said there had been no reports or concerns regarding the employees' care and treatment of the residents. She said the employees would be notified and suspended pending the outcome of the investigation. On 10/20/22 at 12:38 PM, the third and final video was received from Resident #3's responsible party, it was recorded on 10/13/22 at 7:36 PM, it showed two staff (LVN C and CNA E) providing care to the resident while he was in bed. LVN C was at the head of the resident's bed encouraging him to allow care but he was saying don't do that, CNA E was observed getting some wipes, she joined LVN C at the resident's bedside. The resident could be heard saying, God dammit, at that point, LVN C's left hand went up with her hand open, while she leaned forward and told the resident to stop it, she does not hit the resident, but it appeared to be a gesture like she was going to slap the resident. On 10/20/22 at 12:45 PM, the Administrator and DON said the third video was LVN C who appeared to raise her hand to Resident #3. They said the other staff was CNA E. Record Review of Resident #3's admission Record dated 10/20/22 indicated the [AGE] year-old male resident was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included dementia and major depressive disorder. Record Review of Resident #3's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] indicated the resident had short and long-term memory problems. He was severely cognitively impaired. He had no behaviors. Record Review of Resident #3's un-dated Care Plan indicated he had behaviors which included, combativeness, physical and verbal aggression with staff. The interventions included to provide physical and verbal cues to alleviate the resident's anxiety and give positive feedback. If the resident resists care, reassure the resident, leave, and return 5-10 minutes later and try again. In an observation on 10/20/22 at 1:34 PM, Resident #3 was propelling himself in his wheelchair. He was not able to answer any direct questions. In an interview on 10/20/22 at 2:44 PM, CNA E watched third video. She said she did not think LVN C was raising her hand to the resident, but she was not paying attention, at the time. She said she thought maybe LVN C was reaching to roll the resident over. She said she had never seen any staff being abusive or mistreating the resident. She said around 10:00 PM yesterday, 10/19/22, the resident's responsible party asked her if she was aware there had been a camera in the room. She said she told her she was not aware. She said the resident's responsible party told her she put the camera in the room because the resident was being abused by the staff. She said she told the resident's responsible party she did not believe that would happen at the facility. She said she did not tell anyone the resident's responsible party reported the resident had been abused. She said LVN C overheard her talking with the resident's responsible party and knew about the allegation. She said she was supposed to inform the Administrator of any abuse allegations; however, she did not report it. In an interview on 10/20/22 at 4:21 PM, with the DON present, LVN C said on 10/19/22 Resident #3 was awake around 2:00 AM and staff got him up in his wheelchair and assisted him to the nurses' station for monitoring. She said the resident became combative, threw things off the nurses' station, and tried to hit, kick and bite staff. She said the video showed her pulling him in his room backwards because he was being combative. She said her right hand was in a fist and pulled back because she thought he was going to grab or bite her. She said she did not make physical contact with the resident. She said the slap sound on the video was when she slapped her own leg. She said she did not feel she was being abusive to the resident. She said she was speaking loudly but it was because the resident was hard of hearing. She said she did tell the resident to stay in his room and closed the door, but it was only for approximately 5 minutes until she could get a CNA to assist her to put the resident back to bed. She denied ever threatening or hitting the resident. She said staff discovered the camera after 2:00 AM and let the DON know. She said she did hear CNA E speaking to Resident #3's responsible party but she did not hear the allegation of abuse. She later said that maybe CNA E told her something about the allegation, but she did not remember, and she was busy at the time. She said she would report abuse to the DON, she was not aware the Administrator was the Abuse Coordinator. She said she should not have raised her voice to the resident. She said Resident #3 tried to kick her as she was leaving the room and that was why she asked him if he was trying to fight her. She said she never raised her hand to hit the resident. The DON informed her she was suspended pending the outcome of the investigation and was not to return to the facility until further notice. In a telephone interview on 10/20/22 at 3:35 PM, with the DON present, CNA D said if the resident was too combative, he was supposed to get another CNA to assist him, but he did not feel the resident was being that aggressive on 10/16/22. He said the resident tugged on the sheet and he let go, he said he did not know, at the time, the camera was in the room. He said he did tell the resident he was going to kick his ass because he was under pressure, but he would not have physically hurt the resident because it was not in his heart to do so. He said what he said was abuse. He said he was frustrated and tired of the resident being so mean. He said he had not seen or heard any other staff be mean or aggressive with the resident. He said he apologized dearly for his actions and would never hurt the residents. The DON informed him he could not report to work and was under investigation. In an interview on 10/20/22 at 5:00 PM, the Administrator said staff knew he was the Abuse Coordinator because they had all been in-serviced and it was posted in the facility. He said it was his expectation that staff would notify him immediately of any allegations of abuse or mistreatment. He said the facility would investigate, and notify the police and State Agency. In a telephone interview on 10/20/22 at 5:42 PM, Resident #3's responsible party said on 10/19/22 she spoke to CNA E regarding her abuse concerns and why she installed the camera. She said she asked if she could show CNA E the videos of the abuse, but the CNA told her her eyesight was not good and she did not think she could see the videos. She said she believed CNA E did not wish to see the videos because she would have to report the abuse to the Administrator. She said it further showed how staff wanted to turn a blind eye to reports of abuse. In a telephone interview on 10/20/22 at 6:07 PM, Former Housekeeper F said she was the housekeeper on Resident #3's hall and she felt staff were not caring for the resident appropriately. She said she believed the staff were not assisting him with meals, were abrupt and discourteous to him. She said she spoke with the Administrator and DON about her concerns, but she believed they were not addressed. She said she spoke to the resident's responsible party regarding her concerns and told her she should put a camera in the resident's room because she believed he was being mistreated by staff. She said when the facility found out she told the resident's responsible party she suspected abuse, the DON called her on 09/10/22, to question her if she knew who the Abuse Coordinator was, and she told her it was the Administrator. She said the Administrator wanted to meet with her in the next day 09/11/22, in his office, but she did not meet with him for fear she would be terminated. She said her last day of employment was 09/11/22. She said the facility's inaction regarding allegations made employees not want to report anything. She said other facility employees knew about things but don't report it. She would not give the investigator the names of the other employees. She said there were employees, still working at the facility, who abused residents. She named CNA E, as an abuser. In an observation on 10/24/22 at 9:30 AM, Resident #3 was propelling himself in his wheelchair. He was smiling and appeared to be in a good mood. He was not able to answer questions appropriately. In an interview on 10/24/22 at 9:43 AM, the Administrator and DON said the videos showed, based on their investigation, verbal abuse, and included intimidation and seclusion. They said they were going to terminate LVN C and CNA D for abuse. They said CNA E would be terminated for not reporting the allegation of abuse to the Administrator. The Administrator and DON said Former Housekeeper F never reported any abuse, neglect, or mistreatment of Resident #3 to them. The Administrator and DON said in-service training was provided orally and written for all staff on all three shifts, after the abuse allegation regarding Resident #3 on 09/15/22. On 10/24/22 at 12:43 PM the Administrator and DON were informed of an Immediate Jeopardy. On 10/25/22 at 3:58 PM Safe Surveys (interviews with residents regarding abuse and/or mistreatment) were received from the Administrator. On 10/25/22 at 4:18 PM the Immediate Jeopardy Plan of Removal was accepted. In an interview on 10/26/22 at 10:04 AM, the Social Worker said Medical Records had completed Safe Surveys with residents on 10/20/22. Record Review of the Safe Surveys, provided by the Administrator, on 10/25/22 at 3:58 PM, did not include any completed by Medical Records. Record Review of the Resident Council Minutes dated 10/17/22 indicated resident said they needed more customer service and respect from the staff. No staff was named and the number of residents who voiced this was not identified. In an interview on 10/26/22 at 10:27 AM, the AD said the Resident Council did bring up, in the meeting on 10/17/22, that they would like staff to be more respectful, but no abuse was alleged. In an interview on 10/26/22 at 11:05 AM, Medical Records said she conducted safe surveys on 10/20/22. She said during the surveys on 10/20/22, Resident #13 said CNA E yelled at her and was pointing her finger at her so close to her she thought the aide was going to hit her, but she did not. She said Resident 13's roommate, Resident #14 said she put on the light again for a different reason, to ask a question, and CNA E yelled at them again and stated, why are you on the light again? What's your problem? I was just in here!. She said Resident #14 was the Resident Council President and told her that they just tried not to bother CNA E after that. She said Resident #14 told Resident #13 they needed to speak up to get it to stop. She said Residents #13 and #14 told her they were verbally abused by CNA E. She said the interviews were between 9:00 AM -11:00 AM on Thursday, 10/20/22. She said she told the Administrator and DON immediately on 10/20/22. She said the residents told her the verbal abuse occurred on Monday, 10/17/22 on the 2:00 PM - 10:00 PM shift. She said, after she reported the allegation of abuse to the Administrator and DON, she interviewed Resident #12 on 10/20/22 between 11:00 AM -12:00 PM and the resident told her CNA E had verbally abused her too by yelling at her. She said once again she immediately informed the Administrator and DON of the verbal abuse allegation on 10/20/22. On 10/26/22 at 12:10 PM the investigator sent the Administrator an email requesting any additional safe surveys and if the facility had any new allegations of abuse. Record Review of Resident #13's admission Record dated 10/29/22 indicated the [AGE] year-old female resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and bipolar disorder (a mental illness). Record Review of Resident #13's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] indicated the resident was cognitively intact with a BIMS score of 15 (a score of 13-15 indicated no cognitive impairment). In an observation and interview on 10/26/22 at 1:22 PM, Resident #13 was in her room in her wheelchair. She said on 10/17/22, her roommate, Resident #14, had the call light and CNA E came in the room and was screaming, upset, that the call light was on. She said CNA E came over to her while she was in her bed and was screaming and pointing her finger so close to her; she was afraid she was going to hit her. She said CNA E was mad that her roommate had turned on the call light. She said she was shocked, she felt threatened and scared by CNA E's outburst. She said she later, the same evening, wanted to just ask a question, she put the call light on, and CNA E came in yelling again and asked why they were on the light again after she had just been in there. She said CNA E verbally abused her on 10/17/22. She said the only person she told, about the abuse, was the Medical Records person on 10/20/22. Record Review of Resident #12's admission Record dated 10/29/22 indicated the [AGE] year-old female resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of mild cognitive impairment, mild intellectual disabilities, depression and, the need for assistance with personal care. Record Review of Resident #12's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] indicated the resident was moderately cognitively impaired with a BIMS score of 10 (a score of 8-12 indicated moderate cognitive impairment). In an observation and interview on 10/26/22 at 1:46 PM, Resident #12 was in her wheelchair. She said about two or three weeks ago, CNA E came in her room and was going to assist with her incontinent care. She said CNA E started yelling at her, saying the resident could help more with the care. She said she was unable to physically help more, and she started crying. She said she was verbally abused by CNA E and was a little scared of her. She said it was on a weekend, and she told a lady working the 500 Hall, she did not know the lady's name, and the DON was called. She said she told the DON what happened with CNA E. She said the DON told her they would do some additional training with staff. She said she felt like she received the silent treatment from CNA E after she reported her. She said she reported the incident again on 10/20/22 to the Medical Records person. At 10/26/22 at 2:41 PM, there was no response from the Administrator regarding the email sent at 12:10 PM. In an interview on 10/26/22 at 2:58 PM, the Administrator said Medical Records conducted some Safe Surveys on 10/20/22. He said she did not notify him of the verbal abuse allegations reported by Residents #12, #13, and #14. He said staff conducting the Safe Surveys were told to immediately report any allegations of abuse and/or mistreatment to him immediately. He said he would look for the Safe Surveys conducted by Medical Records on 10/20/22. In an interview on 10/26/22 at 3:12 PM, the DON said she was not aware of the new allegations regarding CNA E. She said she was not contacted on a weekend regarding an incident between Resident #12 and CNA E. She said she would immediately tell the Administrator of any allegations regarding abuse. She said CNA E was terminated on Monday, 10/24/22 for not reporting Resident #3's responsible party's allegation of abuse to the Administrator. Record Review of Resident #14's admission Record dated 10/29/22 indicated the [AGE] year-old female resident was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included mild cognitive impairment and anxiety. Record Review of Resident #14's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] indicated the resident was cognitively intact with a BIMS score of 15 (a score of 13-15 indicated no cognitive impairment). In an observation and interview on 10/26/22 at 4:04 PM, Resident #14 was in bed in her room. She said she had been the Resident Council President about a month. She said, in the Resident Council Meeting in October 2022 it was discussed how the staff were speaking to the residents, at times. She said the residents perceived some of the staff to be snotty and argumentative, at times, like when a resident needed something the staff acted like they were doing the resident a favor instead of the fact that the staff worked for the residents. She said this was discussed in the council because staffs' attitudes towards the residents were getting worse not better. She said Medical Records came in and asked her, last week on 10/20/22 about her treatment in the facility. She said she told her about an incident on Monday 10/17/22 around 5:00 PM, she requested to be transferred from her wheelchair to bed and provided incontinent care. She said CNA E told her go to room and get in position. She said she followed instructions and waited over an hour and then put the call light on. She said CNA E came into the room yelling and screaming that the resident should not have put the call light on and that she had to just wait her turn for assistance. She said she told CNA E she was going to report her, and CNA E told her to go ahead because she did not have to answer to the resident. She said CNA E was screaming over her and pointing her finger. She said CNA E then went to her roommate's (Resident #13) side of the bed, the roommate was in bed, CNA E was standing over Resident #13, still yelling, and pointing her finger but was directed at her (Resident #14) and not the roommate (Resident #13). She said Resident #13 became afraid CNA E was going to hit her and Resident #13 started crying. She said she told Resident #13 not to cry because CNA E was mad at her (Resident #14). She said CNA E left the room, and Resident #13, who does not cuss, said Holy Shit!. She said about an hour later, the same evening, Resident #13 just wanted to ask a question, so she put the call light on, and CNA E came in the room screaming again. She said CNA E asked them What is your problem why is the call light on again?. She said Resident #13 apologized and said she just wanted to ask the AD something. She said she had been a resident at the facility for 5 years and CNA E had always had a temper. She said CNA E had an attitude like she was invincible because nothing ever happened to her, and she felt like she would not get fired. She said CNA E had always had a bad temper, but it had never been like this before. She said she did not tell anyone about the incident until the Medical Records person asked her about abuse on 10/20/22. She said she was verbally abused and intimidated by CNA E on 10/17/22. In an interview on 10/26/22 at 4:47 PM, the DON and the Clinical Resource RN said Medical Records had the Safe Surveys dated 10/20/22, on her person, for Residents #12, #13, and #14. She said Medical Records reported them verbally to the Administrator on 10/20/22 but did not give him the forms. They said the Administrator and Medical Records were suspended pending the outcome of the investigation. Record Review of Safe Surveys dated 10/20/22, not timed, indicated the question, Do you feel that you have been intentionally injured by a team member? -Resident #12 - verbal abuse -Resident #13 - verbal abuse with violently yelling and afraid CNA E would hit her on Monday (10/17/22) -Resident #14 - verbally abused with attitude - CNA E Record Review revealed Medical Records completed the three above Safe Surveys again on 10/20/22, not timed, and all three residents' answers to Do you feel you have been intentionally injured by a team member? were changed to, No. In an interview on 10/27/22 at 10:02 AM, the Clinical Resource RN and DON said the facility began in-services with all staff on the types of abuse, with a written quiz. The DON was made the Abuse Prevention Coordinator. The facility began interview with staff to see if any abuse allegations had been reported to the Administrator that were not acted upon. The facility began a root cause analysis. She said the Safe Surveys conducted on 10/20/22 with Residents #12, #13, and #14 revealed verbal abuse by CNA E. The DON said CNA E worked on 10/21/22, after the allegations of verbal abuse were reported to the Administrator on 10/20/22. She said CNA E did not work after 10/21/22. She said CNA E was terminated on 10/24/22 for not reporting the allegation of abuse made by Resident #3's responsible party, but not related to the allegations of verbal abuse. Record Review of CNA E's time sheet dated 10/27/22 indicated she worked on 10/21/22 from 2:24 PM - 9:48 PM, 7.4 hours. Attempts were made to interview CNA E on 10/28/22 at 5:23 PM, 7:24 PM, and 10/29/22 at 12:19 PM, there was no answer to the phone call and messages, a text was also sent on 10/29/22 at 12:20 PM requesting an interview, no return call was received prior to the exit on 10/29/22 at 1:00 PM. In a telephone interview on 10/27/22 at 5:26 PM, Medical Records said she told the Administrator immediately about each of the allegations of verbal abuse on 10/20/22. She said she told him after each allegation was made. She said the DON was also present, during the discussion with the Administrator. She said the administrator told her to shred Resident #12, #13, #14's Safe Surveys that revealed verbal abuse. She said he told her State was not looking at verbal abuse as being intentionally injured. She said the Administrator, then gave her new forms to complete with the same residents again. She said on 10/26/22, after the investigator asked about the Safe Surveys, she got the three original Safe Surveys for Resident #12, #13, and #14 out of the shred bin to give to the Administrator. She said the Administrator understood on 10/20/22 Residents #12, #13, and #14 had alleged they were verbally abused by CNA E. In an interview on 10/27/22 at 5:41 PM, the DON said she was not involved in the conversation regarding the abuse, as stated above, on 10/20/22. She said she was not aware of abuse being reported on the three residents (Residents #12, #13, and #14) in question. In a telephone interview on 10/27/22 at 5:45 PM, the Administrator said DON was not in the room when Medical Records discussed the verbal abuse allegations. He said Medical Records did notify him on 10/20/22 of the verbal abuse allegations. He said with everything going on the verbal abuse allegations did not cross his mind again. He said yesterday (10/26/22) Medical Records did get the Safe Surveys out of the shred bin, but he did not tell her to shred them. He told her to set them aside in his office. He said he did ask her to conduct new Safe Surveys on Resident #12, #13, and #14 because he did not believe verbal abuse was applicable to the question, Do you feel that you have been intentionally injured by a team member?. He said he was aware of the facility abuse policy and reporting requirements. In an interview on 10/27/22 at 6:35 PM, Resident #14 said she was having increased anxiety related to the verbal abuse from CNA E and just a combination of things. She said she might need an increase in her anti-anxiety medication. Record Review of the facility's Abuse: Prevention of and Prohibition Against dated October 2022 indicated verbal abuse included the use of oral, written, or gestured language that willfully includes disparaging and derogatory terms to residents or their representative, or within their hearing distance, regardless of their [NAME], ability to comprehend, or disability. Prevention included - all staff, residents and visitors are encouraged to report incidents and grievances without the fear of retribution. Supervising staff to identify and correct any inappropriate or unprofessional behaviors. Identifying, correcting, and intervening in situations in which abuse is more likely to occur. Investigation included - all identified events are reported to the Administrator immediately. After receiving the allegatio[TRUNCATED]
CRITICAL (K) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Administration (Tag F0835)

Someone could have died · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the facility was administered in a manner that enabled it to...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the facility was administered in a manner that enabled it to use its resources effectively and efficiently to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident for 4 (Residents #3, #12, #13, and #14) of 14 residents reviewed for abuse. 1) CNA E failed to report Resident #3's responsible party's allegation of abuse to the Administrator on 10/19/22. 2) The Administrator (the Abuse Coordinator) failed the residents by not implementing the Abuse Policy when he was informed, on 10/20/22, of Resident #12, #13, and #14's allegations that CNA E verbally abused them. CNA E continued to work after the Administrator was notified of the abuse. Safe Surveys conducted on 10/20/22, identified abuse and indicated additional residents were being abused. The Safe Surveys were not provided to the investigator until repeated inquiry and were found in the shred bin. These failures could place all the residents, who resided in the facility, at risk for abuse and mental anguish. This failure resulted in an identification of an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation on 11/14/22. While the IJ was removed on 11/14/22, the facility remained out of compliance at a severity level of actual harm, and a scope identified as pattern due to the facility's need to complete in-service training and evaluate the effectiveness of the corrective actions. Findings included: In an interview, with the DON and Administrator on 10/20/22 at 9:15 AM, the DON said staff found a camera hidden in a Halloween decoration in Resident #3's room. The DON said she received the call from staff on 10/19/22 round 2:00 AM staff regarding the camera. She said the staff texted her a picture of the Halloween decoration and the camera in it. The DON had staff unplug the camera because it was plugged into an un-approved extension cord. The DON said she was not surprised to find the hidden camera in the room, because the resident's family disagreed with an abuse investigation, conducted on 09/15/22, that did not reveal any abuse. The Administrator said Resident #3's family did not contact the facility regarding the camera, and they had not reported any concerns. The Administrator said he was going to have the Social Worker contact Resident #3's family regarding the camera to get to sign an Electronic Monitoring Form, but he did not know if the Social Worker had contacted them yet. The Administrator and DON said they had not heard anything from the family regarding the camera and no abuse or care issues had been reported to them. On 10/20/22 at 10:43 AM, a video was received from Resident #3's responsible party. The video was recorded on 10/19/22 at 1:58 AM, it showed a female staff person (LVN C) taking Resident #3 to his room in his wheelchair. She pulled him backwards into the room in his wheelchair. LVN C, once in the resident's room, she faced the resident and said, there you go, she pointed her right finger at the resident and said, you stop it, then she pulled her right hand in a fist, the fist does not touch the resident, but her left hand came down on something that cannot be seen in frame and a pop was heard, at the same time LVN C was heard again saying, you stop it, the resident told LVN C, fuck you, LVN C turned towards the door and it appeared the resident attempted to continue the altercation, but the images are obscured by the Halloween decoration. LVN C asked the resident, are you fighting me?', then she said angrily, at the door, you stay there and then shuts the door. On 10/20/22 at 11:08 AM, a video was received from Resident #3's responsible party, it was recorded on 10/16/22 at 12:09 AM, it showed a male staff person (CNA D) enter the resident's room the resident was in bed. CNA D picked up the bed sheet but the resident tugs on the sheet, and CNA D lets go of the sheet. The resident says, get off me, you mother fucker, and throws the sheet at CNA D. CNA D walked to the foot of the resident's bed and told he resident, I'm going to kick your ass. The resident responds but his response could not be understood on the video. In a telephone interview on 10/20/22 at 11:25 AM, Resident #3's responsible party said she had a previous complaint regarding staff treatment of the resident, which she believed to be abuse, that was investigated and found to be unsubstantiated on 09/15/22. She said she disagreed with the findings of the facility's investigation and felt the facility was covering up abuse and/or mistreatment of Resident #3. She said a former employee, Housekeeper F, informed her she believed Resident #3 was being mistreated and told her she should place a camera in his room, because reports to the Administrator and DON of mistreatment were not being acted on. She said Housekeeper F was terminated for telling her about the mistreatment of Resident #3 for not reporting the abuse allegations to the Administrator. She said based on her experience with the facility; she decided to place a hidden camera in the resident's room. She said the resident did not have a roommate and it was not violating any other resident's privacy. She said when she saw the abuse recorded on the camera, she came to the facility to check on Resident #3 but did not alert the facility to the hidden camera. She said the videos showed Resident #3 was being abused by the staff. She said on 10/19/22 around 2:00 AM she could see on the camera that staff discovered the camera was in the room. She said she could see several staff members looking at the camera before it was unplugged. She said, staff from the facility just called her a few minutes ago, she did not know who, to tell her the camera was not approved and that she would need to sign a consent for its use. She said she asked the person that called if they were concerned about what the camera revealed and the person did not answer the question, and just told her she needed to sign the form in order for the camera to be approved. She said she informed the staff she had already removed the camera from the room and took it home. She said no one reached out to her about the camera prior to the phone call today, after the investigator entered the facility. She said there was one additional video that she had not sent yet, but she would send it. She said she wanted to move the resident to another facility but had to wait for his Medicaid to be approved before her facility of choice would accept him. She said she feels stuck because she cannot move him but cannot trust that he won't be harmed at the facility. On 10/20/22 at 12:04 PM, the Administrator and DON were shown the above videos for staff identification purposes. They said both videos showed abuse of Resident #3. They identified LVN C as the staff in the first video and CNA D in the second video. The DON said there had been no reports or concerns regarding the employees' care and treatment of the residents. She said the employees would be notified and suspended pending the outcome of the investigation. On 10/20/22 at 12:38 PM, the third and final video was received from Resident #3's responsible party, it was recorded on 10/13/22 at 7:36 PM, it showed two staff (LVN C and CNA E) providing care to the resident while he was in bed. LVN C was at the head of the resident's bed encouraging him to allow care but he was saying don't do that, CNA E was observed getting some wipes, she joined LVN C at the resident's bedside. The resident could be heard saying, God dammit, at that point, LVN C's left hand went up with her hand open, while she leaned forward and told the resident to stop it, she does not hit the resident, but it appeared to be a gesture like she was going to slap the resident. On 10/20/22 at 12:45 PM, the Administrator and DON said the third video was LVN C who appeared to raise her hand to Resident #3. They said the other staff was CNA E. Record Review of Resident #3's admission Record dated 10/20/22 indicated the [AGE] year-old male resident was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included dementia and major depressive disorder. Record Review of Resident #3's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] indicated the resident had short and long-term memory problems. He was severely cognitively impaired. He had no behaviors. Record Review of Resident #3's un-dated Care Plan indicated he had behaviors which included, combativeness, physical and verbal aggression with staff. The interventions included to provide physical and verbal cues to alleviate the resident's anxiety and give positive feedback. If the resident resists care, reassure the resident, leave, and return 5-10 minutes later and try again. In an observation on 10/20/22 at 1:34 PM, Resident #3 was propelling himself in his wheelchair. He was not able to answer any direct questions. In an interview on 10/20/22 at 2:44 PM, CNA E watched third video. She said she did not think LVN C was raising her hand to the resident, but she was not paying attention, at the time. She said she thought maybe LVN C was reaching to roll the resident over. She said she had never seen any staff being abusive or mistreating the resident. She said around 10:00 PM yesterday, 10/19/22, the resident's responsible party asked her if she was aware there had been a camera in the room. She said she told her she was not aware. She said the resident's responsible party told her she put the camera in the room because the resident was being abused by the staff. She said she told the resident's responsible party she did not believe that would happen at the facility. She said she did not tell anyone the resident's responsible party reported the resident had been abused. She said LVN C overheard her talking with the resident's responsible party and knew about the allegation. She said she was supposed to inform the Administrator of any abuse allegations; however, she did not report it. In an interview on 10/20/22 at 4:21 PM, with the DON present, LVN C said on 10/19/22 Resident #3 was awake around 2:00 AM and staff got him up in his wheelchair and assisted him to the nurses' station for monitoring. She said the resident became combative, threw things off the nurses' station, and tried to hit, kick and bite staff. She said the video showed her pulling him in his room backwards because he was being combative. She said her right hand was in a fist and pulled back because she thought he was going to grab or bite her. She said she did not make physical contact with the resident. She said the slap sound on the video was when she slapped her own leg. She said she did not feel she was being abusive to the resident. She said she was speaking loudly but it was because the resident was hard of hearing. She said she did tell the resident to stay in his room and closed the door, but it was only for approximately 5 minutes until she could get a CNA to assist her to put the resident back to bed. She denied ever threatening or hitting the resident. She said staff discovered the camera after 2:00 AM and let the DON know. She said she did hear CNA E speaking to Resident #3's responsible party but she did not hear the allegation of abuse. She later said that maybe CNA E told her something about the allegation, but she did not remember, and she was busy at the time. She said she would report abuse to the DON, she was not aware the Administrator was the Abuse Coordinator. She said she should not have raised her voice to the resident. She said Resident #3 tried to kick her as she was leaving the room and that was why she asked him if he was trying to fight her. She said she never raised her hand to hit the resident. The DON informed her she was suspended pending the outcome of the investigation and was not to return to the facility until further notice. In a telephone interview on 10/20/22 at 3:35 PM, with the DON present, CNA D said if the resident was too combative, he was supposed to get another CNA to assist him, but he did not feel the resident was being that aggressive on 10/16/22. He said the resident tugged on the sheet and he let go, he said he did not know, at the time, the camera was in the room. He said he did tell the resident he was going to kick his ass because he was under pressure, but he would not have physically hurt the resident because it was not in his heart to do so. He said what he said was abuse. He said he was frustrated and tired of the resident being so mean. He said he had not seen or heard any other staff be mean or aggressive with the resident. He said he apologized dearly for his actions and would never hurt the residents. The DON informed him he could not report to work and was under investigation. In an interview on 10/20/22 at 5:00 PM, the Administrator said staff knew he was the Abuse Coordinator because they had all been in-serviced and it was posted in the facility. He said it was his expectation that staff would notify him immediately of any allegations of abuse or mistreatment. He said the facility would investigate, and notify the police and State Agency. In a telephone interview on 10/20/22 at 5:42 PM, Resident #3's responsible party said on 10/19/22 she spoke to CNA E regarding her abuse concerns and why she installed the camera. She said she asked if she could show CNA E the videos of the abuse, but the CNA told her her eyesight was not good and she did not think she could see the videos. She said she believed CNA E did not wish to see the videos because she would have to report the abuse to the Administrator. She said it further showed how staff wanted to turn a blind eye to reports of abuse. In a telephone interview on 10/20/22 at 6:07 PM, Former Housekeeper F said she was the housekeeper on Resident #3's hall and she felt staff were not caring for the resident appropriately. She said she believed the staff were not assisting him with meals, were abrupt and discourteous to him. She said she spoke with the Administrator and DON about her concerns, but she believed they were not addressed. She said she spoke to the resident's responsible party regarding her concerns and told her she should put a camera in the resident's room because she believed he was being mistreated by staff. She said when the facility found out she told the resident's responsible party she suspected abuse, the DON called her on 09/10/22, to question her if she knew who the Abuse Coordinator was, and she told her it was the Administrator. She said the Administrator wanted to meet with her in the next day 09/11/22, in his office, but she did not meet with him for fear she would be terminated. She said her last day of employment was 09/11/22. She said the facility's inaction regarding allegations made employees not want to report anything. She said other facility employees knew about things but don't report it. She would not give the investigator the names of the other employees. She said there were employees, still working at the facility, who abused residents. She named CNA E, as an abuser. In an observation on 10/24/22 at 9:30 AM, Resident #3 was propelling himself in his wheelchair. He was smiling and appeared to be in a good mood. He was not able to answer questions appropriately. In an interview on 10/24/22 at 9:43 AM, the Administrator and DON said the videos showed, based on their investigation, verbal abuse, and included intimidation and seclusion. They said they were going to terminate LVN C and CNA D for abuse. They said CNA E would be terminated for not reporting the allegation of abuse to the Administrator. The Administrator and DON said Former Housekeeper F never reported any abuse, neglect, or mistreatment of Resident #3 to them. The Administrator and DON said in-service training was provided orally and written for all staff on all three shifts, after the abuse allegation regarding Resident #3 on 09/15/22. On 10/24/22 at 12:43 PM the Administrator and DON were informed of an Immediate Jeopardy. On 10/25/22 at 3:58 PM Safe Surveys (interviews with residents regarding abuse and/or mistreatment) were received from the Administrator. On 10/25/22 at 4:18 PM the Immediate Jeopardy Plan of Removal was accepted. In an interview on 10/26/22 at 10:04 AM, the Social Worker said Medical Records had completed Safe Surveys with residents on 10/20/22. Record Review of the Safe Surveys, provided by the Administrator, on 10/25/22 at 3:58 PM, did not include any completed by Medical Records. Record Review of the Resident Council Minutes dated 10/17/22 indicated resident said they needed more customer service and respect from the staff. No staff was named and the number of residents who voiced this was not identified. In an interview on 10/26/22 at 10:27 AM, the AD said the Resident Council did bring up, in the meeting on 10/17/22, that they would like staff to be more respectful, but no abuse was alleged. In an interview on 10/26/22 at 11:05 AM, Medical Records said she conducted safe surveys on 10/20/22. She said during the surveys on 10/20/22, Resident #13 said CNA E yelled at her and was pointing her finger at her so close to her she thought the aide was going to hit her, but she did not. She said Resident 13's roommate, Resident #14 said she put on the light again for a different reason, to ask a question, and CNA E yelled at them again and stated, why are you on the light again? What's your problem? I was just in here!. She said Resident #14 was the Resident Council President and told her that they just tried not to bother CNA E after that. She said Resident #14 told Resident #13 they needed to speak up to get it to stop. She said Residents #13 and #14 told her they were verbally abused by CNA E. She said the interviews were between 9:00 AM -11:00 AM on Thursday, 10/20/22. She said she told the Administrator and DON immediately on 10/20/22. She said the residents told her the verbal abuse occurred on Monday, 10/17/22 on the 2:00 PM - 10:00 PM shift. She said, after she reported the allegation of abuse to the Administrator and DON, she interviewed Resident #12 on 10/20/22 between 11:00 AM -12:00 PM and the resident told her CNA E had verbally abused her too by yelling at her. She said once again she immediately informed the Administrator and DON of the verbal abuse allegation on 10/20/22. On 10/26/22 at 12:10 PM the investigator sent the Administrator an email requesting any additional safe surveys and if the facility had any new allegations of abuse. Record Review of Resident #13's admission Record dated 10/29/22 indicated the [AGE] year-old female resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and bipolar disorder (a mental illness). Record Review of Resident #13's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] indicated the resident was cognitively intact with a BIMS score of 15 (a score of 13-15 indicated no cognitive impairment). In an observation and interview on 10/26/22 at 1:22 PM, Resident #13 was in her room in her wheelchair. She said on 10/17/22, her roommate, Resident #14, had the call light and CNA E came in the room and was screaming, upset, that the call light was on. She said CNA E came over to her while she was in her bed and was screaming and pointing her finger so close to her; she was afraid she was going to hit her. She said CNA E was mad that her roommate had turned on the call light. She said she was shocked, she felt threatened and scared by CNA E's outburst. She said she later, the same evening, wanted to just ask a question, she put the call light on, and CNA E came in yelling again and asked why they were on the light again after she had just been in there. She said CNA E verbally abused her on 10/17/22. She said the only person she told, about the abuse, was the Medical Records person on 10/20/22. Record Review of Resident #12's admission Record dated 10/29/22 indicated the [AGE] year-old female resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of mild cognitive impairment, mild intellectual disabilities, depression and, the need for assistance with personal care. Record Review of Resident #12's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] indicated the resident was moderately cognitively impaired with a BIMS score of 10 (a score of 8-12 indicated moderate cognitive impairment). In an observation and interview on 10/26/22 at 1:46 PM, Resident #12 was in her wheelchair. She said about two or three weeks ago, CNA E came in her room and was going to assist with her incontinent care. She said CNA E started yelling at her, saying the resident could help more with the care. She said she was unable to physically help more, and she started crying. She said she was verbally abused by CNA E and was a little scared of her. She said it was on a weekend, and she told a lady working the 500 Hall, she did not know the lady's name, and the DON was called. She said she told the DON what happened with CNA E. She said the DON told her they would do some additional training with staff. She said she felt like she received the silent treatment from CNA E after she reported her. She said she reported the incident again on 10/20/22 to the Medical Records person. At 10/26/22 at 2:41 PM, there was no response from the Administrator regarding the email sent at 12:10 PM. In an interview on 10/26/22 at 2:58 PM, the Administrator said Medical Records conducted some Safe Surveys on 10/20/22. He said she did not notify him of the verbal abuse allegations reported by Residents #12, #13, and #14. He said staff conducting the Safe Surveys were told to immediately report any allegations of abuse and/or mistreatment to him immediately. He said he would look for the Safe Surveys conducted by Medical Records on 10/20/22. In an interview on 10/26/22 at 3:12 PM, the DON said she was not aware of the new allegations regarding CNA E. She said she was not contacted on a weekend regarding an incident between Resident #12 and CNA E. She said she would immediately tell the Administrator of any allegations regarding abuse. She said CNA E was terminated on Monday, 10/24/22 for not reporting Resident #3's responsible party's allegation of abuse to the Administrator. Record Review of Resident #14's admission Record dated 10/29/22 indicated the [AGE] year-old female resident was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included mild cognitive impairment and anxiety. Record Review of Resident #14's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] indicated the resident was cognitively intact with a BIMS score of 15 (a score of 13-15 indicated no cognitive impairment). In an observation and interview on 10/26/22 at 4:04 PM, Resident #14 was in bed in her room. She said she had been the Resident Council President about a month. She said, in the Resident Council Meeting in October 2022 it was discussed how the staff were speaking to the residents, at times. She said the residents perceived some of the staff to be snotty and argumentative, at times, like when a resident needed something the staff acted like they were doing the resident a favor instead of the fact that the staff worked for the residents. She said this was discussed in the council because staffs' attitudes towards the residents were getting worse not better. She said Medical Records came in and asked her, last week on 10/20/22 about her treatment in the facility. She said she told her about an incident on Monday 10/17/22 around 5:00 PM, she requested to be transferred from her wheelchair to bed and provided incontinent care. She said CNA E told her go to room and get in position. She said she followed instructions and waited over an hour and then put the call light on. She said CNA E came into the room yelling and screaming that the resident should not have put the call light on and that she had to just wait her turn for assistance. She said she told CNA E she was going to report her, and CNA E told her to go ahead because she did not have to answer to the resident. She said CNA E was screaming over her and pointing her finger. She said CNA E then went to her roommate's (Resident #13) side of the bed, the roommate was in bed, CNA E was standing over Resident #13, still yelling, and pointing her finger but was directed at her (Resident #14) and not the roommate (Resident #13). She said Resident #13 became afraid CNA E was going to hit her and Resident #13 started crying. She said she told Resident #13 not to cry because CNA E was mad at her (Resident #14). She said CNA E left the room, and Resident #13, who does not cuss, said Holy Shit!. She said about an hour later, the same evening, Resident #13 just wanted to ask a question, so she put the call light on, and CNA E came in the room screaming again. She said CNA E asked them What is your problem why is the call light on again?. She said Resident #13 apologized and said she just wanted to ask the AD something. She said she had been a resident at the facility for 5 years and CNA E had always had a temper. She said CNA E had an attitude like she was invincible because nothing ever happened to her, and she felt like she would not get fired. She said CNA E had always had a bad temper, but it had never been like this before. She said she did not tell anyone about the incident until the Medical Records person asked her about abuse on 10/20/22. She said she was verbally abused and intimidated by CNA E on 10/17/22. In an interview on 10/26/22 at 4:47 PM, the DON and the Clinical Resource RN said Medical Records had the Safe Surveys dated 10/20/22, on her person, for Residents #12, #13, and #14. She said Medical Records reported them verbally to the Administrator on 10/20/22 but did not give him the forms. They said the Administrator and Medical Records were suspended pending the outcome of the investigation. Record Review of Safe Surveys dated 10/20/22, not timed, indicated the question, Do you feel that you have been intentionally injured by a team member? -Resident #12 - verbal abuse -Resident #13 - verbal abuse with violently yelling and afraid CNA E would hit her on Monday (10/17/22) -Resident #14 - verbally abused with attitude - CNA E Record Review revealed Medical Records completed the three above Safe Surveys again on 10/20/22, not timed, and all three residents' answers to Do you feel you have been intentionally injured by a team member? were changed to, No. In an interview on 10/27/22 at 10:02 AM, the Clinical Resource RN and DON said the facility began in-services with all staff on the types of abuse, with a written quiz. The DON was made the Abuse Prevention Coordinator. The facility began interview with staff to see if any abuse allegations had been reported to the Administrator that were not acted upon. The facility began a root cause analysis. She said the Safe Surveys conducted on 10/20/22 with Residents #12, #13, and #14 revealed verbal abuse by CNA E. The DON said CNA E worked on 10/21/22, after the allegations of verbal abuse were reported to the Administrator on 10/20/22. She said CNA E did not work after 10/21/22. She said CNA E was terminated on 10/24/22 for not reporting the allegation of abuse made by Resident #3's responsible party, but not related to the allegations of verbal abuse. Record Review of CNA E's time sheet dated 10/27/22 indicated she worked on 10/21/22 from 2:24 PM - 9:48 PM, 7.4 hours. Attempts were made to interview CNA E on 10/28/22 at 5:23 PM, 7:24 PM, and 10/29/22 at 12:19 PM, there was no answer to the phone call and messages, a text was also sent on 10/29/22 at 12:20 PM requesting an interview, no return call was received prior to the exit on 10/29/22 at 1:00 PM. In a telephone interview on 10/27/22 at 5:26 PM, Medical Records said she told the Administrator immediately about each of the allegations of verbal abuse on 10/20/22. She said she told him after each allegation was made. She said the DON was also present, during the discussion with the Administrator. She said the administrator told her to shred Resident #12, #13, #14's Safe Surveys that revealed verbal abuse. She said he told her State was not looking at verbal abuse as being intentionally injured. She said the Administrator, then gave her new forms to complete with the same residents again. She said on 10/26/22, after the investigator asked about the Safe Surveys, she got the three original Safe Surveys for Resident #12, #13, and #14 out of the shred bin to give to the Administrator. She said the Administrator understood on 10/20/22 Residents #12, #13, and #14 had alleged they were verbally abused by CNA E. In an interview on 10/27/22 at 5:41 PM, the DON said she was not involved in the conversation regarding the abuse, as stated above, on 10/20/22. She said she was not aware of abuse being reported on the three residents (Residents #12, #13, and #14) in question. In a telephone interview on 10/27/22 at 5:45 PM, the Administrator said DON was not in the room when Medical Records discussed the verbal abuse allegations. He said Medical Records did notify him on 10/20/22 of the verbal abuse allegations. He said with everything going on the verbal abuse allegations did not cross his mind again. He said yesterday (10/26/22) Medical Records did get the Safe Surveys out of the shred bin, but he did not tell her to shred them. He told her to set them aside in his office. He said he did ask her to conduct new Safe Surveys on Resident #12, #13, and #14 because he did not believe verbal abuse was applicable to the question, Do you feel that you have been intentionally injured by a team member?. He said he was aware of the facility abuse policy and reporting requirements. In an interview on 10/27/22 at 6:35 PM, Resident #14 said she was having increased anxiety related to the verbal abuse from CNA E and just a combination of things. She said she might need an increase in her anti-anxiety medication. Record Review of the facility's Abuse: Prevention of and Prohibition Against dated October 2022 indicated verbal abuse included the use of oral, written, or gestured language that willfully includes disparaging and derogatory terms to residents or their representative, or within their hearing distance, regardless of their [NAME], ability to comprehend, or disability. Prevention included - all staff, residents and visitors are encouraged to report incidents and grievances without the fear of retribution. Supervising staff to identify and correct any inappropriate or unprofessional behaviors. Identifying, correcting, and intervening in situations in which abuse is more likely to occur. Investigation included - all identified events are reported to the Administrator immediately. After receiving the allegation, during and after the investigation, the Administrator will ensure that all residents are protected from physical and psychosocial harm. Protection included - immediately removing the employee from the care of any resident when an allegation
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Notification of Changes (Tag F0580)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to immediately notify the resident representative regarding a signific...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to immediately notify the resident representative regarding a significant change in the resident's psychosocial status, for one resident (Resident #8) of 14 residents reviewed for changes in condition. The facility did not notify Resident #8's responsible party when she tested positive for COVID-19 and had a room change. This failure could place all the residents residing in the facility at risk of their responsible parties not being aware of room changes and changes in the residents' conditions. Findings included: Record Review of Resident #8's admission Record dated 10/28/22 indicated the [AGE] year-old female resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of stroke. The resident was not her own responsible party. Record Review of Resident #8's admission MDS dated [DATE] indicated the resident's cognition was not assessed. Record Review of the Grievance Log, indicated on 09/14/22 the facility received multiple complaints, from residents' responsible parties regarding not being notified of room changes. The resolution was for the DON to address the issue and ensure the calls were being completed prior to the room changes taking place. The log indicated on 09/14/22 the grievances were resolved. Record Review of Resident #8's Census Record indicated she changed rooms on 09/23/22. Record Review of a Nursing Note dated 9/28/2022 at 7:14 PM, indicated the resident continued on isolation for COVID. Record Review of Resident #8's Progress Notes from 09/23/22 - 10/29/22 did not indicate any documentation the resident's responsible party was notified of her COVID positive status or room change on 09/23/22. In an interview on 10/24/22 at 3:52 PM, Resident #8's responsible party said she was not made aware of the resident's positive COVID status or room change. She said she arrived at the facility, she was not sure of the date, to find the resident had been moved and was in isolation. In an interview on 10/28/22 at 11:30 AM, the DON said an agency staff nurse did not notify Resident #8's responsible party of her COVID positive status, but the responsible party visited the next day and was aware. She said she did not believe the resident had a room change but when looked the in the electronic medical record, the resident did have room change on 09/23/22, when she tested positive for COVID. She said the Admissions Coordinator, or the Social Worker were usually responsible for room change notifications. She said it was important to notify Resident #8's responsible party because the resident was not her own responsible party and the responsible party needed to know about any changes. In an interview on 10/28/22 at 11:57 AM, the Admissions Coordinator said in Resident #8's case, because the resident was COVID positive, it would have been up to the nurse to immediately notify the resident's responsible party of the room change. She said she only assists with notification for planned room changes. Record Review of the facility's un-dated Resident Rights policy indicated it is the policy of this facility to notify the resident, his/her responsible party of changes in the resident's condition and/or status. The nurse supervisor will notify the resident's responsible party when: there is a need to alter the resident's treatment significantly, and there is a change in the resident's room assignment.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0694 (Tag F0694)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the physician order for IV care were followed fo...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the physician order for IV care were followed for 1 (Resident #6) of 1 resident reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to ensure LVNs H, J and K followed the physician's order to ensure Resident #6's IV dressing was changed, according to the physician's order on 10/22. This failure could place, residents who required IV dressing changes, at risk for infection and decline in health status. Findings included: Record review of Resident #6's admission Record dated 10/29/22 indicated the [AGE] year-old male resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, sepsis (an infection), and skin infection. Record review of Resident #6's physician's order dated 09/10/22 indicated the IV had two lines with two plastic caps on the end of each line that were to be changed with each dressing change every 7 days and as needed. Record review of Resident #6's admission MDS dated [DATE] indicated the resident had a BIMS score of 12 which indicated moderately cognitively impaired. He required assistance with activities of daily living, transfers, personal hygiene, and bathing. Record review of Resident #6's Care Plan dated 09/29/22 indicated no care plan for the IV. Record review of Resident #6's October 2022 IV MAR, indicated the resident did not receive an IV antibiotic; however, the IV had two lines with two plastic caps on the end of each line that were to be changed with each dressing change every 7 days and as needed. The documentation indicated the physician ordered care was provided every 7 days on Sundays for 10/02/22, 10/09/22, 10/16/22, and 10/23/22. In an interview on 10/24/22 at 12:46 PM, the DON said she received multiple concerns from Resident #6's responsible party regarding his nursing care. She said she checked on the resident daily and she gave the weekend nurses, who are all agency staff, a report on the resident's needs and condition to ensure continuity of care. In an observation on 10/28/22 at 2:20 PM, Resident #6 was in his room in his wheelchair. An IV site dressing to his right arm and was dated 09/30/22. He was not receiving any IV medication. Record review of Resident #6's Nursing Progress Note dated 10/28/22 at 4:07 PM, the Clinical Resource RN documented, the DON contacted the resident's physician regarding the lack of IV site care since 09/30/22. The physician said he would not be able to come to the facility and assess the site, at this time. He instructed the DON to change the dressing and assess the site. The Clinical Resource RN and the Charge Nurse changed the dressing. The resident did not have any signs or symptoms of redness, warmth, swelling, drainage, or pain. The physician's Nurse Practitioner would be by this evening to assess the site. In an interview on 10/28/22 at 2:30 PM, LVN M said the dressing to Resident #6's IV site was dated 09/30/22, but it should have been changed every 7 days but not on her shift. In an interview on 10/28/22 at 3:50 PM, the Clinical Resource RN and DON said Resident #6's dressing to the IV site on his right arm was dated 09/30/22. The DON said all the agency nurses that documented, on the October 2022 TAR, the dressing was changed as ordered every 7 days. The Clinical Resource RN said the resident's physician was notified, and he did not want to discontinue the IV, at this time. The DON said she was not aware the physician's orders for the IV were not being followed. The Clinical Resource RN said she looked at the IV site today (10/28/22), and there was no redness or drainage. She changed the dressing. She said the resident did not report any pain. In a telephone interview on 10/29/22 at 11:49 AM, Agency LVN H said he only worked at the facility one day on Sunday, 10/09/22 and it was not a good experience. He said he was not given report when he started his shift. He said he did not know where the facility kept the wound care supplies. He said he complained to the agency about the working conditions and would not work for the facility again because he felt he was unable to do even basic nursing care, like dressing changes. He said he did not remember Resident #6 or any specifics regarding his IV care, dressing change or what he documented. In a telephone interview on 10/29/22 at 11:56 AM, Agency LVN J said she worked at the facility one time on, Sunday 10/23/22, she said it was rough because she did not receive report on the residents and was not given a computer to access the clinical records. She said it was very difficult for her to get anything done for the residents. She said she did not remember anything about Resident #6's dressing or IV care. In a telephone interview on 10/29/22 at 12:02 PM, Agency LVN R said he did not change Resident #6's dressing on Sunday, 10/16/22. He said he just looked to see if the dressing was clean and intake. He said his documentation on 10/16/22 was just to verify he observed the dressing; however, he did not provide any IV care. Record review of the facility's un-dated Nursing Clinical IV - Solutions Policy indicated all central lines will be capped or have an extension set applied, and all dressing should be labeled with the date, time, and nurses' initials.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Medical Records (Tag F0842)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain medical records on each resident, in accordance with accep...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain medical records on each resident, in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices, that were complete and accurately documented for 1 (Resident #6) of 14 residents whose clinical records were reviewed for accuracy. The staff failed to accurately document Resident #6's IV site care on his October 2022 TAR. This failure could place, all the residents who resided in the facility, at risk of incomplete and inaccurately documented medical records. Findings included: Record review of Resident #6's admission Record dated 10/29/22 indicated the [AGE] year-old male resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, sepsis (an infection) and skin infection. Record review of Resident #6's physician's order dated 09/10/22 indicated the IV had two lines with two plastic caps on the end of each line that were to be changed with each dressing change every 7 days and as needed. Record review of Resident #6's admission MDS dated [DATE] indicated the resident was moderately cognitively impaired with a BIMS score of 12 (a score of 8-12 indicated moderate cognitive impairment). He required assistance with activities of daily living, transfers, personal hygiene, and bathing. Record review of Resident #6's Care Plan dated 09/29/22 indicated no care plan for the IV. Record review of Resident #6's October 2022 IV MAR, indicated the resident did not receive an IV antibiotic; however, the IV had two lines with two plastic caps on the end of each line that were to be changed with each dressing change every 7 days and as needed. The documentation indicated the physician ordered care was provided every 7 days on Sundays for 10/02/22, 10/09/22, 10/16/22, and 10/23/22. In an interview on 10/24/22 at 12:46 PM, the DON said she received multiple concerns from Resident #6's responsible party regarding his nursing care. She said she checked on the resident daily and she gave the weekend nurses, who are all agency staff, a report on the resident's needs and condition to ensure continuity of care. In an observation on 10/28/22 at 2:20 PM, Resident #6 was in his room in his wheelchair. An IV site dressing to his right arm was dated 09/30/22. He was not receiving any IV medication. Record review of Resident #6's Nursing Progress Note dated 10/28/22 at 4:07 PM, the Clinical Resource RN documented, the DON contacted the resident's physician regarding the lack of IV site care since 09/30/22. The physician said he would not be able to come to the facility and assess the site, at this time. He instructed the DON to change the dressing and assess the site. The Clinical Resource RN and the Charge Nurse changed the dressing. The resident did not have any signs or symptoms of redness, warmth, swelling, drainage, or pain. The physician's Nurse Practitioner would be by this evening to assess the site. In an interview on 10/28/22 at 2:30 PM, LVN M said the dressing to Resident #6's IV site was dated 09/30/22, but it should have been changed every 7 days but not on her shift. In an interview on 10/28/22 at 3:50 PM, the Clinical Resource RN and DON said Resident #6's dressing to the IV site on his right arm was dated 09/30/22. The DON said all the agency nurses that documented, on the October 2022 TAR , the dressing was changed as ordered every 7 days. The Clinical Resource RN said resident's physician was notified, and he did not want to discontinue the IV, at this time. The DON said she was not aware the physician's orders for the IV were not being followed. The Clinical Resource RN said she looked at the IV site today (10/28/22), and there was no redness or drainage. She changed the dressing. She said the resident did not report any pain. In a telephone interview on 10/29/22 at 11:49 AM, Agency LVN H said he only worked at the facility one day on Sunday, 10/09/22 and it was not a good experience. He said he was not given report when he started his shift. He said he did not know where the facility kept the wound care supplies. He said he complained to the agency about the working conditions and would not work for the facility again because he felt he was unable to do even basic nursing care, like dressing changes. He said he did not remember Resident #6 or any specifics regarding his IV care, dressing change or what he documented. In a telephone interview on 10/29/22 at 11:56 AM, Agency LVN J said she worked at the facility one time on, Sunday 10/23/22, she said it was rough because she did not receive report on the residents and was not given a computer to access the clinical records. She said it was very difficult for her to get anything done for the residents. She said she did not remember anything about Resident #6's dressing or IV care. In a telephone interview on 10/29/22 at 12:02 PM, Agency LVN R he said he did not change Resident #6's dressing on Sunday, 10/16/22. He said he just looked to see if the dressing was clean and intact. He said his documentation on 10/16/22 was just to verify he observed the dressing; however, he did not provide any IV care. Record review of the facility's un-dated Clinical Documentation policy indicated services provided to the resident shall be documented in the resident's clinical record. The policy did not address the accuracy of the clinical record documentation.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0561 (Tag F0561)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to make choices about ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to make choices about aspects of his or her life in the facility that are significant to the resident for 2 (Residents #11, and #13) of 14 residents reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to accommodate Resident #11 and #13's preference for showers instead of a bed bath. This failure placed residents, who need assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs), at risk of not having the right to make choices related to their life in the facility. Findings included: Record review of Resident #13's admission Record dated 10/29/22 indicated the [AGE] year-old female resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and morbid obesity. Record review of Resident #13's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] indicated the resident was cognitively intact with a BIMS score of 15. She was totally dependent on two staff for bathing. She was five feet one inch tall and weighed 260 pounds. Record review of Resident #13's un-dated Care Plan, indicated the resident had impaired range of motion to both of her upper and lower extremities. She required one staff participation in bathing. The resident was to receive a shower on Tuesdays and Saturdays, per her request. Record review of Resident #13's Skin Assessment - Shower Sheets, indicated: -09/20/22 - the resident received a bed bath and had no documented skin issues. -09/22/22 - the resident received a bed bath and had no documented skin issues. -09/27/22 - the resident received a bed bath and had no documented skin issues. -09/29/22 - the resident received a bed bath and had no documented skin issues. -09/20/22 - the resident received a bed bath and had no documented skin issues. -10/04/22 - the resident received a bed bath and redness was documented under the resident's right breast and underarm. -10/11/22 - the resident received a bed bath and redness was documented under the resident's right underarm. Record review of Resident #13's electronic medical record for bathing documentation, indicated: -10/15/22 - the resident did not receive a shower. She received a full-body bath. -10/20/22 - the resident did not receive a shower. She received a full-body bath. -10/22/22 - the resident did not receive a shower. She received a full-body bath. -10/27/22 - the resident did not receive a shower. She received a sponge bath. In an observation and interview on 10/26/22 at 1:22 PM, Resident #13 was in her room sitting in her wheelchair. She requested showers, but staff continue to give her a bed bath instead. She said the staff tell her they don't have time, or they will give her a shower, but then they don't. She said it has been about a month since she has had an actual shower and her hair was not clean. The resident's hair was short and curly, some of the curls appeared clumped together from not being shampooed. She said her bath schedule was Tuesdays, Thursdays, and Saturdays on the 2:00 PM - 10:00 PM shift. In an interview on 10/26/22 at 4:04 PM, Resident #14 said she felt bad for her roommate, because Resident #13 has asked for a shower instead of a bed bath, but staff always have some excuse, like they will do it later and then say it's too late to give her one. She said staff don't want to get Resident #13 up with the lift, so they say they don't have enough help. She said she does not know how long it's been since Resident #13 had an actual shower. In an observation and interview on 10/27/22 at 6:38 PM, Resident #13 was in bed. She said she did not get her shower or even a full bed bath this evening. She said she got a little wipe down of her breasts and private area. She said her gown was changed but her hair was still, nasty. The resident's hair appeared greasy, and the curls were stuck together. In an interview on 10/27/22 at 6:40 PM, CNA A, who was working Resident #13's hall, said she was agency staff and did not know which residents on the hall were scheduled for a bath today (10/27/22) on her shift (2:00 PM - 10:00 PM). She said the other aide on the hall, CNA B, was in charge of showers. In an interview on 10/27/22 at 7:00 PM, CNA B said she had been working at the facility about a month; she said she did receive orientation and the shower schedule was posted at the nurses' station. She said realistically she could not get all the showers done on her shift that needed to be done. She said she had been giving residents wipe downs, not bed baths or showers, to save time. She said one resident on the hall got a true bed bath this evening (10/27/22), and the others were wiped down. She said the bathing documentation was in the electronic medical record only, and not on paper shower sheets. Record review of Resident #11's admission Record dated 10/29/22 indicated the [AGE] year-old female resident was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, diabetes and morbid obesity. Record review of Resident #11's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] indicated the resident was cognitively intact with a BIMS score of 15. She was totally dependent on one staff for bathing. She was five feet one inch tall and weighed 253 pounds. Record review of Resident #11's un-dated Care Plan indicated the resident was at risk for an activities of daily living self-care deficit related to morbid obesity. She was to be provided a sponge bath when a full bath or shower could not be tolerated. Record review of Resident #11's Skin Assessment - Shower Sheets, indicated: -09/20/22 - the resident received a bed bath and had no documented skin issues. -09/27/22 - the resident received a bed bath and had no documented skin issues. -10/06/22 - the resident received a bed bath and had no documented skin issues. -10/13/22 - the resident received a bed bath and had redness under her breasts, abdominal fold, and groin. -10/27/22 - the resident received a bed bath and had no documented skin issues. In an interview and observation on 10/28/22 at 10:47 PM, Resident #11 was in bed; she appeared to be well groomed, and her hair had been done. She said she had begged staff for a shower but only received what she would call a spit bath. She said the aides give her excuses of why she cannot receive a shower that included, she can't stand up so they can't do a shower, it would be too hard on their backs, it's too hard to get her into the wheelchair with the lift, they don't have time, and they don't have towels. She said she feels they just don't want to fool with giving her a shower. She said she does not feel there is any oversight for the aides. She said sometimes the aides just use wipes to give her a spit bath, and don't use soap and water. Record review of the Resident Council Minutes dated 08/08/22 indicated the residents reported the aides needed to make sure the residents were getting their showers. Record review of the Resident Council Minutes dated 09/13/22 indicated the residents reported they were only getting showers once a week. In an interview on 10/28/22 at 11:12 AM, the DON said she did not know if there was a reason Resident #13 was only getting bed baths; she said if the resident had good trunk control, she could be showered, but she did not know if that was case for Resident #13. She said she would find out. She said she was not aware staff was just wiping the residents down and not giving them a proper bed bath because the aides documented the residents were provided a bed bath. She said if residents were safe to have a shower, they should have a shower. She said Resident #11 was safe to have a shower. She said she was not sure if the facility had a shower gurney, reclining shower chair, or bariatric shower chair, to ensure the residents who wished to have a shower were accommodated, but she would find out. She said the aides were to document in the electronic medical record and on paper shower sheets. She said the paper shower sheets let the nurses know if the resident had any skin issues. She said the aides had been inconsistent with the documentation on both the electronic medical records and the shower sheets. She said the ADON who was monitoring the showers and bed baths quit about a month ago. She said she tried to monitor but it was hard to keep up because she did not have an ADON, at this time. She said it was important to give the residents a shower if they wanted one because it was the residents' right to have a choice. In an interview on 10/28/22 at 12:40 PM, the DON said the facility did not have any specialized shower equipment for residents with poor trunk control or bariatric residents. Record review of the facility's un-dated Accommodation of Needs policy indicated the resident had the right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of needs and preferences, except when the health or safety of the individual or other residents would be endangered. The facility will evaluate the resident's needs and make reasonable accommodations to the extent possible.
Aug 2022 4 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Safe Environment (Tag F0584)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike envir...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, for daily living for two (Resident #14 and Resident #27) of eighteen residents reviewed for environmental concerns. 1. The toilet in Resident #14 and Resident #27's room was clogged and filled with feces. 2. There was a pervasive foul odor in Resident #14 and Resident #27's room. These failures placed residents at risk of living with unclean, uncomfortable, un-homelike rooms and a diminished quality of life. Findings included: Record review of Resident #14's admission record revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old male, initially admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses, which included but were not limited to: dementia without behavioral disturbance, major depressive disorder, mild intellectual disabilities, abnormalities of gait and edema (fluid retention). Record review of Resident #27's admission record revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old male, initially admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses, which included but were not limited to: dementia without behavioral disturbance, hyperlipidemia (high cholesterol), hypertension (high blood pressure), mild cognitive impairment, and reduced mobility. Observation on 08/23/2022 at 11:15 AM revealed a foul odor in Resident #14 and Resident #27's room immediately upon entering. The toilet appeared to be clogged with water and fecal matter filled to the rim. Interview on 08/23/2022 at 11:16 AM with Resident #14 and Resident #27 revealed their toilet had been clogged and non-functional for a few days. Resident #14 stated he and his roommate had to use the public toilet on a different hall. Resident #14 stated he informed the Administrator and a CNA, whose name he could not remember, that the toilet was not working; however, nothing was done about it. Resident #14 stated the CNA told him and his roommate to use the public toilet. Observation on 08/23/2022 at 2:25 PM revealed the foul odor and clogged toilet was still present in Resident #14 and Resident #27's room. Observation on 08/24/2022 at 9:30 AM revealed the toilet had been fixed in Resident #14 and Resident #27's room. Interview on 08/24/2022 at 1:12 PM with the Maintenance Director revealed he had not received a work order regarding a clogged toilet in Resident #14 and Resident #27's room. He stated he was first informed about it late in the afternoon of 08/23/2022 and immediately fixed it. The Maintenance Director could not say exactly what time he was informed. He stated the facility had a lot of plumbing issues and the staff would normally notify about issues in resident rooms. The Maintenance Director stated the facility uses a system called TELS to submit work orders and they would also contact him directly for emergencies. Record review of the building maintenance log revealed no work orders for a clogged toiled in Resident #14 and Resident #27's room. Interview on 08/24/2022 at 01:25 PM with LVN C revealed she worked at the facility for about nine months. She stated she was assigned to work on the 400 hall and was the nurse for Resident #14 and Resident #27. LVN C denied smelling any foul odors coming from the residents' room and denied being aware that the residents were told to use the public toilet due to their room toilet being clogged with feces. Interview on 08/24/2022 at 01:30 PM with CNA B revealed she had worked at the facility for about four years. She stated she normally worked overnight and had been assigned to work with Resident #14 and Resident #27 over the past few days. CNA B denied being aware the residents were unable to use their toilet due to it being clogged with feces. She denied that the residents informed her of the issue. Interview on 08/24/2022 at 02:05 PM with the Administrator revealed he was unaware the toilet in Resident #14 and Resident #27's room was clogged with feces until he was informed on 08/23/2022. The Administrator stated maintenance repaired the toilet as soon as it was reported. The Administrator stated a clogged toilet was not an issue that would have normally gone on for days as the nursing staff and housekeeping would have noticed the issue while doing rounds, and no one reported it. The Administrator stated leaving a toilet clogged with feces would increase the risk of spreading germs and bacteria, and it would also create an unsanitary environment for the residents. Review of facility's current Plant Management policy, revised January 2009, revealed in part the following: Policy: Establish a management engineering plan to ensure a physical environment is a safe, neat, sanitary environment and meeting regulations to protect the health and safety of the residents, employees and others. Procedure: The plan includes policies and procedures to address: -Preventative maintenance program -Furnishing, equipment and accessories maintained in good order -An operations plan to maintain the facility to keep it clean and safe -A system for reporting repairs and requests (work orders) .
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food safety in the facility's only k...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food safety in the facility's only kitchen where all facility food is prepared. 1. The facility failed to ensure food items were covered, labelled, and dated. 2. The facility failed to ensure utensils/equipment were cleaned and maintained to prevent foodborne illness. These failures could place residents at risk for food contamination and food-borne illness. Findings included: Observation in the kitchen on 08/23/22 at 10:00 AM revealed the following unlabeled and not dated: Observed in the kitchen refrigerator white gravy in a sliver container with no date and label. Observed in the kitchen refrigerator chocolate pudding in a sliver container with no date and label. Observed in the kitchen refrigerator salad in a plastic zipper bag not dated and labeled. Observed in the kitchen refrigerator carrots in a plastic zipper bag not labeled and dated. Observed in the kitchen refrigerator sliced turkey in an open bag not labeled or sealed. Observation of the freezer revealed two unknown items wrapped in clear plastic, unsealed, unlabeled and not dated. Observation in kitchen on 08/23/22 at 10:10 AM revealed utensils and equipment in an uncovered bucket under the food preparation table. The dishware and utensils were not stored in a clean, dry location and was exposed to food particles, grease, splash, dust or other contamination, and not covered or inverted. The bottom rack of the preparation table was soiled in grease. Interview on 08/23/22 at 10:12 AM with the Dietary Aide D revealed if the food was not covered and properly stored, it could cause infection throughout the facility and residents could get sick. Interview on 8/23/22 10:15 AM with the Dietary Manager revealed all the kitchen staff were responsible for putting labels on food, utensils, equipment, and dishware should have been stored to prevent exposure in their designated dry and clean area. The Dietary Manager revealed that the kitchen should be sanitized and cleaned by all kitchen staff. The Dietary Manger revealed residents are at risk from getting sick if food is not labeled or dated. Interview on 08/23/2022 at 10:30 AM with [NAME] A revealed she was responsible for storing and dating food once the package was opened. [NAME] A revealed she sanitized and cleaned the food preparation area after every meal. Interview on 08/25/22 at 3:00 PM, the Administrator revealed all food should be dated as it came into the facility. The Administrator revealed if food was labeled and dated, then no expired food would be found. The Administrator stated residents could get sick if the kitchen is not sanitized and clean. Record review of the facility's current, undated Dish Washing Procedures policy reflected: .instructions for dish storage .5. Cleaned and sanitized utensils and equipment shall be stored at least six inches above the floor in a clean, dry location. Record review of the facility's current, undated Food Safety and Sanitation policy reflected: All time and temperature control for safety (TCS) foods (including leftovers) should be labeled, covered and dated when stored. When food package is opened, the food item should be marked to indicate the open date. This date is used to determine when to discard food. Record review revealed of United States Food & Drug Administration Food Code, dated 2017, reflected: Section: 4-601.11 Equipment, Food-Contact Surfaces, Nonfood- Contact Surfaces, and Utensils. (A) Equipment food-contact surfaces and utensils shall be clean to sight and touch . section 3-501.18 (A) A FOOD specified in 3-501.17(A) or (B) shall be discarded if it: (2) Is in a container or PACKAGE that does not bear a date or day .
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0761 (Tag F0761)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility wer...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility were labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles, and the expiration date when applicable for three (medication cart for Halls 400, 300, and 500) of three medication carts reviewed for labeling and storage and pharmacy services. 1. The facility failed to ensure insulin pens were dated after they were opened and discarded once they expired. 2. RN E failed to administer Resident #20's took Montelukast 10 mg, Gabapentin 300 mg, and metoprolol 25 mg after preparing the medication, but she left the medications with cups in Resident #20's room. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving the therapeutic doses of medication and accidents other resident can take the medications. Findings included: Record review of Resident #20's Face Sheet, dated [DATE], revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old female, with an original admission date of [DATE]. Resident #20's had diagnoses that included gastro-esophageal reflux disease without esophagitis (inflammation of esophagus), dysphagia (difficult in swallowing), Oropharyngeal cancer (part of the throat of the back of the mouth), and gastrostomy status). Review of Resident #20's care plan, with a review date of [DATE], revealed, the resident has activity of daily living self-care performance deficit rule out ataxia(impaired balance), cerebellar ataxia (sudden uncoordinated muscle movement due to disease injury of to the cerebellum) in disease classified elsewhere and gastronomy tube. Review of Resident #20's MDS assessment, dated [DATE], revealed the resident was cognitively intact with a BIMS score of 15. Observation on [DATE] at 08:38 AM revealed RN E removed Montelukast 10 mg/5 ml, Gabapentin 300 mg and Metoprolol 25 mg from the cart, crushed separately and put in three different cups. RN E wheeled the cart to Resident #20's room. Resident #20 was not in the room, RN E took the three cups and placed them on Resident #20's bedside table and left the room. She sat at the nurse's station and was observed walking up and down the hall while the medications cups were still in Resident #20 's room. Observation of the medication cart for Hall 400 on [DATE] at 8:44 AM with RN E revealed two insulin pen, Lantus and Levemir 100 units/ml, 4 vials 100 unit/ml NovoLog, Humulin R, Novolin and Lantus were opened, partially used, and not labeled with the open date. There was another insulin pen Lantus not opened and not stored in the refrigerator and three vials for NovoLog opened on [DATE] , NovoLog opened on [DATE], and Novolog opened [DATE] that were expired. Observation of the medication cart for Hall 100, [DATE] at 09:21 AM with LVN F revealed, one insulin vial, Humalog 100/3 ml that was not opened and was not stored in the refrigerator. Interview on [DATE] at 09:08 AM with RN E, who was the charge nurse for Hall 300, revealed she knew she was supposed to check whether the resident was in the room before she prepared medication. She stated she was not supposed to leave medications in Resident #20's room. She stated she was supposed to lock the medication in her cart and go look for the Resident #20. She stated the risk was another resident could take those medications or Resident #20 could have come and taken them orally and they were to be taken through gastronomy tube. She stated she had done training on medication administration. Interview on [DATE] at 11:16 AM with DON, revealed, she expected the staff to follow the best practice of preparing medications for Resident #20 at her room. She stated her expectation was the nurse could not have prepared the medication without checking whether the resident was in the room, and she could have located the resident rather than leaving the medications with cups in Resident #20's room. She stated she was new in that facility, and she did not know whether RN E had done training on medication administration. Interview on [DATE] at 09:41 AM with LVN F, who was the charge nurse for 100 hall, revealed she was the one who had removed the insulin vial from the refrigerator. She stated she did not put a date on it because she did not administer it to the resident, and she did not return it to the refrigerator. She stated she knew it was the nurses' responsibility to date the insulin after removing from the refrigerator and check the medication cart for the expired medication. Interview on [DATE] 11:57 AM with the DON revealed, her expectation was that staff date the insulin pens once they pulled them from the refrigerator and discard when they are expired. She stated it was also the responsibility of the staff to check daily on the expiration dates. She stated when insulin was past the date of use, they needed to be discarded and they should not be used on residents. She stated if the staff were not putting the opening dates on the insulin pens and vials that required an opening date, it placed residents at risk of having reactions like the medication being ineffective. She stated with insulins not being dated when they were opened, the resident would experience their blood sugars not being controlled and the readings would be high if the insulin being used was past the recommended duration. Interview on [DATE] 12:27 PM with RN E revealed it was the responsibility of the nurses once they took insulin from the refrigerator, to label it with an opened date. She stated insulin that had expired should had been discarded after 28 days or according to manufacturer's instructions. She revealed she did not check on insulin for opening or for expiry dates. She stated she knew having an opening date on insulin shows the amount of time that it needs to be used. She stated administering expired insulin and insulin with no opening date to residents could lead to side effects like blood sugars not being controlled and readings being high. She stated she had not done training on labelling and storage. Review of the facility's current Storage and Labeling of Medications policy, revised [DATE], reflected: The facility shall store all drugs and biologicals in a locked compartments under proper temperatures. Medications and biologicals labelled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles, and include: . Appropriate labelling with residents' names, medication, and cautionary instructions and . Expiration date, when applicable. . Multidose vials to be used for more than one resident are kept in a centralized medication area and do not enter the immediate resident treatment are they should be dedicated for single resident use only. . Multidose vials which have been opened or accessed (e.g., needle-punctured) should be discarded within 28 days unless the manufacturer specifies a different (shorter or longer) date for that opened vial. Multidose vials which have not been opened accessed (e.g., needle -punctured) should be discarded according to the manufacturer's expiration date.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an Infection Prevention and Control Program des...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an Infection Prevention and Control Program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for nine (Residents #1, #10, #14, #20, #47, #60, #68, #80, and #133) of eighteen residents observed for infection control. 1. CNA G failed to transport soiled linen in a sanitary way to prevent the transmission of infection. 2. CNA G failed to perform proper hand hygiene and sanitation between Residents #10, #14, and #47 during meal service. 3. CNA I failed to perform proper hand hygiene and sanitation between Residents #76 and #133 during meal service and failed to don PPE prior to entering Resident #133's room, who was in isolation. 4. The Activity Director failed to perform hand hygiene between Residents #80 and #60 during meal service. 5. RN E failed to perform proper hand hygiene and sanitization of equipment during medication administration for Resident #20. 6. LVN F failed to don PPE before entering Resident #1's isolated room. These failures could place residents at risk of cross-contamination and infections leading to illness. Findings included: Record review of Resident #10's face sheet dated 08/25/22 revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old male originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #10 had a diagnosis of encounter for surgical aftercare following surgery of the digestive system, gastritis without bleeding (inflammation of the lining of the stomach), ileus (a temporary lack of the normal muscle contractions of the intestines), and aphasia (disorder that affects how you communicate). Record review of Resident #10's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed the resident had moderate cognitive impairment with a BIMS score of 9. Record review of Resident #14's face sheet dated 08/25/22 revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old male originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #14 had a diagnosis of Acute kidney failure (kidneys suddenly become unable to filter waste products from your blood), muscle weakness, and dementia without behavioral disturbance (the loss of cognitive functioning - thinking, remembering, and reasoning). Record review of Resident #14's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact with a BIMS score of 15. Record review of Resident #47's face sheet dated 08/25/22 revealed the resident was an [AGE] year-old female originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #47 had a diagnosis of chondromalacia (a common condition causing pain in the kneecap), right shoulder, unspecified rotator cuff tear or rupture of right shoulder, not specified as traumatic, and osteoarthritis (most common form of arthritis). Record review of Resident #47's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed the resident had moderate cognitive impairment with a BIMS score of 7. Record review of Resident #76's face sheet dated 08/25/22 revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old male originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #76 had a diagnosis of ischiorectal abscess (suppuration transverses the external anal sphincter into the ischiorectal space), enterocolitis due to clostridium difficile (bacterium that causes an infection of the large intestine (colon)), and type 2 diabetes (impairment in the way the body regulates and uses sugar). Record review of Resident #76's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed the resident was conatively intact with a BIMS score of 15. Record review of Resident #133's face sheet dated 08/25/22 revealed the resident was an [AGE] year-old male originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #133 had a diagnosis of end stage renal disease kidneys cease functioning on a permanent basis leading to the need for a regular course of long-term dialysis or a kidney transplant to maintain life), dependence on renal dialysis, and Type 2 diabetes (impairment in the way the body regulates and uses sugar). Record review of Resident #80's face sheet dated 08/25/22 revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old female originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #80 had a diagnosis of pulmonary embolism with acute cor pulmonale (massive pulmonary embolism) and pneumonia (an infection that inflames the air sacs in one or both lungs). Record review of Resident #80's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairment with a BIMS score of 0. Record review of Resident #60's face sheet dated 08/25/22 revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old male originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #60 had a diagnosis of cerebral palsy (group of disorders that affect a person's ability to move and maintain balance and posture), and type 2 diabetes (impairment in the way the body regulates and uses sugar). Record review of Resident #60's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact with a BIMS score of 15. Record review of Resident #20's Face Sheet, dated 08/02/22, revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old female, with an original admission date of 12/08/21. Resident #20's had diagnoses that included gastro-esophageal reflux disease without esophagitis (inflammation of esophagus), dysphagia (difficult in swallowing), and gastrostomy status. Record review of Resident #20's MDS assessment, dated 08/02/22, revealed the resident was cognitively intact with a BIMS score of 15. Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 08/25/22 revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old female originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1 had a diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (brain disorder that slowly destroys memory and thinking skills, and, eventually, the ability to carry out the simplest tasks), hypothyroidism (common condition where the thyroid doesn't create and release enough thyroid hormone into your bloodstream), and dementia (loss of cognitive functioning - thinking, remembering, and reasoning - to such an extent that it interferes with a person's daily life). Observation on 08/23/22 at 10:38 AM revealed CNA G leaving Resident #3's room and then walking down 400 hall carrying a contained bag of trash and uncontained soiled linen both in her right hand. She was observed to be wearing gloves. She went to the soiled linen closet where she deposited the unbagged linen into the soiled linen barrel. She then removed her gloves. Interview with CNA G on 08/23/22 at 10:40 AM revealed she had just provided care to Resident #3 and was transporting the trash and soiled linen to the soiled linen closet. She said she had not taken off or changed her gloves after she provided care to Resident #3. She said she should have taken off her gloves and should have bagged the soiled linen prior to leaving the resident's room. She said this was an infection control issue and placed residents at risk of the spread of infection. Observation on 08/23/22 at 12:22 PM revealed CNA G passing lunch trays. She was observed delivering and setting up Resident #10's meal tray in his room without gloves. She exited Resident #10's room and took Resident #14's tray to his room. She was observed to set up Resident #14's meal tray on his bedside table and then exited the room. RN H was observed asking CNA G if she needed hand sanitizer and CNA G responded no. CNA G was then observed to deliver and set up Resident #47's tray in her room. CNA G had not sanitized her hands before delivering Resident #10's, #14's, or #47's food tray or after she left each resident's room. Interview on 08/23/22 at 12:30 PM, CNA G stated she delivered food trays to Residents #10, #14, and #47 without sanitizing her hands between deliveries. She said she was not sure why she needed to sanitize her hands after she delivered and set up food trays for residents. When asked if she thought it may have been an infection control concern, she agreed. She said she had been off for a month, and this was her first day back, so she was not used to all the regulations. Interview on 08/23/22 at 12:40 PM with RN H revealed she had seen CNA G passing food trays without sanitizing her hands between rooms. She said that was why she offered her hand sanitizer. She said not using hand sanitizer between residents when passing and setting up their food trays, may place residents at risk of cross-contamination or infection. Observation on 08/24/22 at 7:53 AM revealed CNA I delivered and set up Resident #68's food tray. CNA I then left the room and picked up another food tray, without sanitizing his hands, and delivered it to Resident #133's bedside table and set up his meal before he exited the room. Resident #133 was on isolation and signage was on his door indicated full PPE was required to enter the room. CNA I was wearing a surgical mask but had not donned a gown, gloves, N-95 mask, or face shield. Interview on 08/24/22 at 8:00 AM with CNA I revealed he had not sanitized his hands after leaving Resident #68's room and then delivered and set up Resident #133's food tray without donning full PPE prior to entering the room. He said Resident #133 had been on isolation and he should have donned a gown, face shield and gloves in addition to an N-95 mask prior to entering the room. He said his actions placed residents at risk of infection or contracting COVID-19. Observation on 08/24/22 at 8:17 AM revealed the Activity Director unwrapped utensils and smeared jam on toast for Resident #80, then place the utensils and food in front of Resident #80 for her to eat. Without sanitizing her hands, she then delivered and set up Resident #60's food tray at the same table. Interview on 08/24/22 at 8:31 AM with the Activity Director revealed she used her bare hands to unwrap utensils and set up Resident #80 and #60's food trays. She said she had not used sanitizer between the set up. She said these placed residents at risk of infection as we could easily pass infection from one resident to another. Interview on 08/24/22 at 8:31 AM with the Clinical Resource Lead revealed the expectation for staff was to sanitize their hands between residents when they delivered and set up food trays. She stated staff were also expected to follow droplet precautions for all residents on isolation. She said this meant donning an N-95 mask, face shield, gown, and gloves prior to entry into isolated rooms for any reason. She said these were important to limit the risk of spreading infection. Interview on 08/24/22 at 8:59 AM with the DON revealed she also saw CNA I enter Resident #133's room without donning PPE. She said they had precautions in place to limit exposure and risk of infection to residents, and staff are expected to follow those precautions. She said she recently presented an in-service on donning and doffing, so staff should know the expectation. She said staff were expected to sanitize their hands between residents they delivered food trays. She said this was important to reduce the risk of spreading infections. She said hand hygiene was the primary method for reducing the spread of infections. She said any linen that came from a resident's room should be contained in a plastic bag to limit the risk of infection. She stated staff should never wear gloves in the halls, for the same reason. Observation on 08/24/22 at 08:56 AM revealed RN E donning gloves without performing hand hygiene, checked resident 20's blood pressure. She was observed walking from the room with gloves documented the findings on her computer and she went back to the room and positioned the resident and put all the supplies together for medication administration. She doff the gloves and don new without performing hand hygiene. Interview on 08/24/22 at 09:08 AM with RN E revealed, she knew she was supposed to wash hand before donning, after doffing and with any contact with the resident. She stated she noticed she was changing the gloves without performing hand hygiene and could lead to contamination. She revealed she has been trained on hand washing. Interview on 08/24/22 at 11:16 AM with DON revealed, she expected the staffs to be following infection control practices of performing hand hygiene before and after contact with residents. She stated RN E had done training on hand washing that is offered by facility on Relias (training) website. Observation on 08/25/22 at 7:15 AM revealed LVN F prepared medication, then enter Resident #1's room without donning PPE. She was wearing a surgical mask. Signage was noted on the door and indicated the use of full PPE when entering the room. Interview on 08/25/22 at 7:20 AM with LVN F revealed she had not donned PPE prior to entering Resident #1's room. She said she should have worn a gown, N-95 mask, gloves, and face shield to enter the room because Resident #1 was on isolation. She said it was important to follow droplet precautions for residents on isolation because their COVID-19 status was unknown. She stated not donning proper PPE posed a risk to the resident and staff and other residents of contracting COVID-19. Interview with the DON on 08/25/22 at 7:25 AM revealed she witnessed LVN F enter Resident #1's room without donning PPE. She stated she just had a meeting with staff that morning about PPE and infection control practices. She said the facility's policy was to follow the Nursing Facilities Guidance for all COVID-19 response. Interview on 08/25/22 at 8:01 AM with the Infection Preventionist revealed Residents #1 and #133 were on isolation and the facility followed droplet precautions when entering their rooms. The said although the facility did not have any current COVID-19 positive residents, it was important for staff to follow droplet precisions for isolated residents to ensure to minimize the risk of all residents from contracting infection or COVID-19. She stated infection control training was provided and she monitored staff by rounding. She said she expected staff to sanitize their hands between residents when they passed meal trays. She stated staff should never leave a resident's room with uncontained soiled linen. She said the concern of these issues was a risk of spreading infection. Interview on 08/25/22 at 2:45 PM with the Administrator revealed his expectation was for staff to sanitize their hands before and after they served and set up a resident's food tray. He stated he expected staff to don full PPE prior to entering any isolated resident's room. He said he had these expectations to limit the risk of the spread of infection or COVID-19 for all residents. Record review of the facility's undated policy titled Hand Hygiene revealed .the facility considers hand hygiene the primary means to prevent the spread of infection .use an alcohol-based hand rub containing at least 62% alcohol, or, alternatively, soap and water for the following: before and after direct contact with residents, before preparing or handling medications, before donning sterile gloves, after removing gloves, before and after entering isolation precaution settings, before and after eating or handling food, before and after assisting a resident with meals, after contact with resident's intact skin, after personal use of the toilet or conducting personal care, after handling used dressings, contaminated equipment, etc . Record review of COVID-19 Response for Nursing Facilities dated 06/27/22 revealed .Handwashing is essential for infection control and mitigating the spread of infection .full PPE is required (N-95, gown, gloves, and eye protection) for healthcare personnel working inside the isolation zone .
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
  • "What safeguards are in place to prevent abuse and neglect?"
  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
Concerns
  • • Multiple safety concerns identified: Federal abuse finding, 11 life-threatening violation(s), 2 harm violation(s), $316,433 in fines. Review inspection reports carefully.
  • • 53 deficiencies on record, including 11 critical (life-threatening) violations. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
  • • $316,433 in fines. Extremely high, among the most fined facilities in Texas. Major compliance failures.
  • • Grade F (0/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
Bottom line: This facility has a substantiated abuse finding. Extreme caution advised. Explore alternatives.

About This Facility

What is Westpark Rehabilitation And Living's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns WESTPARK REHABILITATION AND LIVING an overall rating of 2 out of 5 stars, which is considered below average nationally. Within Texas, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.

How is Westpark Rehabilitation And Living Staffed?

CMS rates WESTPARK REHABILITATION AND LIVING's staffing level at 3 out of 5 stars, which is average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 49%, compared to the Texas average of 46%. RN turnover specifically is 65%, which is notably high. RNs provide skilled clinical oversight, so turnover in this role can affect medical care quality.

What Have Inspectors Found at Westpark Rehabilitation And Living?

State health inspectors documented 53 deficiencies at WESTPARK REHABILITATION AND LIVING during 2022 to 2025. These included: 11 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death), 2 that caused actual resident harm, and 40 with potential for harm. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.

Who Owns and Operates Westpark Rehabilitation And Living?

WESTPARK REHABILITATION AND LIVING is owned by a government entity. Government-operated facilities are typically run by state, county, or municipal agencies. The facility is operated by THE ENSIGN GROUP, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 140 certified beds and approximately 104 residents (about 74% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in EULESS, Texas.

How Does Westpark Rehabilitation And Living Compare to Other Texas Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Texas, WESTPARK REHABILITATION AND LIVING's overall rating (2 stars) is below the state average of 2.8, staff turnover (49%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (1 stars) is much below the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Westpark Rehabilitation And Living?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "What safeguards and monitoring systems are in place to protect residents from abuse or neglect?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations and the substantiated abuse finding on record.

Is Westpark Rehabilitation And Living Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, WESTPARK REHABILITATION AND LIVING has documented safety concerns. The facility has 1 substantiated abuse finding (meaning confirmed case of resident harm by staff or other residents). Inspectors have issued 11 Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 2-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Texas. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.

Do Nurses at Westpark Rehabilitation And Living Stick Around?

WESTPARK REHABILITATION AND LIVING has a staff turnover rate of 49%, which is about average for Texas nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.

Was Westpark Rehabilitation And Living Ever Fined?

WESTPARK REHABILITATION AND LIVING has been fined $316,433 across 5 penalty actions. This is 8.7x the Texas average of $36,243. Fines at this level are uncommon and typically indicate a pattern of serious deficiencies, repeated violations, or failure to correct problems promptly. CMS reserves penalties of this magnitude for facilities that pose significant, documented risk to resident health or safety. Families should request specific documentation of what issues led to these fines and what systemic changes have been implemented.

Is Westpark Rehabilitation And Living on Any Federal Watch List?

WESTPARK REHABILITATION AND LIVING is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.