Complete Care at Care Age

1755 N. Barker Rd., Brookfield, WI 53045 (262) 821-3939
For profit - Corporation 110 Beds Independent Data: November 2025 1 Immediate Jeopardy citation
Trust Grade
16/100
#198 of 321 in WI
Last Inspection: June 2025

Inspected within the last 6 months. Data reflects current conditions.

Overview

Complete Care at Care Age in Brookfield, Wisconsin has received a Trust Grade of F, indicating significant concerns about the quality of care provided. Ranking #198 out of 321 facilities in Wisconsin places it in the bottom half, and at #7 out of 17 in Waukesha County, only one local option is better. The facility's performance has worsened recently, with the number of serious issues increasing from 9 in 2024 to 14 in 2025. Staffing is considered a strength, rated 4 out of 5 stars, but a turnover rate of 51% is average, suggesting some instability among staff. However, there have been concerning incidents, including a critical failure that led to a resident suffering a hip fracture due to improper transfer procedures, and another serious incident where a resident did not receive necessary skin monitoring, indicating a risk of neglect.

Trust Score
F
16/100
In Wisconsin
#198/321
Bottom 39%
Safety Record
High Risk
Review needed
Inspections
Getting Worse
9 → 14 violations
Staff Stability
⚠ Watch
51% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
Penalties
○ Average
$9,750 in fines. Higher than 55% of Wisconsin facilities. Some compliance issues.
Skilled Nurses
✓ Good
Each resident gets 45 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than average for Wisconsin. RNs are trained to catch health problems early.
Violations
⚠ Watch
31 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
★★☆☆☆
2.0
Overall Rating
★★★★☆
4.0
Staff Levels
★★☆☆☆
2.0
Care Quality
★★☆☆☆
2.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2024: 9 issues
2025: 14 issues

The Good

  • 4-Star Staffing Rating · Above-average nurse staffing levels
  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record

Facility shows strength in staffing levels, fire safety.

The Bad

2-Star Overall Rating

Below Wisconsin average (3.0)

Below average - review inspection findings carefully

Staff Turnover: 51%

Near Wisconsin avg (46%)

Higher turnover may affect care consistency

Federal Fines: $9,750

Below median ($33,413)

Minor penalties assessed

The Ugly 31 deficiencies on record

1 life-threatening 4 actual harm
Jun 2025 11 deficiencies 1 IJ
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure each resident receives the necessary care and services in acco...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure each resident receives the necessary care and services in accordance with professional standards of practice (N6, Wisconsin Nurse Practice Act) after experiencing a change of condition for 1 of 11 residents reviewed (R20). R20 had an unintended sudden change of plane while being transferred by a sit to stand lift by a lone Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA). While in the lift sling, the lift's battery died, and resident ended up in a squatting position with her buttocks touching the foot pads of the lift. This sudden change of plane resulted in a hip fracture. Staff did not follow R20's plan of care which included using 2 staff for transfers with a sit to stand lift, and staff moved resident twice without a Registered Nurse (RN) assessment after the change of plane. The facility failed to report R20 having a change of plane to the oncoming shift, failed to give details regarding R20's incident to R20's provider delaying medical treatment, failed to complete a thorough assessment including vital signs at the time of the incident, failed to provide continued monitoring with change in condition including completion of a thorough RN assessment when R20 reported 8 out of 10 pain and 9 out of 10 pain, failed to complete an RN assessment when CNA K reported changes to the appearance of R20's leg and that something was wrong, and failed to document known changes in condition in R20's medical record, including internal rotation of lower right extremity. The facility's failure to ensure each resident received the necessary care and services in accordance with professional standards of practice after experiencing a change of condition led to a finding of immediate jeopardy that began on [DATE]. Surveyor notified NHA A (Nursing Home Administrator) and DON B (Director of Nursing) of the immediate jeopardy on [DATE] at 11:35 AM. The immediate jeopardy was removed on [DATE]; however, the deficient practice continues at a severity/scope of D (potential for no more than minimal harm/isolated) as the facility continues to implement its action plan. Evidenced by: Facility policy, titled Notification of Changes, implemented [DATE], includes: The purpose of this policy is to ensure the facility promptly informs resident, consults with the resident's physician, and notifies, consistent with his or her authority, the resident's representative when there is a change requiring notification . Definitions . Need to alter treatment significantly means a need to stop a form of treatment because of adverse consequences (such as adverse drug reaction), or commence a new form of treatment to deal with a problem; for example the use of any medical procedure, or therapy that has not been used on that resident before . Clinical complications: examples- development of stage 2 pressure injury, recurrent episodes of delirium, recurrent UTIs or onset of depression . Guidelines: The facility must inform the resident, consult with the resident's physician and/or notify the resident's family member or legal representative when there is a change requiring such notification. Accidents- Resulting in injury. Potential to require physician intervention. Significant change in the resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial condition such as deterioration. This may include: Life threatening conditions, or Clinical complications. Circumstances that require a need to alter treatment. This may include: New treatment. Discontinuation of current treatment due to: adverse consequences, acute condition, exacerbation of a chronic condition . An article from the Nation Library of Medicine, titled, Risk Factors for Preoperative Deep Venous Thrombosis in hip fracture patients: a meta-analysis, by J Orthop Traumatol. 2022, includes: . Hip fracture (HF), including intertrochanteric fracture, femur neck fracture, and subtrochanteric fracture, as one of the most geriatric fractures associated with osteoporosis, is expected to affect about 6 million people by the year 2050 worldwide. Previous studies have demonstrated a close relationship between geriatric hip fractures and perioperative morbidity and mortality at 1 year. The treatment of geriatric hip fracture patients is a great challenge due to multiple medical comorbidities and serious perioperative complications. Obtaining stable reduction and fixation to permit early mobilization is critical to decreasing the development of perioperative complications. Early surgery is thought to be the best option for HF patients to reduce the risk of perioperative complications and death . Preoperative DVT, which affects 8-34.9% of hip fracture patients and may be as high as 62% in those with delayed operations, plays a critical role in HF patients' preoperative waiting time. [NAME] reported that delayed surgery, hypoproteinemia, three or more comorbidities, and a d-dimer level?>?1.59 mg/l were predictors of preoperative DVT . Preoperative DVT is one of the most common complications after hip fractures because of immobilization and medical problems of patients. Early prevention of preoperative DVT was beneficial in shortening the time from injury to surgery and lowering the incidence of postoperative complications. Medical problems and prolonged time from injury to admission have recently been linked to an increased risk of preoperative DVT . Patients over the age of 90 had a significantly higher rate of preoperative DVT than any other age group, which was linked to a prothrombotic state and decreased vascular function due to aging . In the present study, the mean time from injury to admission and surgery was significantly longer in the DVT group than in the non-DVT group. Three possible reasons may explain this. First, prolonged immobilization could result in venous congestion; second, vascular injury caused by fracture activated the coagulation system; third, the fracture was frequently coupled with dominant and hidden blood loss, especially hidden blood loss for intertrochanteric fractures. Therefore, earlier admission was necessary for intertrochanteric fractures . According to the Wisconsin Nurse Practice Act, N6.03(1), An R.N. (Registered Nurse) shall utilize the nursing process in the execution of general nursing procedures in the maintenance of health, prevention of illness or care of the ill. The nursing process consists of the steps of assessment, planning, intervention, and evaluation. This standard is met through performance of each of the following steps of the nursing process: (a) Assessment. Assessment is the systematic and continual collection and analysis of data about the health status of a patient culminating in the formulation of a nursing diagnosis. (b) Planning. Planning is developing a nursing plan of care for a patient which includes goals and priorities derived from the nursing diagnosis. (c) Intervention. Intervention is the nursing action to implement the plan of care by directly administering care or by directing and supervising nursing acts delegated to L.P.N.s (Licensed Practical Nurse) or less skilled assistants. (d) Evaluation. Evaluation is the determination of a patient's progress or lack of progress toward goal achievement which may lead to modification of the nursing diagnosis. R20 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses include rheumatoid arthritis, atrial fibrillation, atherosclerotic heart disease, joint disorder, history of falling, weakness, hypertension, sensorineural hearing loss bilaterally, pulmonary hypertension, and age-related osteoporosis. R20's Minimum Data Set (MDS), with Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of [DATE], indicates R20 was cognitively intact with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 out of 15. R20's Comprehensive Care Plan, initiated on [DATE], indicates R20 required assistance of 1 for the following: dressing, bathing, bed mobility, and assist of 2 with sit to stand lift for transfers and needs one staff member to propel her in the wheelchair for long distances. R20's Comprehensive Care Plan indicates R20's medications are administered by the nurse. Facility Self Report, dated [DATE], includes: Investigation Summary: . On [DATE], R20 put on her call light because she wanted to be toileted. The assigned CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) . was in the lunchroom, and CNA L was covering the floor. CNA L transferred R20 with sit to stand lift and took her to the toilet. Shortly thereafter, R20 put on the call light to get off the toilet and go back to bed. CNA L once again used the sit to stand lift without assistance of another staff member and upon raising her up the battery died. R20 was complaining that under her arms (where sling was) was hurting her, so CNA L used the emergency button to lower the lift arm. Apparently, that did not lower initially so CNA L tried to start pushing lift toward R20's bed and after going from the tile bathroom floor to the carpeted bedroom, the lift started to lower with resident still in sling. As the lift arm lowered the resident ended up in a squatting position with her buttocks touching the foot pad of the lift. CNA L decided to try to help the resident by pushing her buttocks and got her high enough to sit in her wheelchair. Shortly after that, CNA M arrived at the unit. CNA L told her she needed help with the transfer from the wheelchair to the bed. After the resident was settled, CNA L told the nurse that the resident was complaining of pain in her leg and that during the transfer with the sit to stand the battery died. She did not mention that this transfer was completed by only herself. LPN G (Licensed Practical Nurse) asked CNA L to write a statement and then she was going to see the resident. CNA L wrote an initial statement on [DATE] that was left for the nurse and not read until after end of day shift. CNA L statement left at nurse station, includes: [DATE] While transfer with the sit to stand. The sit to stand went dead in mid-air. She complained about her arms hurts [sic] so did the force thing to force the sit stand while that was going. [sic] It end sitting her down on the floor. I held her back with my legs so she wouldn't fall back. With her help I was able to get her back in her chair. Then a new sit to stand was used to get her in bed. Nurse was told. Statement was wrote [sic]. UM/RN Q (Unit Manager/Registered Nurse) statement, dated [DATE], includes: R20 had complained of right knee pain after being in the sit to stand. Resident was assessed in bed. Pain to right knee was stated at a 4 out of 10. Floor nurse gave scheduled Tylenol for pain. Resident's right knee was parallel to left knee. Right leg did not have internal rotation when assessed. CNA L second statement, dated [DATE], includes: I answered R20's call light. She was in the bathroom, [sic] as I am lift her up with sit to stand, she complains of pain in her arm pits as I go to lower her the machine died in mid-air, so I press the release button so it can be lower. [sic] wasn't aware that it was going so I tried to get her to her bed as quick as possible but on the way, she had been lower to the ground, so I made sure she didn't hit head and made sure she was sitting upright. With her help, I was able to get her off the floor into her wheelchair, then I use a charged sit to stand to put her in her bed. (Handwritten on the interview is a statement that states per interview did a squat on lift and was able to push up enough to get into wheelchair.) DON B (Director of Nursing) statement, dated [DATE], includes: On [DATE] at around 2:30 PM LPN G reported to me that R20 said she had an issue with an earlier transfer in the sit to stand lift and that her leg was sore. I instructed her to get Unit Manager/RN Q and look at R20 and prepare an incident report. LPN G did complete incident report as other incident. On [DATE] R20 was seen by Nurse Practitioner (NP O and NP P) and she noted there was a leg discrepancy and ordered an x-ray. R20 also had denied any fall at that time and told NP O that she thought it was from being up in the sit to stand too long. I was made aware of the possible change just around 9:00 AM. CNA L was in the facility with a resident . completing one-on-one observation. Around 10:30 AM, I interviewed CNA L and had her complete a new written statement. During that interview I found out that the sit to stand transfer was not completed per policy initially and that only CNA L was in the room. CNA L witnessed the issue with the lift and resident. I felt at that point that the potential injury could be the result of a witnessed fall due to change of plane for the resident. I then went into risk management and changed the reason for the incident report from other to witnessed fall and completed the corresponding assessments for the incident. At about 1:00 PM, the X-ray did reveal a fracture of the right hip, and the resident was being transferred to the emergency room for evaluation. The incident was then reported to the state as an injury of unknown origin because I could not definitively determine cause and investigation was initiated. Facility 24 Hour Communication Board, dated [DATE], includes: R20- Day shift- right knee pain, up long in sit to stand, complained of right knee/leg pain . PM shift- extra strength Tylenol as needed given for 9 out of 10 pain, new order for Flexeril 10mg (milligrams) 1 dose . (It is important to note there is no mention of R20 sitting down on the floor during a sit to stand transfer.) R20 Nurse Notes, Medication Administration Record (MAR), and text messages exchanges with R20's provider include: Nurse Note, Late entry added on [DATE] for [DATE] at 2:00 PM . Writer was notified by LPN G that resident had complaints of pain to her right knee after being in the sit to stand too long. Writer assessed the resident. Right knee appeared equal to left knee. No rotation, redness, or swelling noted. Resident stated she has arthritis in that knee and has pain from time to time. Had pain 4 out of 10 at that time. (It is important to note this is the documentation in R20's medical record of an assessment being completed, but this note was not added to R20's medical record until [DATE], 9 days later. It is also important to note there is no evidence in R20's medical record of vital signs being gathered, including heart rate, blood pressure, or respirations per minute.) Text message, date and time unknown, from facility to provider, includes: resident complained of knee and leg pain after being in sit to stand too long. No injury noted. Will continue to monitor for pain and update with any changes. (It is important to note the facility did not report R20's change of plane, fall, or sudden drop from lift to R20's medical doctor.) Text message dated [DATE] at 2:59 PM, from provider to facility, includes: noted no new orders. Thank you. MAR Note dated [DATE] at 7:33 PM Tylenol Extra Strength Tablet 500 MG. Give 1000 mg by mouth as needed for pain every evening. Text message dated [DATE] at 8:04 PM, from facility to provider, included: R20 is now complaining of 9 out of 10 pain with movement. I did give her as needed Tylenol. Nurse Note, [DATE] at 8:06 PM: Resident is rating hip pain a 9 out of 10, no swelling or discoloration to hip, Pain is with movement. Message sent . to on call Nurse Practitioner. As needed Tylenol given to resident. Will monitor. (It is important to note there is no evidence in R20's medical record of an RN assessment being completed with this new onset of 9 out of 10 pain.) Text message, dated [DATE] at 8:07 PM, from provider to facility, includes: Is there any visible change? (It is important to note R20's medical provider still is unaware of R20's change of plane or that a transfer ended sitting her on the floor.) Text message dated [DATE] at 8:09 PM, from facility to provider, includes: No swelling or skin discoloration but she said it hurt during cares with movement. (It is important to note R20's medical record did not contain evidence of a thorough RN assessment being performed. The above data of no swelling and no discoloration was gathered by an LPN.) Text message, dated [DATE] at 8:10 PM, from provider to facility, includes: It was just from being in the sit to stand? Text message, dated [DATE] at 8:13 PM, from facility to provider, includes: Are you able to see the incident report in point click care? Text message dated [DATE] at 8:16 PM, from facility to provider, includes: Apparently she was in the sit to stand for a while according to her and now is having the right hip pain. She says it feels like she pulled a muscle. MAR Note dated [DATE] at 8:30 PM, includes: Tylenol Extra Strength Tablet 500 MG. Give 1000 mg by mouth as needed for pain every evening. Administration was ineffective . Follow up pain scale: 8. Text message, dated [DATE] at 8:35 PM, from facility to provider, includes: any new orders? Text message dated [DATE] at 8:41 PM, from facility to provider, includes: She now rates the hip pain 8 out of 10, this is one hour after taking the extra strength Tylenol. Text message dated [DATE] at 8:49 PM, from provider to facility, includes: We can try a one time dose of Flexeril 10 milligrams to see if it helps. Text message dated [DATE] at 9:15 PM, from facility to provider, includes: Thank you. Noted. Will continue to monitor for pain and update with any changes. Nurse Note dated [DATE] at 9:29 PM, includes: Physician Assistant from . aware and new order for one time dose of Flexeril 10mg muscle relaxer. Resident aware. Will monitor. Nurse Note, [DATE] at 10:13 PM, includes: One time dose of Flexeril given and effective. Resident reports less pain to right hip, 2 out of 10. Facility 24 Hour Communication Board, dated [DATE], includes: Night Shift- R20- complained of pain to right knee/leg . Day Shift- New order stat x-ray related to right hip, right knee, Flexeril 5mg as needed three times a day for pain . Advanced Practice Nurse Practitioner (APNP) Note, dated [DATE] at 10:30 AM, includes: Chief complaint- right knee and leg pain . Patient was an acute add on today presenting today with right knee and leg pain after being transferred via sit to stand overnight last night per RN report . vital signs- [DATE]: blood pressure- 122/64, oxygen saturation- 96%, pain- 0, temperature- 97.6 degrees, respirations-18, heart rate 74, weight 140 . vitals [DATE] blood pressure- 110/62, oxygen saturation- 95%, pain-0, temperature 97.3 degrees, respirations-17, heart rate- 65 . vitals [DATE] pain 8 . vitals [DATE] pain-0 .Muscoskeletal- no joint tenderness or deformity. Right lower extremity with minimal range of motion. Unable to flex, extend, abduct, adduct, or externally rotate hip without extreme pain. Right lower extremity internally rotated while resting in bed and unable to straighten. Pedal pulses plus 2 bilaterally, warm to touch, and sensation intact. No bruising or swelling noted. (It is important to note the incident took place on [DATE] between 1:00 PM and 2:30 PM according to the resident's statement, CNA L's statement, CNA M's statement, LPN G's statement, and UM/RN Q's statement and this APNP's note reflects the most recent vitals recorded in R20's medical record. These vitals are from [DATE] and [DATE]. The facility did not record R20's blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, or temperature on [DATE] or after the change in condition was noted.) R20's Radiology Report, dated [DATE] at 12:25 PM, includes: . Hip . Right . Results: Intertrochanteric right femoral fracture with mild angulation. Mild soft tissue swelling . Conclusion: Acute Intertrochanteric right femoral fracture as noted . Knee . Right . No acute fracture or dislocation. The osseous structures appear intact. Modest joint space narrowing. Soft tissues are unremarkable. Conclusion: No acute osseous findings. Recommend a repeat multi-view imaging in 1 week or sooner if clinically warranted especially if symptoms continue or persist or progress. R20's SBAR Communication Form, dated [DATE], includes: this started on [DATE] . Since it started it has stayed the same. The condition, symptom, sign has occurred before: No . Medication Changes in the last week: Flexeril . Vital Signs: 139/79, Pulse: 81, Respirations: 18, Temperature: 97.8 . Functional Status: No changes observed. Skin Evaluation: not clinically applicable to the change in condition being reported . Pain: New Intensity of pain: 9 . Appearance- Summarize your observations and evaluations: (blank) . Review and Notify: Primary Care Clinician Notified: Yes- date and time: [DATE] at 1:00 PM. Recommendations of Primary Clinicians: Send to emergency room for evaluation and treatment of right hip fracture. Check all that apply: X-ray . Nursing Note for additional information on change in condition: (blank) . Signed by RN/UM Q . R20's Emergency Department Note, dated [DATE], includes: X-ray today shows a broken hip. Given that you are not ambulatory, there is no clear indication for surgery and based on your wishes and discussion with family, it is safe to go back to your facility. You will need care with movement to try to avoid significant displacement of the right leg especially. You should at least take Tylenol, up to 1 gram, every 6 hours, as needed; if you have stronger pain, it is reasonable to try hydrocodone. The medication prescribed for pain today will make you sleepy; . X-ray pelvis AP and hip right final results: Impression: Impacted and displaced intertrochanteric right femur fracture . Reason for exam: fall, deformity . additional relevant history: fall, deformity . Findings: The osseous structures appear demineralized. There is a mildly impacted and displaced fracture of the proximal right femur involving the base of the femoral neck extending into the intertrochanteric region. Increased varus angulation. The femoral head remains normally aligned with the acetabulum. The pelvic ring appears intact. Left hip alignment is normal . On [DATE] at 10:42 AM during a phone interview, CNA M indicated when she entered the room R20 was in her wheelchair and CNA L told her the sit to stand lift malfunctioned and R20 was on the floor. CNA M indicated she did not report this change of plane to the nurse on the floor or to the oncoming shift, because she figured CNA L would report it. CNA M indicated when a resident has a change of plane, is on the floor, or has a sudden fall from a lift she goes to get the nurse immediately and does not move the resident until the nurse is done with an assessment and tells her it is ok to move the resident. CNA M indicated 2 staff are to be present when staff use any mechanical lift per facility policy. On [DATE] at 11:24 AM during interview, LPN G stated, Originally I was told by CNA L that R20 was complaining of pain to her leg and there was an issue with the sit to stand. I had asked her to write a statement. I ended up finding the statement later on. It was very unclear, and I was looking for clarification. LPN G indicated she did not see any changes in R20 when she looked but asked UM/RN Q to assess her. LPN G indicated she did not remember gathering a set of vitals on R20. LPN G stated, I would like to have had more accurate information and more information by the CNA L. She should not have picked R20 up off of the floor. She should have grabbed a nurse. LPN G indicated education was given after the incident to be sure staff are using sit to stand lifts with two staff. LPN G indicated education that was given did not include what to do post fall or reporting accurate information. On [DATE] at 11:47 AM during a phone interview, CNA K indicated he came in on [DATE] at 2:30 PM and in report they said there was an incident with R20 and the sit to stand lift. CNA K stated, During first rounds, I could tell something was wrong with R20. I said to LPN N I think you need to get an x-ray, her leg does not look quite right. The position of her leg was not right. She was laying in the bed. Didn't look normal. CNA K indicated if a resident has a fall, he is to report the fall immediately and he does not move resident until after an RN has completed an assessment. CNA K indicated staff are to have two staff present when running any mechanical lifts in house per facility policy and he received education on this. CNA K indicated the typed summary of his interview in the Facility Self Report does not reflect what he reported to the facility. On [DATE] at 1:54 PM during interview, DON B indicated CNA L reported to LPN G that the lift battery died during transfer and now R20 is complaining of pain. Then CNA L slipped a written statement containing more information on the nurses' desk before exiting the building for the day. LPN G found the statement around 2:30 PM and brought it to DON B. DON B told LPN G to start an incident report, grab UM/RN Q for an assessment, and to report incident and findings to R20's provider. DON B and Surveyor reviewed CNA L's first statement. DON B and Surveyor reviewed contact with R20's provider. DON B indicated the provider was not made aware R20 was sitting on the ground. DON B stated, I was going to get a second statement from her to make sure there was a fall. DON B indicated CNAs are to report falls immediately to the floor nurse and give as many details as possible. Surveyor asked DON B what the process is for witnessed falls and unwitnessed falls. DON B indicated the process is for an RN to complete an assessment and notify the resident's provider. DON B indicated a thorough assessment contains a full set of vitals, a description of the affected area including any deformities, any discoloration, any changes in temperature, any shortening, or any rotation. DON B indicated she does not see any vitals recorded for [DATE] in R20's medical record. DON B indicated a fall is an unintended change of plane. DON B indicated staff are to have two staff present for all mechanical lift transfers per facility policy and CNA L transferred R20 two times alone, once to the toilet and once out of the bathroom. DON B indicated LPN N called her on [DATE] around 8:15 PM to let her know R20 was experiencing 9 out of 10 pain. DON B indicated she planned to assess R20 when she came in on [DATE] in the morning. Surveyor asked DON B if she would be willing to do an enactment of a staff member using the mechanical lift. DON B indicated she and Corporate Consultant EE would volunteer to demonstrate how to activate the emergency button so Surveyor could see how long it takes to lower a resident completely using the emergency button. (It is important to note R20's medical record does not contain a thorough assessment by DON B.) On [DATE] at 2:18 PM, Surveyor observed DON B and CNA FF maneuvering the lift while Corporate Consultant EE was seated with the sling in place around her. DON B, CNA FF, and Corporate Consultant EE could not get the emergency button to engage and lower the lift all at once. Surveyor observed a turn button on the hydraulic boom of the shift and when DON B turned that button it would only go one turn at a time. When the button made one full turn, the lift would lower a little bit and stop. Then DON B or CNA FF would turn button another full turn and lift would lower a small amount and stop. Surveyor observed staff were unable to drop the lift in one smooth motion using the red emergency buttons. DON B indicated she did not perform any re-enactments with CNA L or other staff after the incident, but she wished she would have. On [DATE] at 3:36 PM during interview, LPN N stated, When I got here for second shift, I was told R20 was on the sit -to - stand lift too long and now her knee hurts. R20 told me she pulled a muscle. I did look at her before dinner time and gave her a Tylenol at 8:30 PM. She said the pain was in her knee. Her leg goes in a little at baseline. I didn't think too much about it. CNA K thought it was an issue. I wasn't so sure. I had R20 move her leg, and it was her knee that she reported hurt. LPN N indicated R20 reported her pain was 9 out of 10 at one point, but she thought it was a strained muscle. LPN N indicated after Tylenol, R20 rated pain 8 out of 10 so she sent another message to R20's provider and eventually she was given a new order for a muscle relaxer. LPN N indicated she did not report R20 had a change of plane, a sudden drop from the lift, a witnessed fall, or ended up sitting on the ground during a transfer to R20's medical provider. LPN N stated, I was not given correct information in report. I would have monitored her differently through my shift if I knew she fell. CNA K and I looked at her leg and it was turned in a little. I thought that was normal. LPN N indicated her and CNA K thought an x-ray would have been ordered. LPN N indicated she did not remember gathering vitals and did not record information about R20's leg being internally rotated in R20's medical record. LPN N indicated she called DON B to report the resident's pain levels 9 out of 10 and 8 out of 10 and DON B indicated she would be in to look at her in the morning. On [DATE] at 3:46 PM, CNA K was interviewed in person this time and stated, I noticed before I did any cares on her (R20) that something was wrong. Her foot did not sit correctly. It was rotated in. I thought there was swelling above her knee. CNA K demonstrated for Surveyor by pointing the toes of his right foot towards his left foot. CNA K stated, I told the nurse. She contacted the doctor, and I was surprised she (the doctor) did not order an x-ray. I reported the pain and the leg to LPN N. I don't know what LPN N reported to the doctor. Surveyor and CNA K reviewed the facility's summary of CNA K's interview of the incident. CNA K indicated the typed statement from the Facility Self Report does not reflect the interview he gave to the facility. CNA K indicated again he knew something was wrong before he performed any cares with R20 and he was unsure if he should even move R20. On [DATE] at 4:33 PM, NP P (Nurse Practitioner) and Surveyor reviewed communication between the facility and the clinic. NP P indicated the clinic was not made aware that R20 had a change of plane, ended up sitting on the ground during a transfer with a mechanical lift, or was dropped suddenly from the lift. NP P stated, If I knew there was a fall I would have probably ordered x-ray then and there, on [DATE] at 8:04 PM. NP P indicated she was present in the facility on [DATE] in the morning and she did the exam in R20's appointment with NP O. NP P stated, R20 had severe bony tenderness and her foot looked like it had inward rotation. I could barely touch her. She was unable to flex, extend, abduct, or adduct. We did not know of a fall. X-ray was ordered stat because when I saw her it was internally rotated, and she was in so much pain. On [DATE] at 7:46 AM during interview, RN/UM Q (Registered Nurse/Unit Manager) indicated she never saw CNA L's first written statement and what she was told was the lift's battery died and the lift dropped her suddenly. RN/UM Q stated CNA L did not know how to activate the emergency button. CNA L pushed it and it didn't work. Then it did. CNA L tried to move R20 in the lift quickly so she wouldn't be on the floor. I did not see the note. I was told about it. Surveyor asked what the definition of fall is. RN/OM Q indicated a fall is a change of plane. Surveyor asked if dropped her suddenly was a fall? RN/UM stated, I don't know if it was a fall. RN/UM Q indicated she does not remember taking a set of vitals on R20 and if she did it would be recorded in R20's medical record. UM/RN Q indicated she did not report R20 had a fall to R20's provider. Surveyor asked, Are aides observed using lifts before they are using them with residents and does the facility perform competency checks? RN/UM Q stated, No they are not part of a skills checklist before they start. That is a good idea. UM/RN Q stated, She (CNA L)
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Pressure Ulcer Prevention (Tag F0686)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Example 2 R35 was admitted to the facility 4/24/23 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, the following: Dementia (a grou...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Example 2 R35 was admitted to the facility 4/24/23 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, the following: Dementia (a group of thinking and social symptoms that interferes with daily functioning), diabetes mellitus type 2 (a long-term condition in which the body has trouble controlling blood sugar), abnormal gait (walking different than normal), chronic kidney disease (disease of the kidneys that will eventually lead to kidney failure), and hypertension (high blood pressure). On 4/24/23, the facility's Treatment Administration Record (TAR) documents the following: Monitor feet to ensure skin is intact and free from s/sx (signs/symptoms) of developing skin alterations. Notify MD (Medical Doctor) with any change in skin integrity. Every evening shift for prevention of skin impairment. R35's Braden's are as follows: 4/24/24: 19 (Not At Risk) 7/24/24: 20 (Not at Risk) 10/25/24: 18 (Mild Risk) 11/8/24: 15 (Mild Risk) 1/21/25: 14 (Moderate Risk) 2/13/25: 11 (High Risk) 5/3/25: 16 (Mild Risk) On 7/5/24, the facility's Skin and Wound Evaluation documents R35 developed an In-house acquired Stage II PI (Partial-thickness skin loss with exposed dermis) to her right heel that resolved on 8/20/24. The document notes, area resolved will continue prevalon boot x7 days. On 2/12/25, R35 enrolled in hospice services. R35's Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicates R35 has a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 2 out of 15, indicating she is severely cognitively impaired. Section M (Skin Conditions) indicates R35 is at risk of PI's. R35 has an Activated Power of Attorney for Health Care (APOAHC). R35's comprehensive care plan documents, in part, as follows: (Date Initiated: 5/5/25) The resident has pressure ulcer (injury) right heel r/t (related to) tight shoes, DM (diabetes mellitus), and generalized weakness, on hospice care; also history of similar wound in 7/2024; Goal: Wound will heal within the limits of the disease process. (Target Date: 8/7/25); *Interventions: (Date Initiated: 5/5/25) Bilateral heel boots at all times; (Date Initiated: 5/5/25) *The resident needs monitoring/reminding/assistance to turn/reposition at least every 2-3 hours, more often as needed or requested. R35's comprehensive care plan for Restorative Program, documents, in part, as follows: (Date Initiated 1/20/25; Date Resolved: 5/13/25) Roll left and right: The resident requires supervision or touching assistance to complete task. (Date Initiated: 5/13/25) The resident requires partial/moderate assistance on [sic] 1 staff to complete task R35's Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) Kardex, dated 5/27/25, documents, in part, as follows: *Prevalon boot on right foot AAT (at all times) except for transfers; no shoes; and Alternate Device(s): Offloading boots on bilateral feet when in bed. It is important to note, the comprehensive care plan indicates Bilateral heel boots at all times. On 4/29/25, R35's Physician visit documents, in part, as follows: 30 day compliance visit SKIN- no masses, no rashes, no lesion on exposed skin Unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition: Patient continues on Boost (supplement). Ongoing weight loss noted and not unexpected due to terminal disease. Weight has decreased by 3 pounds in the last week. On 5/3/25 at 11:33 AM, R35's Progress Notes documents as follows: Body check completed after shower. Resident c/o (complained of) pain to right heel when touched. Noted dark purple area to right heel. Skin is intact. Wound care nurse notified and new orders received. Hospice updated, family updated and provider updated. Will continue to monitor. On 5/4/25 at 10:49 AM, R35's Progress Note documents as follows: Heel boot on while in bed. Pressure injury remains to right heel. Skin remains intact. Area dark purple in color. No c/o (complaints of) pain noted at this time. Betadine applied as ordered. Will continue to monitor. On 5/6/25, NP C (Nurse Practitioner) assessed R35 indicating, in part, as follows: Diagnosis that could affect wound healing: diabetes, dementia, history of falls, abnormal gait, Vitamin D deficiency, CKD, HTN Interventions in Place: Offloading measures per facility protocol, nutrition support, topical wound care Physical Examination Right posterior heel (unstageable pressure ulcer) *100% adherent eschar measuring 1 x 1 x UTD (Unstageable Tissue Depth) cm. No fluctuance or drainage noted. Peri wound is intact, no signs of infection. *Status: reoccurrence Plan: Apply betadine daily, leave open to air. Continue use of Prevalon boot whenever in bed Assessment *Unstageable pressure ulcer of right heel Discussed with nurse Medical records reviewed Wound care re-evaluation in 1 week On 5/13/25 at 8:30 AM, NP C documented the following note: Type: Wound Care Follow Up Chief Complaint: wound to right heel Subjective: Patient seen today sitting up in her wheelchair. Subjective is limited due to dementia however appears comfortable. Per staff no recent fever, chills, nausea or vomiting. Diagnosis that could affect wound healing: diabetes, dementia, history of falls, abnormal gait, Vitamin D deficiency, CKD, HTN Interventions in Place: Offloading measures per facility protocol, nutrition support, topical wound care Physical Examination: Right posterior heel (unstageable pressure ulcer) 100% adherent eschar measuring 1 x 1 x UTD (Unstageable Tissue Depth) cm. No fluctuance or drainage noted. Peri wound is intact, no signs of infection. Status: stable Plan: Apply betadine daily, leave open to air. Continue use of Prevalon boot whenever in bed Assessment: *Unstageable pressure ulcer of right heel Discussed with nurse Medical records reviewed Wound care re-evaluation in 1 week On 5/19/25 at 10:05 AM, a Nutrition Note documents as follows: Most recent weight of 98.8# on 5/17 triggered for a significant weight loss 7.5% x 30d. Resident refused breakfast this morning & per nsg spit out meds. Continued weight loss anticipated as overall status declines. Will continue to offer foods as tolerated and follow hospice plan of care. R35 remains on hospice services, gradual weight loss is expected. Resident is triggering for 8# over 30 days. Resident intake varies and receives Boost supplement 3x (three times) daily. Will continue current POC (Plan of Care) . On 5/20/25 at 8:30 AM, NP C documented the following note: Type: Wound Care Follow Up Chief Complaint: wound to right heel Subjective: Patient seen today sitting up in her Broda chair. Subjective is limited due to dementia however appears comfortable. Per staff no recent fever, chills, nausea or vomiting. Diagnosis that could affect wound healing: diabetes, dementia, history of falls, abnormal gait, Vitamin D deficiency, CKD, HTN Interventions in Place: Offloading measures per facility protocol, nutrition support, topical wound care Physical Examination: Right posterior heel (unstageable pressure ulcer) 100% adherent eschar measuring 1 x 1 x UTD (Unstageable Tissue Depth) cm. No fluctuance or drainage noted. Peri wound is intact, no signs of infection. Status: stable Plan: Apply betadine daily, leave open to air. Continue use of Prevalon boot whenever in bed Assessment: *Unstageable pressure ulcer of right heel Discussed with nurse Medical records reviewed Wound care re-evaluation in 1 week 5/27/25 at 8:15 AM, NP C documented the following note: Type: Wound Care Follow Up Chief Complain: wound to right heel Subjective: Patient seen today sitting on the side of bed getting dressed. Subjective is limited due to dementia however appears comfortable. Per staff no recent fever, chills, nausea or vomiting. Diagnosis that could affect wound healing: diabetes, dementia, history of falls, abnormal gait, Vitamin D deficiency, CKD, HTN Interventions in Place: Offloading measures per facility protocol, nutrition support, topical wound care Physical Examination: Right posterior heel (unstageable pressure ulcer) 100% adherent eschar measuring 1 x 1 x UTD (Unstageable Tissue Depth) cm. No fluctuance or drainage noted. Peri wound is intact, no signs of infection. Status: stable Plan: Apply betadine daily, leave open to air. Continue use of Prevalon boot whenever in bed Assessment: *Unstageable pressure ulcer of right heel Discussed with nurse Medical records reviewed Wound care re-evaluation in 1 week On 5/27/25 at 11:39 AM, the facility documents the following note: Skin/Wound Note: Seen by wound team today. Wound on right heel measuring 1.0 x 1.0 x UNS (Unstageable); wound is now a hard eschar cap that the orders read skin prep and offloading; care plan reviewed and remains appropriate On 5/28/25 the facility changed ownership. On 6/1/25 the facility added the following documentation: Turned and repositioned for each shift (AM: 6:30 AM-2:30 PM, PM: 2:30 PM-10:30 PM, NOC: 10:30 PM-6:30 AM) It is important to note, turning and repositioning is not documented for the following dates/shifts: 6/1 AM 6/3 AM and NOC 6/5 NOC 6/6 PM, NOC 6/7 NOC 6/10 NOC 6/11 AM On 6/3/25 at 4:02 PM, the facility documents the following note: Skin/Wound Note: Seen by wound team today for wound on the right heel which is a UNS (Unstageable) pressure injury. The wound measures: 1.0x1.0xUTD (Unstageable Tissue Depth) (Unstageable Tissue Depth) (Unstageable Tissue Depth). The wound base has full eschar with no drainage. The current order is Iodine and OTA (open to air) twice daily with offloading boots on. All orders approved by NP C (Nurse Practitioner). Care plan in place and remains appropriate. On 6/10/25 at 7:45 AM, Surveyor observed R35 up in her broda chair in the dining room wearing gripper socks. Surveyor observed R35 was not wearing prevalon boots. On 6/10/25 at 8:10 AM, Surveyor spoke with LPN Y (Licensed Practical Nurse). Surveyor asked LPN Y, should R35 be wearing Prevalon boots. Surveyor showed LPN Y R35's care plan. LPN Y stated, R35 should have a prevalon boot on her right foot and is not wearing a prevalon boot. LPN Y stated, she will notify CNA HH (Certified Nursing Assistant). On 6/10/25 at 8:20 AM, Surveyor observed NP C measure and assess R35's PI to her right heel. DON B (Director of Nursing) and Unit Manager/RN Q (Unit Manager/Registered Nurse) were also present in R35's room. NP C stated, the PI measures 1.0 cm x 1.0 cm and is the same and stable. Surveyor observed NP C apply betadine to R35's right heel PI. DON B voiced the start date of the PI as 5/3/25. On 6/10/25 at 8:26 AM, Surveyor spoke with NP C (Nurse Practitioner). Surveyor asked NP C, what caused the PI to R35's right heel. NP C stated, not walking at all, has boots on her, previous PI to the same area, and overall health declining. NP C stated, the PI is unavoidable, she's at risk, she sits in broda or bed; NP C stated, I feel it's going to heal but going to be slow. NP C added, she does feel it's absorbing. NP C stated, it's important for R35 to have boots on. NP C added, R35 does not refuse the prevalon boots. NP C stated, she will always recommend prevalon boots first and if a resident refuses prevalon boots she will try a HeelzUp (an offloading device for heels/feet). NP C stated, R35 has not needed a HeelzUp as she is agreeable to wearing the prevalon boots and does not refuse them. Surveyor shared observation of R35 up in the broda chair in the dining room with no prevalon boots on. Surveyor asked NP C, would you expect R35 to be wearing bilateral prevalon boots per her care plan. NP stated, yes, this is important to offload pressure so the PI can heal. 6/10/25 at 12:15 PM, NP C (Nurse Practitioner) documented the following note: Type: Wound Care Follow Up Chief Complain: wound to right heel Diagnosis that could affect wound healing: diabetes, dementia, history of falls, abnormal gait, Vitamin D deficiency, CKD, HTN Interventions in Place: Offloading measures per facility protocol, nutrition support, topical wound care Physical Examination: Right posterior heel (unstageable pressure ulcer) 100% adherent eschar measuring 1 x 1 x UTD (Unstageable Tissue Depth) cm. No fluctuance or drainage noted. Peri wound is intact, no signs of infection. Status: stable Plan: Apply betadine daily, leave open to air. Continue use of Prevalon boot whenever in bed and in Broda chair Assessment: *Unstageable pressure ulcer of right heel Discussed with nurse General wound care instructions: Keep the wound clean and dry, Monitor for signs of infection (increased redness, warmth, swelling, drainage, odor, or pain), Elevate affected extremity when possible. Wound care re-evaluation in 1 week On 6/10/25 at approximately 9:30 AM, Surveyor spoke to DON B (Director of Nursing) Surveyor asked DON B, if the facility has documentation from R35's provider indicating if the PI is avoidable or unavoidable. DON B stated, the facility does not have this documentation and has requested it from NP C (Nurse Practitioner). On 6/10/25 at 8:52 PM, NP C (Nurse Practitioner) appended the 6/10/25 note to include the following: The following unavoidable statement should be included: Patient with multiple comorbidities and multiple risk factors for developing and worsening of pressure injuries. Interventions consistent with individual needs, goals and standards of care have been implemented. Revisions to intervention were made as appropriate. Wound is considered unavoidable and patient is at risk for further worsening or development of additional areas. On 6/10/25 at 1:45 PM, Surveyor spoke with CNA HH (Certified Nursing Assistant). Surveyor asked CNA HH, how long she has worked at the facility. CNA HH stated, she has worked at the facility since January. Surveyor asked CNA HH, how do you know how to care for R35 and other residents. CNA HH stated, there's a CNA Kardex in each resident's bathroom. Surveyor asked CNA HH, what are R35's skin interventions. CNA HH stated, R35 is supposed to have heel boots in bed. Surveyor and CNA HH walked to R35's room and reviewed the CNA Kardex, dated 5/27/25, in R35's bathroom. Surveyor asked CNA HH, should you have put the prevalon boots on R35's bilateral feet when you got her up, dressed, and in her broda chair. CNA HH stated, Yes. Surveyor asked CNA HH, does R35 refuse the prevalon boot. CNA HH stated, No. Surveyor asked CNA HH, how does R35 transfer. CNA HH stated, she used to transfer with the stand lift but she is declining and now uses a Hoyer (full body) lift. On 6/12/25 at 8:25 AM and 11:00 AM, Surveyor spoke with DON B (Director of Nursing). Surveyor asked DON B to tell me about R35's current and previous PI to her right heel. DON B stated, R35 has diabetes, wears shoes and was wearing shoes after the PI healed the first time (in August 2024). DON B stated, R35's family member got what he believed were diabetic shoes. R35 with her dementia preferred the clunky shoes. DON B stated, she believes the clunky shoes were the cause of the previous PI to R35's right heel. DON B stated, R35 was walking at that time and still mobile. DON B stated, R35 has dementia, diabetes, peripheral vascular disease and started to decline. DON B stated, R35 was enrolled in hospice services in February 2025 before the PI re-developed. Surveyor asked DON B, what is the cause of R35's current PI to her right heel. DON B stated, digging her heels into the bed (note, care plan documents it was her same shoes that caused her first PI to her right heel), not on an air mattress, a lot of back pain, she lays on her back in bed with her arms crossed over her chest. Surveyor asked DON B, is R35 on an air mattress. DON B stated, she believes so. DON B stated, she asked hospice to get her an air mattress as the facility's standard mattress is pressure redistribution. DON B provided documentation that the facility's standard mattress is the Medline Advantage Select SE. R35's mattress is a the Medline Advantage Select SE which is indicated up to a Stage III PI (pressure injury). DON B added, sometimes she is at the mercy of hospice. DON B stated, she has paid for air mattresses in the past before the company changed ownership on 5/28/25. Surveyor asked DON B, how soon should a PI be measured and assessed when it's initially discovered. DON B stated, it should be completed upon discovery. Surveyor asked DON B, is it acceptable for the PI to not be measured and assessed for three (3) days. DON B stated, no. DON B stated, she has residents that have healed PI's that are on air mattresses because they need it. Surveyor requested documentation of DON B's request for an air mattress and hospice correspondence. Of note, no further information was provided to Surveyor. Surveyor asked DON B, was R35 on a turning and repositioning schedule prior to the Unstageable PI developing for the second time to R35's right heel. DON B stated, the facility did not document turning and repositioning prior to the development of the PI. DON B stated, the new company does have staff documenting turning and reposition every 2 hours for the shift. Of note, currently staff are not documenting that turning is repositioning is being done every 2 hours, per standard of practice. DON B stated, unfortunately prior to discovery of R35's PI, the facility's was turning and repositioning residents every 2-3 hours. DON B stated, going forward the facility will be turning and repositioning R35 (and other residents) every 1-2 hours. DON B stated, she learned turning and repositioning a resident a resident with a PI should be occurring every 1-2 hours. DON B added, initially NP C (Nurse Practitioner) instructed staff that R35 is to have prevalon boots on while in bed. DON B added, we did change it to at all times. Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure each resident receives necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to prevent pressure injuries (PIs) from developing and/or worsening and promote healing of PIs for 3 of 5 residents (R35, R34, R28) reviewed for PIs out of a sample of 16 residents. R28 and R35 are being cited at Actual Harm/Isolated; R34 is being cited at Potential for Harm/Isolated. R28 admitted with a pressure injury on his coccyx and was identified to be at risk for pressure injury development. R28 had an intervention in place to wear Prevalon boots at all times except for when in therapy. R28 developed an unstageable pressure injury on his left heel. Surveyor observed R28 to be without his Prevalon boots on, was wearing black shoes, and had his heels directly on the mattress. R28's Medication Administration Record/Treatment Administration Record (MAR/TAR) did not contain an order for Prevalon boots. R28's Kardex did not have an intervention for Prevalon boots. Staff interviewed were not aware R28 had orders for Prevalon boots to be worn at all times and did know that he was care planned to have Prevalon boots on at all times except for when working with therapy for standing/walking. R35 had a previous history of a PI to her right heel. On 5/3/25 the facility discovered a Deep Tissue Injury (DTI) to R35's right heel. The facility did not measure or assess the DTI prior to NP C (Nurse Practitioner) assessing the PI on 5/6/25. On 5/6/25, NP C classified the PI as Unstageable measuring 1.0 x 1.0 cm (centimeter) with 100% eschar. The facility did not notify NP C of any changes to the PI. The facility was turning and repositioning R35 every 2-3 hours versus every 1-2 hours. In addition, the facility is not documenting that turning and repositioning is being completed. R35's care plan documents a PI intervention of Bilateral heel boots at all times. Surveyor observed R35 up in her broda chair without bilateral heel boots with R35's heel in direct contact with the broda chair. R34 did not have an assessment of her pressure injury until 5 days after discovering the wound. Evidenced by: The facility policy, Pressure Injury Prevention Guidelines, dated 5/28/25, documents, in part, as follows: To prevent the formation of avoidable pressure injuries and to promote healing of existing pressure injuries, it is the policy of this facility to implement evidence-based interventions for all residents who are assessed at risk or who have a pressure injury present. Support surfaces do not eliminate the need for turning and repositioning. The standard mattress for all facility beds are pressure redistribution mattresses (i.e. high specification reactive foam). Provide alternative support surfaces as needed. Considerations for utilizing specialized support surfaces: .Stage 3,4, unstageable, or deep tissue injury on trunk (lower body) The facility does not have a policy for turning and repositioning. The National Pressure Injury Advisory Panel (NPIAP) classifies a PI as follows: Stage 2 Pressure Injury: Partial-thickness skin loss with exposed dermis Partial-thickness loss of skin with exposed dermis. The wound bed is viable, pink, or red, moist, and may also present as an intact or ruptured serum-filled blister. Adipose (fat) is not visible and deeper tissues are not visible. Granulation tissue, slough and eschar are not present. These injuries commonly result from adverse microclimate and shear in the skin over the pelvis and shear in the heel. This stage should not be used to describe moisture associated skin damage (MASD) including incontinence associated dermatitis (IAD), intertriginous dermatitis (ITD), medical adhesive related skin injury (MARSI), or traumatic wounds (skin tears, burns, abrasions). Deep Tissue Pressure Injury: Persistent non-blanchable deep red, maroon, or purple discoloration Intact or non-intact skin with localized area of persistent non-blanchable deep red, maroon, purple discoloration, or epidermal separation revealing a dark wound bed or blood-filled blister. Pain and temperature change often precede skin color changes. Discoloration may appear differently in darkly pigmented skin. This injury results from intense and/or prolonged pressure and shear forces at the bone-muscle interface. The wound may evolve rapidly to reveal the actual extent of tissue injury or may resolve without tissue loss. If necrotic tissue, subcutaneous tissue, granulation tissue, fascia, muscle, or other underlying structures are visible, this indicates a full thickness pressure injury (Unstageable, Stage 3 or Stage 4). Do not use DTPI to describe vascular, traumatic, neuropathic, or dermatologic conditions. Unstageable: Obscured full-thickness skin and tissue loss full-thickness skin and tissue loss in which the extent of tissue damage within the ulcer cannot be confirmed because it is obscured by slough or eschar. If slough or eschar is removed, a Stage 3 or Stage 4 pressure injury will be revealed. Stable eschar (i.e. dry, adherent, intact without erythema or fluctuance) on the heel or ischemic limb should not be softened or removed. The facility policy, Completing an Accurate Assessment Regarding Pressure Injuries, dated 5/28/25, includes: The purpose of this policy is to assure that all residents receive an accurate assessment of pressure injuries, including risk, presence, appearance, and change of pressure injuries. 1. Accurate assessments addressing each resident's skin status will be conducted by qualified staff and correctly documented in the medical record. 3. A qualified health professional will document the presence, number, stage, and pertinent characteristics of any pressure injury on the wound documentation form in the medical record. The facility policy, Documentation of Wound Treatments, dated 5/28/25, includes: 2. The following elements are documented as part of a complete wound assessment: a. Type of wound (pressure injury, surgical, etc.) and anatomical location b. Stage of the wound, if pressure injury (stage 1, 2, 3, 4, deep tissue pressure injury, unstageable pressure injury) or the degree of skin loss if non-pressure (partial or full thickness) c. Measurements: height, width, depth, undermining, tunneling d. Description of wound characteristics: i. Color of the wound bed ii. Type of tissue in the wound bed . iii. Condition of the peri-wound skin . iv. Presence, amount, and characteristics of wound drainage/exudate v. Presence or absence of odor vi. Presence or absence of pain. Example 1 R28 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: hemiplegia and hemiparesis, chronic atrial fibrillation, type 2 diabetes mellitus, cognitive communication deficit, abnormal gait and mobility, arthropathy, cerebral infarction, and need for assistance with personal cares. R28 admitted with a pressure injury on his coccyx area. R28's Minimum Data Set (MDS) with Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 4/18/25, indicates R28's cognition is moderately impaired with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 out of 15. R28's Comprehensive Care Plan, initiated Includes: The resident has pressure ulcer left heel, and sacrum- closed 5/27/25- related to immobility, prolonged hospitalization, some ascites and lymphedema with history of PVD, revision 6/2/25 . Goal: the resident's pressure ulcer will show signs of healing and remain free from infection through review date of 8/25/25 . Interventions: Heel lift boots on at all times except when working with therapy for standing/walking, revision date 2/26/25 . heel lift boots on at all times except when working with therapy for standing/walking date, initiated 3/11/25, revision 5/29/25 . the resident needs monitoring/reminding/assisting to turn/reposition at least every 2 to 3 hours, more often as needed or requested, initiated 3/11/25, revision 5/29/25 . R28's Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Injuries, dated 3/4/25, indicates R28 is at risk for pressure injury development with a score of 15. R28's Nurse Note, dated 3/10/25, includes: Writer called to room by assigned CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) concerning open area to left heel. Upon entering room resident had bilateral heel boots in place. Small amount of dried blood was seen on bed sheets near foot of bed. Open area observed to left heel and purple discoloration also observed to left heel. Open area to left heel measures 3.0 cm (centimeters) x 1.5 cm x 0.0 cm. Area cleansed and foam dressing applied to area. Heel boot in place. As needed Tylenol given for pain. Skin prep applied to purple discoloration on heel. (It is important to note R28 has a new open area to his left heel.) R28's Wound Care Initial Evaluation, dated 3/11/25, includes: Left posterior heel DTI (deep tissue injury) . Full thickness wound with mix of granular tissue and purple devitalized tissue at the base. Wound measuring 2.0cm x 2.0cm x unable to determine. Moderate serous drainage noted, no purulence or odor noted. Peri wound without redness or warmth to indicate infection . Plan: Cleanse with normal saline or wound cleanser then apply Silver Alginate to the wound base and cover with ABD pad, secure with kerlix. Change 3 times a week and as needed . Pressure ulcer of unspecified site, unstageable . Pressure-induced deep tissue damage of left heel . Discussed with wound care team . Continue aggressive offloading measures . R28's Nurse Practitioner Note, dated 3/12/25, includes: Pressure-induced deep tissue damage of left heel . Deep tissue injury to left posterior heel with mix of granular tissue and purple devitalized tissue at the base, measuring 2.0cm x 2.0cm x unable to determine. Moderate serous drainage noted, no purulence odor. Peri wound without redness or warmth. Evaluated by wound care team yesterday. Continue current wound care protocol and offloading measures. R28's Nurse Note , dated 3/17/25, includes: Pt (patient) has Left heel DTI, boot in place at all times. R28's Wound Care Follow Up Note, date: 3/18/2025, includes: Left posterior heel (deep tissue injury) . Full thickness wound with 80% Eschar and 20% granular tissue at the base. Wound measuring 2.0cm x 2.0cm x unable to determine . Small amount of serous drainage noted, no purulence or odor noted. Peri wound without redness or warmth to indicate infection. Status: improving . Plan: Cleanse with normal saline or wound cleanser, then apply Silver Alginate to the wound base, and cover with ABD pad, secure with kerlix. Change 3 times a week and as needed . Assessment .Pressure ulcer of unspecified site, unstageable . Pressure-induced deep tissue damage of left heel . Deep tissue injury to left posterior heel with mix of granular tissue and purple devitalized tissue at the base, measuring 2.0cm x 2.0cm x unable to determine . Moderate serous drainage noted, no purulence or odor. Peri wound without redness or warmth. Evaluated by wound care team yesterday. Continue current wound care protocol and offloading measures. Discussed with wound care team . Continue aggressive offloading measures . R28's Wound Care Follow Up, dated 3/25/25, includes: . Left posterior heel (deep tissue injury) . Full thickness wound with 100% Eschar, measuring 2.0cm x 2.2cm x unable to determine. No drainage noted, no purulence or odor noted. Peri wound without redness or warmth to indicate infection . Plan: apply betadine daily, leave open to air . Pressure ulcer of unspecified site, unstageable . Pressure-induced deep tissue damage of left heel . Deep tissue injury to left posterior heel with mix of granular tissue and purple devitalized tissue at the base, measuring 2.0 x 2.0 x unable to determine. Moderate serous drainage noted, no purulence or odor. Peri wound without redness or warmth. Evaluated by wound care team yesterday. Continue current wound care protocol and offloading measures . Discussed with wound care team . Continue aggressive offloading measures . Medical records reviewed . Wound care re-evaluation in 1 week . R28's Wound Care Follow Up, dated 4/1/2025, includes: . Left posterior heel (deep tissue injury) Full thickness wound with 100% Eschar, measuring 2.0cm x 2.0cm x unable to determine. No fluctuance or drainage noted, no purulence or odor noted. Peri wound without redness or warmth to indicate infection . Plan: apply betadine daily, leave open to air . Pressure ulcer of unspecified site, unstageable . Pressure-induced deep tissue damage of left heel . Deep tissue injury to left posterior heel with mix of granular tissue and purple devitalized tissue at the base, measuring 2.0 x 2.0 x unable to determine. Moderate serous drainage noted, no purulence or odor. Peri wound without redness or warmth. Evaluated by wound care team yesterday. Continue current wound care protocol and offloading measures . Discussed with wound care team . Continue aggressive offloading measures . R28's Wound Care Follow Up, dated 4/8/2025, includes: . Left posterior heel (deep tissue injury) . Full thickness wound with 100% Eschar, measuring 2.0cm x 2.0cm x unable to determine. No fluctuance or drainage noted, no purulence or odor noted. Peri wound without redness or warmth to indicate infection . Plan: apply betadine daily, leave open to air . Pressure ulcer of unspecified site, unstageable . Pressure-induced deep tissue damage of left heel . Deep tissue injury to left posterior heel with mix of granular tissue and purple devitalized tissue at the base, measuring 2.0cm x 2.0cm x unable to determine. Moderate serous drainage noted, no purulence or odor. Peri wound without redness or warmth. Evaluated by wound care team yesterday. Continue current wound care protocol and offloading measures . Discussed with wound care team . Continue aggressive offloading measures . R28's Wound Care Follow Up, dated 4/15/25, includes: Left posterior heel (deep tissue injury) Full thickness wound with 100% Eschar, measuring 1.5cm x 1.5cm x unable to determine. No fluctuance or drainage noted, no purulence or odor noted. Peri wound without redness [TRUNCATED]
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that each resident receives adequate supervision and assistanc...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that each resident receives adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents in 1 of 2 residents (R20) reviewed for falls resulting in actual harm, 1 of 1 resident (R31) reviewed for motorized wheelchair charging, and 2 of 4 units reviewed for lithium battery charging. R20 is being cited at Actual Harm/Isolated. R31 and 2 of 4 units is being cited at Potential for Harm/Isolated. R20 was care planned to be a two person assist with a sit to stand transfer. CNA L transferred R20 alone when the lift lost battery power. R20 ended up sitting on the ground, had a sudden drop from the lift, and a change of plane/fall. CNA L assisted R20 off the floor and did not report R20 ended up sitting on the ground, had a sudden drop from a lift, and a change of plane/fall immediately to the floor nurse or to the oncoming shift. CNA L reported that R20 was on the ground to CNA M. CNA M did not report R20 had a fall to the floor nurse. R20 was found to have an intertrochanteric right femoral fracture. R31's motorized wheelchair is charged in her room. The facility charges electric patient lifts in the hallways. This is evidenced by: Facility policy, titled Hoyer Lift and Sit to Stand, undated, states in part; it is important to use all lifts safely . All CNAs should have the proper training before using the lift . Each lift has a safety feature in case of battery malfunction, please be aware how to utilize that feature and potential obstacles that could happen . Per facility policy, all lifts require 2 staff members in the room for transfers for the resident's safety. It is NOT OPTIONAL. (It is important to note in this policy there are no further instructions on how to identify or activate the lifts safety feature.) Facility policy, titled Fall Prevention Program, reviewed and revised on [DATE], states in part; each resident will be assessed for fall risk and will receive care and services in accordance with their individualized level of risk to minimize the likelihood of falls. A fall is an event in which an individual unintentionally comes to rest on the ground, floor, or other level, but not because of an overwhelming external force. The event may be witnessed, reported, or presumed when a resident is found on the floor or ground, and can occur anywhere . When any resident experiences a fall, the facility will assess the resident, complete post fall assessment, complete an incident report, notify physician and family, review resident's care plan and update as indicated, document all assessments and actions, obtain witness statements in case of injury. Manufacturer's recommendations for use of battery-operated patient lift, states in part; the emergency lowering device is intended for use during lift failure. This device will allow lowering of patients only . Turn clockwise to lower. Emergency Lowering Mechanism: In case of lift failure, please follow the procedures below to safely lower the user. The emergency lowering device is located at the top of the actuator shaft. It is intended for use if the actuator fail to operate while a patient is suspended. The device consisting of a plastic collar ring that should be turned clockwise continually until the patient has been lowered. The facility's policy titled Motorized Wheelchairs, dated [DATE], includes: 4. Charging of a motorized wheelchair will take place in an approved area, which is ventilated. At no time is a motorized wheelchair to be charged in a resident room. The facility's policy titled Safe Resident Handling/Transfers, dated [DATE], includes: it is the policy of this facility to ensure that residents are handled and transferred safely to prevent or minimize risk for injury and provide and promote a safe, secure and comfortable experience for the resident while keeping the employees safe in accordance with current standards and guidelines. R20 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses include rheumatoid arthritis, atrial fibrillation, atherosclerotic heart disease, joint disorder, history of falling, weakness, hypertension, sensorineural hearing loss bilaterally, pulmonary hypertension, and age-related osteoporosis. R20's Minimum Data Set (MDS) with Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of [DATE], indicates R20 was cognitively intact with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 out of 15. R20's Comprehensive Care Plan, initiated on [DATE], indicates R1 requires assistance of 1 for the following: dressing, bathing, bed mobility, and assist of 2 with sit to stand lift for transfers and needs one staff member to propel her in the wheelchair for long distances. R20's Comprehensive Care Plan indicates R1's medications are administered by the nurse. Facility Self Report, dated [DATE], includes the following: Date and time occurred-[DATE] at 1:35 PM . Date discovered-[DATE] . Date and time reported-[DATE] 12:46 PM Initial Report-Summary of incident: Patient had reported increased pain in her hip related to a transfer from bathroom to wheelchair where the sit to stand lost power and started to lower while resident was up in lift. The resident ended up in a squatting position with her buttocks touching bottom of the lift and staff were able with the resident's help to get her in an upright seated position and into her wheelchair. A new lift was used to transfer to the resident's bed. Resident is complaining of increased pain since incident and X-rays were ordered by primary nurse practitioner which indicates possible dislocation of right hip and resident will be transferred to hospital for further evaluation and treatment. An investigation initiated. CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) who completed the transfers was suspended today. Investigation to follow . Follow-up Report and Investigation-Investigation Summary: . On [DATE], R20 put on her call light because she wanted to be toileted. The assigned CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) . was in the lunchroom, and CNA L was covering the floor. CNA L transferred R20 with sit to stand lift and took her to the toilet. Shortly thereafter, R20 put on the call light to get off the toilet and go back to bed. CNA L once again used the sit to stand lift without assistance of another staff member and upon raising her up the battery died. R20 was complaining that under her arms (where sling was) was hurting her, so CNA L used the emergency button to lower the lift arm. Apparently, that did not lower initially so CNA L tried to start pushing lift toward R20's bed and after going from the tile bathroom floor to the carpeted bedroom, the lift started to lower with resident still in sling. As the lift arm lowered the resident ended up in a squatting position with her buttocks touching the foot pad of the lift. CNA L decided to try to help the resident by pushing her buttocks and got her high enough to sit in her wheelchair. Shortly after that, CNA M arrived at the unit. CNA L told her she needed help with the transfer from the wheelchair to the bed. After the resident was settled, CNA L told the nurse that the resident was complaining of pain in her leg and that during the transfer with the sit to stand the battery died. She did not mention that this transfer was completed by only herself. LPN G (Licensed Practical Nurse) asked CNA L to write a statement and then she was going to see the resident. CNA L wrote an initial statement on [DATE] that was left for the nurse and not read until after end of day shift. CNA L statement left at nurse station, includes [DATE] While transfer with the sit to stand. The sit to stand went dead in mid-air. She complained about her arms hurts [sic] so did the force thing to force the sit stand while that was going. [sic] It end sitting her down on the floor. I held her back with my legs so she wouldn't fall back. With her help I was able to get her back in her chair. Then a new sit to stand was used to get her in bed. Nurse was told. Statement was written. (It is important to note R20's Care Plan indicates she requires the assistance of 2 staff members and a mechanical lift to meet her transfer needs and CNA L indicates in her interview that she used a sit to stand lift to transfer resident without another staff member present. It is also important to note CNA L indicates R20 ended up sitting on the floor experiencing a change in plane. Also important to note CNA L assisted R20 off of the floor and into her wheelchair without an RN assessing R20 per facility policy and current standards of practice for post fall care.) R20 statement, dated [DATE], includes I wanted to go get on the machine because I wanted to go to the bathroom, like I always do after lunch. It was around 1:00 PM and I put my call light on. It took a little time and then someone came in to take care of me. I had CNA M that day, but she was busy, so this other one came to help. I don't remember her name. She put me on the sit to stand. Then I went to the bathroom and then I was brought back by my bed. Then CNA M came in. She came to help this girl. They put me in bed. I don't think I fell or anything. I don't remember my butt hitting the ground. CNA M statement, dated [DATE], includes I wasn't present when the incident happened yesterday. I only came when I seen [sic] her on the chair and the aide together. The aide told me that R20 was on the floor and that the sit to stand wasn't working, but R20 stated she was never on the floor but that her legs started hurting after being up on the machine for a while. I then helped the CNA L put R20 on the bed. (It is important to note CNA M stated she was aware R20 was on the floor.) LPN G statement, dated [DATE], includes as the day shift was ending on [DATE], CNA L told me there was an issue with the sit to stand lift during the transfer prior to the end of shift and that R20 had said her leg hurt. I told CNA L to write a statement before she left about the transfer. I noticed a statement by my computer about R20 from CNA L. The statement was unclear, and I did not see it until after 2:30 PM. I went looking for CNA L off the unit and found out she had already left the building. I notified DON B (Director of Nursing) why I was looking for the CNA and she directed me to put in an incident report and notify NP O (Nurse Practitioner). I notified Unit Manager/Registered Nurse Q about the statement, and we went in to look at R20 and try to identify what had happened earlier to her. R20 reported she was hurting on her right side from being up in the sit to stand lift for too long and maybe she had pulled a muscle. The statement stated that R20 was on the floor at some point and R20 vehemently denied that. R20 was able to lift her knee and leg on the right side while lying in bed and LPN G had not noticed any change in her pain levels at that time or any leg discrepancy in length. R20 rated her pain as a six on a scale of one to ten. LPN G then completed a risk management report of other incident and passed on in report to LPN N what she knew of the incident. LPN G also did report to NP O (Nurse Practitioner) . of the incident . No new orders given at this time. (It is important to note LPN G did not follow facility fall protocol for a witnessed fall, a reported fall, or presumed fall.) DON B (Director of Nursing) statement, dated [DATE], includes on [DATE] at around 2:30 PM LPN G reported to me that R20 said she had an issue with an earlier transfer in the sit to stand lift and that her leg was sore. I instructed her to get Unit Manager/RN Q and look at R20 and prepare an incident report. LPN G did complete incident report as other incident. On [DATE] R20 was seen by Nurse Practitioner (NP O and NP P) and she noted there was a leg discrepancy and ordered an x-ray. R20 also had denied any fall at that time and told NP O that she thought it was from being up in the sit to stand too long. I was made aware of the possible change just around 9:00 AM. CNA L was in the facility with a resident . completing one-on-one observation. Around 10:30 AM, I interviewed CNA L and had her complete a new written statement. During that interview I found out that the sit to stand transfer was not completed per policy initially and that only CNA L was in the room. CNA L witnessed the issue with the lift and resident. I felt at that point that the potential injury could be the result of a witnessed fall due to change of plane for the resident. I then went into risk management and changed the reason for the incident report from other to witnessed fall and completed the corresponding assessments for the incident. At about 1:00 PM, the X-ray did reveal a fracture of the right hip, and the resident was being transferred to the emergency room for evaluation. The incident was then reported to the State as an injury of unknown origin because I could not definitively determine cause and investigation was initiated. CNA L second statement, dated [DATE], includes I answered R20's call light. She was in the bathroom, [sic] as I am lift her up with sit to stand, she complains of pain in her arm pits as I go to lower her the machine died in mid-air, so I press the release button so it can be lower. [sic] wasn't aware that it was going so I tried to get her to her bed as quick as possible but on the way, she had been lower to the ground, so I made sure she didn't hit head and made sure she was sitting upright. With her help, I was able to get her off the floor into her wheelchair, then I use a charged sit to stand to put her in her bed. Handwritten on the interview is a statement that states per interview did a squat on lift and was able to push up enough to get into wheelchair. (It is important to note CNA L reports a second time that R20 was on the ground and had a change of plane. It is also important to note CNA L reports she assisted R20 off the floor and transferred her 2 times without an RN assessing R20.) UM/RN Q (Unit Manager/Registered Nurse) statement, dated [DATE], includes R20 had complained of right knee pain after being in the sit to stand. Resident was assessed in bed. Pain to right knee was stated at a 4 out of 10. Floor nurse gave scheduled Tylenol for pain. Resident's right knee was parallel to left knee. Right leg did not have internal rotation when assessed. UM/RN Q second statement, dated [DATE], includes as we further investigated events from [DATE], I was made aware by CNA L, that only one person was used to transfer the resident with the sit to stand lift. I had previously been under the impression that 2 staff were used for the transfer as this is facility policy. R20's Nurse Note, dated [DATE], includes late entry for [DATE] at 2:00 PM: Writer was notified by LPN G that resident had complaints of pain to her right knee after being in the sit to stand too long. Writer assessed the resident. Right knee appeared equal to left knee. No rotation, redness, or swelling noted. Resident stated she has arthritis in that knee and has pain from time to time. Had pain 4 out of 10 at that time. (It is important to note UM/RN Q did not treat R20 as if she just had a fall, a change of plane, a sudden drop from a lift, and she did not record an RN assessment in R20's medical record until [DATE] when she added a late entry.) Advanced Practice Nurse Practitioner (APNP) Note, dated [DATE] at 10:30 AM, includes chief complaint- right knee and leg pain . Patient was an acute add on today presenting today with right knee and leg pain after being transferred via sit to stand overnight last night per RN report . vital signs- [DATE]: blood pressure- 122/64, oxygen saturation- 96%, pain- 0, temperature- 97.6 degrees, respirations-18, heart rate 74, weight 140 . vitals [DATE] blood pressure- 110/62, oxygen saturation- 95%, pain-0, temperature 97.3 degrees, respirations-17, heart rate- 65 . vitals [DATE] pain 8 . vitals [DATE] pain-0 .Muscoskeletal- no joint tenderness or deformity. Right lower extremity with minimal range of motion. Unable to flex, extend, abduct, adduct, or externally rotate hip without extreme pain. Right lower extremity internally rotated while resting in bed and unable to straighten. Pedal pulses plus 2 bilaterally, warm to touch, and sensation intact. No bruising or swelling noted. R20's Radiology Report, dated [DATE] at 12:25 PM, includes . Hip . Right . Results: Intertrochanteric right femoral fracture with mild angulation. Mild soft tissue swelling . Conclusion: Acute Intertrochanteric right femoral fracture as noted . Knee . Right . No acute fracture or dislocation. The osseous structures appear intact. Modest joint space narrowing. Soft tissues are unremarkable. Conclusion: No acute osseous findings. Recommend a repeat multi-view imaging in 1 week or sooner if clinically warranted especially if symptoms continue or persist or progress. R20's Emergency Department Note, dated [DATE], includes x-ray today shows a broken hip. Given that you are not ambulatory, there is no clear indication for surgery and based on your wishes and discussion with family, it is safe to go back to your facility. You will need care with movement to try to avoid significant displacement of the right leg especially. You should at least take Tylenol, up to 1 gram, every 6 hours, as needed; if you have stronger pain, it is reasonable to try hydrocodone. The medication prescribed for pain today will make you sleepy; . X-ray pelvis AP and hip right final results: Impression: Impacted and displaced intertrochanteric right femur fracture . Reason for exam: fall, deformity . additional relevant history: fall, deformity . Findings: The osseous structures appear demineralized. There is a mildly impacted and displaced fracture of the proximal right femur involving the base of the femoral neck extending into the intertrochanteric region. Increased varus angulation. The femoral head remains normally aligned with the acetabulum. The pelvic ring appears intact. Left hip alignment is normal . On [DATE] at 10:42 AM, during a phone interview, CNA M indicated when she entered the room R20 was in her wheelchair and CNA L told her the sit to stand lift malfunctioned and R20 was on the floor. CNA M indicated she did not report this change of plane to the nurse on the floor or the oncoming shift, because she figured CNA L would report it. CNA M indicated when a resident has a change of plane, is on the floor, or had a sudden fall from a lift she goes to get the nurse immediately and does not move the resident until the nurse is done with an assessment and tells her it is ok to move the resident. CNA M indicated 2 staff are to be present when staff use any mechanical lift per facility policy. (It is important to note CNA M was aware R20 was on the floor and did not report this to the floor nurse.) On [DATE] at 11:24 AM, LPN G stated, Originally, I was told by CNA L that R20 was complaining of pain to her leg and there was an issue with the sit to stand. I had asked her to write a statement. I ended up finding the statement later. It was very unclear, and I was looking for clarification. LPN G indicated she did not see any changes in R20 when she looked but asked UM/RN Q to assess her. LPN G stated, I would like to have had more accurate information and more information by the CNA L. She should not have picked R20 up off of the floor. She should have grabbed a nurse. LPN G indicated education was given after the incident to be sure staff are using sit to stand with two staff. Surveyor asked if education was provided regarding the fall and post fall policy and protocol. LPN G indicated she was unsure. On [DATE] at 1:54 PM, DON B (Director of Nursing) indicated CNA L reported to LPN G that the lift battery died during transfer and now R20 is complaining of pain. Then CNA L slipped a written statement containing more information on the nurse' desk before exiting the building for the day. LPN G found the statement around 2:30 PM and brought it to DON B. DON B told LPN G to start an incident report, grab UM/RN Q for an assessment, and to report incident and findings to R20's provider. DON B and Surveyor reviewed CNA L's first statement. DON B and Surveyor reviewed contact with R20's provider. DON B indicated the provider was not made aware R20 was sitting on the ground. DON B stated, I was going to get a second statement from her to make sure there was a fall. DON B indicated the facility did not follow the Fall policy and procedure for witnessed falls, reported falls, or presumed falls. DON B indicated CNAs are to report falls immediately to the floor nurse and give as many details as possible. DON B indicated a fall is an unintended change of plane. DON B indicated staff are to have two staff present for all mechanical lift transfers per facility policy and CNA L transferred R20 two times alone, once to the toilet and once out of the bathroom. Surveyor asked DON B if she would be willing to do an enactment of a staff member using the mechanical lift. DON B indicated she and Corporate Consultant EE would volunteer to demonstrate how to activate the emergency button so Surveyor could see how long it takes to lower a resident completely using the emergency button. DON B indicated staff education was provided regarding always using 2 staff with mechanical lifts. DON B indicated education was not provided on the facility fall policy and post fall protocol. On [DATE] at 2:18 PM, Surveyor observed DON B and CNA FF maneuvering the lift while Corporate Consultant EE was seated with the sling in place around her. DON B, CNA FF, and Corporate Consultant EE could not get the emergency button to engage and lower the lift all at once. Surveyor observed a turn button on the hydraulic boom of the shift and when DON B turned that button it would only go one turn at a time. When the button made one full turn, the lift would lower a little bit and stop. Then DON B or CNA FF would turn button another full turn and lift would lower a small amount and stop. Surveyor observed staff were unable to drop the lift in one smooth motion using the red emergency buttons. DON B indicated she did not perform any re-enactments with CNA L or other staff after the incident, but she wished she would have. It should be noted there is a second emergency button that lowers the lift in one motion. On [DATE] at 7:46 AM Surveyor asked RN/UM Q,Are aides observed using lifts before they are using them with residents, does the facility perform competency checks? RN/UM Q stated, No they are not part of a skills checklist before they start. That is a good idea. UM/RN Q stated, She (CNA L) should have come and got LPN G right away. She shouldn't have led us to believe there was a second CNA in the room. Example 2 On [DATE] at 10:14 AM, Surveyor observed R31's motorized wheelchair in R31's room along with the charging cords for the motorized wheelchair. On [DATE] at 3:14 PM, Surveyor interviewed R31 regarding charging of her motorized wheelchair. R31 stated staff charge her wheelchair in her room. On [DATE] at 3:27 PM, Surveyor interviewed CNA CC (Certified Nursing Assistant) regarding charging R31's motorized wheelchair. CNA CC indicated staff charge R31's motorized wheelchair in her room. On [DATE] at 3:31 PM, Surveyor interviewed DON B (Director of Nursing) regarding the charging of R31's motorized wheelchair. DON B indicated staff charge R31's motorized wheelchair in her room. DON B stated she was not certain of the facility's policy on charging motorized wheelchairs. VPOC DD (Vice President of Clinical Operations) was present during the interview with DON B. VPOC DD informed Surveyor and DON B that motorized wheelchairs are not allowed to be charged in a resident's room. Example 3 The facility utilizes Medline electric patient lifts. The battery used in these lifts are sealed lead acid batteries. The Safety Data Sheet (SDS) for sealed lead acid batteries, dated 6/23, includes: Battery posts, terminals, and related accessories contain lead and lead compounds, chemicals known to cause cancer and reproductive harm, and during charging, strong inorganic acid mists containing sulfuric acid are evolved. Use adequate ventilation. The acid mist and vapors generated by heat or fire are corrosive. Store batteries in cool, dry, well-ventilated areas. Avoid overcharging and smoking, or sparks near battery. On [DATE] at 10:15 AM, Surveyor observed a Hoyer (electric patient lift) plugged into the wall and charging on the 400-hallway. On [DATE] at 10:16 AM, Surveyor observed a stand lift (electronic patient lift) plugged into the wall and charging on the 300-hallway. On [DATE] at 10:16 AM, Surveyor interviewed CNA FF (Certified Nursing Assistant) regarding the charging of electronic patient lifts. CNA FF indicated staff charge the electronic patient lifts in the hallway. On [DATE] at 10:18 AM, Surveyor interviewed CNA GG regarding the charging of electronic patient lifts. CNA GG indicated staff charge the electronic patient lifts in the hallway. On [DATE] at 10:52 AM, Surveyor interviewed CNA M regarding the charging of electronic patient lifts. CNA M indicated staff charge the electronic patient lifts in the hallway. On [DATE] at 10:03 AM, Surveyor interviewed NC EE (Nurse Consultant) regarding the charging of electronic patient lifts. NC EE indicated typically electronic patient lifts are not charged in the hallways but the facility does not use wall battery charging stations, so they plug them into the wall on the hallways to charge. On [DATE] at 8:18 AM, Surveyor interviewed DON B (Director of Nursing) regarding where staff charge the electric patient lifts. DON B indicated the lifts are charged in the hallways. DON B indicated they have always charged the lifts in the hallway and the facility has no concerns regarding safety with the batteries charging in the hallways.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0554 (Tag F0554)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure that all residents are clinically appropriate to...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure that all residents are clinically appropriate to self-administer medications for 2 of 2 sampled residents (R36, 31) and 1 of 1 supplemental resident's (R24) reviewed for self- administration of medications. R36 was observed to have a cup of medications left on his bedside table for him to take independently. R36 does not have an assessment for self-administration of medications indicating that he is safe to administer medications independently. R31 had containers of medication at bedside and had scheduled medications left on her bedside table for longer than 1 hour. R31's self-administration assessment only allows Lactaid at bedside and requires nurses to follow up with R31 after 1 hour. R24 had an inhaler at his bedside. R24 does not have an assessment for self-administration of medications indicating that he is safe to administer medications independently. Evidenced by: The facility's policy titled Resident Self- Administration of Medication dated 5/28/25 states in part, .3. When determining if self- administration is clinically appropriate for a resident, the interdisciplinary team should, at a minimum consider the following: a. The medications appropriate and safe for self- administration; b. The resident's physical capacity to open medication bottles, administer injections. c. The resident's cognitive status, including their ability to correctly name their medications and know what conditions they are taken for. d. The resident's capability to follow directions and tell time to know when medications need to be taken. e. The resident's comprehension of instructions for the medications they are taking, including the dose, timing, and signs of side effects, and when to report to facility staff . Example 1 R36 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include generalized anxiety disorder, polyosteoarthritis (a diagnosis that indicates that arthritis is present in 5 or more joints simultaneously), and congestive heart failure (the heart cannot pump enough blood to meet the body's needs). R36's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] states that R36 has a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 14 out of 15, indicating that R36 is cognitively intact. On 6/9/25 at 10:45 AM, Surveyor interviewed R36. Surveyor noted that there was a medication cup with medications in it, sitting on R36's bedside table. Surveyor asked R36 if those were his morning medications, R36 stated yes, and reported to Surveyor that he always takes them. Surveyor reviewed R36's physician's orders. There was no order for R36 to self- administer medications. Surveyor reviewed R36's care plan. There was no care plan for self- administration of medications. Surveyor reviewed R36's assessments. There was no assessment completed indicating that R36 was safe to self- administer medications. On 6/10/25 at 2:29 PM, Surveyor interviewed LPN F (Licensed Practical Nurse). Surveyor asked LPN F if she had administered R36's morning medications on 6/9/25, LPN F stated yes. Surveyor asked LPN F if R36 is able to take medications independently, LPN F stated yes. Surveyor asked LPN F if R36 has an order to self- administer medications, LPN F stated no. Surveyor asked LPN F if R36 has a completed self- administration assessment, LPN F stated that she was not sure. On 6/11/25 at 11:23 AM, Surveyor interviewed DON B (Director of Nursing). Surveyor asked DON B what the facility's process is for determining that a resident is safe to self- administer medications, DON B reported that they would complete an assessment and based on the results of the assessment, they would get an order for the resident to self- administer medications. Surveyor asked DON B if R36 has an assessment to self- administer medication, DON B stated that R36 has never indicated that he was interested in self- administration, so there is not an assessment. Surveyor shared observation with DON B. Surveyor asked DON B if R36 should have an assessment and a physician's order to self- administer medications if the nurses are going to leave the medications in the room, DON B stated yes. Example 2 R31's self-administration assessment dated [DATE] includes the following: Lactaid at bedside with resident. All other meds must be administered by nurse but may be left at bedside for up to 1 hour. 1. The resident can correctly read label and/or identify each medication. Requires assistance. 2. The resident can correctly state what each medication is for. Requires assistance. 3. The resident can correctly state the time/frequency medications are to be taken. Requires assistance. 4. The resident can correctly state the correct dosage/quantity for each administration. Requires assistance. 6. The resident can appropriately document self-administration of the medications listed. Requires assistance. 7. The resident can demonstrate secure storage of medications kept in room. Requires assistance. 11. The resident can correctly administer eye drops or eye ointments correctly. Not Applicable. C. Approvals IDTC (Interdisciplinary Team) 1a. IDTC Review Summary: Medications will be administered by Nurse but may be left at bedside for up to 1 hour. 1b. IDTC fees resident is safe to self-administer listed medications? No. R31's physician orders, printed 6/11/25, include: NURSE to administer all meds to resident - can leave at bedside for up to 1 hour after dispensing but must follow up and document. On 6/9/25 at 3:00 PM, Surveyor observed containers of Lactaid, artificial tears, Imodium and Tums in a basket on R31's bedside table. On 6/10/25 at 11:51 AM, Surveyor entered R31's room. CNA Z (Certified Nursing Assistant) was finishing getting R31 up for the day. Prior to CNA Z leaving the room, CNA Z reminded R31 to take her medications. Surveyor observed 3 pills on R31's bedside table and a pill on R31's floor. On 6/10/25 at 12:10 PM, Surveyor interviewed LPN F (Licensed Practical Nurse) regarding R31's medications. LPN F indicated she had given R31 her morning medication between 9:45 - 10:00 AM. LPN F indicated R31 had taken all her medication at that time. LPN F indicated R31 may have medications at bedside for up to 1 hour. LPN F picked up the pill off the floor and removed the pills from R31's bedside table. LPN F indicated those medications were left from the evening shift yesterday. LPN F removed the Imodium and Tums from R31's room and informed R31 that DON B (Director of Nursing) would come talk with R31 regarding the medications. On 6/10/25 at 12:10 PM, Surveyor interviewed R31 regarding her medications. R31 indicated the medications were from last night. R31 indicated she was too tired and forgot to take them. On 6/11/25 at 1:47 PM, Surveyor was walking past R31's room. R31's door was open. Surveyor observed R31 was not in her room. Surveyor observed 8 pills in a medication cup on R31's lunch tray. On 6/11/25 at 1:52 PM, Surveyor interviewed LPN J regarding noon medication pass. LPN J indicated the noon medication pass takes about 30 minutes. LPN J indicated she completed her noon medication pass before 1:00 PM. LPN J indicated R31 is allowed to have her medications at bedside after administration for up to 1 hour then the nurse must ensure R31 took her medications. On 6/11/25 at 2:06 PM, Surveyor observed R31 coming down the hallway. R31 indicated she had been in the rehabilitation room to meet with visitors. R31 indicated she left her room at 1:00 PM. On 6/11/25 at 2:36 PM, Surveyor observed R31 had taken her noon medications. On 6/11/25 at 8:44 AM, Surveyor interviewed DON B (Director of Nursing) regarding R31's medications. DON B indicated R31 was assessed to have medications left at bedside for up to 1 hour and the nurses must follow up with R31 to ensure the medications were taken. DON B indicated the artificial tears, Imodium, and Tums should not be at R31's bedside and the nurse should have followed up within an hour to ensure R31 took her medications but did not. Example 3 On 6/9/25 at 10:30 AM, Surveyor observed R24's room. R24 had a Combivent inhaler on his bedside table. On 6/11/25 at 2:17 PM, Surveyor observed R24's room. R24 had a Combivent inhaler on the stand next to his bed. On 6/11/25 at 1:52 PM, Surveyor interviewed LPN J regarding self-administration of medications. LPN J indicated R24 was not assessed to safely self-administer medications. On 6/10/25 at 2:47 PM, Surveyor interviewed DON B (Director of Nursing) regarding R24's self-administration of medication assessment. DON B indicated R24 does not have a self-administration of medication assessment. DON B indicated medications should not be left at their bedside if a resident is not assessed to be safe to take medications independently.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Comprehensive Care Plan (Tag F0656)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a comprehensive person-centered care plan included a sleep assessment and sleep tracking for 3 of 5 residents (R6, R18, and R43...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a comprehensive person-centered care plan included a sleep assessment and sleep tracking for 3 of 5 residents (R6, R18, and R43) reviewed for unnecessary medications. R6 is prescribed melatonin and does not have a sleep assessment or sleep tracking. R18 is prescribed melatonin and does not have a sleep assessment or sleep tracking. R43 is prescribed melatonin and does not have a sleep assessment or sleep tracking. This is evidenced by: The facility's policy titled Use of Psychotropic Medication(s), dated 5/28/25, includes: Adequate indications for use refers to the identified, documented clinical rationale for administering a medication that is based upon an assessment of the resident's condition and therapeutic goals and after any other treatments have been deemed clinically contraindicated. 5. The indications for initiating, maintaining, or discontinuing medications(s), [sic] as well as the use of non-pharmacological approaches, will be determined by evaluating the resident's physical, behavioral, mental, and psychosocial signs and symptoms in order to identify and rule out any underlying medical conditions, including the assessment of relative benefits and risks, and the preferences and goals for treatment. 7. The resident's medical record shall include documentation of this evaluation and the rationale for chosen treatment options. 15. The resident's response to the medication(s), including progress towards goals and presence/absence of adverse consequences, shall be documented in the residence medical record. Example 1 R6's physician orders, printed on 6/12/25, include melatonin 3 mg at bedtime for difficulty sleeping. R6 does not have a sleep assessment completed. R6 does not have sleep monitoring documented. Example 2 R18's physician orders, printed on 6/12/25, include melatonin 3 mg at bedtime for sleep hygiene. R18 does not have a sleep assessment completed. R18 does not have sleep monitoring documented. Example 3 R43's physician orders, printed on 6/12/25, include melatonin 3 mg at bedtime for insomnia. R43 does not have a sleep assessment completed. R43 does not have sleep monitoring documented. On 6/11/25 at 4:27 PM, Surveyor interviewed DON B (Director of Nursing) regarding sleep assessment and sleep monitoring for residents taking a sleep aid. DON B indicated the facility does not complete sleep assessments and sleep monitoring as part of their routine practice for sleep aids. DON B indicated R6, R18, and R43 do not have sleep assessments or sleep monitoring.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Incontinence Care (Tag F0690)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Example 2 R28 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including urinary tract infection (2/25/25) , urine retention, a...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Example 2 R28 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including urinary tract infection (2/25/25) , urine retention, and neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder. On 6/10/25 at 10:56 AM Surveyor observed R28 being pushed in his wheelchair down the hallway. Surveyor heard something rubbing as R28 passed. Surveyor observed R28's catheter bag dragging on the floor. On 6/10/25 at 10:59 AM LPN Y (Licensed Practical Nurse) indicated R28's catheter bag should not be in contact with the floor. LPN Y stated, I will fix this. On 6/10/25 12:03 PM NHA A (Nursing Home Administrator) indicated residents' catheters should not be touching the floor. On 6/10/25 at 1:53 PM DON B (Director of Nursing) indicated R28's catheter should not be in contact with floor. On 6/11/25 at 1:26 PM during wound care observation, Surveyor observed R28's catheter bag to be resting in contact with the floor. On 6/11/25 at 1:27 PM LPN G indicated R28's catheter bag should not be in direct contact with the facility's floor. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that residents with an indwelling catheter received the appropriate care and services to prevent a urinary tract infection (UTI) for 2 of 2 residents (R49 & R28) reviewed for catheters. *Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) did not perform proper hand hygiene during catheter/peri care on R49. *R28's catheter bag was dragging on the floor under wheelchair. Evidenced by: The facility policy, dated 5/28/25, states, in part: . Policy: It is the policy of this facility to ensure that residents with indwelling catheters receive appropriate catheter care and maintain their dignity and privacy when indwelling catheters are in use. Policy Explanation: 1. Catheter care will be performed every shift and as needed by nursing personnel . Compliance Guidelines: . 7. Perform hand hygiene . The facility policy entitled Hand Hygiene, dated 5/28/25, states, in part: . Policy: All staff will perform proper hand hygiene procedures to prevent the spread of infection to other personnel, residents, and visitors. This applies to all staff working in all locations within the facility. Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: . 1. Staff will perform hand hygiene when indicated, using proper technique consistent with accepted standards of practice. 2. Hand hygiene is indicated and will be performed under the conditions listed in, but not limited to, the attached hand hygiene table . 5. Additional considerations: a. The use of gloves does not replace hand hygiene. If your task requires gloves, perform hand hygiene prior to donning gloves, and immediately after removing gloves . Hand Hygiene Table: . Before applying and after removing personal protective equipment (PPE), including gloves . Before and after handling clean or soiled dressings, linens, etc. After handling items potentially contaminated with blood, body fluids, secretions, or excretions. When, during resident care, moving from a contaminated body site to a clean body site . Example 1 R49 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and has diagnoses that include pressure ulcer of sacral region, unstageable and Type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic chronic kidney disease (a long-term condition in which the body has trouble controlling blood sugar and using it for energy and develops kidney disease). R49's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 5/21/25 shows R49 has a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 indicating R49 is cognitively intact. R49's Care Plan dated 5/22/25, states, in part: . Focus: The resident has a urinary catheter. Date Initiated: 5/20/25. Revision on: 5/05/25 . Interventions: *Catheter: care and treatment per current MD (Medical Doctor) orders. Date Initiated: 5/20/25. Revision on: 5/20/25 . R49's Physician Orders as of 6/11/25, states, in part: . Catheter care every shift for catheter hygiene . On 6/11/25 at 7:37AM, Surveyor observed CNA D (Certified Nursing Assistant) perform catheter care on R49. CNA D gathered supplies to include two garbage bags, one with 4 soapy washcloths in and the other garbage bag with rinse washcloths in. CNA D set both bags onto bed. CNA D grabbed a soapy washcloth and performed catheter care and then put soiled wash cloth back into the garbage bag with the clean soapy wash clothes. CNA D then reached into the garbage bag with the rinse washcloths in and retrieved a rinse washcloth and rinsed R49's peri area and catheter and put the used rinse washcloth back into garbage bag with the clean rinse wash clothes. CNA D then dried the peri area with a clean towel. CNA D removed gloves and performed hand hygiene with soap and water and applied new gloves. CNA D rolled R49 onto right side and reached into the garbage bag with soapy washcloths and grabbed the used washcloth with a spot of blood on it from previous catheter care. CNA D put the washcloth back into the garbage bag and retrieved a new washcloth and proceeded to perform cares on R49's bottom. CNA D placed used washcloths back into the garbage bag and grabbed a rinse washcloth out of the other garbage bag with the rinse washcloths in. CNA D rinsed and dried R49's bottom and then removed gloves and applied new gloves without hand hygiene. On 6/11/25 at 7:57AM, Surveyor interviewed CNA D and asked when hand hygiene should be performed during catheter/peri care. CNA D indicated before and after and if gloves become soiled. Surveyor asked if hand hygiene should be performed between removing gloves and applying new gloves. CNA D indicated yes. Surveyor asked CNA D if hand hygiene should have been completed after care was provided on R49's bottom, new gloves were applied, and a new brief placed under R49. CNA D indicated yes, I should have washed my hands. Surveyor asked if soiled washcloths should be in same garbage bag as the clean washcloths and CNA D indicated she keeps the dirty and clean separated in the garbage bags by keeping the dirty ones in one corner and clean ones in another corner. Surveyor asked CNA D if that could be a risk of cross contamination and CNA D indicated yes. On 6/11/25 at 8:20 AM, Surveyor interviewed DON B (Director of Nursing) and asked when hand hygiene should be performed during wound care and peri/catheter care. DON B indicated you would perform hand hygiene and change gloves in between cleansing the areas and rinsing the areas. DON B indicated hand hygiene should be performed after doffing and donning gloves. Surveyor informed DON B of observation of CNA D placing soiled washcloths and clean washcloths in the same garbage bags during catheter care. DON B indicated she would have expected separate garbage bags for the clean and dirty washcloths to avoid a risk of cross contamination.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Pharmacy Services (Tag F0755)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure residents are free of any significant medication errors for 2 ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure residents are free of any significant medication errors for 2 of 2 residents (R31 and R41) reviewed for medications. The facility did not ensure R31 took her evening medications as prescribed. R41 did not receive one dose of the intravenous (IV) antibiotic ordered for wound infection. This is evidenced by: The facility's policy titled Medication Errors, dated 5/28/25, includes: It is the policy of this facility to provide protections for the health, welfare, and rights of each resident by ensuring residents receive care and services safely in an environment free of significant medication errors. Medication error means the observed or identified preparation or administration of medications or biologicals which is not in accordance with the prescriber's order; manufacturer's specifications (not recommendations) regarding the preparation and administration of the medication or biological; or accepted professional standards and principles which apply to professionals providing services. Significant medication error means one which causes the resident discomfort or jeopardizes his/her health and safety. The facility shall ensure medications will be administered as follows: a. According to physician's orders. b. Per manufacturer's specifications regarding the preparation, and administration of the drug or biological. c. In accordance with accepted standards and principles which apply to professionals providing services. 3. Medication errors, once identified, will be evaluated to determine if considered significant or not by utilizing the following three general guidelines: a. Resident's condition: If the resident's condition requires rigid control . 4. The facility will consider factors indicating errors in medication administration, including, but not limited to, the following: . Medication omission; The facility's Medication Administration policy, dated 5/28/25, states, in part: .20. Sign MAR (medication administration record) after administered. According to the National Institutes of Health National Library of Medicine (www.nih.gov), patients with Parkinson's disease require strict adherence to an individualized, timed medication regimen . Dosing intervals are specific to each individual patient because of the complexity of the disease. When medications are not administered on time and according to the patient's unique schedule, patients may experience an immediate increase in symptoms. Delaying medications by more than one hour, for example, can cause patients with Parkinson's disease to experience worsening tremors, increased rigidity, loss of balance, confusion, agitation, and difficulty communicating. Example 1 R31 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include Parkinson's Disease (A disorder of the central nervous system that affects movement, often including tremors). R31's physician orders, printed 6/11/25, include Carbidopa-Levodopa 25-100 mg tablet give 2.5 tablets by mouth six times a day for Parkinson's Disease 5:30 AM, 9:30 AM, 1:30 PM, 5:30 PM, 8:30 PM and 11:30 PM. On 6/10/25 at 11:51 AM, Surveyor entered R31's room. CNA Z (Certified Nursing Assistant) was finishing getting R31 up for the day. Prior to CNA Z leaving the room, CNA Z reminded R31 to take her medications. Surveyor observed medications on R31's bedside table and on R31's floor under R31's electric wheelchair. On 6/10/25 at 12:10 PM, Surveyor interviewed LPN F (Licensed Practical Nurse) regarding R31's medications. LPN F indicated she had given R31 her morning medication between 9:45 - 10:00 AM. LPN F indicated R31 had taken all her medication at that time. LPN F picked up the pill off the floor and removed the pills from R31's bedside table. LPN F identified the medications as Carbidopa-Levodopa. LPN F indicated the medications on the bedside table were left from the evening shift yesterday. LPN F cannot account for the time when the Carbidopa-Levodopa found under R31's electric wheelchair should have been administered. On 6/10/25 at 12:10 PM, Surveyor interviewed R31 regarding her medications. R31 indicated the medications were left from last night. R31 indicated she was too tired and forgot to take them. On 6/11/25 at 7:43 AM, Surveyor interviewed LPN J regarding medication errors. LPN J indicated an omitted medication is a medication error. On 6/10/25 at 2:47 PM, Surveyor interviewed DON B (Director of Nursing) regarding R31's medications. DON B indicated R31 had previously been able to self-administer her medications, but it became unsafe due to her tremors. DON B indicated in December 2024, R31 was assessed to not be able to self-administer her medications. DON B indicated staff were finding medications under R31 when she would take her medications in bed and on the floor also. Surveyor shared the observation of medications on R31's bedside table from the previous day and medication being found on the floor. DON B indicated omitted medications were a medication error. Example 2 R41 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and has a diagnosis of encounter for surgical aftercare following surgery on the digestive system. R41's Progress notes include: *5/27/25 1:28 PM received call from lab that wound culture contained klebsiella (a bacteria that can cause infection) . *5/27/25 3:46 PM .new orders for meropenem (antibiotic used to treat serious bacterial infections) . R41's Physician's Orders include: Meropenem Intravenous Solution Reconstituted 500 mg (milligrams) every 8 hours for incision infection. Start date: 5/28/25. End date: 6/4/25. R41's June 2025 Medication Administration Record (MAR) shows a blank for the 6/1/25 10:00 PM dose of Meropenem Intravenous Solution. On 6/12/25 at 8:22 AM, Surveyor interviewed LPN H (Licensed Practical Nurse) and asked if documentation is needed when administering medications. LPN H stated that the medication needs to be signed out on the MAR. Surveyor asked what a blank on the MAR means. LPN H stated it wasn't given. On 6/12/25 at 8:30 AM, Surveyor interviewed ADON I (Assistant Director of Nursing) and asked about a blank on the MAR. ADON I stated it means it was not given. On 6/12/25 at 9:24 AM, Surveyor interviewed DON B (Director of Nursing) and asked if documentation is needed when administering medications. DON B stated the medication needs to be signed out on the MAR. Surveyor asked what a blank on the MAR means. DON B stated no one signed it out. Surveyor asked if a medication has been given if the MAR is blank. DON B stated no, if it is not documented, it was not done.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0806 (Tag F0806)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not provide food that accommodates resident preferences; ap...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not provide food that accommodates resident preferences; appealing options of similar nutritive value to residents who choose not to eat food that is initially served or who request a different meal choice for 3 of 17 sampled resident's (R23, R31, & R37). R23 was being served foods that were listed on his meal ticket as disliked food. R23's food preferences were not being honored. R31 was being served gravy that was listed on her meal ticket as disliked food. R31's food preferences were not being honored. R37's received foods that are on the R37 has indicated she should not have. Evidenced by: The facility policy entitled Resident Food Preferences, dated 5/28/25, states, in part: . Individual food preferences will be assessed upon admission and communicated to the interdisciplinary team. Modifications to diet will only be ordered with the resident's or representative's consent. Policy Interpretation and Implementation: 1. Upon the resident's admission (or within twenty-four (24) hours after his/her admission) the dietician or nursing staff will identify a resident's food preferences. 2. When possible, staff will interview the resident directly to determine current food preferences based on history and life patterns related to food and mealtimes. 3. Nursing staff will document the resident's food and eating preferences in the care plan . The facility's policy entitled Resident Rights, dated 5/8/25, states, in part: . Policy: The facility will inform the resident both orally and in writing, in a language that the resident understands, of his or her rights and all rules and regulations governing resident conduct and responsibilities during the stay at the facility . 5 Self- Determination. The resident has the right to, and the facility must promote and facilitate the resident self-determination through support of resident choice . Example 1 R23 admitted to facility on 4/28/25 and has diagnoses that include moderate protein-calorie malnutrition, unspecified dementia (a diagnosis of dementia where the specific type of dementia cannot be clearly determined), and need for assistance with personal care. R23's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] shows R23 has a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. R23's Care Plan, dated 4/29/25, states, in part: . Focus: The resident is at risk for inadequate intake related to does not wear dentures, history of dysphagia. Increased nutritional needs related to skin breakdown. Date Initiated: 4/29/25. Revision on: 4/29/25 . Interventions: . *Monitor/record/report to MD (medical doctor) PRN (as needed) s/sx (signs and symptoms) of malnutrition . *Provide, serve diet as ordered . R23's meal ticket shows: . Diet: Regular- regular consistency. Liquid: Thin. Allergies: NKA (no known allergies) Likes: Bananas, toast with jelly, pancakes, French toast, waffles, peanut butter & jelly sandwiches, soups, mashed potatoes. Dislikes: all vegetables, salads . On 6/9/25 at 11:48 AM, Surveyor observed R23's lunch tray being served to him in his room. Surveyor observed vegetables (carrots, yellow carrots, and green beans), rice and cubed beef on plate. R23 told the CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) to take the tray back because the beef is too tough to chew, and he does not like vegetables. While this Surveyor was talking with R23, RD E (Registered Dietician) came into room and offered R23 alternatives. R23 indicated wanting a peanut butter and jelly sandwich and mashed potatoes with gravy if they have it. R23 told RD E, I told you last week I don't like vegetables. RD E indicated she was aware, and the staff must get better about not serving disliked foods. Surveyor asked RD E to see the meal ticket she brought into R23's room. Surveyor pointed out the disliked foods R23 has listed, and vegetables were one. RD E indicated they must get better about this, and she was going to talk with the kitchen staff about this. On 6/9/25 at 11:48 AM, Surveyor interviewed R23 who indicated he was losing weight, and he has no teeth. R23 indicated he does not like vegetables or oatmeal, and he has told the staff this and he keeps getting served vegetables and oatmeal and items he can't chew. R23 indicated he voiced this concern to the dietician just last week. On 6/11/25 at 8:01 AM, Surveyor interviewed RD E and asked if residents should be served foods they have listed as disliked foods and RD E indicated no. Surveyor asked if preferences should be respected, and RD E indicated yes. RD E indicated R23 should not have been served vegetables as it was a dislike of his. RD E indicated she was going to educate the kitchen staff regarding this issue. Example 2 R37 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include vascular dementia, Crohn's disease (a chronic inflammatory bowel disease that causes inflammation and swelling in the digestive tract), and history of strokes. R37's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] states that R37 has a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 14 out of 15, indicating that R37 is cognitively intact. R37's care plan dated 3/18/24 states in part: .Focus: The resident has an alteration in gastro- intestinal status r/t (related to) GERD (Gastroesophageal reflux disease ( a chronic digestive disorder that occurs when stomach contents flow back into the esophagus, causing irritation), Crohn's .Interventions: Avoid snacks that aggravate the condition. Give medications as ordered. Monitor/document side effects and effectiveness. Obtain and monitor lab/ diagnostic work as ordered. Report results to MD and follow up as indicated . It is important to note that R37's care plan does not indicate what foods to avoid or what safe alternatives would be. R37's dietary meal ticket states in part .Instructions: Low Residue diet. No fresh vegetables, no oatmeal, no beans, no salad- or may have if resident requests . On 6/9/25 at 11:25 PM, Surveyor interviewed R37. R37 reported that she has Crohn's Disease and that sometimes the dietary staff gives her food items that are not compatible with her disease. On 6/9/25 at 12:27 PM, Surveyor observed R37's meal in the dining room. R37 was served mixed vegetables that included green beans. R37 reported to Surveyor that staff gave her mixed vegetables that she can't eat, despite it being on her meal ticket. On 6/9/25 at 12:33 PM, Surveyor interviewed RD E (Registered Dietician). Surveyor asked RD E if a resident's meal ticket says no beans, should the resident be served beans, RD E stated no. Surveyor reviewed R37's meal ticked with RD E. RD E stated that R37 should have not been served beans. Example 3 R31's meal ticket, printed 6/11/25, includes: Dislikes: Gravy Breakfast: . Cherrios [sic] . On 6/10/25 at 2:13 PM, Surveyor interviewed R31 regarding her meals. R31 stated she dislikes gravy, and it is on her meal ticket. R31 stated I think they think it says I like gravy because they always give me extra. R31 expressed frustration with receiving gravy at mealtimes because she has told them she dislikes it and it is on her meal ticket yet she continues to receive gravy. R31 indicated she frequently has to ask staff to bring her Cheerios at breakfast even though it is listed on her meal ticket that she wants to receive Cheerios at breakfast.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0804 (Tag F0804)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure that each resident receives food and drink that ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure that each resident receives food and drink that is palatable and at a safe and appetizing temperature. This has the potential to affect 4 of 4 sampled residents (R56, R23, R37, R29) reviewed for food palatability and 4 of 4 supplemental residents (R2, R8, R14, and R5). R56, R23, R37, R29, R2, R8, R14, and R5 voiced concerns with their food not being palatable. Surveyors conducted 2 test trays and both test trays were not palatable. Evidenced by: Facility policy, titled Record Food Temperatures, implemented 5/28/25, includes: . Hot foods will be held at 135 degrees Fahrenheit or greater . Potentially hazardous cold food temperatures will be kept at or below 41 degrees Fahrenheit. Example 1 R29 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), with Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 4/9/25, indicates his cognition is moderately impaired with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11 out of 15. It also indicates he understands others and is understood by others. On 6/9/25 at 12:26 PM, R29 indicated their meat was too tough to chew. Surveyor observed R29's plate to have beef cut in bite size pieces pushed to the side. Example 2 R8 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His most recent MDS with ARD of 3/8/25, indicates R8 is cognitively intact with a BIMS score of 13 out of 15. On 6/9/25 at 12:26 PM, R8 indicated the meat was too tough to chew. Surveyor observed R8's plate to have beef cut in bite size pieces pushed to the side. R8 demonstrated trying to pass a fork through the meat and was unsuccessful. Example 3 On 6/9/25 at 12:29 PM, Surveyor ordered a test tray. On 6/9/25 at 12:30 PM, Surveyor observed DA S (Dietary Aide) walking down the hallway with a room tray. The room tray had a plate of hot food on it and over the top of the food was the bottom of a heat holding cambrio. DA S indicated the cambrio should have a top that goes over the plate and a bottom that goes under the plate to keep the hot food hot, but the facility often runs out of cambrio bottoms and tops because there are more residents than cambrios in the facility. On 6/9/25 at 12:33 PM, Surveyor conducted a test tray in the facility's main dining room. The mixed vegetables temperature was 122 degrees Fahrenheit. The beef with gravy over rice was 130 degrees Fahrenheit. Surveyor tried to pass a fork in a piece of beef. With some pressure, Surveyor was able to pick up the meat with the fork. Surveyor was not able to chew the meat down enough to swallow as the meat was tough and difficult to chew. This test tray was not palatable. On 6/10/25 at 10:52 AM, [NAME] W indicated he partially cooked the beef the day prior to serving it and then finished it yesterday when it was served. [NAME] W indicated he knew the meat was tough, dry, and he thought he cooked it too long. [NAME] W indicated the recipe did not say to cook the meat two separate times. [NAME] W indicated the temperature of the food should be about 160 when it is plated. Example 4 R5 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His most recent MDS with ARD of 4/4/25 Indicates R5 usually understands others and is usually understood by others. On 6/9/25 at 2:10 PM, R5 indicated the meat was terrible and tough in his noon time meal. R5 also indicated he eats most meals in his room and his hot food comes cold at times. Example 5 R14 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her most recent MDS with ARD of 4/4/25 indicates R14's cognition is intact with a BIMS score of 14 out of 15. On 6/9/25 at 2:15 PM, R14 indicated her meat was chewy at her noon lunch meal. R14 stated, I eat in my room, but the meal is cold a lot of the time. I have people bring me in food. I can't eat a lot of the food here it is terrible. At lunch, I couldn't swallow the meat, chewed and chewed and chewed. Example 6 On 6/10/25 at 11:06 AM, during the Resident Council Group Task, R23, R2, R8, and R37 voiced concerns related to their hot foods being served to cold and at an undesired temperature. On 6/10/25 at 1:43 PM, District Dietary Manager U and NHA A (Nursing Home Administrator) indicated hot foods should be served hot and cold foods should be served cold. Example 7 R56 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and has diagnoses that include mild protein-calorie malnutrition and fracture of right femur. R56's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 3/28/25, shows R56 has a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 9 indicating R56 has moderate cognitive impairment. On 6/9/25, at 10:52AM, R56 indicated to Surveyor that the food and coffee is always lukewarm to cold. Example 8 R23 admitted to facility on 4/28/25 and has diagnoses that include moderate protein-calorie malnutrition, unspecified dementia (a diagnosis of dementia where the specific type of dementia cannot be clearly determined) and need for assistance with personal care. R23's admission MDS Assessment, dated 5/2/25, shows R23 has a BIMS score of 11 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. On 6/9/25, at 11:48AM, R23 indicated to Surveyor that the beef that was served for lunch he could not chew and food is not always hot. Example 9 On 6/9/25 at 11:05 AM, Surveyor interviewed R2 regarding the meals she eats at the facility. R2 indicated the meat they are served is tough to chew. R2 indicated when eating in her room, the food is always cold. R2 was eating in the dining room on 6/9/25 for lunch and stated the food is warmer when it is in the dining room. Example 10 On 6/12/25 at 12:03 PM, Surveyor observed meal delivery on the 300 and 400 hallways. The meal trays were on an open metal rack. The last tray was delivered at 12:17 PM. On 6/12/25 at 12:17 PM, Surveyor took the temperatures of the food on the test tray. Manicotti was 167 degrees Breadstick was 133.3 degrees Milk was 52.1 degrees Cranberry juice was 51 degrees The milk and Cranberry juice were not at a palatable temperature.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility has not established an infection prevention and control program designed to p...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility has not established an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 3 of 19 sampled residents (R49, R23, and R41) and 1 of 1 supplemental residents (R19) observed for hand hygiene. Staff did not perform proper hand hygiene per standards of practice during wound care on R49 and R23. A nurse had a breach in infection control during medication adminstration observation for R19 when a nurse did not perform hand hygiene following a blood glucose test. A nurse had a breach in infection control during wound care for R41. Evidenced by: The facility policy entitled Hand Hygiene, dated 5/28/25, states, in part: . Policy: All staff will perform proper hand hygiene procedures to prevent the spread of infection to other personnel, residents, and visitors. This applies to all staff working in all locations within the facility. Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: . 1. Staff will perform hand hygiene when indicated, using proper technique consistent with accepted standards of practice. 2. Hand hygiene is indicated and will be performed under the conditions listed in, but not limited to, the attached hand hygiene table . 5. Additional considerations: a. The use of gloves does not replace hand hygiene. If your task requires gloves, perform hand hygiene prior to donning gloves, and immediately after removing gloves . Hand Hygiene Table: . Before applying and after removing personal protective equipment (PPE), including gloves . Before and after handling clean or soiled dressings, linens, etc. After handling items potentially contaminated with blood, body fluids, secretions, or excretions. When, during resident care, moving from a contaminated body site to a clean body site . The facility's Hand Hygiene policy, dated 5/28/25, states, in part: All staff will perform proper hand hygiene procedures to prevent the spread of infection to other personnel, residents, and visitors. This applies to all staff working in all locations within the facility.2. Hand hygien is indicated and will be performed under the conditions listed in, but not limited to, the attached hand hygiene table.Hand Hygiene Table includes: *after handling contaminated objects *before and after handling clean or soiled dressings, linens, etc *after handling items potentially contaminated with blood, bodily fluids, secretions, or excretions . The facility's Clean Dressing Change policy, dated 5/28/25, states, in part: It is the policy of this facility to provide wound care in a manner to decrease potential for infection and/or cross-contamination.9. Loosen the tape and remove the existing dressing. 10. Remove gloves, pulling inside out over the dressing. Discard into appropriate receptacle. 11. Wash hands and put on clean gloves. 12. Cleanse the wound as ordered . Example 1 R49 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and has diagnoses that include pressure ulcer of sacral region, unstageable and Type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic chronic kidney disease (a long-term condition in which the body has trouble controlling blood sugar and using it for energy and develops kidney disease). R49's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 5/21/25 shows R49 has a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 indicating R49 is cognitively intact. R49's Care Plan dated 5/22/25, states, in part: . Focus: The resident has pressure ulcer coccyx and right ischium related to immobility, ulcers present upon admission and prior admit to facility. Date Initiated: 5/22/25. Revision on: 5/22/25 . Interventions: . Administer treatments as ordered and monitor for effectiveness. Date Initiated: 5/22/25 . R49's June Medication Administration Record (MAR) shows order: Dakin's wash to right ischial wound followed by culiform packing to fill open space of wound and cover with 4 x 4 bordered gauze every day and evening shift for wound care. Order Date: 6/3/25 . On 6/10/25 at 7:24 AM, Surveyor observed NP C (Nurse Practitioner) perform wound care on R49's coccyx and right ischium. Surveyor observed NP C remove the dressing and packing from the ischium wound and measure the wound. NP C removed gloves and applied new gloves without hand hygiene. NP C applied treatment and dressing to the ischium wound then removed gloves. NP C applied new gloves without hand hygiene. NP C measured the coccyx wound and applied treatment and dressing. NP C removed gloves and applied new gloves without hand hygiene. On 6/10/25 at 8:05 AM, Surveyor interviewed NP C and asked when hand hygiene should be performed during wound care. NP C indicated you would remove gloves every time when it's dirty. NP C indicated she washes hands when she leaves the residents' rooms. NP C indicated that is the policy she follows. Surveyor asked if hand hygiene should be performed after doffing and donning gloves and NP C indicated she removes the dirty with the glove. On 6/11/25 at 8:20 AM, Surveyor interviewed DON B (Director of Nursing) and asked when hand hygiene should be performed during wound cares and peri/catheter cares. DON B indicated you would perform hand hygiene and change gloves in between cleansing the area and rinsing the area. Surveyor informed DON B of observation of NP C removing gloves and applying new gloves without hand hygiene. DON B indicated hand hygiene should be performed after doffing and donning gloves. Example 2 R23 admitted to facility on 4/28/25 and has diagnoses that include moderate protein-calorie malnutrition, unspecified dementia (a diagnosis of dementia where the specific type of dementia cannot be clearly determined) and need for assistance with personal care. R23's admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] shows R23 has a BIMS score of 11 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. R23's Care Plan dated 4/29/25, states, in part: . Focus: The resident has multiple pressure ulcers relate to immobility, deconditioning and refusals to reposition at times. Date Initiated: 4/29/25. Revision on: 4/29/25 . Interventions: . *Administer treatments as ordered and monitor for effectiveness. Date Initiated: 4/29/25 . R23's June MAR shows: Bilateral Buttock Wounds: Cleanse with saline, pat dry. Skin prep peri-wound. Apply calcium alginate to wound base, cover with bordered gauze dressing every day shift for wound care. Order Date: 6/5/25. Discontinue Date: 6/10/25 . Normal Saline Wash to left plantar foot wound followed by skin prep to peri wound followed by Purachol to wound bed followed by bordered gauze every day shift every Tuesday, Thursday, Saturday for wound care. Order Date: 5/20/25 Discontinue Date: 6/10/25 . Normal Saline Wash to left front iliac crest wound followed by skin prep to peri wound followed by Purachol and foam dressing every day shift every Tuesday, Thursday, Saturday for wound care. Order Date: 5/20/25 . On 6/10/25 at 7:41 AM, Surveyor observed NP C perform wound care on R23. NP C removed dressing from left foot, measured the wound and removed her right glove with gloved left hand and applied new right glove without hand hygiene. NP C measured left iliac wound and applied alginate and bordered gauze. NP C removed gloves and applied new gloves without hand hygiene. NP C removed dressings to right lower leg, cleansed wound and applied treatment and dressing. NP C removed right glove with gloved left hand and applied new glove without hand hygiene. NP C measured moisture associated dermatitis wound on R23's bottom, cleansed wound and applied treatment. NP C removed both gloves and applied new gloves without hand hygiene. NP C measured right and left buttock wounds and applied treatment and dressings. NP C removed gloves and applied new gloves without hand hygiene. On 6/10/25 at 8:05AM, Surveyor interviewed NP C and asked when hand hygiene should be performed during wound care. NP C indicated you would remove gloves every time when it's dirty. NP C indicated she washes hands when she leaves the residents' rooms. NP C indicated that is the policy she follows. Surveyor asked if hand hygiene should be performed after doffing and donning gloves and NP C indicated she removes the dirty with the gloves. On 6/11/25 at 8:20 AM, Surveyor interviewed DON B (Director of Nursing) and asked when hand hygiene should be performed during wound cares and peri/catheter cares. DON B indicated you would perform hand hygiene and change gloves in between cleansing the area and rinsing the area. Surveyor informed DON B of observation of NP C removing gloves and applying new gloves without hand hygiene. DON B indicated hand hygiene should be performed after doffing and donning gloves. Example 3 On 6/11/25 at 11:51 AM, Surveyor observed LPN J (Licensed Practical Nurse) during Medication Administration observation. LPN J performed a blood glucose test for R19 in R19's room. LPN J took the supplies to the medication cart in the hall, opened the medication cart drawer and accessed disinfectant wipes to wipe off the testing meter. LPN J did not remove gloves or perform hand hygiene after the test, prior to touching the medication cart. Surveyor interviewed LPN J and asked about hand hygiene. LPN J stated that hand hygiene is needed before resident cares, when coming out of a resident room, and before and after any procedures. Surveyor asked about hand hygiene following R19's blood glucose test. LPN J stated that gloves should have been removed and hand hygiene should have been performed prior to touching the medication cart. On 6/12/25 at 9:06 AM, Surveyor interviewed DON B (Director of Nursing) and asked about hand hygiene when performing a blood sugar. DON B indicated that gloves are contaminated following blood glucose testing. DON B stated that gloves should be removed after the test and hands cleansed prior to touching the medication cart. Example On 6/11/25 at 11:10 AM, Surveyor observed LPN G (Licensed Practical Nurse) perform wound care for R41. LPN G removed R41's wound dressing, disposed of the dressing, then began to cleanse the wound. LPN G did not remove gloves and cleanse hands prior to cleansing the wound. Following the dressing change, LPN G removed gloves, then with bare hands, grabbed the outside front of the gown and pulled the gown away to remove it. Upon leaving R41's room, Surveyor asked LPN G when hand hygiene is needed during wound care. LPN G stated before starting, anytime you go from dirty to clean, and after complete. Surveyor asked if a wound dressing is considered dirty. LPN G stated yes, gloves should have been removed and hand hygiene performed after removal of the dressing. Surveyor asked about procedure for removal of PPE. LPN G stated gloves are removed first, then gown. Surveyor asked if the outside of the gown should be touched with bare hands. LPN G stated, no, the gown should be touched inside when removing. Surveyor asked if LPN G had touched the outside of the gown. LPN G stated yes. On 6/12/25 at 9:06 AM, Surveyor interviewed DON B (Director of Nursing) and asked about hand hygiene with wound care. DON B stated that there should be removal of gloves and hand hygiene after removal of a wound dressing, prior to cleansing the wound. Surveyor asked DON B about technique for removal of PPE. DON B stated that the outside of the gown is contaminated and should not be touched with bare hands.
CONCERN (F) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observation and interview, the facility did not maintain a safe and sanitary environment in which food is prepared, stored, and distributed. This has the potential to affect all 57 residents ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation and interview, the facility did not maintain a safe and sanitary environment in which food is prepared, stored, and distributed. This has the potential to affect all 57 residents who reside in the facility. The facility did not have a system in place for manually monitoring the internal concentration of the chemical dishwasher. Surveyor observed staff prepping food and in food preparation areas without hair restraints. Surveyor observed food in circulation to be opened and undated or pass the expiration date. Evidenced by: Example 1 Facility's policy, titled Recording Dish Machine Temperatures, undated, includes: Dishwashing staff will monitor and record dishwasher machine temperatures to assure proper sanitizing of dishes. The food service manager will train dishwashing staff to monitor dish machine temperatures throughout the dishwashing process. Staff will be trained to record dish machine temperatures for the wash and rinse cycles at each meal. The food service manager will spot check this log to assure temperatures are appropriate and staff is actually monitoring dish machine temperatures. Dishwashing staff will be trained to report any problem with the dish machine to the food service manager as soon as they occur. The food service manager will promptly assess any dish machine problems and take action immediately to assure sanitation of dishes. (It is important to note the facility has a dishwasher set up to be a chemical sanitizing dishwasher and the facility would need a policy related to manually monitoring the concentration of the dishwasher, not the temperature.) On 6/9/25 at 10:16 AM, DA T (Dietary Aide) indicated he was unsure if the facility used anything for monitoring the internal temperature or the parts per million of the dishwasher. DA T indicated there is a log for recording dishwasher temperatures. DA T indicated there are test strips that they could use too. Surveyor observed the test strips to have expired on 10/1/21. Surveyor observed the dishes pass through the dishwasher and the dishwasher stayed at a constant temperature of about 120 degrees Fahrenheit. DA T indicated the dishwasher should be at 150 for wash and 180 for rinse. DA T indicated the nursing staff used all of the hot water for resident showers and that is why the dishwasher is not reaching temperature. Surveyor observed DA T continue to pass dishes through dish washer. On 6/9/25 at 10:31 AM, District Dietary Manager T indicated the dishwasher should reach 150 degrees Fahrenheit for wash and 180 degrees Fahrenheit for rinse. District Dietary Manager T and Surveyor observed the dishwasher noting the temperature is staying right around 120 degrees Fahrentheit. District Dietary Manager T indicated someone else was on the way and they would know the dishwasher better than her. District Dietary Manager T and Surveyor reviewed the Dish Machine Temperature Log together. Dish Machine Temperature Log Diary dated 1/1/25-6/9/25, include: Temperature must be recorded once during each meal period daily. If dishwasher does not reach minimum temperature for wash and rinse, contact manager on duty. AM- Wash 150 . Rinse 180 . PM- Wash 150 . Rinse 180 . All boxes have check marks . On 6/10/25 at 11:48 AM, District Dietary Manager U indicated the facility does not have a system for monitoring of internal temps or concentration of dishwasher, but he called Ecolab, and he will get a system going. On 6/10/25 at 1:43 PM, NHA A (Nursing Home Administrator) and District Dietary Manager U indicated the facility should be monitoring the dishwasher's concentration with test strips and not monitoring the temperature, because the dishwasher is set up to be a chemical sanitizing machine. District Dietary Manager U indicated he received some test strips from Ecolab that were not expired and he threw the expired ones out. NHA A indicated the facility has a new log now that they will be using to record the test strip results daily. Example 2 Facility policy, titled Hair Restraints, undated, includes: Policy- to ensure that proper sanitation standards are being followed in all dining department kitchens. Procedure- all staff entering a kitchen will wear a hairnet/hair restraint, ensuring that all hair is completely covered by the hair net. Hairnets/hair restraints will be available to all staff near the entrance to each kitchen. Signs will be posted on each kitchen door to alert staff to wear a hair net/hair restraint before entering. On 6/10/25 at 10:52 AM, Surveyor observed District Dietary Manager U to have very short hair and beard and to be in the food preparation area with no beard net or hair restraint. On 6/10/25 at 10:52 AM, Surveyor observed [NAME] W to be using the 3-compartment sink with no beard net. [NAME] W indicated he was washing cookie sheets. On 6/10/25 at 11:35 AM, Surveyor observed [NAME] V to have an uncovered mustache while scooping coleslaw and putting it into small bowls. [NAME] V indicated he forgot to put on a beard net, and he would get one right away. On 6/10/25 at 11:48 AM, District Dietary Manager U indicated he thinks hair over 1/2 inch needs to be covered by a hair restraint . On 6/10/25 at 1:43 PM, NHA A and District Dietary Manager U indicated all hair should be restrained when in the kitchen and especially when working with clean dishes and open food. Example 3 Facility policy, titled Dining Department Storage, undated, includes: Food should be dated as it is placed on the shelves . Date marking to indicate the date or day by which a ready to eat, potentially hazardous food should be consumed, sold, or discarded will be visible on all high risk food . Leftover food . is clearly labeled and dated before being refrigerated . All food should be covered, labeled, and dated. All foods will be checked to assure that foods will be consumed by their safe use by dates or discarded . On 6/9/25 at 9:54 AM, Surveyor observed honey wheat bread that had been opened with no open date. Surveyor observed opened breaded fish in the freezer with no open date, opened breaded chicken patties in the freezer with no open date, opened turkey brats with no open date, and opened chicken breasts in the freezer with no open date and no expiration date. In the facility's walk-in refrigerator, Surveyor observed sliced ham to be dated 5/10/25, applesauce to be removed from original container with no label/ no open date/no expiration date, and Surveyor observed potato salad that had been opened with no open date. During an interview [NAME] W indicated all food that is opened should have an opened date, the ham should have been tossed out, and any food removed from the original container should also have a label on it of what it is. On 6/10/25 at 1:43 PM, NHA A and District Dietary Manager U indicated all opened food should be labeled and dated and food pass the use by date or expiration date should be discarded.
Jan 2025 3 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Report Alleged Abuse (Tag F0609)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility did not report 1 (R2) of 2 incidents to the State Survey Agency and/or Nursing...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility did not report 1 (R2) of 2 incidents to the State Survey Agency and/or Nursing Home Administrator during the required timeframe. On 12/7/24 NHA (Nursing Home Administrator) was informed of a skin tear on R2's left wrist which CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant)-G reported to LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse)-E as occurring when taking off R2's sweat shirt. NHA-A was not informed on 12/7/24 of R2's allegation the skin tear occurred when CNA-G grabbed her arm. The allegation of CNA-G grabbing R2's arm was reported to DON (Director of Nursing)-B on 12/7/24 but DON-B did not report this to the State agency. The allegation of physical abuse was not reported to NHA-A or the State agency until 12/9/24. Findings include: The facility's policy titled, Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation and last reviewed/revised 9/22/23 under policy documents: It is the policy of [name of facility] to provide protections for the health, welfare and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of resident property. Under the section VII. Reporting/Response documents A. The facility will have written procedures that include: 1. Reporting of all alleged violations to the Administrator, state agency, adult protective services and to all other required agencies (e.g., law enforcement when applicable) within specified timeframe's: a. Immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury, or b. Not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury. R2's diagnoses includes osteoarthritis, anxiety disorder, hypertension, essential tremor, and depressive disorder. R2's annual MDS (minimum data set) with an assessment reference date of 11/27/24 has a BIMS (brief interview mental status) score of 13 which indicates cognitively intact. R2 requires substantial/maximal assistance for toileting hygiene, rolling left & right, lying to sitting on the edge of the bed , chair/bed to chair transfers and toilet transfers. Walk 10 feet and walk 50 feet with two turns is assessed as partial/moderate assistance. R2 is assessed as frequently incontinent of urine and occasionally incontinent of bowel. The cognitive loss/dementia CAA (care area assessment) was not triggered. The Functional Abilities (Self-Care and Mobility) CAA dated 12/10/24 under Care Plan Considerations documents Is a long term resident. Needs assist with ambulation, locomotion, dressing, hygiene, toileting, bathing, bed mobility, and transfers. BIMS 13. Diagnosis includes arthritis, PAF (Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation), and venous insufficiency. Proceed to care plan functional abilitities. R2's nurses note dated 12/7/24, at 20:41 (8:41 p.m.) documents CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) reported when she took off residents sweat shirt resident said I'm bleeding and CNA came to get the nurse. Noted 4.5 cm (centimeter) x (times) 4 cm skin tear to left wrist. Skin tear cleansed with NS (normal saline) approximated and steri stripped. [Medical Group Name] [Name] PA (Physician Assistant) updated on call RN (Registered Nurse) Manager updated. This nurses note was written by LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse)-E. On 1/15/25, at 11:48 a.m., Surveyor reviewed the Facility Reported Incident involving R2 with date of occurrence documented 12/7/24, date discovered is documented as 12/9/24, and date reported is 12/9/24. On 1/15/25, at 2:42 p.m., Surveyor interviewed LPN-E regarding her nurses note dated 12/7/24. LPN-E informed Surveyor CNA-G told her when she was taking off R2's sweatshirt she got a skin tear. LPN-E informed Surveyor she asked CNA-G how R2 received the skin tear as it was a large skin tear. LPN-E informed Surveyor R2 said she just knows after the CNA took off her shirt she was bleeding when the CNA was in the room. LPN-E informed Surveyor she called the nurse manager right away regarding R2's skin tear. LPN-E informed when she went back to R2's room and CNA-G was not in the room, R2 told her the CNA grabbed to arm to put her in bed. Surveyor asked LPN-E after R2 told you the CNA grabbed her arm did you notify the RN Manager know. LPN-E replied yes and then they did an investigation. Surveyor asked LPN-E who the nurse manager was. LPN-E replied [name of] RN Manager-F. On 1/16/25, at 8:15 a.m., Surveyor interviewed RN Manager-F regarding R2's skin tear which occurred on 12/7/24. Surveyor asked RN Manager-F if she was in the building. RN Manager-F informed Surveyor she was on call and not in the facility. Surveyor asked RN Manager-F how she became aware of R2's skin tear. RN Manager-F replied the floor nurse and thought it was name of LPN-E. Surveyor asked RN Manager-F if she remembers what LPN-E said to her. RN Manager-F stated R2 got a skin tear and thinks she received the skin tear when the CNA was getting her ready for bed. The CNA wasn't exactly sure how it happened and notified her (LPN-E) of the skin tear. RN Manager-F informed Surveyor she called NHA (Nursing Home Administrator)-A to let her know of the skin tear as R2 had said wait until her son hears. RN Manager-F explained a lot of times the son will skip over everyone and goes to NHA-A. Surveyor asked RN Manager-F after LPN-E's initial call to her did LPN-E call her back. RN Manager-F replied she text me later. Surveyor asked what did LPN-E text her. RN Manager-F informed Surveyor R2 was upset and R2 said she received the skin tear when the CNA grabbed her arm. RN Manager-F informed Surveyor not to down play but R2 can be very particular on how she wants her cares, R2 will tell you what she wants and can get persnickety. Surveyor asked RN Manager-F if she called NHA-A back after she was informed R2 had said the CNA grabbed her arm. RN Manager-F replied I did not because she was in Chicago, figured I'd call [first name of] DON (Director of Nursing)-B. Surveyor asked RN Manager-F what she told DON-B. RN Manger-F replied the CNA grabbed her arm. Surveyor asked RN Manager-F if she was given any instructions from DON-B. RN Manager-F informed Surveyor the CNA wasn't staying for the whole shift, not working the next day (Sunday) and they were going to look at it on Monday. On 1/16/25, at 8:49 a.m., Surveyor asked DON-B when she became aware of R2's skin tear which occurred on 12/7/24. DON-B replied think they called me that night. I had [first name of CNA-G] sent home after her statement. DON-B informed Surveyor she wants to say LPN-E called her that they have an issue with [name of resident]'s skin. Surveyor asked if RN Manager-F called her. DON-B informed Surveyor RN Manager-F called her to report what was going on with R2 and CNA-G was sent home after her statement. Surveyor asked DON-B if she was made aware R2's allegation of CNA-G grabbing her arm. DON-B informed Surveyor that's what R2 told LPN-E. Surveyor asked DON-B if she notified the State on 12/7/24. DON-B replied no I did not. Surveyor asked DON-B why she didn't report the allegation to the State agency. DON-B replied I was still investigating. DON-B informed Surveyor R2 has a history of accusing staff that's why she wanted to look into it more before going forward with anything else. Surveyor asked DON-B when the last time R2 made an accusation about staff. DON-B replied I don't know, I really have to look, don't know the answer off the top of my head. Surveyor asked DON-B to look into when R2 last made an accusation and get back to Surveyor. On 1/16/25, at 9:39 a.m., DON-B informed Surveyor September was the last time R2 accused a CNA or staff of doing something that wasn't intentional. On 1/16/25, at 11:01 a.m., Surveyor asked NHA-A why R2's allegation of CNA-G grabbing her arm which resulted in a skin tear on 12/7/24 wasn't reported until 12/9/24. NHA-A informed Surveyor when she was initially called the initial report didn't say anything about the CNA grabbing R2's arm. NHA-A informed the skin tear was written up as a grievance. NHA-A informed Surveyor when she came in Monday (12/9/24), R2's son called her and at some point she went to speak to R2. When she spoke with R2 it was different than what she was told and so she did a self report. Surveyor informed NHA-A Surveyor spoke with RN Manager-F who informed Surveyor she had called her (NHA-A) about R2's skin tear but didn't call NHA-A back as she didn't want to bother NHA-A as she was in Chicago. RN Manager-F informed Surveyor she called DON-B. Surveyor asked DON-B if she reported the allegation of CNA-G grabbing R2's arm on 12/7/24 and Surveyor was informed by DON-B she didn't. Surveyor informed NHA-A R2's allegation should have been reported on 12/7/24. No additional information was provided to Surveyor as to why the facility did not report R2's allegation until 12/9/24.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0657 (Tag F0657)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility did not ensure 1 (R2) of 4 residents care plans were revised. R2's care plan w...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility did not ensure 1 (R2) of 4 residents care plans were revised. R2's care plan was not revised after an allegation on 12/7/24 of a CNA grabbing R2's wrist causing a skin tear. Findings include: The facility's policy titled, Care Plan Revisions Upon Status Change and implemented 10/21/24 under Policy documents The purpose of this procedure is to provide a consistent process for reviewing and revising the care plan for those residents experiencing a status change. Under Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines documents 1. The comprehensive care plan will be reviewed, and revised as necessary, when a resident experiences a status change. R2's diagnoses includes osteoarthritis, anxiety disorder, hypertension, essential tremor, and depressive disorder. The ADL (Activities Daily Living) Functional Potential/Rehabilitation and/or Limited Mobility care plan initiated 9/29/23 documents the following interventions: *Bathing/Showering: Provide sponge bath when a full bath or shower cannot be tolerated. Initiated 9/29/23. *Bathing/Showering: Resident prefers showers. Initiated 9/29/23 & revised 10/3/24. *Bathing/Showering: The resident is dependent on (1) staff to provide bath/shower. Initiated & revised 9/29/23. *Do not disturb resident between Midnight and 0800 (8:00 a.m.) unless call light is on. Initiated 11/13/23. *Dressing-Resident will have the option to wear gown or other item of choice for sleeping. Initiated 4/24/24. *Eating: The resident needs setup or clean up assistance to eat. Initiated 9/29/23. *Lower Body dressing: The resident is dependent on (1) staff for dressing. Initiated & revised 9/29/23. *Lying to sitting on the side of the bed: The resident requires substantial/maximum assistance by (1) staff to complete task. Initiated & revised 9/29/23. Mobility: The resident uses manual wheelchair. Initiated 9/29/23. *Oral Care: The resident needs moderate/clean up assistance with oral care assist with brushing and flossing twice daily am/eve (morning/evening) and antibacterial rinse to follow. Initiated 9/29/23 & revised 3/21/24. *Personal Hygiene: The resident is dependent on (1) staff for personal hygiene. Initiated & revised 9/29/23. *Putting on or taking off shoes: The resident is dependent on staff to complete. Initiated 9/29/23. *Roll left and right: The resident requires substantial/maximum assistance on (1) staff to complete. Initiated & revised 11/24/24. *The resident has no weight bearing restrictions. Initiated: 9/29/23. *Toileting Transferring: The resident needs substantial/maximum (1) staff assistance to complete task. Initiated & revised 11/24/24. *Toileting Transferring: The resident needs partial/moderate assistance of 1 staff assistance to complete task. Initiated 9/29/23. *Transfer: The resident needs partial/moderate assistance of 1 staff for transferring. Initiated 9/29/23. *Upper Body Dressing: The resident is dependent on (1) staff for dressing. Initiated 9/29/23 & revised 8/23/24. *Walk 10 FT (feet): The resident requires substantial/maximum assistance on 1 staff to complete task. Initiated 9/29/23. *Walk 10 FT: The resident uses a [2 wheeled walker] [standard walker] for walking. Initiated & revised 9/29/23. R2's annual MDS (minimum data set) with an assessment reference date of 11/27/24 has a BIMS (brief interview mental status) score of 13 which indicates cognitively intact. R2 requires substantial/maximal assistance for toileting hygiene, rolling left & right, lying to sitting on the edge of the bed , chair/bed to chair transfers and toilet transfers. Walk 10 feet and walk 50 feet with two turns is assessed as partial/moderate assistance. R2 is assessed as frequently incontinent of urine and occasionally incontinent of bowel. The Visual/Bedside [NAME] Report located in R2's bathroom dated 12/9/24 under the section Resident Care documents * DRESSING-Resident will have the option to wear gown or other item of choice for sleeping. Under the section Mobility documents * MOBILITY: The resident needs substantial/maximum assistance for 1 staff for mobility. * MOBILITY: The resident uses manual wheelchair. *WALK 10 FT (feet): The resident requires substantial/maximum assistance on 1 staff to complete task. *WALK 10 FT: The resident uses a [2 wheeled walker] [standard walker] for walking. On 1/15/25, at 10:32 a.m., Surveyor observed CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant)-C enter R2's room and ask R2 if she was ready to get up. CNA-C removed the bedding, removed gripper socks, and placed tubi grips & gripper socks on R2. CNA-C opened R2's closet and gave R2 choices of what to wear. CNA-C placed gloves on and asked R2 if she wanted the door open or closed. R2 stated open and CNA-C explained to Surveyor R2 is claustrophobic. CNA-C stated to R2 you do your thing. R2 grabbed onto the left transfer bar stating I try to get out of bed by myself. Resident then asked CNA-C to swing her legs so she was sitting on the edge of the bed. CNA-C placed the walker next to R2, raised the head of the bed up high and then R2 stated I don't have to tell her, she knows what to do. CNA-C placed a towel on top of the cushion in the wheelchair and then raised the height of the bed up telling R2 let me know when. R2's bed was raised up until R2 slid with her feet on the floor while R2 held onto the walker & wheelchair. After R2 was standing up, R2 sat in the wheelchair. CNA-C wheeled R2 into the bathroom. CNA-C explained in the evening R2 likes to be wheeled into the bathroom and walk back to bed with a walker. CNA-C then placed powder on the toilet seat. R2 explained to Surveyor she sticks to the toilet seat. R2 held onto the grab bar, stood up, took a couple steps to turn and sat on the toilet. CNA-C removed her gloves, washed her hands, and placed gloves on. R2 washed her face, CNA-C removed R2's gown, washed R2's upper body & placed a sweatshirt on R2. CNA-C placed an incontinence product and pants on R2, moved the wheelchair closer and then R2 grabbed onto the grab bar and stood up. CNA-C washed R2's frontal perineal area & buttocks, applied barrier cream and pulled up incontinence product & pants. R2 sat in wheelchair. On 1/15/25, at 2:11 p.m., Surveyor asked CNA-C if she heard any concerns regarding CNA-G. CNA-C replied just from first name of R2. CNA-C explained CNA-G did a double and didn't do what R2 wanted her to do going to bed, grabbed her wrist that's how she got her skin tear. On 1/16/25, at 10:20 a.m., Surveyor spoke with CNA-D on the telephone regarding R2 on 12/7/24. CNA-D explained R2 was already in bed with a sweater. CNA-D informed Surveyor R2 never is in bed with a sweater as she takes it off before going to bed. CNA-D informed Surveyor the CNA was confused on how to put R2 to bed. CNA-D explained R2 walks back from the bathroom to the bed with a walker. On 1/16/25, at 11:01 a.m., Surveyor met with NHA (Nursing Home Administrator)-A regarding R2's allegation on 12/7/24 when CNA-G grabbed R2's arm which resulted in a skin tear. Surveyor reviewed this facility reported incident. Surveyor asked NHA-A if there was any change in R2's plan of care after this incident to prevent a further occurrence. Surveyor informed NHA-A Surveyor observed morning cares on 1/15/25. Surveyor explained to NHA-A how R2 has a certain routine of how to gets out of bed and was informed in the evening R2 is wheeled into the bathroom and then she walks back to bed with a walker. Surveyor also informed NHA-A R2 likes to have the room door open as she is claustrophobic. Surveyor informed NHA-A none of R2's interventions address what R2 likes and asked how would a CNA who hasn't taken care of R2 prior know this. NHA-A informed Surveyor she doesn't recall and will have to ask. On 1/16/25, at 12:25 p.m. NHA-A provided Surveyor with R2's Visual/Bedside [NAME] Report dated 1/16/25. Surveyor noted the Resident Care section has been updated with the following: *Prefers to keep her door open even while cares are being performed per her preference and *Toileting in the evening: Will ambulate from BR (bathroom) to bed with wheeled walker but will not ambulate from bed to BR per her choice. Do not rush her. On 1/16/25, at 1:27 p.m., Surveyor met with NHA-A and DON-B. Surveyor asked if the interventions on the [NAME] come from the care plan. DON-B replied yes. Surveyor asked why the care plan was not revised prior to Surveyor asking. DON-B informed Surveyor she doesn't want to throw anyone under the bus and stated she delegated it and didn't follow up to make sure it was done. Surveyor asked for a copy of R2's revised care plans. On 1/16/25, at 1:56 p.m., Surveyor was provided with R2's care plans. The ADL Functional Potential/Rehabilitation and/or Limited Mobility care plan initiated 9/29/23 was revised with the following interventions: *Prefers to keep her door open even while cares are being performed per her preference. Initiated 1/16/25. *Toileting in the evening: Will ambulate from BR to bed with wheeled walker but will not ambulate from bed to BR per her choice. Do not rush her. Initiated 1/16/25. No additional information was provided as to why R2's care plans were not revised prior to Surveyor inquiring on 1/16/25.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Pharmacy Services (Tag F0755)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility did not provide pharmaceutical services, including procedures...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility did not provide pharmaceutical services, including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals to meet the needs of each resident for 5 (R3, R5, R6, R7 and R8) of 7 residents reviewed for medications. *R3, R5, R6, R7 and R8 had MD orders for narcotic pain medication. Facility staff did not consistently document the administration time of the pain medication directly after administering the pain medication as outlined in the facility policy. The late documentation could result in duplication of pain medication administration. *R5 had duplicate Medical Doctor (MD) orders for Oxycodone (a narcotic pain medication). Facility staff were using both MD orders for documenting the administration of Oxycodone. Findings include: The Wisconsin State Regulation entitled, DHS 132.60(5)(d)2. documents, in part: . Responsibility for administration. Policies and procedures designed to provide safe and accurate acquisition, receipt, dispensing and administration of medications shall be developed by the facility and shall be followed by personnel assigned to prepare and administer medications and to record their administration. The same person shall prepare, administer, and immediately record in the resident's clinical record the administration of medications. The facility policy dated May 2018, titled, Preparation and General Guidelines. Medication Administration-General Guidelines documents, in part: Medications are administered as prescribed in accordance with good nursing principles and practices . Documentation (including electronic) . The individual who administers the medication dose records the administration on the resident's MAR/eMAR [Medication Administration Record/electronic Medication Administration Record] directly after the medication is given . On 1/16/25, Director of Nursing supplied the above Medication Administration Policy to Surveyor. Surveyor asked if the Medication Administration policy had been changed recently. DON-B stated No. 1.) R3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that includes dementia, and recent hospitalization for sepsis and right lower extremity fractures. R3's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documents R3 is severely cognitively impaired. R3 has pain almost constantly and the pain will occasionally affect R3's sleep. R3's Medical Doctor (MD) order, dated 9/18/24, documents: Oxycodone HCL Tablet 5 milligrams (MG). Give 5MG by mouth every 6 hours as needed for pain. Surveyor reviewed R3's Medication Administration Record (MAR) and R3's Orders administration note within the electronic medical record. Surveyor noted that the time entered on R3's MAR as the administration time was not documented directly after medication administration. Surveyor noted 12 times that R3's medication administration was documented later in the day. Examples include: -On 9/20/24, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)-H documented Oxycodone 5MG was administered at 9PM. This administration note was created at 10:58 PM, which is 1 hour and 58 minutes later. -On 9/27 24, LPN-I documented Oxycodone 5MG was administered at 10:36 AM. This administration note was created at 1:37 PM, which is 3 hours and 1 minute later. -On 9/28/24, LPN-I documented Oxycodone 5MG was administered at 8:35 AM. This administration note was created at 9:05 AM, which is 40 minutes later. -On 9/29/24, LPN-I documented Oxycodone 5MG was administered at 8:21 AM. This administration note was created at 1:22 PM, which is 5 hours and 1 minute later. -On 10/6/24, LPN-H documented Oxycodone 5MG was administered at 3:02 PM. This administration note was created at 10:03 PM, which is 7 hours and 1 minute later. -On 10/6/24, LPN-H documented Oxycodone 5MG was administered at 9:20 PM. This administration note was created at 10:04 PM, which is 44 minutes later. -On 10/12/24, LPN-I documented Oxycodone 5MG was administered at 9:28 AM. This administration note was created at 11:29 PM, which is 2 hours and 1 minute later. -On 10/17/24, LPN-I documented Oxycodone 5MG was administered at 7:05 AM. This administration note was created at 4:15 PM, which is 9 hours and 10 minutes later. -On 10/22/24, LPN-I documented Oxycodone 5MG was administered at 7:15 AM. This administration note was created at 12:39 PM, which is 5 hours and 24 minutes later. -On 10/25/24, LPN-H documented Oxycodone 5MG was administered at 9:30 PM. This administration note was created at 10:51 PM, which is 1 hour and 21 minutes later. -On 10/26/24, LPN-I documented Oxycodone 5MG was administered at 8:08 AM. This administration note was created at 2:26 PM, which is 6 hours and 18 minutes later. -On 10/26/24, LPN-H documented Oxycodone 5MG was administered at 4:15 PM. This administration note was created at 5:35 PM, which is 1 hour and 20 minutes later. Surveyor noted these 12 examples include late documentation up to 9 hours and 10 minutes later than the medication was administered. Surveyor noted in these 12 examples, staff did not follow facility policy or Wisconsin State Regulation that indicate staff should immediately record in the resident's clinical record the administration of medications. Surveyor noted during the time the medication was given but not documented, another facility staff could have come along and saw the medication was not given and administer the medication again. This could potentially cause a medication error. 2.) Surveyor reviewed R5's MAR and R5's Orders administration note within R5's electronic medical record. Surveyor noted that the time entered on R5's MAR as the administration time was not documented directly after medication administration. Surveyor noted 11 times that R5's medication administration was documented later in the day. Examples include: -On 10/25/24, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)-H documented Oxycodone 5MG was administered at 8:34 PM. This administration note was created at 10:54 PM, which is 2 hours and 20 minutes later. -On 10/29/24, LPN-I documented Oxycodone 5MG was administered at 12:04 PM. This administration note was created at 2:04 PM, which is 2 hours later. -On 10/29/24, Registered Nurse (RN)-K documented Oxycodone 10MG was administered at 2:45 PM. This administration note was created at 3:46 PM, which is 1 hour and 1 minute later. -On 10/30/24, LPN-I documented Oxycodone 10MG was administered at 8:02 AM. This administration note was created at 8:22PM, which is 20 minutes later. -On 10/30/24, LPN-H documented Oxycodone 10MG was administered at 3:30 PM. This administration note was created at 6:28 PM, which is 2 hours and 58 minutes later. -On 10/30/24, LPN-H documented Oxycodone 10MG was administered at 8 PM. This administration note was created on 10/31/24 at 00:21 AM, which is 4 hours and 21 minutes later. -On 10/31/24, LPN-I documented Oxycodone 10 MG was administered at 7:30 AM. This administration note was created at 8:13 AM, which is 43 minutes later. -On 11/5/24, LPN-I documented Oxycodone 10 MG was administered at 7 AM. This administration note was created at 7:45 AM, which is 45 minutes later. -On 11/7/24, LPN-I documented Oxycodone 10 MG was administered at 7 AM. This administration note was created at 7:32 AM, which is 32 minutes later. -On 11/9/24, LPN-I documented Oxycodone 10 MG was administered at 7:15 AM. This administration note was created at 9:05 AM, which is 1 hour and 50 minutes later. -On 11/13/24, LPN-I documented Oxycodone 10 MG was administered at 8:02 AM. This administration note was created at 11:51 AM, which is 3 hours and 49 minutes later. Surveyor noted these 11 examples include late documentation up to 4 hours and 21 minutes later than the medication was administered. Surveyor noted in these 11 examples, staff did not follow facility policy or Wisconsin State Regulation that documents staff should immediately record in the resident's clinical record the administration of medications. Surveyor noted that during the time the medication was given but not documented, another facility staff could have come along and saw that the medication was not given and administer the medication again. This could potentially cause a medication error. 3.) R6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that include Wedge compression fracture of T11-T12 Vertebra, Subsequent encounter for fracture with delayed healing, and Low back pain. R6's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documents R6 is cognitively intact. R6 has pain almost constantly. R6's pain occasionally affects R's sleep and almost constantly interferes with day-to-day activity. R6's MD order dated 10/24/24 and discontinued on 10/30/24 documents, Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen tablet 5-325 milligrams (MG). Give 1 tablet by mouth every 4 hours for pain. R6's MD order dated 10/30/24 and discontinued on 11/4/24 documents, Oxycodone HCL oral tablet 5MG. Give 1 tablet by mouth every 6 hours as needed for pain. R6's MD order dated 11/4/24 and discontinued 11/15/24 documents, Oxycodone HCL oral tablet 5MG. Give 1 tablet by mouth every 6 hours as needed for pain. Surveyor reviewed R6's Medication Administration Record (MAR) and R6's Orders administration note within R6's electronic medical record. Surveyor noted that the time entered on R6's MAR as the administration time was not documented directly after medication administration. Surveyor noted 11 times R6's medication administration was documented later in the day. Examples include: -On 10/25/24, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)-H documented Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen 5-325MG was administered at 8:10 PM. This administration note was created at 10:49 PM, which is 2 hours and 39 minutes later. -On 10/26/24, LPN-I documented Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen 5-325MG was administered at 1:01 PM. This administration note was created at 2:21 PM, which is 1 hour and 20 minutes later. -On 10/26/24, LPN-H documented Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen 5-325MG was administered at 9PM. This administration note was created at 00:55 AM, which is 3 hours and 55 minutes later. -On 10/27/24, LPN-I documented Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen 5-325MG was administered at 1:29 PM. This administration note was created at 2:29 PM, which is 1 hour later. -On 10/28/24, RN-K documented Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen 5-325MG was administered at 4:45 PM. This administration note was created at 6:22 PM, which is 1 hour and 37 minutes later. -On 10/30/24, LPN-I documented Oxycodone 5MG was administered at 10:32 AM. This administration note was created at 12:56 PM, which is 2 hours and 24 minutes later. -On 10/30/24, LPN-H documented Oxycodone 5MG was administered 4:30PM. This administration note was created at 5:24 PM, which is 54 minutes later. -On 10/30/24, LPN-H documented Oxycodone 5MG was administered at 10:30 PM. This administration note was created on 10/31/24 at 00:19, which is 1 hour and 49 minutes later. -On 11/7/24, LPN-I documented Oxycodone 5MG was administered at 8:30 AM. This administration note was created at 11:13 AM, which is 2 hours and 43 minutes later. -On 11/9/24, LPN-I documented Oxycodone 5MG was administered at 8:16 AM. This administration note was created at 1:16 PM, which is 5 hours later. -On 11/13/24, LPN-I documented Oxycodone 5MG was administered at 7:16 AM. This administration note was created at 11:44 AM, which is 4 hours and 28 minutes later. Surveyor noted that these 11 examples include late documentation up to 5 hours later than the medication was administered. Surveyor noted that in these 11 examples, staff did not follow facility policy or Wisconsin State Regulation that documents staff should immediately record in the resident's clinical record the administration of medications. Surveyor noted that during the time the medication was given but not documented, another facility staff could have come along and saw that the medication was not given and administer the medication again. This could potentially cause a medication error. 4.) R7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that include Aftercare following joint replacement surgery, Fibromyalgia and Chronic pain Syndrome. R7's Medicare 5-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documents that R7 is cognitively intact. R7 had pain almost constantly. R7's pain frequently affects R7's sleep. R7's MD order with a start date of 10/23/24 documents Oxycodone HCL tablet 5 milligrams (MG). Give 2 tablets by mouth every 6 hours as needed for pain. Surveyor reviewed R7's Medication Administration Record (MAR) and R7's Orders administration note within R7's electronic medical record. Surveyor noted that the time entered on R7's MAR as the administration time was not documented directly after medication administration. Surveyor noted 2 times that R7's medication administration was documented later in the day. Examples include: -On 10/24/24, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)-H documented Oxycodone 10MG was administered at 4PM. This administration note was created at 4:17 PM, which is 17 minutes later. -On 10/28/24, LPN-H documented Oxycodone 10MG was administered at 10:10 PM. This administration note was created at 11:15 PM, which is 1 hour and 5 minutes later. Surveyor noted that these 2 examples include late documentation up to 1 hour and 5 minutes later than the medication was administered. Surveyor noted that in these 2 examples, staff did not follow facility policy or Wisconsin State Regulation that documents staff should immediately record in the resident's clinical record the administration of medications. Surveyor noted that during the time the medication was given but not documented, another facility staff could have come along and saw that the medication was not given and administer the medication again. This could potentially cause a medication error. 5.) R8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that include Cellulitis of left lower limb, Osteoarthritis, and chronic pain syndrome. R8's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documents R8 is cognitively intact. R8 has pain frequently. R8's pain frequently affects R8's sleep. R8's MD order with a start date of 10/2/24 documents Oxycodone HCL tablet 5 milligrams (MG). Give 1 tablet by mouth every 6 hours as needed for pain. R8's MD order with a start date of 10/2/24 documents Oxycodone HCL tablet 5MG. Give 2 tablets by mouth every 6 hours as needed for pain. Surveyor reviewed R8's Medication Administration Record (MAR) and R8's Orders administration note within R8's electronic medical record. Surveyor noted that the time entered on R8's MAR as the administration time was not documented directly after medication administration. Surveyor noted 8 times that R8's medication administration was documented later in the day. Examples include: -On 10/3/24, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)-H documented Oxycodone 10MG was administered at 4PM. This administration note was created at 7:50PM, which is 3 hours and 50 minutes later. -On 10/6/24, LPN-H documented Oxycodone 10MG was administered at 2:30 PM. This administration note was created at 2:54PM, which is 24 minutes later. -On 10/10/24, LPN-I documented Oxycodone 10MG was administered at 10:30 AM. This administration note was created at 10:57 AM, which is 27 minutes later. -On 10/12/24, LPN-I documented Oxycodone 10MG was administered at 10:20 AM. This administration note was created at 4:21 PM, which is 5 hours and 1 minute later. -On 10/13/24, LPN-I documented Oxycodone 10MG was administered at 11 AM. This administration note was created at 11:49 AM, which is 49 minutes later. -On 10/15/24, LPN-I documented Oxycodone 10MG was administered at 7:08 AM. This administration note was created at 3:08 PM, which is 8 hours later. -On 10/17/24, LPN-I documented Oxycodone 5MG was administered at 6:45 AM. This administration note was created at 8:20 AM, which is 1 hour and 35 minutes later. -On 10/23/24, RN-K documented Oxycodone 10MG was administered at 9:50 PM. This administration note was created at 11:07 PM, which is 1 hour and 17 minutes later. Surveyor noted that these 8 examples include late documentation up to 8 hours later than the medication was administered. Surveyor noted that in these 8 examples, staff did not follow facility policy or Wisconsin State Regulation that documents staff should immediately record in the resident's clinical record the administration of medications. Surveyor noted that during the time the medication was given but not documented, another facility staff could have come along and saw that the medication was not given and administer the medication again. This could potentially cause a medication error. On 1/15/25, at 2:10 PM, Surveyor interviewed Registered Nurse (RN)-J. Surveyor asked when a medication administration time should be documented. RN-J stated that RN-J will always document the administration of a medication as soon as the medication is administered. On 1/15/25, at 2:20 PM, Surveyor interviewed RN-K. Surveyor asked when a medication administration time should be documented. RN-K stated it should be documented at the same time as the medication was administered. Surveyor asked if a medication would ever be documented hours after the medication administration. RN-K stated it shouldn't be documented like that, but in a rare circumstance like being pulled away to do something else or deal with something urgent, it may be documented later. RN-K indicated that best practice would be to document at the time of administration. On 1/16/25 at 8:35 AM, Surveyor observed LPN-I administering medications. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)-I documented the administration of medications immediately after administering the medications. On 1/16/25, at 8:45 AM, Surveyor interviewed LPN-I. Surveyor asked how long LPN-I had been working in the facility. LPN-I stated LPN-I had worked 30 years in the facility. Surveyor asked if in the past, LPN-I had documented the administration of medications later than immediately after the administration. LPN-I stated over the years, yes. LPN-I continued and indicated that after a recent incident regarding diverging of medication involving a different nurse, LPN-I did not document the administration late anymore. LPN-I stated that LPN-I would sometimes forget to put the documentation into the electronic medical record and sign out the narcotic pain medication until later in the day. LPN-I indicated there were times that LPN-I was at home when LPN-I remembered that documentation was not completed. On 1/16/25, at 11:25 AM, Surveyor interviewed RN Manager-F. Surveyor asked if facility staff can document a medication administration hours after it was given. RN-F stated that facility staff can back time a medication administration, if needed. Surveyor asked when documentation of a medication administration should occur. RN-F stated that after a medication if given, it should immediately be documented as given. Surveyor informed RN-F of facility staff documenting the administration of medications sometimes hours after the administration. Surveyor asked if RN-F was concerned about the late documentation. RN-F stated yes, it is not best practice. On 1/16/25, at 12:55 PM, Surveyor interviewed Nursing Home Administrator (NHA)-A and Director of Nursing (DON)-B. Surveyor asked when a medication administration should be documented. DON-B stated the minute that the medication is given. DON-B stated that through an investigation relating to diverting medication that occurred on 10/30/24, DON-B noted that staff were not always signing out a medication administration on the MAR. Surveyor informed DON-B and NHA-A that facility staff were not always documenting the medication administration time on the MAR immediately after the medication was given. Surveyor gave examples of documentation being completed up to 9 hours after the medication administration. Surveyor asked if DON-B would be concerned about documenting medication administration that long after giving a medication. DON-B stated that 9 hours is ridiculous, especially since staff have 8-hour shifts. DON-B stated that DON-B would be concerned. On 1/16/25, at 3:32 PM, DON-B stated that DON-B reviewed medication administration times on a few facility staff members for the last month. DON-B stated that LPN-I did not have any long gaps in between medication administration and documentation of the administration. DON-B stated that RN-K did have one instance of about an hour difference in documentation. DON-B stated that DON-B will complete education and will audit. On 1/17/25 at 1:17 PM, NHA-A sent Surveyor additional information for review. Surveyor reviewed the additional information however Surveyor notes current noncompliance was identified at this regulation. 6.) R5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that include: Infection and inflammatory reaction due to internal right knee prosthesis. R5's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documents R5 has intact cognition. R5 has pain almost constantly which frequently affects R5's sleep. R5's Medical Doctor (MD) order dated 10/24/24 with a discontinue date of 11/16/24 documents: Oxycodone HCL oral tablet 5 milligrams (MG). Give 1 tablet by mouth every 4 hours as needed for Pain Management. R5's Progress note dated 10/25/24, at 4:36 PM, documents in part, New Order Received to increase As Needed Oxycodone to 1 or 2 tabs every 4 hours as needed . R5's MD order dated 10/25/24 with a discontinue date of 10/28/24 documents: Oxycodone HCL oral tablet 5 MG. Give 2 tablet by mouth every 4 hours as needed for Pain. Give 1-2 tablets by mouth every 4 hours as needed for Pain Management. R5's MD order dated 10/28/24 with a discontinue date of 11/16/24 documents: Oxycodone HCL oral tablet 5 MG. Give 1 tablet by mouth every 4 hours as needed for Pain. R5's MD order dated 10/28/24 with a discontinue date of 11/16/24 documents: Oxycodone HCL Oral Tablet 5 MG. Give 2 tablets by mouth every 4 hours as needed for pain. Surveyor noted that from 10/28/24 through 11/16/24, R5 had a duplicate order of one tablet of Oxycodone. Surveyor reviewed R5's Medication Administration Record (MAR) and noted that facility staff would document the administration of one 5MG tablet in either the order started on 10/24/25 or the order started on 10/28/24. Surveyor noted this could cause confusion and the possibility of giving more medication because the documentation was split between the two orders on the MAR. On 1/16/25, at 12:55 PM, Surveyor interviewed Nursing Home Administrator (NHA)-A and Director of Nursing (DON)-B. Surveyor informed NHA-A and DON-B that R5 had duplicate orders of Oxycodone 5MG. DON-B indicated that R5's dose was increased to 1 to 2 tabs every four hours as needed on 10/25/24. Surveyor informed DON-B and NHA-A of the concern that when the new order was received the previous order was not discontinued thus leaving a duplicate order for facility staff to document administrations on in the MAR. No further information was provided regarding the duplicate one tab of 5MG Oxycodone order. .
Apr 2024 2 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Report Alleged Abuse (Tag F0609)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, are reported immediately to the administrator of t...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, are reported immediately to the administrator of the facility and to the State Survey Agency in accordance with State law through established procedures. The staff did not report the incident to the administration immediately after the incident and did not contact law enforcement to report this reasonable suspicion of a crime for 1 (R1) of 3 residents reviewed for abuse and neglect. On 4/2/24 while providing cares, R1 accused Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)-D of slapping her. CNA-D reported this to Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)-C. LPN-C did not immediately report the allegation of abuse to administration. Law enforcement was not called to report this reasonable suspicion of a crime. Findings include: Surveyor reviewed facility's Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation policy with a revised date of 09/22/2023. Documented was: Policy: It is the policy of [this facility] to provide protections for the health, welfare and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of resident property. .VII. Reporting/Response A. The facility will have written procedures that include: 1. Reporting of all alleged violations to the Administrator, state agency, adult protective services and to all other required agencies (e.g., law enforcement when applicable) within specified timeframes . 5. Taking all necessary actions as a result if the investigation, which may include, but are not limited to, the following: a. Analyzing the occurrence(s) to determine why abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property or exploitation occurred, and what changes are needed to prevent further occurrences; b. Defining how care provisions will be changed and/or improved to protect residents receiving services; c. Training of staff on changes made and demonstration of staff competency after training is implemented; d. Identification of staff responsible for implementation of corrective actions; e. The expected date for implementation; and f. The expected date for implementation; and Identification of staff responsible for monitoring the implementation of the plan. B. The Administrator will follow up with government agencies, during business hours, to confirm the initial report was received, and to report the results of the investigation when final within 5 working days of the incident, as required by state agencies . R1 was admitted to the facility 2/1/23 with diagnoses that included COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease), Dementia, Restlessness and Agitation and History of Falls. Surveyor reviewed R1's MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment with an assessment reference date of 2/7/24. Documented under Cognition was a BIMS (brief interview of mental status) score of 05 which indicated severe cognitive impairment. Surveyor reviewed Misconduct Incident Report with a Report Submitted Date of 4/5/2024. Documented under Summary of Incident was Date occurred 04/02/2024. Time occurred 03:35 AM . Briefly Describe the incident . On 4/2/24, it was reported to the Administrator that the resident stated that she was slapped in the face. An investigation was immediately initiated. Resident had been immediately evaluated and found to have no injury. [CNA-D] was identified as accused caregiver. She was contacted, statement obtained and she was notified of investigation . Surveyor reviewed Investigation Summary prepared by Nursing Home Administrator (NHA)-A. Documented was: 4/2/24 at [6:25 AM] in person interview with [Director of Nursing (DON)-B] Met with [LPN-C] to discuss allegations of [R1] for possible physical abuse from earlier in the shift. Discussed that if there is abuse alleged, the staff member needs to be removed from providing care to that resident and all others and that notification should be immediate and a phone call to myself or the Administrator. Verbalized understood and told me [CNA-D] no longer cared for that resident and [LPN-C] completed all the necessary cares the rest of the evening. [LPN-C] did tell the writer that residents often have similar behaviors especially during the night including delusional type episodes and resisting care for at least the last year here in facility. [R1] is often startled easily and often paints her walls with feces and tears off her briefs. [LPN-C] does not think that anything happened to [R1] but that she was having some behaviors and upset due to her-dementia. [LPN-C] herself went into room and provided incontinence care around 5am and saw no injury to [R1's] face but [R1] did continue to say that someone hit her. Surveyor noted that Administration was not immediately informed of the abuse allegation and it was not reported until the morning. Surveyor reviewed Misconduct Incident Report with a Report Submitted Date of 4/5/2024. Documented under Summary of Incident was Date discovered 04/02/2024. Documented under Law Enforcement Involvement was Was law enforcement contacted or involved? No. Surveyor noted law enforcement should have been contacted due to suspicion of physical abuse as a crime. On 4/11/24 at 12:27 PM, Surveyor interviewed Nursing Home Administrator (NHA)-A and DON-B. Surveyor asked if the incident was reported to the police. NHA-A stated no, I didn't think it was a crime. Surveyor asked why LPN-C did not report the incident immediately upon being made aware of the allegation. DON-B stated she was not sure. DON-B stated she had just arrived at the facility and got a text message while she was still in the parking lot at 5:42 AM. DON-B stated she went directly to the nurse's station to investigate. Surveyor asked if LPN-C should know to call administration immediately with an allegation of abuse. DON-B stated yes. DON-B also noted with a phone call, not a text. DON-B stated LPN-C had individualized abuse training that day.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Investigate Abuse (Tag F0610)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that in response to allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, the facility must prevent further potential abuse, n...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that in response to allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, the facility must prevent further potential abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment while the investigation is in progress. This had the potential to effect 19 of 19 residents on the 400 hallway. On 4/2/24 while providing cares, R1 accused Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)-D of slapping her. CNA-D reported this to Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)-C. LPN-C did not immediately report the allegation of abuse to administration resulting in CNA-D not being removed from the resident care area immediately pending investigation and was allowed to work the rest of the shift. Findings include: Surveyor reviewed facility's Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation policy with a revised date of 09/22/2023. Documented was: Policy: It is the policy of [this facility] to provide protections for the health, welfare and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of resident property . VI. Protection of Resident The facility will make efforts to ensure all residents are protected from physical and psychosocial harm, as well as additional abuse, during and after the investigation. Examples include but are not limited to: A. Responding immediately to protect the alleged victim and integrity of the investigation; B. Examining the alleged victim for any sign of injury, including a physical examination or psychosocial assessment if needed; C. Increased supervision of the alleged victim and residents; D. Room or staffing changes, if necessary, to protect the residents) from the alleged perpetrator; E. Protection from retaliation; F. Providing emotional support and counseling to the resident during and after the investigation, as needed; G. Revision of the resident's care plan if the resident's medical, nursing, physical, mental, or psychosocial needs or preferences change as a result of an incident of abuse . R1 was admitted to the facility 2/1/23 with diagnoses that included COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease), Dementia, Restlessness and Agitation and History of Falls. Surveyor reviewed R1's MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment with an assessment reference date of 2/7/24. Documented under Cognition was a BIMS (brief interview mental status) score of 05 which indicated severe cognitive impairment. Surveyor reviewed Misconduct Incident Report with a Report Submitted Date of 4/5/2024. Documented under Summary of Incident was Date occurred 04/02/2024. Time occurred 03:35 AM . Briefly Describe the incident . On 4/2/24, it was reported to the Administrator that the resident stated that she was slapped in the face. An investigation was immediately initiated. Resident had been immediately evaluated and found to have no injury. [CNA-D] was identified as accused caregiver. She was contacted, statement obtained and she was notified of investigation and that she was being suspended pending the results of the investigation. Surveyor reviewed Investigation Summary prepared by Nursing Home Administrator (NHA)-A. Documented was: 4/2/24 at [6:25 AM] in person interview with [Director of Nursing (DON)-B] Met with [LPN-C] to discuss allegations of [R1] for possible physical abuse from earlier in the shift. Discussed that it there is abuse alleged, the staff member needs to be removed from providing care to that resident and all others . Surveyor reviewed witness statement documented by Director of Nursing (DON)-B. Documented was: 4/2/24 at [6:35 AM] in person interview to discuss events and written statements provided. [CNA-D] [CNA-D] told writer You know how [R1] is. I said I was aware of her history of behaviors and bowel obsession. Asked questions about the initial interaction with [R1] that night and [CNA-D] verbalized her written statement to me. Asked why she went to get the [LPN-C], [CNA-D] stated because [R1] kept saying I hit her when I did not. So, I told [LPN-C] because I was not going back in that room again and that [R1] would most likely need help again around 5am. Asked if [R1] may have struck the wall during provision of cares and [CNA-D] responded no. Asked if anything could have fallen on [R1] while completing bed change and brief change, [CNA-D] said no. Informed [CNA-D] . I would contact her after investigation has been completed. On 4/11/24 at 12:27 PM, Surveyor interviewed Nursing Home Administrator (NHA)-A and DON-B. Surveyor asked when CNA-D was removed from the resident care area pending investigation. DON-B stated the morning of 4/2 after the interview. Surveyor noted incident time of 3:45 AM and interview time of 6:35 AM. Surveyor stated the CNA was not immediately removed from the resident care area then. DON-B stated no. DON-B stated LPN-C should have called and reported the incident and CNA-C would have been removed from the resident care area at that time. DON-B stated LPN-C had individualized abuse training that day.
Mar 2024 7 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Report Alleged Abuse (Tag F0609)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 2.) R25 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of a fractured patella, coronary artery disease, muscular dystroph...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 2.) R25 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of a fractured patella, coronary artery disease, muscular dystrophy, anxiety, depression, and dementia. R25's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated R25 had moderate cognitive impairment with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11 and was assessed as being dependent on staff for toileting with moderate to substantial assist with other activities of daily living. R25 had a knee immobilizer to the left leg due to the left patella fracture and had a transfer status of Hoyer lift. R25 had an activated Power of Attorney (POA). R25's hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE] documented R25 presented to the emergency room on [DATE] with complaints of left knee pain but did not recall falling. The hospital spoke to R25's POA via phone who informed them R25 had a colonoscopy the day before and was more weak than usual, fell twice, and had left knee pain. R25 ambulated with a walker. The x-ray report from 10/31/2023 impression stated increased swelling/thickening of the patellar tendon suspicious for injury with avulsion fracture of the inferior patella. The ankle appeared normally aligned on nondedicated imaging with degenerative changes in the partially imaged foot; minimal spurring at the plantar and posterior calcaneus. On 12/5/2023 at 1:17 PM, in the progress notes, Nurse Practitioner (NP)-F charted R25 was seen on 12/4/2023 and R25 denied pain. The extremity exam indicated a left knee immobilizer was in place and there was no edema, clubbing, or cyanosis. On 12/9/2023 at 6:41 AM, in the progress notes, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)-E charted R25 was found sitting on the edge of the bed and had the call light pulled out of the wall. R25 stated they were looking for the remote for the TV. LPN-E charted R25 was assisted back into bed and explained that the TV was off. The bed was placed in low position. On 12/10/2023 at 7:17 PM, in the progress notes, the physician charted R25 was seen on 12/8/2023 and R25 denied pain. The extremity exam indicated a left knee immobilizer was in place and there was no edema, clubbing, or cyanosis. On 12/21/2023 at 6:30 AM, in the progress notes, NP-F charted R25 was seen on 12/21/2023 and R25 denied pain. The extremity exam indicated a left knee immobilizer was in place and there was no edema, clubbing, or cyanosis. On 12/26/2023 at 6:00 AM, in the progress notes, NP-F charted R25 was seen on 12/26/2023 and R25 denied pain. The extremity exam indicated a left knee immobilizer was in place and there was no edema, clubbing, or cyanosis. On 1/2/2024 at 1:03 PM, in the progress notes, LPN-E charted R25 was noted to have increased edema to bilateral extremities with 1-2 plus pitting edema. R25 did not have any complaints of shortness of breath or difficulty breathing. A recent weight was obtained and R25 had a ten-pound weight gain. The NP was notified, and new orders were obtained for tubigrips to bilateral lower extremities and labs to be drawn in the morning. On 1/3/2024 at 11:30 AM in the progress notes, LPN-E charted edema continued to R25's bilateral lower extremities with 1-2 plus pitting edema. Tubigrips were on, lung sounds were clear, and R25 did not have any complaints of shortness of breath or difficulty breathing. R25 complained of pain to the left ankle when moved or touched. R25 was given acetaminophen and the NP was notified. New orders were obtained to ice ankle as needed and to get an x-ray of the left ankle. Acetaminophen was scheduled. R25's POA was contacted, and a message was left to call back for the change in condition. On 1/3/2024, R25 was seen by NP-F and documented NP-F had been alerted the day before of R25 complaining of left ankle pain increased with movement. R25 had not had any falls in the last 30 days. R25 had been non-weight bearing to the left lower extremity since hospitalization due to patellar deformities. (Surveyor noted R25 had been weight bearing as tolerated.) R25 had been wearing an immobilizer. R25 is forgetful of current weightbearing status and has attempted to self-transfer in the past. R25 reported pain 8/10 with movement, 3/10 at rest. Swelling was noted to the left ankle. An x-ray was ordered due to significantly limited range of motion. NP-F documented R25 had a possible ankle fracture from fall prior to hospitalization with new onset of pain related to improved edema and resolved pain in the knee. (Surveyor noted previous documentation by NP-F indicated there was no swelling or edema to R25's lower extremities and nursing charted edema on 1/2/2024.) On 1/4/2024 at 2:25 AM, in the progress notes, nursing charted the x-ray results came back indicating a fracture to the left fibula shaft at level of syndesmosis with no displacement. The NP was notified, and orders were obtained to splint the left ankle, non-weight bearing to left lower extremity, and schedule an appointment with ortho. Surveyor reviewed Facility Reported Incidents that had been submitted to the State Agency. No report was found for R25's left ankle fracture as an injury of unknown origin. On 3/19/2024 at 2:02 PM, Surveyor requested from Nursing Home Administrator (NHA)-A any information regarding R25's fractured left ankle. On 3/20/2024 at 8:54 AM, NHA-A provided an investigation into R25's left ankle fracture. Staff statements were obtained on 1/4/2024, the day after the x-ray confirmed a fracture. No report was filed with the State Agency. In an interview on 3/20/2024 at 9:52 AM, Surveyor asked Social Worker (SW)-G what the facility process was when a resident was found with an injury of unknown origin. SW-G stated Director of Nursing (DON)-B will follow up with the incident to determine what is reportable and what is not reportable. Surveyor asked SW-G if NHA-A is involved in the reporting process. SW-G was not sure if NHA-A was involved in determining what is reported to the State Agency, but thought NHA-A would have some say in the process. In an interview on 3/20/2024 at 10:11 AM, Surveyor asked NHA-A why R25's fractured ankle was not reported to the State Agency. NHA-A stated they thought the fracture was due to the original fall and NP-F was very involved in determining the cause. NHA-A stated nursing would know better than NHA-A about the circumstances of the fracture. In an interview on 3/20/2024 at 10:23 AM, Surveyor met with NP-F and NHA-A. Surveyor asked NP-F how it was determined what caused R25's fractured ankle. NP-F stated documentation was reviewed and R25 had not had any recent falls, had an immobilizer on the left leg, and R25 complained of left ankle pain. NP-F stated NP-F assessed R25 and ordered an x-ray at that time. Surveyor shared with NP-F and NHA-A R25 did not have any swelling to the ankle prior to 1/2/2024 and the original fall occurred two months prior to the discovery of the left ankle fracture. NP-F stated R25 had immense pain to the left knee with swelling and when that subsided, the ankle injury could have been more pronounced. NP-F stated with R25's cognition, R25 did not always remember R25 was not supposed to bear weight to the left leg. NP-F stated R25 was frail and geriatric so cannot say if the ankle fracture would have healed within the two months since the fall. Surveyor shared with NHA-A the concern R25's ankle fracture was not reported to the State Agency as an injury of unknown origin. NHA-A agreed the incident should have been reported. No further information was provided at that time. Based on interview and record review the Facility did not report 2 of 2 incidents to the State Survey Agency and/or Nursing Home Administrator. * A possible diversion of liquid morphine was not reported to the Nursing Home Administrator and State Agency. * R25's ankle fracture was not reported to the State Agency as an injury of unknown origin. Findings include: The Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation policy last reviewed/revised 9/22/23 documents alleged violation is a situation or occurrence that is observed or reported by staff, resident, relative, visitor or others but has not yet been investigated and, if verified, could be indication of noncompliance with the Federal requirements related to mistreatment, exploitation, neglect, or abuse, including injuries of unknown source, and misappropriation of resident property. Under VII Reporting/Response documents: A. The facility will have written procedures that include: 1. Reporting of all alleged violations to the Administrator, state agency, adult protective services and to all other required agencies (e.g., law enforcement when applicable) within specified timeframes: a. Immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury or b. Not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury. 1.) On 3/18/24 at 2:06 p.m. Surveyor asked LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse)-K if she was aware of any morphine or other narcotics missing. LPN-K informed Surveyor she heard about it but didn't know any details. LPN-K informed Surveyor because of the potential narcotics missing they changed the way they log all received narcotics. LPN-K explained when medication comes in they have to sign for the card and when the card is finished or the resident is discharged on the log two people have to sign. On 3/18/24 at 3:52 p.m. Surveyor asked LPN-M if she was aware of Resident's morphine being missing. LPN-M informed Surveyor she heard about it in report. Surveyor inquired when this was. LPN-M informed Surveyor about four months ago roughly but she's bad with time. LPN-M informed Surveyor they went from liquid to tablet form of morphine. Surveyor asked if LPN-M knew the name of the Resident who was missing their morphine. LPN-M informed Surveyor it was mostly hospice patients. On 3/18/24 at 2:32 p.m. during the end of the day meeting NHA (Nursing Home Administrator)-A and DON (Director of Nursing)-B, Surveyor asked DON-B if there are any concerns regarding missing narcotics. DON-B informed Surveyor they don't have any concerns regarding missing narcotics and thought the nurses were lackadaisical in counting. Surveyor asked DON-B why she thought this. DON-B informed Surveyor there were not a lot of signatures on the shift to shift but things were matching up. DON-B informed Surveyor they changed their system on how they track narcotics in and out. DON-B explained it is not by Resident's name each card gets a number. DON-B informed Surveyor if a resident is discharged or the medication is used up it has to be signed by two nurses. DON-B stated we had rumors, there was agency in the building there were random rumors. Easy to divert that's why we worked on a plan. DON-B stated there was no missing narcotics. On 3/19/24 at 9:47 a.m. Surveyor asked LPN-N if she was aware of any Residents missing their morphine. LPN-N informed Surveyor she heard rumbling of something but doesn't know specific details. Surveyor asked LPN-N if she remembered anything. LPN-N informed Surveyor something with morphine, there was juice in the bottle instead of morphine then they switched the liquid morphine to a pill form. Surveyor asked LPN-N when this was. LPN-N replied honestly don't know, within the last year. LPN-N informed Surveyor there was a resident who's morphine was ineffective, the nurse found out it was juice not morphine and the liquid morphine was switched immediately to pill form for all residents. LPN-N was unable to provide Surveyor with the name of the Resident. On 3/19/24 at 2:41 p.m. Surveyor asked LPN-J if she was aware of any Resident's morphine or narcotics missing. LPN-J informed Surveyor they used to have liquid morphine. Her manager told her something was wrong with it and they started using pills. Surveyor asked who the manager is. LPN-J informed Surveyor name of LPN/UM (Licensed Practical Nurse/Unit Manager)-Q but she doesn't think she is here today. On 3/19/24 at 2:46 p.m. Surveyor asked LPN-R if she heard of Resident's morphine being missing. LPN-R replied I have. LPN-R explained there was an issue with morphine liquid and then converted everything to tablets. Surveyor asked LPN-R what the issue was. LPN-R explained there was a Resident down the 300 unit that they couldn't get their pain symptoms under control. The unit manager said enough of this, she popped off the morphine top and said it smelled like mouthwash. The Manager then got a sealed morphine out of the contingency machine on south. Surveyor asked who the Resident was on the 300 unit. LPN-R informed Surveyor she doesn't know the name as she doesn't take care of residents on 300. Surveyor asked who the manager was. LPN-R stated the first name of LPN/UM-Q. LPN-R informed Surveyor they also changed the system of how they count narcotics. On 3/19/24 at 4:04 p.m. Surveyor spoke with Pharmacist-S on the telephone and asked if he was able to tell Surveyor in the last six months has there been any liquid morphine removed from the contingency machine at [Name of] Facility and when the Facility switched from liquid morphine to tablets. Pharmacist-S informed Surveyor, Surveyor probably needs to speak with FM (Facility Manager)-T. At 4:07 p.m. Surveyor spoke with FM-T on the telephone. Surveyor asked FM-T when [Name of] Facility switched from liquid morphine to tablets and if they have any records of when liquid morphine was removed from contingency. FM-T informed Surveyor they switched to tablets in the beginning of October and had discussions of doing this with the DON. Surveyor asked FM-T if he knew why the Facility switched from liquid to tablets. FM-T informed Surveyor he would have to go back and do more research but would get back to Surveyor. On 3/19/24 at 5:20 p.m. FM-T left Surveyor a voice message asking Surveyor to return his call. On 3/19/24 at 5:49 p.m. Surveyor telephoned FM-T back and left a message requesting a return call. On 3/20/24 at 9:32 a.m. Surveyor telephoned FM-T and left a message requesting a return call. FM-T did not return Surveyor's call. On 3/20/24 at 8:21 a.m. Surveyor asked LPN-U if she knew why the Facility changed from liquid morphine to tablets. LPN-U replied I'll have to get back to you on that one. LPN-U went into an office, returned and informed Surveyor they all did an in-service and it was visually hard to read the bottles. Surveyor asked LPN-U if she was aware of a Resident's morphine not being in the bottle. LPN-U replied no and informed Surveyor she just knows there was a situation with the count doesn't know officially as it was on the other side of the building. LPN-U informed Surveyor she just knows the count was off. On 3/20/24 at 12:50 p.m. Surveyor asked DON-B why liquid morphine was switched to tablets. DON-B replied I already told you because of the counting issues and the spilling issues. Morphine comes with an eye dropper. Consistently the bottle leaks. DON-B informed Surveyor before they switched to tablets the pharmacy provided them with stoppers so the nurses were not just pulling from the bottles but they were spilling into the carts. DON-B informed Surveyor the bottles were hard to read and it's not a guessing game when it comes to narcotics for end of life. DON-B informed Surveyor the official change was 10/13/23. DON-B stated to Surveyor she knew Surveyor was going to come back to her and 10/16/23 was when they started in-servicing. DON-B showed Surveyor the new log with card number, resident name, medication name, date received, date removed, reason and signatures. Surveyor then informed DON-B what Surveyor was being told by nursing staff of a Resident's pain not being managed and the Resident was on liquid morphine. LPN/UM-Q checked the morphine and there wasn't morphine in the bottle. Surveyor was told by one nurse it was juice and by another nurse it was mouthwash. LPN/UM-Q went to contingency for a new bottle of liquid morphine and after morphine from the new bottle was given to this resident, the resident's pain was being managed. Surveyor informed DON-B Surveyor was unable to interview LPN/UM-Q as she is on vacation out of the state. DON-B informed Surveyor there was that rumor going around and heard that too but didn't witness it herself. Surveyor asked DON-B if she spoke with LPN/UM-Q when she thought there was something else other than morphine in the morphine bottle. DON-B informed Surveyor there was no way to confirm whether it was or wasn't. Surveyor asked DON-B if she did an investigation into the possible misappropriation of resident property/drug diversion. DON-B replied no I did not. Surveyor asked DON-B why she didn't do an investigation. DON-B replied I was in the process of changing the way narcotics were being handled before this happened. I was already working on it. DON-B explained she ordered a control substance log book. Surveyor informed DON-B Surveyor doesn't understand why she wouldn't have investigated this. DON-B informed Surveyor she didn't feel it was necessary at that point because she didn't think there was a diversion. DON-B stated my unit manager (LPN/UM-Q) is a little jagged from where she worked before when it was happening. I told her she was being overly paranoid. Surveyor asked DON-B if there is anything else she'd like to tell Surveyor. DON-B replied no. On 3/20/24 at 1:13 p.m. Surveyor asked NHA (Nursing Home Administrator)-A if she was aware of why Resident's liquid morphine being switched to pill form. NHA-A informed Surveyor they were switching due to concerns of the amounts identified. Surveyor asked NHA-A if she was informed liquid in a Resident's morphine bottle may not have been morphine. NHA-A replied no. Surveyor asked if she had been made aware of this would an investigation been initiated. NHA-A replied I would look into it. Surveyor asked NHA-A who makes the decision if there is going to be an investigation. NHA-A informed Surveyor generally it would go to [name of] DON-B and then she would bring it to her. NHA-A informed Surveyor there was a concern of liquid morphine checks on the narcotics log and they decided to get rid of the liquid morphine. Surveyor inquired if there was any investigation. NHA-A replied no. On 3/20/24 at 1:26 p.m. Surveyor asked DON-B if LPN/UM-Q informed her of the Resident's name who she thought liquid morphine had been removed and replaced with something else. DON-B replied no. Surveyor asked DON-B if she asked LPN/UM-Q the Resident's name. DON-B replied I don't remember to be honest. DON-B informed Surveyor she thinks it was a Resident on the 400 hall. Surveyor asked why she thought this. DON-B that's where most of the hospice residents were. DON-B did not report the possible misappropriation of resident property/medication diversion to NHA-A. This allegation not report this to the State agency.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0685 (Tag F0685)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the Facility did not ensure 1 (R2) of 1 Resident's reviewed for communication...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the Facility did not ensure 1 (R2) of 1 Resident's reviewed for communication received proper treatment and assistive devices to maintain hearing ability. R2 had an audiology consult on 2/19/24 for a lost hearing aid. Under recommendations for attending M.D. (medical doctor)/Nursing Staff documents Medical consult to obtain medical clearance for comprehensive evaluation for hearing aids. As of 3/20/24 medical clearance was not obtained and R2 does not have a right hearing aid. Findings include: The Hearing and Vision Services Policy dated 8/23 under policy documents It is the policy of this facility to ensure that all residents have access to hearing and vision services and receive adaptive equipment as indicated. R2's diagnosis includes dementia. R2's care plan documents the potential for alteration in communication r/t (related to) hearing loss care plan initiated 7/6/23 & revised 10/4/23 documents the following interventions: * Ask yes/no questions. Initiated 7/11/23. * Be conscious of resident position when in groups, activities, dining room to promote proper communication with others. Initiated 7/11/23. * Communication: Allow adequate time to respond, Repeat as necessary, Do not rush, Request clarification from the resident to ensure understanding, Face when speaking, make eye contact, Turn off TV/radio to reduce environmental noise, Ask yes/no questions if appropriate, Use simple, brief, consistent words/cues, Use alternative communication tools as needed. Initiated 7/11/23 & revised 12/20/23. * Cueing, reorientation as needed. Initiated 7/11/23. * Gain attention before talking. Initiated 7/11/23. * Make sure hearing aid is in place in RIGHT ear. Initiated 7/6/23 & revised 12/20/23. * Offer assistance to apply hearing aids. Initiated 7/6/23. The physician order with an order date of 7/6/23 documents Right hearing aide to be kept in med (medication) cart. Place in AM (morning), remove at HS (hour sleep). every day and evening shift for sensory care. per audiology keep liquids out of right hear sic (ear) unless prescribed by ENT (ears, nose, throat). The physician order with an order date of 11/3/23 documents ensure battery is in hearing aide when putting in hearing aid every day shift for hearing aid. The order administration note dated 1/5/24 at 21:38 (9:38 p.m.) Right hearing aid to be kept in med cart. Place in AM, remove at HS. every day and evening shift for Sensory care. per audiology: keep liquids out of right hear (sic) ear unless prescribed by ENT. Documents hearing aid not in room or ear. This note was documented by RN (Registered Nurse)-L. R2's quarterly MDS (minimum data set) with an assessment reference date of 1/11/24 has a BIMS (brief interview mental status) score of 4 which indicates severe cognitive impairment. Under the hearing section for ability to hear (with hearing aid or hearing appliance if normally used) is assessed as having minimal difficulty. Under the hearing aid section yes is checked for hearing aid or other hearing appliance used. The order administration note dated 1/17/24 at 19:50 (7:50 p.m.) Right hearing aid to be kept in med cart. Place in AM, remove at HS. every day and evening shift for Sensory care. per audiology: keep liquids out of right hear (sic) ear unless prescribed by ENT. Documents missing. This note was written by LPN-M. The order administration note dated 1/21/24 at 19:51 (7:51 p.m.) Right hearing aid to be kept in med cart. Place in AM, remove at HS. every day and evening shift for Sensory care. per audiology: keep liquids out of right hear (sic) ear unless prescribed by ENT. Documents missing. This note was written by LPN-M. The order administration note dated 2/7/24 at 17:48 (5:48 p.m.) Right hearing aid to be kept in med cart. Place in AM, remove at HS. every day and evening shift for Sensory care. per audiology: keep liquids out of right hear (sic) ear unless prescribed by ENT. Documents missing. This note was written by LPN-M. The order administration note dated 2/9/24 at 15:50 (3:50 p.m.) Right hearing aid to be kept in med cart. Place in AM, remove at HS. every day and evening shift for Sensory care. per audiology: keep liquids out of right hear (sic) ear unless prescribed by ENT. Documents missing. This note was written by LPN-M. The order administration note dated 2/11/24 at 18:37 (6:37 p.m.) Right hearing aid to be kept in med cart. Place in AM, remove at HS. every day and evening shift for Sensory care. per audiology: keep liquids out of right hear (sic) ear unless prescribed by ENT. Documents Hearing aids were not in resident's ears. The order administration note dated 2/23/24 at 15:23 (3:23 p.m.) Right hearing aid to be kept in med cart. Place in AM, remove at HS. every day and evening shift for Sensory care. per audiology: keep liquids out of right hear (sic) ear unless prescribed by ENT. Documents Not returned yet. This note was written by LPN-M. The order administration note dated 3/13/24 at 09:44 (9:44 a.m.) Right hearing aid to be kept in med cart. Place in AM, remove at HS. every day and evening shift for Sensory care. per audiology: keep liquids out of right hear (sic) ear unless prescribed by ENT. Documents getting new hearing aids. This note was written by LPN-K. The CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) [NAME] as of 3/19/24 under the section Vision/Hearing/Speech documents * Ensure that eye glasses are in place and being worn by resident. Surveyor noted this [NAME] does not include R2 should be wearing a right hearing aid. On 3/18/24 at 10:14 a.m. Surveyor observed R2 sitting in a wheelchair in her room. Surveyor observed R2 is not wearing a hearing aid in her right ear. Surveyor observed a sign on the wall in R2's room which states Please give me my hearing aids so I can hear you!! On 3/18/24 at 11:55 a.m. Surveyor observed R2 sitting in a wheelchair. Surveyor observed R2 is not wearing her right hearing aid. On 3/18/24 at 12:40 p.m. Surveyor observed R2 sitting in a wheelchair at a table in the dining room. Surveyor observed R2 is not wearing her right hearing aid. On 3/18/24 at 1:43 p.m. Surveyor observed staff wheeling R2 down the hallway. Surveyor observed R2 is not wearing her right hearing aid. On 3/18/24 at 4:04 p.m. Surveyor observed R2 in the life enrichment center participating in an activity of decorating foam Easter eggs. Surveyor observed R2 is not wearing her right hearing aid. On 3/19/24 at 9:17 a.m. Surveyor observed R2 eating breakfast. Surveyor observed R2 is not wearing her right hearing aid. On 3/19/24 at 11:41 a.m. Surveyor observed R2 sitting in a wheelchair. Surveyor observed R2 is not wearing her right hearing aid. Surveyor asked R2 if she wears hearing aids. R2 informed Surveyor she used to but the hearing aid got lost. R2 stated they were suppose to order them but this never happened. On 3/19/24 at 11:45 a.m. Surveyor asked CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant)-O if R2 wears a hearing aid. CNA-O informed Surveyor today is the first day she has R2 as they gave her the split assignment. CNA-O stated as far as I know no, she doesn't have any in her ears. On 3/19/24 at 2:21 p.m. Surveyor asked LPN-K if R2 wears a hearing aid. LPN-K replied usually does. LPN-K explained R2 was recently seen by the audiologist and R2 is getting custom hearing aids that goes in her ears as the other ones were over the counter. LPN-K informed Surveyor R2 is waiting for her new ones. On 3/19/24 at 2:23 p.m. Surveyor asked SW (Social Worker)-G if she is involved with Resident's hearing aids. SW-G explained to Surveyor she sets up the appointment for the audiologist to come to the Facility. Surveyor asked SW-G when the last time the audiologist saw R2. SW-G informed Surveyor the last time R2 saw the audiologist was 2/20 (February 20th). Surveyor inquired if there were any recommendations. SW-G replied comprehensive hearing. Surveyor asked SW-G if hearing aids were ordered for R2. SW-G informed Surveyor they did impressions and believe they are waiting on authorization and ear molds need to be taken. SW-G reviewed the audiology report and informed Surveyor the 2/19 note states need to obtain medical clearance for comprehensive evaluation for hearing aids. Surveyor asked if the medical clearance was completed. SW-G informed Surveyor she thinks that is what they are waiting for now. Surveyor asked why nothing was done so that R2 could receive a new hearing aid. SW-G informed Surveyor she emailed on March 1st & March 14th but didn't hear anything back. Surveyor asked & received copies of R2's audiology consult. Surveyor asked SW-G why she made an audiology appointment for R2 in February. SW-G informed Surveyor R2 lost her right hearing aid. Surveyor asked SW-G if she knew when R2's right hearing aid was lost. SW-G replied no. On 3/19/24 at 2:43 p.m. Surveyor asked LPN-J if R2 wears a hearing aid. LPN-J informed Surveyor R2 only as a right hearing aide that went missing. LPN-J informed Surveyor they couldn't find the hearing aid and even went through the laundry bags. Surveyor asked LPN-J when she couldn't find R2's hearing aid what did she do. LPN-J informed Surveyor she didn't do anything explaining the daughter was going to come back the next day and if she couldn't find it she was going to speak with SW-G. Surveyor asked LPN-J when R2's hearing aid went missing. LPN-J informed Surveyor its been a good month, probably the end of January beginning of February. On 3/19/24 at 3:24 p.m. Surveyor reviewed R2's [Name of] audiology consult for date of exam 2/19/24. Under clinical findings/progress note documents Staff (SW-G's first name) informed me that the patient lost their right hearing aid. Initiated the paperwork to see patient for comprehensive evaluation for hearing aid. The audiogram, from October, 2023 will be valid until April, 2024. However, ear mold impressions need to be taken. Under recommendations for attending M.D. (medical doctor)/Nursing Staff documents Medical consult to obtain medical clearance for comprehensive evaluation for hearing aids. This consult was electrically signed by the audiologist on 2/19/24. There is a handwritten notation of noted 2-20-24. There is not a name of which staff noted this consult on 2/20/24. On 3/19/24 at 3:41 p.m. Surveyor called [Name of Audiology company] and spoke with [Name]. Surveyor informed the representative Surveyor was trying to determine the status of name of R2's hearing aid. Surveyor was informed R2 was last seen on 2/19 and there is a recommendation for the attending doctor for a medical consult to obtain medical clearance for a comprehensive evaluation. Surveyor was informed this medical clearance is required in order to do an ear mold for the hearing aid, they sent the form, and are waiting for this clearance. Surveyor inquired if the form for medical clearance would of been sent to name of SW-G. The representative replied yes because she is our contact. On 3/20/24 at 9:20 a.m. Surveyor asked LPN-K who reviews [Name of] consults when they come back. LPN-K replied either the nurse or manager. LPN-K informed Surveyor the consults are sent to the social worker and then she would give it to the nurse or manager depending on who is here. On 3/20/24 at 9:26 a.m. Surveyor asked SW-G when she receives an audiology consult from [Name] what does she do with the consult. SW-G informed Surveyor she gives it to the nurse. Surveyor inquired who would follow up on the recommendations. SW-G informed Surveyor if they need something from the doctor the nurse would do this. SW-G explained when this is done she will reach out to [Name of] audiology. Surveyor asked SW-G how she receives the medical consult clearance form. SW-G informed Surveyor they will send the form to her or sometimes the faxes go out by nursing. Surveyor informed SW-G Surveyor had spoken to [Name of] audiology company and was informed they sent the medical consult form. SW-G informed Surveyor they may have faxed it and she can look back to see if she received it. On 3/20/24 at 10:50 a.m. SW-G informed Surveyor she went through her emails and didn't see anything for R2. Surveyor asked SW-G if anyone from nursing told her a medical clearance is required for R2. SW-G replied no. On 3/20/24 at 11:01 a.m. Surveyor asked LPN-N who would review Resident's audiology consults. LPN-N informed Surveyor the nurse and manager. Surveyor asked LPN-N if she would review the recommendations to ensure they are completed. LPN-N replied that would be honestly above my pay grade. On 3/20/24 at 11:05 a.m. Surveyor asked DON (Director of Nursing)-B what is the process for audiology consults. DON-B informed Surveyor the report goes out to the nurses station for them to get any new orders. Surveyor inquired if the nurses would review what the recommendations are. DON-B replied yes. Surveyor informed DON-B R2 had an audiology consult on 2/19/24. Surveyor informed DON-B the consult recommended a medical consult to obtain medical clearance for comprehensive evaluation for hearing aids which Surveyor was informed wasn't completed. DON-B looked at her phone stating nothing in hucu. Surveyor inquired what hucu was. DON-B informed Surveyor it's how they communicate with [Name of] medical group. DON-B informed Surveyor she will ask [Name of] NP (Nurse Practitioner)-F if she was notified. DON-B informed Surveyor there is no order, doesn't know who noted the audiology consult and will follow up. No further information was provided.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Pressure Ulcer Prevention (Tag F0686)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the Facility did not ensure Residents with a pressure injury received necessa...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the Facility did not ensure Residents with a pressure injury received necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to prevent the development of pressure injuries and to promote healing for 1 (R2) of 5 Residents reviewed for pressure injuries. R2 has a stage 2 right buttock pressure injury with an intervention for an air cushion on R2's wheelchair. Observations were made on 3/18/24 & 3/19/24 of the air cushion not on. Facility staff were not aware the air cushion was off until brought to their attention by the Surveyor. Findings include: The Pressure Injury Prevention and Management policy implemented 12/1/23 under policy explanation and compliance guidelines includes documentation of: 4. Interventions for Prevention and Promote Healing. a. After completing a thorough assessment/evaluation, the interdisciplinary team shall develop a relevant care plan that includes measurable goals for prevention and management of pressure injuries with appropriate interventions. b. Interventions will be based on specific factors identified in the risk assessment, skin assessment, and any pressure injury assessment (e.g., moisture management, impaired mobility, nutritional deficit, staging, wound characteristics), c. Evidence-based interventions for preventions will be implemented for all residents who are assessed at risk or who have a pressure injury present. Basic or routine care interventions could include, but are not limited to: i. Redistribute pressure (such as repositioning, protecting and/or offloading heels, etc.); ii. Minimize exposure to moisture and keep skin clean, especially of fecal contamination; iii. Provide appropriate, pressure-redistributing, support surfaces; iv. Provide non-irritating surfaces; and v. Maintain or improve nutrition and hydration status, where feasible. R2's diagnoses includes dementia, congestive heart failure, hypertension, and diabetes mellitus. The pressure ulcer care plan initiated 7/12/23 & revised 1/8/24 includes an intervention of Air chair cushion when up should be on charger all night in room; turn on once up in wheelchair. Initiated 7/12/23. The physician order with an order date of 7/12/23 documents Check that wheelchair cushion is functioning and charged if needed every shift for wound care. The physician order with an order date of 8/28/23 documents APP chair cushion; check if plugged in and functioning. Ensure green light is on when resident up in chair every shift for wound care. The Braden assessment dated [DATE] has a score of 17 which indicates at risk for pressure injury development. The quarterly MDS (minimum data set) with an assessment reference date of 1/11/24 has a BIMS (brief interview mental status) score of 4 which indicates severe cognitive impairment. R2 is assessed as requiring substantial/maximal assistance for toileting hygiene & toilet transfer, partial/moderate assistance for chair/bed to chair transfer & roll left and right. R2 is occasionally incontinent of urine and frequently incontinent of bowel. R2 is assessed as being at risk for pressure injury development and has no pressure injuries. R2's wound assessment dated [DATE] by Wound APNP (Advanced Practice Nurse Prescriber)-P documents for interventions in place Pressure relief measures - air mattress to bed and cushion for chair, Protein supplement, PT/OT (physical therapy/occupational therapy). Under physical examination documents Right buttock (Stage 2 pressure ulcer) Partial thickness wound to the right buttock with 100% pink tissue. The ounce sic (wound) measuring 0.3 x 0.2 x 0.1 cm (centimeters). No drainage noted. Peri wound with blanchable redness noted and nearly resolved callous. Decrease in tenderness with exam. No warmth to indicate infection. R2's wound assessment dated [DATE] by Wound APNP-P documents for interventions in place Pressure relief measures - air mattress to bed and cushion for chair, Protein supplement, PT/OT. Under physical examination documents Right buttock (Stage 2 pressure ulcer) Partial thickness wound to the right buttock with 100% pink tissue. Wound measuring 0.2 x 0.2 x 0.1 cm. No drainage noted. Peri wound with blanchable redness noted and nearly resolved callous. Decrease in tenderness with exam. No warmth to indicate infection. The CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) [NAME] as of 3/19/24 under the section Maintain skin integrity documents * Air chair cushion when up should be on charger all night in room, turn on once up in wheelchair. On 3/18/24 at 10:14 a.m. Surveyor observed R2 sitting in a wheelchair in her room. Surveyor observed there is a chair air box on the back of R2's chair with bright green lights on indicating the air cushion is on. On 3/18/24 at 11:55 a.m. Surveyor observed R2 sitting in a wheelchair. Surveyor observed the bright green lights are not on the chair air box located on the back of R2's wheelchair which indicates the air cushion is not on. On 3/18/24 at 12:10 p.m. Surveyor observed R2 being wheeled into the dining room. Surveyor observed the bright green lights are still not on the chair air box located on the back of R2's wheelchair which indicates the air cushion is not on. On 3/18/24 at 12:40 p.m. Surveyor observed R2 sitting in a wheelchair at a table in the dining room. Surveyor observed the bright green lights are still not on the chair air box located on the back of R2's wheelchair which indicates the air cushion is not on. On 3/18/24 at 1:44 p.m. Surveyor observed staff wheeling R2 down the hallway. Surveyor observed the bright green lights are still not on the chair air box located on the back of R2's wheelchair which indicates the air cushion is not on. On 3/18/24 at 4:04 p.m. Surveyor observed R2 in the life enrichment center participating in an activity of decorating foam Easter eggs. Surveyor observed the bright green lights are not on the chair air box located on the back of R2's wheelchair which indicates the air cushion is not on. On 3/19/24 at 7:23 a.m. Surveyor observed R2 in bed awake on her back with the head of the bed elevated. On 3/19/24 at 9:16 a.m. Surveyor observed R2 sitting in a wheelchair at a dining table eating breakfast. Surveyor observed the bright green lights are not on the chair air box located on the back of R2's wheelchair which indicates the air cushion is not on. On 3/19/24 at 9:38 a.m. Surveyor observed R2 sitting on the toilet in the bathroom in R2's room. At 9:40 a.m. LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse)-N assisted R2 with standing up from the toilet, pulled up R2's incontinence product & pants and assist R2 with sitting in the wheelchair. After R2 washed her hands, LPN-N wheeled R2 out of the bathroom. Surveyor observed the bright green lights are still not on the chair air box located on the back of R2's wheelchair which indicates the air cushion is not on. On 3/19/24 at 10:29 a.m. Surveyor observed R2 sitting in a wheelchair in the small dining room adjacent to the nurses station. Surveyor observed the bright green lights are still not on the chair air box located on the back of R2's wheelchair which indicates the air cushion is not on. On 3/19/24 at 11:43 p.m. Surveyor observed R2 sitting in a wheelchair in R2's room. Surveyor observed the bright green lights are still not on the chair air box located on the back of R2's wheelchair which indicates the air cushion is not on. On 3/19/24 at 11:46 p.m. Surveyor asked CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant)-O about R2's air cushion in the wheelchair. CNA-O informed Surveyor she doesn't know anything about it. CNA-O indicated it's plugged in at night and she unplugs is, that's all she knows. On 3/19/24 at 11:52 a.m. Surveyor accompanied CNA-O to the dining room with R2. Surveyor asked CNA-O if the air cusion was on. CNA-O stated it's not on so I don't know. On 3/19/24 at 11:55 a.m. Surveyor asked CNA-O if she could bring R2 over to LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse)-K. Surveyor asked LPN-K when R2 is in the wheelchair should the air cushion be on. LPN-K replied yes. Surveyor showed LPN-K there are no bright green lights on the chair air box. LPN-K then turned the air cushion on. LPN-K informed CNA-O the cushion does not go on automatically and that it needs to be turned on. Surveyor informed LPN-K R2's air cushion was not on yesterday afternoon and also today. LPN-K replied that's good to know. On 3/19/24 at 2:05 p.m. Surveyor during the end of the day meeting. Surveyor informed NHA (Nursing Home Administrator)-A and DON (Director of Nursing)-B of the observations of R2's air cushion not being on yesterday afternoon and today until Surveyor informed staff. On 3/20/24 at 7:16 a.m. LPN-K informed Surveyor R2's cushion stopped working and they are going to notify the rental company. On 3/21/24 at 3:45 p.m. Surveyor received additional information from the Facility which consisted of a statement from the [cushion company] representative. This additional information did not change the deficient practice. On 3/22/24 Surveyor requested and received the manufacturers information for the chair air cushion. Surveyor noted under general information documents The device is a high quality and affordable pressure relief set cushion system for wheelchair users. It helps to decrease the concentrated pressure, distribute the pressure over the entire contact interface and stimulate capillary blood flow for pressure ulcer prevention.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the Facility did not ensure 1 (R30) of 4 Residents reviewed for falls received the supervis...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the Facility did not ensure 1 (R30) of 4 Residents reviewed for falls received the supervision and assistance to prevent accidents. On 11/16/23 R30 fell out of bed during incontinence cares as CNA-I rolled R30 away from her and not towards her. Findings include: R30's diagnoses includes hypertension, spinal stenosis cervical region, and anxiety disorder. The Morse fall scale dated 11/6/23 has a score of 55 which indicates R30 is at high risk for falling. The quarterly MDS (minimum data set) with an assessment reference date of 11/11/23 has a BIMS (brief interview mental status) score of 15 which indicates cognitively intact. R30 is assessed as having upper extremity impairment on both sides for functional limitation in range of motion. R30 is assessed as being dependent for toileting hygiene, upper & lower body dressing, rolling left to right, and chair/bed to chair transfer. R30 is always incontinent of urine & bowel. R30 has fallen since prior assessment with one fall with an injury not major. The nurses note dated 11/16/23 at 13:50 (1:50 p.m.) documents Writer called to resident's room to evaluate after fall out of bed during incontinence cares. Resident was rolled onto her right side, toward window, and rolled off of bed and landed on her right side, still facing window. Resident had no changes to ROM (range of motion) of legs or arms. Resident with limited ROM of all extremities at baseline. Denied pain with movement of arms and legs. Did report pain when lifting both legs to get hoyer sling under her. Upon palpation of spine, resident noted pain in lumbosacral area. No bruising noted at times of assessment. No crepitus to palpation of area. Resident assisted off floor with 4 staff and hoyer lift. Resident did not report pain during transfer into bed. Order obtained for sacral x-ray to rule out fracture. Of note, resident is not always able to understand others and had some difficulty rating pain, first stating 8/10 and then rating mild. No nonverbal pain indicators during transfer or log rolling of resident. Resident did also complain of pain to the left side of her head, although she fell onto her right side. No palpable abnormality noted. No bruising noted. This nurses note was written by RN (Registered Nurse)-D. The nurses note dated 11/16/23 at 14:48 (2:48 p.m.) documents CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) was providing cares for resident and res (Resident) rolled off the right side of the bed on to the floor. CNA alerted nurse. RN notified and assessed resident. No injury noted to res head. RN gave permission to hoyer resident up off the floor to the bed. Res was able to lift her legs up off the floor to place hoyer. Res did report pain at a 10/10 to her sacral area while laying on the floor. Once resident was back in her bed her pain went to 0/10. [Name] PA (Physician Assistant) notified of fall and sacral pain. NOR (new order received) for lumbar x ray to eval (evaluate) for fracture. Emergency contact [Name] notified. This nurses note was written by LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse)-C. The nurses note dated 11/17/23 at 05:13 (5:13 a.m.) documents F/U (follow up) fall, no visible injury noted, X-ray ordered lower back (tail bone area) d/t (due to) disc. (discomfort) Neuro checks neg. (negative) sleeping well at this time. This nurses note was written by LPN-H. The lumbar spine x-ray for date of service 11/16/23 & report date 11/17/23 includes documentation of No obvious or acutely displaced fracture. The incident report dated 11/16/23 under incident description for nursing description documents CNA was providing cares for resident because resident was incontinent. As CNA was rolling resident, she rolled off the bed on the right side onto the floor as CNA was providing cares. For Resident description documents Res (resident) stated she rolled onto the floor as CNA was providing cares. The Event Note Fall Incident Initial Note dated 11/16/23 under the section background (ie possible and/or actual contributing factors) documents Air mattress. CNA rolled resident away from her. CNA-I's verbal education worksheet dated 11/16/23 under the section employee is expected to do the following documents When assisting a resident with rolling, roll the resident toward you. If you need to roll the resident away from you, there must be another staff assisting so that the resident is rolled towards them, preventing the resident from rolling out of bed. On 3/20/24 at 10:21 a.m. Surveyor informed DON (Director of Nursing)-B Surveyor noted CNA-I was educated following R30's fall on 11/16/23 and inquired if all CNA's were educated about rolling Residents towards them. DON-B replied no it was just her. [Name of] RN-D educated her right then. On 3/20/24 at 12:46 p.m. Surveyor asked DON-B if the expectation for CNA's when providing cares for a resident in bed should the Resident be rolled towards them. DON-B informed Surveyor R30's legs and arms are flaccid and should always bed rolled towards staff. Surveyor informed DON-B of the concern of R30 being rolled away from the CNA during cares in bed and falling on the floor.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Medication Errors (Tag F0758)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility did not ensure potential side effects of psychotropic medications were monito...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility did not ensure potential side effects of psychotropic medications were monitored and consents were provided for 1 (R25) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. *R25 received an order for Seroquel 25 mg (milligrams) on 12/18/2023. R25's activated Power of Attorney (POA) did not sign the medication consent for use of the Seroquel until 3/19/2024 after Surveyor inquired about the consent and no monitoring was documented for potential adverse side effects of the Seroquel until 3/19/2024. Findings include: R25 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of a fractured patella, coronary artery disease, muscular dystrophy, anxiety, depression, and dementia. R25's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated R25 had moderate cognitive impairment with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11 and was assessed as being dependent on staff for toileting with moderate to substantial assist with other activities of daily living. R25 had a knee immobilizer to the left leg due to the left patella fracture and had a transfer status of Hoyer lift. R25 had an activated Power of Attorney (POA). On 11/17/2023, R25 had an initial psychological visit for psychotropic medication management. R25 was seen weekly and then monthly with changes made to medications as appropriate for behaviors. On 12/18/2023 at 10:52 AM, in the progress notes, nursing charted a new order was obtained from Psychiatric services to start Seroquel 25 mg twice daily for behaviors. R25's POA was called and a message was left to return the call for a change in treatment. Surveyor reviewed R25's medical record. No consent for the use of Seroquel was found and no monitoring for adverse side effects of psychotropic medications was found. On 3/19/2024 at 2:02 PM, Surveyor requested from Nursing Home Administrator (NHA)-A and Director of Nursing (DON)-B a consent for R25's use of Seroquel because Surveyor was unable to find a consent in R25's record. DON-B stated they would provide a copy the following day. On 3/20/2024 at 8:29 AM, NHA-A provided Surveyor with a copy of R25's consent for Seroquel. The form had been completed by Registered Nurse (RN)-D on 3/19/2024 after Surveyor had brought the concern to the facility's attention. Surveyor reviewed R25's record and found monitoring for psychotropic medication side effects that had been entered into R25's record on 3/19/2024. On 3/19/2024 at 5:10 PM in the progress notes, RN-D charted R25's POA was notified that a written consent was needed for Seroquel. Verbal consent was obtained via phone today, 3/19/2024. An email consent was sent to the POA as well and the POA stated the consent would be signed and sent back as soon as possible. In an interview on 3/20/2024 at 9:38 AM, RN-D stated RN-D called R25's POA and got verbal consent for Seroquel yesterday. Surveyor asked RN-D how RN-D was aware R25 did not have a consent. RN-D could not remember how RN-D knew this needed to be done. RN-D stated the Unit Manager on R25's unit was unavailable this week so did not know any specifics about R25. In an interview on 3/20/2024 at 9:47 AM, Social Worker (SW)-G stated behavior meetings are every month or every other month with the interdisciplinary team consisting of psych services, pharmacy, social services, and nursing where all residents are reviewed that are on antipsychotic, antidepressant, and anti-anxiety medications. SW-G stated they also have weekly meetings for residents that are on antipsychotic medications with nursing and social services. Surveyor asked SW-G who is responsible for obtaining consents for the use of psychotropic medications. SW-G stated either the nurse or the nurse manager would get the consent. Nursing also puts in any monitoring orders. On 3/20/2024 at 10:29 AM, Surveyor shared with NHA-A the concern R25's consent for the use of Seroquel and monitoring for medication side effects was not completed until 3/19/2024 after Surveyor brought the concerns to their attention. NHA-A stated yes, when Surveyors asked for the consents on 3/19/2024 they realized they had not been done and they did a facility-wide sweep to make sure all consents were obtained for psychotropic medications. No further information was provided at that time.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0565 (Tag F0565)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility did not ensure grievances and recommendations discussed during resident group meetings (Resident Council) were acte...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility did not ensure grievances and recommendations discussed during resident group meetings (Resident Council) were acted upon promptly and with feedback provided by the Facility. R2, R4, R20, and R51, expressed concern the Facility did not resolve grievances or provide feedback of steps taken to resolve grievances discussed at Resident Council Meetings. The grievance documents generated from Resident Council Meetings do not identify how the grievances were investigated, if interviews with staff/residents were completed, or the outcome of the investigation. Resident Council Minutes did not include actions taken regarding the concerns voiced by residents. Findings Include: Surveyor reviewed the facility's Resident Council Meetings policy and procedure implemented 2/20/23 and notes the following: . Policy: This facility supports the rights of Residents to organize and participate in Resident groups, including a Resident Council. This policy provides guidance to promoting structure, order, and productivity in these group meetings. Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 6. The group may appoint a Resident to take notes/maintain meeting minutes or may elect the Life Enrichment Director/designated liaison to take notes/maintain minutes. Meeting minutes may include, but are not limited to: a. Names of Residents in attendance b. Follow up from previous meetings c. Issues discussed d. Recommendations from the group to facility staff e. Names of staff members, speakers, and other guests present in the meeting 7. The facility shall act upon concerns and recommendations of the Council, make attempts to accommodate recommendations to the extent practicable, and communicate its decisions to the Council. On 3/18/24 at 2:09 PM, Surveyor reviewed the Facility documented minutes from the Resident Council meetings. Documented was: -On 9/27/23: One Resident expressed concern their toilet is not clean. -One Resident stated they are missing pants. Surveyor notes the Facility does not have documented grievance forms completed addressing the expressed concerns and resolution. Surveyor notes the 10/30/23 meeting minutes do not have documentation addressing the follow up of the grievances from the 9/27/23 meeting or if the grievances were resolved. On 11/20/23 the meeting minutes document: -One Resident expressed a concern related to the outside lab technician not explaining what they were doing to her. -One Resident stated they have to ask to get their room cleaned. Surveyor notes the Facility does not have documented grievance forms completed addressing the expressed concerns and resolution. On 12/28/23 the meeting minutes document: - Concern expressed that Dietary staff are not wearing hair nets. - Call lights not answered on 3rd shift. -Resident with toilet troubles and dusting. -Door not shutting right. Surveyor notes the meeting minutes do not have documentation the grievances from the 11/20/23 meeting were resolved and the Facility does not have documented grievance forms completed addressing the expressed concerns and resolution from the 12/28/23 meeting. Surveyor notes the facility did not have hold a Resident Council Meeting in January 2024 due to a RSV here was no meeting in January 2024 due to RSV (respiratory Syncytial Virus) outbreak. On 2/13/24 the meeting minutes document: -Food could be warmer, the past weekend was bad and very slow. Surveyor notes the meeting minutes do not have documentation the grievances from the 12/28/23 meeting were resolved or follow up provided and the Facility does not have documented grievance forms completed addressing the expressed concern and resolution from the 2/13/24 meeting. On 3/14/24 the meeting minutes document: -Activities-more activities on Saturday. -Laundry concerns. -Food is always cold, meat tough and terrible, raw broccoli in the cheese soup. Food delivery in dining room takes way too long, Not served by table. Surveyor notes there are grievance forms written up for the concerns and it is documented the designated staff have until 3/29/24 to resolve the concerns. On 3/19/24 at 10:30 AM, Surveyor conducted the Resident Council Interview task. The following Residents attended and Surveyor notes their Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score. -R50-BIMS of 7 as documented on the 5 day Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE]. The score of 7 indicates R50 is severely impaired for daily decision making. -R2-BIMS of 4 as documented on the quarterly MDS dated [DATE]. The score of 4 indicates R2 is severely impaired for daily decision making. -R4-BIMS of 15 as documented on the quarterly MDS dated [DATE]. The score of 15 indicates R4 is cognitively intact for daily decision making. -R20-BIMS of 15 as documented on the quarterly MDS date 1/25/24. The score of 15 indicates R20 is cognitively intact for daily decision making. -R51-BIMS of 15 as documented on the admission MDS dated [DATE]. The score of 15 indicates R51 is cognitively intact for daily decision making. Surveyor discussed the topic of resolution to concerns and follow up with concerns discussed in the Facilely Resident Council Meetings with all Residents present at the meeting. All Residents expressed concern the Facility staff do not address concerns discussed at the Resident Council meetings and follow up to concerns is not discussed or addressed. On 3/19/24 at 12:28 PM, Surveyor interviewed Activity Director (AD)-V. AD-V stated AD-V has only been in the position for 3 months and sometimes takes minutes. AD-V indicated Activity Assistant (AA)-W was taking minutes prior to AD-V. AD-V stated the facility just started this month with a new procedure for addressing concerns and getting resolution. AD-V confirmed that Resident Rights are not reviewed at the Resident Council meetings, does not review who the facility ombudsman is or how to contact the State Survey Agency with concerns. AD-V stated AD-V does not even know where that information is located in the facility for Residents to view. AD-V informed Surveyor the following: Why would I remind Residents where the survey results are if they don't ask? On 3/19/24 at 2:12 PM, Surveyor interviewed the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA)-A. Per NHA-A a review of outstanding concerns is done and the facility goes department by department to obtain any general concerns. NHA-A has started a new process with the Activity Director (AD)-O. Surveyor shared the concern that during the Resident Council meeting, Residents expressed that Resident Rights are reviewed, the Residents did not know who or what the ombudsman is, where the state survey results are kept for review, and the Residents do not know where the information is kept informing them how to contact the State Agency to express concerns. Surveyor also shared the concern there is no documented resolution to concerns from previous months in the Resident Council meeting notes. No further information was provided at this time. On 3/19/24 at 2:42 PM, NHA-A confirmed they can not locate written documentation concerns discussed in Resident Council for September, November, December 2023, and February 2024 were addressed and resolved. NHA-A also confirmed the facility does not review Resident Rights, location of State Agency complaint information, ombudsman, or location of State Survey results at the Resident Council Meetings. On 3/20/24 at 8:21 AM, Surveyor was notified by NHA-A that an inservice was completed with staff and an impromptu Resident Council Meeting will be held today to review topics discussed yesterday.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Investigate Abuse (Tag F0610)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on interview and record review the Facility did not thoroughly investigate a possible misappropriation of property for Residents receiving liquid morphine. This has the potential to affect 7 hos...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review the Facility did not thoroughly investigate a possible misappropriation of property for Residents receiving liquid morphine. This has the potential to affect 7 hospice residents who received liquid morphine on the 300 & 400 units in October 2023. Findings include: The Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation policy last reviewed/revised 9/22/23 documents alleged violation is a situation or occurrence that is observed or reported by staff, resident, relative, visitor or others but has not yet been investigated and, if verified, could be indication of noncompliance with the Federal requirements related to mistreatment, exploitation, neglect, or abuse, including injuries of unknown source, and misappropriation of resident property. Section V. Investigation of alleged abuse, neglect and exploitation documents A. An immediate investigation is warranted when suspicion of abuse, neglect or exploitation or reports of abuse, neglect, or exploitation occur. B. Written procedures for investigation include: 1. Identifying staff responsible for the investigation; 2. Exercising caution in handling evidence that could be used in a criminal investigation (e.g., not tampering or destroying evidence); 3. Investigating different types of alleged violations; 4. Identifying and interviewing all involved persons, including the alleged victim, alleged perpetrator, witnesses, and others who might have knowledge of the allegations; 5. Focusing the investigation on determining if abuse, neglect, exploitation, and/or mistreatment has occurred, the extent, and cause; and; 6. Providing complete and thorough documentation of the investigation. 7. Provide resident/representative a summary of conclusion of investigation using the Investigation Resolution Form. The Discrepancies, Loss and/or Diversion of Medications policy & procedure with an effective date of May 2018 under policy documents All discrepancies, suspected loss and/or diversion of medications, irrespective of drug type or class, are immediately investigated and report filed. Under procedures documents: A. Immediately upon the discovery or suspicion of a discrepancy, suspected loss of diversion, the Administrator, Director of Nursing (DON) and Consultant Pharmacist are notified and an investigation conducted. The Director of Nursing leads the investigation. 1.) The information is not to be discussed with other individuals. 2.) During the process, the Consultant Pharmacist will verify suspected loss. On 3/18/24 at 2:06 p.m. Surveyor asked LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse)-K if she was aware of any morphine or other narcotics missing. LPN-K informed Surveyor she heard about it but didn't know any details. LPN-K informed Surveyor because of the potential narcotics missing they changed the way they log all received narcotics. LPN-K explained when medication comes in they have to sign for the card and when the card is finished or the resident is discharged on the log two people have to sign. On 3/18/24 at 3:52 p.m. Surveyor asked LPN-M if she was aware of Resident's morphine being missing. LPN-M informed Surveyor she heard about it in report. Surveyor inquired when this was. LPN-M informed Surveyor about four months ago roughly but she's bad with time. LPN-M informed Surveyor they went from liquid to tablet form of morphine. Surveyor asked if LPN-M if she knew the name of the Resident who was missing their morphine. LPN-M informed Surveyor it was mostly hospice patients. On 3/18/24 at 2:32 p.m. during the end of the day meeting NHA (Nursing Home Administrator)-A and DON (Director of Nursing)-B, Surveyor asked DON-B if there are any concerns regarding missing narcotics. DON-B informed Surveyor they don't have any concerns regarding missing narcotics and thought the nurses were lackadaisical in counting. Surveyor asked DON-B why she thought this. DON-B informed Surveyor there were not a lot of signature on the shift to shift but things were matching up. DON-B informed Surveyor they changed their system on how they track narcotics in and out. DON-B explained it is not by Resident's name each card gets a number. DON-B informed Surveyor if a resident is discharged or the medication is used up it has to be signed by two nurses. DON-B stated we had rumors, there was agency in the building there were random rumors. Easy to divert that's why we worked on a plan. DON-B stated there was no missing narcotics. On 3/19/24 at 9:47 a.m. Surveyor asked LPN-N if she was aware of any Residents missing their morphine. LPN-N informed Surveyor she heard rumbling of something but doesn't know specific details. Surveyor asked LPN-N if she remembered anything. LPN-N informed Surveyor something with morphine, there was juice in the bottle instead of morphine then they switched the liquid morphine to a pill form. Surveyor asked LPN-N when this was. LPN-N replied honestly don't know, within the last year. LPN-N informed Surveyor there was a resident who's morphine was ineffective, the nurse found out it was juice not morphine and the liquid morphine was switched immediately to pill form for all residents. LPN-N was unable to provide Surveyor with the name of the Resident. On 3/19/24 at 2:41 p.m. Surveyor asked LPN-J if she was aware of any Resident's morphine or narcotics missing. LPN-J informed Surveyor they used to have liquid morphine. Her manager told her something was wrong with it and they started using pills. Surveyor asked who the manager is. LPN-J informed Surveyor name of LPN/UM (Licensed Practical Nurse/Unit Manager)-Q but she doesn't think she is here today. On 3/19/24 at 2:46 p.m. Surveyor asked LPN-R if she heard of Resident's morphine being missing. LPN-R replied I have. LPN-R explained there was an issue with morphine liquid and then converted everything to tablets. Surveyor asked LPN-R what the issue was. LPN-R explained there was a Resident down the 300 unit that they couldn't get their pain symptoms under control. The unit manager said enough of this, she popped off the morphine top and said it smelled like mouthwash. The Manager then got a sealed morphine out of the contingency machine on south. Surveyor asked who the Resident was on the 300 unit. LPN-R informed Surveyor she doesn't know the name as she doesn't take care of residents on 300. Surveyor asked who the manager was. LPN-R stated the first name of LPN/UM-Q. LPN-R informed Surveyor they also changed the system of how they count narcotics. On 3/19/24 at 4:04 p.m. Surveyor spoke with Pharmacist-S on the telephone and asked if he was able to tell Surveyor in the last six months has there been any liquid morphine removed from the contingency machine at [Name of] Facility and when the Facility switched from liquid morphine to tablets. Pharmacist-S informed Surveyor, Surveyor probably needs to speak with FM (Facility Manager)-T. At 4:07 p.m. Surveyor spoke with FM-T on the telephone. Surveyor asked FM-T when [Name of] Facility switched from liquid morphine to tablets and if they have any records of when liquid morphine was removed from contingency. FM-T informed Surveyor they switched to tablets in the beginning of October and had discussions of doing this with the DON. Surveyor asked FM-T if he knew why the Facility switched from liquid to tablets. FM-T informed Surveyor he would have to go back and do more research but would get back to Surveyor. On 3/19/24 at 5:20 p.m. FM-T left Surveyor a voice message asking Surveyor to return his call. On 3/19/24 at 5:49 p.m. Surveyor telephoned FM-T back and left a message requesting a return call. On 3/20/24 at 9:32 a.m. Surveyor telephoned FM-T and left a message requesting a return call. FM-T did not return Surveyor's call. On 3/20/24 at 8:21 a.m. Surveyor asked LPN-U if she knew why the Facility changed from liquid morphine to tablets. LPN-U replied I'll have to get back to you on that one. LPN-U went into an office, returned and informed Surveyor they all did an in-service and it was visually hard to read the bottles. Surveyor asked LPN-U if she was aware of a Resident's morphine not being in the bottle. LPN-U replied no and informed Surveyor she just knows there was a situation with the count doesn't know officially as it was on the other side of the building. LPN-U informed Surveyor she just knows the count was off. On 3/20/24 at 12:50 p.m. Surveyor asked DON-B why liquid morphine was switched to tablets. DON-B replied I already told you because of the counting issues and the spilling issues. Morphine comes with an eye dropper. Consistently that bottle leaks. DON-B informed Surveyor before they switched to tablets the pharmacy provided them with stoppers so the nurses were not just pulling from the bottles but they were spilling into the carts. DON-B informed Surveyor the bottles were hard to read and it's not a guessing game when it comes to narcotics for end of life. DON-B informed Surveyor the official change was 10/13/23. DON-B stated to Surveyor she knew Surveyor was going to come back to her and 10/16/23 was when they started in-servicing. DON-B showed Surveyor the new log with card number, resident name, medication name, date received, date removed, reason and signatures. Surveyor then informed DON-B what Surveyor was being told by nursing staff of a Resident's pain not being managed and the Resident was on liquid morphine. LPN/UM-Q checked the morphine and there wasn't morphine in the bottle. Surveyor was told by one nurse it was juice and by another nurse it was mouthwash. LPN/UM-Q went to contingency for a new bottle of liquid morphine and after morphine from the new bottle was given to this resident, the resident's pain was being managed. Surveyor informed DON-B Surveyor was unable to interview LPN/UM-Q as she is on vacation out of the state. DON-B informed Surveyor there was that rumor going around and heard that too but didn't witness it herself. Surveyor asked DON-B if she spoke with LPN/UM-Q when she thought there was something else other than morphine in the morphine bottle. DON-B informed Surveyor there was no way to confirm whether it was or wasn't. Surveyor asked DON-B if she did an investigation into the possible misappropriation of resident property/drug diversion. DON-B replied no I did not. Surveyor asked DON-B why she didn't do an investigation. DON-B replied I was in the process of changing the way narcotics were being handled before this happened. I was already working on it. DON-B explained she ordered a control substance log book. Surveyor informed DON-B Surveyor doesn't understand why she wouldn't have investigated this. DON-B informed Surveyor she didn't feel it was necessary at that point because she didn't think there was a diversion. DON-B stated my unit manager (LPN/UM-Q) is a little jagged from where she worked before when it was happening. I told her she was being overly paranoid. Surveyor asked DON-B if there is anything else she'd like to tell Surveyor. DON-B replied no. On 3/20/24 at 1:13 p.m. Surveyor asked NHA (Nursing Home Administrator)-A if she was aware of why Resident's liquid morphine being switched to pill form. NHA-A informed Surveyor they were switching due to concerns of the amounts identified. Surveyor asked NHA-A if she was informed liquid in a Resident's morphine bottle may not have been morphine. NHA-A replied no. Surveyor asked if she had been made aware of this would an investigation been initiated. NHA-A replied I would look into it. Surveyor asked NHA-A who makes the decision if there is going to be an investigation. NHA-A informed Surveyor generally it would go to [name of] DON-B and then she would bring it to her. NHA-A informed Surveyor there was a concern of liquid morphine checks on the narcotics log and they decided to get rid of the liquid morphine. Surveyor inquired if there was any investigation. NHA-A replied no. On 3/20/24 at 1:26 p.m. Surveyor asked DON-B if LPN/UM-Q informed her of the Resident's name who she thought liquid morphine had been removed and replaced with something else. DON-B replied no. Surveyor asked DON-B if she asked LPN/UM-Q the Resident's name. DON-B replied I don't remember to be honest. DON-B informed Surveyor she thinks it was a Resident on the 400 hall. Surveyor asked why she thought this. DON-B that's where most of the hospice residents were.
Apr 2023 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility did not always ensure that they provided the necessary care and treatm...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility did not always ensure that they provided the necessary care and treatment services to 1 out of 3 ( R1) residents who were in need of additional interventions based on a comprehensive assessment. R1 was admitted with a slow healing surgical wound. The wound clinic and physician indicated the need for R1 to receive additional protein to aide in wound healing. The facility did not address R1's need for additional protein and did not add additional interventions to the nutritional plan of care for promotion of wound healing. R1 also experience a fall on 2/8/23 while receiving therapy services. R1 was yelling out in pain after she fell to both her knees. R1 was not provided with a comprehensive Registered Nurse (RN) assessment before she was moved twice with a Hoyer lift, potentially causing further injury and excruciating pain. This is evidenced by: 1. R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included status post Cholecystectomy with surgical abdominal wound, non-healing. Other diagnosis included type 2 diabetes mellitus, abnormalities of gait, anxiety disorder, cellulitis of left lower limb, and obesity due to excess calories. R1 was being seen, outside the facility, for wound care to the abdominal surgical wound. On 12/16/22, R1 attended the wound care clinic and the clinic made changes to the care and treatment of the wound. The orders also stated that R1 needs a nutrition consult with Dietician to eval and treat, need for increased protein. R1 was to return to the wound clinic 3 to 4 weeks. Surveyor conducted a review of R1's medical record and noted that an admission Nutrition Assessment was completed on 12/17/22. The assessment stated that R1 is to receive a Consistent Carbohydrate Diet (eating the same amount of carbohydrates every day). Education given to R1 on weight management and wound healing. Plan is to monitor intake and weights and adjust diet per preferences. R1's individual plan of care, initiated on 12/14/22, states that R1 has a nutritional problem/ potential nutritional problem: Obesity with Body Mass Index greater than 30 and increased nutrient needs to support surgical healing. Interventions included to have the Registered Dietician evaluate and make diet recommendations as needed. The plan of care also indicates that R1 has potential/ actual impairment to skin integrity. Interventions included to encourage good nutrition and hydration to promote healthier skin. A review of R1's physician orders and Medication Administration Record (MAR) for December 2022 showed that R1 had an order for Pro-Stat liquid (amino acids- protein Hydrolys) two times daily give 30 cc for wound healing. The start date for this order was 12/14/22 and the end date was 12/15/22. R1 refused the Pro-stat on 12/14/22 and 12/15/22. On December 15, 2022, a new order for Pro-stat liquid, give 30 ml by mouth in the morning for supplement was obtained. This order was then discontinued on the same day. There was no further indication why the medication was discontinued and if there was any additional supplement to be given in its place. It was then noted that on 1/9/23, an order was obtained for Pro-stat liquid, give 30 ml by mouth 2 times a day for wound healing. The start date was 1/9/23 and then discontinued on 1/19/23. R1 had refused the Pro-stat liquid 15 out of 22 times during this timeframe. Nursing note dated 1/10/23 stated that R1 refused Pro-stat said she won't take it because it tastes horrible. After the Pro-stat was discontinued on 1/19/23, there was no indication that the Pro-stat was replaced with any additional nutritional supplements to aide in wound healing. On 1/13/23, R1 was seen at the wound clinic for further care and treatment of the abdominal wound. The after-visit summary from the wound clinic included treatment instruction and stated to provide R1 with increased protein in diet for wound healing. Recommend 1.5 grams protein/ kg of body weight a day. R1 was to follow-up at the wound clinic in 4 weeks. Nursing note dated 1/13/23 at 1:22 p.m., R1 seen at [name of hospital] wound clinic this shift. New order for abdominal wound: change dressing 3 times a week. Wash wound with warm soap and water. Use non-scented, non-antimicrobial soap. Apply Medihoney topical medication to open wound area. Cover with dry dressing. Use lotion with dimethicone to peri-wound and scar tissue. (Remedy Hydraguard lotion). Order processed and resident/ power of attorney aware. Surveyor noted this nursing note did not indicate whether the need for increased protein in diet for wound healing had been shared with Registered Dietician or the Dietary department so they could address the additional nutritional need. A Physician progress note dated 1/14/23 indicates; Chronic cholecystitis: status post cholecystectomy, ventral incisional hernia and parastomal hernia repairs, abdominal wall debridement. Post operation complicated by poor wound healing. IV antibiotics have been completed. Recent wound clinic appointment on 1/13/23: new wound orders given. Increase protein. Follow-up in 4 weeks. A Physician Assistant progress note dated 1/19/23 indicates; Chronic cholecystitis: status post cholecystectomy, ventral incisional hernia and parastomal hernia repairs, abdominal wall debridement. Post operation complicated by poor wound healing. IV antibiotics have been completed. Now with good oral intake. Local wound cares are in place. Wound improving. Recent wound clinic appointment on 1/13/23; new wound orders given. Increase protein. Follow-up in 4 weeks. It was noted that on this date, 1/19/23, the order for Pro-Stat was discontinued. A Physician Assistant progress note dated 1/25/23 indicates; Chronic cholecystitis: status post cholecystectomy, ventral incisional hernia and parastomal hernia repairs, abdominal wall debridement. Post operation complicated by poor wound healing. IV antibiotics have been completed. Now with good oral intake. Local wound cares are in place. Wound improving. Recent wound clinic appointment on 1/13/23; new wound orders given. Increase protein. Follow-up in 4 weeks. A Physician Assistant progress note dated 2/8/23; Chronic cholecystitis: status post cholecystectomy, ventral incisional hernia and parastomal hernia repairs, abdominal wall debridement. Post operation complicated by poor wound healing. IV antibiotics have been completed. Now with good oral intake. Local wound cares are in place. Wound improving. Recent wound clinic appointment on 1/13/23; new wound orders given. Increase protein. Follow-up in 4 weeks. Further review of R1's medical record noted that on 1/9/23, a physician order was written for R1 to receive a high/protein/ high calorie diet. Regular texture, thin fluid consistency. There was no further evidence that the dietary department was made aware of this change to R1's diet or that the Dietician was notified of the recommended change. R1's physician orders also still had an order for Carb consistent diet, originally written on 12/14/22 and had not been discontinued. On 4/18/23 at 11:38 a.m., Surveyor interviewed Registered Dietician (RD)- C regarding R1's wound healing. RD- C stated that she completed an admission assessment for R1 on 12/17/22. RD- C stated that she had recommended that R1 receive a consistent carb diet due to her having a diagnosis of diabetes and in addition she was obese and wanted to lose a bit of weight. RD- C stated that this type of diet is not a heavy modification from the regular diets served at the facility. RD- C stated that R1 also receives vitamin -c supplement and a multi vitamin with minerals. RD- C stated if R1's intake was sufficient it would meet her nutritional needs. Surveyor asked RD- C if she had been aware of the orders from the wound clinic to increase protein for R1 for wound healing. RD- C stated she was not made aware of this. RD- C confirmed she did not have any further assessment of R1 since admission and did not write any additional progress notes. Surveyor asked RD- C if she was aware that the wound clinic had an order to provide R1 with an increase in protein 1.5 grams protein/ kg of body weight a day. RD- C stated she was not made aware of this and if she had been aware she would have addressed it in R1's medical record. RD- C was also not aware of the physician and physician assistant progress notes indicting the need for additional protein per the wound clinic. Surveyor asked about the physician order for a high/ calorie, high protein diet on 1/9/23. RD- C stated she would not have recommended that type of diet for R1 as this type of diet would have been high in carbs and would affect R1's glucose levels. RD- C stated that she would have recommended adding protein in other ways such as adding protein powder to certain foods like pudding or providing Greek yogurt or string cheese for additional protein. Surveyor asked RD- C about the discontinued use of Pro-stat liquid supplement. RD- C stated she was not aware of the supplement being discontinued. On 4/18/23 at 1:15 p.m., Surveyor interviewed Food Services Manager (FSM)- G regarding R1 and the type of diet she was receiving. FSM- G stated that whenever there is an order for a change in diet she will speak with nursing about it and the dietician. FSM- G stated she is alerted by the changes when staff fill out a diet slip with the changes written on it. FSM- G stated she recalls speaking with R1 about her dietary preferences and that she was getting double portions when she was first admitted . Surveyor asked if FSM- G could provide information as to what type of diet R1 was receiving while at the facility. FSM- G provided Surveyor with a diet slip, dated 2/10/23 (R1 was discharged [DATE]) stating R1 is receiving a controlled carb/ high calorie/ high protein diet. FSM- G was not able to provide additional information as to what R1 was receiving while residing at the facility and discussed that the diet card provided has 2 different types of diets that would not be beneficial for R1 if provided together. On 4/18/23 at 2:00 p.m., Surveyor interviewed Director of Nursing- B (DON) regarding R1's need for additional protein to be added to her nutritional plan of care to assist in wound healing. DON- B stated that RD- C should have been made aware of it and could not provide any additional information as to why the need of additional protein had not been added to the plan for R1's wound healing. DON- B was not able to provide additional information as to why the plan of care was not updated and why the Dietician did not provide further assessment of R1's nutritional needs. Surveyor reviewed the facility's Post fall Resident Assessment and Documentation, dated 8/2017, which indicated: Policy: Designated staff member(s) will assess and document all resident falls in medical record and on facility Post Fall Assessment. Guidelines: Resident should not be moved until examined for injuries by a Registered Nurse. The resident may be moved to his/her room by safest means after exam. If a fracture of the leg, hip or femur is highly suspected, the resident should be made as comfortable as possible, monitored for shock, vital signs monitored, and ambulance should be contacted. Stay with the resident at all times. DO NOT ATTEMPT TO MOVE THE RESIDENT IF FURTHER INJURY IS A RISK. Policy review: Assessing falls and their causes, dated 2/10/2020 Purpose: The purpose of this procedure are to provide guidelines for assessing a resident after a fall and to assist staff in identifying the causes of the fall. Steps in the Procedure: After a fall: 1. If a resident has just fallen or is found on the floor without a witness to the event, evaluate for possible injuries to the head, neck, spine and extremities. 2. Obtain and record vital signs as soon as it is safe to do so. 3. If there is evidence of injury, provide appropriate first aid and/ or obtain medical treatment immediately. 4. If an assessment rules out significant injury, help the resident to a comfortable sitting, lying, or standing position, and then document relevant details. 2. R1 was receiving physical therapy services with goals for increasing ability to safely transfer and ambulate. R1's plan of care stated that she is at risk for falls due to weakness. Interventions included for Physical Therapy to evaluate and treat as ordered and as needed. Nursing note dated 2/8/23 at 11:48 a.m.; Therapist was ambulating R1 with 4 wheeled walker, gait belt and wheelchair follow when R1's left knee may have buckled causing R1 to fall to her knees. With therapy assistance, R1 was lowered to ground. R1 did not hit her head. Nurses called to therapy gym and R1 Hoyered into her wheelchair by nursing staff and therapist. R1 taken back to her room and Hoyered to bed. R1 reports pain 10/10 to her knees and is moaning in pain. Ice packs applied to both knees. As needed Oxycodone given immediately. Power of Attorney notified of fall and prefers R1 go to the hospital for evaluation. Writer called emergency room Registered Nurse to give report. Nurse Practitioner notified of fall and hospital transfer. Nursing note dated 2/8/22 at 12:27 p.m., Ambulance here for hospital transfer. Nursing note dated 2/8/22 at 2:11 p.m., R1 admitted to hospital, RN manager aware. A review of the hospital paperwork stated that R1 presented to the emergency room on 2/8/23 with knee pain after an assisted fall while working with physical therapy. Work up revealed bilateral distal femoral fractures. R1 underwent bilateral femur ORIF (open reduction and internal fixation surgery) on 2/12/23. Surveyor conducted a review of the facility's falls investigation dated 2/8/23 for R1. The time of fall was noted to be 11:30 a.m. Statements were obtained from 4 members of the rehab therapy staff. All 4 statements indicate that nursing was notified/ requested to come to the therapy gym to assess R1. It was noted, through further review, that R1 was working on ambulation goal with therapy at the time and was assessed to working on taking steps with the 4 wheeled walker, gait belt in place, stand by guarded assist of 1 therapy staff and wheelchair followed behind resident. Surveyor interviewed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)- D on 4/18/23 at 11:15 a.m. regarding R1's fall in the therapy gym. LPN- D was assigned to the unit in which R1 was residing at the time of the fall. LPN- D stated that she heard the overhead page for nursing to immediately report to the therapy gym. LPN- D stated when she arrived there was 2 other nurses' already in the gym. LPN- D stated she helped put R1 in the Hoyer lift and placed R1 into the wheelchair and then helped to Hoyer lift R1 into bed. LPN- D stated R1 was yelling in pain, and she gave her ice packs and Oxycontin after she was placed into bed. Surveyor asked LPN- D if there had been a Registered Nurse in to assess R1 before they moved her (R1) with the Hoyer lift. LPN- D stated she believed all 3 nurses in the gym were LPN's but there was a lot of people in and out of the gym including nursing managers. LPN- D stated she was aware of the need for a RN to assess a resident after a fall and before they move a resident to a safer location. LPN- D stated R1 kept stating that her knees hurt really bad. LPN- D stated she did see blood on the floor, and they were trying to figure out where the blood came from. LPN- D stated she recalled R1 had a skin tear to her hand or finger. LPN- D stated she called both R1's Power of Attorney and the Nurse Practitioner and they both requested to send R1 to the emergency room for further evaluation. On 4/18/23 at 11:53 a.m., Surveyor interviewed Physical therapist (PT)- E and Rehab Director (RD) - F regarding R1's fall while receiving therapy services on 2/8/23. PT- E stated that before R1 fell, she had ambulated in the therapy gym. PT- E stated it seemed like R1's knees buckled, and she did the best to help lower R1 to the ground. R1 landed on both her knees. PT- E stated they immediately called for nursing to come in to assess R1. PT- E stated that R1 seemed to be in shock at first but there did not seem to be any obvious injuries. PT- E stated there was some blood on the floor, and they were trying to figure out where that came from. PT- E stated that nursing brought in the Hoyer lift and believed it was LPN- D who assessed R1 for any possible injuries. On 4/18/23 at 2:00 p.m., Surveyor interviewed Director of Nursing (DON) - B regarding R1's fall on 2/8/23. DON- B stated she reported to the therapy gym when she heard the page for nursing. DON- B stated there were several staff who reported to therapy after the page for nursing. DON- B was asked who performed the assessment on R1 to determine if she had any significant injuries and that she was safe to be placed in a Hoyer lift. DON- B stated she was completely sure but believed Assistant DON- H was the last nurse in the therapy gym. DON- B stated R1 was screaming out in pain and kept yelling for help to get up. DON- B stated R1 had fallen to the floor and was in a praying position and it was hard to see if she had any injuries because of how she was situated on the floor. DON- B stated it was about 2-3 minutes before R1 was Hoyered to the wheelchair and R1 kept yelling in pain, my knees, my knees. On 2/18/23 at 2:43 p.m., Surveyor interviewed ADON- H regarding R1's fall on 2/8/23. Surveyor asked who had performed the assessment of R1's possible injuries before she was moved from the gym floor with the Hoyer lift. ADON- H stated she recalled R1 yelling out in pain, and she did a quick assessment of R1. ADON- H stated she just wanted to get R1 back to her room so they could lay her down. ADON- H stated it did not appear there were any obvious fractures that she could see. Surveyor asked ADON- H if she had asked R1 if she could move her legs. ADON- H stated she did not, that she just did a quick visual assessment. ADON- H stated it was very busy in the therapy gym after R1 had fallen. ADON- H stated she did not document in R1's medical record that she had assessed R1 and there was no further RN assessment of R1 after she was placed into her bed. ADON- H stated she did not believe R1 had any serious injuries and at the time there was no need to call 911 and have R1 remain on the floor until emergency personnel could safely place her on a gurney for transport. As of the time of exit, no additional information had been provided as to why a comprehensive RN assessment was not conducted after R1 had fallen to the floor on 2/8/23. If RN staff had thoroughly assessed R1 they may have determined there was a serious injury and moving R1 via Hoyer lift could potentially cause further injury and increased pain.
Jan 2023 7 deficiencies 2 Harm
SERIOUS (G)

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Pressure Ulcer Prevention (Tag F0686)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, record review and staff interviews, the facility did not always ensure that 3 out of 4 residents ( R37, R...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, record review and staff interviews, the facility did not always ensure that 3 out of 4 residents ( R37, R2, R360) reviewed for pressure ulcers received the necessary care and treatment to promote healing of existing pressure ulcers and to avoid the development of new pressure ulcers. R37 developed a Stage #3 pressure ulcer to his middle finger of the right hand. R37's range of motion to the right hand had deteriorated and a contracture developed. R37 was not provided with pressure relief for the contracture to the right hand and developed the stage #3 pressure ulcer. R2 had a history of resolved pressure ulcers to the right ankle and left buttocks. On [DATE] R2 developed a new pressure ulcer to the right buttocks (stage 2) and an order was given to obtain an alternating air mattress to provide additional pressure relief. The facility acknowledged that R2 should have had this type of mattress on his bed prior to the development of the new pressure ulcer to the right buttock and also that the mattress was ordered [DATE] and was not placed on the bed until [DATE]. R360 was admitted on [DATE] with a left heel pressure injury which was not comprehensively assessed on admission. In addition, R360 was admitted with a general skin issue of buttocks red and blanchable which was not assessed on admission on [DATE]. The first skin and wound evaluation of these areas was on [DATE] where the facility identified the left heel as a stage 3 and incorrectly identified the buttock as a stage 2. A review of the treatment administration record (TMAR) noted that the medi-honey treatment ordered on [DATE] for the left heel was not been signed out as administered from [DATE] through [DATE] (7 days). Findings include: Policy review: Wound Care, revised October, 2010 Purpose: The purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for the care of wounds to promote healing. Documentation: The following information should be recorded in the resident's medical record: (includes) 1. Type of wound care given 6. All assessment data (i.e., wound bed color, size, drainage, etc.) 8. Any problems or complaints made by the resident related to the procedure. 1. R37 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include Malignant Neoplasm of Colon, Unspecified; Nondisplaced Intertrochanteric Fracture of Right Femur, Subsequent Encounter for Closed Fracture with Routine Healing; Right Humerus Fracture, Encounter for Palliative Care, Other Unspecified Arthritis, Unspecified Shoulder; and Polyneuropathy, Unspecified. R37 was admitted with the supportive services of hospice care and remained on hospice care through the survey exit date of [DATE]. R37's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated [DATE], indicated R37 is at risk of developing pressure injuries; there are no pressure injuries documented during the assessment reference period. The MDS documented R37 did not have a functional limitation of range of motion impairment on one side (upper and lower extremities) of R37's body; R37 required the total assistance of two (2) staff for showering/bathing, one (1) staff assistance in the form of supervision, cueing, or encouragement, for eating; and one (1) staff extensive assistance for personal hygiene, dressing, and oral care tasks. R37 has an indwelling catheter and is always incontinent of bowel. R37's Quarterly MDS assessment, dated [DATE], indicated R37 Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score is 7, indicating R37's cognition is severely impaired. R37 is at risk of developing pressure injuries, and R37 has an unhealed Stage 3 pressure injury at time of assessment. The MDS indicates R37's has a pressure relieving device for chair, pressure relieving device for bed, turning/repositioning program, pressure injury care, application of non-surgical dressing and ointment treatment applied, other than feet. R37 has a functional limitation of range of motion impairment on one side (upper extremity) of R37's body. R37 requires total assistance of two (2) staff for showering/bathing, one (1) staff assistance in the form of supervision, cueing, or encouragement, for eating; and one (1) staff extensive assistance for personal hygiene, dressing, and oral care tasks. R37 has an indwelling catheter and is always incontinent of bowel. R37's Care Plan, dated [DATE], documents [R37] has an Activities of Daily Living (ADL) self-care performance deficit. Interventions include: -[R37] is totally dependent on two (2) staff assistance due to total dependence on staff for showering/bathing, date initiated: [DATE] -[R37] requires the extensive assistance by one (1) staff to eat, date initiated: [DATE]. On [DATE], this intervention was revised to include: EATS IN CARE GROUP TWO. -[R37] is totally dependent on two (2) staff for dressing, date initiated: [DATE]. -[R37 is totally dependent on one (1) staff total dependence with personal hygiene and oral care, date initiated: [DATE]. R37's Care Plan, dated [DATE], documents R37 has limited physical mobility, with a goal to remain free of complications related to immobility, including contractures . Interventions include: -[R37] does not walk, date initiated: [DATE] -[R37] is totally dependent on one (1) staff for locomotion, date initiated: [DATE] -[R37] has NO WEIGHT BEARING RESTRICTIONS; date initiated: [DATE]. R37's Care plan, date initiated [DATE], documents [R37] has the potential/actual impairment to skin integrity. Interventions include: -Elevate heels off the bed, date initiated: [DATE] -Encourage good nutrition and hydration in order to promote healthier skin, date initiated: [DATE]. -Monitor plan and administer pain medications/treatments as ordered and/or per pain problem, date initiated: [DATE]. -[R37] needs pressure relieving/reducing cushion to protect the skin while up in chair, date initiated: [DATE]. -[R37] needs pressure relieving/reducing cushion to protect the skin while in bed, date initiated: [DATE]. The facility completed a Quarterly Braden skin assessment on [DATE]. The score was 14, indicating R37 is a moderate risk for developing a pressure injury Surveyor reviewed R37's medical record and notes the following: On [DATE], Hospice Client Coordination Note Report documents [R37] voiced concern over the contraction of R37's left (sic) right hand and nails digging into R37's hand. Hospice will supply R37 with a palm guard. On [DATE], Hospice Recert Summary Report documents [R37's] right hand is severely contracted, and R37 can no longer open hand. On [DATE], Health Status Note documents [R37] noted to have redness to tip of right middle finger with swelling and puss like drainage to nailbed. R37 received an order for Doxycycline Monohydrate mg PO (by mouth) BID (twice daily) x 7days, Iodine to nailbed and tip of right middle finger BID. On [DATE], Health Status Note documents [R37] continues ABT (antibiotic)/Cellulitis to Right Middle Finger, Doxycycline 100mg BID x7 Days, and tolerating with no adverse reactions noted. Affected area contracted, reddened, edematous, painful to touch. Tx (treatment) ordered to affected area daily and (Licensed Practical Nurse M) unable to complete (treatment) d/t (due to) contracture and pain (at) this time. Surveyor noted there is no documentation R37's physician was consulted when the treatment to R37's right middle finger could not be completed as ordered. On [DATE], Skin and Wound Evaluation documents [R37] is a new patient and has a left (sic) middle finger with Stage 3 pressure injury due to contracture. New treatment documented: Gentamicin then Alginate, change daily. Place washcloth in palm to prevent further pressure. Wound measurements include: Length: 0.30 cm (centimeters) Width: 0.59 cm On [DATE], the Physician Orders Note documents [R37] was prescribed Cyclobenzaprine HCL Tablet 10 MG every morning for contracture management, and as needed (PRN) every 12 hours for contracture care. Surveyor notes R37 was prescribed Cyclobenzaprine (a muscle relaxant) six (6) days after staff was unable to complete the treatment to R37's right contracted hand due to pain, and this is the same day R37 was identified as having a Stage 3 pressure injury to the middle finger of the contracted hand. On [DATE], Health Status Note documents [R37] required premedication with morphine prior to wound treatment due to R37 having increased pain even prior to wound treatment. R37 had pain, but appeared to tolerate treatment better. On [DATE], Health Status Note documents a rolled washcloth was applied (to R37's right hand). Surveyor notes this is the first documentation of this intervention being implemented although it is listed on Skin and Wound Evaluation form dated [DATE]. This intervention is not documented on R37's care plan. On [DATE], Skin and Wound Evaluation documents. Wound measurements include: Length: 0.19 cm Width: 0.20 cm On [DATE], the Physician's Orders Note documents: Wash right hand and middle finger with Dakin's 0.25% f/b (followed by) Anasept to tip of middle finger and nail bed f/b calcium alginate and rolled wash cloth or carrot every day shift for wound care. On [DATE], Health Status Note documents [R37's] affected area (right hand) is contracted and painful to touch. R37 continues on Cyclobenzaprine 10mg Q (every) AM for contractures with minor improvement noted. Pain managed with scheduled Tramadol & (and) APAP (Acetaminophen), and PRN (as needed) Morphine with dressing changes. On [DATE], Hospice Visit Note Report documents [R37] experienced pain when R37's hand was opened to add a barrier to (right) palm. On [DATE], Nutrition/Dietary Note documents [R37] triggered for a wound on (R37's) finger, new. (R37) remains on hospice, with variable intakes from 51-100%. Diet Rx (prescription): regular. Weights have fluctuated substantially. Trial house supplement 120 ml BID (twice daily) for wound healing and overall nutrition support, comfort care. Will f/u (follow up) prn (as needed). On [DATE], Skin and Wound Evaluation documents: Wound measurements include: Length: 0.93 cm Width: 0.72 cm Treatment Administration Record documents: Wash right hand and middle finger with Dakin's 0.25% f/b calcium alginate and rolled wash cloth or carrot every day shift for wound care. Start Date: [DATE] On [DATE], Skin and Wound Evaluation documents [R37's] carrot is to be placed (in right hand) to help reduce pressure. (R37) often throws (carrot); will continue to place and to use Alginate to help decease moisture. Wound measurements include: Length: 0.51 cm Width: 0.68 cm On [DATE], Skin and Wound Evaluation documents [R37's] pressure ulcer is essentially closed and staff to continue Alginate and carrot to assist with moisture control and reduce pressure. Wound team will monitor x3 weeks as follow up; continue contracture management and treat as ordered. Wound measurements include: Length: 0.68 cm Width: 1.07 cm Surveyor reviewed the Weekly Skin Shower Observation forms for R37 from [DATE]-[DATE] ([DATE] was not received). Surveyor notes the following: On [DATE], R37's Weekly Skin Shower Observation form indicates R37's skin is intact, free from alterations/impairments. On [DATE], R37's Weekly Skin Shower Observation form indicates R37's skin has alteration(s), list all areas observed. Surveyor notes there are no areas documented. On [DATE], R37's Weekly Skin Shower Observation form indicates R37's skin has alteration(s), list all areas observed. Surveyor notes there are no areas documented. On [DATE], R37's Weekly Skin Shower Observation form indicates R37's skin has alteration(s), list all areas observed. Surveyor notes there are no areas documented. On [DATE], R37's Weekly Skin Shower Observation form indicates R37's skin has alteration(s), list all areas observed. Surveyor notes there are no areas documented. On [DATE], R37's Weekly Skin Shower Observation form indicates R37's skin has alteration(s), list all areas observed. Surveyor notes there are no areas documented. Surveyor notes there are no identified areas documented (right hand contracture and right middle finger pressure ulcer) on reviewed Weekly Skin Shower Observation forms. On [DATE], at 09:50 AM, Surveyor observed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) J perform a wound treatment to R37's right middle finger. Surveyor observed R37's right hand was contracted and there was no dressing, nor carrot, in R37's right hand. LPN J verbalized (R37) usually takes it off throughout the day. LPN J verbalized R37's right hand looks tight today. LPN J had difficulty opening R37's right hand, and required one (1) person staff assistance to open R37's right hand minimally to get to wound area in order to perform ordered wound treatment. LPN J verbalized having more difficulty opening R37's hand and placing the carrot to reduce pressure. On [DATE], at 10:00 AM, Surveyor interviewed Licensed Practical (LPN) J, who stated R37's carrot is to always remain in R37's right hand. LPN J verbalized R37 pulls out the carrot frequently. On [DATE], at 1:02 PM, Surveyor interviewed Director of Rehabilitation Services N, who indicated the rehabilitation department has never provided services to R37. Director of Rehabilitation Services N verbalized the rehabilitation department provided the carrot for R37 after finding out the carrot hospice ordered is on backorder. Director of Rehabilitation Services is unaware of date when carrot was provided to R37. On [DATE], at 1:45 PM, Surveyor interviewed Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) O, who verbalized any special instructions for resident personal cares are written on care cards located in each resident bathroom, or in an electronic record. CNA O showed Surveyor the care card for R37; Surveyor noted no instructions were listed in regard to R37 receiving Range of Motion (ROM) exercises, nor identification or use of any appropriate devices (palm guard, washcloth, carrot) for contracture and wound management in order to relieve pressure. CNA O stated R37 had nothing in R37's right hand this morning when CNA O arrived to perform morning personal cares. CNA O saw the carrot and verbalized not knowing what to do with it. CNA O did not place carrot in R37's hand, but believes the rehabilitation department assisted in placing R37's carrot in right palm today. On [DATE], at 09:57 AM, Surveyor interviewed Registered Nurse (RN) Manager P, who verbalized on [DATE], [R37] had been participating in a Life Enrichment activity (manicure) with R37's daughter. RN Manager P stated R37's daughter brought R37 back to the unit and was concerned as R37's finger was red. RN Manager P verbalized there was nothing (palm guard) in R37's hand at the time, and RN Manager P opened up (R37's right hand) by pulling (R37's) finger back the best I could. It was hard, but I did the best I could. I saw definitely an infection around the nailbed. RN P verbalized for contractures; it is RN Manager P's understanding to routinely monitor the contracture. RN Manager P verbalized treatments (on R37's right middle finger) can be difficult because it is so tight and (R37) winces. On [DATE], at 10:08 AM, Surveyor interviewed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) M, who stated it is an expectation that nurses will perform full body checks for each resident upon admission, and at every weekly shower day. During weekly shower body checks, nurses look for skin breakdown, rashes, including anything out of the norm for each resident. LPN M verbalized it is the expectation that contractures and anything related to feet, hands, and skin are observed; all wounds are documented as such. Nurses record findings on a Weekly Skin Shower Observation form. LPN M verbalized R37 is premedicated before R37's daily wound treatment to alleviate the pain associated with opening up R37's hand, verbalizing R37 receives morphine before the treatment. LPN M made a fist with LPN M's hand to demonstrate R37's contracture. LPN M flexed fingers and touched the palm of LPN M's hand, he goes like this and (R37's) fingers dig in. LPN M verbalized R37's contracture is severe, and it is a constant battle keeping (R37's) palm guard in place. LPN M verbalized R37's contracture is a very tight contracture so lots of pressure in there (LPN M pointed to palm area of own hand). On [DATE], at 10:20 AM, Surveyor entered R37's bedroom with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) M. Surveyor observed R37 sitting in R37's Broda chair with eyes closed. LPN M touched R37's right hand. Surveyor observed R37's mouth open, and R37 scrunched R37's eyes together. LPN M verbalized R37 makes that face when R37 is in pain. Surveyor noted carrot was in place in R37's right hand. On [DATE], at 11:49 AM, Surveyor interviewed Director of Nursing (DON) B. When Surveyor asked how R37 developed a contracture, DON B replied, I don't have an answer for that. A hospice aide was coming in 2-3 times per week. I assumed they were providing routine CNA care to do Range of Motion. DON B verbalized finding out about R37's pressure injury from a note left by Registered Nurse (RN) Manager P. DON B verbalized due to being on hospice care, R37 wouldn't normally be seen by wound care team, but as the wound was in a trickier spot, DON B included R37 on facility wound care rounds. DON B verbalized as R37 was on antibiotics for Cellulitis since [DATE], R37 wouldn't have been seen by wound team right away. R37 was seen seven (7) days later, on [DATE]. DON B verbalized R37 will be receiving restorative services (Passive Range of Motion (PROM) and carrot program), beginning [DATE]. DON B verbalized no interventions were implemented for R37 for contracture before the washcloth and carrot placement. DON B verbalized the carrot was first used as an intervention for R37 on [DATE]. On [DATE], at 3:05 PM, Surveyor informed Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) A of the concern with R37 not being provided with pressure relief due to right hand deterioration and subsequent contracture, resulting in a Stage 3 pressure injury to R37's right middle finger. 2. Resident #2 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included Vascular Dementia, Type 2 Diabetes, Major Depressive Disorder and Hypertension. R2 was started on hospice care on [DATE] and remained under hospice care through the survey exit date on [DATE]. A review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicates that R2 is severely cognitively impaired and needs total and extensive 2-person physical assistance with activities of daily living. R2 is noted to always be incontinent of bladder and frequently incontinent of bowel. R2 has experienced weight loss that is not physician prescribed and is at risk for pressure ulcer development. The MDS indicates that during the assessment reference period, R2 does not currently have any unhealed pressure ulcers. It is noted there is a pressure reducing device for the bed and chair. The facility completed a quarterly Braden skin assessment on [DATE]. The score was 11, indicating R2 is at high risk for developing a pressure ulcer. A review of R2's individual plan of care states that R2 has potential for the skin impairment due to fragile skin. Revised [DATE]. Interventions included: o Heel lift boots on when in bed- often refuses but continue to try o The resident needs pressure relieving/reducing cushion to protect the skin while up IN CHAIR. o The resident needs pressure relieving/reducing mattress to protect the skin while IN BED. R2's plan of care also indicated that R2 has pressure ulcer left buttocks and history of small sacral PI (Pressure injury) r/t Immobility, refusals to reposition on sides; Date Initiated: [DATE] Revision on: [DATE]. Interventions include: o Follow facility policies/protocols for the prevention/treatment of skin breakdown. Date Initiated: [DATE] o If the resident refuses treatment, confer with the resident, IDT (Interdisciplinary team) and family to determine why and try alternative methods to gain compliance. Document alternative methods. Date Initiated: [DATE] o Monitor nutritional status. Serve diet as ordered, monitor intake and record. Date Initiated: [DATE] o Teach resident/family the importance of changing positions for prevention of pressure ulcers. Encourage small frequent position changes. Date Initiated: [DATE] o Weekly treatment documentation to include measurement of each area of skin breakdown's width, length, depth, type of tissue and exudate Date Initiated: [DATE] o Wound MD consult as indicated Date Initiated: [DATE] Nutrition progress note dated [DATE]; R2 triggers for a wound, though it is now essentially closed. Diet Rx: consistent CHO. Supplement RX: 120 ml 1x/d House supplement. PO ranges from 51-100%. R2 remains on hospice. Will f/u prn. Surveyor conducted further review of R2's medical record and noted that R2 had a previously healed area to the left buttock. The pressure ulcer was noted to be first observed on [DATE], stage #3 and healed [DATE]. During treatment of this area, an air pump mattress was in use. R2 has also had previous pressure ulcer to the right outer ankle. Skin and wound evaluation, dated [DATE]; pressure ulcer stage #2 - 1 day old, location right buttocks area 0.65 cm, length 1.92 cm, width 0.52 cm. Notes- new PI (pressure injury) noted, resident (R2) no longer has air mattress- hospice updated to get a new one due to PI development; area is clean NOR (New Order Received) for skin prep and barrier cream 3 x week, hospice re-ordering mattress. Physician order dated [DATE]: MONITOR PRESSURE INJURY FOR S/SX OF INFECTION, OR WORSENING OF WOUND. NOTIFY MD IF S/SX OF INFECTION ARE OBSERVED OR WOUND HAS WORSENED every shift for monitor skin integrity Physician order dated [DATE]: SWW (soap, water, to right buttock PI f/b skin prep and small foam dressing every day shift every Tue, Thu, Sat for wound care. Surveyor made an observation of R2 on [DATE] at 10:23am. R2 was lying in bed on his back. HOB (head of bed) elevated. Side rail up with call light. Has regular mattress. Has a new mattress, wrapped in plastic wrap, in entry of room and placed on side of wall. Skin and wound evaluation dated [DATE]; pressure ulcer stage #2 right buttock status 8 days old. Acquired in - house. Area: 0.68 cm, length 1.68 cm, width 0.62 cm. Notes: area has improved and is more consistent with MASD (moisture associated skin damage) as opposed to pressure injury. Will discontinue foam now that air mattress in place. Barrier cream each shift and offload if R2 allows. [DATE] at 03:30 PM, Surveyor conducted an interview with DON- B regarding R2's development of the Stage #2 pressure ulcer to right buttock. DON- B stated she doesn't understand why hospice took away the air mattress and they were trying to get it back in place. DON- B stated new mattress got delivered yesterday ([DATE]) and was placed on bed yesterday. DON- B was not able to provide additional information as to why it was recommended that R2 have the air mattress in place on [DATE] and it was not until [DATE] that the mattress was in place on R2's bed. On [DATE], DON- B provided Surveyor with a copy of an invoice showing that on [DATE], the medical equipment company had come to the facility to take back an alternating pressure mattress. It was noted this was the date that R2 started on hospice. DON- B stated that he had the air mattress recently, but Hospice again discontinued it. On [DATE] 03:38 PM observation was made with Administrator- A that the air mattress is in place on bed for R2. As of the time of exit on [DATE], the facility was not able to provide additional information as to why R2 was not provided with an alternating air- mattress, as per the plan of care, to assist in the prevention of developing a pressure ulcer to the right buttocks. 3. R360 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included Hypertension, Cerebral Infraction, Epilepsy, Aphasia, Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis, moderate protein- calorie malnutrition and Dehydration. An admission Evaluation dated [DATE] reflects in Section J: Skin: Are there any skin issues present- yes. General skin issues: buttocks red and blanchable. Is there a pressure injury- left heel pressure (no further description given such as size and stage). Care Plan: skin- educate resident/ family of causative factors and measures to prevent skin injury. Elevate heels off bed. Pressure relieving/ reducing cushion for chair and bed to protect skin. A physician order, written [DATE] documents: Heel Boots to be worn when in bed every shift. A physician order was written on [DATE] for the left heel to be cleansed with NSW and then to apply medi- honey to open areas every day shift every Tuesday, Thursday, Saturday for wound care. Medicare Charting dated [DATE]; New Admit [DATE] with PMH: Recurrent CVA, Seizure Disorder, Afib s/p PPM, HTN, Dyslipidemia, Expressive Aphasia, R-Sided Weakness. AAOx2-3, pleasant & cooperative @ times, expressive aphasia with picture board or white board, and hand gestures. Res Total Dependent for Transfer x2 assist via Hoyer Lift, and Extensive Assist x1 for ADLs. Res NPO (nothing by mouth) with continuous tube feed 60 ML for 1300 cc, w/ 45 ml water flushed Q 1 hr and tolerating, G-tube intact & patent, placement confirmed, No residual this AM & 10mL @ Noon. Skin PWD with Pressure Ulcer to Left Heel, Tx completed this AM as ordered with dressing c/d/i, off-loading boots in bed. BLEs with no edema noted. VSS. Non-verbal indicators of pain/discomfort upon movement only, managed with scheduled & PRN APAP @ this time. Participates in PT/OT/ST as ordered. R360 refused to get out of bed this AM and refused PT/OT. R360 accepted PT/OT later upon second approach. Continue to monitor accordingly. Medicare Charting dated [DATE] left heel - wound care. (No mention of Right buttock). Nursing note dated [DATE] at 03:11 a.m., F/U admit, Alert easily aroused, difficult with speech uses communication board. has continuous tube feeding tolerating well 0200 residual 15ml. sleeping well no c/o pain or disc. Medicare Charting dated [DATE] indicated wound care to Left heel and buttocks. Medicare Charting dated [DATE]- wound care to left heel. Narrative: Resident (R360) with history of stroke, a-fib, seizure disorder and HTN. Recently arrived from . to be close to family. Recent stroke with right sided weakness and aphasic and difficulty swallowing. Recent PEG tube placement and receiving tube feeding for 20 hours a day. Resident receives Osmolite 1.5 at 65cc/hr, resident tolerating without difficulty. Resident is aphasic, can talk but speech can be garbled at times. Resident easily communicates with yes and no questions and has a communication board available at bedside. Staff anticipates most of resident's needs. Resident can be forgetful at times. Resident does not appear to be in any pain except with movement, resident will moan and groan with any movement. Resident requires assist of 2 with mechanical lift for all transfers. Resident is incontinent of bowel and bladder. All meds via PEG tube. Resident does occasionally get up into w/c but usually no more than 2 hours, as he cannot tolerate being up for extended amount of times. Resident does have a pressure wound to left heel. Resident wears protective heel boots at all times, and treatment is done as ordered. Resident participates in therapies. Surveyor conducted a review of the admission MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated [DATE]. The assessment indicates that R360 has moderately impaired cognitive skills. R360 needs extensive 2-person physical assist with activities of daily living. R360 is always incontinent of bowel and bladder. R360 is at risk for developing a pressure ulcer and currently has an unhealed pressure ulcer. R360 is said to have 1- Stage 2 present on admission and 1 Stage #3 present on admission. R360 has a pressure relieving device for the chair and bed. The CAA (care area assessment) for skin states: R360 admitted to facility from a SNF in (name of state). Needs assist with bed mobility, transfers, toileting, eating, locomotion, dressing, hygiene, and bathing. Attends therapy per POC (plan of care) . BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) 0. Diagnosis includes hemiplegia, aphasia, and malnutrition. Incontinent of bowel and bladder. admitted with skin concerns. Braden scale 12. Proceed to care plan skin integrity. R360's individual plan of care, initiated [DATE] states that R360 has pressure ulcer left heel and right buttock r/t Immobility, hemiparesis, prefers to lay on back, HOB (Head of Bed) has to be elevated for tube feeding. Interventions included: *Administer treatments as ordered and monitor for effectiveness. Date Initiated: [DATE]. *Educate the resident/family/caregivers as to causes of skin breakdown; including: transfer/positioning requirements; importance of taking care during ambulating/mobility, good nutrition and frequent repositioning. Date Initiated: [DATE]. *R360 needs assistance to turn/reposition at least every 1-2 hours, more often as needed or requested. Date Initiated: [DATE]. *R360 requires Pressure relieving/reducing device on bed/chair. Date Initiated: [DATE]. A Skin and Wound evaluation, dated [DATE], indicates R360 has a Stage #3 pressure ulcer to the left heel that was present on admission. Exact date [DATE]. Wound measurements: area- 2.1 cm, length 3.2 cm, Width 1.1 cm no depth or undermining or tunneling. Moderate exudate. Slow to heal; wound healing is slow or stalled but stable, little/ no deterioration. Notes: admitted with Stage #3 to heel was treated with Medihoney and foam; will change to Iodosorb and foam since slough diminished. MD and POA aware. The facility had not conduct a previous assessment of this Stage 3 left heel pressure injury on [DATE] in order to determine the progression or deterioration of the wound. The facility completed no assessment to include staging, measurements or other wound characteristics on admission. A physician order was written on [DATE] for the left heel to be cleansed with NSW and then to apply medi- honey to open areas every day shift every Tuesday, Thursday, Saturday for wound care. Further review of the treatment administration record (TMAR) noted that the medi-honey treatment had not been signed out as administered from [DATE] through [DATE]. A Skin and Wound evaluation dated [DATE] indicates R360 has a Stage #2 pressure ulcer to right buttock that was present on admission ([DATE]). Exact date: [DATE]. Area: 0.2 cm, Length 0.7 cm, Width 0.5cm, no depth, undermining or tunneling. Epithelial- 60% of wound covered. 40% granulation. Light amount of exudates. Notes: admitted with MASD (moisture associated skin damage) which has now evolved into Stage 2 pressure injury in this location. Will discontinue barrier cream and start skin prep and foam dressing 3 times a week. Surveyor noted according to the European Pressure Ulcer Advisory [NAME], the National Pressure Injury Advisory Panel (NPIAP) and Pan Pacific Pressure Injury Alliance, Prevention and Treatment of Pressure ulcers/injuries: Quick Reference Guide, 2019 granulation tissue is not present in a stage 2 pressure injury. Granulation tissue is noted in a stage 3 pressure injury. Surveyor noted the facility's skin and wound evaluation dated [DATE] incorrectly staged the right buttock as a stage 2 and not a stage 3. There was no comprehensive assessment of R360's right buttocks pressure ulcer that was said to be present[TRUNCATED]
SERIOUS (G)

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Deficiency F0688 (Tag F0688)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility did not ensure a Resident with limited range of motion received...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility did not ensure a Resident with limited range of motion received the appropriate treatment and services to prevent further decrease in range of motion for 1 (R37) of 1 Residents reviewed for limited range of motion. On 5/25/22, R37 was transferred from the hospital to the facility. R37 had been hospitalized following a fall which resulted in a right hip fracture and right humerus fracture. There was no surgical repair of the right humerus and R37 was advised to keep the right arm in a sling. R37 was admitted to the facility with the supportive services of hospice care. The facility did not document the interventions to address R37's limited arm Range of Motion (ROM), or identity interventions to prevent further decline in the right arm ROM until after R37's right hand became contracted. Findings include: The Facility policy, entitled Prevention of Decline in Range of Motion, dated 10/1/22 documents Residents who enter the facility without limited range of motion will not experience a reduction in range of motion unless the resident's clinical condition demonstrated that a reduction in range of motion is unavoidable. Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 1. The facility in collaboration with the medical director, director of nurses and as appropriate, physical/occupational consultant, shall establish and utilize a systematic approach for prevention of decline in range of motion, including the assessment, appropriate care planning, and preventative care. 2. Assessment for Range of Motion a. Licensed nurses will assess a resident's range of motion (such as current extent of movement of his/her joints and the identification of limitations) on admission/readmission, quarterly, and upon a significant change. b. Residents who exhibit limitations in range of motion, initially and thereafter, will be referred to the therapy department for a focused assessment of range of motion. c. Nursing assistants will report any significant changes in range of motion, as noted during daily care activities, to the resident's nurse when any changes are noted. d. The assessment should include identified risks which could impact resident's range of motion including, but not limited to: i. Immobilization . iii. Any condition where movement may result in pain, spasms, or loss of movement. iv. Clinical conditions such as immobilized limbs or digits because of injury, fractures . 3. Appropriate Care Planning a. Based on comprehensive assessment, the facility will provide interventions, exercises, and/or therapy to maintain or improve range of motion. b. The facility will provide treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice. This includes, but is not limited to i. Appropriate services (specialized rehabilitation, restorative, maintenance). ii. Appropriate equipment (braces or splints) . d. Interventions will be documented on the resident's person centered plan. Documentation should include, but not limited to: i. Type of treatments; ii. Frequency and duration of treatments; iii. Measurable objectives . f. Modifications to the plan of care will be made as needed. 4. Preventative Care a. Staff will be educated on the risk factors for a decline in range of motion. These include, but are not limited to: i. Limbs or digits immobilized because of injury . iv. Pain, spasms, and immobility associated with arthritis . b. Staff will be educated on basic, restorative nursing care that does not require the use of a qualified therapist or licensed nurse oversight . v. Assisting residents with range of motion exercises, performing passive range of motion for residents unable to actively participate. R37 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include Humerus Fracture, Nondisplaced Intertrochanteric Fracture of Right Femur, Subsequent Encounter for Closed Fracture with Routine Healing; Encounter for Palliative Care, Malignant Neoplasm of Colon, Unspecified; Other Unspecified Arthritis, Unspecified Shoulder; and Polyneuropathy, Unspecified. R37's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 5/31/22, indicated R37 has a functional limitation in range of motion impairment on one side (upper and lower extremities) of R37's body; R37 required total assistance of two (2) staff for showering/bathing, and the extensive assistance of one (1) staff for eating, personal hygiene, dressing, and oral care tasks. R37's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 8/31/22, indicated there is no longer a functional limitation of range of motion impairment on one side (upper and lower extremities) of R37's body; R37 required the total assistance of two (2) staff for showering/bathing, one (1) staff assistance in the form of supervision, cueing, or encouragement, for eating; and one (1) staff extensive assistance for personal hygiene, dressing, and oral care tasks. R37's Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 12/1/22, indicates R37 has a functional limitation of range of motion impairment on one side (upper extremity) of R37's body. R37 requires the total assistance of two (2) staff for showering/bathing, one (1) staff assistance in the form of supervision, cueing, or encouragement, for eating; and the extensive assistance of one (1) staff for personal hygiene, dressing, and oral care tasks. On 01/05/23, at 1:40 PM, Surveyor interviewed Minimum Data Set (MDS) Coordinator I, who verbalized completing R37's admission MDS assessment, dated 5/31/22 as having a functional limitation in range of motion impairment on one side (upper and lower extremities) of R37's body due to fractures. MDS Coordinator I stated if a contracture was present, MDS Coordinator I would have written a progress note citing that. MDS Coordinator I verbalized R37's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 8/31/22, lists no impairment noted, which means R37 had no issues with performance of either active or passive Range of Motion (ROM). R37's Quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 12/1/22, documents R37 has a functional limitation of range of motion impairment on one side (upper extremity) of R37's body, which MDS Coordinator I verbalized documenting this due to R37's right hand contracture. Surveyor reviewed MDS Coordinator I progress notes and found no documentation noting R37 had a contracture during initial admission MDS assessment. Surveyor notes there is no documentation R37 was admitted to the facility with a contracted right hand. R37's right hand became contracted while residing at the facility. R37's Care Plan, dated 5/25/22, documents [R37] has an Activities of Daily Living (ADL) self-care performance deficit. Interventions include: -[R37] is totally dependent on two (2) staff assistance due to total dependence on staff for showering/bathing, date initiated: 5/25/22 -[R37] requires the extensive assistance by one (1) staff to eat, date initiated: 5/25/22. On 9/6/22, this intervention was revised to include: EATS IN CARE GROUP TWO. -[R37] is totally dependent on two (2) staff for dressing, date initiated: 5/25/22. -[R37 is totally dependent on one (1) staff total dependence with personal hygiene and oral care, date initiated: 5/25/22. R37's Care Plan, dated 5/25/22, documents R37 has limited physical mobility, with a goal to remain free of complications related to immobility, including contractures . Interventions include: -[R37] does not walk, date initiated: 5/25/22 -[R37] is totally dependent on one (1) staff for locomotion, date initiated: 5/25/22 -[R37]has NO WEIGHT BEARING RESTRICTIONS; date initiated: 5/26/22. Surveyor noted no initial or revised interventions pertaining to R37's limited Range of Motion (ROM) and subsequent contracture, to include participation in a Range of Motion (passive or active) program, nor the use of any ordered appropriate devices (palm guard, washcloth, or carrot). Interventions of a palm guard, washcloth, and carrot were implemented after the right-hand contracture was first documented on 9/20/22 in Hospice Recert Summary Report. Surveyor reviewed R37's medical record and notes the following: On 5/25/22, Health Status Note documents [R37] was wearing a sling for a right humerus fracture. Surveyor noted there is no sling mentioned as an intervention anywhere on R37's care plan. On 9/20/22, Hospice Recert Summary Report documents [R37's] right side is contracted, so vitals were checked on R37's left side. On 10/17/22, Hospice Client Coordination Note Report documents [R37] voiced concern over the contraction of R37's left (sic) hand and nails digging into R37's hand. Hospice will supply (R37) with a palm guard. On 10/25/22, Hospice Recert Summary Report documents [R37] complained of right-hand arm/hand pain, but mostly R37's hand. R37 indicated pain at all times but hurts more when R37 tries to move R37's right hand or arm. The only intervention recorded/provided was R37 receiving as needed (PRN) pain medication. Surveyor notes there is no documentation of a palm guard being in place or used as an intervention. On 11/9/22, Hospice Recert Summary Report documents [R37] was not wearing a palm guard. R37 noted hand hurts a little without palm guard. R37 indicated someone was going to come fix the palm guard, but this hadn't occurred yet. Surveyor noted this is the first time there is documentation of R37 having the palm guard. On 11/26/22, Hospice Recert Summary Report documents [R37's] right hand severely contracted, and R37 no longer can open hand. On 11/30/22, Health Status Note documents [R37's] affected area (right hand) is contracted, reddened, edematous, painful to touch. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) M was unable to complete an ordered treatment for R37 due to contracture and pain. On 01/05/23, at 10:08 AM, Surveyor interviewed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) M, who verbalized not remembering whether LPN M returned to try to re-attempt (R37's) treatment. LPN M verbalized that if this had occurred, LPN M would have written it in a progress (Health Status) note. On 12/6/22, Physician Orders Note documents [R37] was prescribed Cyclobenzaprine HCL Tablet 10 MG (micrograms) every morning for contracture management, and as needed (PRN) every 12 hours for contracture care. On 12/11/22, Health Status Note documents a rolled washcloth was applied (to R37's right hand). Surveyor notes this intervention is not documented on R37's care plan. On 12/13/22, Physician's Orders Note documents [R37] to use a rolled washcloth or carrot every day shift in conjunction with treatment. On 12/13/22, Health Status Note documents [R37's] affected area (right hand) is contracted and painful to touch. R37 continues on Cyclobenzaprine 10mg Q (every) AM for contractures with minor improvement noted. Pain managed with scheduled Tramadol & (and) APAP (Acetaminophen), and PRN Morphine with dressing changes. On 12/15/22, Hospice Visit Note Report documents [R37] experienced pain when R37's hand was opened to add a barrier to (right) palm. On 12/21/22, Hospice Recert Summary Report documents [R37] has increased contracture to right hand, and tenderness to affected area. On 12/29/22, Hospice Recert Summary Report documents [R37] receives pain medication to relieve discomfort when contracted hand is cleaned. On 12/30/22, Hospice Visit Note Report (Type: Aide Hospice Visit) documents hospice aide services performed with/for R37. This report identifies categories (Activities of Daily Living, Intake/Output, and Other Services) and subsequent services a hospice aide provides to R37 during each visit. Surveyor noted there is no category, nor service, of Range of Motion (active or passive) indicated/performed for R37 during this visit. Surveyor reviewed the Weekly Skin Shower Observation forms for R37 from 11/21/22-01/02/23 (11/28/22 was not received). Surveyor notes the following: On 11/21/22, R37's Weekly Skin Shower Observation form indicates R37's skin is intact, free from alterations/impairments. On 12/05/22, R37's Weekly Skin Shower Observation form indicates R37's skin has alteration(s), list all areas observed. Surveyor notes there are no areas documented. On 12/12/22, R37's Weekly Skin Shower Observation form indicates R37's skin has alteration(s), list all areas observed. Surveyor notes there are no areas documented. On 12/19/22, R37's Weekly Skin Shower Observation form indicates R37's skin has alteration(s), list all areas observed. Surveyor notes there are no areas documented. On 12/26/22, R37's Weekly Skin Shower Observation form indicates R37's skin has alteration(s), list all areas observed. Surveyor notes there are no areas documented. On 01/02/23, R37's Weekly Skin Shower Observation form indicates R37's skin has alteration(s), list all areas observed. Surveyor notes there are no areas documented. On 1/04/23, at 09:50 AM, Surveyor observed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) J perform a wound treatment to R37's right middle finger. Surveyor observed R37's right hand was contracted and there was no dressing, nor carrot, on R37's right hand. LPN J verbalized (R37) usually takes it off throughout the day. LPN J verbalized R37's right hand looks tight today. LPN J had difficulty opening R37's right hand and required one (1) person staff assistance to open R37's right hand minimally to get to wound area in order to perform ordered wound treatment. LPN J verbalized having more difficulty opening R37's hand and placing the carrot to reduce pressure. On 01/04/23, at 10:00 AM, Surveyor interviewed Licensed Practical (LPN) J, who stated R37's carrot is to remain in his right hand at all times. LPN J verbalized R37 pulls out the carrot frequently. On 01/04/23, at 1:02 PM, Surveyor interviewed, Director of Rehabilitation Services N, who indicated the rehabilitation department has never provided services to R37. Director of Rehabilitation Services N verbalized the rehabilitation department provided the carrot for R37 after finding out the carrot hospice ordered is on backorder. Director of Rehabilitation Services is unaware of date when carrot was provided to R37. On 01/04/23, at 01:17 PM, Surveyor interviewed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) J, who verbalized R37 was not on any Range of Motion (ROM), nor restorative program, since R37's admission to the facility. LPN J indicates R37's carrot is on backorder from hospice, so facility provided one approximately 1-2 weeks ago. Before this, LPN J states facility was using a washcloth for (R37's) right hand. Surveyor notes there is no documentation of placing a washcloth in R37's right hand related to the contracted hand on R37's care plan. On 01/04/23, at 1:45 PM, Surveyor interviewed Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) O, who verbalized providing cares for R37 routinely in the Summer of 2022 and stated no special attention was required for R37's right hand/arm. CNA O recalled having no issues opening R37's right hand to provide daily personal cares. CNA O stated any special instructions for cares would be written on care cards located in each resident bathroom, or in an electronic record. CNA O showed Surveyor the care card for R37; Surveyor noted no instructions were listed in regard to R37 receiving Range of Motion (ROM) exercises, nor identification or use of any appropriate devices (palm guard, washcloth, carrot). CNA O verbalized never performing Range of Motion exercises to R37 when assigned to his care for the day. CNA O stated R37 had nothing in R37's right hand this morning when CNA O arrived to perform am personal cares. CNA O saw the carrot and verbalized not knowing what to do with it. CNA O did not place the carrot in R37's hand but believes the rehabilitation department assisted in placing R37's carrot in right palm today. On 01/05/23, at 09:57 AM, Surveyor interviewed Registered Nurse (RN) Manager P, who verbalized [R37] had been participating in a Life Enrichment activity (manicure) with R37's daughter. RN Manager P stated R37's daughter brought R37 back to the unit and was concerned as R37's finger was red. RN Manager P verbalized there was nothing (palm guard) in R37's hand at the time, and RN Manager P opened up (R37's right hand) by pulling (R37's) finger back the best I could. It was hard, but I did the best I could. I saw definitely an infection around the nailbed. RN P verbalized for contractures; it is RN Manager P's understanding to routinely monitor the contracture. RN Manager P verbalized treatments (on R37's right middle finger) can be difficult because it is so tight and (R37) winces. On 01/05/23, at 10:08 AM, Surveyor interviewed LPN M, who stated it is an expectation that nurses will perform full body checks for each resident upon admission, and on every weekly shower day. LPN M verbalized all contractures are noted upon admission and monitored. During weekly shower body checks, nurses look for skin breakdown, including anything out of the norm for each resident. LPN M verbalized it is the expectation that contractures and anything related to feet, hands, and skin are observed. Nurses record findings on a Weekly Skin Shower Observation form. LPN M stated R37 has a palm guard and that R37 typically takes it off. LPN M verbalized R37 is premedicated before R37's daily treatment to alleviate the pain associated with opening up R37's hand, verbalizing R37 receives morphine before the treatment. LPN M made a fist with LPN M's hand to demonstrate R37's contracture. LPN M flexed fingers and touched the palm of LPN M's hand, he goes like this and (R37's) fingers dig in. LPN M verbalized R37's contracture is severe, and it is a constant battle donning his palm guard. LPN M verbalized R37's contracture is a very tight contracture so lots of pressure in there (palm area of right hand). On 1/5/23, at 10:20 AM, Surveyor entered R37's bedroom with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) M. Surveyor observed R37 sitting in R37's Broda chair with eyes closed. LPN M touched R37's right hand. Surveyor observed R37's mouth open, and R37 scrunched R37's eyes together. LPN M verbalized R37 makes that face when R37 is in pain. Surveyor noted carrot was in place in R37's right hand at this time. On 01/05/23, at 11:49 AM, Surveyor interviewed Director of Nursing (DON) B. When Surveyor asked how R37 developed a contracture, DON B replied, I don't have an answer for that. A hospice aide was coming in 2-3 times per week. I assumed they were providing routine CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) care to do Range of Motion. DON B verbalized R37 will be receiving Passive Range of Motion and carrot program, restorative services, beginning 1/9/23. DON B verbalized no interventions were implemented for R37 for the contracture before the washcloth and carrot placement. DON B verbalized the carrot was first used as an intervention for R37 on 12/20/22. Surveyor notes there is no documentation of the use of a washcloth or carrot as an intervention in R37's care plan. On 01/05/23, at 3:05 PM, Surveyor informed Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) of the concern of R37 not having documented interventions to address R37's limited arm Range of Motion (ROM) or have identified interventions to monitor to prevent the decline of Range of Motion in the right arm until R37's hand became contracted.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

ADL Care (Tag F0677)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, observation and interview the facility did not provide care and services related to Restorative Nursing ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, observation and interview the facility did not provide care and services related to Restorative Nursing Services for dependent residents for 1 (R26) of 1 resident reviewed for therapy services. * R26 was discharged from Physical Therapy (PT) on 11/9/22. On 11/18/22 an order was written to begin Restorative Nursing Rehabilitation and was not completed per order and plan of care. Findings include: Surveyor reviewed facility's Restorative Nursing Services policy with a revision date of July 2017. Documented was: Policy Statement Residents will receive restorative nursing care as needed to help promote optimal safety and independence. Policy Interpretation and Implementation 1. Restorative nursing care consists of nursing interventions that may or may not be accompanied by formalized rehabilitative services (e.g., physical, occupational or speech therapies). 2. Residents may be started on a restorative nursing program upon admission, during the course of stay or when discharged from rehabilitative care. 3. Restorative goals and objectives are individualized and resident-centered, and are outlined in the resident's plan of care. 4. The resident or representative will be included in determining goals and the plan of care. 5. Restorative goals may include, but are not limited to supporting and assisting the resident in: a. Adjusting or adapting to changing abilities; b. Developing, maintaining or strengthening his/her physiological and psychological resources; c. Maintaining his/her dignity, independence and self-esteem; and d. Participating in the development and implementation of his/her plan of care. R26 was admitted to the facility 10/25/22 with diagnoses that included Unspecified Fracture of the Lower End of Left Radius, Subsequent Encounter for Closed Fracture with Routine Healing; Unspecified Fracture of the Lower End of Left Ulna, Subsequent Encounter for Closed Fracture with Routine Healing; Rheumatoid Arthritis; Fibromyalgia; Need for Assistance with Personal Care; Other Abnormalities of Gait and Mobility; Unspecified Fracture of Left Wrist and Hand, Subsequent Encounter for Fracture with Routine Healing and History of Falling. On 1/3/23 at 10:05 AM and 1/5/23 at 9:02 AM Surveyor interviewed R26. R26 informed Surveyor that she is on a walking program and Restorative Therapy but it hardly ever happens. R26 noted when it was first ordered it was being completed by a nice woman that came occasionally but she no longer works at the facility. R26 was concerned with Restorative Therapy not being completed and she will get weaker and not be able to discharge to her home. Surveyor reviewed R26's Minimum Data Set (MDS) admission Assessment with a date of 10/29/22. Documented under Cognition was a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 which indicated cognitively intact. Documented under Functional Status for Bed Mobility and Transfer Status was 3/2 which indicated Extensive assistance - resident involved in activity, staff provided weight-bearing support; One person physical assist. Documented under Walk in Room and Walk in Corridor was 7/2 which indicated Activity occurred only once or twice - activity did occur but only once or twice; One person physical assist. Surveyor reviewed Physician Discharge Orders for R26. Documented with a Start of Care date of 10/26/22 and End of Care date of 11/9/22 was Physical Therapy Discharge. Surveyor reviewed Therapy Referral for Restorative Nursing Rehabilitation for Transfers and Ambulation with a date of 11/18/2022. Documented was: Diagnosis: [fracture (Fx)] Left lower radius Precautions: [left upper extremity (LUE) [non weight bearing (NWB)] Problem: [Patient (Pt)] Decreased functional transfers, ambulation & ADL's Program: 1. [Ambulate (amb)] with [short based quad cane] X100 feet & [wheelchair (w/c)] to follow 2. Sit to Stand from lift chair Seat up X 10 reps Goal: 1. Pt to maintain ability to amb in room & halls with [assist of 1] 2. Pt to maintain sit to Stand transfer. Surveyor reviewed R26's Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) Assignment [NAME] for directed resident care. Documented was: * NURSING REHAB/RESTORATIVE: Transfers #1 Sit to stand from lift chair with seat elevated x 10 reps * NURSING REHAB/RESTORATIVE: Walking Program #1 Ambulate with short based Quad cane 100ft and w/c to follow behind Surveyor reviewed R26's task for Nursing Rehab Restorative for Transfers and Ambulation. Surveyor noted the tasks did not start until 12/14/22. Surveyor reviewed R26's Comprehensive Plan of Care. Documented under Restorative Program with an initiated date of 12/14/22 was: Focus: Restorative Program: Transfers & Ambulation Goal: Will participate in current Restorative Program through next review Interventions/Tasks: - Documentation by Restorative CNA which reflects progress / refusals/ acceptance RNA (restorative nursing assistant) of program and working toward goals established - Encourage resident to participate to their max potential; Do not rush or push too hard - NURSING REHAB/RESTORATIVE: Transfers #1 Sit to stand from lift chair with seat elevated × 10 reps - NURSING REHAB/RESTORATIVE: Walking Program #1 Ambulate with short based Quad cane 100ft and w/c to follow behind - Review plan and evaluate progress monthly by RN; document in progress notes On 1/4/23 at 3:14 PM Surveyor interviewed Director of Nursing (DON)-B. Surveyor asked about the Restorative Nursing program in the facility. DON-B stated they had an aide who completed all the restorative programs but she retired at the end of November. Surveyor asked about R26's Restorative program. DON-B stated it was not being completed from 11/18/22 through 11/26/22 because she (R26) was Covid positive and then from 11/26/22 through 12/14/22 after the aide retired. DON-B stated there was no program until 12/14/22 when the program was restarted. DON-B stated a new Restorative CNA starts at the facility on 1/8/23.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0692 (Tag F0692)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility did not ensure 1 (R29) of 5 resident reviewed for weight loss received the nec...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility did not ensure 1 (R29) of 5 resident reviewed for weight loss received the necessary services to assist with nutritional maintenance. R29 experienced a 9.4 pound weight loss (5.9%) from 11/23/22- 12/14/22 without having a comprehensive assessment or further interventions put into place to help R29 not to loose any further weight. This is evidenced by: Policy review: Weighing and Measuring the Resident revised March 2011. Purpose: The purposes of this procedure are to determine the resident's weight and height, to provide a baseline and an ongoing record of the resident's body weight as an indicator of the nutritional status and medical condition of the resident, and to provide a baseline height in order to determine the ideal weight of the resident. Reporting: 1. Report significant weight loss/ weight gain to the nurse supervisor. 2. The threshold for significant unplanned and undesired weight loss/ gain will be based on the following criteria (where percentage of body weight loss+ (usual weight - actual weight/ usual weight x 100): a. 1 month- 5% weight loss is significant; greater that 5% is severe. b. 3 month- 7.5% weight loss is significant; greater that 7.5 % is severe. c. 6 months- 10 % weight loss is significant; greater than 10 % is severe. 3. Notify the Nurse Supervisor if the resident refuses the procedure. 4. Report other information in accordance with facility policy and professional standards of practice. R29 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included Alzheimer's Disease, Osteoarthritis, Hypertension, major Depressive Disorder and Dysphasia. The Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set), dated 10/21/22, assessed R29 to have a BIMS (brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 3- suggesting severe cognitive impairment. R29 was not said to have any behaviors. R29 needs supervision and 1-person physical assistance with eating. R29's weight is listed at 159 pounds and there is no known weight loss or gain at the time of this assessment (10/21/22). The most recent, comprehensive quarterly nutrition assessment dated [DATE], stated that R29 is at low risk. Nutrition problem: No nutrition dx at this time. Estimated needs: 1603-1818 kcals (22-25 kcal/kg), 73-87 g pro (1.0-1.2g/kg). Nutrition goal: Intake > 75% all meals Weight stable +/-1-3%. Tolerate diet served Nutrition intervention: Adjust diet per preferences and monitor weights/intakes. Consistent carbohydrate diet. Nursing note dated 10/17/2022 at 11:24 a.m.; Notified by CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) this morning that resident kicked door to room open. Resident refusing to eat breakfast and has been redirected multiple times by multiple staff members back to room and encouraged her to eat her breakfast. Resident has been periodically refusing to eat meals throughout the day or will only eat very little. Resident also noted to have some behaviors at times which is per her norm. Behaviors appear to have been consistent now lately for the last week and have increased at times. Call placed to Nurse Practitioner. Lab results note dated 10/19/2022 at 12:10 p.m.; Labs drawn on 10/18/2022 noted by Nurse Practitioner, Sodium slightly elevated at 150 with normal BUN and Creatinine. Total protein was low at 5.5. NP recommendation at this time is for dietician to evaluate protein and give recommended treatment. Writer updated dietician. Response received from dietician. Dietician will review resident case and follow up with facility. Dietary/ Nutrition Progress note dated 10/19/2022 at 5:38 p.m.; Reviewed recent labs from 10/18. Total protein low, albumin WNL (within normal limits). Low total protein likely more indicative of liver/kidney disease or malabsorption. To be safe, will order House supplement 120 ml BID (2 times a day). Will f/u (follow up) prn (as needed). Nursing note dated 10/28/2022 at 10:41 a.m.; Continued monitoring for Celexa. Acknowledge addition of Celexa to medication regimen. Res continues on Celexa 10mg QD (once a day), and tolerating with no adverse reactions noted. No s/sx (signs or symptoms) of depression noted @ this time. Food & fluid intake encouraged with noted improvement when eating in cafe. VSS. Continue to monitor accordingly. Nursing note dated 11/11/2022 at 12:30 p.m.; a speech therapist here relayed decreased interest in foods, assisted to promote intake resists and tires easily of the efforts inclusive of drinks and or supplements which leaves in random places and discards, very forgetful and short attention to things, often propels self away from activities and rests in random locations, Plan of care note dated 11/23/2022 at 1:10 p.m.; PLAN OF CARE: Interdisciplinary team meeting held for R29 on 11/17/2022. R29 was invited to the care conference but declined to attend. Resident's POA (Power of Attorney) was invited but not in attendance. R29 continues to self-propel herself in her W/C (wheelchair). Resident's weight, diet and appetite were discussed. Medications were reviewed. Care plan was reviewed. No concerns noted at this time. R29's individual plan of care, initiated on 5/1/2019 indicates that R29 has a potential nutritional problem and R29 will maintain adequate nutritional status as evidenced by maintaining weight within 10% of UBWR, no s/sx of malnutrition, and consuming at least 75-100% of at least 2 meals daily through review date. Interventions included: o Resident will have a stable weight of +/-1-3%. Date Initiated: 07/10/2020 o Provide, serve diet as ordered. Monitor intake and record q meal. Date Initiated: 05/01/2019 o RD (Registered Dietician) to evaluate and make diet change recommendations PRN. Date Initiated: 05/01/2019 Surveyor conducted a review of R29's current physician orders. The orders included that R29 is to have weekly body check and weight on shower day every WED AM every day shift every Wed for shower. This order was initiated on 11/11/2020. The following weights were recorded within the electronic medical record for R29: 12/14/2022 13:02 148.6 Lbs Wheelchair (Manual) 12/11/2022 07:03 149.4 Lbs Wheelchair (Manual) 12/7/2022 13:12 155.8 Lbs Wheelchair (Manual) 11/30/2022 09:42 153.2 Lbs Wheelchair (Manual) 11/23/2022 11:43 158.0 Lbs Wheelchair (Manual) 11/16/2022 13:07 157.6 Lbs Wheelchair (Manual) 11/9/2022 14:21 157.4 Lbs Wheelchair (Manual) 11/3/2022 15:28 157.0 Lbs WHEELCHAIR SCALE 10/5/2022 11:01 158.6 Lbs Wheelchair (Manual) 9/28/2022 10:52 157.6 Lbs Wheelchair (Manual) Surveyor calculated a 9.4-pound weight loss from 11/23/22 to 12/14/22. This represents a 5.9% weight loss, per facility policy indicates a sever weight loss for 1 month period of time. Further review of the medical record did not show that R29 had been assessed by the dietician to determine the cause of the severe weight loss and to determine if the weight loss was desirable or avoidable. On 12/20/22, R29 was visited and assessed by her primary physician at the facility. A review of the MD progress states R29 was seen for follow-up of current hypertension, hypernatremia and depression. Since discontinuation of Remeron, R29's sodium level has been better. R29's mood has been stable on Celexa but unfortunately R29's weight is now down. R29 reports she is eating well and feels good. No recent behavior issues. Blood pressure has been nicely controlled. R29 does get some slight edema. Assessment: Weight loss. The plan is to continue current medications, if weight continue to decrease could consider switching to Paxil. On 01/05/23 at 09:37 AM, Surveyor interviewed Registered Dietician (RD) -L regarding R29's severe weight loss. Surveyor asked RD- L if she had been made aware of the weight loss after the last weight documented on 12/14/22. RD- L stated that she just completed R29's quarterly assessment yesterday (1/4/22.) RD- L stated she was not aware of the weight loss, and she conducted the quarterly assessment because R29 was due for it. RD- L stated that R29 went off Mirtazapine (anti-depressant) due to her sodium level being 147. Her primary provider stopped the medication. There was a note about sodium level being high and it looks like weight dropped off once the medication was stopped. R29 has been on house supplement since 10/20/22. RD- L stated she conducted the quarterly review remotely and does have access to the electronic medical records. RD- L stated was not made aware of weight loss prior to yesterday. RD- L stated she does print off the weights monthly for the Quality Improvement meetings. RD- L stated generally the nurse manager will let her know about any loss/ gains via email. RD- L stated she just updated R29's care plan yesterday due to the unintentional weight loss. RD- L stated she does not think it will be realistic for R29 to regain the 10 pounds she lost. Surveyor asked RD- L if she had a current weight on R29, noting the last recorded weight is from 12/14/22. RD- L stated she did yesterday's assessment based on 12/14/22 weight. RD- L stated she is not aware of any changes in preferences of food changing. RD- L did contact the unit and requested that R29 be weighed today for a current weight. RD- L was told by nursing staff that they can't weigh R29 due to covid isolation. (covid positive 12/26/22). RD- L stated she agreed with Surveyor about the concern over R29's severe weight loss and that RD- L conducted a comprehensive assessment without a current weight to accurately reflect R29's nutritional status. On 01/05/23 at 12:55 PM, Surveyor conducted an interview with DON (Director of Nursing)- B who stated she was unaware of the weight loss. DON- B stated the Dietician would have been aware of the weights because they are discussed in QAPI (Quality Assurance Performance Improvement). DON- B stated they have not weighed R29 because she is in isolation for Covid and they don't have a portable scale and would not allow R29 out of her room with Covid. A review of the Comprehensive Nutritional Assessment, completed by RD- L on 1/4/23 indicates that R29 has unintentional weight loss due to decreased intake after discontinuation of Mirtazapine (Remeron). 8.7 % weight loss in the past month. Nutritional intervention: Adjust diet per preferences, monitor weights/ intakes. Continue house supplement 120 ml, three times daily. As of the time of exit, the facility was not able to provide any additional information as to why the Registered Dietician was not made aware of R29's severe weight loss over a 1 month period of time prior to 1/4/23.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Medication Errors (Tag F0758)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 (R13) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 (R13) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications had adequate behavior monitoring while receiving psychotropic medications. * R13 received psychotropic medications without adequate behavior monitoring. Findings include: R13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R13 has diagnoses of Vascular Dementia, Major Depressive Disorder and Anxiety disorder. On 12/25/202, the physician ordered Remeron 7.5 (antidepressant) mg daily. R13 receives psychotropic medications including scheduled Remeron (antidepressant) on a daily basis. On 1/3/23 at 10:15 AM. Surveyor reviewed R13's medical record. Surveyor asked DON (Director of Nursing) -B where behavior monitoring would be located in the medical record. DON-B told Surveyor this information would be documented by nursing staff in the MAR (Medication Administration Record). Surveyor asked DON-B what the expectation would be for behavior monitoring for a resident receiving psychotropic medications. DON-B told Surveyor residents receiving psychotropic medications should have documented behavior monitoring on a daily basis. On 1/3/23 at 11:30 AM, Surveyor reviewed R13's MAR for November 2022- December 2022. No documentation was noted related to behavior monitoring for R13. On 1/3/23 at 3:15 PM, Surveyor shared with the facility of having difficulty finding Behavior monitoring for R13's psychotropic medication. DON (Director of Nursing)-B told Surveyor they would look into this further. On 1/4/23 at 9:00 AM, Surveyor reviewed R13's physician orders. Surveyor noted an order was initiated on 1/4/23 to conduct behavior monitoring for R13 every shift by nursing staff. On 1/5/23 at 2:30 PM, Surveyor shared concerns with DON-B and NHA (Nursing Home Adminstrator)-A related to R13''s lack of behavior monitoring related to psychotropic medication use previous to 1/4/23. No additional information was supplied by the facility at this time.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observation, interview and record review, the Facility did not utilize proper infection control techniques to prevent and control the spread of infections such as COVID-19. The facility did ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview and record review, the Facility did not utilize proper infection control techniques to prevent and control the spread of infections such as COVID-19. The facility did not ensure all necessary staff were fit tested for N95's. The facility's last recording of staff having a fit test for N95's was 5/6/21 where 18 of the 175 staff members were noted to be fit tested. Findings include: According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Interim Infection Prevention and Control Recommendations for Healthcare Personnel During the Coronovirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic, updated 9/23/2022, states in part, 2. Recommended infection prevention and control (IPC) practices when caring for a patient with suspected or confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection: Personal Protective Equipment: - HCP who enter the room of a patient with suspected or confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection should adhere to Standard Precautions and use a NIOSH-approved particulate respirator with N95 filters or higher, gown, gloves, and eye protection (i.e. goggles, or a face shield that covers the frotn and sides of the face). - Respirators should be used in the context of a comprehensive respiratory protection program, which includes medical evaluations, fit testing and training in accordance with the Occupational Safety and Health Administration's (OSHA) Respiratory Protection Standard (29 CFR 1910.134) https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/hcp/infection-control-recommendations.html On 1/5/23 at 10:30 AM, Surveyor conducted interview with ADON (Assistant Director of Nursing)-C who is also the facility's infection control preventionist. During this interview ADON-C reported the facility currently has 3 Residents with COVID-19, who reside on the same unit. ADON-C reported no concerns with the availability of PPE. Surveyors on the Survey team observed staff member wearing N95s. Surveyor asked ADON-C if they were aware if facility staff has received fit testing to ensure proper fit for staff members who wear N-95 masks. ADON-C told Surveyor that they were unsure and that they would need to look into this further. On 1/5/23 at 12:20 PM, Surveyor conducted interview with DON (Director of Nursing)-B. DON-B provided Surveyor with a fit test record last updated 5/6/21 with 18 current employees listed. Surveyor noted the facility has a total of 175 staff members. DON-B was unable to say how many staff members were not fit tested for N95s, nor did DON-B share with surveyor as to why the facility was not conducting N95 fit testing. Surveyor asked DON-B if all current staff have received fit testing in accordance with OSHA (Occupation Safety Health Administration) guidelines. DON-B told Surveyor that they haven't conducted any recent fit testing for N-95 masks. On 1/5/23 at 2:30 PM, Surveyor met with NHA (Nursing Home Administrator)-A. Surveyor made NHA-A aware of concerns that there is no evidence that all current employees have received N-95 fit testing in accordance with OSHA guidelines. No additional information was supplied by the facility at this time.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0947 (Tag F0947)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 2 Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA-G and CNA-H) of 5 reviewed for abuse training and 5 (CNA-D, CNA-E, CNA-F, CNA-G, and CNA-H) of 5 r...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 2 Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA-G and CNA-H) of 5 reviewed for abuse training and 5 (CNA-D, CNA-E, CNA-F, CNA-G, and CNA-H) of 5 reviewed for dementia training who had been employed for over a year or providing direct care received dementia management & resident abuse prevention training. This has the potential to affect all 62 residents residing at the facility as staff work throughout the facility. Findings include: Surveyor reviewed the Facility Assessment with a revision date of 10/14/2022 to identify resources the facility needs to care for their residents. Documented under Staff Training/Education and Competencies was: .Abuse, neglect, and exploitation - training that at a minimum educates staff on (1) Activities that constitute abuse, neglect, exploitation, and misappropriation of resident property; (2) Procedures for reporting incidents, of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or the misappropriation of resident property; and (3) Care/management for persons with dementia and resident abuse prevention. Surveyor reviewed facility's Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation, Mistreatment and Misappropriation of Resident Property with no date. Documented under Abuse Policy was: . d. All new employees/volunteers will receive training on the abuse policy prior to direct or indirect resident contact. e. All new employees/volunteers will be oriented to the Abuse Policy and made aware of their responsibility to report any suspected maltreatment as defined and described in this policy. f. Attendance at a yearly in-service on the Abuse Policy and on Resident Rights is mandatory for all employees/volunteers . Surveyor reviewed facility's Dementia - Clinical Protocol policy with a revision date of November 2018. Documented under Treatment/Management was: . 2. Nursing assistants will receive initial training in the care of residents with dementia and related behaviors. In-services will be conducted at least annually thereafter. Additionally, performance reviews will be conducted annually and in-service education will be based on the results of the reviews . On 1/4/23, Surveyor requested in-service and orientation education records for CNA-D, CNA-E, CNA-F, CNA-G, and CNA-H for abuse and dementia trainings. Surveyor noted the following: CNA-D was hired on 12/27/22. Surveyor noted CNA-D received abuse, neglect, & exploitation training on 12/27/22 but did not receive dementia training. CNA-E was hired on 12/22/22. Surveyor noted CNA-E received abuse, neglect, & exploitation training on 12/22/22 but did not receive dementia training. CNA-F was hired on 12/8/22. Surveyor noted CNA-F received abuse, neglect, & exploitation training on 12/8/22 but did not receive dementia training. CNA-G was hired on 1/6/16 and CNA-H was hired 11/14/18. Surveyor reviewed the Training Plan Completion History for Dementia Training for the period of 1/4/22 to 1/4/23 that did not document CNA-G or CNA-H as completed. Surveyor reviewed Course Completion History for Preventing, Recognizing, and Reporting Abuse for the period of 1/1/22 to 1/4/23 that did not document CNA-G or CNA-H as completed. Surveyor reviewed Course Completion History for The Elder Justice Act for the period of 1/1/22 to 1/4/23 that did not document CNA-G or CNA-H as completed. On 1/4/23 at 3:09 PM Surveyor interviewed Director of Nursing (DON)-B about CNA trainings. Surveyor asked why CNA-D, CNA-E, and CNA-F had not yet received Dementia training. DON-B stated the 3 CNAs are new and get the training during orientation which takes place 1/19/23. Surveyor asked how does the facility know staff are competent to work with dementia residents and why they were allowed direct patient care prior to training. DON-B stated they will have to look at that process. DON-B provided evidence of Abuse training for these 3 CNAs. Surveyor asked about Abuse and Dementia training for CNA-G and CNA-H who had not received annual training. DON-B stated they are behind on the trainings. Surveyor asked why they were behind. DON-B stated they will say they do not have time but stated to Surveyor that they will now have the trainings completed before their next shift.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
Concerns
  • • Multiple safety concerns identified: 1 life-threatening violation(s), 4 harm violation(s). Review inspection reports carefully.
  • • 31 deficiencies on record, including 1 critical (life-threatening) violation. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
  • • Grade F (16/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
Bottom line: Trust Score of 16/100 indicates significant concerns. Thoroughly evaluate alternatives.

About This Facility

What is Complete Care At Care Age's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns Complete Care at Care Age an overall rating of 2 out of 5 stars, which is considered below average nationally. Within Wisconsin, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.

How is Complete Care At Care Age Staffed?

CMS rates Complete Care at Care Age's staffing level at 4 out of 5 stars, which is above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 51%, compared to the Wisconsin average of 46%.

What Have Inspectors Found at Complete Care At Care Age?

State health inspectors documented 31 deficiencies at Complete Care at Care Age during 2023 to 2025. These included: 1 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death), 4 that caused actual resident harm, and 26 with potential for harm. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.

Who Owns and Operates Complete Care At Care Age?

Complete Care at Care Age is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 110 certified beds and approximately 64 residents (about 58% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in Brookfield, Wisconsin.

How Does Complete Care At Care Age Compare to Other Wisconsin Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Wisconsin, Complete Care at Care Age's overall rating (2 stars) is below the state average of 3.0, staff turnover (51%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (2 stars) is below the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Complete Care At Care Age?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations.

Is Complete Care At Care Age Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, Complete Care at Care Age has documented safety concerns. Inspectors have issued 1 Immediate Jeopardy citation (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 2-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Wisconsin. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.

Do Nurses at Complete Care At Care Age Stick Around?

Complete Care at Care Age has a staff turnover rate of 51%, which is 5 percentage points above the Wisconsin average of 46%. Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.

Was Complete Care At Care Age Ever Fined?

Complete Care at Care Age has been fined $9,750 across 1 penalty action. This is below the Wisconsin average of $33,176. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.

Is Complete Care At Care Age on Any Federal Watch List?

Complete Care at Care Age is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.