WILLIAMS BAY HEALTH SERVICES
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Williams Bay Health Services has a Trust Grade of C+, indicating a decent level of care that is slightly above average. It ranks #182 out of 321 nursing homes in Wisconsin, placing it in the bottom half of facilities statewide, and #4 out of 7 in Walworth County, meaning only three local options are better. Unfortunately, the facility is currently worsening, having increased from 3 reported issues in 2023 to 4 in 2025. Staffing is a concern, with a turnover rate of 66%, significantly higher than the Wisconsin average of 47%, which may affect the consistency of care. While there have been no fines reported, which is a positive sign, there are serious concerns regarding resident safety, such as a resident sustaining injuries during transfers due to improper handling and the facility's failure to maintain adequate infection control measures. Additionally, there were incidents of improper bed inspections that resulted in injuries. Despite having better RN coverage than 92% of facilities in Wisconsin, the combination of high turnover and these incidents raises valid concerns for families considering this nursing home.
- Trust Score
- C+
- In Wisconsin
- #182/321
- Safety Record
- Moderate
- Inspections
- Getting Worse
- Staff Stability ⚠ Watch
- 66% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Wisconsin facilities.
- Skilled Nurses ✓ Good
- Each resident gets 68 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than 97% of Wisconsin nursing homes. RNs are the most trained staff who catch health problems before they become serious.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 11 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
Facility shows strength in fire safety.
The Bad
Near Wisconsin average (3.0)
Meets federal standards, typical of most facilities
20pts above Wisconsin avg (46%)
Frequent staff changes - ask about care continuity
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
18 points above Wisconsin average of 48%
The Ugly 11 deficiencies on record
Mar 2025
4 deficiencies
1 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 2 (R26 and R29) of 2 residents reviewed received ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0697
(Tag F0697)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that 1 (R26) of 2 residents reviewed for pain management recei...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility did not maintain an effective infection control program under which it investigates, controls, and prevents infections in the facility.
* Tota...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0909
(Tag F0909)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation, interview and record review, the Facility did not ensure proper inspection of resident beds.
*On 02/12/2025 and 03/03/2025, R26 was injured during a transfer. The metal pieces o...
Read full inspector narrative →
Sept 2023
3 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Free from Abuse/Neglect
(Tag F0600)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to protect the residents' right to be free from neglect by staff for one of three residents (Resident (R) 1) reviewed...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Report Alleged Abuse
(Tag F0609)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to report an allegation of neglect by staff for one of three residents (Resident (R) 1) reviewed for neglect in a tot...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Investigate Abuse
(Tag F0610)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to investigate an allegation of neglect by staff for one of three residents (Resident (R) 1) reviewed for neglect in ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Oct 2022
4 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Pressure Ulcer Prevention
(Tag F0686)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility did not ensure 1 of 2 residents with pressure injuries was provid...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0745
(Tag F0745)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that 1(R19) of 12 sampled Residents received medically related...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Drug Regimen Review
(Tag F0756)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility did not act on recommendations made by the pharmacist for 2 (R12, R13) of 5 r...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to hel...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Why is there high staff turnover? How do you retain staff?"
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Wisconsin facilities.
- • 11 deficiencies on record, including 1 serious (caused harm) violation. Ask about corrective actions taken.
- • 66% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
About This Facility
What is Williams Bay Health Services's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns WILLIAMS BAY HEALTH SERVICES an overall rating of 3 out of 5 stars, which is considered average nationally. Within Wisconsin, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This mid-range rating indicates the facility meets federal standards but may have areas for improvement.
How is Williams Bay Health Services Staffed?
CMS rates WILLIAMS BAY HEALTH SERVICES's staffing level at 3 out of 5 stars, which is average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 66%, which is 20 percentage points above the Wisconsin average of 46%. High turnover can affect care consistency as new staff learn residents' individual needs.
What Have Inspectors Found at Williams Bay Health Services?
State health inspectors documented 11 deficiencies at WILLIAMS BAY HEALTH SERVICES during 2022 to 2025. These included: 1 that caused actual resident harm and 10 with potential for harm. Deficiencies causing actual harm indicate documented cases where residents experienced negative health consequences.
Who Owns and Operates Williams Bay Health Services?
WILLIAMS BAY HEALTH SERVICES is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by NORTH SHORE HEALTHCARE, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 50 certified beds and approximately 31 residents (about 62% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in WILLIAMS BAY, Wisconsin.
How Does Williams Bay Health Services Compare to Other Wisconsin Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Wisconsin, WILLIAMS BAY HEALTH SERVICES's overall rating (3 stars) matches the state average, staff turnover (66%) is significantly higher than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (3 stars) is at the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Williams Bay Health Services?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "How do you ensure continuity of care given staff turnover, and what is your staff retention strategy?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's high staff turnover rate.
Is Williams Bay Health Services Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, WILLIAMS BAY HEALTH SERVICES has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 3-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Wisconsin. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Williams Bay Health Services Stick Around?
Staff turnover at WILLIAMS BAY HEALTH SERVICES is high. At 66%, the facility is 20 percentage points above the Wisconsin average of 46%. High turnover means new staff may not know residents' individual needs, medications, or preferences. It can also be disorienting for residents, especially those with dementia who rely on familiar faces. Families should ask: What is causing the turnover? What retention programs are in place? How do you ensure care continuity during staff transitions?
Was Williams Bay Health Services Ever Fined?
WILLIAMS BAY HEALTH SERVICES has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.
Is Williams Bay Health Services on Any Federal Watch List?
WILLIAMS BAY HEALTH SERVICES is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.