LAKE HAMILTON HEALTH AND REHAB
Inspected within the last 6 months. Data reflects current conditions.
Lake Hamilton Health and Rehab has a Trust Grade of B, indicating it is a good choice for families seeking care, as it performs solidly compared to other facilities. It ranks #68 out of 218 in Arkansas, placing it in the top half, and is the best option among nine facilities in Garland County. The facility is improving, having reduced its issues from 10 in 2024 to 4 in 2025, which is a positive trend. However, it has concerning staffing levels, with RN coverage less than 83% of facilities in the state, and a turnover rate of 54%, which is average but suggests potential inconsistency in care. While there have been no fines reported, some specific incidents have raised concerns; for example, food items in the kitchen were not stored properly, and staff failed to wash hands between serving residents, both of which could lead to foodborne illnesses. Additionally, there was a lack of privacy during personal care for some residents, highlighting areas that need improvement despite the facility's strengths in overall quality measures.
- Trust Score
- B
- In Arkansas
- #68/218
- Safety Record
- Low Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Better
- Staff Stability ⚠ Watch
- 54% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Arkansas facilities.
- Skilled Nurses ⚠ Watch
- Each resident gets only 16 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Arkansas. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 22 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
5-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
Facility shows strength in quality measures, fire safety.
The Bad
Near Arkansas avg (46%)
Higher turnover may affect care consistency
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
The Ugly 22 deficiencies on record
May 2025
4 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0688
(Tag F0688)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, it was determined that the facility did not ensure there was a device in place to prevent further contracture and/or skin br...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Resident Rights
(Tag F0550)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observations, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that privacy was provided while providing care to maintain dignity fo...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 1 ice machine was maintained in a sanitary condition; expired food items were promptly removed / discard...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observations, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, it was determined that the facility did not ensure Enhance Barrier Precautions (EBP) were implemented and followed; that s...
Read full inspector narrative →
Apr 2024
10 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Resident Rights
(Tag F0550)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff were sitting face to face with residents during meal service to promote dignity for 1 (Resident #41) of 3 sampled...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0583
(Tag F0583)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to protect 1 (Resident #231) sampled resident ' s privacy by leaving medication cards with identifiable resident information faci...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the unlocked public bathroom near a common resident area was equipped with a pull cord on the call light to ensure res...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure only licensed nursing staff provided oxygen as ordered by the physician via concentrator, and/or portable oxygen tank t...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
3. A review of Resident #68's Physicians Order dated 01/15/2024 documented Resident #68 was to receive 15 units of a long acting insulin at bedtime related to type 2 diabetes mellitus.
b. On 04/11/202...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Pharmacy Services
(Tag F0755)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure stock narcotics were counted, and accurately documented when received from the pharmacy to ensure the correct count was...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Unnecessary Medications
(Tag F0759)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was less than 5%. Physician orders were not followed for 2 (Resident #...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were not stored at the bedside for residents without self-administration rights approved by the Interdiscip...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0804
(Tag F0804)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure meals were served in a method that maintained the appearance of cold products and at temperatures that were acceptable ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation, interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure food items stored in the freezer were covered, sealed, and dated to minimize the potential for food borne illness for r...
Read full inspector narrative →
Apr 2023
8 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Safe Environment
(Tag F0584)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident personal hygiene items were stored in a sanitary man...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0604
(Tag F0604)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to document the medical symptoms that required the use of a restraint; failed to demonstrate ongoing monitoring and evaluation fo...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to complete a Comprehensive Care Plan to include care for indwelling catheters for 1 (Resident #74) of 4 (Residents #10, #70, #7...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0679
(Tag F0679)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide activities designed to meet the interests and support the physical, mental and psychosocial wellbeing of each residen...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0757
(Tag F0757)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who received antibiotics did not receive them for an excessive duration, without adequate monitoring and ind...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to obtain a Physician's Order for supplemental oxygen before administering it to a resident for 1 (Resident #31) of 9 (Residents...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0725
(Tag F0725)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe staffing levels were maintained for 2 (Residents #1 and #10) of 30 (Residents #1, #2, #3, #4, #7, #10, #20, #21, ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff washed their hands or changed gloves between residents ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
- • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Arkansas facilities.
- • 22 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
About This Facility
What is Lake Hamilton Health And Rehab's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns LAKE HAMILTON HEALTH AND REHAB an overall rating of 4 out of 5 stars, which is considered above average nationally. Within Arkansas, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.
How is Lake Hamilton Health And Rehab Staffed?
CMS rates LAKE HAMILTON HEALTH AND REHAB's staffing level at 3 out of 5 stars, which is average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 54%, compared to the Arkansas average of 46%. RN turnover specifically is 70%, which is notably high. RNs provide skilled clinical oversight, so turnover in this role can affect medical care quality.
What Have Inspectors Found at Lake Hamilton Health And Rehab?
State health inspectors documented 22 deficiencies at LAKE HAMILTON HEALTH AND REHAB during 2023 to 2025. These included: 22 with potential for harm.
Who Owns and Operates Lake Hamilton Health And Rehab?
LAKE HAMILTON HEALTH AND REHAB is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by CENTRAL ARKANSAS NURSING CENTERS, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 84 certified beds and approximately 75 residents (about 89% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in HOT SPRINGS, Arkansas.
How Does Lake Hamilton Health And Rehab Compare to Other Arkansas Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Arkansas, LAKE HAMILTON HEALTH AND REHAB's overall rating (4 stars) is above the state average of 3.1, staff turnover (54%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (3 stars) is at the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Lake Hamilton Health And Rehab?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"
Is Lake Hamilton Health And Rehab Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, LAKE HAMILTON HEALTH AND REHAB has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 4-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Arkansas. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Lake Hamilton Health And Rehab Stick Around?
LAKE HAMILTON HEALTH AND REHAB has a staff turnover rate of 54%, which is 7 percentage points above the Arkansas average of 46%. Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was Lake Hamilton Health And Rehab Ever Fined?
LAKE HAMILTON HEALTH AND REHAB has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.
Is Lake Hamilton Health And Rehab on Any Federal Watch List?
LAKE HAMILTON HEALTH AND REHAB is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.