AXIOM GARDENS OF MOUNT VERNON

#5 DOCTORS PARK, MOUNT VERNON, IL 62864 (618) 242-1064
For profit - Corporation 106 Beds Independent Data: November 2025
Trust Grade
5/100
#456 of 665 in IL
Last Inspection: March 2025

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

Axiom Gardens of Mount Vernon has received a Trust Grade of F, indicating significant concerns about the facility's quality of care. With a state rank of #456 out of 665 facilities in Illinois, they are in the bottom half, and they rank #3 out of 4 in Jefferson County, meaning there is only one better local option. Although the facility is improving, with the number of issues decreasing from 15 in 2024 to 13 in 2025, it still has serious weaknesses, including a poor staffing rating of 1 out of 5 stars and a concerning turnover rate of 55%. Families should be aware that there have been serious incidents, such as a resident falling out of bed and sustaining injuries, and another resident who was not adequately monitored for fall risks, which led to significant injuries. Additionally, the facility has received $37,500 in fines, which is average for the area, but still indicates a history of compliance issues. Overall, while there are some improvements, the facility's low trust grade and concerning incidents should give families pause.

Trust Score
F
5/100
In Illinois
#456/665
Bottom 32%
Safety Record
High Risk
Review needed
Inspections
Getting Better
15 → 13 violations
Staff Stability
⚠ Watch
55% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
Penalties
⚠ Watch
$37,500 in fines. Higher than 100% of Illinois facilities. Major compliance failures.
Skilled Nurses
⚠ Watch
Each resident gets only 19 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Illinois. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
Violations
⚠ Watch
37 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Overall Rating
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Staff Levels
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Care Quality
★★☆☆☆
2.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2024: 15 issues
2025: 13 issues

The Good

  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record

Facility shows strength in fire safety.

The Bad

1-Star Overall Rating

Below Illinois average (2.5)

Significant quality concerns identified by CMS

Staff Turnover: 55%

Near Illinois avg (46%)

Higher turnover may affect care consistency

Federal Fines: $37,500

Above median ($33,413)

Moderate penalties - review what triggered them

The Ugly 37 deficiencies on record

3 actual harm
May 2025 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from resident to resident physical abuse...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from resident to resident physical abuse for 2 (R3 and R4) of 3 residents reviewed for abuse in the sample of 4. Findings Include: R3's admission Record documented R3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and included diagnoses of unspecified dementia, essential hypertension, unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition, atrial fibrillation, osteoarthritis of knee, adult failure to thrive, and unspecified macular degeneration. R3's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], documented that R1 has a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11, indicating R3 is moderately impaired. R3's Care Plan with a date of 05/01/2025 included a focus area of I have a behavior problem (Physical altercation with roommate.) The interventions listed are administer meds as ordered, anticipate and meet residents needs, arrange placement with compatible roommate, and monitor for evidence of agitation. R4's admission Record documented R4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and included diagnoses of vascular dementia, unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance and anxiety, and primary insomnia. R4's MDS assessment dated [DATE], documented a BIMS score of 99 indicating that R4 was unable to complete the interview. R4's Care Plan with a date of 03/25/2025, included a focus area of I have impaired cognitive function/dementia or impaired thought processes related to a diagnosis of vascular dementia. The interventions listed are use the residents preferred name, identify yourself, face the resident when speaking, engage the resident with simple, structured activities that avoid overly demanding tasks, monitor and report any changes in cognitive function, and review medications. The facility's Final Abuse Investigation Report with no date documented on 05/01/2025 at 5:00 A.M, V15 (Certified Nurse Assistant/CNA) was walking in the hall and witnessed R4 and R3 entangled on the floor of their room. R3 was observed having skin tears on the outer side of both hands and R4 had a swollen nose. R3 and R4 were separated immediately. R3 reported that he was sleeping and that a man jumped on top of him. R4 did not have a recollection of the event. Residents are no longer roommates and there have been no further incidents. On 05/23/2025 at 9:35AM, V13 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) stated that he was the nurse that came on shift on 05/01/2025 at 6:00 AM and the incident occurred before he arrived. V13 stated that R3 and R4 were sharing a room at the time of the incident. V13 stated that R3 was always stating that people were stealing his stuff, and everyone was out to get him. V13 stated it is very rare for R4 to have behaviors. V13 stated R4 gets frustrated because he is not able to make his needs known. V13 stated that he feels that R3 was the aggressor in the incident. V13 stated that R3 always talks about being a [NAME] and whipping people. V13 stated he feels that R4 sat on the edge of R3's bed causing R3 to become agitated and that is when the incident occurred. V13 stated that neither resident was sent out to seek treatment. V13 stated that R3 was moved to the non-locked side of the facility in a room by himself. V13 stated that R4 has had no behaviors since the incident with R3. On 05/23/2025 at 9:50AM, R3 was alone in his room in bed and stated he was in an altercation about a year and a half ago. R3 stated he does not remember being in an altercation with anyone the last couple of months. R3 stated that someone tried to beat up on him but he handled it. R3 stated I worked him over. On 05/23/2025 at 9:57 AM, V1 (Administrator) stated that after the incident with R3 and R4, R4 was evaluated by psych and medications were adjusted. V1 stated that after the incident the residents were immediately separated and R3 was moved off the locked dementia side of the facility. V1 stated that R3 can be territorial and would get upset when residents would wonder in his room. On 05/23/2025 at 10:36 AM, V14 (CNA) stated that R4 is a pleasant resident and does not cause any trouble. V14 stated that R4 gets frustrated when you have to wake him up but other than that he will allow staff to provide care for him. V14 stated she has never witnessed R4 be aggressive with any other resident. V14 stated that after the incident, R3 stated he worked (R4) over real good. On 05/23/2025 at11:13 AM, V15 (CNA) stated that she was the aide working on the locked dementia unit the night the altercation occurred between R3 and R4. V15 stated she was doing bed checks on the middle hall and heard someone yelling help. V15 stated that she could tell it was coming from the front hall so she went to the front hall. V15 stated she entered R3 and R4's room and observed R3 and R4 entangled on the floor in an altercation. V15 stated she removed R4 from on top off R3. V15 stated she and R4 left the room and went to the nurses station. V15 stated that she has never observed R4 being combative with anyone. V15 stated that R3 did not like R4 in his room because R4 would rummage through his personal belongings. V15 stated that before the incident occurred, R3 had voiced that he would like a different room because he did not like R4 in there and was going to kick R4 out of the room. V15 stated she is not sure if the nurses reported this to V1 or not. On 05/23/2025 at 3:19 PM, V16 (LPN) stated she was the nurse the night the incident occurred between R3 and R4. V16 stated it was reported to her by V15 (CNA) that R3 and R4 had been entangled together on the floor. V16 stated that R3 explained that R4 kept coming over to his bed and R3 told him to quit. R4 explained to V16 that they just went at it. V16 stated that R3 always thinks someone is out to get him and does not like having roommates. V16 stated that R3 didn't like that R4 would rummage through his things. Facility policy titled Abuse Prevention and Reporting - Illinois with a revision date of 10/24/2022, documented under section titled Guidelines - This facility affirms the right of our residents to be free from abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of property, deprivation of goods and services by staff or mistreatment. This facility therefore prohibits abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of property, and mistreatment of residents. In order to do so, the facility has attempted to establish a resident sensitive and resident secure environment. The purpose of this policy is to assure that the facility is doing all that is within its control to prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of property, deprivation of goods and services by staff and mistreatment of residents. Protection of Residents: Residents who allegedly abused another resident shall be immediately evaluated to determine the most suitable therapy, care approaches, and placement, considering his or her safety, as well as the safety of other residents and employees of the facility. In addition, the facility shall take all steps necessary to ensure the safety of residents including but not limited to, the separation of residents.
Mar 2025 1 deficiency
CONCERN (F) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to follow current CDC (Center for Disease Control) guidelines for proper PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) use and failed to ef...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to follow current CDC (Center for Disease Control) guidelines for proper PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) use and failed to effectively sanitize floors during COVID outbreak. This has the potential to affect all 53 residents living in the facility. The Findings Include: 1. On 3/27/25 at 11:00 am, V14 (Housekeeping Supervisor) said they use (Brand Cleaner) Lavender all purpose neutral cleaner when they mopped the floor currently and during the COVID outbreak. V14 said she is unsure if it kills COVID or not. On 3/26/25 at 2:30pm, V12 (Housekeeping) said there was cleaner in her mop water as she was moping. V12 said it is (Brand Cleaner) Lavender All Purpose Neutral Cleaner. V12 said she doesn't know if it kills COVID or not. On 3/27/25 at 10:37 am, V16 (floor cleaner manufacturer representative) said that (Brand Cleaner) Lavender All Purpose Neutral Floor Cleaner has zero kill time for COVID. V16 said it is just a multi purpose floor cleaner and does not kill COVID. On 3/27/25 at 1:00pm, V1 (Administrator) said she was not aware the cleaner they were using to mop the floors did not kill COVID. 2. On 3/26/25 at 2:00pm, V6 (Activity Assistant Aide) said she wore just a surgical mask when going in the COVID positive resident rooms during the outbreak. On 3/27/25 at 10:00am, V8 (Social Services Director) said that staff wore surgical masks when caring for COVID positive residents. V8 said she doubled her surgical mask. V8 said she asked the nurse for N95 and goggles and was told there was none. V8 said PPE supplies were kept where the time clock is and there was none. On 3/26/25 at 12:50pm, V9 (CNA/Certified Nurse Assistant) said she did not wear a N95 mask and face shield/goggles during the Covid outbreak. V9 said there was only surgical masks and that another CNA called and asked and was told there was none. On 3/26/25 at 1:20 pm, V10 (CNA) said they all wore surgical masks during the COVID outbreak. V10 said they did not have anything but gowns, gloves and surgical masks. On 3/26/25 at 2:30pm, V11 (CNA) said she and everybody wore surgical masks when their residents had COVID. V11 said there was not any N95 masks or eye/face shields. V11 said they did have gowns and gloves. On 3/27/25 at 2:40pm, R3 who was alert to person, place and time, said that he did have COVID back when everyone had it. R3 said that staff did not wear anything but a regular mask. R3 said they did not wear anything over their eyes or wear a gown. On 3/27/25 at 12:30pm, R7 who was alert to person, place and time, said she did have COVID when everyone had it. R7 said staff just wore regular masks. On 3/27/25 at 2:00pm, V2 (DON/Director of Nurses) said she does not know why staff were not wearing the proper PPE when it was available. V2 said all of the staff have been trained on wearing the proper PPE. A facility matrix printed 3/28/25 documents there are 53 residents living the facility. Facility Document labeled Infection Prevention and Control Program (revised 12/5/24) documents .All facility personnel shall adhere to the Infection Control Program in the performance of their daily assignments. Employees disregarding the facility's policies and procedures shall be retrained as necessary, disciplined, and may be discharged for repeated non-compliance The facility shall assure that necessary training, equipment and supplies are maintained to carry out an effective Infection Control Program. According to the CDC website at https://www.cdc.gov/covid/hcp/infection-control/index.html#:~:text=HCP%20who%20enter%20the%20room,and%20sides%20of%20the%20face), Healthcare Provider who enter the room of a patient with suspected or confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection should adhere to Standard Precautions and use a NIOSH Approved particulate respirator with N95 filters or higher, gown, gloves, and eye protection (i.e., goggles or a face shield that covers the front and sides of the face).
Mar 2025 11 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0604 (Tag F0604)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to have assessments and/or physician's orders for lap restraints for 2 (R12 and R19) of 2 residents reviewed for restraints in a ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to have assessments and/or physician's orders for lap restraints for 2 (R12 and R19) of 2 residents reviewed for restraints in a sample of 39. Findings include: 1. R12's admission record documents an admission date of 06/13/19 with diagnoses including: Alzheimer's disease, dementia, muscle wasting and atrophy, unsteadiness on feet, and encounter for palliative care. R12's order summary report dated 03/13/25 does not document any order for a lap cushion. R12's current care plan does not document a focus area documenting a lap cushion. R12's hospice team visitation log dated 10/15/24 documents problem/intervention/goal: leans forward in wheelchair/lap cushion when up in wheelchair/pt (patient) will not fall out of wheelchair. 2. R19's admission record documents an admission date of 07/27/24 with diagnoses including: cerebral atherosclerosis, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, history of falling, moderate dementia with psychotic disturbance, peripheral vascular disease, muscle wasting and atrophy, and encounter for palliative care. R19's order report documents an order dated 03/13/25 of lap cushion while up in wheelchair for positioning. R19's care plan documents a focus area dated 12/13/24 of resident (R19) does not understand mobility limits due to cognitive limitations. Fall mat at bedside, with an intervention with a date initiated of 11/01/24 with a revision date of 01/03/25 of lap cushion to assist in position maintenance. R19 hospice team visitation log dated 07/25/24 documents problem/intervention/goal: high fall risk, leans forward when in wheelchair/lap cushion when up in wheelchair/pt (patient) will not have any falls. On 03/13/25 at 8:45 AM, V1 (Administrator) stated, they do not have any assessments for R12 and R19's lap cushion. She believes they were both initiated as fall interventions for R12 and R19. On 03/12/25 at 12:10 PM, R12 and R19 were being assisted with lunch and they both had lap restraints intact. On 03/13/25 from 11:45 AM to 12:15 PM, V19 was being assisted with lunch with her lap restraints intact. On 03/13/25 at 12:07 PM, V9 (Certified Nurse Assistant) stated, R19 should have her lap restraint removed during meals. V9 stated R19 would not be able to remove the lap restraint if she was asked to do so. The facility policy dated 05/24/18 titled, Restraints documents: 1. residents that are admitted with a physician's order for restraint use shall have a restraint use assessment performed and a physician order obtained for the release of restraints with supervision during the assessment process, as appropriate, or an order to discontinue use. 2 periodic assessments shall address the resident's status in an effort to reduce or eliminate restraints whenever possible and assure the restrictive method is used which allows the resident to function at their highest practicable level. 3 the use of restraints will be reviewed by the interdisciplinary team periodically and at least quarterly thereafter. 4 restraint assessments are performed at a minimum with the initial application, change in type of restraint and change in the resident's condition which affects how the resident responds to current treatment.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to perform fall risk assessments timely and implement effective interve...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to perform fall risk assessments timely and implement effective interventions to prevent falls for 1 of 6 residents (R17) reviewed for falls in a sample of 39. Findings include: R17's admission record documents an admission date of 05/15/19, with the following diagnoses in part, Alzheimer's disease, unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, with other behavioral disturbances. R17's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], documents a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 99, indicating R17 was unable to complete interview. Fall investigation dated 12/23/24 documents R17 was being walked to the dining room with 2 CNAs (Certified Nursing Assistants). This fall investigation documents the following interventions were implemented, Frequent reminders to have help and assist with ambulation when needed. Fall investigations dated 02/13/25 and 02/22/25 for R17 documents no new interventions were implemented. R17's most recent fall risk assessment is dated 12/23, with no year documented. This assessment documents that R17 is at high risk for falls. R17's old care plan documents an intervention dated 05/23/24 as the most recent fall intervention. R17's current care plan, located in her electronic medical record, documents five fall interventions, all with an initiation date of 03/10/25. On 03/13/25 at 11:18am, V7 (MDS/Care Plan Coordinator) stated interventions should be listed on the care plan, that is the only place it would be. V7 stated the interventions listed on the fall investigation report for R17 from 12/23/24 were not appropriate interventions. On 03/13/25 at 2:17pm, V2 (Director of Nurses) stated she did not see any interventions for R17's falls on 02/13/25 and 02/22/25 anywhere in the medical record. V2 stated she was not sure why there was 5 interventions dated for 03/10/25, because there was no reason for her to have had 5 interventions with that initiation date. V2 stated that the most recent fall risk assessment they had for R17 was from 12/23/24. V2 stated that interventions of frequent reminders to have help and assist with ambulation as needed for V17's fall on 12/23/24 would not be appropriate interventions for a fall that occurred while she was being assisted by two staff members with ambulation. Facility Policy titled Fall Prevention Program with a revision date of 11/21/17 documents the following: A Fall Risk Assessment will be performed at least quarterly, and with each significant change in mental or functional condition and after any fall incident . Accident/Incident reports involving falls will be reviewed by the Interdisciplinary team to ensure appropriate care and services were provided and determine possible safety interventions.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that tables were properly cleaned and sanitized, prior to residents eating on them for 3 of 16 (R32, R41, and R44) revi...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that tables were properly cleaned and sanitized, prior to residents eating on them for 3 of 16 (R32, R41, and R44) reviewed for dining in the sample of 39. Findings include: 1. R32's admission record dated 3/13/25, documents an admission date of 05/17/23 with a diagnosis in part of unspecified dementia, unspecified severity with agitation. R32's MDS (Minimum Data Set), dated 3/01/25, documents a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 99 which indicates severely impaired cognition. Section GG document set-up and clean up assistance with eating. Section I documents non-Alzheimer's dementia. On 03/10/25 at 12:10PM, R153 got up from the table after he was done eating leaving his plate on the table. R32 walked into the dining room and sat down at the table spot that R153 had been eating at. R32 started to eat off the plate that R153 left on the table. R32 ate the rest of R153's chicken and mashed potatoes. V11 (Certified Nurse Assistant/CNA) took R153's plate away from R32 and told him that he couldn't eat that. V11 asked R32 if he ate the food on R153's plate and he answered yes. Table area where R32 sat down at was soiled with food. No staff observed cleaning or sanitizing table area. On 03/10/25 at 12:35PM, R32 was served his plate over top of food soiled table. 2. R44's admission record dated 02/20/25, documents an admission date of 08/07/24, with diagnoses in part of bipolar disorder, current episode manic severe with psychotic features and other frontotemporal neurocognitive disorder. R44's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 02/14/25 documents in Section C a BIMS score of 99 which indicates severely impaired cognition. Section GG documents eating as set-up and clean-up assistance. Section I document non-Alzheimer's dementia and bipolar disorder. On 03/10/25 at 12:17PM, V13 (Licensed Practical Nurse) brought R44 over to a table in the dining room where R10 was sitting prior. R10's plate was still sitting on table in front of R44. V11 (CNA) removed R10's plate from in front of R44 but did not clean the table. R44 was observed eating the food off the table with her fingers saying how hunger she was. R44 continued to eat food remains from the table with her fingers. R44 ate all the food remains off the table. On 03/10/25 at 12:40PM R44 was served her tray. The table was still soiled with food no staff cleaned or sanitized table prior to delivering tray or after tray was delivered. 3. R41's admission record dated 03/13/25, documents an admission date of 12/04/24 with diagnoses in part of unspecified dementia with agitation, Wernicke's encephalopathy, convulsions, and anxiety. R41's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 12/23/24 documents a BIMS score of 99. Section GG documents eating as supervision and clean-up assistance. On 03/12/25 at 11:50AM, R41 sat down at a table where someone else was sitting and eating at prior. R41 was trying to eat off the plate that was sitting on the table. R41's table area was soiled with food. On 03/12/25 at 11:52AM, V8 (Activity Assistant) removed the plate from R41. V8 took the dirty plate away from the table and placed the plate in the dirty dish area. V8 did not wipe the table off. On 03/12/25 at 12:00PM, R41's tray was served over top of soiled food table. No staff cleaned or sanitized table prior to place plate on table. On 03/10/25 at 12:42PM, V11 (CNA) stated that all tables should be wiped down and sanitized before a resident sits down to eat. V11 said that anytime a resident sits down to eat that the area should be cleaned for the next resident. On 03/12/25 at 1:56PM, V8 (Activity Assistant) stated that all table should be wiped down and clean prior to any resident sitting down to eat. On 03/12/25 at 1:58PM, V6 (Dietary Aide) stated that all tables should be cleaned and sanitized prior to any resident sitting down to eat. V6 said that if another resident was sitting at the spot another resident wants to sit at then that spot should be cleaned prior to them sitting down and the food removed from the table. The facility policy titled Resident Dining Services under procedures 11. Staff should clean and sanitize dining room tables after resident leaves table.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide Enhanced Barrier Precautions according to prof...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide Enhanced Barrier Precautions according to professional standards of practice for 3 out of 3 residents (R13, R22, R38) reviewed for infection control in a sample of 39. Findings include: 1. R38's admission record documents an admission date of 12/24/24 with the following diagnoses in part, local infection of the skin and subcutaneous tissue and necrotizing fasciitis. R38's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], documents a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15, indicating R38 is cognitively intact. R38's Order Summary Sheet dated 03/13/25 documents the following active treatment orders; Wound Cleansing Site: Cleanse BLE (Bilateral Lower Extremities) with saline. Apply xeroform, cover with calcium alginate, ABD (abdominal) pad and wrap with gauze, every day shift related to necrotizing fasciitis. Wound Cleansing Site: Cleanse left heel with normal saline or sterile water, apply calcium alginate, and cover with dry dressing every day shift for food wound. R38's medical record, including care plan, does not include measures to put enhanced barrier precautions in place. On 03/10/25 at 10:50am, No enhanced barrier precautions posted on or around R38's door. No PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) observed near R38's door. On 03/10/25 at 12:24 PM, No enhanced barrier precautions posted on or around R38's door. No PPE observed near R38's door. On 03/11/25 at 11:04AM, No enhanced barrier precautions posted on or around R38's door. No PPE observed near R38's door. On 03/12/25 at 8:47AM, No enhanced barrier precautions posted on or around R38's door. No PPE observed near R38's door. 2. R22's admission record documents an admission date of 09/10/24 with the following diagnosis in part, Idiopathic aseptic necrosis of unspecified toe(s). R22's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], documents a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 13, indicating R22 is cognitively intact. R22's Order Summary Sheet dated 03/13/25 documents the following active treatment orders; Wound cleansing site: Left lateral calf and left anterior knee. And R (right) forearm. Wipe with skim prep daily every day shift for skin tear. Wound cleansing site: Left lateral calf and R forearm. Wipe with skin prep daily every day shift for skin tear. R22's medical record, including care plan, does not include measures to put enhanced barrier precautions in place. 3. R13's admission record documents an admission date of 01/30/25 with the following diagnosis in part, unspecified atherosclerosis of native arteries of extremities, unspecified extremity. R13's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], documents a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 13, indicating R13 is cognitively intact. R13's Order Summary Sheet dated 03/13/25 documents the following active treatment order; Betadine surgical scrub external solution (Povidone-Iodine). Apply to bilat (bilateral) feet topically one time a day every Mon, Wed, Fri for post amputation bilat feet through metatarsal bone. Apply betadine wet to dry to bilat surgical sites on feet, cover with Adaptec, 4x4, kerlix, cast padding and ace wrap. R38's medical record, including care plan, does not include any enhanced barrier precautions in place. On 03/12/25 at 10:00AM, V20 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) asked what kind of trash bag she needed for the wound trash. V20 stated she didn't know what kind of trash bag she needed, if she needed a regular bag or a red biohazard bag. V20 said that R38 is not on enhanced barrier precautions, she didn't know what enhanced barrier precautions were. V20 stated none of her residents are on enhanced barrier precautions. On 03/12/25 at 10:20am, V1 (Administrator) stated that she didn't know what enhanced barrier precautions was and that she didn't have anyone in the facility that was on enhanced barrier precautions. V1 stated she didn't know that resident with wounds, urinary catheters, feeding tube, central lines and tracheostomy requires any special precautions. She said that they just use standard precautions for all residents. On 03/12/25 at 10:25am, V2 (Director of Nursing/DON) stated that she did not know anything about enhanced barrier precautions and that they didn't have anyone at the facility that was on enhanced barrier precautions. She said that she would look up the enhanced barrier precautions and put it in place. On 03/12/25 at 1:43PM, isolation bins were observed outside of R13, R22, and R38's doors and enhanced barrier precaution signs were also posted. On 03/12/25 at 3:45PM, V2 stated that they did put up enhanced barrier signs and PPE on R13, R22 and R38's rooms. V2 stated those are the only resident that would need enhanced barrier precautions related to wounds. V2 stated that no other resident in the facility qualifies for enhanced barrier precautions. Facility policy titled Enhanced Barrier Precautions, with a revision date of 05/07/24 documents that enhanced barrier precautions are indicated for residents with chronic wounds.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0883 (Tag F0883)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to maintain/offer influenza vaccinations for one (R34) resident of 5 re...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to maintain/offer influenza vaccinations for one (R34) resident of 5 residents reviewed for immunizations in a sample of 39. Findings include: R34's admission Record documents an admission date of 09/12/24 with diagnoses including Parkinson's disease, dementia, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, and cognitive communication deficit. R34's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documents a brief interview of mental status score of 99 indicating resident was unable to complete the interview. R34's current Physician's orders dated 03/17/25 documents an order stating: immunization: may have annual flu vaccine with consent unless contraindicated with an order date 09/16/2024 with no start date or end date noted. R34's electronic medical record does not contain any documentation that R34 received an influenza vaccination in 2024, nor does it contain documentation that R34 was offered the vaccine or refused. On 03/11/25 at 3:30 PM, V2 (Director of Nursing) stated, she does not have any information for R34's influenza vaccination for 2024. V2 stated the only information she could find was where he received his influenza vaccination on 08/24/23. V2 stated most of the residents received the vaccination in October 2024, she does not know why he did not receive his then.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Resident Rights (Tag F0550)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, observation, and record review the facility failed provide respectful dining service by serving residents at...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, observation, and record review the facility failed provide respectful dining service by serving residents at the same table at the same time, keeping residents from taking food from other residents for 8 (R4, R9, R10, R24, R29, R39, R42, R44) of 21 residents reviewed for dining in a sample of 39. Findings include: 1. R24's admission record dated 03/13/25, documents an admission date of 09/30/24 with diagnoses in part of diabetes mellitus and vitamin d deficiency. R24's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 01/06/25 documents in Section C a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 99 which indicates severely impaired cognition. Section GG documents eating as setup and clean-up assistance. Section K documents no weight loss or weight gain. R24's Care Plan with date revised date of 10/20/24 documents a focus area of R24 (resident) has potential nutritional problem r/t (related to) edentulous, receives therapeutic diet. Interventions include in part: provide and serve diet as ordered. On 03/10/25 at 12:00PM, R24 stated he was going to leave the dining room because he wasn't served a tray and everyone else at his table was. On 03/10/25 at 12:02PM, V11 (Certified Nurse Assistant/CNA) started talking to R24 asking him not to leave the dining room that kitchen was working on the lunch trays and that she would see if she could get R24's tray. On 03/10/25 at 12:34PM, R24 was upset and yelling out that he thinks it's crap he has been waiting so long on his food. R24 stated that everyone else at his table got food, why does he not get any food. On 03/10/25 at 12:36PM R24's tray was served. 2. R29's admission record dated 02/20/25 documents an admission date of 12/01/22, with diagnoses in part of unspecified dementia, severe, with other behavioral disturbance, anxiety disorder, and major depressive disorder recurrent. R29's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 12/18/24 documents in Section C a BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score of 5 which indicates severely impaired cognition. Section GG documents eating as supervision or touching assistance. Section I documents non-Alzheimer's dementia. R29's Care Plan documents a focus area of risk for malnutrition with a date initiated of 06/27/24. Interventions in part of provide supervision during meals. Another focus area of R29 (resident) has impaired cognitive function/dementia or impaired thought processes as evidenced by impaired memory, disorganized thought processes date initiated 06/27/24. Interventions include in part of cue, reorient, and supervise as needed, keep the resident's routine consistent and try to provide consistent care as much as possible in order to decrease confusion. On 03/10/25 at 12:12 PM, R29 was sitting at the table with R39. R29 took R39's lemon dessert and spoon. R29 ate all R39's dessert. R29 was the only resident at the table who did not have a plate of food. Staff was made aware that R29 ate all R39's dessert and at 12:17 PM, V11 (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) brought R39 another dessert. R29 did not have a plate of food yet at this time. R29 took the new dessert that R39 was served and ate all that dessert as well. Staff never intervened to stop R29 from eating R39's desserts. On 03/10/25 at 12:35PM R29 was served a plate of food. 3. R44's admission record dated 02/20/25, documents an admission date of 08/07/24, with diagnoses in part of bipolar disorder, current episode manic severe with psychotic features and other frontotemporal neurocognitive disorder. R44's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 02/14/25 documents in Section C a BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score of 99 which indicates severely impaired cognition. Section GG documents eating as set-up and clean-up assistance. Section I document non-Alzheimer's dementia and bipolar disorder. R44's Care Plan with a revision date of 08/20/24 documents a focus area of R44 (resident) is known to display fluctuations in mood related to dementia, bipolar disorder. Interventions include in part monitor/document/report PRN (as needed) any risk for harm to self: suicidal plan, past attempts at suicide, risky actions, stocking pills, saying goodbye to family, giving away possessions or writing a note, intentionally harmed, or tried to harm self, refusing to eat or drink, refusing med or therapies, sense of hopelessness or helplessness, impaired judgement or safety awareness. Focus area of R44 (resident) has impaired cognitive function/dementia or impaired thought processes as evidenced by BIMS score of 99, Dementia. Interventions include in part keep the resident's routine consistent and try to provide consistent care givers as much as possible in order to decrease confusion, provide a program of activities that accommodates R44's abilities. Focus area of Behavior Management with interventions of ensure the safety of R44 and others, initiate visual supervision during acute episodes, monitor for repeatedly approaching others, redirect as needed and utilize diversion techniques as needed. On 03/10/25 at 12:17PM, V13 (Licensed Practical Nurse) brought R44 over to a table in the dining room where R10 was sitting prior. R10's plate was still sitting on table in front of R44. V11 (CNA) removed R10's plate from in front of R44 but did not clean the table. R44 was observed eating the food off the table with her fingers saying how hungry she was. R44 continued to eat food remains from the table with her fingers. R44 ate all the food remains off the table. On 03/10/25 at 12:20PM, R44 started touching R39's chicken who was sitting at the table with her. R44 kept rubbing and touching all over R39's chicken while R39 was trying to eat. R39 stopped eating all together. On 03/10/25 at 12:40PM, R44 was served her tray. 4. R9's admission record dated 03/13/25, documents an admission date of 05/11/2022 with diagnoses in part of unspecified dementia, other psychotic disorder not due to a substance or known physiological condition and major depressive disorder. R9's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 02/06/25 documents in Section C a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 8 which indicates severely impaired cognition. Section GG documents eating setup and clean-up assistance. Section K Documents no weight gain or loss. R9's care plan with a revised date of 08/16/24 documents a focus area R9 (resident) has the potential nutritional problems of weight loss r/t cognitive deficits. Interventions include in part provide, serve diet as ordered. Monitor intake and record q (every) meal. On 03/10/25 at 12:30PM, R9 was waiting on her tray and was asking where his food was. R9's tablemates were served at 12:08PM she had still not received a tray. On 03/10/25 at 12:40PM, R9's tray was served. 5. R42's admission record dated 03/13/25, documents an admission date of 07/19/24 with diagnoses in part of unspecified dementia, unspecified severity with other behavioral disturbance, altered mental status, other frontotemporal neurocognitive disorder, and personal history of traumatic brain injury. R42's MDS dated [DATE] documents in Section C a BIMS score of 99 which indicates severely impaired cognition. Section GG documents eating as supervision and touching assistance. Section I documents non-Alzheimer's dementia. R42's care plan with revision date of 07/13/24 documents a focus area of resident is usually able to perform ADL's (activities of daily living) with supervision and cues as needed. Interventions include in part eating the resident is able to feed self with supervision. Another focus area of function/dementia or impaired thought processes as evidenced by BIMS=3 r/t dementia. Interventions for this focus area include in part cue, reorient, and supervise as needed, engage the resident in simple, structured activities that avoid overly demanding tasks, and provide a program of activities that accommodates the resident's abilities. On 03/10/25 at 12:36PM, R42 was observed taking R4's plate away from her. R42 started eating off R4's plate he ate all her mashed potatoes. V11 (CNA) removed R4's plate away from R42. R42 was sitting at the same table as R4 who was served at 12:17PM. R42 was served at 12:45PM. On 03/10/25 at 12:42PM, V11 (CNA) stated that she didn't know why all the tables were not being served at the same time. V11 stated when the residents sat down at the tables, she put all of the resident dietary lunch cards together in a group so everyone at a table would be served at the same time. V11 said that she handed the kitchen the dietary cards in that order. V11 said whoever was working in the kitchen must have separated out the lunch dietary cards and they were just serving whoever they want to serve. V11 said several of the residents are getting upset because they are having to watch their tablemates eat while they wait. V11 said she doesn't know why they did this, but it is making several of the residents mad and they are wanting to leave, or they are taking other residents' food from them. On 03/10/25 at 11:50 AM through lunch service V5 (Dietary) took a group of the dietary cards rearranged them to put the regular diet cards together, the mechanical soft diets together and puree diets together and was calling to V6 (Dietary) what kind of diet he needed and would then deliver that tray to the window.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0692 (Tag F0692)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents with a history of weight loss or at r...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents with a history of weight loss or at risk for nutritional problems received ordered supplements with meals for 6 of 6 residents (R7, R12, R17, R19, R23, R35) reviewed for nutrition in a sample of 39. Findings Include: On 03/11/24 between 11:40 AM and 12:25 PM, R7, R12, R17, and R23 did not receive a health shake or a nutritional ice cream with the lunch meal. On 03/12/25 between 11:43 AM and 12:27 PM, R7, R17, R19 and R23 did not receive a nutritional ice cream with the lunch meal. 1. R23's admission record documents an admission date of 11/09/21 with diagnoses including: dementia, cerebral infarction, delusional disorders, hallucinations, vitamin D deficiency, hereditary and idiopathic neuropathy, muscle wasting and atrophy and fatigue. R23's care plan documents a focus area noting: the resident has a potential nutritional problem of weight loss r/t (relating to) CVA (cerebrovascular accident), dementia with behaviors, and delusional disorder dated 08/23/24 with interventions including: provide, serve diet as ordered dated 06/13/24 and RD (registered dietician) to evaluate and make diet change recommendations PRN ((pro re nata (as the situation demands)) dated 06/13/24. R23's Nutritional assessment dated [DATE] documents a current weight of 157.2 pounds, section titled, Evaluation of Current Weight documents: -10.48% weight loss x six months with a nutritional status stating: significant weight loss noted x 6 months. BMI (Body mass index) WNL (within normal limits) for age, BMI 23.27 normal (23.0 - 29.9). The section titled, Dietitian Nutritional Assessment documents: Due to significant weight loss and varying PO (per oral) intake will recommend to add a health shake TID (three times a day) with meals to provide additional nutrition and RD to follow up as needed. R23's Nutritional Care Form by V19 (Registered Dietician /RD) dated 01/27/25 documents: RD note (weight) January wt (weight): 147.8 # (pounds) w/ (with) significant weight loss x 1 mo (5.98%) and x 6 mo (17.8%). BMI: (body mass index) 21.82 (underweight). Diet rx (prescription): regular with PO (per oral) intake approximately 50 - 100% breakfast, approximately 50-75% lunch and approximately 75-100 % supper per Jan intake log. Meds reviewed. No new labs. No pressure injuries reported. Note 12/19/24 RD is pending. Will re-recommend and add nutritional ice cream BID (twice a day). RD to follow up PRN. Diet order change to health shake three times a day with meals and nutritional ice cream twice a day. R23's nutrition/dietary note dated 2/21/25 at 1:20 PM documents: RD note (weight review) February wt (weight) 155# with sig (significant) wt (weight) loss noted x 6 mo (months) (11.02%) BMI: 27.8%, nutritional ice cream two times a day and health shake with meals. Despite wt loss x 6 mo, wt x 1 mo is up approximately 4.87% with supplements added recently. Will only recommend to clarify (brand) of nutritional ice cream to (brand) of nutritional ice cream. R23's order summary report dated 03/13/25 documents an order dated 01/29/25 with no end date listed of nutritional ice cream two times a day and an order dated 01/29/25 with no end date listed of health shake with meals. R23's Weights and Vitals documents a weight on 2/11/25 a weight of 156.8 pounds and on 03/11/2025 of 144.3 pounds. Which documents a 7.97 % weight loss within one month. 2. R12's admission record documents an admission date of 06/13/19 with diagnoses including: Alzheimer's disease, dementia, muscle wasting and atrophy, unsteadiness on feet, and encounter for palliative care. R12's current Physician Order sheet documents an order dated 01/23/25 with no end date noted for nutritional health shake with meals. R12's care plan has a focus area of: The resident (R12) has a potential nutritional problem needs staff to feed each meal r/t (relating to) dementia, Alzheimer's disease dated 08/06/24 with an intervention listed as: provide, serve diet as ordered dated 06/13/24 and RD (registered dietician) to evaluate and make diet change recommendations PRN dated 06/13/24. 3. R19's admission record documents an admission date of 07/27/25 with diagnoses including: cerebral atherosclerosis, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, history of falling, moderate dementia with psychotic disturbance, peripheral vascular disease, muscle wasting and atrophy, and encounter for palliative care. R19's current Physician Order sheet documents an order dated 01/29/25 of nutritional ice cream for two times a day for breakfast and lunch with no end date documented. R19's care plan documents a focus area dated 08/14/24 documenting: the resident has unplanned/unexpected weight loss r/t (related to) dementia, and cerebral atherosclerosis with an intervention of: give the resident supplements as ordered with an initiated date of 06/13/24. 4. R7's admission record documents an admission date of 06/30/23 with diagnoses including: dementia, major depressive disorder, rheumatic aortic stenosis with insufficiency, type 2 diabetes mellitus, spinal stenosis, spondylolisthesis, muscle weakness, and age-related osteoporosis. R7's current Physician Order sheet dated 03/13/25 documents an order for nutritional ice cream one time a day with a start date of 01/30/25 with no end date noted. R7's care plan documents a focus area dated 12/16/24 documents: the resident has a potential nutritional problem r/t (relating to) dementia dated 12/17/24, change (specific brand) nutritional ice cream to (specific brand) nutritional ice cream with an intervention listed of: provide, serve diet as ordered with a date initiated of 06/13/24. 5. R17's admission record documents an admission date of 05/15/19 with diagnoses including: Alzheimer's disease, major depressive disorder, dementia, vitamin D deficiency, and vitamin B12 deficiency. R17's current Physician Order sheet dated 03/13/25 documents an order dated 01/23/25 with no end date noted documenting nutritional ice cream two times a day. R17's care plan documents a focus area indicating the resident has a potential nutritional problem of not consuming enough calories r/t dementia dated 09/09/24 with interventions listed as: provide, serve diet as ordered and RD to evaluate and make diet change recommendations PRN both dated 06/13/24. 6. R35's admission record dated 03/13/25, documents an admission date of 09/21/24 with diagnoses in part of unspecified dementia unspecify severity with other behavioral disturbance, major depressive disorder, and type 2 diabetes mellitus. R35's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 01/14/25 documents in Section C a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) of 12 which indicates moderately impaired cognition. Section GG eating as setup or clean-up assistance. Section K document no weight loss and no weight gain. R35's Physician Orders documents on 1/29/25 a supplement for a magic cup (nutritional ice cream) is ordered one time a day. R35's Care plan with a revised date 06/25/24 with a focus area of R35 (resident) has the potential nutritional problem. Interventions include in part provide and serve diet as ordered. On 03/11/25 at 11:57AM R35 was served her lunch tray no nutritional ice cream served with lunch tray. On 03/11/25 at 12:00PM, V8 (Activity Assistant) was reviewing R35's dietary lunch card and V8 stated that R35 should have gotten a nutritional ice cream with her lunch. V8 said that he was going to go to the kitchen window to get R35 nutrition ice cream. V8 asked the kitchen staff for the nutrition ice cream. V8 stated that the kitchen staff told him they were out of nutrition ice cream and didn't have any substitute for the ice cream. On 03/12/25 at 12:20PM, R35 was served her lunch tray no nutritional ice cream served with lunch tray. On 03/12/25 at 12:47 PM, V6 (Dietary) stated on 03/11/25 the facility did not have any health shakes or nutritional ice cream and on 03/12/25 the facility was still out of nutritional ice cream. On 03/12/25 at 1:56PM, V8 (Activity Assistant) stated that he was helping in kitchen and that they were out of nutritional supplement still. V8 said they have been without nutritional ice cream for at least 2 days. V8 said that he looked in the freezer and refrigerator himself to check to see if they have any and he said that the facility doesn't have any nutritional ice cream. V8 said that on 03/11/25 that the facility didn't have any nutritional ice cream or nutritional supplements. V8 said that they did get nutritional supplements in today, but still no nutritional ice cream. On 03/12/25 at 1:58PM V6 (Dietary) stated they didn't have any nutritional ice cream in the facility, and they had been out for 2 days now. V6 said they were also out of nutritional supplement, but that a truck came in today and they received the nutritional supplement. V6 said he didn't know when they would be getting the nutritional ice cream in. V6 said if they were going to get the nutritional ice cream, he would have thought it would have been today when the truck came in. V6 stated that he has not given the resident who are to receive nutritional ice cream or supplements any kind of nutritional substitute. On 03/13/25 at 3:30 PM, V1 (Administrator) stated, if the kitchen does not have any nutritional shakes or nutritional ice cream, they should make fortified pudding or an equal replacement to give as a substitute until they get more supplements in. On 03/17/25 at 3:27 PM, V19 (Registered Dietician) stated if the facility was out of the supplements she recommended for a resident with weight loss, she would expect them to give a substitution, for example a fortified pudding or another substitution. If the resident was to receive multiple supplements, she would want a substitution given. The facility can always call her for any recommendations if they need some. The undated facility policy titled, Nutritional/Dietary Supplements documents: Nutritional/dietary supplements are provided to residents per clinician order. The dietary department should maintain a current list of residents and their ordered supplement(s). Nursing services delivers and documents the consumption of ordered nutritional/dietary supplements on the MAR (medication administration record) per facility guidelines or state requirements. The facility policy dated 2022 titled, Unintentional Weight Loss documents: unintentional weight loss can be rapid or sometimes slow and insidious. It is important that systems are in place to detect, assess and develop and individualized plan of care for persons with unintentional weight loss.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0712 (Tag F0712)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on interview and record review the facility failed to have a physician perform a comprehensive evaluation within 30 days post admission for 5 of 5 residents (R2, R13, R48, R49, and R102) reviewe...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to have a physician perform a comprehensive evaluation within 30 days post admission for 5 of 5 residents (R2, R13, R48, R49, and R102) reviewed for physicians' visits in a sample of 39. Findings include: 1.) R2's admission Record documents an admission date of 01/20/25 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, type 2 diabetes mellitus, heart failure, liver cell carcinoma, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, anemia, and hereditary and idiopathic neuropathy. 2.) R102's admission record documents an admission date of 02/12/25 with diagnoses including neurocognitive disorder with Lewy bodies, dementia, metabolic encephalopathy, acute systolic heart failure, chronic kidney disease stage 1, chronic atrial fibrillation, and depression. 3.) R49's admission record documents an admission date of 02/07/25 neurocognitive disorder with Lewy Bodies, hyperlipidemia, and gastro-esophageal reflux disease with esophagitis. 4.) R13's admission record documents an admission date of 01/30/25 with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, atherosclerosis of native arteries of extremities, psychosis not due to a substance or known physiological condition, schizoaffective disorder, and tobacco use. 5.) R48's admission record documents an admission date of 01/22/25 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, peripheral vascular disease, hypothyroidism, anxiety disorder, bipolar disorder, hypertension, aortic aneurysm, and diaphragmatic hernia. On 03/13/25 at 3:45 PM, V1 (Administrator) stated V21 (Medical Director) has not physically been in the building since January 15, 2025 and has not seen R2, R102, R49, R13 or R48 in person for a comprehensive admission assessment. They have all seen the nurse practitioner.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0744 (Tag F0744)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents with dementia received the necessary...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents with dementia received the necessary person-centered care and services consistent with the resident goals and symptomology for 5 of 8 residents (R23, R29, R32, R42, R44) reviewed for dementia care in the sample of 39. Findings include: 1. R32's admission record dated 3/13/25, documents an admission date of 05/17/23 with a diagnosis in part of unspecified dementia, unspecified severity with agitation. R32's MDS (Minimum Data Set), dated 3/01/25, documents a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 99 which indicates severely impaired cognition. Section GG document set-up and clean up assistance with eating. Section I documents non-Alzheimer's dementia. R32's Care Plan with a revised date of 09/24/24 documents a focus area of risk for malnutrition r/t (related) dementia. 09/23/24 Remeron daily as ordered. Interventions include in part: Provide supervision during meals, R32 has another focus area of resident has impaired cognitive function/dementia or impaired thought processes. Interventions include in part keep the resident routine consistent and try to provide consistent care givers as much as possible in order to decrease confusion. On 03/10/25 at 12:10PM, R153 got up from the table after he was done eating lunch leaving his plate on the table. R32 walked into the dining room and sat down at the table where R153 had been eating at. R32 started to eat off the plate that R153 left on the table. R32 ate the rest of R153's chicken and mashed potatoes. V11 (Certified Nurse Assistant/CNA) took R153's plate away from R32 and told him that he couldn't eat that. V11 asked R32 if he ate the food on R153's plate and he answered yes. On 03/10/25 at 12:35PM, R32 was served his lunch plate. 2. R29's admission record dated 02/20/25, documents an admission date of 12/01/22, with diagnoses in part of unspecified dementia, severe, with other behavioral disturbance, anxiety disorder, and major depressive disorder recurrent. R29's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 12/18/24 documents in Section C a BIMS score of 5 which indicates severely impaired cognition. Section GG documents eating as supervision or touching assistance. Section I documents non-Alzheimer's dementia. R29's Care Plan documents a focus area of risk for malnutrition with a date initiated of 06/27/24. Interventions in part of provide supervision during meals. Another focus area of R29 (resident) has impaired cognitive function/dementia or impaired thought processes as evidenced by impaired memory, disorganized thought processes date initiated 06/27/24. Interventions include in part of cue, reorient, and supervise as needed, keep the resident's routine consistent and try to provide consistent care as much as possible in order to decrease confusion. On 03/10/25 at 12:12PM, R29 was sitting at the table with R39. R29 took R39's lemon dessert and spoon. R29 ate all R39's dessert. R29 was the only resident at the table who did not have a plate of food. Staff was made aware that R29 ate all R39's dessert and at 12:17PM staff brought R39 another dessert. R29 did not have a plate of food yet at this time. R29 took the new dessert that R39 was served and ate all that dessert as well. Staff never intervened to stop R29 from eating R39's desserts. On 03/10/25 at 12:35PM, R29 was served a plate of food. 3. R44's admission record dated 02/20/25, documents an admission date of 08/07/24, with diagnoses in part of bipolar disorder, current episode manic severe with psychotic features and other frontotemporal neurocognitive disorder. R44's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 02/14/25 documents in Section C a BIMS score of 99 which indicates severely impaired cognition. Section GG documents eating as set-up and clean-up assistance. Section I document non-Alzheimer's dementia and bipolar disorder. R44's Care Plan with a revision date of 08/20/24 documents a focus area of resident is known to display fluctuations in mood related to dementia, bipolar disorder. Interventions include in part monitor/document/report PRN (as needed) any risk for harm to self: suicidal plan, past attempts at suicide, risky actions, stocking pills, saying goodbye to family, giving away possessions or writing a note, intentionally harmed, or tried to harm self, refusing to eat or drink, refusing med or therapies, sense of hopelessness or helplessness, impaired judgement or safety awareness. Focus area of resident has impaired cognitive function/dementia or impaired thought processes as evidenced by BIMS score of 99, Dementia. Interventions include in part keep the resident's routine consistent and try to provide consistent care givers as much as possible in order to decrease confusion, provide a program of activities that accommodates (R44's) abilities. Focus area of Behavior Management with interventions of ensure the safety of (R44) and others, initiate visual supervision during acute episodes, monitor for repeatedly approaching others, redirect as needed and utilize diversion techniques as needed. On 03/10/25 at 12:20PM, R44 started touching R39's chicken. R44 kept rubbing and touching all over R39's chicken while R39 was trying to eat. R39 stopped eating all together. On 03/12/25 at 1:45PM, R44 was in the dining room sitting at the table with R35. No staff present in the dining room. R44 kept touching R35's arm. R35 told R44 to leave her alone and stop touching her that she wasn't in the mood for it today. R35 told R44 not to touch her again she wasn't kidding. R44 continued to touch and talk to R35 telling her how beautiful she was and kept touching her face and rubbing R35's arm. R35 told R44 to stop messing around and asked R44 if she wanted to fight. R44 responded That would be a good thing. R35 then responded with I don't think so. On 3/12/25 at 1:50PM, R44 got up from the dining room table and started to walk toward the hallway trying to get in other resident's rooms. R44 then went back into the dining room and sat next to R35 again touching R35's arm and trying to rub her face. On 03/10/25 at 12:17PM, (V13 Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) brought R44 over to a table in the dining room where R10 was sitting prior. R10's plate was still sitting on the table in front of R44. V11 (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) removed R10's plate from the table in front of R44, but did not clean the table. R44 was observed eating the food off the table with her fingers saying how hungry she was. R44 continued to eat food remains from the table with her fingers. R44 ate all the food remains off the table. On 03/12/25 at 2:00PM, V12 (LPN) stated that R44 is not on one on ones. V12 was not aware that R44 was in the dining room with R35. V12 said that none of the residents have any special intervention on the dementia care unit. V12 stated that no resident on the dementia care unit has any individualized care plans either. V12 said that they do the best they care with what they have to work with. V12 said she was going to send someone to the dining room to get R44 so that R35 didn't do anything to her. V12 said a lot of the residents on the dementia care unit have behaviors, and they just do what they can. On 03/12/25 at 2:05PM unknown staff went and got R44 from the dining room and sat R44 by the nurse's station. R44 started to touch R1 getting in her face telling R1 she was beautiful and hugging all over her. Unknown staff removed R44 from R1's personal space. R44 kept getting up close to several other residents. Unknown staff just kept moving her away from the other residents. No other interventions tried at that time other than redirection. R44's progress note dated 03/08/25 by V12 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) documents, (R44) up, grabbing food and drinks out of peers hands. Staff unable to redirect. (R44) keeps going up to peers that are asking her to stop! and go away! (R44) needs to have 1:1 intervention when awake to keep her from getting hurt by her peers. CNA staff must stay right with her to keep her from agitating peers and them lash out at her. Very difficult for staff to keep this resident safe from peers when she is awake. Progress note dated 03/12/25 by V12 (LPN) documents (R44) is up, keeps touching peers and getting in their personal space. Very difficult to redirect. (R44) will not follow request by peers to back up or to stop touching me. Staff has to keep redirecting her away from peers. (R44) keeps going right back to getting in her peers' space. Received all scheduled meds per MAR (Medication Administration Record) with some difficulty. No s/s (signs and symptoms) of distress or discomfort observed. 4. R23's admission record dated 03/13/25, documents an admission date of 11/09/21 with diagnoses in part of unspecified dementia severe with other behavioral disturbance, delusional disorder, and other hallucinations. R23's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 02/01/25, documents in Section C a BIMS should not be attempted related to resident is rarely/never understood. Staff assessment documents short- and long-term memory problems. Section GG documents sit to stand as partial/moderate assistance and walking as supervision or touching assistance. Section I documents non-Alzheimer's dementia. R23's Care Plan with a revision date of 08/16/24 with a focus of resident has behavior problems r/t dementia, hallucinations, delusional disorder, amnesia. Interventions include in part anticipate and meet the resident's needs, intervene as necessary to protect the right and safety of others, approach/speak in a calm manner. Divert attention. Remove from situation and take to alternate location as needed and provide a program of activities that is of interest and accommodates resident's status. On 03/11/25 at 11:30AM, R23 was found lying in R29's bed asleep. R29 was sitting in her room in her recliner. V13 (LPN) and an unknown (CNA) was sitting up at nurse's station and was asked if that was R23 in R29's bed. V13 answered it could be. On 03/11/25 at 11:45AM, R23 was still laying in R29's bed. 5. R42's admission record dated 03/13/25, documents an admission date of 07/19/24 with diagnoses in part of unspecified dementia, unspecified severity with other behavioral disturbance, altered mental status, other frontotemporal neurocognitive disorder, and personal history of traumatic brain injury. R42's MDS dated [DATE] documents in Section C a BIMS score of 99 which indicates severely impaired cognition. Section GG documents eating as supervision and touching assistance. Section I documents non-Alzheimer's dementia. R42's care plan with revision date of 07/13/25 documents a focus area of resident is usually able to perform ADL's (activities of daily living) with supervision and cues as needed. Interventions include in part eating the resident is able to feed self with supervision. Another focus area of function/dementia or impaired thought processes as evidenced by BIMS=3 r/t dementia. Interventions for this focus area include in part cue, reorient, and supervise as needed, engage the resident in simple, structured activities that avoid overly demanding tasks, and provide a program of activities that accommodates the resident's abilities. On 03/10/25 at 12:36PM, R42 was observed taking R4's plate away from her. R42 started eating off R4's plate and he ate all of her mashed potatoes. V11 (CNA) removed R4's plate away from R42. R42 was sitting at the same table as R4 who was served at 12:17PM. R42 was not served until 12:45PM. On 03/12/25 at 1:57PM, V17 (CNA) stated that they do not do any one on one's with any residents. V17 said that she was not aware of any individualized care plans for any resident. V17 stated when a resident has a behavior she tries to redirect if she can. V17 said that she is not aware of any special activities that they do for the residents. On 03/12/25 at 1:59PM, V18 (CNA) stated that they do not do one on ones for any residents on the dementia care unit. V18 said that when a resident has a behavior that they redirect the resident when they can. On 03/13/25 at 1:00PM, V7 (MDS Coordinator) stated that none of the dementia care residents have individualized dementia care plans. V7 said all the dementia care plans are just basic care plan that they aren't individualized for each dementia resident's needs. V7 asked if she should be doing individualized care plans for each dementia resident. V7 said she would do what she could to help divert behaviors or mood problems. V7 said she knew nothing about doing the individualized care plans, but that she would work on it. On 03/13/25 at 2:30PM, V14 (Activity Director) stated that all the residents at the facility have the same activities. V14 said that the dementia care unit does not have separate activities from the other unit. V14 said that she will take the other residents over to the locked unit for activities. V14 said that she doesn't have individualized activities just for the residents with dementia. V14 said that she does try to involve all the residents in the activities but sometimes the residents on the dementia unit all will get up and leave. V14 stated that she has stuff on the dementia care side that residents can do but that the staff on the dementia side won't ever do the activities with the residents. V14 said that when a resident has a behavior or mood problems that all the certified nurse assistants do is redirect the resident. V14 said that the certified nursing staff will not do any activities with the residents to see if that will help the behaviors. V14 said the certified staff will redirect the resident or sit them at the nurse's station. V14 said that when a resident is having a behavior, or they are having problem with a resident the certified staff will try to come get her or the activity assistant. V14 said they might be in the middle of an activity or something and the certified staff won't doing anything with the resident they want me or my assistant to help take care of the behavior. V14 said that certified staff could be doing something with the residents to such as an activity to see if it helps the behavior, but they won't. On 03/13/25 at 2:35PM, V8 (Activity Assistant) stated that the certified nursing staff from the dementia care locked unit will try to come get him when a resident is having a behavior. V8 said they will come get me and see if I will go over to do an activity with the resident or see if I can help with the resident behavior. V8 said that he might be busy and if he is that none of the staff will do anything to help the resident with the behavior, they just wait for him or redirect the resident. V8 said that the certified nursing staff could do an activity with the resident the same as he could, but they don't think that is their job. On 03/13/25 at 2:47PM, V15 (Social Service Director/SSD) stated that she doesn't know of any extra things they do for the dementia care unit residents. V15 said that she doesn't know if the dementia care residents have any individualized care plans. V15 said that if they did that V7 (MDS) would know. V15 said that she doesn't know of anything special they do for the dementia care residents on the locked unit. V15 stated that they need to do more individualized care with the dementia care residents to help with their behaviors, but she said that they would need more staff to be able to do that. On 03/13/25 at 2:57PM, V16 (CNA) stated that they have not received any special training on dementia care residents. V16 said he has worked at the facility for 6 months. V16 stated they don't do anything special with the residents on the dementia care unit. V16 said he is not aware of any activity supplies that are available for them to use to help divert residents' behaviors. V16 said they just try to redirect resident when they can and then chart the behavior. V16 said that other places he has worked use to do the training on dementia care. V16 said that he notices the residents have more behaviors in the evening time. V16 said that they usually will try to redirect the resident or put them up at the nurse's station or turn on the television for them. V16 said that sometime when they pass out snacks that will help the resident behaviors. On 03/13/25 at 3:26pm, V2 (Director of Nursing) stated she was not sure about individualized interventions or activities for residents with dementia or if they are care planned for them, that would be a question for activities or the care plan nurse. V2 stated that staff recently had completed the dementia live training with one of the hospice groups. The facilities policy titled Dementia Unit Admission/discharge Criteria and Program documents, The dementia unit, housed in a wing of this facility, addresses special needs of individuals with dementia who could possibly pose a risk to themselves outside of a secured unit. The goal of this program is to provide a safe environment for the individual, while offering activities that support the best quality of life possible. The program will offer a person-centered approach. Person centered care encompasses four major elements, and these are identified as the core values of this unit. A value base that asserts the absolute value of all human lives regardless of age and cognitive ability, an individualized approach, recognizing uniqueness, understanding the world from a perspective of the service user, providing a social environment that supports psychosocial needs. In order to assure the best possible outcome, a team consisting of the Director of Nursing, Director of Social Service, Director of Activities, Nursing staff (which may be RN (Registered Nurse), LPN, QMA (Qualified Medication Aide) and CNA), medical director, psychiatric nurse practitioner, and counseling consult will work together to develop plans of care that allow the resident to experience the best quality of life possible. admission Guidelines for Dementia Unit document in part, The secured dementia unit exists to provide residents with the cognitive or Alzheimer's/Dementia related diagnosis a safe and comfortable environment where staff has been trained to care for their special needs.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Pharmacy Services (Tag F0755)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on interview, observation, and record review the facility failed to process the returning and/or destroying of unused medication for 4 of 4 (R12, R16, R32, R156) residents reviewed for medicatio...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview, observation, and record review the facility failed to process the returning and/or destroying of unused medication for 4 of 4 (R12, R16, R32, R156) residents reviewed for medications storage in the sample of 39. Findings include: 1. R32's admission record dated 3/13/25, documents an admission date of 05/17/23 with a diagnosis in part of unspecified dementia, unspecified severity with agitation. R32's Physician orders documents order for Ipratr-albuter 0.5mg (milligrams)-3mg/ml (milliliters) ordered on 01/10/24. On 03/12/25 at 9:45AM, R32 had an open box of ipratropium Bromide and Albuterol Sulfate inhalation solution 0.5mg/3mg/3ml in the medication room refrigerator that expired on 02/2025. 2. R156's admission record dated 03/13/25, documents an admission date of 01/14/2019 and a discharge date of 02/25/25 with diagnoses in part of Alzheimer's, Dementia severe with other behavior disturbances, anemia, and hyponatremia. R156's Immunization record documents no Shingrix vaccine was given to R156. On 03/12/25 at 10:30AM there was a Shingrix vial kit 50mcg (micrograms)/0.5ml vial in medication refrigerator with an expiration date of 10/02/23 with R156's name on it. 3. R16's admission record dated 03/13/25, documents an admission date of 08/02/22 with diagnoses in part of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cerebral infarction, Crohn's disease, seizures, white matter disease, solitary pulmonary nodule, and personal history of malignant neoplasm of ovary. R16's immunization record documents on 09/08/22 one dose of Shingrix was given to R16. On 03/12/25 at 10:30AM, R16's Shingrix vial kit 50mcg (micrograms)/0.5ml vial second dose was in medication refrigerator with an expiration date of 10/06/23. 4. R12's admission record dated 03/13/25, documents an admission date of 06/13/2019 with diagnoses in part of Alzheimer's, dementia, and encounter for palliative care. R12's immunization record documents on 09/11/22 one dose of Shingrix vaccine was given to R12. On 03/12/25 at 10:30AM, R12's Shingrix vial kit 50mcg (micrograms)/0.5ml vial second dose was in medication refrigerator with an expiration date of 10/06/23. 5. On 03/12/25 at 10:30AM the medication refrigerator had Vaxneuvance 0.5ml syringes (stock) order date 10/15/22 with an expiration 11/30/22, Stock Pneumovax 23 vials 0.5ml 2 vials expired 05/06/24, and Stock Prevnar 20 syringes 0.5ml expired 02/28/25. On 03/12/25 at 10:40AM, V2 (Director of Nursing) stated that pharmacy checks their medications for any medications that are expired. V2 said that pharmacy was in not too long ago and checked the refrigerator and carts for expired medication and gave her a report stating that no expired medications were found. V2 stated that she was going to have the expired medication that were found taken care of either sent back or destroyed. On 03/13/25 at 10:45AM, V20 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) stated that pharmacy comes in and checks the medication carts and medication refrigerator often for expired meds. V20 stated that V2 gave her the last pharmacy check dated 01/16/25 and it doesn't show any expired refrigerated meds. A paper with a handwritten date of 01/16/25 with facility pharmacies name titles General medication storage Audit documents there was no check mark next to expired refrigerated meds are not present. The facility policy titled Disposal/Destruction of Expired or Discontinued Medication with a revision date of 07/10/24 documents under procedure: 4. Facility should place all discontinued or outdated medications in a designated, secure location which solely for discontinued medication or marked to identify the medication are discontinued and subject to destruction. 7. Facility should dispose of discontinued medications, outdated medications, or medications left in facility after a resident has been discharged or deceased , in a timely fashion, no more then 90-days of the date the medication was discontinued by physician/prescriber, or sooner per applicable law.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Menu Adequacy (Tag F0803)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow the approved menu for portion sizes and items t...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow the approved menu for portion sizes and items to be served for 8 of 21 residents (R2, R5, R7, R10, R11, R12, R14, R44) reviewed for dining in the sample of 39. Findings include: 1. On 03/10/25 between 11:50 AM and 12:15 PM while observing the plating of the lunch meal R5, R7, R10, and R44 were served a number 12 scoop (2 2/3 ounces) of ground chicken. The facility document titled Diet Spreadsheet documents day 16 Monday dental soft (mech (mechanical) soft) ground fried chicken w/ (with) gravy #8 dipper (4 ounces). R7's current Physician Orders dated 03/13/25 documents an order for regular diet with mechanical soft texture with an order date of 01/23/25. R5's current Physician Orders dated 03/13/25 documents an order dated 01/29/25 of CCD (controlled carb (carbohydrate) diet), mechanical soft texture with a start date of 01/29/25 and no end date listed. R10's current Physician Orders dated 03/13/25 documents an order dated 01/29/25 with no end dated listed of regular diet, mechanical soft texture. R44's current Physician Orders dated 02/20/25 documents an order dated 01/23/25 listing regular diet, mechanical soft texture. 2. On 03/10/25 between 11:45 AM and 12:25 PM no residents were served margarine during the lunch meal. The facility's document titled, Diet Spreadsheet documents day 16 Monday lists: regular diet: cornbread/margarine 3 x 2-1/2 svg (serving)/1 tsp (teaspoon), dental soft (mech soft) cornbread/margarine 3 x 2-1/2 svg (serving)/1 tsp (teaspoon), pureed: pureed cornbread/margarine #10 scoop/1 tsp. On 03/11/25 between 11:40 AM and 12:13 PM no residents were served margarine during the lunch meal. The facility document titled, Diet Spreadsheet documents day 17 Tuesday lists: regular diet: bread/margarine 1 slice/1 tsp (teaspoon), dental soft (mech soft) bread/margarine 1 slice/1 tsp, CCHO (LCS) (consistent carbohydrate (low concentrate sweets)) 1 slice/1 tsp. On 03/12/25 between 11:45 AM and 12:27 PM no residents were served margarine during the lunch meal. The facility document titled, Diet Spreadsheet documents day 18 Wednesday lists: regular diet: dinner roll/margarine 1 each/1 tsp (teaspoon), dental soft (mech soft) soft dinner roll/margarine 1 each/1 tsp, CCHO (LCS) (consistent carbohydrate (low concentrate sweets)) dinner roll/margarine 1 each/1 tsp. On 03/13/25 at 10:17 AM, R11 stated she would like butter with her bread and cornbread. R11 was alert and oriented to person, place, and time. On 03/13/25 at 11:22 AM, R14 stated he would like butter with his bread, cornbread, and other items. R14's was alert to person, place, and time. On 03/13/25 at 11:26 AM, R10 stated he would like butter with his bread and cornbread. R10's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 01/22/25 documents a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 12 indicating he is moderately cognitively intact. On 03/13/25 at 11:24 AM, R2 stated he would like butter with his bread, cornbread, and other items. R2's MDS dated [DATE] documents a BIMS score of 13 indicating he is cognitively intact. On 03/13/25 at 11:35 AM, R12 stated she would like butter with her bread and cornbread. R12's MDS dated [DATE] documents a BIMS score of 12 indicating she is moderately cognitively intact. On 03/13/25 at 3:13 PM, V1 (Administrator) stated, residents should be served the portion size indicated on the spreadsheet. The undated facility policy titled, Portion Control documents: 2. Serve portions according to the menu spreadsheet 3. Use scoops, spoodles, ladles, and scales to serve proper menu portions on the tray line.
Oct 2024 2 deficiencies 1 Harm
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to prevent resident to resident abuse for 1 (R2) of 3 residents reviewe...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to prevent resident to resident abuse for 1 (R2) of 3 residents reviewed for abuse in a sample of 26. This failure resulted in R2 being pushed down and verbally threatened by R1 and R2 being fearful of R1. Findings include: R1's admission Record documents and admission date of 4/21/23 with diagnoses including: dementia with unspecified severity with agitation. R1's New admission Information Sheet documents a diagnosis of Dementia with Behavior. R1's Diagnosis Sheet (undated) documents a diagnosis of: dementia with aggressive behavior. R1's care plan documents a focus area of: the resident (R1) has potential to be physically aggressive to staff and other residents r/t (related to) dementia with a revision date of 07/18/24. The interventions listed include: administer medications as ordered; monitor/document for side effects and effectiveness; analyze times of day, places, circumstances, triggers, and what de-escalate behavior and document; assess and address for contributing sensory deficits; assess and anticipate resident's needs: food, thirst, toileting needs, comfort level, body positioning, pain and etc. (et cetera); communication: provide physical and verbal cues to alleviate anxiety, give positive feedback, assist verbalization of source of agitation; assist to set goals for more pleasant behavior; encourage seeking out of staff member when agitated; give the resident as many choices as possible about care and activities; monitor/document/report PRN (as needed) any s/sx (signs or symptoms) of resident posing danger to self and others; psychiatric/psychogeriatric consult as indicated; and when the resident becomes agitated: intervene before agitation escalates, guide away from source of distress, engage calmly in conversation, if response is aggressive, staff to walk calmly away and approach later. All interventions are dated 06/27/2024. R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 02, indicating R1 has severe cognitive impairment. Section E, Behaviors, under Behavioral Symptoms documents that physical behavior symptoms directed towards others occurred 1 to 3 days during the assessment period. R1's Behavior Tracking Record dated September 2024 documents target behaviors of agitation and aggression. A 0 is documented on all days through 9/26/24, including 9/24/24, indicating R1 had no behaviors. R1's Nurse's Notes dated 09/24/24 at 6:45 AM documents: resident was involved with peer on peer with other resident. This resident was the aggressor. (R1) pushed other resident, hit her and knocked her down to the floor and stated, I'm going to kill you. R1's Nurse's Notes dated 09/24/24 at 6:55 AM documents: spoke with (psychiatric office) new order to send resident to ER (Emergency Room) for psychiatric evaluation. R1's Emergency Department Notes from the local hospital dated 09/24/24 documents a Chief Complaint of Aggressive Behavior. A provider notes dated 9/24/24 at 7:50 AM documents presents to ED (Emergency Department) from (name of facility) for aggressive behaviors. Calm and docile for EMS (Emergency Medical Services). NH (Nursing Home) reports he had an altercation with a female resident in the facility. R2's Physician Order Sheet dated 09/01/24 to 09/30/24 documents a diagnosis of dementia dated 12/09/23. R2's MDS dated [DATE] documents a BIMS score of 03, indicating R2 has severe cognitive impairment. R2's Nurse's Notes dated 09/24/24 at 6:45 AM document: CNA (Certified Nurse Aide) yelling from dining room, this writer (V4-Registered Nurse) ran to the dining room to find resident on the floor with another resident standing up. CNA stated he hit her and pushed her over. Housekeeping saw resident go down and wrote a statement. Resident peer stated I'm going to kill you when resident went down she fell on her right side - arm, elbow, hip and face. R2's ED (Emergency Department) nurse timeline notes from the local hospital dated 09/24/24 at 8:20 AM documents: patient presents with right arm/leg pain after another resident pushed her down. At 8:50 AM the notes document: slight grimace with movement of right knee and right elbow. R2's Hospital notes dated 09/24/24 documents: final diagnoses: contusion of right elbow; unspecified dementia, unspecified severity without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety; pain in right knee; headache; and cervicalgia. On 09/27/24 at 8:40 AM, R2 stated she was scared. When asked why, R2 stated because of the fight. R2 then stated, that man, he's mean. On 09/27/24 at 10:12 AM, V4 (Registered Nurse) stated that R1 can be nice and then all of the sudden something can agitate him and he can become aggressive. She was working when the peer to peer incident happened between R1 and R2. V23 (Housekeeping) witnessed the event and yelled for assistance. She made the report, assessed the residents and sent them out for evaluation. On 10/01/24 at 2:10 PM, V18 (Certified Nurse Aide) stated she saw R2 later in the day on 09/24/24 after she returned from the hospital. V18 stated that R2 could not specify where she was hurting but she was trying to tell her about the incident. On 10/01/24 at 1:45 PM, V23 (Housekeeping) stated that she was in the hall cleaning looking in the dining room when the incident between R1 and R2 happened. R1 and R2 were sitting at the same table when R1 got up abruptly and went over to R2. R2 stood up from her chair and R1 started yelling at R2. R1 then hit R2 and pushed R2 down. She ran over to them to try to keep R2 from hitting her head and yelled for help at the same time. There was no other staff in the dining room, the nurse on duty was at the nurse's station and the CNA's were assisting other residents. V23 stated, R2 was scared and complained her arm and leg were hurting. A final investigation report received by the Illinois Department of Public Health from the facility from V1 (Administrator) on 9/27/24 documents On 9/24/24 at approximately 6:50 AM, it was reported to this administration by (V3-Assistant Director of Nursing) that an alleged peer to peer incident happened between (R2) and (R1). The report further documents that (V23-Housekeeper) stated that she was in the dining room and looked up to see (R1) standing from his seat and he began to yell towards (R2). (R2) then stood from her chair and (R1) moved towards her and pushed her to the floor while telling (R2) that he wanted to kill her. (R2) then said that she was scared. The report concludes the facility can substantiate that no injuries occurred following the interaction between (R2) and (R1). The facility policy, dated 11/28/16, titled Abuse Policy and Procedures documents in part: this facility affirms the right of our residents to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation as defined below. This includes, but is not limited to, freedom from corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion and any physical or chemical restraint not required to treat the resident ' s medical symptoms. This facility therefore prohibits mistreatment, exploitation, neglect or abuse of its residents, and has attempted to establish a resident sensitive and resident secure environment. The purpose of this policy is to assure that the facility is doing all that is within its control to prevent occurrences of mistreatment, exploitation, neglect or abuse of our residents. This will be done by: dementia management and resident abuse prevention.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Safe Environment (Tag F0584)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on interview, observation and record review the facility failed to provide a safe and sanitary environment for residents to shower for 20 (R7 - R26) of 20 residents reviewed for environment in a...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview, observation and record review the facility failed to provide a safe and sanitary environment for residents to shower for 20 (R7 - R26) of 20 residents reviewed for environment in a sample of 26 . Findings include: On 09/30/24 at 11:45 AM, the shower room on the west side of the building had mold at the right side of the shower stall between the floor and the wall and along the wall for approximately 8 tiles and between the back wall and the floor for approximately 4 tiles across and 3 tiles up. Each tile appeared to be approximately 4 inches x 4 inches. The attached toilet room had approximately 0.75 inch of black accumulation of dirt and debris around the bottom of the toilet. On 10/02/24 at 12:10 PM, V13 (Activities Director/Certified Nurse Aide) stated the shower stall could be cleaner but it is challenging because she does not believe the vent in the bathroom works and they have to keep the hot water on constantly so they have hot water in the shower and they shower all the residents on the west side in the shower room. This is the only shower room on this side of the building. On 10/02/24 at 12:32 PM, V15 (Maintenance) stated they are getting an accumulation of black stuff in the caulk and in the grout in the shower stall. They have to keep the hot water running constantly in the shower stall and the attached bathroom because the pump does not work. The vent in the shower room does not work so it is always warm and damp in there. The previous owner knew and they would not fix it. They have done the best they could with it. The undated facility policy titled, Physical Plant & Environmental Policy & Guidelines documents in part: the building and grounds must be maintained in the best presentable state and must be done so through routine maintenance and upkeep, housekeeping, and ensuring compliance with current federal, state, local and NFPA (The National Fire Protection Association) codes. The census dated 09/27/24 documents 20 residents (R7, R8, R9, R10, R11, R12, R13, R14, R15, R16, R17, R18, R19, R20, R21, R22, R23, R24, R25, R26) reside on the west side of the facility and a total of 47 residents reside at the facility.
Apr 2024 2 deficiencies 1 Harm
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Notification of Changes (Tag F0580)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

Based on interview and record review the facility failed to notify a resident's physician for a fall with injury in a timely manner for one of three residents (R1) reviewed for falls in a sample of 7....

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to notify a resident's physician for a fall with injury in a timely manner for one of three residents (R1) reviewed for falls in a sample of 7. This failure resulted in delayed treatment for R1's impacted distal radius fracture and ulnar styloid fracture of the right wrist. Findings included: According to R1's admission Face Sheet and Cumulative Diagnosis sheet, R1 was admitted to this facility on 12/7/2022 with the diagnoses of Severe Dementia associated with Alcoholism without behavioral Disturbance, Psychotic Mood Disorder, and Anxiety. R1's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 12/18/2023, documented an attempt to assess R1 using the BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) test, but R1 was unable to perform the test due to rarely or never understood and thus had no score out of 15 total indicating R1 has severe cognitive impairment. This same MDS documented R1 is independent with walking, transferring, does not use a wheel chair and has no impairment to upper and lower extremities. On 4/11/2024 at 9:22am, V6 (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) said on 3/31/2024 she was working R1's unit the evening R1 fell out of bed. V6 said at around 10:00pm, she was up at the nurses station, which is close to R1's room, when she heard a loud thump and went to check on R1. V6 said she found R1 sitting on the floor next to her bed. V6 said R1 told her she was ok so she helped R1 back into bed and went to report the fall to the nurse (V5) and V5 came to see R1 immediately. On 4/11/2024 at 8:45am, V5 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) said on 3/31/2024, she and V6 were working on R1's hallway when R1 fell out of bed and hurt her right wrist. V5 said she assessed R1 and did not find any injuries to R1's body except R1's right hand/wrist was very bruised and swollen. V5 said she contacted R1's family to report the fall and injury. V5 said she tried to contact R1's doctor all night, but did not get an answer. V5 said she did not send R1 to the local emergency room and thought the next shift (day shift) would notify the doctor of R1's fall and injury to right wrist/hand and get treatment for R1. On 4/11/2024 at 11:26am, V11 (LPN) said she worked the dayshift on 4/1/2024 and 4/2/2024 but did not remember being told in report about R1's fall and right wrist/hand injury, bruising and swelling and thus did not continue to attempt to notify R1's doctor on either day. V11 said it is so hectic and loud on the dementia unit that she has trouble concentrating. V11 said the facility was not short staffed and she feels adequately trained, but has only worked at this facility for about 3 months. V11 said on the morning of 4/1/2024, R1 came to her and showed her the injured wrist, but V11 did not catch what R1 was trying to tell her. V11 said on 4/2/2024 at 12:00pm, during the noon meal, V18 (Social Service Director) was the first staff to notice R1's right hand was injured and asked V2 (Director of Nursing/DON) to take a look at it. V11 said she was too busy to contact R1's doctor until around 3:00pm when she sat down to chart at the nurse's station. V11 said at 3:00pm, she notified V14 (Nurse Practitioner) of R1's right wrist/hand injury with swelling and bruising. A Social Service Progress Note in R1's medical record dated 4/1/2024 documented by (V18/Social Service Director/SSD) the following: Was told in morning meeting the resident (R1) had fallen out of bed. After morning meeting I sat down with resident in her room. She claims it doesn't hurt Not really is what she said. Couldn't explain what happened to me. Only said It just happened yah know. A Nurse's Note in R1's medical record and dated 4/1/2024 (actual date of entry 3/31/2024) documented V5 called R1's doctor at 10:45pm, 11:20pm and on 4/1/2024 at 4:15am, but the doctor's phone continued to have a busy signal every time V5 called. A Social Service Progress Note in R1's medical record dated 4/2/2024 by (V18/Social Service Director/SSD) documented the following: Writer noticed residents (R1) Rt (right) arm bruised, hand/palm swollen. I (V18) reported this to DON (Director of Nursing-V2). She immediately when (sic) down to resident's room. Xray was ordered (mobile x-ray service name). After results was taken to ER (Emergency Room) Returned with temp (temporary) cast . A Nurse's Note in R1's medical record entered by V2 (DON) on 4/2/2024 at 12:40pm documented the following: Request from SS (Social Services) to check residents R (right) arm, has bruising and R (right) hand palm is swollen. Resident c/o (complained of) pain when hand touched, but could not rate pain. Will contact NP (Nurse Practitioner). A Nurse's Note in R1's medical record entered by V2 on 4/2/2024 at 1430 (2:30pm) documented the following: Clarification of R (right) forearm discoloration. Dark bruising vertical marks with yellow discoloration around the wrist area. Palm of the hand is discolored also (dark). (R1) has no recall of hurting her arm. A Nurse's Note in R1's medical record by V11 (LPN) on 4/2/2024 at 3:00pm documented the following: Resident noted to have bruising at different stages to the R (right) wrist and to R (right) forearm. Notified mother who states res. (resident) has had a cast in the past and will not leave it alone, that she will work it off. Notified provider (V14 /Nurse Practitioner) via (name of messaging service used to communicate with providers) with pictures . A Nurse's Note in R1's medical record by V11 (LPN) on 4/2/2024 at 6:30pm documented the following: (mobile x-ray service providers name) personnel here (at facility) to do x-ray to R (right) forearm. The x-ray service provider results for R1 dated 4/2/2024 documented the following: Procedure-Right Forearm, 2 views, Findings-an impacted distal radial fracture is identified. The fracture does not involve the articular surface. An ulnar styloid process fracture is also noted. Moderate degenerative changes are present. The remaining osseous structures are intact. R1's ED (Emergency Department) Physician Documentation from the local hospital dated 4/3/2024 documented the following in part: This patient presents from the nursing home with diagnosis of an impacted distal radius fracture and ulnar styloid fracture of the right wrist. This was sustained in a fall yesterday. A Nurse's Note in R1's medical record by V5 (LPN) on 4/3/2024 at 4:40am documented the following: Rec'd (received) stat x-ray results #1 R (right) wrist fx (fracture), #2 R (right) forearm fx (fracture), #3 R (right) hand fx (fracture). A Nurse's Note in R1's medical record by V5 (LPN) on 4/3/2024 at 4:45am documented the following: Called (name of on call doctor) TO (telephone order) to send resident (R1) to ER (emergency room) for eval (evaluation) and Tx (treatment). On 4/11/2024 at 12:39pm, V2 (Director of Nursing/DON) and V3 (Assistant DON) were interviewed at the same time and both agreed R1's doctor was not notified of R1's injuries and fall in a timely manner and that it should not have taken 2 days to begin providing R1 care of her injured right wrist/hand that was determined 2 days later to be a fractured right wrist. V3 said when R1's doctor could not be reached, V5 (LPN) should have sent R1 to the local emergency room for evaluation of her right wrist/hand injury at the time the injury was first discovered. V2 said V11 (LPN) should have continued to reach R1's doctor but failed to do so. V2 said the facility does not have a policy on what the nursing staff should do if they cannot reach the resident's doctor in a timely manner, but they will look into getting one.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on interview, record review, and observation the facility failed to implement fall interventions to prevent future falls after a fall with injury occurred for one of three residents (R1) reviewe...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview, record review, and observation the facility failed to implement fall interventions to prevent future falls after a fall with injury occurred for one of three residents (R1) reviewed for falls in a sample of seven. Findings included: According to R1's admission Face Sheet and Cumulative Diagnosis sheet, R1 was admitted to this facility on 12/7/2022 with the diagnoses of Severe Dementia associated with Alcoholism without behavioral Disturbance, Psychotic Mood Disorder, and Anxiety. R1's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 12/18/2023, documented an attempt to assess R1 using the BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) test, but R1 was unable to perform the test due to rarely or never understood and thus had no score out of 15 total indicating R1 has severe cognitive impairment. This same MDS documented R1 is independent with walking, transferring, does not use a wheel chair and has no impairment to upper and lower extremities. A Fall Risk Assessment in R1's medical record dated 4/1/2024 documented R1 is a high risk for falls. No other fall assessments for R1 could be reproduced by the facility when asked during this survey. On 4/11/2024 at 9:22am, V6 (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) said on 3/31/2024 she was working R1's unit the evening R1 fell out of bed. V6 said at around 10:00pm, she was up at the nurses station, which is close to R1's room, when she heard a loud thump and went to check on R1. V6 said she found R1 sitting on the floor next to her bed. V6 said R1 told her she was ok so she helped R1 back into bed and went to report the fall to the nurse (V5) and V5 came to see R1 immediately. On 4/11/2024 at 8:45am, V5 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) said on 3/31/2024, she and V6 were working on R1's hallway when R1 fell out of bed and hurt her right wrist. V5 said she assessed R1 and did not find any injuries to R1's body except R1's right hand/wrist was very bruised and swollen. V5 said she contacted R1's family to report the fall and injury. A Social Service Progress Note in R1's medical record dated 4/1/2024 documented by (V18/Social Service Director/SSD) the following: Was told in morning meeting the resident (R1) had fallen out of bed. After morning meeting I sat down with resident in her room. She claims it doesn't hurt Not really is what she said. Couldn't explain what happened to me. Only said It just happened yah know. The x-ray service provider results for R1 dated 4/2/2024 documented the following: Procedure-Right Forearm, 2 views, Findings-an impacted distal radial fracture is identified. The fracture does not involve the articular surface. An ulnar styloid process fracture is also noted. Moderate degenerative changes are present. The remaining osseous structures are intact. R1's ED (Emergency Department) Physician Documentation from the local hospital dated 4/3/2024 documented the following in part: This patient presents from the nursing home with diagnosis of an impacted distal radius fracture and ulnar styloid fracture of the right wrist. This was sustained in a fall yesterday. A Final Investigation Report received by the (State Agency) dated 4/8/24 documents the following in part: This serves as the final follow up report to the initial report of an alleged incident with injury involving (R1) sent on 4/3/24 . In conclusion, the facility can substantiate an injury occurred when (R1) was lying close to the edge of her bed and fell. She has a follow up appointment with orthopedic services on 04/16/2024. QA (Quality Assurance) team met and reviewed care plan and determined the cause of the fall to be (R1's) poor safety awareness related to her dementia diagnosis. She has been placed on 15 minute visual checks, staff will encourage resident to change to a safe bed position and a floor mat will be placed at bedside when resident in bed. SSD (Social Service Director) will continue to meet weekly with (R1) to allow time to discuss feelings and concerns. Care plan has been updated to reflect current status. (R1) remains at baseline. On 4/10/2024 at 9:20am, no fall mat was seen in R1's bedroom, which is on the dementia unit. On 4/11/2024 at 2:30pm, no fall mat was seen in R1's bedroom. On 4/17/2024 at 8:12am, no fall mat was seen in R1's bedroom. On 4/17/2024 at 7:58am, V15 (CNA) said none of the residents on the dementia unit uses a fall mat during the day or during the night. On 4/17/2024 at 8:01am, V16 (CNA) said no one on the dementia unit uses a fall mat during the day or during the night. On 4/17/2024 at 8:48am, V4 (LPN) said R1 resides on the dementia unit. V4 said none of the residents on the dementia unit, including R1, use a fall mat as a fall intervention. R1's Care Plan is noted to be 5 pages long with a start date of 1/30/2024. R1's care plan included the following focus areas: Cognitive Loss/Dementia, Communication, ADL (Activities of Daily Living) Function Rehab, Continence, Activities, Nutrition, Pressure Ulcers, Return to Community and Life Style Preferences. This same Care Plan does not include a plan of care for R1's fall with injury, which occurred on 3/31/2024 and does not include interventions to prevent future falls for R1. The facility Fall Prevention Policy dated 11/28/2012 documents the following in part: Purpose: To assure the safety of all residents in the facility. The program will include measures which determine the individual needs of each resident by assessing the risk of falls and implementation of appropriate interventions, to provide necessary supervision and assistive devices are utilized as necessary. Safety interventions will be implemented for each resident identified at risk. All assigned nursing personnel are responsible for ensuring on-going precautions are put in place and consistently maintained. Fall risk interventions will be identified on the care plan. On 4/11/2024 at 12:39pm, V1 (Administrator), V2 (Director of Nursing/DON) and V3 (Assistant DON) were interviewed at the same time. V1 said R1 is supposed to be using a fall mat, but the facility does not have one for her and needs to get one ordered. V1 said R1 has not had a fall mat in place as indicated in the final report sent to (State Agency) on 4/8/2024 and R1's care plan was not updated. V2 said R1's care plan should have included a focus area for falls with fall interventions created to prevent R1 from future falls, but they failed to update R1's care plan after R1 fell.
Mar 2024 11 deficiencies 1 Harm
SERIOUS (G)

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to fully investigate resident falls, failed to perform a root cause ana...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to fully investigate resident falls, failed to perform a root cause analysis of the falls, and failed to develop and implement appropriate interventions to prevent future falls for 3 of 13 residents (R21, R2, and R27) reviewed for falls in a sample of 31. This failure resulted in R21 falling and sustaining a facial laceration with sutures, nasal bone fractures, and a nondisplaced fracture of the left middle finger. Findings include: 1. R21's New admission Information Sheet documents an admission date of 05/15/2019. R21's Cumulative Diagnosis Log (undated) documents diagnoses including: Advanced Dementia, Altered Mental Status, Alzheimer's Disease, closed fracture of ramus of right pubis, closed compression fracture of body of L1 vertebra, closed left arm fracture, and Pelvic ring fracture, decreased Mobility. R21's MDS (Minimum Data Sheet) dated 12/04/23 documents no BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) was conducted due R21 is rarely understood. R21's Fall Risk assessment dated [DATE] documents a score of 15, this document notes 10 points or more = high risk score. The facility document titled. Fall Analysis Log dated February documents R21 had falls on 2/12/24, the one dated January notes a fall on 01/28/24, the one dated November notes a fall on 11/05/23 and the log dated October documents falls on 10/15/23, 10/21/23, and 10/23/23. On 03/06/24 at 10:30 AM, V1 (Administrator) stated the documents titled, Quality Improvement Review are the fall investigations for the residents. R21's Quality Improvement Review dated 02/12/24 at 8:30 AM documents: Resident (R21) was observed walking in the hallways. She was wearing her non-skid socks. She (R21) was then noted sitting on her buttocks in the hall. No environmental issues noted. Resident (R21) has decreased safety issues and will reach out for others. Assessed at the ER (Emergency Room). (R21's) BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) is 3. Intervention is to have 15 minute visual checks and frequent monitoring. On 03/07/24 at 2:00 PM, V1 (Administrator) stated, from that fall investigation (fall occurring on 2/12/24) she could not tell what the root cause of the fall was, if R21 was injured, what an appropriate intervention would be and there was no interviews done in relation to the fall from other residents or staff. R21's Nurse's notes dated 02/12/24 at 6:15 PM documents noted res (R21) sitting upright on floor in hallway. Raised goose egg erected to left forehead. The area is purple and bleeding. R21 moves head and neck freely. C/O (complaints of) pain to left forehead only. ROM (Range of Motion) WNL (Within Normal Limits) for this resident. Assist res (resident) to stand. Ambulated to her own room (without) difficulty. Continue to require pressure to forehead d/t (due to) continued bleeding. R21's Nurses Note dated 2/12/24 at 6:45 PM documents called EMS (Emergency Medical Service) for request to transfer. R21's Nurse's notes dated 02/13/24 at 1:35 AM documents: Resident (R21) returned to facility per wheelchair and staff. R21 is cheery and slightly confused, she has a dressing to her forehead containing 2 to 3 sutures. R21's hospital records dated 02/12/24 document: Diagnosis: Unspecified injury of head, initial encounter; Laceration without foreign body of other part of head. Discharge Instructions: Head injury, Facial Laceration. Follow up instructions: Reason: staple/suture removal, return to ED (Emergency Department) or have sutures removed by your physician in 5-7 days. R21's Quality Improvement Review dated 01/28/24 at 8:35 AM documents: This resident (R21) was ambulating in the hallway before this event occurred. She has complaints of aching afterward. She has decreased safety awareness and her BIMS is 3. The intervention is to educate staff on checking residents for proper footwear/non-skid socks, monitor frequently and encourage resident to ask for assistance/offer assistance. On 03/07/24 at 2:00 PM, V1 (Administrator) stated, from that fall investigation (fall occurring on 1/28/24) she could not tell what the root cause of the fall was, if R21 was injured, if she was sent out for evaluation, if that was an appropriate intervention for this fall and there were no interviews done in relation to the fall from other residents or staff. V1 stated, R21 would be assisted with her footwear by staff and R21's care plan documents an intervention on 10/23/23 of: R21 to wear nonskid socks during ambulation on the unit, so that would also be a duplicate intervention. R21's Nurse's notes dated 01/28/24 at 9:25 AM document: Resident (R21) fell in hallway in a cubby area where she was not seen. Another resident found her and reported it to one of the aides. She was found sitting up leaning on the wall, blood coming from her nose, hematoma on her forehead on the right side. She has a laceration on her nose. R21 states she does not know what happened. R21 was sent to ER for evaluation. R21's Social Service Progress Notes dated 01/29/24 document: Resident (R21) fell yesterday 01/28/24. Another resident found her and reported it. She was bleeding from the nose. Sent to ED. R21 has a broken nose and bruising all over face. R21's Social Service Progress Notes dated 02/01/24 document: Resident (R21) still has bruising on her face. Says it hurts a little but not complaining. Ambulates around on her own and can have an unsteady gait from time to time. Can communicate but jumble words when speaking. She can still make her needs known. BIMS 3, her focus isn't the best. R21's Nurse's notes dated 01/30/24 at 8:48 AM document: Bruising noted to both sides of face. R21's Emergency Department records dated 01/28/24 document: CT (Computed Tomography) Maxillofacial: There are bilateral mildly depressed nasal bone fractures. There is chronic appearing rightward deviation of the nasal septum, however there is also likely a mildly displaced fracture through the posterior septum with 2 to 3 mm (millimeters) displacement. Impression: 1. Right frontal scalp hematoma. No acute intracranial abnormality. 2. Bilateral mildly depressed nasal bone fractures. 3. Probable mildly displaced fracture through the posterior nasal septum. R21's Quality Improvement Review dated 11/05/23 at 4:15 PM documents: Resident (R21) was ambulating in the east dining room with her non skid socks on. She appeared to trip before this event. She was seen in the ER for complaints of left hand wrist discomfort. She has decreasing safety awareness. Intervention is to have a PT (Physical Therapy) evaluation. On 03/07/24 at 10:30 AM, V24 (Physical Therapy Director) stated R21 was already receiving occupational therapy from 10/11/23 to 12/06/23 and physical therapy from 11/15/23 to 12/29/23. R21's Nurse's notes dated 11/05/23 at 4:15 PM documents: R21 was seen tripping over another resident's chair and fell to the floor. R21 attempted to catch self resulting in skin tear on left hand and left middle finger. Complaints of pain to left hand and steri strips applied to areas on hand. At 4:30 PM R21 will not sit down in dining room, continues to wander. Multiple attempts have been made by staff to help direct resident to seat. R21's Nurse's notes dated 11/5/23 at 9:09 PM documents that R21's middle finger on left hand is blue inf color and R21 was sent to the local hospital for evaluation and treatment. R21's Nurse's notes dated 11/05/23 at 8:49 AM document: Resident (R21) in room for breakfast. She sat up on the side of the bed to eat breakfast tray. R21 took AM medications with difficulty. Bruising and swelling noted to R21's left hand. On 37/24 at 11:00 AM, V8 (Licensed Practical Nurse) stated, she would have to guess the note dated 11/05/23 at 8:49 AM should be 11/06/23 at 8:49 AM. R21's Hospital notes dated 11/05/23 document: Diagnosis: Fall on same level, unspecified, Contusion of other part of head, contusion of hand. Discharge instructions: Hand contusion, Head injury. R21's Nurse's Note dated 11/8/23 at 11:25 AM documents New x-ray orders for L (left) hand and wrist. R21's Nurse's note dated 11/9/23 at 9:50 AM documents Received results of X-ray on 11/8/23, NP (Nurse Practitioner) notified and wanted her sent to ER (Emergency Room). She was sent to (name of local hospital) ER. Before leaving she c/o mild pain and not being able to move fingers on L hand. No c/o pain anywhere else besides her hand. Currently at ER (with) CNA (Certified Nurse's Assistant) from facility. R21's Hospital notes dated 11/09/23 document: Diagnosis: Non-displaced fracture of distal phalanx of left middle finger. Discharge Instructions: Finger Fracture; Follow up instructions: When - 5 to 6 days, reason - worsening of condition; Recheck today's complaints. R21's Imaging Report dated 11/9/23 documents: Exam Reason: pain with trauma/injury. Discussion: The bones are diffusely demineralized. There is possible recent intra-articular fracture involving the proximal aspect of the third digit middle phalanx. Which can be correlated with the clinical situation. Osteoarthritic changes are most severe in the first carpometacarpal joint region. Impression: 1. Possible recent fracture involving the proximal aspect of the third digit middle phalanx, can correlate with the clinical situation. Emergency Department records dated 11/9/23 note: at 11:06 AM This [AGE] year old white female presents to ER with complaints of fall injury. 11:06 AM The patient (R21) or guardian reports injury. The complaints affect the left hand diffusely. Context: The problem was sustained at a nursing home or assisted living facility, resulted from a fall. Onset: The symptom(s)/episode began/occurred acutely. Modifying factors: the symptoms are aggravated by movement. Associated signs and symptoms: Pertinent positives: swelling, Severity of symptoms: in the emergency department the symptoms are unchanged. It is unknown whether or not the patient has had similar symptoms in the past. It is unknown whether or not the patient has recently seen a physician, [AGE] year old lady with Dementia who sustained injury to left hand from a ground level fall a few days ago. She has no other complaints. She has associated swelling of the digits. She denies headache, denies neck and back pain. Diagnosis: Nondisplaced fracture of distal phalanx of left middle finger. R21's Quality Improvement Review dated 10/23/23 at 4:15 PM documents: Resident (R21) has independent ambulation and decreased safety awareness. She was in the east dining room but had removed her nonskid socks when this event occurred. R21's BIMS is 3. Intervention is to educate staff to encourage resident to put her socks on and leave socks on for safety when walking. R21's Nurse's Notes dated 10/23/23 at 4:15 PM document: R21 was on the floor in dining room. R21 was sitting on her bottom in front of the table she had been sitting at. R21's Nurse's Notes dated 10/24/23 at 12:00 AM documents: R21 is up to Nurse's station with complaints of right rib cage pain and bruising noted. R21's Quality Improvement Review dated 10/21/23 at 3:38 PM documents: Resident (R21) has decreasing safety awareness and independent ambulation. She was in the east dining room and appeared unsteady. She was wearing her nonskid socks. She has a BIMS of 3. Intervention for this event is to have a therapy evaluation. R21's Nurse's Note dated 10/21/23 at 4:00 PM documents: Resident (R21) found on the floor by another resident's family. R21 stated, that man pushed me however the man that she was pointing to was a female. A male resident was witnessed attempting to help R21 from the floor and a female resident was hovering behind her. The family member of the other resident helped R21 from the floor and brought her to the nursing station. X-ray of right shoulder, wrist and hip were ordered and awaiting approval. R21's Patient Report from the mobile X-Ray company dated 10/22/23 document Reason: Fall on right side with pain within the shoulder, wrist and hip areas. Findings: No acute fractures or dislocations are noted. Chronic fracture deformity of the distal radius is identified. An ulnar positive variance is noted. Moderate degenerative changes are present. The surrounding soft tissues are normal. On 03/07/24 at 2:00 PM, V1 (Administrator) stated, from the 10/21/23 fall investigation she could not tell what the root cause of the fall was, if R21 was injured, what an appropriate intervention would be and there was no interviews done in relation to the fall from other residents or staff. She stated from the fall investigation it sounded like the fall was witnessed but the nurse's notes stated she was found by another resident's family member, which strongly suggests it was an unwitnessed fall. V1 stated, she does not know why the intervention was to have a therapy evaluation, since she was already on therapy. The intervention of wearing nonskid socks during ambulation would not be helpful when the Quality Improvement document states she has them on. On 10/15/23 at 6:15 PM R21's Quality Improvement Review documents: This ambulatory resident (R21) was observed in the bathroom. She was trying to use the bathroom by herself. She did have her gripper socks on and was sitting on her buttocks in front of the stool. No environmental factors. R21 is on antidepressant medications and antihypertensive medication. She has decreasing safety awareness. Intervention is to educate staff to encourage resident to ask for assistance in the bathroom. There is no documentation of this fall in the nurse's notes. On 03/07/24 at 2:00 PM V1 (Administrator) stated, from that fall investigation (for the fall occurring on 10/15/23) she could not tell what the root cause of the fall was, if R21 was injured, what an appropriate intervention would be and there was no interviews done in relation to the fall from other residents or staff. V1 stated with R21's cognition level she would not remember very long to ask for assistance in the bathroom, so that is not an appropriate intervention. V1 stated, R21's MDS (Minimum Data Set) documents she is assessed as needing assistance to the toilet and supervision with locomotion. R21's MDS dated [DATE] documents toilet use: Limited assistance - resident highly involved in activity, staff provide guided maneuvering or limbs or other non-weight bearing assistance with one person physical assistance, and for locomotion on unit as supervision - oversight, encouragement or cueing with setup help only. R21's care plan with a category of Falls documents: Resident (R21) has periods of poor safety awareness where she does not pay attention to surroundings and location of objects around her. Risk factors include: forgetfulness and episodes of confusion and poor safety awareness. Current cognitive level is alert and oriented x3 with episodes of forgetfulness with a start date of 08/16/21. Interventions documented include: Remind of safety precautions and limitations as necessary with a start date of 08/16/21, frequent reorientation and reminders on location of room and surrounding with a start date of 08/16/21, staff are to assist resident to bathroom during HS (evening) and when they see resident attempting to use restroom without assistance. PT/OT (Physical therapy/occupational therapy) to evaluate for safety and gait training. 10/23/23, resident unsteady with gait. Will have therapy see if can do evaluation with a start date of 10/27/23, and R21 had fallen due to other resident's chair, balance and weakness noted and will benefit from therapy evaluation with a start date of 11/10/23. There is no documentation on R21's Care Plan for interventions implemented after R21's fall on 10/15/23 and 1/28/24. 2. R2's New admission Information sheet documents R2 has an admission date of 04/22/19. R2's Cumulative Diagnosis Log documents diagnoses including: Dementia, Generalized anxiety disorder, Alzheimer's disease, Irritable Bowel Syndrome, and Macular Degeneration. R2's Minimum Data Sheet dated 10/9/23 documents active diagnoses including: Unsteadiness on feet, Muscle Weakness, and other Reduced Mobility. The facility document titled Fall Analysis Log dated February 2024 documents R2 had falls on 2/1/24, 2/13/24, and 02/14/24. The January 2024 Fall Analysis Log documents that R2 had falls on 01/08/24, 01/13/24, and 01/29/24. The November 2023 Fall Analysis Log documents that R2 had falls on 11/02/23, 11/07/23, 11/16/23, 11/21/23, and 11/24/23. R2's Fall Risk assessment dated [DATE] documents a score of 8 with a reference of 10 points or More = High risk Score. Under the section History of Fall Last 3 Months and answer of 0 is documented, indicating that R2 has no known history of falls. R2's Quality Improvement Review dated 02/13/24 at 12:00 AM documents: Resident (R2) was at the east nurse's station and had been sitting on her walker seat. She attempted to stand up and fell to the floor. BIMS 99 (indicating severely impaired cognition). Intervention is to encourage resident to ask for assistance from staff. On 03/07/24 at 2:00 PM, V1 (Administrator) stated, R2's Fall Risk assessment dated [DATE] is incorrect, the category History of Fall Last 3 Months documents zero falls for a point assessment of 0, she stated she can see where she has had eight falls in the last three months which would be a point value of 5, which would give her a score of 13, which would make her a high fall risk. She stated, she does not know why it got filled out incorrectly. V1 stated that R2 would not remember to ask for assistance if told to for very long because of her cognitive limitation, so the intervention of encourage R2 to ask for assistance from staff was not an appropriate intervention and R2 is already assessed as needing assistance. V1 also stated there is no documentation stating whether the physician was notified. There is no nurse's note regarding the fall on 02/13/24. R2's Quality Improvement Review dated 01/29/24 at 1:00 PM documents: Resident (R2) has very poor vision, uses a wheeled walker, takes psychotropics and antidepressants on a routine basis. She is non-compliant with asking for any assistance. She can become agitated very easily. Resident (R2) was by the east nurse's station with her walker when this event occurred. She had a skin tear to the left shin and a reddened area to the left elbow. No further complaints. She had on proper footwear but did not indicate she needed help changing positions. Intervention is to always use the wheeled walker, proper footwear and encourage her to accept staff assistance with ADL's (Activities of Daily living). She has a very poor safety awareness. R2's Nurse's notes dated 01/29/24 at 1:50 PM document: Resident (R2) had a witnessed fall at 1:00 PM R2's walker caught on furniture when trying to turn around by nurse's station and resident lost her balance resulting in fall. R2 did not hit her head. R2 has complaints of left elbow pain. There is a bruise noted and a skin tear to left shin noted. Steri-strips applied. On 03/07/24 at 2:00PM V1 (Administrator) stated, from the documentation of the fall investigation (for the fall occurring on 1/29/24), (the Quality Improvement Review) it sounds as if R2 had been using a wheeled walker, had proper footwear on, and it notes that she is non-compliant with asking for assistance. V1 stated, she does not believe there is a new intervention included on the fall investigation or an appropriate intervention. V1 stated, R2's care plan does not document any intervention for the fall on 01/29/24. R2's Quality Improvement Review dated 01/13/24 at 11:00 AM documents: This resident (R2) has poor vision, decreasing safety awareness, reluctance to ask for assistance with anything. She is on psychotropics and antidepressants. She is non-compliant with staff encouragement to allow assistance with ADL's. She can also become easily agitated and is forgetful. This event occurred in the bathroom where resident was attempting to sit on the toilet and missed. Correct footwear and interventions were in place. No injuries. BIMS 99. Intervention is to toilet her with any request as she allows assistance. R2's Nurse's notes dated 01/13/24 at 11:00 AM documents that resident (R2) was found in restroom on knees. R2 states, I hit my head. Neurological checks were initiated and were within normal limits for resident. Fall report filled out. On 03/07/24 at 2:00 PM, V1 (Administrator) stated, an intervention of toilet her with any request is not an appropriate intervention, she should be toileted upon request, and she is assessed to need assistance with toileting. V1 stated R2 has a previous intervention to have assistance with toileting. V1 stated that the fall investigation documents she is non-compliant with asking for assistance. R2's Quality Improvement Review dated 01/08/24 at 9:55 AM documents Resident (R2) has a wheeled walker, poor vision, and is on psychotropics and antidepressants. She is non-compliant with asking for help and /or accepting assistance. This event happened in the hallway while resident was using her wheeled walker. Intervention is to continue to encourage resident to accept assistance and educate staff to approach her up to five times to offer assistance. On 03/07/24 at 2:00 PM, V1 (Administrator) stated, from the Quality Improvement Review (from the fall occurring on 1/8/24) you cannot tell what happened in the fall, if there were any injuries, what the root cause of the fall was and if that intervention would be an appropriate intervention. There is no documentation of the fall on 01/08/24 in the nurse's notes. R2's Quality Improvement Review dated 11/21/23 at 6:15 PM documents: Resident (R2) was observed to fall while trying to get to bed. She had her nonskid socks on but has decreasing safety awareness. BIMS 99. The intervention is to assist her with ADL's. R2's nurse's notes dated 11/21/23 at 6:15 PM documents: V26 (Registered Nurse) was walking by R2's room and noted R2 was lying on her right side on the floor beside the bed. R2 stated, I bumped my head Small raised area noted to back of head. No other injury noted. On 03/07/24 at 2:00 PM, V1 (Administrator) stated, she does not know how the fall investigation (for the fall occurring on 11/21/23) documents that R2 was observed falling and the nurse's note documents R2 was found on the floor. V1 stated there are some discrepancies between the two accounts of the fall, she does not know why. R2's Quality Improvement Review dated 11/16/23 at 11:30 AM documents: Resident (R2) has poor vision and a decreasing safety awareness. She uses a wheeled walker. She ambulated from her room to the bathroom where she attempted to sit on the toilet seat. She missed the seat and went to the floor. She did have her nonskid socks on but is non-compliant with asking for assistance on a regular basis. Intervention is to have a therapy evaluation. R2's BIMS is 99. R2's Nurse's notes dated 11/13/23 at 2:00 AM documents: R2 fell in the bathroom trying to sit on the toilet. The aide who was helping her turned around for a pull up to help her change and R2 missed the toilet and fell on her bottom in front of the sink next to the toilet. R2 bumped her head on the toilet but has no injuries. On 03/07/24 at 2:00 PM, V1 (Administrator) stated that she does not know who the aide was, and the fall investigation (for the fall occurring on 11/13/23) does not document an aide present, the aide should not have turned around until R2 was seated, especially with R2's poor eyesight. R2's care plan documents a section for Falls with a start date of 05/12/2019 and a Goal of: Resident/responsible party will be able to state potential consequence of self-transfer/ambulation and state why still prefers self-care thru next CP (care plan) review with a date of 12/06/21. The intervention documented on 11/17/23 is Therapy evaluation, and the intervention documented on 02/13/24 is: encourage resident (R2) to ask for assistance. 3. R27's Face Sheet documents an admission date of 11/2/2022. R27's POS (Physician's Order Sheet) dated 2/1/2024 through 2/29/2024 documents R27's has been diagnosed with Hemiplegia following Cerebral Infarct affecting left side, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Essential Hypertension, Need for Assistance with Care, Depression, Urinary Retention, Cognitive Impairment and Right Internal Carotid Thrombosis. R27's MDS (minimum data set) dated 11/21/23 documents R27 was assessed with BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) in which R27 scored 13 out of 15 total and indicates R27 is cognitively intact. Fall Risk Assessment for R27 dated 2/15/2024 documents R27 is a high fall risk. On 3/5/2024 at 11:15am, R27 said he fell a few times at this facility. A Nurse's note in R27's medical record and dated 2/15/2024 at 7:45pm and entered by V25 (Registered Nurse/RN) documented the following: Resident yelling for son from room. Went to room, resident on floor on back with feet still up on bed. Very confused, thought he was in a car and thought son was in room. Informed NP (Nurse Practitioner) on call and orders received to send to local emergency room for evaluation. Nurse's note in R27's medical record and dated 2/15/2024 at 11:00pm documented R27 returned from the emergency room with negative CT scan (computed tomography). On 3/7/2024 at 3:00pm, V25 (Registered Nurse) said R27's psychotropic medications had been increased. V25 said on 2/15/2024, R27's psychotropic medication administration times were changed from R27 receiving Quetiapine 100mg (anti-psychotic) at bedtime to R27 receiving Quetiapine 100mg at 4:00pm. V25 said on 2/15/2024 she administered R27's Quetiapine 100mg at 4:00pm and at 5:45pm, R27 had fell. V25 said she heard R27 yelling and went to see what was going on. V25 said she seen R27 laying on the floor on his back but still had his feet up on the bed. V25 said R27 was sent to the local emergency room to be checked for injuries from his fall, but none were found and R27 was diagnosed with a urinary tract infection. Local hospital emergency room records dated 2/15/2024 document R27 was diagnosed with a urinary tract infection and did not document anything about R27 being seen for possible fall injuries. On 3/7/2024 at 10:00am, V2 (Director of Nursing) said R27 had an unwitnessed fall on 2/15/2024 and she performed the fall investigation. V2 submitted a facility form titled Quality Improvement Review and dated 2/15/24 at 1745 (5:45PM) as written documentation of the fall investigation she performed for R27's fall on 2/15/24. This form documented the following: Resident found on floor of his room. When asked what happened he told the nurse he needed to get in his car. Resident has decreased safety awareness and decreased cognitive issues. Uncooperative with BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status). New interventions are a floor pad and upper side rail times one. On 3/7/2024 at 10:00am, V2 said she had not considered the time change/increase of his psychotropic medication as being a factor in R27's fall on 2/15/2024. V2 said she did not have any witness statements or other investigation documentation for R27's fall on 2/15/2024 and could not produce documentation of performing root cause analysis for this fall. A facility policy titled Fall Prevention (last revision date of 11/10/18) documents the following in part: Policy is to provide for resident safety and to minimize injuries related to falls, decrease falls and still honor each resident's wishes/desires for maximum independence and mobility. #5 Immediately after any resident fall, the unit nurse will assess the resident and provide any care or treatment needed for the resident. A fall huddle will be conducted with staff on duty to help identify circumstances of the event and appropriate interventions. #6 The unit nurse will place documentation of the circumstances of a fall in the nurses notes or on an Aim for Wellness form along with any new interventions on deemed to be appropriate at the time The unit nurse will also place a new intervention on the CNA (Certified Nurse's Assistant) assignment worksheet. #7 Report all falls during morning Quality Assurance meetings Monday through Friday. All falls will be discussed in the morning Quality Assurance meeting and any new interventions will be written on the care plan.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Resident Rights (Tag F0550)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, observation and record review the facility failed to observe a resident's choice to smoke by restricting her...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, observation and record review the facility failed to observe a resident's choice to smoke by restricting her access to her cigarettes and requiring her to be supervised without cause for 1 or 1 residents (R28) reviewed for smoking in a sample of 31. Findings included: R28's face sheet documents an admission date to the facility of 8/11/2023. R28's current Physician's Order Sheet (POS) documents that R28 has diagnoses including Asthma, Diabetes Mellitus type 2, Essential Hypertension, Systolic Congestive Heart Failure and Parkinson's among others. R28's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] and 11/28/2023 documents a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 out of 15 total, indicating R28 is not cognitively impaired, and was performed by V4 (Social Service Director/SSD). A Social Service Progress Note in R28's medical record dated 8/28/2023 by V4 (SSD) documented the following: Resident found smoking in her room. Informed of safety reasons why this isn't allowed. Nurse took her cigarettes and lighter away from her. She was recently out with family, must be how she obtained items. R28 is doing well other than she isn't happy about not getting to go out and smoke whenever she chooses. Resident can answer all assessment questions scored 14 out of 15 on BIMS but can't remember she went out to smoke 30 minutes ago. She is on every two-hour smoke break, weather permitting. R28's Nurse's Note dated 10/22/2023 at 10:30am and written by V9 (Licensed Practical Nurse) documented in part: Resident had a cigarette before breakfast. Came to the desk after breakfast and stated she had not had a cigarette all day. This writer informed her that she's been out x/times 1. At this time pt (patient) is at the NS (Nurses Station) demanding that she gets a cigarette even though the CNA's (Certified Nursing Assistants) have let her know they are busy getting other residents up. R28's Nurse's Note dated 11/8/2023 at 1645 (4:45pm) entered by V25 (Registered Nurse) documented the following in part: Asks to go outside to smoke when all staff on hall are busy with patient care. (R28) will say you have to take me out to smoke before all residents are in DR (Dining Room) to eat when staff are unavailable. R28's Nurse's Note dated 11/11/2023 at 1740 (5:40pm) and entered by V9 (Licensed Practical Nurse) documented the following in part: Pt (patient/R28) is unable to go out and smoke at this time and expressed that she is a higher priority. She wants the CNAs to stop bringing people from the DR (Dining Room) and laying them down to take her out. This writer expressed that she was late to dinner, and she came during serving and medication pass time so therefore was unable to go out at that time. I let her know there is only two CNA's present, and they are doing what they have to do to finish off the shift. Smoking schedule need adjusted for a more appropriate time and resident needs to adhere to a strict schedule. R28's Nurse's Note dated 11/17/2023 at 9:30am and entered by V25 (Registered Nurse) documented the following in part: resident up to nurse's station demanding to go outside to smoke a cigarette. T (temperature) outside is 31. Per ADON (Assistant Director of Nursing) must wait until T (temperature) outside is 33. R28's Nurse's Note dated 11/25/2023 at 12:10pm and entered by V25 (Registered Nurse) documented the following in part: Resident stood up in DR (Dining Room) and aggressively made a statement I need to go out and smoke. Residents are still being fed in DR (Dining Room) asked resident if she thinks she should smoke before everyone is done-when rule states that she may smoke when all of residents are out of the dining room. R28's Nurse's Note dated 11/29/2023 at 7:00am and entered by V25 (Registered Nurse) documented the following in part: resident adamant she needed to go outside for a cigarette. Temperature too cold to go outside. Resident continues to say she needs to have a cigarette. Re-orientation not successful. Explained that she has to wait until it is warmer to go outside. Resident asked kitchen supervisor if he could take her out-it is still too cold to go outside, and we are not finished with breakfast. Explained this to her with help of kitchen supervisor. This was not in any way RUDE, as resident would not accept that she must wait until (staff) done with breakfast. When asked to wait until we are done with breakfast, (R28 replied) why can't one of you take me outside. It is still too cold to go outside, and breakfast is not over. R28's Nurse's Note dated 12/6/2023 at 11:20am and entered by V28 (Registered Nurse) documented in part: Up to nurse's station at 6:30am demanding to go smoke when told she needed to wait till 7:30am she started to yell stating-Every time I come up here somebody tells me something different- she was asked not to yell and told that other residents were sleeping. She stated-I'm not yelling at you, I'm yelling at the situation. She was again asked not to yell. She began making a crying noise. She was told she had to wait for the designated smoke time. R28's Nurse's Note dated 12/16/2023 at 1712 (5:12pm) and entered by V9 (Licensed Practical Nurse) documented in part: Pt (patient) upset because she cannot smoke r/t (related to) the rain. Came to the desk and demanded the CNA to take her out after this writer told her that it was raining. Pt (patient) insisted she had a spot where they would not get wet. Again, let her know she couldn't go. R28's Nurse's Note dated 12/30/2023 at 11:14am and entered by V9 (Licensed Practical Nurse) documented in part: Pt (patient) was wanting to smoke at 6:30am and was offered a nicotine patch. Pt (patient) was pleased to put the patch on. Pt (patient) then requested a cigarette at breakfast because- (R28 said) the patch wasn't working yet. I refused to let her go out (for a cigarette). On 3/5/2024 at 10:58am, R28 said she has smoked for over 30 years. R28 said she is treated like a child and cannot even keep her own cigarettes in her possession and was forced to give them over to the nurse. R28 said I have my right mind and am able to smoke independently when I'm away from this facility visiting my son. R28 said the facility will not allow her to go outside and smoke by herself because the facility's policy says all residents must have a staff member present to go outside to smoke. R28 said I can never find a staff member who has a few minutes to take me outside so I can smoke. On 3/5/2024 at 1:55pm, V4 (SSD) said R28 has never been assessed for independent smoking or been evaluated for smoking safety due to the facility policy requiring all residents to have staff present when outside smoking. V4 said she agreed the facility policy of no residents being allowed to smoke independently violates residents' rights. V4, said she feels the facility's staff give R28 a hard time about smoking. On 3/6/2024 at 12:00pm, observed R28 ask V2 (Director of Nursing), V16, V15, V17 (all Certified Nursing Assistants) and V9 (Licensed Practical Nurse) to take her outside to smoke and all were observed telling R28 to wait because they were serving lunch. On 3/7/2024 at 9:43am observed R28 come to nurse station and ask V25 (Registered Nurse) to smoke. V25 responded I'll have to check with the girls, right now I have to give an injection to someone. On 3/7/2024 at 3:45pm, V1 (Administrator) said they use a smoking contract, but never got a signed smoking contract with R28 when she was admitted to this facility. V1 said the staff are not intending to violate R28's rights but are only concerned for her health. V1 said R28 was the facility's only smoker and doesn't matter if R28 can smoke independently or not, the facility policy says no resident is allowed to smoke without staff present. A facility policy titled Smoking Policy (undated) documents the following: It is the policy of (nursing home name) smoking is only permitted outside the facility according to the following guidelines. There will be no smoking inside the facility by either resident or staff. Guidelines: 1. Smoking will be permitted by residents and staff in an approved outside location. 2. Residents must always be accompanied by a staff member to smoke and may not keep his/her own smoking materials. 3. Outside area must be at least 15' (feet) from any entrance. 4. Metal ashtrays shall be provided in smoking areas. 5. Unauthorized ashtrays (Those of improper composition or location) shall be removed or replaced as soon as they are discovered. A facility document titled Smoking Schedule (dated 8/18/2023) documents the following: 6A, 8A, 10A, 12P, 2:30P, 4P, 6P, 8P All smokers are to be offered the opportunity to go out to smoke at these times. Staff are to accompany residents and are to allow 15 minutes, one cigarette at each opportunity. No residents are to be out smoking with supervision. R28's Care Plan (no revision date documented) does not include R28's smoking preferences or concerns related to smoking.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0637 (Tag F0637)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on interview and record review the facility failed to complete significant change assessments when residents were admitted to hospice care for 2 of 2 residents (R2 and R6) reviewed for significa...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to complete significant change assessments when residents were admitted to hospice care for 2 of 2 residents (R2 and R6) reviewed for significant changes in a sample of 31. Findings include: 1. R2's New admission Information sheet documents R2 has an admission date of 04/22/19. R2's Cumulative Diagnosis Log (undated) documents diagnoses including: Dementia, Generalized anxiety disorder, Alzheimer's disease, Irritable Bowel Syndrome, and Macular Degeneration. R2's Minimum Data Sheet dated 07/11/23 documents active diagnoses including: Unsteadiness on feet, Muscle Weakness, and other Reduced Mobility. R2's Physician Order Sheet dated 03/01/24 documents: Admit to Hospice with a start date of 01/06/24. On 03/06/23 at 1:00 PM, when asked for R2's most current Minimum Data Sheet (MDS), the MDS Quarterly assessment provided for R2 documents an assessment date of 10/9/23. In section O, Special Treatment, Procedures, and Programs, of the same MDS, Hospice is not checked. There was no Significant Change MDS assessment provided. 2. R6's Physician Order Sheet dated 03/01/24 documents an admission date of 03/22/22 with diagnosis including: Alzheimer's Dementia with behavioral disturbance, Unspecified Timing of Dementia onset, and Septicemia. R6's Care Plan Summary dated 07/19/23 documents R6 was admitted to Hospice care on 07/12/23. On 03/06/23 at 1:00 PM, when asked for R6's most current MDS, R6's Quarterly MDS was provided with an assessment date of 10/23/23. In section O, Special Treatment, Procedures, and Programs, of the same MDS, Hospice is not checked. There was no Significant Change MDS assessment provided. On 03/07/24 at 2:00 PM V1 (Administrator) stated, when R2 and R6 were admitted to hospice a significant change MDS should have been completed, she did not know why it was not completed. V1 stated there was no policy for completing assessments for significant changes.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

ADL Care (Tag F0677)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to provide feeding assistance for 1 of 3 residents (R2) reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL) in a sample of 31. Finding...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to provide feeding assistance for 1 of 3 residents (R2) reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL) in a sample of 31. Findings include: 1. R2's New admission Information sheet documents an admission date of 04/22/19. R2's Cumulative Diagnosis Log (undated) documents diagnoses including Dementia, Generalized Anxiety Disorder, Alzheimer's disease, irritable bowel syndrome, and Macular Degeneration. R2's Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an assessment date 10/9/23 documents active diagnoses including Unsteadiness on feet, Muscle Weakness, and other Reduced Mobility. The same MDS in section B under Vision documents Highly impaired-object identification in question, but eyes appear to follow objects. Section C, documents that no BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental status) should be performed due to resident is rarely/never understood. Section GG documents that R2 requires partial/ moderate assistance (helper does less than half the effort. Helper lifts, holds, or supports trunk or limbs, but provides less than half the effort). On 03/05/24 at 12:10 PM, R2 was observed in her room sitting up in bed with her lunch on her bedside table next to her. There were no staff observed assisting R2 with eating. On 03/06/24 at 12:15 PM, R2 was observed in the dining room. R2's lunch was placed in front of her. R2 was observed moving her hand around to find her beverage and her plate. R2 did struggle with getting food onto her utensil. There were no staff observed assisting R2 with eating. On 03/06/24 at 12:40 PM, V24 (Physical Therapy Director) stated, it would be helpful if R2 had a plate guard, therapy had made the recommendation a long time ago, R2 really struggles with eating and where her food is due to her vision. On 03/07/24 at 3:50 PM, V2 (Director of Nursing) stated, the plate guard for R2 was discontinued on 03/22/23. V2 stated, she believed R2 did not care for it, but due to her vision, R2 requires assistance with eating anyways. On 03/07/24 at 2:00 PM, V1 (Administrator) stated the facility does not have a policy for the assistance of residents with feeding.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0679 (Tag F0679)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, observation, and record review the facility failed to provide a program of activities that is consistent and...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, observation, and record review the facility failed to provide a program of activities that is consistent and meets the preferences and interests of 2 of 5 residents (R39 and R28) reviewed for activities in a sample of 31. Findings include: 1. R39's New admission Assessment documents an admission date of 1/4/2024. R39's Cumulative Diagnosis log documents diagnosis including Dementia, Elopement Risk. R39's Activity Assessment dated 1/08/2024 documents R39's activity interests as baking, bingo, board games, music, wildlife, word games, flowers, gardening, cooking, movies, playing sports, card games. R39's Activity Attendance Record dated January 2024 documents R39 participating in activities 5 days a week. On 3/06/2024, at 8:45 AM, R39 stated that she feels bored and wants more different activities to do. R39 stated that there isn't an activity director for the facility at this time. 2. R28's New admission Assessment documents an admission date of 8/11/2023. R28's Cumulative Diagnosis log documents diagnosis including Congested Heart Failure (CHF), Asthma, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Major Depression, Hypertension, Atrial Fibrillation. R28's Activity Assessment dated 2/6/2024 documents R28's activity interests as reading, baking, writing, music, wildlife, flowers, needlework, television, gardening, puzzles, cooking, movies. R28's Activity Attendance Record dated January 2024 documents participating in activities 5 days a week, February 2024, documents participating in activities [DATE] - 9, 2024 with no further documentation for February 2024. On 3/06/2024, at 10:30 AM, R28 stated that she wishes there were more of a variety of activities to do at the facility. R28 stated that here lately there has not been any activities going on. On 3/04/2024, at 9:40 a.m., V1 (Administrator) stated that the facility has been without an Activity Director since the middle of February 2024. V1 stated that there is a certified nurse aide (CNA), that works on the night shift that is interested in the activity director's position. V1 stated that she is in the process of hiring another CNA for the night shift to replace her so the activity director's position can be filled. On 3/06/2024, at 10:15 AM, V4 (Social Services) stated that she has been filling in for the activity director the last couple of weeks. On 3/05/2024, at 2:30 PM, observed V19 (CNA) painting residents' nails. On 3/06/2024, at 10:00 AM, observed V17 (CNA) passing out snacks and drinks, having social hour with residents. The facility's activity calendar for March 2024 documents on 3/04/2024 (10AM - Ball Toss, 2PM, Bingo), 3/05/2024 (10AM - Card Games, 2PM, Nerf Guns), 3/06/2024 (10AM - Ball Toss, 2PM, Jenga), 3/07/2024 (10AM - Nerf Guns, 2PM Social Circle). There were no observations made during the survey of these activities occurring at their scheduled date and time. The facility's activity policy dated 9/2017 documents that it will provide an ongoing programming of activities designed to meet, in accordance with the comprehensive assessment, the interests and the physical, mental, and psychosocial wellbeing of each resident. The program is under the direction of an Activity Director, who shall have a specific planned program of group and individual activities based upon the residents' needs and interests.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Medication Errors (Tag F0758)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to attempt non-pharmacological interventions before administering an in...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to attempt non-pharmacological interventions before administering an increase in psychotropic medication and failed to track the targeted behavior/symptom the psychotropic medication is being used to treat for 1 of 5 (R27) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications in a sample of 31. Findings included: According to R27's face sheet, R27 was admitted to this facility on 11/2/2022. R27's POS (Physician's Order Sheet) dated 2/1/2024 through 2/29/2024 documents R27's has diagnosis of Hemiplegia following Cerebral Infarct affecting left side, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Essential Hypertension, Need for Assistance with Care, Depression, Urinary Retention, Cognitive Impairment and Right Internal Carotid Thrombosis. R27's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 11/21/23 documents R27 has a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) of 13 which indicates R27 is cognitively intact. R27's POS (Physician's Order Sheet) dated 2/1/24- 2/29/24 documents R27's was prescribed an anti-psychotic medication on 9/26/23 called Quetiapine/Seroquel 25mg by mouth at 7:00am and 100mg by mouth at bedtime for Depression. Physician note for R27 dated 1/3/2024 documents R27 was seen at the facility by V23 (Psychiatric Nurse Practitioner) for a routine Psychiatric follow up visit. This follow up visit note documents the following in part: R27 with documented history of MDD (Major Depressive Disorder) with psychotic features, Vascular dementia with delusions, adjustment disorder is seen today. R27 appears calm and cooperative and well groomed. R27 reports his mood is good, denies anxiety, denies hallucinations. Reports usual sleep and appetite, denies paranoia, psychosis, or manic symptoms. Tolerating medications well. PLAN: continue with current regimen of Quetiapine (Seroquel) 25mg by mouth every AM (morning) and 100mg by mouth every HS (bedtime) for the diagnosis of Delusions, hallucinations, MDD. R27's targeted behavior tracking for December 2023, January 2024, February 2024 and March 2024 for the psychotropic medication, Quetiapine/Seroquel document R27 is being monitored for the targeted behavior of mood swings and is taking the psychotropic medication for the diagnosis of Ischemic Stroke with Left Paralysis on non-dominate side. All four months document R27 as having zero episodes of mood swings during those months. A review of R27's nurse's notes from 10/10/2023 through 3/6/2024 documented on 12/1/2023 at 9:00am R27 had yelled out for the nurse due to being in pain. On 12/4/2023 at 2:37pm was yelling out due to pain and said, I can't take this, I'm hurting a lot. On 1/3/2024 at 12:00pm was yelling I need help. I'm in pain. For 10 minutes until staff could get him repositioned. No other documentation of R27 intermittently calling out was noted. No documentation of R27 being physically or verbally aggressive was found except for the following nurse's note entry dated 2/12/24. No entries prior to 2/15/2024 document R27 as having delusions or hallucinations. A Nurse's noted written on 2/12/24 in R27's medical record by V2 (Director of Nursing) at 10:00am, documents the following: Resident was noted to request a shower this am, yet attempted to hit CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) when she was washing him. He is now sitting up in his w/c (wheelchair) in his room yelling. This RN (Registered Nurse) educated/encouraged him to sit back and not cause himself discomfort. On same day at 12:20pm, V2 documented the following: Resident up in his w/c (wheelchair) eating lunch (feeding self) and frequently calling out for CNA to help him and take him back to his room. This writer re-educated/encouraged R27 three times to be patient. Physician note for R27 dated 2/15/2024 documents R27 was seen at the facility by V23 (Psychiatric Nurse Practitioner) for a routine Psychiatric follow up visit. This follow up visit note documents the following in part: R27 has a history of MDD (Major Depressive Disorder) and Dementia. R27 reports his mood as so-so, reports his anxiety is at baseline and he sleeps well at night. Symptoms of Psychosis or Mania not reported at this visit. Staff deny concerns. Staff reports R27 requested a shower and attempted to smack at staff during his shower and intermittently calls out. Staff report intermittent verbal and physical aggression. We will increase his (anti-psychotic) Quetiapine (Seroquel). R27's records reviewed and with documented history of hallucinations and delusions and diagnosis history of Dementia with delusions and MDD with psychotic features. R27 was seen by psychiatry during his recent hospitalization for his CVA (Cardiovascular Accident/Stroke) due to symptoms of mental illness. R27 was admitted from hospital (9/26/23) on (anti-psychotic) Seroquel. PLAN: Increase Quetiapine to 50mg by mouth every AM and 100mg by mouth at 4:00pm. R27's MAR (Medication Administration Record) dated 2/1/24 through 2/29/24 documents on 2/15/2024 at 4:00pm, R27 received Quetiapine 100mg and prior to this date, R27 had received it at bedtime (8:00pm). R27's Nurse's note dated 2/15/2024 at 7:45pm and entered by V25 (Registered Nurse/RN) documented the following: Resident yelling for son from room. Went to room, resident on floor on back with feet still up on bed. Very confused, thought he was in a car and thought son was in room. Informed NP (Nurse Practitioner) on call and orders received to send to local emergency room for evaluation. Nurse's note in R27's medical record and dated 2/15/2024 at 11:00pm documented R27 returned from the emergency room with negative CT scan (computed tomography). R27's Hospital Records dated 2/15/24 documented in part, ED (Emergency Department) course: He does have what looks like a urinary tract infection which was treated with Ceftriaxone. Do feel patient is stable for discharge home to facility on antibiotics .Discharge instructions. Urinary Tract Infection, Adult . Prescriptions: Cephalexin 500 mg Oral Capsule . R27's Nurse's note dated 2/16/2024 at 3:30am documented R27 awake and seeing spiders in his room. R27's Nurse's note dated 2/23/2024 at 1:12pm documented R27 had fixed eyes and was refusing to eat lunch. R27's Nurse's note dated 2/24/2025 at 3:47pm documented R27 was resting in bed and thought a snake was wrapped around his leg. R27's Nurse's note dated 2/25/2024 at 8:55am documented R27's eyes fixed towards the ceiling, responds to voice. R27 is only alert to self and is having some difficulty with communication. R27's Nurse's note dated 2/27/2024 at 9:00am, R27 very lethargic, barely eats anything and starts to fall asleep with his fork/spoon in his hand. Does not follow objects (with his eyes) and has a blank stare. Conversation very limited, (Quetiapine) Seroquel 25mg was increased to 50mg called (Psychiatry name) and spoke with staff regarding resident. (Staff) will speak to doctor and get back to writer. On this same day at 10:05am nurse note documented, POA (power of attorney) informed of resident's condition. Did a zoom meeting with NP (Nurse Practitioner), new orders to send to local emergency room due to lethargy, hallucinations, unable to track objects with eyes. On this same day at 12:15am, nurse note documented N.O. (new order) Decrease Seroquel/Quetiapine every AM (morning) and Zyprexa (anti-psychotic) 5mg every 12 hours as needed for 14 days. R27's Hospital Records dated 02/27/24 document in part, HPI (History of Present Illness): 10:55 (am) [AGE] year-old from local nursing home with history of CVA present to ER for nurse reported complaint of lethargy by EMS. In the ER, patient was awake, alert and stated that he is here because the nursing staff said use lethargic. Patient stated I do not feel lethargic. Patient did complain of chest congestion X2 days. Nursing staff reported that patient Seroquel dose was increased. Patient states he was just trying to sleep .Patient has a history of chronic urinary incontinence and has a catheter with clear yellow urine . R27's Hospital Records also document, Differential Diagnosis Acute upper respiratory infection, pneumonia, bronchitis, medication side effect, Local emergency room records for R27 dated 2/27/2024 documented R27 was diagnosed with possible upper respiratory infections and personal history of other drug therapy. On 3/7/2024 at 3:00pm, V25 (Registered Nurse) said R27's psychotropic medications had been increased due to him having aggressive behaviors towards staff, but the increase was too much for him and he was drugged out of his mind and the medication had to be decreased. V25 said R27 began to have hallucinations after his psychotropic medication was increased. V25 said she did not know of any non-pharmacological interventions attempted before R27's psychotropic medication was increased on 2/15/2024. Pharmacy consultation report with recommendation date of 2/16/2024 documented in part that R27 has a prescription for an opioid (hydrocodone/acetaminophen 7.5mg/325mg QID (four times per day) in combination with a medication that may increase adverse effects. Quetiapine (recently increased to 50mg every AM and 100mg at bedtime on 2/15/2024) Pregabalin 100mg TID (three times per day) and Baclofen 20mg TID (three times per day). Resident had a fall on 2/15/2024. Recommendations: This combination may increase the risk of toxicity and overdose. The FDA (Food and Drug Administration) has issued a BOXED WARNING stating that health care professionals should limit prescribing opioid medicines with other CNS (Central Nervous System) depressants (benzodiazepines, gabapentinoids, sedatives, muscle relaxants, antipsychotics) only to those for whom alternative treatment options are inadequate. Additionally, concomitant use of stimulants may mask the signs/symptoms of overdose. If prescribed together, the minimum dose and duration of each drug needed to maintain the desired clinical effect should be used. Please consider decreasing Quetiapine (anti-psychotic) back to 25mg every AM and 100mg at HS (bedtime). This document has a section for physician response which is left blank. A handwritten statement at the bottom documents All ready decreased to 25mg every AM on 2/27/2024 with and non-legible initials that appears to be the letter M. A facility policy titled Psychotropic Medication Policy with last revision date of 11/28/2017 documents in part: It is the policy of this facility that residents shall not be given unnecessary drugs. Unnecessary drug is any drug used without adequate monitoring, without adequate indication for use, and in the presents of adverse consequences that indicate the drug should be reduced or discontinued. These medications will not be given solely for staff convenience. That these medications be withheld if the resident is lethargic and/or exhibiting signs of over sedation. Under the section titled Procedure: Attempt to rule out social and environmental factors as causative agents of the maladaptive behavior. Psychotropic medications shall not be prescribed prior to attempting non-pharmacological interventions to decrease behavior. Any resident receiving such medications shall have a psychiatric diagnosis or documented evidence of maladaptive behavior, which can be considered harmful to themselves or others, destructive to property, or if emotional problems exist which cause the resident frightful distress. According to Nation Library of Medicine at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9827929/#:~:text=Symptoms%20of%20UTI%20are%20atypical,the%20absence%20of%20a%20fever. Symptoms of UTI are atypical in the elderly population, like hypotension, tachycardia, urinary incontinence, poor appetite, drowsiness, frequent falls, and delirium. UTI manifests more commonly and specifically for this age group as delirium or confusion in the absence of a fever.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0887 (Tag F0887)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to administer the updated (2023-2024 Formula) COVID-19 vaccine to 3 of...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to administer the updated (2023-2024 Formula) COVID-19 vaccine to 3 of 7 residents (R42, R36, R22) reviewed for immunizations in a sample of 31. Findings include: The facility policy titled, Immunization of Residents (revision date 4/21/22) documents the facility will offer immunizations and vaccinations that aid in the prevention of infectious diseases unless medically contraindicated or otherwise ordered by the resident's attending physician or facility's medical director. 1. R42's Face Sheet documents an admission date of 10/10/2023 and a date of birth (DOB) indicating that R42 is [AGE] years of age. Documented diagnoses include Dementia, Hyperlipidemia, Hypertension, Irritable Bowel Syndrome, Hepatocellular Carcinoma. An undated document titled Residents from a health clinic in R42's medical record documents in special notes section, No insurance, do not administer. An Adult Vaccination Consent Form for the COVID-19 vaccine, verbal consent given by R42's power of attorney (POA) and dated 10/15/2023. R42's medical record for the updated (2023-2024 Formula) COVID-19 vaccine documents physician's order dated for 3/11/2024. 2. R36's Face Sheet documents an admission date of 3/17/2023 and a DOB indicating that R36 is [AGE] years of age. Documented diagnoses include Dementia, hearing loss due to nerve damage since childhood. An undated document titled Residents from a health clinic in R42's medical record documents in special notes section, Do not administer, insurance won't cover. An Adult Vaccination Consent Form for the COVID-19 vaccine, verbal consent was given by R36's POA and dated 10/4/2023. R36's medical record for the updated (2023-2024 Formula) COVID-19 vaccine documents it was administered on 3/07/2024. 3. R22's Face Sheet documents an admission date of 7/27/2020 and a DOB indicating that R22 is [AGE] years of age. R22's documented diagnosis include dementia. An undated document titled Residents from a health clinic in R22's medical record documents in special notes section, Do not administer, insurance won't cover. An Adult Vaccination Consent Form for the COVID-19 vaccine verbal consent was given by R22's POA and dated 10/4/2023. R22's medical record for the updated (2023-2024 Formula) COVID-19 vaccine documents it was administered on 3/07/2024. On 3/06/2024 at 1:35 PM, V1 (Administrator) said the facility had a COVID-19 vaccine clinic on 11/01/2023. V1 stated that the previous Director of Nursing (DON), was responsible for getting all the residents their Covid-19 vaccines. V1 stated the previous DON dropped the ball into making sure R42, R36, and R22 all received their Covid-19 vaccines. On 3/07/2024, at 11:00 AM, V22 (Regional Clinical Director) stated that after lunch R42, R36, and R22 will be going over to the local pharmacy to receive their Covid-19 vaccine.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0638 (Tag F0638)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete quarterly resident assessments for 11 (R3, R10, R30, R42, ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete quarterly resident assessments for 11 (R3, R10, R30, R42, R11, R25, R2, R33, R6, R22, R12) of 11 residents reviewed for quarterly resident assessments in a sample of 31. Findings: On 3/06/2024, at 2:00 PM, V21 (Regional Administrator) stated that the resident assessments for R3, R10, R30, R42, R11, R25, R2, R33, R6, & R22 have not been completed. 1 R3's Face Sheet documents admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including dementia and Parkinson's. R3's last quarterly resident assessment documents a completion date of 10/23/2023. 2. R10's Face Sheet documents admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including major depression disorder, Parkinson, dementia, history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. R10's last quarterly assessment documents a completion date of 10/23/2023. 3. R30's Face Sheet documents admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis of dementia. R30's last quarterly resident assessment documents a completion date of 10/09/2023. 4. R42's Face Sheet documents admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including anxiety, dementia, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, irritable bowel syndrome, hepatocellular carcinoma, osteoarthritis. R42's last quarterly resident assessment documents a completion date of 10/10/2023. 5. R11's Face Sheet documents admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including dementia, Alzheimer's bipolar, muscle weakness. R11's last quarterly resident assessment documents a completion date of 10/16/2023. 6. R25's Face Sheet documents admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis of dementia with behavior. R25's last quarterly resident assessment documents a completion date of 10/30/2023. 7. R2's Face Sheet documents admitted to the facility on [DATE], diagnoses including dementia, hypertension, depression, acid reflux. R2's last quarterly resident assessment documents a completion date of 10/19/2023. 8. R33's Face Sheet documents admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypertension, history of lung cancer. R33's last quarterly resident assessment documents a completion date of 10/30/2023. 9. R6's Face Sheet documents admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including dementia, facial paralysis of left side, hearing loss, back pain. R6's last quarterly resident assessment documents a completion date of 10/23/2023. 10. R22's Face Sheet documents admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis of dementia. R22's last quarterly resident assessment was completed on 10/16/2023. 11. R12's Face Sheet documents admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including dementia, altered mental status. R12's last quarterly resident assessment was completed on 10/05/2023.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0692 (Tag F0692)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, observation, and record review the facility failed to provide supplements as ordered for 6 of 11 residents (...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, observation, and record review the facility failed to provide supplements as ordered for 6 of 11 residents (R2, R21, R11, R17, R14 and R22) reviewed for nutrition in a sample of 31. Findings include: 1. R2's New admission Information documents R2 has an admission date of 04/22/19. R2's Cumulative Diagnosis Log documents diagnosis including Dementia, Generalized anxiety disorder, Alzheimer's disease, irritable bowel syndrome, and Macular Degeneration. R2's Minimum Data Sheet (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R2 did not have a BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) conducted due R2 is rarely understood active diagnosis including Unsteadiness on feet, Muscle Weakness, and other Reduced Mobility. R2's Physician Order Sheet dated 03/01/24 documents a Dietary order: supplement orders document nutritional ice cream BID (two times a day) with a start date of 12/05/23. R2's Dietary Services Communication dated 01/30/24 documents: I. Observation/Comments: weight down by 3 months, hospice patient, intake varies approximately 0 - 100%. On 03/04/24 at 12:00 PM, R2 did not receive any nutritional ice cream for lunch. On 03/05/24 at 7:40 AM, R2 did not receive any nutritional ice cream during breakfast. On 03/05/24 at 11:45 AM, R2 did not receive any nutritional ice cream during lunch. On 03/06/24 at 7:45 AM, R2 did not receive any nutritional ice cream during breakfast. On 03/06/24 at 11:50 AM, R2 did not receive any nutritional ice cream for lunch. On 03/06/24 at 5:20 PM, R2 did not receive any nutritional ice cream for dinner. 2. R21's New admission Information Sheet documents an admission date of 05/15/2019. R21's Cumulative Diagnosis log documents diagnosis including Advances Dementia, Altered Mental Status, Alzheimer's Disease, closed fracture of ramus of right pubis, closed compression fracture of body of L1 vertebra, closed left arm fracture, and Pelvic ring fracture, decreased Mobility. R21's MDS dated [DATE] documents no BIMS was conducted due R21 is rarely understood. R21's Physician Order Sheet dated 03/01/24 documents supplement orders of; nutritional ice cream cup BID (twice a day) with a start date of 10/25/23. R21's Dietary card documents; nutritional ice cream cup under the heading lunch and dinner. On 03/04/24 at 12:00 PM, R21 did not receive any nutritional ice cream for lunch. On 03/05/24 at 11:45 AM, R21 did not receive any nutritional ice cream for lunch. On 03/06/24 at 11:50 AM, R21 did not receive any nutritional ice cream for lunch. On 03/06/24 at 5:20 PM, R21 did not receive any nutritional ice cream for dinner. R21's Dietary notes dated 02/21/24 documents: RD (Registered Dietician) note: February weight 105.8 pounds with a significant weight increased for 3 months. BMI (Body Mass Index) is 19.35% which is low. Diet is regular with nutritional ice cream BID (two times a day) and 30 cc liquid nutritional supplement (TID) three times a day. Weight remains below an acceptable BMI. Will recommend to increase liquid nutritional supplement to 120 cc TID. R21's Dietary Services Communication dated 02/21/24 documents: weight is up for 3 months but is down for 6 months, appetite varies, and BMI is down. R21's Report of Monthly Weight and Vitals documents a weight for January 2024 as 107.4 pounds, February 2024 as 105.8 pounds, and March 2024 as 103.6 pounds. 3. R11's Physician Order Sheet dated 03/01/24 documents an admission date of 02/03/24 with diagnosis including: Alzheimer's Disease, Dementia with Behaviors, Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage and Hip fracture. Dietary orders including Mechanical soft diet with a start date of 05/28/20 and supplement orders of 4 ounces health shake three times daily with a start date of 09/28/23 and nutritional ice cream BID (twice daily) with a start date of 12/12/23. R11's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documents no BIMS was conducted due R11 is rarely understood. On 03/04/24 at 12:00 PM, R11 did not receive any nutritional ice cream for lunch. On 03/05/24 at 7:40 AM, R11 did not receive any nutritional ice cream during breakfast. On 03/05/24 at 11:45 AM, R11 did not receive any nutritional ice cream for lunch. On 03/06/24 at 7:45 AM, R11 did not receive any nutritional ice cream during breakfast. On 03/06/24 at 11:50 AM, R11 did not receive any nutritional ice cream for lunch. On 03/06/24 at 5:20 PM, R11 did not receive any nutritional ice cream for dinner. 4. R17's Physician Order Sheet dated 03/01/24 documents an admission date of 07/19/18 with diagnosis including: Dementia and Diabetes Mellitus Type II, and Dietary orders including: supplement orders of nutritional ice cream three times a day with a start date of 10/31/23. R17's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documents no BIMS was conducted due R17 is rarely understood. On 03/04/24 at 12:00 PM, R17 did not receive any nutritional ice cream for lunch. On 03/05/24 at 7:40 AM, R17 did not receive any nutritional ice cream during breakfast. On 03/05/24 at 11:45 AM, R17 did not receive any nutritional ice cream for lunch. On 03/06/24 at 7:45 AM, R17 did not receive any nutritional ice cream during breakfast. On 03/06/24 at 11:50 AM, R17 did not receive any nutritional ice cream for lunch. On 03/06/24 at 5:20 PM, R17 did not receive any nutritional ice cream for dinner. 5. R14's Physician Order Sheet dated 03/01/24 documents an admission date of 06/13/19 with diagnosis including: Alzheimer's, and Dementia and Dietary orders including: supplement orders of health shake three times a day with a start date of 04/15/23 and nutritional ice cream BID (two times a day) relating to weight loss with a start date 01/27/23. R14's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documents no BIMS was conducted due R14 is rarely understood. On 03/04/24 at 12:00 PM, R14 did not receive any health shake or nutritional ice cream for lunch. On 03/05/24 at 7:40 AM, R14 did not receive any health shake or nutritional ice cream during breakfast. On 03/05/24 at 11:45 AM, R14 did not receive any health shake or nutritional ice cream for lunch. On 03/06/24 at 7:45 AM, R14 did not receive any health shake or nutritional ice cream during breakfast. On 03/06/24 at 11:50 AM, R14 did not receive any health shake or nutritional ice cream for lunch. On 03/06/24 at 5:20 PM, R14 did not receive any health shake or nutritional ice cream for dinner. 6. R22's Physician Order Sheet dated 03/01/24 documents an admission date of 10/16/23 with diagnosis including: Dementia with behaviors and Dietary orders including: supplement orders of nutritional ice cream two (BID) times a day with a start date of 07/26/23 and health shakes TID (three times a day) with meals relating to weight loss with a start date of 02/15/23. R22's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documents no BIMS was conducted due R22 is rarely understood. On 03/04/24 at 12:00 PM, R22 did not receive any nutritional ice cream or health shakes for lunch. On 03/05/24 at 7:40 AM, R22 did not receive any nutritional ice cream or health shakes during breakfast. On 03/05/24 at 11:45 AM, R22 did not receive any nutritional ice cream or health shakes for lunch. On 03/06/24 at 7:45 AM, R22 did not receive any nutritional ice cream or health shakes during breakfast. On 03/06/24 at 11:50 AM, R22 did not receive any nutritional ice cream or health shakes for lunch. On 03/06/24 at 5:20 PM, R22 did not receive any nutritional ice cream or health shakes for dinner. On 03/07/24 at 1:00 PM, V6 (Maintenance/Dietary Supervisor) stated all supplements should be served as ordered. He believes all residents receive them with lunch and/or dinner. V6 stated he was not sure why the residents did not receive their supplements they had them at the facility. The facility policy dated 10/13 titled, Nutrition Supplements and Nourishments documents: It is the policy of (this facility) to provide additional calories and/or protein to resident who cannot and/or are not capable of consuming adequate nutrients through their regular meal. It is also the policy of (this facility) to provide guidelines for the selection, ordering, use and monitoring of nutrition supplements and nourishments.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Menu Adequacy (Tag F0803)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on interview, observation and record review the facility failed to serve the correct portion size of protein during lunch service and failed to thicken liquids as ordered for 6 of 11 (R2, R11, R...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview, observation and record review the facility failed to serve the correct portion size of protein during lunch service and failed to thicken liquids as ordered for 6 of 11 (R2, R11, R19, R21, R26, R28) residents reviewed for nutrition in a sample of 31. Findings include: The facility menu information given for 3/04/24 titled, Week 1 Monday documents: #12 scoop (1/3 cup) sloppy joe on a bun. For the regular diet and mechanical soft diets. On 03/04/24 at 11:30 AM, V10 (Dietary) served approximately a half a scoop of the 3 ounce scoop used to serve the sloppy joe. To residents trays that included residents R2, R11, R21, R26 and R28. On 03/07/24 at 1:00 PM, V6 (Maintenance/Dietary Supervisor) stated, all residents should receive the documented serving amount from the approved menu. They dietary staff should be using the scoop size listed on the menu and filling it to the top, level it off and serving that amount. 1. R2's New admission Information documents R2 has an admission date of 04/22/19. R2's Cumulative Diagnosis Log documents diagnosis including: Dementia, Generalized anxiety disorder, Alzheimer's disease, Irritable Bowel Syndrome, and Macular Degeneration. R2's Physician Order Sheet dated 03/01/24 documents a Dietary order of Regular diet with regular texture with a start date was 05/23/22. 2. R21's New admission Information Sheet documents an admission date of 05/15/2019. R21's Cumulative Diagnosis log documents diagnosis including: Advances Dementia, Altered Mental Status, Alzheimer's Disease, closed fracture of ramus of right pubis, closed compression fracture of body of L1 vertebra, closed left arm fracture, and Pelvic ring fracture, decreased Mobility. R21's Physician Order Sheet dated 03/01/24 documents an order for a regular diet with a start date of 10/10/22. 3. R26's Physician Order Sheet documents an admission date of 12/14/23 with diagnosis including Dementia, Wandering, Vitamin Deficiency and General Muscle Weakness and a dietary order of a regular diet with regular texture. 4. R28's Physician Order Sheet dated 03/01/24 documents an admission date of 08/11/23 with diagnosis including Asthma, Diabetes Type II, Long term use of Hypoglycemics, Muscle Atrophy, Difficulty walking, weakness and Parkinson's disease and Dietary Orders including: Regular Diet with NAS (no added salt) with a start date of 08/11/23. 5. R11's Physician Order Sheet dated 03/01/24 documents an admission date of 02/03/24 with diagnosis including: Alzheimer's Disease, Dementia with Behaviors, Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage and Hip fracture and Dietary orders including: Mechanical soft diet with a start date of 05/28/20. 6. R19's POS (Physician Order Sheet) dated 3/1/2024 through 3/31/2024 documents R19's diet order as Puree, Honey Thick Liquids spoon fed, Magic Cup twice per day and Med Pass (high calorie/high protein supplement) 60 mL (milliliters) three times per day and a diagnosis of Dementia. R19's MDS (minimum data set) dated 11/1/2023 documents R19 is dependent on staff to feed her meals. This same MDS documents R19 was unable to be assessed for mental status and has severe cognitive impairment. On 3/6/2024 at 11:51am, V16 (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) was observed assisting R19 with her 60 mL of High calorie/high protein supplement. The supplement was not thickened and V16 held the cup of supplement up to R19's mouth and was attempting to dump the liquid in, however the liquid was running out the other side of R19's mouth and running down the front of her shirt. On 3/6/2024 at 12:30pm, V16 said she did not know R19's supplement was supposed to be thickened and spoon fed to R19. On 03/07/24 at 2:00 PM, V1 (Administrator) stated the facility does not have a policy for the assistance of residents with feeding.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and observation the facility failed to maintain infection control practices while assisting residents with me...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and observation the facility failed to maintain infection control practices while assisting residents with meals for 5 of 18 residents (R11, R12, R14, R19, R20) reviewed for infection control practices while dining in a sample of 31. Findings included: 1. R11's POS dated 3/1/2024 through 3/31/2024 documents R11's diet order as Mechanical Soft and R11 has been diagnosed with Alzheimer's Dementia. R19's MDS dated [DATE] documents R11 is dependent on staff to feed her meals. This same MDS document R11 was unable to be assessed for mental status and has severe cognitive impairment. 2. R12's POS dated 3/1/2024 through 3/31/2024 documents R12's diet order as Pureed solids and R12 has been diagnosed with Alzheimer's Dementia. R14's MDS dated [DATE] documents R12 is dependent on staff to feed her meals. This same MDS document R12 was unable to be assessed for mental status and has severe cognitive impairment. 3. R14's POS dated 3/1/2024 through 3/31/2024 documents R14's diet order as Pureed solids with R14 to receive assistance with feeding at all meals and R14 has been diagnosed with Alzheimer's Dementia. R14's MDS dated [DATE] documents R14 is dependent on staff to feed her meals. This same MDS document R14 was unable to be assessed for mental status and has severe cognitive impairment. 4. R19's POS (Physician Order Sheet) dated 3/1/2024 through 3/31/2024 documents R19's diet order as Puree, Honey Thick Liquids spoon fed, Magic Cup twice per day and Med Pass (high calorie/high protein supplement) 60 mL (milliliters) three times per day and has been diagnosed with Dementia. R19's MDS (minimum data set) dated 11/1/2023 documents R19 is dependent on staff to feed her meals. This same MDS documents R19 was unable to be assessed for mental status and has severe cognitive impairment. 5. R20's POS dated 3/1/2024 through 3/31/2024 documents R20's diet order as Pureed and R20 has been diagnosed with Alzheimer's Dementia. R20's MDS dated [DATE] documents R20 is dependent on staff to feed her meals. This same MDS document R20 was unable to be assessed for mental status and has severe cognitive impairment. On 3/4/2024 at 11:55am, V2 (Director of Nursing) was observed feeding both R12 and R14 at the same time. R12 and R14 were both seated at the dining table with V2 sitting in between R12 and R14. V2 was observed multiple times spooning up a bite of food with her right hand and feeding it to R14 and with the same hand spooning up a bite of food for R12 and vice versa. V2 was observed multiple times using a paper napkin to wipe food from R14's face and using the same hand to spoon up a bite of food to feed R12 and vice versa. V2 was observed multiple times grabbing the top rim of R12's drinking glass and putting the rim of the glass to R12 mouth to drink the liquid and spooning up a bite of food and feeding R14 with the same hand. V2 did not perform hand hygiene or wash her hands at any time throughout the noon meal while assisting R12 and R14. At this same meal and during the same observation period, V16 (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) was observed feeding both R11 and R19 at the same time. R11 and R19 were seated at the dining table and V16 sat in between them. V16 was observed multiple times spooning up a bite of food with her right hand and feeding it to V11 and then with the same hand spooning up a bite of food and feeding it to R19 and visa versa. V16 was observed multiple times wiping V11's mouth with a paper napkin using her right hand and using the same hand to spoon up a bite of food and feeding R19. V16 was observed multiple times using a paper napkin to wipe R19's mouth with her right hand and using the same hand to spoon up a bite of food for R11. No hand hygiene was performed throughout the entire noon meal. On 3/5/2024 at 11:51am, V16 (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) was observed feeding both R11 and R19 at the same time. R11 and R19 were seated at the dining table and V16 sat in between them. V16 did not wash her hands or perform hand hygiene prior to feeding R11 and R19. V16 was observed multiple times spooning up a bite of food with her right hand and feeding it to V11 and then with the same hand spooning up a bite of food and feeding it to R19 and visa versa. V16 was observed multiple times wiping V11's mouth with a paper napkin using her right hand and using the same hand to spoon up a bite of food and feeding R19. V16 was observed multiple times using a paper napkin to wipe R19's mouth with her right hand and using the same hand to spoon up a bite of food for R11. No hand hygiene was performed throughout the entire noon meal. At the same meal and during the same observation period, V2 (Director of Nursing/DON) was observed assisting R14 and R12 with their noon meals at the same time. R14 and R12 were seated at the dining table and V2 sat in between them. V2 did not wash her hands or perform hand hygiene prior to assisting R14 and R12 with their noon meals. V2 was observed multiple times spooning up a bite of food with her right hand and feeding it to R14 and with the same hand spooning up a bite of food for R12 and visa versa. V2 was observed multiple times using a paper napkin to wipe food from R14's face and using the same hand to spoon up a bite of food to feed R12 and visa versa. V2 was observed multiple times grabbing the top rim of R12's drinking glass and putting the rim of the glass to R12 mouth to drink the liquid and spooning up a bite of food and feeding R14 with the same hand. V2 did not perform hand hygiene or wash her hands at any time throughout the noon meal while assisting R12 and R14. On 3/6/2024 at 11:45pm, V16 was observed assisting R12 and R14 with their noon meal at the same time. V16 did not wash her hands or perform hand hygiene prior to assisting R12 and R14 with their meals. R12 and R14 were both seated at the dining table and V16 sat in between them. V16 was observed multiple times spooning up a bite of food with her right hand and feeding it to R14 and with the same hand spooning up a bite of food for R12 and vice versa. V16 was observed multiple times using a small paper napkin to wipe food from R14's face and using the same hand to spoon up a bite of food to feed R12 and vice versa. V16 was observed multiple times grabbing the top rim of R12's drinking glass and putting the rim of the glass to R12 mouth to drink the liquid and next spooning up a bite of food and feeding R14 with the same hand. V16 did not perform hand hygiene or wash her hands at any time throughout the noon meal while assisting R12 and R14. At the same meal and during the same observation period, V19 (CNA) was observed assisting R19 and R20 with their noon meal. R19 and R20 were both seated at the dining table with V19 seated between them. V19 did not wash her hands or perform hand hygiene before assisting R19 and R20 with their noon meals. V19 was observed multiple times using a small paper napkin to wipe R19's face and with the same hand spoon up a bite of food and feeding R20 and vice versa. V19 never washed her hands or performed hand hygiene throughout the noon meal service. On 3/7/2024 at 10:00am, V2 (Director of Nursing) said when staff assist residents with eating their meal, she expects them to maintain infection control measures, including hand hygiene and hand washing when appropriate.
Sept 2023 2 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0583 (Tag F0583)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Residents Right to Privacy for 1 of 7 residents (R3) reviewe...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Residents Right to Privacy for 1 of 7 residents (R3) reviewed for resident's rights in a sample of 7. The findings include: R3's New admission Information note indicates R3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include Dementia and Elopement Risk. R3's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 6/19/23 document that R3 should not have a BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) due to rarely/never being understood. On 9/20/23 at 10:50am, R3 who was alert to person and place stated that V21 (LPN/Licensed Practical Nurse) took a picture of her on a day a church group was singing and dancing in the facility and she doesn't know why she took it. R3 said that a resident from the other side was there and was sitting by her. R3 said that she was tapping his arm to the music and was trying to help him clap his hands. R3 said she did not know if anyone called her husband. R3 said she was not flirting with that man or anybody, she loves her husband. On 9/20/23 at 8:49am, V12 (family member) said he received a call from a nurse telling him his wife (R3) was flirting with other men at the facility. V12 said that he talked to R3, and she told him she was at an activity with music. V12 said R3 told him she was sitting next to a man from the other side and was not flirting with him. V12 said after he talked to R3, he felt R3 was not doing anything wrong. V12 said he does not know why the nurse called him, but she did. V12 then stated it was V21 that called him. On 9/20/23 at 9:50am, V27 (CNA) said that V21 did take a picture and video of R3. V27 said that she thinks V21(LPN/Licensed Practical Nurse) got mad at R3 because R3 told V21 she was acting like a whore since she was having an affair with another staff member and that is why she also called R3's husband. On 9/20/23 at 12:05pm, V1 (Administrator) said that it is not right for an employee to take a picture of a resident or to call a resident's husband and tell him she was flirting. V1 she was going to look into it. The undated Illinois Long Term Care Resident Rights booklet provided to each resident upon admission documents in part, Your right to dignity and respect: You have a right to make your own choices, Your facility must treat you with dignity and respect . Your rights to privacy and confidentiality: You have a right to privacy and confidentiality of your personal and medical records. Your medical and personal care are private
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Pharmacy Services (Tag F0755)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide routine medications to ensure continuity of care for 1 of 3...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide routine medications to ensure continuity of care for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for medication administration in a sample of 7. The findings include: R1's New admission Information sheet documents R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The same document list R1's diagnosis as Dementia with behavior Disturbance. R1's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 8/29/23 note that a BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) should not be completed due to the R1 rarely/never being understood. On 9/19/23 at 6:00am R1 was noted in the hallway getting his medications. At that time R1 was confused and did not answer questions appropriately. R1's care plan notes a problem area dated 6/11/23 of resident requires use of psychotropic medication to manage mood and/or behavior issues. One of the listed interventions is to administer anti-psychotic medication as ordered-See POS (Physician's order sheet) for current medication, dose, and schedule. R1's Physician's orders dated 9/1/23-9/30/23 note an order dated 8/8/23 for Quetiapine Fumarate 50mg tab Take 1/2 tablet twice a day. The same physician orders note on 9/1/23 to DC (discontinue) Seroquel (Quetiapine Fumarate) pm dose. There is an entry for Seroquel 25mg take 1-tab po (by mouth) once daily with no date. The same Physician order notes on 9/6/23 Seroquel 25mg once daily. R1's Medication Administration Record (MAR) note that on 9/1/23 there is no entry. On 9/2/23, 9/3/23, 9/4/23, 9/5/23, 9/6/23, 9/9/23, 9/10/23, 9/11/23 note initials that are circled. There are no entries on the back of the MAR to explain what the circles and initials meant. On 9/19/23 at 6:00am, V3 (LPN/Licensed Practical Nurse) said that she wasn't sure why Seroquel was circled on the MAR for R1, but she thinks it was something to do with the ordering and she had to send another order she thinks on 9/6. On 9/19/23 at 9:30am, V2 (Resident Care Coordinator) said she thinks the reason R1 did not receive his Seroquel there was an issue with getting it from the pharmacy. V2 said R1's insurance dropped off and she thinks it was a prior approval problem. On 9/20/23 at 10:07am, V6 (Local pharmacy technician) said she did not see a problem with R1's medication being delivered to the facility. V6 said she doesn't think it was a prior authorization issue since they just did a prior authorization in August when the dose changed. V6 said it was first initiated on 8/8/23 and they got the prior approval. V6 said they sent a 4-day supply for them to get time for the prior approval V6 said the Quetiapine (Seroquel) 25mg was sent to the facility on 9/6/23. V6 said it went through with no issues. V6 said they did not have an order dated 9/1/23 and after 8/8/23 the next order they received was 9/6/23. On 9/20/23 at 10:45am, V2 said that the medication was lost and that is why it was not given to R1. V2 said there is no documentation that the physician was notified when Seroquel was not given. V2 also said there was not a medication discrepancy form filled out. V2 said that R1 did not have an increase in behaviors when Seroquel was not given. On 9/20/23 at 11:00am, V3 said that Seroquel was not given to R1 on 9/4/23, 9/5/23 and 9/6/23 and that she did not call the physician to inform him that Seroquel was not given and did not fill out an adverse drug reactions and medication discrepancy form. V3 said that R1 did not have any increase in his behaviors. V3 said R1 did cuss a little more and was a little more grumpy from 9/2/23-9/11/23. On 9/26/23 at 1:37pm, V26 (RN/Registered Nurse) said she did receive R1's card of Seroquel from the pharmacy on 9/6/23. V26 said that she was working by herself on the 6pm to 2 am shift. V26 said she typically works the west side, so she took the east sides med and put back in the bag and puts them in the med room and then the 10pm nurse puts them away. V26 said she was unaware that they could not find them since no one called her. V26 said the next time she returned to work is when she found out they could not find it. V26 said she looked at the cards on the east side and pulled out the pharmacy book and yes, she did sign it in. V26 said she then went to the other side and there are 3 drawers on the cart. The first drawer is for resident's current meds and the second and third are overflow. V26 said she put the card in the overflow drawer to the side and the card had fallen on its side. V26 said that when you circle your initials on the MAR, that means it was not available or the resident refused it. Document labeled Facilities Adverse Drug Reaction and Medication Discrepancy policy reviewed 11/16/18 note it is the policy of the facility that adverse drug reactions and drug errors are to be reported to the resident's physician, documented in the nursing notes and documented on an Adverse Drug Reaction or Medication Discrepancy Report. The same form notes a medication discrepancy/error has been made when one of the following occurs: .medication not administered.
Jun 2023 7 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0604 (Tag F0604)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to identify the medical symptom being treated for the use of a physical restraint, assessment for its use, and failed to provide ongoing monit...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to identify the medical symptom being treated for the use of a physical restraint, assessment for its use, and failed to provide ongoing monitoring and evaluation for the continued use of a physical restraint to treat a medical symptom for one (R12) of one resident reviewed for restraints in the sample of 25. The findings include: R12's New admission record documents an admission date of 1/14/19. R12's Cumulative Diagnosis Log documents diagnoses including but not limited to Alzheimer's Disease, Dementia with behaviors, bipolar disorder, and Major Depressive Disorder. R12's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 4/19/23 documents that R12 did not get screened for a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score due to being rarely or never being understood and severely impaired. Section P (restraints) of the same MDS documents that there are no physical restraints being used in chair or out of bed. R12's May 2023 Physician Order Sheet (POS) documents an order of Safety Device Orders. May Use Lap Buddy have dated 11/9/22. This order has no additional documentation to show the rationale for the device, no instructions for when to use, duration for use, or documentation of the medical reason for its use. R12's Care plan documents a category of Falls with a start date of 3/28/21 and notes Resident has risk factors that require monitoring and intervention to reduce potential for self-injury. (R12) is a fall risk r/t (related to) sev impaired cog (severely impaired cognition), unable to understand boundaries. (R12) is dependent for all ADLs (Activities of Daily Living), inc of B & B (incontinent of bowel and bladder), attempts to get up out of wc (wheelchair) and puts self to bed at times. A handwritten note under this documentation states 11-9-22 Lap buddy order. There is no additional documentation on the care plan to show the medical reason for its use, instructions for when or how to use, or duration for use. On 5/24/23 at 11:30, R12 was observed in a wheelchair with a hard, plastic covered foam device that fits in the space below the arms of the wheelchair that prevents R12 from standing or leaning forward in the wheelchair. R12 was also observed on 5/25/23 at 12:00pm sitting in her wheelchair in the dining room with the foam cushion on her wheelchair. On 6/1/23 at 2:30pm, V11 (CNA/Certified Nurse Assistant) stated that R12 only has the foam cushion on while she is in the dining room because she tends to lean forward. V11 said that R12 is only up for meals so that is the only time the cushion is used. On 6/2/23 at 11:00am, when asked about documentation regarding R12's foam cushion, V12 (RN/Registered Nurse) stated that the Treatment Administration Record (TAR) is the only place to chart on it. V12 said there is no other documentation to do on the foam cushion. On 6/1/23 at 2:00pm, V1 (Administrator) said she could not find any documentation on the foam cushion. The facility was unable to provide reproducible evidence to show a restraint assessment had been completed prior to or at the time the order was written, nor any documentation of monitoring, duration, or the medical reason/rationale for its use. The facility Restraint Reduction/Elimination Program revised 8/25/18 documents under Policy: The purpose of this program is to reduce and/or remove restraints to achieve each resident's highest practical physical, mental and psychosocial level and to enhance the resident's quality of life and dignity. This document notes the following under Procedure: 1. After completion of a Physical Enabler/Restraint Use/Reduction Evaluation (reviewed at least quarterly) the IDT (Interdisciplinary Team) will then determine need for possible reduction/elimination of physical restraint according to the following scoring method: 0-20 Priority, 21-35 Good, 36+ Poor Candidate. The facility document titled Enabler/Restraint Review Log has column headings that include Resident's Initials, The Enabler/Restraint Order per POS/MD Order, Improves Functioning By, Diagnosis Necessitating Use, Date Care Plan Updated, Assessment Accurate Restraint/MDS, Date of Recent Note, and Alternative Methods Attempted. A facility document titled Fulfilling Responsibilities of Restraint Protocols documents facility staff roles regarding the restraint protocol. The following is listed under CNA responsibilities: Review care plan for each resident using restraints to know what restraint to apply, when to apply, when to release and what function it is meant to support (safety, positioning); Apply restraint correctly and supervise per plan of care; Release restraint at appropriate times and at least every two hours and change position, keep resident under visual observation until the device is replaced. The following is listed under Charge Nurse Responsibilities: Complete physician order for all restraints-Must include Restraint type, when it is to be work, reason for use, related diagnosis and when it can be released. Record monthly in Monthly Nurse's Note response to restraint including skin condition, acceptance, current functioning, resulting behaviors; Observe each restrained resident throughout the day to ensure proper use and release of restraint. The following is listed under MDS Coordinator responsibilities: Restraint Assessment and Restraint Reduction Assessment, quarterly and prn (as needed) for significant change in condition of functioning; Quarterly and prn note of how restraint improves/enhances functioning or reduces safety risks, lesser methods attempted and resident response and functioning in nurse's note or in care plan area . The following is listed under Director of Nursing responsibilities: Review restrained resident's charts weekly and complete report for discussion with IDT at QA Daily meeting; Complete and maintain Enabler/Restraint Review Log and all supporting documentation; Ensure documentation exists for each resident with a restraint or enabler; Physician order including when to be applied, rationale for use, related diagnosis, when to release; monthly nurses note, consent for use; quarterly assessment; care plan; quarterly review of care plan. The following is listed under the Administrator responsibilities: Weekly check of at least two at least two records of restrained residents for proper documentation, Daily tours throughout facility to ensure proper use and release of restraints, participation in IDT weekly discussion of restrained residents.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0637 (Tag F0637)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to perform a significant change of condition assessment for 1 of 2 (R2...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to perform a significant change of condition assessment for 1 of 2 (R22) residents reviewed for hospice in the sample of 25. The findings include: R22's New admission Information document notes that R22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Dementia, Alzheimer's, and syncope. R22's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 3/15/23 note that a BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) was not conducted due to resident being rarely or never being understood. R22's May 2023 Physician's Order Sheet (POS) documents an order dated 4/1/22 to admit to residential hospice with a diagnosis of Vascular Dementia. On 6/2/23 at 1:00pm, V1 (Administrator) said the MDS (Minimum Data Set) Coordinator only comes to the facility 8 hours a week. V1 said she cannot find where a significant change MDS assessment was conducted. On 6/2/23 at 2:00pm, V14 (BOM/Business Office Manager) said they have no policy noting when a significant change assessment should be done. There was no documentation provided that a significant change was done after R22 was admitted to a hospice program.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0645 (Tag F0645)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure coordination of a Level II PASARR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review) assessment for 1 (R4) of 3 residents reviewed for PAS...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure coordination of a Level II PASARR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review) assessment for 1 (R4) of 3 residents reviewed for PASARR screening in the sample of 25. The findings include: R4's document titled New admission Information documents a facility admission date of 1/9/13. R4's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 4/3/23 documents a BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) should not be conducted due to resident is rarely or never understood. R4's Interagency Certification of Screening Results documents that a Level 1 screening was done on 1/10/13, and screening indicated that nursing facility services are appropriate. R4's OBRA (Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act)-Initial Screen documents in Part III, that there was a reasonable basis to suspect a mental illness. Part IV of the same document notes a date of referral for a Level II Screening was completed on 1/11/13. Evidence of completion of the Level II Screening could not be found in R4's medical record. On 6/1/23 at 2:15pm, V1 (Administrator) said she has no documentation that a LEVEL II screening was done.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to administer sliding scale insulin per physician's orders and monitor ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to administer sliding scale insulin per physician's orders and monitor blood glucose levels for 1 (R24) of 6 residents reviewed for medications in a sample of 25. The Findings Include: R24's New admission Information Sheet documents an admission date of 06/30/20. R24's Cumulative Diagnosis Log includes dementia, depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, Parkinson's, and insomnia. R24's most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3, indicating R24 has severe cognitive impairment. R24's April 2023 POS (Physician's Order Sheet) contains hand written orders as follows - NO: (new order) Humulin R 100 Units/ML (milliliter) 3ML per sliding scale with meals TID (three times a day) dated 04/17/23, and outlines the blood sugar level dosage parameters: 150 or less: 0 Units; 151-200: 5 Units; 201-250: 6 Units; 251-300: 7 Units; 301-350: 8 Units; 351 plus: 10 Units and call MD (medical doctor). R24's progress note dated 04/17/23 also documents this new order for sliding scale insulin. This POS also contains an order for fingerstick glucose monitoring: twice weekly on Mondays and Fridays before breakfast and dinner dated 02/10/23, and an order for Metformin 500 mg po q 12 hours with morning and evening meals dated 03/20/23. R24's May 2023 POS includes - Humulin R 100 Units/ML 3ML per sliding scale with meals TID (three times daily) dated 04/17/23 and outlines the blood sugar level dosage parameters: 150 or less: 0 Units; 151-200: 5 Units; 201-250: 6 Units; 251-300: 7 Units; 301-350: 8 Units; 351 plus: 10 Units and call MD. Fingerstick glucose monitoring: twice weekly on Mondays and Fridays before breakfast and dinner dated 02/10/23, and an order for Metformin 500 mg po q 12 hours with morning and evening meals dated 03/20/23. R24's June 2023 POS includes - Humulin R 100 Units/ML 3ML per sliding scale with meals TID dated 04/17/23 and outlines the blood sugar level dosage parameters: 150 or less: 0 Units; 151-200: 5 Units; 201-250: 6 Units; 251-300: 7 Units; 301-350: 8 Units; 351 plus: 10 Units and call MD. Fingerstick glucose monitoring: twice weekly on Mondays and Fridays before breakfast and dinner dated 02/10/23, and an order for Metformin 500 mg po q 12 hours with morning and evening meals dated 03/20/23. There is no order for fingerstick glucose monitoring prior to the administration of the sliding scale insulin on the April, May, or June 2023 Physician's Order Sheets. On 05/31/23, 06/01/23, and 06/02/23, R24's April MAR (Medical Administration Record) was not found inR24's medical and record and could not be reproduced when requested from the facility. R24's May 2023 MAR has no clear documentation times for the blood glucose levels or corresponding insulin dosages. The following dates are blank for the insulin order with no administration time documented - 05/08, 05/12, 05/13, 05/15, 05/16, 05/22, 05/28, 05/29. The following dates with no time reference document a blood glucose reading that would warrant a dose of insulin. However, there is no documentation insulin was administered on - 05/02 - 179; 05/03 - 174; 05/05 - 174; 05/06 - 183; 05/07 - 172. The following dates with a time of 11:00 AM are blank - 05/07, 05/08, 05/12, 05/13, 05/16, 05/21, 05/25, 05/27, 05/28, 05/29. The following dates document a blood glucose reading at 11:00 AM that would warrant a dose of insulin. However, there is no documentation insulin was administered on - 05/05 - 181; 05/06 - 292; 05/15 - 209; 05/19 - 180; 05/20 - 217. The following dinner blood glucose level reading is blank on - 05/04, 05/07, 05/08, 05/12, 05/13, 05/16, 05/18, 05/29. The following dates document a blood glucose reading at dinner that would warrant a dose of insulin. However, there is no documentation insulin was administered: 05/06 - 175; 05/15 - 176; 05/21 - 198; 05/26 - 176. R24's June 2023 MAR dated 06/01/23 includes one blood sugar reading of 201 with no documentation of insulin being administered. On 06/02/23 at 12:50 PM, V13 (Regional Director of Clinical Operations) stated she was not able to provide R24's April MAR. When shown the May 2023 MAR with the blank and sporadic documentation, V13 stated it should not look like that. When asked if she would have expected the nurse to monitor R24's blood sugar, administer insulin per sliding scale, and document accordingly as ordered, V13 stated she would expect this. On 06/02/23 at 10:33 AM, V4 (Licensed Practical Nurse - LPN) stated R24 came over the from the LTC (Long Term Care) side to the memory care side in May 2023. When asked where the order for blood sugar checks prior to giving the sliding scale insulin was documented, V4 stated she was not sure, but thought they were checking R24's blood sugar prior to giving him the insulin. When asked about R24's April MAR, V4 stated it might be still be on the other side. Of note, the LTC side and memory care side are all in the same facility and the residents have one medical record regardless of room assignment. On 06/02/23 at 11:40 AM, V12 (Registered Nurse - RN) who was working on the LTC side where R24 used to reside was asked about R24's April MAR and, she too was unable to locate it. V12 stated she did not know where the order for blood sugar checks prior to administering the sliding scale insulin was located. V12 commented that there had been issues in getting orders transferred across documents.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Medication Errors (Tag F0758)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a PRN (as needed) anti-psychotic drug was discontinued for 1 ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a PRN (as needed) anti-psychotic drug was discontinued for 1 (R24) of 4 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications in the sample of 25. Findings Include: R24's New admission Information Sheet documents he admitted to this facility on 06/30/20. R24's Cumulative Diagnosis Log includes dementia, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, Parkinson's, and insomnia. R24's most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicates he is severely cognitively impaired with a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 3. R24's June 2023 POS (Physician's Order Sheet) includes an order for Olanzapine (Zyprexa) 7.5 mg po hs (milligram by mouth at hour of sleep) dated 03/20/23. R24 is also prescribed Zyprexa 5 mg take 1.5 tablets (7.5 mg) po q (every) evening PRN dated 03/20/23. R24's June 2023 PRN MAR (Medication Administration Record) also documents the order for Zyprexa 5 mg take 1.5 tablets (7.5 mg) po q (every) evening PRN dated 03/20/23. On 06/02/23 at 12:50 PM, when asked about R24's order for PRN Zyprexa with a start date of 03/20/23, V13 (Regional Director of Clinical Operations) stated it should only be for 14 days and should have been discontinued or scheduled.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Menu Adequacy (Tag F0803)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents on a pureed diet received correct portion sizes for 8 of 8 residents (R10, R12, R13, R14, R15, R19, R21 and R...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents on a pureed diet received correct portion sizes for 8 of 8 residents (R10, R12, R13, R14, R15, R19, R21 and R22) reviewed for receiving a pureed diet in a sample of 25. The Findings Include: On 5/30/23 at 11:30 AM, V2 (Cook) was observed pureeing hamburgers for lunch. V2 stated at this time that she purees 10 servings of protein for lunch. V2 was observed putting in 6 hamburgers and 3 buns to puree. When questioned as to how V2 knew there was the correct amount of protein per resident, V2 stated that she can tell by looking at the patty of meat that they were at least 3-4 ounces. On 5/30/23 at 1:30 PM, V9 (Dietary Manager) stated that the cook is to weigh out the meat and ensure that 3 oz of protein is blended so each resident gets the appropriate amount at each meal. After the protein is blended, then it is measured, and they use a graph to determine which scoop size to use to portion it amongst the residents who receive pureed foods. On 6/1/23 at 9:30 AM, V8 (Registered Dietitian) stated that the food should be weighed out to ensure that each resident on a pureed diet is getting 3 ounces of protein and an entire bun, the same as the residents who receive a regular diet, to ensure adequate nutrition. On 6/1/23 at 1:30 PM, V1 (Administrator) stated that they did not have a recipe for the lunch served on 5/30/23 because it was a special meal for the holiday. The closest recipe that could be referred to for the meal would be the Salisbury steak. V1 stated that V9 (Dietary Manager) hand prepared the burgers out and did not use burgers that were pre- prepared and frozen, so they are unable to determine how much the meat weighed raw and how much cooking loss occurred to know final weight of the cooked burger. R10's new admission information sheet documents an admission date of 6/25/19. R10's current physician order sheet for the month of June has a dietary order of: Puree Diet with Nectar thick liquids. Diagnoses listed include dementia, Alzheimer's, Urinary Tract Infection, depression. R12's new admission information sheet documents an admission date of 3/26/53. R12's current physician order sheet for the month of June has a dietary order of: Mechanical soft. On 6/2/23 at 11:45 AM, V12 (Registered Nurse) verified that R12 is on a puree diet and the order sheet is not updated. Diagnoses listed on the order sheet include Alzheimer disease, dementia with behaviors, major depressive disorder, anxiety, and bipolar disorder. R13's new admission information sheet documents an admission date of 6/13/16. R13's current physician order sheet for the month of June documents diet orders of puree. Diagnoses include dementia and Alzheimer's. R14's new admission information sheet documents an admission date of 8/9/19. R13's current physician order sheet for the month of June documents a diet order of puree with honey thickened liquids. Diagnoses include dementia, depression, seizure disorder and decline in condition. R15's new admission information sheet documents an admission date of 6/13/19. R15's current physician order sheet for the month of June documents a diet order of pureed diet. Diagnoses include Alzheimer's and dementia. R19's new admission information sheet documents an admission date of 5/17/18. R19's current physician order sheet for the month of June documents a diet order of puree meats. Diagnoses include dementia and diabetes mellitus 2. R21's new admission information sheet documents an admission date of 9/3/19. R21's current physician order sheet for the month of June documents a diet order of puree. Diagnoses include dementia, alcohol abuse and anxiety. R22's new admission information sheet documents an admission date of 7/3/20. R22's current physician order sheet for the month of June documents a diet order of pureed. Diagnosis includes dementia, Alzheimer's, and a fall risk. The pureed Salisbury steak puree recipe documents residents should each get 3 ounces of the meat. The recipe is as follows: 1. Measure the number of puree portions required from the recipe. 2. Add the food to the processor and process to a fine consistency. The facility policy for Method of Pureeing Food documents: It is the policy of (name of Corporation) to ensure residents that are on a pureed diet receive food that is prepared in an acceptable manner to enhance tolerance and intake and provide consistency of preparation. 1. Portion food as directed in recipe by cutting serving pan as specified, using dipper to corresponding portion size, or following recipe portion size. 2. Place desired number of portions into food processor or blender.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0727 (Tag F0727)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a full time Director of Nursing was employed and failed to ensure a Registered Nurse was working 8 hours a day/7 day a week. This fa...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a full time Director of Nursing was employed and failed to ensure a Registered Nurse was working 8 hours a day/7 day a week. This failure has the potential to affect all 40 residents residing in the facility. The Findings Include: On 6/1/23 at 11:13 AM, V1 (Administrator) stated that V10's (former Director of Nursing/DON) last day at the facility was 4/30/23. V1 stated that they have been interviewing and have extended an offer to an applicant in hopes that she will accept. V1 also confirmed that the schedule had days that no Registered Nurse (RN) was working 8 hours a day minimum. On 6/2/23 at 10:00 AM, V4 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) and V7 (Certified Nurse Assistant/CNA) stated that they do not have a DON currently on staff. V4 stated that during the week they go to the Administrator for any issues and on the weekends the nurse working each side of the building is who staff go to with concerns. Nursing schedules from January through May 2023 were reviewed and documented the following: The January schedule has no Registered Nurse (RN) hours documented for 1/7, 1/8, 1/22, 1/28 and 1/29/23. The February schedule documents no RN working a minimum of 8 hours a day on 2/18 and 2/22/23. The March schedule documents no RN working on 3/18/23. The April schedule documents no RN working 4/1, 4/15, and 4/16/23. The May schedule documents that no RN was working on 5/14, 5/21, 5/27 and 5/28/23. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form dated 5/31/23 documents there are 40 residents residing in the facility.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "What safeguards are in place to prevent abuse and neglect?"
  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
Concerns
  • • Multiple safety concerns identified: Federal abuse finding, 3 harm violation(s), $37,500 in fines. Review inspection reports carefully.
  • • 37 deficiencies on record, including 3 serious (caused harm) violations. Ask about corrective actions taken.
  • • $37,500 in fines. Higher than 94% of Illinois facilities, suggesting repeated compliance issues.
  • • Grade F (5/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
Bottom line: This facility has a substantiated abuse finding. Extreme caution advised. Explore alternatives.

About This Facility

What is Axiom Gardens Of Mount Vernon's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns AXIOM GARDENS OF MOUNT VERNON an overall rating of 1 out of 5 stars, which is considered much below average nationally. Within Illinois, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.

How is Axiom Gardens Of Mount Vernon Staffed?

CMS rates AXIOM GARDENS OF MOUNT VERNON's staffing level at 1 out of 5 stars, which is much below average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 55%, compared to the Illinois average of 46%. RN turnover specifically is 57%, which is notably high. RNs provide skilled clinical oversight, so turnover in this role can affect medical care quality.

What Have Inspectors Found at Axiom Gardens Of Mount Vernon?

State health inspectors documented 37 deficiencies at AXIOM GARDENS OF MOUNT VERNON during 2023 to 2025. These included: 3 that caused actual resident harm and 34 with potential for harm. Deficiencies causing actual harm indicate documented cases where residents experienced negative health consequences.

Who Owns and Operates Axiom Gardens Of Mount Vernon?

AXIOM GARDENS OF MOUNT VERNON is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 106 certified beds and approximately 54 residents (about 51% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in MOUNT VERNON, Illinois.

How Does Axiom Gardens Of Mount Vernon Compare to Other Illinois Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Illinois, AXIOM GARDENS OF MOUNT VERNON's overall rating (1 stars) is below the state average of 2.5, staff turnover (55%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (2 stars) is below the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Axiom Gardens Of Mount Vernon?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What safeguards and monitoring systems are in place to protect residents from abuse or neglect?" "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" These questions are particularly relevant given the substantiated abuse finding on record and the below-average staffing rating.

Is Axiom Gardens Of Mount Vernon Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, AXIOM GARDENS OF MOUNT VERNON has documented safety concerns. The facility has 1 substantiated abuse finding (meaning confirmed case of resident harm by staff or other residents). The facility has a 1-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Illinois. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.

Do Nurses at Axiom Gardens Of Mount Vernon Stick Around?

AXIOM GARDENS OF MOUNT VERNON has a staff turnover rate of 55%, which is 9 percentage points above the Illinois average of 46%. Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.

Was Axiom Gardens Of Mount Vernon Ever Fined?

AXIOM GARDENS OF MOUNT VERNON has been fined $37,500 across 3 penalty actions. The Illinois average is $33,454. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.

Is Axiom Gardens Of Mount Vernon on Any Federal Watch List?

AXIOM GARDENS OF MOUNT VERNON is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.