FLORENCE NURSING HOME
Inspected within the last 6 months. Data reflects current conditions.
Florence Nursing Home in Marengo, Illinois, has a Trust Grade of B, indicating it is a good choice, though not without some concerns. It ranks #143 out of 665 facilities in Illinois, placing it in the top half, and #4 out of 10 in McHenry County, meaning only three local options are better. The facility is improving, having reduced its issues from four in 2024 to two in 2025. Staffing is a mixed bag; while the turnover rate is low at 37%, the staffing rating is only 2 out of 5 stars, suggesting there may not be enough staff available at times. The home has $3,168 in fines, which is average, and it provides more RN coverage than 77% of Illinois facilities, ensuring better oversight of resident care. However, there are some notable concerns. For instance, staff failed to use proper personal protective equipment while providing care to residents with feeding tubes and catheters, risking infection. Additionally, a resident requiring assistance was improperly transferred without a gait belt, raising safety concerns. Lastly, incontinence care was performed without proper hygiene protocols, leading to potential cross-contamination. Overall, while there are strengths in staffing stability and RN oversight, families should be aware of the care practices and incidents that have occurred.
- Trust Score
- B
- In Illinois
- #143/665
- Safety Record
- Low Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Better
- Staff Stability ○ Average
- 37% turnover. Near Illinois's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
- Penalties ⚠ Watch
- $3,168 in fines. Higher than 88% of Illinois facilities, suggesting repeated compliance issues.
- Skilled Nurses ✓ Good
- Each resident gets 51 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than average for Illinois. RNs are trained to catch health problems early.
- Violations ○ Average
- 9 deficiencies on record. Average for a facility this size. Mostly minor or procedural issues.
The Good
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
-
Staff turnover below average (37%)
11 points below Illinois average of 48%
Facility shows strength in fire safety.
The Bad
Near Illinois avg (46%)
Typical for the industry
Below median ($33,413)
Minor penalties assessed
The Ugly 9 deficiencies on record
May 2025
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to transfer a resident in a safe manner. This applies to ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide incontinence care in a manner to prevent cross...
Read full inspector narrative →
Apr 2024
3 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Pressure Ulcer Prevention
(Tag F0686)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to have pressure relieving devices in place for one of o...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to safely perform ADL (Activities of Daily Living) assistance for one ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement an Enhanced Barrier Precautions Procedure which applies to all 30 residents in the facility.
The findings include:
T...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jan 2024
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Notification of Changes
(Tag F0580)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify a resident's legal representative of a change in condition for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for notification in the sample of 6.
...
Read full inspector narrative →
May 2023
3 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
ADL Care
(Tag F0677)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident's oral appliance was applied correct...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to handle ready to eat foods according to professional food safety standards. This applies to 2 (R12 and R13) of 12 residents rev...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0883
(Tag F0883)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to offer and administer pneumonia vaccines (pneumococcal conjugate vacc...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
- • $3,168 in fines. Lower than most Illinois facilities. Relatively clean record.
- • 37% turnover. Below Illinois's 48% average. Good staff retention means consistent care.
- • No major red flags. Standard due diligence and a personal visit recommended.
About This Facility
What is Florence's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns FLORENCE NURSING HOME an overall rating of 4 out of 5 stars, which is considered above average nationally. Within Illinois, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.
How is Florence Staffed?
CMS rates FLORENCE NURSING HOME's staffing level at 2 out of 5 stars, which is below average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 37%, compared to the Illinois average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.
What Have Inspectors Found at Florence?
State health inspectors documented 9 deficiencies at FLORENCE NURSING HOME during 2023 to 2025. These included: 9 with potential for harm.
Who Owns and Operates Florence?
FLORENCE NURSING HOME is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 56 certified beds and approximately 31 residents (about 55% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in MARENGO, Illinois.
How Does Florence Compare to Other Illinois Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Illinois, FLORENCE NURSING HOME's overall rating (4 stars) is above the state average of 2.5, staff turnover (37%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (5 stars) is much above the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Florence?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?" These questions are particularly relevant given the below-average staffing rating.
Is Florence Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, FLORENCE NURSING HOME has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 4-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Illinois. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Florence Stick Around?
FLORENCE NURSING HOME has a staff turnover rate of 37%, which is about average for Illinois nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was Florence Ever Fined?
FLORENCE NURSING HOME has been fined $3,168 across 1 penalty action. This is below the Illinois average of $33,111. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.
Is Florence on Any Federal Watch List?
FLORENCE NURSING HOME is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.