MIDTOWNE MEADOWS HEALTH AND REHAB

110 DYLAN WAY, MIDLOTHIAN, TX 76065 (972) 775-5538
For profit - Limited Liability company 121 Beds Independent Data: November 2025
Trust Grade
78/100
#290 of 1168 in TX
Last Inspection: August 2024

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

Midtowne Meadows Health and Rehab has received a Trust Grade of B, indicating it is a good choice among nursing homes, though there are areas for improvement. It ranks #290 out of 1,168 facilities in Texas, placing it in the top half, and #3 out of 10 in Ellis County, meaning only two local options are better. The facility is new, with its first inspection showing a stable trend, but it has identified two concerns: a failure to ensure a safe environment for residents and issues with infection control practices. Staffing is a weakness here, with a low rating of 1 out of 5 stars, although turnover is impressively low at 0%. While the facility does have a concerning level of RN coverage, it has a solid health inspection rating of 5 out of 5 stars, suggesting that most health protocols are being followed. Specific incidents included a failure to keep residents' environments free of hazards and lapses in proper hand hygiene during resident care, which could pose risks for infection.

Trust Score
B
78/100
In Texas
#290/1168
Top 24%
Safety Record
Low Risk
No red flags
Inspections
Too New
0 → 2 violations
Staff Stability
○ Average
Turnover data not reported for this facility.
Penalties
⚠ Watch
$20,131 in fines. Higher than 99% of Texas facilities. Major compliance failures.
Skilled Nurses
⚠ Watch
Each resident gets only 15 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Texas. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
Violations
✓ Good
Only 2 deficiencies on record. Cleaner than most facilities. Minor issues only.
★★★★☆
4.0
Overall Rating
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Staff Levels
★★★☆☆
3.0
Care Quality
★★★★★
5.0
Inspection Score
Stable
: 0 issues
2024: 2 issues

The Good

  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record

Facility shows strength in fire safety.

The Bad

Federal Fines: $20,131

Below median ($33,413)

Minor penalties assessed

The Ugly 2 deficiencies on record

Aug 2024 2 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined the facility failed to maintain an infection control progr...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined the facility failed to maintain an infection control program designed to help prevent the development and transmission of disease and infection for 2 (Resident #57, Resident #217) of 2 residents reviewed for infection control. 1.CNA A failed to perform hand hygiene (hand washing) after removing soiled gloves and before putting on clean gloves on 08/14/24 08:26 AM, during incontinence care for Resident #57. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #217's foley catheter bag was not touching the floor. This failure could place residents in the facility at risk for the development and transmission of infections. Findings included: Review of Resident #57's face sheet reflected Resident #57, a [AGE] year-old female, admitted to the facility 01/29/24 with congestive heart failure (progressive deterioration of the heart muscle), atrial fibrillation (irregular heartbeat), hypertension (high blood pressure), protein-calorie malnutrition, non-rheumatic aortic valve stenosis (narrowing of blood vessels), anxiety (feelings of fear), hypokalemia (low potassium), muscle weakness, and pain in unspecified joint. Review of Resident #57's care plan, dated 06/10/24, reflected Resident #57 is incontinent of bladder and to provide perineal care (genital area) after each incontinence episode. Review of Resident #57's MDS dated [DATE] reflected Resident #57 had a BIMS score of 10, was severely impaired vision, incontinent, and dependent on staff for toileting and personal hygiene. Observation on 08/14/24 at 08:26 AM revealed CNA A washed her hands in the resident's restroom and applied clean gloves. She opened the brief and used a clean wipe for each swipe, down each side of the labia, then the center. Resident #57 rolled to the side and used a clean wipe to clean her bottom. CNA A removed the brief, dropped it in a trash can near her, and removed the soiled gloves. Hand hygiene was not performed before putting on clean gloves. A clean brief was placed under the Resident #57 and secured on each side. CNA A removed her gloves, pulled down Resident #57's top and pulled the resident's blanket up to cover her. CNA A washed her hands in the resident's restroom before leaving the room. During an interview with CNA A 08/14/24 at 08:35 AM, she stated she normally uses hand sanitizer between glove changes, but she forgot it this time. In an interview with the ADON 08/15/24 at 09:57 AM, she stated CNA A should have used hand hygiene to prevent infection. During an interview with LVN 08/14/24 2:05 PM, she stated CNA A should have washed her hands or used hand sanitizer before putting on clean gloves. During an interview with the Infection Prevention Nurse 08/14/24 09:02 at AM, she stated CNA A should always practice hand hygiene when removing soiled gloves. The facility's Handwashing/Hand Hygiene policy, revised August 2019, reflected Use an alcohol-based hand rub containing at least 62% alcohol; or, alternatively, soap (antimicrobial or non-antimicrobial). The use of gloves does not replace hand washing/hand hygiene. Integration of glove use along with routine hand hygiene is recognized as the best practice for preventing healthcare-associated infections. Perform hand hygiene before applying non-sterile gloves. When removing non-sterile gloves . perform hand hygiene. Review of Resident #217's face sheet reflected Resident #217, an [AGE] year-old male, admitted to the facility 08/09/24 with atherosclerotic heart disease (fat buildup in blood vessels of the heart), hypertension (high blood pressure), chronic kidney disease (progressive failure of kidney function), and benign prostatic hyperplasia with lower urinary tract symptoms (enlarged prostate gland), pacemaker (implanted device to regulate heart rhythm), urinary tract infection (infection of urinary system). Review of Resident #217's care plan, dated 08/13/24, reflected Resident #217 had a foley catheter and to monitor input/output, for signs of discomfort, and symptoms of urinary tract infection. Review of Resident #217's MDS, dated [DATE], reflected Resident #217 had a BIMS score of 7, an indwelling foley catheter, was incontinent of bowel, and dependent on staff for toileting and personal hygiene. Observation on 08/13/24 at 01:08 PM revealed Resident #217 sitting in a recliner in his room. He had just finished lunch and his bedside table was in front of him. Resident #217's foley catheter bag was hanging from the rim of a small trash and the bottom of the foley bag was touching the floor. It was in a privacy bag. The trash can was on the resident's right side, between the recliner and bedside table. During an interview with LVN 08/14/24 at 08:52 AM, she stated Resident #217's foley bag touching the floor was an infection control issue. In an interview with Infection Prevention Nurse 08/14/24 at 02:06 PM, she stated the foley bag should not hang from the trash can or touch the floor. During an interview with ADON 08/15/24 10:02 AM, she stated the foley bag should not touch the ground or hang from the trash can, because the foley was attached to Resident #217 and this can cause infection. Review of the facility policy revised August 2019, and titled Care, Urinary Catheter, stated Be sure the tubing and drainage bag are kept off the floor.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that residents' environment remained free of...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that residents' environment remained free of accident hazards as was possible for 3 (Resident #27, #60, and #64) of 4 residents reviewed for accident prevention. The facility failed to obtain physician orders or a physician assessment as of 08/13/2024 for Residents #27, #60, and #64 for the usage of a Bolster mattress prior to installing the mattress to assist in fall prevention. This failure could prevent residents from having an environment that was free and clear of accidents and hazards. Findings included: Record review of Resident #27's Face Sheet, dated 08/15/2024, reflected she was an [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE]. Relevant diagnoses included unspecified dementia (memory decline), lack of coordination, and repeated falls. Record review of Resident #27's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] reflected, she had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 06 (severe cognitive impairment) and for ADL care it reflected assistance for transfers, toileting, and bathing and the resident was totally dependent for assistance. Record review of Resident #27's physician orders dated 08/14/24 reflected no orders for a bolster mattress and no physician assessment was observed in the facility system records. An observation on 08/14/24 at 11:03 AM of Resident #27's bed revealed she was sleeping on a bolster mattress, which had the upper and lower sides of the mattress had raised sides of at least 6 inches. Record review of Resident #60's Face Sheet, dated 08/14/2024, reflected she was a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE]. Relevant diagnoses included unspecified Alzheimer Disease (memory loss), muscle weakness, and repeated falls. Record review of Resident #60's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] reflected, she had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 04 (severe cognitive impairment) and for ADL care it reflected assistance for transfers, toileting, and bathing and the resident was totally dependent for assistance. Record review of Resident #60's physician orders dated 08/13/24 reflected no orders for a bolster mattress and no physician assessment was observed in the facility system records. An observation on 08/13/24 at 10:44 AM of Resident #60's bed revealed she was sleeping on a bolster mattress which had the upper and lower sides of the mattress had raised sides of at least 6 inches. Record review of Resident #64's Face Sheet, dated 08/14/2024, revealed she was a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE]. Relevant diagnoses included unspecified dementia, muscle weakness, and abnormalities of gait and mobility. Record review of Resident #64's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed, she had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 03 (severe cognitive impairment) and for ADL care it reflected assistance for transfers, toileting, and bathing and the resident required moderate assistance. An observation on 08/13/24 at 10:15 AM of Resident #64's bed revealed she was sleeping on a bolster mattress which had the upper and lower sides of the mattress had raised sides of at least 6 inches. Record review of Resident #64's physician orders dated 08/14/24 revealed no orders for a bolster mattress no physician assessment was observed in the facility system records. In an interview on 08/14/24 at 1:45 PM, the DON and the Administrator were made aware that Residents #60 and #64 were observed to have bolster mattresses on their beds; however, no physician orders or physician assessments were found in the system of records for these residents. The DON stated the bolster mattresses were needed for the resident because of their history for falls. She stated that an assessment was completed, and the mattress did not pose a risk for any of the residents. The DON advised that she submitted a request to the physician for the residents to have the mattresses on 08/14/24. She stated the reason physician orders were needed was to ensure that the mattresses were safe for the residents. The Administrator stated that there was an assessment completed and signed by the physician in the resident's care plan discussion regarding their history of falls. Record review of facility policy on Verbal orders, dated 02/2014, stated Verbal orders shall only be given in an emergency or when the attending physician is not immediately available to write or sign the order.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
  • • Only 2 deficiencies on record. Cleaner than most facilities. Minor issues only.
Concerns
  • • $20,131 in fines. Higher than 94% of Texas facilities, suggesting repeated compliance issues.
Bottom line: Generally positive indicators. Standard due diligence and a personal visit recommended.

About This Facility

What is Midtowne Meadows Health And Rehab's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns MIDTOWNE MEADOWS HEALTH AND REHAB an overall rating of 4 out of 5 stars, which is considered above average nationally. Within Texas, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.

How is Midtowne Meadows Health And Rehab Staffed?

CMS rates MIDTOWNE MEADOWS HEALTH AND REHAB's staffing level at 1 out of 5 stars, which is much below average compared to other nursing homes.

What Have Inspectors Found at Midtowne Meadows Health And Rehab?

State health inspectors documented 2 deficiencies at MIDTOWNE MEADOWS HEALTH AND REHAB during 2024. These included: 2 with potential for harm.

Who Owns and Operates Midtowne Meadows Health And Rehab?

MIDTOWNE MEADOWS HEALTH AND REHAB is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 121 certified beds and approximately 101 residents (about 83% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in MIDLOTHIAN, Texas.

How Does Midtowne Meadows Health And Rehab Compare to Other Texas Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Texas, MIDTOWNE MEADOWS HEALTH AND REHAB's overall rating (4 stars) is above the state average of 2.8 and health inspection rating (5 stars) is much above the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Midtowne Meadows Health And Rehab?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?" These questions are particularly relevant given the below-average staffing rating.

Is Midtowne Meadows Health And Rehab Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, MIDTOWNE MEADOWS HEALTH AND REHAB has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 4-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Texas. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.

Do Nurses at Midtowne Meadows Health And Rehab Stick Around?

MIDTOWNE MEADOWS HEALTH AND REHAB has not reported staff turnover data to CMS. Staff turnover matters because consistent caregivers learn residents' individual needs, medications, and preferences. When staff frequently change, this institutional knowledge is lost. Families should ask the facility directly about their staff retention rates and average employee tenure.

Was Midtowne Meadows Health And Rehab Ever Fined?

MIDTOWNE MEADOWS HEALTH AND REHAB has been fined $20,131 across 5 penalty actions. This is below the Texas average of $33,280. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.

Is Midtowne Meadows Health And Rehab on Any Federal Watch List?

MIDTOWNE MEADOWS HEALTH AND REHAB is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.