CLAYBERG, THE
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Clayberg, The in Cuba, Illinois has received a Trust Grade of B, indicating it is a good facility and a solid choice for families researching nursing homes. It ranks #131 out of 665 nursing homes in Illinois, placing it in the top half of facilities in the state, and #3 out of 6 in Fulton County, meaning there are only two local options considered better. The facility is improving, having reduced its number of issues from 6 in 2024 to 3 in 2025, although it has had some concerning incidents. Staffing is rated average with a turnover of 38%, which is better than the state average, and there have been no fines, a positive sign for compliance. However, there have been specific incidents of concern, such as a resident suffering a fracture after slipping while ambulating barefoot and another resident being allowed to leave the building unsupervised. Additionally, staff did not consistently perform hand hygiene during medication administration, which could pose infection risks. Overall, while there are strengths in staffing stability and compliance, the facility does have areas that need improvement.
- Trust Score
- B
- In Illinois
- #131/665
- Safety Record
- Moderate
- Inspections
- Getting Better
- Staff Stability ○ Average
- 38% turnover. Near Illinois's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Illinois facilities.
- Skilled Nurses ✓ Good
- Each resident gets 43 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than average for Illinois. RNs are trained to catch health problems early.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 13 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
-
Staff turnover below average (38%)
10 points below Illinois average of 48%
Facility shows strength in fire safety.
The Bad
Near Illinois avg (46%)
Typical for the industry
The Ugly 13 deficiencies on record
Apr 2025
3 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Pressure Ulcer Prevention
(Tag F0686)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow their plan of care for potential skin impairment for one (R40) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers/skin br...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to follow standard precautions and perform hand hygiene before or after administration of oral medications for eight residents (...
Read full inspector narrative →
MINOR
(C)
Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact
Staffing Information
(Tag F0732)
Minor procedural issue · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to post the required staffing information to include the census and actual hours worked per shift for nursing staff. This has th...
Read full inspector narrative →
May 2024
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to train staff on how to properly use equipment to prevent a fall for ...
Read full inspector narrative →
May 2024
5 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Transfer Notice
(Tag F0623)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
2) R43's Medication Review Report, dated 5/14/24, documents he has diagnoses which include a history of Atrial Firbrillation, Chronic Kidney Disease, Dementia and Congestive Heart Failure.
R43 was hos...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Pressure Ulcer Prevention
(Tag F0686)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility to prevent cross contamination during a pressure ulcer treatment for one (R31) of one resident reviewed for pressure ulcers in the samp...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an opened multi-dose diabetic insulin pen and an opened multi-dose insulin vial was labeled with the date opened for t...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to perform hand hygiene during incontinence care for one...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medication Errors
(Tag F0758)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
3. R21's current admission Record documents R21 has an admission date of 4/10/2023.
R21's Physician Orders, dated 9/27/23, documents R21 has received Seroquel (anti-psychotic medication) 50mg (milligr...
Read full inspector narrative →
Mar 2023
3 deficiencies
1 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
Facility failures resulted in two deficient practices.
A. Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to ensure fall prevention interventions were in place and new fall pre...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0657
(Tag F0657)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to revise a fall prevention care plan following a resident fall for one of 16 residents reviewed for care plan accuracy in the sample of 26.
...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medication Errors
(Tag F0758)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to attempt a gradual dose reduction of a psychotropic medication as ordered by the physician for one of three residents (R31) re...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jan 2023
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Notification of Changes
(Tag F0580)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the physician and resident representative of a change in con...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Illinois facilities.
- • 38% turnover. Below Illinois's 48% average. Good staff retention means consistent care.
- • 13 deficiencies on record, including 1 serious (caused harm) violation. Ask about corrective actions taken.
About This Facility
What is Clayberg, The's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns CLAYBERG, THE an overall rating of 4 out of 5 stars, which is considered above average nationally. Within Illinois, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.
How is Clayberg, The Staffed?
CMS rates CLAYBERG, THE's staffing level at 3 out of 5 stars, which is average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 38%, compared to the Illinois average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.
What Have Inspectors Found at Clayberg, The?
State health inspectors documented 13 deficiencies at CLAYBERG, THE during 2023 to 2025. These included: 1 that caused actual resident harm, 11 with potential for harm, and 1 minor or isolated issues. Deficiencies causing actual harm indicate documented cases where residents experienced negative health consequences.
Who Owns and Operates Clayberg, The?
CLAYBERG, THE is owned by a government entity. Government-operated facilities are typically run by state, county, or municipal agencies. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 49 certified beds and approximately 46 residents (about 94% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in CUBA, Illinois.
How Does Clayberg, The Compare to Other Illinois Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Illinois, CLAYBERG, THE's overall rating (4 stars) is above the state average of 2.5, staff turnover (38%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (5 stars) is much above the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Clayberg, The?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"
Is Clayberg, The Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, CLAYBERG, THE has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 4-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Illinois. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Clayberg, The Stick Around?
CLAYBERG, THE has a staff turnover rate of 38%, which is about average for Illinois nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was Clayberg, The Ever Fined?
CLAYBERG, THE has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.
Is Clayberg, The on Any Federal Watch List?
CLAYBERG, THE is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.