WESLEY ENHANCED LIVING MAIN LINE REHAB AND SKD NSG
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Wesley Enhanced Living Main Line Rehab and Skilled Nursing in Media, Pennsylvania has a Trust Grade of C, indicating it is average-neither great nor terrible. It ranks #248 out of 653 facilities in Pennsylvania, placing it in the top half, and #13 out of 28 in Delaware County, meaning only a few local options are better. The facility is improving, having reduced issues from five in 2023 to four in 2024. Staffing is a strong point with a perfect 5-star rating and a low turnover rate of 25%, significantly better than the state average. However, the facility has concerning fines totaling $151,457, higher than 98% of facilities in Pennsylvania, suggesting recurring compliance issues. Additionally, there are incidents of concern, including a critical finding where a resident suffered burns from a hot water machine that failed to maintain safe temperatures, highlighting a serious risk to residents' safety. Another incident revealed extension cords creating potential tripping hazards in the facility due to a power outage, which could pose risks of falls. While there are strengths in staffing and overall ratings, families should weigh these serious safety concerns when considering this nursing home.
- Trust Score
- C
- In Pennsylvania
- #248/653
- Safety Record
- High Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Better
- Staff Stability ✓ Good
- 25% annual turnover. Excellent stability, 23 points below Pennsylvania's 48% average. Staff who stay learn residents' needs.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- $151,457 in fines. Lower than most Pennsylvania facilities. Relatively clean record.
- Skilled Nurses ✓ Good
- Each resident gets 69 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than 97% of Pennsylvania nursing homes. RNs are the most trained staff who catch health problems before they become serious.
- Violations ○ Average
- 9 deficiencies on record. Average for a facility this size. Mostly minor or procedural issues.
The Good
-
5-Star Staffing Rating · Excellent nurse staffing levels
-
4-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
-
Low Staff Turnover (25%) · Staff stability means consistent care
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
-
Staff turnover is low (25%)
23 points below Pennsylvania average of 48%
Facility shows strength in staffing levels, quality measures, staff retention, fire safety.
The Bad
Well above median ($33,413)
Significant penalties indicating serious issues
The Ugly 9 deficiencies on record
Jul 2024
2 deficiencies
1 IJ (1 facility-wide)
CRITICAL
(L)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Someone could have died · This affected most or all residents
⚠️ Facility-wide issue
Based on observation, facility documentation, and clinical record review, as well as staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the hot water dispensing machine produced water a...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Administration
(Tag F0835)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on a review of their job descriptions it was determined that the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) and the Director of Nursing (DON) did not effectively manage the facility to ensure the beverage...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jan 2024
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0757
(Tag F0757)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to provide adequate indications for use of pain medications for one of 24 resid...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observations and interviews during a facility power outage, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents environment remained as free of accident hazards as is possible in t...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jan 2023
5 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Notification of Changes
(Tag F0580)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on clinical record review and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to notify the physician about a resident's status for one of 24 residents reviewed. (Resident 59)
Findings Inc...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on review of clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a care plan for a...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on clinical record review, review of facility documentation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision during a transfer and an elopement for...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Drug Regimen Review
(Tag F0756)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on clinical record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the physician provided clinical rationales for declining consultant pharmacist recommendations for one of five res...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Laboratory Services
(Tag F0770)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on clinical record review and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to complete laboratory studies as ordered by the physician for two of 24 residents reviewed. (Resident 48 and ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • 25% annual turnover. Excellent stability, 23 points below Pennsylvania's 48% average. Staff who stay learn residents' needs.
- • Multiple safety concerns identified: 1 life-threatening violation(s), $151,457 in fines. Review inspection reports carefully.
- • 9 deficiencies on record, including 1 critical (life-threatening) violation. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
- • $151,457 in fines. Extremely high, among the most fined facilities in Pennsylvania. Major compliance failures.
- • Grade C (58/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
About This Facility
What is Wesley Enhanced Living Main Line Rehab And Skd Nsg's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns WESLEY ENHANCED LIVING MAIN LINE REHAB AND SKD NSG an overall rating of 4 out of 5 stars, which is considered above average nationally. Within Pennsylvania, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.
How is Wesley Enhanced Living Main Line Rehab And Skd Nsg Staffed?
CMS rates WESLEY ENHANCED LIVING MAIN LINE REHAB AND SKD NSG's staffing level at 5 out of 5 stars, which is much above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 25%, compared to the Pennsylvania average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.
What Have Inspectors Found at Wesley Enhanced Living Main Line Rehab And Skd Nsg?
State health inspectors documented 9 deficiencies at WESLEY ENHANCED LIVING MAIN LINE REHAB AND SKD NSG during 2023 to 2024. These included: 1 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death) and 8 with potential for harm. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.
Who Owns and Operates Wesley Enhanced Living Main Line Rehab And Skd Nsg?
WESLEY ENHANCED LIVING MAIN LINE REHAB AND SKD NSG is owned by a non-profit organization. Non-profit facilities reinvest revenue into operations rather than distributing to shareholders. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 60 certified beds and approximately 56 residents (about 93% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in MEDIA, Pennsylvania.
How Does Wesley Enhanced Living Main Line Rehab And Skd Nsg Compare to Other Pennsylvania Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Pennsylvania, WESLEY ENHANCED LIVING MAIN LINE REHAB AND SKD NSG's overall rating (4 stars) is above the state average of 3.0, staff turnover (25%) is significantly lower than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (3 stars) is at the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Wesley Enhanced Living Main Line Rehab And Skd Nsg?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations.
Is Wesley Enhanced Living Main Line Rehab And Skd Nsg Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, WESLEY ENHANCED LIVING MAIN LINE REHAB AND SKD NSG has documented safety concerns. Inspectors have issued 1 Immediate Jeopardy citation (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 4-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Pennsylvania. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.
Do Nurses at Wesley Enhanced Living Main Line Rehab And Skd Nsg Stick Around?
Staff at WESLEY ENHANCED LIVING MAIN LINE REHAB AND SKD NSG tend to stick around. With a turnover rate of 25%, the facility is 21 percentage points below the Pennsylvania average of 46%. Low turnover is a positive sign. It means caregivers have time to learn each resident's needs, medications, and personal preferences. Consistent staff also notice subtle changes in a resident's condition more quickly. Registered Nurse turnover is also low at 20%, meaning experienced RNs are available to handle complex medical needs.
Was Wesley Enhanced Living Main Line Rehab And Skd Nsg Ever Fined?
WESLEY ENHANCED LIVING MAIN LINE REHAB AND SKD NSG has been fined $151,457 across 1 penalty action. This is 4.4x the Pennsylvania average of $34,593. Fines at this level are uncommon and typically indicate a pattern of serious deficiencies, repeated violations, or failure to correct problems promptly. CMS reserves penalties of this magnitude for facilities that pose significant, documented risk to resident health or safety. Families should request specific documentation of what issues led to these fines and what systemic changes have been implemented.
Is Wesley Enhanced Living Main Line Rehab And Skd Nsg on Any Federal Watch List?
WESLEY ENHANCED LIVING MAIN LINE REHAB AND SKD NSG is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.