BELVEDERE NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER, LLC
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Belvedere Nursing and Rehabilitation Center holds a Trust Grade of F, indicating significant concerns about the facility's quality and care. Ranking #185 out of 218 facilities in Arkansas places it in the bottom half, and it is the lowest-rated facility in Garland County. Although the facility is improving, with issues decreasing from four in 2024 to one in 2025, there are still serious deficiencies, including a critical failure to manage water safety, which poses health risks to residents. Staffing is average with a 3/5 star rating, but turnover is high at 56%, which can disrupt care continuity. Additionally, the facility has incurred $209,455 in fines, higher than 99% of Arkansas facilities, raising concerns about compliance. Specific incidents include a resident suffering serious injuries due to improper transfer methods and a failure to implement fall prevention measures, highlighting both weaknesses in care and the need for improvement.
- Trust Score
- F
- In Arkansas
- #185/218
- Safety Record
- High Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Better
- Staff Stability ⚠ Watch
- 56% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
- Penalties ⚠ Watch
- $209,455 in fines. Higher than 94% of Arkansas facilities. Major compliance failures.
- Skilled Nurses ⚠ Watch
- Each resident gets only 12 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Arkansas. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 29 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
4-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
Facility shows strength in quality measures, fire safety.
The Bad
Below Arkansas average (3.1)
Significant quality concerns identified by CMS
Near Arkansas avg (46%)
Frequent staff changes - ask about care continuity
Well above median ($33,413)
Significant penalties indicating serious issues
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
8 points above Arkansas average of 48%
The Ugly 29 deficiencies on record
Mar 2025
1 deficiency
1 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff followed care planned interventions requiring one staff member to perform transfers with gait belt to promote re...
Read full inspector narrative →
Nov 2024
4 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for 1 (Resident #11) of 1 resident residing in the Memory Unit, related t...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure proper hand hygiene was performed during peri care to reduce the risk of cross contami...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, record review, interview, and facility record review, the facility failed to ensure the central bath and soiled utility room on 300 Hall were locked to prevent resident access to...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure
dietary staff washed their hands before handling clean equipment or food items when contaminat...
Read full inspector narrative →
Dec 2023
10 deficiencies
1 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to implement interventions for previous falls as indicated from the care plan to decrease the potential for future falls with in...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0637
(Tag F0637)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete a Significant Change in Status Minimum Data Set (MDS) after a decline in two or more Activities of daily living (ADL) for 1 (Resid...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0638
(Tag F0638)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete a comprehensive assessment using the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) process within regulatory time frames for 2 (Resident #7...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Resident Rights
(Tag F0550)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure catheter output bags were concealed in a privacy bag to protect the resident's dignity for 2 (Resident's #39, and #62) ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's care plan was individualized to ad...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0657
(Tag F0657)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident's individualized care plan were update...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a physician's order was in the electronic health record prior to administration of oxygen for 1 Resident (d#44) of 5 sa...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were not left in a resident's room for one Resident (R#97) of one sampled resident. The findings are:
1. Re...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0865
(Tag F0865)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement program (QAPI) Committee developed and implemented appropriate plans of action to ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store the ice scoop in a closed container to ensure the infection prevention and control program was followed to provide a saf...
Read full inspector narrative →
Oct 2023
1 deficiency
1 IJ (1 facility-wide)
CRITICAL
(L)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Someone could have died · This affected most or all residents
⚠️ Facility-wide issue
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop and implement a water management program to prevent the likelihood of waterborne illnesses caused by opportunistic pathogens such a...
Read full inspector narrative →
Nov 2022
4 deficiencies
1 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a cognitively impaired resident was adequately supervised wh...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Report Alleged Abuse
(Tag F0609)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 7. On 11/29/2022 at 8:49 a.m., the Surveyor asked the Director of Nursing (DON), When any alleged abuse is reported, what is the...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Investigate Abuse
(Tag F0610)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 7. On 11/29/2022 at 8:49 a.m., the Surveyor asked the Director of Nursing (DON), When are body audits performed on the residents...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff implemented proper infection prevention and control practices to prevent the development and transmission of COV...
Read full inspector narrative →
Sept 2022
9 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Assessment Accuracy
(Tag F0641)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Quarterly Minimum Date (MDS) Assessment was coded correctly to reflect a Deep Tissue Injury and an ulcer to facilitate appropria...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0657
(Tag F0657)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Care Plan was reviewed and revised to include a wound on the left heel and right anterior ankle to ensure appropri...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to notify the physician and obtain orders for wound care to promote continuity of care when a resident hit their hand causing a ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Tube Feeding
(Tag F0693)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Licensed Practical Nurse checked for tube ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0805
(Tag F0805)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure pureed food items were blended to a smooth, lump-free consistency to minimize the risk of choking or other complications for residents...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Comprehensive Care Plan accurately described the care and services that were to be provided to assist residents in...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure oxygen was administered at the flow rate ordered by the physician to reduce the potential for respiratory complication...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were kept locked and secured when unattended on th...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 2 ice machines and scoop holders were maintained in clean condition to prevent the potential contamination of residents' food or ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
- "Why is there high staff turnover? How do you retain staff?"
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
- • Multiple safety concerns identified: 1 life-threatening violation(s), 3 harm violation(s), $209,455 in fines, Payment denial on record. Review inspection reports carefully.
- • 29 deficiencies on record, including 1 critical (life-threatening) violation. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
- • $209,455 in fines. Extremely high, among the most fined facilities in Arkansas. Major compliance failures.
- • Grade F (0/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
About This Facility
What is Belvedere, Llc's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns BELVEDERE NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER, LLC an overall rating of 1 out of 5 stars, which is considered much below average nationally. Within Arkansas, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.
How is Belvedere, Llc Staffed?
CMS rates BELVEDERE NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER, LLC's staffing level at 3 out of 5 stars, which is average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 56%, which is 9 percentage points above the Arkansas average of 46%. High turnover can affect care consistency as new staff learn residents' individual needs. RN turnover specifically is 60%, which is notably high. RNs provide skilled clinical oversight, so turnover in this role can affect medical care quality.
What Have Inspectors Found at Belvedere, Llc?
State health inspectors documented 29 deficiencies at BELVEDERE NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER, LLC during 2022 to 2025. These included: 1 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death), 3 that caused actual resident harm, and 25 with potential for harm. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.
Who Owns and Operates Belvedere, Llc?
BELVEDERE NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER, LLC is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by CENTRAL ARKANSAS NURSING CENTERS, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 119 certified beds and approximately 116 residents (about 97% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in HOT SPRINGS, Arkansas.
How Does Belvedere, Llc Compare to Other Arkansas Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Arkansas, BELVEDERE NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER, LLC's overall rating (1 stars) is below the state average of 3.1, staff turnover (56%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (1 stars) is much below the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Belvedere, Llc?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "How do you ensure continuity of care given staff turnover, and what is your staff retention strategy?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations and the facility's high staff turnover rate.
Is Belvedere, Llc Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, BELVEDERE NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER, LLC has documented safety concerns. Inspectors have issued 1 Immediate Jeopardy citation (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 1-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Arkansas. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.
Do Nurses at Belvedere, Llc Stick Around?
Staff turnover at BELVEDERE NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER, LLC is high. At 56%, the facility is 9 percentage points above the Arkansas average of 46%. Registered Nurse turnover is particularly concerning at 60%. RNs handle complex medical decisions and coordinate care — frequent RN changes can directly impact care quality. High turnover means new staff may not know residents' individual needs, medications, or preferences. It can also be disorienting for residents, especially those with dementia who rely on familiar faces. Families should ask: What is causing the turnover? What retention programs are in place? How do you ensure care continuity during staff transitions?
Was Belvedere, Llc Ever Fined?
BELVEDERE NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER, LLC has been fined $209,455 across 2 penalty actions. This is 6.0x the Arkansas average of $35,173. Fines at this level are uncommon and typically indicate a pattern of serious deficiencies, repeated violations, or failure to correct problems promptly. CMS reserves penalties of this magnitude for facilities that pose significant, documented risk to resident health or safety. Families should request specific documentation of what issues led to these fines and what systemic changes have been implemented.
Is Belvedere, Llc on Any Federal Watch List?
BELVEDERE NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER, LLC is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.