YORK NORTH SKILLED NURSING AND REHABILITATION CTR
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
York North Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation Center holds a Trust Grade of C, which means it is average compared to other facilities. It ranks #518 out of 653 in Pennsylvania, placing it in the bottom half of nursing homes in the state, and #9 out of 14 in York County, indicating only a few local options are better. The facility is on an improving trend, with the number of issues decreasing from 20 in 2024 to 18 in 2025. Staffing is rated average with a turnover of 43%, which is slightly better than the state average, and there have been no fines reported, a positive sign. However, there are significant concerns, including failures to properly notify residents about transfers, lack of comprehensive care plans for some residents, and inadequate personal hygiene for those dependent on staff, suggesting areas needing urgent attention.
- Trust Score
- C
- In Pennsylvania
- #518/653
- Safety Record
- Low Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Better
- Staff Stability ○ Average
- 43% turnover. Near Pennsylvania's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Pennsylvania facilities.
- Skilled Nurses ○ Average
- Each resident gets 32 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — about average for Pennsylvania. RNs are the most trained staff who monitor for health changes.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 52 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
4-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
-
Staff turnover below average (43%)
5 points below Pennsylvania average of 48%
Facility shows strength in quality measures, fire safety.
The Bad
Below Pennsylvania average (3.0)
Below average - review inspection findings carefully
Near Pennsylvania avg (46%)
Typical for the industry
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
The Ugly 52 deficiencies on record
Feb 2025
18 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0576
(Tag F0576)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on resident and staff interviews, policy review, clinical record record review, and facility document review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the resident right to receive m...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0578
(Tag F0578)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on clinical record review, policy review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure each resident and/or representative the right to formulate an Advance Directiv...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0605
(Tag F0605)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on clinical record review, facility document and policy reivew, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents were free from chemical restraints for one of...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Assessment Accuracy
(Tag F0641)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI- a standardized approach for applying a problem identification process in nursing homes, adopted to examine nursing home quality and to impro...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0655
(Tag F0655)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on clinical record review, facility policy review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to deve...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0657
(Tag F0657)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the care plan was reviewed and revised for two of 37 residents reviewed (Reside...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on review of facility policy, observations, record reviews, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide respiratory care/oxygen services consistent w...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0698
(Tag F0698)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on clinical record review, facility policy review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate records related to dialysis communication for...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Pharmacy Services
(Tag F0755)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on clinical record review, facility document review, pharmacy statement review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure pharmaceutical services that assured th...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0825
(Tag F0825)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed provide therapy services to ensure residents receive specialized rehabilitative services to assist them to a...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Transfer Notice
(Tag F0623)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on clinical record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the resident/resident representative and the representative of the Office of the State Long-T...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on clinical record review, policy review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for three of 37 resi...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
ADL Care
(Tag F0677)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on clinical record review and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain adequa...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, review of the clinical record, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0692
(Tag F0692)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on clinical record review, policy review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to monitor the ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0802
(Tag F0802)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, policy review, review of facility documentation, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide sufficient dining services staff to ensu...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on review of facility policy, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to store and serve food/beverages in accordance with professional standards for food ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, policy review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a safe environment that supports infection prevention and control for five of 33 resid...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jun 2024
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on policy review, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure all residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional stan...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0809
(Tag F0809)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, facility-provided documentation, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide meals at regular times and in accordance with resident n...
Read full inspector narrative →
Apr 2024
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0725
(Tag F0725)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observations, policy review, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to have sufficient nursing staff to provide nursing and related services to attain o...
Read full inspector narrative →
Mar 2024
16 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
ADL Care
(Tag F0677)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain adeq...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on facility policy review, observations, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, facility incident report review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a thorough investigation was c...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0692
(Tag F0692)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on clinical record review, facility policy review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to monitor the resident's clinical condition after a significant weight loss wa...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on review of facility policy, observations, record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide respiratory care/oxygen services consistent with profession...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0710
(Tag F0710)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on clinical record review and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the physician addressed a significant weight loss in a timely manner for tw...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Dental Services
(Tag F0791)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, staff and resident interviews, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide routine and/or emergency dental services for one of 33 residents reviewed ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Assessment Accuracy
(Tag F0641)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on clinical record review, observations, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0657
(Tag F0657)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on clinical record review, observations, facility policy reivew, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to revise and/or update the resident comprehensive plan of care ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0679
(Tag F0679)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on staff and resident interviews, facility policy review, and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to provide an ongoing program of activities designed to mee...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Incontinence Care
(Tag F0690)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on clinical record review, policy review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure physician orders were followed for catheter care for one of four residents rev...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0691
(Tag F0691)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on clinical record review and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents requiring urostomy services receive care consistent with professional standards of pr...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0698
(Tag F0698)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents who require dialysis receive such services co...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0804
(Tag F0804)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, review of facility policy, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide food and beverage that were at a safe and appetizing temperatu...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observations, review of facility policy, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to store and serve food/beverages in accordance with professional standards for food ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0947
(Tag F0947)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on document review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure nurse-aides are sufficient with in-service training, continuing education competencies to include dem...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jan 2024
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Safe Environment
(Tag F0584)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observations, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide sufficient maintenance services necessary to maintain a safe, sanitary, comfortable, and...
Read full inspector narrative →
Dec 2023
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medical Records
(Tag F0842)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on clinical record review, staff interview, and policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure accurate clinical record documentation for one of eight residents reviewed (Re...
Read full inspector narrative →
Aug 2023
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0804
(Tag F0804)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, document review, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide food at a safe temperature for one of one lunch meal observed on the 600...
Read full inspector narrative →
Aug 2023
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0698
(Tag F0698)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, staff and resident interviews, clinical record review, and policy review, it was determined that the facil...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jul 2023
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0726
(Tag F0726)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on document review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure nurse aides are proficient and competent in skills and techniques necessary to care for residents' ne...
Read full inspector narrative →
Apr 2023
10 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0583
(Tag F0583)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, staff interview, and facility policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure each resident the right to confidentiality of his or her medical record for one ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Assessment Accuracy
(Tag F0641)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for one of 30 resident...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Pressure Ulcer Prevention
(Tag F0686)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on clinical record review, observation, staff interview, and facility policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure necessary treatment and services to promote healing and ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, facility policy review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident environment remains free of accident hazards for one of seven residen...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain proper infection control hand hygiene practices to help prevent the development of and transmission of ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0578
(Tag F0578)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on policy review, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure each r...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on review of the clinical record, observations, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0730
(Tag F0730)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on document review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure an annual performance review is completed for each nurse aide for three of five nurse aide performanc...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Menu Adequacy
(Tag F0803)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observations, policy review, select facility document review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a nutritionally adequate menu substitution for one of...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0947
(Tag F0947)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on document review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the required in-service training for nurse aides is no less than 12 hours per year for two of five nu...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
- • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Pennsylvania facilities.
- • 43% turnover. Below Pennsylvania's 48% average. Good staff retention means consistent care.
- • 52 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
- • Grade C (50/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
About This Facility
What is York North Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation Ctr's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns YORK NORTH SKILLED NURSING AND REHABILITATION CTR an overall rating of 2 out of 5 stars, which is considered below average nationally. Within Pennsylvania, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.
How is York North Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation Ctr Staffed?
CMS rates YORK NORTH SKILLED NURSING AND REHABILITATION CTR's staffing level at 3 out of 5 stars, which is average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 43%, compared to the Pennsylvania average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.
What Have Inspectors Found at York North Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation Ctr?
State health inspectors documented 52 deficiencies at YORK NORTH SKILLED NURSING AND REHABILITATION CTR during 2023 to 2025. These included: 52 with potential for harm. While no single deficiency reached the most serious levels, the total volume warrants attention from prospective families.
Who Owns and Operates York North Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation Ctr?
YORK NORTH SKILLED NURSING AND REHABILITATION CTR is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by GENESIS HEALTHCARE, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 161 certified beds and approximately 153 residents (about 95% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in YORK, Pennsylvania.
How Does York North Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation Ctr Compare to Other Pennsylvania Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Pennsylvania, YORK NORTH SKILLED NURSING AND REHABILITATION CTR's overall rating (2 stars) is below the state average of 3.0, staff turnover (43%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (2 stars) is below the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting York North Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation Ctr?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"
Is York North Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation Ctr Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, YORK NORTH SKILLED NURSING AND REHABILITATION CTR has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 2-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Pennsylvania. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at York North Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation Ctr Stick Around?
YORK NORTH SKILLED NURSING AND REHABILITATION CTR has a staff turnover rate of 43%, which is about average for Pennsylvania nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was York North Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation Ctr Ever Fined?
YORK NORTH SKILLED NURSING AND REHABILITATION CTR has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.
Is York North Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation Ctr on Any Federal Watch List?
YORK NORTH SKILLED NURSING AND REHABILITATION CTR is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.