DELAVAN HEALTH SERVICES

905 E GENEVA ST, DELAVAN, WI 53115 (262) 728-6319
For profit - Limited Liability company 50 Beds NORTH SHORE HEALTHCARE Data: November 2025
Trust Grade
75/100
#88 of 321 in WI
Last Inspection: December 2024

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

Delavan Health Services has a Trust Grade of B, which indicates it is a good choice for families looking for a nursing home. It ranks #88 out of 321 facilities in Wisconsin, placing it in the top half overall, and #2 out of 7 in Walworth County, meaning only one local option is better. The facility's performance is improving, with issues decreasing from three in 2023 to two in 2024. Staffing is relatively strong, with a rating of 3 out of 5 stars and a turnover rate of 42%, which is below the state average. Notably, there have been no fines, which is a positive sign, and the facility has more registered nurse coverage than 97% of Wisconsin facilities, ensuring better oversight of resident care. However, there are some concerns. A serious issue was identified where two residents did not receive proper treatment for pressure injuries, potentially leading to worsened health conditions. Additionally, the facility failed to maintain an effective infection control program, which could pose risks to all residents. There were also findings of improper hand hygiene practices during medication administration and meal service, raising concerns about the potential spread of infections. Overall, while there are strengths in staffing and oversight, families should be aware of these critical areas that need improvement.

Trust Score
B
75/100
In Wisconsin
#88/321
Top 27%
Safety Record
Moderate
Needs review
Inspections
Getting Better
3 → 2 violations
Staff Stability
○ Average
42% turnover. Near Wisconsin's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
Penalties
✓ Good
No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Wisconsin facilities.
Skilled Nurses
✓ Good
Each resident gets 70 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than 97% of Wisconsin nursing homes. RNs are the most trained staff who catch health problems before they become serious.
Violations
⚠ Watch
12 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
★★★★☆
4.0
Overall Rating
★★★☆☆
3.0
Staff Levels
★★★☆☆
3.0
Care Quality
★★★★☆
4.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2023: 3 issues
2024: 2 issues

The Good

  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record
  • Staff turnover below average (42%)

    6 points below Wisconsin average of 48%

Facility shows strength in fire safety.

The Bad

Staff Turnover: 42%

Near Wisconsin avg (46%)

Typical for the industry

Chain: NORTH SHORE HEALTHCARE

Part of a multi-facility chain

Ask about local staffing decisions and management

The Ugly 12 deficiencies on record

1 actual harm
Dec 2024 1 deficiency
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility did not establish and maintain an infection prevention and co...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility did not establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program based upon current standards of practice, designed to provide a safe environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all 36 residents. * The facility's Water Management Plan (WMP) was not based on current standards of practice and did not: - Reflect changes in program members - Include the Infection Preventionist (IP) - Identify control measures based on where Legionella could grow and spread and identify how to monitor the control measures and risks - Identify acceptable ranges of control limits and corrective actions to take when control limits are not met * The facility did not implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for 1 resident (R13) when R13 required EBP as recommended by the Center for Disease Control (CDC) and per the facility's policy. Findings include: Water Management Plan (WMP) The facility's policy titled Infection Prevention and Control Program with a last review date of 07/23/2024, documents in part, .16. Water Management: a. A water management program has been established as part of the overall infection prevention and control program. b. Control measures and testing protocols are in place to address potential hazards associated with the facility's water systems. c. The Maintenance Director serves as the leader of the water management program. The 06/24/2021 CDC Toolkit, titled: Developing a Water Management Program to Reduce Legionella Growth & Spread in Buildings identifies the key elements of a water management program for healthcare facilities to include: 1. Establish a water management program team 2. Describe the building water systems using text and flow diagrams 3. Identify areas where Legionella could grow and spread 4. Decide where control measures should be applied and how to monitor them 5. Establish ways to intervene when control limits are not met 6. Make sure the program is running as designed and is effective 7. Document and communicate all the activities The CDC toolkit identifies locations in a building's water system where Legionella can grow and spread to include but not limited to: ~Hot and cold water storage tanks ~Water heaters ~Water Filters ~Electronic and manual faucets ~Aerators ~Shower heads and hoses ~Pipes, valves and fittings ~Infrequently used equipment including eye wash stations ~Ice machines ~Hot tubs The CDC toolkit identifies factors internal to buildings that can lead to Legionella growth to include: ~Biofilm (microorganisms that are adhered to surface and form a protective slime layer, like the inside of plumbing system) ~Scale and sediment ~Water temperature fluctuations: Provides conditions where Legionella grows best (77°-108°F) ~Water pressure changes ~PH (measurement of acidity or alkalinity of a solution on a scale 0 to 14) ~Inadequate disinfectant: Does not kill or inactivate Legionella ~Water stagnation: Encourages biofilm growth and reduces temperature and levels of disinfectant The Wisconsin State Plumbing Code, Chapter SPS 382.50(3)(b)6, requires a nursing home's hot water system to be installed and maintained to provide bacterial control by one of the following methods: ~Water stored and circulation initiated at a minimum of 140°F and with a return of a minimum of 124°F. This standard is best practice even considering the facility was built prior to May 2003 and grandfathered to meet requirement. ~Water chlorinated at 2mg/L residual ~Another disinfection system approved by the department 1.) Surveyor reviewed the facility's document titled, LEGIONELLA WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN, date of plan review 02/28/2024, which documents that the WMP team consists of Nursing Home Administrator (NHA)-A, Director of Nursing (DON)-B, Director of Maintenance (DM)-D, and Business Office Manager. Surveyor noted the facility's WMP team did not include the Infection Preventionist (IP) and that in the Describe Your Building Water Systems section it simply documents, Using Text. Surveyor reviewed the facility's document titled, LEGIONELLA WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN, date of plan review is 02/09/2023, which documents the WMP team consists of NHA-A, DON-B, former Director of Maintenance, and former Business Office Manager. Surveyor again noted that this previous version of the plan also did not include the IP. Surveyor noted the facility's document states the following, II. Describe Your Building Water System Water from the city enters the building in two areas, the director of nursing closet and the therapy office closet. The water in the DON office goes through a water softener. Cold water is sent throughout the building overhead and drops down to showers, sinks and bathrooms. One pipe of cold water runs overhead to the boiler room to two hot water heaters. They are set to 148 degrees that go directly to the laundry area and the kitchen. Hot water is sent to mixer that keeps water to showers, resident bathrooms and bathrooms and employee bathrooms at 110 degrees. The therapy addition water that enters in the therapy office closet is sent to the water softener in the maintenance closet. Cold water is sent overhead to resident bathrooms, two employee bathrooms and two sinks in therapy area. Hot and cold water is also sent to the washer in therapy. Water heater is in the maintenance closet goes to a mixer that keeps the water at 110 degrees. III. Areas Where Legionella Could Grow and Spread The areas identified with the best conditions for the growth of Legionella are the dead-end branches. The document indicates the facility's fish tank has scheduled cleanings from an outside vendor, but then indicates the fish tank has a minimal or no risk of contracting Legionnaires. IV. Control Measures and Monitoring documents, Daily water temperatures and hot water heater checks will be made by the maintenance department to ensure everything is working as it should. These are done Monday-Friday. Water will be flushed through pipes in area that are not used very often on a schedule. Water management plan will be reviewed after any additions, or changes to the building. All residents with symptoms will be evaluated. V. Ways to Intervene When Control Limits Are Not Met In the event water management gets out of control, [NAME] Health Services will look to the experts for advice and come into the building to perform repairs or if something should need replacing. Surveyor noted the facility included a document in the WMP titled, [FACILITY NAME] EVACUATION PLAN layout. Surveyor notes on the facility layout, the facility marked water source incoming, dead end water, water heater, water softeners, and hot/cold water mixer. Surveyor noted the facility's description of water systems did not include ice machines, eye wash stations, or areas that have changed, such as the Social Service office is now the Maintenance office, and if those locations still have dead legs. On 12/18/2024 at 08:32 AM, Surveyor interviewed DM-D. Surveyor asked DM-D to explain the facility's WMP to Surveyor by walking through the facility's WMP documents. DM-D informed Surveyor the IP was not part of the WMP team. Surveyor asked DM-D if the facility has any dead legs in the facility. DM-D indicated to Surveyor that the facility no longer has dead legs. Surveyor showed DM-D the facility's document titled [FACILITY NAME] EVACUATION PLAN. DM-D informed Surveyor the document is the diagram of the facility's water systems. DM-D indicated the dead ends identified in the WMP need to be updated and the remaining dead legs are flushed every other month. DM-D indicated to Surveyor that a communication room located on the map was previously a shower room, and DM-D believes may have been capped. DM-D indicated to Surveyor that the Social Services office on the map needs to be updated to what is now the Maintenance office, which has two pipes with open and close valves that are capped. Surveyor asked DM-D to identify the WMP risk areas in the facility. DM-D indicated to Surveyor that the only identified risk for the WMP is in the kitchen, where the water is set to 148 degrees Fahrenheit (F). DM-D indicated the water temperature is hot there and there is a risk for burns. Surveyor noted there was no documentation of the water heater maintaining the set temperature, and Surveyor was not provided with the ranges in which the water heater is maintained. Surveyor asked DM-D to indicate where the risk areas for Legionella are located. DM-D indicated to Surveyor that the drains from the coffee machine and ice machine drain into the floor drain, so nothing can crawl or wash back up into those machines. DM-D indicated to Surveyor that daily water temperatures are obtained and documented for all resident rooms and areas where residents use the water. DM-D indicated all faucets and shower heads are flushed weekly, but no logs are kept. DM-D indicated the WMP flow map needs to be updated, and a few updated areas are missing on the map. Surveyor noted DM-D began adding to the map with a pen while speaking to Surveyor. Surveyor requested DM-D provide Surveyor with all logs associated with the WMP control measures. Surveyor was provided with the log for water temperature checks in resident rooms and therapy areas. Surveyor reviewed the temperature logs and noted water temperatures were documented for all resident rooms, therapy north sink, and therapy kitchen. DM-D indicated to Surveyor that the water heaters and dead legs are flushed monthly, but logs are not kept of the specific areas being flushed. On 12/18/2024 at 09:30 AM, Surveyor interviewed IP-C. IP-C informed Surveyor that IP-C is not part of the WMP and stated the WMP has members that include the NHA-A and DM-D. On 12/18/2024 at 03:10 PM, Surveyor interviewed NHA-A regarding concerns with the WMP. NHA-A informed Surveyor the flow chart for the WMP plan was currently being redone. NHA-A indicated that the WMP plan was not updated to reflect changes in WMP team members and did not include the current IP. Surveyor noted the facility's WMP did not have an identified risk assessment to indicate all areas where Legionellas could grow and spread. Surveyor noted the facility did not have identified control measures or acceptable ranges for control measures for all areas where Legionellas or other water borne pathogens could grow and spread. Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) The facility's policy titled Enhanced Barrier Precautions with a last review date of 08/08/2024, documents in part, .2. Initiation of Enhanced Barrier Precautions: a. The facility will have the discretion in using EBP for residents who do not have a chronic wound or indwelling medical device and are infected or colonized with an MDRO that is not currently defined as a CDC-targeted or novel MDRO. B. An order for enhanced barrier precautions (in accordance with physician-approved standing orders) will be initiated for residents with any of the following: i. Wounds (eg., chronic wounds such as pressure ulcers, diabetic foot ulcers, unhealed surgical wounds, and chronic venous stasis ulcers) and/or indwelling medical devices (eg., central lines, peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs), hemodialysis catheters, urinary catheters, feeding tubes, tracheostomy/ventilator tubes) even if the resident is not known to be infected or colonized with a MDRO. 2.) R13 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including non-pressure chronic ulcer of right ankle, type 2 diabetes mellitus with foot ulcer, and non-pressure chronic ulcer of right ankle with an onset date of 11/05/2024. Surveyor reviewed the facility's document titled Order Summary report and noted R13 has treatment orders documenting, left great toe diabetic: cleanse with wound wash and pat dry f/b betadine daily . with an order date of 12/17/2024. Surveyor noted a treatment order documenting, umbilical OA (open area): wash with wound cleanser, pat dry, apply calcium alginate,cover with ABD (abdominal gauze pad) and tape daily and PRN (as needed) . with an order date of 12/13/2024. Surveyor reviewed [NAME] wound notes titled WOUND EVALUATION & MANAGEMENT SUMMARY dated 12/17/2024, which documents in part: R13's diabetic wound of the left posterior ankle resolved on 12/17/2024, diabetic wound of the left first toe full thickness, measuring 0.5 x 0.5 x 0.1 cm with 100% thick adherent black necrotic tissue, and abdominal wound. R13's abdomen wound is documented as etiology-fungal infection, measuring 0.4 x 0.5 x 0.1 cm with moderate serous exudate, 10% slough and 90% granulation.B. Plan/Treatment . 6. Additional interventions/plans: Seen by [doctor name] at bedside. Continue current treatment with calcium alginate and ABD daily and PRN. This area is scar tissue from surgical wound s/p (status post) hysterectomy a couple years ago. It opens at times. Large abdomen causing some MASD at times. On 12/17/2024 at 09:51 AM, Surveyor interviewed R13. R13 informed Surveyor that R13 has a pressure wound and a chronic wound and receives wound care treatments. Surveyor noted no EBP (enhanced barrier precautions) sign on R13's door and no Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) in or outside of R13's room for staff to wear when treating R13. On 12/18/2024 at 09:15 AM, Surveyor interviewed IP-C. IP-C informed Surveyor that EBP are used with residents if the resident has a catheter, invasive device, or chronic wound. IP-C informed Surveyor that standard precautions plus gown and gloves are expected with EBP. On 12/18/2024 at 10:56 AM, Surveyor observed wound care with Wound Nurse-E. Surveyor noted no EBP sign and no EBP PPE in room or outside of room. Surveyor observed Wound Nurse-E did not put on gown before performing wound care on R13. On 12/18/2024 at 02:50 PM, Wound Nurse-E informed Surveyor that R13 is not on EBP due to wound not being chronic. On 12/18/2024 at 03:10 PM, Surveyor interviewed NHA-A and DON-B. Surveyor notified NHA-A and DON-B of concerns regarding R13 not being on EBP. Surveyor inquired why R13 was not on EBP. DON-B indicated to Surveyor that DON-B was not sure if the facility was considering R13's wound to be chronic or not. On 12/19/2024 at 08:07 AM, Surveyor observed EBP now in place for R13 and R13's care plan was updated to include EBP. On 12/19/2024 at 09:16 AM, Surveyor interviewed Registered Nurse (RN)-F. RN-F indicated to Surveyor that R13 has had the wound on R13's belly on and off for four years which started as a surgical site and has grown tremendously since being at the facility. RN-F indicated to Surveyor that R13's abdomen wound was healed then reopened.
Aug 2024 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Investigate Abuse (Tag F0610)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that in response to allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitatio...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that in response to allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, alleged violations are thoroughly investigated for 2 of 6 (R1 and R3, R4) reviewed for abuse. A review of the facility self-report involving R1, showed an allegation of neglect and the investigation into this allegation is not complete. R1 reported that her legs were wet, she was in pain, and had asked for her dressing to be changed and none of those needs were met. A review of the facility self-report involving R3 and R4, showed an allegation of abuse. R3 reported R4 touched R3 above the breast and 1-2 inches below the collar bone. Findings include: The facility's policy Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation last revised on 715/22 includes, in part: Policy: It is the policy of this facility to provide protections for the health, welfare and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of resident property. Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 1. The facility will develop and implement written policies and procedures that: b. Establish written policies and procedures to investigate any such allegations. V. Investigation of Alleged Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation. A. An immediate investigation is warranted when allegation or suspicion of abuse, neglect or exploitation, or reports of abuse, neglect or exploitation occur. B. Written procedures for investigations include: 3. Investigating different types of alleged violations; 4. Identifying and interviewing all persons, including the alleged victim, alleged perpetrator, witnesses, and others who might have knowledge of the allegation(s); 5. Focusing the investigation on determining if abuse, neglect, exploitation, and/or mistreatment has occurred, the extent, and cause. 1.) R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that include metabolic encephalopathy, diabetes mellitus type 2, end stage renal disease, renal dialysis, pulmonary hypertension, chronic pain, and disorders of calcium metabolism. On 12/22/23, the facility filed a Misconduct Incident Report to the State indicating that a staff member felt that two nurses failed to properly care for a resident. The CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) reported that R1 needed something for pain and that she requested to have her dressings changed. LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) indicates that she did not change R1's dressing as R1 stated they were too painful and that she did not want her bandages changed until tomorrow morning. R1 was provided with Norco. Dressing were reinforced but not changed by the nurse on the following shift. On 8/19/24 at 8:50 AM, Surveyor interviewed R1. R1 had no concerns and indicated that her legs have since healed. R1 indicated she got wound care when she needed it and pain has been controlled. On 8/19/24 at 2:30 PM, Surveyor interviewed NHA (Nursing Home Administrator)-A and DON (Director of Nursing)-B. Surveyor asked NHA-A and DON-B if other residents were interviewed to see if they had any concerns with wound care, care in general or pain. NHA-A stated, I didn't look at it like that, I need to widen the investigation. Surveyor asked if any other residents had concerns. NHA-A stated, I see what you are saying. Surveyor noted that the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation. The facility failed to interview other residents to ensure that they had no concerns with wound care or pain and the facility also failed to provide any education to staff on wound care and pain.2.) R3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that include Parkinson's, diabetes, dementia and anxiety. R4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that include prostate cancer, dementia, hypertension and congested heart failure. On 5/28/24 the facility filed a Misconduct Incident Report to the State Agency indicating that R3 alleged R4 touched her breast. On 8/19/24 at 2:17 PM, Surveyor interviewed NHA A (Nursing Home Administrator) and DON B (Director of Nursing). Surveyor asked for documentation of other resident's interviews and staff interviews that were completed as stated in the Investigation Summary. NHA A stated we are unable to find the documentation. Surveyor asked NHA A if the interview documentation should be in the investigation. NHA A stated yes, the documentation should be available. Surveyor noted that the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation and that the facility failed to have evidence other residents and staff were interviewed regarding the accusation of abuse. No additional information was provided as to why the facility did not ensure that in response to allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, alleged violations were thoroughly investigated for R1, R3 & R4.
Sept 2023 3 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interviews, the facility did not ensure a fall was thoroughly investigated, along with a corrective i...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interviews, the facility did not ensure a fall was thoroughly investigated, along with a corrective intervention, in a transport van. This was discovered with 1 (R11) of 5 residents reviewed with accidents. * R11 had a fall in a transport van on 4/1/23 and there was not an investigation completed at the time of the event. There was no documented corrective action/intervention from this fall. Findings include: Surveyor reviewed the policy and procedure for Fall Prevention and Management Guidelines dated 11/8/2022. - Section 7. When any resident experiences a fall, the facility will: 5) Environmental review for possible factors; 6) Contributing factors to the fall; 9.b) Complete an incident report in Risk Management; 9.e.) Document all assessments and actions. On 09/25/23 at 09:11 AM Surveyor spoke with R11. R11 goes out to dialysis three times a week. R11 indicated they fell in the van twice because of no seatbelt. R11 thought it was a couple months ago. R11 did not have any injury. R11 indicated they have a new chair now and has no concerns. R11's medical record was reviewed by Surveyor. R11 was admitted on [DATE] and has an activated Power of Attorney for Healthcare. R11 has a leg amputation, hemiparesis/hemiplegia from a stroke, and end stage renal disease with hemodialysis. On 4/1/23 R11 had an After Visit Summery from the emergency department. The diagnosis was a closed head injury, abrasion of the left hand and strain of neck muscles. The Progress Note on 4/1/23 at 10:27 PM by RN(Registered Nurse)-D indicated R11 fell at dialysis with a head injury. There is a documented assessment. The admission MDS(minimum data set) assessment completed 3/9/23 indicates total staff assist for activity for daily living. R11 was assessed as having moderate cognitive impairment. RN-D was not available for interview. R11 has had no falls since 4/1/23. R11 has a plan of care for Fall risk started 3/4/23 does not include the fall on 4/1/23. There was no revisions to the plan of care from the fall on 4/1/23. The Interventions are a low bed from 3/4/23. On 9/25/23 at 3:00 PM at the facility daily end of the day meeting Surveyor requested any information regarding the fall with seatbelt. DON(Director of Nurses)-B indicated they will get more information. On 09/26/23 at 07:54 AM DON-B spoke with Surveyor. DON-B did not have any documented investigation from the fall on 4/1/23. There was a progress note in R11 medical record. They performed neuro assessments. DON-B did not have any further information. There has been no fall events since 4/1/23. There is no investigation into the circumstances of the fall in the transport van. On 09/26/23 at 12:58 PM DON-B spoke with Surveyor. DON-B indicated they spoke today to the van Driver-E. The Driver-E is also the owner of this community transport service. Driver-E felt the pillow under R11 wheelchair could have been the issue. Driver-E indicated R11 was seat belted in. The transportation is arranged through Community Care and R11 is the only resident that used this service. There has been no issues since 4/1/23. On 09/26/23 at 01:39 PM Surveyor called Driver-E. Driver-E indicated they did not talk about what happened with the facility until today. Driver-E indicated [R11] wears a blanket over their lap and felt [R11] was not in an appropriate wheelchair, was a wrong wheelchair, the leg was just amputated and the wheelchair was secured. Driver-E indicated [R11] was sitting on pillows and slid off the wheelchair seat when they turned a corner. They did call 911 and R11 was taken to the hospital. There has been no concerns since then. They have not transported R11 since May or June of 2023. On 9/26/23 at 3:00 PM at the facility end of day meeting, Surveyor shared the concerns with R11's fall investigation. No further information was provided.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Medication Errors (Tag F0758)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility did not always ensure that 1 (R8) out of 4 residents reviewed, were given psy...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility did not always ensure that 1 (R8) out of 4 residents reviewed, were given psychotropic medications for valid reasons, with appropriate behavioral interventions and adequate monitoring. * R8 was administered scheduled Quetiapine Fumarate (Seroquel- antipsychotic) and Venlafaxine (Effexor-antidepressant) with no identified targeted behaviors for staff to be monitoring in order to determine the effectiveness of each medication. Findings include: On 9/27/23 the facility's policy and procedure titled Psychotropic Medications dated 10/24/22 was reviewed and read: the facility will identify an indication for use. The indications for use of any psychotropic drug will be documented in the medical record. The resident's response to medication, including progress toward goals and presence/absence of adverse consequences, shall be documented in the resident's medical record. R8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Schizophrenia and Bipolar Disorder. On 9/27/23 R8's current physician's orders for Quetiapine Fumarate and Venlafaxine were reviewed and indicated R8 started Quetiapine Fumarate 400 milligrams (MG) once a day on 7/14/23 for schizoaffective disorder. R8's Venlafaxine 37.5 MG was started on 7/15/23 for schizoaffective disorder. On 9/26/23 R8's care plan for use of psychotropic medication dated 8/2/23 was reviewed and read: Monitor and document all behaviors and targeted behaviors. Report behavior changes to physician. No where in R8's care plan does it indicate any adverse behaviors R8 has exhibited due to his mental health conditions. On 9/27/23 R8's medical record was reviewed and the only behavior monitoring found was charted by the Certified Nursing Assistant and only identified if R8 had a behavior. No identified targeted behavior was identified for Quetiapine Fumarate and Venlafaxine administration. On 9/27/23 R8's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for August and September 2023 was reviewed and indicated R8 received Quetiapine Fumarate and Venlafaxine daily as ordered as it was signed off each nurse who administered it. No targeted behaviors for the medications use was identified. On 09/27/23 at 10:09 AM Administrator-A indicated the new social worker did not identify targeted behaviors for R8. Administrator-A indicated targeted behaviors for R8 should have been identified and put on R8's MAR for the nurse to document on and this was not done for R8's administration of Quetiapine Fumarate and Venlafaxine. The above findings were shared with the Administrator and Director of Nurses on 9/27/23 at 10:09 AM. Additional information was requested if available, none was provided.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Unnecessary Medications (Tag F0759)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility did not ensure the medication error rate was below 5%. During med...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility did not ensure the medication error rate was below 5%. During medication pass, surveyors observed 3 errors out of 36 opportunities with a medication error rate of 8.33%. * 2 (R35 and R31) of 4 residents observed during medication administration did not receive their medication as ordered. R35 received one spray of Futicasone nasal spray in each nostril instead of two sprays as per physician order. R35 received 2 puffs of the Fluticasone inhaler instead of the physician order of one puff. On 9/26/23 at 7:47am, R31 was administered Metoprolol Succinate ER 25 mg when it should have been held if R31's heart rate was below 60. R31's heart rate was 59. Findings include: 1. On 9/26/23 at 8:03 a.m. Surveyor observed RN-F administer medications to R35. R35 was administered Fluticasone Proprionate nasal suspension 50 mcg/act one spray in each nostril. R35 was also administered Fluticasone Propionate HFA Inhalation Aerosol 110 mcg/act two quick puffs inhalation. After medication administration pass, Surveyor reviewed R35 physician orders and MAR (medication administration record). R35 orders for Fluticasone Propionate Nasal Suspension 50 mcg/act indicate two sprays in each nostril. The orders for Fluticasone Propionate HFA Inhalation Aerosol 110 mcg/act indicate one puff inhalation. On 9/26/23 at 3:00 p.m., during the daily exit meeting, Surveyor explained to DON (director of nursing)-B and NHA(nursing home administrator)-A the concern R35 received the one spray each nostril of Fluticasone nasal spray and the physician order indicates two sprays each nostril. Surveyor also explained R35 received 2 puffs of the Fluticasone inhaler and the order indicates one puff. On 9/27/23 at 9:30 a.m. DON-B acknowledged the medication errors and stated she had no additional information. 2. On 09/26/2023 at 7:47 am, Surveyor observed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)-C prepare and administer R31's morning medications. On 09/26/2023 at 7:47 am, LPN-C administered Metoprolol Succinate ER 25 mg to R31. After completion of the medication pass, Surveyor reviewed R31's physician orders and September 2023 MAR (medication administration record). R31 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, hypertensive heart, chronic kidney disease and chronic diastolic heart failure. The September 2023 MAR for R31 indicates to hold Metoprolol Succinate ER 25 mg if heart rate is less than 60. On 09/26/2023 at 9:30 am, Surveyor interviewed LPN-C. LPN-C confirmed heart rate of 59 at the time of morning medication pass. Surveyor explained medication error observed during medication pass. LPN-C indicated she made a mistake and should not have given Metoprolol Succinate with a heart rate of 59. The above finding was shared with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA)-A on 9/26/2023 at 2:59 pm at end of day meeting.
Jun 2022 7 deficiencies 1 Harm
SERIOUS (G)

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Pressure Ulcer Prevention (Tag F0686)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review and staff interviews, the facility did not always ensure that 2 out of 4 (R27, R9) residents...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review and staff interviews, the facility did not always ensure that 2 out of 4 (R27, R9) residents reviewed with pressure injuries received the necessary treatment and services to promote healing, prevent infection and prevent new injuries from developing. R27 was admitted to the facility with areas of skin impairment to the right lateral ankle- noted to be a stage 3 open area. An area to the right great toe which was noted to be a stage 3 open area and dark blue/purple areas on bottom of feet, possible DT (Deep Tissue). The facility failed to comprehensively assess these areas upon first observation and also failed to obtain a treatment for these areas from 11/4-11/15/21. The facility did not update the individual plan of care with interventions that would assist in healing these areas. R9 developed a suspected deep tissue injury to the right heel and the facility did not compressively assess the area from the initial observation on 12/2/21 until 12/9/22 when the area is noted to be necrotic by Wound MD- M. The facility had interventions in place at the time to avoid pressure injury development such as a speciality air- mattress but they did not updated the plan of care with further interventions to assist in the healing of the wound to R9's right heel. Findings include: 1.) R27 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included heart disease, anemia, chronic kidney disease stage 2, peripheral vascular disease, hypertension, muscle weakness, anxiety disorder and cognitive communication deficit. The facility conducted an admission Braden assessment on 5/4/22 and noted R27 was at risk for developing a pressure ulcer. A review of the admission assessment, dated 5/4/22, identified the following skin integrity concerns: Right anecdotal- bruising IV site Left anecdotal- bruising IV site Right lateral ankle- open area 1.5 x 1.9 x 0.7 Stage 3 Right great toe open area 0.3 x 0.6 x 0.1 stage 3 Heel inspection- mushy and discolored Comments: Dark blue/purple areas on bottom of feet, possible DT (Deep Tissue). Applied skin prep, made nurse aware, put-on blue boots to float heels. Applied dressing to ankle OA and great toe, d/t (due to) drainage. Will update wound team to wounds. This assessment was created by LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) - E. Surveyor noted the wounds were not comprehensively assessed as there was no description of the wound beds and no treatment obtained until 5/15/22. R27's Individual Plan of Care, initiated on 5/4/22, states that R27 is at risk for skin integrity condition, or pressure sores due to impaired mobility, thin/ fragile skin. Interventions included apply alternating pressure mattress to bed if indicated. Assure proper inflation- check frequently. Apply pressure reduction chair cushion on wheelchair and pressure reduction mattress on the bed. Ensure cushion is properly placed, clean and dry. Frequent repositioning in bed and chair. Conduct pressure injury assessments (i.e.- Braden Scale) as indicated. Assess skin for redness or pressure related changes with each care encounter- report any changes immediately. The admission MDS (Minimum Data Set), dated 5/11/22, stated that R27 had a BIMS (brief interview for mental status) of 4 (severely impaired). R27 needs extensive 1 person physical assistance for all ADL's (activities of daily living). R27 did not experience any pain in the last 5 days prior to this assessment reference date. R27 is at risk for pressure injuries and yes- unhealed areas are noted. R27 had 1 unstageable- deep tissue injury that was present upon admission. 0- venous and arterial ulcers and no other wounds. The skin CAA (Care Area Assessment) dated 5/11/22 stated that R27 was admitted with DTI (Deep Tissue Injury) and osteomyelitis to right great toe. Currently has DTI to ankle and r great toe osteomyelitis. Is able to make needs known. Is frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder. Requires assist with transfers and mobility. No concerns with nutritional status, appetite poor on therapeutic diet, is diabetic. RISKS: skin breakdown, infection, pain. Surveyor continued to review R27's medical record which did not show any further documented, comprehensive assessment of R27's wounds to her right foot/ ankle and heel that were first observed upon admission on [DATE]. Surveyor conducted a review of the Treatment Administration Record (TAR) for May 2022. The TAR did not show evidence that any type of treatment had been administered to R27's right foot, heel or ankle from 5/4/22 until a physician order was obtained on 5/15/22. The order was written to Paint right lateral ankle and right great toe with betadine, spray right lateral heel with skin prep, pad right lateral heel with ABD and secure with rolled gauze every evening and as needed (PRN). The first comprehensive assessment of R27's wounds to her right foot/ ankle/ heel was completed on 5/17/22. The following note was documented in the electronic medical record: 5/17/2022 at 11:03 a.m.; Skin/Wound Note- [R27] with wounds to right foot since admission. Right great toe has an abrasion measuring 0.6 x 0.9 x 0.1 with 100% granulation, right lateral ankle with scab measuring 1 x 0.4 x 0 dry without drainage, right heel with S (suspected) DTI measuring 3 x 1.5 x 0 purple and closed. Treatments in place for all three of these wounds. Coccyx with pinkness that is blanchable and closed. Groin and peri-anus pink with cream ordered for MASD (moisture-associated dermatitis) r/t (related to) incontinence. Air mattress in place, blue boots on when resident is in bed, continue to turn and repo q 2 hours (reposition every 2 hours) and PRN. MD and daughter aware of wounds and in agreement with the plan. Resident denies pain to these areas. 5/19/2022 at 5:36 p.m. Skin/Wound Note MD- M was in to see R27 last night. R27 seen for right great toe, right lateral ankle, right heel wounds and MASD to perineal and peri-anal area. NOR (new order). Added additional supplement and vit (Vitamin) C BID (two times a day). Review of (name of clinic) Wound Physician Assessment: dated 5/18/22: CHIEF COMPLAINT: This patient has multiple wounds. HISTORY OF PRESENT ILLNESS At the request of the referring provider, a thorough wound care assessment and evaluation was performed today. R27 has an unstageable DTI of the right, lateral heel for at least 4 days duration. There is no exudate. The patient verbalizes pain with score of 0 out of 10. Arterial Wound of the right, dorsal, first toe full thickness wound size: 0.6 x 0.9 x 0.1 cm 90% granulation, 5% bone, 5% necrotic tissue. Surveyor noted the Wound Physician is now referring to the right great as an Arterial wound versus previous reference to the area being a pressure injury. *ADDITIONAL WOUND DETAIL Pt w/ Hx osteomyelitis of R great toe, as seen on X-ray 3/29/22. Pt treated with 2 courses oral abx as outpatient. IV abx during recent hospitalization d/c'd due to new C diff infection. Pt evaluated 4/26/22 as inpatient by podiatry to discuss possible amputation--surgery deferred out of concern for advanced peripheral arterial disease *DRESSING TREATMENT PLAN Primary Dressing(s) Betadine apply once daily for 30 days *Arterial Wound of the right, lateral ankle partial thickness 1.0 x 0.4 x not measurable, dried scab Surveyor noted the Wound Physician is now referring to the right lateral ankle as an Arterial wound versus previous reference to the area being a pressure injury. DRESSING TREATMENT PLAN for the first dorsal toe, right foot and Lateral ankle: Primary Dressing(s) Betadine apply once daily for 30 days *Unstageable DTI of the right, lateral heel partial thickness pressure Wound size: 3.0 x 1.5 x not measurable surface area 4.5 cm DRESSING TREATMENT PLAN for the Unstageable DTI of the right lateral heel. Primary Dressing(s): Skin prep apply once daily for 30 days PLAN OF CARE REVIEWED AND ADDRESSED. Recommendations: Off-load wound; Reposition per facility protocol; Sponge boot; Vitamin C 500mg twice daily PO; Multivitamin once daily PO; Protein supplements 3x daily with meals PLAN OF CARE REVIEWED AND ADDRESSED: My goal for this wound is healing as evidenced by a decrease in surface area of the wound and/or a decrease in the percentage of necrotic tissue within the wound bed. Wound Care Note from, dated 5/31/22: NOTE: Signing off on patient (R27) who remains in the facility. Pt now enrolled in hospice services, who requested to take over primary management of pt's wounds. Skin / Wound note dated 5/31/2022 at 09:55 a.m.; Right heel sDTI remains intact and light purple in color measuring 3 x 1.5 x 0. Betadine paint BID per hospice orders. Right great toe abrasion measures 0.6 x 0.5 x 0.2 with pinkness and slight swelling noted, minimal drainage noted with twice a week honey and foam dressing in place per hospice. Right lateral ankle scab measures 1.4 x 0.3 x 0. adding BID Betadine treatment at this time. No s/s of infection noted. Hospice following wounds. Resident and family in agreement with hospice plan of care for wounds. Skin / Wound note dated 6/9/2022 at 2:31 p.m.; Right heel sDTI remains intact and light purple in color measuring 3.2 x 1.4 x 0. Betadine paint BID per hospice orders. Right great toe abrasion measures 0.9 x 0.9 x 0.4 with pinkness and slight swelling noted, minimal drainage noted with twice a week honey and foam dressing in place per hospice. Right lateral ankle scab measures 1.1 x 0.3 x 0. adding BID Betadine treatment at this time. No s/s of infection noted. Hospice following wounds. Resident and family in agreement with hospice plan of care for wounds. Skin/ Wound note dated 6/14/2022 at 08:19 a.m.; Right heel sDTI remains intact and dark brown in color measuring 3.5 x 1.5 x 0, it is 90% necrotic tissue and 10% granulation to the border. Betadine paint BID per hospice orders. Right great toe abrasion measures 0.9 x 1 x 0.4 with pinkness and slight swelling noted, minimal drainage noted with twice a week honey and foam dressing in place per hospice. It is 20% bone, 70% granulation and 10% slough with minimal s/s drainage. Right lateral ankle scab measures 1 x 0.3 x 0. adding BID Betadine treatment at this time. Right lateral bunion area 1 x 0.5 x 0 discoloration and intact. No s/s of infection noted. Hospice following wounds. Resident and family in agreement with hospice plan of care for wounds. Will add gauze wrap to foot/heel for protection. MD in agreement with the plan. Surveyor conducted a review of the current treatment orders for R27. The following was noted: Assist resident to turn and reposition q (every) 2 hours and PRN. No directions specified for order. Surveyor noted review of the plan of care showed that this intervention was not added for R27. Right great toe, clean with wound wash, apply thin layer of medi honey to slough, cover with foam dressing. Change 2 x a week and PRN until healed, at bedtime every Tues, Fri Right heel, right lateral bunion and right lateral ankle-paint with Betadine BID and wrap foot/ankle with rolled gauze for protection, keep heel boots on al all times, may remove when doing treatment. Every morning and at bedtime AND as needed for may change if soiled or dislodged. Place pillows or blue heels off device in a comfortable position to float residents' heels when in bed and chair as tolerated. No directions specified for order. Surveyor noted this intervention was not added to R27's individual plan of care. On 6/15/22 at 11:21 a.m., Surveyor observed LPN- D provide treatment to R27's wounds to her right foot/ ankle/ heel. The following was observed: R27 gives permission for Surveyor to observe treatment along side of LPN- D. LPN- D proceeds to the bathroom to wash her hands. LPN- D has placed the treatment supplies on R27's bedside table without any type of barrier for infection control. R27's table had candy wrappers, papers and miscellaneous belongings on the table along side the gauze, tape, scissors and treatment medication. It was observed that R27 did have boots on both her right and left feet and LPN- D removed the boots and socks. There was a bandage dated 6/14 to R27's right great toe that LPN- D removed. LPN- D then started to cut the tape that was applied to R27's right foot/ ankle holding the gauze in place. At this time R27 begins to show facial grimacing and winches in pain. LPN- D continues to remove gauze. LPN- D then lifts R27's right leg up to inspect the areas and R27 begins to state ouch, ouch, ouch. LPN- D does not address R27's pain level and begins to cleanse the right great toe with gauze that has been sprayed with wound cleanser. LPN- D then dries the area with gauze. LPN- D then removes her gloves, does not wash her hands and leaves the room to obtain additional supplies from the cart that is located in hallway. LPN- D then returns into the room and applies new gloves without washing her hands. LPN- D applies the medi-honey to the bandage and adheres it to R27's right great toe. LPN- D then removes her gloves and goes into bathroom to wash her hands. Surveyor asks R27 if she has pain from the areas on her right foot, R27 responds yes, my foot hurts all of the time. LPN- D applies new gloves and opens the Betadine/Iodine treatment and begins to paint the wound located on the side of R27's right foot. It was noted that LPN- D did not cleanse the right heel or lateral foot before applying the iodine. (Directions for use of Betadine state 1. Clean. Gently clean the affected area. 2. Treat. Apply a small amount of solution to affect area. 3. Protect. Let dry and cover with sterile bandage if needed.) LPN- D lifts R27's right leg to apply the Iodine treatment and R27 winces out in pain again. LPN- D continues to swab the heel and then places R27's heel back down on the bedsheet. The bedsheet appeared with some stains prior to treatment and noted that the Iodine has also now left a stain to the bed sheet. LPN- D applies the Iodine to the lateral foot and then proceeds to wrap the right foot/ heel with gauze. LPN- D places the extra gauze, tape and scissors on the bed sheet next to R27. The gauze taped and dated and LPN- D applies the boots back to R27's feet. LPN- D then walks over to the garbage can and removes the trash bag with her gloved hands. LPN- D then removes additional garbage from the garbage can that was not in the trash bag and places into trash bag. LPN- D then removes hers gloves, grabs the tape and scissors and leaves the room without washing her hands. LPN- D then returns the tape and scissors back in the drawer of the treatment cart and then uses hand sanitizer. Surveyor conducted further review of R27's plan of care after observing R27's pain during the above treatment observations. The plan of care stated the following: Resident has pain or the potential for pain r/t or evidenced by: Decreased mobility . Interventions included: o Administer analgesics per MD orders. Give prior to treatments, therapy or cares. o Anticipate Resident's need for pain relief and respond as soon as possible to any complaint of pain. o Observe Resident during cares for signs of pain i.e. facial grimacing, hesitancy with movement, furrowed brows, saying Ouch, refusing to move or transfer. Always ask Resident about their pain with each encounter. On 6/15/22 at 7: 55 a.m., Surveyor interviewed DON- B and Director of Clinical Operations- N in regard to R27' skin impairments to the right foot and heel. DON- B stated that upon admission, R27 was wearing heel boots for protection and was receiving a multi vitamin. On 5/13/22 a protein supplement was added. Surveyor asked if there had been a physician order for the use of the skin prep. DON- B stated that she did not see one after reviewing the record for R27. DON- B confirmed that if a wound is identified, it should be comprehensively assessed, and a treatment should be ordered. DON- B stated she is not aware why a treatment was not initiated upon discovery of the areas. On 06/15/22 01:41 p.m. Surveyor interviewed DON- B in regard to R27's area of skin impairment to the right foot/ ankle and heel. Surveyor verified with DON- B that a treatment was not obtained for R27 upon admission when the areas to the right lateral ankle and right great toe and dark blue/purple areas on bottom of feet, possible deep tissue. Surveyor shared the above observation of the treatment provided to R27 on 6/15/22 by LPN- D. Surveyor spoke of the pain R27 experienced during the treatment that went unaddressed by LPN- D and the infection control concerns during the treatment. DON- B was asked what areas remain for R27. DON- B stated that the bunion listed on her assessment is a new area and developed sometime between 6/9/22 and 6/14/22. DON- B obtained an order for Betadine to treat all the areas on the right foot/ ankle and heel and the treatment to the right great toe remained the same. As of the time of exit, the facility was not able to provide additional evidence that they had Comprehensively assessed R27's wounds to her right foot, upon admission on [DATE]. The facility did not obtain a treatment order until 5/15/27 and did not update the plan of care with further interventions to assist with the healing of these areas. The facility originally identified the areas to R27's right foot as pressure injuries, they were then documented as a suspected deep tissue injury to the heel and possible arterial ulcers to the lateral foot and top of great right toe. The areas were then described as abrasions, suspected deep tissue area and the development of a new bunion. The facility staff did not practice safe infection control practices during the treatment observation and did not address the pain R27 was experiencing during the treatment administration. 2. Resident 9 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis that included Multiple Sclerosis, abnormal posture, muscle weakness generalized, insomnia, mood disorder, visual hallucinations, major depressive disorder, hypertension. Upon admission, R9 was noted to have an unstageable (due to Necrosis ) area on her sacrum. R9 has been seen by a wound MD prior to admission to the facility to treat the area. Surveyor conducted a review of the weekly skin assessments and on 12/2/21 it was noted that R9 had a New skin impairment- see note DTI ( Deep Tissue Injury) right heel- assessment 12/2/21 Surveyor noted that there was not a comprehensive assessment, completed by a Registered Nurse (RN) of the DTI to R9's right heel following the initial observation on 12/2/21. Nursing note dated 12/2/2021 at 9:22 p.m. stated R9 returned from shower, writer informed of darkened area to right heel, assessment of site, area dark purple in color, no open areas, measures approximately 5.5 cm x 5.5 cm, DON (Director of Nursing), NP (Nurse Practitioner) for MD, and family made aware, treatment order per DON of Betadine, pad with ABD and wrap with Kerlix daily, fax to MD to update, orders for blue boots and elevator to keep heels off bed, wrier explained to resident how injury occurs and treatment of injury, skin to left heel intact, clean and dry. It was noted that this entry was written by LPN- E A physician order was obtained on 12/2/21 stated right heel (possible DTI) - cleanse with soap/ water, pat dry, swab with betadine, pad with abd, wrap with kerlix, and secure with tape at bedtime for wound care. Clinical Follow-up note dated 12/3/2021 at 12:45 a.m., late Entry: Note Text: R9 is on follow up for: late entry for 12/3/21. f/u IR on 12/2/21 right heel deep tissue bruise. The current status is Resident does not c/o heel pain. Wound is dressed per Dr orders. Clinical Follow- up note dated 12/3/2021 at 5:38 a.m., R9 is on follow up for: R heel (possible DTI). The current status is R heel bandaged. remains dry and intact. no complaints of pain or other concerns Health Status Note dated 12/3/2021 at 9:25 a.m., Late Entry: Note : IDT met to review the sDTI noted to this R9's right heel on PM shift last night. R9 was given a shower and the CNA told LPN- E about the findings. R9 was not aware of the injury as she does not have much feeling in her legs related to her multiple sclerosis. She also has thrombocytopenia. R9 prefers to lay on her back with a pillow under her legs. She does state that often times the pillow doesn't keep her heels off the bed but that's how she likes it. Offloading was discussed and foam boots were added to her careplan. She is in agreement with the plan to wear blue boots and off load when she is in bed. (name of clinic) wound MD will be into see this resident 12/09/2021. Treatment was obtained from the MD and R9's brother was notified. Health status note dated 12/3/2021 at 11:16 p.m Resident is on follow up for: R heel (possible DTI). The current status is R heel bandaged. remains dry and intact. See TAR for Tx for healing pressure ulcer Clinical Follow- up note dated 12/4/2021 at 8:45 p.m , R9 is on follow up for: IR - right heel - DTI. The current status is f/u IR - DTI to right heel, no new skin issues noted, no c/o pain r/t wound, blue boots in place for protection, treatment to site per orders, no other c/o. Clinical follow-up note dated 12/5/2021 at 12:45 a.m., R9 is on follow up for: DTI to right heel, dressing/treatment per orders. Resident denies pain. Skin intact The current status is DTI has intact skin, resident denies pain, following treatment orders; blue boots on. It was noted that there still was not a comprehensive assessment of the Suspected deep tissue injury from 12/2/21 to 12/9/21. There was no description of the area, measurement or investigation as to how the deep tissue injury may have been caused. On 12/9/21, R9 is seen by (name of clinic) Wound Physician. Chief complaint- multiple wounds. Site #2 Unstageable (due to Necrosis) of the right heel. Pressure, Duration- greater than 12 days. Wound size (LxWxD) 6.5 X 3 X no measurable cm. Surface area 19.50 cm. Exudate- moderate Serous. Thick adherent black necrotic tissue (eschar)- 100%. Dressing Treatment Plan: Santyl apply once daily for 30 days; Xeroform sterile gauze apply once daily for 30 days. Site #2- surgical excisional debridement procedure . Remove necrotic tissue and establish the margins of viable tissue. Plan of care recommendations: reposition per facility protocol; off-load wound. EZ boot to be worn in bed and chair to off-load wound. Surveyor noted that in the nursing notes from 12/2/21 until 12/9/21, the SDTI to R9's right heel was never described as having necrosis present on the wound bed. The next skin wound note was dated: 12/16/2021 at 4:25 p.m which stated, Wound team saw patient (R9) this morning. coccyx/right buttock unstageable pressure injury worsening. Odor present. Dr. updated via phone and she will be in tomorrow to assess and treat the wound. measurements 6 x 6 with undermining at 0000 2.5cm, 0300 2cm, 0600 1.2cm, wound is all necrotic inside and we will continue Santyl treatment daily. Right heel unstageable pressure injury improving. Measurements 4.5 x 5 x 0 and it appears to be a fading purple color. Will continue same treatment and have Dr assess tomorrow as well. Resident denies pain and discomfort. She is on an air mattress with blue boots and pillows under her legs, she is encouraged to lay side to side and chooses to lay in her back often. She verbalizes understanding of need to side lay. A review of the Individual Plan of Care for R9 stated that R9 has 2 pressure injuries (sacrum and right heel) r/t Immobility. This plan of care was initiated on 4/1/22. Interventions included: *The residents will Pressure ulcer will show signs of healing and remain free from infection by/through review date. ·Follow facility policies/protocols for the prevention/treatment of skin breakdown. The plan of care was not updated with the interventions for the use of the blue boots and to elevate the heels off the bed. R9 continued to receive treatment to the deep tissue injury located on the right heel daily and continued to be seen by Wound MD- M weekly for assessment of the areas. Skin Wound note dated 4/14/2022 at 4:33 p.m., per most recent hospitalization D/C orders IV ABX's Vancomycin and Ceftriaxone were only to be given for 32 days ending this weekend, however, per wound MD -M assessment on res's (sic) wounds on Wed. 4/13/2022 there are worsening S/S of wound and healing process, wound culture to Right heel was picked up by lab and results pending at this time, Infectious Disease (ID) MD was called and notified of wound MD - M concerns regarding worsening wounds and concern for IV ABX's ending this weekend, writer and wound RN/DON - B present during call with ID MD, ID MD gives orders at this time to D/C end date for IV ABX Vanco and Ceftriaxone and to continue both IV ABX's until further notice from ID MD, continue with weekly labs and fax results to ID on Mondays, when wound culture results from Right heel are final please send to ID for orders, and to update ID in 1 week with appearance and assessment of wounds from Wound MD- M. Skin Wound Note dated 4/15/2022 at 3:26p.m. stated Wound MD- M was provided a copy of R9's preliminary right heel culture results. It showed gram negative rods. Wound MD- M stated that this could be why her right heel is worsening. He would like to see the final culture when available and no new orders are needed at this time based on the preliminary culture. Skin/ Wound note dated 6/9/2022 at 2:46 p.m. stated Wound MD- M off this week. Nursing wound rounds done by DON- B. Right heel wound improving and measures 0.2 x 1 x 0.3 50% gran and 50% slough, skin tear to right heel 0.9 x 0.4 x 0 almost healed. On 6/15/21 at 8:40 a.m., Surveyor interviewed DON-B who stated that she is pretty sure she was made aware of the SDTI to R9's right heel on 12/2/21 when it was first observed. DON- B stated that the expectation is that any wound is comprehensively assessed by a Registered Nurse. DON- B stated that she recalls the area to R9's heel being purple and that she did call the physician to get a treatment order. DON- B stated that R9 had MS and really doesn't have feeling in her legs/ feet and that she will have her heels lifted by a pillow in bed or wear the blue boots. R9 was also on an air-mattress at the time the area developed. R9 does get up in her wheelchair twice daily for 1-hour periods of time and is to wear the blue boots when up. As of the time of exit, the facility was not able to provide evidence that R9's SDTI was comprehensively assessed upon the initial observation of the wound. The first comprehensive assessment was completed on 12/9/21 when Wound MD- M assessed the area to the right heel and documents there is an area of necrosis present. The facility did obtain a treatment on 12/2/21 and R9 was using a specialty air mattress at the time of discovery. The facility also did not provide evidence that they had updated the plan of care with all of the interventions that were to be in place to promote the healing of the wound to R9's right heel.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0558 (Tag F0558)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure that 1 (R21) of 12 sampled Residents were reason...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure that 1 (R21) of 12 sampled Residents were reasonably accommodated by providing Residents access to a call light. Findings include: Surveyor reviewed the facility's Call Light, Use of policy and procedure effective June 2017 and notes the following: Purpose * To respond promptly to Resident's call for assistance. * To ensure call system is in proper working order. Procedure 8. When providing care to Resident, be sure to position the call light conveniently for the Resident to use. Tell the Resident where the call light is and show him/her how to use the call light. 9. Orient all new Residents to the call light at the bedside as well as the call light in the bathroom, shower, or tub rooms. Have the Resident demonstrate the use of the call light to be sure he/she understands your instructions. 11. Be sure all call lights are placed on the bed at all times, never on the floor or bedside stand. R21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Chrohn's Disease, Alcohol Abuse with Alcohol-Induced Mood Disorder, Major Depressive Disorder, and Anxiety Disorder. R21 has a legal guardian. Surveyor reviewed R21's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE]. R21's documented Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score is 4, meaning R21 demonstrates severely impaired skills for daily decision making. R21's MDS documents that R21 requires limited assistance for bed mobility and transfers. R21 requires extensive assistance for toileting. Surveyor notes that R21's Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) care card dated 6/15/22 documents under Safety the following: * Place call light or communication device within reach, answer call light promptly-always. Surveyor reviewed R21's comprehensive care plan and notes the following: R21 is at risk for falls due to deconditioning/weakness, gait balance problems, absence of right toes, joint/range of motion reduction, cognition with no safety awareness, behaviors, and pain. Initiated 12/5/18, Revised 2/1/22 Intervention: Place call light or communication device within reach. Answer call light promptly-always Initiated 12/5/18, Revised 5/24/20 On 6/13/22 at 9:37 AM, Surveyor observed R21 in bed sleeping. R21's call light was clipped on the backside of the privacy curtain which was at the end of R21's bed, not within reach of R21. On 6/13/22 at 2:35 PM, Surveyor observed R21 in bed sleeping. R21's call light was clipped on the backside of the privacy curtain which was at the end of R21's bed, not within reach of R21. On 6/15/22 at 9:17 AM, Surveyor observed R21's call on the floor, under R21's bed on the right side. R21 is sitting in R21's wheelchair in front of overbed table eating breakfast by the doorway, to the left of the bed. R21's bed is pushed against the wall. On 6/15/22 at 9:18 AM, Surveyor interviewed CNA-J in regards to R21 and use of the call light. CNA-J confirmed that R21 can physically turn the call light on, knows what to do with the call light, and that the call light is for requesting the need for help. CNA-J states R21 does not use the call light frequently. CNA-J states that R21 uses the call light more in the bathroom. CNA-J confirmed that R21 should be using the call light to transfer from bed to wheelchair. On 6/15/22 at 9:32 AM, Surveyor showed R21 the call light that was draped across the empty bed on the other side of the room. Surveyor asked R21 if R21 knew what it was. R21 stated, its the thing to call for help, I push the red button and the nurses will come. I know how to use and have used it when I need to. Surveyor asked R21 if R21 knew where his call light was right now, and R21 said, I don't see it. Surveyor notes R21's call light is still located under R21's bed. On 6/15/22 at 1:50 PM, Surveyor spoke to Director of Nursing (DON-B) in regards to call lights. DON-B stated that call lights should be within reach at all times. Surveyor shared concern of R21's call light not being within reach. No further information was provided at this time. On 6/15/22 at 2:00 PM, CNA-F confirmed the facility policy and procedure is that all Resident call lights should be clipped to either the shirt or blanket so the Resident can reach the call light.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility did not ensure each Resident received adequate supervision or a...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility did not ensure each Resident received adequate supervision or assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 (R38) of 4 Residents reviewed for falls. * R38 had a fall on 6/11/22. R38 has an intervention documented on R38's care plan to not place R38 in a nightgown until ready for bed and to encourage R38 to stay in common area after supper to detour R38 from attempting to self transfer to bed. R38's fall incident report documented R38 was placed in night gown and left in R38's wheelchair. Findings Include: Surveyor reviewed the facility's Fall Prevention and Management Guidelines policy and procedure revised 3/10/21 and noted the following: Policy The facility will maintain a fall prevention and management program. Fall Prevention and Management Guidelines Objectives: *Limit or prevent the occurrence of falls with the parameters that can be controlled through structured program interventions. Details of Key Elements B. Plan of Care 1. Specific interventions should be developed based on results of the fall assessment and individual Resident's preferences. 2. As information is updated, it needs to be communicated to the staff, Resident and family. C. Evaluation 1. Complete a post fall evaluation and completed required notification after every fall. 2. Activate reporting mechanism/tracking of falls within the facility 3. Facility protocol should include falls management review and analysis by the QAPI committee. R38 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Unspecified Dementia, Type 2 Diabetes mellitus, Rheumatoid Arthritis, Major Depressive Disorder, and Adjustment Disorder with Mixed Anxiety and Depressed Mood. R38 has an activated Health Care Power of Attorney (HCPOA). R38's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) documents R38's Brief Interview for Mental Status(BIMS) score to be a 2, indicating R38 demonstrates severely impaired skills for daily decision making. R38's MDS also documents that R38 requires extensive assistance for bed mobility, transfers, and toileting. R38's Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) care card dated 6/15/22 documents the following for Safety: *2/15/22 Do not put R38's nightgown on until he is ready to go to bed *4/8/22 Encourage R38 to stay in common areas after supper to detour R38 from attempting to self transfer to bed R38's comprehensive care plan documents that R38 is at risk for falls due to deconditioning/weakness Initiated 4/21/21 Interventions documented for R38 2/15/22 Do not put R38's nightgown on until R38 is ready to go to bed 4/8/22 Encourage R38 to stay in common areas after supper to detour R38 from attempting to self transfer to bed Surveyor reviewed the fall incident report dated 6/11/22. The incident report indicates R38 is at risk for falls. R38 was found on the mat next to the bed. R38 was interviewed and indicated he was trying to lay down. R38 was assessed for injuries and none were indicated. Surveyor notes that the physician and HCPOA was notified. Surveyor also notes that neurochecks were completed per policy and procedure. The following statement was obtained from CNA-L: R38 was in R38's room in R38's wheelchair. R38 had dinner and I took out R38's tray and got R38 in R38's gown and changed R38's brief in the bathroom around 7:30 PM. At 9:00 PM, I found R38 in R38's room laying on the floor mat by R38's bed. Surveyor notes that R38 should have been in the common area and gown should not have been put on R38 until R38 was ready for bed per care card and care plan. Surveyor also notes that R38's care plan has not been updated with any new interventions from the 6/11/22 fall. On 6/15/22 at 10:37 AM, Surveyor interviewed Director of Nursing (DON-B) in regards to R38's 6/11/22 fall. DON-B stated: I have been talking to the staff about after dinner, to get R38 ready for bed and not leave R38 in a gown in R38's wheelchair. R38 gets tired and antsy so R38 needs to be laid down very soon after meals. DON-B stated that it is DON-B's responsibility to update the care plan. On 6/15/22 at 1:55 PM, Surveyor spoke to DON-B and shared the concern that R38's care plan interventions of leaving in common area until ready for bed and R38's gown should not be placed on until ready for bed was not implemented at time of fall. DON-B is in agreement that the interventions were not followed and understands the concern and agree that both interventions should have been in place. No further information was provided at this time.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Incontinence Care (Tag F0690)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, record review and staff interviews the facility did not always ensure that 1 out of 1 residents reviewed ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, record review and staff interviews the facility did not always ensure that 1 out of 1 residents reviewed (R9) who entered the facility without an indwelling catheter is not catheterized unless the resident's clinical condition demonstrates that catheterized was necessary. R9 was admitted with a stage #4 pressure ulcer to the sacral wound. R9 was also noted to be incontinent of urine. On 11/1/21, the Wound MD ordered for R9 to have an indwelling catheter put in place to aide in healing of the sacral wound. The facility did not develop a plan of care with interventions to prevent urinary tract infections while the catheter was in use as well as did not have a goal for the removal of the catheter when R9's clinical condition no longer demonstrated that the catheterization was necessary. This is evidenced by: R9 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis that included Multiple Sclerosis, abnormal posture, muscle weakness generalized, insomnia, mood disorder, visual hallucinations, major depressive disorder, hypertension. Surveyor conducted a review of R9's medical record and noted that R9 was being seen by [NAME] (wound management) and there was a progress note dated 11/9/21. The note stated that following: Focused Wound Exam (Site 1) UNSTAGEABLE (DUE TO NECROSIS) SACRUM FULL THICKNESS Etiology (quality) Pressure MDS 3.0 Stage Unstageable Necrosis Duration > 53 days Objective Healing Wound Size (L x W x D): 4 x 5.5 x 0.3 cm Surface Area: 22.00 cm² Cluster Wound Periwound radius: Callus Exudate: Moderate Sero - sanguineous Slough: 40 % Granulation tissue: 20 % Skin: 40 % This wound is in an inflammatory stage and is unable to progress to a healing phase because of the presence of a biofilm. Wound progress: No Change ADDITIONAL WOUND DETAIL Was seen by [NAME] physician in past, and wound has changed since last evaluation. hospitalized , finished therapy in [name of state], and now transferred to [NAME] SNF for long term care. Although it has some non-blanching areas, slough, and is slightly larger, it does have sections of intact skin. Clinically, these even out and is not changed from prior (all granulated 4 x 5 x 0.1) wound debrided, tolerated well. Issues with urine getting under the foam dressing - will try waterproof gauze island to see if it helps. If adhesive is too harsh despite skin prep, consider using gauze and covering with transparent film. Encouraged offloading, changing position for short periods using upper body, keeping head of bed less than 30 degree to offload wound, etc Physician order dated 11/19/21; Indwelling Urinary Catheter 16 FR 5-10 xx balloon for diagnosis of wound healing Provide Cath care per protocol. Facility's skin / wound note dated 11/22/2021 at 08:22 a.m., R9 was admitted with unstageable pressure ulcer to her right buttock measuring. Today it measures 2.7 x 6.5 x 0.2 with 25 necrotic tissue, 25% slough and 50% granulation tissue. Moderate drainage noted. Resident on an air mattress. She is incontinent of B and B. Product in place. Encouraged resident to try to position self-off this right buttock when able. She denies pain and discomfort to the area. Last debrided 11/16/2021. Vorah wound MD scheduled to see resident 11/23/2021. Resident now with foley catheter in place for wound healing. Resident very incontinent of urine and dressing needed to be replaced multiple times a day r/t urinary incontinence. Foley draining clear yellow to amber colored urine without complication. Skin/ Wound note dated 11/29/2021 at 07:05 a.m., Late Entry; R9 was admitted with an unstageable pressure injury to her right buttock. Today it measures 5.7 x 5 x 0.2. There is a circular area inside these measurements with necrotic tissue which measures 2.7 x 2.2 x 0. Resident denies pain and states that she has been lying on her back more this week. She was educated that it would be best if she could lay on her side. She verbalized understanding and agrees to try to stay off her back. No odor is present, moderate s/s drainage is noted. MD scheduled to visit resident tomorrow and this wound will more than likely need manual debridement. She denies pain to the area. Skin/ wound note dated 12/23/2021 at 2:37 p.m., Wound MD into see resident today and gave orders to start a wound vac when available to right buttock/sacral ulcer. Continue Betadine to right heel eschar. Surveyor conducted a review of the Significant Change MDS (Minimum Data Set), dated 3/23/22. The MDS indicates that R9 has a indwelling catheter in place. It also indicates that R9 had 2- stage #4 pressure injuries, present upon admission. The Care Area Assessment (CAA) for Catheter stated: Nature of the problem/condition: RES IS INCONTINENT OF BOWEL AND HAS FOLEY CATHETER FOR BLADDER AND HAS DEFICIT IN MOBILITY REQUIRES STAFF OF 2 WITH TRANSFERS. RES HAS DX OF DEPRESSION AND AT TIMES HAS DIFFICULTY MAKING NEEDS KNOWN *Will Urinary Incontinence and Indwelling Catheter be addressed in the care plan? Yes, Objective: improvement, avoid complications and minimize risks *Describe impact of this problem/need on the resident and your rationale for care plan decision. (Include complications and risk factors and the need for referral to other health professionals) RES HAS BEEN IDENTIFIED AS HAVING INCONTINENCE DUE TO WEAKNESS AND MOBILITY, DEPRESSION. RES CONT ON FOLEY CATHETER DUE TO WOUNDS AND DX OF SEPSIS AND MS TO DECREASE OR MAINTAIN CURRENT FUNCTION SEE RES CURRENT MEDS. STAFF TO ASSIST WITH 2 FOR TRANSFERS HOYER LIFT AND 1 WITH PERICARE AND CLOTHING MANAGEMENT. RISK INCLUDE SKIN BREAKDOWN, UTI, CONFUSION. Surveyor conducted a review of the Individual Plan of Care for R9. It was noted that the plan of care did not include anything regarding the use of the indwelling Foley catheter to assist in wound healing. R9 has a history of urinary tract infections and the plan of care did not address this along with continuing to assess the use of the Foley catheter as wound healing progressed. Nursing noted dated 3/19/2022 at 03:24 a.m., R9 is afebrile. Interim. Alert and oriented per baseline. HOB elevated to ease respirations. No pedal edema noted. Abdomen soft, nontender to touch. Bowel sounds active all 4 quadrants. Foley catheter patent draining clear yellow urine. Wound vac intact and patent to sacral wound. Continues on IV Rocephin for tx of UTI and IV Vancomycin for tx of sacral wound infection. No adverse reaction to abx's noted. No s/sx of inflammation noted at PICC site. No c/o discomfort at this time. Skin/ Wound Note dated 5/19/2022 at 7:49 a.m., Wound MD was into see resident last night for sacral ulcer and right heel ulcer. NOR. Wound vac dc. See details in misc tab vorah note. Skin/ Wound note dated 6/9/2022 at 2:46 p.m., Wound MD off this week. Nursing wound rounds done by DON- B. Right heel wound improving and measures 0.2 x 1 x 0.3 50% gran and 50% slough, skin tear to right heel 0.9 x 0.4 x 0 almost healed. Sacral pressure injury measures 7.0 x 4.5 x 2.7 with undermining 4 cm at 11 o'clock. moderate drainage noted to dressing. Peri-wound pale and without complication. No odor noted to wound. Resident denies pain to both areas. Air mattress in place. Continues on PO ABT x 2 for MRSA in the sacral wound. Nursing note dated 5/26/2022 at 9:58 a.m., Medicare meeting was held on 5-25. R9's heel wound is improving. She requires daily dressing changes. Catheter possibly being discontinued next week. Patient meets with Wound MD. Patient will remain in facility for LTC. Nursing note dated 6/3 stated that lab results faxed to MD. Order for Diflucan 100 mg po q daily x 7 days. Nursing note dated 6/13/2022 at 02:10 a.m., R9 started on po Diflucan 100mg qd x 7 days per the ua results, this order was faxed over by MD earlier this shift. med to start in the am. resident continues with Foley and clear yellow urine. Surveyor made observation of R9 on 06/13/22 02:43 PM awake lying in bed. TV on. Air mattress in place. Cath beg in place with privacy cover. Nursing note dated 6/14/2022 at 2:07 a.m. R9 is afebrile. Continues the Doxycycline and Bactrim DS for tx of MRSA in sacral wound. Resident is on the Diflucan for tx of UTI. Foley catheter patent draining clear yellow urine. Dressing intact to sacral wound. No adverse reaction to abx's noted. On 6/14/22, Surveyor interviewed DON- B in regard to R9's continued use of the indwelling catheter for wound healing. Surveyor asked about the nursing noted dated 5/26/22 where there was mention that R9's catheter might be discounted in the next week. DON- B stated that the Wound MD was going to follow-up on the next visit and then he was on vacation, so it didn't get addressed yet. DON- B stated she would follow up on the issue. DON- B was asked why there was not a plan of care and continued assessment for the need of the indwelling catheter for R9. DON- B stated that she would have to review the medical record before answering. Skin wound note dated 6/14/2022 at 11:46 a.m., Discussed catheter with Wound MD on 05/26/2022. He stated that we would leave it in for wound healing at this time. He will re-evaluate on his next visit. Discussed resident again at this time with Wound MD and he wishes for the catheter to stay in until he is able to assess the wound tomorrow afternoon. At that time, he will make a decision. Nursing note dated 6/15/2022 at 3:47 a.m., R9 is afebrile. Continues on the Doxycycline and Bactrim DS to tx MRSA in sacral wound. Resident is on the Diflucan to treat yeast in her urine. No adverse reaction to abx's noted. As of the time of exit, the facility was not able to provide additional information as to why R9's use of the indwelling catheter for wound healing was not assessed for the need for continued use. The facility did not develop a plan of care with interventions to avoid the possibility of R9 being diagnosed with an urinary tract infection while the indwelling catheter was in place and also recently developed a yeast infection in the urine. There was no goal for the removal if the indwelling catheter.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Medication Errors (Tag F0758)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility did not always ensure that 2 out of 5 (R7 and R9) residents reviewed f...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility did not always ensure that 2 out of 5 (R7 and R9) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications and the daily use of a Anti-psychotic medication were comprehensively assessed for possible adverse consequences such as Tardive dyskinesia (abnormal, recurrent, involuntary movements that may be irreversible and typically present as lateral movements of the tongue or jaw, tongue thrusting, chewing, frequent blinking, brow arching, grimacing, and lip smacking, although the trunk or other parts of the body may also be affected.) Monthly medication reviews, completed by the licensed Pharmacist, recommenced over a period of several months that both R7 and R9 have an AIMS (Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale) assessment conducted to determine if there may be any adverse consequences to the continued use of a psychotropic medications. The facility did not respond to these recommendations in a timely manner. This is evidenced by: 1. R7 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis that include vascular dementia with behavioral disturbance, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, kidney failure, depressive disorder, osteoporosis. A review of R7's physician orders showed that R7 was receiving the following medication: Seroquel Tablet 25 MG (QUEtiapine Fumarate) Give 1 tablet by mouth in the evening every Tue, Wed, Thu, Fri, Sat, Sun for delusions/hallucinations related to VASCULAR DEMENTIA WITH BEHAVIORAL DISTURBANCE (F01.51) Give early per NP as res sundowns and ref after 1600 most meds AND Give 0.5 tablet by mouth every evening shift every Mon for delusions/hallucinations According to the annual MDS (Minimum Data Set), dated 3/31/22, R 7 has a BIMS (Brief interview for mental status) score of 1- severely impaired. R7 displays behaviors such as inattention- behavior present, fluctuates (comes and goes, changes in severity) Disorganized thinking- behavior present, fluctuates. R7 also received both antipsychotic meds and anti-depressant medications over the past 7 days. Yes- antipsychotics were received on a routine basis only. No GDR (gradual dose reduction) attempted. Yes- Physician documented GDR as clinically contraindicated- 3/22/22 R7's individual plan of care stated that R7 was at risk for adverse effects r/t use of antidepressant medication (Paroxetine) prescribed for depression. Interventions included o AIMS (Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale used to measure tardive dyskinesia, possible side effect for medication use) testing per facility guidelines (upon admission, initiation of, change of, every 6 months, and PRN). Surveyor conducted a review of the required monthly pharmacy review. On 11/15/21, the Pharmacist conducted a monthly review of medications. The pharmacist recommend that the facility check the AIMS for R7. This was again recommended on 12/15/21, 1/19/22 and 2/16/22. There was no evidence that the facility had followed up on the Pharmacist recommendations. Further review of the medical record showed that the facility had conducted an AIMS assessment on 5/21/21 and then not again until 2/25/22. R7's score was a zero. A review of the instructions for the AIMS assessment stated the following: *This exam is used for assessing side effects of antipsychotic drugs only; it should not be used for antianxiety, antidepressant or sedative drugs. Complete examination procedure before making rating. For all MOVEMENT ratings (section A, B, and C) rate highest severity observed. Check one code for each evaluation. Complete upon admission, initiation of antipsychotic med; change of antipsychotic med, and every 6 months. On 6/15/22 at 1:30 p.m., Surveyor interviewed DON (Director of Nursing)- B in regard to the monthly pharmacy reviews. DON- B stated that she reviewed the monthly recommendations from the Pharmacist and will forward any recommendations onto the physician for review and any changes. Surveyor asked DON- B why the facility did not respond to the Pharmacist's recommendations for R7 to have an AIMS assessment done from November, 2021 through February, 2022. DON- B responded that she was not aware of those recommendations. 2. R9 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis that included Multiple Sclerosis, abnormal posture, muscle weakness generalized, insomnia, mood disorder, visual hallucinations, major depressive disorder, hypertension. Surveyor conducted a review of the Significant Change MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 3/23/22. R9 had a BIMS (Brief Interview for mental status) of 13- cognitively intact. R9 did not have any behaviors noted. R9 used antipsychotic medications for the last 7 days prior to this assessment. A review of the Individual Plan of Care for R9 stated; at risk for adverse effects r/t use of antidepressant medication (Mirtazapine) prescribed for depression and use of antipsychotic medication (Risperdal) for mood disorder due to unknown physiological condition (F06.30). 11-23-21 GDR of psych meds clinically contraindicated. 02-24-22 GDR of psych meds clinically contraindicated. Interventions included: AIMS testing per facility guidelines (upon admission, initiation of, change of, every 6 months, and PRN) Surveyor conducted a review of the required monthly pharmacy review. On 11/15/21, the Pharmacist conducted a monthly review of medications. The pharmacist recommend that the facility check the AIMS for R9. This was again recommended on 12/15/21, 1/19/22 and 2/16/22. There was no evidence that the facility had followed up on the AIMs recommendations from the Pharmacist dated 11/15/21, 12/15/21, 1/19/22, and 2/16/22 until 2/25/22. Further review of the medical record showed that the facility had conducted an AIMS assessment, upon admission on [DATE] to establish a baseline. The facility conducted an Initial AIMS assessment on 2/25/22 with a score of 7. The assessment suggests that a referral for a neurological assessment be made based on the AIMS results. It was noted that the facility did not follow-up on a neurological referral for R 9. On 6/15/22 at 1:30 p.m., Surveyor interviewed DON (Director of Nursing)- B in regard to the monthly pharmacy reviews. DON- B stated that she reviewed the monthly recommendations from the Pharmacist and will forward any recommendations onto the physician for review and any changes. Surveyor asked DON- B why the facility did not respond to the Pharmacist's recommendations for R9 to have an AIMS assessment done from November, 2021 through February, 2022. DON- B responded that she was not aware of those recommendations.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility did not follow an effective infection control program to help prevent the transmission of infections for 1 (R34) of 5 residents observed...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility did not follow an effective infection control program to help prevent the transmission of infections for 1 (R34) of 5 residents observed for medication administration and for 14 ( R17, R2, R4, R29, R246, R10, R43, R42, R26, R18, R21, R38, R37, and R41) of 40 residents observed during meal tray pass. During medication administration on 6/14/22, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)-D touched 2 pills with her bare hands and placed them in the med cup for R34. LPN-D dropped a pill onto the medication cart and then picked it up with her bare hands and placed it in the med cup for R34. LPN-D administered the potentially cross contaminated pills to R34. During 2 meals, staff did not perform hand hygiene inbetween delivering meal trays to 16 residents potentially cross contaminating food trays. Findings include: Surveyor reviewed the facility's Administering Medications policy with a revision date of April 2019. Documented was: Policy Statement Medications are administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed . 25. Staff follows established facility infection control procedures (e.g., handwashing, antiseptic technique, gloves, isolation precautions, etc.) for the administration of medications, as applicable . On 6/14/22 Surveyor observed LPN-D prepare and pass medications for R34. R34's medications were in blisters packs. LPN-D popped a pill out of the blister pack into her bare hands and placed it in a medication cup. LPN-D took a second blister pack and popped a pill out into her bare hands and placed it in the medication cup. LPN-D took a third blister pack and popped a pill out and it fell onto the medication cart. LPN-D picked up the pill with her bare hands and placed it in the medication cup. LPN-D continued to pop 4 more pills directly into the medication cup. LPN-D mixed pudding with the pills and administered them to R34. LPN-D potentially contaminated 3 of the pills for R34 by not following infection control guidelines. On 6/14/22 at 2:52 PM Surveyor interviewed Director of Nursing (DON)-B. Surveyor asked how staff should handle medications from blister packs they will administer. DON-B stated they should pop the medications directly into the cup. Surveyor asked if staff should touch them with bare hands. DON-B stated no. Surveyor asked if a pill falls onto the medication cart what should be done. DON-B stated the pill should be destroyed and a new clean medication should be administered. Surveyor noted the observations of LPN-D touching 2 pills, dropping 1 pill and picking it up and administering those medications to R34. DON-B stated they should have been destroyed and replaced. Surveyor reviewed the undated facility Handwashing/Hand Hygiene policy and procedure and notes the following: Policy Statement This facility considers hand hygiene the primary means to prevent the spread of infections. Policy Interpretation and Implementation 1. All personnel shall be trained and regularly in-serviced on the importance of hand hygiene in preventing the transmission of healthcare-associated infections. 2. All personnel shall follow the handwashing/hand hygiene procedures to help prevent the spread of infections to other personnel, Residents, and visitors. 3. Hand hygiene products and supplies shall be readily accessible and convenient for staff use to encourage compliance with hand hygiene policies. 7. Use an alcohol-based hand rub containing at least 62% alcohol; or, alternatively, soap(antimicrobial or non-antimicrobial) and water for the following situations: p. Before and after assisting a Resident with meals Surveyor notes that at time of survey, there were 16 Residents residing on the 200 unit. Surveyor notes that all Residents eat their meals in their rooms at this time due to a COVID-19 outbreak. Surveyor observed two (2) meal tray passes. Surveyor observed CNAs obtaining a tray from the cart, going into the room and set up the tray for each Resident. Surveyor's observation for tray set-up includes the following: placing the tray on the overbed table, taking lids off of the food and drink items, cutting up food items, and/or opening condiment packets. On 6/13/22 at 12:31 PM, Surveyor observed lunch tray pass on unit 200. Surveyor observed Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA-I) pass and set up a tray for R17. CNA-I performed no hand hygiene. CNA-I obtained R10's tray from the cart and passed and set up the tray for R10. CNA-I performed no hand hygiene. CNA-I then passed and set up a tray for R43. Surveyor observed CNA-I perform no hand hygiene. CNA-I passed and set up R18's lunch tray. CNA-I observed CNA-I perform no hand hygiene. CNA-I obtained a tray for R41 and set up and performed no hand hygiene. CNA-J passed and set up R37's tray and performed no hand hygiene. CNA-J then passed and set up R246's tray and Surveyor observed CNA-J perform no hand hygiene. CNA-J then passed and set up R21's tray and performed no hand hygiene. CNA-J then obtained R38's tray, set up the tray, and CNA-J performed no hand hygiene. CNA-J then passed and set up tray for R42. Surveyor observed CNA-J not to perform hand hygiene. CNA-J obtained R29's tray and set up, and CNA-J performed no hand hygiene. CNA-J then served tray to R41, set up the tray and perform no hand hygiene. On 6/14/22 at 8:38 AM, Surveyor observed breakfast tray pass on unit 200. CNA-I passed and set up tray for R38 and performed no hand hygiene after exiting the room. CNA-G passed and set up a tray for R10 and performed no hand hygiene. CNA-G then passed and set up a tray for R17 and performed no hand hygiene. CNA-G obtained R21's tray and passed and set up R21's tray and performed no hand hygiene. CNA-H obtained, passed, and set up R37's tray and performed no hand hygiene. CNA-H then passed and set up R26's tray and performed no hand hygiene. CNA-H then passed and set up R41's tray and performed no hand hygiene before exiting the room. CNA-F obtained, passed, and set up R4's tray and performed no hand hygiene. CNA-F then obtained R19's tray, and passed and set up R19's tray and performed no hand hygiene before exiting the room. CNA-J obtained R29's tray passed and set up and performed no hand hygiene before exiting the room. On 6/14/22 at 2:42 PM, Surveyor asked Director of Nursing(DON-B) what is the expectation for hand hygiene between tray pass. DON-B stated to wash hands or use hand sanitizer after/before every new tray pass. Surveyor shared the concern with DON-B and Administrator (NHA-A) of no hand hygiene between tray passes with breakfast and lunch observations. Surveyor requested documentation of the date and content of the most recent hand washing inservice. DON-B stated DON-B would need to look for it. Surveyor notes the facility did not provide any documentation of a hand washing inservice for facility staff.
MINOR (C)

Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact

Deficiency F0838 (Tag F0838)

Minor procedural issue · This affected most or all residents

Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure the facility-wide assessment was reviewed and updated at least annually. This had the potential to effect all 40 Residents. The ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure the facility-wide assessment was reviewed and updated at least annually. This had the potential to effect all 40 Residents. The facility did not review and update the facility assessment since 11/1/2017. The facility assessment was last reviewed with QAA (Quality Assessment and Assurance)/QAPI (Quality Assurance and Performance Improvment) committee on 11/28/17. Findings Include: Surveyor reviewed the facility's Facility Assessment Tool policy dated 10/2017 and notes the following: Requirement Nursing facilities will conduct, document, and annually review a facility-wide assessment, which includes both their Resident population and the resources the facility needs to care for their Residents. Guidelines for Conducting the Assessment 3. The facility must review and update this assessment annually or whenever there is/the facility plans for any change that would require a modification to any part of this assessment. On 6/14/22 at 1:32 PM, Surveyor reviewed the facility assessment and noted the date of 11/1/2017, meaning the facility assessment has not been updated on annual basis. On 6/15/22 at 2:36 PM, Nursing Home Administrator (NHA)-A verified the facility assessment, dated 11/1/2017, was the most recent facility assessment available. NHA-A revealed no facility assessment review or revision was completed since that date. NHA-A stated, I may or may not know it is part of the regulation to update the assessment on a annual basis. Surveyor asked NHA-A if the facility assessment had been reviewed at QAPI committee meetings. NHA-A states that maybe parts of the facility assessment have been updated through QAPI, but is not able to specify what parts of the facility assessment may have been updated. NHA-A stated NHA-A has no documentation that the facility assessment was reviewed and updated through the QAPI process. NHA-A stated, I will need to get it updated.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Wisconsin facilities.
  • • 42% turnover. Below Wisconsin's 48% average. Good staff retention means consistent care.
Concerns
  • • 12 deficiencies on record, including 1 serious (caused harm) violation. Ask about corrective actions taken.
Bottom line: Generally positive indicators. Standard due diligence and a personal visit recommended.

About This Facility

What is Delavan Health Services's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns DELAVAN HEALTH SERVICES an overall rating of 4 out of 5 stars, which is considered above average nationally. Within Wisconsin, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.

How is Delavan Health Services Staffed?

CMS rates DELAVAN HEALTH SERVICES's staffing level at 3 out of 5 stars, which is average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 42%, compared to the Wisconsin average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.

What Have Inspectors Found at Delavan Health Services?

State health inspectors documented 12 deficiencies at DELAVAN HEALTH SERVICES during 2022 to 2024. These included: 1 that caused actual resident harm, 10 with potential for harm, and 1 minor or isolated issues. Deficiencies causing actual harm indicate documented cases where residents experienced negative health consequences.

Who Owns and Operates Delavan Health Services?

DELAVAN HEALTH SERVICES is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by NORTH SHORE HEALTHCARE, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 50 certified beds and approximately 39 residents (about 78% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in DELAVAN, Wisconsin.

How Does Delavan Health Services Compare to Other Wisconsin Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Wisconsin, DELAVAN HEALTH SERVICES's overall rating (4 stars) is above the state average of 3.0, staff turnover (42%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (4 stars) is above the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Delavan Health Services?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"

Is Delavan Health Services Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, DELAVAN HEALTH SERVICES has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 4-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Wisconsin. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.

Do Nurses at Delavan Health Services Stick Around?

DELAVAN HEALTH SERVICES has a staff turnover rate of 42%, which is about average for Wisconsin nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.

Was Delavan Health Services Ever Fined?

DELAVAN HEALTH SERVICES has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.

Is Delavan Health Services on Any Federal Watch List?

DELAVAN HEALTH SERVICES is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.