ROBSTOWN NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER

603 E AVE J, ROBSTOWN, TX 78380 (361) 387-1568
Non profit - Corporation 94 Beds WELLSENTIAL HEALTH Data: November 2025 3 Immediate Jeopardy citations
Trust Grade
12/100
#828 of 1168 in TX
Last Inspection: October 2024

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

Robstown Nursing and Rehabilitation Center has received a Trust Grade of F, indicating significant concerns about care quality and safety. Ranking #828 out of 1168 facilities in Texas places it in the bottom half, and at #11 out of 14 in Nueces County, only three facilities nearby are rated worse. The situation appears to be worsening, with reported issues increasing from 4 in 2023 to 10 in 2024. Staffing is a significant concern, with a poor rating of 1 out of 5 stars and a high turnover rate of 62%, which is above the Texas average of 50%. The facility has incurred $12,055 in fines, which is average, but troubling incidents were noted, including residents suffering facial injuries from assaults by another resident, and the facility's failure to investigate these incidents properly or protect vulnerable residents. While it does have excellent quality measures, the overall environment raises serious red flags that families should consider carefully.

Trust Score
F
12/100
In Texas
#828/1168
Bottom 30%
Safety Record
High Risk
Review needed
Inspections
Getting Worse
4 → 10 violations
Staff Stability
⚠ Watch
62% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
Penalties
✓ Good
$12,055 in fines. Lower than most Texas facilities. Relatively clean record.
Skilled Nurses
⚠ Watch
Each resident gets only 16 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Texas. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
Violations
⚠ Watch
16 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
★★☆☆☆
2.0
Overall Rating
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Staff Levels
★★★★★
5.0
Care Quality
★★☆☆☆
2.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2023: 4 issues
2024: 10 issues

The Good

  • 5-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record

Facility shows strength in quality measures, fire safety.

The Bad

2-Star Overall Rating

Below Texas average (2.8)

Below average - review inspection findings carefully

Staff Turnover: 62%

16pts above Texas avg (46%)

Frequent staff changes - ask about care continuity

Federal Fines: $12,055

Below median ($33,413)

Minor penalties assessed

Chain: WELLSENTIAL HEALTH

Part of a multi-facility chain

Ask about local staffing decisions and management

Staff turnover is elevated (62%)

14 points above Texas average of 48%

The Ugly 16 deficiencies on record

3 life-threatening
Oct 2024 3 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Comprehensive Care Plan (Tag F0656)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan based on assesse...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan based on assessed needs that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet the resident's medical, nursing, mental, and psychosocial needs and describes the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 1 (Resident #48) of 8 residents reviewed for comprehensive person-centered care plans. The facility failed to develop and implement Resident #48's care plan to keep the bed in a low position. This failure could affect the resident by placing them at risk for not receiving care and services to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. The findings included: Record review of Resident #48's face sheet dated 10/09/24 reflected a [AGE] year-old female with an admission date of 01/20/24. Pertinent diagnoses included Depression (mental disorder that can cause a persistent low mood, loss of interest, and other symptoms that affect a person's thoughts, feelings, and ability to function), Cognitive Communication Deficit (difficulty in communication caused by a disruption in cognition), and Generalized Anxiety Disorder (mental health condition that causes people to experience excessive and persistent worry about everyday things). Record review of Resident #48's Quarterly MDS assessment section C, cognitive patterns, dated 09/11/24 reflected a BIMS score of 3 (severe impairment). Record review of Resident #48's care plan reflected the problem [Resident #48] is risk for falls initiated and revised on 02/15/24. Interventions listed to treat the problem reflected Anticipate and meet The resident's needs initiated on 02/15/24, and Be sure The resident's call light is within reach and encourage the resident to use it for assistance as needed. The resident needs prompt response to all requests for assistance initiated on 02/15/24, and Encourage resident/staff to keep bed in low position initiated and revised on 10/10/2024. Further record review of Resident #48's care plan reflected the problem [Resident #48] has had an actual fall initiated on 03/07/24 and revised on 03/22/24. Interventions listed to treat the problem reflected 03/07/2024 unwitnessed fall neuros-initiated skin assessment performed initiated on 03/07/2024 and revised on 09/30/24. Record review of Resident #48's order summary reflected an active order dated 10/04/24 for Low Air loss mattress with Bolster. Record review of Resident #48's most recent fall risk evaluation dated 08/20/24 reflected Resident #48 scored a 10 (High Risk). During an observation on 10/08/24 at 9:55 AM, Resident #48's bed was not in the lowest position and no fall mats were in place at the sides of her bed. During an interview with the RP of Resident #48 on 10/08/24 at 9:55 AM, the RP stated Resident #48 had only fallen once approximately 6 months ago since she had been at the facility. The RP stated there used to be fall mats in place at Resident #48's bedside. The RP stated he was always included in care plan meetings, but that he did not remember them discussing specifics on how to keep Resident #48 safe in case of falls. During an observation on 10/10/24 at 8:42 AM, Resident #48's bed was not in the lowest position and no fall mats were in place at the sides of her bed. During an interview with LVN A on 10/10/24 at 8:53 AM, LVN A stated she was currently the nurse in charge of hall 100, the hall that Resident #48 resided on. LVN A stated she had only been working at the facility for a week. LVN A stated she was not aware Resident #48 had a fall in the past. LVN A stated a score of 7 or above on the fall risk assessment indicated a high risk. LVN A stated if a resident was high risk, she would put their bed in the lowest position and put fall mats in place at the sides of the resident's bed. LVN A stated based on Resident #48's fall risk assessment, she should have fall mats and her bed placed in the lowest position. LVN A stated Resident #48 was at a higher risk of fractures and head injuries because she did not have these precautions. During an interview with the ADON on 10/10/24 at 9:06 AM, the ADON stated a score of 10 or greater on the fall risk assessment indicated a high risk. The ADON stated they do individualized care at the facility, and just because a resident was indicated as high risk on their fall assessment, does not mean fall mats and lowering the bed to the lowest position were necessary. The ADON stated Resident #48 had an air mattress with bolsters on the sides to help prevent her from falling out of bed. The ADON stated Resident #48 had fall mats in place after her fall on 03/07/24, but that the IDT team decided they were unnecessary and removed them on 09/30/24. The ADON stated staff knew to lower Resident #48's bed if they saw it in a high position. The ADON stated Resident #48 would raise her bed on her own. The ADON stated she thought it was highly unlikely Resident #48 would fall again. During an interview with the DON on 10/10/24 at 9:10 AM, the DON stated a score of 10 or greater on the fall risk assessment indicated a high risk. The DON stated Resident #48 had bolsters on her air mattress, which helped to prevent a fall. The DON stated the fall mats were in place after Resident #48's initial fall, but they were removed on 09/30/24 after the IDT team decided they were unnecessary. The DON stated Resident #48's previous fall was an isolated incident. The DON stated staff knew to lower Resident #48's bed if it was too high. The DON stated they review and revise care plans quarterly and as needed. The DON stated they in-service as much of the nursing staff as possible after every fall. The DON stated if a nurse was not aware of an intervention implemented on behalf of a resident, it would be harder for the nurse to care for that resident. Record review of the facility policy titled Comprehensive Care Plans dated 10/24/22 reflected the following: 3. The comprehensive care plan will describe, at a minimum, the following: a. The services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. 8. Qualified staff responsible for carrying out interventions specified in the care plan will be notified of their roles and responsibilities for carrying out the interventions, initially and when changes are made.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitch...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for sanitation. The facility failed to maintain the floors safely. The facility failed to ensure utensils were clean and sanitized. The facility failed to ensure dishes were clean and sanitary. The facility failed to ensure juice guns were maintained and sanitary. The facility failed to ensure ingredients were not left open to air. The facility failed to ensure food in the refrigerator was not expired. The facility failed to ensure food in the dry storage area was properly covered. The facility failed to ensure food in the freezer was properly packaged. The facility failed to ensure equipment was maintained and sanitary. These failures could place residents at risk of foodborne illnesses. Findings included: An observation of the kitchen on 08/24 at 8:52 AM revealed the following: The floors were wet and slippery. A large spatula on the puree machine had broken edges on all sides. There were 71 plastic drinking glasses with heavy white residue on the bottoms and insides. There were 13 plastic coffee cups with white residue, dark brown stains, and scratches on the insides. Two of the coffee cups were on the cart for serving residents, and the rest were on the clean racks. One of the coffee cups had a gel-like substance on the inside. There were 21 plastic bowls with residue and/or food particles on the insides and deep scratches on the bottoms. 2 of 2 juice guns were soaking in a bucket of a cloudy brown liquid. The inside of the heads had a removable black substance around them. Inside the ice machine there was a removable brownish substance on the ice chute. There was an uncovered Styrofoam bowl on a prep table with a white powered substance. The bowl was uncovered and had discolored clumps in it and a small scoop. A partially filled 5-liter container in the refrigerator labeled pudding had a use-by date of 10/01/24. There were 5 bowls of dry cereal on a tray in the dry storage that were not properly covered. There was a partially filled box of sugar frozen cookie dough in the freezer open to air. There were 4, 4-oz. Individual containers labeled vanilla ice cream in the freezer with what appeared to be melted contents on the tops of the containers. The can opener was crusted with filth. The DA/DW was observed dumping dirty plastic glasses, bowls, and coffee cups from the trays on the clean racks into the rinse water of the 3-compartment sink. Observation of the kitchen on 10/10/24 at 2:05 PM revealed lids for Styrofoam cups were in the dry storage area in 4 different sizes and had lids to fit all sizes. In an interview with the DA/DW on 10/08/24 at 9:05 AM, he said he was the dishwasher today and it was his responsibility to check the dishes for cleanliness before they were used. He said the plastic cups, drinking glasses and bowls were on the clean rack, ready for use. He said he did not know what the white residue was inside the plastic drinking glasses, coffee cups, and bowls. He said the kitchen staff used the spatula with the broken edges daily in the puree, and said, It (the spatula) was fine. He said the juice guns were cleaned every day. He said he did not know what they were soaking in and he did not put them in there. He said, I would drink from the glasses. I don't know what the problem is. I don't sit there and look at everything, I just do my job. He said the FSM was out today. In an interview with the cook on 10/08/24 at 9:10 AM, she said the uncovered bowl of white powder was thickener. She said it had been open to air for about two hours. She said she did not know what the clumping came from, then placed another bowl upside down on top of it with the scoop still inside. In an interview with the FSM on 10/10/24 01:18 PM, she said the ADM told her about the juice guns. She said the guy from the juice gun company was replacing them now. She said she told the DA/DW not to soak the juice guns in water the way he was, with no sanitation. She said kitchen staff soaked the plastic dishes daily. She said she spoke with the water people about getting a water softener. She said kitchen staff would have to physically scrub the glasses to remove the residue and that would take a whole person all day. She said the scratches in the coffee cups and bowls could harbor food and bacteria and make the residents ill. She said of the scratches in the coffee cups and bowls there could be loose plastic, and the residents could ingest it. She said the facility ordered new ones. She said the brand-new spatula came with the new puree machine. She said the spatula could split and fall into the food and plastic bits could be ingested by the residents and cause illness. She said the cooks were responsible for overseeing damaged equipment to let her know so she could replace it. She said she cleaned the can opener and it should not be rusted. She said she was ordering a new one because it was rusted. She said the ice machine was supposed to be wiped down daily. She said the vent to the ice machine was left off by the maintenance man. It was on top, and he replaced it yesterday afternoon. She said the vent covering and filter fell off frequently and daily because it was held on by velcro, even though there were screw holes. She said the ice machine vent cover and filter had been that way for several weeks. She said the process for using thickener was to follow the manufacturer directions that were printed on the box for whatever needed to be thickened. The bowl by the prep table should not have been there. She said the use by date on the pudding had 3 days from the date on the item to use it by and it was expired. She said the bowls of cereal were not covered properly-they had the right size lids. She said the DA was responsible for fitting the proper lids to the cups and bowls. In an interview with the MS on 10/10/24 at 2:08 PM, he said the process of maintenance needs for the kitchen was that he did almost daily walk throughs and sometimes received them verbally. He said maintenance requests were normally generated by the facility electronic maintenance request system for staff to enter. He said the vent on the ice machine covered the filter for the ice machine. He said he used the Velco system for about 3 months and every couple of days, if not more, it would fall off and he would find it on top of the ice machine. He said without the cover and filter, the condenser and fan could get dirty. He said cross contamination could occur and get something in the food because someone would have to pick it up during food service and put it on top of the machine because it was right there near the stove. In an interview with the ADM on 10/10/24 at 5:14 PM, she said she was having the water company come out and look into a water softener. She said she ordered 2 cases of new plastic cups & bowls. She said she was hiring a new DM and educating and revamping the process and systems of the kitchen to make sure they were followed. She said she did not know any of this was going on in the kitchen because she expected the leadership there to do better. Record review of the daily cleaning log dated 09/01/24 - 09/30/24 revealed the following: The ice scoop and container, knife rack, other equipment, garbage, range and grill, steam table, and storeroom were not cleaned on 09/07/24. The microwave, other equipment, range and grill, refrigerator, freezer, and cooler were not cleaned on 09/17/24. Cutting boards and other equipment were not cleaned on 09/18/2024. The coffee machine, cutting boards, dish machine, garbage, ice scoop and container, juice machine, knife rack, microwave, other equipment, and sinks and faucets were not cleaned on 09/19/24. Other equipment was not cleaned on 09/20, 09/21, and 09/22/24. The coffee machine, cutting boards, knife rack, and ice scoop and container were not cleaned on 09/27, and 09/28/24. None of the 21 items listed on the daily cleaning schedule were initialed on 09/29/24. Further review revealed the initials on the daily cleaning schedule appeared to be written by the same hand. There were no other cleaning schedules provided. Record review of kitchen in-services revealed the following: 05/04/24-sanitation; all dietary staff will complete their daily cleaning schedule before leaving their shift. All dietary staff will sign off on all daily and monthly cleaning schedule. FSM will check for completion of these duties daily. Any infractions of not doing these duties will lead to one-on-one or disciplinary actions. Labeling and dating-all dietary staff will label and date any leftover foods daily. All foods will be discarded in 2 days. Any boxes of food that have been opened and resealed has to have the date it was opened. Daily Cleaning Duties-all staff are required to sweep & mop at end of each shift. If you drop something, pick it up, make sure handwashing sink is kept clean .Infection control-On serving line, nothing that has left the kitchen such as coffee cups, water mugs, plates, silverware, etc. Will be placed with dirty equipment to be washed and replace with clean when asked for. 06/07/24-Cleaning schedule-All dietary staff will complete cleaning schedule and initial on log that it has been done daily. Failure to do so will lead to one-on-one or interdisciplinary action. 07/02/24-Covered foods for hallways, Garbage disposal, Snack Carts. 09/16/24-Hot beverage service. 10/10/24- Juice machine and guns; juice machine will be cleaned every shift and juice guns cleaned with hot water and scrubbed with brush. Guns will not be left in water in container after cleaning. Guns will be placed in clean gun holder after cleaning, Wet Floors; all dietary staff will mop up any spills which will cause floors to be slippery. When racking all dishes they need to be racked over 3-compartment sinks to prevent spillage of any liquids. Floors are to remain dry at all times. Record review of the facility policy titled, Manual Cleaning and Sanitization of Utensils and Portable Equipment dated October, 1, 2018 revealed under Policy: The facility will follow the cleaning and sanitization requirements of the state and US Food Codes for manual cleaning in order to ensure that all utensils and equipment are thoroughly cleaned and sanitized to minimize the risk of food hazards. Under Procedure: 5. Prior to washing, pre-flush or pre-scrape all equipment and multi-use utensils. When necessary, presoak to remove gross food particles and soil. 8. Sanitize all multi-use eating and drinking utensils and the food-contact surfaces of other equipment. Record review of the FDA Food Code 2022 Ch. 4, part 4-2, subpart 4-201, Section 4-201.11 Equipment and Utensils. Equipment and utensils shall be designed and constructed to be durable and to retain their characteristic qualities under normal use conditions. 4-202 Cleanability 4-202.11 Food contact surfaces (A) Multiuse food-contact surfaces shall be: (1) Smooth (2) Free of breaks, open seams, cracks, chips, inclusions, pits, and similar imperfections 4-602 Frequency4-602.11 Equipment Food-Contact Surfaces and Utensils. (A) Equipment food-contact surfaces and utensils shall be cleaned: (5) At any time during the operation when contamination may have occurred. 3-6 Food Identity, Presentation, and On-Premises Labeling 3-601.11 Standards of Identity. Packaged Food shall comply with standard of identity requirements in 21 CFR 131-169 and 9 CFR 319 Definitions and standards of identity or composition, and the general requirements in 21 CFR 130 - Food Standards: General and 9 CFR 319 Subpart A- General. 3-602 Labeling (A) Food packaged in a food establishment, shall be labeled as specified in law, including 21 CFR 101 - Food labeling, and 9 CFR 317 Labeling, marking devices, and containers. (B) Label information shall include: (1)The common name of the FOOD, or absent a common name, an adequately descriptive identity statement.
MINOR (C)

Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact

Deficiency F0912 (Tag F0912)

Minor procedural issue · This affected most or all residents

Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the required 80 square foot per resident in 47 of 47 multiple resident rooms numbers (101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 10...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the required 80 square foot per resident in 47 of 47 multiple resident rooms numbers (101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 203, 204, 205, 206, 207, 208, 209, 210, 301, 302, 303, 304, 305, 306, 307, 401, 403, 404, 405, 406, 407, 501, 502, 503, 504, 505, 506, 507, 508, 509, 510, 600, 601, 602, 604, 606, 608, and 609). The facility failed to provide 80 square feet per resident in 47 shared resident rooms. This failure could affect residents who resided in the facility and could result in inadequate space for resident's activities of daily living in their rooms. Findings included: During an interview with the Administrator on 10/08/24 at 9:30 AM, the Administrator stated she wanted to apply for a room waiver again this year. The Administrator stated there had been no changes to room sizes since the last survey. The Administrator stated all their resident rooms were under 160 square feet. Review of annual surveys revealed the square footage of 20 sampled room measurements were as followed: 102 - 154.9 103 - 153.3 104 - 151.1 105 - 148.7 204 - 153.6 205 - 153.3 206 - 153.5 208 - 152.9 301 - 151.7 302 - 151.0 404 - 154.3 407 - 151.9 503 - 155.1 504 - 152.5 507 - 154.6 508 - 152.8 602 - 154.0 604 - 153.8 608 - 154.2 609 - 153.8 Record review of the facility Bed Classification form dated 10/08/24 revealed all resident rooms were certified as rooms for 2 residents.
Sept 2024 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Report Alleged Abuse (Tag F0609)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving the reasonable suspic...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving the reasonable suspicion of a crime were reported immediately to a law enforcement entity for its political subdivision, within two hours if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury, or not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury, for 1 (Resident #1 ) of 7 residents reviewed for abuse/neglect. The facility failed to report Resident #1's allegations of abuse to the local law enforcement agency within the allotted time frame of 2 hours on 08/18/24 when Resident #1 was injured in a physical altercation initiated by Resident #2 at around 2 PM, sustaining a skin tear to his right forearm. This failure could place all residents at increased risk for potential abuse due to unreported allegations of abuse. The findings included: Resident #1 Record review of Resident #1's face sheet reflected an [AGE] year-old male with an admission date of 03/13/20. Pertinent diagnoses included Alzheimer's Disease (a brain disorder that causes a gradual decline in memory, thinking, and behavioral abilities), Major Depressive Disorder (a serious mental disorder that can affect how someone feels, thinks, and acts characterized by a depressed mood and loss of interest in activities that were normally enjoyable), Generalized Anxiety Disorder (a mental disorder that causes people to experience excessive, persistent, and uncontrollable worry for months to years). Record review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS assessment section C, Cognitive Patterns, dated 07/17/24 reflected a BIMS score of 3 (severe impairment). Further review revealed section E, Behavior, showed no history of aggressive behaviors. Record review of Resident #1's care plan revealed no history of planning for aggressive behaviors. Record review of a Change of Condition assessment dated [DATE] noted a resident-to-resident altercation with a skin tear to right arm of Resident #1. Record review of a Wound assessment dated [DATE] noted a right forearm skin tear length of 6 cm and width of 4 cm to Resident #1. In an interview with Resident #1 at 9:30 AM on 09/20/24, Resident #1 stated he enjoyed his time at the facility. Resident #1 stated the nurses were good and that he got along with all the other residents. Resident #1 stated he did not remember ever having an altercation or incident with Resident #2. Resident #2 Record review of Resident #2's face sheet reflected an [AGE] year-old male with an original admission date of 09/27/21 and a current admission date of 07/23/24. Pertinent diagnoses included Unspecified Psychosis (used when someone has psychotic symptoms that don't meet the criteria for a specific psychotic disorder) and Major Depressive Disorder. Record review of Resident #2's Comprehensive MDS assessment section C, Cognitive Patterns, dated 07/25/24 reflected a BIMS score of 7 (severe impairment). Further review revealed section E, Behavior, showed physical behaviors such as hitting, kicking, pushing and grabbing occurred daily while verbal behaviors such as threatening others, screaming at others and cursing occurred 1 to 3 days per week. Further review of section E revealed Resident #2 experienced hallucinations (perceptual experiences in the absence of real external sensory stimuli) and delusions (misconceptions or believed that are firmly held, contrary to reality). Further review of section E revealed Resident #2's behaviors have improved since his prior assessment. Record review of Resident #2's care plan revealed the problem [Resident #2] is potential to be verbally aggressive r/t ineffective coping skills, poor impulse control initiated on 09/15/23. Interventions listed for this problem included Analyze of key time, places, circumstances, triggers, and what de-escalates behavior and document, and Assess and anticipate resident's needs: food, thirst, toileting needs, comfort level, body positioning, pain, etc,. Record review of the provider investigation report dated 08/24/24 revealed on 08/18/24, LVN A was told that Resident #2 stated his roommate and him were arguing over the tv remote in their room. Resident #2 stated Resident #1 pushed him and they both fell. Resident #2 stated he got Resident #1 up and they shook hands afterwards. Resident #2 denied any pain or discomfort at the time of reporting. Resident #2 was immediately placed on a one-to-one with constant supervision and moved to a room in a different hall. Resident #1 stated that he was in his bed when Resident #2 came over to him and grabbed both of his arms, shaking him and yelling at him. Resident #1 had a skin tear to his right forearm that required treatment. Resident #1 denied pain and stated he was not fearful or felt like he was in danger. Provider investigation report did not provide any evidence that a local law enforcement agency was notified of this incident. Further review revealed In conclusion, [Resident #2] admitted to wanting the TV remote and attempted to take it from roommate causing a skin tear. [Resident #2] placed on one-to-one monitoring. No further behavior from [Resident #2]. He remained in his room. Continue to monitor his well-being. No new orders from physician. [Resident #1] admitted that he had a TV remote, and the roommate grabbed it and him as well, trying to take it. He denies pain to arm. [Resident #2] moved immediately to another hall. [Resident #1] denies feeling fearful and continues to come to dining for all meals. Continue to monitor his well-being. No further behaviors from resident and no new orders from physician. In an interview with Resident #2 at 9:36 AM on 09/20/24, Resident #2 stated some nurses were not good at their jobs. Resident #2 stated he had issues with a roommate in the past but could not remember his name. Resident #2 stated he grabbed the remote from his roommate, but that his roommate then lunged at him and hit him in the head. Resident #2 stated that he hit his roommate back in self-defense and they ended up struggling on the floor for a few minutes. Resident #2 stated he won the fight, and then afterwards held out his hand to make peace. In an interview with the DOS at 1:29 PM on 09/19/24, the DOS stated Resident #1 did not remember the incident the following day after it happened. The DOS stated Resident #2 lived with severe schizophrenia and did not like having a roommate. The DOS stated the two residents had only been roommates for a few weeks at the time of the incident. The DOS stated they have struggled to find a roommate for Resident #2. The DOS stated Resident #1 had never had any issues with roommates in the past. The DOS stated he had never observed Resident #2 be physical or rude to another resident. In an interview with the DON at 3:00 PM on 09/19/24, the DON stated Resident #1 had never been aggressive with other residents or staff. The DON stated Resident #2 had been verbally aggressive with others before, but never physically aggressive. The DON stated the initial assessment performed after the incident by LVN A determined that Resident #2 grabbed the arms of Resident #1, which caused bruising to both arms and a skin tear to Resident #1's right arm. The DON stated Resident #2 was immediately put on a one-to-one. The DON stated the remote control to the television in their room was found in Resident #2's pocket, but the batteries and battery cover were found in the bed of Resident #1. The DON stated the two residents have never encountered each other in the facility since they switched rooms because Resident #2 spent most of his time in his new room. The DON stated the administrator made the decision on whether to call the police after the incident. The DON stated she believed this incident did meet the definition of an assault. In an interview with LVN A at 9:01 AM on 09/20/24, LVN A stated she was working on 08/18/24, the day of the incident. LVN A stated Resident #2 came up to the nurse's station and asked for batteries for the remote control for the television in his room. LVN A stated she went into their room and saw the skin tear on Resident #1's right forearm and bruising on his left forearm. LVN A stated she performed the head-to-toe assessment on both of the residents and only noted injuries to Resident #1. LVN A stated Resident #1 told her that he had the remote, but Resident #2 walked over to him while he was in bed and grabbed his arms. LVN A stated, based on the injuries and stories of the residents, she concluded that Resident #2 caused the injuries to Resident #1's arms. LVN A stated that Resident #2 never admitted to causing the injuries to Resident #1. LVN A stated that this incident probably would be considered assault. LVN A stated the two residents have not interacted since this incident because Resident #2 stayed in his new room all the time. LVN A stated Resident #2 only left his new room for coffee, ice, and milk. In an interview with the ADON at 10:36 AM on 09/20/24, the ADON stated she did not feel Resident #2 was a danger to Resident #1 anymore. The ADON stated she was not at the facility on the day of the incident. The ADON stated assuming the injuries to Resident #1 were caused by Resident #2, then it would qualify as abuse. The ADON stated the most reasonable conclusion to draw based on the evidence was that Resident #2 caused the injuries to Resident #1's arms. In an interview with the ADM at 11:36 AM on 09/20/24, the ADM stated the police were not initially notified after this incident between Resident #1 and Resident #2 on 08/18/24. The ADM stated she did notify the local police department on 09/19/24 of the incident and obtained the case number. The ADM stated she met with her regional team shortly after the incident, and as a team, concluded the incident did not rise to the level necessitating notifying the police department. The ADM stated they did not have a policy addressing the conditions in which notifying a local law enforcement agency regarding an incident at the facility was necessary. The ADM stated she did not think there was reasonable suspicion that a crime had occurred during the incident. The ADM stated she thought it was more likely than not that abuse had not occurred during this incident. The ADM stated she did not believe Resident #2 intended to cause the injuries to Resident #1. The ADM stated the most likely cause of the injuries to Resident #1 was Resident #2 grabbing him. Record review of the facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation dated 08/15/22 reflected the following: VII. Reporting/Response A. The facility will have written procedures that include: 1. Reporting of all alleged violations to the Administrator, state agency, adult protective services and to all other required agencies (e.g., law enforcement when applicable) within specified timeframes: a. Immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury, or b. Not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury.
Feb 2024 6 deficiencies 3 IJ (3 affecting multiple)
CRITICAL (K) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

Someone could have died · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure each resident had the right to be free from abu...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure each resident had the right to be free from abuse for three residents (Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3) of 12 residents reviewed for abuse/neglect. The facility failed to ensure: -Resident #1 and Resident #2 were free of abuse, Resident #1 and Resident #2 sustained facial injuries from being hit in the face by Resident #3 multiple times, while they laid in bed resulting in bruising, cuts and discoloration to their face. -Facility nursing staff failed to assess residents after being notified of residents with injuries. -Resident #1 verbalized he was fearful of the alleged perpetrator and fearful that he was going to get assaulted again, since the perpetrator was not removed from the vicinity. An IJ was identified on 02/21/24. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 10:01 AM. While the IJ was removed on 02/23/24, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of pattern and a severity level of potential for more than minimal harm that is because all staff were not aware of and did not implement the facility's abuse prevention and reporting policy and procedure. These failures have the potential to result in serious injury or death as a result of abuse and neglect. The findings included: Resident #1 Resident#1 is an [AGE] year-old male initially admitted on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnosis of cerebral infarction, dysphagia, cognitive communication deficit, dementia and muscle wasting and atrophy. Record review of Resident #1's MDS Quarterly dated 11/25/2023 revealed Resident #1 had a BIMS Score of 01-severe cognitive impairment and needed extensive assistance with all ADLs. Record review of Resident #1's Care Plan date initiated on 11/27/2023 revealed Resident #1 had an ADL self-care performance deficit related to weakness, limited mobility. Resident #1 is dependent on staff for meeting emotional, intellectual, physical, and social needs r/t Cognitive deficits, Immobility. Interventions, Bed mobility: Resident #1 requires extensive assistance by x 1 staff to turn and reposition in bed frequently and as necessary. Transfers: requires Mechanical Lift (hoyer) with (2) staff assistance for transfers. The resident needs 1:1 bedside/in-room visits and activities if unable to attend out of room events. Record review of Resident #1's Weekly Skin Evaluation dated 2/14/2024, revealed site: face, description: swelling under left eye with bruising and three small cuts to left inner eye area. Additional comments: was hit by another resident. Signed by LVN A on 02/15/2024. Record review of Resident #1's progress note dated 2/14/2024 at 23:14 (11:14PM) revealed Patient was in his room when another patient entered the room and hit the patient in the face. The patient sustained an injury he has swelling and bruising to left eye. Patient also has several small cuts to the left side of his face. Dr was notified along with Facility administrator and director of nursing. Patient family member was also notified. Patient showing no signs of distress noted at this time. Record review of Resident #1's incident report conducted by LVN A dated 2/15/2024, Incident description: Nursing description: Nurse was called to patient room by CNA. CNA informed nurse that patient was hit by another resident. Patient was laying in bed. Resident Description: Noted to have bruising and swelling to left eye with several small cuts to left inner and outer eye; Injuries observed at time of incident: No injuries observed at time of incident. Record review of Resident #1's incident report dated 2/15/2024 Injuries Report Post incident (conducted by DON): Injury Type: Bruise/Discoloration to: chest, right hand (back), face, left upper arm, left shoulder (front). Notes: Upon assessment resident identified with discoloration to top of right hand approximately 6.0x5.0cm. Large purple/green discoloration to left shoulder radiating towards left chest resembling as fingerprints. Left eye with swelling with red/purple discoloration. Left cheek with 2 superficial scratches and 1 small scratch below left eye. Small discoloration to left elbow. Other info: patient was hit by another resident. Record review of Resident#1's Pain Evaluation indicated it was not performed on 02/14/2024. Record review of Resident #1's Weekly Skin Evaluation conducted by the DON dated 02/15/2024 at 10:19AM revealed Resident #1 sustained injury to: left elbow (discoloration), right hand (back)(discoloration), beneath left eye scratch, left cheek scratches, left chest discoloration, left eye discoloration with swelling, left shoulder discoloration. Additional comments: This is follow-up skin assessment for resident-to-resident altercation on 2/14/2024. Record review of Resident #1's Pain Evaluation conducted by the DON on 02/15/2024 at 12:07PM revealed Resident #1 complained of pain to his left eye-pain expressed post resident to resident altercation (receiver). Resident #1 exhibited facial pain expression of grimacing. Body language: tense. What alleviates the pain? Pain medication. What makes the pain worse? movement, touch. Resident #2 Resident #2 is an [AGE] year-old male initially admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnosis of cerebral infarction, acute and chronic respiratory failure, and hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction. Record review of Resident #2's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 01-severe cognitive impairment and needed extensive assistance with all ADLs. Record review of Resident #2's Care Plan date initiated 12/04/2023 revealed, the resident has an ADL self-care performance deficit r/t Hemiplegia. Interventions: functional performance: chair/bed-to-chair transfer: the resident requires dependent assistance required to transfer to and from a bed to a wheelchair. Functional performance: eating: The Resident requires Substantial Max assistance required for eating. Functional performance: lower body dressing: The Resident requires Extensive assistance required for lower/upper body dressing. Functional performance: lying to sitting on side of bed: The Resident requires Extensive assistance required to move from lying on the back to sitting on the side of the bed and with no back support. Functional performance: oral hygiene: The Resident requires Extensive assistance required for oral hygiene. Functional performance: roll left to right: The Resident requires Extensive assistance to roll from lying on back to left and right side and return to lying on back on the bed. BED MOBILITY: The resident requires extensive assistance by 1 staff to turn and reposition in bed at least Q2 hours and as necessary. TRANSFER: [Resident #2] requires Mechanical Lift (hoyer) with (2) staff assistance for transfers. Record review of Resident #2's progress notes by LVN A dated 2/14/2024 at 23:00 (11:00PM) revealed, Patient was laying in bed when another patient went into his room and hit him in the face. The patient received a bruise and several small cuts to right side of face. Patient stated another resident hit him with his fist. Facility Director DON and DR. were notified patient family RP was called and notified. Record review of Resident #2's Weekly Skin Evaluation dated 02/14/2024 conducted by LVN A, revealed Resident #2's face with bruising noted to right and left side of face with small cut to left side of face. Additional comments: Patient was hit by another patient. Signed by LVN A on 02/15/2024. Record review of Resident#1's Pain Evaluation indicated it was not performed on 02/14/2024. Record review of Resident #2's Incident report dated 2/14/2024 conducted by LVN A revealed, Incident Description: Nursing Description: CNA called nurse to patient room. Patient was hit by another resident in the face. Resident Description: Patient was laying in bed was noted to have red areas and cuts to both sides of his face. Immediate Action Taken: Description: Patient face was cleaned, and vitals were taken. Vitals WNL. Patient not showing any signs of distress at this time. RP, MD notified. Injury Type: Abrasion to face, injury type: bruise/discoloration to face. Record review of Resident #2's Incident report dated 2/14/2024 Injury Report Post Incident conducted by DON, Injury type: bruise/discoloration to face. Notes: Upon assessment resident identified with redness (with small areas of purple) discolorations throughout entire face and neck area. Resident has had small scratches to cheeks, beneath left eye, chin and left eyebrow. Other info: patient was hit by another resident. Record review of Resident #2's Weekly Wound progress dated 2/15/2024 conducted by the DON revealed, bruising and scratches, dark red/purple, Redness (with small areas of purple) discolorations throughout entire face, scratches beneath left eye, cheeks, chin and above left eyebrow. Record review of Resident #2's Progress note by LVN C dated 2/15/2024 at 6:50AM revealed, Resident assessed head to toe by this nurse. Resident's right jaw and ear with swelling and redness. Beneath left eye, cheek, and chin several scratches and redness. Resident asked if he had any pain and resident reports that his jaw hurts but unable to rate pain on scale of 0-10 which is baseline. Pain was treated with PRN Morphine 0.25ml SL which was effective. Record review of Resident #2's Progress note by DON dated 2/15/2024 at 13:00 (1:00PM) revealed, on 2/14/2024 Charge nurse reports resident was involved in a resident-to-resident altercation. Upon assessment resident identified with redness (with small areas of purple) discolorations throughout entire face and neck area. Resident also had small scratches to cheeks, beneath left eye, chin and left eyebrow.AM charge nurse reports she received an order for facial x-ray related to swelling and complaints of pain, x-ray results pending. Record review of Resident #2's Pain Evaluation dated 02/15/2024 at 15:03 (3:03PM) conducted by the DON, revealed Resident #2's face exhibited Pain expressed post resident to resident altercation (receiver). Resident #2 exhibited facial grimacing and tense body language. What alleviates the pain? Pain medication. What makes the pain worse? movement, touch. Resident #3 Resident#3 is an 80- year-old male admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis of congestive heart failure, dementia, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, anxiety, and cognitive communication deficit. Record review of Resident #3's quarterly MDS dated , 12/19/23 revealed a BIMS score of 2-severe cognitive impairment, physical behavioral symptoms directed toward others (e.g., hitting, kicking, pushing, scratching, grabbing, abusing others sexually) ranging 4-6days, uses walker for mobility, and can walk 50 feet with supervision. Record review of Resident #3's Care Plan revised on 10/02/2023 revealed, [Resident #3] is/has potential to be physically aggressive related to poor impulse control. Interventions: 12/16/2023, and 9/9/2023 Resident had a physical altercation with other resident, both were separated immediately. 2/14/24 - [Resident #3] had a physical altercation with other residents, both were separated immediately. 9/9/2023 Resident had a physical altercation with roommate, both were separated immediately. Roommate moved to another room. Administer medications as ordered. Monitor/document for side effects and effectiveness. Analyze times of day, places, or circumstances, triggers, and what de-escalates behavior and document. Assess and anticipate resident's needs: food, thirst. toileting needs, comfort level, body positioning, pain etc. COMMUNICATION: provide physical and verbal cues to alleviate anxiety; give positive feedback, assist verbalization of source of agitation, assist to set goals for more pleasant behavior, encourage seeking out of staff member when agitated. Record review of Resident #3's weekly skin evaluation dated 2/14/2024 at 10:00AM and signed/lock date of 2/15/2024 at 12:57AM revealed, no injuries noted. - There was no other skin evaluation noted for the date 2/14/2024, post resident-to-resident altercation. Record review of Resident #3's progress notes revealed there were no progress notes for date 2/14/2024 regarding resident-to-resident altercation. Record review of Resident #3's Progress note dated 2/15/2024 at 12:00AM, Doctor/MD notes: was informed that patient had altercation with multiple residents causing injuries last night. Social worker received warrant to have patient sent to ER for clearance in preparation for admission to [hospital name] behavioral hospital. NP aware of patient status. Record review of Resident #3's Progress note dated 2/15/2024 at 1:13PM by the SW, Resident became combative with two other residents last night, then upon redirection he became combative towards staff. The SW sent referral to the behavioral health and requested services. The SW requested an emergency detention warrant from the county judge. Judge Signed Warrant. When the officers arrived at the facility to transport Resident #3 to [behavioral hospital], Resident #3 became agitated, verbally aggressive, and then combative towards the officers. Once officers were able to subdue Resident #3, he was transferred to ER to get medically cleared for behavioral health. Record review of Resident #3's Progress note dated 2/15/2024 at 3:43PM by the DON, on 2/14/2024 Charge nurse reports resident was involved in resident-to-resident altercation (initiator-aggressor). Upon assessment resident identified with noted with purple discoloration to left hand. Social services to detain a detention warrant. Resident continues on 1 on 1care. Resident does not appear to have any negative psych-social effects from incident and is unable to recall event. Will continue to monitor. During an observation and interview on 02/17/2024 at 3:14PM Resident #1 stated a man entered his room and began hitting him in the face a couple of days ago. Resident #1 stated a man hit him about 5 times on his face. Resident #1 stated he was fearful of living at facility because he is scared the man is going to hit him again. Resident #1 stated the man stopped himself, and that there was no other person in the room. Upon observation Resident #1 has black/purple discoloration on left eye within the eye socket area as well as extended toward the temporal area where green discoloration is present and covers 25% of face. During an observation on 02/17/2024 at 3:14PM Resident #2 had purple/green discoloration on left eye around the rim of left eye, as well as had red/ purple discoloration on the right side of his neck, resembling a handprint. Resident #2 also had red discoloration on the lower left portion, near the lower left eye lid, of the eye socket, which appears to measure about one inch in circumference (circle like appearance). During an interview on 02/17/2024 at 3:14PM Resident #2 (Resident #1's roommate) stated it hurts while pointing to his left eye. Resident #2 was not able to communicate what happened to his eye. During an interview on 02/17/2024 at 3:48PM NA A stated she worked the 6PM-6AM shift. NA A stated Resident #1 and Resident #2 were roommates, and she distinctly recalled on 02/14/2024 at 8:25PM, she entered Resident #1 and Resident #2's room as part of her rounds (brief changes, clothes changes for bedtime). NA A stated prior to entering Resident #1 and Resident #2's room, she saw that their lights were off, and stated she thought it was strange due to Resident #1 and Resident #2 both being bedbound but continued without turning the lights on. NA A stated once she entered their room, she started with Resident #1, and stated she looked at Resident #1's face and saw a dark shadow around his left eye, so she turned on the lights and saw bright red blood on at least half of Resident #1's face, as well as on Resident #1's blanket/covers, bed, and a little on the wall. NA A stated, when she asked Resident #1 what happened, Resident #1 stated that someone hit him and was trying to kill him. NA A stated she quickly ran out of the room and notified LVN A. NA A stated, while she notified LVN A at the nurse's station, she waited for LVN A to get up to check on Resident #1, but that LVN A did not immediately get up to assess the situation. NA A stated, while LVN A was at the nurse's station, LVN A directed NA A to go back into the room to clean up Resident #1, with perineal wet wipes, without LVN A assessing him first. NA A stated while cleaning up Resident #1, she saw he had bruises on his left side of chest, blood/bruising on his right hand and swelling on left eye with blood all over his face .NA A stated once she cleaned Resident #1's face, and changed his linen, she went back to the nurse's station and overheard LVN A speaking to an unknown caller, and overheard LVN A state Resident #3 hit Resident #1, without any other details given. NA A stated during the later part of the evening before approximately 10PM, she walked with LVN A into Resident #1's room, where LVN A looked at Resident #1 and then proceeded to exit the room. NA A stated while she walked out of the room with LVN A, NA A saw Resident #2 and saw blood on his Resident #2's face, as well as heard Resident #2 breathing irregularly. NA A stated Resident #2 had blood stains on his neck, and claw marks on both side of his neck, handprint on his right side of neck, as though someone choked him. NA A stated LVN A put a pulse oximeter on Resident #2's finger, and that LVN A stated, Resident #2 is breathing okay. NA A stated she walked out of Resident #1 and Resident #2's room with LVN A but did not see LVN A do any form of head-to-toe assessment on either of the Residents. NA A stated she then spoke to LVN B and explained the details of her initial findings of Resident #1's blood-soaked linen and face, and LVN B did not go with NA A to see Resident #1's injuries. NA A stated when she went back to her 600 hallway to check on Resident #1, she saw Resident #3 in the hallway with blood on his fists, and that Resident #3 stated I'll beat you up like I beat up the boys. NA A stated during her 02/14/2024-02/15/2024 6PM-6AM shift, she did not see any leadership staff arrive on site, nor any law enforcement. NA A stated when the morning shift (6AM on 2/15/24) arrived, she notified LVN C, and LVN C went into Resident #1 and Resident#2's room and observed that Resident #1 started to cry and complained he was hurting. NA A stated she was instructed to follow the chain of command whenever she suspected abuse and did notify her charge nurse as well as LVN B on 02/14/2024 but did not know of any other options she had to advocate for Resident #1 and Resident #2. Attempted to interview LVN A on 02/18/2024 at 9:18AM, 9:27AM, 5:07PM, as well as on 02/19/2024 at 4:39PM and on 02/23/24 at 5:10 PM, 5:11 PM, 5:12 PM but was unsuccessful . During an interview on 02/18/2024 at 9:54AM, LVN B stated she did not enter the room of Resident #1 to assess the resident's injuries. LVN B stated she asked LVN A if she had completed a head-to-toe assessment, behavior monitoring form, as well as asked if she did the incident report, to which LVN A stated she did. LVN B stated she took what LVN A stated as truthful, and stated LVN A described the resident-to-resident altercation with minimal severity. LVN B stated she believed LVN A notified the proper chain of command, as well as believed LVN A completed the proper documentation, and did not find a need to intervene on LVN A's residents. LVN B stated she was in another resident's room, when LVN A ran to LVN B stating that Resident #3 was running after LVN A trying to hit LVN A and that Resident #3 was also yelling and stating vulgar and derogative remarks to LVN A. LVN B stated she quickly confronted Resident #3, de-escalated Resident #3's behavior, and guided Resident #3 back to his room, tucked him in, and left Resident #3's room. After leaving Resident #3's room she had no other contact with Resident #3 and did not enter Resident #1 and Resident #2's room. During multiple interviews with the Administrator and DON, between 02/17/2024 at 6:17PM, and 02/19/2024 at 5:47PM, the DON stated on 2/14/24 around 8:40PM, LVN A called and notified the DON that Resident #3 hit Resident #1, but that LVN A did not present any details of the occurrence, only that Resident #3 hit Resident #1. The DON stated that she immediately instructed LVN A to call the Administrator. The Administrator stated around 8:45PM-9:00PM, she received a call from LVN A and that LVN A stated that Resident #3 hit Resident #1. The Administrator stated that during that one and only notification phone call, LVN A never gave any detailed description of the severity of Resident #1's injury. The DON stated that on 2/14/24 at 9:50PM, she texted (text reviewed) LVN A that LVN A needed to complete a change in condition form, risk management form, Q15min behavior monitoring form, skin assessments, supportive documentation (weekly wound progress), and pain assessments for both Resident #1 and Resident #3. The Administrator stated around 6AM on 2/15/24 she was notified by a 6AM-6PM clinical staff member that the clinical staff member entered Resident #2's room and Resident #2 appeared to have swelling to his face as well as serious facial injuries. The Administrator stated she arrived at the facility around 6:30AM and entered Resident #1 and Resident #2's room and found that Resident #1 had substantial facial injuries of dark purple discoloration around the left side of Resident #1's face as well as swelling throughout his face and did notice on the right side of Resident #1's right side of neck, red fingerlike marks on his neck. The Administrator stated she also saw Resident #2's face and observed purple discoloration on his face, red coloration around Resident #2's neck, with also swelling. Both Administrator and DON stated they were never notified about Resident #2's injuries until notified the morning of 2/15/24 around 6AM. Both stated, when they were notified by LVN A around 8:45PM, she never described the severity of Resident #1's injuries only that he was hit, which lead them to determine that they did not need to move Resident #3, who lived directly in front of Resident #1 and Resident #2 (roommates), from his room to somewhere else. The DON stated she directed LVN A to conduct Q15min checks for Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3. Both stated the Q15min surveillance was adequate at the time, but had they known the severity of the altercations, they would have put Resident #3 on a one-to-one to ensure the safety of the other residents. Both stated it was plausible, that during the Q15 surveillance, for the 14minutes when the nurse was not monitoring Resident #3, Resident #3 could have exited his room, inflicted more injury onto Resident #1 and Resident #2, and go back to his room, since these three residents were front door neighbors. The Administrator stated on the morning of 2/15/24 around 6:30-7:00AM, a 1:1 was implemented for Resident #3, and when speaking to Resident #1 first, in Spanish, Resident #1 stated that man beat me up, and when speaking to Resident #2, in Spanish he stated, he hit me. The Administrator stated she was unable to interview Resident #3, due to his aggressive behavior on 2/15/2024, and then later Resident #3 was removed from the facility. When asked about the facility's Abuse and Neglect policy, and their definition of physical abuse, the Administrator stated, Resident #3 hitting Resident #1 would fall under physical abuse, and stated had they known the severity of the injuries they would have entered the facility that evening of 2/14/24 and began an investigation into the resident-to-resident abuse, removed Resident #3 from his immediate accessibility of Resident #1 and Resident #2, as well as notified the local authorities, and state agencies. Both stated they did not begin an investigation, nor did they think to remove Resident #3 from his room, nor did they notify law enforcement or state agencies, due to LVN A not describing the severity of the physical altercations. Both stated they in-service staff regularly about abuse and neglect, and stated the last in-service regarding abuse and neglect was done on 02/15/2024 but was not 100% complete. Record review on 02/18/2024, of the facility's Abuse/Neglect in-service dated 2/15/24 documented 27 staff members attendance signatures, however two of the signatures were doubled, which made 25 staff members in attendance. During an interview on 02/19/2024 at approximately 6:00PM, the DON stated the Abuse and Neglect in-service was started on 02/15/2024 but was not 100% completed, and that the facility was lacking at least 4 staff members to be 100% completed with the in-service. Record review on 02/19/2024, of the facility's Abuse/Neglect in-service dated 2/15/24 had a continuation of additional signatures which made 50 staff members in attendance, however per the staff roster the facility employed 59 staff members. Record review of the facility's Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation policy dated 8/15/22 stated, Definitions: Physical abuse- includes but not limited to hitting, slapping, punching, biting and kicking. Identification of Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation: Possible indicators of abuse include, but are not limited to 2. Physical marks such as bruises or patterned appearances such as a handprint, belt or ring mark on a resident's body. Investigation of Alleged Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation: A. An immediate investigation is warranted when suspicion of abuse, neglect or exploitation, or reports of abuse, neglect or exploitation or reports of abuse, neglect, or exploitation occur. Protection of Resident: D. Room or staffing changes, if necessary, to protection the resident(s) from the alleged perpetrator. Reporting/Response A.The facility will have written procedures that include: 1. Reporting of all alleged violations to the Administrator, state agency, adult protective services and all other required agencies (e.g., law enforcement when applicable) within specified timeframes: a. Immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury. This was determined to be an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) and the Administrator was notified of the IJ on 02/21/2024. The Administrator was provided with IJ templates on 02/21/2024 at 10:01AM. The following Plan of Removal was submitted by the facility was accepted on 02/22/24 at 3:58PM. The facility's Plan of Removal included: On February 21, 2024, the facility was notified by the surveyor, that an immediate jeopardy had been called and the facility needed to submit a letter of credible allegation. The Facility respectfully submits this Letter for Plan of Removal pursuant to Federal and State regulatory requirements. The immediate jeopardy allegations are as follows: F-Tag 600: Abuse. The facility failed to ensure the resident's right to be free from abuse and neglect. Done for those affected: oResident #3 was assessed by licensed nurse on 02/14/2024. MD was notified by licensed nurse on 02/14/2024. 02/14/2024 Resident #3 was placed on every 15-minute checks. Resident #3 was transferred to the hospital and was placed on 1:1 on 2/15/24 pending transfer to the hospital. Resident remains at the hospital. On Monday, 2/19/2024 Facility care planned with family. Referral is being sent to other facilities at the request of the family. If unable to find a transferring facility, the resident will return on a 1-1 until the decision is made on the 30-day notice of discharge. Resident will remain on 1-1 until he is discharged . oResident #1 was assessed on 02/14/2024 by [clinical staff name] to include pain and skin evaluation. Assessment revealed swelling under left eye with bruising and 3 small cuts to left inner eye. Psychosocial assessment was completed by Social Worker on 02/15/2024. Plan of care was reviewed and updated by licensed nurse on 02/15/2024. MD was notified by licensed nurse on 02/14/2024 and 02/15/2024. oResident #2 was assessed on 02/14/2024 by, [clinical staff name] to include pain and skin evaluation. Assessment revealed bruising noted to right and left side of face with small cut to left side of face. Psychosocial assessment was completed by Social Worker on 02/15/2024. Plan of care was reviewed and updated by licensed nurse on 02/15/2024. MD was notified by licensed nurse on 02/14/2024 and 02/15/2024. Identify residents who could be affected: o On 02/15/2024, the Facility Social Worker(s) completed 100% of interviews of interviewable residents to assess for potential abuse. No additional concerns were identified. Residents who are confused were asked yes and no questions. On the 2 residents who are unable to answer, their spouses were contacted. Out of the 2 one denied any allegations of abuse and the other did not answer his phone and has not returned the call. Was called each day and answered on 2/17/24 and he denied any allegations of abuse. o On 02/15/2024, the DON/designee reviewed the incident/accidents in the last 30 days to ensure that investigations, timely reporting to HHSC as indicated, resident assessments and supervision to include 1:1 supervision as needed were completed and provided. All other residents were identified to be in their room except 2 female residents who were up and watching television and do not have any history of behaviors. Systemic Process: oEffective immediately on 02/15/2024, the Administrator/ DON and/ or designee began reeducation to 100% of facility staff on the following: o Abuse and Neglect and Abuse Policy to include timely Investigation and HHSC Reporting to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, are reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury, or not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury. The Administrator who is the Abuse Prevention Coordinator will be immediately notified for any concerns with Abuse, Neglect and Misappropriation. o Resident Supervision to include 1:1 staff supervision o Quality of Care to include proper resident assessment with each resident incident/accidents - Please include what this process is/if using a P & P you may attach policy and include statement to refer to that policy #/name o See attached policy labeled Incidents and Accidents o During the Morning Meeting. Risk Management will be reviewed to ensure that all required assessments were completed. o when will an assessment be conducted after knowledge of an injury; o The assessment will be conducted at the time of incident and the nurse will enter all information into the appropriate forms within 8 hours of occurrence. o The assessment will include date, time, nature of incident, location, initial findings, immediate interventions, notifications and orders obtained or follow-up interventions. o The resident was placed on Q 15-minute checks immediately following the incident. Residents' doorway is visible from the nurses station and staff kept a watch on his door throughout the shift. Aides were on and off the halls throughout the night and the resident remained in his room and the other 2 residents were safe in bed. Resident remained in his room and no further behavior. At 6:00am the resident was placed on 1-1 in preparation for him to awaken. Social Worker went before Judge to obtain a detention warrant to [hospital name]. [local city police enforcement] called and notified of the incident and we requested assistance with transp[TRUNCATED]
CRITICAL (K) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Abuse Prevention Policies (Tag F0607)

Someone could have died · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to implement its policies and procedures that prohibit an...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to implement its policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, and exploitation of residents for three residents (Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3) of 12 residents reviewed for abuse and neglect. 1. The facility failed to immediately implement an investigation after they were made aware of an abuse allegation involving Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3. 2. The facility failed to report the abuse allegation to the State Survey Agency and local law enforcement in accordance with state law. 3.The facility failed to ensure that all residents were protected from physical and psychosocial harm after made aware of the incident involving a resident to resident assault when Resident #3 assaulted Resident #1 and Resident #2 and they sustained facial bruising, cuts, and discoloration. An IJ was identified on 02/21/23. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 10:01 AM. While the IJ was removed on 02/23/24, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of pattern and a severity level of potential for more than minimal harm that is because all staff were not aware of and did not implement the facility's abuse prevention and reporting policy and procedure. These failures had the potential to result in serious injury or death as a result of the resident-to-resident physical abuse and the facility's systemic failure. The findings include: Resident #1 Resident#1 is an [AGE] year-old male initially admitted on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnosis of cerebral infarction, dysphagia, cognitive communication deficit, dementia and muscle wasting and atrophy. Record review of Resident #1's MDS Quarterly dated 11/25/2023 revealed Resident #1 had a BIMS Score of 01-severe cognitive impairment and needed extensive assistance with all ADLs. Record review of Resident #1's Care Plan date initiated on 11/27/2023 revealed Resident #1 had an ADL self-care performance deficit related to weakness, limited mobility. Resident #1 is dependent on staff for meeting emotional, intellectual, physical, and social needs r/t Cognitive deficits, Immobility. Interventions, Bed mobility: Resident #1 requires extensive assistance by x 1 staff to turn and reposition in bed frequently and as necessary. Transfers: requires Mechanical Lift (hoyer) with (2) staff assistance for transfers. The resident needs 1:1 bedside/in-room visits and activities if unable to attend out of room events. During an observation and interview on 02/17/2024 at 3:14PM Resident #1 stated a man entered his room and began hitting him in the face a couple of days ago. Resident #1 stated a man hit him about 5 times on his face. Resident #1 stated he was fearful of living at facility because he is scared the man is going to hit him again. Resident #1 stated the man stopped himself, and that there was no other person in the room. Upon observation Resident #1 has black/purple discoloration on left eye within the eye socket area as well as extended toward the temporal area where green discoloration is present and covers 25% of face. Resident #2 Resident #2 is an [AGE] year-old male initially admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnosis of cerebral infarction, acute and chronic respiratory failure, and hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction. Record review of Resident #2's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 01-severe cognitive impairment and needed extensive assistance with all ADLs. Record review of Resident #2's Care Plan date initiated 12/04/2023 revealed, the resident has an ADL self-care performance deficit r/t Hemiplegia. Interventions: functional performance: chair/bed-to-chair transfer: the resident requires dependent assistance required to transfer to and from a bed to a wheelchair. Functional performance: eating: The Resident requires Substantial Max assistance required for eating. Functional performance: lower body dressing: The Resident requires Extensive assistance required for lower/upper body dressing. Functional performance: lying to sitting on side of bed: The Resident requires Extensive assistance required to move from lying on the back to sitting on the side of the bed and with no back support. Functional performance: oral hygiene: The Resident requires Extensive assistance required for oral hygiene. Functional performance: roll left to right: The Resident requires Extensive assistance to roll from lying on back to left and right side and return to lying on back on the bed. BED MOBILITY: The resident requires extensive assistance by 1 staff to turn and reposition in bed at least Q2 hours and as necessary. TRANSFER: [Resident #2] requires Mechanical Lift (hoyer) with (2) staff assistance for transfers Resident #3 Resident#3 is an 80- year-old male admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis of congestive heart failure, dementia, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, anxiety, and cognitive communication deficit. Record review of Resident #3's quarterly MDS dated , 12/19/23 revealed a BIMS score of 2-severe cognitive impairment, physical behavioral symptoms directed toward others (e.g., hitting, kicking, pushing, scratching, grabbing, abusing others sexually) ranging 4-6days, uses walker for mobility, and can walk 50 feet with supervision. Record review of Resident #3's Care Plan revised on 10/02/2023 revealed, [Resident #3] is/has potential to be physically aggressive related to poor impulse control. Interventions: 12/16/2023, and 9/9/2023 Resident had a physical altercation with other resident, both were separated immediately. 2/14/24 - [Resident #3] had a physical altercation with other residents, both were separated immediately. 9/9/2023 Resident had a physical altercation with roommate, both were separated immediately. Roommate moved to another room. Administer medications as ordered. Monitor/document for side effects and effectiveness. Analyze times of day, places, or circumstances, triggers, and what de-escalates behavior and document. Assess and anticipate resident's needs: food, thirst. toileting needs, comfort level, body positioning, pain etc. COMMUNICATION: provide physical and verbal cues to alleviate anxiety; give positive feedback, assist verbalization of source of agitation, assist to set goals for more pleasant behavior, encourage seeking out of staff member when agitated. During an observation and intervention on 02/17/2024 at 3:14 PM Resident #2 had purple/green discoloration on left eye around the rim of left eye, as well as had red/ purple discoloration on the right side of his neck, resembling a handprint. Resident #2 also had red discoloration on the lower left portion, near the lower left eye lid, of the eye socket, which appears to measure about one inch in circumference (circle like appearance). Resident #2 (Resident #1's roommate) stated it hurts while pointing to his left eye. During an interview on 02/17/2024 at 4:47 PM the SW stated on 2/15/2024 around 8AM, the Administrator notified him of the resident-to-resident altercation, and that a warrant was needed for Resident #3, as necessary step to initiate a transfer to a behavioral hospital. The SW stated from what he saw, Resident #1 and Resident #2 on 02/15/2024, after lunch, did not look good. The SW stated Resident #1 had bruises on body, had a black eye that was swollen, and Resident #2's face looked red and swollen. The SW stated both Resident #1 and Resident #2 were bed bound. The SW stated on 2/15/2024 around 12PM lunch time, the local city police entered the nursing facility to execute the warrant for Resident #3. The SW stated when the police entered Resident #3's room, Resident #3 became aggressively agitated, to which the police attempted to calm Resident #3 down, yet Resident #3 continued to swing and kick the officers. The SW stated any suspicion of abuse must be reported to the Administrator and could not definitively state the next steps of the Administrator and had limited knowledge of the clinical staff steps. During multiple interviews with the Administrator and DON, between 02/17/2024 at 6:17PM and 02/19/2024 at 5:47PM, the DON stated on 2/14/24 around 8:40PM, LVN A called and notified the DON that Resident #3 hit Resident #1, but that LVN A did not present any details of the occurrence, only that Resident #3 hit Resident #1. The DON stated that she immediately instructed LVN A to call the Administrator. The Administrator stated around 8:45PM-9:00PM, she received a call from LVN A and that LVN A stated that Resident #3 hit Resident #1. The Administrator stated that during that one and only notification phone call, LVN A never gave any detailed description of the severity of Resident #1's injury. The DON stated that on 2/14/24 at 9:50PM, she texted (text reviewed) LVN A that LVN A needed to complete a change in condition form, risk management form, Q15min behavior monitoring form, skin assessments, supportive documentation (weekly wound progress), and pain assessments for both Resident #1 and Resident #3. The Administrator stated around 6AM on 2/15/24 she was notified by a 6AM-6PM clinical staff member that the clinical staff member entered Resident #2's room and Resident #2 appeared to have swelling to his face as well as serious facial injuries. The Administrator stated she arrived at the facility around 6:30AM and entered Resident #1 and Resident #2's room and found that Resident #1 had substantial facial injuries of dark purple discoloration around the left side of Resident #1's face as well as swelling throughout his face and did notice on the right side of Resident #1's right side of neck, red fingerlike marks on his neck. The Administrator stated she also saw Resident #2's face and observed purple discoloration on his face, red coloration around Resident #2's neck, with also swelling. Both Administrator and DON stated they were never notified about Resident #2's injuries until notified the morning of 2/15/24 around 6AM. Both stated, when they were notified by LVN A around 8:45PM, she never described the severity of Resident #1's injuries only that he was hit, which lead them to determine that they did not need to move Resident #3, who lived directly in front of Resident #1 and Resident #2 (roommates), from his room to somewhere else. The DON stated she directed LVN A to conduct Q15min checks for Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3. Both stated the Q15min surveillance was adequate at the time, but had they known the severity of the altercations, they would have put Resident #3 on a one-to-one to ensure the safety of the other residents. Both stated it was plausible, that during the Q15 surveillance, for the 14minutes when the nurse was not monitoring Resident #3, Resident #3 could have exited his room, inflicted more injury onto Resident #1 and Resident #2, and go back to his room, since these three residents were front door neighbors. The Administrator stated on the morning of 2/15/24 around 6:30-7:00AM, a 1:1 was implemented for Resident #3, and when speaking to Resident #1 first, in Spanish, Resident #1 stated that man beat me up, and when speaking to Resident #2, in Spanish he stated, he hit me. The Administrator stated she was unable to interview Resident #3, due to his aggressive behavior on 2/15/2024, and then later Resident #3 was removed from the facility. When asked about the facility's Abuse and Neglect policy, and their definition of physical abuse, the Administrator stated, Resident #3 hitting Resident #1 would fall under physical abuse, and stated had they known the severity of the injuries they would have entered the facility that evening of 2/14/24 and began an investigation into the resident-to-resident abuse, would have removed Resident #3 from his immediate accessibility of Resident #1 and Resident #2, as well as notified the local authorities, and state agencies. Both stated they did not begin an investigation, nor did they think to remove Resident #3 from his room, nor did they notified law enforcement or state agencies, due to LVN A not describing the severity of the physical altercations. Both stated they in-service staff regularly about abuse and neglect, and stated the last in-service regarding abuse and neglect was done on 02/15/2024 but was not 100% complete. During an interview on 02/192024 at 3:47PM with the Regional Consultant and DON. The DON was asked about who would be in charge if the Administrator was unavailable, the DON stated she would be. The DON stated she did not have access to TULIP to complete incidental self-reports and does not know the process to report, and continued by stating she would look to the Administrator or the Regional Consultant for guidance when needing to notify state agencies. The Regional Consultant stated another way to notify state agencies would be to email CII, to which the DON did not respond. The DON stated, had she known the severity of Resident #1 and Resident #2's injuries she would have begun an investigation immediately on 02/14/2024, she would have removed Resident #3 from Resident #1 and Resident #2's immediate vicinity, she would have placed Resident #3 on a 1:1 and not Q15min checks, and would have reported it sooner to the state agencies as well as notified local authority. The Regional Consultant stated during the evening of 02/14/2024, nursing aides as well as nurses were active within the halls, however when asked how the facility could definitely ensure supervision was maintained if the clinical staff were in and out of residents' rooms, no response was given. The DON stated it was plausible that while nurses and aides were busy in other residents' rooms, Resident #3 could have exited his room, walked across to Resident #1 and Resident #2's room, and inflict additional harm to the residents. Record review on 02/17/2024 at 9:12AM reviewed TULIP intakes which documented receiving the facility's self-report on 2/15/2024 at 7:58AM, which was 11 hours after the resident-to-resident physical altercation. On 02/22/2024 at 4:07PM, the local city law enforcement police department was called to verify event #24-002817, dispatcher stated the event number was linked to a police officer, who was on site at the nursing facility on 02/15/2024, requesting an ambulance for medical assistance. The dispatcher stated the call was received on 02/15/2024 at 11:56AM. The call did not come from the nursing facility. The dispatcher stated there was no record of any other call from the nursing facility, nor regarding the nursing facility on 02/14/2024 nor anytime prior to 11:56AM on 02/15/2024. On 02/22/2024 at 4:09PM called CCPD to verify event #24-002817, the dispatcher stated they do not dispatch to another city's jurisdiction. Record review of the facility's Abuse/Neglect in-service was conducted on 02/15/2024 and completed on 02/21/2024 Record review of the facility's Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation policy dated 08/15/2022 stated, Reporting/Response A.The facility will have written procedures that include: 1. Reporting of all alleged violations to the Administrator, state agency, adult protective services and all other required agencies (e.g., law enforcement when applicable) within specified timeframes: a. Immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury. This was determined to be an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) on 02/20/2024. The Administrator was notified. The Administrator was provided with IJ templates on 02/21/2024 at 10:01AM. The following Plan of Removal submitted by the facility was accepted on 02/22/24 at 3:58PM. The facility's Plan of Removal included: On February 21, 2024, the facility was notified by the surveyor, that an immediate jeopardy had been called and the facility needed to submit a letter of credible allegation. The Facility respectfully submits this Letter for Plan of Removal pursuant to Federal and State regulatory requirements. The immediate jeopardy allegations are as follows: F- Tag 607: The facility must develop and implement written policies and procedures that: Prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, and exploitation of residents a misappropriation of resident property, of residents and misappropriation of resident property. Done for those affected: o Resident #3 was assessed by licensed nurse on 02/14/2024. MD was notified by licensed nurse on 02/14/2024. 02/14/2024 Resident #3 was placed on every 15-minute checks. Resident #3 was transferred to the hospital and was placed on 1:1 on 2/15/24 pending transfer to the hospital. Resident remains at the hospital. On Monday, 2/19/2024 Facility care planned with family. Referral is being sent to other facilities at the request of the family. If unable to find a transferring facility, the resident will return on a 1-1 until the decision is made on the 30-day notice of discharge. Resident will remain on 1-1 until he is discharged . o Resident #1 was assessed on 02/14/2024 by [clinical staff name] to include pain and skin evaluation. Assessment revealed swelling under left eye with bruising and 3 small cuts to left inner eye. Psychosocial assessment was completed by Social Worker on 02/15/2024. Plan of care was reviewed and updated by licensed nurse on 02/15/2024. MD was notified by licensed nurse on 02/14/2024 and 02/15/2024. o Resident #2 was assessed on 02/14/2024 by, [clinical staff name] to include pain and skin evaluation. Assessment revealed bruising noted to right and left side of face with small cut to left side of face. Psychosocial assessment was completed by Social Worker on 02/15/2024. Plan of care was reviewed and updated by licensed nurse on 02/15/2024. MD was notified by licensed nurse on 02/14/2024 and 02/15/2024. Identify residents who could be affected: o On 02/15/2024, the Facility Social Worker(s) completed 100% of interviews of interviewable residents to assess for potential abuse. No additional concerns were identified. Residents who are confused were asked yes and no questions. On the 2 residents who are unable to answer, their spouses were contacted. Out of the 2 one denied any allegations of abuse and the other did not answer his phone and has not returned the call. Was called each day and answered on 2/17/24 and he denied any allegations of abuse. o On 02/15/2024, the DON/designee reviewed the incident/accidents in the last 30 days to ensure that investigations, timely reporting to HHSC as indicated, resident assessments and supervision to include 1:1 supervision as needed were completed and provided. All other residents were identified to be in their room except 2 female residents who were up and watching television and do not have any history of behaviors. Systemic Process: o Effective immediately on 02/15/2024, the Administrator/ DON and/ or designee began reeducation to 100% of facility staff on the following: o Abuse and Neglect and Abuse Policy to include timely Investigation and HHSC Reporting to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, are reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury, or not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury. The Administrator who is the Abuse Prevention Coordinator will be immediately notified for any concerns with Abuse, Neglect and Misappropriation. o Resident Supervision to include 1:1 staff supervision o Quality of Care to include proper resident assessment with each resident incident/accidents - Please include what this process is/if using a P & P you may attach policy and include statement to refer to that policy #/name o See attached policy labeled Incidents and Accidents o During the Morning Meeting. Risk Management will be reviewed to ensure that all required assessments were completed. o when will an assessment be conducted after knowledge of an injury; o The assessment will be conducted at the time of incident and the nurse will enter all information into the appropriate forms within 8 hours of occurrence. o The assessment will include date, time, nature of incident, location, initial findings, immediate interventions, notifications and orders obtained or follow-up interventions. o The resident was placed on Q 15-minute checks immediately following the incident. Residents' doorway is visible from the nurses station and staff kept a watch on his door throughout the shift. Aides were on and off the halls throughout the night and the resident remained in his room and the other 2 residents were safe in bed. Resident remained in his room and no further behavior. At 6:00am the resident was placed on 1-1 in preparation for him to awaken. Social Worker went before Judge to obtain a detention warrant to [hospital name]. [local city police enforcement] called and notified of the incident and we requested assistance with transportation to [hospital name]. Staff will be reeducated prior to the start of their next scheduled shift. Any facility staff on FMLA, Leave of Absence, non-scheduled workday or PTO will be reeducated prior to the start of their next scheduled shift. o The facility maintains an onsite Weekend Manager and Nursing Supervisor that conduct rounds and may initiate and address resident incidents and will escalate to the appropriate administrative staff when required. The Administrator who is the Abuse Prevention Coordinator will be immediately notified for any concerns with Abuse, Neglect and Misappropriation. Is there a weekend manager/nurse supervisor on site in evening/night shift? Yes, there is a weekend manager/ nurse supervisor on the evening shift. After 6pm the 2 Charge Nurse are the supervisor's along with on call Director of Nurses and Administrator. o To monitor, the Director of Nursing/ designee will review resident incidents in facility Stand-up Morning Meeting, attended Monday - Friday. Resident incidents will be reviewed for potential abuse situations and need for reporting as per HHSC guidelines. Review will also include to ensure investigation was completed, resident assessments and supervision to include 1:1 supervision as needed was completed and provided. o The Administrator will monitor to ensure new resident incidents are reviewed daily Monday-Friday to ensure concerns are addressed timely and if necessary, reported per HHSC guidelines, investigation was completed, resident assessments and supervision to include 1:1 supervision as needed was completed and provided. - How long will this process occur? o On going as part of our Morning Meeting Process. o Administrator/designee will conduct quarterly and as needed on Abuse, Neglect, & Exploitation education to ensure facility staff remains knowledgeable on the identification and reporting of abuse/neglect/exploitation. o The facility has the Essential Rounds Program in place where administrative staff is assigned to residents. Staff will round and visit to ensure resident wellness and safety. Findings will be reported during Morning Stand-up meetings to address and follow up on concerns/grievances. Who conducts visits/rounds with residents on weekends? Manager on Duty and/or RN Supervisor Monitoring: o DON/designee will audit residents' incidents for possible abuse/neglect/exploitation issues 3 times per week for 3 months. o Administrator/designee will present findings to the QAPI committee monthly for 3 months. The QAPI Committee will make recommendations accordingly. o An AdHoc QAPI was conducted on 02/15/2024 attended by the Administrator, DON, Medical Director and Regional Clinical Specialist to discuss the Immediate Jeopardy concerning F 607 - develop and implement written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, and exploitation of residents misappropriation of resident property and develop the above Action Plan. Please accept this letter as our plan of removal for the determination of Immediate Jeopardy issued on 2/21/24. Verification of the Plan of Removal: On 02/22/24 and 02/23/24 a total of 25 staff members from various departments from both day and night shifts were interviewed: -The staff had been trained over abuse and neglect and were aware of what to report, who to report to and time frames for reporting. -The staff members were aware of 1:1 supervision of residents and what that meant. -Nursing staff had been trained and were aware of required assessments under risk management to complete when dealing with an alleged violation that occurred at the facility or involved a resident. -Nursing staff were aware of what information would be documented on assessments and timeframe for completing those assessments. -The DON and Administrator had been trained over abuse and neglect, timely reporting, management and residents with behaviors and completing through investigations. -The DON and Administrator were aware of what should be reported, the appropriate time frames to report and had provided facility staff with training over abuse and neglect reporting. -The DON and Administrator and ADON stated they reviewed incidents for any potential abuse by reviewing items such as the 24-hour report, clinical notes, incident reports, risk management items and any report from nursing over incidents from the previous 24 hours during their morning meetings and stated this was something that was already apart of their procedures and something they would continue doing indefinitely. -Leadership staff stated items such as the 24-hour report and risk management items are also reviewed on the weekend by the RN supervisor or the DON. -The Administrator stated when any abuse or neglect occurrence were identified it would also be discussed during their monthly QAPI meeting with the medical director. -Leadership staff stated rounds were completed daily Monday through Friday morning by department heads with any concerns, grievances, or issues discussed during their morning meeting. -The Administrator also stated these rounds were completed by the manager on duty and the RN supervisor on the weekends and stated staff would receive education over abuse and neglect at least monthly. An IJ was identified on 02/21/23. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 10:01 AM. While the IJ was removed on 02/23/24, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of pattern and a severity level of potential for more than minimal harm that is because all staff were not aware of and did not implement the facility's abuse prevention and reporting policy and procedure.
CRITICAL (K) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

Someone could have died · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents received treatment and care in ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice and the comprehensive person-centered care plan, for two residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2) of 12 residents reviewed for quality of care, in that: The facility failed to promptly respond and assess Resident #1 and Resident #2 on 2 separate occasions by 2 different LVNs when they were made aware of Resident #1 and Resident #2 having injuries from an assault after being hit in the face multiple times, while they laid in bed resulting in bruising, cuts and discoloration to their face. An IJ was identified on 02/21/23. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 10:01 AM. While the IJ was removed on 02/23/24, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of pattern and a severity level of potential for more than minimal harm that is because all staff were not aware of and did not implement the facility's abuse prevention and reporting policy and procedure. These deficient practices could affect residents and place them at risk of not receiving the who receive care and treatment needed from facility staff and affect their quality of life. The findings included: 1.) Resident #1 Resident#1 is an [AGE] year-old male initially admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnosis of cerebral infarction (stroke), dysphagia (problem swallowing), cognitive communication deficit, dementia (cognitive memory deficit) and muscle wasting (decrease in size and wasting of muscle tissue) and atrophy (waste away). Record review of Resident #1's MDS Quarterly dated 11/25/2023 revealed Resident #1 had a BIMS Score of 01-severe cognitive impairment and needed extensive assistance with all ADLs. Record review of Resident #1's Care Plan date initiated on 11/27/2023 revealed Resident #1 had an ADL self-care performance deficit related to weakness, limited mobility. Resident #1 is dependent on staff for meeting emotional, intellectual, physical, and social needs r/t Cognitive deficits, Immobility. Interventions, Bed mobility: Resident #1 requires extensive assistance by x 1 staff to turn and reposition in bed frequently and as necessary. Transfers: requires Mechanical Lift (hoyer) with (2) staff assistance for transfers. The resident needs 1:1 bedside/in-room visits and activities if unable to attend out of room events. Record review of Resident #1's Weekly Skin Evaluation by LVN A dated 2/14/2024, revealed site: face, description: swelling under left eye with bruising and three small cuts to left inner eye area. Additional comments: was hit by another resident. Signed by LVN A on 02/15/2024. Record review of Resident #1's progress note dated 2/14/2024 at 23:14 (11:14PM) revealed Patient was in his room when another patient entered the room and hit the patient in the face. The patient sustained an injury he has swelling and bruising to left eye. Patient also has several small cuts to the left side of his face. Dr was notified along with Facility administrator and director of nursing. Patient family member was also notified. Patient showing no signs of distress noted at this time. Record review of Resident #1's incident report conducted by LVN A dated 2/15/2024, Incident description: Nursing description: Nurse was called to patient room by CNA. CNA informed nurse that patient was hit by another resident. Patient was laying in bed. Resident Description: Noted to have bruising and swelling to left eye with several small cuts to left inner and outer eye; Injuries observed at time of incident: No injuries observed at time of incident. Record review of Resident #1's incident report dated 2/15/2024 Injuries Report Post incident (conducted by DON): Injury Type: Bruise/Discoloration to: chest, right hand (back), face, left upper arm, left shoulder (front). Notes: Upon assessment resident identified with discoloration to top of right hand approximately 6.0x5.0cm. Large purple/green discoloration to left shoulder radiating towards left chest resembling as fingerprints. Left eye with swelling with red/purple discoloration. Left cheek with 2 superficial scratches and 1 small scratch below left eye. Small discoloration to left elbow. Other info: patient was hit by another resident. Record review of Resident#1's Pain Evaluation, revealed it was not performed by LVN A on 02/14/2024. Record review of Resident #1's Weekly Skin Evaluation conducted by DON dated 02/15/2024 at 10:19AM revealed Resident #1 sustained injury to: left elbow (discoloration), right hand (back)(discoloration), beneath left eye scratch, left cheek scratches, left chest discoloration, left eye discoloration with swelling, left shoulder discoloration. Additional comments: This is follow-up skin assessment for resident-to-resident altercation on 2/14/2024. Record review of Resident #1's Pain Evaluation conducted by the DON on 02/15/2024 at 12:07PM revealed Resident #1 complained of pain to his left eye-pain expressed post resident to resident altercation (receiver). Resident #1 exhibited facial pain expression of grimacing. Body language: tense. What alleviates the pain? Pain medication. What makes the pain worse? movement, touch. 2.) Resident #2 Resident #2 is an [AGE] year-old male initially admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnosis of cerebral infarction (stroke), acute and chronic respiratory failure, and hemiplegia (paralysis) and hemiparesis (weakness or the inability to move on one side of the body) following cerebral infarction. Record review of Resident #2's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 01-severe cognitive impairment and needed extensive assistance with all ADLs. Record review of Resident #2's Care Plan date initiated 12/04/2023 revealed, the resident has an ADL self-care performance deficit r/t Hemiplegia. Interventions: functional performance: chair/bed-to-chair transfer: the resident requires dependent assistance required to transfer to and from a bed to a wheelchair. Functional performance: eating: The Resident requires Substantial Max assistance required for eating. Functional performance: lower body dressing: The Resident requires Extensive assistance required for lower/upper body dressing. Functional performance: lying to sitting on side of bed: The Resident requires Extensive assistance required to move from lying on the back to sitting on the side of the bed and with no back support. Functional performance: oral hygiene: The Resident requires Extensive assistance required for oral hygiene. Functional performance: roll left to right: The Resident requires Extensive assistance to roll from lying on back to left and right side and return to lying on back on the bed. BED MOBILITY: The resident requires extensive assistance by 1 staff to turn and reposition in bed at least Q2 hours and as necessary. TRANSFER: [Resident #2] requires Mechanical Lift (hoyer) with (2) staff assistance for transfers. Record review of Resident #2's progress notes by LVN A dated 2/14/2024 at 23:00 (11:00PM) revealed, Patient was laying in bed when another patient went into his room and hit him in the face. The patient received a bruise and several small cuts to right side of face. Patient stated another resident hit him with his fist. Facility Director DON and DR. were notified patient family RP was called and notified. Record review of Resident #2's Weekly Skin Evaluation dated 02/14/2024 conducted by LVN A, revealed Resident #2's face with bruising noted to right and left side of face with small cut to left side of face. Additional comments: Patient was hit by another patient. Signed by LVN A on 02/15/2024. Record review of Resident#1's Pain Evaluation revealed no evaluation was conducted/completed by LVN A on 02/14/2024. Record review of Resident #2's Incident report dated 2/14/2024 conducted by LVN A revealed, Incident Description: Nursing Description: CNA called nurse to patient room. Patient was hit by another resident in the face. Resident Description: Patient was laying in bed was noted to have red areas and cuts to both sides of his face. Immediate Action Taken: Description: Patient face was cleaned, and vitals were taken. Vitals WNL. Patient not showing any signs of distress at this time. RP, MD notified. Injury Type: Abrasion to face, injury type: bruise/discoloration to face. Record review of Resident #2's Incident report dated 2/14/2024 Injury Report Post Incident conducted by DON, Injury type: bruise/discoloration to face. Notes: Upon assessment resident identified with redness (with small areas of purple) discolorations throughout entire face and neck area. Resident has had small scratches to cheeks, beneath left eye, chin and left eyebrow. Other info: patient was hit by another resident. Record review of Resident #2's Weekly Wound progress dated 2/15/2024 conducted by the DON revealed, bruising and scratches, dark red/purple, Redness (with small areas of purple) discolorations throughout entire face, scratches beneath left eye, cheeks, chin and above left eyebrow. Record review of Resident #2's Progress note by LVN C dated 2/15/2024 at 6:50AM revealed, Resident assessed head to toe by this nurse. Resident's right jaw and ear with swelling and redness. Beneath left eye, cheek, and chin several scratches and redness. Resident asked if he had any pain and resident reports that his jaw hurts but unable to rate pain on scale of 0-10 which is baseline. Pain was treated with PRN Morphine 0.25ml SL which was effective. Record review of Resident #2's Progress note by DON dated 2/15/2024 at 13:00 (1:00PM) revealed, on 2/14/2024 Charge nurse reports resident was involved in a resident-to-resident altercation. Upon assessment resident identified with redness (with small areas of purple) discolorations throughout entire face and neck area. Resident also had small scratches to cheeks, beneath left eye, chin and left eyebrow.AM charge nurse reports she received an order for facial x-ray related to swelling and complaints of pain, x-ray results pending. Record review of Resident #2's Pain Evaluation dated 02/15/2024 at 15:03 (3:03PM) conducted by the DON, revealed Resident #2's face exhibited Pain expressed post resident to resident altercation (receiver). Resident #2 exhibited facial grimacing and tense body language. What alleviates the pain? Pain medication. What makes the pain worse? movement, touch. 2.) Resident #3 Resident#3 is an 80- year-old male admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis of congestive heart failure, dementia, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, anxiety, and cognitive communication deficit. Record review of Resident #3's quarterly MDS dated , 12/19/23 revealed a BIMS score of 2-severe cognitive impairment, physical behavioral symptoms directed toward others (e.g., hitting, kicking, pushing, scratching, grabbing, abusing others sexually) ranging 4-6days, uses walker for mobility, and can walk 50 feet with supervision. Record review of Resident #3's Care Plan revised on 10/02/2023 revealed, [Resident #3] is/has potential to be physically aggressive related to poor impulse control. Interventions: 12/16/2023, and 9/9/2023 Resident had a physical altercation with other resident, both were separated immediately. 2/14/24 - [Resident #3] had a physical altercation with other residents, both were separated immediately. 9/9/2023 Resident had a physical altercation with roommate, both were separated immediately. Roommate moved to another room. Administer medications as ordered. Monitor/document for side effects and effectiveness. Analyze times of day, places, or circumstances, triggers, and what de-escalates behavior and document. Assess and anticipate resident's needs: food, thirst. toileting needs, comfort level, body positioning, pain etc. COMMUNICATION: provide physical and verbal cues to alleviate anxiety; give positive feedback, assist verbalization of source of agitation, assist to set goals for more pleasant behavior, encourage seeking out of staff member when agitated. Record review of Resident #3's weekly skin evaluation dated 2/14/2024 at 10:00AM and signed/lock date of 2/15/2024 at 12:57AM revealed, no injuries noted. - There was no other skin evaluation noted for the date 2/14/2024, post resident-to-resident altercation. Record review of Resident #3's progress notes, revealed no progress notes for date 2/14/2024 regarding resident-to-resident altercation. Record review of Resident #3's Progress note dated 2/15/2024 at 12:00AM, Doctor/MD notes: was informed of that patient had altercation with multiple residents causing injuries last night. Social worker received warrant to have patient sent to ER for clearance in preparation for admission to [hospital name] behavioral hospital. NP aware of patient status. Record review of Resident #3's Progress note dated 2/15/2024 at 1:13PM by the SW, Resident became combative with two other residents last night, then upon redirection he became combative towards staff. SW sent referral to behavioral health and requested services. SW requested an emergency detention warrant from the county judge. Judge Signed Warrant. When the officers arrived at the facility to transport Resident #3 to [behavioral hospital], Resident #3 became agitated, verbally aggressive, and then combative towards the officers. Once officers were able to subdue Resident #3, he was transferred to ER to get medically cleared for behavioral health. Record review of Resident #3's Progress note dated 2/15/2024 at 3:43PM by the DON, on 2/14/2024 Charge nurse reports resident was involved in resident-to-resident altercation (initiator-aggressor). Upon assessment resident identified with noted with purple discoloration to left hand. Social services to detain a detention warrant. Resident continues on 1 on 1care. Resident does not appear to have any negative psych-social effects from incident and is unable to recall event. Will continue to monitor. During an observation and interview on 02/17/2024 at 3:14PM Resident #1 stated a man entered his room and began hitting him in the face a couple of days ago. Resident #1 stated a man hit him about 5 times on his face. Resident #1 stated he was fearful of living at facility because he is scared the man is going to hit him again. Resident #1 stated the man stopped himself, and that there was no other person in the room. Upon observation Resident #1 has black/purple discoloration on left eye within the eye socket area as well as extended toward the temporal area where green discoloration is present and covers 25% of face. During an observation and intervention on 02/17/2024 at 3:14PM Resident #2 had purple/green discoloration on left eye around the rim of left eye, as well as had red/ purple discoloration on the right side of his neck, resembling a handprint. Resident #2 also had red discoloration on the lower left portion, near the lower left eye lid, of the eye socket, which appears to measure about one inch in circumference (circle like appearance). Resident #2 (Resident #1's roommate) stated it hurts while pointing to his left eye. During an interview on 02/17/2024 at 3:48PM NA A stated on 02/14/2024 at 8:25PM, she entered Resident #1 and Resident #2's room (roommates), and stated she looked at Resident #1's face and saw a dark shadow around his left eye, so she turned on the lights and saw bright red blood on at least half of Resident #1's face, as well as on Resident #1's blanket/covers, bed, and a little on the wall. NA A stated, when she asked Resident #1 what happened, Resident #1 stated that someone hit him and was trying to kill him. NA A stated she quickly ran out of the room and notified LVN A. NA A stated, while she notified LVN A at the nurse's station, she waited for LVN A to get up to check on Resident #1, but that LVN A did not immediately get up to assess the situation. NA A stated, while LVN A was at the nurse's station, LVN A directed NA A to go back into the room to clean up Resident #1, with perineal wet wipes, without LVN A assessing him first. NA A stated while cleaning up Resident #1, she saw he had bruises on his left side of chest, blood/bruising on his right hand and swelling on left eye with blood all over his face. NA A stated around 10:00 PM, LVN A accompanied NA A to observe Resident #1 in his room. NA A stated while LVN A was with her, LVN A did not assess under Resident #1's clothes or blankets, nor did she witness any head-to-toe assessment being conducted. NA A stated while NA A and LVN A were exiting the room, NA A noticed that Resident #2 was breathing irregular, to which NA A stated LVN A put a pulse oximeter on Resident #2's finger, and that LVN A stated, Resident #2 is breathing okay. NA A stated while LVN A was with her, she did not witness LVN A assess under Resident #2's clothes or blankets, nor did not see LVN A conduct a full head-to-toe assessment on Resident #2. NA A stated she then spoke to LVN B and explained the details of her initial findings of Resident #1's blood-soaked linen and face, and LVN B did not go with NA A to see Resident #1's injuries. NA A stated when she went back to her hall to check on Resident #1, when she saw Resident #3, the aggressor, in the hallway with blood on his fists. NA A stated when the morning shift (6AM on 2/15/24) arrived, she notified LVN C, and LVN C went into Resident #1 and Resident#2's room and observed that Resident #1 start to cry and complained he was hurting. Attempted to interview LVN A on 02/18/2024 at 9:18AM, 9:27AM, 5:07PM, as well as on 02/19/2024 at 4:39PM and on 02/23/24 at 5:10 PM, 5:11 PM, 5:12 PM but was unsuccessful. During an interview on 02/18/2024 at 9:54AM with LVN B, LVN B stated she did not enter the room of Resident #1 and Resident #2 (roommates) to assess the resident's injuries. LVN B stated she asked LVN A if she had completed, for Resident #1 and Resident #2, full head-to-toe assessments, behavior monitoring forms, as well as asked if she did the incident report, to which LVN A stated she did. LVN B stated she took what LVN A stated as truthful, and stated LVN A described the resident-to-resident altercation with minimal severity. LVN B stated she believed LVN A notified the proper chain of command, as well as believed LVN A completed the proper documentation, and did not find a need to intervene on LVN A's residents. LVN B stated she was in another resident's room, when LVN A ran to LVN B stating that Resident #3 was running after LVN A trying to hit LVN A and that Resident #3 was also yelling and stating vulgar and derogative remarks to LVN A. LVN B stated she quickly confronted Resident #3, de-escalated Resident #3's behavior, and guided Resident #3 back to his room, tucked him in, and left Resident #3's room. After leaving Resident #3's room she had no other contact with Resident #3 and did not enter Resident #1 and Resident #2's room. LVN B stated I don't remember anything from the night of the incident, I don't know exactly what happened or when because I was on the other side. LVN B stated she knew she needed to calm down Resident #3 and then he was okay after then. LVN B stated she was not sure the exact details of the altercation or injuries, LVN B stated she does not believe Resident #3 was put on a 1:1 the night of 2/14/2024. During an interview on 2/19/2024 at 5:47PM the DON and Administrator, the DON stated around 8:40PM she instructed LVN A to call the Administrator and stated that LVN A stated Resident #3 hit Resident #1. The Administrator stated that during that one and only notification phone call on 02/14/2024 at 8:45PM, LVN A never gave any detailed description of the severity of Resident #1's injury. The DON stated that on 2/14/24 at 9:50PM, she texted (text reviewed) LVN A that LVN A needed to complete a change in condition form, risk management form, Q15min behavior monitoring form, skin assessments, supportive documentation (weekly wound progress), and pain assessments for both Resident #1 and Resident #3 . The DON and Administrator stated LVN A skin assessments for Resident #1 and Resident #2 were not appropriate as they lacked substantial details. The DON stated the expectation of the facility was when performing a skin assessment/head-to-toe assessment the nurses are expected to describe the wound with measurements, color, type of tissue and if there is any pain. The DON continued by stating she called LVN B around 8:54PM on 02/14/2024, and she instructed LVN B to aide LVN A in calming down Resident #3. During that 8:54PM call, the DON did not instruct LVN B to do any form of assessment on Resident #1 or Resident#2 due to her belief that LVN A would follow her directive, and that the severity of the injuries was not fully detailed, to which would warrant an immediate commencement of investigation. The Administrator stated now looking back, she would have begun the investigation when she was notified, she would have removed Resident #3 from the immediate vicinity of Resident #1 and Resident #2, she would have put Resident #3 on a 1:1 to advocate for resident safety and would have notified the local authorities and state agencies. The Administrator stated a normal person, who is cognitively aware, may exhibit fearfulness if they knew their abuser was still close to them without constant supervision, and continued by stating it is unknown how a resident, who is not cognitively aware, would feel knowing the perpetrator was within their proximity. Both stated, in the future they will follow the facility's policy on abuse and neglect. Record review of LVN B's written and signed statement undated stated, Statement for incident on 2-14-24: At about 8:30PM on 2-14-24 [Resident #3] was observed walking down 100 Hall. The nurse for side 2 [clinical nurse name] informed me that Resident #3 had hit two other residents [Resident #2 and Resident #1]. [clinical nurse name ] asked me to calm Resident #3 down because he was trying to hit her and another aide. I assisted Resident #3 to his room and administered his evening medications.'- written statement does not indicate that LVN B checked on nor assessed Resident #1, Resident #2, nor Resident #3. Record review of the facility's Abuse/Neglect in-service was conducted on 02/15/2024 and completed on 02/21/2024. Record review of the facility's Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation policy dated 08/15/2022 stated, Protection of Resident- The facility will make efforts to ensure all resident are protected from physical and psychosocial harm, as well as additional abuse, during and after the investigation. B. Examining the alleged victim for any sign of injury, including a physical examination or psychosocial assessment if needed. C. Increased supervision of the alleged victim and residents; D. Room or staffing changes, if necessary, to protect the resident(s) from the alleged Perpetrator Record review of the facility's Skin Assessment policy dated 12/07/2022 stated, 1. A full body, or head to toe, skin assessment will be conducted by a licensed or registered nurse. The assessment may also be performed after a change of condition. 7. D. Describe wound (measurements, color, type of tissue in wound bed, drainage, order, pain). This was determined to be an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) on 02/20/2024. The Administrator was notified. The Administrator was provided with IJ templates on 02/21/2024 at 10:01AM. The following Plan of Removal submitted by the facility was accepted on 02/22/24 at 3:58PM. The facility's Plan of Removal included: On February 21, 2024, the facility was notified by the surveyor, that an immediate jeopardy had been called and the facility needed to submit a letter of credible allegation. The Facility respectfully submits this Letter for Plan of Removal pursuant to Federal and State regulatory requirements. The immediate jeopardy allegations are as follows: F-Tag 600/67/684: Abuse Done for those affected: o Resident #3 was assessed by licensed nurse on 02/14/2024. MD was notified by licensed nurse on 02/14/2024. 02/14/2024 Resident #3 was placed on every 15-minute checks. Resident #3 was transferred to the hospital and was placed on 1:1 on 2/15/24 pending transfer to the hospital. Resident remains at the hospital. On Monday, 2/19/2024 Facility care planned with family. Referral is being sent to other facilities at the request of the family. If unable to find a transferring facility, the resident will return on a 1-1 until the decision is made on the 30-day notice of discharge. Resident will remain on 1-1 until he is discharged . o Resident #1 was assessed on 02/14/2024 by [clinical staff name] to include pain and skin evaluation. Assessment revealed swelling under left eye with bruising and 3 small cuts to left inner eye. Psychosocial assessment was completed by Social Worker on 02/15/2024. Plan of care was reviewed and updated by licensed nurse on 02/15/2024. MD was notified by licensed nurse on 02/14/2024 and 02/15/2024. o Resident #2 was assessed on 02/14/2024 by, [clinical staff name] to include pain and skin evaluation. Assessment revealed bruising noted to right and left side of face with small cut to left side of face. Psychosocial assessment was completed by Social Worker on 02/15/2024. Plan of care was reviewed and updated by licensed nurse on 02/15/2024. MD was notified by licensed nurse on 02/14/2024 and 02/15/2024. Identify residents who could be affected: o On 02/15/2024, the Facility Social Worker(s) completed 100% of interviews of interviewable residents to assess for potential abuse. No additional concerns were identified. Residents who are confused were asked yes and no questions. On the 2 residents who are unable to answer, their spouses were contacted. Out of the 2 one denied any allegations of abuse and the other did not answer his phone and has not returned the call. Was called each day and answered on 2/17/24 and he denied any allegations of abuse. o On 02/15/2024, the DON/designee reviewed the incident/accidents in the last 30 days to ensure that investigations, timely reporting to HHSC as indicated, resident assessments and supervision to include 1:1 supervision as needed were completed and provided. All other residents were identified to be in their room except 2 female residents who were up and watching television and do not have any history of behaviors. Systemic Process: o Effective immediately on 02/15/2024, the Administrator/ DON and/ or designee began reeducation to 100% of facility staff on the following: o Abuse and Neglect and Abuse Policy to include timely Investigation and HHSC Reporting to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, are reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury, or not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury. The Administrator who is the Abuse Prevention Coordinator will be immediately notified for any concerns with Abuse, Neglect and Misappropriation. o Resident Supervision to include 1:1 staff supervision o Quality of Care to include proper resident assessment with each resident incident/accidents - Please include what this process is/if using a P & P you may attach policy and include statement to refer to that policy #/name o See attached policy labeled Incidents and Accidents o During the Morning Meeting. Risk Management will be reviewed to ensure that all required assessments were completed. o when will an assessment be conducted after knowledge of an injury; o The assessment will be conducted at the time of incident and the nurse will enter all information into the appropriate forms within 8 hours of occurrence. o The assessment will include date, time, nature of incident, location, initial findings, immediate interventions, notifications and orders obtained or follow-up interventions. o The resident was placed on Q 15-minute checks immediately following the incident. Residents' doorway is visible from the nurses station and staff kept a watch on his door throughout the shift. Aides were on and off the halls throughout the night and the resident remained in his room and the other 2 residents were safe in bed. Resident remained in his room and no further behavior. At 6:00am the resident was placed on 1-1 in preparation for him to awaken. Social Worker went before Judge to obtain a detention warrant to [hospital name]. [local city police enforcement] called and notified of the incident and we requested assistance with transportation to [hospital name]. Staff will be reeducated prior to the start of their next scheduled shift. Any facility staff on FMLA, Leave of Absence, non-scheduled workday or PTO will be reeducated prior to the start of their next scheduled shift. o The facility maintains an onsite Weekend Manager and Nursing Supervisor that conduct rounds and may initiate and address resident incidents and will escalate to the appropriate administrative staff when required. The Administrator who is the Abuse Prevention Coordinator will be immediately notified for any concerns with Abuse, Neglect and Misappropriation. Is there a weekend manager/nurse supervisor on site in evening/night shift? Yes, there is a weekend manager/ nurse supervisor on the evening shift. After 6pm the 2 Charge Nurse are the supervisor's along with on call Director of Nurses and Administrator. o To monitor, the Director of Nursing/ designee will review resident incidents in facility Stand-up Morning Meeting, attended Monday - Friday. Resident incidents will be reviewed for potential abuse situations and need for reporting as per HHSC guidelines. Review will also include to ensure investigation was completed, resident assessments and supervision to include 1:1 supervision as needed was completed and provided. o The Administrator will monitor to ensure new resident incidents are reviewed daily Monday-Friday to ensure concerns are addressed timely and if necessary, reported per HHSC guidelines, investigation was completed, resident assessments and supervision to include 1:1 supervision as needed was completed and provided. - How long will this process occur? o On going as part of our Morning Meeting Process. o Administrator/designee will conduct quarterly and as needed on Abuse, Neglect, & Exploitation education to ensure facility staff remains knowledgeable on the identification and reporting of abuse/neglect/exploitation. o The facility has the Essential Rounds Program in place where administrative staff is assigned to residents. Staff will round and visit to ensure resident wellness and safety. Findings will be reported during Morning Stand-up meetings to address and follow up on concerns/grievances. Who conducts visits/rounds with residents on weekends? Manager on Duty and/or RN Supervisor Monitoring: o DON/designee will audit residents' incidents for possible abuse/neglect/exploitation issues 3 times per week for 3 months. o Administrator/designee will present findings to the QAPI committee monthly for 3 months. The QAPI Committee will make recommendations accordingly. o An AdHoc QAPI was conducted on 02/15/2024 attended by the Administrator, DON, Medical Director and Regional Clinical Specialist to discuss the Immediate Jeopardy concerning F tag 600 - Free from Abuse and Neglect; and develop the above Action Plan. Please accept this letter as our plan of removal for the determination of Immediate Jeopardy issued on 2/21/24. Verification of the Plan of Removal: On 02/22/24 and 02/23/24 a total of 25 staff members from various departments from both day and night shifts were interviewed: -The staff had been trained over abuse and neglect and were aware of[TRUNCATED]
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Report Alleged Abuse (Tag F0609)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that all allegations involving abuse, neglect, e...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that all allegations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property were reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation was made, if the events that caused the allegation involved abuse or resulted in serious bodily injury, to the administrator of the facility and to other officials which included to the State Survey Agency, in accordance with State law through established procedures for three residents (Resident #1, Resident #2 and Resident #3) of 12 residents reviewed for abuse/neglect. The facility failed to report the abuse allegation to the State Survey Agency and local law enforcement in accordance with state law after they were made aware of an abuse allegation involving Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3. These failures had the potential to result in serious injury or death as a result of the resident-to-resident physical abuse and the facility's systemic failure. The findings include: 1.) Resident #1 Resident#1 is an [AGE] year-old male initially admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnosis of cerebral infarction (stroke), dysphagia (problem swallowing), cognitive communication deficit, dementia (cognitive memory deficit) and muscle wasting and atrophy . Record review of Resident #1's MDS Quarterly dated 11/25/2023 revealed Resident #1 had a BIMS Score of 01-severe cognitive impairment and needed extensive assistance with all ADLs. Record review of Resident #1's Care Plan date initiated on 11/27/2023 revealed Resident #1 had an ADL self-care performance deficit related to weakness, limited mobility. Resident #1 is dependent on staff for meeting emotional, intellectual, physical, and social needs r/t Cognitive deficits, Immobility. Interventions, Bed mobility: Resident #1 requires extensive assistance by x 1 staff to turn and reposition in bed frequently and as necessary. Transfers: requires Mechanical Lift (hoyer) with (2) staff assistance for transfers. The resident needs 1:1 bedside/in-room visits and activities if unable to attend out of room events. Record review of Resident #1's Weekly Skin Evaluation dated 2/14/2024, revealed site: face, description: swelling under left eye with bruising and three small cuts to left inner eye area. Additional comments: was hit by another resident. Signed by LVN A on 02/15/2024. Record review of Resident #1's progress note dated 2/14/2024 at 23:14 (11:14PM) revealed Patient was in his room when another patient entered the room and hit the patient in the face. The patient sustained an injury he has swelling and bruising to left eye. Patient also has several small cuts to the left side of his face. Dr was notified along with Facility administrator and director of nursing. Patient family member was also notified. Patient showing no signs of distress noted at this time. Record review of Resident #1's incident report conducted by LVN A dated 2/15/2024, Incident description: Nursing description: Nurse was called to patient room by CNA. CNA informed nurse that patient was hit by another resident. Patient was laying in bed. Resident Description: Noted to have bruising and swelling to left eye with several small cuts to left inner and outer eye; Injuries observed at time of incident: No injuries observed at time of incident. Record review of Resident #1's Weekly Skin Evaluation conducted by DON dated 02/15/2024 at 10:19AM revealed Resident #1 sustained injury to: left elbow (discoloration), right hand (back)(discoloration), beneath left eye scratch, left cheek scratches, left chest discoloration, left eye discoloration with swelling, left shoulder discoloration. Additional comments: This is follow-up skin assessment for resident-to-resident altercation on 2/14/2024. 2. Resident #2 Resident #2 is an [AGE] year-old male initially admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnosis of cerebral infarction (stroke), acute and chronic respiratory failure, and hemiplegia (paralysis) and hemiparesis (weakness or the inability to move on one side of the body) following cerebral infarction. Record review of Resident #2's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 01-severe cognitive impairment and needed extensive assistance with all ADLs. Record review of Resident #2's Care Plan date initiated 12/04/2023 revealed, the resident has an ADL self-care performance deficit r/t Hemiplegia. Interventions: functional performance: chair/bed-to-chair transfer: the resident requires dependent assistance required to transfer to and from a bed to a wheelchair. Functional performance: eating: The Resident requires Substantial Max assistance required for eating. Functional performance: lower body dressing: The Resident requires Extensive assistance required for lower/upper body dressing. Functional performance: lying to sitting on side of bed: The Resident requires Extensive assistance required to move from lying on the back to sitting on the side of the bed and with no back support. Functional performance: oral hygiene: The Resident requires Extensive assistance required for oral hygiene. Functional performance: roll left to right: The Resident requires Extensive assistance to roll from lying on back to left and right side and return to lying on back on the bed. BED MOBILITY: The resident requires extensive assistance by 1 staff to turn and reposition in bed at least Q2 hours and as necessary. TRANSFER: [Resident #2] requires Mechanical Lift (hoyer) with (2) staff assistance for transfers. Record review of Resident #2's progress notes by LVN A dated 2/14/2024 at 23:00 (11:00PM) revealed, Patient was laying in bed when another patient went into his room and hit him in the face. The patient received a bruise and several small cuts to right side of face. Patient stated another resident hit him with his fist. Facility Director DON and DR. were notified patient family RP was called and notified. Record review of Resident #2's Weekly Skin Evaluation dated 02/14/2024 conducted by LVN A, revealed Resident #2's face with bruising noted to right and left side of face with small cut to left side of face. Additional comments: Patient was hit by another patient. Signed by LVN A on 02/15/2024. Record review of Resident #2's Incident report dated 2/14/2024 conducted by LVN A revealed, Incident Description: Nursing Description: CNA called nurse to patient room. Patient was hit by another resident in the face. Resident Description: Patient was laying in bed was noted to have red areas and cuts to both sides of his face. Immediate Action Taken: Description: Patient face was cleaned, and vitals were taken. Vitals WNL. Patient not showing any signs of distress at this time. RP, MD notified. Injury Type: Abrasion to face, injury type: bruise/discoloration to face. Record review of Resident #2's Incident report dated 2/14/2024 Injury Report Post Incident conducted by DON, Injury type: bruise/discoloration to face. Notes: Upon assessment resident identified with redness (with small areas of purple) discolorations throughout entire face and neck area. Resident has had small scratches to cheeks, beneath left eye, chin and left eyebrow. Other info: patient was hit by another resident. Record review of Resident #2's Weekly Wound progress dated 2/15/2024 conducted by the DON revealed, bruising and scratches, dark red/purple, Redness (with small areas of purple) discolorations throughout entire face, scratches beneath left eye, cheeks, chin and above left eyebrow. Record review of Resident #2's Progress note by LVN C dated 2/15/2024 at 6:50AM revealed, Resident assessed head to toe by this nurse. Resident's right jaw and ear with swelling and redness. Beneath left eye, cheek, and chin several scratches and redness. Resident asked if he had any pain and resident reports that his jaw hurts but unable to rate pain on scale of 0-10 which is baseline. Pain was treated with PRN Morphine 0.25ml SL which was effective. Record review of Resident #2's Progress note by DON dated 2/15/2024 at 13:00 (1:00PM) revealed, on 2/14/2024 Charge nurse reports resident was involved in a resident-to-resident altercation. Upon assessment resident identified with redness (with small areas of purple) discolorations throughout entire face and neck area. Resident also had small scratches to cheeks, beneath left eye, chin and left eyebrow.AM charge nurse reports she received an order for facial x-ray related to swelling and complaints of pain, x-ray results pending. 2.) Resident #3 Resident#3 is an 80- year-old male admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis of congestive heart failure (heart failure), dementia, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, anxiety, and cognitive communication deficit. Record review of Resident #3's quarterly MDS dated , 12/19/23 revealed a BIMS score of 2-severe cognitive impairment, physical behavioral symptoms directed toward others (e.g., hitting, kicking, pushing, scratching, grabbing, abusing others sexually) ranging 4-6days, uses walker for mobility, and can walk 50 feet with supervision. Record review of Resident #3's Care Plan revised on 10/02/2023 revealed, [Resident #3] is/has potential to be physically aggressive related to poor impulse control. Interventions: 12/16/2023, and 9/9/2023 Resident had a physical altercation with other resident, both were separated immediately. 2/14/24 - [Resident #3] had a physical altercation with other residents, both were separated immediately. 9/9/2023 Resident had a physical altercation with roommate, both were separated immediately. Roommate moved to another room. Administer medications as ordered. Monitor/document for side effects and effectiveness. Analyze times of day, places, or circumstances, triggers, and what de-escalates behavior and document. Assess and anticipate resident's needs: food, thirst. toileting needs, comfort level, body positioning, pain etc. COMMUNICATION: provide physical and verbal cues to alleviate anxiety; give positive feedback, assist verbalization of source of agitation, assist to set goals for more pleasant behavior, encourage seeking out of staff member when agitated. Record review of Resident #3's progress notes, no progress notes for date 2/14/2024 regarding resident-to-resident altercation. Record review of Resident #3's Progress note dated 2/15/2024 at 12:00AM, Doctor/MD notes: was informed of that patient had altercation with multiple residents causing injuries last night. Social worker received warrant to have patient sent to ER for clearance in preparation for admission to [hospital name] behavioral hospital. NP aware of patient status. Record review of Resident #3's Progress note dated 2/15/2024 at 1:13PM by the SW, Resident became combative with two other residents last night, then upon redirection he became combative towards staff. SW sent referral to behavioral health and requested services. SW requested an emergency detention warrant from the county judge. Judge Signed Warrant. When the officers arrived at the facility to transport Resident #3 to [behavioral hospital], Resident #3 became agitated, verbally aggressive, and then combative towards the officers. Once officers were able to subdue Resident #3, he was transferred to the ER to get medically cleared for behavioral health. Record review of Resident #3's Progress note dated 2/15/2024 at 3:43PM by the DON, on 2/14/2024 Charge nurse reports resident was involved in resident-to-resident altercation (initiator-aggressor). Upon assessment resident identified with noted with purple discoloration to left hand. Social services to detain a detention warrant . Resident continues on 1 on 1care. Resident does not appear to have any negative psych-social effects from incident and is unable to recall event. Will continue to monitor. During an observation and interview on 02/17/2024 at 3:14PM Resident #1 stated a man entered his room and began hitting him in the face a couple of days ago. Resident #1 stated a man hit him about 5 times on his face. Resident #1 stated he was fearful of living at the facility because he is scared the man is going to hit him again. Resident #1 stated the man stopped himself, and that there was no other person in the room. Upon observation Resident #1 has black/purple discoloration on left eye within the eye socket area as well as extended toward the temporal area where green discoloration is present and covers 25% of face. During an observation and intervention on 02/17/2024 at 3:14PM Resident #2 had purple/green discoloration on left eye around the rim of left eye, as well as had red/ purple discoloration on the right side of his neck, resembling a handprint. Resident #2 also had red discoloration on the lower left portion, near the lower left eye lid, of the eye socket, which appeared to measure about one inch in circumference (circle like appearance). Resident #2 (Resident #1's roommate) stated it hurts while pointing to his left eye. During an interview on 02/17/2024 at 4:47PM the SW stated on 2/15/2024 around 8AM, the Administrator notified him of the resident-to-resident altercation, and that a warrant was needed for Resident #3, as necessary a step to initiate a transfer to a behavioral hospital. The SW stated from what he saw, Resident #1 and Resident #2 on 02/15/2024, after lunch, did not look good. The SW stated Resident #1 had bruises on his body, had a black eye that was swollen, and Resident #2's face looked red and swollen. The SW stated both Resident #1 and Resident #2 were bed bound. The SW stated on 2/15/2024 around 12PM lunch time, the local city police entered the nursing facility to execute the warrant for Resident #3. The SW stated when the police entered Resident #3's room, Resident #3 became aggressively agitated, to which the police attempted to calm Resident #3 down, yet Resident #3 continued to swing and kick the officers. The SW stated any suspicion of abuse must be reported to the Administrator and could not definitively state the next steps of the Administrator and had limited knowledge of the clinical staff steps. During multiple interviews with the Administrator and DON, between 02/17/2024 at 6:17PM and 02/19/2024 at 5:47PM, the DON stated on 2/14/24 around 8:40PM, LVN A called and notified the DON that Resident #3 hit Resident #1, but that LVN A did not present any details of the occurrence, only that Resident #3 hit Resident #1. The DON stated that she immediately instructed LVN A to call the Administrator. The Administrator stated around 8:45PM-9:00PM, she received a call from LVN A and that LVN A stated that Resident #3 hit Resident #1. The Administrator stated that during that one and only notification phone call, LVN A never gave any detailed description of the severity of Resident #1's injury. The DON stated that on 2/14/24 at 9:50PM, she texted (text reviewed) LVN A that LVN A needed to complete a change in condition form, risk management form, Q15min behavior monitoring form, skin assessments, supportive documentation (weekly wound progress), and pain assessments for both Resident #1 and Resident #3. The Administrator stated around 6AM on 2/15/24 she was notified by a 6AM-6PM clinical staff member that the clinical staff member entered Resident #2's room and Resident #2 appeared to have swelling to his face as well as serious facial injuries. The Administrator stated she arrived at the facility around 6:30AM and entered Resident #1 and Resident #2's room and found that Resident #1 had substantial facial injuries of dark purple discoloration around the left side of Resident #1's face as well as swelling throughout his face and did notice on the right side of Resident #1's right side of neck, red fingerlike marks on his neck. The Administrator stated she also saw Resident #2's face and observed purple discoloration on his face, red coloration around Resident #2's neck, with also swelling. Both Administrator and DON stated they were never notified about Resident #2's injuries until notified the morning of 2/15/24 around 6AM. Both stated, when they were notified by LVN A around 8:45PM, she never described the severity of Resident #1's injuries only that he was hit, which lead them to determine that they did not need to move Resident #3, who lived directly in front of Resident #1 and Resident #2 (roommates), from his room to somewhere else. The DON stated she directed LVN A to conduct Q15min checks for Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3. Both stated the Q15min surveillance was adequate at the time, but had they known the severity of the altercations, they would have put Resident #3 on a one-to-one to ensure the safety of the other residents. Both stated it was plausible, that during the Q15 surveillance, for the 14 minutes when the nurse was not monitoring Resident #3, Resident #3 could have exited his room, inflicted more injury onto Resident #1 and Resident #2, and go back to his room, since these three residents were front door neighbors. The Administrator stated on the morning of 2/15/24 around 6:30-7:00AM, a 1:1 was implemented for Resident #3, and when speaking to Resident #1 first, in Spanish, Resident #1 stated that man beat me up, and when speaking to Resident #2, in Spanish he stated, he hit me. The Administrator stated she was unable to interview Resident #3, due to his aggressive behavior on 2/15/2024, and then later Resident #3 was removed from the facility. When asked about the facility's Abuse and Neglect policy, and their definition of physical abuse, the Administrator stated, Resident #3 hitting Resident #1 would fall under physical abuse, and stated had they known the severity of the injuries they would have entered the facility that evening of 2/14/24 and began an investigation into the resident-to-resident abuse, would have removed Resident #3 from his immediate accessibility of Resident #1 and Resident #2, as well as notified the local authorities, and state agencies. Both stated they did not think to remove Resident #3 from his room, nor did they notify law enforcement or state agencies, due to LVN A not describing the severity of the physical altercations. Both stated they began their investigation of the resident-to-resident altercation on 02/15/2024 around 6:30AM, 11 hours after the event. Both stated they in-service staff regularly about abuse and neglect, and stated the last in-service regarding abuse and neglect was done on 02/15/2024 but was not 100% complete. The Administrator stated now looking back, she would have begun the investigation when she was notified, she would have removed Resident #3 from the immediate vicinity of Resident #1 and Resident #2, she would have put Resident #3 on a 1:1 to advocate for resident safety and would have notified the local authorities and state agencies. The Administrator stated a normal person, who is cognitively aware, may exhibit fearfulness if they knew their abuser was still close to them without constant supervision, and continued by stating it is unknown how a resident, who is not cognitively aware, would feel knowing the perpetrator was within their proximity. Both stated, in the future they will follow the facility's policy on abuse and neglect. During an interview on 02/19/2024 at 3:47PM with the Regional Consultant and DON. The DON was asked about who would be in charge if the Administrator was unavailable, the DON stated she would be. The DON stated she did not have access to TULIP to complete incidental self-reports and does not know the process to report, and continued by stating she would look to the Administrator or the Regional Consultant for guidance when needing to notify state agencies. The Regional Consultant stated another way to notify state agencies would be to email CII, to which the DON did not respond. The DON stated, had she known the severity of Resident #1 and Resident #2's injuries she would have begun an investigation immediately on 02/14/2024, she would have removed Resident #3 from Resident #1 and Resident #2's immediate vicinity, she would have placed Resident #3 on a 1:1 and not Q15min checks, and would have reported it sooner to the state agencies as well as notified local authority. The Regional Consultant stated during the evening of 02/14/2024, nursing aides as well as nurses were active within the halls, however when asked how the facility could definitely ensure supervision was maintained if the clinical staff were in and out of residents' rooms, no response was given. The DON stated it was plausible that while nurses and aides were busy in other residents' rooms, Resident #3 could have exited his room, walked across to Resident #1 and Resident #2's room, and inflict additional harm to the residents. Record review on 02/17/2024 at 9:12AM reviewed TULIP intakes which documented receiving the facility's self-report on 2/15/2024 at 7:58AM, which was 11 hours after the resident-to-resident physical altercation. Record review of the facility's Abuse/Neglect in-service was conducted on 02/15/2024 and completed on 02/21/2024. Record review of the facility's Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation policy dated 08/15/2022 stated, Reporting/Response A. The facility will have written procedures that include: 1. Reporting of all alleged violations to the Administrator, state agency, adult protective services and all other required agencies (e.g., law enforcement when applicable) within specified timeframes: a. Immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Pharmacy Services (Tag F0755)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services, (including procedures that assure ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services, (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of 1 of (Resident #4) of 12 residents reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to administer Resident #4's medication appropriately. LVN D left Resident #4's lifesaving medications on his bedside table, without ensuring Resident #4 took the medication appropriately. This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving medications as ordered. The findings included: Record review of Resident #4's face sheet dated 02/18/2024, revealed Resident #4 was a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted on [DATE]. Resident #4 was diagnosed with acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (respiratory failure), sepsis (infection), weakness, and acute embolism and thrombosis (blood clots). Record review of Resident #4's admission MDS dated [DATE] revealed, Resident #4 had a BIMS of 15-cognitively aware, as well as coded for needing partial/moderate assistance with toileting hygiene, lower body dressing, and bed mobility. Resident #4 also coded for Anemia, deep vein thrombosis (blood clot in the deep vein of the leg), hypertension (high blood pressure) and orthostatic hypotension (positional low blood pressure). Record review of Resident #4's Care Plan date initiated 02/06/2024 revealed, Resident #4 has an ADL self-care performance deficit r/t weakness, Acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (low oxygen). Goal: [Resident #4] will maintain current level of function in through the review date. Interventions: BATHING/SHOWERING: [Resident #4] requires extensive assist by 1 staff with bathing/showering) QOD and as necessary. BED MOBILITY: [Resident #4] requires extensive assist with bed mobility as needed. DRESSING: The resident requires extensive assist by 1 staff to dress. EATING: [Resident #4] requires extensive assist x1 staff to eat. PERSONAL HYGIENE: [Resident #4] requires extensive assist by 1 staff with personal hygiene and oral care. TOILET USE: [Resident #4] requires extensive assist by 1 staff for toileting. TRANSFER: [Resident #4] requires extensive assist by 1 staff to move between surfaces as necessary. Encourage the resident to participate to the fullest extent possible with each interaction. Encourage the resident to use bell to call for assistance. Monitor/document/report PRN any changes, any potential for improvement, reasons for self-care deficit, expected course, declines in function. Record review of Resident #4's Medication Administration Record revealed, Resident #4 received his evening medications of Remeron Oral Tablet 15 MG (Mirtazapine) Give 1 tablet by mouth at bedtime related to Depression, Midodrine (for low blood pressure) 15mg, and Ferrous Sulfate ( for anemia) 325mg tablet. During an observation and interview on 02/17/2024 at 5:02PM Resident #4 retrieved a clear medicine cup from his bedside table, and upon further inspection there were at least 4 pills of various colors and sizes. Resident #4 stated the medicine cup was left on his bedside table by LVN D. Resident #4 stated she had left the cup 15 minutes ago, as he was attempting to utilize the urinal. Resident #4 stated LVN D left it on his table for his convenience. Resident #4 stated he did not know what medications were in the cup and could not recall LVN D stating what medications were in the cup. Resident #4 pushed the call light at 5:11PM, to which the DON entered and was shown the cup of medications on Resident #4's bedside table. During an interview on 02/17/2024 at 5:15PM the DON stated, leaving medications on Resident #4's bedside table was not an acceptable practice. The DON stated proper medication administration would be for LVN D to keep Resident #4's medication secured with her until actual administration, and that medications should never be left unattended. The DON stated nurses are expected to ensure medications are administered appropriately to ensure residents are taking them. The DON stated Resident #4's medications could have potentially been thrown away or someone could have taken them from Resident #4's possession while he slept. The DON stated LVN D could have jeopardized Resident #4's well-being by not administering his needed medications. The DON stated she will conduct a 1 on 1 in-service with LVN D. During an interview on 02/17/2024 at 5:24PM LVN D stated her procedure when administering medications was to review medications with the residents, double check orders, if taking blood pressure medications will take blood pressure reading prior to administering medications, will gather medication administration supplies, make sure resident's say their names, and administer medications, and will document the administration. LVN D stated she went in and gave Resident #4 his medications, and stated Resident #4 requested to use his urinal, to which LVN D gave him his urinal and stepped out of Resident #4's room, leaving his medication cup (with medications in it) on his bedside table. LVN D stated she did not go back into double check if Resident #4 took his medications. LVN D stated her remorse for not properly administering Resident #4's medication. LVN D stated potentially Resident #4's medication could have been thrown out or taken by someone. LVN D stated she was pretty bugged out about situation. LVN D stated the medication cup that was left on Resident #4's bedside table was iron supplements and Midodrine (a blood pressure medication that assists with keeping blood pressure from going too low). LVN D stated if Resident #4's blood pressure is not maintained, his blood pressure could get critically low where Resident #4 could pass out, and worst-case scenario, Resident #4's vital organs could shut down due to not receiving adequate amount of oxygen due to low blood pressure. LVN D stated she was in-serviced about medication administration via the facility's online computer-based training in December 2023. LVN D stated she should have kept Resident #4's medications with her and once Resident #4 was done with using his urinal, she should have then administered his medication to ensure he took them. Record review of the facility's Medication administration dated 02/17/2024 stated, Please ensure resident take scheduled medication (DO NOT LEAVE AT BEDSIDE); Please make sure all resident rights reviewed, right drug, right dose, right frequency, right time, right patient; Please notify MD/DON if patient refuses medication- had LVN D in attendance. Record review of the facility's RN/LVN Orientation skills checklist documented LVN D completed medication administration competency on 03/15/2023. Record review of the facility's Medication Administration policy dated 10/24/2022 stated, 15. Observe resident consumption of medication.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0728 (Tag F0728)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure nurse aides were able to demonstrate competencies in skills...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure nurse aides were able to demonstrate competencies in skills and techniques necessary to care for residents' needs, as identified through resident assessments, and described in the plan of care, for three residents (Resident #4, Resident #5, and Resident #6) of 12 residents reviewed for competent nursing staff, in that: Uncertified Nurse Aides were scheduled to work independently, performing hands-on care to residents, without any formal certification or competency trainings. These deficient practices could affect residents that are dependent upon staff for personal care and could potentially result in medical complications. Findings included: 1) Resident #4 Record review of Resident #4's face sheet dated 02/18/2024, revealed Resident #4 was a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted on [DATE]. Resident #4 was diagnosed with acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (respiratory failure), sepsis (infection), weakness, and acute embolism and thrombosis (blood clots). Record review of Resident #4's admission MDS dated [DATE] revealed, Resident #4 had a BIMS of 15-cognitively aware, as well as coded for needing partial/moderate assistance with toileting hygiene, lower body dressing, and bed mobility. Record review of Resident #4's Care Plan date initiated 02/06/2024 revealed, Resident #4 has an ADL self-care performance deficit r/t weakness, Acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (low oxygen). Goal: [Resident #4] will maintain current level of function in through the review date. Interventions: BATHING/SHOWERING: [Resident #4] requires extensive assist by 1 staff with bathing/showering) QOD and as necessary. BED MOBILITY: [Resident #4] requires extensive assist with bed mobility as needed. DRESSING: The resident requires extensive assist by 1 staff to dress. EATING: [Resident #4] requires extensive assist x1 staff to eat. PERSONAL HYGIENE: [Resident #4] requires extensive assist by 1 staff with personal hygiene and oral care. TOILET USE: [Resident #4] requires extensive assist by 1 staff for toileting. TRANSFER: [Resident #4] requires extensive assist by 1 staff to move between surfaces as necessary. Encourage the resident to participate to the fullest extent possible with each interaction. Encourage the resident to use bell to call for assistance. Monitor/document/report PRN any changes, any potential for improvement, reasons for self-care deficit, expected course, declines in function. 2). Resident #5 Record review of Resident #5's face sheet dated 02/18/2024 revealed Resident #5 was a [AGE] year-old male, who was admitted on [DATE]. Resident #5 was diagnosed with diabetes mellitus type 2 (sugar abnormality), need for assistance with personal care, pressure ulcer of left buttock, right leg above knee absence (amputation) and morbid obesity. Record review of Resident #5's annual MDS dated [DATE] revealed he had a BIMS of 12-cognitively aware. Resident #5 was also coded for one person assist for bed mobility, transfer, eating, and toilet use. Record review of Resident #5's Care Plan date initiated 02/06/2024 revealed Resident #5 has an ADL self-care performance deficit r/t Amputation (RAKA), Limited Mobility, Limited ROM. Interventions: BATHING/SHOWERING: [NAME] requires extensive assistance by (1) staff with bathing/showering 3 times a week and as necessary. BED MOBILITY: [NAME] requires extensive assistance by (1-2) staff to turn and reposition in bed and as necessary. DRESSING: [NAME] requires extensive assistance by (1) staff to dress. EATING: [NAME] requires supervision set up by (1) staff to eat. PERSONAL HYGIENE: [NAME] requires extensive assistance by (1) staff with personal hygiene and oral care. TOILET USE: [NAME] requires extensive assistance by (1) staff for toileting. TRANSFER: [NAME] requires extensive assistance by (2) staff to move between surfaces and as necessary. Encourage the resident to use bell to call for assistance. 3) Resident #6 Record review of Resident #6's face sheet dated 02/18/2024, revealed Resident #6 was a [AGE] year-old female who was initially admitted on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident #6 was diagnosed with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (constricted windpipe), hemiplegia (paralysis) and hemiparesis (weakness or the inability to move on one side of the body) following cerebral infarction, bilateral osteoarthritis of knee (inflammation of bone and cartilage), congestive heart failure (heart failure), and muscle wasting and atrophy. Record review of Resident #6's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed, Resident #6 had a BIMS score of 13-cognitively aware. Resident was also coded for needing two persons assist with bed mobility, transfers, and toilet usage. Record review of Resident #6's Care Plan date initiated 10/29/2021 and target date 05/05/2024 revealed, Resident #6 has an ADL self-care performance deficit r/t Limited Mobility, Stroke. Interventions: BATHING/SHOWERING: [Resident #6] requires extensive assistance by (1) staff with showering 3 times a week and as necessary. BED MOBILITY: [Resident #6] requires extensive assistance by (1) staff to turn and reposition in bed and as necessary. DRESSING: [Resident #6] requires extensive assistance by (1) staff to dress. EATING: [NAME] requires supervision by (1) staff to eat. PERSONAL HYGIENE: [Resident #6] requires extensive assistance by (1) staff with personal hygiene and oral care. TRANSFER: [Resident #6] requires Mechanical Lift (hoyer) with (2) staff assistance for transfers. Encourage the resident to participate to the fullest extent possible with each interaction. Encourage the resident to use bell to call for assistance. Monitor/document/report PRN any changes, any potential for improvement, reasons for self-care deficit, expected course, declines in function. Praise all efforts at self-care. During an interview on 02/17/2024 at 6:17PM the DON stated that nurse aides in training are not allowed to perform hands-on patient care independently. The DON stated nurse aides in training are allowed to shadow CNAs, provide feeding assistance within the presence of nursing staff, as well as able to answer call light, but are not allowed to perform hands-on care. When asked why NA A was scheduled on 02/14/2024 for the 6PM-6AM shift for halls 400, 500, and 600, the DON stated the CNA scheduled that evening oversaw rounding (changing brief, cleaning residents, turning residents) on residents with the assistance of LVN B. The DON stated she was uncertain of NA A competencies, but that NA A was scheduled to solely assist with answering call lights and hydration. The DON stated the reason why nurse aides in training are not allowed to perform hands-on care independently and by themselves was that they are not fully competent on how to properly care for the residents and could potentially jeopardize a resident's safety and well-being. The DON stated the facility offers a nurse aide in training program at their facility, and once the nurse aides complete the classes as well as competency trainings, the facility would allow the individuals to work independently while waiting to sit for the certification nurse aide exam. The DON stated NA A and NA B are nurse aides in training, and that NA B has not started her actual classes but will start soon. The DON stated NA B is allowed to answer call lights and assist with hydration but not allowed to perform hands-on care by herself. During an interview on 02/18/2024 at 8:43AM NA C stated she was an uncertified nurse aide. NA C stated she was hired in September 2023, and began CNA classes the first week of February 2024. NA C stated when she was hired, she received a day of orientation, and was then allowed to work independently on the floor by herself. NA C stated she has worked with NA A and NA B before and would verbalize to her charge nurses for the need of an actual CNA, due to NA A and NA B being nurse aides in training.NA C stated upon her request for an actual CNA, nursing staff voiced they were unaware that nurse aides in training were not allowed to work independently by themselves. NA C stated she went to school to become a CNA but did not complete the certification course nor exam. NA C stated when she would work with NA B, she would worry about the resident's safety, due to NA B's lack of formal training and being new to the healthcare workforce. NA C stated when she has worked with NA A and NA B, both have been assigned hallways to take care of, and both performed hands-on care to the residents independently, and by themselves. NA C stated multiple aides are verbalized to her, their fearfulness of speaking up to the DON about the working conditions (working by themselves performing hands-on care without formal training or education), as well as their fear of being terminated for voicing their opinions to the DON. NA C stated several nurse aides in trainings were told that if state was ever within the nursing facility, to say that their duties consist of answering call lights and assisting with non-clinical/hands-on duties. During an interview on 02/18/2024 at 11:22AM NA A stated she was a nurse aide in training, and has been employed at the facility since 08/2023, but had not attended any CNA classes due to the instructor going through personal medical issues. NA A stated when she was hired, she had orientation for her first week, and for her second week, she was scheduled to work independently taking care and performing hand-on duties (cleaning, changing briefs, turning residents, giving bed baths etc.) to residents. NA A stated she had no prior healthcare experience. NA A stated when she started, she felt overwhelmed and was worried she would hurt the residents due to the lack of experience and formal training. NA A stated when she was hired, she was told that she would perform non-clinical duties and would not be performing hands-on care until she completed the CNA training and competencies. NA A stated she has attended one session of classes in the beginning week of February 2024, and is amid her second session (February 17-19, 2024). NA A reiterated that she had not attended any other CNA class prior to the first week of February 2024. NA A stated she does not recall being given any care competencies. NA A stated she was told by the DON to tell state that her duties are to answer call lights and assist with hydration, and that she does not perform hands-on care to residents by herself. During an interview on 02/18/2024 at 12:09PM NA B stated she has been employed at the nursing facility for 3 months. NA B stated her duties are to assist CNAs, answer call lights, and help with drinks. NA B stated she has not yet attended the CNA classes, but states she believed she will start soon. NA B could not recall being given an CNA competency. NA B stated she works day shift sometimes (6AM-6PM) as well as works night shift (6PM-6AM). NA B stated she does not perform hands on care to residents, and that CNAs will do brief changes. NA B stated this is her first job in healthcare and had no other patient care experience. NA B stated she was hired in November 2023. NA B stated the facility gave her orientation to floor and was told she would only be able to shadow CNAs, while the CNAs change briefs and provide hands-on care. Hasn't started classes, stated she can only answer call lights, help with hydration and asks if the residents need anything. During an interview on 02/19/2024 at 8:00AM CNA A stated on 02/14/2024 during her 6PM-6AM shift, NA A was in charge of the 400, 500, and 600 halls. CNA A stated NA A is a nurse aide in training but performs independent hands-on care for residents. CNA A stated nurse aides in trainings have verbalized their concerns to her as well as to management about the working by themselves. CNA A stated nurse aides have verbalized to her, their fearfulness of speaking out about the working conditions, due to feeling the facility will retaliate and terminate them, as well as been groomed/coached to tell state that all nurse aides in training do is shadow CNAs. CNA A stated she was worried about the safety of the residents when uncertified nurse aides are scheduled to work independently without any healthcare or formal competency trainings. CNA A stated CNAs perform rounds which consists of changing briefs, and will perform every 2-3hours, spot check (brief checks) for those that cannot speak, just to make sure residents are okay. CNA A stated she has been scheduled with NA B, and that NA B works by herself and performs the independent hands-on resident care of a CNA. CNA A stated she has overhead the DON instruct the nurse aides to tell state that their duties consist of answering call lights and assist with hydration. CNA A stated the residents depend on them and verbalized the concern of utilizing uncertified nurse aides in training for independent patient care. During an interview on 02/17/2024 at 5:02PM Resident #4 stated NA A would assist him with hands on care. Resident #4 stated NA A would assist him by herself with emptying his urinal, performing perineal and gluteal folds cleaning, as well as would assist him to move within his bed. Resident #4 stated when he was admitted to the facility as well as was able to describe NA A physical characteristics accurately. During an interview on 02/18/2024 at 3:33PM Resident #5 stated NA B worked nights, and would assist him by herself, by independently utilizing/removing his bed pan and urinal and by herself help him move within his bed. Resident #5 stated NA B would assist him in cleaning his gluteal area without any other staff member present. Resident #5 stated NA A would also assist him at night with a bedpan by herself. Resident #5 stated NA A would assist with cleaning his gluteal folds area and help him move within his bed without any other staff member present. Resident #5 stated NA C would assist him in the same manner as NA A and NA B. Resident #5 was able to provide the names of the staff members that would assist him, as well as accurately describe the physical characteristics of the three uncertified nurse aides. During an interview on 02/18/2024 at 3:52PM Resident #6 stated she wears brief due to her incontinent episodes. Resident #6 stated NA B recently has been switching/working morning and night shifts. Resident #6 stated NA B seemed to be hesitant when changing Resident #6's brief. Resident #6 stated NA B will sometimes have another staff member help her, but majority of the time NA B will clean, change, and assist Resident #6 with turning, by herself. Resident #6 stated NA A will enter her room and assist Resident #6 with changing her brief and her bed linen. Resident #6 was able to state the names of NA A and NA B, as well as describe their physical characteristics. Record review of NA A's CNA Orientation Skills Checklist dated 10/06/2023 documented NA A's completion of CNA competency check-off regarding hands-on care. Record review of NA B's facility CNA Orientation Skills Checklist dated 12/29/2023 documented NA B's completion of CNA competency check-off regarding hands-on care. Record review of Nurse Aide online Certificant Registry on 02/18/2024, documented no information on NA A, NA B, or NA C, however, did show CNA A with a current Nurse Aide certification that expires on 07/22/2024. Record review of the facility's sign in sheet on: 02/12/2024 6PM-6AM- NA A (assigned hallways 100 and 300) and NA B (assigned hallways 200 and 600)- both documented their arrival by initialing the sign in sheet. 02/14/2024 NA A (assigned hallways 400,500, and 600) documented their arrival by initialing the sign in sheet. Record review of the facility's Job Description for Nurse Aide in Training undated stated, The Nurse Aide in Training will provide assigned residents with non-clinical care and services in accordance with directives given by Certified Nurse Aid and/or Charge Nurse until completion of the training program. Requested policy and procedure for unlicensed personnel/ uncertified nurse aides, per the Administrator the facility does not have a policy and procedure for unlicensed personnel, or uncertified nurse aides.
Jul 2023 3 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and co...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program, designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections, for one (R#200) of five residents reviewed for infection control. 1. The facility failed to ensure CNA A performed hand hygiene and changed gloves prior to perineal care and after touching multiple surfaces. 2. The facility failed to ensure dietary staff immediately exited the facility after testing positive for COVID-19. These failures could place residents at risk for infection through cross contamination of pathogens. The findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #200's Face Sheet, dated 07/27/2023, revealed the resident was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #200 was a [AGE] year-old female with diagnoses which included: Alzheimer's (degenerative cognition), muscle weakness, difficulty walking, anxiety, hypertension (high blood pressure). Record review of Resident #200's MDS assessment dated [DATE] documented a 6 out of 15 BIMS score which indicated severe cognitive impairment. The MDS also revelaed Resident #200 required extensive dependency of staff to assist in activities of daily living. Resident #200 was coded for always incontinent. Record review of Resident #200's Comprehensive Care Plan date initiated 05/09/2023 and revised 05/23/2023 stated, Focus: Resident #200 has bladder incontinence r/t Alzheimer's. Goal: Resident #200 will remain free from skin breakdown due to incontinence and brief use through review date. Interventions: brief use: Resident #200 uses disposable briefs. Change frequently. Clean peri-area with each incontinence episode. Encourage fluids during the day to promote prompted voiding responses. Incontinent: check frequently for incontinence. During an observation on 07/26/23 at 04:28 PM Resident #200 granted consent to perform perineal care. CNA A began by washing her hands for 28 seconds. CNA A continued by applying clean gloves and retrieved supplies. With the initial pair of clean gloves CNA A touched Resident #200's bed controls, call light, and removed Resident #200's pants and visibly soiled brief. CNA A continued by retrieving multiple clean wipes, and with the initial pair of gloves commenced the perineal care. CNA A proceeded to turn Resident #200 by grabbing the residents left leg, and in a pushing motion, turned the resident to the right side. CNA A continued to clean the gluteal excrement using the same initial pair of visibly soiled gloves. CNA A did perform hand hygiene for 43seconds after perineal care. During interview on 07/26/2023 at 4:42 PM with CNA A, inquired about the procedural steps taken on Resident #200's perineal care. CNA A stated she should have removed her contaminated gloves, performed hand hygiene, and applied new gloves prior to perineal care. CNA A stated she was nervous and it slipped her mind. CNA A stated once she was done cleaning the perineum area, she should have removed her dirty gloves, performed hand hygiene, and applied a new pair of gloves prior to turning R#200. CNA A stated by performing hand hygiene followed by applying a new set of clean gloves before performing rectum cleaning care, would be a preventative measure to promote infection control and minimize potential of cross contamination. CNA A stated by touching the bed control, call light, Resident #200's pants and soiled brief, followed then by Resident#200's perineal area, may have exposed the resident to infectious microorganisms. CNA A stated she was in serviced about infection control and hand hygiene two weeks ago but was nervous and forgot her training. During interview on 07/26/2023 at 5:12 PM with the DON, she stated prior to the commencement of perineal care, CNA A should have performed hand hygiene after touching the multiple surfaces as a preventative measure to assist in infection control. The DON stated CNA A potentially exposed Resident #200 to infectious microorganisms and the potential spread of bacteria. The DON stated if a resident contracts an infection, the infection could lead to a severe urinary tract infection or worse confusion. The DON stated the reasoning as to why these specific steps were necessitated was to minimize risk of infection. The DON stated it was standard of practice to clean from cleanest to dirtiest. The DON stated she followed CDC recommendations and it was not necessary for CNA A to change gloves from moving from the perineum area to buttock area. The DON stated she facilitated an in-service on perineal/incontinent care June 2023. The DON stated she conducted in-services and skill checkoffs upon hire, annually and as needed. The DON stated each skill check off was focused on infection control. Record Review of the CDC Guidelines regarding Hand Hygiene in Healthcare Settings, last reviewed January 8, 2021 indicated Healthcare providers should use an alcohol-based hand rub or wash with soap and water for the following clinical indications: Immediately before touching a patient, before performing an aseptic task (e.g., placing an indwelling device) or handling invasive medical devices, before moving from work on a soiled body site to a clean body site on the same patient, after touching a patient or the patient's immediate environment, after contact with blood, body fluids or contaminated surfaces, and immediately after glove removal. Record Review of the facility's Hand Hygiene Policy, dated 10/24/22 indicated: .2. Hand hygiene is indicated and will be performed under the conditions listed in, but not limited to, the attached hand hygiene table. (Table was not presented upon request) 6. The use of gloves does not replace hand hygiene. If your task requires gloves, perform hand hygiene prior to donning gloves, and immediately after removing gloves. 2. During an interview on 7/24/2023 at 1:45 PM with the Complainant #1 revealed dietary staff tested positive for COVID-19 and was required to finish preparing breakfast at the facility. During an observation and interview on 7/25/2023 at 10:45 AM, dietary staff C said she tested herself for COVID-19 on 7/19/2023 between 5:20 AM and 5:40 AM. She said she called the administrator and sent a photo of the positive test. She said it was about 7:00 AM when she talked to the administrator, and she left the facility after breakfast was served at about 8:10 AM. Dietary staff A exhibited signs of infection such as cold sweats. Dietary staff C wore a mask. During an interview with the DON on 7/25/2023 at 12:30 PM, she said she sent dietary staff C home after 10:45 AM. The DON said dietary staff C did not have a fever but had a dry cough. The DON said that Dietary staff C had tested negative for COVID-19. The DON said she could tell there was something else going on with her and did not need to assess her further based on what dietary staff C told her. During an interview with the Administrator on 7/25/2023 at 1:00 PM she said staff who didn't feel well needed to call in and let the facility know. The administrator said she would like a four-hour notice, or the earliest possible. The administrator said she could not find anyone to come in, so dietary staff C remained in the facility. The administrator said she kept dietary staff C at the facility, preparing breakfast for the residents, until a replacement was available around 8:10 AM. During an interview with the Administrator on 7/27/2023 at 2:45 PM, she said she arrived at the facility on or/about 7:20 AM - 7:30 AM on 7/19/2023. The administrator said she did not punch in. The administrator said she saw dietary staff C and told her a replacement staff was coming. The administrator said she was in a hurry and did not tell dietary staff C to leave. The administrator said dietary staff C should have known to leave. The administrator said she should have told dietary staff A to leave. During an interview with LVN B on 7/27/2023 at 3:05 PM, she said she was shown Dietary staff C's positive COVID-19 test, and told Dietary staff C she needed to leave immediately and to call the administrator from the car on the way home. LVN B said Dietary staff C needed to leave immediately because she was covid-19 positive. Dietary staff C was in her office when LVN B told her to leave. LVN B said she told dietary staff C to leave because she didn't want to be exposed to covid. LVN B said dietary staff C said she would leave but did not. During an interview with Dietary Staff C on 7/25/2023 at 10:45 AM she said she did not leave because there was no one else there. During an interview with the DON on 7/27/2023 at 3:45 PM, she said the facility did in-services in the past that would indicate staff were supposed to alert the administrator if staff showed signs or symptoms of COVID-19. The DON stated dietary staff C should have left when she tested positive. Record review of the facility's COVID-19 emergency preparedness plan reflected: CMS Centers for Clinical Standards and Quality. Safety and Oversight Group (3/20/2022) Ref: QsO-20-14-NH Page 4 of 7: Any staff that develop signs and symptoms of a respiratory infection while on-the-job, should: Immediately stop work, put on a face mask, and self-isolate at home.
CONCERN (F) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitche...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed and 1 of 1 nutrition room, for kitchen sanitation. 1. The facility failed to ensure spices were properly covered and sealed. 2. The facility failed to ensure steam tables were kept clean. 3. The facility failed to ensure plastic dishes were kept clean. 4. The facility failed to ensure the air vent in the kitchen was clean. 5. The facility failed to ensure the ice machine was cleaned. 6. The facility failed to ensure food items in the nutrition area were labeled and dated. 7. The facility failed to ensure the temperature in the nutrition room wasn't too hot. These failures could place residents at risk of foodborne illnesses. Findings include: Observation during the initial tour of the kitchen on 07/24/23 at 10:25 am revealed six, 18 oz. plastic containers of spices next to the stove were open to the air. A 6-quart container of thickened powder on the prep table was open to the air. The steam table had a thick water line of a yellowish substance with some redness in one and small fuzzy-looking black dots in another. There were 33 of 46 coffee cups that were heavily stained with a dark brown substance, some with a removable white residue. There were 120 of 125 juice glasses that had a thick whitish coating on the bottom, some with a white residue on the insides. There were 28 of 43 soup bowls that were heavily stained with a brown and/or whitish residue. The air vent had a gross amount of black build-up around it, and next to the blower, that blew directly on the stove. The ice machine had small round fuzzy black dots along the top of the ice chute, yellowish streaks running down the inside of one side, and areas of a fuzzy black substance along the outside of the machine. Observation of the nutrition room on 07/26/23 at 02:03 pm revealed one undated and unlabeled packaged pastry, five, 12 oz. cans of red soda, two, 12 cans of cola, two, 7.5 oz. cans of clear soda, five, 7.5 oz. cans of brown soda, four, 10oz. bottles of red punch, two, 4oz. packages of baby food, three, 3.2 oz. packages of baby food, six, 4 oz. cups of fruit, three sleeves of round crackers, one opened and partially empty 24 oz. bottle of syrup, five, 0.7 sticks of powered orange drink, 20, 3 oz. packages of yogurt, 24, 3.2 oz. packages of applesauce-were all unlabeled and undated. The thermometer inside the nutrition room showed the temperature in the room was 78F. There was no log to record or monitor the temperature of the nutrition room. An interview with the COOK on 07/24/23 at 10:43 am revealed the cups on the tray on the coffee maker were clean and in use. Interview with the AAD on 07/24/23 at 11:10 am revealed she used to work in the kitchen, and she was helping out today because the DS was out with Covid-19 for the last 3 days, and she did not know the dishes were not cleaned. Interview with DA A on 07/24/23 at 11:20 am revealed the residue in the juice glasses was because they were stained from the night before. The DA A stated it (the residue) doesn't come off, even with washing them by hand. The DA A stated the stained juice and milk glasses were like that because they did not have time in the mornings to make the juices and milk and pour them, so they did it the night before around 8:00 pm and the full glasses would sit in the refrigerator overnight. The DA A stated breakfast was at 7:00 am and the kitchen staff came in at 6:00 am. The DA A stated there was no cleaning schedule, and the kitchen staff just does the routine stuff, like mopping, dishes, and wiping things down. An interview with the ADM on 07/24/23 at 11:45 am stated they were now using paper cups, bowls, and glasses because the dishes in the kitchen were unusable. Interview with the DM on 07/25/23 at 10:35 am revealed her turnover was terrible and that she only had 3 employees. The DM stated she was down 2 cooks and 1 dietary aid. The DM stated she soaked the cups, bowls, and glasses with a degreaser and then ran them through the washer. The DM stated the degreaser got the residue off. The DM stated, The cleaning schedule was a check-off type, and it was on her desk when she left last Wednesday (07/19/23) because she was out sick. The DM stated she checked the cleaning schedule every morning to make sure the staff was checking it off. The DM stated the staff knows to check off their duties. The duties did not get done since she went home Wednesday (07/19/23) because she had left it on her desk. They do their daily thing-cooking, temperature logs, trash cans, sweeping, and mopping. The DM stated this morning when she returned to work, she cleaned the steam table. The DM stated she did in-services with them (kitchen staff) when she finds the staff not doing their duties. The last in-services were last month. The DM stated the RD wrote on her last visit for maintenance to take care of the air vent, but they did not. The DM stated she (herself) put it into the electronic maintenance log to get it (the air vent) cleaned last month. She stated there was no water softener at the facility. She stated the COOK knew to soak the dishes because she's the cook. She stated it was the dietary aids' job to make sure the dishes were clean. She stated the other aides trained the new aides. She stated she trained the cooks and the aides. She stated she did not have a guide to use for training. She stated she looked at the chemical and temperature logs. She stated, She looked at the logs today and found the dietary aid had not taken the temperatures of the milk, coffee, and food, so she did it herself. She stated, It was important to make sure food and milk were not in the danger zone for hot food, milk 41F, cold food 40F and under, coffee can't too hot. It should be at 151F or 152F because we don't want to run the risk of the residents burning themselves. Besides taking care of things herself, she did a lot of hands-on training that might stick (stay in their heads/remember) for a couple of days. She stated there were no posters or reminders for staff to look at for guidance when she was not there, other than the cleaning schedule. She stated if she was not there, the staff did not do the regular cleaning. The DM stated she had an in-service this morning on sanitation. She stated, For someone coming off the street, it can be overwhelming to learn. An interview with DA B on 07/25/23 at 4:50 pm revealed she had been employed at the facility for over a year and her training consisted of 3 days, where she mostly just watched, then she was shadowed for another 2 days, she had an in-service today about sanitation on the cups. An interview with the ADM on 07/26/23 at 02:24 pm revealed she knew the formula (for tube feedings) did not need to be labeled, but the residents' drinks and snacks, she thought they had the names on the boxes. The ADM stated it was required to have their (resident's) names and dates on drinks and snacks the residents kept in the nutrition room. The ADM stated staff were responsible for labeling the items in the nutrition room-whoever took in the item should have labeled it before it ever reached the nutrition room. The ADM stated labeling items was important because the items were the property of the residents and you wouldn't want to give a resident someone else's drinks or snack because that resident might get sick. The ADM stated the nutrition room should be cooler than it was because the heat could ruin the items in there. The ADM was asked to provide policies for nutrition room temperatures and storage. In an observation and interview with DA B on 07/26/23 at 04:45 pm revealed a partially full 16 oz. bottle of soda on the prep table, next to the steam table. The dishes with residue were cleaner but still had residue on the insides of them. The steam table still had scaling and redness in them. DA B stated she soaked the dishes in the sanitation side of the 3-compartment sink for 15 minutes. DA B stated she did not know what the chemical was in the 3-compartment sink. DA B stated the cups still looked bad. DA B stated the bottle of soda belonged to the COOK, who was Spanish speaking only. DA B stated the COOK knowa a little English, and they do the best they can to communicate. The only Daily Cleaning schedule provided, posted, and checked off in the kitchen was dated 07/24/23 and 07/25/23. DA B stated they don't really go by the cleaning schedule-they just clean whatever looked like needed to be cleaned-they sweep and mop and wipe down the prep tables. Interview and observation of the nutrition room with the AMS on 07/27/23 at 1:50 pm revealed The temperature in the nutrition room should be at 72F. Upon entering the nutrition room, the AMS stated, It's hot in here-there should be air conditioning in here, and stated the thermometer showed 79F. The AMS stated, It should be cooler because the cans of soda could burst or the snacks could melt and be ruined and they belong to the residents. A record review of the electronic maintenance log documented the vent in the kitchen was cleaned and the filter changed monthly on 04/28/23, 05/05/23, and 06/14/23. There was no documentation that the request for cleaning was made last month by the DM, or the RD. A record review of In-Services for kitchen staff documented: 01/04/23 Food Handling on Tray Line, 02/08/23 Temperature Logging, 03/10/23 Foods and Meat Textures, Dialysis Sack Lunch, Thicken Liquids, 03/21/23 Handling Leftovers, 04/05/23 Menu Substitution Guide, 04/06/23 Shelf-Life, 04/19/23 Communication Slips, 04/24/23 Auto-Chlor, Janitor Closet Dispenser, 05/31/23 Disposal, 06/08/23 Infection Control-Sanitizing dining room tables. There was no in-service dated 07/25/23. The facility did not provide policies for nutrition room temperatures or storage after being asked for them.
MINOR (C) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact

Deficiency F0912 (Tag F0912)

Minor procedural issue · This affected most or all residents

Based on observation and record review, the facility failed to provide the required 80 square foot per resident in 47 of 47 multiple resident rooms (101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 202, 2...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation and record review, the facility failed to provide the required 80 square foot per resident in 47 of 47 multiple resident rooms (101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 202, 203, 204, 205, 206, 207, 208, 209, 210, 301, 302, 304, 305, 306, 307, 401, 403, 404, 405, 406, 407, 501, 502, 503, 504, 505, 506, 507, 508, 509, 510, 600, 601, 602, 604, 606, 608, and 609). This deficient practice could affect residents who reside in the facility and could result in inadequate space for resident's activities of daily living in their rooms. Findings included: During an interview with the Administrator on 7/24/2023 at 1:00 PM, she indicated she wanted to continue the room waiver. She said there has been no changes to room size since the last survey. Review of annual surveys revealed 20 sampled room measurements were; 102 - 154.9 103 - 153.3 104 - 151.1 105 - 148.7 204 - 153.6 205 - 153.3 206 - 153.5 208 - 152.9 301 - 151.7 302 - 151.0 404 - 154.3 407 - 151.9 503 - 155.1 504 - 152.5 507 - 154.6 508 - 152.8 602 - 154.0 604 - 153.8 608 - 154.2 609 - 153.8 A review of the facility Bed Classification Form dated 7/24/2023 revealed all resident rooms were certified as rooms for 2 residents.
Mar 2023 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and co...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program, designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections, for one (R# 1) of seven residents that were reviewed for infection control and transmission-based precautions policies and practices, in that: a. NA A did not remove their contaminated gloves after cleansing resident of bowel movement, prior to catheter care. NA A proceeded to clean without performing hand hygiene and maintained usage of dirty gloves while cleaning foley catheter site. These failures could place residents at risk for infection through cross contamination of pathogens. The findings included: Record review of R #1's Face Sheet dated 03/29/2023 revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted originally on 05/12/2020, with readmission date, 05/18/2022. Her diagnoses included, Inappropriate secretion of antidiuretic hormone (condition in which the body makes too much antidiuretic hormone), constipation (not passing stools regularly or you're unable to completely empty your bowel), anemia (body does not have enough healthy red blood cells), osteoarthritis (degenerative joint disease), and hypertension (high blood pressure). Record review of R #1's MDS dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status score of 5/severely impaired cognition, as well as extensive dependency of staff to assist in activities of daily living. Indwelling catheter used. Record review of R #1's Comprehensive Care Plan initiated: 03/16/2023 documented, Problem: has Indwelling Catheter r/t urinary retention. Goal: will be/remain free from catheter-related trauma through review date. Interventions: Catheter: The resident has 16 French 10 ml indwelling catheter position catheter bag and tubing below the level of the bladder and away from entrance room door. Leg strap to be applied with catheter as indicated; observe skin for any changes in integrity and report to nurse. RN Monitor/document for pain/discomfort due to catheter. Monitor/record/report to MD for signs and symptoms of UTI: pain, burning, blood-tinged urine, cloudiness, no output, deepening of urine color, increased pulse, increased temp, Urinary frequency, foul smelling urine, fever, chills, altered mental status, change in behavior, change in eating patterns. Observation on 03/29/2023 at 11: 09AM, NA A commenced procedural catheter care of R #1. NA A entered R #1's room after knocking. NA A began with washing hands for 30seconds, gloved up, and prepared table of needed supplies. NA A continued by raising bed and then discarded gloves. After discarding the gloves, NA A continued with no hand hygiene but did apply new gloves. NA proceeded to clean bowel movement with observable residue on gloves. Once bowel movement was cleaned, using same pair of gloves, removed brief, applied new brief, and with the same gloves performed catheter care inside perineal area. During an interview on 03/29/2023 at 11: 28AM with NA A, NA A stated that they should have changed those gloves after cleaning bowel movement, for the reason to minimize contraction of infection. NA A stated they should have washed hands and changed gloves, before, during, and after care to minimize chance of infection. NA A stated their recognition of error and proceeded to state it was noted as a standard of practice. NA A stated they were last in serviced about catheter care in their facility's education class that transpired on Sunday 03/26/2023. During an interview on 03/29/2023 at 1:50PM with the DON, the observed performance of R #1's catheter care performed by NA A, was verbally detailed to the DON. DON stated cleansing should have begun at the perineal area. The DON continued with stating that it was a standard of practice to go from cleanest (front/ perineal) to dirtiest (back/rectum) to avoid infection. The DON stated that after perineum care, hand hygiene should have been performed prior to moving to the second part of cleaning of the bowel movement. The DON stressed the importance of infection prevention, and stated that personnel were educated and observed by her performing specific care during checkoffs, before being allowed to work on floor independently. Record Review of the facility's Incontinent Care Proficiency Checklist, undated, stated: 2) When washing, rinsing, and drying the urethral area a. Gently wash, rinse, and dry around the juncture of the catheter and meatus then b. Turn resident to side away from you and cleaning from front to back clean the rectal area. Record Review of the facility's Catheter Care, Urinary Policy dated 07/15 stated, 6) Wash resident's genitalia and perineum thoroughly with soap and water. Rinse area well and towel dry 9) Remove gloves and discard into the designated container. Wash and dry your hands thoroughly 10)Put on clean gloves 12)With nondominant hand separate the labia of the female resident 14)Use a washcloth with warm water and soap to cleanse the labia. Use one area of washcloth for each downward, cleansing stroke Record Review of the facility's Hand hygiene Policy dated 04/15 stated, Handwashing for at least twenty (20) seconds with soap and water or hand sanitizer should be performed under the following conditions, but not limited to: h. Before and after assisting a resident with personal care l. Before and after assisting a resident with toileting Record Review of the CDC Guidelines regarding Hand Hygiene in Healthcare Settings, dated January 30, 2020, stated Healthcare personnel should use an alcohol-based hand rub or wash with soap and water for the following clinical indications: Immediately before touching a patient, before performing an aseptic task (e.g., placing an indwelling device) or handling invasive medical devices, before moving from work on a soiled body site to a clean body site on the same patient, after touching a patient or the patient's immediate environment, contaminated surfaces, and immediately after glove removal. Record Review of facility's Incontinent Care Proficiency Checklist, undated, stated: 2) When washing, rinsing, and drying the urethral area a. Gently wash, rinse, and dry around the juncture of the catheter and meatus then b. Turn resident to side away from you and cleaning from front to back clean the rectal area. Record Review of facility's Catheter Care, Urinary Policy dated 07/15 stated, 6) Wash resident's genitalia and perineum thoroughly with soap and water. Rinse area well and towel dry 9) Remove gloves and discard into the designated container. Wash and dry your hands thoroughly 10)Put on clean gloves 12)With nondominant hand separate the labia of the female resident 14)Use a washcloth with warm water and soap to cleanse the labia. Use one area of washcloth for each downward, cleansing stroke Record Review of facility's Hand hygiene Policy dated 04/15 stated, Handwashing for at least twenty (20) seconds with soap and water or hand sanitizer should be performed under the following conditions, but not limited to: h. Before and after assisting a resident with personal care l. Before and after assisting a resident with toileting
May 2022 2 deficiencies
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0838 (Tag F0838)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to identify the resources needed to provide the necessary care and services the residents require during an emergency in that: T...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to identify the resources needed to provide the necessary care and services the residents require during an emergency in that: There was not enough water on hand to provide the required one gallon of water per person for three days at all times in the event of an emergency. This deficient practice of not having resources available to receive necessary care and services could place residents at risk. The findings were: Observation of emergency water supply on 05/17/22 at 10:30 am during initial tour of the kitchen with DS revealed eight 5-gallon bottles of water set aside for emergency use. Record review of facility policy number 09.001 revised 09/10/21, emergency and disaster planning under section 8-2, Water, documented The facility should have a plan to provide some emergency water of its own in the event water is not available from the supplier. A minimum of one gallon of water per person for three days should be kept at all times. Record review of CMS 672 revealed a census of 58 residents as of 05/17/22. During an interview with DS on 05/19/22 at 2:00pm revealed storage is a big problem and this is what they (ADM) give me, referring to the eight, five gallons of water stacked in storage. While looking at the policy number 09.001, as referred to above, she calculated for 58 residents, at one gallon per resident for three days would come to a total of 174 gallons. With 40 gallons on hand, a deficit of 134 gallons was present. She said a budget for emergency supplies would be helpful. She also said, It just got away from me. Record review of Facility assessment date 01/17/22 showed a water supplier name and unable to locate (food supplier name) agreement During an interview with ADM and DS on 5/20/22 at 1:30pm revealed ADM unaware the facility had not had an assessment update since 01/17/22 and they both said they did not have any problems having food or water delivered.
MINOR (C)

Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact

Deficiency F0912 (Tag F0912)

Minor procedural issue · This affected most or all residents

Based on observation and record review, the facility failed to provide the required 80 square foot per resident in 47 of 47 multiple resident rooms (101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 202, 2...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation and record review, the facility failed to provide the required 80 square foot per resident in 47 of 47 multiple resident rooms (101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 202, 203, 204, 205, 206, 207, 208, 209, 210, 301, 302, 304, 305, 306, 307, 401, 403, 404, 405, 406, 407, 501, 502, 503, 504, 505, 506, 507, 508, 509, 510, 600, 601, 602, 604, 606, 608, and 609). This deficient practice could affect residents who reside in the facility and could result in inadequate space for resident's activities of daily living in their rooms. Findings included: During an interview with the Administrator on 05/20/22 at 10:20 am, she indicated she wanted to continue the room waiver. Review of annual surveys revealed 20 sampled room measurements were; 102 - 154.9 103 - 153.3 104 - 151.1 105 - 148.7 204 - 153.6 205 - 153.3 206 - 153.5 208 - 152.9 301 - 151.7 302 - 151.0 404 - 154.3 407 - 151.9 503 - 155.1 504 - 152.5 507 - 154.6 508 - 152.8 602 - 154.0 604 - 153.8 608 - 154.2 609 - 153.8 Interview on 05/20/22 at 9:20 am with the Maintenance Director, while observing residents' rooms, revealed all the rooms have remained with same measurements. A review of the facility Bed Classification Form dated 05/17/22 revealed all resident rooms were certified as rooms for 2 residents.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
  • "Why is there high staff turnover? How do you retain staff?"
  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
Concerns
  • • Multiple safety concerns identified: 3 life-threatening violation(s). Review inspection reports carefully.
  • • 16 deficiencies on record, including 3 critical (life-threatening) violations. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
  • • $12,055 in fines. Above average for Texas. Some compliance problems on record.
  • • Grade F (12/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
Bottom line: This facility has 3 Immediate Jeopardy findings. Serious concerns require careful evaluation.

About This Facility

What is Robstown's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns ROBSTOWN NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER an overall rating of 2 out of 5 stars, which is considered below average nationally. Within Texas, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.

How is Robstown Staffed?

CMS rates ROBSTOWN NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER's staffing level at 1 out of 5 stars, which is much below average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 62%, which is 16 percentage points above the Texas average of 46%. High turnover can affect care consistency as new staff learn residents' individual needs.

What Have Inspectors Found at Robstown?

State health inspectors documented 16 deficiencies at ROBSTOWN NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER during 2022 to 2024. These included: 3 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death), 10 with potential for harm, and 3 minor or isolated issues. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.

Who Owns and Operates Robstown?

ROBSTOWN NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER is owned by a non-profit organization. Non-profit facilities reinvest revenue into operations rather than distributing to shareholders. The facility is operated by WELLSENTIAL HEALTH, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 94 certified beds and approximately 58 residents (about 62% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in ROBSTOWN, Texas.

How Does Robstown Compare to Other Texas Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Texas, ROBSTOWN NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER's overall rating (2 stars) is below the state average of 2.8, staff turnover (62%) is significantly higher than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (2 stars) is below the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Robstown?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "How do you ensure continuity of care given staff turnover, and what is your staff retention strategy?" "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations, the facility's high staff turnover rate, and the below-average staffing rating.

Is Robstown Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, ROBSTOWN NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER has documented safety concerns. Inspectors have issued 3 Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 2-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Texas. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.

Do Nurses at Robstown Stick Around?

Staff turnover at ROBSTOWN NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER is high. At 62%, the facility is 16 percentage points above the Texas average of 46%. High turnover means new staff may not know residents' individual needs, medications, or preferences. It can also be disorienting for residents, especially those with dementia who rely on familiar faces. Families should ask: What is causing the turnover? What retention programs are in place? How do you ensure care continuity during staff transitions?

Was Robstown Ever Fined?

ROBSTOWN NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER has been fined $12,055 across 1 penalty action. This is below the Texas average of $33,199. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.

Is Robstown on Any Federal Watch List?

ROBSTOWN NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.