MONTICELLO HOUSE

1048 W BALTIMORE AVENUE, MEDIA, PA 19063 (610) 857-6358
Non profit - Corporation 86 Beds Independent Data: November 2025
Trust Grade
90/100
#87 of 653 in PA
Last Inspection: June 2025

Inspected within the last 6 months. Data reflects current conditions.

Overview

Monticello House has received an impressive Trust Grade of A, meaning it is highly recommended and considered excellent among nursing homes. It ranks #87 out of 653 facilities in Pennsylvania, placing it in the top half, and #6 out of 28 in Delaware County, indicating that only five local options are better. The facility is showing improvement, having reduced issues from one in 2024 to none in 2025. Staffing is a strong point here, with a perfect 5/5 star rating and a turnover rate of 38%, which is lower than the state average. While there are no fines reported, the facility has faced some concerns, including inadequate infection control measures for certain residents and a lack of a comprehensive care plan for a resident exhibiting exit-seeking behavior. Overall, Monticello House offers a supportive environment but has room for improvement in specific care protocols.

Trust Score
A
90/100
In Pennsylvania
#87/653
Top 13%
Safety Record
Low Risk
No red flags
Inspections
Getting Better
1 → 0 violations
Staff Stability
○ Average
38% turnover. Near Pennsylvania's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
Penalties
✓ Good
No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Pennsylvania facilities.
Skilled Nurses
✓ Good
Each resident gets 47 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than average for Pennsylvania. RNs are trained to catch health problems early.
Violations
✓ Good
Only 5 deficiencies on record. Cleaner than most facilities. Minor issues only.
★★★★★
5.0
Overall Rating
★★★★★
5.0
Staff Levels
★★★★★
5.0
Care Quality
★★★★★
5.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2024: 1 issues
2025: 0 issues

The Good

  • 5-Star Staffing Rating · Excellent nurse staffing levels
  • 5-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record
  • Staff turnover below average (38%)

    10 points below Pennsylvania average of 48%

Facility shows strength in staffing levels, quality measures, fire safety.

The Bad

Staff Turnover: 38%

Near Pennsylvania avg (46%)

Typical for the industry

The Ugly 5 deficiencies on record

May 2024 1 deficiency
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observation, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP-infection control prevention designed to reduce tr...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP-infection control prevention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms that employs targeted gown and glove use during high contact resident care activities) were in place for residents requiring enhanced barrier precautions for five of five reviewed (Residents 10, 21, 50, 56, and 58). Findings include: Review of Resident 10's clinical records revealed Resident 10 was admitted to the facility with a diagnosis of left sub gluteal abscess. The resident had an order for IV (Intravenous- a medication administered through a needle or tube inserted into a vein) antibiotics. Observation conducted on March 7, 2024, at 11:00 a.m., revealed a central line catheter to Resident 10's right upper chest. Observation conducted of Resident 10's room on the first three days of the survey failed to reveal evidence of EBP (Enhanced Barrier Precautions) signage or PPE (Personal Protective Equipment). Observation conducted on May 10, 2024, at 11:01 a.m., revealed Resident 21 had a pressure ulcer to the sacrum. Continued observation revealed resident had an indwelling foley catheter (flexible tube inserted into the bladder for removing fluid). An observation of Resident 21's room on the first three days of the survey failed to reveal evidence of EBP signage or PPE. Review of Resident 50's clinical record revealed diagnosis list includes a Gastrostomy Tube (GT- medical device used to provide nutrition to people who cannot obtain nutrition by mouth). Observation conducted of Resident 50's room on the first three days of the survey failed to reveal evidence of EBP signage or PPE. Review of Resident 56's clinical record revealed diagnosis list including but not limited to Gastrostomy Tube. Observation conducted of Resident 56's room on the first three days of the survey failed to reveal evidence of EBP signage or PPE. Review of Resident 58's clinical records revealed the resident had an indwelling Foley catheter. Observation conducted of Resident 58's room on the first three days of the survey failed to reveal evidence of EBP signage or PPE information regarding the facility's EBP process/procedures. Interview with non-licensed Employees E3 and E4 was conducted on May 10, 2024. Both employees were unable to provide explanation of Enhanced Barrier Precautions and how it relates to residents. An interview with the Director of Nursing on May 10, 2024, at 12:30 p.m., was conducted. The DON reported that the facility had not implemented the Enhanced Barrier Precaution process and was still in the process of educating staff. The above information was presented to the Nursing Home Administrator on May 10, 2024, at 1:45 p.m. 28 Pa. Code 201.18(b)(1) Management 28 Pa. Code 211.5(f) Clinical records 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(3)(5) Nursing services
Jul 2023 4 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Comprehensive Care Plan (Tag F0656)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on clinical records review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a comprehensive plan of care regarding an exit-seeking behavior for one of the 20 residents ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on clinical records review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a comprehensive plan of care regarding an exit-seeking behavior for one of the 20 residents reviewed (Resident 60). Findings include: Review of Resident 60's diagnosis list includes Dementia (term used to describe a group of symptoms affecting memory, thinking, and social abilities severely enough to interfere with daily life), mild cognitive impairment, and Depression. Review of the nursing progress notes dated April 20, 2023, at 3:21 p.m., revealed Resident 60 was trying to get into the elevator, resident was informed that she/he cannot leave the floor alone, a resident replied I'm getting off this floor one way or another. A monitoring device was placed on the resident's right ankle. Review of Resident 60's elopement assessment completed on April 20, 2023, revealed resident was At Risk for Elopement. Review of Resident 60's current plan of care failed to reveal, the facility had developed an elopement/exit-seeking behavior care plan for the resident. Interview conducted with the Director of Nursing on July 13, 2023, at 10:00 a.m., confirmed an elopement/exit-seeking behavior care plan was not developed for Resident 60. The facility failed to develop a comprehensive elopement/exit-seeking behavior care plan for Resident 60. 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(5) Nursing services Previously cited 8/19/22
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on a review of the facility's policy, clinical records review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to timely address and notify the physician of a significant weight...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on a review of the facility's policy, clinical records review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to timely address and notify the physician of a significant weight change of two of the 20 residents reviewed (Resident 28 and 51). Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Weights, last reviewed on February 8, 2022, revealed all residents are weighed on admission, weekly x four, monthly as a means of monitoring nutrition. Compare the weight to the last recorded weight, if a gain or loss falls within the parameters below, reweight. Parameters for evaluation of the significance of unplanned and undesired weight loss are as follows: 1 month-5% is significant weight loss, greater than 5% is severe loss; 3 months-7.5% is significant weight loss, greater than 7.5% is severe loss; and 6 months-10% is significant weight loss, greater than 10% is severe loss. If the resident falls within the parameters listed above, notify the Dietitian. Interview conducted with the Director of Nursing on July 12, 2023, at 1:00 p.m., revealed nursing is responsible for notifying the physician of a significant weight change in the residents. Review of Resident 28's diagnosis list revealed aftercare following explantation of left knee joint prosthesis, and Sepsis (body's extreme reaction to an infection, without prompt treatment can lead to organ failure, tissue damage, and death). Review of Resident 28's weights and vitals revealed a weight of 246.8 lbs. on June 24, 2023, and 191 lbs. on June 30, 2023, 55.8 lbs. (22.61%) weight loss in six days. The resident's weight was not checked until July 11, 2023, which had a result of 189.4 lbs. Review of the nursing progress notes dated June 30, 2023, revealed admission weight marked as 264 pounds, the last weight noted in epic (hospital record) was 265 pounds on June 17, 2023. The resident was weighed yesterday via the total lift at 191 pounds. Will continue to monitor. Further review of Resident 28's clinical records review failed to reveal the identified significant weight change was timely addressed, and physician notified. Interview with Employee E7, Dietician was conducted on July 12, 2023, at 12:40 p.m. Employee E7 reported that she/he consulted the resident on July 6, 2023, for an abnormal Albumin level but was not notified of the significant weight loss of the resident. Interview conducted with the DON on July 13, 2023, at 10:00 a.m., confirmed that the physician was not notified of Resident 28's significant weight change. Review of Resident 51's weights and vitals revealed a weight of 252.6 lbs. on June 19, 2023, and 238.1 lbs. on July 3, 2023, a 14.5 lbs. (7.78%) weight loss in two weeks. Further review of Resident 51's clinical records review failed to reveal the identified significant weight change was timely addressed, and physician was notified. Interview conducted with the DON on July 13, 2023, at 10:00 a.m., confirmed that the physician was not notified of Resident 51's significant weight change. The facility failed to ensure Resident 28's and 51's significant weight change was timely addressed, and physician was notified. 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(5) Nursing services Previously cited 8/19/22
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0698 (Tag F0698)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on clinical record review and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to obtain physician orders for dialysi...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on clinical record review and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to obtain physician orders for dialysis services for one of one resident reviewed (Resident 57). Findings include: Review of Resident 57's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. 2023, with diagnoses including Renal Failure. Review of Resident 57's care plans revealed, Resident 57 received dialysis every Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturday. Review of Resident 57's clinical record failed to reveal as of July 12, 2023, a physician's order for the resident to receive dialysis services. Interview with the Nursing Home Administrator and Director of Nursing on July 13, 2023, at approximately 2:30 p.m. confirmed, Resident 57 has been receiving dialysis treatments three times each week since hisher admission on [DATE]. 2023, but there was no physician's order for dialysis treatment obtained until July 13, 2023. The facility failed to ensure Resident 57 had a physician order for Dialysis services that resident receives three times a week. 28 Pa. Code: 211.5(f) Clinical records 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(5) Nursing Services
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on review of facility policy, observations and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to prepare food under sanitary conditions in one of four dining rooms. (5th floor) Find...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on review of facility policy, observations and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to prepare food under sanitary conditions in one of four dining rooms. (5th floor) Findings include: Review of facility policy, Single use gloves and hair restraints, policy revised date May 20, 2019, revealed that beard restraints are to be worn if facial hair growth is more than ½ inch long. This includes goatees as well. Hair restraints (including hair net or a hat). are to be worn during meal service in the pantries, while food is actively being prepared, served or cooked. Observation on July 10, 2023, at 12:15 p.m. during the lunch meal revealed two dietary staff (E4 and E5) bringing plated food from the pantry without beard guards. Observations also included the food was being delivered from the pantry without a lid and placed on trays to be delivered to resident rooms. The tray cart was in the dining room were residents were seated. Observation of the pantry revealed a tray line (where the food is plated) and a room that contained a trash can and dirty plates and trays from the previous meal. Dietary Aide E4 and E5, would take one plate at a time from the tray line, through the room, to the dining room and place it on the tray cart and then a lid would be placed over the food. Observation conducted on fifth floor dining room revealed dietary staff, employee E6, enter dining room then wipe nose using gloved right hand. Employee E6 proceeded to nearest table to assist two residents with meal items. Employee E6 used residents' utensils to cut food items and moved a baked potato using the same glove(s) that were used to wipe nose prior to assisting the residents. Employee E6 was not observed changing gloves or sanitizing hands/gloves between wiping nose and handling residents eating utensils or food. Interview on July 11, 2023 at approximately 11:30 a.m. with Dietary Manager E3, revealed that beard guards must be worn in the pantries. It was also revealed, that food distribution {as explained above) was not to the facilities standards. The facility failed to ensure food was served in sanitary conditions in one of four dining rooms. 28 Pa Code 201.18(b)(1)(e)(1) Management 28 Pa Code 211.6(f) Dietary Services
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • Grade A (90/100). Above average facility, better than most options in Pennsylvania.
  • • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
  • • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Pennsylvania facilities.
  • • Only 5 deficiencies on record. Cleaner than most facilities. Minor issues only.
Concerns
  • • No significant concerns identified. This facility shows no red flags across CMS ratings, staff turnover, or federal penalties.
Bottom line: Generally positive indicators. Standard due diligence and a personal visit recommended.

About This Facility

What is Monticello House's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns MONTICELLO HOUSE an overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars, which is considered much above average nationally. Within Pennsylvania, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.

How is Monticello House Staffed?

CMS rates MONTICELLO HOUSE's staffing level at 5 out of 5 stars, which is much above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 38%, compared to the Pennsylvania average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.

What Have Inspectors Found at Monticello House?

State health inspectors documented 5 deficiencies at MONTICELLO HOUSE during 2023 to 2024. These included: 5 with potential for harm.

Who Owns and Operates Monticello House?

MONTICELLO HOUSE is owned by a non-profit organization. Non-profit facilities reinvest revenue into operations rather than distributing to shareholders. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 86 certified beds and approximately 83 residents (about 97% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in MEDIA, Pennsylvania.

How Does Monticello House Compare to Other Pennsylvania Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Pennsylvania, MONTICELLO HOUSE's overall rating (5 stars) is above the state average of 3.0, staff turnover (38%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (5 stars) is much above the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Monticello House?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"

Is Monticello House Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, MONTICELLO HOUSE has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 5-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Pennsylvania. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.

Do Nurses at Monticello House Stick Around?

MONTICELLO HOUSE has a staff turnover rate of 38%, which is about average for Pennsylvania nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.

Was Monticello House Ever Fined?

MONTICELLO HOUSE has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.

Is Monticello House on Any Federal Watch List?

MONTICELLO HOUSE is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.