The Blossoms at the Village Rehab & Nursing Center
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
The Blossoms at the Village Rehab & Nursing Center has a Trust Grade of C, which means it is average and positioned in the middle of the pack among nursing homes. It ranks #136 out of 218 facilities in Arkansas, placing it in the bottom half, and #7 out of 9 in Garland County, indicating that only two local options are rated better. The facility is improving, having reduced issues from 14 in 2023 to 4 in 2024. Staffing is average with a 3/5 rating and a turnover rate of 59%, which is around the state's average, but it has concerning RN coverage, being lower than 91% of facilities in Arkansas. There have been no fines on record, which is a positive sign, but there are notable concerns regarding hygiene practices; for example, dietary staff have been observed not washing their hands before handling food, which risks foodborne illness for residents. Additionally, there were issues with the facility not adequately assessing residents’ ability to self-administer medications, which could compromise their safety and independence. Overall, while there are some strengths, families should be aware of the weaknesses in hygiene and medication management.
- Trust Score
- C
- In Arkansas
- #136/218
- Safety Record
- Low Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Better
- Staff Stability ⚠ Watch
- 59% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Arkansas facilities.
- Skilled Nurses ⚠ Watch
- Each resident gets only 13 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Arkansas. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 24 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
Facility shows strength in fire safety.
The Bad
Near Arkansas average (3.1)
Meets federal standards, typical of most facilities
12pts above Arkansas avg (46%)
Frequent staff changes - ask about care continuity
11 points above Arkansas average of 48%
The Ugly 24 deficiencies on record
Aug 2024
4 deficiencies
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0554
(Tag F0554)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observations, interviews, record review, facility document review, and facility policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to assess for, obtain physician's order for, and care...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure an unattended medication cart was not left unlocked and keys unattended.
The findings include:
On 08/15/24 at 9:35 AM, the Surveyor...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Through observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure food brought in for residents was properly labeled, food items received had both open and expiration dates, and food se...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observations, interviews, record review, facility document review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure hand hygiene was performed during medication administration, faile...
Read full inspector narrative →
Nov 2023
11 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0554
(Tag F0554)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure resident without self-administration approved by the Interdisciplinary Team [IDT]. This failed practice affected 1 resi...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0646
(Tag F0646)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Deficiency Text Not Available
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Resident Rights
(Tag F0550)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
.Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure residents who reside on the secure unit were fed in a manner that provided dignity to each resident. This included standing over resid...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0568
(Tag F0568)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received an individual financial record statement quarterly for 1 (Resident #18) of 82 residents. This failed practice had...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0569
(Tag F0569)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
F569
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Medicaid recipient residents and/or their responsible parties were notified when their resident trust balance was within $200 o...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0577
(Tag F0577)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure state survey results, and contact information for the ombudsman, and the Office of Long-Term Care [OLTC] was readily av...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that resident chairs were free of tears, exposing the foam cushion in the smoking area to ensure an environment free of...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0692
(Tag F0692)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure water was accessible and provided for 1 (Resident #46) of 5 sampled residents ( R#40, #44, #46,#61,#65), who required a...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0804
(Tag F0804)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure meals were served in a method that maintained t...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff washed and/or sanitized their hands during meal service on the facility's 'special secured unit to prevent cross...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure dietary staff washed their hands before handling clean equipment or food items to prevent potential food borne illness for residents w...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jul 2023
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the medication cart on the Secure Unit was locked and medications were not left out on top of the medication cart unsupervised. This f...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jun 2023
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Pressure Ulcer Prevention
(Tag F0686)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure orders for twice daily wound care for a resident unstageable pressure ulcer to the left ischium was implemented when o...
Read full inspector narrative →
Feb 2023
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0655
(Tag F0655)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure a Baseline Care Plan was completed with the minimum necessary...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jul 2022
6 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Resident Rights
(Tag F0550)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure privacy and dignity was maintained by providing a privacy bag for a foley catheter for 1 Resident (Resident #84) of the ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0657
(Tag F0657)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to conduct, and invite the resident or their representative to participate in, Care Plan meetings to develop and revise the resident's Care Pl...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Transfer Notice
(Tag F0623)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify the resident or representative in writing the reason for tra...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
3. Resident #43 was admitted with a Diagnosis of Unspecified Dementia without Behavioral Disturbance. According to the Quarterly MDS with a 05/22/22 ARD documented resident scored a 12 (7-12 indicates...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0885
(Tag F0885)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to inform the residents and/or their representatives by 5:00 PM. the next day following the occurrence of a single confirmed COVID-19 infectio...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure dietary staff washed their hands between dirty and clean tasks and before handling clean equipment or food items to pre...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Why is there high staff turnover? How do you retain staff?"
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
- • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Arkansas facilities.
- • 24 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
- • Grade C (55/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
- • 59% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
About This Facility
What is The Blossoms At The Village Rehab & Nursing Center's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns The Blossoms at the Village Rehab & Nursing Center an overall rating of 3 out of 5 stars, which is considered average nationally. Within Arkansas, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This mid-range rating indicates the facility meets federal standards but may have areas for improvement.
How is The Blossoms At The Village Rehab & Nursing Center Staffed?
CMS rates The Blossoms at the Village Rehab & Nursing Center's staffing level at 3 out of 5 stars, which is average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 59%, which is 12 percentage points above the Arkansas average of 46%. High turnover can affect care consistency as new staff learn residents' individual needs. RN turnover specifically is 56%, which is notably high. RNs provide skilled clinical oversight, so turnover in this role can affect medical care quality.
What Have Inspectors Found at The Blossoms At The Village Rehab & Nursing Center?
State health inspectors documented 24 deficiencies at The Blossoms at the Village Rehab & Nursing Center during 2022 to 2024. These included: 24 with potential for harm.
Who Owns and Operates The Blossoms At The Village Rehab & Nursing Center?
The Blossoms at the Village Rehab & Nursing Center is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 101 certified beds and approximately 92 residents (about 91% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in HOT SPRINGS, Arkansas.
How Does The Blossoms At The Village Rehab & Nursing Center Compare to Other Arkansas Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Arkansas, The Blossoms at the Village Rehab & Nursing Center's overall rating (3 stars) is below the state average of 3.1, staff turnover (59%) is significantly higher than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (3 stars) is at the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting The Blossoms At The Village Rehab & Nursing Center?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "How do you ensure continuity of care given staff turnover, and what is your staff retention strategy?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's high staff turnover rate.
Is The Blossoms At The Village Rehab & Nursing Center Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, The Blossoms at the Village Rehab & Nursing Center has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 3-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Arkansas. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at The Blossoms At The Village Rehab & Nursing Center Stick Around?
Staff turnover at The Blossoms at the Village Rehab & Nursing Center is high. At 59%, the facility is 12 percentage points above the Arkansas average of 46%. Registered Nurse turnover is particularly concerning at 56%. RNs handle complex medical decisions and coordinate care — frequent RN changes can directly impact care quality. High turnover means new staff may not know residents' individual needs, medications, or preferences. It can also be disorienting for residents, especially those with dementia who rely on familiar faces. Families should ask: What is causing the turnover? What retention programs are in place? How do you ensure care continuity during staff transitions?
Was The Blossoms At The Village Rehab & Nursing Center Ever Fined?
The Blossoms at the Village Rehab & Nursing Center has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.
Is The Blossoms At The Village Rehab & Nursing Center on Any Federal Watch List?
The Blossoms at the Village Rehab & Nursing Center is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.