WINDSOR QUAIL VALLEY POST-ACUTE HEALTHCARE

3640 HAMPTON DR, MISSOURI CITY, TX 77459 (281) 778-5144
Government - Hospital district 120 Beds WELLSENTIAL HEALTH Data: November 2025 4 Immediate Jeopardy citations
Trust Grade
7/100
#620 of 1168 in TX
Last Inspection: March 2025

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

Windsor Quail Valley Post-Acute Healthcare has a Trust Grade of F, indicating significant concerns about the quality of care provided. They rank #620 out of 1168 facilities in Texas, placing them in the bottom half, and #7 out of 15 in Fort Bend County, meaning only six local options are better. The facility is showing improvement, having reduced issues from 8 in 2024 to 2 in 2025, but it still has serious challenges, including a critical finding where a resident developed severe pressure ulcers due to inadequate care. Staffing ratings are below average with a turnover rate of 54%, which is concerning as it suggests instability in care, although RN coverage is average. Additionally, the facility has faced $52,036 in fines, which is typical for the state, but the critical incidents related to abuse and neglect raise red flags for potential safety issues.

Trust Score
F
7/100
In Texas
#620/1168
Bottom 47%
Safety Record
High Risk
Review needed
Inspections
Getting Better
8 → 2 violations
Staff Stability
⚠ Watch
54% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
Penalties
⚠ Watch
$52,036 in fines. Higher than 88% of Texas facilities, suggesting repeated compliance issues.
Skilled Nurses
⚠ Watch
Each resident gets only 26 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Texas. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
Violations
⚠ Watch
14 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
★★★☆☆
3.0
Overall Rating
★★☆☆☆
2.0
Staff Levels
★★★★☆
4.0
Care Quality
★★★☆☆
3.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2024: 8 issues
2025: 2 issues

The Good

  • 4-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record

Facility shows strength in quality measures, fire safety.

The Bad

3-Star Overall Rating

Near Texas average (2.8)

Meets federal standards, typical of most facilities

Staff Turnover: 54%

Near Texas avg (46%)

Higher turnover may affect care consistency

Federal Fines: $52,036

Above median ($33,413)

Moderate penalties - review what triggered them

Chain: WELLSENTIAL HEALTH

Part of a multi-facility chain

Ask about local staffing decisions and management

The Ugly 14 deficiencies on record

4 life-threatening
Mar 2025 2 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

ADL Care (Tag F0677)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide the necessary services to maintain personal car...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide the necessary services to maintain personal care for one of seven residents (Resident #19) reviewed for ADL care in that: -Resident #19 waited over an hour to receive incontinent care. -The call light activator switch was placed out of reach. -During that hour, three staff entered and exited the room without assisting the resident with incontinent care. -One staff turned off the call light and left the room. The deficient practice could cause residents at risk of not receiving the care as needed and place them at higher risk for skin breakdown. Findings included: Record review of the admission Record for Resident #19 revealed he was [AGE] years old and was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, quadriplegia (loss of use of all four extremities), anxiety disorder, and muscle wasting and atrophy. Record review of the MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #19 scored 10/15 on the BIMS, indicative of moderately impaired cognition. The MDS reflected the resident was dependent for hygiene. The MDS reflected the resident had a suprapubic indwelling catheter for urine and was incontinent of bowel. The MDS reflected the resident had four Stage 4 pressure sores. Record review of the Care Plan (revised 07/05/2023) for Resident #19 revealed the resident had bowel incontinence. One Intervention read, in part, .Check resident at frequent hours and provide incontinent care as needed. Record review of the Care Plan (revised 07/23/2024) revealed Resident #19 had a Stage 4 pressure sore on his sacral area. Record review of the Care Plan (revised 09/08/2022) for Resident #19 revealed the resident was at risk for skin breakdown from bowel incontinence. One Intervention read, in part, .Provide timely incontinent care . Observation and interview on 03/04/2025 at 10:36 a.m. revealed Resident #19 lying in bed. He said the staff do not check on him very often, and do not answer call lights promptly. Observation revealed the call light activator (pressure-type) switch was placed on the over bed table, out of the resident's reach. The Surveyor activated the call light at that time (10:36 a.m.). Observation on 03/04/2025 at 10:43 a.m. revealed RN L enter Resident #19's room. RN L exited the room at 10:47 a.m. The call light remained on. Observation on 03/04/2025 at 11:02 a.m. revealed CNA K entered the day room area across from Resident #19's room. The call light in the hallway was on and visible. CNA K put lotion or hand sanitizer on his hands, got a drink of water, and left the area, walking past Resident #19's room. Observation and interview on 03/04/2025 at 11:08 a.m. revealed Resident #19 was in the same position. He said RN L adjusted the television and left. He said he told RN L that he needed to be cleaned up. Resident #19 said He told me he would get someone and he just left. Observation on 03/04/2025 at 11:11 a.m. revealed RN L walk to the day room area across from Resident #19's room and looked into the room. Resident #19's call light was still on and visible. RN L left the area. Observation on 03/04/2025 at 11:15 a.m. revealed a female staff entered Resident #19's room. She exited the room. Observation at that time revealed the call light was off. Observation on 03/04/2025 at 11:30 a.m. revealed the Maintenance Director entered Resident #19's room. The Surveyor was in the day room and heard the resident say something but could not hear clearly enough to understand. The Maintenance Director said I'll get somebody and left the room. Observation on 03/04/2025 at 11:38 a.m. revealed LVN T entered Resident #19's room briefly and exited. Observation on 03/04/25 at 11:42 a.m. revealed CNA K enter the day room across from Resident #19's room, drank some water, and left the area. Observation on 03/04/2025 at 11:44 a.m. revealed the Speech Therapist enter Resident #19's room. Observation on 03/04/2025 at 11:48 a.m. revealed LVN T propelled Resident #19's roommate into the room. In an interview on 03/04/2025 at 12:00 p.m. LVN T said the first time she checked on Resident #19 (11:38 a.m.) she was seeing if he needed to be repositioned. She said the second time she went in (11:48 a.m.) Resident #19 said he would wait until the Speech Therapist left. Observation and interview on 03/04/2025 at 12:02 p.m. revealed RN L was at the nurses' station. RN L said when he went in to Resident #19's room the resident said he needed the television fixed. RN L said Resident #19 also said he needed to be changed. RN L said he went to tell the CNA . Observation at that time revealed RN L approached CNA F in the hallway. The Surveyor could not hear what RN L said to CNA F, but CNA F responded, I'll change him this afternoon. At that time the Surveyor asked RN L what a reasonable time frame was for a resident to be changed after he requested it. RN L said Reasonable is thirty minutes. Maximum one hour. He said he had told CNA K earlier. In an interview on 03/04/2025 at 12:06 p.m., CNA F said she had checked on Resident #19 when she started her shift at 6:00 a.m. She said she asked him if he needed to be changed then, and he said not before breakfast. She said she had just gone back into the room, but the Speech Therapist was in there. She said RN L had not told her earlier that Resident #19 needed care. She said CNA K just told her. Observation on 03/04/2025 at 12:10 p.m. revealed RN L and CNA F enter Resident #19's room. In an interview on 03/04/2025 at 12:31 p.m., Resident #19 said he had been cleaned up. Observation revealed the call light activator switch was on the over bed table, out of reach. In an interview on 03/04/2025 at 12:33 p.m., CNA K said RN L had told him to tell CNA F that Resident #19 needed to be changed. He said he told CNA F sometime after 11 [11:00 a.m.]. In an interview on 03/06/25 at 11:25 a.m., the DON said a reasonable time for a resident to be changed after activating the call light was between five to twenty minutes. The DON stated if a nurse answered a residents call light, If the resident requires two persons, get help. Or they can change the resident. If they're in the middle of med pass or something they can attempt to get a CNA. The DON said waiting from 10:36a.m. to 12:10p.m. was not reasonable. She said RN L should have told the resident he would come back or find a CNA. She said the CNA does not need to be assigned to that hall to help a resident. She said the possible negative outcomes for the resident would be a decline in the resident's comfort level, including dignity, and skin breakdown. The facility policy Call Lights: Accessibility and Timely Response (10/13/2022) read, in part, .5. Staff will ensure the call light is within reach of resident and secured, as needed .10. All staff members who see or hear an activated call light are responsible for responding. If the staff member cannot provide what the resident desires, the appropriate personnel should be notified.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and co...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 resident (Resident #19) of 7 residents reviewed for infeciton control. -Staff provided incontinent care for the resident and did not practice hand hygiene prior to repositioning the resident and arranging the linens. The deficient practice placed the residents at risk for infection. Findings included: Record review of the admission Record for Resident #19 revealed he was [AGE] years old and was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, quadriplegia (loss of use of all four extremities), anxiety disorder, and muscle wasting and atrophy. Record review of the MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #19 scored 10/15 on the BIMS, indicative of moderately impaired cognition. The MDS reflected the resident was dependent for hygiene. The MDS reflected the resident had a suprapubic indwelling catheter for urine and was incontinent of bowel. Record review of the Care Plan (revised 07/05/2023) for Resident #19 revealed hethe resident had bowel incontinence. One Intervention read, in part, .Check resident at frequent hours and provide incontinent care as needed. Record review of the Care Plan (revised 09/08/2022) for Resident #19 revealed the resident was at risk for skin breakdown from bowel incontinence. One Intervention read, in part, .Provide timely incontinent care . Observation and interview on 03/06/2025 revealed CNA A and CNA G provide incontinent care for Resident #19. Both staff washed their hands and donned gowns and gloves. CNA G loosened the resident's brief. CNA A used disposable wipes to wipe the right groin area. She then discarded the wipe. She repeated the sequence for the left groin. The resident was turned onto his right side. The resident had two wound dressings that were intact and appeared clean. CNA A used disposable wipes to clean a small amount of feces from the perineal area, and discarded the wipes. The staff turned Resident #19 onto his left side. CNA G removed the soiled brief and discarded it. CNA A cleaned the resident again. Both staff placed a new brief under the resident and secured it. CNA A and CNA G did not remove their gloves or practice hand hygiene before repositioning the resident. They then covered the resident with linens. CNA A then, while wearing the same gloves, moved Resident #19's motorized wheelchair. Both staff then removed their gowns and gloves. CNA A and CNA B stated they did not perform glove changes and hand hygiene, but should have. In an interview on 03/06/2025 at 4:05 p.m., the DON said when providing incontinent care, the staff should have changed gloves when going from dirty to clean. They should have practiced hand hygiene after removing the dirty brief and discarding it. She said a negative outcome would be an increased risk of infection. The facility policy Hand Hygiene (10/24/2022) read, in part, .1. Staff will perform hand hygiene when indicated, using proper technique consistent with accepted standards of practice.
Aug 2024 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Resident Rights (Tag F0550)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and records reviewed, the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and records reviewed, the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promoteds maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life, for 1 (Resident #1) of 6 residents reviewed for resident rights. -The facility failed to allow Resident #1 to exercise his right to choose that CNA B not provide him care. This failure could place residents at risk for decreased feelings of self-worth and dignity. The findings included: Record review of Resident #1's admission Record, dated 07/31/2024, revealed a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident's diagnoses included bipolar disorder (a mental health condition that causes extreme mood swings between emotional highs and lows), intervertebral disc disorders with myelopathy (injury to the spinal cord caused by severe compression), spinal stenosis (condition in which the spaces in the spine narrow, compressing the spinal cord), muscle wasting and atrophy (loss of muscle mass and strength), and unspecified deformity of left finger(s). Record review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 06/06/2024, revealed a BIMS score of 12, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Further review revealed the resident was dependent with toileting hygiene and showering/bathing. Record review of Resident #1's undated care plan revealed the resident had an ADL self-care performance deficit r/t limited range of motion and was totally dependent on 1 staff for bathing/showering, dressing, personal hygiene/oral care, and toilet use. Resident needed extensive assistance with bed mobility and required mechanical lift with 2 staff assistance for transfer. Observation and interview on 07/31/2024 at 7:50 a.m. revealed, Resident #1 was lying in bed watching television. He said he did not want CNA B proving care to him and that CNA B was aware. He said CNA B would go into his room and offer him care but he would refuse. He said when CNA B would offer him care after he told him he did not want care from him it made him feel uncomfortable, like he was being punished, and like CNA B had power over him. He said he told the previous DON that he did not want CNA B assisting him, and he was assigned another CNA. He said when that DON left, CNA B was assigned to him again. He said he reported this to CNA C but was told they were not his CNA, and CNA B would be providing his care. He said he only reported his concern to the previous DON. In an interview at 10:36 a.m., CNA B said Resident #1 told him approximately a month ago that he did not want him providing care to him. He said he let the ADON know, and she suggested for him to switch rooms with the other CNA on the hall. He said for the past couple of days he offered Resident #1 help with his care because his call light would be on, but the resident would refuse his help. He said he first let his coworker know that she was assigned to the resident, but she would give him attitude and deny the resident's room was assigned to her. He said he would find another CNA to assist the resident. He said the ADON told him yesterday not to go into the resident's room. He said he followed CNA C into the resident's room this morning, 07/31/24, to show CNA C that the resident did not want him proving care to him and CNA C was trying to persuade the resident to let him care for him. He said he told the ADON today, 07/31/24, at approximately 8:30 a.m. that CNA C was not cooperating. He said he found another CNA to assist the resident. He said CNA C has since started to provide care to the resident. He said Resident #1 had the right to say he did not want him to assist him with his care. He said it could potentially affect the resident emotionally because they could be afraid something negative could happen to them. In an interview at 11:39 a.m., CNA C said the ADON told her yesterday that CNA B could not work with Resident #1 but did not say why. She said she was assigned to Resident #1 today but was not assigned to him this morning. She said CNA B and her had a discussion in the hallway about who was to provide care to the resident this morning. She said yesterday no one told her about a swap until 11:29 a.m. She said she never refused to provide care to Resident #1 . In an interview on 07/31/2024 at 12:26 p.m., the ADON said Resident #1 had a lot of psych issues and one week he would not have a problem with an assigned aide and the following week he would say he had a problem with the aide. She said CNA B was not to provide care to Resident #1 because her understanding was a charger came up missing but was found. She said the previous interim DON said CNA B was not to provide care to Resident #1. She said she told CNA B not to go into the room because it could put him in a place that he should not even be in. She said CNA B knew he was not to provide care or go into Resident #1's room since at least 07/10/2024. She said it was the right of the resident to specify if they did not want a certain aide to assist them with their care. In an interview on 07/31/2024 at 12:50 p.m., the DON said she has been working at the facility since last Monday, 07/22/24. She said she did not know Resident #1 requested that CNA B not provide him care and said she found out today. She said she was not informed by any of the staff members that CNA B should not be providing care to him. She said residents had the right to say they did not want a particular CNA to provide them care. She said emotional harm could potentially result from receiving assistance from a CNA they did not want, and their BP could go up. She said to her knowledge CNA B went into the resident's room this morning to show CNA C that the resident did not want care from him. She said her expectation was for the CNAs to abide by a resident's request to not have a particular CNA assist them with their care. Record review of the facility's document titled Your Rights and Protections as a Nursing Home Resident, undated, read in part . You have the right to .be treated with dignity and respect .
Jul 2024 1 deficiency 1 IJ
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Pressure Ulcer Prevention (Tag F0686)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents received care, consistent with prof...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents received care, consistent with professional standards of practice to identify, prevent pressure ulcers from developing and promote healing for 1 (Resident CR# 1) of 9 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility failed to prevent, identify, and treat pressure sores on Resident CR#1's right buttock and right hip. CR #1 was sent to the hospital after family intervention, and there it was determined she had an unstageable wound to her buttocks and a stage 3 wound to her hip. The noncompliance was identified as Past Non-Compliant. The IJ began on 07/13/2024 and ended on 07/16/2024. The facility corrected the non-compliance before the survey began. This failure placed residents who were at risk of developing wounds of delayed identification, treatment, hospitalization, surgeries, infection, a decline in health, and pain. Findings included: Record review of Resident CR #1's admission face sheet undated revealed she was an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included: dementia (general term for loss of memory, language, and thinking ability), Alzheimer's Disease ( progressive disease that destroys memory and important mental functioning) , malignant neoplasm of breast (cancerous tumor), cognitive communication deficit, chronic kidney disease, and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). Record review of Resident CR#1's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed her BIMS score was 99 which meant it was unable to be completed. The resident's cognitive skills for daily decision making were severely impaired. The resident was always incontinent of bowel and bladder. Resident CR #1 was dependent on staff for rolling left and right, sitting to lying, lying to sitting on side of bed, sitting to standing, chair/bed-to-chair, and tub shower transfer. The resident was identified as having medically complex conditions. Review of Section M Skin Conditions revealed Resident CR#1 was at risk of developing pressure ulcers. The resident did not have any unhealed pressure ulcers. Record review of Resident CR#1's care plan date initiated 03/21/2024. Date revised 04/17/2024 revealed: Problem: Resident CR#1 was at risk for pressure ulcer development related to incontinence (trouble controlling elimination) and dependence on staff, cognitive deficit. Goal: The resident would have intact skin, free of redness, blisters, or discoloration through review date 09/01/2024. Interventions: Follow the facility policy and protocols for the prevention and treatment of skin breakdown. Inform the resident, family, caregivers of any new areas of skin breakdown. Monitor, document, report as needed any changes in skin status: appearance, color, wound healing, signs, and symptoms of infection, wound size, and stage (classification of pressure wound injury). Record review of Resident CR#1's Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Ulcer Risk unsigned dated 06/04/2024 was scored 15 out of 23. The resident's category was at risk for the development of pressure ulcers. Record review of Resident CR#1's Weekly Skin Evaluation dated 07/06/2024 signed by RN A revealed the resident had no abnormal skin areas. Record review of Resident CR#1's Weekly Skin Evaluation dated 07/13/2024 signed by RN A revealed the resident had no abnormal skin areas. Record review of the facility Grievance Log dated 07/14/2024 revealed: Resident involved: Resident CR#1. Report person: RP. Main concern: Wounds. Resolution: Sent to hospital. Record review of the facility Nurse's Progress Notes by RN A dated 07/14/2024 at 2:13 AM revealed 11:42 PM Resident CR#1's Daughter D came to the nurse's station. The Resident CR#1's Daughter D reported she called 911. She wanted her to go to the hospital because she had a bad wound. 11:44 PM the 911 crew picked up the resident. 11:52 PM Resident CR#1 transferred to local hospital emergency room by 911 crew. Record review of local hospital ED Triage (process that prioritizes treatment) Notes dated 07/14/2024 revealed EMS was called for patient with a new wound on the buttocks. Record review of local hospital History and Physical dated 07/14/2024 revealed Resident CR#1 was brought to the ED from a nursing home with a pressure ulcer on the buttocks area. The patient had a stage II right buttock sacral ulcer going into stage III present on admission. Physical Examination revealed Wound: Pressure Injury Right Buttocks. Wound: Pressure Injury Right Hip. Record review of local hospital Wound Care Nurse Evaluation dated 07/15/2024: Wound Assessment revealed: 1.Wound 07/14/2024 Pressure Injury Right Buttocks: Unstageable pressure injury POA. Size 2.5 length cm X 2.5 width cm X 0 depth cm. No undermining (damaged tissue beneath the skin). No tunneling (a tunnel that extended from the wound into deeper tissue). Wound bed (base of wound) was covered with eschar (collection of dried dead tissue within a wound). Edges well defined (edges were flushed with wound base). 2. Wound 07/14/2024 Pressure Injury Right Hip: Stage III POA. Size 2.5 length cm X 2.0 width cm X 0.1 depth cm. No undermining. No tunneling. Wound bed was pink with minimal necrotic tissue (dead or dying tissue that cannot perform the normal function). Edges well defined. Record review of Hospital Wound care orders dated 07/15/2024 revealed the right buttock and the right hip cleanse with Vashe (wound cleaning solution). Pat dry. Apply Polymem dressing (a dressing that cleans the wound bed). Cover with Mepilex dressing (absorbent foam dressing) every other day . In an interview on 07/17/2024 at 12:53 PM the Interim DON stated the two wound care nurses RN A and LVN B were suspended pending an internal investigation brought to us by Resident CR#1's Daughter D. Resident CR#1's Daughter D reported the resident had a bad wound on her hip. The family member called 911 to have the resident taken to the hospital. She stated LVN B worked Monday through Friday. LVN B was also suspended due to putting a protective padded dressing on the resident's hip without an order. The weekend treatment nurse RN A reported to us she did a complete head to toe assessment on Resident CR#1 prior to her leaving on 07/13/2024. RN A stated the resident did not have any open area. RN A resigned . In a phone interview on 07/17/2024 at 2:00 PM LVN B stated she was not the wound care nurse for the 500 hall where Resident CR#1 was. The week-end nurse RN A was responsible for the 500 hall assessments. LVN B stated as the main treatment nurse she made random assessments of all residents on the 500 hall. LVN B stated Resident CR#1 laid on her right side a lot. The LVN stated she put a protective dressing to prevent breakdown. LVN B stated she did not have any open areas. On 07/06/2024 the resident's right hip was pink but blanched (redness that disappeared when pressure was applied but returned when the pressure was removed. Blood was still inside the vessels). LVN B stated she was aware that if there was a wound, she would notify the physician and family . In a phone interview on 07/17/2024 at 4:11 PM RN A stated she assessed Resident CR#1's skin weekly on the weekends. RN A stated she did a complete head to toe assessment on 07/13/2024 . RN A stated the resident did not have any open areas. RN A stated if she found something it would need to be reported for treatment to start. RN A stated she did not know how this occurred. Observation and interview at the local hospital on [DATE] at 8:22AM revealed Resident CR#1 in bed on her left side. Resident CR#1 was nonverbal. Observation at this time revealed the resident's right hip with an open wound. The wound base was visible and pink. Continued observation revealed an open wound to the resident's right buttocks. The wound base was not visible due to eschar. Resident CR#1's family member was at the resident's bedside. In an interview at this time the family member stated she saw an open sore on her mother's hip. She stated she noticed an odor. In an interview at the local hospital on [DATE] at 8:45AM the Hospital RN stated she was Resident CR#1's nurse for the day. RN C stated the resident was not verbal. The RN stated the resident was admitted for new pressure wounds. RN C stated the dressings were changed every other day. The Wounds were documented as POA which meant present on admission. In an interview on 07/18/2024 at 9:50AM the interim DON stated she began the position on 07/04/2024. The DON stated her expectations, and the facility policy was that all staff would assess the resident's skin. She stated if issues were found it wound be reported and documented in the computer. The DON stated the skin assessments were done weekly. All wounds were expected to be assessed and treated as ordered. The physician and resident's responsible party was to be notified of any skin changes. The DON stated it was the responsibility of the DON to monitor skin assessments and wound care weekly. The DON stated when we received the complaint, we had a QAPI meeting and implemented a plan. The two nurses were interviewed on how this occurred. Both nurses reported they assessed the resident they did not see any open wounds. In an interview on 07/19/2024 at 10:48AM the Regional Clinical Specialist stated the facility policy and expectations were for skin assessments to be done on admission, weekly, and as needed. She stated if something new was identified the nurse, physician, nurse practitioner, and resident's responsible party were notified immediately so treatment could start. She stated she was not sure how this occurred. On approximately 07/03/2024 LVN B was asked to look at the resident's right hip by a CNA. The nurse looked at the resident's hip but did not see a wound. LVN B put a protective dressing on the resident's hip due to her being at risk for wounds. As the interview continued, she stated it was the DON's responsibility for monitoring the skin assessment. The monitoring was to be done by making rounds weekly to follow up after the wound care nurse. In a phone interview on 07/19/2024 at 11:01 AM the facility wound care physician stated he was not caring for Resident CR#1. The wound care physician stated it wound not be possible to determine a shear wound from a pressure wound from a picture. He stated the wound would need to be assessed to determine if it was a sheer wound. He stated in general a stage III wound or a wound with eschar would take more than a few hours to have occurred . In an interview on 07/19/2024 at 11:37 AM the Administrator stated his expectations for skin assessments were done appropriately according to the facility policy. He stated he was not sure how this occurred. He understood wounds could occur quickly within a matter of hours. He stated LVN B put a protective dressing on the resident's hip but did not communicate with the clinical staff. It was RN A's responsibility to assess the residents on the 500 hall. The DON was responsible for monitoring the wound care and skin assessments, and they had weekly skin meetings. Any skin changes were discussed in the meeting. The Administrator stated to prevent this in the future both nurses were suspended and terminated. He stated We hired a new experienced treatment nurse. We were monitoring residents' skin daily. Record review of the facility's policy titled Skin assessment dated [DATE] read in part: . Policy: It is our policy to perform a full body skin assessment as part of our systemic approach to pressure injury prevention and management. This policy includes the following procedural guidelines in performing the full body assessment. Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 1. A full body, or head to toe skin assessment will be conducted by a licensed or registered nurse upon admission/re-admission, weekly for three weeks, and weekly thereafter. The assessment may also be performed after a change of condition or after any newly identified pressure injury . The noncompliance was identified as Past Non-Compliant. The IJ began on 07/13/2024 and ended on 07/16/2024. The facility corrected the non-compliance by: Suspended the two wound care nurses. 100% head-to-toe assessments on all residents. Facility self-reported to Health and Human Service Commission. Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Impromptu meeting (done without planning) with the Administrator, the DON, and the Medical Director. Notified the resident's physician and nurse practitioner. The DON assessed the residents with wounds with the facility wound care physician. Educated all staff on abuse and neglect. Identifying, reporting, and documenting changes to include changes in skin condition. Measures to prevent pressure injuries and weekly skin assessment. Actions to take if notified of a change in a resident's skin condition. Staff will report changes in condition to include skin changes to charge nurse and the DON . On 07/18/2024 at 4:36 PM., facility administrator was notified of past noncompliance IJ. A plan of removal was not requested. An IJ template was provided to the administrator via email.
Apr 2024 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

ADL Care (Tag F0677)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary services to maintain grooming a...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary services to maintain grooming and personal care for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for ADL care. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 received proper grooming, including hair washing, three times a week (Monday, Wednesday and Friday) as per her bed bath and shower schedule. 2. The facility failed to address Resident#1's refusal to have her hair washed with FM on 3/6/2024. These failures could place Residents at risk for skin breakdown, infection, and loss of self-esteem. Findings Included: Record review of the undated Face Sheet for Resident#1 revealed, a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of apraxia (a motor speech disorder that makes it hard to speak), hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body), Cerebrovascular Disease (a group of conditions that affect the blood vessels of the brain, usually caused by having a stroke), Contracture (condition of hardening of the muscles, tendons or other tissue, often leading to deformity and rigidity of joints), Dysphagia following cerebral infarction (swallowing disorder caused by a stroke). Record Review of a Comprehensive MDS dated [DATE] for Resident #1, revealed she had a BIMS score of 3, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. Her functional abilities reflected she required substantial/maximal assistance for bed baths and showers. Record Review of the Care plan dated 6/29/2016 for Resident #1 revealed, she requires total assistance, by two staff, with showering as scheduled and as necessary; staff must anticipate and meet needs as she has a communication problem r/t aphasia (loss of ability to understand or express speech, caused by brain damage). Record Review of the Care plan meeting held on 3/6/2024 at 11:50am, by the SW, with the FM in the facility revealed discussion of code status, orders and plan of care; however, the meeting did not mention a concern with Resident #1 refusing to have her hair combed, matted hair or any need for a professional beautician. Record Review of the April 2024 ADL Schedule revealed Resident#1 received showers and/or bed baths Monday, Wednesday and Friday on the 2pm - 10pm shift. Record review of a facility shower schedule revealed Resident #1 was scheduled to receive a shower three times a week on Monday, Wednesday and Friday on the 2PM -10PM shift. Record Review of the PCC (electronic health record used to document information on each resident) notes for Resident#1 and dated 4/18/2024 at 3:37p) for a Change of Condition revealed, the Red Abrasion to back of scalp began on 4/18/2024. The NP was notified and new orders for clean site, apply Vaseline, LOTA Have TX Nurse Assess. Record review of Resident#1's physician's order dated 6/24/2016 revealed, Resident#1 had an order dated 4/18/2024 at 6:00pm to cleanse abrasion to back of scalp with wc; and on 4/19/2024 at 9:00am to cleanse abrasion to back of scalp w/ wc/pat dry, apply Vaseline, LOTA one time a day for abrasion until 4/19/2024 at 11:59pm. Record Review of PCC revealed, the wound care doctor rounded, assessed denuded (irritation) to the sacral area, new order to cleanse with normal saline/wound cleanser, pat dry, apply calcium alginate to wound bed, cover with bordered foam dressing daily and prn soiled or dislodged, well noted, order followed through, well tolerated. The FM was called to be updated on new orders, no response. Unable to leave a message due to no voicemail set up. During observation and on 4/24/2024 at 12:40pm, Resident#1 was laying in her bed and had a satin hair scarf. The Wound Nurse removed the scarf and Resident#1's hairstyle was in cornrows (braids). A small area on the back of her head was not braided. Unable to observe the open wounds on the scalp. Wound Nurse stated that Resident #1's scalp had an abrasion that appeared like someone may have scratched the back of her head in that area. During an interview on 4/24/2024 at 3:30pm with CNA A, revealed she has been caring for Resident#1 for some time now. She stated Resident #1 always scream; however, she can tell if the screams are for pain or other attention. She stated the Resident#1 is in a lot of pain due to her legs. She states both legs are contracted and sometimes it's difficult giving her a bath or shower and not being in pain. She states the resident can say yes or no. She states if the residents seem to be in a lot of pain and it is off the time of the medication schedule, she will contact the charge nurse. CNA A states she does comb resident's hair during bed baths; however, because her neck is stiff, she is unable to get to the bottom part of the back of her head. She states when she noticed the hair beginning to get matted at the back, she told the resident's FM to see if there may be someone, he knew that could come and do her hair. She stated when she returned to work after 2 days off, the resident hair was braided. In an interview on 4/24/2024 at 3:40pm interview with the Beautician revealed, on Saturday 4/13/2024 the FM came to the salon and said Resident #1 needed her hair done because her hair looked like it was matted. She told him she would be back at the facility on Thursday 4/18/2024 and would do her hair then. On 4/18/24 she did Resident#1's hair, which was extremely dirty and matted. In her professional opinion, the Beautician stated Resident #1's hair appeared it had not been combed or washed over a period time. She stated based on how dirty the Resident #1's hair was, in her professional opinion, it appeared her hair had not been washed in at least 3-4 months. It was completely matted to the hair tie on the back of her head used to maintain a ponytail. The Beautician further revealed the FM's were in the facility and she summoned them into the beauty shop where she informed them that Resident #1's hair would have to be cut because it was matted. She was given permission to do so. Afterwards, she began to wash her hair and observed Resident#1 crying and screaming. The Beautician stopped washing her hair and looked closer at her scalp. At that time, she observed the open wounds on the scalp. She stated the type of wounds Resident #1 had occurred was a result of her hair not being washed; being matted and the scalp not having air to breath. She stated this could infect the scalp, which is what has happened to the resident over a period. She stated she took a photo of it while the family was there. She stated the FM observed the same thing. She stated she sent the photo to the staff over the activity department. The Beautician also revealed she has a double State of Texas License, one as an instructor for cosmetology students and the other as a actual beautician. She states she has over 20 years in the hair care industry. In an Interview on 4/25/2024 at 11:20am with CNA B, he stated he has cared for Resident#1 for the 8 months he has worked in this facility. CNA B observed a rubber band in the back of Resident #1's hair, which is where her hair is matted. He has tried combing her hair, but it would be tangled, and Resident #1 would be in pain so he would stop. CNA B indicated he did not know why her hair was matted but it just got tangled up. In an Interview on 4/25/2024 at 1:40pm with the ADON it was revealed, she was aware of the issue with Resident#1's head. She stated the Activity Director informed her the resident had something in her head that the Beautician had found. The ADON stated she went to Resident #1's room and observed a round red area in the back of her scalp much like the scalp had been irritated. It did not have any depth to it or draining. The ADON believes the scalp was irritated because Resident #1 did not like her hair to be combed and as a result the scalp became irritated. The ADON stated she notified the NP and she gave an order to clean it and apply Vaseline and let the treatment nurse assess it. She stated she tried to call family member. Stated the FM were there; however, she never spoke with them. She stated she has never documented a resident not allowing staff to comb their hair. She Stated it should be care planned because it is more often than not that staff is allowed to comb her hair. The ADON stated Resident #1 receives her baths on Monday, Wednesday and Friday. She stated Resident #1 has refused bathing on occasion. When that happens, the CNAs are required to tell the nurses and the nurse should go in and speak with the resident. The ADON stated the hair washing and combing is a part of the bed bath and shower schedule; however, if a resident refused any part (ex., oral care or hair care) of the ADL there is no documentation. Interviewed on 4/25/2024 at 2:00pm with the DON, it was revealed she is aware of Resident #1's hair being matted. She believed it is matted because the Resident#1 will not allow the CNAs to comb her hair in the back. She stated it is not a wound, it was not open nor was it draining. She stated if it was a wound, then there would have been an order for triple biotics. She stated it appeared to only be an abrasion; it was not a wound and it is no longer on her scalp. She further stated the CNAs have tried to get the FM to pay for a beautician on previous occasions, but he just ignored the request. She states there is no documentation from staff regarding conversations with the FM regarding Resident #1's hair. She stated that washing hair is part of a CNA's responsibility when they give showers and some bed baths. The DON revealed, Vaseline was appropriate for Resident #1 because the skin on her scalp was not open. Stated she went to see Resident #1's head and there wasn't anything there. She stated Resident #1 was seen by the Wound Nurse as well. In a telephone interview on 4/26/24 at 12:40pm with Resident #1's PCP, it was revealed she was not notified of an issue with her head, so she did not complete an examination of head/scalp area. The PCP states Resident#1's health was on the decline, so she visits her weekly. In an interview with FM on 4/29/2024 at 11:52AM, FM stated he took the initiative to find a beautician for Resident #1's hair because it was matted and didn't look like it had been washed. During a telephone interview on 4/26/24 at 12:59pm with the NP revealed she received a call from the ADON regarding Resident#1's scalp but did not receive any pictures. She stated she was informed that Resident #1's scalp in the back was slightly red and there were no open wounds/open areas. Because there were no open wounds, she stated she may have told the ADON to put Vaseline on the area on the back of the head but can't recall saying anything about Vaseline. The NP stated if she was advised of any skin tear, small or large, she would have advised the ADON to apply an anti-biotic cream/ointment and not Vaseline. A record review of Resident #1's bed bath and shower schedule dated 3/27/2024 through 4/24/2024, revealed she received her bed bath and shower three times per week as per schedule and there are no indications of refusals. A record review of the facility's ADL policy dated 5/26/2023 revealed, care services of bathing, dressing, and oral care. A resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living will receive the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene.
Feb 2024 4 deficiencies 3 IJ
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Abbreviations: ADMIN - Administrator ADON-Assistant Director of Nursing AS-Agency Staff BIMS-Brief Interview for Mental Status ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Abbreviations: ADMIN - Administrator ADON-Assistant Director of Nursing AS-Agency Staff BIMS-Brief Interview for Mental Status MA- Medical Aides CNA-Certified Nursing Assistant CR-Closed Record CW-Confidential Witness DON - Director of Nursing DORC - Director of Resident Care ED - Executive Director ERN - emergency room Nurse EMS-Emergency Medical Services EMT-Emergency Medical Technician FM-Family Member HHSC-Health and Human Services Commission IJ-Immediate Jeopardy IT-Immediate Threat LE-Law Enforcement LVN-Licensed Vocational Nurse PD- Police Dept MD-Medical Doctor MT - Resident Med Tech NP- Nurse Practitioner R-Resident RA-Resident Assistant RN-Registered Nurse RP-Responsible Party Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse for 1 resident (CR#1) of 5 residents reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to ensure each resident was free from abuse when CR#1 was physically abused by CNA C on 2/20/2024 around 6:30am, which was the time CNA A started her morning shift and observed the bruising to CR#1's face. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on 02/25/2024 at 5:23 p.m. While the IJ was removed on 02/27/2024 at 6:00pm, the facility remained out of compliance at the severity level of no actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy with a scope identified as isolated due to the facility's need to evaluate the effectiveness of the corrective systems. These failures placed residents at risk of physical harm, emotional distress, mental anguish and death from possible abuse and neglect. Findings Include: Record review of CR#1's face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old female who was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted [DATE]. CR#1 has a diagnosis of Anoxic Brain Damage (lack of oxygen to the brain causing death of brain cells), Type 2 diabetes mellitus hypoglycemia w/o coma (low blood sugar levels), hypertension (high blood pressure), dysphagia (difficult swallowing), major depression disorder (low or depressed mood), chronic kidney disease (damaged kidneys and/or loss of kidney function), cognitive communication deficit (difficulty thinking and using language), anxiety disorder (pounding heart and sweating when responding to certain situations), dementia (impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions that interferes with doing everyday activities). Record review of CR#1's MDS assessment dated [DATE], revealed a BIMS score of 4 (severe cognitive impairment). Cognitive skills for daily decision making further revealed, resident can repeat at least three words heard, resident is able to recall prior questions after cueing, resident does not have any psychosis behaviors, which includes physical behaviors, verbal behavior, or any other behavior symptoms directed at others and the resident was able to participate in an activity preference interview of her interest while in the facility. Record Review of the Progress Notes for CR#1: There was only one progress note entered since 1/3/2024 and that was on 2/21/2024 at 16:17 (4:17pm), which was titled Admin Note and stated the Administrator notified FM of the HHSC investigation on 2/21/2024 with allegations of abuse. Record review of CR#1's care plan updated 03/31/2022 revealed, the resident has a communication problem r/t expressive Aphasia, Hearing deficit, Neurological symptoms. The goal was the resident will maintain current level of communication function by making sound, using appropriate gestures, responding to yes/no questions appropriately through the review date. The interventions are to allow adequate time to respond, repeat as necessary, do not rush, request clarification from the resident to ensure understanding, face when speaking, make eye contact. Ask yes/no questions if appropriate, use simple, brief, consistent words/cues, use alternative communication tools as needed. Resident is a one (1) person total assist and two (2) person transfer using a mechanical lift. Further review of Resident #1's care plan updated revealed no documentation regarding the facial injuries on 2/21/2024 or any plan initiated to keep her safe while in the facility going forward. Record Review of CR#1's orders dated 2/1/2024 - 2/29/2024 revealed calcium tablet-1 tablet by mouth for type 2 diabetes (last taken 2/21/24 at 2000 (8PM) hours); magnesium oxide (last taken 2/22/2024 at 0730 (7:30AM); sertraline (1 tablet daily for anxiety); vitamin D2 (1 tablet daily); Coreg oral tablet by mouth one time daily (hold if <110HR<60); Depakote capsule 2 times daily); Janumet oral tablet two times daily for mood disorder. Hold if drowsy; Janumet oral tablet by mouth two times daily (d/c date 2/6/2024); refresh tears solution (carboxymethylcellulose sodium) instilled one drop in both eyes two times a day for dry eye syndrome (start date 6/30/2022 1700 (5PM)). -The orders reflected a code 7 at 1700 hours, indicating the resident is sleeping and see progress notes (FM observed nurse putting eye drops in CR#1's eyes when she arrived during this time); Lorazepam 1 tablet by mouth three times daily; Accucheck one time a day related to diabetes (notify MD if bs <70 or >250); monitor vital signs every two weeks one time a day every 2 weeks on Mondays for Health monitoring (start 2/19/2024); Behavior monitoring for antianxiety from 2/1/2024 until 2/21/2024 reflected a code of 0, indicating CR#1 did not have any behaviors noted during all shifts; Behavior monitoring for antidepressants from 2/1/2024 until 2/21/2024 reflected a code of 0, indicating CR#1 did not have any behaviors noted during all shifts. Behavior monitoring for antipsychotic from 2/1/2024 until 2/21/2024 reflected a code of 0, indicating CR#1 did not have any behaviors noted during all shifts and on 2/21/24; Behavior monitoring for Busplrone (anxiolytic medication to treat anxiety) from 2/1/2024 until 2/21/2024 reflected a code of 0, indicating CR#1 received a 1, which indicated mania (mental health marked by periods of great excitement or euphoria, delusions and overactivity); in the EVE2 and a 6-grandiosity (unrealistic sense of superiority in which someone believes themselves to be unique and better than others) in the NOC1; Assess pain on each shift; monitoring antianxiety received a 1 and 6 on 2/21/24; Monitoring side effects for antidepressants codes indicated none, but on 2/21/24 there is a 1 in evening and 6 NOC 1 Record Review of R#2's MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed, BIMS score of 8 (moderate cognitive impairment). Cognitive skills for daily decision making further revealed, resident can repeat at least three words heard after first attempt, was accurate when asked about the current month, resident is able to recall prior questions after cueing, able to recall a color without cueing. Resident has no symptoms of delirium, she is attentive, organized thinking and has a level of consciousness, resident has no symptoms of feeling down, depressed or hopeless; resident has no indicators of psychosis, hallucinations or delusions; Resident's active diagnoses are progressive neurological conditions, hypertension, anxiety disorder, depression (other than bipolar), psychotic disorder (other than schizophrenia). Record Review of R#2's psychological progress note dated 2/10/2024 revealed, improved coping. No issues. Record Review of R#2's psychological progress note dated 2/20/2024 revealed no change in mental status, specifically stressor or changes in mental status that may affect functioning. Noted during psychotherapy were improved coping skills, adjustment to illness-decline-loss. Resident noted she is hopeful that her family member will be taking her home soon, which she is looking forward to. No issues. The clinician will follow up with patient in 1-2 weeks to continue to address client's symptoms. Record Review of R#2's psychological progress note dated 2/26/2024 revealed, client's BIMS score was reduced from 8 to 4 (indicating cognitive decline); client reported year as 2020, could only recall 0 of the 3 words. Clinician explored with client what happened to her roommate, which client didn't want to discuss, but stated she has already told it too many times. Stated resident stated the night before she found out her roommate had a black eye, she heard the CNA C changing the roommate and heard a scuffle and the roommate said no and stop. She further stated she did not see anything and did not hear anyone being hit. Client stated she was shocked to learn her roommate had an injury the next day. States client was tearful and spoke of her roommate not coming back and that she will miss her as they were together for a long time. Record Review of L.E. report dated 2/21/2024 from PD. According to the police report, based on the age of the resident and the injury, Adult Protective Services was contacted. The report indicated that the resident did not inform the officers of the nature of her injuries but did report she had been assaulted to the EMS personnel. Record Review of EMS report FB. According to the EMS report, they arrived at the facility on 2/21/2024 at 10:34am. CR#1 was noted to have a periorbital hematoma to the right eye. CR#1 was noted to be warm to the touch. According to the EMS responder, R#2 mentioned, that yesterday evening CR#1 was yelling and she assumed that she was being changed as she usually yells when being changed. The EMS responder stated, CR#1 stated she was hit when he asked her what happened. She further states she was hit by a staff after he asked her if she was hit by another patient or staff. CR#1 was transported, non-emergency, to hospital. EMS Responder stated during transport he took her vitals and the right pupil was noted to be 2mm and the left pupil 4mm. Record Review of Progress note created on 2/21/2024 at 13:46 (1:36pm), effective 2/21/2024 at 10:41am revealed, CR#1 transferred to hospital for evaluation and CT scan per FM request. Resident left the facility via stretcher and two EMT in stable condition. On 2/22/2024 at 10:53am Interview with R#2 - Stated she was the room mate of CR#1. She stated she was in the room with CR#1 when CNA C came in the room to change them both. She stated she was changed first. She stated she heard CR#1 scream and tell CNA C that she was hurting her. She stated CR#1 continued to say, stop, stop you're hurting me. She stated the CNA C responded, Just be quiet its all your imagination! CR#2 stated that prior to Tuesday 2/20/2024, CR#1 did not have those bruises. She stated she was afraid that something may happen to her. She stated CR#1s FM came to the facility yesterday, 2/20/2024 and when she entered the room she asked R#2 if she had seen what happened to CR#1. At that time R#2 stated she was able to look at CR#1 face and saw those horrible bruises. According to R#2, this incident occurred the morning on 2/20/2024. She stated that the CNA comes in to change them right before her shift ends. She further stated that the morning shift CNA comes in to check and change both, CR#1 and R#2, at the beginning of their shift. She reiterated that the CNA that she heard CR#1 screaming at was the lady whose shift was ending. This, according to R#2 was the night shift CNA (CNA C). Observation and attempted interview with CR#1 on 02/22/2024 at 12:50 p.m. while in the hospital, revealed she was in bed eating lunch. CR #1 briefly looked up but she did not respond to any questions. The redness under CR#2's right eye was not as profound as the photos shown the day of FM's observation in the facility. The bruising on her right jaw still had a discoloration, while mild, still noticeable. Hospital Nursing staff came into to the room to change her and when they asked her to turn toward them, she responded by doing what they asked. On 02/22/2024 at 1:00p.m. 2/22/24 at 12:30pm- Interview with LE. stated he arrived at the facility on 2/21/2024 at 8:50am. and met with FM, another family member and CR #1. He stated FM requested for CR#1 to be transported to ER. He stated during the time of gathering information from all involved, the EMS worker informed him the resident stated she was assaulted. He stated when he questioned resident, she would not respond to him. He further stated that he spoke to the DON Wednesday, yesterday, after being contacted by the resident's family member. He stated that the timeline was on Friday the FM saw the resident and she had no bruises and when she arrived on Tuesday evening, the resident had bruises. On 2/22/24 at 1:00pm Interview with FM - FM stated she visited CR#1 on Friday 2/16/24, 4:00pm - 4:30pm and left that evening around 7:30pm and CR#1 had no bruises. She stated she returned Tuesday 2/20/24, between 5:00pm - 5:30pm and CR#1 was in the cafeteria. She stated at this time she noticed CR#1's bruised eye. She stated she left the cafeteria area and went into the ADON's office to inquire about what happened to CR#1 face. She stated both ADON's (A & B) were in the office. She stated she told them that CR#1 looked like she has been assaulted. She stated the ADON A responded, Now no one has hit CR#1. She may have hit her head on the wall area. FM felt the ADON A was being condescending, which angered her. FM responded, that analogy is not true and she asked why she wasn't notified CR#1 had marks and bruises on her face. FM stated at this time the ADON B got up and accompanied her to the cafeteria. She stated at that time the CR# 1 was asked who hit her. She stated a male. The ADON B stated at that time that there were no male CNA's working on the night shift. She stated the ADON B continued to tell her CR# 1 may have hit her head on the wall. FM told the ADON B that it was not possible to do that based on how her Geri Chair (padded reclining geriatric chair) was positioned. She stated she asked ADON B again why she was not notified (CR#1) had bruises. FM stated she did not get an answer. FM stated she spoke with the Admin who told her that he was doing an abuse investigation. He stated he did not know about the accusations of abuse or about the resident's eye. The Admin went to get the DON to ask what was going on. She stated the DON began saying CR#1 could be combative and this may be the reason for her injury. FM stated at this time she disagreed with them and left the facility. She stated CR#1 began to cry and beg her not to leave, but she had to leave at that time and made a decision to return in the morning with LE. FM stated she called LE on her way to the facility. FM stated she arrived at the facility on Wednesday 2/21/24, around 8:30am at which time CR# 1 was seated in her geri chair at the nurses' station. FM witnessed a nurse putting eye drops in CR#1s eyes. She spoke with the DON. She stated the DON initially told her that he had no idea and was not notified of the bruising. She stated after she told the DON she had contacted the police, the DON told her she received a photo while she was off of CR#1s eye and she was going to do an investigation. On 2/22/24 at 2:48pm Interview with CW - CW stated that on Monday evening CR #1 was in her room seated in a chair slumped over about to fall out. CW stated that there were two CNA's in another resident's room just talking and laughing. CW stated CW called the CNA's to go help CR#1 and they did. CW stated on Monday CW did not see bruising on CR#1s 's face. CW stated Tuesday morning around 8:30am CW observed the bruising on CR#1s face, her eye was swollen and really red and her jaw was black and blue and swollen going down towards her neck. CW stated the injuries were unbelievable and looked as if someone had beat her up. CW stated CW typically goes into CR#1s room and says hello because CW has gotten an opportunity to meet CR#1's FM and CW has told her CW is there with CW's own FM all the time and CW will check on her CR#1. CW stated each day CW arrives at the facility; CW will go to CR#1s room and kiss her on the forehead and tell her CW is just checking on her. On 2/22/24 at 5:05pm Interview with RN B- stated she works 2-10 shift and is familiar with CR# 1. LVN A stated CR#1's FM spoke to her about the redness around CR# 1's eyes. She stated she did not see anything on the face of CR #1. LVN A said she did not see the bruise prior to the 2/22/2024. She states she saw the redness on CR #1's eye and believes it was on the left eye. On 2/22/2024 at 5:17pm Interview with CNA B - stated she always work 2-10 shift. She did see CR #1 on Monday 2/19/24, and Tuesday 2/20/24, and did not notice any marks or bruises on resident face. She stated she was not assigned to CR #1 but saw her two days ago. CN A B said she did not notice marks or bruises on her face on Tuesday and CR#1 had a red eye. CNA B stated she reported her observation to the nurse in charge, LVN A. CNA B stated CR# 1 has never been combative when she worked with her. CNA B stated, If I see a resident with injury I will report to the nurse in charge. On 2/23/24 at 7:41am Telephone Interview with CNA A - Stated CR#1 was usually trying to fight while changing her, but she just tensed up her body. CNA A stated she was able to change her. CNA A stated she was training CNA L who had just started. CNA A stated she did noticed bruising on CR#1. CNA A stated her eye was swollen, and she believes it was the right eye. Did not ask what happened to her eye. She stated she informed the charge nurse, LVN B. CNA A stated CR#1 never screamed she was being hurt while changing her. She stated the last training on abuse and neglect was 2-3 weeks ago. She said she did not know why she was trained. The in-service was conducted by DON and Abuse coordinator. In an interview with CNA C on 2/23/24 at 4:28am revealed, she worked with CR#1 on Monday evening and did not notice bruises. CNA C said she changed her in the morning. She stated if her face looked like this it would have been noticed. CNA C stated resident does talk a little. She can say what she wants and if she wants to get in her chair and go to the nurse's station. CNA C will take her to the nursing station when she requests throughout her shift. She stated at no time did CR# 1 tell her to stop or she was hurting while changing her. In an interview with RN C on 2/23/24 at 4:58am revealed, he worked the weekend and did see CR# 1. RN C stated he did not observe CR #1 with any marks or bruises on her face. When shown a photo of resident's marks/bruises, RN C stated he has never seen her face like that and if he had he would have been alarmed and written an incident report. On 2/23/24 at 7:52am - Telephone Interview with LVN B - Stated during the earlier morning hours of her shift, 2/20/2024, around breakfast, the CNA A came to her and told her that CR#1's eye was red and swollen. She stated at this time CNA A had pushed CR#1 to the nursing area. She stated she observed the eye to be red and swollen and reported it to the LVN C.She again stated when CNA A told her about CR#1, she was already in her Geri Chair located in the hallway. She looked at CR#1 and then proceeded to speak with LVN C around 9:45am. She stated she attended the nursing morning meeting and told everyone (including both ADON's and Administrator that CR#1's eye appeared red and swollen. On 2/23/24 at 8:35am -Telephone interview with LVN C.- LVN C indicated that on Tuesday, 2/20/24, she was the treatment nurse. She said in the morning between 10 AM and 11 AM, LVN B came to her, while she was documenting on another resident in the office and told her that CR#1's eye was red and somewhat raised. She said that the LVN B was the charge nurse. She stated that she looked at the CR#1s eye while she was seated in her geri chair by the nurse's station. She stated that the eye was a little red but told LVN B to keep observing the eye LVN C stated that her last in-service for abuse and neglect was Wednesday with the Administrator, HR and DON. On 2/23/2024 at 9:50am Interview with Admin - Stated he is the coordinator for abuse and neglect at the facility. Stated on Wednesday, 2/21/24, CR#1's injuries appeared to have gotten worse. On 2/23/24 at 5:58pm Interview with DON. Stated CR#1 went to the hospital on Wednesday 2/21/24. She stated she had not worked on Tuesday 2/20/24, and had no idea what was going on until CR#1's FM came to the facility on 2/21/24 and told her she had called the police. She stated FM told her to look at CR#1's eye. She did. She stated she told FM that she would check on the issues and that she had not been informed of any type of injuries. The DON stated the resident was always rubbing her eyes and this may have caused bruising. FM brought the bruising to her attention and said CR#1 was abused. The DON stated she conducted an in-service for abuse. She stated the resident has a history of taking psychiatric medication because of her behavior problems. She indicated CR#1 has been combative lately. The DON stated the FM requested CR#1 be sent to the hospital, which the facility had no other option but to comply. She stated the bruises may have come from CR#1 vigorously rubbing her eyes. The DON was shown a photo of the CR#1's facial area and she stated the resident's bruises were not there when she left the facility. It was like a scratch when she left the facility. The DON brought in an in-service that was signed by some staff and not by others. She stated she completed the Abuse and Neglect and Exploitation in-service on Wednesday after the FM, brought it to her attention. The DON continued to deny the CR#1's face had those bruises when she left the facility. The DON stated, if FM was so upset about CR#1 why did she leave her on Tuesday? The DON stated if there is suspected abuse, protocol will be to ask all the residents if they feel safe. She stated she would call the police and make an incident report. In an interview with ERN on 2/24/24 at 9:35am. revealed she was the emergency room nurse that evaluated CR#1 upon her arrival by EMS. She stated per EMT, the FM requested that the resident be seen due to possible assault. The EMT said that family found CR# 1with unexplained bruising and the facility was dismissive. ERN stated the EMT further stated CR# 1 told him someone hit her, but there was not a lot of detail. ERN is also forensic interviewer. She stated she spoke with CR#1. She stated when speaking to CR#1, you have to wait and allow her time to process what you are saying for at least 30 seconds. CR#1 was asked her name and she responded accurately. She asked her if she knew where she was (ER) and after about 30 seconds responded in the affirmative and said where (ER) she was. ERN stated she has taken photos of CR#1 and completed a forensic report. She stated HHSC can send in a request and obtain all photos and other pertinent information. ERN stated that in her professional opinion, CR#1's facial injuries are consistent with someone who has been assaulted. Record review of In-service training dated 2/21/2024 by the Admin on Abuse and neglect and exploitation signed by some staff members. Record review of LVN B's timecard reflected she was suspended on 2/24/24. Record review of CNA C's counseling report reflected she was suspended on 2/25/2024. On 02/25/2024 at 5:43pm the Facility's Administrator and DON notified, via telephone, of the Immediate Jeopardy for Abuse (F-600). The Template was signed by the Bus Mgr and MDS. The POR was immediately requested at this time. The following plan of removal was accepted on 2/27/24 at 12:01 p.m. REMOVAL OF IMMEDIATE JEOPARDY On February 25, 2024, the facility was notified by the surveyor, that an immediate jeopardy had been called and the facility needed to submit a Plan of Removal pursuant to Federal and State regulatory requirements. The immediate jeopardy allegations are as follows: F- Tag 600: The resident has the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation. The facility failed to ensure each resident was free from abuse when CR#1 was physically abused by CNA C on 2/20/24 around 6:30am resulting in bruising to CR#1's face. Done for those affected: Resident CR#1 was assessed by licensed nurse on 2/21/2024. MD was notified by licensed nurse on 2/21/2024. Resident CR#1 was transferred to the hospital for evaluation on 2/21/2024 and remains at the hospital. An Allegation of Abuse was reported to HHSC for Resident CR#1 on 2/21/2024. On 2/25/2024, the facility suspended the Certified Nurse Aide who worked with resident CR#1 on the 2/19/2024 10pm to 6am shift, pending investigation. If CNA C is found to be guilty of abusing CR#1, the facility will terminate employment immediately. Identify residents who could be affected: Beginning 2/21/2024, the Facility Social Worker(s) completed 100% of interviews of interviewable residents to assess for potential abuse. Date of completion is 2/23/2024. Findings: No additional concerns were identified. Effective 2/25/2024, Administrator and/or designee notified facility residents of abuse and neglect reporting. Reeducation included who the abuse coordinator is and how to report concerns and/ or allegation of abuse, neglect, mistreatment and/ or misappropriation to facility personnel. Date of completion is 2/26/2024. Effective 2/26/24, Administrator and/or designee notified families via alert media of the facility abuse and neglect reporting process. Reeducation included who the abuse coordinator is and how to report concerns and/ or allegation of abuse, neglect, mistreatment and/ or misappropriation to facility personnel. Date of Completion is 2/26/2024. On 2/23/2024, head to toe assessments were completed by the Licensed Nurse on all residents to identify any signs of injuries of unknown source. All other residents were assessed head to toe by a licensed nurse related to abuse, neglect and mistreatment with no concerns identified. Date of completion is 2/23/2024. Findings: No additional concerns were identified. On 2/23/2024, the DON/designee reviewed the resident progress notes for the last 30 days to ensure concerns related to abuse and neglect were identified and an investigation initiated, and the incident reported to HHSC. Findings: No additional concerns were identified. On 2/23/2024, the DON/ Designee reviewed incident/accidents in the last 30 days to ensure that investigations, timely reporting to HHSC as indicated, and resident assessments to include head to toe assessments were completed. Findings: No additional concerns were identified. Systemic Process: On 2/23/2024, the Regional [NAME] President of Operations reeducated the Administrator (Abuse Coordinator) on Abuse and Neglect and Abuse Policy. Abuse and Neglect and Abuse Policy to include timely Investigation and HHSC Reporting to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse (with or without serious bodily injury); or neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, that result in serious bodily injury are reported immediately, but not later than two hours after the incident occurs or is suspected. Date of Completion is 2/23/2024. -On 2/23/2024, the Administrator/ DON and/ or designee began reeducation to 100% of facility staff on the following: *Abuse and Neglect and Abuse Policy to include timely Investigation and HHSC Reporting to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse (with or without serious bodily injury); or neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, that result in serious bodily injury are reported immediately, but not later than two hours after the incident occurs or is suspected. An incident that does not result in serious bodily injury and involves neglect, exploitation, missing resident, misappropriation, drug theft, fire, emergency situations that pose a threat to resident health and safety, a death under unusual circumstances will be reported immediately, but not later than 24 hours after the incident occurs or is suspected. The Administrator who is the Abuse Prevention Coordinator will be immediately notified for any concerns with Abuse, Neglect and Misappropriation. Date of completion is 2/23/2024. *Resident assessment to include head to toe assessments and documentation with each resident incident/accidents. Date of completion is 2/23/2024. -Effective 2/24/2024, any facility staff on FMLA, Leave of Absence, non-scheduled workday or PTO will be reeducated by the Administrator and/or designee prior to the start of their next scheduled shift. -The facility maintains an onsite Weekend Manager and Nursing Supervisor that conduct rounds and may initiate and address resident incidents and will escalate to the appropriate administrative staff when required. The Administrator who is the Abuse Prevention Coordinator will be immediately notified for any concerns with Abuse, Neglect and Misappropriation. -To monitor, the Director of Nursing/ designee will review the 24-hour report and resident incidents in facility Stand-up Morning Meeting, attended Monday - Friday. 24 Hour Report and resident incidents will be reviewed for potential abuse situations and need for reporting as per HHSC guidelines. Review will also include to ensure investigation, resident assessments to include a head-to-toe assessments were completed and provided. Date of implementation is 2/23/2024. -The Administrator will monitor to ensure new resident incidents are reviewed daily Monday-Friday to ensure concerns are addressed timely and if necessary, reported per HHSC guidelines, investigation was completed, resident assessments were completed and provided. Date of implementation is 2/23/2024. -Administrator/designee will conduct quarterly and as needed on Abuse, Neglect, & Exploitation education to ensure facility staff remains knowledgeable on the identification and reporting of abuse/neglect/exploitation. Date of Implementation is 2/23/2024. -The facility has the Wellsential Ambassador Rounds Program in place where administrative staff is assigned to residents. Staff will round and visit to ensure resident wellness and safety Monday through Friday. Findings will be reported during Morning Stand-up meetings to address and follow up on concerns/grievances. Date of Implementation is 2/23/2024. Monitoring: -An AdHoc (as needed) QAPI meeting was conducted on 2/25/2024, attended by the Administrator, DON, Medical Director and Regional Clinical Specialist to discuss the Immediate Jeopardy concerning F- Tag 600 - the resident has the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation. This includes but is not limited to freedom from corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion and any physical or chemical restraint not required to treat the resident's medical symptoms. Each resident has the right to be free from abuse, neglect and corporal punishment of any type by anyone. Please accept this letter as our plan of removal for the determination of Immediate Jeopardy issued on 2/25/2024. The surveyor confirmed the facility implemented their plan of removal and Monitoring began on 2/26/2024 - 2/27/2024. Residents were interviewed regarding skin assessments, abuse and neglect and reporting. 8 residents interviewed indicated the DON and other nursing staff completed a skin assessment, the social worker spoke with each resident about abuse, [TRUNCATED]
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Abuse Prevention Policies (Tag F0607)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on Interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement abuse and neglect policies and procedures that prohibit ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on Interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement abuse and neglect policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, and exploitation of residents for 1 (CR#1) of 5 residents reviewed for abuse by not implementing their abuse policy to prohibit and prevent abuse by conducting an investigation immediately; thus, failing to protect resident when there is a warranted suspicion of abuse and identifying staff responsible for the investigation. The facility failed to ensure each resident was free from abuse when CR#1 was physically abused by CNA C on 2/20/2024 around 6:30am, which was the time CNA A started her morning shift and observed the bruising to CR#1's face. These failures placed residents at risk of physical harm, emotional distress, mental anguish and death from possible abuse and neglect. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on 02/23/2024 at 5:42 PM. While the IJ was removed on 02/24/2024 at 8:43PM, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy due to the facility's need to evaluate the effectiveness of their corrective actions. Findings Include: Record review of the ANE policy dated 8/12/2024 revealed, it is the policy of this facility to provide protections for the health, welfare and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of resident property. V. Investigation of alleged abuse, neglect and exploitation A. An immediate investigation is warranted when suspicion of abuse, neglect or exploitation, or reports of abuse, neglect or exploitation occur. B. Written procedures for investigations include: 1. Identifying staff responsible for the investigation 2. Exercising caution and handling evidence that could be used in a criminal investigation; I 3. Investigating different types of alleged violations; 4. Identifying and interviewing all involved persons, including the alleged victim, alleged perpetrator, witnesses, and others who might have knowledge of the allegations, 5. focusing the investigation on determining, if abuse, neglect, exploitation, and or mistreatment, has occurred, the extent, and calls; and 6. Providing complete and thorough documentation of the investigation Record Review of CR#1's face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old female who was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted [DATE]. CR#1 has a diagnosis of Anoxic Brain Damage (lack of oxygen to the brain causing death of brain cells), Type 2 diabetes mellitus hypoglycemia w/o coma (low blood sugar levels), hypertension (high blood pressure), dysphagia (difficult swallowing), major depression disorder (low or depressed mood), chronic kidney disease (damaged kidney's and/or loss of kidney function), cognitive communication deficit (difficulty thinking and using language), anxiety disorder (pounding heart and sweating when responding to certain situations), dementia (impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions that interferes with doing everyday activities). Record Review of CR#1's MDS dated [DATE], revealed a BIMS score of 4 (Severe Cognitive Impairment). Cognitive skills for daily decision making further revealed, resident can repeat at least three words heard, resident is able to recall prior questions after cueing, resident does not have any psychosis behaviors, which includes physical behaviors, verbal behavior, or any other behavior symptoms directed at others and the resident was able to participate in an activity preference interview of her interest while in the facility. Record Review of CR#1's care plan updated 03/31/2022 revealed, the resident has a communication problem r/t expressive Aphasia, Hearing deficit, Neurological symptoms. The goal was the resident will maintain current level of communication function by making sound, using appropriated gestures, responding to yes/no questions appropriately through the review date. The interventions are to allow adequate time to respond, repeat as necessary, do not rush, request clarification from the resident to ensure understanding, face when speaking, make eye contact. Ask yes/no questions if appropriate, use simple, brief, consistent words/cues, use alternative communication tools as needed. Resident is a one (1) person total assist and two (2) person transfer using a mechanical lift. Further review of Resident #1's care plan updated revealed no documentation regarding the facial injuries on 2/21/2024 or any plan initiated to keep her safe while in the facility going forward. Record Review of CR#1'sVitals revealed the following: *CR#1's last weight taken was 2/1/2024 at 21:57. She weighed *150.6. *CR#1's last Blood Pressure taken at the following times: 2/19/2024 at 07:02 *133/70 2/19/2024 at 15:44 *129/64 2/20/2024 at 07:43 *132/71 2/20/2024 at 15:21 *122/101 2/21/2024 at 07:05 *130/72 *CR#1's pain levels: 2/19/2024 at 09:05 *0 value 2/21/2024 at 11:12 *0 value *CR#1's Temperature 2/18/2024 at 18:43 *97.6 2/19/2024 at 09:05 *97.6 *CR#1's Head Circumference None noted *CR#1's 02 sats 11/22/2023 10:05 at *96.0% 02/19/2024 09:05 at *97.0 *CR#1's Pulse 2/19/2024 at 07:02 *74 2/19/2024 at 09:05 *78 2/19/2024 at 15:44 *57 2/20/2024 at 07:43 *66 2/20/2024 at 15:21 *65 2/21/2024 at 07:05 *74 *CR#1's Respirations 11/22/2023 10:05 at 18 Breaths/min 02/19/2024 09:05 at 18 Breaths/min *CR#1's Blood Sugar 2/18/2024 110.0 mg/dl 2/19/2024 111.0 mg/dl 2/20/2024 148.0 mg/dl 2/21/2024 130.0 mg/dl Record review of CR#1's orders dated 2/1/2024 - 2/29/2024 revealed, calcium tablet-1 tablet by mouth for type 2 diabetes (last taken 2/21/24 at 2000 hours); magnesium oxide (last taken 2/22/2024 at 0730); sertraline (1 tablet daily for anxiety); vitamin D2 (1 tablet daily); Coreg oral tablet by mouth one time daily (hold if <110HR<60); Depakote capsule02 times daily); Janumet oral tablet9two times daily for mood disorder. Hold if drowsy; Janumet oral tablet by mouth two times daily (d/c date 2/6/2024); refresh tears solution (carboxymethylcellulose sodium) instill one drop in both eyes tow time a day for dry eye syndrome (start dated 6/30/2022 1700) - according to the orders, there is a code 7 at the 1700 hours with initials AMD-Code 7 according to the charts states the resident is sleeping and see progress notes (FM observed nurse putting eye drops in CR#1's eyes when she arrived during this time; Lorazepam 1 tablet by mouth three times daily; Accucheck one time a day related to diabetes (notify MD if bs <70 or >250); monitor vital sign every two weeks one time a day every 2 weeks on Mon for Health monitoring (start 2/19/2024); Behavior monitoring for antianxiety from 2/1/2024 until 2/21/2024 there is a code of 0, which according to staff CR#1 did not have any behaviors noted during all shifts; Behavior monitoring for antidepressants from 2/1/2024 until 2/21/2024 there is a code of 0, which according to staff cR#1 did not have any behaviors noted during all shifts. Behavior monitoring for antipsychotic from 2/1/2024 until 2/21/2024 there is a code of 0, which according to staff CR#1 did not have any behaviors noted during all shifts and on the February 21st; Behavior monitoring for Busplrone (anxiolytic medication to treat anxiety) from 2/1/2024 until 2/21/2024 there is a code of 0, which according to staff CR#1she received a 1-mania (mental health marked by periods of great excitement or euphoria, delusions and overactivity) in the EVE2 and a 6-grandiosity (unrealistic sense of superiority in which someone believes themselves to be unique and better than others) in the NOC1; Assess pain on each shift; monitoring antianxiety received a 1 and 6 on February 21, 2024; Monitoring side effects for antidepressants codes indicated none, but on February 21, 2024 there is a 1 in evening and 6 NOC 1; Record Review of the Progress Notes for CR#1: There was no only one progress note entered since 1/3/2024 and that was on 2/21/2024 at 16:17 (4:17pm), which was titled Admin Note and stated the Administrator notified FM of the HHSC investigation on 2/21/2024 with allegations of abuse. Record Review of R#2 MDS dated [DATE] revealed, BIMS score of 8 (moderate cognitive impaired). Cognitive skills for daily decision making further revealed, resident can repeat at least three words heard after first attempt, was accurate when asked about the current month, resident is able to recall prior questions after cueing, able to recall a color without cueing. Resident has no symptoms of delirium, she is attentive, organized thinking and has a level of consciousness, resident has no symptoms of feeling down, depressed or hopeless; resident has no indicators of psychosis, hallucinations or delusions; Residents active diagnoses is progressive neurological conditions, hypertension, anxiety disorder, depression (other than bipolar), psychotic disorder (other than schizophrenia). Record Review of R#2's psychological progress note dated 2/10/2024 revealed, improved coping. No issues. Record Review of R#2's psychological progress note dated 2/20/2024 revealed no change in mental status, specifically stressor or changes in mental status that may affect functioning. Noted during psychotherapy were improved coping skills, adjustment to illness-decline-loss. Resident noted she is hopeful that her son will be taking her home soon, which she is looking forward to. No issues. The clinician will follow up with patient in 1-2 weeks to continue to address client's symptoms. Record Review of R#2's psychological progress note dated 2/26/2024 revealed, clients BIMS score was reduced from 8 (Moderate Cognitive Impairment) to 4 (Severe Cognitive Impairment); client reported year as 2020, could only recall 0 of the 3 words. Clinician explored with client what happened to her roommate, which client didn't want to discuss, but stated she has already told it too many times. Stated resident stated the night before she found out her roommate had a black eye, she heard the CAN changing the roommate and heard a scuffle and the roommate said no and stop. She further stated she did not see anything and did not hear anyone being hit. Client stated she was shocked to learn her roommate had an injury the next day. States client was tearful and spoke of her roommate not coming back and that she will miss her as they were together for a long time. Record Review of L.E. report dated 2/21/2024 from PD. According to the police report, based on the age of the resident and the injury, Adult Protective Services was contacted (Intake#485517). The report indicated that the resident did not inform the officers of the nature of her injuries but did report she had been assaulted to the EMS #608 personnel. Record Review of EMS report FB. According to the EMS report, they arrived at the facility on 2/21/2024 at 10:34am. CR#1 was noted to have a periorbital hematoma to the right eye. CR#1 was noted to be warm to the touch. According to the EMS responder, R#2 mentioned, that yesterday evening CR#1 was yelling and she assumed that she was being changed as she usually yells when being changed. The EMS responder stated, CR#1 stated she was hit when he asked her what happened. She further states she was hit by a staff after he asked her if she was hit by another patient or staff. CR#1 was transported, non-emergency, to hospital. EMS Responder stated during transport he took her vitals and the right pupil was noted to be 2mm and the left pupil 4mm. On 2/22/2024 at 10:53am Interview with R#2 - Revealed she is the room mate of CR#1. She states she was in the room with CR#1 when CNA C came in the room to change them both. She states she was changed first. She stated she heard CR#1 scream and tell CNA C that she was hurting her. She stated CR#1 continued to say, stop, stop you're hurting me. She stated the CNA C responded, Just be quiet its all your imagination! CR#2 stated that prior to Tuesday 2/20/2024, CR#1 did not have those bruising. She stated she was afraid that something may happen to her. She stated CR#1s FM came to the facility yesterday, 2/20/2024 and when she entered the room she asked R#2 if she had seen what happened to CR#1. At that time R#2 stated she was able to looked at CR#1 face and seen those horrible bruises. I asked R#2 if this incident occurred with the night shift or morning shift? According to R#2, this incident occurred the morning on 2/20/2024. She stated that the CNA comes in to change right before her shift ends. She further stated that the morning shift CNA comes in to check and change both, CR#1 and R#2, at the beginning of their shift. She reiterated that the CNA that she heard CR#1 screaming at was the lady whose shift was ending. This, according to R#2 is the night shift CNA (CNA C). Observation and attempted interview with CR#1 on 02/22/2022 at 12:50 p.m. while in the hospital. CR#1 was in bed eating lunch. CR #1 briefly looked up at me but did not respond to any questions. The redness under CR#1's right eye was not as profound as the photos shown the day of FM observation in the facility. The bruising on her right jaw still had a discoloration, while mild, still noticeable. Hospital Nursing staff came into to the room to change her and when they asked her to turn toward them, she responded by doing what they asked. In an interview with LE on 02/22/2024 at 12:30p.m. revealed he did not want to add anything to his report. He stated he arrived at the facility on 2/21/2024 at 8:50am. and met with FM, her granddaughter and CR #1. He stated FM requested for her sister to be transported to ER. He stated during the time of gathering information from all involved, the EMS worker informed him the resident stated she was assaulted. He stated when he questioned resident, she would not respond to him. He further stated that he spoke to the DON Wednesday, yesterday, after being contacted by the residence sister, Mrs. [NAME]. He stated that the timeline was on Friday the sister seen the resident and she had no bruises and when she arrived on Tuesday evening, the resident had bruises. He stated that he submitted the report to the CID unit who will investigate further. In an interview with FM on 2/22/24 at 1:00pm revealed she visited CR#1 on Friday February 16, 2024, 4:00pm - 4:30pm and left that evening around 7:30pm and CR#1 had no bruises. She states she returned Tuesday February 20, 2024, between 5:00pm - 5:30pm and CR#1 was in the cafeteria. She stated at this time she noticed CR#1s bruised eye. She stated she left the cafeteria area and went into the ADON's office to inquire about what happened to CR#1 face. She stated both ADON's (A & B) were in the office. She stated she told them that CR#1 looked like she has been assaulted. She stated the ADON A responded, Now no one has hit Ms. [NAME]. She may have hit her head on the wall area. FM member felt the ADON A was being condescending, which angered her. FM responded, that analogy is not true and she asked why she wasn't notified her sister had marks and bruises on her face. FM stated at this time the ADON B got up and accompanied her to the cafeteria. She states at that time the CR# 1 was asked who hit her. She stated a male. The ADON B stated at that time that there were no male CNA's working on the night shift. She stated the ADON B continued to tell her CR# 1 may have hit her head on the wall. FM told the ADON B that it was not possible to do that based on how her Geri Chair was positioned. She states she asked ADON B again why she wasn't notified her sister had bruises? FM stated she did not get an answer. FM stated she spoke with the Admin who told her that he was doing an abuse investigation. He stated he did not know about the accusations of abuse or about the residents' eye. The Admin went to get the DON to ask what is going on. She stated the DON began saying CR#1 could be combative and this may be the reason for her injury. FM states at this time she disagreed with them and left the facility. She stated her sister began to cry and beg her not to leave, but she had to leave at that time and made a decision to return in the morning with LE. FM stated she called LE on her way to the facility. FM stated she arrived at the facility on Wednesday February 21, 2024, around 8:30am at which time CR# 1 was seated in her geri chair at the nurses' station. FM witnessed a nurse putting eye drops in CR#1s eyes. She spoke with the DON. She stated the DON initially told her that he had no idea and was not notified of the bruising. She stated after she told the DON she had contacted the police, the DON told her she received a photo while she was off of CR#1s eye and she was going to do an investigation. In an interview with CW on 2/22/24 at 2:48pm revealed on Monday evening (during 2-10 shift) she did not see bruising on CR#1s 's face. She states Tuesday morning around 8:30am she observed the bruising on CR#1s face, her eye was swollen and red and her jaw was black and blue and swollen going down towards her neck. She states the injuries were unbelievable and looked as if someone had beat her up. CW stated she typically goes into CR#1s room and say hello because she has gotten an opportunity to meet FM and she has told her she's there with her own FM all the time and she will check on her CR#1. She states each day she arrives at the facility; she will go to CR#1s room and kiss her on the forehead and tell her she's just checking on her. In an interview with RN B on 2/22/24 at 5:05pm revealed, stated she works 2-10 shift and is familiar with CR# 1. States CR#1's FM spoke to her about the redness around CR# 1's eyes. She stated she did not see anything on the face of CR #1. RN B said she did not see the bruise prior to the 2/22/2024. She states she saw the redness on CR #1's eye and believes it was on the left eye. In an interview with CNA B on 2/22/2024 at 5:17pm revealed, she always work 2-10 shift. She did see CR #1 on Monday February 19, 2024, and Tuesday February 20, 2024 and did not notice and marks or bruises on resident face. She stated she was not assigned to CR #1 but saw her two days ago. Did not notice marks or bruises on her face on Tuesday and CR#1 had a red eye. States she reported her observation to the nurse in charge, RN B. I asked if the CR# 1 was combative when she seen her and she stated CR# 1 has never been combative when she worked with her. When asked what the policy on a change in condition is, CNA B stated, If I see a resident with injury I will report to the nurse in charge. In an interview with CNA A on 2/23/24 at 7:41am revealed, CR#1 was usually trying to fight while changing her, but she just tensed up her body. States she was able to change her. States she was training CNA L who had just started. States she did noticed bruising on CR#1. Stated her eye was swollen, believes it was the right eye. Did not ask what happened to her eye. She states she informed the charge nurse, LVN B. States CR#1 never screamed she was being hurt while changing her. States last training on abuse and neglect was 2-3 weeks ago. She doesn't know why she was trained. The in-service was conducted by DON and Abuse coordinator. In an interview with CNA C on 2/23/24 at 4:28am revealed, she worked with CR#1 on Monday evening and did not notice bruises. Changed her in the morning. States she did not inspect or assess; however, if her face looked like this it would have been noticed. States resident does talk a little. She can say what she wants and if she wants to get in her chair and go to the nurse's station. CNA C will take her to the nursing station when she requests throughout her shift. She stated at no time did CR# 1 tell her to stop or she was hurting while changing her. In an interview with LVN E on 2/23/22 at 4:58am revealed, he worked the weekend and did see CR# 1. States he did not observe CR #1 with any marks or bruises on her face. When shown a photo of resident's marks/bruises, LVN E stated he has never seen her face like that and if he had he would have been alarmed and written an incident report. LVN E was asked if the CNA's complete documentation of what they do for a resident, and he stated yes. I asked if he could show me. RN C attempted to gain access as to what CNA assisted CR #1 and it (point click care in computer) was locked. He stated this is unusual as the nurses have access to what the CNA has completed during their shift. He stated the only person that has access to the computer is the DON. In an interview with LVN B on 2/23/24 at 7:52am revealed, during the earlier morning hours of her shift, 2/20/2024, around breakfast, the CNA A came to her and told her that CR#1's eye was red and swollen. She stated at this time CNA A had pushed CR#1 to the nursing area. She states she observed the eye to be red and swollen and reported it to the LVN C. She stated there was no assessment completed. She stated she did not document in PCC even though she had access. She stated she felt it was enough just to relay the information to the LVN C. LVN B appeared to get agitated with me and began asking me my name and who did I work for. I again identified myself and suggested that she call her DON, who was in the facility, to confirm who she was talking to. I continued my questioning. When asked concerning Change of condition protocol, LVN B stated she is supposed to let her supervisor know concerning the resident and document in PCC. She stated there was not an issue with PCC and she confirmed that she did have access to PCC. She stated there was a lot going on during this time (breakfast, etc.). She again stated when CNA A told her about CR#1, she was already in her Geri Chair located in the hallway. She looked at CR#1 and then proceeded to speak with LVN C around 9:45am. She states she attended the nursing morning meeting and told everyone (both ADON's, Administrator, can't think of the other staff who were in attendance) that CR#1's eye appeared red and swollen. In an interview with LVN C on 2/23/24 at 8:35am revealed on Tuesday, February 20, 2024, she was the treatment nurse. She states she comes in early, and she leaves a little early. She said in the morning between 10 AM and 11 AM, LVN B came to her, while she was documenting on another resident in the office and told her that CR#1 eye was red and somewhat raised. She said that the LVN B was the charge nurse. She stated that she looked at the CR#1s eye while she was seated in her geri chair by the nurse's station. She stated that the eye was a little red but told LVN B to keep observing the eye. She stated that she did not complete any documentation, nor did she complete an assessment and the reason was because she was not the charge nurse. She stated if she was the charge nurse, she would have followed protocol. She states she would have completed a full assessment of the resident then, checking vitals, diagnosis, then call the MD. She states she would have completed the change of condition form and documented doctor's recommendation as per the change of condition policy. LVN C states that her last in-service for abuse and neglect was Wednesday with the Administrator, HR and DON. In an interview with Admin on 2/23/2024 at 9:50am revealed he is the coordinator for abuse and neglect at the facility. Stated on Wednesday, February 21, 2024, CR#1 injuries appeared to have gotten worse and at this time he instituted a facility investigation report and filed with health and human services. Administrator stated he is not done with his investigation, but he has begun to interview residents in the same hallway (100) as CR #1 resided by asking them if they felt safe in the facility if they were ever threatened by staff or other residents and if they were ever assaulted or misused. He stated CNA A Followed protocol when she informed LVN B of the change and condition. He states that the issue here appears to be a breakdown in communications and that there should have been more detailed documentation. States that there should've been an appropriate assessment of the resident and an incident report should have been filed. He stated he wasn't given the 5 days to complete the Provider Investigation. In an interview with DON on 2/23/24 at 5:58pm revealed, CR#1 went to the hospital on Wednesday February 21, 2024. She stated she had not worked on Tuesday February 20, 2024, and had no idea what was going on until Ms. [NAME] came to the facility on February 21, 2024 and told her she had called the police. She stated FM told her to look at CR#1's eye. She did. She states she told Ms. [NAME] that she would check on the issues that she had not been informed of any type of injuries. The DON states the resident was always rubbing her eyes and this may have caused bruising. Ms. [NAME] brought the bruising to her attention and said her sister was abused. The DON stated she told Ms. [NAME] she was going to do an investigation, but that was too late because she has already called police. The DON stated the nurse practitioner checked the resident on Tuesday 2/20/24 morning and documented. I indicated that the documentation from the NP is not in PCC. The DON indicated she must not have uploaded her notes yet. The DON stated she conducted an in-service for abuse. Stated the resident has a history of psych medication because of her behavior problem. The DON indicated that resident was on psych meds and the facility was trying to reduce the medication. She indicated CR#1 has been combative lately but could not give any reason why this behavior hasn't been documented by nursing staff in PCC. The DON stated the FM requested CR#1 be sent to the hospital, which the facility had no other option but to comply. She stated the bruises may have come from CR#1 vigorously rubbing her eyes. The DON was shown a photo of the CR#1 facial area and she stated the resident bruises were not there when she left the facility. It was like a scratch when she left the facility. The DON brought in an in-service that was signed by some staff and not by others. She stated she completed the Abuse and Neglect and Exploitation on Wednesday after the FM, brought it to her attention. The DON continued to deny the CR#1s face had those bruises when she left the facility. During the conversation, the DON became angry and stated, if FM was so upset about CR#1 why did she leave her on Tuesday? I replied, I don't know that is a question that only FM could answer. The DON stated if there is suspected abuse, protocol will be to ask all the residents if they feel safe. She stated she would call the police and make an incident report. In a telephone interview with ERN on 2/24/24 at 9:35am. revealed she was the emergency room nurse that evaluated CR#1 upon her arrival by EMS. She states per EMT, the FM requested that the resident be seen due to possible assault. The EMT said that family found CR# 1with unexplained bruising and the facility was dismissive. ERN stated the EMT further stated CR# 1 told him someone hit her, but there was not a lot of detail. ERN is also forensic interviewer. She stated she spoke with CR#1. She stated when speaking to CR#1, you have to wait and allow her time to process what you are saying for at least 30 seconds. CR#1 was asked her name and she responded accurately. She asked her if she knew where she was (ER) and after about 30 seconds responded in the affirmative and said where (ER)she was. ERRN stated she has taken photos of CR#1 and completed a forensic report. She stated HHSC can send in a request and obtain all photos and other pertinent information. ERN stated that in her professional opinion, CR#1's facial injuries are consistent with someone who has been assaulted. On 2/29/2024 at 2:15pm an interview with ADON A revealed, FM was in her office. The FM asked what was going on with CR#1 eye. ADON A stated she told her that it could have been from FM leaning on rail from GERI Chair. ADON A stated ADON B walked in the office and told FM that he's responsible for the 100 hall. When asked what the protocol is when issues arise with residents having unknown injuries, the ADON A stated usually the charge nurse document in PCC and call the FM or RP. Depending how serious, the charge nurse will notify ADON, DON, Admin. On 2/29/2024 at 2:19pm an interview with ADON B revealed, FM was in the office on 2/20/2024 talking to ADON A, as he was entering the office. At this time, he stated ADON A introduced him to FM. Stated FM told him she did not believe CR#1's injury was from the rail. FM accompanied ADON B to CR# 1's room and showed the halo. The halo enabler is used for resident to pull herself up and reposition. FM suggested may be her sister laid her face on the halo enabler and that caused injury. ADON B stated the FM was not upset. On 02/23/2024 at 5:42pm the Facility's Administrator and DON notified of the Immediate Jeopardy for Abuse (F-607). The Template was signed.and the POR was immediately requested at this time. REMOVAL OF IMMEDIATE JEOPARDY On February 23, 2024, the facility was notified by the surveyor, that an immediate jeopardy had been called and the facility needed to submit a Plan of Removal pursuant to Federal and State regulatory requirements. The immediate jeopardy allegations are as follows: F- Tag 607: The facility must develop and implement written policies and procedures that: Prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, and exploitation of residents a misappropriation of resident property, of residents and misappropriation of resident property Done for those affected: Resident CR#1 was assessed by licensed nurse on 2/21/2024. MD was notified by licensed nurse on 2/21/2024. Resident CR#1 was transferred to the hospital for evaluation on 2/21/2024 and remains at the hospital. An Allegation of Abuse was reported to HHSC for Resident CR#1 on 2/21/2024. Identify residents who could be affected: Beginning 2/21/2024, the Facility Social Worker(s) completed 100% of interviews of interviewable residents to assess for potential abuse. Date of completion is 2/23/2024. Findings: No additional concerns were identified. On 2/23/2024, head to toe assessments were completed by the Licensed Nurse on all residents to identify any signs of injuries of unknown source. All other residents were assessed head to toe by a licensed nurse related to abuse, neglect and mistreatment with no concerns identified. Date of completion is 2/23/2024. Findings: No additional concerns were identified. On 2/23/2024, the DON/designee reviewed the resident progress notes for the last 30 days to ensure concerns related to abuse and neglect were identified and an investigation initiated, and the incident reported to HHSC. Findings: No additional concerns were identified. On 2/23/2024, the DON/ Designee reviewed incident/accidents in the last 30 days to ensure that investigations, timely reporting to HHSC as indicated, and resident assessments to include head to toe assessments were completed. Findings: No additional concerns were identified. Systemic Process: On 2/23/2024, the Regional [NAME] President of Operations reeducated the Administrator (Abuse Coordinator) on Abuse and Neglect and Abuse Policy. Abuse and Neglect and Abuse Policy to include timely Investigation and HHSC Reporting to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse (w[TRUNCATED]
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Investigate Abuse (Tag F0610)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to have evidence that all alleged violations of abuse we...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to have evidence that all alleged violations of abuse were thoroughly investigated, to prevent further potential abuse or mistreatment while the investigation was in progress, and report the result of all investigations to other officials in accordance with State law, including to the State Survey Agency within 5 working days of the incident for 1 of 5 residents (CR #1) reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to complete the investigation of the allegation of abuse, report the results of the investigation to HHSC within 5 days, and prevent further potential abuse while the investigation was in progress when CR #1 was found with suspicious injuries of unknown origin. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on 02/26/2024 at 1:48pm. While the IJ was lowered on 02/27/2024 at 6:00pm, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy due to the facility's need to evaluate the effectiveness of their corrective actions. These failures placed resident(s) involved in abuse incidents at risk of continued abuse, mistreatment, further injury, pain and physical and emotional distress contributing to further serious injuries. Findings Include: Record review of CR#1's undated face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old female who was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted [DATE]. CR#1 has a diagnosis of Anoxic Brain Damage (lack of oxygen to the brain causing death of brain cells), Type 2 diabetes mellitus hypoglycemia w/o coma (low blood sugar levels), hypertension (high blood pressure), dysphagia (difficult swallowing), major depression disorder (low or depressed mood), chronic kidney disease (damaged kidneys and/or loss of kidney function), cognitive communication deficit (difficulty thinking and using language), anxiety disorder (pounding heart and sweating when responding to certain situations), dementia (impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions that interferes with doing everyday activities). Record review of CR#1's MDS assessment dated [DATE], revealed a BIMS score of 4 (severe cognitive impairment). Cognitive skills for daily decision making further revealed, resident can repeat at least three words heard, resident is able to recall prior questions after cueing, resident does not have any psychosis behaviors, which includes physical behaviors, verbal behavior, or any other behavior symptoms directed at others and the resident was able to participate in an activity preference interview of her interest while in the facility. Record review of CR#1's care plan updated 03/31/2022 revealed, the resident has a communication problem r/t expressive Aphasia, Hearing deficit, Neurological symptoms. The goal was the resident will maintain current level of communication function by making sound, using appropriate gestures, responding to yes/no questions appropriately through the review date. The interventions are to allow adequate time to respond, repeat as necessary, do not rush, request clarification from the resident to ensure understanding, face when speaking, make eye contact. Ask yes/no questions if appropriate, use simple, brief, consistent words/cues, use alternative communication tools as needed. Resident is a one (1) person total assist and two (2) person transfer using a mechanical lift. Further review of Resident #1's care plan updated revealed no documentation regarding the facial injuries on 2/21/2024 or any plan initiated to keep her safe while in the facility going forward. Record Review of CR#1's orders dated 2/1/2024 - 2/29/2024 revealed calcium tablet-1 tablet by mouth for type 2 diabetes (last taken 2/21/24 at 2000 (8PM) hours); magnesium oxide (last taken 2/22/2024 at 0730 (7:30AM); sertraline (1 tablet daily for anxiety); vitamin D2 (1 tablet daily); Coreg oral tablet by mouth one time daily (hold if <110HR<60); Depakote capsule 2 times daily); Janumet oral tablet two times daily for mood disorder. Hold if drowsy; Janumet oral tablet by mouth two times daily (d/c date 2/6/2024); refresh tears solution (carboxymethylcellulose sodium) instill one drop in both eyes two times a day for dry eye syndrome (start date 6/30/2022 1700 (5PM)). -The orders reflected a code 7 at 1700 hours, indicating the resident is sleeping and see progress notes (FM observed nurse putting eye drops in CR#1's eyes when she arrived during this time); Lorazepam 1 tablet by mouth three times daily; Accucheck one time a day related to diabetes (notify MD if bs <70 or >250); monitor vital signs every two weeks one time a day every 2 weeks on Mondays for Health monitoring (start 2/19/2024); Behavior monitoring for antianxiety from 2/1/2024 until 2/21/2024 reflected a code of 0, indicating CR#1 did not have any behaviors noted during all shifts; Behavior monitoring for antidepressants from 2/1/2024 until 2/21/2024 reflected a code of 0, indicating CR#1 did not have any behaviors noted during all shifts. Behavior monitoring for antipsychotic from 2/1/2024 until 2/21/2024 reflected a code of 0, indicating CR#1 did not have any behaviors noted during all shifts and on 2/21/24; Behavior monitoring for Busplrone (anxiolytic medication to treat anxiety) from 2/1/2024 until 2/21/2024 reflected a code of 0, indicating CR#1 received a 1, which indicated mania (mental health marked by periods of great excitement or euphoria, delusions and overactivity); in the EVE2 and a 6-grandiosity (unrealistic sense of superiority in which someone believes themselves to be unique and better than others) in the NOC1; Assess pain on each shift; monitoring antianxiety received a 1 and 6 on 2/21/24; Monitoring side effects for antidepressants codes indicated none, but on 2/21/24 there is a 1 in evening and 6 NOC 1 Record Review of the Progress Notes for CR#1: There was no only one progress note entered since 1/3/2024 and that was on 2/21/2024 at 16:17 (4:17pm), which was titled Admin Note and stated the Administrator notified FM of the HHSC investigation on 2/21/2024 with allegations of abuse. Record Review of R#2's MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed, BIMS score of 8 (moderate cognitive impairment). Cognitive skills for daily decision making further revealed, resident can repeat at least three words heard after first attempt, was accurate when asked about the current month, resident is able to recall prior questions after cueing, able to recall a color without cueing. Resident has no symptoms of delirium, she is attentive, organized thinking and has a level of consciousness, resident has no symptoms of feeling down, depressed or hopeless; resident has no indicators of psychosis, hallucinations or delusions; Resident's active diagnoses are progressive neurological conditions, hypertension, anxiety disorder, depression (other than bipolar), psychotic disorder (other than schizophrenia). Record Review of R#2's psychological progress note dated 2/10/2024 revealed, improved coping. No issues. Record Review of R#2's psychological progress note dated 2/20/2024 revealed no change in mental status, specifically stressor or changes in mental status that may affect functioning. Noted during psychotherapy were improved coping skills, adjustment to illness-decline-loss. Resident noted she is hopeful that her family member will be taking her home soon, which she is looking forward to. No issues. The clinician will follow up with patient in 1-2 weeks to continue to address client's symptoms. Record Review of R#2's psychological progress note dated 2/26/2024 revealed, client's BIMS score was reduced from 8 to 4 (indicating cognitive decline); client reported year as 2020, could only recall 0 of the 3 words. Clinician explored with client what happened to her roommate, which client didn't want to discuss, but stated she has already told it too many times. Stated resident stated the night before she found out her roommate had a black eye, she heard the CNA C changing the roommate and heard a scuffle and the roommate said no and stop. She further stated she did not see anything and did not hear anyone being hit. Client stated she was shocked to learn her roommate had an injury the next day. States client was tearful and spoke of her roommate not coming back and that she will miss her as they were together for a long time. Record Review of L.E. report dated 2/21/2024 from PD. According to the police report, based on the age of the resident and the injury, Adult Protective Services was contacted. The report indicated that the resident did not inform the officers of the nature of her injuries but did report she had been assaulted to the EMS personnel. Record Review of CNA C's timesheet reveal she last worked on 02/22/2024 9:46pm - 6:32am hours. She was suspended on 2/25/2024. On 2/22/2024 at 10:53am Interview with R#2 - Stated she was the room mate of CR#1. She stated she was in the room with CR#1 when CNA C came in the room to change them both. She stated she was changed first. She stated she heard CR#1 scream and tell CNA C that she was hurting her. She stated CR#1 continued to say, stop, stop you're hurting me. She stated the CNA C responded, Just be quiet its all your imagination! CR#2 stated that prior to Tuesday 2/20/2024, CR#1 did not have those bruises. She stated she was afraid that something may happen to her. She stated CR#1s FM came to the facility yesterday, 2/20/2024 and when she entered the room she asked R#2 if she had seen what happened to CR#1. At that time R#2 stated she was able to look at CR#1 face and saw those horrible bruises. According to R#2, this incident occurred the morning on 2/20/2024. She stated that the CNA comes in to change them right before her shift ends. She further stated that the morning shift CNA comes in to check and change both, CR#1 and R#2, at the beginning of their shift. She reiterated that the CNA that she heard CR#1 screaming at was the lady whose shift was ending. This, according to R#2 was the night shift CNA (CNA C). Observation and attempted interview with CR#1 on 02/22/2024 at 12:50 p.m. while in the hospital, revealed she was in bed eating lunch. CR #1 briefly looked up but she did not respond to any questions. The redness under CR#2's right eye was not as profound as the photos shown the day of FM's observation in the facility. The bruising on her right jaw still had a discoloration, while mild, still noticeable. Hospital Nursing staff came into to the room to change her and when they asked her to turn toward them, she responded by doing what they asked. On 02/22/2024 at 1:00p.m. 2/22/24 at 12:30pm- Interview with LE. stated he arrived at the facility on 2/21/2024 at 8:50am. and met with FM, another family member and CR #1. He stated FM requested for CR#1 to be transported to ER. He stated during the time of gathering information from all involved, the EMS worker informed him the resident stated she was assaulted. He stated when he questioned resident, she would not respond to him. He further stated that he spoke to the DON Wednesday, yesterday, after being contacted by the resident's family member. He stated that the timeline was on Friday the FM saw the resident and she had no bruises and when she arrived on Tuesday evening, the resident had bruises. On 2/22/24 at 1:00pm Interview with FM - FM stated she visited CR#1 on Friday 2/16/24, 4:00pm - 4:30pm and left that evening around 7:30pm and CR#1 had no bruises. She stated she returned Tuesday 2/20/24, between 5:00pm - 5:30pm and CR#1 was in the cafeteria. She stated at this time she noticed CR#1's bruised eye. She stated she left the cafeteria area and went into the ADON's office to inquire about what happened to CR#1 face. She stated both ADON's (A & B) were in the office. She stated she told them that CR#1 looked like she has been assaulted. She stated the ADON A responded, Now no one has hit CR#1. She may have hit her head on the wall area. FM felt the ADON A was being condescending, which angered her. FM responded, that analogy is not true and she asked why she wasn't notified CR#1 had marks and bruises on her face. FM stated at this time the ADON B got up and accompanied her to the cafeteria. She stated at that time the CR# 1 was asked who hit her. She stated a male. The ADON B stated at that time that there were no male CNA's working on the night shift. She stated the ADON B continued to tell her CR# 1 may have hit her head on the wall. FM told the ADON B that it was not possible to do that based on how her Geri Chair (padded reclining geriatric chair) was positioned. She stated she asked ADON B again why she was not notified (CR#1) had bruises. FM stated she did not get an answer. FM stated she spoke with the Admin who told her that he was doing an abuse investigation. He stated he did not know about the accusations of abuse or about the resident's eye. The Admin went to get the DON to ask what was going on. She stated the DON began saying CR#1 could be combative and this may be the reason for her injury. FM stated at this time she disagreed with them and left the facility. She stated CR#1 began to cry and beg her not to leave, but she had to leave at that time and decided to return in the morning with LE. FM stated she called LE on her way to the facility. FM stated she arrived at the facility on Wednesday 2/21/24, around 8:30am at which time CR# 1 was seated in her geri chair at the nurses' station. FM witnessed a nurse putting eye drops in CR#1s eyes. She spoke with the DON. She stated the DON initially told her that he had no idea and was not notified of the bruising. She stated after she told the DON she had contacted the police, the DON told her she received a photo while she was off of CR#1s eye and she was going to do an investigation. On 2/22/24 at 2:48pm Interview with CW - CW stated that on Monday evening CR #1 was in her room seated in a chair slumped over about to fall out. CW stated that there were two CNA's in another resident's room just talking and laughing. CW stated CW called the CNA's to go help CR#1 and they did. CW stated on Monday CW did not see bruising on CR#1s 's face. CW stated Tuesday morning around 8:30am CW observed the bruising on CR#1s face, her eye was swollen and really red and her jaw was black and blue and swollen going down towards her neck. CW stated the injuries were unbelievable and looked as if someone had beat her up. CW stated CW typically goes into CR#1s room and says hello because CW has gotten an opportunity to meet CR#1's FM and CW has told her CW is there with CW's own FM all the time and CW will check on her CR#1. CW stated each day CW arrives at the facility; CW will go to CR#1s room and kiss her on the forehead and tell her CW is just checking on her. On 2/22/24 at 5:05pm Interview with LVN A- stated she works 2-10 shift and is familiar with CR# 1. LVN A stated CR#1's FM spoke to her about the redness around CR# 1's eyes. She stated she did not see anything on the face of CR #1. LVN A said she did not see the bruise prior to the 2/22/2024. She states she saw the redness on CR #1's eye and believes it was on the left eye. On 2/22/2024 at 5:17pm Interview with CNA B - stated she always work 2-10 shift. She did see CR #1 on Monday 2/19/24, and Tuesday 2/20/24, and did not notice any marks or bruises on resident face. She stated she was not assigned to CR #1 but saw her two days ago. CN A B said she did not notice marks or bruises on her face on Tuesday and CR#1 had a red eye. CNA B stated she reported her observation to the nurse in charge, LVN A. CNA B stated CR# 1 has never been combative when she worked with her. CNA B stated, If I see a resident with injury I will report to the nurse in charge. On 2/23/24 at 7:41am Telephone Interview with CNA A - Stated CR#1 was usually trying to fight while changing her, but she just tensed up her body. CNA A stated she was able to change her. CNA A stated she was training CNA L who had just started. CNA A stated she did noticed bruising on CR#1. CNA A stated her eye was swollen, and she believes it was the right eye. Did not ask what happened to her eye. She stated she informed the charge nurse, LVN B. CNA A stated CR#1 never screamed she was being hurt while changing her. She stated the last training on abuse and neglect was 2-3 weeks ago. She said she did not know why she was trained. The in-service was conducted by DON and Abuse coordinator. In an interview with CNA C on 2/23/24 at 4:28am revealed, she worked with CR#1 on Monday evening and did not notice bruises. CNA C said she changed her in the morning. She stated if her face looked like this it would have been noticed. CNA C stated resident does talk a little. She can say what she wants and if she wants to get in her chair and go to the nurse's station. CNA C will take her to the nursing station when she requests throughout her shift. She stated at no time did CR# 1 tell her to stop or she was hurting while changing her. In an interview with RN C on 2/23/24 at 4:58am revealed, he worked the weekend and did see CR# 1. RN C stated he did not observe CR #1 with any marks or bruises on her face. When shown a photo of resident's marks/bruises, RN C stated he has never seen her face like that and if he had he would have been alarmed and written an incident report. On 2/23/24 at 7:52am - Telephone Interview with LVN B - Stated during the earlier morning hours of her shift, 2/20/2024, around breakfast, the CNA A came to her and told her that CR#1's eye was red and swollen. She stated at this time CNA A had pushed CR#1 to the nursing area. She stated she observed the eye to be red and swollen and reported it to the LVN C.She again stated when CNA A told her about CR#1, she was already in her Geri Chair located in the hallway. She looked at CR#1 and then proceeded to speak with LVN C around 9:45am. She stated she attended the nursing morning meeting and told everyone (including both ADON's and Administrator that CR#1's eye appeared red and swollen. On 2/23/24 at 8:35am -Telephone interview with LVN C.- LVN C indicated that on Tuesday, 2/20/24, she was the treatment nurse. She said in the morning between 10 AM and 11 AM, LVN B came to her, while she was documenting on another resident in the office and told her that CR#1's eye was red and somewhat raised. She said that the LVN B was the charge nurse. She stated that she looked at the CR#1s eye while she was seated in her geri chair by the nurse's station. She stated that the eye was a little red but told LVN B to keep observing the eye LVN C stated that her last in-service for abuse and neglect was Wednesday with the Administrator, HR and DON. On 2/23/2024 at 9:50am Interview with Admin - Stated he is the coordinator for abuse and neglect at the facility. He stated on Wednesday, 2/21/24, CR#1's injuries appeared to have gotten worse and at this time he completed a provider self-reporting of LTC incident report with health and human services. On 2/23/24 at 5:58pm Interview with DON. Stated CR#1 went to the hospital on Wednesday 2/21/24. She stated she had not worked on Tuesday 2/20/24 and had no idea what was going on until CR#1's FM came to the facility on 2/21/24 and told her she had called the police. She stated FM told her to look at CR#1's eye. She did. She stated she told FM that she would check on the issues and that she had not been informed of any type of injuries. The DON stated the resident was always rubbing her eyes and this may have caused bruising. FM brought the bruising to her attention and said CR#1 was abused. The DON stated she told FM she was going to do an investigation, but that was too late because she has already called police. The DON stated she conducted an in-service training to nursing staff for abuse and neglect. The DON stated the FM requested CR#1 be sent to the hospital, which the facility had no other option but to comply. She stated the bruises may have come from CR#1 vigorously rubbing her eyes. The DON was shown a photo of the CR#1's facial area and she stated the resident's bruises were not there when she left the facility. It was like a scratch when she left the facility. The DON continued to deny the CR#1's face had those bruises when she left the facility. During the interview the DON appeared irritated by my questions, she stated, if FM was so upset about CR#1 why did she (FM) leave her on Tuesday? The DON stated if there is suspected abuse, protocol will be to ask all the residents if they feel safe. She stated she would call the police and make an incident report. In an interview with ERN on 2/24/24 at 9:35am. revealed she was the emergency room nurse that evaluated CR#1 upon her arrival by EMS. She stated per EMT, the FM requested that the resident be seen due to possible assault. The EMT said that family found CR# 1with unexplained bruising and the facility was dismissive. ERN stated the EMT further stated CR# 1 told him someone hit her, but there was not a lot of detail. ERN is also forensic interviewer. She stated she spoke with CR#1. She stated when speaking to CR#1, you have to wait and allow her time to process what you are saying for at least 30 seconds. CR#1 was asked her name and she responded accurately. She asked her if she knew where she was (ER) and after about 30 seconds responded in the affirmative and said where (ER) she was. ERN stated she has taken photos of CR#1 and completed a forensic report. She stated HHSC can send in a request and obtain all photos and other pertinent information. ERN stated that in her professional opinion, CR#1's facial injuries are consistent with someone who has been assaulted. On 2/26/2024 at 6:00pm, A request to view the unfinished investigation currently. The Admin provided the following: oRecord review of the current investigation revealed, Employees who did not witness the incident concerning CR#1 to sign the form dated 2/21/2024 titled, EMPLOYEES IN INCIDENT AREA HAVING NO KNOWLEDGE OF INCIDENT. oRecord review revealed, a form employees signed titled, Interview Record dated 2/21/2024 in which the admin Interviewed the NP who stated CR#1 was observed by her with discoloration alongside of right eye on 2/20/24. The NP stated the impacted area appeared as CR#1 bumped the side orbital eye area against her bed halo rail or fell asleep in bed with side eye against the rail. NP stated impacted area was slightly discolored, no bruising along lower eye lid observed. Stated CR#1 likely did not sustain fall b/c she requires total assistance to get up. Record review of the unfinished investigation lacked any interviews of nursing staff that cared for CR#1, there was no immediate nursing staff in-service training for abuse and neglect. The DON brought in an in-service that was signed by some staff and not by others. She stated she completed the Abuse and Neglect and Exploitation in-service on Wednesday after the FM, brought it to her attention. Record review of electronic signed document dated 2/20/2024 and signed on 2/23/2024 by NP, revealed the NP conducted rounds on 2/20/24 and seen CR#1 sitting in her Geri Chair in nurses' station outside of the dining room. Stated CR#1 was seen with very slight discoloration to right lower orbital below eye and above cheek. Mild swelling present. CR#1 denies pain/discomfort. EOM Intact. Mild erythema presents on sclera of right eye. CR#1 states she wants to go to the dining room with activities. No distress noted. CR#1 vitals stable. Discussed findings with ADONs and treatment team. No fall occurred. CR#1 frequently in Geri-chair during the daytime hours found with head lying on right side. Discussed possibility of CR#1 hitting face on hand rale on the wall next to her chair. CR#1 has history of anxiety, cognitive impairment. CR#1 has history of dry eye syndrome requiring artificial tears scheduled twice daily. CR#1 mood and behavior at her baseline. Record review of interview record for LVN A without a time of interview and dated 2/21/24. The form was titled Injury of Unknown Origin and signed by Admin and DON. It revealed, LVN A stated CR#1 was in her Geri chair when she began her 2-10 shift. LVN A stated CR#2 right eye was slight red and swollen with no discoloration. LVN A stated eye drop was administered by CMA (unknown) as ordered. Record review of interview record for CNA A without a time of interview and dated 2/21/24. The form was titled Injury of Unknown Origin and signed by Admin and DON. It revealed, she worked with CR#1 on 2/20/24 6am-2pm shift. States she went into CR#1's room and observed resident right eye was red and a lot swollen. States she notified the charge nurse who observed CR#1's eye. Record review of interview record for CNA A without a time of interview and dated 2/21/24. The form was titled Injury of Unknown Origin and signed only by Admin. It revealed, he interviews with CNA, via phone. He was informed that CNA A observed CR#1's right eye at approximately 6:20-6:30 upon entering her room. CNA states the eye was red around the pupil. States CR#1 made on allegations to who the person who may have caused injury. States CNA stated she immediately reported it to LVN B. Record review revealed admin investigation was to interview staff who cared for and or interacted with CR#1 during the dates and shifts below (2/19/2024, 2/20/2024 and 2/21/2024) during day shift, evening shift and night shift on the 100 hall, which is where CR#1 room was. Record review of In-service training dated 2/21/2024 by the Admin on Abuse and neglect and exploitation lacked signatures for all nursing staff members. Record review of LVN B's timecard shows she was suspended on 2/24/24. Record review of CNA C's counseling report states she was suspended on 2/25/2024. On 02/26/2024 at 1:48pm the Facility's Administrator notified of the Immediate Jeopardy for Abuse (F-610). The Template was signed and POR was immediately requested at this time. The following plan of removal was accepted on 2/27/24 at 12:01 p.m. REMOVAL OF IMMEDIATE JEOPARDY On February 26, 2024, the facility was notified by the surveyor, that an immediate jeopardy had been called and the facility needed to submit a Plan of Removal pursuant to Federal and State regulatory requirements. The immediate jeopardy allegations are as follows: F- Tag 610: The facility failed to investigate, suspend suspected staff member accused of abuse after resident injuries were reported by FM, CNA A and LE. The facility is placing current residents at risk of abuse and neglect by CNA C's continuous access. The facility failed to immediately investigate, report, and protect the resident when CR#2 was found with suspicious injuries of unknown origin. Done for those affected: Resident CR#1 was assessed by licensed nurse on 2/21/2024. MD was notified by licensed nurse on 2/21/2024. Resident CR#1 was transferred to the hospital for evaluation on 2/21/2024 and remains at the hospital. An Allegation of Abuse was reported to HHSC for Resident CR#2 on 2/21/2024. On 2/25/2024, the facility suspended the Certified Nurse Aide who worked with resident CR#1 on the 2/19/2024 10pm to 6am shift, pending investigation. If CNA C is found to be guilty of abusing CR#1, the facility will terminate employment immediately. Identify residents who could be affected: Beginning 2/21/2024, the Facility Social Worker(s) completed 100% of interviews of interviewable residents to assess for potential abuse. Date of completion is 2/23/2024. Findings: No additional concerns were identified. Effective 2/25/2024, Administrator and/or designee notified facility residents of abuse and neglect reporting. Reeducation included who the abuse coordinator is and how to report concerns and/ or allegation of abuse, neglect, mistreatment and/ or misappropriation to facility personnel. Date of completion is 2/26/2024. oEffective 2/26/24, Administrator and/or designee notified families via alert media of the facility abuse and neglect reporting process. Reeducation included who the abuse coordinator is and how to report concerns and/ or allegation of abuse, neglect, mistreatment and/ or misappropriation to facility personnel. Date of Completion is 2/26/2024. oOn 2/23/2024, head to toe assessments were completed by the Licensed Nurse on all residents to identify any signs of injuries of unknown source. All other residents were assessed head to toe by a licensed nurse related to abuse, neglect and mistreatment with no concerns identified. Date of completion is 2/23/2024. Findings: No additional concerns were identified. oOn 2/23/2024, the DON/designee reviewed the resident progress notes for the last 30 days to ensure concerns related to abuse and neglect were identified and an investigation initiated, and the incident reported to HHSC. Findings: No additional concerns were identified. oOn 2/23/2024, the DON/ Designee reviewed incident/accidents in the last 30 days to ensure that investigations, timely reporting to HHSC as indicated, and resident assessments to include head to toe assessments were completed. Findings: No additional concerns were identified. Systemic Process: On 2/23/2024, the Regional [NAME] President of Operations reeducated the Administrator (Abuse Coordinator) on Abuse and Neglect and Abuse Policy. Abuse and Neglect and Abuse Policy to include timely Investigation and HHSC Reporting to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse (with or without serious bodily injury); or neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, that result in serious bodily injury are reported immediately, but not later than two hours after the incident occurs or is suspected. Date of Completion is 2/23/2024. On 2/23/2024, the Administrator/ DON and/ or designee began reeducation to 100% of facility staff on the following: Abuse and Neglect and Abuse Policy to include timely Investigation and HHSC Reporting to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse (with or without serious bodily injury); or neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, that result in serious bodily injury are reported immediately, but not later than two hours after the incident occurs or is suspected. An incident that does not result in serious bodily injury and involves: neglect, exploitation, missing resident, misappropriation, drug theft, fire, emergency situations that pose a threat to resident health and safety, a death under unusual circumstances will be reported immediately, but not later than 24 hours after the incident occurs or is suspected. The Administrator who is the Abuse Prevention Coordinator will be immediately notified for any concerns with Abuse, Neglect and Misappropriation. Date of completion is 2/23/2024. Resident assessment to include head to toe assessments and documentation with each resident incident/accident. Date of completion is 2/23/2024 Effective 2/24/2024, any facility staff on FMLA, Leave of Absence, non-scheduled workday or PTO will be reeducated by the Administrator and/or designee prior to the start of their next scheduled shift. The facility maintains an onsite Weekend Manager and Nursing Supervisor that conduct rounds and may initiate and address resident incidents and will escalate to the appropriate administrative staff when required. The Administrator who is the Abuse Prevention Coordinator will be immediately notified for any concerns with Abuse, Neglect and Misappropriation. To monitor, the Director of Nursing/ designee will review the 24-hour report and resident incidents in facility Stand-up Morning Meeting, attended Monday - Friday. 24 Hour Report and resident incidents will be reviewed for potential abuse situations and need for reporting as per HHSC guidelines. Review will also include to ensure investigation, resident assessments to include head-t[TRUNCATED]
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Medical Records (Tag F0842)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Tag:842 S/S= D Surveyor Name(s): [NAME] Immediate Supervisor: [NAME] Based on interview and record review, the facility failed...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Tag:842 S/S= D Surveyor Name(s): [NAME] Immediate Supervisor: [NAME] Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain clinical records in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices that are complete and accurately documented for 1 of 5 Residents (CR#1) reviewed for clinical records accuracy, there was only one progress note Record Review of the Progress Notes for CR#1: There was only one progress note entered since 1/3/2024; then, on 2/21/2024 at 16:17 (4:17pm), there was a note which was titled Admin Note and stated the Administrator notified FM of the HHSC investigation on 2/21/2024 with allegations of abuse. The facility failed to maintain an accurate record by indicating CR #1's unexplained or unknown eye injury, what medical staff did after observing the injury, who they called and the type of assessment completed. This deficient practice could affect residents whose records are maintained by the facility and could place resident(s) at risk for errors in care and treatment. Findings Include: Record review of CR#1's undated face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old female who was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted [DATE]. CR#1 has a diagnosis of Anoxic Brain Damage (lack of oxygen to the brain causing death of brain cells), Type 2 diabetes mellitus hypoglycemia w/o coma (low blood sugar levels), hypertension (high blood pressure), dysphagia (difficult swallowing), major depression disorder (low or depressed mood), chronic kidney disease (damaged kidneys and/or loss of kidney function), cognitive communication deficit (difficulty thinking and using language), anxiety disorder (pounding heart and sweating when responding to certain situations), dementia (impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions that interferes with doing everyday activities). Record review of CR#1's MDS assessment dated [DATE], revealed a BIMS score of 4 (severe cognitive impairment). Cognitive skills for daily decision making further revealed, resident can repeat at least three words heard, resident is able to recall prior questions after cueing, resident does not have any psychosis behaviors, which includes physical behaviors, verbal behavior, or any other behavior symptoms directed at others and the resident was able to participate in an activity preference interview of her interest while in the facility. Record review of CR#1's care plan updated 03/31/2022 revealed, the resident has a communication problem r/t expressive Aphasia, Hearing deficit, Neurological symptoms. The goal was the resident will maintain current level of communication function by making sound, using appropriate gestures, responding to yes/no questions appropriately through the review date. The interventions are to allow adequate time to respond, repeat as necessary, do not rush, request clarification from the resident to ensure understanding, face when speaking, make eye contact. Ask yes/no questions if appropriate, use simple, brief, consistent words/cues, use alternative communication tools as needed. Resident is a one (1) person total assist and two (2) person transfer using a mechanical lift. Further review of Resident #1's care plan updated revealed no documentation regarding the facial injuries on 2/21/2024 or any plan initiated to keep her safe while in the facility going forward. Record Review of CR#1's orders dated 2/1/2024 - 2/29/2024 revealed calcium tablet-1 tablet by mouth for type 2 diabetes (last taken 2/21/24 at 2000 (8PM) hours); magnesium oxide (last taken 2/22/2024 at 0730 (7:30AM); sertraline (1 tablet daily for anxiety); vitamin D2 (1 tablet daily); Coreg oral tablet by mouth one time daily (hold if <110HR<60); Depakote capsule 2 times daily); Janumet oral tablet two times daily for mood disorder. Hold if drowsy; Janumet oral tablet by mouth two times daily (d/c date 2/6/2024); refresh tears solution (carboxymethylcellulose sodium) instill one drop in both eyes two times a day for dry eye syndrome (start date 6/30/2022 1700 (5PM)). -The orders reflected a code 7 at 1700 hours, indicating the resident is sleeping and see progress notes (FM observed nurse putting eye drops in CR#1's eyes when she arrived during this time); Lorazepam 1 tablet by mouth three times daily; Accucheck one time a day related to diabetes (notify MD if bs <70 or >250); monitor vital signs every two weeks one time a day every 2 weeks on Mondays for Health monitoring (start 2/19/2024); Behavior monitoring for antianxiety from 2/1/2024 until 2/21/2024 reflected a code of 0, indicating CR#1 did not have any behaviors noted during all shifts; Behavior monitoring for antidepressants from 2/1/2024 until 2/21/2024 reflected a code of 0, indicating CR#1 did not have any behaviors noted during all shifts. Behavior monitoring for antipsychotic from 2/1/2024 until 2/21/2024 reflected a code of 0, indicating CR#1 did not have any behaviors noted during all shifts and on 2/21/24; Behavior monitoring for Busplrone (anxiolytic medication to treat anxiety) from 2/1/2024 until 2/21/2024 reflected a code of 0, indicating CR#1 received a 1, which indicated mania (mental health marked by periods of great excitement or euphoria, delusions and overactivity); in the EVE2 and a 6-grandiosity (unrealistic sense of superiority in which someone believes themselves to be unique and better than others) in the NOC1; Assess pain on each shift; monitoring antianxiety received a 1 and 6 on 2/21/24; Monitoring side effects for antidepressants codes indicated none, but on 2/21/24 there is a 1 in evening and 6 NOC 1 On 2/22/24 at 1:00pm Interview with FM - FM stated she visited CR#1 on Friday 2/16/24, 4:00pm - 4:30pm and left that evening around 7:30pm and CR#1 had no bruises. She stated she returned Tuesday 2/20/24, between 5:00pm - 5:30pm and CR#1 was in the cafeteria. She stated at this time she noticed CR#1's bruised eye. She stated she left the cafeteria area and went into the ADON's office to inquire about what happened to CR#1 face. She stated both ADON's (A & B) were in the office. She stated she told them that CR#1 looked like she has been assaulted. She stated the ADON A responded, Now no one has hit CR#1. She may have hit her head on the wall area. FM felt the ADON A was being condescending, which angered her. FM responded, that analogy is not true and she asked why she wasn't notified CR#1 had marks and bruises on her face. FM stated at this time the ADON B got up and accompanied her to the cafeteria. She stated at that time the CR# 1 was asked who hit her. She stated a male. The ADON B stated at that time that there were no male CNA's working on the night shift. She stated the ADON B continued to tell her CR# 1 may have hit her head on the wall. FM told the ADON B that it was not possible to do that based on how her Geri Chair (padded reclining geriatric chair) was positioned. She stated she asked ADON B again why she was not notified (CR#1) had bruises. FM stated she did not get an answer. FM stated she spoke with the Admin who told her that he was doing an abuse investigation. He stated he did not know about the accusations of abuse or about the resident's eye. The Admin went to get the DON to ask what was going on. She stated the DON began saying CR#1 could be combative and this may be the reason for her injury. FM stated at this time she disagreed with them and left the facility. She stated CR#1 began to cry and beg her not to leave, but she had to leave at that time and made a decision to return in the morning with LE. FM stated she called LE on her way to the facility. FM stated she arrived at the facility on Wednesday 2/21/24, around 8:30am at which time CR# 1 was seated in her geri chair at the nurses' station. FM witnessed a nurse putting eye drops in CR#1s eyes. She spoke with the DON. She stated the DON initially told her that he had no idea and was not notified of the bruising. She stated after she told the DON she had contacted the police, the DON told her she received a photo while she was off of CR#1s eye and she was going to do an investigation. On 2/23/24 at 7:52am - Telephone Interview with LVN B - Stated during the earlier morning hours of her shift, 2/20/2024, around breakfast, the CNA A came to her and told her that CR#1's eye was red and swollen. She stated at this time CNA A had pushed CR#1 to the nursing area. She stated she observed the eye to be red and swollen and reported it to the LVN C. She again stated when CNA A told her about CR#1, she was already in her Geri Chair located in the hallway. She looked at CR#1 and then proceeded to speak with LVN C around 9:45am. She stated she attended the nursing morning meeting and told everyone (including both ADON's and Administrator that CR#1's eye appeared red and swollen. She states she did not complete any documentation regarding CR#1's unexplained injuries. On 2/23/24 at 8:35am -Telephone interview with LVN C.- LVN C indicated that on Tuesday, 2/20/24, she was the treatment nurse. She said in the morning between 10 AM and 11 AM, LVN B came to her, while she was documenting on another resident in the office and told her that CR#1's eye was red and somewhat raised. She said that the LVN B was the charge nurse. She stated that she looked at the CR#1s eye while she was seated in her geri chair by the nurse's station. She stated that the eye was a little red but told LVN B to keep observing the eye. LVN C stated that her last in-service for abuse and neglect was Wednesday with the Administrator, HR and DON. She stated she did not complete any documentation regarding CR#1's unexplained injuries. On 2/23/2024 at 9:50am Interview with Admin - Stated he is the coordinator for abuse and neglect at the facility. He stated on Wednesday, 2/21/24, CR#1's injuries appeared to have gotten worse and at this time he instituted a facility (Provider) investigation report and filed with HHSC. He did not complete any documentation regarding CR#1's unexplained injuries On 2/23/24 at 5:58pm Interview with DON. Stated CR#1 went to the hospital on Wednesday 2/21/24. She stated she had not worked on Tuesday 2/20/24 and had no idea what was going on until CR#1's FM came to the facility on 2/21/24 and told her she had called the police. She stated FM told her to look at CR#1's eye. She did. She stated she told FM that she would check on the issues and that she had not been informed of any type of injuries. The DON stated the resident was always rubbing her eyes and this may have caused bruising. FM brought the bruising to her attention and said CR#1 was abused. The DON stated she told FM she was going to do an investigation, but that was too late because she has already called police. She stated she did not complete documentation regarding CR#1's injuries. 2/26/2024 at 4:27pm Interview with ADON A-States the LVN [NAME] stated there was something going on with the resident's eye. She stated ADON B said he would look at the eye. Stated she believes ADON B called the DON. ADON A stated if she had seen her face like the photo shown on Investigator's computer, she would have immediately told Admin, DON, and NP. She would have completed documentation in PCC. However, she did not complete any documentation regarding CR#1's eye. 2/26/2024 at 4:46pm Interview with ADON B - States he was in the meeting when LVN [NAME] stated it was something going on with CR#1's eye. States he told the nurse to let the NP know and document. States he checked her face. He stated he didn't see much. States the LVN told him that the NP was on it and recommend monitoring. He stated he did not document in PCC because it is usually the nurse on duty who documents. States he called the DON and let her know. Told her the NP had seen the resident.
Jan 2024 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0625 (Tag F0625)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record review the facility did not provide, in writing, a bed-hold notice upon transfer at the time of t...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record review the facility did not provide, in writing, a bed-hold notice upon transfer at the time of transfer of a resident to a hospital or for therapeutic leave, for 1 of 3 residents (CR#1) reviewed for transfers and discharge. -The facility failed to provide bed-hold notifications to CR#1 when she was transferred to the hospital. This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving notice of the facility's bed hold policy before being transferred. Findings included: Record review of CR#1's Face Sheet (undated) revealed, a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included: spinal stenosis (a narrowing of the spinal canal), pneumonia (infection that inflames air sacs in one or both lungs, which may fill with fluid) and hypokalemia (a blood level that is below normal in potassium). CR#1 was transferred to an acute care hospital on [DATE]. Record review of CR#1's Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 15 out of 15 indicating intact cognition. She required extensive assistance from two persons, physical assist with bed mobility, dressing, personal care, and hygiene. Required total dependence with toilet use. CR#1 was frequently incontinent of bladder and bowel. Record review of CR#1's Discharge MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident's return was anticipated post discharge, and it was an unplanned discharge with no evidence of an acute change in mental status. Record review of CR#1's Care Plan initiated 04/13/2023 and updated on 04/26/2023 revealed the following: Focus- (CR#1) had an ADL self-care performance deficit r/t Spinal Stenosis. Goal: The resident will improve current level of function in ADLs through the review date. Interventions: Bathing/showering: The resident requires extensive assistance by (1) staff with bathing/showering as necessary. Toilet use: The resident is totally dependent on 1 staff for toilet use. Record review of CR#1's Progress Note dated 09/18/23 at 2:46am written by LVN A revealed, Resident transferred at 0210 in stable condition via [company name] EMS . Record review of CR#1's September 2023 EMR revealed no transfer or discharge plans documented. Record review of CR#1's paper/electronic chart revealed no notification of the facility's bed hold policy. In a telephone interview on 01/12/2024 at 9:14a.m., with the Ombudsman, he said on 8/21/23, had a fair hearing for an improper discharge and on 9/13/23, received notification CR#1 won the hearing. He said CR#1 was sent to the hospital in stable condition. The facility failed to provide a written bed hold policy to CR#1 upon transfer. Attempted telephone interview on 01/12/2024 at 9:34 a.m., with CR#1 was unsuccessful. In an interview on 01/12/2024 at 9:44a.m., the Administrator said the Social Worker was responsible for discharge planning. He said residents that were sent to the hospital for acute care had the right to return to the facility. The Administrator said the bed hold policy was not provided to the residents at admission. The Administrator said the facility's admission packet did not include the bed hold policy. He said it was a form that was given by nursing in the event of a transfer. In an interview on 01/12/2024 at 9:59 a.m., with the Administrator and the DON, the DON said CR#1 was not provided a written bed hold policy upon transfer. CR#1 was transferred sometime in September 2023. The DON said corporate created a bed hold form in the end of December 2023. She said residents that were transferred in January 2024 should have a bed hold form in their electronic medical records. In an interview on 01/12/2024 at 10:38a.m., the Social Worker said that she was responsible for the resident discharge process. She said when a resident was transferred to the hospital, they had the right to return but, she was not aware of the requirement to present the residents with a bed hold policy. In an interview on 01/12/2024 at 11:31a.m., with LVN A, he said he worked full time at this facility. He said CR#1 was transferred to the hospital in stable condition. He said he did not provide CR#1 with bed hold policy. LVN A said, I have heard of the bed hold at other facilities that I have worked at but not at this facility. In a telephone interview on 01/12/2024 at 1:15 p.m., with CR#1's Family Member, she said CR#1 was discharged to the hospital on [DATE]. She said CR#1 was not provided an explanation of the resident's rights to remain at the facility, the bed hold policy, or any discharge planning. Record review of the facility's Bed Hold Notice Upon Transfer policy dated 10/24/22 revealed read in part: . Policy: At the time of transfer for hospitalization or therapeutic leave, the facility will provide to the resident and/or the resident representative written notice which specifies the duration of the bed-hold policy and addresses information explaining the return of the resident to the next available bed. Definitions: Bed-Hold means the holding or reserving a resident's bed while the resident is absent from the facility for therapeutic leave or hospitalization. Reserve Bed Payment refers to payments made by a State to the facility to hold a bed during a resident's temporary absence from a nursing facility. Therapeutic Leave refers to absences for purposes other than required hospitalization. Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: Bed Hold Notice Upon Transfer 1. Before a resident is transferred to the hospital or goes on therapeutic leave, the facility will provide to the resident and/or the resident representative written information that specifies: a. The duration of the state bed-hold policy, if any, during which the resident is permitted to return and resume residence in the nursing facility; b. The reserve bed payment policy in the state plan policy, if any. c. The facility policies regarding bed-hold periods to include allowing a resident to return to the next available bed. d. Conditions upon which the resident would return to the facility: o The resident requires the services which the facility provides; o The resident is eligible for Medicare skilled nursing facility services or Medicaid nursing facility services. 2. In the event of an emergency transfers of a resident, the facility will provide within 24 hours written notice of the facility's bed-hold policies, as stipulated in the State's plan .
Oct 2022 4 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and con...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #33) reviewed for infection control. MA C failed to wear gloves when administering a nasal spray and failed to perform hand washing/sanitization after administering a nasal spray to Resident #33. This failure could place residents at risk for infections. Findings include: Record review of Resident #33's face sheet, dated 10/17/22, revealed an [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included: hypertension, age-related cataract, heart failure and constipation . Record review of Resident #33's Quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], revealed moderately impaired vision with use of corrective lenses, moderately impaired cognition as indicated by a BIMS score of 13 out of 15, extensive assistance with most ADLs and always incontinent of both bladder and bowel. Record review of Resident #33's care plan, revised 09/07/22, revealed no related focus areas, goals or interventions. Record review of Resident #33's Physician's Orders, dated 07/01/21, revealed Systane Eyedrops- 1 drop in both eyes two times a day for dry eyes. Record review of Resident #33's Physician's Orders, dated 07/02/22, revealed Fluticasone 50 mcg/act- 1 spray in both nostrils one time a day for allergies. An observation on 10/17/22 at 07:58 AM revealed, MA C prepared medication for administration for Resident #33. She retrieved the bottle of Systane eye drops and Fluticasone nasal spray put on gloves, entered the resident's room and informed the resident she would be administering her eye drops. After administering 1 drop of Systane in each of Resident #33's eyes she told the resident she would need help to reposition the resident prior to administering the other medications. MA C exited the resident's room and returned with a CNA who helped move the resident up on the bed in order to elevate her head at a 45 angle. After removing her gloves and performing hand hygiene, MA C returned to the resident room while holding the nasal spray bottle with her bare hands, primed the nasal spray by squirting one spray into the air and then inserted the nasal spray into Resident #33's right nostril and administered 2 sprays followed by 2 sprays to the left nostril. MA C exited the resident room, placed the nasal spray back into the box, into her medication cart and then prepared oral medication for administration to Resident #33. She did not perform hand hygiene after coming into direct contact with Resident #33 and touching the nasal spray that was inserted into the resident's nostril with her bare hands. In an interview on 10/17/22 at 11:38 AM, the DON said nursing staff were not expected to wear gloves when administering nasal sprays. She said MA C was not required to wash her hands after administering the nasal spray to Resident #33 since her hands were not visibly soiled but she was required to at least sanitize her hands using a hand sanitizer following administration of the nasal spray. She said hand hygiene (washing or sanitizing) was required after direct contact with residents and failure to sanitize/wash hands could lead to the potential to spread disease . Record review of MA C's Medication Administration Observation Report, dated 01/21/22, revealed 5- For meds with parameters, vital signs are taken prior to administration. Competency met. 17- Proper hand washing technique at appropriate times, competency met-yes. Record review of the facility policy titled Medication Administration, revised 10/01/19, revealed 1-Preparation .B- Handwashing and Sanitizing- The person administering medications adheres to good hand hygiene, which includes washing hands thoroughly before beginning medication pass, prior to handling any medication, after coming into direct contact with a resident, and before and after administration of ophthalmic, topical, vaginal, rectal and parental preparations and medication given via enteral tubes. Examination gloves are worn when necessary. Hand sanitizing is done with an approved sanitizer between hand washings, when returning to the medication cart or preparation (assuming hands have not touched a resident or potentially contaminated surface) .Medication Administration Guidelines g- Wash your hands with soap and water or sanitize your hands before giving someone medicine. Record review of the facility policy titled Handwashing- Hand Hygiene, revised January 2018, revealed, Use an alcohol-based hand rub containing at least 62% alcohol; or, alternatively, soap (antimicrobial or non-antimicrobial) and water for the following situations: . b- Before and after direct contact with residents . I- after contact with a resident's intact skin. Single use disposable gloves should be used: . when anticipating contact with blood and bodily fluids.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0658 (Tag F0658)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure services were provided or arranged by the facili...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure services were provided or arranged by the facility, as outlined by the comprehensive care plan, that met professional standards of for 2 of 20 residents (Resident #23 and Resident #91) reviewed for services that met professional standards. 1. The facility failed to administer BP medication to Resident #23 as ordered by administering outside of parameters. 2. The facility failed to administer BP medication to Resident #91 as ordered by administering outside of parameters. These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving the care and services identified on their care plan and ordered by their Physicians and could result in a decline in health status. Findings include: 1. Record review of Resident #23's admission face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included hypertension (elevated blood pressure), cerebral infarction (ischemic stroke as a result of disrupted blood flow to the brain due to problems with the blood vessels that supply it), type II diabetes (elevated blood glucose levels), heart failure (a chronic condition where the heart does not pump the blood as well as it should). Record review of Resident #23's care plan revised 09/28/2021, read in part: Problem: Resident #23 had hypertension; Goal: Resident #23 will remain free of complications related to hypertension; Interventions: Give anti-hypertensive medications as ordered. Record review of Resident #23's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 07/29/22, revealed a BIMS score of 10, which indicated his cognition was moderately impaired. The MDS revealed one of Resident #23's active diagnoses included hypertension. Record review of Resident #23's physician's order summary report, dated 10/16/22, revealed Amlodipine Besylate 10 Mg one tablet at bedtime for hypertension. Hold for SBP <110. Record review of Resident #23's physician order summary report, dated 10/16/22, revealed Hydralazine HCL 50 Mg two times a day for hypertension. Hold for SBP <110, HR <60. Record review of Resident #23's Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated 10/01/22 - 10/31/22, revealed Amlodipine Besylate 10 Mg one tablet at bedtime for hypertension. Hold for SBP <110. Resident #23's MAR revealed the medication was administered on the following date and time with the following BP: 10/02/22 at 8:00 PM BP was 106/77 by MA A. Record review of Resident #23's Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated 10/01/22 - 10/31/22, revealed hydralazine HCL 50 Mg two times a day for hypertension. Hold for SBP <110, HR <60. Resident #23's MAR revealed the medication was administered on the following date and time with the following BP: 10/09/22 at 5:00 PM BP was 100/67 by MA A. In an observation on 10/17/22 at 10:44 AM Resident #23 was in the hall self-propelling in his wheelchair. Attempted to interview but resident refused to be interviewed . In an interview on 10/17/22 at 12:00 PM, MA A stated the initials on Resident #23's MAR were her initials, and the check marks indicated the two medications were given. The MA stated before she gave BP medications, she checked the resident's blood pressure to make sure it was within the parameters and if it was not, she would not give the medication she marked it as held and notified the nurse. The risk to the resident was the blood pressure could drop too much if the medication is given outside the ordered parameters. The MA refused to state why the medications were given on 10/02 and 10/09 and how to prevent it from occurring again . In an interview on 10/17/22 at 12:15 PM, the DON stated her expectations were the ordered parameters for blood pressure medications were followed. These medications were given outside the ordered parameters and should not have been given. The risk to the resident was the resident's blood pressure could drop too low. To prevent this from occurring again the staff would be in-serviced. In an interview on 10/18/22 at 10:01 AM, the Administrator stated he was not clinical, but his expectations were that medications were administered according to the nursing policies and to follow physician's orders. He stated the risk to the resident best to his knowledge was the blood pressure could go low. To prevent it from occurring again he would reeducate, In-service and monitor the staff. 2. Record review of Resident #91's face sheet, dated 10/16/22, revealed a [AGE] year-old female initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included: Pneumonia, iron deficiency anemia, age-related physical debility, muscle wasting and hypotension. Record review of Resident #91's Annual MDS, dated [DATE], revealed the resident had severely impaired vision, moderately impaired cognition as indicated by a BIMS score of 12 out of 15, required extensive assistance to total dependence on most ADLs, wheelchair use, was always incontinent of both bladder and bowel and an active diagnosis of orthostatic hypotension . Record review of Resident #91's Care Plan revealed: Problem- Resident #91 has a diagnosis of hypotension; Goal- The resident will remain free of complications related to hypertension through the review date; Intervention- Give anti-hypertensive medications as ordered. Monitor for side effects such as orthostatic hypotension and increased heart rate and effectiveness. Resident #91 was not care planned for hypotension. Record review of Resident #91's Physician Orders, dated 09/29/22, revealed, Midodrine 5 mg- Give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day for hypotension. Give for SBP <110 . Record review of Resident #91's October MAR revealed, multiple facility nursing staff administered Resident #23 Midodrine 5 mg outside of physician set parameter of SBP <100 on: 10/1/22 at 5:00 PM with BP 100/69 by DON 10/3/22 at 5:00 PM with BP 143/71 by MA E 10/4/22 at 9:00 AM with BP 100/68 by MA C 10/5/22 at 5:00 PM with BP 144/71 by MA E 10/7/22 at 9:00 AM with BP 101/63 by LVN A and 5:00 PM with BP 125/60 by MA A 10/8/22 at 9:00 AM with BP 112/66 by ADON 10/10/22 at 5:00 PM with BP 143/70 by MA E 10/11/22 at 9:00 AM with BP 100/65 by MA C and 5:00 PM with BP 141/70 by MA E 10/12/22 at 5:00 PM with BP 143/71 by MA E 10/13/22 at 9:00 AM with BP 124/70 by MA B and 5:00 PM with BP 143/70 by MA E 10/14/22 at 5:00 PM with BP 143/70 by MA E 10/15/22 at 9:00 AM with BP 100/69 by MA C and 5:00 PM with BP 127/59 by MA D In an interview on 10/17/22 at 12:31 PM, the DON said prior to medication administration nursing staff must verify the 10 rights first, ensuring administration involved the right person and right drug. Once verified nursing staff must introduce themselves to the patient and check for ordered parameters such as BP and if the patient was within parameters the medication was to be administered. She said if the patient was outside of parameters such as a SBP of 100 and above for Resident #91 the medication was not to be administered and documentation should be completed in the facility EMR. The DON said Midodrine should not be administered outside of parameters because administration could cause the resident's BP to sky rocket placing them at risk for side effects . In an observation and interview on 10/18/22 at 11:50 AM, Resident #91 in bed and receiving oxygen via nasal canula, she appeared well fed, well-groomed in no immediate distress. Resident #91 said she had problems with her BP sometimes and it had gone as high as 190 at which point she experienced headache, chest pain/SOB . She said her blood pressure normally went high prior to hospitalization, which she had a few, from worsening of her CHF (a weakened heart condition that causes fluid buildup in the feet, arms, lungs and other organs) but she felt better ever since she was placed on a renal diet (diet low in sodium, phosphorous and protein) and fluid restriction. Record review of MA C's Medication Administration Observation Report, dated 01/21/22, revealed, 5- For meds with parameters, vital signs are taken prior to administration. Competency met. Record review of LVN A Medication Pass Worksheet, dated 04/20/22, revealed LVN A passed her medication administration assessment, and medications were administered in accordance with the patient's physician's orders. Record review of MA A's Medication Pass Audit, dated 04/22/22, revealed, 8- Medications are administered in accordance with current physician's orders?- competency met-yes. Record review of MA E's Medication Pass Audit, dated 05/13/22, revealed, 8- Medications are administered in accordance with current physician's orders?- competency met-yes. Record review of MA C's Medication Administration Observation Report, dated 10/15/22, revealed, 5- For meds with parameters, vital signs are taken prior to administration. Competency met. Record review of the facility policy titled Medication Administration revised, 10/01/19, revealed, 2- Administration . B- Medications are administered in accordance with written orders of the prescriber . Right Assessment/Response- Medications like blood pressure medications always warrant a quick blood pressure check before giving a blood pressure medication. Nurses must be aware of parameters for administration specific to a medication.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Pharmacy Services (Tag F0755)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services, which included procedures that assured the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and ad...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services, which included procedures that assured the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals, to meet the needs of each resident for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #86) and 2 of 3 medication carts (100-300 Hall Medication Aide Cart and 200-400 Hall Nursing Cart) reviewed for pharmacy services. - The facility failed to discard an expired bottle of Pro-Stat, a protein supplement, located in the 100-300 Hall Medication Aide Cart. - The facility failed to discard an expired bottle of Pro-Stat located in the 100-300 Hall Medication Aide Cart. - The facility failed to discard expired Insulin prescribed for Resident #86 that was located in the 200-400 Hall Nursing Cart. These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving the therapeutic benefit of medications and/or adverse reactions to medications. Findings include: 100-300 Medication Aide Cart In an observation and interview on 10/17/22 at 11:00 AM, inventory of the Medication Aide Cart with MA C revealed: - 10 full and 3 partial loose pills - An open and in use bottle of Pro-Stat, with an open date of 03/2022 with manufacturer's instructions to discard 3 months after opening. MA C said nursing staff were expected to check their carts weekly and while in use for loose pills and expired medications. She said once found loose pills should be discarded and she was not aware the Pro-Stat had a 3 month shelf life. MA C said she always used the expiration date under the bottle. She said once medication expired it could become less effective and if the Pro-Stat was administered to the resident it could cause GI upset. 200-400 Hall Nursing Cart In an observation and interview on 09/12/22 at 09:12 AM, inventory of the 100 Hall Nursing Cart with LVN A revealed: - An open and in use vial of Insulin Aspart for Resident #86 with an open date of 09/07/22 with manufacturer's instructions to discard 28 days (10/5/22) after opening. - an open and in use bottle of Pro-Stat, with an open date of 03/29/2022 with manufacturer's instructions to discard 3 months after opening. LVN A said nursing staff were expected to check their carts while in use and daily for expired medications and supplements. She said Insulin Aspart expired 28 days after it was opened and the insulin vial for Resident #86 was expired and should had been discarded previously. LVN A said after insulin expired it became less effective and if used it could place residents at risk of uncontrolled blood sugars. LVN A said she did not know Pro-Stat had a shelf life of 3 months and since it was expired it could not be used because it might be less effective and could cause GI upset. She said since both the Insulin and Pro-Stat were expired they could not be used and must be discarded in the drug disposal bin located in the medication storage room. In an interview on 10/17/22 at 11:38, the DON said nursing staff were to check their carts daily for loose pills and expired medications. She said the pharmacist consultant also did monthly cart audits while the chart nurses inspected the carts weekly. The DON said all loose pills should be tossed in the trash with the expectation that all trash cans were covered and inaccessible to residents. The DON said she did not know Pro-Stat expired 3 months after dating and all insulin should be used before their beyond use date because after that date there was a decreased efficacy and if used the insulin could fail to properly regulate a patient's blood sugar. She said expired medications should be discarded in the drug disposal bin located in the medication storage room. The DON said the facility did not have a policy that addressed medication storage. Record review of the manufacturer's Insulin Aspart Injection Highlights of Prescribing Information revised 10/2019, revealed, After vials have been opened: throw away all Insulin Aspart vials after 28 days, even if they still have insulin left in them .
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Unnecessary Medications (Tag F0759)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the medication error rate was not five pe...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the medication error rate was not five percent (%) or greater. The facility had a medication error rate of 6 percent based on 2 errors out of 33 opportunities, which involved 2 of 7 residents (Resident #33 and Resident #77); and 2 of 4 staff (MA A and MA C) reviewed for medication errors. 1. MA C failed to administer Resident #33's Nasal Spray as ordered by administering 2 sprays in each nostril instead of 1. 2. MA A failed to administer Resident #77 Nifedipine ER (extended release), a medication that should not be crushed, by crushing the medication. These failures could place residents at risk of inadequate therapeutic outcomes, increased negative side effects, and a decline in health. Findings Include: 1. Record review of Resident #33's face sheet, dated 10/17/22, revealed an [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included: hypertension, age-related cataract, heart failure and constipation. Record review of Resident #33's Quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], revealed moderately impaired vision with use of corrective lenses, moderately impaired cognition as indicated by a BIMS score of 13 out of 15, extensive assistance with most ADLs and always incontinent of both bladder and bowel. Record review of Resident #33's care plan, revised 09/07/22, revealed no related focus areas, goals or interventions. Record review of Resident #33's Physician's Orders, dated 07/01/21, revealed Systane Eyedrops- 1 drop in both eyes two times a day for dry eyes. Record review of Resident #33's Physician's Orders, dated 07/02/22, revealed Fluticasone 50 mcg/act- 1 spray in both nostrils one time a day for allergies. An observation on 10/17/22 at 07:58 AM revealed, MA C prepared medication for administration for Resident #33. She retrieved the bottle of Systane eye drops and Fluticasone nasal spray put on gloves, entered the resident's room and informed the resident she would be administering her eye drops. After administering 1 drop of Systane in each of Resident #33's eyes she told the resident she would need help to reposition the resident prior to administering the other medications. MA C exited the resident's room and returned with a CNA who helped move the resident up on the bed in order to elevate her head at a 45 angle. After removing her gloves and performing hand hygiene, MA C returned to the resident room while holding the nasal spray bottle with her bare hands, primed the nasal spray by squirting one spray into the air and then inserted the nasal spray into Resident #33's right nostril and administered 2 sprays followed by 2 sprays to the left nostril. MA C exited the resident room, placed the nasal spray back into the box, into her medication cart and then prepared oral medication for administration to Resident #33. 2. Record review of Resident #77's face sheet, dated 10/17/22, revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included: dementia without behavioral disturbance, hemiplegia and hemiparesis (one-sided paralysis), difficulty swallowing and hypertension . Record review of Resident #77's Quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], revealed moderately impaired vision with the use of corrective lenses, moderately impaired cognition as indicated by a BIMS score of 10 out of 15, extensive assistance to total dependence with ADLs, frequently incontinent of bladder and always incontinent of bowel. Record review of Resident #77's Care Plan, dated 08/30/22, revealed Focus- diagnoses of hypertension, is on medication; Goal- free of complications related to hypertension, free from s/sx of hypertension .Interventions- give anti-hypertensive medications as ordered. Record review of Resident #77's Physician's Orders, dated 01/26/22, revealed, may crush medications and/or open capsules PRN as per pharmacy guidelines. Record review of Resident #77's Physician's Orders, dated 02/15/22, revealed Nifedipine ER Extended Release 24 hour 90 mg- give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for hypertension hold if SBP less than 110, DBP less than 60, HR less than 60. An observation and interview on 10/17/22 at 09:00 AM revealed, MA A prepared oral medication for administration to Resident #77. She retrieved a blister pack of Nifedipine ER 90 mg as well as other oral medications for the resident, the blister back of Nifedipine ER did not have an assessor label (sticker) that stated Do not Crush. MA A crushed Nifedipine ER 90 mg along with other oral formulations, mixed them with pudding and administered the crushed medications to Resident #77 at 09:07 AM. MA said the only medications that should not be crushed were enteric coated medications because crushing them would change their taste. She said extended release formulations could be crushed and administered at the resident's request. In an interview on 10/17/22 at 11:38 AM , the DON said medication should be administered as ordered and MA C said she administered 2 sprays instead of 1 spray into the nostril of Resident #33. She said EC and ER medications should not be crushed because it interrupted their delivery method and administering do not crush medications could result in resident's not receiving the right dose of the medication. Record review of MA A's Medication Pass Audit, dated 04/22/22, revealed, 8- Medications are administered in accordance with current physician's orders?- competency met-yes. 10- Medications are crushed appropriately per pharmacy recommendations or physician orders, competency met-no. Record review of MA C's Medication Administration Observation Report, dated 01/21/22, revealed 6- Correct medication verified by visual check of med, label & MAR Record review of the facility policy titled Medication Administration revised 10/01/19 revealed, (1) Preparation .G- Tablet Crushing/Capsule Crushing .a- Long-acting or enteric coated dosage forms should not be crushed; an alternative should be sought .e- For residents able to swallow or having difficulty swallowing, tablets which can be appropriately crushed may be ground coarsely and mixed with the appropriate vehicle such as applesauce so that the resident receives the entire dose ordered. Please consult with product literature or 'Do Not Crush' list which the facility may have or with the pharmacist if there is a question about medications to be crushed.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
Concerns
  • • Multiple safety concerns identified: 4 life-threatening violation(s), $52,036 in fines. Review inspection reports carefully.
  • • 14 deficiencies on record, including 4 critical (life-threatening) violations. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
  • • $52,036 in fines. Extremely high, among the most fined facilities in Texas. Major compliance failures.
  • • Grade F (7/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
Bottom line: This facility has 4 Immediate Jeopardy findings. Serious concerns require careful evaluation.

About This Facility

What is Windsor Quail Valley Post-Acute Healthcare's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns WINDSOR QUAIL VALLEY POST-ACUTE HEALTHCARE an overall rating of 3 out of 5 stars, which is considered average nationally. Within Texas, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This mid-range rating indicates the facility meets federal standards but may have areas for improvement.

How is Windsor Quail Valley Post-Acute Healthcare Staffed?

CMS rates WINDSOR QUAIL VALLEY POST-ACUTE HEALTHCARE's staffing level at 2 out of 5 stars, which is below average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 54%, compared to the Texas average of 46%. RN turnover specifically is 64%, which is notably high. RNs provide skilled clinical oversight, so turnover in this role can affect medical care quality.

What Have Inspectors Found at Windsor Quail Valley Post-Acute Healthcare?

State health inspectors documented 14 deficiencies at WINDSOR QUAIL VALLEY POST-ACUTE HEALTHCARE during 2022 to 2025. These included: 4 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death) and 10 with potential for harm. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.

Who Owns and Operates Windsor Quail Valley Post-Acute Healthcare?

WINDSOR QUAIL VALLEY POST-ACUTE HEALTHCARE is owned by a government entity. Government-operated facilities are typically run by state, county, or municipal agencies. The facility is operated by WELLSENTIAL HEALTH, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 120 certified beds and approximately 94 residents (about 78% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in MISSOURI CITY, Texas.

How Does Windsor Quail Valley Post-Acute Healthcare Compare to Other Texas Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Texas, WINDSOR QUAIL VALLEY POST-ACUTE HEALTHCARE's overall rating (3 stars) is above the state average of 2.8, staff turnover (54%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (3 stars) is at the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Windsor Quail Valley Post-Acute Healthcare?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations and the below-average staffing rating.

Is Windsor Quail Valley Post-Acute Healthcare Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, WINDSOR QUAIL VALLEY POST-ACUTE HEALTHCARE has documented safety concerns. Inspectors have issued 4 Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 3-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Texas. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.

Do Nurses at Windsor Quail Valley Post-Acute Healthcare Stick Around?

WINDSOR QUAIL VALLEY POST-ACUTE HEALTHCARE has a staff turnover rate of 54%, which is 8 percentage points above the Texas average of 46%. Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.

Was Windsor Quail Valley Post-Acute Healthcare Ever Fined?

WINDSOR QUAIL VALLEY POST-ACUTE HEALTHCARE has been fined $52,036 across 2 penalty actions. This is above the Texas average of $33,599. Fines in this range indicate compliance issues significant enough for CMS to impose meaningful financial consequences. Common causes include delayed correction of deficiencies, repeat violations, or care failures affecting resident safety. Families should ask facility leadership what changes have been made since these penalties.

Is Windsor Quail Valley Post-Acute Healthcare on Any Federal Watch List?

WINDSOR QUAIL VALLEY POST-ACUTE HEALTHCARE is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.