AVIATA AT SPRING HILL

12170 CORTEZ BLVD, BROOKSVILLE, FL 34613 (352) 597-5100
For profit - Limited Liability company 120 Beds AVIATA HEALTH GROUP Data: November 2025 3 Immediate Jeopardy citations
Trust Grade
34/100
#172 of 690 in FL
Last Inspection: April 2025

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

Aviata at Spring Hill has received a Trust Grade of F, indicating significant concerns about the facility's overall quality. Ranking #172 out of 690 in Florida places it in the top half of state facilities, and it is the best option among six in Hernando County. The facility's trend is stable, with nine reported issues each year for 2024 and 2025. Staffing is rated 2 out of 5 stars, which is below average, but turnover is relatively low at 38%, better than the state average. Notably, there have been critical incidents involving unqualified staff administering intravenous medications, raising serious safety concerns for residents. Despite these weaknesses, the absence of fines and a strong quality measure rating of 5 out of 5 are positive aspects to consider.

Trust Score
F
34/100
In Florida
#172/690
Top 24%
Safety Record
High Risk
Review needed
Inspections
Holding Steady
9 → 9 violations
Staff Stability
○ Average
38% turnover. Near Florida's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
Penalties
✓ Good
No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Florida facilities.
Skilled Nurses
⚠ Watch
Each resident gets only 22 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Florida. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
Violations
⚠ Watch
26 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
★★★★☆
4.0
Overall Rating
★★☆☆☆
2.0
Staff Levels
★★★★★
5.0
Care Quality
★★★☆☆
3.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2024: 9 issues
2025: 9 issues

The Good

  • 5-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record
  • Staff turnover below average (38%)

    10 points below Florida average of 48%

Facility shows strength in quality measures, fire safety.

The Bad

Staff Turnover: 38%

Near Florida avg (46%)

Typical for the industry

Chain: AVIATA HEALTH GROUP

Part of a multi-facility chain

Ask about local staffing decisions and management

The Ugly 26 deficiencies on record

3 life-threatening
Apr 2025 9 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Assessment Accuracy (Tag F0641)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were accurate for 3 of 7 ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were accurate for 3 of 7 residents reviewed, Residents #28, #30, and #105. Findings include: 1) Review of Resident #105's progress note dated 1/30/2025 at 7:53 AM read, EMS [Emergency Medical Service] called for emergent transfer to local ER [Emergency Room] for evaluation and treatment. Review of Discharge Return Anticipated MDS assessment dated [DATE] showed the resident was discharged to home/community under Section A- 2105: Discharge Status. During an interview on 4/23/2025 at 9:30 AM, Staff C, MDS Registered Nurse (RN), and Staff D, RN, stated, There is an MDS discrepancy since section A reads that resident is coded that resident discharged to home on 1/30/2025, however, the progress notes show that the APRN [Advanced Practice Registered Nurse] sent [Resident #105's name] to hospital on 1/30/2025. During an interview on 4/24/2025 at 9:16 AM, the Director of Nursing confirmed there was an MDS discrepancy on Section A- discharge status. 2) Review of Resident #28's physician order dated 3/20/2025 read, Sertraline HCl Oral Tablet 25 MG (Sertraline HCl), Give 50 mg by mouth one time a day for depression. Review of Resident #28's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] showed the resident was not receiving antidepressant medications under Section N- Medications. During an interview on 4/24/2025 at 1:25 PM, Staff C, MDS RN, confirmed that Section N of Resident #28's MDS is incorrect. 3) Review of Resident #30's physician order dated 3/5/2025 read, Atenolol Oral Tablet 50 MG (Atenolol), Give 1 tablet by mouth every 12 hours for HTN hold, for sbp [systolic blood pressure] less than 100 or pulse less than 60. Review of Resident #30's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] did not show hypertension indicated as a diagnosis under Section I- Active Diagnoses. During an interview on 4/24/2025 at 1:25 PM, Staff C, MDS RN, confirmed that Section I of Resident #30's MDS is incorrect.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0645 (Tag F0645)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 2) Review of Resident #28's admission record showed the resident was most recently admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including m...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 2) Review of Resident #28's admission record showed the resident was most recently admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including major depressive disorder with onset date of 12/26/2024. Review of Resident #28's PASRR dated 11/27/2024 showed no mental illness documented. Review of Resident #28's physician order dated 3/20/2025 read, Sertraline HCl Oral Tablet 25 MG (Sertraline HCl), Give 50 mg by mouth one time a day for depression. Review of psychiatric progress note dated 3/20/2025 read, Medical Necessity/ Reason for Today's Visit . Follow up for Medication and Behavior management and lab review . Follow-up after recent medication change. During an interview on 4/24/2025 at 9:57 AM, the DON confirmed that the PASSR was not accurate for Resident #28. 3) Review of Resident #30's admission record showed the resident was most recently admitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses including major depressive disorder and generalized anxiety disorder with onset dates of 1/30/2025. Review of Resident #30's PASRR dated 2/16/2025 showed no mental illness documented. Review of Resident #30's physician order dated 2/17/2025 read, Trazodone HCl Oral Tablet 50 MG (Trazodone HCl), Give 1 tablet by mouth at bedtime related to major depressive disorder. Review of Resident #30's physician order dated 3/14/2025 read, Paroxetine HCl Oral Tablet 20 MG (Paroxetine HCl), Give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day related to panic disorder (episodic paroxysmal anxiety), major depressive disorder. During an interview on 4/24/2025 at 9:57 AM, the DON confirmed that the PASSR was not accurate for Resident #30. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure an accurate Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) was completed for 3 of 5 residents reviewed for mood and behavior, Residents #28, #30, and #256. Findings include: 1) Review of Resident #256's admission record showed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder and major depressive disorder with onset dates of 4/9/2025. Review of Resident #256's PASRR dated 3/25/2025 showed no mental illness documented. Review of Resident #256's physician order dated 4/10/2025 read, Sertraline HCl Oral Tablet 100 MG [milligrams] (Sertraline HCl), Give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for depression. Review of Resident #256's physician order date 4/17/2025 read, Quetiapine Fumarate Oral Tablet 50 MG (Quetiapine Fumarate), Give 50 mg by mouth at bedtime related to schizoaffective disorder, depressive type . home med [medication], patient declines GDR [gradual dose reduction]. Review of Resident #256's psych admission note dated 4/15/2025 read, Chief Complaint: I'm ready to go home. History of Present Illness: This patient is a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to this facility on 4/9/2025 with a diagnosis of traumatic subdural hemorrhage without loss of consciousness. Today's visit: The patient has a history of depression, schizoaffective disorder (depressive type with disorganized thinking and hallucinations), and prior opioid and nicotine dependence. She reports no anxiety with her current drug regimen but admits to depression related to adjustment, due to being away from her family and home. During an interview on 4/24/2025 at 8:43 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated, admission will ask for the screening, but they do not review them. I review them after resident is admitted in about 7 days. [Resident #256's name] screening needs to be revised to include the schizoaffective and major depressive diagnosis. Review of the facility policy and procedure titled Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASSR) with the last review date of 1/20/2025 read, Policy: The center will assure that all Serious Mentally Ill (SMI) and Intellectually Disabled (ID) residents receive appropriate pre-admission screening according to Federal/State guidelines. The purpose is to ensure that the residents with SMI or are ID receive the care and services they need in the most appropriate setting. Procedure: 1. It is the responsibility of the center to assess and assure that the appropriate preadmission screening, either Level I or Level II, are conducted and results obtained prior to admission and placed in the appropriate section of the resident's medical record.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Comprehensive Care Plan (Tag F0656)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan for 1 of 4 resident...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for oxygen therapy, Resident #37. Findings include: Review of Resident #37's admission record showed the resident was initially admitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), heart failure, presence of cardiac pacemaker, syncope and collapse, anemia, atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery, chest pain, and peripheral vascular disease. During an observation on 4/22/2025 at 8:11 AM, Resident #37 was sitting on the side of the bed with an oxygen concentrator set at 2 liters and the oxygen tubing was lying on the ground. During an interview on 4/22/2025 at 8:11 AM, Resident #37 stated, I removed the oxygen, and I put it on whenever I need to. Review of Resident #37's physician order dated 1/27/2025 read, Oxygen As Needed (PRN) 2 L [liters] via nasal cannula. Review of Resident #37's physician order dated 7/21/2024 read, May self-administer medications. Review of Resident #37's care plan dated 1/31/2025 showed no focus for oxygen administration and self-administration of medications. Review of Resident #37's weights and vitals summary from January 1, 2025 through April 22, 2025 showed the resident received oxygen via nasal cannula on 1/12/2025, 1/13/2025, 1/16/2025, 1/18/2025, 1/23/2025, 1/27/2025, 2/1/2025, 2/6/2025, 2/9/2025, 2/10/2025, 2/13/2025, 3/26/2025, 3/27/2025 and 4/1/2025. During an interview on 4/22/2025 at 3:22 PM, Staff C, Minimum Data Set (MDS) Registered Nurse (RN), confirmed that there was no care plan written for oxygen therapy. During an interview on 4/23/2025 at 9:46 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed that Resident #37 did not have a care plan for oxygen or for self-administration of medications, and the resident should be care planned for both. Review of the facility policy and procedure titled Plans of Care with the last review date of 1/20/2025 read, Policy: An individualized person-centered plan of care will be established by the interdisciplinary team (IDT) with the resident and/or resident representative(s) to the extent practicable and updated in accordance with state and federal regulatory requirements . Procedure . Review, update and/or revise the comprehensive plan of care based on changing goals, preferences and needs of the resident and in response to current interventions after the completion of each OBRA [Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act] MDS assessment (except discharge assessments, and as needed. The interdisciplinary team shall ensure the plan of care addresses any resident needs and that the plan is oriented toward attaining or maintaining the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received appropriate wound care for 2 of 6 residents reviewed for skin and wound care, Residents #65 and #40...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received appropriate wound care for 2 of 6 residents reviewed for skin and wound care, Residents #65 and #406. Findings include: 1) During an observation on 4/21/2025 at 9:16 AM, Resident #406 was lying in bed. There was a gauze island bordered dressing on the resident's left forearm, which was dated 4/20/2025 (Photographic evidence obtained). During an observation on 4/22/2025 at 9:30 AM, Resident #406 was lying supine in bed, wearing blue foam heal protectors. There was a gauze bordered dressing on the resident's left forearm, which was dated 4/20/2025. During an observation on 4/22/2025 at 12:50 PM, Resident #406 was sitting in his wheelchair in his room. There was a foam bordered dressing on the resident's left forearm, which was dated 4/22/2025 with no initials. Review of Resident #406's physician orders did not show an order for wound care for the resident's left forearm. During an interview on 4/23/2025 at 10:17 AM, Staff F, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), stated, [Resident 406's name] has orders for wound care to right lower extremity, but I don't see any for his left forearm. I don't see any change of condition notes. During an interview on 4/23/2025 at 10:47 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated, [Resident #406's name] does not have orders for wound care to the left forearm. The staff are not supposed to do wound care without having a wound care order. They are supposed to initial and date all dressings. 2) During an observation on 4/21/2025 at 11:11 AM, Resident #65 was sitting in her wheelchair in her room. There was a white gauze wrapped dressing on the resident's right arm, which had no date or initials (Photographic evidence obtained). During an observation on 4/22/2025 at 8:35 AM, Resident #65 was lying in her bed. There was a white gauze wrapped dressing on the resident's right arm, which had no date or initials. During an observation on 4/23/2025 at 8:30 AM, Resident #65 was sitting in her wheelchair in her room. There was a white gauze wrapped dressing on the resident's right arm, which had no date or initials. Review of Resident #65's physician orders did not show an order for dressing changes for the resident's right arm. During an interview on 4/23/2025 at 10:37 AM, Staff G, Registered Nurse (RN), stated, Wound care dressings should be dated. There should be orders for wound care. During an interview on 4/23/2025 at 10:50 AM, the DON stated, Dressing should be dated. [Resident #65's name] has orders for skin prep, but I do not see wound care orders to wrap with a gauze. Review of the facility policy and procedures titled Dressing, Dry/Clean with the last review date of 1/20/2025 read, Purpose: The purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for the application of dry, clean dressings. Preparation: 1. Verify that there is a physician's order for this procedure . Steps in the procedure . 17. Apply the ordered dressing and secure with tape or bordered dressing per order. (Note: Use non-allergenic tape as indicated.) Label with date and initials to top of dressing.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Respiratory Care (Tag F0695)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received appropriate oxygen therapy for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for respiratory services, Residents #406 a...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received appropriate oxygen therapy for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for respiratory services, Residents #406 and #407. Findings include: 1) During an observation on 4/21/2025 at 11:38 AM, Resident #406 was lying in bed, receiving oxygen via nasal cannula (NC) at 2 liters per minute (L/min). During an observation on 4/22/2025 at 9:30 AM, Resident #406 was lying in bed, wearing receiving oxygen via NC at 2L/min. Review of Resident #406's physician order dated 4/17/2025 read, Respiratory: Oxygen For comfort. During an interview on 4/23/2025 at 12:50 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated, We should have added 2 liters on the order. The oxygen was ordered per patient request. He wanted to be on oxygen. During an interview on 4/23/2025 at 10:17 AM, Staff F, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), stated, I do expect oxygen orders to have a flow rate, especially if they have COPD [Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease], so that we don't hyper oxygenate them. 2) During an observation on 4/21/2025 at 10:10 AM, Resident #407 was lying in bed, receiving oxygen via NC with tubing attached to an oxygen concentrator, which was set to 2 liters per minute. During an observation on 4/22/2025 at 10:30 AM, Resident #407 was lying in bed, receiving oxygen via nasal at 2 liters per minute. Review of Resident #407's physician orders showed no orders for administration of oxygen. During an interview on 4/22/2025 at 12:50 PM, the DON stated, I only see an order for O2 [oxygen] tubing changes. She [Resident #407] needs an order for O2. During an interview on 4/23/2025 at 10:40 AM, Staff G, Registered Nurse (RN), stated, There should be orders in the system when a patient is on oxygen. Usually for comfort care, we do 2 liters. Review of the facility policy and procedure titled Oxygen Therapy with the last review date of 1/20/2025 read, Policy: Oxygen therapy is the administration of a FiO2 [fraction of inspired oxygen] greater than 21% by means of various administration devices to: raise the resident's PaO2 [partial pressure of oxygen] to an acceptable baseline using the lowest FiO2, to treat hypoxemia, to decrease work of breathing, to reverse and prevent tissue hypoxia, and/or to decrease myocardial work. Procedure: Physician's order for oxygen therapy shall include: Administration modality, FiO2 or liter flow, continuous or PRN [as needed[, PRN orders must include specific guidelines as to when the resident is to use oxygen.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0698 (Tag F0698)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were assessed before and after dialysis treatments for 1 of 1 resident receiving dialysis services, Resident #39. Findings...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were assessed before and after dialysis treatments for 1 of 1 resident receiving dialysis services, Resident #39. Findings include: Review of Resident #39 Hemodialysis Communication Record dated 4/10/2025 showed no pre and post dialysis vital signs or observations documented. Review of Resident #39's Hemodialysis Communication Record dated 4/12/2025 showed no pre and post dialysis vital signs or observations documented. Review of Resident #39's Hemodialysis Communication Record dated 4/22/2025 showed no pre and post dialysis vital signs or observations documented. Review of Resident #39' records showed no hemodialysis communication documentation for 3/8/2025, 3/11/2025, 3/13/2025, 3/20/2025, 3/22/2025, 3/25/2025, 3/27/2025, 3/29/2025. Review of Resident #39's physician order dated 3/6/2025 read, Hemodialysis Tuesday, Thursday, Saturday, [name, address and phone number of local dialysis center and transportation company information] every day shift every Tue [Tuesday], Thu [Thursday], Sat [Saturday] for ESRD [End Stage Renal Disease]/Hemodialysis send a Lunch. During an interview on 4/23/2025 at 3:42 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated, For [Resident #39's name], I don't have any other communication forms for dialysis. I do not know if the nurses know to do the pre and post dialysis form. I have not educated them on it. During an interview on 4/23/2025 at 3:44 PM, Staff H, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), stated, Residents that go to dialysis have a binder, and in the form, we have to record the vitals, medications and assessment. When the residents come back, we have to assess them again and fill out the bottom portion of the form. Review of the facility policy and procedure titled Coordination of Hemodialysis Services with the last review date of 1/20/2025 read, Policy: Residents requiring an outside ESRD facility will have services coordinated by the facility. There will be communication between the facility and the ESRD facility regarding the resident. The facility will establish a Dialysis Agreement/ Arrangement if there are any residents requiring Dialysis Services. The agreement shall include how the residents [Sic.] care is to be managed. Procedure: 1. The Dialysis Communication form will be initiated by the facility for any resident going to an ESRD center for hemodialysis . 5 Nursing will complete the post dialysis information on Dialysis Communication form and file the completed form in the Resident's Clinical Record.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0761 (Tag F0761)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

3) During an observation on 4/21/2025 at 10:09 AM, Resident #407 was lying in bed, wearing a gown. There was a Dextrose 5% intravenous (IV) fluid bag running. Neither IV bag nor tubing was dated. Duri...

Read full inspector narrative →
3) During an observation on 4/21/2025 at 10:09 AM, Resident #407 was lying in bed, wearing a gown. There was a Dextrose 5% intravenous (IV) fluid bag running. Neither IV bag nor tubing was dated. During an observation on 4/22/2025 at 12:50 PM, Resident #407 was lying in bed, wearing a gown. There was a Dextrose 5% intravenous (IV) fluid bag running. Neither IV bag nor tubing was dated. During an interview on 4/23/2025 at 10:40 AM, Staff G, Registered Nurse (RN), stated, [Resident #407's name] fluid bag should be dated. I am not sure about dating the tubing because it gets discarded. During an interview on 4/23/2025 at 11:00 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated, Normally IV bag and tubing should be dated, initialed and timed. Review of the facility policy and procedure titled Intravenous Administration of Fluids and Electrolytes with the last review date of 1/20/2025 read, Policy: Staff will be knowledgeable regarding safe and aseptic administration of intravenous fluids and electrolytes for hydration. Procedure . 8. When infusion is complete . For continuous therapy: a. [NAME] solution container with label that states when bag started and approximate time of completion. b. Never write directly on the bag with ink or marker; always use a label or tape. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were secured in one of two halls (400 Hall). Findings include: 1) During an observation on 4/21/2025 at 11:25 AM, there was one bottle of antifungal powder (Miconazole Nitrate 2%) on the bedside table in Resident #3's room (Photographic evidence obtained). During an interview on 4/21/2025 at 11:25 AM, Resident #3 stated, The CNA [Certified Nursing Assistant] will put the fungal powder on my arms and legs once a day. During an observation on 4/22/2025 at 8:05 AM, there was one bottle of antifungal powder (Miconazole Nitrate 2%) on the bedside table in Resident #3's room. 2) During an observation on 4/21/2025 at 10:00 AM, there was one bottle of Equate medicated body powder, active ingredient menthol 0.15%, on the bedside table in Resident #37's room (Photographic evidence obtained). During an observation on 4/22/2025 at 8:11 AM, there was one bottle of Equate medicated body powder, active ingredient menthol 0.15%, on the bedside table in Resident #37's room. During an interview on 4/22/2025 at 8:11 AM, Resident #37 stated, I put the powder on my groin at least daily and sometimes even more when I get sweaty. During an interview on 4/22/2025 at 8:45 AM, Staff A, CNA, confirmed the medication was unsecured at the bedside and stated, I would tell the nurse, but no medication can be at the bedside. I do not apply any medications to the residents. During an interview on 4/22/2025 at 8:57 AM, Staff B, Licensed practical Nurse (LPN), stated, Medication is not allowed at the bedside. If they have been evaluated for self-administration, the medication can remain at the bedside, but the medication still needs to be locked in the drawer to make sure that the medication is secured. During an interview on 4/22/2025 at 9:11 AM, the Assistant Director of Nursing stated, Medications are not allowed at the bedside unsecure. If they have been evaluated for self-administration, the medication can remain at the bedside, but the medication still needs to be locked in the drawer to make sure that they are secure. During an interview of 4/23/2025 at 9:46 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated, The nystatin powders should not have been in the room. No medication is allowed to be stored in the room unless the resident is screened for self-administration and then the medications can be stored in the room but locked up. Review of the facility policy and procedure titled Medication Storage with the last review date of 1/20/2025 read, Policy: Medications will be stored in a manner that maintains the integrity of the product and ensures the safety of the residents and is in accordance with FL Department of Health Guidelines. Procedure: A. With the exception of Emergency Drug Kits, all mediations will be stored in a locked cabinet, cart or medication room that is accessible only to authorized personnel, as defined by facility policy.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Medical Records (Tag F0842)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

4) Review of Resident #37's physician order dated 3/28/2025 read, Insulin Glargine Subcutaneous Solution Pen-injector 100 UNIT/ML (Insulin Glargine), Inject 25 unit subcutaneously at bedtime for DM, H...

Read full inspector narrative →
4) Review of Resident #37's physician order dated 3/28/2025 read, Insulin Glargine Subcutaneous Solution Pen-injector 100 UNIT/ML (Insulin Glargine), Inject 25 unit subcutaneously at bedtime for DM, HOLD if BGM [Blood Glucose Monitoring] Less than 120, AND Inject 15 unit subcutaneously in the morning for DM2 hold for BG less than 100. Review of Resident #37's MAR for April 2025 showed blood sugar level of 94 on 4/8/2025 with 15 units of Insulin Glargine administered. During an interview on 4/23/2025 at 9:40 AM, Staff E, Registered Nurse (RN), stated, I reviewed the chart, and I had documented the blood sugar of 94 twice in error. I documented that I gave the insulin. I did not give the insulin in the AM [morning time] on 4/8/25. During an interview on 4/23/2025 at 3:28 PM, the Assistant Director of Nursing stated, If a medication is not given, then an explanation should be placed on why the medication was held. Physician orders are to be followed and if an error occurs in the chart. The error needs to be corrected. Review of the facility policy and procedure titled Medication-Oral Administration of with the last review date of 1/20/2025 read, Procedure . Review physician order . Review the MAR or EMAR [electronic Medication Administration Record] should there be any uncertainties verify the MAR or EMAR with the Physician's Order Sheet (POS) and seek clarification as indicated . Document the administration and acceptance or decline of all medications administered. This may include . b. When documenting in the EMAR, the nurse will document immediately prior to administration and or immediately post administration based on preferred individual professional practice of the nurse. Should the resident decline or be unable to accept the medication this will need to be documented following standard protocol. Review of the facility policy and procedure titled Insulin Administration-Injection Pens with the last review date of 1/20/2025 read Procedure . Document in medical record. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate medical records for 4 of 7 residents reviewed for medication administration, Residents #37, #39, #256, and #407. Findings include: 1) Review of Resident #256's physician order dated 4/14/2025 read, Insulin Lispro (1 Unit Dial) Subcutaneous Solution Pen-injector 100 UNIT/ML [milliliter] (Insulin Lispro), Inject as per sliding scale: if 120-150=1; 151-200=2 units; 201-250= 4 units; 251-300= 6 units, subcutaneously before meals and at bedtime related to type 2 diabetes mellitus with hypoglycemia with coma. Review of Resident #256's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for April 2025 for administration of Insulin Lispro using a sliding scale showed blood sugar level of 123 and code 12 (Insulin not required) on 4/15/2025 at 9:00 PM, blood sugar level of 387 and code 1 [Held per parameters] on 4/18/2025 at 9:00 PM, blood sugar level of 90 and code 12 on 4/19/2025 at 4:00 PM, blood sugar level of 480 and code 11 on 4/21/2025 at 9:00 PM, and blood sugar level of 322 and code 11 on 4/22/2025 at 6:00 AM. Review of Resident #256's physician order dated 4/15/2025 read, Insulin Lispro Injection Solution 100 UNIT/ML (Insulin Lispro), Inject 5 unit subcutaneously with meals for DM [Diabetes Mellitus]. Review of Resident #256's MAR for April 2025 for administration of Insulin Lispro 5 units showed blood sugar level of 90 and code 12 on 4/19/2025 at 4:30 PM, blood sugar documented as NA (Not Applicable) on 4/20/2025 at 6:30 AM and at 4:30 PM, and on 4/22/2025 at 6:30 AM. During an interview on 4/22/2025 at 1:49 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated, I spoke to [Staff I, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)'s name] and she stated she gave [Resident #256's name] insulin. She does not know why it was not documented accurately. During an interview on 4/23/2025 at 8:15 AM, the DON stated, I spoke to [Staff N, LPN's name] and he stated he documented NA [for Resident #256's blood sugar level] because he had documented the blood sugar previously. I expect the staff to document the blood sugar every time it is required on the medication administration record even if it is multiple times. During an interview on 4/23/2025 at 8:56 AM, Staff K, LPN, stated, [Resident #256's name] felt uncomfortable with her blood sugar and felt more comfortable without insulin coverage and I consulted with the physician. I did not document the conversation with the physician. During an interview on 4/23/2025 at 9:42 PM, Medical Doctor #1 stated, [Resident #256's name] has a sliding scale in addition to 5-unit standing order. The staff contact me and notify me if they will be holding the medication when it is out of parameters. 2) Review of Resident #407's physician order dated 4/9/2025 read, Insulin Glargine Subcutaneous Solution Pen-injector 100 unit/ml (Insulin Glargine), Inject 40 unit subcutaneously two times a day for DM. Review of Resident #407's MAR for April 2025 for administration of Insulin Glargine 40 units showed no entry documented on 4/16/2025 at 6:00 AM, code 12 on 4/17/2025 at 6:00 AM, and code 11 on 4/20/2025 at 6:00 AM. Review of Resident #407's physician order dated 4/9/2025 read, Novolin R FlexPen Injection Solution Pen-Injector 100 unit/ML (Insulin Regular (Human)), Inject as per sliding scale: if 151-200=1; 201-250= 2 unit; 251-300= 3 unit, subcutaneously before meals and at bedtime for DM. Review of Resident #407's MAR for April 2025 for administration of Novolin R Flex Pen showed no entry documented on 4/16/2025 at 6:00 AM. Review of Resident #407's progress notes for April 2025 did not document notification to the provider regarding blood sugar or insulin coverage. During an interview on 4/23/2025 at 8:15 AM, the DON stated, I spoke to [Staff I, LPN's name] and she stated [Resident #407's name] blood sugar was low, and she held the long-acting insulin, but did not recall if she contacted the provider. She stated normally she will contact the provider regarding holding any medication. Staff are expected to call the provider and get new orders or document the communication to the provider. During an interview on 4/23/2025 at 10:05 AM, Staff J, LPN, stated, [Resident #407's name] Long acting was given, and the short acting was held due to parameters. I do not know why it did not show in the system. During an interview on 4/23/2025 at 9:42 PM, Medical Doctor #1 stated, We follow [Resident #407's name] very closely regarding her diabetes. Nurses normally contact me if it is not by phone, it is in person when I am in the facility. The staff will call me if they are holding her insulin. She [Resident #407] sometimes runs pretty low. 3) Review of Resident #39's physician order dated 3/5/2025 read, Insulin Aspart Subcutaneous Solution Pen-Injector 100 UNIT/ML (Insulin Aspart), Inject as per sliding scale: if 0-150=0; 151-200=2; 201-250=4; 251-300=6; 301-350=8; 351-400=10; 401 + =10 give 10 units and call MD [Medical Doctor] for further instructions, subcutaneously before meals for DM. Review of Resident #39's MAR for April 2025 for administration of Insulin Aspart showed blood sugar levels of 540 on 4/8/2025 at 4:30 PM, 545 on 4/15/2025 at 11:30 AM, 424 on 4/16/2025 at 11:30 AM and 431 at 4:30 PM, 497 on 4/19/2025 at 11:30 AM and 411 at 4:30 PM, and 437 on 4/20/2025 at 11:30 AM. Review of Resident #39's progress notes for April 2025 did not show notifications to the provider regarding blood sugar levels or insulin coverage. Review of Resident #39's physician order dated 3/5/2025 read, Insulin Aspart Flex Pen Subcutaneous Solution Pen Injector 100 UNIT/ML (Insulin Aspart), Inject 5 unit subcutaneously before meals for diabetes mellitus. Review of Resident #39's MAR for April 2025 for administration of Insulin Aspart 5 units showed code 12 on 4/11/2025 at 6:30 AM, code 11 on 4/20/2025 at 6:30 AM, and code 12 on 4/21/2025 at 6:30 AM. Review of Resident #39's physician order dated 3/10/2025 read, Insulin Glargine Subcutaneous Solution Pen Injector 100 unit/ML (Insulin Glargine), Inject 15 units subcutaneously two times a day for DM. Review of Resident #39's MAR for April 2025 for administration of Insulin Glargine 15 units showed code 12 on 4/11/2025 at 6:00 AM. During an interview on 4/22/2025 at 3:49 PM, the DON stated, I spoke to [Staff B, LPN's name], who stated that she contacted [Medical Doctor #2s's name] about [Resident #39's name] blood glucose being over 400 on 4/8/25, and [Medical Doctor #2's name] did not give any new orders at that time. [Staff B's name] stated that typically she would document the notification of the provider in the progress notes, and must have forgotten to document. During an interview on 4/22/2025 at 3:50 PM, the DON stated, I spoke to [Staff I, LPN's name], who stated that she spoke with [Medical Doctor #3' name] regarding [Resident #39's name] blood sugar being over 400 on 4/15, and 4/16 that he was notified, and there were no new orders. During an interview on 4/22/2025 at 3:51 PM, the DON stated, I spoke with [Staff L, LPN's name], who stated that a new order for insulin was added on 4/20 at 17:50 [5:50 PM] after reviewing 4/19 and 4/20 glucose results with MD. During an interview on 4/23/2025 at 9:00 AM, Medical Doctor #3 stated, The nurses call the concierge line and they have access to secured text line and frequently text any concerns to me. Communication from the staff has been good. I have thousands of patients and cannot remember if I was called about that specific patient on that day. Normally the staff call. I do expect nurses to call me if they are ever uncomfortable or have concerns about a patient. During an interview on 4/23/2025 at 9:14 AM, Staff M, LPN, stated, Saturday night we tried and sent a text message. I might have contacted the provider. I am not sure. Usually when I hold the insulin, I normally will call the doctor and let him know.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Antibiotic Stewardship (Tag F0881)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to establish antibiotic stewardship program to monitor antibiotic use for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for antibiotic use, Resident...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to establish antibiotic stewardship program to monitor antibiotic use for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for antibiotic use, Resident #406. Findings include: Review of Resident #406's physician order dated 4/17/2025 read, Erythromycin Ophthalmic Ointment 5 MG (milligram)/GM (gram), Instill 1 application in left eye three times a day for eye infection . Order Status: Active. Start Date: 04/17/2025. End date: [Blank]. During an observation on 4/23/2025 at 8:13 AM, Resident #406 was sitting up in bed, eating breakfast. Resident #406's left eye was not red or drooping, and no drainage was visible. During an interview on 4/23/2025 at 10:17 AM, Staff F, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), stated, I think the Erythromycin antibiotic ointment is ordered continuously for him and was something he was using at home for drooping, draining left eye. It has an indefinite end date. During an interview on 4/23/2025 at 10:47 AM, the DON (Director of Nursing) stated, Antibiotics normally have a stop date. We are waiting for the provider to see [Resident #406's name] before we put in a stop date for his erythromycin ointment. When I saw his left eye on Monday, it still had a lot of drainage. During an interview on 4/23/2025 at 3:05 PM, the Infection Preventionist stated, Usually antibiotic orders have an end date. Everything should have an end date. When [Resident #406's name] came in his eye showed signs of an eye infection and now he [Resident #406] started to clear up and is doing better. [Resident #406's name] came in with that order. Review of the facility policy and procedure titled Antibiotic Stewardship -Orders for Antibiotics with the last review date of 01/20/2025 read, Policy Statement: Antibiotics will be prescribed and administered to residents under the guidance of the facility's Antibiotic Stewardship Program and in conjunction with the facility's general policy for Medication Utilization and Prescribing. Policy Interpretation and Implementation . 2. If an antibiotic is indicated, prescribers will provide complete antibiotic orders including the following elements . d. duration of treatment: (1) start and stop date or (2) number of days of therapy.
Feb 2024 9 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0638 (Tag F0638)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete the quarterly assessment in a timely manner for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for minimum data set assessments, Resident #59. Finding...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete the quarterly assessment in a timely manner for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for minimum data set assessments, Resident #59. Findings include: Review of Resident #59's Minimum Data Set (MDS) records showed the next quarterly assessment with assessment reference date of 12/29/2023 was overdue for 26 days. During an interview on 2/7/2024 at 9:40 AM, the MDS Coordinator stated, [Resident #59's name] quarterly assessment is overdue 26 days. Review of the facility policy and procedures titled MDS last reviewed on 1/24/2024 showed the policy read, Policy: The center conducts initial and periodical standardized, comprehensive and reproducible assessments no less than every three months for each resident including, but not limited to, the collection of data regarding functional status, strengths, weaknesses and preferences using the federal and/or state required RAI. Procedure: Maintain all resident assessments completed within the previous 15 months in the resident's active clinical record or in a centralized location that is easily and readily accessible.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Comprehensive Care Plan (Tag F0656)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for 1 of 6 residents reviewed, Re...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for 1 of 6 residents reviewed, Resident #74. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #74's admission record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis of malignant neoplasm of brain. Review of Resident #74's palliative medicine consult note dated 6/29/2022 revealed the resident was referred for palliative care services related to diagnoses that included malignant neoplasm of brain, dysphagia, aphasia, and physical deconditioning. Review of Resident #74's palliative care note dated 1/24/2024 revealed the resident continued in receiving palliative care services for the active diagnoses that included adult failure to thrive syndrome, with the medical interventions that included comfort interventions only. Review of Resident #74's care plan with the start date of 12/21/2023 revealed no focus area with goals and interventions related to palliative care. During an interview on 2/7/2024 at 10:28 AM, the Minimum Data Set Coordinator confirmed that palliative care services had not been included in Resident #74's care plan. She confirmed palliative care services should have been included in Resident #74's comprehensive care plan.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that residents received care and services consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 of 5 residents rece...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that residents received care and services consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 of 5 residents receiving intravenous medication, Resident #216. Findings include: During an observation on 2/7/2024 at 8:11 AM, Staff B, License Practical Nurse (LPN), entered Resident #216's room and performed hand hygiene. Staff B primed Resident #216's intravenous (IV) tubing and sanitized the needleless connector. Staff B did not prime the normal saline flush syringe or check blood return before flushing the peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) line. During an interview on 2/7/2024 at 8:27 AM, Staff A, LPN, Unit Manager, stated, The nurse should have primed the normal saline syringe before administering it. During an interview on 2/7/2024 at 8:35 AM, Staff B, LPN, stated, I just took the IV refresher course and I don't remember them saying we needed to do that. I always stop short of administering the whole syringe definitely. The class was very detailed but don't remember them mentioning that. Review of Resident #216's physician order dated 2/6/2024 showed the order read, Cefepime HCl [Hydrochloride] Intravenous Solution 2 GM [gram]/100 ML [milliliter]. Use 2 grams intravenously every 12 hours for wound infection until 2/11/2024. Review of Resident #216's physician order dated 2/2/2024 showed the order read, IVs: Flush PICC Line with10 ml of normal saline every shift and as needed. Review of the facility policy and procedures titled Medication Administration with the last review date of 1/24/2024 showed the policy read, Procedure . 8. Prime administration set, if not pre-primed by pharmacy . 10. Maintaining asepsis, attach flush syringe to needleless connector. Aspirate the catheter to obtain positive blood return to verify vascular access patency. Flush with prescribed flushing agent. Remove syringe.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Respiratory Care (Tag F0695)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received respiratory care consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 of 3 residents reviewed f...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received respiratory care consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for oxygen therapy, Resident #319. Findings include: During an observation on 2/5/2024 at 12:50 PM, Resident #319 was lying in bed with oxygen running at 4 liters per minute via nasal cannula. During an observation on 2/6/2024 at 8:15 AM, Resident #319 was lying in bed with oxygen running at 4 liters per minute via nasal cannula. Review of Resident #319's physician order dated 2/4/2024 showed the order read, Oxygen As Needed PRN 3l [as needed 3 liters] via nasal cannula for shortness of breath as needed. Review of Resident #319's care plan initiated on 1/24/2024 showed the care plan read, Focus: The resident has oxygen therapy r/t [related to] COPD [Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease] . Interventions . Oxygen Setting: O2 [Oxygen] via nasal prongs @ 3L [at 3 liters] as ordered. Humidified (as ordered). During an observation on 2/7/2024 at 8:35 AM with Staff A, Unit Manager, Resident #319 was lying in bed with oxygen running at 4 liters per minute via nasal cannula. During an interview on 2/7/2024 at 8:35 AM, Staff A, Unit Manager, stated, [Resident #319's name] oxygen orders are for 3 liters per minute. I will go back in and correct the flow rate. Review of the facility policy and procedures titled Oxygen Therapy with the last review date of 1/24/2024 showed the policy read, Policy: In the event that a resident requires the use of oxygen to manage a medical condition, The Company will offer assistance as ordered by the resident's physician. Only enrichers, concentrators, and liquid oxygen will be used. Oxygen therapy must be reviewed by the nurse on a regular basis and all staff members offering assistance with oxygen must be properly trained. Procedure: 1. The nurse will organize the oxygen therapy as ordered by the resident's physician.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Medication Errors (Tag F0758)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure orders for psychotropic drugs were limited to 14 days for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications, Resident #74. Findi...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure orders for psychotropic drugs were limited to 14 days for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications, Resident #74. Findings include: Review of Resident #74's physician order dated 1/19/2024 showed the order read, Alprazolam Oral Tablet 0.5 MG [milligrams] (Alprazolam) *Controlled Drug* Give 1 tablet by mouth every 3 hours as needed for restlessness agitation Under the care of [NAME] Program Palliative Care. Review of Resident #74's Medication Administration Record for January 2024 revealed the resident received Alprazolam Oral Tablet 0.5 MG on 1/19/2024. Review of Resident #74's Medication Administration Record for February 2024 revealed the resident received Alprazolam Oral Tablet 0.5 MG on 2/1/2024, 2/2/2024 (two doses), 2/4/2024, and 2/6/2024 (two doses). Review of Resident #74's psychiatric progress notes dated 1/19/2024 and 1/30/2024 revealed no documentation indicating the attending physician or prescribing practitioner had specified the duration of Resident #74's PRN [as needed] anti-anxiety medication. Review of Resident #74's most recent psychiatric progress notes, dated 1/30/2024 and 1/19/2024, failed to reveal documentation attending physician or prescribing practitioner had specified the duration of Resident #74's PRN antianxiety medication. During an interview on 2/7/2024 at 9:55 AM, Staff A, Licensed Practical Nurse, confirmed that Resident #74 had been prescribed with an antianxiety medication on 1/19/2024, and the resident's antianxiety medication prescription had exceeded 14 days. Review of the facility policy and procedures titled Medication Management- Psychotropic Medications last reviewed on 1/24/2024, showed the policy read, Procedure . 7. PRN physician order(s) for psychotropic medications are limited to 14 days. Except, if the physician or prescribing practitioner believes that it is appropriate to extend beyond 14 days and documents the rationale in the medical record and indicates the duration of the PRN order.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff performed hand hygiene during tracheostomy care for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for tracheostomy care, Resident #32...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff performed hand hygiene during tracheostomy care for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for tracheostomy care, Resident #32, and during medication administration for 2 of 6 residents reviewed for medication administration, Residents #74 and #69, to prevent possible spread of infection and communicable diseases. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #32's physician order dated 10/13/2022 read, Change trach [Tracheostomy] q [every] 30 days. Review of Resident #32's physician order dated 9/18/2019 read, Tracheostomy- Access skin around stoma site and under ties during trach care. During an observation on 2/7/2024 at 11:40 AM, Staff F, License Practical Nurse (LPN), removed Resident #32's oxygen mask, inner cannula, and gauze from the tracheostomy site. Staff F removed her surgical gloves and without performing hand hygiene proceeded to open the sterile tracheostomy kit. Staff F donned new sterile gloves and started to clean the tracheostomy plate and surrounding areas. Without changing gloves or performing hand hygiene, Staff F proceeded to open a new inner cannula and placed the inner cannula into the outer cannula with the same gloves she used to clean the tracheostomy site. Staff F touched the inner cannula portion that would be inserted into the stoma. Review of the facility policy and procedure tilted Tracheostomy Care with the last review date of 1/24/2024 showed the policy read, For tracheostomy with disposable inner canula . Remove your gloves and discard into a waster container . Perform Hand Hygiene. Review of the facility policy and procedures tilted Hand Hygiene with the last review date of 1/24/2024 showed the policy read, Process: Hand hygiene should be performed . When hands are moved from a contaminated-body site to a clean body site during patient care. Review of the facility's skills competency assessment for tracheostomy care dated 10/2021 showed the assessment read, The employee demonstrates skills and competence in the following . Wash hands and apply gloves (soap and water or hand sanitizer). Clean work surface and cover with non-permeable barrier. Remove gloves, discard. Perform hand hygiene. During an interview on 2/7/2024 at 12:30 PM, Staff A, LPN, Unit Manager, stated, [Staff F's name] did not practice sterile techniques and should have washed her hands when changing gloves during the tracheostomy care. 2. During an observation on 2/7/2024 at 8:46 AM, Staff F, LPN, started preparing medications for Resident #74 at the medication cart without performing hand hygiene. Staff F entered the resident's room and washed her hands and took Resident #74's blood pressure with a small wrist blood pressure cuff. Staff F exited the room and returned to the medication cart. Staff F did not perform hand hygiene. Staff F retrieved blood pressure medication and entered Resident #74's room and handed a cup and water to the resident. Resident #74 spit out the medication and refused to take medications. Staff F returned to the medication cart and started preparing medications for Resident #69 without performing hand hygiene. Staff F grabbed the blood pressure cuff without sanitizing it in between residents and entered Resident #69's room. Staff F washed her hands after entering the resident's room. Staff F took the resident's blood pressure and exited the room. Staff F returned to the medication cart and retrieved blood pressure medication without performing hand hygiene. Staff F entered Resident #69's room and administered all medications to Resident #69. Staff F exited the resident's room and returned to the medication cart and opened a new resident record without performing hand hygiene. During an interview on 2/7/2024 at 9:17 AM, Staff F, LPN, stated, I should have washed my hands more in between residents. I know you sanitize the blood sugar machine, but I did not know we had to sanitize the blood pressure machine. During an interview on 2/7/2024 at 9:20 AM, Staff A, LPN, Unit Manager, stated, The nurse should have washed her hands in between resident interaction and sanitized her blood pressure cuff between resident use. During an interview on 2/7/2024 at 1:10 PM, the Infection Preventionist stated, The nurse should have sanitized the blood cuff in between resident use. It is considered a reusable item. Review of the facility policy and procedures titled Handwashing with the last review date of 1/24/2024 showed the policy read, Policy: An essential component of infection control is hand washing. All staff members must wash their hands. Review of the facility policy and procedures titled Cleaning and Disinfection of Resident-Care Items and Equipment with the last review date of 1/24/2024 showed the policy read, Policy Statement: Resident-care equipment, including reusable items and durable medical equipment will be cleaned and disinfected according to current CDC recommendations for disinfection and the OSHA Bloodborne Pathogens Standards. Policy Interpretation and Implementation . d. Reusable items are cleaned and disinfected or sterilized between residents.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Assessment Accuracy (Tag F0641)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident assessment was accurate for 1 of 3 residents review...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident assessment was accurate for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for discharge, Resident #114. Finding include: Review of Resident #114's summary of discharge date d 12/4/2023 at 6:00 PM showed the resident was discharged to home with spouse/family. Review of Resident #114's Minimum Data Set (MDS) Discharge Return Not Anticipated Assessment, dated 1/4/2024, showed the resident was discharged to an acute hospital on [DATE]. During an interview on 2/7/2024 at 12:37 PM, the Minimum Data Set Coordinator confirmed Resident #114 discharged home and the MDS dated [DATE] was inaccurate. Review of the facility policy and procedures titled MDS last reviewed on 1/24/2024 showed the policy read, Policy: The center conducts initial and periodical standardized, comprehensive and reproducible assessments no less than every three months for each resident including, but not limited to, the collection of data regarding functional status, strengths, weaknesses and preferences using the federal and/or state required RAI. Procedure . Each person completing a section or portion of a section of the MDS signs the Attestation Statement indicating its accuracy.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0761 (Tag F0761)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medications and biologicals were stored and labeled properly in 4 of 7 medication carts reviewed (Photographic evi...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medications and biologicals were stored and labeled properly in 4 of 7 medication carts reviewed (Photographic evidence obtained). Findings include: During an observation of Magnolia Medication Cart on 2/5/2024 at 8:57 AM with Staff B, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), there were one opened Humalog insulin pen with no opened or expiration dates, one opened bottle of pro-stat with no opened or expiration dates, one opened Fluticasone Furoate/Vilanterol Ellipta Inhaler with no opened or expiration dates, and one medication cup containing gold color gel capsules with no identifier. During an interview on 2/5/2024 at 9:02 AM, Staff B, LPN, stated, The insulin pen belongs to a resident that was discharged last week. The pen should have been removed from the medication cart. The medication should be labeled with the opened date when opened. The capsules are fish oil. I got them from the other medication cart. I was waiting on central supply to get a bottle. Medication should be stored in original packaging. During an observation of Split Medication Cart on 2/5/2024 at 9:07 AM with Staff D, LPN, there were one opened bottle of pro-stat with no opened or expiration dates, one opened Humulin vial with no opened or expiration dates, one opened vial of insulin Glargine-yfgn with no opened or expiration dates, one opened vial of insulin Lispro with no opened or expiration date and not stored in original packaging, and one medication cup containing two gold clear gel capsules with no identifier. During an interview on 2/5/2024 at 9:10 AM, Staff D, LPN, stated, Medication should be stored in the original packing from pharmacy. Medication should be labeled with opened and expiration dates. The capsules are fish oil. During an observation of Elm Medication Cart on 2/5/2024 at 9:15 AM with Staff E, LPN, there were one opened bottle of Latanoprost eye drop with no opened or expiration dates, one opened bottle of Ciprofloxacin eye drops with no opened or expiration dates, two opened Advair Diskus inhaler with no opened or expiration dates, one opened Breo Ellipta inhaler with no opened or expiration dates, one opened Trelegy Ellipta inhaler with no opened or expiration dates, and one opened bottle of pro-stat with no opened or expiration dates. During an interview on 2/5/2024 at 9:20 AM, Staff E, LPN, stated, All opened medications should be dated when opened. During an observation of Lake Street Medication Cart on 2/5/2024 at 9:25 AM with Staff C, LPN, there were one opened Fiasp flex insulin pen with no opened or expiration dates, one expired Basaglar kwikpen with an opened date of 12/20/2023, one opened Humalog insulin pen with no opened or expiration dates, one opened Latanoprost eye drops with no opened or expiration dates, and one expired Novolog insulin pen with an opened date of 1/1/2024. During an interview on 2/5/2024 at 9:35 AM, Staff C, LPN, stated, Expired medications should be removed from medication cart. When we open a medication, the medication should be labeled with opened and expiration date. During an interview on 2/7/2024 at 10:20 AM, Staff A, LPN, Unit Manager, stated, Medication should be labeled with opened and expiration date. Medication should be stored in the original pharmacy packing and expired medication should be removed from medication cart. Review of the facility policy and procedures titled Medication Storage with the last review date of 1/24/2024 showed the policy read, Procedure . E. Medications will be stored in the original, labeled containers received from the pharmacy. Review of the facility policy and procedures titled Insulin Pen Labeling & Packaging with the last review date of 1/24/2024 showed the policy read, Procedure: A. Labeling and packaging of individual Insulin Pens . 2. Insulin Pens are placed in a resealable bag with the following labels/stickers . d. A yellow Date/Expiration sticker.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food items were dated and/or labeled, and covered, and the kitchen equipment was maintained in a clean condition. Find...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food items were dated and/or labeled, and covered, and the kitchen equipment was maintained in a clean condition. Findings include: During an observation while conducting an initial tour of the kitchen on 2/5/2024 at 9:05 AM with the District Dietary Manager (DDM) and the Kitchen Manager, there were two pitchers containing juice in the reach-in cooler without an identifying label or date, and one medium-sized stainless steel bowl with a partial clear plastic cover with no date or identifying label that had use for puree written on the clear plastic cover. The catch tray on the gas stove had a large buildup of burnt food particles and debris spills. There was rust and food on the can opener blade and holder. There were 54 glasses of assorted drinks without an identifying label in the reach-in cooler. During an interview on 2/5/2024 at 9:12 AM, the DDM stated that all foods should have identifying labels and dates. The DDM stated that the stainless steel bowl with use for puree written on the cover should have been labeled as chicken salad and dated. The DDM also stated that the catch tray on the stove should have been cleaned weekly and it had a lot of buildup and had not been cleaned. During the follow-up visit to the kitchen on 2/6/2024 at 6:25 AM with the DDM, there were six vanilla health shakes with no pulled or use-by dates, one opened gallon container of milk with no opened date, and nine swirl bowls of a fruit type dessert leftover with no identifying label or date. During an observation on 2/6/2024 at 6:57 AM, a robot coupe machine used to prepare ground, pureed, and chopped foods was stored with water in the base and not stored to allow the equipment to air dry. During an interview on 2/6/2024 at 6:57 AM, the Morning [NAME] stated the robot coupe was clean and ready to use. During an interview on 2/6/2024 at 7:00 AM, the DDM stated all products should be labeled and dated when opened including leftover foods, and the equipment should be cleaned and stored properly. The DDM stated the supplements should have a pulled to thaw date and a use by date. During an observation while conducting a tour of the nourishment rooms with the Dietary Supervisor (DS) on 2/7/2024 at 6:47 AM, there were seven assorted sandwiches with no identifying label in Unit One Nourishment Room and eleven sandwiches with no identifying label in Unit Two Nourishment Room. The microwave oven in Unit Two Nourishment Room had a large amount of food spatter on the inner top of the microwave oven. During an interview on 2/7/2024 at 6:55 AM, the DS stated that all food items should be identified, and refrigerators and microwave ovens should be cleaned according to the cleaning of equipment policy. Review of the facility policy and procedures titled Food Storage: Cold Foods last reviewed on 1/24/2024 showed the policy read, Procedures . 5. All foods will be stored wrapped or in covered containers, labeled and dated, and arranged in a manner to prevent cross contamination. Review of the facility policy and procedure titled Manual Warewashing last reviewed on 1/24/2024 showed the policy read, Procedure . 3. All serviceware and cookware will be air dried prior to storage. Review of the facility policy and procedures titled Equipment last reviewed on 1/24/2024 showed the policy read, Procedures: 1. All equipment will be routinely cleaned and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's directions and training materials.
Sept 2022 8 deficiencies 3 IJ
CRITICAL (J)

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from medical neglect by al...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from medical neglect by allowing unqualified facility staff to work outside of their scope of practice, administering intravenous (IV) medications via a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) line for 1 of 2 residents, Resident #84, without certification of education, training, and validation of competency for IV medication administration. IV infusion without IV certification and validation of competency could result in the likelihood of serious harm and/or death for residents who are administered IV medication infusions. This can result in an increased risk of infection, damage to veins and injection sites, an air embolism, phlebitis, and blood clots, which can occur from a poorly administered IV infusion. Phlebitis can cause blood clots, which can block important blood vessels, causing tissue damage or even be life-threatening. Lack of proper training and verification to assess IV patency (the line is open and not blocked allowing the treatment to flow directly into the patient's vein) can increase the spread of infection. Lack of training and verified competency to assess the insertion site for signs and symptoms of phlebitis or infection, fluid leaking (resulting in the treatment not being administered as ordered), redness, pain, tenderness, and swelling can result in the likelihood of increased risk of serious harm and/or death. Proper placement of the PICC through X-ray or ultrasound is required prior to the administration of medication; this knowledge is provided through training and education as part of the certification process. Findings include: Review of Resident #84's records revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses including atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery (heart disease) with angina pectoris (chest pain), acquired absence of left leg below knee, acquired absence of right leg below knee, hyperlipidemia (high cholesterol), hypertension, local infection of the skin, major depressive disorder, pressure ulcer right buttock stage 3, and pressure ulcer left buttock stage 3. Review of the physician order dated 8/21/2022 for Resident #84 reads, Sodium Chloride Injection Solution 0.9% (Sodium Chloride), Use 75 ml [milliliter]/hr [hour] intravenously every shift related to encounter for other specified prophylactic measures (Z29.8) for 14 days. IV [intravenous] NS [normal saline] to run continuously until IV ABT [antibiotic] completed. Review of the physician order dated 8/28/2022 for Resident #84 reads, Vancomycin HCl in Dextrose Intravenous Solution 1-5 GM [grams]/200 (milliliters)-% (Vancomycin HCl- Dextrose) Use 1000 mg [milligrams] intravenously in the evening for wound for 14 days. Pharmacy to dose. Review of the physician order dated 8/21/2022 for Resident #84 reads, IVs: Type of Access PICC. Review of the physician order dated 8/21/2022 for Resident #84 reads, IVs: Evaluate site for leakage/ bleeding/ signs of infection every shift. Review of the IV company report dated 8/22/2022 for Resident #84 reads, Reason for Consultation: PICC (non-valved) . Reason for Insertion: Drugs . Post-Insertion Data. Line Insertion: 3 CG PICC. Comments: 4 FR [French] PICC inserted into R [Right] basilic vein successfully . Instructed to order CXR [chest x-ray] for verification of PICC line tip placement prior to use. Review of the radiology report dated 8/22/2022 at 3:12 PM for Resident #84 reads, Conclusion: No acute cardiopulmonary process. Right PICC line tip in the right jugular venous system, recommend repositioning. Review of the IV company report dated 8/23/2022 for Resident #84 reads, Reason for Consultation: PICC (non-valved) . Reason for Insertion: Drugs . Post-Insertion Data. Line Insertion: 3 CG PICC. Reinsertion: Yes. Reinsertion Due To: Malpositioned PICC. Comments: 4 FR PICC inserted into L [left] basilic vein successfully . Instructed to order CXR for verification of PICC line tip placement prior to use. Review of Resident #84's medical record indicated that no chest X-ray was ordered to confirm and verify proper placement prior to administering the medications. Review of Resident #84's medical record indicated that no [NAME] 3CG tip confirmation report (magnetic tracking of the tip of the PICC line that uses ECG (electrocardiogram) was present in the medical report. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) documented that Staff J, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), administered Sodium Chloride 0.9% at 75 milliliters per hour on 8/22/2022 at 8:50 AM to Resident #84. Review of the MAR documented that Staff H, LPN, administered Sodium Chloride 0.9% at 75 milliliters per hour 8/23/2022 at 10:14 AM through a peripheral IV to Resident #84. Review of the MAR documented that Staff H, LPN, administered 10 milliliters of Normal Saline IV to Resident #84. Review of the MAR documented that Staff I, LPN, administered 10 milliliters of normal saline flush intravenously on 8/26/2022 at 11:38 AM through a left arm PICC line to Resident #84. Review of the MAR documented that Staff I, LPN, administered Sodium Chloride solution 0.9% at 75 milliliters per hour on 8/26/2022 at 11:38 AM through a left arm PICC line to Resident #84. Review of the MAR documented that Staff I, LPN, administered Vancomycin 1000 mg IV on 8/26/2022 at 11:38 AM through a left arm PICC line to Resident #84. Review of the MAR documented that Staff I, LPN, administered Vancomycin 1000 mg IV on 8/27/2022 at 8:39 AM through a left arm PICC line to Resident #84. Review of the MAR documented that Staff I, LPN, administered 10 milliliters of normal saline on 8/27/2022 at 8:40 AM intravenously through a left arm PICC line to Resident #84. Review of the MAR documented that Staff I, LPN, administered Sodium Chloride solution 0.9% at 75 ml/hr on 8/27/2022 at 8:40 AM through a left arm PICC line to Resident #84. Review of the MAR documented that Staff I, LPN, administered Vancomycin 1000 mg IV on 8/28/2022 at 11:08 AM through a left arm PICC line to Resident #84. Review of the MAR documented that Staff I, LPN, administered 10 milliliters of normal saline IV on 8/28/2022 at 11:39 AM through a left arm PICC line to Resident #84. Review of the MAR documented that Staff I, LPN, administered Vancomycin 1000 mg IV on 8/28/2022 at 6:16 PM through a left arm PICC line to Resident #84. Review of the employee file for Staff J, LPN, showed no IV competency or PICC line competency training within the file. Review of the employee file for Staff I, LPN, showed no IV competency or PICC line competency training within the file. Review of the employee file for Staff H, LPN, no IV competency or PICC line competency training within the file. During an interview on 8/31/2022 at 8:40 AM, the Advanced Practice Registered Nurse (APRN) stated, I was not aware that we did not do an X-ray to confirm line placement prior to administering medications. There are possible complications related to infusing medications into any line that is not confirmed. During an interview on 8/31/2022 at 9:15 AM, the Attending Physician stated, I was made aware yesterday we did not complete an X-ray of the PICC line. Since then, we have obtained an X-ray showing the catheter is in place so there is no harm to the patient. I can't speak to harm to the patient as it is properly positioned at this time. I do expect for IV fluids to be administered per my orders and if they don't, they need to call me. During an interview on 8/31/2022 at 12:00 PM, Staff H, LPN, stated, I was the nurse on the day that [Resident #84's name] PICC line was reinserted. The nurse from the IV company came in and inserted it. I helped him with [Resident #84's name] arm. I held it, so he could get the dressing on. He told me that he thought it was in the right place. He did give me the paper that explained that I needed to get an X-ray. It is my signature on the sheet. I didn't know that I needed to get an X-ray. The nurse, he told me he didn't think he would need to come back. I just didn't know. I thought it was okay to use. I just attached it to his PICC line after the IV nurse left. I didn't know that I needed to get a chest X-ray. I should not have hung the IV. I really didn't think I was hanging it. I just connected it to the IV. I am not IV certified. I did not take the IV certification. I know that I can't hang antibiotics. I just didn't think that the normal saline was a problem. I have flushed PICC lines after antibiotics, but I haven't hung them. I just wanted him to get his fluids, so I did hang it. I did hang a new bag to the peripheral IV that the resident had before the PICC line was put in. Once they came to do the PICC, the IV was out and I just connected the normal saline to the PICC line as soon as the IV nurse left. During an interview on 8/31/2022 at 1:45 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated, I was shocked that [Staff H, LPN's name] had done anything related to [Resident #84's name] PICC line. I heard her say that she did not have the IV certification and I was shocked. She was practicing outside her scope as an LPN. I was not aware that this was happening. I do not really know the process for verifying if an LPN is competent to do IVs. I just got here. I literally started the day you arrived for survey. We should have a copy of their 30-hour course when they are hired. We should not allow LPNs to administer IV medications unless we know that they have had the course. During a telephone interview on 8/31/2022 at 2:59 PM Staff I, LPN, stated, I took an 8-hour course many years ago. I guess I did not do the 30-hour IV course, so I guess I am not IV certified. I thought I was okay to do the IVs with what I had done. No one ever asked me for my certification to do IV med administration. I did administer the Vancomycin, flush the PICC line and do the normal saline that was ordered to run continuously to [Resident #84's name]. I wasn't aware that it would be a problem. I wish I had known. I did not do a competency specific to the care of the PICC line dressing when I was hired. During a telephone interview on 8/31/2022 at 3:10 PM, Staff J, LPN, stated, I did administer [Resident #84's name] IV and I hung the normal saline. I have been doing IV medications. I was told that as long as there is an RN [Registered Nurse] in the building that I could do it. I was told that by [Staff C, LPN's name] the unit manager. I am in school to be an RN and I was told that I could do it, so I have. I am aware that as an LPN without IV certification I cannot administer any IV medications because it's against the nurse practice act. But I was told it was okay because I was in nursing school. During an interview on 8/31/2022 at 3:20 PM, the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) stated, I was not aware that any LPNs who were not IV certified would be administering IV medications. I would not tell any staff that they could practice outside of the nurse practice act. I am not aware of anyone telling an LPN that it was acceptable to administer meds through a PICC or change dressings if they had not taken the course. During an interview on 8/31/2022 at 3:30 PM, Staff C, LPN, stated, I have not told anyone that they could administer IV medications if they are not IV certified as an LPN. I have not said that it is okay for any LPN to administer IV medications if there is an RN in the building. I know that we as LPNs have to follow our scope of practice and that if we have not had the additional training, we can't administer medications IV. During an interview on 9/1/2022 at 7:35 AM, the Human Resources Director stated, The process of hiring staff starts with the application. We do verify licenses for licensed staff, and we will ask LPNs who tell us they are IV certified. The process used to be for human resources to get all certification nurses have and the DON would know and keep record of any staff competencies for nurse. During a telephone interview on 9/1/2022 at 8:10 AM, the Medical Director stated, I came by yesterday and found out about this problem. I did not know we had LPNs who weren't IV certified, administering IV medications. I would expect nurses to practice within their scope of practice. We plan to implement a solution. I would expect that all nurses practice within their scope of practice. Review of the policy and procedure titled Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation & Misappropriation with an approval date of 8/8/2022 reads, Policy: It is inherent in the nature and dignity of each resident at the center that he/she be afforded basic human rights, including the right to be free from abuse, neglect, mistreatment, exploitation and/or misappropriation of property. The management of the facility recognizes these rights and hereby establishes the following statements, policies and procedures to protect these rights and to establish a disciplinary policy, which results in the fair and timely treatment of occurrences of resident abuse. Employees of the center are charged with a continuing obligation to treat residents so they are free from abuse, neglect, mistreatment, and/or misappropriation of property. No employee may at any time commit an act of physical, psychological, or emotional abuse, neglect, mistreatment, and/or misappropriation of property against any resident. Violation of this standard will subject employees to disciplinary action, including dismissal, provided herein. Definitions . Neglect is the failure of the center, its employees or service providers to provide goods and services to a resident that are necessary to avoid physical harm, pain, mental anguish, or emotional distress. Examples include but are not limited to . Failure to take precautionary measures to protect the health and safety of the resident . Procedure: Acts of abuse directed against residents are absolutely prohibited. Such acts are cause for disciplinary action, including dismissal and possible criminal prosecution. Questions may arise as to what actions constitute abuse of a resident. Any action that may cause or causes actual physical, psychological or emotional harm, which is not caused by simple negligence, constitutes abuse. Review of the policy and procedure titled Administration of Intermittent Infusion with an approval date of 8/8/2022 reads, Guidance . 2. Documentation of central vascular access device (CVAD) tip location must be included in the medical record prior to administration of medications. Maintain catheter patency per flushing/locking protocol while awaiting confirmation. Documentation may include: 2.1. Copy of chest X-ray results reporting location of tip, or fluoroscopy report. Review of the policy and procedure titled Continuous infusion of Medications and Solutions with an approval date of 8/8/2022 reads, To be Performed by: Licensed nurses according to state law and facility policy. The nurse is responsible and accountable for obtaining and maintaining competence with infusion therapy within his or her scope of practice. Competency validation is documented in accordance with organizational policy . Guidance . 2. Documentation of central vascular access tip location must be included in the medical record prior to administration of medications. Maintain catheter patency per flushing/locking protocol while awaiting tip confirmation. Documentation may include: 2.1. Copy of chest x-ray or fluoroscopy report; 2.2. Telephone order from radiologist stating location of tip (e.g. cavoatrial junction, IVC); 2.3. Copy of ECG technology insertion report.
CRITICAL (J)

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Deficiency F0726 (Tag F0726)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure licensed nurses had appropriate competencies a...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure licensed nurses had appropriate competencies and skills sets to provide nursing and related services to residents by allowing unqualified facility staff to work outside of their scope of practice, administering intravenous (IV) medications via a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) line for 1 of 2 residents, Resident #84, without certification of education, training, and validation of competency for IV medication administration. IV infusion without IV certification and validation of competency could result in the likelihood of serious harm and/or death for residents who are administered IV medication infusions. This can result in an increased risk of infection, damage to veins and injection sites, an air embolism, phlebitis, and blood clots, which can occur from a poorly administered IV infusion. Phlebitis can cause blood clots, which can block important blood vessels, causing tissue damage or even be life-threatening. Lack of proper training and verification to assess IV patency (the line is open and not blocked allowing the treatment to flow directly into the patient's vein) can increase the spread of infection. Lack of training and verified competency to assess the insertion site for signs and symptoms of phlebitis or infection, fluid leaking (resulting in the treatment not being administered as ordered), redness, pain, tenderness, and swelling can result in the likelihood of increased risk of serious harm and/or death. Proper placement of the PICC through X-ray or ultrasound is required prior to the administration of medication; this knowledge is provided through training and education as part of the certification process. Findings include: Review of Resident #84's records revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses including atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery (heart disease) with angina pectoris (chest pain), acquired absence of left leg below knee, acquired absence of right leg below knee, hyperlipidemia (high cholesterol), hypertension, local infection of the skin, major depressive disorder, pressure ulcer right buttock stage 3, and pressure ulcer left buttock stage 3. Review of the physician order dated 8/21/2022 for Resident #84 reads, Sodium Chloride Injection Solution 0.9% (Sodium Chloride), Use 75 ml [milliliter]/hr [hour] intravenously every shift related to encounter for other specified prophylactic measures (Z29.8) for 14 days. IV [intravenous] NS [normal saline] to run continuously until IV ABT [antibiotic] completed. Review of the physician order dated 8/28/2022 for Resident #84 reads, Vancomycin HCl in Dextrose Intravenous Solution 1-5 GM [grams]/200 (milliliters)-% (Vancomycin HCl- Dextrose) Use 1000 mg [milligrams] intravenously in the evening for wound for 14 days. Pharmacy to dose. Review of the physician order dated 8/21/2022 for Resident #84 reads, IVs: Type of Access PICC. Review of the physician order dated 8/21/2022 for Resident #84 reads, IVs: Evaluate site for leakage/ bleeding/ signs of infection every shift. Review of the IV company report dated 8/22/2022 for Resident #84 reads, Reason for Consultation: PICC (non-valved) . Reason for Insertion: Drugs . Post-Insertion Data. Line Insertion: 3 CG PICC. Comments: 4 FR [French] PICC inserted into R [Right] basilic vein successfully . Instructed to order CXR [chest x-ray] for verification of PICC line tip placement prior to use. Review of the radiology report dated 8/22/2022 at 3:12 PM for Resident #84 reads, Conclusion: No acute cardiopulmonary process. Right PICC line tip in the right jugular venous system, recommend repositioning. Review of the IV company report dated 8/23/2022 for Resident #84 reads, Reason for Consultation: PICC (non-valved) . Reason for Insertion: Drugs . Post-Insertion Data. Line Insertion: 3 CG PICC. Reinsertion: Yes. Reinsertion Due To: Malpositioned PICC. Comments: 4 FR PICC inserted into L [left] basilic vein successfully . Instructed to order CXR for verification of PICC line tip placement prior to use. Review of Resident #84's medical record indicated that no chest X-ray was ordered to confirm and verify proper placement prior to administering the medications. Review of Resident #84's medical record indicated that no [NAME] 3CG tip confirmation report (magnetic tracking of the tip of the PICC line that uses ECG (electrocardiogram) was present in the medical report. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) documented that Staff J, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), administered Sodium Chloride 0.9% at 75 milliliters per hour on 8/22/2022 at 8:50 AM to Resident #84. Review of the MAR documented that Staff H, LPN, administered Sodium Chloride 0.9% at 75 milliliters per hour 8/23/2022 at 10:14 AM through a peripheral IV to Resident #84. Review of the MAR documented that Staff H, LPN, administered 10 milliliters of Normal Saline IV to Resident #84. Review of the MAR documented that Staff I, LPN, administered 10 milliliters of normal saline flush intravenously on 8/26/2022 at 11:38 AM through a left arm PICC line to Resident #84. Review of the MAR documented that Staff I, LPN, administered Sodium Chloride solution 0.9% at 75 milliliters per hour on 8/26/2022 at 11:38 AM through a left arm PICC line to Resident #84. Review of the MAR documented that Staff I, LPN, administered Vancomycin 1000 mg IV on 8/26/2022 at 11:38 AM through a left arm PICC line to Resident #84. Review of the MAR documented that Staff I, LPN, administered Vancomycin 1000 mg IV on 8/27/2022 at 8:39 AM through a left arm PICC line to Resident #84. Review of the MAR documented that Staff I, LPN, administered 10 milliliters of normal saline on 8/27/2022 at 8:40 AM intravenously through a left arm PICC line to Resident #84. Review of the MAR documented that Staff I, LPN, administered Sodium Chloride solution 0.9% at 75 ml/hr on 8/27/2022 at 8:40 AM through a left arm PICC line to Resident #84. Review of the MAR documented that Staff I, LPN, administered Vancomycin 1000 mg IV on 8/28/2022 at 11:08 AM through a left arm PICC line to Resident #84. Review of the MAR documented that Staff I, LPN, administered 10 milliliters of normal saline IV on 8/28/2022 at 11:39 AM through a left arm PICC line to Resident #84. Review of the MAR documented that Staff I, LPN, administered Vancomycin 1000 mg IV on 8/28/2022 at 6:16 PM through a left arm PICC line to Resident #84. Review of the employee file for Staff J, LPN, showed no IV competency or PICC line competency training within the file. Review of the employee file for Staff I, LPN, showed no IV competency or PICC line competency training within the file. Review of the employee file for Staff H, LPN, no IV competency or PICC line competency training within the file. During an interview on 8/31/2022 at 8:40 AM, the Advanced Practice Registered Nurse (APRN) stated, I was not aware that we did not do an X-ray to confirm line placement prior to administering medications. There are possible complications related to infusing medications into any line that is not confirmed. During an interview on 8/31/2022 at 9:15 AM, the Attending Physician stated, I was made aware yesterday we did not complete an X-ray of the PICC line. Since then, we have obtained an X-ray showing the catheter is in place so there is no harm to the patient. I can't speak to harm to the patient as it is properly positioned at this time. I do expect for IV fluids to be administered per my orders and if they don't, they need to call me. During an interview on 8/31/2022 at 12:00 PM, Staff H, LPN, stated, I was the nurse on the day that [Resident #84's name] PICC line was reinserted. The nurse from the IV company came in and inserted it. I helped him with [Resident #84's name] arm. I held it, so he could get the dressing on. He told me that he thought it was in the right place. He did give me the paper that explained that I needed to get an X-ray. It is my signature on the sheet. I didn't know that I needed to get an X-ray. The nurse, he told me he didn't think he would need to come back. I just didn't know. I thought it was okay to use. I just attached it to his PICC line after the IV nurse left. I didn't know that I needed to get a chest X-ray. I should not have hung the IV. I really didn't think I was hanging it. I just connected it to the IV. I am not IV certified. I did not take the IV certification. I know that I can't hang antibiotics. I just didn't think that the normal saline was a problem. I have flushed PICC lines after antibiotics, but I haven't hung them. I just wanted him to get his fluids, so I did hang it. I did hang a new bag to the peripheral IV that the resident had before the PICC line was put in. Once they came to do the PICC, the IV was out and I just connected the normal saline to the PICC line as soon as the IV nurse left. During an interview on 8/31/2022 at 1:45 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated, I was shocked that [Staff H, LPN's name] had done anything related to [Resident #84's name] PICC line. I heard her say that she did not have the IV certification and I was shocked. She was practicing outside her scope as an LPN. I was not aware that this was happening. I do not really know the process for verifying if an LPN is competent to do IVs. I just got here. I literally started the day you arrived for survey. We should have a copy of their 30-hour course when they are hired. We should not allow LPNs to administer IV medications unless we know that they have had the course. During a telephone interview on 8/31/2022 at 2:59 PM Staff I, LPN, stated, I took an 8-hour course many years ago. I guess I did not do the 30-hour IV course, so I guess I am not IV certified. I thought I was okay to do the IVs with what I had done. No one ever asked me for my certification to do IV med administration. I did administer the Vancomycin, flush the PICC line and do the normal saline that was ordered to run continuously to [Resident #84's name]. I wasn't aware that it would be a problem. I wish I had known. I did not do a competency specific to the care of the PICC line dressing when I was hired. During a telephone interview on 8/31/2022 at 3:10 PM, Staff J, LPN, stated, I did administer [Resident #84's name] IV and I hung the normal saline. I have been doing IV medications. I was told that as long as there is an RN [Registered Nurse] in the building that I could do it. I was told that by [Staff C, LPN's name] the unit manager. I am in school to be an RN and I was told that I could do it, so I have. I am aware that as an LPN without IV certification I cannot administer any IV medications because it's against the nurse practice act. But I was told it was okay because I was in nursing school. During an interview on 8/31/2022 at 3:20 PM, the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) stated, I was not aware that any LPNs who were not IV certified would be administering IV medications. I would not tell any staff that they could practice outside of the nurse practice act. I am not aware of anyone telling an LPN that it was acceptable to administer meds through a PICC or change dressings if they had not taken the course. During an interview on 8/31/2022 at 3:30 PM, Staff C, LPN, stated, I have not told anyone that they could administer IV medications if they are not IV certified as an LPN. I have not said that it is okay for any LPN to administer IV medications if there is an RN in the building. I know that we as LPNs have to follow our scope of practice and that if we have not had the additional training, we can't administer medications IV. During an interview on 9/1/2022 at 7:35 AM, the Human Resources Director stated, The process of hiring staff starts with the application. We do verify licenses for licensed staff, and we will ask LPNs who tell us they are IV certified. The process used to be for human resources to get all certification nurses have and the DON would know and keep record of any staff competencies for nurse. During a telephone interview on 9/1/2022 at 8:10 AM, the Medical Director stated, I came by yesterday and found out about this problem. I did not know we had LPNs who weren't IV certified, administering IV medications. I would expect nurses to practice within their scope of practice. We plan to implement a solution. I would expect that all nurses practice within their scope of practice. Review of the policy and procedure titled Administration of Intermittent Infusion with an approval date of 8/8/2022 reads, Guidance . 2. Documentation of central vascular access device (CVAD) tip location must be included in the medical record prior to administration of medications. Maintain catheter patency per flushing/locking protocol while awaiting confirmation. Documentation may include: 2.1. Copy of chest X-ray results reporting location of tip, or fluoroscopy report. Review of the policy and procedure titled Continuous infusion of Medications and Solutions with an approval date of 8/8/2022 reads, To be Performed by: Licensed nurses according to state law and facility policy. The nurse is responsible and accountable for obtaining and maintaining competence with infusion therapy within his or her scope of practice. Competency validation is documented in accordance with organizational policy . Guidance . 2. Documentation of central vascular access tip location must be included in the medical record prior to administration of medications. Maintain catheter patency per flushing/locking protocol while awaiting tip confirmation. Documentation may include: 2.1. Copy of chest x-ray or fluoroscopy report; 2.2. Telephone order from radiologist stating location of tip (e.g. cavoatrial junction, IVC); 2.3. Copy of ECG technology insertion report.
CRITICAL (J)

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Administration (Tag F0835)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility administration failed to effectively and efficiently attain or ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility administration failed to effectively and efficiently attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident by not assuming full responsibility for the day to day operations of the facility by allowing unqualified facility staff to work outside of their scope of practice, administering intravenous (IV) medications via a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) line for 1 of 2 residents, Resident #84, without certification of education, training, and validation of competency for IV medication administration. IV infusion without IV certification and validation of competency could result in the likelihood of serious harm and/or death for residents who are administered IV medication infusions. This can result in an increased risk of infection, damage to veins and injection sites, an air embolism, phlebitis, and blood clots, which can occur from a poorly administered IV infusion. Phlebitis can cause blood clots, which can block important blood vessels, causing tissue damage or even be life-threatening. Lack of proper training and verification to assess IV patency (the line is open and not blocked allowing the treatment to flow directly into the patient's vein) can increase the spread of infection. Lack of training and verified competency to assess the insertion site for signs and symptoms of phlebitis or infection, fluid leaking (resulting in the treatment not being administered as ordered), redness, pain, tenderness, and swelling can result in the likelihood of increased risk of serious harm and/or death. Proper placement of the PICC through X-ray or ultrasound is required prior to the administration of medication; this knowledge is provided through training and education as part of the certification process. Findings include: Review of the job description for the Executive Director 1, with an effective date of 8/8/2022, reads, Purpose of Your Job Position: The Executive Director 1 is responsible for management of the facility in a manner which exemplifies Consulate Health Care's standard of operational excellence, to include but not limited to creating an environment in which employees demonstrate Compassion, Honesty, Integrity and Respect for one another and everyone they come into contact with, and business practices are conducted with Passion. The primary purpose of the Executive Director is to direct the day-to-day functions of the facility in accordance with current federal, state, and local standards, guidelines, and regulations that govern nursing facilities to ensure that the highest degree of quality care can be provided to our residents at all times. You are entrusted to provide innovative, responsible healthcare with the creation and implementation of new ideas and concepts that continually improve systems and processes to achieve superior results. Review of the job description for Director of Clinical Services I, with an effective date of 8/22/2022, reads, Purpose of Your Job Position: As a Consulate Health Care Director of Clinical Services, you are entrusted with the responsibility of caring for our residents, families, co-workers, visitors, and all others; as well as demonstrating in all interactions, Consulate Health Care's five core values of Compassion, Honesty, Integrity, Respect, and Passion. The primary purpose of your job position is to plan, organize, develop, and direct the overall operation of our Nursing Service Department in accordance with current federal, state, and local standards, guidelines, and regulations that govern our facility, and as may be directed by the Executive Director to ensure that the highest degree of quality care is maintained at all times. You are entrusted to provide innovative, responsible healthcare with creation and implementation of new ideas and concepts that continually improve systems and processes to achieve superior results . Duties and Responsibilities . 5. Set and monitor achievement of goals and objectives for the nursing department consistent with established philosophy and standard of practice. 6. Recruit and hire a sufficient number of qualified nursing staff to deliver efficient resident care in accordance with the established staffing plan. 7. Establish, implement, and continually update competency/ skills checklists for nursing staff . 9. Maintain and guide the implementation of current policies and procedures, which reflect adherence to corporate and external regulatory guidelines . 11. Establish and monitor compliance with an effective medical record documentation system . 14. Actively participate in the quality improvement process for the facility . 15. Participate in and/or provide in-service education sessions. Review of Resident #84's records revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses including atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery (heart disease) with angina pectoris (chest pain), acquired absence of left leg below knee, acquired absence of right leg below knee, hyperlipidemia (high cholesterol), hypertension, local infection of the skin, major depressive disorder, pressure ulcer right buttock stage 3, and pressure ulcer left buttock stage 3. Review of the physician order dated 8/21/2022 for Resident #84 reads, Sodium Chloride Injection Solution 0.9% (Sodium Chloride), Use 75 ml [milliliter]/hr [hour] intravenously every shift related to encounter for other specified prophylactic measures (Z29.8) for 14 days. IV [intravenous] NS [normal saline] to run continuously until IV ABT [antibiotic] completed. Review of the physician order dated 8/28/2022 for Resident #84 reads, Vancomycin HCl in Dextrose Intravenous Solution 1-5 GM [grams]/200 (milliliters)-% (Vancomycin HCl- Dextrose) Use 1000 mg [milligrams] intravenously in the evening for wound for 14 days. Pharmacy to dose. Review of the physician order dated 8/21/2022 for Resident #84 reads, IVs: Type of Access PICC. Review of the physician order dated 8/21/2022 for Resident #84 reads, IVs: Evaluate site for leakage/ bleeding/ signs of infection every shift. Review of the IV company report dated 8/22/2022 for Resident #84 reads, Reason for Consultation: PICC (non-valved) . Reason for Insertion: Drugs . Post-Insertion Data. Line Insertion: 3 CG PICC. Comments: 4 FR [French] PICC inserted into R [Right] basilic vein successfully . Instructed to order CXR [chest x-ray] for verification of PICC line tip placement prior to use. Review of the radiology report dated 8/22/2022 at 3:12 PM for Resident #84 reads, Conclusion: No acute cardiopulmonary process. Right PICC line tip in the right jugular venous system, recommend repositioning. Review of the IV company report dated 8/23/2022 for Resident #84 reads, Reason for Consultation: PICC (non-valved) . Reason for Insertion: Drugs . Post-Insertion Data. Line Insertion: 3 CG PICC. Reinsertion: Yes. Reinsertion Due To: Malpositioned PICC. Comments: 4 FR PICC inserted into L [left] basilic vein successfully . Instructed to order CXR for verification of PICC line tip placement prior to use. Review of the medical record indicated that no Chest X ray was ordered to confirm and verify proper placement prior to administering medications. Review of the medical record indicated that no [NAME] 3CG tip confirmation report (magnetic tracking of the tip of the PICC line that uses ECG (electrocardiogram) was present in the medical report. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) documented that Staff J, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), administered Sodium Chloride 0.9% at 75 milliliters per hour on 8/22/2022 at 8:50 AM to Resident #84. Review of the MAR documented that Staff H, LPN, administered Sodium Chloride 0.9% at 75 milliliters per hour 8/23/2022 at 10:14 AM through a peripheral IV to Resident #84. Review of the MAR documented that Staff H, LPN, administered 10 milliliters of Normal Saline IV to Resident #84. Review of the MAR documented that Staff I, LPN, administered 10 milliliters of normal saline flush intravenously on 8/26/2022 at 11:38 AM through a left arm PICC line to Resident #84. Review of the MAR documented that Staff I, LPN, administered Sodium Chloride solution 0.9% at 75 milliliters per hour on 8/26/2022 at 11:38 AM through a left arm PICC line to Resident #84. Review of the MAR documented that Staff I, LPN, administered Vancomycin 1000 mg IV on 8/26/2022 at 11:38 AM through a left arm PICC line to Resident #84. Review of the MAR documented that Staff I, LPN, administered Vancomycin 1000 mg IV on 8/27/2022 at 8:39 AM through a left arm PICC line to Resident #84. Review of the MAR documented that Staff I, LPN, administered 10 milliliters of normal saline on 8/27/2022 at 8:40 AM intravenously through a left arm PICC line to Resident #84. Review of the MAR documented that Staff I, LPN, administered Sodium Chloride solution 0.9% at 75 ml/hr on 8/27/2022 at 8:40 AM through a left arm PICC line to Resident #84. Review of the MAR documented that Staff I, LPN, administered Vancomycin 1000 mg IV on 8/28/2022 at 11:08 AM through a left arm PICC line to Resident #84. Review of the MAR documented that Staff I, LPN, administered 10 milliliters of normal saline IV on 8/28/2022 at 11:39 AM through a left arm PICC line to Resident #84. Review of the MAR documented that Staff I, LPN, administered Vancomycin 1000 mg IV on 8/28/2022 at 6:16 PM through a left arm PICC line to Resident #84. Review of the employee file for Staff J, LPN, showed no IV competency or PICC line competency training within the file. Review of the employee file for Staff I, LPN, showed no IV competency or PICC line competency training within the file. Review of the employee file for Staff H, LPN, no IV competency or PICC line competency training within the file. During an interview on 8/31/2022 at 8:40 AM, the Advanced Practice Registered Nurse (APRN) stated, I was not aware that we did not do an X ray to confirm line placement prior to administering medications. There are possible complications related to infusing medications into any line that is not confirmed. During an interview on 8/31/2022 at 9:15 AM, the Attending Physician stated, I was made aware yesterday we did not complete an x-ray of the PICC line. Since then, we have obtained an x-ray showing the catheter is in place so there is no harm to the patient. I can't speak to harm to the patient as it is properly positioned at this time. I do expect for IV fluids to be administered per my orders and if they don't, they need to call me. During an interview on 8/31/2022 at 12:00 PM, Staff H, LPN, stated, I was the nurse on the day that [Resident #84's name] PICC line was reinserted. The nurse from the IV company came in and inserted it. I helped him with [Resident #84's name] arm. I held it, so he could get the dressing on. He told me that he thought it was in the right place. He did give me the paper that explained that I needed to get an X-ray. It is my signature on the sheet. I didn't know that I needed to get an X-ray. The nurse, he told me he didn't think he would need to come back. I just didn't know. I thought it was okay to use. I just attached it to his PICC line after the IV nurse left. I didn't know that I needed to get a chest X-ray. I should not have hung the IV. I really didn't think I was hanging it. I just connected it to the IV. I am not IV certified. I did not take the IV certification. I know that I can't hang antibiotics. I just didn't think that the normal saline was a problem. I have flushed PICC lines after antibiotics, but I haven't hung them. I just wanted him to get his fluids, so I did hang it. I did hang a new bag to the peripheral IV that the resident had before the PICC line was put in. Once they came to do the PICC, the IV was out and I just connected the normal saline to the PICC line as soon as the IV nurse left. During an interview on 8/31/2022 at 1:45 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated, I was shocked that [Staff H, LPN's name] had done anything related to [Resident #84's name] PICC line. I heard her say that she did not have the IV certification and I was shocked. She was practicing outside her scope as an LPN. I was not aware that this was happening. I do not really know the process for verifying if an LPN is competent to do IVs. I just got here. I literally started the day you arrived for survey. We should have a copy of their 30-hour course when they are hired. We should not allow LPNs to administer IV medications unless we know that they have had the course. During a telephone interview on 8/31/2022 at 2:59 PM, Staff I, LPN, stated, I took an 8-hour course many years ago. I guess I did not do the 30-hour IV course, so I guess I am not IV certified. I thought I was okay to do the IVs with what I had done. No one ever asked me for my certification to do IV med administration. I did administer the Vancomycin, flush the PICC line and do the normal saline that was ordered to run continuously to [Resident #84's name]. I wasn't aware that it would be a problem. I wish I had known. I did not do a competency specific to the care of the PICC line dressing when I was hired. During a telephone interview on 8/31/2022 at 3:10 PM, Staff J, LPN, stated, I did administer [Resident #84's name] IV and I hung the normal saline. I have been doing IV medications. I was told that as long as there is an RN [Registered Nurse] in the building that I could do it. I was told that by [Staff C, LPN's name] the unit manager. I am in school to be an RN and I was told that I could do it, so I have. I am aware that as an LPN without IV certification I cannot administer any IV medications because it's against the nurse practice act. But I was told it was okay because I was in nursing school. During an interview on 8/31/2022 at 3:20 PM, the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) stated, I was not aware that any LPNs who were not IV certified would be administering IV medications. I would not tell any staff that they could practice outside of the nurse practice act. I am not aware of anyone telling an LPN that it was acceptable to administer meds through a PICC or change dressings if they had not taken the course. During an interview on 8/31/2022 at 3:30 PM, Staff C, LPN, stated, I have not told anyone that they could administer IV medications if they are not IV certified as an LPN. I have not said that it is okay for any LPN to administer IV medications if there is an RN in the building. I know that we as LPNs have to follow our scope of practice and that if we have not had the additional training, we can't administer medications IV. During an interview on 9/1/2022 at 7:15 AM, the Administrator stated, I am ultimately responsible for all that occurs in the building, and I had asked about whether all the LPNs were IV certified and knew that there were several LPNs needing the course. We had not arranged the course yet because I was waiting for the new director of nursing to get here. During the onboarding process, we should be verifying whether LPNs are IV certified and keeping record of this within their employee files. This should have been done and I can't tell you why it has not been. During an interview on 9/1/2022 at 7:35 AM, the Human Resources Director stated, The process of hiring staff starts with the application. We do verify licenses for licensed staff, and we will ask LPNs who tell us they are IV certified. The process used to be for human resources to get all certification nurses have and the DON would know and keep record of any staff competencies for nurse. During a telephone interview on 9/1/2022 at 8:10 AM, the Medical Director stated, I came by yesterday and found out about this problem. I did not know we had LPNs who weren't IV certified, administering IV medications. I would expect nurses to practice within their scope of practice. We plan to implement a solution. I would expect that all nurses practice within their scope of practice. Review of the policy and procedure titled Administration of Intermittent Infusion with an approval date of 8/8/2022 reads, Guidance . 2. Documentation of central vascular access device (CVAD) tip location must be included in the medical record prior to administration of medications. Maintain catheter patency per flushing/locking protocol while awaiting confirmation. Documentation may include: 2.1. Copy of chest X-ray results reporting location of tip, or fluoroscopy report. Review of the policy and procedure titled Continuous infusion of Medications and Solutions with an approval date of 8/8/2022 reads, To be Performed by: Licensed nurses according to state law and facility policy. The nurse is responsible and accountable for obtaining and maintaining competence with infusion therapy within his or her scope of practice. Competency validation is documented in accordance with organizational policy . Guidance . 2. Documentation of central vascular access tip location must be included in the medical record prior to administration of medications. Maintain catheter patency per flushing/locking protocol while awaiting tip confirmation. Documentation may include: 2.1. Copy of chest x-ray or fluoroscopy report; 2.2. Telephone order from radiologist stating location of tip (e.g. cavoatrial junction, IVC); 2.3. Copy of ECG technology insertion report.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Pressure Ulcer Prevention (Tag F0686)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received care consistent with profes...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received care consistent with professional standards of practice to prevent worsening of pressure sores for 1 of 3 residents observed for pressure ulcers, Resident #31, in a total sample of 36 residents. Findings include: During an observation on 8/30/2022 at 10:00 AM, Resident #31 was sitting in bed with the head elevated. There was a wound vac (vacuum assisted closure device) that was not alarming, and the machine was set at -120 mm (millimeters) hg (mercury). There was no alarm ringing from the wound vac machine. Resident #31 lifted her blankets and there was a large amount of serosanguinous drainage noted on a large pad that was positioned under the resident's right above the knee amputation. During an interview on 8/30/2022 at 10:00 AM, Resident #31 stated, There is something wrong with this [wound vac]. It isn't suctioning like it should be. I have told them last night and this morning. The nurses know that I need to have a new dressing and pad. They have known since they came in. I told a nurse last night, too. During an observation of Resident #31's wound conducted on 8/30/2022 with Staff B, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), Staff B assisted the resident to position on her side. There was a transparent dressing that was rolling up at the edges. The black Granufoam was not set within the wound edges and the transparent dressing was not adhering to the skin and there was no suction being applied to the wound. The wound vac machine was not alarming during this observation. There was a large amount of serous drainage that was dripping down the sides of the transparent dressing. Resident #31's right upper leg and thigh both front and back were reddened. During an interview on 8/30/2022 at 10:15 AM, Staff B, LPN, stated, I know that her wound vac is not working, but I have to finish med [medication] pass and then I will do it. The resident told me about it earlier, maybe 30-45 minutes ago. Review of Resident #31's medical record revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] , transferred to the hospital and returned to the facility on 7/27/2022 with the diagnoses including necrotizing fasciitis (a serious bacterial infection that destroys tissue under the skin), pressure ulcer of sacral region stage 2, pressure ulcer of right hip stage 3, major depressive disorder, lumbar spina bifida (a birth defect in which the spinal cord fails to develop properly), anemia in other diseases, hyperlipidemia (high cholesterol), hypertension, acquired absence of right leg above the knee, and acquired absence of left leg above the knee. Review of the physician order dated 8/15/2022 for Resident #31 reads, Wound vac to back of right thigh. Review of Resident #31's admission/readmission data dated 7/27/2022 reads, Right thigh rear: unstageable wound no measurements, Sacrum: open area, other: amputee left and right BKA [below the knee amputation], other scab thigh right/front. Review of Resident #31's weekly skin sweep dated 8/29/2022 reads, 23) Coccyx red, 35) Right thigh (rear) open wound, wound vac in place. There are no wound measurements documented. Review of Resident #31's weekly skin sweep dated 8/23/2022 reads, 23) Coccyx raw, no openings, 38) Left knee (front) scab on stump, 35) Right thigh (rear) open wound, wound vac in place. There were no wound measurements documented. Review of Resident #31's weekly skin sweep dated 8/17/2022 reads, 2. Skin Intact: no. 3. Notes: see wound care assessment. There was no wound care assessment documented in the medical record. Review of Resident #31's weekly skin sweep dated 8/10/2022 reads, 2. Skin Intact: no. 3. Notes: see wound care assessment. There was no wound care assessment documented in the medical record. Review of Resident #31's weekly skin sweep dated 8/3/2022 reads, 2. Skin Intact: no. 3. Notes: see wound care notes for skin assessment. wound vac intact and in use. There were no wound measurements documented. Review of the Wound Care documentation from Healogics dated 8/24/2022 reads, Wound #1 status is healed, wound #2 status is healed. History of present illness reads: 8-3: went to hospital, upper leg was debrided and wound vac placed, will look to see if following up with surgeon, if not will follow the wound. There was no documentation of wound measurement for the right leg wound. Review of the Wound Care documentation from Healogics dated 8/17/2022 reads, History of present illness 8-3: went to hospital, upper leg was debrided and wound vac placed, will look to see if following up with surgeon, if not will follow the wound. There was no documentation of wound measurement for the right leg wound. Review of the Wound Care documentation from Healogics dated 8/10/2022 reads, History of present illness 8-3: went to hospital, upper leg was debrided and wound vac placed, will look to see if following up with surgeon, if not will follow the wound. There was no documentation of wound measurement for the right leg wound. Review of the Wound Care documentation from Healogics dated 8/3/2022 reads, History of present illness 8-3: went to hospital, upper leg was debrided, and wound vac placed, will look to see if following up with surgeon, if not will follow the wound. There were no documentation of wound measurement for the right leg wound. During an observation of wound care conducted on 8/30/2022 at 10:45 AM, Resident #31 was repositioned on her side. Staff B, LPN, assembled supplies, entered the room and cleaned the overbed table and placed wound care supplies on the overbed table. Staff B donned gloves without performing hand hygiene, opened 3 packages of 4x4 gauze and a 100 ml (milliliter) bottle of normal saline. Staff B removed the old dressing of a 4x4 gauze and cleaned the wound bed from the top of the wound to the bottom using the gauze 2 times and discarded it. Staff B then picked up the bottle of normal saline and moistened another 4x4 gauze and cleaned the wound from the top to the bottom using the 4x4 twice before discarding. Staff B picked up the 4x4 gauze and poured normal saline on the gauze and cleaned the wound once from the top to the bottom. Staff B removed gloves and donned a new pair without performing hand hygiene. Staff B pulled a pair of scissors from her uniform pocket and began to cut the transparent dressing, placing the scissors on the overbed table. Staff B took the opened package of 4x4 gauze and used the measurements on the side of the package to measure the wound length, width and depth, touching the wound bed during the measurements. After measurements were completed, Staff B began placing the transparent dressing on the skin surrounding the wound bed. Staff B used the scissors to open the package of wound care supplies, placing the scissors back on the overbed table. Staff B then picked up the black Granufoam dressing and cut the foam to the shape of the wound, and then placed the foam on the wound bed. Staff B covered the Granufoam with the transparent dressing, cut a 1/2-centimeter hole with the scissors in the transparent dressing, placed the sensor tubing over the hole and attached the tube to the wound vac machine and verified that the setting was -120 mm hg. Staff B removed her gloves and exited the room without performing hand hygiene. During an interview on 8/30/2022 at 11:00 AM, Staff C, LPN, stated, Residents get weekly wound measurements done and documented. They are documented on the wound forms. Usually the wound care nurse practitioner does the measurements every week. During an interview on 8/30/2022 at 11:20 AM, Staff B, LPN, stated, Wound measurements are usually done by Healogics and we don't measure them. I did not know that they weren't being done. The length, width and depth should be measured when they are admitted and when the weekly wound care see them. I should have used hand sanitizer before I put on my gloves. I thought that I had placed my scissors on the field that I cleaned and that would be okay to do that. During an interview on 8/31/2022 at 8:20 AM, the Director of Nursing stated, I don't know why the wound nurse practitioner was not seeing this resident. They should have been. The surgeon was not seeing the patient every week. We should have called the wound care nurse and had them take over the care of the resident. There are no wound measurements documented since she came back to the facility. Review of the policy and procedure titled Pressure Injury Record with an approval date of 8/8/2022 reads, Policy: To document the presence of skin impairment/ new skin impairment related to pressure when first observed and weekly thereafter until the site is resolved. One site will be recorded per page. Procedure: 1. Residents will have a Pressure Injury Record completed for each skin impairment that is related to pressure . 4. Enter the stage of the pressure injury. 5. Enter the size of the pressure injury- length x width x depth in centimeters. 6. Enter the tissue type and color. 7. Enter the wound edges and drainage. 8. Enter the per-wound information. Review of the policy and procedure titled Dressing Change with an approval date of 8/8/2022 reads, Policy: A clean dressing will applied [Sic.] by a nurse to a wound as ordered to promote healing. Sterile dressing will be used only if specifically ordered. Procedure . Perform hand hygiene; Apply gloves; Remove and dispose of soiled dressing; Remove gloves; Perform hand hygiene; Apply gloves; Evaluate wound for type, color, amount of drainage; Cleanse wound as ordered, dispose of gauze; Remove gloves and perform hand hygiene; Apply treatment as ordered and clean dressing; Discard gloves and perform hand hygiene.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program to prevent the possible development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. The facility failed to ensure the staff performed hand hygiene during wound care in one of three wound care observations. Findings include: During an observation on 8/30/2022 at 10:00 AM, Resident #31 was sitting in bed with the head elevated. There was a wound vac (vacuum assisted closure device) that was not alarming, and the machine was set at -120 mm (millimeters) hg (mercury). There was no alarm ringing from the wound vac machine. Resident #31 lifted her blankets and there was a large amount of serosanguinous drainage noted on a large pad that was positioned under the resident's right above the knee amputation. During an interview on 8/30/2022 at 10:00 AM, Resident #31 stated, There is something wrong with this [wound vac]. It isn't suctioning like it should be. I have told them last night and this morning. The nurses know that I need to have a new dressing and pad. They have known since they came in. I told a nurse last night, too. During an observation of Resident #31's wound conducted on 8/30/2022 with Staff B, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), Staff B assisted the resident to position on her side. There was a transparent dressing that was rolling up at the edges. The black Granufoam was not set within the wound edges and the transparent dressing was not adhering to the skin and there was no suction being applied to the wound. The wound vac machine was not alarming during this observation. There was a large amount of serous drainage that was dripping down the sides of the transparent dressing. Resident #31's right upper leg and thigh both front and back were reddened. During an interview on 8/30/2022 at 10:15 AM, Staff B, LPN, stated, I know that her wound vac is not working, but I have to finish med [medication] pass and then I will do it. The resident told me about it earlier, maybe 30-45 minutes ago. Review of Resident #31's medical record revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] , transferred to the hospital and returned to the facility on 7/27/2022 with the diagnoses including necrotizing fasciitis (a serious bacterial infection that destroys tissue under the skin), pressure ulcer of sacral region stage 2, pressure ulcer of right hip stage 3, major depressive disorder, lumbar spina bifida (a birth defect in which the spinal cord fails to develop properly), anemia in other diseases, hyperlipidemia (high cholesterol), hypertension, acquired absence of right leg above the knee, and acquired absence of left leg above the knee. Review of the physician order dated 8/15/2022 for Resident #31 reads, Wound vac to back of right thigh. Review of Resident #31's admission/readmission data dated 7/27/2022 reads, Right thigh rear: unstageable wound no measurements, Sacrum: open area, other: amputee left and right BKA [below the knee amputation], other scab thigh right/front. During an observation of wound care conducted on 8/30/2022 at 10:45 AM, Resident #31 was repositioned on her side. Staff B, LPN, assembled supplies, entered the room and cleaned the overbed table and placed wound care supplies on the overbed table. Staff B donned gloves without performing hand hygiene, opened 3 packages of 4x4 gauze and a 100 ml (milliliter) bottle of normal saline. Staff B removed the old dressing of a 4x4 gauze and cleaned the wound bed from the top of the wound to the bottom using the gauze 2 times and discarded it. Staff B then picked up the bottle of normal saline and moistened another 4x4 gauze and cleaned the wound from the top to the bottom using the 4x4 twice before discarding. Staff B picked up the 4x4 gauze and poured normal saline on the gauze and cleaned the wound once from the top to the bottom. Staff B removed gloves and donned a new pair without performing hand hygiene. Staff B pulled a pair of scissors from her uniform pocket and began to cut the transparent dressing, placing the scissors on the overbed table. Staff B took the opened package of 4x4 gauze and used the measurements on the side of the package to measure the wound length, width and depth, touching the wound bed during the measurements. After measurements were completed, Staff B began placing the transparent dressing on the skin surrounding the wound bed. Staff B used the scissors to open the package of wound care supplies, placing the scissors back on the overbed table. Staff B then picked up the black Granufoam dressing and cut the foam to the shape of the wound, and then placed the foam on the wound bed. Staff B covered the Granufoam with the transparent dressing, cut a 1/2-centimeter hole with the scissors in the transparent dressing, placed the sensor tubing over the hole and attached the tube to the wound vac machine and verified that the setting was -120 mm hg. Staff B removed her gloves and exited the room without performing hand hygiene. During an interview on 8/30/2022 at 11:20 AM, Staff B, LPN, stated, I should have used hand sanitizer before I put on my gloves. I thought that I had placed my scissors on the field that I cleaned and that would be okay to do that. Review of the policy and procedure titled Dressing Change with an approval date of 8/8/2022 reads, Policy: A clean dressing will applied [Sic.] by a nurse to a wound as ordered to promote healing. Sterile dressing will be used only if specifically ordered. Procedure . Perform hand hygiene; Apply gloves; Remove and dispose of soiled dressing; Remove gloves; Perform hand hygiene; Apply gloves; Evaluate wound for type, color, amount of drainage; Cleanse wound as ordered, dispose of gauze; Remove gloves and perform hand hygiene; Apply treatment as ordered and clean dressing; Discard gloves and perform hand hygiene. Review of the policy and procedure titled Hand Hygiene with an approval date of 8/8/2022 reads, Overview: The CDC [Centers for Disease Control and Prevention] defines hand hygiene as cleaning your hands by using either handwashing (washing with soap and water), antiseptic hand wash, or antiseptic hand rubs (i.e. alcohol-based sanitizer including foam or gel). Purpose: To reduce the spread of germs in the healthcare setting. Process: Hand hygiene should be performed . After contact with blood, body fluids, or excretions, mucous membranes, non-intact skin, or wound dressings . After glove removal.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents received care and services for c...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents received care and services for central venous access devices in accordance with professional standards of practice for 2 of 2 residents with a central venous access device, Residents #84 and #86, in a total sample of 36 residents. Findings include: 1. During an observation on 8/28/2022 at 11:16 AM, Resident #84 was observed resting in bed with the head of the bed elevated. There was an IV (intravenous) pump with a 1000 milliliter (ml) bag of 0.9% normal saline infusing into a left arm single lumen PICC (peripherally inserted central catheter) line. The PICC line was wrapped with gauze that had a yellow tan substance on the gauze that was dried. The transparent dressing was lifting on all four edges exposing the insertion site to air. During an interview on 8/28/2022 at 12:10 PM, Staff C, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), confirmed that the left PICC line dressing was wrapped in gauze that was stained, the dressing edges were lifting and not adhering to the resident's skin and there was gauze covering the insertion site. During an observation on 8/28/2022 at approximately 12:15 PM, Staff C, LPN, proceeded to change the PICC line dressing for Resident #84. Staff C donned gloves without performing hand hygiene, removed the old dressing, gauze and silver impregnated patch. Staff C removed gloves, opened the dressing kit, and placed them on the resident's bed. Staff C donned the sterile gloves in the package without performing hand hygiene, cleaned the insertion site for 2 seconds, and applied the transparent dressing. Staff C removed gloves and exited the resident's room. Staff did not measure the arm circumference or external catheter length. During an interview on 8/28/2022 at 12:25 PM, Staff C, LPN, stated, I should have checked to arm and catheter length when I changed the dressing. I should have washed my hands before I put on gloves, and I should have cleaned the site longer. Oh, I should have put a face mask on the patient or asked him to turn his head before I did the dressing. Review of Resident #84's records revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses including atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery (heart disease) with angina pectoris (chest pain), acquired absence of left leg below knee, acquired absence of right leg below knee, hyperlipidemia (high cholesterol), hypertension, local infection of the skin, major depressive disorder, pressure ulcer right buttock stage 3, and pressure ulcer left buttock stage 3. Review of the physician order dated 8/21/2022 for Resident #84 reads, Sodium Chloride Injection Solution 0.9% (Sodium Chloride), Use 75 ml [milliliter]/hr [hour] intravenously every shift related to encounter for other specified prophylactic measures (Z29.8) for 14 days. IV [intravenous] NS [normal saline] to run continuously until IV ABT [antibiotic] completed. Review of the physician order dated 8/28/2022 for Resident #84 reads, Vancomycin HCl in Dextrose Intravenous Solution 1-5 GM [grams]/200 (milliliters)-% (Vancomycin HCl- Dextrose) Use 1000 mg [milligrams] intravenously in the evening for wound for 14 days. Pharmacy to dose. Review of the physician order dated 8/21/2022 for Resident #84 reads, Change dressing on admission or 24 hours after insertion and weekly thereafter and PRN [as needed]. Review of the physician order dated 8/21/2022 for Resident #84 reads, PICC or midline: Measure upper arm circumference and external catheter length on admission, with each dressing change and PRN. Review of the physician order dated 8/21/2022 for Resident #84 reads, IVs: Type of Access PICC. Review of the physician order dated 8/21/2022 for Resident #84 reads, IVs: Evaluate site for leakage/ bleeding/ signs of infection every shift. Review of the IV company report dated 8/22/2022 for Resident #84 reads, Reason for Consultation: PICC (non-valved) . Reason for Insertion: Drugs . Post-Insertion Data. Line Insertion: 3 CG PICC. Comments: 4 FR [French] PICC inserted into R [Right] basilic vein successfully . Instructed to order CXR [chest x-ray] for verification of PICC line tip placement prior to use. Review of the radiology report dated 8/22/2022 at 3:12 PM for Resident #84 reads, Conclusion: No acute cardiopulmonary process. Right PICC line tip in the right jugular venous system, recommend repositioning. Review of the IV company report dated 8/23/2022 for Resident #84 reads, Reason for Consultation: PICC (non-valved) . Reason for Insertion: Drugs . Post-Insertion Data. Line Insertion: 3 CG PICC. Reinsertion: Yes. Reinsertion Due To: Malpositioned PICC. Comments: 4 FR PICC inserted into L [left] basilic vein successfully . Instructed to order CXR for verification of PICC line tip placement prior to use. Review of the radiology reports indicated no CXR was completed for Resident #84. Review of the physician orders indicated no order for CXR for Resident #84. During an interview on 8/30/2022 at 11:50 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated, All PICC lines should be verified with Chest X ray for placement before we use them. I did not know that he did not have X ray confirmation of his PICC line when it needed to be reinserted. We should not have used the line until we did. I see that was his second PICC line. I expect that all staff understand this and follow the orders for PICC line and care. We have batch orders that should be entered when a PICC line goes in. This is a problem. All PICC line dressings should be changed 24 hours after they are inserted and whenever they are soiled or compromised. I expect nurses to follow physician orders. During an interview on 8/31/2022 at 8:40 AM, the Advanced Practice Registered Nurse (APRN) stated, I was not aware that we did not do an X ray to confirm line placement prior to administering medications. There are possible complications related to infusing medications, but truly I am not familiar enough with the nursing home process. I would expect that the nurses will do arm circumference measurements to make sure there is no clot or infections process being completed. During an interview on 8/31/2022 at 9:15 AM, the Attending Physician stated, I do expect staff to safely administer IV fluids per my orders and to complete my orders and if they don't they need to call me. 2. During an observation on 8/31/2022 at 9:04 AM, Resident #86 was resting in bed with a left single lumen PICC line. The transparent dressing was dated 8/28/2022 with a 2x2 gauze under the transparent dressing. Review of Resident #86's records revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses including chronic osteomyelitis right thigh, infection of amputation stump, left lower extremity chronic venous insufficiency, hypertension, and anemia in chronic kidney disease. Review of the physician order dated 8/28/2022 for Resident #86 reads, Change dressing on admission or 24 hours after insertion and weekly thereafter and PRN. Every day shift every Sun [Sunday]. Review of the physician orders dated 8/10/2022 for Resident #86 reads, PICC or midline: Measure upper arm circumference and external catheter length on admission, with each dressing change and prn, every night shift every Thu [Thursday]. Review of Resident #86's Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed NA was documented for arm circumference and length on 8/11/2022, 3 was documented for arm circumference and length on 8/18/2022, and NA was documented for arm circumference and length on 8/25/2022. During an interview on 8/31/2022 at 10:11 AM, the DON stated, I do expect the nurses to follow physicians' orders for measuring arm circumference. It is a standard to change dressings every 48 hours if they have gauze under them. I don't know why the staff is documenting NA. NA would mean not applicable and that they did not do it. They should have followed the physician orders. Review of the policy and procedure titled Central Vascular Access Device (CVAD) Dressing Change with an approval date of 8/8/2022 reads, Considerations: 1. Central vascular access devices (CVADs) include: 1.1 Peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) . 2. The catheter insertion site is a potential entry site for bacteria that may cause a catheter-related infection . Guidance . 2. When a transparent dressing is applied over a sterile gauze dressing it is considered a gauze dressing and is changed . 2.2. Every 2 days, 2.3. If the integrity of the dressing has been compromised (wet, loose, or soiled) . 9. Length of external catheter is obtained . 9.2. During dressing changes . 10. For PICC's, upper arm circumference (10 cm [centimeters] above the antecubital fossa) is obtained . 10.2. Upon admission if no insertion measurement available, then weekly . Procedure: 1. Verify prescriber order . 4. Perform hand hygiene . 7. [NAME] masks and clean gloves . 9. Remove old dressing/securement device, being careful not to disturb catheter . 11. Remove gloves. Perform hand hygiene at bedside using appropriate hand sanitizer. 12. [NAME] sterile gloves. 13. Vigorously cleanse around catheter insertion site with antimicrobial solution, according to the manufacturer's instructions. Allow to air dry. Review of the policy and procedure titled Administration of Intermittent Infusion with an approval date of 8/8/2022 reads, Guidance . 2. Documentation of central vascular access device (CVAD) tip location must be included in the medical record prior to administration of medications. Maintain catheter patency per flushing/locking protocol while awaiting confirmation. Documentation may include: 2.1. Copy of chest X-ray results reporting location of tip, or fluoroscopy report.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Respiratory Care (Tag F0695)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received respiratory care services c...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received respiratory care services consistent with professional standards of practice for 4 of 5 residents reviewed for respiratory care services, Residents #80, #84, #95, and #201, in a total sample of 36 residents. Findings include: 1. During an observation on 8/28/2022 at 12:00 PM, Resident #80 was sitting in her bed with oxygen being administered via nasal cannula (N/C). Oxygen concentrator was set at 3.75 liters per minute. During an observation on 8/28/2022 at 3:30 PM, Resident #80 was receiving oxygen via N/C. Oxygen concentrator was set at 3.75 liters per minute. During an observation on 8/29/2022 at 9:00 AM, Resident #80 was receiving oxygen via N/C. Oxygen concentrator was set at 3.75 liters per minute. Review of Resident #80's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses including hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body) and hemiparesis (muscle weakness or partial paralysis on one side of the body) following cerebral infraction (stroke), pericardial effusion (fluid buildup), pleural effusion (a buildup of fluid between the tissues that line the lungs and the chest), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with (acute) exacerbation, (a condition involving constriction of the airways and difficulty or discomfort in breathing). Review of the physician order dated 8/8/2022 for Resident #80 reads, Respiratory: Oxygen-continuous 2 liter via N/C. During an interview on 8/31/2022 at 9:30 AM, Staff F, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), stated, It is supposed to on 2 liters. Oh, I was not aware it was on 3.75 liters. 2. Review of Resident #95's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]with the diagnoses including other specified myoneural disorders; COVID-19; influenza due to other identified influenza virus with other respiratory manifestations; fibromyalgia; unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbance; urinary tract infection, site not specified; atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery without angina pectoris; mixed hyperlipemia; other urethral stricture, male, meatal; muscle weakness (generalized); difficulty in walking, not elsewhere classified; need for assistance with personal care; other lack of coordination; gastro-esophageal reflux disease without esophagitis; presence of urogenital implants; old myocardial infarction; and essential (primary) hypertension. Review of Resident #95's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, completed on 8/14/2022, reads, Should brief interview for mental status (C0200-C0500) be conducted? 0. No (resident is rarely/never understood.) Review of Resident #95's physician orders did not reveal an active order for the administration of oxygen. During an observation on 8/28/2022 at 11:07 AM, Resident #95 was lying in his bed in his room. There was an oxygen concentrator located on the floor at the left side of his bed. The oxygen concentrator was running and was set to 2 liters per minute. The tubing from the oxygen concentrator was in the resident's bed, tangled up in the resident's sheets. The resident was not wearing his nasal cannula. During an observation on 8/29/2022 at 9:26 AM, Resident #95 was observed lying in his bed. The resident was being administered oxygen via a nasal cannula attached to the tubing that was connected to the oxygen concentrator. The oxygen concentrator was set at 2 liters per minute. (Photographic evidence obtained.) During an observation on 8/29/2022 at 11:27 AM, Resident #95 was observed lying in his bed. The resident was being administered oxygen via a nasal cannula. The oxygen concentrator was set at 2 liters per minute. (Photographic evidence obtained.) During an interview on 8/30/2022 at 9:40 AM, Staff A, Registered Nurse (RN), Unit 2 Manager, confirmed that Resident #95 had been receiving oxygen. After reviewing Resident #95's clinical record, Staff A confirmed the resident had an order for continuous oxygen at 2 liters per minute that was discontinued on 8/24/2022. Staff A stated, On 8/27/22 at approximately 6:30 PM, I checked all the residents on Unit 2. [Resident #95's name] oxygen concentrator was off, and he was not wearing the nasal cannula. Another nurse must have checked on the resident later, saw the oxygen concentrator in the resident's room, turned it on, and put the nasal cannula on the resident, thinking that the resident was supposed to be receiving oxygen. During an interview on 8/30/2022 at 3:15 PM, the Director of Nursing stated it was her expectation that the nurses should be aware of what each resident's physician orders were and the nurses should be monitoring the residents who were on oxygen administration. The Director of Nursing confirmed that Resident #95 did not have an active physician order for oxygen administration on 8/29/2022. 3. During an observation on 8/28/2022 at 9:55 AM, Resident #84 was resting in bed with the head of his bed elevated 45 degrees with oxygen infusing via nasal cannula. The oxygen concentrator was set at 4 liters per minute. During an observation on 8/29/2022 at 9:40 AM, Resident #84 was resting in bed with the head of the bed elevated with oxygen infusing via nasal cannula. The oxygen concentrator was set at 4 liters per minute. Review of Resident #84's records revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses including atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery (heart disease) with angina pectoris (chest pain), acquired absence of left leg below knee, acquired absence of right leg below knee, hyperlipidemia (high cholesterol), hypertension, local infection of the skin, major depressive disorder, pressure ulcer right buttock stage 3, and pressure ulcer left buttock stage 3. Review of the physician order dated 8/27/2022 for Resident #84 reads, Oxygen at 2 L [liters] as needed PRN if O2 [oxygen] drops less than 90%. During an interview on 8/29/2022 at 9:40 AM, Staff D, Registered Nurse (RN), stated, I don't know why his oxygen is at 4 liters. His order is for 2 liters. There is no way that he can change it himself. He cannot reach it. We should check the oxygen when we administer medications. I would not go above 2 liters of oxygen. 4. During an observation on 8/28/2022 at 2:32 PM, Resident #201 was observed resting in bed with oxygen infusing via nasal cannula. The oxygen concentrator was set at 4 liters per minute. Review of Resident #201's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses including COVID-19, hypertensive heart disease with heart failure, type 2 diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and major depressive disorder. Review of the physician orders dated 8/18/2022 for Resident #201 reads, Respiratory: Oxygen Continuous 2 L/NC [nasal cannula]. During an observation on 8/29/2022 at 12:03 PM, Resident #201 was resting in bed with oxygen infusing via nasal cannula. The oxygen concentrator was set a 4 liters per minute. During an interview on 8/29/2022 at 12:45 PM, Staff E, RN, stated, His oxygen is running at 4 liters on the concentrator. If we have any concerns, we would start oxygen and call the physician to get an order. If any resident had any decompensation, we should document it in the progress notes. His order is for 2 liters, and it shouldn't be at 4 liters. During an interview conducted on 8/30/2022 at 1:35 PM, the Director of Nursing stated, I would expect the staff to follow the doctors' orders for oxygen and check at least daily what the settings are. Review of the policy and procedure titled Oxygen Therapy with an approval date of 8/8/2022 reads, Policy: Oxygen therapy is the administration of a FiO2 [Fraction of Inspired Oxygen] greater than 21% by means of various administration devices to . to decrease work of breathing; to reverse and prevent tissue hypoxia, and/or; to decrease myocardial work . Procedure: Physician's order for oxygen therapy shall include: Administration modality; FiO2, or liter flow; continuous or PRN [as needed]; PRN orders must include specific guidelines as to when the resident is to use oxygen . Review physician's order.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was prepared and stored in a safe and san...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was prepared and stored in a safe and sanitary manner. Findings include: During an initial observation of the main kitchen with Staff G, Cook, on 8/28/2022 beginning at 10:15 AM, there were open items inside the cooler with no opening date including [NAME] El Whole Eggs, a ceramic bowl of purple jelly-like substance, Sysco Imperial Thickened Dairy Drink and a clear bag of approximately four cups of sliced lemons. In the freezer on the floor under the racks, there were pieces of paper trash, small milk cartons. In the dry storage area, there was one container of food wrapped in foil, which was not labeled or dated. On the shelf in the dry storage area, there was an area approximately 8 inches of what appears to be spilled white sugar. The door to the dry storage area was propped open with three large dented cans. In a free-standing cooler, there was a black substance on the door frame. The gasket on the door was cracked and split. In prep area, there was breakfast eggs sitting out on counter with utensils sitting inside, one gallon of milk sitting out on counter. The slicer has old food debris build up on the blade. There were personal items (cell phone) out on prep table area. The oven had brown buildup substance around edges. The cups and saucers were sitting on a tray in an upright position (photographic evidence obtained). During an interview on 8/28/2022 at approximately 10:25 AM, Staff G, Cook, stated, I have been here only one week and the oven is not used to cook only to hold items. Staff G acknowledged the undated items in the cooler. During an interview on 8/29/2022 at approximately 11:15 AM, the Certified Dietary Manager stated that she had not finished training Staff G, and she was not aware of the concerns with gasket being cracked and split. Review of the policy and procedure titled Food Storage: Cold revised in May 2014 reads, Policy Statement: It is the center policy to insure all Time/Temperature Control for Safety (TCS), frozen and refrigerated food items, will be appropriately stored in accordance with guidelines of the USDA Food Code. Action Steps: 1. The Food Services Director is responsible for storing all items 6 inches above the floor and 18 inches below sprinkler unit . 5. The Food Service Director/ Cook(s) insures that all food items are stored properly in covered containers, labeled and dated, and arranged in a manner to prevent cross contamination. Review of the policy and procedure titled Food Storage- Dry Goods revised in May 2014 reads, Policy Statement: It is the center policy to insure all dry goods will be appropriately stored in accordance with guidelines of the USDA Food Code. Action Steps: Dry Storage: 1. The Food Services Director or designee is responsible to store all items 6 inches above the floor on shelves, racks, dollies or other surfaces which facilitate thorough cleaning. Items may not be stored within 18 [inches] of the sprinkler unit . 3. The Food Services Director or designee ensures that all packaged and canned food items shall be kept clean dry, and properly sealed. Review of the policy and procedure titled Equipment revised in May 2014 reads, Policy Statement: It is the center policy that all foodservice equipment is clean, sanitary, and in proper working order. Action Steps: 1. The Food Services Director will ensure that all equipment is routinely cleaned and maintained in accordance to [Sic.] manufacturer directions and training materials. 2. The Food Services Director will ensure that all staff members are properly trained in the cleaning and maintenance of all equipment. 3. The Food Services Director will ensure that all food contact equipment is cleaned and sanitized after every use . 5. The Food Services Director will ensure that all submit requests for maintenance or repairs to the Administrator and /or Maintenance Director as needed.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Florida facilities.
  • • 38% turnover. Below Florida's 48% average. Good staff retention means consistent care.
Concerns
  • • Multiple safety concerns identified: 3 life-threatening violation(s). Review inspection reports carefully.
  • • 26 deficiencies on record, including 3 critical (life-threatening) violations. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
  • • Grade F (34/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
Bottom line: This facility has 3 Immediate Jeopardy findings. Serious concerns require careful evaluation.

About This Facility

What is Aviata At Spring Hill's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns AVIATA AT SPRING HILL an overall rating of 4 out of 5 stars, which is considered above average nationally. Within Florida, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.

How is Aviata At Spring Hill Staffed?

CMS rates AVIATA AT SPRING HILL's staffing level at 2 out of 5 stars, which is below average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 38%, compared to the Florida average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care. RN turnover specifically is 67%, which is notably high. RNs provide skilled clinical oversight, so turnover in this role can affect medical care quality.

What Have Inspectors Found at Aviata At Spring Hill?

State health inspectors documented 26 deficiencies at AVIATA AT SPRING HILL during 2022 to 2025. These included: 3 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death) and 23 with potential for harm. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.

Who Owns and Operates Aviata At Spring Hill?

AVIATA AT SPRING HILL is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by AVIATA HEALTH GROUP, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 120 certified beds and approximately 111 residents (about 92% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in BROOKSVILLE, Florida.

How Does Aviata At Spring Hill Compare to Other Florida Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Florida, AVIATA AT SPRING HILL's overall rating (4 stars) is above the state average of 3.2, staff turnover (38%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (3 stars) is at the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Aviata At Spring Hill?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations and the below-average staffing rating.

Is Aviata At Spring Hill Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, AVIATA AT SPRING HILL has documented safety concerns. Inspectors have issued 3 Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 4-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Florida. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.

Do Nurses at Aviata At Spring Hill Stick Around?

AVIATA AT SPRING HILL has a staff turnover rate of 38%, which is about average for Florida nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.

Was Aviata At Spring Hill Ever Fined?

AVIATA AT SPRING HILL has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.

Is Aviata At Spring Hill on Any Federal Watch List?

AVIATA AT SPRING HILL is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.