SMP HEALTH - ST CATHERINE NORTH
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
SMP Health - St. Catherine North has a Trust Grade of B+, which means it is recommended and above average in quality. It ranks #13 out of 72 facilities in North Dakota, placing it in the top half of the state, and #4 out of 8 in Cass County, indicating that only one other local facility is better. The facility's trend is stable, with no significant changes in issues from 2023 to 2024, and it has a strong staffing rating of 5 out of 5 stars, with a turnover rate of 37%, which is better than the state average of 48%. However, there are some concerns, as the facility has received $6,168 in fines, which is average, and has less RN coverage than 91% of other state facilities, which could impact care quality. Specific incidents include a failure to provide adequate assistance during a mechanical lift transfer, resulting in an injury, and medication errors affecting the accuracy of residents' care plans. Overall, while the facility has strong staffing and a good reputation, families should be aware of these issues as they make their decision.
- Trust Score
- B+
- In North Dakota
- #13/72
- Safety Record
- Moderate
- Inspections
- Holding Steady
- Staff Stability ○ Average
- 37% turnover. Near North Dakota's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- $6,168 in fines. Lower than most North Dakota facilities. Relatively clean record.
- Skilled Nurses ○ Average
- Each resident gets 37 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — about average for North Dakota. RNs are the most trained staff who monitor for health changes.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 12 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
5-Star Staffing Rating · Excellent nurse staffing levels
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
-
Staff turnover below average (37%)
11 points below North Dakota average of 48%
Facility shows strength in staffing levels, fire safety.
The Bad
Near North Dakota avg (46%)
Typical for the industry
Below median ($33,413)
Minor penalties assessed
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
The Ugly 12 deficiencies on record
Oct 2024
3 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Unnecessary Medications
(Tag F0759)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, review of facility policy, review of professional reference, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than five percent for 2 of 7 resid...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0760
(Tag F0760)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review, review of facility policy, review of professional reference, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents remained free of significant medication e...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, review of facility policy/procedure, review of manufactures' label, and staff interview, the facility failed to date time sensitive thickened beverages with an opened date and to...
Read full inspector narrative →
May 2024
1 deficiency
1 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review, review of facility investigation, review of the facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision and assistance for 1 of 1 closed record...
Read full inspector narrative →
Sept 2023
4 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
MDS Data Transmission
(Tag F0640)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and review of the Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual (Version 1.16), the facility failed to ensure timely electronic data submission ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide appropriate supervision for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident #97) observed during a gait belt transfer. Failu...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0849
(Tag F0849)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents' records contained the hospice plan of care and certification of a terminal illness for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Re...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Assessment Accuracy
(Tag F0641)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, review of the Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual (Version 1....
Read full inspector narrative →
Aug 2022
4 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Transfer Notice
(Tag F0623)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide the resident or their representative and the State Long Term Care Ombudsman written notice of transfer for 1 of 2 resident cl...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Assessment Accuracy
(Tag F0641)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, review of the Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual (Version 1....
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
ADL Care
(Tag F0677)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received the necessary services to maintain oral hygiene for 1 of 8 sampled...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a safe environment for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #34) who utilized an electric wheelchair...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • Grade B+ (83/100). Above average facility, better than most options in North Dakota.
- • 37% turnover. Below North Dakota's 48% average. Good staff retention means consistent care.
- • 12 deficiencies on record, including 1 serious (caused harm) violation. Ask about corrective actions taken.
About This Facility
What is Smp Health - St Catherine North's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns SMP HEALTH - ST CATHERINE NORTH an overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars, which is considered much above average nationally. Within North Dakota, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.
How is Smp Health - St Catherine North Staffed?
CMS rates SMP HEALTH - ST CATHERINE NORTH's staffing level at 5 out of 5 stars, which is much above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 37%, compared to the North Dakota average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.
What Have Inspectors Found at Smp Health - St Catherine North?
State health inspectors documented 12 deficiencies at SMP HEALTH - ST CATHERINE NORTH during 2022 to 2024. These included: 1 that caused actual resident harm and 11 with potential for harm. Deficiencies causing actual harm indicate documented cases where residents experienced negative health consequences.
Who Owns and Operates Smp Health - St Catherine North?
SMP HEALTH - ST CATHERINE NORTH is owned by a non-profit organization. Non-profit facilities reinvest revenue into operations rather than distributing to shareholders. The facility is operated by SMP HEALTH, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 125 certified beds and approximately 120 residents (about 96% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in FARGO, North Dakota.
How Does Smp Health - St Catherine North Compare to Other North Dakota Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in North Dakota, SMP HEALTH - ST CATHERINE NORTH's overall rating (5 stars) is above the state average of 3.1, staff turnover (37%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (4 stars) is above the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Smp Health - St Catherine North?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"
Is Smp Health - St Catherine North Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, SMP HEALTH - ST CATHERINE NORTH has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 5-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in North Dakota. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Smp Health - St Catherine North Stick Around?
SMP HEALTH - ST CATHERINE NORTH has a staff turnover rate of 37%, which is about average for North Dakota nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was Smp Health - St Catherine North Ever Fined?
SMP HEALTH - ST CATHERINE NORTH has been fined $6,168 across 1 penalty action. This is below the North Dakota average of $33,141. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.
Is Smp Health - St Catherine North on Any Federal Watch List?
SMP HEALTH - ST CATHERINE NORTH is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.