CRITICAL
(K)
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Safe Environment
(Tag F0584)
Someone could have died · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike en...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, to include maintenance services necessary to maintain comfortable and safe temperature levels, for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, in that:
The facility presented with 2 Heating Ventilation and Air Conditioning systems [HVAC], of which 1 HVAC was not functioning causing cold interiors during the winter season.
An IJ was identified on [DATE]. The IJ template was provided on [DATE] at 07:04 PM. While the IJ was removed on [DATE], the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of pattern and a severity level of no actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy because the facility needed to monitor their corrective actions.
This deficient practice placed residents at risk for harm by a diminished quality of life.
The Finding were:
The HVAC systems did not use 2 of 4 corridors (A Hall and B Hall) for a portion of the return air supply, inspected for return air supply. Air-Conditioning, Heating, Ventilating Ductwork, and Related Equipment. Air-conditioning, heating, ventilating ductwork, and related equipment.
Record review revealed the facility had received a Waiver Approval letter dated [DATE] for Corridor Return Air, which had expired on [DATE] and that renewal documents had been submitted during the [DATE] survey period.
Observations between on [DATE] between 10:00 a.m. to 11:00 a.m. revealed rooms on A Hall and B Hall were provided with ducted supply air but not with return air intakes. The return air intakes for the HVAC system were located in the corridors outside the rooms, causing the corridors to serve as a part of the return air system for the adjoining areas.
During an exit interview on [DATE] at 5:00 p.m., when questioned as to the use of the A and B Halls being used as return air for the HVAC System, the Administrator said that she knew of the return air use in the aforementioned areas and that the facility had a waiver, as issued on [DATE] by the CMS for a three-year period (expired [DATE]). When asked if he knew the waiver had expired, the Administrator said he did and asked that it be renewed.
Record review of the past air temperatures for San [NAME], Texas. In [DATE] the average high air temperature was 91-92 degrees Fahrenheit [F]. In [DATE], [DATE]-21, 2023, was 105 degrees F. The air temperature for [DATE] was 94-97 degrees F. In [DATE] the average high air temperature was 97 degrees F and with humidity was over 100 degrees F. This summer the county had 74 days of 100 degrees F, and over, ambient air temperatures.
Observations on [DATE] at 9:50 AM with Maintenance Director X conducted environmental rounds of the facility and stated the temperatures should be between 71-81 degrees F. Observations were made of Residents gathered in the main dining room for the activity of Bingo. The Maintenance Director X stated the #1 HVAC unit was not working for a while, the HVAC unit serviced the A and B halls, which included the main dining room. The Maintenance Director X stated he had set the #1 HVAC unit to heat when he learned residents were going to have bingo in the main dining room. The Maintenance Director X stated he was not sure why the #1 HVAC was not at a good temperature and will notify the Administrator. Further observations and temperature records revealed the main dining room was 62.6 degrees F.
At 10:20 AM the main dining the air temperature room was 54.9 degrees F.
At 10:22 AM in the C end section of hall, the air temperature was 58.0 degrees F.
At 10:23 AM in the C start of hall, the air temperature was 67.3 degrees F.
At 10:26 AM in the D Hall, at start of hall (memory care unit), the air temperature was 69.3 degrees F.
At 10:37 AM in the D Hall, at end of hall, the air temperature was 67.8 degrees F.
Interview on [DATE] at 11:25 AM with the Administrator stated he was notified of the air temperature in the A and B Halls by the Life Safety Code surveyor (LSC) and was not aware that the C and D Halls were not heating for residents. No other reply.
Interview on [DATE] at 10:06 AM with the ADON stated the HVAC system was having issues since earlier this year, 2023, either May or [DATE]. The ADON stated the resident families first noticed and reported the staff, that was when the facility was testing air temperatures. The facility brought in mobile Air Conditioning units. The ADON stated they discovered the A Hall (previous secure unit) was not cooling and was hot, so they moved those residents to the B Hall . Then the ADON stated the facility noticed the B Hall was not cooling, so the residents were moved to another part of the facility in May or June of 2023. They had a low census at the time. The facility moved the residents who resided on the A Hall secured unit to the first half of the D Hall and the rest of the residents moved to the second half of D Hall and other residents to the C Hall .
A record review of the facility's Homelike Environment policy dated February 2021, revealed, policy statement; residents are provided with a safe, clean, comfortable and home like environment and encouraged to use their personal belongings to the extent possible. policy interpretation and implementation; the facility staff and management maximizes, to the extent possible, the characteristics of the facility that reflect a personalized, home like setting. these characteristics include; . comfortable and safe temperatures (71-81 degrees F) .
This was determined to be an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) on [DATE] at 07:04 PM. The Administrator was notified. The Administrator was provided with the IJ template on [DATE]. The following Plan of Removal was accepted on [DATE] at 03:10 PM.
Immediate Jeopardy
PLAN OF REMOVAL
[DATE]
Immediate Action:
- Bids to repair the HVAC system currently out of order are being obtained from [HVAC Contractors]. The ceiling will be secured and repaired as part of the HVAC project.
- Is a goal as far as a date to accept a bid by? All bids to be submitted by [DATE].
- Anticipated date of repair? Contractor will be approved to begin work on or before [DATE].
- What is being done in the meantime to ensure residents have a comfortable living environment? No residents currently reside in the area affected by the A/C outage. For the occupied areas of the building, random temperature checks will be taken twice daily (in the morning and in the afternoon/evening) to ensure temperatures are within acceptable range. If temperature is outside limits, thermostats will be adjusted (switched from cooling to heated and vice-versa) as needed. Temperature checks will be completed on regular weekdays by the maintenance director or designee, and on weekends/holidays by the receptionist. The administrator or designee will review the daily temperature logs for completeness and compliance.
Plan of Removal Verification [DATE]
Record review of several contract bids for HVAC repair.
Record review of daily temperature logs, dated [DATE], revealed the morning temperatures were within range for all areas of the facility that were utilized and occupied, apart from the main dining room, which was 64.4 degrees F. The action documented by the facility to remedy the low temperature in the main dining room was switching the HVAC system from A/C to Heat. Further record review of the afternoon/evening temperature logs revealed all temperatures in appropriate ranges for all utilized and occupied areas of the facility.
Record review of daily temperature logs, dated [DATE], revealed temperatures to be within appropriate range as required by Appendix PP.
Observation on [DATE] at 11:30 AM with Administrator rounded halls for air temperatures revealed Hall D, Hall C and main dining room as required.
Observation on [DATE] at 3:45 PM revealed temperatures in all utilized and occupied areas of the building to be as required by the Appendix PP.
The Administrator was informed the Immediate Jeopardy was removed on [DATE] at 6:49 PM. While the IJ was removed on [DATE], the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of pattern and a severity level of no actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy because the facility needed to monitor their corrective actions.
CRITICAL
(K)
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Someone could have died · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure that the residents' environment remained as ...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure that the residents' environment remained as free of accident hazards as is possible and each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 1 facility and 18 of 18 residents (Resident #1, #4 , #12, #14, #17, #23, #25, #38, #40, #41, #47, #48, #52, #56, #60, #64, #66, and #67) reviewed for accident hazards and supervision, in that:
1. Residents (Resident # 1, #4, #12, #14, #17, #23, #25, #38, #40, #41, #47, #48, #52, #56, #60, #64, #66, and #67) were residents who resided on the facility's memory care unit and needed supervision and safety monitoring due to their diagnoses of dementia and wander / elopement risks and were without staff care and or supervision, without secured entry exit doors, and without secured windows on 11/17/2023.
2. The facility developed an entrapment hazard when the facility did not effectually disable the electronic locking doors at the previous memory care unit.
3. The facility did not have a functioning call light system for the whole facility - Halls A, B, C, and D.
4. The facility did not have a secured door at the loading dock entry and exit door near Hall D.
An IJ was identified on 11/17/2023. The IJ template was provided on 11/17/2023 at 07:04 PM. While the IJ was removed on 11/19/2023, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of pattern and a severity level of no actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy because the facility needed to monitor their corrective actions
These failures could place residents at risk for harm by elopement, entrapment, and neglect.
The findings included:
1. Resident #1
A record review of Resident #1's admission record dated 11/18/2023 revealed an admission date of 09/19/2017 with diagnoses which included dementia with behavioral disturbance [not a specific disease but is rather a general term for the impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions that interferes with doing everyday activities].
A record review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted for long term care and assessed with a BIMS score of 03 out of a possible 15 which indicated severe cognitive impairment.
A record review of Resident #1's care plan dated 11/18/2023 revealed, Resident resides on the memory care unit date Initiated: 07/24/2022, Revision on: 05/16/2023 .Resident's safety will be maintained through next review date .Monitor Resident per protocol to ensure safety .
A record review of Resident #1's elopement risk assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #01 was assessed as a High Risk for elopement.
A record review of Resident #1's physicians' order, dated 01/18/2023, revealed, Admit to secured unit.
A record review of Resident #1's Clinical Census report dated 11/18/2023 revealed Resident #1 resided in the facility's D Hall, in the memory care unit.
Resident #4
A record review of Resident #4's admission record dated 11/18/2023 revealed an admission date of 10/19/2021 with diagnoses which included dementia and schizophrenia [serious mental illness that affects how a person thinks, feels, and behaves. People with schizophrenia may seem like they have lost touch with reality].
A record review of Resident #4's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #0 was an [AGE] year-old male admitted for long term care and assessed with a BIMS score of 06 out of a possible 15 which indicated severe cognitive impairment.
A record review of Resident #4's care plan dated 11/18/2023 revealed, Resident resides on the memory care unit date Initiated: 07/17/2022, Revision on: 05/16/2023 .Resident's safety will be maintained through next review date .Monitor Resident per protocol to ensure safety .
A record review of Resident #4's elopement risk assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #4 was assessed as a High Risk for elopement.
A record review of Resident #4's physicians' order, dated 01/18/2023, revealed, Admit to secured unit.
A record review of Resident #04's Clinical Census report dated 11/18/2023 revealed Resident #04 resided in the facility's D Hall, in the memory care unit.
Resident #12
A record review of Resident #12's admission record dated 11/18/2023 revealed an admission date of 05/03/2021 with diagnoses which included Alzheimer's disease [a progressive disease beginning with mild memory loss and possibly leading to loss of the ability to carry on a conversation and respond to the environment].
A record review of Resident #12's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #04 was an [AGE] year-old female admitted for long term care and assessed with a BIMS score of 05 out of a possible 15 which indicated severe cognitive impairment.
A record review of Resident #12's care plan dated 11/18/2023 revealed, Resident resides on the memory care unit date Initiated: 07/17/2022, Revision on: 05/16/2023 .Resident's safety will be maintained through next review date .Monitor Resident per protocol to ensure safety .
A record review of Resident #12's elopement risk assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #12 was assessed as a High Risk for elopement.
A record review of Resident #12's physicians' order, dated 01/18/2023, revealed, Admit to secured unit.
A record review of Resident #12's Clinical Census report dated 11/18/2023 revealed Resident #12 resided in the facility's D Hall, in the memory care unit.
Resident #14
A record review of Resident #14's admission record dated 11/18/2023 revealed an admission date of 12/15/2021 with diagnoses which included dementia.
A record review of Resident #14's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #14 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted for long term care and assessed with a BIMS score of 04 out of a possible 15 which indicated severe cognitive impairment.
A record review of Resident #14's care plan dated 11/18/2023 revealed, Resident resides on the memory care unit date Initiated: 07/24/2022, Revision on: 05/16/2023 .Resident's safety will be maintained through next review date .Monitor Resident per protocol to ensure safety .
A record review of Resident #14's elopement risk assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #14 was assessed as a Moderate Risk for elopement.
A record review of Resident #14's Clinical Census report dated 11/18/2023 revealed Resident #14 resided in the facility's D Hall, in the memory care unit.
Resident #17
A record review of Resident #17's admission record dated 11/18/2023 revealed an admission date of 01/05/2023 with diagnoses which included dementia and Alzheimer's disease.
A record review of Resident #17's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #17 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted for long term care and assessed with a BIMS score of 03 out of a possible 15 which indicated severe cognitive impairment.
A record review of Resident #17's care plan dated 11/18/2023 revealed, Resident resides on the memory care unit date Initiated: 02/07/2023, Revision on: 05/16/2023 .Resident's safety will be maintained through next review date .Monitor Resident per protocol to ensure safety .
A record review of Resident #17's elopement risk assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #17 was assessed as a Moderate Risk for elopement.
A record review of Resident #17's Clinical Census report dated 11/18/2023 revealed Resident #17 resided in the facility's D Hall, in the memory care unit.
Resident #23
A record review of Resident #23's admission record dated 11/16/2023 revealed an admission date of 08/11/2023 with diagnoses which included dementia and bipolar disorder [a mental illness that causes unusual shifts in a person's mood, energy, activity levels, and concentration].
A record review of Resident #23's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #23 was an [AGE] year-old female admitted for long term care and assessed with a BIMS score of 06 out of a possible 15 which indicated severe cognitive impairment.
A record review of Resident #23's care plan dated 11/18/2023 revealed, Resident resides on the memory care unit date Initiated: 10/03/2023, .Resident's safety will be maintained through next review date .Monitor Resident per protocol to ensure safety .
A record review of Resident #23's elopement risk assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #23 was assessed as a Moderate Risk for elopement.
A record review of Resident #23's Clinical Census report dated 11/18/2023 revealed Resident #23 resided in the facility's D Hall, in the memory care unit.
Resident #25
A record review of Resident #25's admission record dated 11/16/2023 revealed an admission date of 01/21/2015 with diagnoses which included dementia [not a specific disease but is rather a general term for the impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions that interferes with doing everyday activities] and [serious mental illness that affects how a person thinks, feels, and behaves. People with schizophrenia may seem like they have lost touch with reality].
A record review of Resident #25's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #25 was an [AGE] year-old female admitted for long term care and assessed with a BIMS score of 07 out of a possible 15 which indicated severe cognitive impairment.
A record review of Resident #25's care plan dated 11/18/2023 revealed, Resident resides on the memory care unit date Initiated: 07/24/2022, .Resident's safety will be maintained through next review date .Monitor Resident per protocol to ensure safety .
A record review of Resident #25's elopement risk assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #25 was assessed as a High Risk for elopement.
A record review of Resident #25's Clinical Census report dated 11/18/2023 revealed Resident #25 resided in the facility's D Hall, in the memory care unit.
Resident #38
A record review of Resident #38's admission record dated 11/15/2023 revealed an admission date of 04/13/2021 with diagnoses which included dementia.
A record review of Resident #38's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #38 was an [AGE] year-old male admitted for long term care and assessed with a BIMS score of 03 out of a possible 15 which indicated severe cognitive impairment.
A record review of Resident #38's care plan dated 11/18/2023 revealed, The Resident [#38] has impaired cognitive function/dementia or impaired thought processes Dementia Date Initiated: 08/23/2022 .Cue, reorient and supervise as needed.
A record review of Resident #38's elopement risk assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #38 was assessed as a Moderate Risk for elopement.
A record review of Resident #38's Clinical Census report dated 11/18/2023 revealed Resident #38 resided in the facility's D Hall, in the memory care unit.
Resident #40
A record review of Resident #40's admission record dated 11/16/2023 revealed an admission date of 05/07/2021 with diagnoses which included dementia.
A record review of Resident #40's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #40 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted for long term care and assessed with a BIMS score of 06 out of a possible 15 which indicated severe cognitive impairment.
A record review of Resident #40's care plan dated 11/18/2023 revealed, Resident [#40] resides on the memory care unit Date Initiated: 06/27/2022 .Resident's safety will be maintained through next review date . Monitor Resident per protocol to ensure safety.
A record review of Resident #40's elopement risk assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #40 was assessed as a High Risk for elopement.
A record review of Resident #40's Clinical Census report dated 11/18/2023 revealed Resident #40 resided in the facility's D Hall, in the memory care unit.
Resident #41
A record review of Resident #41's admission record dated 11/16/2023 revealed an admission date of 10/03/2023 with diagnoses which included Alzheimer's disease.
A record review of Resident #41's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #41 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted for long term care and assessed with a BIMS score of 06 out of a possible 15 which indicated severe cognitive impairment.
A record review of Resident #41's care plan dated 11/18/2023 revealed, Resident [#41] resides on the memory care unit Date Initiated: 07/24/2022 .Resident's safety will be maintained through next review date . Monitor Resident per protocol to ensure safety.
A record review of Resident #41's physicians' order, dated 10/04/2023, revealed, May reside on a secured unit.
A record review of Resident #41's elopement risk assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #41 was assessed as a High Risk for elopement.
A record review of Resident #41's Clinical Census report dated 11/18/2023 revealed Resident #41 resided in the facility's D Hall, in the memory care unit.
Resident #47
A record review of Resident #47's admission record dated 11/17/2023 revealed an admission date of 06/03/2021 with diagnoses which included Alzheimer's disease and dementia with behavioral disturbance.
A record review of Resident #47's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #47 was an [AGE] year-old female admitted for long term care and assessed with a BIMS score of 02 out of a possible 15 which indicated severe cognitive impairment.
A record review of Resident #47's care plan dated 11/18/2023 revealed, Resident [#47] resides on the memory care unit Date Initiated: 07/24/2022 .Resident's safety will be maintained through next review date . Monitor Resident per protocol to ensure safety.
A record review of Resident #47's physicians' order, dated 01/18/2023, revealed, Admit to secured unit.
A record review of Resident #47's elopement risk assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #47 was assessed as a Moderate Risk for elopement.
A record review of Resident #47's Clinical Census report dated 11/18/2023 revealed Resident #47 resided in the facility's D Hall, in the memory care unit.
Resident #48
A record review of Resident #48's admission record dated 11/17/2023 revealed an admission date of 06/06/2021 with diagnoses which included dementia with behavioral disturbance.
A record review of Resident #48's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #48 was a [AGE] year-old male admitted for long term care and could not complete a BIMS assessment and was assessed with disorganized thinking - ( .the resident's thinking disorganized or incoherent (rambling or irrelevant conversation, unclear or illogical flow of ideas, or unpredictable switching from subject to subject).
A record review of Resident #48's care plan dated 11/18/2023 revealed, Resident [#48] resides on the memory care unit Date Initiated: 05/16/2023 .Resident's safety will be maintained through next review date . Monitor Resident per protocol to ensure safety.
A record review of Resident #48's elopement risk assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #48 was assessed as a High Risk for elopement.
A record review of Resident #48's Clinical Census report dated 11/18/2023 revealed Resident #48 resided in the facility's D Hall, in the memory care unit.
Resident #52
A record review of Resident #52's admission record dated 11/17/2023 revealed an admission date of 11/01/2021 with diagnoses which included Alzheimer's disease.
A record review of Resident #52's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #52 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted for long term care and could not complete a BIMS assessment and was assessed with disorganized thinking - .the resident's thinking disorganized or incoherent (rambling or irrelevant conversation, unclear or illogical flow of ideas, or unpredictable switching from subject to subject).
A record review of Resident #52's care plan dated 11/18/2023 revealed, Resident [#52] resides on the memory care unit for wandering and being at risk for placing self in unsafe place Date Initiated: 07/21/2022 .Resident's safety will be maintained through next review date .Initiated: 05/16/2023 .Monitor Resident per protocol to ensure safety .
A record review of Resident #52's elopement risk assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #52 was assessed as a Moderate Risk for elopement.
A record review of Resident #52's Clinical Census report dated 11/18/2023 revealed Resident #52 resided in the facility's D Hall, in the memory care unit.
Resident #56
A record review of Resident #56's admission record dated 11/15/2023 revealed an admission date of 08/12/2022 with diagnoses which included dementia with behavioral disturbance [not a specific disease but is rather a general term for the impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions that interferes with doing everyday activities].
A record review of Resident #56's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #56 was a [AGE] year-old male admitted for long term care and assessed with a BIMS score of 01 out of a possible 15 which indicated severe cognitive impairment.
A record review of Resident #56's care plan dated 11/18/2023 revealed, Resident [#56] resides on the memory care unit for elopement risk. He has a history of wandering into other residents' rooms and going outside unattended. Date Initiated: 07/26/2022 .Resident's safety will be maintained through next review date. Date Initiated: 05/16/2023 .Monitor Resident per protocol to ensure safety
A record review of Resident #56's elopement risk assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #56 was assessed as a High Risk for elopement.
A record review of Resident #56's Clinical Census report dated 11/18/2023 revealed Resident #56 resided in the facility's D Hall, in the memory care unit.
Resident #60
A record review of Resident #60's admission record dated 11/17/2023 revealed an admission date of 12/02/2022 with diagnoses which included dementia [not a specific disease but is rather a general term for the impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions that interferes with doing everyday activities].
A record review of Resident #60's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #60 was a [AGE] year-old male admitted for long term care and assessed with a BIMS score of 05 out of a possible 15 which indicated severe cognitive impairment.
A record review of Resident #60's care plan dated 11/18/2023 revealed, Resident [#60] resides on the memory care unit for elopement risk. He has a history of wandering. Date Initiated: 12/08/2022 .Resident's safety will be maintained through next review date. Date Initiated: 05/16/2023 .Monitor Resident per protocol to ensure safety
A record review of Resident #60's elopement risk assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #60 was assessed as a Moderate Risk for elopement.
A record review of Resident #60's Clinical Census report dated 11/18/2023 revealed Resident #60 resided in the facility's D Hall, in the memory care unit.
Resident #64
A record review of Resident #64's admission record dated 11/17/2023 revealed an admission date of 11/28/2022 with diagnoses which included violent behavior, cognitive social or emotional deficit following cerebral infarction [stroke].
A record review of Resident #64's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #64 was a [AGE] year-old male admitted for long term care and could not complete a BIMS assessment and was assessed with disorganized thinking - .the resident's thinking disorganized or incoherent (rambling or irrelevant conversation, unclear or illogical flow of ideas, or unpredictable switching from subject to subject).
A record review of Resident #64's care plan dated 11/18/2023 revealed, Resident [#64] resides on the memory care unit for elopement risk. He has a history of wandering. Date Initiated: 12/12/2022 .Resident's safety will be maintained through next review date. Date Initiated: 05/16/2023 .Monitor Resident per protocol to ensure safety
A record review of Resident #64's elopement risk assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #64 was assessed as a Moderate Risk for elopement.
A record review of Resident #64's Clinical Census report dated 11/18/2023 revealed Resident #64 resided in the facility's D Hall, in the memory care unit.
Resident #66
A record review of Resident #66's admission record dated 11/17/2023 revealed an admission date of 01/05/2023 with diagnoses which included dementia with behavioral disturbance [not a specific disease but is rather a general term for the impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions that interferes with doing everyday activities] and delusional disorders.
A record review of Resident #66's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #66 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted for long term care and could not complete a BIMS assessment and was assessed with disorganized thinking - .the resident's thinking disorganized or incoherent (rambling or irrelevant conversation, unclear or illogical flow of ideas, or unpredictable switching from subject to subject).
A record review of Resident #66's care plan dated 11/18/2023 revealed, Resident [#66] resides on the memory care unit for elopement risk. He has a history of wandering. Date Initiated: 02/03/2023 .Resident's safety will be maintained through next review date. Date Initiated: 05/16/2023 .Monitor Resident per protocol to ensure safety
A record review of Resident #66's elopement risk assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #66 was assessed as a Moderate Risk for elopement.
A record review of Resident #66's Clinical Census report dated 11/18/2023 revealed Resident #66 resided in the facility's D Hall, in the memory care unit.
Resident #67
A record review of Resident #67's admission record dated 11/17/2023 revealed an admission date of 04/21/2023 with diagnoses which included dementia [not a specific disease but is rather a general term for the impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions that interferes with doing everyday activities].
A record review of Resident #67's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #67 was a [AGE] year-old male admitted for long term care and assessed with a BIMS score of 07 out of a possible 15 which indicated severe cognitive impairment.
A record review of Resident #67's care plan dated 11/18/2023 revealed, Resident [#67] resides on the memory care unit for elopement risk. He has a history of wandering. Date Initiated: 05/16/2023 .Resident's safety will be maintained through next review date. Date Initiated: 10/03/2023 .Monitor Resident per protocol to ensure safety
A record review of Resident #67's elopement risk assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #67 was assessed as a Moderate Risk for elopement.
A record review of Resident #67's Clinical Census report dated 11/18/2023 revealed Resident #67 resided in the facility's D Hall, in the memory care unit.
During an observation on 11/14/2023 at 10:10 AM revealed the memory care unit housed in the first half of the D Hall presented with 18 residents (Residents #1, #4, #12, #14, #17, #23, #25, #38, #40, #41, #47, #48, #52, #56, #60, #64, #66, and #67). The memory care unit had 2 sets of double doors which were closed without the ability to lock and no alarm. All the windows in the memory care unit were 4 ½ inches off the floor and were able to fully open. Further observations revealed the memory care unit had a malfunctioning call light system which would sometimes illuminate a call light without sounds and sometimes would sound and not illuminate.
During an interview on 11/14/2023 at 10:20 AM, LVN H and CNA U stated they were the LVN and CNA for the memory care unit which occupied the beginning of the D Hall. LVN H and CNA U stated the call light system had been malfunctioning for weeks. LVN H stated the staff paid attention to the lights and would round on residents frequently. CNA U and LVN H stated the entry exit doors were kept shut but had no locks on the doors which allowed residents and staff to freely pass through. LVN H stated when residents go out of the memory care unit staff redirect the residents back into the unit. LVN H and CNA U stated the memory care unit was set up sometime in the summer of 2023, due to the previous memory care unit, housed in A-Hall, was uninhabitable due to a faulty air-conditioner unit. LVN H and CNA U stated the previous unit had secured doors and windows and a functioning call light system. LVN H and CNA U stated the facility DON had knowledge of the unsecured doors and malfunctioning call light system.
During and observation and interview on 11/14/2023 at 10:38 AM, LVN H and surveyor rounded on residents' rooms and revealed no windows were secured and could fully open. LVN H stated she was unaware the windows could fully open and could pose an elopement risk for residents.
During an interview on 11/16/2023 at 1:30 PM, Resident #60's representative with power of attorney stated, Resident #60 is confused, young enough, and strong enough to open a window and get out .I expected the memory care unit to be safe and secure for my [Resident #60].
During an observation on 11/17/2023 at 6:28 AM revealed the memory care unit presented without any secured doors for entry and or exit of the memory care unit. Observation revealed a malfunctioning call light system where the call light panel at the nurse station continuously alarmed. Observation revealed 18 residents, [Resident #19 had been discharged ]; Residents #1, #4, #12, #14, #17, #23, #25, #38, #40, #41, #47, #48, #52, #56, #60, #64, #66, and #67, without staff care and or supervision. Further observation revealed no staff in the memory care unit after a room-to-room search which included a census of each Resident. Continued observation revealed residents ambulating throughout the unit with some residents asleep in their bedrooms.
During an observation and interview on 11/17/2023 at 6:40 AM revealed Restorative Aide S entered the memory care unit and stated she was not assigned to care for residents in the memory care unit but was just dropping by to check on residents. RA S stated there were no staff in the memory care unit and she would stay until someone would arrive.
During an interview on 11/17/2023 at 6:41 AM LVN B and CNA AA stated they were scheduled to work the D Hall from 11:00 PM to 7:00 AM. LVN B stated CNA F was scheduled to work the memory care unit from 11:00 PM to 6:00 AM and CNA AA was scheduled to care for the rest of the residents on the D Hall who were not residents of the memory care unit. LVN B stated the residents on the memory care unit should have supervision by CNA U who was assigned to relieve CNA F. LVN B stated he was unaware CNA U was not working in the memory care unit. LVN B stated sometimes LVN U was late. LVN B stated no one had reported to him there was no staff in the memory care unit. LVN B stated residents could have eloped and or been injured without staff supervision. LVN B stated he could not be in 2 places and had nursing duties at the end of the non-memory care unit, D Hall. CNA AA stated she was unaware the memory care unit had no staff and was responsible for providing resident care in the non-memory care d-hall.
During an observation and interview on 11/17/2023 at 7:00 AM revealed LVN H and CNA U at the facility's time clock. CNA U did not identify herself as CNA U and LVN H stated CNA U should have relieved CNA F at 6:00 AM and stated CNA U had a history of being absent for care in the memory care unit.
During an interview on 11/17/2023 at 10:06 AM with the ADON stated the HVAC system was having issues since earlier this year, 2023, either May or June 2023. The ADON stated the resident families first noticed and reported the staff, that was when the facility was testing air temperatures. The facility brought in mobile Air Conditioning units. The ADON stated they discovered the A Hall (previous secure unit) was not cooling and was hot, so they moved those residents to the B Hall . Then the ADON stated the facility noticed the B Hall was not cooling, so the residents were moved to another part of the facility in May or June of 2023. They had a low census at the time. The facility moved the residents who resided on the A Hall secured unit to the first half of the D Hall and the rest of the residents moved to the second half of D Hall and other residents to the C Hall.
During an interview on 11/17/2023 at 11:10 AM Staffing Coordinator G stated CNA U had not called in late and his expectation was for CNA U to relieve CNA F.
During an interview on 11/17/2023 at 5:02 PM the ADON stated he was unaware the memory care unit was without staff on the morning of 11/17/2023 at 6:00 AM. The ADON stated the expectation was for a staff member to be supervising, caring, and monitoring the residents in the memory care unit and should not leave the unit until the staff member has been relieved by the next staff member.
During an interview on 11/18/2023 at 2:22 PM CNA F stated she was scheduled to work 11:00 PM to 6:00 AM in the memory care unit and was usually relieved by CNA U. CNA F stated sometimes she just leaves because CNA U was not there to relieve her at 6:00 AM. CNA F stated LVN B Knows.
During an interview on 11/18/2023 at 3:02 PM CNA U stated she did not call anyone to alert them of her tardiness. CNA U stated she had not seen CNA F or LVN B when she arrived on 11/17/2023 at 6:00 AM and stated she had left the memory care unit to use the bathroom.
2. During an observation on 11/16/2023 at 5:35 PM revealed the A Hall previous location of the memory care unit. The path to the unit was clear and unencumbered to any pedestrian or person who used a wheelchair and or walker. The doors to the A Hall presented closed with an electronic keypad adjacent. The doors freely opened without the use of the keypad and locked behind after entry into the unit. Further observation did not reveal any way of exit. The surveyor became entrapped and used the emergency fire exit to exit the A Hall.
During an observation and interview on 11/16/2023 at 5:50 PM the Administrator and the Maintenance Director received a report from the surveyor of the entrapment incident. The Administrator and the Maintenance Director demonstrated the secured locked double doors to the A Hall and utilized the keypad to release the locked doors. The Administrator requested the Maintenance Director to enter the secured A Hall and re-set the alarming fire exit door. The Maintenance Director entered the A Hall, the secured doors locked after his entry, he reset the fire alarm door and returned to the locked doors to the A Hall, entered in the code at the keypad to release the doors and exited the A Hall. Upon the Maintenance Directors exit and after the doors shut, the Administrator, to demonstrate the function of the locked door, pushed upon the door and revealed the door op[TRUNCATED]
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0578
(Tag F0578)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure residents could request and formulate advance directives, f...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure residents could request and formulate advance directives, for 1 of 8 (Resident #59) residents reviewed for formulation of advanced directives in that:
Resident #59's medical record reflected conflicting physicians' orders for Resident #59's wishes for an advance directive.
This failure could result in residents not having their end-of-life choices respected.
Findings included:
Record review of Resident #59's admission Record, dated [DATE], revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], was re-admitted on [DATE], and had diagnoses of legal blindness, age-related physical disability, major depressive disorder, and end stage renal disease.
Record review of Resident #59's consolidated physician orders print date [DATE], revealed the physician, on [DATE], ordered Resident #59 to be a Full Code.
Record review of Resident #59's Significant change MDS, dated [DATE], revealed the resident had a BIMS of 15 (which indicated the resident was cognitively intact), and received dialysis services.
Record review of Resident #59's care plan, dated [DATE], revealed, resident/family had chosen DNR. Review quarterly to ensure that completed OOHDNR is on chart.
Record review of Resident # 59's chart revealed the resident had an OOHDNR dated [DATE].
Interview on [DATE] at 12:46 PM with SW stated he did go to care plan meetings. The SW stated Resident #59 was able to make his own decisions and depending on his mood attend care plan meetings. The SW stated sometimes staff changed things and did not consult with the SW. The SW verified the discrepancy with Resident #59's chart in that; the physicians order was for Resident #59 to be a full Code [to receive CPR] and the care plan called for Resident #59 to be OOHDNR [Resident #59 was not to receive CPR]. The SW stated he talked to Resident #59, and the resident stated he wanted to have a DNR status at this time, [[DATE]].
Interview [DATE] at 10:41 AM with SW stated Resident # 59 had an OODNR updated order which was not corrected my nursing.
Interview on [DATE] at 10:42 AM with the ADON stated he was responsible for nursing department, and had not updated the physicians' OOHDNR order and thus Resident #59 had conflicting orders for CPR. The ADON stated this placed Resident #59 at risk for not following his wishes for an advance directive.
Record review of the Policy, Advanced Directive, dated [DATE], revealed, The resident had the right to formulate an advance directive, including the right to accept or refuse medical or surgical treatment. Advance Directive are honored in accordance with state law and facility policy. Definition 1. a. Advanced care planning a process of communication between individuals and their healthcare agents to understand, reflects on, discuss, and plan for future healthcare decisions for a time when individuals are not able to make their own healthcare decisions. b. Advanced Directive a written instruction, such as living will or durable power of attorney for health care, recognized by state law relating to the provisions of health care when the individual is incapacitated. 3. DNR indicates that, in case of respiratory or cardiac failure, the resident. Had directed that no cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) or other life -sustaining treatments or methods are to be used. Determining Existence of Advanced Directive 1. Prior to or upon admission of a resident, the social services director or designee inquiries of the resident, ., about the existence of any written advance directives. 9. Inquiries concerning advanced directive should be referred to the . nursing services and/or social services director.
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the facility must develop and implement a co...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the facility must develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights, that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment. The comprehensive care plan must describe the following -The services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being as required for 1 of 8 (Resident #49) residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans, in that:
Resident #49's comprehensive care plan did not address the resident's use of a Trapeze bar for bed mobility or the use of a seatbelt on the resident's electric wheelchair.
These deficient practices could affect all residents and could result in a decrease in care for residents.
The Findings were:
Record review of Resident #49's admission Record, dated 11/17/2023, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and re-admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses of: Acute Transverse Myelitis inn Demyelinating disease (Autoimmune and demyelinating disorders, infections, a medication, or a recreational drug can inflame tissues in spinal cord segments, causing transverse myelitis, which may progress to complete transverse sensorimotor myelopathy.), mild cognitive impairment, depression, colostomy, paraplegia,(paralysis of the legs and lower body, typically caused by spinal injury or disease) diabetes 1/II (metabolic disease, involving inappropriately elevated blood glucose levels), age-related physical debility, and need for assistance with personal care.
Record review of Resident #49's Quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], revealed the resident's cognition score was 15/15 (intact), range of motion revealed the resident had impairment on both lower extremities, required the use of a wheelchair to mobilize, paraplegia, depression, colostomy, mild cognitive impairment, Acute Transverse Myelitis in Demyelinating disease, the resident's weight was 244 pounds, and the resident was indicated to have a pressure ulcer.
Observation on 11/15/2023 at 11:17 AM in Resident #49's room revealed he had a trapeze bar above his bed, his electric wheelchair had a seatbelt, and he was lying on his bed.
Interview on 11/15/2023 at 11:18 AM with Resident #49 revealed he used the trapeze bar to move around in bed and he stated he could release the seatbelt when he needs to on his own.
Observation on at 11/18/23 at 3:18 PM in Resident #49's room revealed he had a trapeze bar above his bed, his electric wheelchair had a seatbelt, and he was lying on his bed.
Record review of Resident #49's consolidated physician orders for November 2023 revealed there were no orders for a trapeze bar or electric wheelchair seatbelt.
Record review of Resident #49's care plan dated 9/2/2023 revealed ADL self-care performance deficit and requires hand on assistance, resident had a physical mobility related to hemiplegia, resident is at risk for falls related to paraplegia, use of wheelchair (electric). Further review of the resident's care plan revealed the care plan did not address the resident's use of a trapeze bar for bed mobility or the use of a seatbelt on the resident's electric wheelchair.
Interview on 11/18/23 at 11:24 AM with MDS revealed Resident #49 did not have a care plan for the trapeze bar and seatbelt for his wheelchair. The MDS stated she was aware Resident #49 used both of those devices. The MDS stated the risk for not adding the devices in a resident's care plan would be that staff would not provide the appropriate the type of care. The MDS stated Resident #49 was able to get out of electric wheelchair seatbelt when he wanted.
Interview on 11/18/23 at 2:50 PM with DON confirmed Resident #49 used a trapeze bar above the resident's bed and used a seat belt for the resident's electric wheelchair. The DON stated the facility did not do consent forms for trapeze bar or wheelchair seatbelts. The DON stated she was not aware that those types of devices needed a consent.
Record review of Facility Policy titled, Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, dated March 2022, revealed, Assessments of residents are ongoing and care plans are revised as information about the residents and the residents' conditions change.
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0657
(Tag F0657)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the care plan was reviewed and revised by the interdiscipli...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the care plan was reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team after each assessment, including both the comprehensive and quarterly review assessments for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #65) reviewed for comprehensive care plans, in that:
Resident #65's care plan was not revised to indicate significant weight loss after their Dietician Comprehensive Assessment in accordance with minimum standards.
This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving appropriate interventions to meet their current needs.
The findings included:
Record review of Resident #65's face sheet, dated 11/17/2023, revealed an [AGE] year-old resident with diagnoses including chronic kidney disease (longstanding disease of the kidneys leading to renal failure), mild protein-calorie malnutrition (a nutritional status in which reduced availability of nutrients leads to changes in body composition and function), and Alzheimer's disease (progressive disease that destroys memory and other important mental functions).
Record review of Resident #65's MDS Assessment, dated 11/6/2023, revealed, under the section labeled Weight Loss, the Code 0, indicating No, for the prompt, Loss of 5% or more in the last month or loss of 10% or more in the last 6 months.
Record review of Resident #65's Dietician Comprehensive assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had significant weight loss of 8.32% of their body weight in 30 days, and 15.84% of their body weight in 180 days. Further review of the Dietician Comprehensive Assessment revealed recommendations to add a diabetic snack every night, as well as supplement pass due to weight loss.
Record review of Resident #65's Orders revealed an order dated 8/22/2023, for a house supplement three times a day for weight loss. The order was entered by the ADON.
Record review of Resident #65's care plan with a review date of 9/8/2023 revealed there were no interventions for weight loss until 8/7/2023, while the Dietician Comprehensive Assessment completed on 7/13/2023 indicated the resident had lost 15.84% of their body weight in 180 days.
Interview on 11/19/2023 at 10:00 AM, the ADON stated the Dietician sent facility staff an email to communicate their dietary assessments with staff. The ADON stated he was not sure whether he received the email at the time it was delivered for the Dietician Comprehensive Assessment that occurred on 7/13/2023. The ADON stated he was the one to put in the orders for Resident #65 for the supplement in August of 2023. The ADON stated the care plan should have been updated after the 7/13/2023 Dietician Comprehensive Assessment. The ADON stated they were not sure why the care plan had not been updated after the 7/13/2023 Dietician Comprehensive Assessment, and that the expectation was for care plans to be revised after any significant changes, including weight loss. The ADON stated they could not determine why Resident #65's care plan had not been updated, but that it was the responsibility of the Interdisciplinary Team to ensure care plans were revised timely.
Interview on 11/19/2023 at 5:00 PM the Dietician stated she was aware of some weight loss in the facility and documented notes. The Dietitian stated interventions for residents for weight loss included high calorie meals, health shakes, and a supplement shake provided during resident's medication times.
Record review of the facilty's policy titled, Weight Assessment and Intervention, dated March 2022, revealed, 1 month - 5% weight loss is significant; greater than 5% is severe.
Record review of the facilty's policy titled, Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, dated March 2022, revealed, Assessments of residents are ongoing and care plans are revised as information about the residents and the residents' conditions change.
Record review of the facilty's policy titled, Care Planning -IDT, dated March 2022, revealed, the interdisciplinary team is responsible for the development of resident care plans. I. Resident care plans are developed according to the timeframes and criteria established by §483.21. 2.Comprehensive, person-centered care plans are based on resident assessments and developed by an interdisciplinary team (IDT). registered nurse with responsibility for the resident; c. a nursing assist ant with responsibility for the resident; d. a member of the food and nutrition service staff.
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the facility must ensure that residents receive ...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the facility must ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices for 2 of 8 (Residents #50 and #59) residents reviewed for quality of care, in that:
1. The facility provided hospice services for Resident #50 without a physicians' order.
2. The facility supported and facilitated dialysis services for Resident #59 without a physicians' order.
These failures could affect all residents with contracted services and could result with inappropriate care.
The Finding were:
1. Record review of Resident #50's admission Record, dated 11/17/2023, revealed she was admitted on [DATE], age [AGE], primary payer was hospice, with diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease, dementia, cognitive communications deficit.
Record review of Resident #50's admission MDS assessment, dated 11/6/2023, revealed Resident #50 was assessed with a BIMS score was 2/15 (severely impaired), ADL mobility and transfers reflected the resident required substantial/max assistance, and was on hospice services.
Record review of Resident #50's care plan, dated 10/12/2023, revealed Resident #50 had chosen hospice services with diagnosis of Alzheimer's and was under special instructions, please only shower Resident #50 three times a week per family request any issues with hospice, please call .
Record review of Resident #50's the consolidated physician's orders for November 2023 revealed no order for hospice services.
Observation on 11/15/2023 at 1:07 PM in Resident #50's room revealed she was in bed, unresponsive and her family was at her side.
Interview on 11/15/2023 at 1:08 PM Resident #50's family stated the hospice staff for Resident #50 were good.
Interview on 11/15/2023 at 4:02 PM with the ADON in Resident #50's chart online, confirmed no current order for hospice services and was discontinued on 4/11/2023. The ADON stated Resident #50 was on hospice services.
Interview on 11/19/2023 at 10:29 AM LVN O stated Resident #50 was provided with hospice services.
2. Record review of Resident #59's admission Record revealed he was re-admitted on [DATE] age was 58, with diagnoses of legal blindness, age-related physical disability, major depressive disorder, and end stage renal disease (occurs when chronic kidney disease - the gradual loss of kidney function - reaches an advanced state).
Record review of Resident #59's Significant change MDS, dated [DATE], revealed his cognition was 15/15 (intact) and he received dialysis services.
Record review of Resident #59's care plan, dated 11/1/2023, revealed Resident #59 had a diagnoses of end stage renal disease. He was receiving dialysis, refused at times and went to dialysis 3 times a week.
Record review of Resident #59's consolidated physician's orders print date 11/17/2023 revealed no order for dialysis.
Interview on 11/18/2023 at 12:46 PM the SW stated Resident #59 went to care plan meetings. The SW stated Resident #59 made his own decisions and depending on his mood if he wanted to go to care plan meeting. SW stated at times he refused to go to Dialysis.
Interview on 11/19/2023 at 10:42 AM the ADON stated he was responsible for the nursing department, and he should have made sure Resident #59 had an order for dialysis and Resident #50's had an order for hospice services.
Interview on 11/17/2023 at 4:26 PM with LVN N revealed she was now aware Resident #59 had no orders for dialysis.
Interview on 11/17/2023 at 4:28 PM the DON stated he would check and then discontinue orders section of chart but was not sure why Resident #59 did not have orders for dialysis. The DON stated there was a time Resident #59 did not want dialysis, then he changed his mind. The DON stated she did not re-enter the order for dialysis. When asked who was responsible for putting in resident orders was, the DON stated the charge nurse, the ADON and the DON were over all nursing department.
Interview on 11/18/2023 at 11:16 AM MDS confirmed Resident #59 was on dialysis and sometimes refused the services.
Interview on at 11/19/2023 at 10:30 AM LVN O stated Resident #59 went to dialysis on Tuesdays, Thursdays and Saturdays. LVN O sated she was not aware Resident #59 did not have orders for dialysis.
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to store all drugs and biologicals in locked compartments under proper temperature controls, and permit only authorized person...
Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to store all drugs and biologicals in locked compartments under proper temperature controls, and permit only authorized personnel to have access to the keys, for 1 of 1 medication aide medication cart, reviewed for security, in that,
The Medication Aide J's medication cart was unattended and unlocked.
This failure placed residents at risk for harm by misappropriation of property and not receiving the therapeutic effects of their medications.
The findings included:
During an observation on 11/14/2023 at 4:46 PM, revealed the facility's Medication Aide J's medication cart was unattended, and unlocked. The medication cart was observed to have the lock button unengaged and unlocked. An observation revealed the Medication Aide J [MA J] was down the hall in a resident's room.
During an interview on 11/14/2023 at 4:52 PM MA J stated she was the facility's medication aide and the cart she had charge of was the medication aide medication cart. MA J stated she had gone down the hall to attend to a Resident and she had left the medication cart unattended and unlocked. MA J stated she should have locked the cart and did not.
During an interview on 11/14/2023 at 5:15 PM LVN AV stated she was the charge nurse for the hall and was MA J's supervisor. LVN AV stated the professional standard and her expectations for nursing staff who have control of medication carts was to have the medication cart locked when not in direct use, she [MA J] should have locked her cart when she left it.
During an interview on 11/14/2023 at 5:20 PM the DON stated she had received a report MA J had left the medication cart unattended and unlocked. The DON stated her expectations were for all nursing staff who have control of medications, secure the medications and to lock medication carts when left unattended. The DON stated all nurses and / or medication aides were responsible for medication storage security. The DON stated the risk for harm to residents were varied and could include residents not receiving the therapeutic effects of their prescribed medications.
A record review of the facility's undated Storage of Medications policy revealed, Policy Statement: the facility shall store all drugs and biologicals in a safe, secure, and orderly manner. Policy Interpretation and Implementation: . Compartments (including, but not limited to, drawers, cabinets, rooms, refrigerators, carts, and boxes.) containing drugs and biologicals shall be locked when not in use, and trays or carts used to transport such items shall not be left unattended if open or otherwise potentially available to others.
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Safe Environment
(Tag F0921)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the must provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff, and the public for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for s...
Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the must provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff, and the public for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for safe, functional, sanitary and comfortable environment in that:
The facility failed to maintain ceilings in the facility.
This deficient practice placed residents at risk for harm by diminished health status and diminished self esteem.
The Finding were:
Observations during the building inspection tour on 11/14/2023 at 12:40 p.m. revealed a section of ceiling approximately 20 feet long was cracked and was separated from another piece of the ceiling. Further observation revealed the ceiling in the Therapy room was sagging and pieces of the gypsum in several areas were starting to peel and crack.
During an interview at the time of the observations, the Maintenance Director stated the ceiling had been like that for a few months. The Maintenance Director stated he was aware that the ceiling needed to be repaired and that he notified management about the issue because it was unsanitary and could cause illness to spread with residents.
Observation on 11/14/2023 at 2:39 p.m. revealed a section of ceiling approximately 6 ft. by 6 ft. had signs of water damage and was missing gypsum/ceiling finish exposing the inside of the attic space.
In an interview at the time of the observation, the Maintenance Director stated the ceiling had been like that for 2 months due to an air conditioning leak. The Maintenance Director stated he was aware that the ceiling needed to be repaired and that he notified management about the issue because it was unsanitary and could cause illness to spread with residents.
During an interview at the time of the observation, the Administrator stated the ceiling had been like that for 2 months due to an air conditioning leak. The Administrator said he was waiting on quotes from the contractor and final approval to make the repairs.
A record review of the facility's Hazardous Areas, Devices and Equipment policy dated July 2017, revealed, policy statement all hazardous areas, devices and equipment in the facility will be identified and addressed appropriately to ensure residents safety and mitigate accident hazards to the extent possible. policy interpretation and implementation: as part of the facilities overall safety and accident prevention program, hazardous areas and objects in the residence environment will be identified and addressed by the safety committee. the safety committee will consist of members from the interdisciplinary team which will include a representative from the clinical, leadership, maintenance, and environmental services team. identification of hazards; a hazard is defined as anything in the environment that has the potential to cause injury or illness. examples of environmental hazards include, but are not limited to the following; equipment and devices that are left unattended or are malfunctioning; devices and equipment that are improperly used or poorly maintained; . open areas or items that should be locked when not in use; . disabled locks, latches, or alarms .
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Grievances
(Tag F0585)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to make prompt efforts to resolve any grievances the residents may have for 11 of 30 grievances reviewed in that:
The facility did not provid...
Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to make prompt efforts to resolve any grievances the residents may have for 11 of 30 grievances reviewed in that:
The facility did not provide a response or written description of any action taken after receiving written grievances.
This failure could affect residents who reside in the facility for unresolved grievances in a prompt manner.
The findings included:
During confidential interviews on 11/15/2023 at 10:05 AM, residents stated grievances were not always followed up on and they were concerned the grievances they wrote were not being addressed.
Record review of the facility's grievance binder revealed 11 grievances written between 1/26/2023 and 2/23/2023 were left blank under the subsection of the grievance titled Grievance Official Follow-Up.
Record review of document titled Grievance Form, dated 1/26/2023 revealed a grievance made by resident family members related to nursing services and assigned to the nursing department to investigate. The subsection Grievance Official Follow-Up, and Date Resolved were left blank upon exit.
Record review of document titled Grievance Form, dated 1/26/2023 revealed a grievance made by a resident relating to dietary services. The subsection Person Investigating Complaint/Grievance was left blank, as was the subsection Grievance Official Follow-Up, and Date Resolved upon exit.
Record review of document titled Grievance Form, dated 1/26/2023 revealed a grievance made by a resident relating to environmental services. The subsection Person Investigating Complaint/Grievance was blank as was the subsection Grievance Official Follow-Up, and Date Resolved upon exit.
Record review of document titled Grievance Form, dated 2/1/2023 revealed a grievance made by a resident relating to nursing services, specifically a CNA being unkind to the resident when answering a call light. The CNA was not named. The subsection Person Investigating Complaint/Grievance were left blank, as were the subsection Grievance Official Follow-Up, and Date Resolved upon exit.
Record review of document titled Grievance Form, dated 2/2/2023 revealed a grievance made by a resident family member relating to missing resident property. The subsection Person Investigating Complaint/Grievance as well as Date Resolved were left blank upon exit.
Record review of document titled Grievance Form, dated 2/2/2023 revealed a grievance made by a resident family member relating to the resident's caregivers. The subsection Person Investigating Complaint/Grievance as well as Date Resolved were left blank upon exit.
Record review of document titled Grievance Form, dated 2/8/2023 revealed a grievance made by a resident relating to inadequate perineal care by unnamed staff. The subsection Person Investigating Complaint/Grievance as well as Date Resolved were left blank upon exit.
Record review of document titled Grievance Form, dated 2/13/2023 revealed a grievance made by a resident family member relating to ADL care as well as resident necessities. The subsection Person Investigating Complaint/Grievance as well as Date Resolved were left blank upon exit.
Record review of document titled Grievance Form, dated 2/15/2023 revealed a grievance made by staff about a resident relating to a resident threatening others with their cane. The subsection Person Investigating Complaint/Grievance as well as Date Resolved were left blank upon exit.
Record review of document titled Grievance Form, dated 2/21/2023 revealed a grievance made by a resident relating to receiving perineal care in a timely manner and staffing. The subsection Person Investigating Complaint/Grievance as well as Date Resolved were left blank upon exit.
Record review of document titled Grievance Form, dated 2/23/2023 revealed a grievance made by a resident family member relating to facility answering family member phone calls in a timely manner. The subsection Person Investigating Complaint/Grievance as well as Date Resolved were left blank upon exit.
Interview on 11/17/2023 at 4:00 PM, the ADON stated that the Administrator was responsible for Grievances when there was not a Social Worker employed at the facility.
Interview on 11/17/2023 at 4:05 PM, the DON stated that she was responsible for Grievances during the time that there was not an Administrator or Social Worker employed at the facility. The DON confirmed during the months of January and February, she was responsible for Grievances and responding to them, or assigning them to other departments to respond to. The DON stated she believed a response had been given to these grievances, but that it had not been written down on the grievance paperwork. The DON stated that during the time in which grievances were not responded to, there was a lot going on at the facility. She stated the policy for responding to grievances, according to the Social Services Director, is to respond within 72 hours.
Interview on 11/18/2023 at 3:45 PM, the Social Services Director stated that they had begun working at the facility at the end of May of 2023. The social worker stated that when they began working at the facility, they looked at past grievances in the grievance binder to ensure they were all responded to. The social worker stated they believe these grievances were responded to but was unsure why the follow-up was not written down. The social worker stated their expectation for grievances is to be told about them promptly from other staff, so they were able to respond to the grievances personally. The Social Services Director stated their expectation is for any grievances made in resident council meetings were to be written down by the staff member that attends resident council meetings and provided to the Social Services Director.
Record review of facility policy titled, Grievances/Complaint, Filing, dated April 2017, revealed Upon receipt of a grievance and/or complaint, the grievance officer will review and investigate the allegations and submit a written report of such findings to the administrator within five (5) working days of receiving the grievance and/or complaint, and A written summary of the investigation will also be provided to the resident, and a copy will be filed in the business office.
Record review of facility policy titled, Grievances, undated, revealed The grievance proves to include initiation of resolution within 72 hours of receiving grievance. Upon further review, the policy also revealed All written grievance decisions shall include the date the grievance was received, a summary statement of the Resident's grievance, the steps taken to investigate the grievance, a summary of the pertinent findings or conclusions regarding the Resident's concern, a statement as to whether the grievance was confirmed or not confirmed, any corrective action taken or to be taken by the facility as a result of the grievance, and the date the written decision was issued.
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Report Alleged Abuse
(Tag F0609)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitati...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, are reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury, or not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury, to the administrator of the facility and to other officials, including to the State Survey Agency, for 2 of 20 residents (Residents #12 and 47) reviewed for injuries of unknown source, and for 1 of 1 facility HVAC system not operating in that:
1. The DON and LVN V did not report to HHSC that Resident #47 had shoved Resident #12 against a wall on [DATE], causing Resident #12 pain.
2. The HVAC system was not operating for 8 months. This was not reported to HHSC state agency.
a. Resident #54, #7, #58, and #5 stated the main dining room was cold for an activity like bingo.
This deficient practice placed residents at risk for abuse.
The findings included:
1. A record review of Resident #12's admission record, dated [DATE], revealed an admission date of [DATE] with diagnoses which included Alzheimer's disease [a progressive disease beginning with mild memory loss and possibly leading to loss of the ability to carry on a conversation and respond to the environment] and chronic pain due to trauma.
A record review of Resident #12's quarterly MDS assessment, dated [DATE], revealed Resident #12 was an [AGE] year-old female admitted for long term care. Further review revealed Resident #12's BIMS was assessed a 5 out of a possible 15, which indicated severe cognitive impairment.
A record review of Resident #47's admission record dated [DATE] revealed an admission date of [DATE] with diagnoses which included Alzheimer's disease [a progressive disease beginning with mild memory loss and possibly leading to loss of the ability to carry on a conversation and respond to the environment] and dementia with behavioral disturbance [not a specific disease but is rather a general term for the impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions that interferes with doing everyday activities].
A record review of Resident #47's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #47 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted for long term care and assessed with a BIMS score of 02 out of a possible 15 which indicated severe cognitive impairment.
A record review of Resident #12's medical record revealed a nurse note dated [DATE] at 5:58 PM, authored by LVN V, Nursing Position: Licensed Practical Nurse Created By: LVN V Created Date : [DATE] 17:58:27 Note Text: Resident [#12] was pushed by another Resident [#47] and hit the wall then slide down to the floor. Resident said, 'She [#47] pushed me down.' [#12's Family] was notified when he came in to visit [Resident #12]. Monitoring and PRN APAP pain medication administered for c/o headache and back pain. Physician called but no one answered couldn't leave voice mail will attempt to call again later. [ADON] notified. Monitoring for injuries and any further pain. As well as monitoring for behaviors.
During an interview on [DATE] at 4:07 PM the DON stated LVN V was no longer employed by the facility. The DON stated LVN V worked the evening shift from 3:00 PM to 11:00 PM. The DON stated LVN V had generated an internal incident report and she [the DON] had reviewed the incident report and signed off on it on [DATE]. The DON stated the report was reviewed in the morning meeting the next day [[DATE]] and was decided the incident was not a reportable event due to the resident did not have an injury or emotional harm.
2. Observations between on [DATE] between 10:00 a.m. to 11:00 a.m. revealed Resident rooms on A Hall and B Hall were provided with ducted supply air but not with return air intakes. The return air intakes for the HVAC system were in the corridors outside the rooms, causing the corridors to serve as a part of the return air system for the adjoining areas. Further observation revealed the A and B Halls were unoccupied by residents at the time.
Observation on [DATE] at 3:45 PM with the Maintenance Director X in Halls A and B revealed the HVAC system was not operating.
Interview on [DATE] at 3:45 PM with the Maintenance Director X in Halls A and B revealed the HVAC system had not been in good operation and had to move the residents to Halls C and D. The Maintenance Director X stated this had not been fixed and was not sure when it will be fixed. The Maintenance Director X further stated the facility had 2 HVAC systems for the facility, the one that was not working covered the A and B Halls and the main dining room.
During an interview on [DATE] at 5:00 PM, when questioned as to the use of the A and B Halls being used as return air for the HVAC System, the Administrator said that he knew of the return air use in the afore mentioned areas and that the facility had a waiver, as issued on [DATE] by the CMS for a three- year period (expired [DATE]). When asked if he knew the waiver had expired, the Administrator said he did and asked that it be renewed.
Observations on [DATE] at 9:50 AM with the Maintenance Director X in the main dining area, (had an air thermometer gun) in between Halls A and B and Halls C and D was 62.6 degrees F. Further observation revealed there were residents in the main dining room playing bingo at the time.
Observation on [DATE] at 10:20 AM revealed the air temperature in the main dining room was 54.9 degrees F.
Interview on [DATE] at 11:23 AM with the Administrator stated the HVAC was broken and had to move residents from A and B Halls to C and D Halls. The Administrator stated he had bids for HVAC but had not been fixed, since February 2023. The Administrator stated the HVAC system not in operating condition for residents was not called into the State Survey Agency.
Interview on [DATE] at 11:35 AM with Administrator stated he was not here at time of the HVAC issues on the A and B Halls and the HVAC was not working since [DATE]. The Administrator stated he did not call it in to the State Survey Agency. The Administrator stated he would have called into the State Survey Agency the issues with the HVAC system, due to a failure of cooling for residents, and they ended up moving resident to the C and D Halls.
Interview on [DATE] at 4:15 PM with MDS stated the AC unit went out in the summertime, family members were saying it was hot, and staff said it was hot. MDS stated the facility administrative staff talked about grievances in the morning meetings. MDS stated she remembered the Maintenance Supervisor going around with thermometer. The facility bought some portable AC units in the A and B Halls. Then the decision to move everyone to C and D Halls was made and staff assisted resident move to C and D Halls. MDS stated the current Administrator was here at the time.
Interview on at [DATE] at 4:29 PM with Activity Director stated the AC was not working in [DATE]; it started getting hotter and that was when the temperature outside was 3 digits. The Activity Director stated residents were moved to C and D hall due AC unit did not work.
Interviews on [DATE] at 12:00 PM with Resident #54 stated the main dining room was cold.
Interviews on [DATE] at 1:55 PM with Resident #7 stated the main dining room was cold.
Interviews on [DATE] at 1:58 PM with Resident #58 stated the main dining room was cold.
Interviews on [DATE] at 3:20 PM with Resident #5 stated the main dining room was cold. Interview with Residents stated it was cold and prefer not to go to activities in main dining room. Resident #5 stated at times they would move the activity to a warmer area.
A record review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation, or Misappropriation - Reporting and Investigating, dated [DATE], revealed, All reports of Resident abuse (including injuries of unknown origin), neglect, exploitation, or theft / misappropriation of Resident property are reported to local, state and federal agencies (as required by current regulations) and thoroughly investigated by facility management .The Administrator serves as the Abuse Prevention Coordinator. In the absence of the Administrator, the Director of Nursing or designee will fulfill the duties of the Abuse Prevention Coordinator .
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0726
(Tag F0726)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to have sufficient nursing staff with the appropriate ...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to have sufficient nursing staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to provide nursing and related services to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident, as determined by resident assessments and individual plans of care and considering the number, acuity and diagnoses of the facility's resident population for 18 of 18 residents reviewed for memory care (Residents #1, #4, #12, #14, #17, #23, #25, #38, #40, #41, #47, #48, #52, #56, #60, #64, #66, and #67) reviewed for memory care and nursing services, in that:
1. CNA F failed to wait her her relief, CNA U, and left her assignment resulting in the 18 residents on the memory care unit being left unattended for one hour on the morning of 11/17/2023.
2. LVN V did not provide continuation of nursing services for Resident #12's incident of peer-to-peer aggression on 07/27/2023 by not reporting to the incident to oncoming nurse for follow-up.
These failures could have placed residents at risk for harm by lack of supervision, lack of nursing interventions and lack of physicians receiving reports for their residents.
The findings included:
1. Record review of the facility's census for 11/17/2023 revealed 18 residents resided on the facility's memory care unit, Hall D Rooms 1-14.
Observation on 11/17/2023 at 6:28 AM revealed the memory care unit presented without any secured doors for entry and or exit of the memory care unit. Further observation revealed the 18 residents (Residents #1, #4, #12, #14, #17, #23, #25, #38, #40, #41, #47, #48, #52, #56, #60, #64, #66, and #67) on the memory care unit were without staff care and or supervision. Further observation revealed no staff in the memory care unit after a room-to-room search which included a census of each resident. Continued observation revealed there were residents ambulating throughout the unit and some residents asleep in their bedrooms.
During an observation and interview on 11/17/2023 at 6:40 AM revealed RA S entered the memory care unit and stated she was not assigned to care for residents in the memory care unit but was just dropping by to check on residents. RA S stated there were no staff in the memory care unit and she would stay until someone would arrive.
During an interview on 11/17/2023 at 6:41 AM LVN B and CNA AA stated they were scheduled to work Hall D from 11:00 PM to 7:00 AM. LVN B stated CNA F was scheduled to work the memory care unit from 11:00 PM to 6:00 AM and CNA AA was scheduled to care for the rest of the residents on the D Hall who were not residents of the memory care unit. LVN B stated the residents on the memory care unit should have supervision by CNA U who was assigned to relieve CNA F. LVN B stated he was unaware CNA U was not working in the memory care unit. LVN B stated sometimes LVN U was late. LVN B stated no one had reported to him there was no staff in the memory care unit. LVN B stated residents could have eloped and or been injured without staff supervision. LVN B stated he could not be in 2 places and had nursing duties at the end of the non-memory care unit, D Hall. CNA AA stated she was unaware the memory care unit had no staff and was responsible for providing resident care in the non-memory care of D Hall.
During an observation and interview on 11/17/2023 at 7:00 AM revealed LVN H and CNA U at the facility's time clock. CNA U did not identify herself as CNA U, and LVN H stated CNA U should have relieved CNA F at 6:00 AM and stated CNA U had a history of being absent for care in the memory care unit.
During an interview on 11/17/2023 at 11:10 AM Staffing Coordinator G stated CNA U had not called in late and his expectation was for CNA U to relieve CNA F.
During an interview on 11/17/2023 at 5:02 PM the ADON stated he was unaware the memory care unit was without staff on the morning of 11/17/2023 at 06:00 AM. the ADON stated the expectation was for a staff member to be supervising, caring, and monitoring the residents in the memory care unit and should not leave the unit until the staff member has been relieved by the next staff member.
During an interview on 11/18/2023 at 2:22 PM CNA F stated she was scheduled to work 11:00 PM to 6:00 AM in the memory care unit and was usually relieved by CNA U. CNA F stated sometimes she just left because CNA U was not there to relieve her at 6:00 AM. CNA F stated LVN B knows.
During an interview on 11/18/2023 at 3:02 PM CNA U stated she did not call anyone to alert them of her tardiness. CNA U stated she had not seen CNA F or LVN B when she arrived on 11/17/2023 at 6:00 AM and stated she had left the memory care unit to use the bathroom.
2. Record review of Resident #12's admission record, dated 11/18/2023, revealed an admission date of 05/03/2021 with diagnoses which included Alzheimer's disease [a progressive disease beginning with mild memory loss and possibly leading to loss of the ability to carry on a conversation and respond to the environment].
Record review of Resident #12's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 04/21/2023, revealed the resident was an [AGE] year-old female admitted for long term care and assessed with a BIMS score of 05 out of a possible 15 which indicated severe cognitive impairment .
Record review of Resident #12's care plan, dated 11/18/2023, revealed, Resident resides on the memory care unit date Initiated: 07/17/2022, Revision on: 05/16/2023 .Resident's safety will be maintained through next review date .Monitor Resident per protocol to ensure safety
Record review of Resident #12's physician's orders revealed Resident #12 was to receive clopidogrel [a blood thinner] 75 mg once a day for chest pain and was to be monitored daily for side effects of the blood thinner to include, monitor for .sudden severe headache, .bruising, sudden changes in mental status, .every shift.
Record review of resident #12's nursing notes revealed a note, dated 07/27/2023 at 4:35 PM authored by LVN V, that read, acetaminophen [Tylenol] tablet 325 mg give 2 tablets by mouth every 4 hours as needed for pain, administered due to c/o [complaint of] headache and back pain post fall r/t [related to] received physical aggression from another Resident].
Record review of Resident #12's nursing notes revealed a note dated 07/27/2023 at 5:40 PM authored by LVN V, Resident was pushed by another Resident and hit the wall then slide down to the floor. Resident [#12] said she pushed me down. [Resident #12's family] was notified when he came in to visit [Resident #12] monitoring and PRN APAP pain medication administered for c/o headache and back pain. Physician called but no one would answer, could not leave voice mail, will attempt to call again later. [ADON] notified. Monitoring for injuries and any further pain, as well as monitoring for behaviors.
Record review of Resident #12's medical record dated 07/27/2023 to 11/18/2023 revealed no documentation for a report to the physician for the peer-to-peer aggression on 07/27/2023 which resulted in head and back pain.
During an interview with the DON and the ADON on 11/18/23 at 4:07 PM, the DON and the ADON stated LVN V was no longer employed by the facility. The DON stated LVN V worked the evening shift from 3:00 PM to 11:00 PM. The ADON stated the expectation was for continuous nursing services and if LVN V could not have reached the physician she should have given report to the next oncoming nurse and so on. The DON stated the oncoming nurse for Resident #12 was LVN C, who worked 11:00 PM to 7:00 AM, followed by LVN H who worked from 7:00 AM to 3:00 PM. The The DON stated LVN V had generated an internal incident report and she [the DON] had reviewed the incident report and signed off on it on 07/28/2023. The DON stated the report was reviewed in the morning meeting the next day and was decided the incident report was complete due to the resident did not have an injury or emotional harm.
During an interview with LVN H on 11/18/23 at 4:15 PM, LVN H stated if she had received report from LVN C she would have ensured the physician would have received a report and would have documented the report in the resident's record. LVN H stated since there was no documentation, she did not receive a report from LVN C.
Record review of the facility's policy titled Staffing, Sufficient and Competent Nursing, dated August 2022, revealed, Policy Statement: our facility provides sufficient numbers of nursing staff with the appropriate skills and competency necessary to provide nursing and related care and services for all residents in accordance with resident care plans and the facility assessment. Policy Interpretation and Implementation: sufficient staff: licensed nurses and certified nursing assistants are available 24 hours a day, seven days a week to provide competent resident care services including: assuring residents safety; attaining or maintaining the highest practical physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each Resident; . responding to residents needs . Competent Staff: competency is a measurable pattern of knowledge, skills, abilities, behaviors, and other characteristics that an individual needs to perform work roles or occupational functions successfully . staff must demonstrate the skills and techniques necessary to care for residents needs including but not limited to the following areas: resident rights; behavioral health; psychosocial care; dementia care; . communication; basic nursing skills; . medication management; . identification of changes in condition . licensed nurses and nursing assistants are trained and must demonstrate competency in identifying, documenting, and reporting resident changes of condition consistent with their scope of practice and responsibilities .
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Unnecessary Medications
(Tag F0759)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate below 5%. The facili...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate below 5%. The facility error was 11.11% based on 3 errors out of 27 opportunities for 3 of 7 residents (Resident #13, #39, and #44) reviewed for medication administration:
1. LVN H administered expired insulin to Resident #39.
2. RN AW administered late medication for Resident #44. The medication was scheduled for administration any time between 08:00 AM and 10:00 AM. The medication was administered at 10:49 AM.
3. RN AW administered late medications for Resident #13. The medication was scheduled for administration any time between 08:00 AM and 10:00 AM. The medication was administered at 11:06 AM.
These deficient practices placed residents at risk for not receiving therapeutic effects of their medications and possible adverse reactions.
The findings included:
1. A record review of Resident #39's admission record, dated [DATE], revealed an admission date of [DATE] with diagnoses which included diabetes mellitus type II [a deadly disease where the body cannot process sugar].
A record review of Resident #39's quarterly MDS assessment, dated [DATE], revealed Resident #39 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted for long term care and assessed with a BIMS score of 03 out of a possible 15 which indicated severe cognitive impairment.
A record review of Resident #39's care plan dated [DATE] revealed, Resident [#39] has a DX of Diabetes. Is at risk for Hypo/hyperglycemic episodes and complications related to disease process. Date Initiated: [DATE] .Observe for S/S of Hypoglycemia to include but not limited to: fatigue, dizziness, sweating, cool clammy skin, palpitations, change in mental stats. Notify Nurse Date Initiated: [DATE] LPN RN CNA o Observer for S/S of Hyperglycemia to include but not limited to: weakness, muscle cramps, tachycardia [fast heartbeat], diaphoresis [sweating], anxiety, change in mental status. Notify Nurse Date Initiated: [DATE] LPN RN .Provide insulin as ordered and scheduled Date Initiated: [DATE] LPN RN.
A record review of Resident #39's physician's orders dated [DATE] revealed Resident #39 was to receive Humalog solution, 100 units per ml, insulin, per sliding scale; if [blood sugar is] 0-150 = 0 units; 151-200 = 2 units .
During an observation on [DATE] at 10:50 AM revealed LVN N prepared 2 units of Humalog solution 100 units per ml and administered the injection to Resident #39.
During an observation and interview on [DATE] at 10:53 AM LVN N revealed the vial of insulin Humalog solution 100 units pre ml with a handwritten date upon the vial [DATE]. LVN N stated the date was the date when the insulin vial was removed from refrigeration storage and placed into use. LVN N stated she was uncertain how many days the vial could be used until it reached the discard date, maybe 30?. LVN N stated she would find out and report back.
During an interview on [DATE] at 11:09 AM LVN N stated the insulin Humalog vial could have been used for 28 days prior to the vial's discard date. LVN H stated the 28th day from [DATE] would be [DATE]. LVN H stated she administered insulin 1 day past the discard date. LVN H stated the expired insulin may not provide blood sugar control for Resident #39 as intended. LVN H stated she had placed the vial into service on [DATE] and wrote the date upon the vial and failed to write the discard date of [DATE] 28 days later.
During an interview on [DATE] at 05:02 PM the ADON stated nurses were responsible for writing 2 dates on insulin vials when the vials were put into use; 1 date should be the date the vial was removed from refrigeration and the other date should be the date the insulin manufacturer stated the insulin should be discarded. The ADON stated Humalog should be discarded after 28 days off use. The ADON stated the insulin becomes less effective after the discard date and residents would be at risk for not receiving the therapeutic effects of their medication.
2. A record review of Resident #44's admission record dated [DATE] revealed an admission date of [DATE] with diagnoses which included depressive disorders [also known as depression, a common mental disorder. It involves a depressed mood or loss of pleasure or interest in activities for long periods of time].
A record review of Resident #44's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #44 was a [AGE] year-old-male admitted for long term care and assessed with a BIMS score of 13 out of a possible 15 which indicated Resident #39 was cognitively intact.
A record review of Resident #39's care plan dated [DATE] revealed, The Resident [#39] uses antidepressant medication r/t Depression .The resident will be free from discomfort or adverse reactions related to antidepressant therapy through the review date .Administer antidepressant medications as ordered by physician .
A record review of Resident #39's physician's orders revealed Resident #44 was to receive divalproex sodium capsules 125 mg, give 2 capsules by mouth 2 times a day at 09:00 AM and again at 08:00 PM.
During an observation from 10:42 AM to 10:49 AM on [DATE] revealed RN AW prepared and administered divalproex 125 mg two capsules to Resident #44 at 10:49 AM.
3. A record review of Resident #13's admission record dated [DATE], revealed an admission date of [DATE] with diagnoses which included hypertension [high blood pressure].
A record review of Resident #13's admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #13 was an [AGE] year-old female admitted for long term care and assessed with a BIMS score of 15 out of a possible 15 which indicated Resident #13 was cognitively intact.
A record review of Resident #13's care plan dated [DATE] revealed, Resident has DX of Hypertension. Is at risk for Hypo-/hypertensive episodes .Resident will have no reports of complications due to Hypo/Hypertensive [low blood pressure and / or high blood pressure] episodes through next review date .Check B/P [blood pressure] as ordered and notify MD of abnormal results .
A record review of Resident #13 physician's orders dated [DATE] revealed Resident #13 was to receive carvedilol 25 mg 1 table by mouth two times a day, at 08:00 AM and again at 08:00 PM, for high blood pressure.
During an observation from 11:01 AM to 11:06 AM on [DATE] revealed RN AW prepared and administered to Resident #13 1 tablet of carvedilol 25 mg at 11:06 AM.
During an interview on [DATE] at 11:06 AM RN AW stated she was the charge nurse on the d-hall and was scheduled from 07:00 AM to 03:00 PM. RN AW stated she was late administering medications for residents on d-hall due to the scheduled medication aide had called in unavailable. RN AW stated earlier around 08:30 AM and after the residents breakfast the DON reported to RN AW the medication aide would not be coming in and RN AW needed to administer the medications on her hall. RN AW stated she reported to the DON she had a potential to administer medications late due to her workload and the DON allowed her to continue. RN AW stated residents who received their medications late could be at risk for not receiving the therapeutic effects of their medications. RN AW stated she was responsible for residents receiving their medications as prescribed by the physician.
During an interview on [DATE] at 11:20 AM the DON stated she reported to RN AW she would not have the assistance of a medication aide today and would be responsible for resident care and medication administration. The DON stated she offered to assign someone to help administer medications and RN AW refused the offer. The DON stated she left RN AW to continue administering medications. The DON stated each nurse was responsible for administering medications as prescribed.
A record review of the facility's Insulin Administration policy dated [DATE] revealed, Purpose: to provide guidelines for the safe administration of insulin to residents with diabetes. Preparation: . the nursing staff will have access to specific instructions from the manufacturer if appropriate on all forms of insulin delivery system(s) prior to their use . check expiration date, if drawing from an opened multi dose vial. if opening a new vial, record expiration date and time on the vial (follow manufacturers recommendation for expiration after opening).
A record review of the Lilly USA website, https://www.humalog.com/u100 , accessed [DATE], titled Humalog U-100 Insulin revealed, .Storage for Humalog U-100 KwikPens and Vials, Unopened Humalog should be stored in a refrigerator (36° to 46°F [2° to 8°C]) and can be used until the expiration date on the carton or label . Opened Humalog vials, prefilled pens, and cartridges must be thrown away 28 days after first use, even if they still contain insulin . Do not use HUMALOG past the expiration date printed on the label or 28 days after you first use it.
A record review of the Institute for Safe Medication Practices website,
https://www.ismp.org/resources/guidelines-timely-medication-administration-response-cms-30-minute-rule#:~:text=(Although%20it%20is%20generally%20safe,delayed%20more%20than%202%20hours.)
accessed [DATE], titled Guidelines for Timely Medication Administration: Response to the CMS 30-minute rule revealed, .Establish guidelines for timely drug administration of scheduled non-time-critical medications as follows: .Medications administered more frequently than daily but not more frequently than every 4 hours (e.g., BID [twice a day], TID [three times a day], q4h [every 4 hours], q6h [every 6 hours]): Administer these medications plus or minus 1 hour from the scheduled time.
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Room Equipment
(Tag F0908)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to Maintain all mechanical, electrical, and patient care equipment in safe operating condition for 1 of 1 facility in that:
1...
Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to Maintain all mechanical, electrical, and patient care equipment in safe operating condition for 1 of 1 facility in that:
1. Kitchen faucets had running water that could not be turned off by kitchen staff and caused a drip of water to be on floor on one of sinks in the kitchen.
2. There were ceiling lights with missing covers, broken, and missing lights in the kitchen and in the main dining room.
3. In the Laundry Room, there were 2 out of 3 washers and 3 out of 6 dryers were not working.
These failures could affect residents and could result in residents not having clothes and light.
The Findings were:
1. Observation on 11/14/2023 at 10:23 AM in the kitchen with the DM revealed a three compartment sink and a single compartment sink had running water that could not be stopped by the kitchen staff. At one of the sinks with running water was a big bucket in sink to catch water while the floor under sink had a small pool of water that dripped from the sink.
Observation on 11/15/2023 at 9:50 AM with [NAME] T and Maintenance Director X in the kitchen revealed a three compartment sink and a single compartment sink had running water that could not be stopped by the kitchen staff. At one of the sinks with running water was a big bucket in sink to catch water while the floor under sink had a small pool of water that dripped from the sink.
During an interview with [NAME] T on 11/15/2023 at 9:50 AM, [NAME] T stated she had tried to turn the water faucet off at the sink, but they would not turn off when she turned the knob. [NAME] T stated she had reported this to the DM a few months ago and was not sure if it would be fixed. [NAME] T stated the Maintenance Supervisor had fixed the three compartments sink at one point, but it still had running water coming from the faucet.
2. Observation on 11/14/2023 at 10:23 AM in the kitchen with the DM revealed the dish machine area had three ceiling lights. Further observation revealed the ceiling light directly over the dish machine where staff stood and the other two ceiling lights were on the side of the dish machine in staff walkways. The ceiling lights were missing bulbs, light protector covers, and a light protector cover was missing pieces.
Observation on 11/15/2023 at 9:50 AM with Maintenance Director X in the dish machine area of the kitchen revealed there was one light with the protection cover broken in different places, the second light was missing a light bulb and a third ceiling light was missing pieces of the protection cover.
Observation on 11/16/2023 at 9:50 AM with the Maintenance Director X in the main dining room revealed a ceiling light protection cover was coming off.
3. Observation on 11/16/2023 at 10:40 AM with the Maintenance Director X and Laundry Aide AY revealed 2 out of 3 washers were not working and 3 out of 6 dryers were not working.
During an interview with Laundry Aide AY on 11/16/2023 at 10:40 AM, Laundry Aide AY stated 2 out of the 3 washers were not working and 3 out of the 6 dryers were not working. Laundry Aide AY stated they were managing with the one working washer and three working dryers, and broken washers and dryers had not worked for over one year. Laundry aide AY stated she had reported this issues to her manager.
During an interview with the Housekeeping/Laundry Director W on 11/16/2023 at 11:03 AM, the Housekeeping/Laundry Director W stated she was aware of the washers and dryers not working and had no complaints from the residents. The Housekeeping/Laundry Director W stated they had a few companies that bought the facility within the last year, and they had not fixed the laundry issues for a few weeks. This was reported to the Maintenance Director and the Administrator. The Housekeeping/Laundry Director W stated she had two shifts for laundry, one shift from 5:00 AM to 2:00 PM and the next shift was from 2:00 PM to 9:00 PM.
Interview on 11/14/2023 at 10:24 AM with the DM in the kitchen confirmed the kitchen issues with water faucets and ceiling lights. The DM stated she verbally reported the water faucets over sink dripping and running, and the ceiling lights to the Maintenance Director X.
Interview on 11/16/2023 at 10:00 AM with Maintenance Director X stated staff verbally told him about items that needed to be fixed in the facility. The Maintenance Director X stated he had a maintenance log in front to his office door and the two nurses' stations. The Maintenance Director X confirmed the kitchen faucets had running water, water dripping on floor and the laundry issues. The Maintenance Director X further stated he had reported to the Administrator, and he did not know when the issued would be fixed.
Record review of the facility's maintenance logs revealed they did not have any of the above issues to be worked on by the Maintenance Director X.
Interview on 11/16/2023 at 10:02 AM with the Maintenance Director X stated the two sinks in the kitchen had been leaking water for about 1-2 weeks. The Maintenance Director X stated he fixed the first kitchen sink, but it was still leaking water. The Maintenance Director X stated the DM let him know in the kitchen the two sinks were leaking water out of faucets, and they had some missing ceiling lights that did not have protection covers on them.
Interview on 11/16/2023 at 11:23 AM with the Administrator stated he was made aware of the kitchen issues after LSC and Maintenance Director X discussed the issues. The Administrator stated he was aware of the washers/dryers that were broken.
Record review of the facility's policy titled, Hazardous Area, Devices and Equipment, dated July 2017, revealed, All Hazardous area, devices, and equipment in eh facility will be identified and addressed appropriately to ensure resident safety and mitigate accidents hazards to the extent possible. 1. As part of the facility's overall safety and accident prevention program, hazardous areas, and objects in the resident environment will be identified and addressed by the safety committee. Safety Committee consist of all department heads, such as maintenance. leadership, and environmental services. Identification of Hazards, 1. A hazard is defined as anything in the environment that has the potential to cause injury or illness. example. a. equipment and devices that are left unattended or are malfunctioning. b. devise and equipment that are improperly used or poorly maintained. h. insufficient lighting or glare. I. unsafe exposure of heating elements or water temperatures. Monitoring, 1. Monitoring to ensure that recommendations are implemented consistently and correctly will be a component of the safety and accident prevention program.
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Administration
(Tag F0835)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews and record review failed to ensure facility must be administered in a manner that enables it t...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews and record review failed to ensure facility must be administered in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident for 1 of 8 (Resident #39) residents and 1 of 1 facility, in that:
1. The facility failed to maintain and or repair the 1 of 2 Heating Ventilation Air Conditioner systems [HVAC].
2. The facility failed to maintain and or repair the call light system.
3. The facility failed to communicate and coordinate between nursing and dietary staff which resulted in Resident #39's physician ordered House supplement was not available.
4. The facility failed to maintain and or repair the ceilings.
This could affect and could result in residents diminished quality of life, diminished self-esteem and not receiving supplements for interventions to prevent weight loss.
The Findings were:
1. Observations between on [DATE] between 10:00 a.m. to 11:00 a.m. revealed rooms on A Hall and B Hall were provided with ducted supply air but not with return air intakes. The return air intakes for the HVAC system were located in the corridors outside the rooms, causing the corridors to serve as a part of the return air system for the adjoining areas.
During an interview on [DATE] at 5:00 p.m., when questioned as to the use of the A and B Halls being used as return air for the HVAC System, the Administrator said that she knew of the return air use in the aforementioned areas and that the facility had a waiver, as issued on [DATE] by the CMS for a three-year period (expired [DATE]). When asked if he knew the waiver had expired, the Administrator said he did and asked that it be renewed.
Record review of the past air temperatures for San [NAME], Texas. In [DATE] the average high air temperature was 91-92 degrees Fahrenheit [F]. In [DATE], [DATE]-21, 2023, was 105 degrees F. The air temperature for [DATE] was 94-97 degrees F. In [DATE] the average high air temperature was 97 degrees F and with humidity was over 100 degrees F. This summer the county had 74 days of 100 degrees F, and over, ambient air temperatures.
Observations on [DATE] at 9:50 AM with Maintenance Director X conducted environmental rounds of the facility and stated the temperatures should be between 71-81 degrees F. Observations were made of Residents gathered in the main dining room for the activity of Bingo. The Maintenance Director X stated the #1 HVAC unit was not working for a while, the HVAC unit serviced the A and B Halls, which included the main dining room. The Maintenance Director X stated he had set the #1 HVAC unit to heat when he learned residents were going to have bingo in the main dining room. The Maintenance Director X stated he was not sure why the #1 HVAC was not at a good temperature and will notify the Administrator. Further observations and temperature records revealed the main dining room was 62.6 degrees F.
At 10:20 AM the main dining the air temperature room was 54.9 degrees F.
At 10:22 AM in the C end section of hall, the air temperature was 58.0 degrees F.
At 10:23 AM in the C start of hall, the air temperature was 67.3 degrees F.
At 10:26 AM in the D Hall, at start of hall (memory care unit), the air temperature was 69.3 degrees F.
At 10:37 AM in the D Hall, at end of hall, the air temperature was 67.8 degrees F.
Interview on [DATE] at 11:25 AM with the Administrator stated he was notified of the air temperature in the A and B Halls by the Life Safety Code surveyor (LSC) and was not aware that the C and D Halls were not heating for residents. No other reply.
Interview on [DATE] at 10:06 AM with the ADON stated the HVAC system was having issues since earlier this year, 2023, either May or [DATE]. The ADON stated the resident families first noticed and reported the staff, that was when the facility was testing air temperatures. The facility brought in mobile Air Conditioning units. The ADON stated they discovered the A Hall (previous secure unit) was not cooling and was hot, so they moved those residents to the B Hall. Then the ADON stated the facility noticed the B hall was not cooling, so the resident was moved to other part of the facility. They had a low census at the time. The facility moved the A Hall secure unit to the first half of the D Hall and the rest of the residents moved to the second half of D Hall and other residents to the C Hall.
A record review of the facility's policy titled, Homelike Environment, dated February 2021, revealed, policy statement; residents are provided with a safe, clean, comfortable and home like environment and encouraged to use their personal belongings to the extent possible. policy interpretation and implementation; the facility staff and management maximizes, to the extent possible, the characteristics of the facility that reflect a personalized, home like setting. these characteristics include; . comfortable and safe temperatures (71-81 degrees F) .
2. During an observation on [DATE] from 10:30 to 11:00 AM revealed the call light system on D Hall was not functioning as designed.
During an observation on [DATE] at 10:10 AM revealed the memory care unit presented with 19 residents (Residents #1, #4, #12, #14, #17, #19, #23, #25, #38, #40, #41, #47, #48, #52, #56, #60, #64, #66, and #67). Further observations revealed the memory care unit had a malfunctioning call light system which would sometimes illuminate a call light without sounds and sometimes would sound and not illuminate.
During an interview on [DATE] at 10:20 AM LVN H and CNA U stated they were the LVN and CNA for the memory care unit which occupied the beginning of the D Hall. LVN H and CNA U stated the call light system had been malfunctioning for weeks. LVN H stated the staff paid attention to the lights and would round on residents frequently. LVN H and CNA U stated the facility DON had knowledge of the malfunctioning call light system.
During an observation and interview on [DATE] at 10:59 AM revealed the call light for Residents #12 and #40 would illuminate outside of their rooms but not illuminate and or sound at the nurses' station. CNA U stated she would round on residents frequently due to the call light system did not sound and furthermore residents usually were not in their rooms.
During an observation on [DATE] at 3:58 PM revealed room [ROOM NUMBER], call light was pushed and no noise on the outside of room [ROOM NUMBER].
During an observation on [DATE] at 3:50 PM revealed room [ROOM NUMBER], call light was pushed and no noise on the outside of room [ROOM NUMBER].
During an interview on [DATE] at 4:00 PM the Maintenance Director X confirmed he pushed the call light device in room [ROOM NUMBER] and 44, and no light was on the outside of the rooms with no noise. The Maintenance Director X confirmed Halls C and D call lights were not functioning.
During an observation and interview on [DATE] from 9:50 AM though 11:37 AM revealed the call light system of the entire facility had malfunctioned, which included call lights were not audible in some halls and call lights didn't light above residents' rooms or at nurse's station call light panel.
During an observation on [DATE] at 10:15 AM, on the B Hall (no residents) Rooms 100, 60, 68, 9, 14, 29, 21 call light was pushed, but no noise. The Maintenance Director X stated staff would walk round the halls and residents were provided small bells to ring for help for Halls B and C.
During an interview on [DATE] at 10:15 AM with the Maintenance Director X confirmed Halls A and B call lights were pushed and were not audible or functioning.
During an interview on [DATE] at 11:23 AM with Administrator stated he was aware of the call lights and was brought to attention after surveyor intervention.
During an observation on [DATE] at 6:13 AM revealed the call light outside of room [ROOM NUMBER] was illuminated but did not sound any alert. Further observation of the call light alert board at the nurses' station was not illuminated for any room and was silent.
During an observation on [DATE] at 6:28 AM revealed the memory care unit presented without any secured doors for entry and or exit of the memory care unit. Further observation revealed a malfunctioning call light system where the call light panel at the nurse station continuously alarmed. Further observation revealed 18 residents, [Resident #19 had been discharged ]; Residents #1, #4, #12, #14, #17, #23, #25, #38, #40, #41, #47, #48, #52, #56, #60, #64, #66, and #67, without staff care and or supervision. Further observation revealed no staff in the memory care unit after a room-to-room search which included a census of each Resident. Continued observation revealed residents ambulating throughout the unit with some residents asleep in their bedrooms.
During an observation on [DATE] at 6:29 AM revealed the nurse all light alert board located at the nurses' station in the memory care unit was continuously sounding and was not illuminating and rooms, further observation revealed no call lights in the memory care unit were illuminated by residents' rooms.
During an interview on [DATE] at 5:10 PM the ADON stated the facility had a malfunctioning call light system and as of [DATE] residents were given small wooded handled bells to use as call light alerts.
During an interview on [DATE] at 1:55 PM Resident #7 stated he used the small call bell to call for help from staff.
During an interview on [DATE] at 1:58 PM Resident #58 stated he was given the bell to ring for staff assistance.
During an interview on [DATE] at 2:00 PM Resident #68 stated he used a small bell to ring for staff to help him.
During an interview on [DATE] at 2:10 PM Resident #54 stated staff gave him a small bell to ring if he needed help from staff.
During an interview on [DATE] at 3:20 PM Resident #11 stated he was given the bell to ring for staff assistance.
During an interview on [DATE] 3:34 PM with Resident #5 stated he was given the bell to ring for staff assistance.
During an interview on [DATE] at 6:09 PM the Medical Director stated Administrator had reported the facility's call light system had malfunctioned. The Medical Director stated the malfunctioning call light system was a danger for residents to include injurious falls and neglect, and especially to elderly confused residents.
A record review of the facility's policy titled, Call System, Resident, dated [DATE], revealed, Policy Heading: residents are provided with a means to call staff for assistance through a communication system that directly calls a staff member or a centralized workstation. Policy Interpretation and Implementation: each resident is provided with a means to call staff directly for assistance from his or her bed from toileting and or bathing facilities and from the floor. call system communication may be audible or visual . the resident call system remains functional at all times. if audible communication is used, the volume is maintained at an audible level that can be easily heard. if visual communication is used, the lights remain functional . the resident call system is routinely maintained and tested by the maintenance department .
3. Record review of Resident #39's admission Record dated [DATE] revealed she was admitted on [DATE], readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of chronic pulmonary disease diabetes II, dementia, muscle wasting and atrophy, reduced mobility, pain, nutritional deficiency, and major depressive disorder.
Record review of Resident #39's chart revealed weighs for 6 months.
For 1 month -[DATE] at 117.2 pounds and [DATE] at 140 pounds, with a weight loss of 16.41. For 3 months a weight loss of 23.30, on 3rd month, [DATE] was 153.3 pounds. Review of weights for [DATE] was documented 3 times.
Record review of Resident #39's consolidated physician's orders dated [DATE] revealed an order for Consistent Carbohydrate diet regular texture, thin consistency related to diabetes II underlying condition of chronic kidney disease and House Supplement two times a day give 120 ml twice a day for weight loss.
Record review of Resident #39's MAR for [DATE] revealed she was not administered House supplement 5 times by MA M.
Record review of Resident #39's Significant change MDS dated [DATE] revealed she was cognitively severely impaired, diagnoses of nutritional deficiencies, her weight was 117, was on a therapeutic diet.
Record review of Resident #39's Dietitian Summary for [DATE] was documented Resident #39 had house supplement of 120 ml, now would increase 1 to 80 ml for weight loss.
Record review of Resident #39's kitchen diet cart from DM had no mention of a supplement.
Interview on [DATE] at 9:50 AM with cook T stated they do run out of supplies at times and report to the DM.
Observation on [DATE] at 11:35 AM with Resident #39 observed her lunch tray did not have a supplement on it.
Interview on [DATE] at 12:45 PM with Dietary Aide AX stated they have run out of supplements in past, and nurses give something else.
Interview on [DATE] at 2:15 PM with MA M confirmed she did not administer Resident #39's house supplement the 5 times due to no supply. MA M stated she would report this to the charge nurse on duty that day.
Interview on [DATE] at 2:29 PM with ADON stated the charge nurse did not bring it to his attention and was not aware that the MA did not have the supply to administer the supplements. The ADON sated he did not see any notes from charge nurses concerning Resident #39 not administering her supplement. The ADON stated the process would be that the MA report to charge nurse, the charge nurse documents on resident chart and notifies the ADON.
Interview on [DATE] at 3:06 PM with Administrator stated he was not aware not having med pass/supplement supplies, the DM Q does come to morning meetings at times.
Interview on [DATE] at 3:19 PM with DON stated she was not aware of Resident #39 was not receiving med pass/House Shake for weight loss interventions.
Interview on [DATE] at 3:21 PM with DM Q stated the kitchen orders the house shakes and the magic cups and Central supply orders the med pass.
Interview on [DATE] at 3:30 PM with CTS stated no staff told her she was out of med pass, and when they did, she ordered, so they have some now. Central Supply stated she did not notify the DON or the Administrator
Interview on [DATE] at 5:00 PM with the Dietician stated she was aware of some weight loss in the facility and documented notes. The Dietitian stated she was made aware of by nursing department that the supplies were not administered and had some interventions in place, such as, med pass and house shake supplements. The Dietitian stated there had been some supply chain issues. Interventions for resident weight loss were high call or 2.0 med pass, health shake, calories are there that they need, if continue to lose weight, will add milk shake to lunch and supper. The Dietitian stated for Resident #39 the nursing department had reported no change of condition and was stable at her weight. The Dietician stated the risk to resident would be that the weight loss would be accelerated, the med pass was the first line, 2nd was appetite stimulants. The Dietitian stated she would recommend weekly weights, she would talk to central supply to make sure they have the product.
4. Observations during the building inspection tour on [DATE] at 12:40 PM revealed a section of ceiling approximately 20 feet long was cracked and was separated from another piece of the ceiling. Further observation revealed the ceiling in the Therapy room was sagging and pieces of the gypsum in several areas were starting to peel and crack. During an interview at the time of the observations, the Maintenance Director X stated the ceiling had been like that for a few months. The Maintenance Director X stated he was aware that the ceiling needed to be repaired and that he notified management about the issue because it was unsanitary and could cause illness to spread with residents.
Observation on [DATE] at 2:39 PM revealed a section of ceiling approximately 6 ft. by 6 ft. had signs of water damage and was missing gypsum/ceiling finish exposing the inside of the attic space. In an interview at the time of the observation, the Maintenance Director X stated the ceiling had been like that for 2 months due to an air conditioning leak. The Maintenance Director X stated he was aware that the ceiling needed to be repaired and that he notified management about the issue because it was unsanitary and could cause illness to spread with residents. During an interview at the time of the observation, the Administrator stated the ceiling had been like that for 2 months due to an air conditioning leak. The Administrator said he was waiting on quotes from the contractor and final approval to make the repairs.
A record review of the facility's policy titled, Hazardous Areas, Devices and Equipment, dated [DATE], revealed, policy statement all hazardous areas, devices and equipment in the facility will be identified and addressed appropriately to ensure residents safety and mitigate accident hazards to the extent possible. policy interpretation and implementation: as part of the facilities overall safety and accident prevention program, hazardous areas and objects in the residence environment will be identified and addressed by the safety committee. the safety committee will consist of members from the interdisciplinary team which will include a representative from the clinical, leadership, maintenance, and environmental services team. identification of hazards; a hazard is defined as anything in the environment that has the potential to cause injury or illness. examples of environmental hazards include, but are not limited to the following; equipment and devices that are left unattended or are malfunctioning; devices and equipment that are improperly used or poorly maintained; . open areas or items that should be locked when not in use; . disabled locks, latches, or alarms .
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0919
(Tag F0919)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to be adequately equipped to allow residents to call f...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to be adequately equipped to allow residents to call for staff assistance through a communication system which relays the call directly to a staff member or to a centralized staff work area from each resident's bedside and toilet and bathing facilities, for 1 of 1 facility's reviewed for a functioning call light system for 4 of the facility's 4 halls (Halls A, B, C, and D) reviewed for resident call system, in that:
The facility failed to have a functioning call light system for the census of 69 residents who resided on the facility's 4 halls, Halls A, B, C, and D.
This failure could place residents at risk for injuries or neglect.
The findings included:
During an observation on 11/14/2023 from 10:30 to 11:00 AM revealed the call light system on D Hall was not functioning as designed.
During an observation on 11/14/2023 at 10:10 AM revealed the memory care unit presented with 19 residents (Residents #1, #4, #12, #14, #17, #19, #23, #25, #38, #40, #41, #47, #48, #52, #56, #60, #64, #66, and #67). Further observations revealed the memory care unit had a malfunctioning call light system which would sometimes illuminate a call light without sounds and sometimes would sound and not illuminate.
During an interview on 11/14/2023 at 10:20 AM LVN H and CNA U stated they were the LVN and CNA for the memory care unit which occupied the beginning of the D Hall. LVN H and CNA U stated the call light system had been malfunctioning for weeks. LVN H stated the staff paid attention to the lights and would round on residents frequently. LVN H and CNA U stated the facility DON had knowledge of the malfunctioning call light system.
During an observation and interview on 11/14/2023 at 10:59 AM revealed the call light for Residents #12 and #40 would illuminate outside of their rooms but not illuminate and or sound at the nurses' station. CNA U stated she would round on residents frequently due to the call light system did not sound and that residents were usually not in their rooms.
During an observation on 11/14/2023 at 3:50 PM revealed room [ROOM NUMBER], call light was pushed and no noise on the outside of room [ROOM NUMBER].
During an observation on 11/14/2023 at 3:58 PM revealed room [ROOM NUMBER], the call light was pushed and no noise on the outside of room [ROOM NUMBER].
During an interview on 11/14/2023 at 4:00 PM with the Maintenance Director X confirmed he pushed the call light device in rooms [ROOM NUMBERS], and no light was on the outside of the rooms with no noise. The Maintenance Director X confirmed Halls C and D hall call lights were not functioning.
During an observation and interview on 11/16/2023 from 9:50 AM through 11:37 AM revealed the call light system of the entire facility had malfunctioned, which included call lights were not audible in some halls and call lights didn't light above residents' rooms or at nurse's station call light panel.
During an interview on 11/16/2023 at 10:15 AM with the Maintenance Director X confirmed Halls A and B hall call lights were pushed and was not audible and not functioning.
During an observation and interview on 11/16/2023 at 10:15 AM, on the B Hall (no residents) Rooms 100, 60, 68, 9, 14, 29, 21 call lights were pushed, but there was no noise. The Maintenance Director X stated staff would walk round the halls and residents were provided small bells to ring for help for Halls B and C.
During an interview on 11/16/2023 at 11:23 AM with the Administrator stated he was aware of the call lights not functioning and was [NAME] to attention after surveyor investigtions.
During an observation on 11/17/2023 at 6:13 AM revealed the call light outside of room [ROOM NUMBER]was illuminated but did not sound any alert. Further observation of the call light alert board at the nurses' station was not illuminated for any room and was silent.
During an observation on 11/17/2023 at 6:28 AM revealed a malfunctioning call light system where the call light panel at the nurse station continuously alarmed. Observation revealed 18 residents, [Resident #19 had been discharged ]; Residents #1, #4, #12, #14, #17, #23, #25, #38, #40, #41, #47, #48, #52, #56, #60, #64, #66, and #67, without staff care and or supervision. Further observation revealed no staff in the memory care unit after a room-to-room search which included a census of each Resident. Continued observation revealed residents ambulating throughout the unit with some residents asleep in their bedrooms.
During an observation on 11/17/2023 at 6:29 AM revealed the nurse call light alert board located at the nurses' station in the memory care unit was continuously sounding and was not illuminating and rooms, further observation revealed no call lights in the memory care unit were illuminated by residents' rooms.
During an interview on 11/18/2023 at 05:10 PM the ADON stated the facility had a malfunctioning call light system and as of 11/16/2023 residents were given small wooded handled bells to use as call light alerts.
During an interview on 11/19/2023 at 1:55 PM Resident #7 stated he used the small call bell to call for help from staff.
During an interview on 11/19/2023 at 1:58 PM Resident #58 stated he was given the bell to ring for staff assistance.
During an interview on 11/19/2023 at 2:00 PM Resident #68 stated he used a small bell to ring for staff to help him.
During an interview on 11/19/2023 at 2:10 PM Resident #54 stated staff gave him a small bell to ring if he needed help from staff.
During an interview on 11/19/2023 at 3:20 PM Resident #11 stated he was given the bell to ring for staff assistance.
During an interview on 11/19/23 3:34 PM with Resident #5 stated he was given the bell to ring for staff assistance.
During an interview on 11/19/2023 at 6:09 PM the Medical Director stated Administrator had reported the facility's call light system had malfunctioned. The Medical Director stated the malfunctioning call light system was a danger for residents to include injurious falls and neglect, and especially to elderly confused residents.
A record review of the facility's policy titled, Call System, Resident, dated September 2022, revealed, Policy Heading: residents are provided with a means to call staff for assistance through a communication system that directly calls a staff member or a centralized workstation. Policy Interpretation and Implementation: each resident is provided with a means to call staff directly for assistance from his or her bed from toileting and or bathing facilities and from the floor. call system communication may be audible or visual . the resident call system remains functional at all times. if audible communication is used, the volume is maintained at an audible level that can be easily heard. if visual communication is used, the lights remain functional . the resident call system is routinely maintained and tested by the maintenance department .
MINOR
(C)
Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact
Deficiency F0577
(Tag F0577)
Minor procedural issue · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain the availability of the most recent survey results for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for rights to survey results in that...
Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain the availability of the most recent survey results for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for rights to survey results in that:
The facility failed to place survey results in a readily accessible location where individuals wishing to examine survey results without having to ask to review them.
This failure could affect residents who reside in the facility and could result in a lack of awareness for visitors, family, and residents regarding the survey results and the plan of correction submitted by the facility.
The findings included:
Observation on 11/14/2023 at 9:15 AM reflected a sign on the wall stating the survey result binder was available for review below. Further observation revealed that there was not a survey binder in the area around the sign where it could be seen.
During confidential interviews on 11/15/2023 at 10:05 AM, residents reported they were not familiar with what the survey inspection results were or where they were located.
Interview and Observation with the Administrator on 11/15/2023 at 12:05 PM revealed he was not sure where the survey binder was but believed it to be in the lobby. The binder was found shortly after behind the receptionist's desk. The Administrator stated he intended to hang it back up on the wall but had not.
Interview on 11/15/2023 at 12:15 PM, the receptionist stated that if a resident wanted to see the book, they would need to ask. She stated that this was because the binder had been stolen in the past, and residents were not able to get to the survey results binder behind her desk.
Record review of policy, Survey results, Examination of dated April 2007 revealed 2. A copy of the most recent standard survey, including and subsequent extended surveys, follow up revisit's reports, etc., along with state approved plans of correction of noted deficiencies, is maintained in a 3-ring binder located in an area frequent by most residents, such as the main lobby or resident activity room.