Stonehenge of Orem

435 West Center Street, Orem, UT 84057 (801) 850-5454
For profit - Limited Liability company 34 Beds STONEHENGE OF UTAH Data: November 2025
Trust Grade
95/100
#22 of 97 in UT
Last Inspection: March 2024

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

Stonehenge of Orem has received a Trust Grade of A+, indicating it is an elite facility and among the best available options. It ranks #22 out of 97 nursing homes in Utah, placing it in the top half, and #4 out of 13 in Utah County, which means only three local facilities are rated higher. The facility is new and has not shown any trends over time yet, as this is its first inspection. Staffing is a strength here, with a rating of 4 out of 5 stars and a turnover rate of 24%, significantly lower than the state average of 51%. There have been no fines, which is a positive sign of compliance. However, there was one concern noted during the inspection regarding the management of pharmaceutical services, specifically that the facility lacked a proper process for disposing of unused narcotics, which could pose a risk to residents. Overall, while Stonehenge of Orem has many strengths, it is important for families to be aware of this concern regarding medication management.

Trust Score
A+
95/100
In Utah
#22/97
Top 22%
Safety Record
Low Risk
No red flags
Inspections
Too New
0 → 1 violations
Staff Stability
✓ Good
24% annual turnover. Excellent stability, 24 points below Utah's 48% average. Staff who stay learn residents' needs.
Penalties
✓ Good
No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Utah facilities.
Skilled Nurses
✓ Good
Each resident gets 78 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than 97% of Utah nursing homes. RNs are the most trained staff who catch health problems before they become serious.
Violations
✓ Good
Only 1 deficiencies on record. Cleaner than most facilities. Minor issues only.
★★★★★
5.0
Overall Rating
★★★★☆
4.0
Staff Levels
★★★★★
5.0
Care Quality
★★★★★
5.0
Inspection Score
Stable
: 0 issues
2024: 1 issues

The Good

  • 4-Star Staffing Rating · Above-average nurse staffing levels
  • 5-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
  • Low Staff Turnover (24%) · Staff stability means consistent care
  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record
  • Staff turnover is low (24%)

    24 points below Utah average of 48%

Facility shows strength in staffing levels, quality measures, staff retention, fire safety.

The Bad

Chain: STONEHENGE OF UTAH

Part of a multi-facility chain

Ask about local staffing decisions and management

The Ugly 1 deficiencies on record

Mar 2024 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Pharmacy Services (Tag F0755)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined that the facility did not provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispe...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined that the facility did not provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident. Specifically, the facility did not have a process in place to destroy narcotics when not administered to the residents. Resident identifiers: 129 and 130. Findings included: On 3/13/24 at 8:30 AM, an observation was made of the facility medication cart located on the South hallway with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 1. The following medications were observed inside: a. A multi dose medication card which held Oxycodone 5 mg (milligram) had the back of pocket number 23 was opened with tape now closing it, there was no medications observed in the pocket. The bottom of the narcotic card, under the waste section, had a note written by a staff member that documented, the Oxycodone had been taped closed back into pocket number 23 after the resident refused it. b. A multi dose medication card which held Hydrocodone - APAP (Acetaminophen) 5-325 mg had the back of pocket number 2 was opened with tape now closing it, there was no medication observed in the pocket. No information was documented under the waste section of the form to explain what happened to the narcotic. c. A multi dose medication card which held Oxycodone 10 mg had the back of pocket number 25 was opened with tape now closing it, there was no medication observed in the pocket. No information was documented under the waste section of the form to explain what happened to the narcotic. On 3/13/24 at 8:30 AM, an interview was conducted with LPN 1. LPN 1 stated when a narcotic needed to be discarded it was done by two nursing staff, if available. And the narcotic was put in the sharps container. If two staff were not available LPN 1 stated they had been told that it was okay to tape the narcotic back in the the medication card for future use. LPN 1 stated the staff would circle the number on the narcotic sheet of the pill that was taped back in. LPN 1 stated the medication would then be used when the resident needed that medication again. LPN 1 stated she was unsure how future staff would know if the correct medication had been placed back into the medication card or if the medication was kept clean by the previous nurse. LPN 1 stated she was unsure what the correct process was. On 3/13/24 at 9:00 AM, an interview was conducted with Registered Nurse (RN) 1. RN 1 stated two nurses would dispose of a narcotic and sign it out in the narcotic book. RN 1 stated she did not know what to do if there was only one nurse on duty and a narcotic needed to be wasted. RN 1 stated, you would need to keep it right, and put it back in? RN 1 then stated she just did not know because she had not been faced with that or been told what to do in that situation. On 3/13/24 at 10:16 AM, an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON). The DON stated the staff were expected to sign out a narcotic when they get it from the cart. The DON stated when the nurses waste a narcotic they were supposed to waste it with another nurse, if another nurse is not available then the nurse could place the narcotic in a cup and save it to waste when the next nurse came on shift. The DON stated a wasted medication would be one that was dropped, the nurse popped out the wrong medication, or refused by the resident. The DON stated it would be a nursing judgement call whether the medication needed to be discarded. The DON stated she was unsure if the facility had a procedure for disposing of medications. The DON stated the medications could be taped back into the medication card and used again. The DON stated the nurses would have to trust the previous nurse who put the medication in the card that it was the correct medication and that is was kept clean. The DON stated the nurses were not expected to write anything on the narcotic sheet under the waste section if they taped it back into the card, only if they wasted the medication.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • Grade A+ (95/100). Above average facility, better than most options in Utah.
  • • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
  • • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Utah facilities.
  • • Only 1 deficiencies on record. Cleaner than most facilities. Minor issues only.
Concerns
  • • No significant concerns identified. This facility shows no red flags across CMS ratings, staff turnover, or federal penalties.
Bottom line: Generally positive indicators. Standard due diligence and a personal visit recommended.

About This Facility

What is Stonehenge Of Orem's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns Stonehenge of Orem an overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars, which is considered much above average nationally. Within Utah, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.

How is Stonehenge Of Orem Staffed?

CMS rates Stonehenge of Orem's staffing level at 4 out of 5 stars, which is above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 24%, compared to the Utah average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.

What Have Inspectors Found at Stonehenge Of Orem?

State health inspectors documented 1 deficiencies at Stonehenge of Orem during 2024. These included: 1 with potential for harm.

Who Owns and Operates Stonehenge Of Orem?

Stonehenge of Orem is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by STONEHENGE OF UTAH, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 34 certified beds and approximately 24 residents (about 71% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in Orem, Utah.

How Does Stonehenge Of Orem Compare to Other Utah Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Utah, Stonehenge of Orem's overall rating (5 stars) is above the state average of 3.4, staff turnover (24%) is significantly lower than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (5 stars) is much above the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Stonehenge Of Orem?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"

Is Stonehenge Of Orem Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, Stonehenge of Orem has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 5-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Utah. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.

Do Nurses at Stonehenge Of Orem Stick Around?

Staff at Stonehenge of Orem tend to stick around. With a turnover rate of 24%, the facility is 21 percentage points below the Utah average of 46%. Low turnover is a positive sign. It means caregivers have time to learn each resident's needs, medications, and personal preferences. Consistent staff also notice subtle changes in a resident's condition more quickly.

Was Stonehenge Of Orem Ever Fined?

Stonehenge of Orem has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.

Is Stonehenge Of Orem on Any Federal Watch List?

Stonehenge of Orem is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.